reporting your findings- what does it take to clear the “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

73
Reporting your Findings- What does it take to clear the “peer-reviewed” hurdle? DIE 4564 Research Methods Week 3 Day 3

Upload: temira

Post on 22-Mar-2016

26 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

DIE 4564 Research Methods Week 3 Day 3. Reporting your Findings- What does it take to clear the “peer-reviewed” hurdle? . General Guidelines Use proper grammar and spelling Use a style guide (such as APA ). Writing Research. General Guidelines - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Reporting your Findings- What does it take to clear the

“peer-reviewed” hurdle?

DIE 4564 Research MethodsWeek 3 Day 3

Page 2: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

• General Guidelines Use proper grammar and spelling Use a style guide (such as APA)

Page 3: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Writing Research• General Guidelines

Understand functions of scientific reportingA report should communicate a body of

specific data and ideas.A report should contribute to the general

body of scientific knowledge.A report should stimulate and direct

further inquiry.

Page 4: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Avoid PlagerismPlagiarism – presenting someone else’s words or thoughts as though they were your own, constituting intellectual theft. Ground rules for avoiding plagiarism:

1. Do not use another writer’s exact words without using quotation marks and giving a complete citation.

2. Do not edit or paraphrase another’s words and present the revised version as your own.

3. Do not present another’s ideas as your own, even if you use totally different words to express those ideas.

Page 5: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Writing Research• Some Basic Considerations

Audience Form and Length of Report Aim of Report “Advice to Authors” – guidelines for journal

publication

Page 6: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Choosing a Target Journal• Researchers who want to publish their findings

must identify one or more journals that could reasonably be expected to disseminate their reports.

• Selecting a target journal early in the writing process makes it easier to hone the paper’s message for the journal’s audience.

Page 7: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Aim, Scope, Audience• The most important considerations when

considering potential target journals are the fit of the research topic with the aims, scope, and audience of the journal.

• Some general journals are very broad in focus, while some specialty journals publish in only one geographic or subspecialty area.

Page 8: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Impact Factors• The target journal should not be selected

primarily because of its impact factor, ranking, or reputation, but these are all factors to consider.

• The impact factor is based on the number of times a typical article in a journal is cited in its first year or two after publication.

Page 9: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Journal CharacteristicsAfter identifying potential journals, look at the journal requirements, such as• word limits• turnaround time (the average time from

submission to first decision) • acceptance rates• the method of submission

Page 10: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Publication CostsAlthough many journals are able to cover costs through subscriptions, advertising, and/or the support of a professional society, an increasing number of them are resorting to a variety of mechanisms that compel authors to cover some of the costs of publishing.

Page 11: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Publication CostsExamples of these publication costs are:• submission fees• processing charges / fees• page charges / fees• membership fees for sponsoring organizations• open access feesPublication fees are usually disclosed in a journal’s author guidelines and/or on the journal’s website.

Page 12: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Online Journals• The vast majority of print publications also offer

online access to subscribers. • Some recently-founded journals are available

only online. • Some open-access online journals are well

respected, but be cautious about publishing in new, unproven journals.

• Before submitting to an online-only journal, be sure that the journal is legitimate.

Page 13: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

From Paper to Publication• A manuscript has a high likelihood of eventually

being published if it is written in decent English, if the methods were reasonably rigorous and valid, and if the findings have a clear application or message.

• Publication is a priority for many health researchers because, from the perspective of the broader scientific community, a project that has not been published is a project that never happened.

Page 14: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

The Paper’s “Plot”Every paper should tell a “story” that has:• A beginning—the introduction sets the stage• A middle—the methods and results say what

happened• An end—the discussion provides a conclusion that

ties all the parts of the story together

The first step in editing is to make sure that the big picture is being clearly communicated.

Page 15: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Does the Paper Tell a Compelling “Story”?

Page 16: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Organization of the Report Purpose and Overview

Provide a brief statement of the purpose of the study and the main findings (in a journal article, this is the abstract)

Review of the LiteratureFit your research into the context of

existing scientific knowledge

Page 17: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Organization of the Report Study Design and Execution

Include the population, the sampling frame, the sampling method, the sample size, the data collection method, the completion rate, and the methods of data processing and analysis.

Page 18: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Organization of the Report Analysis and Interpretation

The presentation, manipulation and interpretation of data should be integrated together

Summary and ConclusionsReview significant findings in the

context of the larger project and existing scientific research, review shortcomings and make suggesting for future research

Page 19: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Guidelines for Reporting Analyses Provide maximum data without being cluttered For quantitative data, presenting data such that

the reader can re-compute them Describe all aspects of quantitative analysis Provide details Integrate supporting materials Draw explicit conclusions Point out qualifications Write clearly

Page 20: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Tables & Figures• Many health journals limit the number of tables

and figures allowed for each article, often to a maximum total of four (tables and figures combined).

• This limit means that the content for tables and figures must be carefully selected to highlight the most important aspects of the study.

Page 21: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Tables & Figures• Tables should be used to organize and present

statistical results that cannot easily be listed in the text in a sentence or two.

• Graphs and other figures should be used when a visual presentation of the material is more effective than words at conveying a result.

• Any images used should be meaningful, not merely decorative.

• There is no need to repeat information in the text that is provided in a table or figure.

Page 22: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Tables• A table should provide enough information so

that it can be independently interpreted and understood even in the absence of the text.

• The rows and columns should each have a descriptive label.

• For each statistic, provide a confidence interval, p-value, and/or other measure of uncertainty.

• Consistent fonts, spacing, and number of decimal points should be used for all tables in the manuscript.

Page 23: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

FIGURE 29- 1 Example Frequency Table for a Case Series

Page 24: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Figures• A graph should provide enough information in the

title, figure, and/or legend or key for a reader to be able to interpret the graph even without reading the related portion of the text.

• High-resolution photographs, maps, flowcharts, and other images made by the authors can also be figures.

• Photographs of study participants are usually not allowed without the written permission of the subjects.

Page 25: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

FIGURE 29- 2 Examples of Correct and Problematic Graphs

Page 26: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Key Content for Articles Reporting on Analysis of Individual-Level Data

Page 27: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Key Content for Articles Reporting on Analysis of Individual-Level Data

Page 28: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Common Reporting Guidelines

Page 29: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Style & ClarityIn a final check, look at each word, sentence, paragraph, and section, examining style and clarity.• Words must be used carefully.• Sentences must be concise and clear.• The voice must be consistent.• The grammar and spelling must be proper

throughout.

Page 30: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

From Paper to Publication• Submitting to a journal as soon as a revised and

polished manuscript has been crafted is critical. • Submission is not the end of the writing process.

Additional revisions will likely be required, even if the first journal to which a manuscript is submitted accepts the paper.

Page 31: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Journal Selection• Once all coauthors are satisfied that the

manuscript is ready to be submitted for peer review, one journal must be selected as the first journal for submission.

• Submitting to two or more journals at the same time is not permitted in the health sciences.

• See the website of the Committee on Publication Ethics about appropriate conduct for authors.

Page 32: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Manuscript Formatting• Each journal provides author guidelines that

state how manuscripts should be formatted. The guidelines must be carefully followed.

Page 33: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Manuscript Formatting Requirements Addressed by Journals’ Author Guidelines

Page 34: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Manuscript Formatting Requirements Addressed by Journals’ Author Guidelines

Page 35: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Cover Letter• Even though most submissions are made online,

a cover letter must usually still be uploaded. • The letter should summarize the manuscript and

seek to convince the editor that the work is important, valid, original, and a good fit with the aims of the journal.

• The editorial staff’s decision about whether to consider the article for publication may be made solely on the basis of the abstract and cover letter, so these documents should be compelling.

Page 36: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Sample Cover Letter Content

Page 37: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Online Submission• Most journals require online submission. • Only the corresponding author—the coauthor

who will communicate with the journal and answer questions from readers after the paper is published—needs to register.

• In addition to facilitating submission of the manuscript, the online account enables the corresponding author to track the manuscript’s progress through the review process.

Page 38: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Initial Review• Once a manuscript is submitted, the journal’s

editorial staff does a preliminary review and decides whether to send the manuscript to external peer reviewers or to reject it without review.

• Some journals send nearly all manuscripts out to reviewers; others select only a small fraction of them for peer review.

Page 39: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

The Journal Review Process

Page 40: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Rejection Without Review• Rejection without review is often not a commentary

on the quality of the manuscript. It is rather a decision based on the perceived fit of the paper with the journal’s current interests.

• If an article is rejected without review, the authors should identify a different journal that might be a better fit, make any edits deemed necessary, reformat the manuscript for the new journal, and submit there.

Page 41: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

External Review Results• Decision letters sent after peer review are

almost always accompanied by comments provided by one to four reviewers.

• An external peer review can lead to three possible results: Rejection An opportunity to revise and resubmit Acceptance

Page 42: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Rejection• Rejection from one (or even several) journals

does not mean that a paper will never be published.

• Most papers can be made suitable for publication if the researchers are willing to learn from each set of reviewer comments.

• Never submit to a second journal without taking advantage of the input provided by the first set of reviewers.

Page 43: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Revision & Resubmission• Authors invited to revise and resubmit (R&R) to

the same journal need to edit the manuscript and prepare a response to each reviewer comment.

• Every response needs to be carefully constructed and respectful.

• Authors who disagree with the suggestion of a reviewer are not obligated to change their paper to suit the reviewer, but they do need to write a thoughtful explanation of their point of view.

Page 44: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Sample Responses to Reviewer Comments

Page 45: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

After Acceptance• Once a paper is formally accepted, it is usually

sent to a copyeditor, who checks the paper carefully for grammar, spelling, and adherence to the journal’s style.

• The paper is then sent to a layout specialist who formats the document to look like all the other articles published in the journal.

• The page proofs (or galley proofs) are then sent to the corresponding author for review, usually as a pdf file.

Page 46: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

After Acceptance• After the authors return the page proofs, the

time to publication of the article depends on the journal.

• Soon after the article is published, the abstract will be added to the databases that index the journal.

• The published article may be cited for the first time in another article about a year or so after publication.

• At this point, the research cycle is complete!

Page 47: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Chapter 17 Quiz

In most journals, each article beings with a/n _____.

A. table of contentsB. indexC. summaryD. abstract

Page 48: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Chapter 17 Quiz

Answer: D.In most journals, each article beings with an abstract.

Page 49: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Chapter 17 Quiz

2. Most original research is seen as a/n _____ of what has previously been learned.

A. causeB. replacementC. extension

Page 50: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Chapter 17 Quiz

Answer: C.Most original research is seen as an extension of what has previously been learned.

Page 51: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Chapter 17 Quiz3. Which of the following questions might you ask

when evaluating data on websites?

A. Who is the author of the website?B. Is the site advocating for a particular point of

view?C. Does the website give complete references?D. all of the aboveE. none of the above

Page 52: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Chapter 17 Quiz

ANSWER: D.You should ask all of the following questions when evaluating data on websites:

1. Who is the author of the website?2. Is the site advocating for a particular point

of view?3. Does the website give complete

references?

Page 53: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Chapter 17 Quiz

4. Which of the following should be included in a research report?

A. purpose and overviewB. review of the literatureC. analysis and interpretationD. all of the aboveE. none of the above

Page 54: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Chapter 17 Quiz

ANSWER: D.All of the following should be included in a research report:

1. purpose and overview2. review of the literature3. analysis and interpretation

Page 55: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Presenting at Conferences• Research results are often publicly shared for

the first time during an oral presentation or poster session at an academic or professional conference.

• The primary outcome of most professional and academic conferences is networking.

• Presenting new research at a conference can be a useful way to get feedback on a project.

Page 56: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Structure of ConferencesMost conferences include a mix of:• Plenary sessions where keynote addresses are

given• Business meetings run by the officers of the

sponsoring organization• Concurrent sessions in which multiple panels of

oral presentations are held at the same time in different rooms

• Poster sessions in which attendees can mingle while reviewing research posters

Page 57: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Structure of Conferences• Oral presentations require speaking in front of

an audience and possibly facing an open question-and-answer period in which the work can be discussed.

• Poster sessions allow attendees to browse posters at their own pace and interact with presenters if they want more information about a project.

Page 58: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Submitting an Abstract• Researchers interested in presenting at a

conference are usually required to submit an abstract for consideration by the organizing committee.

• Abstracts selected for a conference are usually printed in a conference bulletin.

• A good abstract includes key words and conveys one clear health message that is appropriate to the audience expected at the conference.

Page 59: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Submitting an Abstract• Submitting an abstract for consideration infers a

commitment to attend the conference if selected to be a presenter.

• Most conferences require presenters to pay a registration fee (often several hundred dollars) as well as cover all of their own travel expenses.

Page 60: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Preparing a Poster• When preparing a poster, give equal attention to

its content and to its design. • Posters can be created using either specialized

graphic design software or a simple presentation software program like PowerPoint. The size of a “slide” can be adjusted so that the dimensions match those required by the conference.

• Check on printing costs, which vary significantly based on size, amount of color, paper type, etc.

Page 61: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Suggestions for Poster Content, Layout, and Formatting

Page 62: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Suggestions for Poster Content, Layout, and Formatting

Page 63: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Sample Poster Layout

Page 64: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Presenting a Poster• At most conferences, the poster presenter is

responsible for setting up and taking down the poster at an assigned time.

• Some conferences designate poster session times when presenters are expected to stand by their posters and interact with attendees.

Page 65: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Preparing an Oral Presentation• A typical oral presentation time slot is about 15

minutes long, with about 10 to 12 minutes of this time slot available for the actual presentation.

• Most presenters at health science conferences prepare a set of PowerPoint slides that will guide their talks and provide information to the audience.

• Most presenters cover 1 or 2 slides a minute, so about 12 to 20 slides are appropriate for a 10- to 12-minute talk.

Page 66: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Sample Distribution of Slides for a 10- to 12-Minute Talk

Page 67: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Checklist for Presentation Slide Show

Page 68: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Checklist for Presentation Slide Show

Page 69: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Preparing an Oral Presentation• Preparing the slide show is only the first step in

preparing to make an oral presentation. • Practice making the presentation many times in the

weeks before the conference, since practice makes a positive experience more likely.

Page 70: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?
Page 71: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Giving an Oral Presentation• Arrive at the presentation room at least 15

minutes before the panel begins and check in with the moderator.

• Be considerate of other presenters in their session by strictly adhering to their assigned time limits.

• Be prepared to politely answer questions from the audience, either immediately after the presentation or after all the panelists in the session have spoken.

Page 72: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Checklist of Tasks on the Day of the Presentation

Page 73: Reporting your Findings-  What does it take to clear the  “peer-reviewed” hurdle?

Checklist of Tasks on the Day of the Presentation