reported by john c.t. ko january 27 , 2007
DESCRIPTION
A Review on the Sustainability Policy of Industrial Parks in Taiwan: Example of Hsinchu Science-based Industrial Park. Reported by John C.T. Ko January 27 , 2007. Outline of the Presentation. 1) Introduction 2) The Environmental & Social Impacts of the HSIP 3) The Policy - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Reported by John C.T. Ko January 27 , 2007](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56815525550346895dc302ec/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Reported by John C.T. Ko
January 27, 2007
A Review on the Sustainability Policy of Industrial Parks in Taiwan: Example of Hsinc
hu Science-based Industrial Park
![Page 2: Reported by John C.T. Ko January 27 , 2007](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56815525550346895dc302ec/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Policy Paper Presentation Presented by: John C.T. Ko
Outline of the Presentation
1) Introduction2) The Environmental & Social Impacts
of the HSIP3) The Policy4) Policy Issues5) 5 Policy Options6) Conclusion & Recommendations
![Page 3: Reported by John C.T. Ko January 27 , 2007](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56815525550346895dc302ec/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Part I: Introduction
![Page 4: Reported by John C.T. Ko January 27 , 2007](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56815525550346895dc302ec/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Policy Paper Presentation Presented by: John C.T. Ko
Introduction
Background of the Study
Objectives of the Study
Significance of the Study
Scope and Limitations
Definition of Terms
![Page 5: Reported by John C.T. Ko January 27 , 2007](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56815525550346895dc302ec/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Policy Paper Presentation Presented by: John C.T. Ko
Background of the Study (1)
Historical review and the evolution of the industrial park in Taiwan
HSIP’s successful factorsEconomic performance of the HSIP
![Page 6: Reported by John C.T. Ko January 27 , 2007](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56815525550346895dc302ec/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Policy Paper Presentation Presented by: John C.T. Ko
Background of the Study (2)
![Page 7: Reported by John C.T. Ko January 27 , 2007](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56815525550346895dc302ec/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Policy Paper Presentation Presented by: John C.T. Ko
Background of the Study (3)
SustainabilityProblems
![Page 8: Reported by John C.T. Ko January 27 , 2007](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56815525550346895dc302ec/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Policy Paper Presentation Presented by: John C.T. Ko
Objectives of the Study
Develop an Integrated Policy Framework
Develop an Integrated Policy Framework
Identify the Sustainability Problems
Identify the Sustainability Problems
Promote a Better Social Welfare
Promote a Better Social Welfare
ObjectivesObjectives
![Page 9: Reported by John C.T. Ko January 27 , 2007](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56815525550346895dc302ec/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Policy Paper Presentation Presented by: John C.T. Ko
Significance of the Study
Pay Attention to Social Impacts
Pay Attention to Social Impacts
Maximize Industrial Profits
Maximize Industrial Profits
Minimize Industrial Damages
Minimize Industrial Damages
Explore Regulatory Context
Explore Regulatory Context
Formulate Effective Policies
Formulate Effective Policies
![Page 10: Reported by John C.T. Ko January 27 , 2007](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56815525550346895dc302ec/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Policy Paper Presentation Presented by: John C.T. Ko
Scope and Limitations
Time frame: 19802006Space frame: SIPHSIPTheoretical frame: PolicySustainability
Time frame: 19802006Space frame: SIPHSIPTheoretical frame: PolicySustainability
xEconomic competitiveness: incentives…xEnvironmental damage: air, water, soil…xSocial impact: health, disparity, inequality
xEconomic competitiveness: incentives…xEnvironmental damage: air, water, soil…xSocial impact: health, disparity, inequality
ScopeScope
LimitationsLimitations
![Page 11: Reported by John C.T. Ko January 27 , 2007](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56815525550346895dc302ec/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Policy Paper Presentation Presented by: John C.T. Ko
Definition of Terms
Industrial Park
Science-Based Industrial Park
Eco-Industrial Park
Export Processing Zone
Special Economic Zone
Freeport Zone
![Page 12: Reported by John C.T. Ko January 27 , 2007](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56815525550346895dc302ec/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Part II: The Environmental & Social Impacts of the HSIP
![Page 13: Reported by John C.T. Ko January 27 , 2007](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56815525550346895dc302ec/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Policy Paper Presentation Presented by: John C.T. Ko
The Environmental & Social Impacts
HSIP 1997: UMC fire with toxic air, fire fighters fainted. Surrounding residents Damage to the health
HSIP 1997: UMC fire with toxic air, fire fighters fainted. Surrounding residents Damage to the health
San Jose 1982: Chemicals leaked out of underground storage tanks. Neighboring families Cancer
San Jose 1982: Chemicals leaked out of underground storage tanks. Neighboring families Cancer
HSIP 2000: Shengli Corp’s illegal dumping of chemical waste into the river Groundwater polluted
HSIP 2000: Shengli Corp’s illegal dumping of chemical waste into the river Groundwater polluted
Past Incidentsin the SIP
Past Incidentsin the SIP
![Page 14: Reported by John C.T. Ko January 27 , 2007](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56815525550346895dc302ec/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Policy Paper Presentation Presented by: John C.T. Ko
The Environmental & Social Issues of the HSIP
CoastalPollution
CoastalPollution
WaterConsumption
WaterConsumption
Groundwater Pollution
Groundwater Pollution
Waste Water Discharge
Waste Water Discharge
Public Health Crisis
Public Health Crisis
OHS & Social Issues
OHS & Social Issues
HSIP
![Page 15: Reported by John C.T. Ko January 27 , 2007](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56815525550346895dc302ec/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Part III: The Policy
![Page 16: Reported by John C.T. Ko January 27 , 2007](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56815525550346895dc302ec/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Policy Paper Presentation Presented by: John C.T. Ko
Structure of Overall Policy
The “Act for Establishment & Administration of SIPs”
Plus more than 100 other regulations in 15 categories
“IT Duty-free Law”
“Land Rental Regulation”
HSIP committee handles the application process, only EIA reviewed by local Gov.
Self-Sustaining Community
Special Adm. District under Central Gov.Special Adm. District under Central Gov.
A Duty-free PolicyA Duty-free Policy
One-Stop Service + sound infrastructureOne-Stop Service +
sound infrastructure
![Page 17: Reported by John C.T. Ko January 27 , 2007](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56815525550346895dc302ec/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Policy Paper Presentation Presented by: John C.T. Ko
Sustainability Policy
7 key laws Environmental Impact Assessment Act 1994
Waste Disposal Act 1997
Soil & Groundwater Pollution Remediation Act 2000
Air Pollution Control Act (2002, latest revised)
Water Pollution Control Act (2002, latest revised)
Drinking Water Management Act (amended in 1997)
Toxic Chemical Substances Control Act 1986
![Page 18: Reported by John C.T. Ko January 27 , 2007](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56815525550346895dc302ec/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Part IV: Policy Issues
![Page 19: Reported by John C.T. Ko January 27 , 2007](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56815525550346895dc302ec/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Policy Paper Presentation Presented by: John C.T. Ko
Policy Issues
1. Local Government’s Power Minimized
2. Lax Environment Management System
► Development Permit System
Problem
► Total Capacity Control Problem
1. Local Government’s Power Minimized
2. Lax Environment Management System
► Development Permit System
Problem
► Total Capacity Control Problem
![Page 20: Reported by John C.T. Ko January 27 , 2007](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56815525550346895dc302ec/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Part V: Policy Options
![Page 21: Reported by John C.T. Ko January 27 , 2007](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56815525550346895dc302ec/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Policy Paper Presentation Presented by: John C.T. Ko
5 Policy Options
Option #1: Sustain a high economic growth (Status quo)
Option #2: Enhance the environmental protection measure
Option #3: Release the supervisory power to local government
Option #4: Formulate a passive regulatory stipulation
Option #5: Formulate a proactive voluntary stipulation
?
![Page 22: Reported by John C.T. Ko January 27 , 2007](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56815525550346895dc302ec/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Policy Paper Presentation Presented by: John C.T. Ko
Assumptions (1)
Policy Options Criteria Criteria Code Qualitative Description
Efficiency A Effectively reach an optimal balance between economy and sustainability
Cost-Saving B Effectively save the government budget expenses
Sustainability C Effectively minimize environmental and social impacts
Economic Prospect D Effectively entails the economic
benefits for the nationLegal & Adm.
Feasibility E Effectively conform to the laws and international trend & expectation
![Page 23: Reported by John C.T. Ko January 27 , 2007](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56815525550346895dc302ec/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Policy Paper Presentation Presented by: John C.T. Ko
Policy Options Rating Scale
Descriptive Interpretation
Numeric Interpretation
Very Effective 4Effective 3
Moderately Effective 2Ineffective 1
Assumptions (2)
![Page 24: Reported by John C.T. Ko January 27 , 2007](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56815525550346895dc302ec/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Policy Paper Presentation Presented by: John C.T. Ko
Policy Options Prioritization Index
Priority Index Description
Numeric Priority Index
Highest Priority 4
High Priority 3
Fairly Priority 2
Less Priority 1
Assumptions (3)
![Page 25: Reported by John C.T. Ko January 27 , 2007](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56815525550346895dc302ec/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Policy Paper Presentation Presented by: John C.T. Ko
Assumptions (4)
Policy Options Criteria on Weighted Percent
Criterion CodeWeighted
Importance (%)
A (Efficiency) 30%
B (Cost-Saving) 10%
C (Sustainability) 30%
D (Economic Prospect) 20%
E (Legal & Adm. Feasibility) 10%
![Page 26: Reported by John C.T. Ko January 27 , 2007](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56815525550346895dc302ec/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Policy Paper Presentation Presented by: John C.T. Ko
Decision Matrix (1)
1st Step Using the Selection Rating Scale
Criteria Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Option 5A (Efficiency) 2 4 3 2 4B (Cost-saving) 3 2 3 4 1C (Sustainability) 2 4 3 3 4D (Economy) 4 3 3 3 3E (Legal & Adm.) 2 4 3 2 3Total Score 13 17 15 14 15
Ranking 5 1 2 4 2
![Page 27: Reported by John C.T. Ko January 27 , 2007](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56815525550346895dc302ec/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Policy Paper Presentation Presented by: John C.T. Ko
Decision Matrix (2)
CriteriaPriority index
Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Option 5
A (Efficiency) 4 8 16 12 8 16B (Cost-saving) 2 6 4 6 8 2C (Sustainability)
4 8 16 12 12 16
D (Economy) 3 12 9 9 9 9E (Legal & Adm.)
2 4 8 6 4 6
Total Score 38 53 45 41 49Ranking 5 1 3 4 2
2nd Step Applying Priority Index
![Page 28: Reported by John C.T. Ko January 27 , 2007](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56815525550346895dc302ec/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Policy Paper Presentation Presented by: John C.T. Ko
Decision Matrix (3)
CriteriaWeighted %
Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Option 5
A (Efficiency) 30% 2.4 4.8 3.6 2.4 4.8B (Cost-saving) 10% 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.2C (Sustainability)
30% 2.4 4.8 3.6 3.6 4.8
D (Economy) 20% 2.4 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8E (Legal & Adm.)
10% 0.4 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.6
Total Score 8.2 12.6 10.2 9.0 12.2Ranking 5 1 3 4 2
3rd Step Applying Weighted Percentage
![Page 29: Reported by John C.T. Ko January 27 , 2007](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56815525550346895dc302ec/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Part VI: Conclusion & Recommendations
![Page 30: Reported by John C.T. Ko January 27 , 2007](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56815525550346895dc302ec/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Policy Paper Presentation Presented by: John C.T. Ko
Conclusion
Option 2 Option 5 > Option 3 > Option 4 > Option 1≧
Option 2 + Option 5 + Option 3 + Option 4 + Option 1
![Page 31: Reported by John C.T. Ko January 27 , 2007](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56815525550346895dc302ec/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Policy Paper Presentation Presented by: John C.T. Ko
Recommendations
Environmental laws should be strengthened Information should be made available & accessible The HSIP & local government should work in close
partnership International expertise on monitoring hi-tech
operation processes should be shared globally International NGO action should join to help the
transformation Corporate social responsibility: promote a company-
community partnership
![Page 32: Reported by John C.T. Ko January 27 , 2007](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062500/56815525550346895dc302ec/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Policy Paper Presentation Presented by: John C.T. Ko
Taipei 101The tallest building in the world