report to the hearing officer - san diego · 2015-11-14 · report to the hearing officer hearing...

53
THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: SUMMARY Hearing Officer AT&T MOBILITY CADMAN PARK PTS PROJECT NUMBER: 327884 4330 Moraga Avenue, San Di ego, CA 92117 Shelly Kilbourn (PianCom lnc.) Agent for AT&T Mobility Issue(s): Should the Hearing Officer approve a new Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) on an existing church property in the RM-1-1 zone of the Clairemont Mesa Community Planning area? StaffRecommendation(s}- APPROVE Conditional Use Permit No. 1145480. Community Planning Group Recommendation- On February 18,2014, the Clairemont Community Planning Group voted 11-0-0 to recommend approval of the proposed AT&T WCF (Attachment 11 ). Environmental Review: The project was detennined to be exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15303 (New Construction). Tllis project is not pending an appeal of the environmental detennination. The environmental exemption determination for this project was made on December 9, 2014 and the opportunity to appeal that detennination ended December 23, 20 14 (Attachment 7). BACKGROUND The proposed project is located on the northwest corner of Kamloop Avenue and Moraga A venue on an existing church property. The site location abuts Cadman Elementary School and the Cadman Park and Recreation Center directly to the west (Attachment I). There are residential uses to the north, south and east. There are currently two existing Wireless Communication Facilities approved and in operation (T-Mobile and Ycrizon) on this property. As a result, this is a collocation site with the intended coverage objective primarily focused on the sunounding single family residential uses (Attachment 15).

Upload: others

Post on 17-Jul-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO

REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER

HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005

ATTENTION:

SUBJECT:

LOCATION:

APPLICANT:

SUMMARY

Hearing Officer

AT&T MOBILITY CADMAN PARK PTS PROJECT NUMBER: 327884

4330 Moraga Avenue, San Diego, CA 92117

Shelly Kilbourn (PianCom lnc.) Agent for AT&T Mobility

Issue(s): Should the Hearing Officer approve a new Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) on an existing church property in the RM-1-1 zone of the Clairemont Mesa Community Planning area?

StaffRecommendation(s}- APPROVE Conditional Use Permit No. 1145480.

Community Planning Group Recommendation- On February 18,2014, the Clairemont Community Planning Group voted 11-0-0 to recommend approval of the proposed AT&T WCF (Attachment 11 ).

Environmental Review: The project was detennined to be exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15303 (New Construction). Tllis project is not pending an appeal of the environmental detennination. The environmental exemption determination for this project was made on December 9, 2014 and the opportunity to appeal that detennination ended December 23, 20 14 (Attachment 7).

BACKGROUND

The proposed project is located on the northwest corner of Kamloop A venue and Moraga A venue on an existing church property. The site location abuts Cadman Elementary School and the Cadman Park and Recreation Center directly to the west (Attachment I). There are residential uses to the north, south and east. There are currently two existing Wireless Communication Facilities approved and in operation (T-Mobile and Ycrizon) on this property. As a result, this is a collocation site with the intended coverage objective primarily focused on the sunounding single family residential uses (Attachment 15).

Page 2: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

T-Mobile and Verizon are located inside separate church towers designed to integrate with the existing property. These two designs were unanimously supported by the Clairemont Mesa Community Planning Group. Due to the existing size limitation of these two to\vers, an additional carrier within either of these two designs would not be possible. Instead, AT&T is proposing to install a 30-foot tall mono pine consisting of twelve antennas and associated components (Attachment 1 0). The monopine has been designed to address concerns related to visual impacts by implementing a high density branch count along with extending each branch 24-inches in front of each antenna. This, combined with the utilization of antenna socks, will effectively screen each antenna and the associated components (Remote Radio Units and Surge Suppressors) hum public views. These camouflaging techniques along with the proposed landscaping will help create a realistic tree appearance from various views to and from the church property.

The equipment associated with this project will be concealed inside a 250-square foot equipment enclosure with a trellis roof, designed to match the existing V erizon enclosure located on the most southwesterly portion of the lot. The combination of existing and proposed landscaping will appropriately screen this element and reduce any visual impacts. The proposed WCF reqaires a Conditional Usc Pennit (CUP) pursuant to the City of San Diego Municipal Code Section 141.0420( e)(!).

On February 18, 2014, the Clairemont Community Planning Group voted to approve the proposed AT&T WCF with a vote of 11-0-0 with a condition to install a solid fence on the property line separating the adjacent property owners and the proposed enclosure_ This feature has been included in the latest design (Attaclunent 9).

DISCUSSION

The City of San Diego General Plan requires all WCFs to be concealed in existing structures when possible, or otherwise usc camouflaging techniques to hide or blend them into the surrounding area. The proposed AT&T WCF consists of twelve antetmas installed on a 30~foot tall monopine. Compliance with the General Plan is achieved by implementing a high density branch count for the mono pine with specific branch configuration for an optimal design; a design that is aesthetically pleasing and respectful of the neighborhood context. The design is consistent with the Land Development Code Section 141.0420. This section of the regulations reinforces the City's General Plan requirement and requires all WCF to utilize rea'lonable means to conceal or minimize the visual impacts of wireless communication facilities through integration. Integration with existing structures or among other existing uses shall be accomplished through the use of architecture, landscape m1d siting solutions. This project will also include antenna socks that will fully cover the length of the proposed antennas which will help reduce the visibility ofthc conduits. Combined with the landscape improvements, the proposed AT&T YVCF will result in a design that complies with the General Plan and the Land Development Code Section 141.0420.

- 2-

Page 3: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

ALTERNATfVE

1. Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 1145480, with modifications.

2. Deny Conditional Use Permit No. 1145480, if the Hearing Officer makes written findings based on substantial evidence that the approval is not authorized by state or local zoning law.

1. Aerial Photograph 2. Community Plan Land Use Map 3. Project Location Map 4. Project Data Sheet 5. Draft Pennit Resolution with Findings 6. Draft Permit with Conditions 7. Environmental Exemption 8. Photo Survey 9. Project Plan(s) 10. Project Photosimulation(s) 11. Community Planning Group Recommendation 12. Ownership Disclosure Statement 13 . Project Chronology 14. Applicant's draft findings 15. Telecom Technical Analysis

Rev 1!25/ ll hmd

- 3 -

Page 4: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

-Aerial Photo AT&T Cadman Park- Project No. 327884 4330 Moraga Avenue, San Diego, CA 92 117

North

w ~ ;:t> (")

~ 3,

Page 5: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

Clairemont Mesa

Existing Conditions

Land Use

o -.f ... roty-

•~o...ne.s - --P.n - C<rm>!!IO:II

o-~~

* Community Land Use Map (Clairemont Mesa)

AT&T C~tdman Park- Project No. 327884 4330 Moraga Avenue, San Diego, CA 92117

North

w ~ ~ () :r: ~

~ N

Page 6: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

\::F·o'-'~'V'

*

~ · COOm•m

liPrnemary School

t ~?. ~

:::0

""'(':)

~ Cadman Pm nnd RN;rt'allon Cenr~r

-1-tYtiJ;.

Oop "'tt(->

1 ~• ~ tmf'n Recreauoo :enrer

Project Location Map AT&T Cadman Park- Project No. 327884 4330 Moraga Avenue, San Diego, CA 921 17

MOraga Cl ~ ~ ~

~ (<;)

Karnloop Ave

A ~

~ g

~ ~

Q.

North

w

~'

~ ~

i >--l UJ

Page 7: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

ATTACHMENT 4

PROJECT DATA SHEET

PROJECT NAME: AT&T Cadman Park

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) consisting of twelve (12) antennas on a 30~foot tall rnono~pine. The associated equipment is located inside a 250-squarc foot enclosure with landscaping.

COMMUNITY PLAN AREA: Clairemont Mesa

DISCRETIONARY Conditional Use Permit

ACTIONS:

COMMUNITY PLAN LAND Institutional

USE DESIGNATION:

(Ri\1-1-1) ZONING INFORMATION:

CVRRE!'I'T HhiGHT LIMIT: 30-fect l'ROPOSED HElGHr: 30-fect

CVRRENT FRO!\'T SETBACK; 15-iect PROPOSED FRO'•H SJ<:TBACK: ~o Change

CURRENT SIDE SETBACK: 5-fcet PROPOSED SIDE SETBACK: Ko change

ClTRRE!I,'T RI£AR SETBACK: !5-fect l'ROPOSED REAR SETBACK: No change

ADJACENT LAND USE DESIGNATION EXISTING LAND USE PROPERTIES: &ZONE

NORTH: Residential/RM-2-5 Residential

SOUTH: ResidentialfRS-1-7 Residential

EAST: Residential/RS~ 1-7 Residential

WEST: School/RS··l-7 School/Park

DEVIATIONS OR VARIANCES No deviations are proposed.

REQUESTED:

COMMUNITY PLANNING GROUP On February 18, 2014, the Clairemont Community Plwming Group voted

RECOI\~1 ENDATION: 11 ~0-0 to approve the ATT project subject to installation of a 6-foot solid fence between the adjacent property owner and the church property and a caging area V\ith a lock between the AT&T and Verizon enclosures.

Page 8: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

HEARING OFFICER RESOLUTION NO.

CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1145480

ATTACHME'IT 5

AT&T MOBILITY CADMAN PARK PROJECT i'iO. 327884

WHEREAS. CLAIREMONT CHRISTIAN CHURCH. Owner. and AT&T MOBILITY. Permittee. filed an application with the City of San Diego for a permit to install a Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) consisting of twelve (12) panel antennas on a 30-foot tall monopine. The associated cabinets will be concealed inside a 250-square foot equipment enclosure with proposed landscaping as described in and by reference to the approved Exhibits "A" and con·esponding conditions of approval for the associated Conditional Use Pennit (CUP) No. 1145480;

\VHEREAS, the project site is located at 4330 Moraga Avenue, San Diego, CA 92117 in the RM-1-1 zone of the Clairemont Mesa Community Planning Area;

WHEREAS, the project site is legally described as Lots 3447, 3448, 3449 ofClairemont Unit No. 16 according to Map thereof No. 3145 filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego Collllty, October 22. 1954;

WHEREAS. on January 21, 2015. the HEARING OFFICER of the City of San Diego considered Conditional lise Permit (CUP) No. 1145480 pursuant to the Land Development Code of the City of San Diego;

WHEREAS, on December 9, 2014, the City of San Diego, as Lead Agency, through the Development Services Department, made and issued an Environmental Determination that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code section 21000 et. seq.) under CEQA Guideline Section 15303 (Ncvv Construction) and there was no appeal of the Enviromnental Determination filed within the time period provided by San Diego Municipal Code Section 112.0520;

BE IT RESOLVED by the HEARING OFFICER ofthe City of San Diego as follows:

That the HEARING OFFICER adopts the following written Findings, dated January 21. 2015.

FINDINGS:

Findings -for Conditional Use Permit- Section §126.0305

1. The proposed development will not adversely affect the applicable land use plan;

The Clairernont Mesa Community Plan does noi address Wireless Communication Facilities (WCF); hovvevcr, the City of San Diego General Plan requires all WCFs to be concealed in existing structures when possible, othenvise usc camouflage and screening techniques to hide or blend them into the surrounding area. Additionally, each WCF shall be desit,rncd to be aesthetically pleasing and respectful of the neighborhood context to minimize the visual impacts of the vvireless facilities. For this project, AT&T is proposing to conceal their antennas within the 30-foot tall monopinc design on an existing church property. To comply with the General Plan, the mono pine maintains the industry standard of three (3) branches per foot fOr a total of 60 branches consistent with the WCF Design

Page I of3

Page 9: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

ATTACHMENTS

Guidelines. Antenna socks will also be utilized to achieve a design that is aesthetically pleasing and respectful of the neighborhood context. Lastly, to reduce the visibility of the antennas, each branch will extend a minimum of24winches in front of the antenna for maximum concealment. The associated equipment area is set back from the public right-of-way and the adjacent residential uses and screened appropriately with existing and proposed landscaping. Furthermore, the equipment is fully concealed inside a new concrete block shelter with stucco finish and a wood trellis root: designed to match the adjacent Verizon enclosure. Therefore, the proposed WCF will not adversely affect the Clairemont Mesa Community Plan; nor the City of San Diego General Plan.

2. The proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare;

The project consists of a new 30-foot tall monopine and an associated equipment building. The antennas and the associated Remote Radio Units (RRUs) are effectively concealed by using camouflaging techniques identified within the WCF Design Guidelines. These techniques include: antenna socks, extending the branches a minimum of24-inches in front of the ante1mas, maintaining three (3) branches per foot for a total of sixty (60) branches and painting all exposed conduits and mounting pipes to match the mono-pine bark. The equipment associated with this project is concealed inside a new concrete block shelter with stucco finish, and wood trellis roof designed to match the existing Verizon enclosure. The project is collocated with two existing carriers (T-Mobile and Verizon) at 4330 Moraga Avenue in the RM-1-l zone within the Clairemont Mesa Community Plan,

The project was detennined to be exempt from the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15303 (New Construction) on December 9, 2014. The conditions of approval for the project will require compliance with several operational constraints and development controls intended to assure the continued public health, safety and welfare. All proposed improvement plans associated \Yith the project will be reviewed prior to issuance of construction permits and inspected during construction to assure the project will meet or exceed all relevant and applicable building, electrical, mechanical, plumbing and fire codes.

Additionally, the F edcral Telecommunication Act of 1996 preempts local governments from regulating the 11 placcment, construction and modification of wireless comnnmication facilities on the basis ofthe environmental effects of Radio Frequency (RF) emission to the extent that such facilities comply \Vith the Federal Communication Commission's (FCC) standards for such emissions. n AT&T submitted an RF Report, which concluded that the project complies with FCC RF Standards. Therefore, the project would not result in any significant bcalth or safety risks to the surrounding area within matters of the City's jurisdiction. In conclusion, the proposed project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare.

3. The proposed development will comply with the regulations of the Land Development Code including any allowable deviations pursuant to the Land Development Code; and

The proposed WCF has been designed to comply with the Wireless Communication Facility Regulations Land Development Code Section 141.0420 and the RM-1-1 zone. Pursuant to LDC Section 141.0420( e)(l) a Conditional Usc Permit is required. LDC Section 141.0420 requires all WCFs to be designed to minimize visual impacts. The 30-foot tall monopine utilizes screening techniques such as antenna socks, high branch count and extending each branch length accordingly to replicate the appearance of a live tree. The rnonopine is setback from the nearest sidewalk and screened from public views with the existing and proposed landscaping improvements. The equipment room featuring a

Page2of3

Page 10: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

ATTACH~IENT 5

concrete block shelter with stucco finish, and wood trellis roof results in a desirable design that maintains and preserves the neighborhood character consistent V\ith the adjacent Vcrizon enclosure. No deviations are proposed for this project. Therefore, the proposed WCF will comply with the regulations of the Land Development Code.

4. The proposed use is appropriate at the proposed location.

The proposed WCF is located next to an existing overflow parking area behind the single story church facility. As designed, the project is a Process 3, Preference 3 location. According to Council Policy 600-43, the applicant must justify choosing a Process 3/Preference 3 location over other lower Preference level locations. The applicant submitted a justification map that identifies the current search ring which is s1mounded by primarily residential uses. Additionally, this search ring as illustrated in the coverage map is necessary to help improve the current coverage objective. Based on the justification map, it appears that there were no other lcnver preference level sites that could provide the necessary coverage. Instead, this non-residentially used property was selected. There are currently two other wireless carriers at this site providing similar coverage, In conclusion, the monopine design is appropriately located within an existing overflow parking area and would blend in with the existing and proposed landscaping improvements as a natural screen to the adjacent residential uses. Therefore, the proposed WCF use is appropriate at the proposed location.

BE TT FURTHER RESOLVED that, based on the findings hereinbefore adopted by the HEARING OFFICER, Conditional Use Permit No. 1145480 is hereby GRANTED by the HEARlNG OFFICER to the referenced Owner/Permittee, in the form, exhibits, terms and conditions as set forth in Conditional Usc Permit No. 1145480, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof.

Simon Tse Development Project Manager Development Services

Adopted on: January 21,2015

Internal Order No. 24003908

Page 3 of3

Page 11: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

RECORDING REQUESTED BY CITY OF SAN DIEGO

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PERMIT INTAKE, MAIL STATION 501

WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO

PROJECT MANAGEMENT PERMIT CLERK

MAIL STATION 501

ATTACHMENT 6

SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE INTERNAL ORDER NUMBER: 24003908

CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1145480 AT&T MOBILITY CADMAN PARK PROJECT NO. 327884

HEARING OFFICER

This Conditional Use Permit No. 1145480 is granted by the HEARING OFFICER of the City of San Diego to CLAIREMONT CHRISTIAN CHURCH, Owner, and AT&T MOBILITY, Permittee, pursuant to San Diego Municipal Code [SDMC] section Chapter 12, Article 6, Division 3 and Land Development Code Section 141.0420. The project site is located at 4330 Moraga Avenue, San Diego, CA 92117 in the RM~ l ~ 1 zone of the Clairernont Mesa Commtmity Planning Area. The project site is legally described as Lots 3447, 3448, 3449 of Clairemont Unit No. 16 according to Map thereof No. 3145 filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, October 22, 1954.

Subject to the tenns and conditions set forth in this Permit, permission is granted to Owner and Permittee for a Wireless Communication Facility (WCF), described and identified by size, dimension, quantity, type, and location on the approved exhibits [Exhibit 01A01

] dated January 21,2015, on file in the Development Services Department.

The project shall include:

a. A Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) consisting of a total of twelve (12) panel antennas on a 30-foot tall monopine. The associated cabinets will be concealed inside a 250-squarc foot equipment enclosure with a matching trellis;

b. I\venty-four (24) Remote Radio Units, four (4) Raycaps, and two (2) Global Positioning (GPS) Antennas;

c. Removal of two (2) wood light standards and installation three (3) new 25-foot tall light standards;

Page I of8

Page 12: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

ATTACHMENT 6

d. Landscaping (planting, irrigation and landscape related improvements); and

e. Public and private accessory improvements determined by the Development Services Department to be consistent with the land use and development standards for this site in accordance with the adopted community plan, the California Environmental Quality Act [CEQA] and the CEQA Guidelines, the City Engineer's requirements, zoning regulations, conditions of this Permit, and any other applicable regulations of the SDMC.

STANDARD REQUIREMENTS:

1. This permit must be utilized within thirty-six (36) months after the date on which all rights of appeal have expired. If this pennit is not utilized in accordance with Chapter 12, Article 6, Division 1 of the SDMC within the 36 month period, this permit shall be void unless an Extension of Time has been granted. Any such Extension of Time must meet all SDMC requirements and applicable guidelines in effect at the time the extension is considered by the appropriate decision maker. This pcnnit must be utilized by February 4, 2018.

2. This Conditional Use Pennit (CUP) and corresponding use of this site shall expire on January 21,2025. Upon expiration of this approval, the facilities and improvements described herein shall be removed from this site and the property shall be restored to its original condition preceding approval of this permit unless the applicant of record files a new application for a facility which will be subject to compliance with all regulations in effect at the time.

3. No later than ninety (90) days prior to the expiration of this approval, the Owner/Permittee may submit a new application to the Development Services Department for consideration with review and a decision by the appropriate decision maker at that time. Failure to submit prior to the deadline will be cause for enforcement for noncompliance, which may include penalties and fines.

4. Under no circumstances, docs approval of this pennit authorize the Owner/Pennittee to utilize this site for WCF purposes beyond the permit expiration date. Use of this pern1it approval beyond the expiration date of this permit is prohibited.

5. No permit for the construction, occupancy, or operation of any facility or improvement described herein shall be granted, nor shall any activity authorized by this Permit be conducted on the premises until;

a. The Owncr/Pennittec signs omd returns the Pennit to the Development Services Department; and

b. The Permit is recorded in the Office of the San Diego County Recorder.

6. While this Permit is in effect, the subject property shall be used only for the purposes and llllder the terms and conditions set forth in this Permit unless otherwise authorized by the appropriate City decision maker.

Page 2 of 8

Page 13: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

ATTACHMENT 6

7. This Pem1it is a covenant running with the subject property and all of the requirements and conditions of this Permit and related documents shall be binding upon the Owner/Permittee and any successor(s) in interest.

8. The continued use of this Permit shall be subject to the regulations of this and any other applicable governmental agency.

9. Issuance of this Pennit by the City of San Diego does not authorize the Owner/Pcnnittee for this Permit to violate any Federal, State or City laws, ordinances, regulations or policies including, but not limited to, the Endangered Species Act of 1973 [ESA] and any amendments thereto (16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq.).

10. The Owner/Permittee shall secure all necessary building pcnnits. The Owner/Permittee is informed that to secure these permits, substantial building modifications and site improvements may be required to comply with applicable building, fire, mechanical, and plumbing codes, and State and Federal disability access laws.

11. Construction plans shall be in substantial conformity to Exhibit "A." Changes, modifications, or alterations to the construction plans are prohibited unless appropriate application(s) or amendment(s) to this Permit have been granted.

12. All of the conditions colltained in this Permit have been considered and were detennined­neeessary to make the findings required for approval of this Permit. The Penn it holder is required to comply with each and every condition in order to maintain the entitlements that are granted by this Permit.

If any condition of this Permit, on a legal challenge by the Owner/Permittee of this Permit, is found or held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, unenforceable, or unreasonable, this Permit shall be void. However, in such an event, the Ovmcr/Permittee shall have the right, by paying applicable processing fees, to bring a request for a new pcnnit without the "invalid" conditions(s) back to the discretionary body which approved the Pcnnit for a determination by that body as to whether all of the iindings necessary for the issuance of the proposed pennit can still be made in the absence of the "invalid" condition(s). Such hearing shall be a hearing de novo, and the discretionary body shall have the absolute right to approve, disapprove, or modify the proposed pcnnit and the condition(s) contained therein.

13. The OwnerfPennittcc shall defend, indemnify, and hold hannless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any and all claims, actions, proceedings, damages, judgments, or costs, including attomey's fees, against the City or its agents, officers, or employees, relating to the issuance of this permit including, but not limited to, any action to attack, set aside, void, challenge, or annul this development approval and any environmental document or decision. The City will promptly notify Ovvner/Permittee of any claim, action, or proceeding and, if the City should fail to cooperate fully in the defense, the Owner/Permittee shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City or its agents, officers, and employees. The City may elect to conduct its own defense, participate in its own defense, or

Page 3 of8

Page 14: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

ATTACHMENT 6

obtain independent legal counsel in defense of any claim related to this indemnification. In the event of such election, Owner/Pennittee shall pay all of the costs related thereto, including without limitation reasonable attorney's fees and costs. In the event of a disagreement between the City and Owner/Pennittee regarding litigation issues, the City shall have the authority to control the litigation and make litigation related decisions, including, but not limited to, settlement or other disposition of the matter. However, the Owner/Permittee shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement unless such settlement is approved by Owner/Permittee.

ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS:

14. The project proposes to export 99~cubic yards of material from the project site. All excavated material listed to be exported, shall be exported to a legal disposal site in accordance with the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (the 11 Green Book''), 2009 edition and Regional Supplement Amendments adopted by Regional Standards Committee.

15. The drainage system proposed for this development, as shown on the site plan, is private and subject to approval by the City Engineer.

16. Prior to the issua.11cc of any construction pem1it, the Permittee shall incorporate any construction Best Management Practices necessary to comply with Chapter 14, Article 2, Division 1 (Grading Regulations) of the San Diego Mlffiicipal Code, into the construction plans or specifications.

17. Prior tn the issuance of any construction permit the PenniUee shall submit a Water Pollution Control Plan (WPCP). The \VPCP shall be prepared in accordance with the guidelines in Appendix E of the City's Storm Water Standards.

18. Any party on whom fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions have been imposed as conditions of approval of this development permit, may protest the imposition within 90 days of the approval of this development penn it by filing a vvritten protest with the City Clerk pursuant to California Govcmment Code 66020.

LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENIS:

19. Complete landscape and irrigation construction documents consistent with the Land Development Manual: Landscape Standards shall be submitted to the Development Services Department for approval. The construction documents shall be in substantial confonnance with Exhibit 'A,' Landscape Development Plan, on file in the Office of the Development Services Department.

20. In the event that the Landscape Pl&l and the Site Plan conflict, the Site Plan shall be revised to be consistent with the Landscape Plan such that landscape areas arc consistent with the Exhibit 'A' Landscape Development Plan.

21. All required landscape shall be maintained in a disease, weed, and litter free condition at all times. Severe prw1ing or 11topping" of trees is not pennitted tmlcss specifically noted in tllls

Page 4 of8

Page 15: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

ATIACHMENT6

Permit. The trees shall be maintained in a safe manner to allow each tree to grow to its mature height and spread.

22. If any required landscape (including existing or new plantings, hardscapc, landscape features, etc.) indicated on the approved construction document plans is damaged or removed during demolition or construction, it shall be repaired and/or replaced in kind and equivalent size per the approved doclunents to the satisfaction oftl1e Development Services Department within 30 days of damage or a Final Land.scape Inspection.

23. Any required planting that dies within 3 years of installation shall be replaced within 30 calendar days of plant death with the same size and species of plant material shown on the approved plan.

24. Prior to installation of faux trees, applicant shall provide BDR-Landscaping with samples of proposed tree(s) leaves.

PLANNING/DESIGN REQUIREMENTS:

25. A topographical survey confonning to the provisions of the SDMC may be required if it is determined, during construction, tl1at there may be a conf1ict between the building(s) under construction and a condition of this Pennit or a regulation of the underlying zone. The cost of any such smvey shall be borne by the Owner/Pennittee.

26. No overhead cabling is permitted.

27. The WCF shall confonn to the stamped approved plans and approvedphotosimulations prior to final Telecom Planning Inspection approval.

28. Photosirnulations in color for the WCF shall be printed (not stapled) on the construction plans. This helps ensure that the construction team building the project constructs the project in compliance with approved the Exhibit "A."

29. The Owner/Permittee shall not cause or allow the antennas located on the WCF to be different sizes (length, width, or height) than as shmvn on the stamped approved plans and as listed here: (78" by 14.8" by 8.6).

30. Top of antenna height not to exceed 27'-0".

31. No exposed pipes or mm1nting apparatus absent antennas shall be present at any time. Mounting pipes shall not be longer than the antennas.

32. Antennas shall be painted and textured to match the monopinelbranchcs to tl1e satisfaction of the Development Services Department.

33. All proposed hand-holes shall be covered with bark material to match the monopine trunk to the satisfaction of the Development Services Department.

Page 5 of8

Page 16: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

AlTACHMENT 6

34. All coaxial conduits shall be routed up through the caisson and into the monopine to the satisfaction of the Development Services Department. ''Doghouse" cable housings are not permitted.

35. Branches shall extend a minimum of24~inches beyond the proposed antennas to the satisfaction of the Development Services Department.

36. Starting branch height shall be no higher than lO~feet.

37. All exposed cables, brackets m1d supports shall be painted to match the rnono~pine foliage to the satisfaction of the Development Services Department.

38. RF socks fully covering the ffont and back of the antennas (and any other components) shall be used.

39. The applicant shall provide color samples of the mono~ pines branches and bark prior to BuildingPennit issuance. This is to ensure that the proposed components integrate \vith the surrounding landscape. Staff will pre-approve the color sample prior to Building Pemllt issuance. The exact samples shall be used during the FlNAL INSPECTION. The color approved by Planning Staff:· must be identical to the as~built mono~pines.

40. Monopines rely on existing and/or proposed trees to integrate with the surroundings. Additional trees may be required, to effectively integrate the rnonopinc, to the satisfaction of the Development Services Department.

41. A topographical survey conforming to the provisions of the SDMC may be required if it is detennined, during construction, that there may be a conflict between the building(s) under construction and a condition of this Penni.t or a regulation of the underlying zone. The cost of any such survey shall be bome by the Owner/Pennittee.

INFORMATION ONLY:

• Please note that a Telecom Planning Inspection Issue will be placed on the project prior to Final Clearance ffom the City's Building Inspector to ensure compliance with the approved plans and associated conditions. Prior to calling for your Final inspection from your building inspection official, please contact the Project Manager listed below at (619) 687-5984 to schedule an inspection of the completed facility. Please schedule this administrative inspection at least ±lvc working days ahead of the requested Final Inspection date.

• The issuance of this discretionary use permit alone does not allow the immediate commencement or continued operation of the proposed use on site. The operation allowed by this discretionary use permit may only begin or recommence after all conditions listed on this pcnnit are fully completed and all required ministerial permits have been issued m1d received final inspection.

Page 6 of8

Page 17: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

ATIACHMENT6

• Any party on whom fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions have been imposed as conditions of approval of this Pennit, may protest the imposition within ninety days of the approval of this development pennit by filing a \Witten protest with the City Clerk pursuant to California Government Code-section 66020.

• This development may be subject to impact fees at the time of construction permit 1ssuance.

APPROVED by the Hearing Officer of the City of San Diego on January 21, 2015 and HO-XX-XXX (TBD).

Page 7 of8

Page 18: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

ATTACHMENT 6

January 21, 2015 Conditional Use Permit No. 1145480

AUTHENTICATED BY THE CJTY OF SAN DIEGO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT

Simon Tsc, Development Project Manager City of San Diego

NOTE: Notary acknowledgment must be attached per Civil Code section H80 ct seq.

The undersigned Owner/Permittee, by execution hereof, agrees to each and every condition of this Permit and promises to perform each and every obligation of Owner/Pem1ittce hereunder.

NOTE: Notary aclrnowlcdgments must be attached per Civil Code section 1180 et seq.

Clairemont Christian Church Owner

By_~----------------------­Name: Title:

AT&T Mobility Permittee

By.~--------------------------­Name: Tit!e:

Page 8 of8

Page 19: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

NOTICE OF EXEMPTION ATTACHMENT?

(Check one or both) TO: X RECORDER/COTJNIY CLERK

P.O. Box 1750, MS A-33 1600 PACJFTC HWY, RoQ.\ .. 1260 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-2422

--~OFFICE OF PLA~NING AND RESEARCH 1400TF.NTIISTR.EFT,ROOM 121 SACRMvlENTO, CA 95814

FROM: CrTY OF SAl'I DIEGO DEVELOI'MENr SERVICES DEPARTMENI 1222 flRST A VE"I\UE, MS 501 SAN DiEGO, CA 921 01

PROJECT NO.: 327884 PROJ.ECT TITLE~ AT&T Cadman Park

PROJECT LOCAT!ON-Sl'ECIFIC: The site is located at 4330 Moraga Ave San Diego, CA 92117 within the Ctairemont Mesa Community Plan area.

PROJECT LOCi\T!ON-CITY/CoU:\JY: San Diego/San Diego

DESCRIPTION OF NATURE AND PuRPOSE Ol' lH.E PROJECT: A Conditional Use Pennit (CUP) to allow for the installation of a Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) consisting of twelve anterums located on a 30-foot tall monopine and a 249-square fOot outdoor WCF equipment enclosure located at a church site. The proposed project complies with height and bulk_ regulations and is located on a pr~ject site that is currently developed with two other wireless carriers.

NAME 01' PUBLIC AGENCY APPROVTh'G PROJECT: City of San Diego

NA!'vfE OF PERSON OR AGENCY CARRYTNG Our PROJECT: PlanCom, Inc. 302 State Place Escondido CA 92029. (760) 715-8703, Contact Krystal Peterson.

EXEMPT STATUS: ( ) Mlti!STEIUA!.(SEC. 21080(b )(!); 15268); ( ) DECLARED EMERGENCY (SEC. 21 080(b)(3); 15209(a)); ( ) EMERGE~CYPROmCT (SEC. 21 080(b)( 4); 15269 (b)(c) (X) CATEGORICAL EXEl\'WfiONS: 15303 (NEW CO!\'STR!:CTION) ( ) STATUTORY EXFMPTION:

REAsm;s \VHY PROJECT IS EXEl'vfPT: The City of San Diego determined that the project would qualifY to be categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15303 (New Construction) which allows 10r the con::.truction of limited numbers of new, small facilities and the installation of small new equipment. Since the project would be constructed at one location and the nwnopine pole is not exceeding any height regulations the exemption is appropriate. Furthermore, since the project would occur on a developed site lacking sensitive resources the exceptions listed in CEQA Section 15300.2 would not apply.

LEAD AGENCYCONTACTPERSON: Jr:;l'f SZYMANSKI TELEPHONE: (619) 446-5324

IF fiLED BY APPLTCANT; J. ATTACHCERTirTED DOCU1vW.NT OF EXEMPTION HNDWG. 2. HA.S A NOTJCE O.F EXL\1PTI0l\' BEE:\! FILED HY THE PUBLIC AGENCY APPROVTNG THE PROJECT?

( ) YES ( ) No

IT IS HEREBY CERTiFIED THAT TifF. ClTY OF SAK OTEGO HAS DETER~iL"lED TifF. ABOVE ACTIVITY TO BE ExtMPT FROM CEQA

CHECK ONE:

(X) SIG!'ii\D BY LEAD AGENCY ( ) SIGNED 13Y APPLlCANT

Januarv9 20!5 DA1E

DATE RECEIVED FOR FlLD-'0 WITH COU~TYCL.ERK OROPR:

Page 20: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

at&t

Photo Study 5/8/20 13

PHOTO STUDY & KEY MAP

SD0458 Cadman Park

4330 Moraga Avenue San Diego, CA 92117

Prepared for: City of San Diego

Department of Planning 1222 Rrst Avenue MS 301

San Diego, CA 92101

Prepared by:

PlanCom, Inc. Contractor Representatives for

AT&T Wireless

302 State Place Escondido, CA 92029

Contact: Shelly Kilbourn, Planning Consultant (619) 208-4685

May 8, 2013

ATTACHMENT 8

Page I

Page 21: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

at&t

Photo Study 5/8/2013

Looking at north elevation

Looking at south elevation

ATTACHMENT 8

-·-

Page 2

Page 22: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

at&t

Photo Study 5/8/20 13

Looking at east elevation

Looking at west elevat ion

ATTACHMENT 8

Page 3

Page 23: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

.. ~

~ at&t

Photo Study 5/8/20 13

ATTACHMENT 8

Looking north from site

Looking south from site

Pagc4

Page 24: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

at&t

Photo Study 5/8/2013

Looking east from site

Looking west from site

ATTACHMENT 8

Page 5

Page 25: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

at&t

Photo Study 5/8/20 13

Aerial Photo

ATTACHMENT 8

Page 6

Page 26: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

at&t

Photo Study 5/8/2013

Key Map

ATTACHMENT 8

Page 7

Page 27: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

'------~--

I VICINITY MAP

THOMAS GUIDE PAGE:

AC>iJRESS: 4;)30 ~ORAOE WtN'J' ""' DrNO. OA i1117

124B-02 ~

COOROINAT~S (~AD 83): l.ITITUO(' N S<<O'p.<l" 'ONGrTUOE' 'If 11?"1l'iW,e<'

RF INFORMATION

at&t MOBILITY

CADMAN PARK 4330 MORAGA AVENUE

SAN DiEGO, CA SD0458

92i17

CONSULTANT TEAM ,-- l APPLICA~~QJ~~~OIL~~~o~~~~.-.:~.".~·;;c I

•RCHITECT: 1\',WA~ .007.< ~ ROB£'1 sc•APE< MCHITECT"I<C & PlA,N'N~ F.O- 3G< <3<1 OA<llSeA~, CA .20<9 (700) -I-3J-'"14 (760) ....,,_,, :'""'

SURYErCR:

fLQYO SUR'<OYING, INC, 11576 "O~GATE CIP~U:

co••JNA, CA '~"0 ("') 73,_,.., {951) "9-70<' (fV)

L~ASI~G/PlANNiriG: PUNCO~, INC.

~GO P"I<.<DW£R 30~ STAT£ PUG." ESCOiiOIOO, CA 320'" (S") 200-1:160

L_ ____ _j

ACCESSIBILITY DISCLAIMER

JliRISDICTION:

7337 TRAJO >r.C£r, 3 E<OT. c.u~" ,,,.,

,-;.., O•!;GO, CA ,12•-<2•)2

(9'0) <5J-l380

CONf,CI: ROO P"flhO'NER .Ot10NE' (510) 20C-228·J

r;HRml;..' COURCH (01-'·0tFCO< OF Cf'R"T) .'ACIFIC <OI.;W'IESf REGION

4330 "CRAGA >'"""' SAN OU,GO, CA 02117 COMAGn T'r O>IN

("B) 27<--!706

CiT'f OF "" Ot(GO

P~O-IECT QESCRI.'fiON: .INS'I'AU.H'~N O' AN AT~O ~001lln' T"<OG""UNICHON

COt<C,!TE OCOC.< (7'-4" ' l4·-o") WUIP"tNT !:NCUJSUR' o• A CO"CRITE PM

•INSIALUI'ON O' TORtE: AN:ENt-!A "<C"oas, o; FOWl io.NEH'<}.S OACH (ToTAl o; \2 .WTENN/>S) "OUNrm fO A pROPOS<D '0'-0" HI<OI< ~OfiOPINE fNCCUO~G :2<) RRU UMS "OU!IC,O BOIIND At•T"NAS

~ HMJ.ATICN OF FcHR (4) R.rCA> JCS-'-'-00-"-gf (>OUIC•)

"""""" ro """'""'-·~~ "ST"'-'.l\TION Or A NEW 200 A\t> <LEC•OIOM_ SCRVIOg f'RO"

AN OXIS'IOG SOO&C '"'J<Sf'00M8l

.,NSTAl_:_)<IInll Of l.IN03·0AFE '"' IRRIOAriON ,; 'l.INNW fOP. TN<,- e•o.ECI,

• INS"llA'"' "' (2) ,,,~ ""' >NT<:N<AS

e INOT<l[.ITIUN OF NEW COLC0/FIB£R O<RYIC( '''C" 'XISTINO UT•UT'r POo..!:

<m• "~C'/f; rwo WOOD UOHT >fANDAROS <> IN<CALL (J) ;EW 2<'-0" HIGI! CO«CRErO: UGW :;T'"O"DS

0 INSTAL'.AfiDN Of OO"CRrTS CU'l6 AT EXISTING PARmG LOC

• OPANO S"AI_ ?ORTION o.- <XIOT:NG .... KINO LO< & R£00N; GUOC HANDICAP OW13

ccc, "'"'· ,,.._,, '"' "" OF"--''""'"'""' NO '' IN 1H< CITY OF 5A.< 01(0<), t.d-.><11' OF SM< "'""' "'AT€ 01' UL"'""· '-"CORDI"'-' TI; "" 1H<"'OF '"· ''" FLOl I" Tit< "'"OC OF ~'E CoUNT"' IC-:<;G<<O" OF"" ~<co COI~'1. OC,OSEX "'· ""

PROJECT ADDRESS.

ASSC'iGPS ?APCEL r~~ldBER;

£XiS~!I<G lDNING:

[X''iTifiG SIT~ ARtA

PROJE~T A.OE~. EQUI•"-iENT 0:'1CCO~UPE

LC~S[ A~~.o.:

PRoJ'0)E~ ~C(;'JO~;JCYo

4-JOO UaR;G> A'ICNU£

S;N DIEGO. OA '1"7

J09--Iil1-0,-00

'" ·r-1

"·'"-' '" 1.3 ACRES

; '""" 1 r"'" <e-e '"" E<IOT>c' TOL>co""'""'"oN'i "'"'-''" ·J' ·"' '"')

'·' "0"" ~ ''"'''''": .~

f-1 ,_, H A-2. I ,_, H

A -5 ;-;

H LST

~S2

SHEET SCHEDULE

S,'" C'-AN

COU<e"'NT ."1.00" eL.<N > "ONOi'"JC PW

EXT<RIOR O..i:'IATIOt<S

''""a" •J.£'1•'1"-NS

YCNO"<E O:i.!:'IATI0' 0o 'NT<N"A """

"ONN•'< O'fA'LS

l.INO>CAeE OE'illil.WENT PIAN

5!IT suo;a GONEOAL INFO'<A"OH

SITe <UR'/OY O<H8tll. '""'"""'a'

SCALE TH£ O"WI'G SCAlES >HOWN IN THIO o£T ROPRES£N' THE CCRilECT "'''--' ONLT WH<~ L<£<r: oe~WINGS AR£ eRit.fEO IN A 2"" ";,·'"'"AT. If' THIS O"WING OtT IS N~T 24" < 16", ;><IS SCT iS NO! TO SCACE. AU. DRAWINo;; ARC SCH£\tA!IC. DO "GT OCALE ~·AWINGS TG O<T£R"JNO a• 'E>Ii'Y .NY Ot"£-<510fS­D.A'HtNGS OF ANT >IZ£ <;~AL'. Nf;\'<R B' SC-<l£0 F~R >">'THIN~ OTeE• TIIAN G.;N,RAL -'<FEfi(NC£.

APPLICABLE CODES AL'. wee< SH-''-'- OC~PI.f \'1% T"E !'·JU.OW!NG lo."PLIC"'--" COCEO'

CAI_IF'ORHIA STAT<; ''JIUliNn 00,_, TITLE ;>,4, 2010 [OfTION

C<-'oRHIA'>'U"""" CGOO. 2010 miliON

GALIFJR"IA "'G"AHIC'L ·:>ODE, ""' W'•ON C'~COrit<t> EC(GTRIC;l'_ CCDC, 'CfO <Ot11•)H

GALIFO'"IA "" COJE, lCIO 00''100 CAL'fMN•<. £N(ROY CJDE, 2"0 £01"1•'"

" T>e """' oc CON ''-'·0'- -H£ .,.,. 'CST;IC~'' .~OC•[

"-'-1,'_ ""''""

--------·----------- -··---- ----··- --- ------·----· -------- --- --------- ---·-- J

I -BOOTH & =oUARJZ_

==·-==

-Q-. ~:at&t ~MOBILITY

1:;37 TRt,JO SfRF:F:T. J CAST_ liDGt.! l61l 5AN D'[GO, CA 3'121- o7n2

==,==

OATE

-,~------ o;.:;-,-- -

OAT'C' -

==,==

CADMAN PARK

1./"·" '1/"/" I2J1S/i·O C?.j•5/11 0'/11/1' o•j12/t 1

0</05/13 04119/" 0'/0<-/IJ os;so_',; f0/10/'3 12./0'," OSI:C/1< "''21/'4

SD0458

DRAWING CAES

"" ZD e£\'I(W Qo'! """ zo (J'lb) Flt<A '"''I"~ ZD ;rug' CITY OOM"EfliS ('o9)

-''""" ""'· -w (") _,IC.HO FML ZD ',ooo)

P.E'<I>EO ZO ~4 (ol) R''"CD 10 tiS ~ob)

'-""'"" zo f' (or "'''"" " iF (clj R''•"CD 20 ~A '·)~ riE>'IS" ZO #0 (o';"' ·~V'SEC Zl #11 to:<> ,C''i>Cll ID ~-I (<<nl)

::

TITLE SHEET

"==

"==i

T-1 I I : , __ -------·------~-- __)

Page 28: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

~OlJ"MllY N>.)rr,

Trt: PRC-cE:CT "OUN'A"Y OHCl'O'< c~ T"<l~ ~~~W!"C. 1'5 Af'~Rc"v~e_ MlD ·> SH0W" 0610 "o,-_C''~"CE C"Lr A ~OU-'DARY S"P;-e~ 'II'" '0 ?,RF'Oi'I'>D 6Y FL0YO SlleV£Yl.'<G, "0

WO~ENTS·

C<OE~N':l SrCWN i'OFctCO PP.F'U~i-WJfY P£":f''9C;I '-£ P.t~O"JlC ?""C'C M;.-'S &

i~~~~c'""~; ;~}lh"c;,c 'F;"_t"f~';~~N ~~ e6~~ (''STifle IJTl''' PClC_ ~00)!21

''"FOR1Y L-'' (TYPI'C.'LI ---~-~-­

'X1'5TI-'<G ChAitl·JN~ f"_N .0-- -•

• .o:oT•J«

""""''

0ROP·OSE0 AT;..T MOaiLiTY AN"l'N"'O & "" JNI" P!h. MOUNT.'e> T:l 30'-0" <!GH ~OMl.-'INE

EXISTING 'i':R'ZG" ~lPUE'-' TEI..OOO~~U"'ICATbNS~, 'OUIPVEN- NSIOC > <::<l$fiNG OGNCRC'E BlUe< WALl. ENCLGSURE ~ITH S'lJC(') ~Ni>H "-"0 A ~c-n0 ffiEl.,,S ON A CONCf<ETE ~t>IC

~,-<STING EOUIFMI:NT S~ED TC R!'MAJN ---·--. R~'~NC i'S. •JIR":-EO BT OWNO:~ "

'L"-"'l'C ~'<"'-SEE SH[C"-­L-1 COR W\1'/0SCA'i OICVO-"e'-<:Nl PL'N

•'-0"

1' ~'""1'. ' Y>R~

- -~ _ I SLTOACe I 1~---L_

----. ----

•'"'~-~,~;--,' - ~a~_a_:_ - - ~ YA'-C

oo:o."-"~

I~-

1

1';~~~~~~·':~~-~~-~~,·~~,'j":":-"'','-,':c:'':':":',:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~·~ I

r ~- -em•" •-••"" •,•c••~ '_(>C.A'EJ ·" """' '""'''

X sr,,,.G COLIC.1lf0 81 c / "CtO>U"C

C-10 m P-'ao.c~·

F_,-GTJNO SJI<GlE SCOR'! CHURCH

F'-JCICilY

• SEGTOR ' AZ't•LJ'~ •·J'

' ~-ecce-' I

' L

' \. ~P<'ANO

''"''''"

-Efi-'C'~C SC·Cf,[ ~"''MC'C (SLE 0"tU LS-I I

--FX'Sll'G •J[VTY °CL0 /'9J1112 ,.,-H -GrT

EX>.:TT><C c-c'"c,,:;o :tme, G"TCCR ANO I•C<W'C< rQ ;;O.iAIN {T"P•'O'L)

--E<Oa~ ·.UJlUi \1•P,O_t, ,.o,[".'N•S "U'.INTOO INCICE :.<IOC"G '<l'-0' OIGH MON·""'-N" "DW'H

VACLT

---!'O•J"O''Ll ,,. 'O'OE CO"O•E"C MOW :;f,,P & IN,CSC""[ i'L<NI5

-rtk;;~;~,~~~~Q~~~11~········j·-······••i: : '~:.-,n;ING ·C~\'""'-'~ unLT'Y UNCS 0T·ICAL)

:-~- """"• ;~~~~~ ;~,s·~~"~~~K'" ,~,,

SITE PLAN

,-;;·----, '--- 2,RG•osEo 6'-0' o'CN ,·;~co"""'

--- '•"'

' ~AIOkO TO YAfC" \\';.._, •IECJ V'O>'Y >ICC COfiOI"IQNS A''IJ 0/T~'<C TC WES­pPQOf'fY C N.O

;/':' ,,_ ,,, :7

~, .. ,.,.__,. ,_..-

\_<'X:STINO "'•0' 'li'CO E<OC~CW "< "£Co'oDED CN F'AilCC_ y,-p j31<5

-----"'D:ISllNG 20'-0" ~IGH CI'Cf

·'""' ""'")'"'

-I~'"'LI. CL'N. •J?f«! -=' PEOE3L\l •JN A CCNGiiE;T•i PAO (I'EMO'IE; & "-"-C~"NE~T '" OING V'RI<c.'l ··ROIF_.SS L'"'-l'C M.'TDi PEl1E:;CAi)

'-, -- "ISTNG CO"CRf:rc ~"-""'-"' CUL'HT R(lj:f;O BQCW SIC·~~"-< '"0 OUT

I F·\C[ CF CIJ'9

\ '1.', II

~ E{IST:N·O OC·CE To<AI<SFG"":R " ""-'--" \ iP·J"EK SEil\'CC GON,CGnCo M TI'~~<SrDR"m)

' ,,., ',

'', ', - ' .'', '.,

- ' ' ' -- ',-£">T"·' c~,Ui'Y POLO ,/>'"27C·'

\ \\ ',

'""'~· . .-o.ec=< ,,,,,,.., .. , ••.• ,..u;"'--' ~., ... ~·"""""''

'" "" """"'>""-~ .._ "'-""'·'" "'""~·="='"" ~ ,_,,,, """-'·Ge >\0., S'fi [-[SO, CA, (CAO~'N P""-'

---------c<~""'"'"'_..,---·---·

,ou.<r__,._,,,., b=----o ""'' "'"""= ~<m.<ir,; Co±,,.,."""-'"""""' ~~..:­"'~' w=~· .,, ,.,;=" ·"l""" ., ''"'""~"''""~ "'~ o,- "'"'' ·'""""" '""""""""S"' "-" -~' 'So= c~·.,r J,~,._

,,~~'~"" """"'"' ·~·'"''-"',. ., ""'"""'"~'"""'"' "' "' ~ "'"'·~= ~"~·~

"""""" ~-'""'."'"" Q'""""""""""'"'-00~"=>

n-""'"'""" ~~

-''' "'' l='P"r""'Uo """'""< ~•• >o = ""'""

"-""'"·~"-F=<'•'"''"'"'"""' w;"'- '"""''-"' '» "'"""~ ,-..,_,~, ,~~"'""~''" m<. ,...,.,.~"'=

~"""''­""'"""'"'-"'>="'"""""~'""'"'"'~""""-"~=--""~"''""-"6"~'"""""'"'""""""'-''~~ """""''" .. ·""""'"'"'"'"""""' ,7=>-<...,•<~='=='"'"""

"""'"'"''-""'"'"'-"' """'"""' v~ "''

I. """"""'"'="'""""'~ • u~,.-="' "'-'"""'""="' """'- "''''' :oooc·-·-"' •• •~•" '"'"''

""''""'~'-~"""'"-1, :-:::' .:-:-;:,-:.:: !:'=:::-:::'"""" M'o'W "'"""'"' ""'= , c~----~-- c'""""'"'~~"~

I ~~-=--"" ~'" - -L_~~-- _____ · ____ -

OITY OF W< OIEOO t<O'ffil'

~ 1, P"''"'" "'""'"WI-'-;£ M0C"Ic0 00 OCA<'LY \\1TH ACCE'"·"IL'T" STAN'lARce,

J:>![\f.~•=-f1.'<1<'NG 'l"'--E.c>~E-S'Pr'''t'----'lJil.:G

>GOC~e:g" SP~C£> g' ,,.

s-<N"-'f:· so>c:£S __ ,_·-~-­i1l!N.

2. Tf'l• N:Jie·OC ?~bPG'iOJ OU WO,,-, WI[H,, 'l<C ~C3l:C '<>GKT-OF-WAY

~.i:~ g,~t ~~~~";;"·~~,?,~,,:~~>:0~~~~~~;i",6,i,"-":~ .~~~ci-i~"·r•cc eERM'N~"' 8M' ""'""""C£, ;ATIOC;,.[ORY TO H'C CITY c'.'01f'£':e

P>IGR CQ '"" IOSl!.'-><G( OF ;~y CO>''>"UCnC' "[,;eiT, 'Hi: CCC\liH;E SHAL'. 'NCG11PORn: ANI <:ONS,'RUCTOt. F"'T "'·VACE'-'1'·'" PR•-OToCCe ''>.COO>AkY TO CG~0LY 'M"cl C">PJC' 1< . .'·I)OC'-.E ,, OI'<IS,'OtJ 1 (Gi>',O•NG i<E;CJ"-'l~NSJ OF '11[ S'l"i I)ILW ~·JNIC'IP'L CC·UE ,,,'D l:'E CO,'STRC't:fC' eU.t" ·Y OPCCI''''-"'J"-

5. P11CR "0 CO> ISSU<t,C£ Of' !',\Y GONSTRUCTI·JO PEil<li T"O PE<"TTEO OH"-.L "'''"1- A W;Tffi PO·-L'J'10N OOO'ROL P'--'tl (',\9~')- Tl-'C W°C> >f'<l.L dE P'O,>~o,9} .N ASCC,'C'NCO .,.H T.-0 '/JIOECtJf:> IN A"PI'"OI' E Of' fn': G'i'Y'S S(JR~ WA.CP ST•'l-JD.',GS.

"-" "' ~' ,, " '"' '" '" YC3

10• ·' G'J_ ~· ~CsB oc '~

" cu. ~,

" " Y~S

FR0"05ED CC'lC"ZT>: G'J<~< A>'D wrc=E P'-""""' WI'- NC­ecOc< 0" ;LTE.O :xiSn'•O STORY ''ACER ~"-"'""'~ P;TTE'"

THO PRC.E''I' 'RCPO';ES TO ~-'•JRT ''' Cu6,C <'RC'S c' ~"f:\1"­F'<OM 'HE .OROii'CT 'liH:. ALL £XC"Af'Cl M'TEF,Al. US"ED 'O BE £-<eQ'fED SH,,LI. 8f; C<PORffO 'G > LEGAl '"POS'L Oil( N A~CQRCANC[ ··-c- TeE s-,,NQ'PD SPEci~C-T.ON<; FOP Pl'8LIC ·IIO"'S CONST1UCTION (fHE """'"" eOaK"), lOCJ ffimCN ~"D RE:·l!CN'l 3J>'~CfhJENT <>;z.;c•€!-.TS AOOP-OJ Br 'lmiON'l >WIO;ROS C"""-TTEt

a. THO '"-"'-'" >rS"E~ P'i:>POSEO •oo f"'S OE:'i;LaPMEN", >S 5HOWN ON THE <IIC "·"· IS PW>TE '·") SuBJCCI TC 1-J'PI,C\-<L "f( TH' CITY EI>'O;NS •.

o. PRDR TO :hF l'iOL'~'CE oF ~'' C·O"TRUG'CON PC,M,~. T. 'l PE''"'Tl> 3.<"--'- EN'D INi'O A ,,_,,NT[rr'-"CE ACOEEIIO!il FOR '"" 01<001.'0 PE,A'Nt:'T B>IP P~<G'IC' &<m-;,:T·C" rJ "HE C IY E'CINC::'

10 "''·CR -0 T11i' I'CIJM~f: oF AO,>" >:a>,3TRliC'"'ON "''""· Tl-<_ PC.'N'fF.t Srl;Ll INCO,POPXO AtW CCNS'110CTION BEST t-'A'c'GEMC"T Ci'AC'li•,CO \'CCES5'i<Y TO GC\lPLY ·o o- Cei-?TE' -•, ,\,ICLE l. O"!ISICJ< I ("-'""'G ~'OUIRE>IC·"OI )F ;,1;: "-'--' JIEOD YUNICIP;, COO£. INfO THf CO,>Tl'L't.['C'' PlANS OR >F>::<::~C\fG"S

·- ~~~o~ ~~ .• ~~ .~s~~~';:N et.l:'i::,,"~;J;;::;;~~~~'~Ef,~;TC~~~~E~~;:'o" SH"--L" P"EP AACO IN .'CCURCM<·:C •ocr-< (HE G'"'"'-"" '" .\PPEJ<OIX E OF TH£ OI'Y'S STORM W'Ti'R ST<N0"'0'

''· ''' tflCROY C<'CSI~ATOR "Ill 8' fJSTMC.' AT THF. ~15ce•ROL cOCA:IcO TQ i<W"OO C OO~'Rc; ·c ·'ON-ER.•f.KE V'Ce<lCI-:"-

lo P'C:W-'SEJ C·~.JIP,E,W E'CC0;\111; 'O'II.l NOC '<.OCK T<i' d"""' 01JRC4CE 01<'1"'" FATTi'"" AOD WILL ,Q- I"GR''-Sf TIIC ,.,,,nOG STO"M WA'JC' 'CU<f Oi< '< Fl T'E C·OC0'R0[ LCCATIO'.

!,

i '-----·---- ------ ------- ·--------------------· --------· ~---- ------- _, ________ _ ·---·-----------··-_____ _)

1===-·==

Sat&t ~MOBILITY

73!7 FlA2C STRO:tr, 3 ['51 RQ~~ :lSSrl S".'1 JIECC. :> 9212'-1!·:2

==··==

"-'- ~---

I ,:::.::.JOTIO"=:

""'

1-s;;::::~,~-

1 ==,::==c'c:,c,:,c'=~~= I CADMAN PARK

?ROJECI i'<Jr/B[r,

800458 4330 ~CR,\CA AVC..

S~'i DI~GO, CA 92117

.===c'~'c'=';'~O:GO ~";';"';'~'==== ;::

I 1/15/10 ,;,C0/10 ,,_/r;;,,, C,/10/1' 03/21/11 04/"!'1 o</05/13 04'19/13 05/0<-f" od/>e•/IJ 10/10/1> 11/06/'0 •JS/<0/1< "/"/"

DRoi.VII.~G DHES ''N 20 0~118'1 Uoo;.

""'- ZO Goo) "''" o£'i'S<O lC •:'uol or, c'""'"-s (•oo) JE;,SEc 'l1Al W (~\

'0\IO<D FINAC 20 (oo,) RE:-,',SCJ 20 f4 (ciJ <E'IISI".t· ro .1" (ioo)

"''"'" ~' •" (") REviS<D :o ,, (.P 'EII<EJ lll .13 (d)(!) e<VIS>:C lD i10 :<";ro RE"SEO t:· o'F' Qo;., '"'"" lC ~II :<mtl~·

1===--

SITE PLAN

==,==1

==--"==1

A-i ' '----~-------~-- ---~

Page 29: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

r

PRO"C·<EJ ~0 ,cetro--­'"'cK;w (SHOWN SII,CEU)

SECTION 'A' 'I '

'I ' !

~-OUTDOCR EQUIPMENT FACIUiYJ

-~-

- reCF'OS£0 CC·>IGi'l_fC dl0(;< W-\_L 'lfln< 3CLJCGC FINIOII

P><C?OOI_Q C·Ot<('F<i:TO F0·"''0'TI0'' (SHC"' >H>~Fil,\

I

-w I

-f'=)_L~;y-~,~?f 0- '~

I

, I

1,

l

FLOOR

I,

I

I

1,

PLAN

PRr.ccsto ;T;,r VOlliUTi '""'"''" & "'- ''"''' 'IPE ,'.i·C~'EO ·o 30'-•J" "'G~ MONQ~I.'·[

--~

t I 1\ I

1-

7-- --- ___ ,".::-.![______

I ~i} "''i"

, I

I //1 1/ / I b' I '~ I /(

I I : 1 r

1 I ---+- --------------------------- -

:I , I ' --"-+-

---19

MONOPINE PLAN """"--"' 1!1"•1'-'1"

KEYED NOTES:

'I L ~"--

/.I ,--

0 pPOPOSED ATo:T 1.10iji!JTY ERICS'i'" L'UTC·OO" PAOlO C>8IOEf

US 6301' & 8'SE "'-''"' ll 1/0" '*'"" , 57 I/'" Hf\;."< , 1G 7/4" OEEP, WEOeT SC•O "S ('YPIG.'l- 0<' 4:

pROf'OSOD A'&T tJ'.lSwTY 0'.')000R 'Q,,£R [Dd1P ... >t1T G.'''''"' ~j~~";1i~:~~~,~W~£;~'?,~~1 "t~L'p~~r~!:'_"~~,~--· '"" PR0f•.·S:D AT«C M0811J"' '"'JW$ 8AC:L'Y E.<"'O'liCN CA8'1·1f'' 'A?OUS/I<L'HA T""'"'" M'H !8 ~;,..,RI<S (3il" w;JE' /'-" H'GH, }Q" DEEC": WEIG-"1• 2800 L.3S (lY'ICAl v• 1J.

O'lVml<O ST'EC -;uaE f'-08 (l'e,;;L OC ") ~

pROPOSOO P'J~'R ;.. <'BE' C-'8'-£ ''?\Y ON °'.-C $i_IT?E"

OMOR '''"TCH OPS<ATCO L'OHT l'l<lURf" "OC'"IOC TC 2'CL'.l\•.-'iE ''"'-l (ri>IC<L OC S)n

AT&T ci:'.S£ ioPC-' TO 'liGN '"l"'H -RELL:O GVERHINC

PROPOS(O 10Tf.W:EG7, :Nc" MP S~'·OS 20QA0e PC'"'O< c,OI)•su. ON JlM COfiTER WI'H ~A'U" PANSCO< OWITUI MOUN::EJ To <i"-1. (;a· Y"Ci: ' •a' OEEP ' "ZZ" HI~H) ~9GhTo 'o LSS

0ROPOOO!l f:TIIERN£1" EJUf•'MC'T CMI,,ET': (CICJ"fvl.<) l /" WIDC. , 2C" HtC'~ < ,. O£'P MOUNrW T~ CTIUTY ti-Fl'At<[ 6eLOW pBG-02 G'B 'JE:-

OfJJ=:l>FD PBC--(>; C'-Bio'OT 24· WICC < ,0. HIGo< ' 8" COS·'. M·JUflftO TQ COl'!"' 1;-FO}Mf:

PR0°0SOD fOLOO LA!J rJ£1" ,-GR F'F; OC NlllC ' Jn' eGH ' ,. 0"P. Willi A; OUTl'T eOUNTC'C :1J ~~"rt H-'RM<C

PR00UOCD GROL'NJ ii·JSS ElM M•JU"'CQ 70 WALl.

O£W:eh. LC'fT'!ACIC-R 0~-".!. 'RO''IOE 'NO l·"'·'lC (1) ''eLL MCL'N'tU "'--'---'$ "2A-1013C" FIRC E<C'NGUISH['< IN "OOV"Ci't<G( !<iTt-< FIRE O'O'MLYEW REQUI"EMO'W;

W•'U ~O'J'TOC· r,CNE""•o,< PEC." .. PTAOl( VR LcC 30<

0RO~OSZf! P'<C CCt;DUITS & 1+ CA. OHRC~'O RCUT£ ',0; '"'~; <"! O·CH[O-"LO <0 "'!G "'OE,,,'PG'"'R "-'<ll.O C0NlJITS -0 MCNLW<O

~FJPC';tC FI8['/PO'i<fll V.O•_>: CUN)ll T "R"1GH

ORPFOSOO 00"'-' 0'-J" WOE< 8"·'-'" ~IGH >C·Jl'D >'EOC ACC£3;; ""'"' .\N·O FRI'-'C WI-H ,~_._T ~Cil"ITY >IGeoAGC

pRGOOS:O S'-c" 'o\'IOc_ < '-·J" hOH 5CC:0 5CE0' .ICCf;S' OAT >0>'1) C'<A'!" <-"'!"-. Af~C "otillJTY" ;:CN.>,Gf;

'OC·POS(O -,£< '-"E l"'OSG>?[ DEo£lJP"'"T 0C'N

PROPOSE.J CG.,~RtE WAL<W.'"

'~5~1<G CO>'CRf;"( ~,_,_WAf

pqaPOOEG a'-G" C'"~-"ETC olLOi:K f;NCLOSCOl W'J.l WHH SMCOTh $!\lOCO ~N•Sf' ~ 'R"--CS 'B0\1';

PROPGSC 1./-NOSC.'f'O pu,.•,T,y._ S~O $EET L-1 F'.)R LAI<OSOAPE OC"E.OF\IO,<r , .'1-l

POOPCSOO C0'-'.£0 COOCR£"'E CUO'l

,0i<Gf'05ED CPO ~'TONM ,;c•"'N"E) IO ..,, cl> (rrFQ.J.. CF 2)

0ROPERTY ~NE (f'-'>IC-'•.1

c:;sn't) CCNfOL'P Lt.E: o;GWN 0 1'-0" fJT0.'/VAL5 I~''C'L)

PR'.lPGSEC <" , ,. 0°E>.'IN~ IN ··~ L me OMifiACf, ',1"-l'IC•~ Of <)

EXISnNC '~''7.0" £'JIPMENT i.CJGL0$Ui1E

EXI,-n''G \OERIZUN Ol1D)OR fl.'.;:'() E~L'>PMW:

f<~ST!N·O WRU3S (f-'PICALi

O<ISf"G CH•JRCH 8UIL0'"0

E<IS''fiG GAI<Oi>Y ~ P0,-r

0 'lGP0stO G" SiA"C<~'C' CONC'f<LTE CU,$

t:<IST'NC L'..,OSCAPE '"'-"

P.iYl\'E OXI,---11<·0 1R[[

R8.<C'<E £>(1J,NG Ot.OO Lf'll0{ C·-LC ~ CIG•IL 1,\Si"AlJ. N'W OS -·J" !•tCH CL"'CPCT UG"T ':"'1<0'·'" IOIT SHLo"T ,_,,

f:'ISC:NG CQUIFC<;.-H 'r~l '0 ''"AIN

eRC 0QSEO <" CfC•. "·\GE G(. ''D"-T

P'OPG';CJ 1 ' 3 RIP-'-'-" eoc< £"CR0f 01ee'FAT~>2

',w.x ""'" """'-"" +-} OROPOSOO Y" "'"" GUA'C'C'I•_

PRG'OSEO OLfrEO OR-<1''

,,OPOO[) 0'-·1" "IC-11 O£'"Jf<Aryif0 lVOE Sfell fTNC." PNN OAI"~

0W1'GCD 0'-1" e1011 •,<-OJI) COI<CF P'-INFI' "0 "-\TC>I W>., "tlD .,E.,cY 51CC COriOI'lO"S <flO E<:E'Il• T·C ''',c·' FP.OPtl'"'

'""

I ---------- ------·------~--~--·-------------- ·-----··------ -- ·-·-·---------------··------- -------·--------·-----·-- ------'

"'·' ·''" ' '"" 0 """' C' '0C'O<

'"'"" '"·'' ' "-"-

11!1'1\lilil'l'lll.lll'illi,'l'llljl ll,:u 1 1 'ill .•

==,== PRCPAI~!_Q CQ_i

at&t MOBiLITY

!0!7 rR'CF. Slli<:l' J EAST, RQOM S"<N DIEG·:•, CA ~di2'-4L·:;L

==.,==

"'-

1===,===1

CADMAN PARK

I /'5!1G -,,f,/'."J ,,_;,s;ro "/f;/11 00/2'/' 04/12/1 I G</00/13 OJ/"/"3 0610</1.1

"'"/" ·c·/10/'-' f1./051"

cof?-c:•• 09/221·•

SD0458

90~ ZC F~iiE\1' (ion'

""" <0 (joo) F'.'N'C "''-"·J ZC :co,l\ Cl"( COM"£""' l'<2)

REWSED "'"" Z(• (dl R£'11'<0 F'N"-. :c :oo,) •cviSm <o f4 ('II R£•,,,-(0 D ;os 0ob) Rt>'IS£0 lO <15 (ol: Pi:'''"'0 ZD ~? (cl) PEVTSED /.') '" (1' )0 F£VI!iCQ ZC ~0 (of' RE',IS£0 ZD #10 'l£">E0 D -111

I===··==

EQUIPMENT FLOOR PLA."J &

MONOPINE PLAN

==,==

==,==

A-2

>

Page 30: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

o' - --' ' -'"I ~-· ;,

;"---...

o-,m.-~riG _ )-i~·~---

# ~-,. c==

__ [_'

.~­

= ···. - : ;~ == = .. ""

.=; ===­

- --.,-----VI_ I

=r

TRELLIS PLAN ""-""'·"'"'·''-{)"

TRELLIS & ROOF NOTES:

0 P"C-'·O'>F: C'J,\~OF:L G-V·C~ LfiCCOSURE ',\' h St'OCTH 'ir~·CC•C ~N'SH "·C >c'"'C" ADJ~CENT Ef,C_GSUP(

l"e.ili'COiD 1<1 'l<t'"ll'; '.'FTFS AT,. 0.~.

OROPCSEIJ o'd CAl_'< 1 S, CCllJt" (f<>IC>ol,:

0P0"0"D C;,V'"'"'O >1(• PI·' ·C.A"PS FGI! CII"NII"< ;-.,,IC"'e 0''-11'

PP"PGOFO Co\ '-''•'l?f_ll TN<>.ONCO STO!P rrr C.'.' )

Y I>DIOES A Slfi·OLE P'-'IEL 0F 'H-: "-1~\UOk _10

'"G'"OSD "-'"-''·'"'"" Cr>!NLN'( MGO P•P.II-Ll' "':"C"EC °CR Ol>F.T' P'C'/!DE STANDAPD WRE TIES TC· F~,.,_- ~ C C• 0 ; T-< OO•JOLE ""OT'3 ·ON BCT"Oii S,O, QF ,-,,,~f. -,U_ "CCICC,-ION f>S Ce[.--

3 1/C", 3 r/'( f',, r.,_y POOT WCDEO TG Or°C "''''' :•v~l<"o'l •Jf ,;.

~ .. , o·, .. ,,. 'l"OE'_ ,,,-;, GA•-'1 (TYPUC "' 4<

; j'" < 1/Z' O'i Co\l'" PC·ST <ICLOSO fO IT'-"' S"-a' T<; PC>T :-<!'VAL OF 4)

CAO~IC- 9 C'- CORE WIRO SIZE 1" GLASO '-

I r'c m ~ Yll "-IJ~ 11 c~ G'~•' IZ"D S--ssL N< 'd. \ Sltr~ WR'F T _"""AT OQSTO ''"0 "'"-' ,. Y' 2" ''-"'"-' tN~J. nOO Rr<C:S ON ENSJN Wlo" AT 2-" Nril'A~

I CN'ON ,_,R[ 7 0,. CAL'A"IZEO S"E L

ST'C 01-" A''l.l •o3 GRAJJE 'I GP. ?ST" '-""0 ""~

-·---- -----· ---

\

CHAINLINK LID PLAN

I ------'

"''11111

11'111 '1

1

11 .. ,11 ;1,1

1),.•

== .. ==

·~· ~~at&t ~MOBILITY I

I!.JI I'<AOE S!PtF:T, .l E:~SI 'OJ~ :5081. S•N DIC:>~. C··, 9'1'21-42~·2

==~-ee:;,=,,, ==I

"· ZON NO

"" ==··==I·

CADMAN PARK

SD0458 4330 ~iOP.;\GA AVE.

SAN Oli:G0. C.\ 92;17

I ====;';'=",;'c~~~-o :';'~';"~';'===~\ ~: c

; 1,'10/'' 11/l'f:O '1!15/'0 0>/15/'1 Ol/~f/ I D4112/"1 ·0~/05/IJ

·1•/'i'/10 06/0-!/U 08/30!13 10/IC/IJ 12/00j13 CS/10/i' 05/"/"

DR0'/11~::; CATES OC.' :; 'P.I•<~ (ioo)

""'" l:J •Job) ""'- "'-'S(D W (co,: CITY c'""'"" i'"ol 0('<100 F•NA- zo (d!

RE'm£: "'"'- lD (ooo) , •. ,,,., '' I' ('•: "'<IZ£G ZD f5 QoO)

'"'"''' " ~' (d) .C'112ED lD f7 (d) <C'!IS(O 10 j> (ell

'"'"" zo "' (ol) <C,Vtoeu tJ I" Uc> ?.E>ISED ZO #11 l<C"t)

== TRELLIS

& CHAINLINK LID PLAN

··==

"==

A-2 .. 1 J

Page 31: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

~~S-'"C 'IE:RI:ON M~EL£SS IEC,GOM·AUWt,:r-,'1;---· o-;c"~"r ''nOE ·\ C''S71NG CON·'R'r• 8LL'CK '/11'.(1 O·tccasu.c l'nT-< so_·cco """" ANC -A- 'liO<\" t~cu_is "" A CONCPCCE 0'-0_ ;,OWN DAS-iCD 00. CLARITY

~ROPCSOC ,r;,T ~08'LITY TF.,CVJUYUNICAPON•; EQUIOMCNT I~SICO """' ~~NC0,,-, >"-!lO< E"C''-'lSURC ~17'< SY·O•OTO '>J'_•CCJ ~"'""<A "000 TRt:LU>

''"'"" os~o· ·IIG> -­T.0EO '0 'lCMI<N

, ____ . ---''''c-'' -------------->;'-

EAST ELEVATION """"--"-"'l'"·1"-<l"

?PJPU"_I) AIW "06'LJT1' ~'IO,NWS & ,~.'" Ufi'TS PIPE "OUNCO ToO "'-c>' """' t.>O"OP.NC

'' '

,, '

I' '

NORTH ELEVATION

1, ___ ·--·---- -------------- ,_ __ ,

PROPOSED & EXIST1NG LANDSCAPE IN FOAEGROOM:I NOT SHOWN i'OH C!

-~- ~~::;~Go 'mi·'e.~.~~~~>sJ,;;~:;;·,~~ YC\'-u"'"' ro~F.R (3CYGOD)

··-----·-.. ----···-------

UhfiHC ,L~IZCN 'ICPELOS> A""""' "0U'-0J -t<SIC' "ISTVC .10-c( 'II•Ci' tnl•_,f_'•l TCJ\''C"

C<lc,I,'O 1-\'0E'LE ,.,-,.""-' t,C_N'O.:J INS,O< R·OO"'OI• Cl."OL_A

i

X!S'I"G JO"" .',<J loN[)C',,'S ( "PIC-'l}

li OJ

I I

"'"""" coc 'Gh 8LILOI'IG

>'COPC"D ATF "OSilnY '""'"'"' & "'" 0'1'' P:f'f: ~OUOTCD TO JO' C" <.~H MG>·C·O:NC

-·--·----- ' --~

m '- '" " -, '"' .o~ ""'" '· '" ., "'"'" '" FOO' J•C, ·' '"'

==.,==

7037 TR,OC STFC[T, 3 E>ST .>.OOY ,.Jg+ \',\N 1)'0Gl), CA "21:'1--EUL

==,==1

·-·'-

'""I"" "'"

OAr£

==,==

CADMAN PARK

SD0458 433oJ MCRAGA AVE_

5~N DIEGO, 8'. 9Zif7

SMj JIEGO WJNTY

==~"~=

1 1/f'/10

1'/"i'" 12/1~.;,

01,'15/'' 00/"/ I 01/12/;1 ,_, ,,, ''""'"' 'JO/D<-/ iJ C·S/30,"13 10ji0/U

12/0,/13 c<,t"!'+

"'".'''

O•:>i zo RE'"EI"-" Gob) >".NA. " U<>l F'O'!c. R~'ISEO ZO -:"9! CITY CC·""~"'' (·os,

""'''" """ zo (") RC'.leEO """ ZD (co')

"'""" to .14 (ol) ''""" ;::::) f15 (loLl RC'/ISto 10 ff<> (or) R£·!1>EO ZCJ #7 (~)

REiiSEo W '" (r} RE/IOEG '" 19 (o•) f'EiiSOC 'D ~" jj) R£¥1<00 "' ~< (k·••:

==" S~EEr Tl LE

EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS

==,==

A-,3 I l __ _ _)

Page 32: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

I l

o6ll1 N" ~1

0-~~: , 2 ,

:: ~

" "' '" ,,

-~ ,, ~ ~ ~ ~~ II I; 1,1 , II ; 0: ~

' w -­" ,,

1 f_:;,~i~:i~~2~:-~ - '-" ~''"'~~m···

" R i=l-<"

853 Fll

c ;; if

~ ;mnmn" " 0

<

'" "' " Oc) :::; ,., -"' ~ 0 , 0' , , ,

ill ;:\ 0 (I)

0" w

, e :l

...._,. "' "'~ '': : - z o ~~ :, 1 :: ;, 4:

,..-.r::;..., •·C:',' ,, ' ', I'"'. ~..., .,_ •• "' 0 ' , ..,.

- ~ (»]J: !~ > : r i ! L! I" ~ ., II gm:mmm" ~~t~ . fY :;"· ~ ~ ~ -~ I~ ~~ ;; ', "":- -:;- "

~ I

"

~ :i'

' ·~ io ~"

' ~ ~ ~~-'c

' ~ ~ ,---

I,

!;.' 5

/ ",,,

I .L~

'Ji';

! r

,,, 6 ,, ~~ ':),

~~ ~

t> ~a! u! t~

i~ 'ill' c~

,

' ' ~~-

o;" ~g , lJ5 • ~

t- j Er, , ~:;'

U@ ·~, , ,

~~ i ~g

/[ \, Hl'll

I ~ -~ 1~

~;' ~

' '

f ~ " ;

~ "-, ~~ LH:

, -~·0,\,

9~~~ ~~[;~ our"' ~§·~~ ~"S" c••('ij:~

~~~~ ~~iJ!i;!

~~~~ \10:"'< li~-::1, (.j;;;"o;,

,, l,l,j ~ , I

J~d\l , , i'-- .o~-.;,. ., --.c · __ ,

~1 'V

~ c ,

~ ' ~

c

~"

~~·; ;,;"'" ;,:,,< sw .. ~~~ ,,, ~,Q

3:Z:t! ~1!~ ,,,

"'""' o~[; l:j~~ ;?'~ ~i]r0 ,,,

z 0 -~ LU _J LU

:r: 1-::Jl

~~

~ ~ ,~ ~-t.;;... ~~

-~

h

' ' ~-., .. ;;; ~g

~~ !i~ 1/ ~~ ,' ~~ ' c' /, ~G o> ~~ ~ "' :tlf g~

;<.---- ---..< .,o -.n<

~ 5

~~ f--:oci'

,, f;jt;

I

__L !j!

~~~ Cl62 "'"'~ :i:a!~ "'"~ §~ .. ;;!¥o; ,, tot:~ 0 ,, ., ~-~§ fo "'·' '"= >--<•;:;;

~i~':j ~~;:

~~~ ~~~-"z.o o>, ~~:J §§~ '-'' "'

~, <1,(' "' (''V ,y-' r:,,) "'l.f' '•J p

-" '1, ~·-1 ,,, l < '/ '~<.J'.(·- 7 )~.. , __ -,, '

( YJ -~j ~,J:-\v i i\ 'd 'l

'·}It \, " \ ~l 'c/ \ .'"l 1'•'

j· ('l,r·!,J..~6,; ,'"'"f ' "(:'.<

{·" f) ,, ) r "" ' ~-"'1.~-<

·~"'- '\ , '--;z /• •i 'i]

--\)1 [J,\ c, ~·' '

,,_, \

,_-.j

'"'·,/1-~) ,+' '-.) l. ~-~{ '<,j

i"O ,;:,_; "" [;]" ;-j~

~5 zw::; ~-[<~ ~~'< o8·-· ~"'"' i,i;;:_.: ijg!i)

h " ~~ -~"' c.~

g:;}-<; rz5 """ ,;;n

~ ' ,, ~~ ~~ I

'"'"'~ -::j

.. ,

G

~ C' , ~

1

Att<Jchment 9

w

~ ,,, '" "' 0

" w

8

,1

~

~ " ~ 31

'I ,,

~~

•• ~~

'" ~;I 8w~

~0; ~~~

!C) -~4

" cou_, \Sa """ $

i~~1 ;j)';~~" l!!co::Jt Yri&~~

~;~~

~ ~~ II!! O.c

§ " ! X'

i3 "::I

~2 3t'.

z 0

~ LU _J LU

!/), Wi 3:l

~ /

1

~ il

" " i-\ ~

i

= " ~"' :~ 1!1'" "'~' sa'l ~' !i: ~:,;;

""' ~~

~~·

II

:~ '<t'

I rtt:j"' ~

-'~-) ----... -~ -----~

!

Page 33: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

l

,,, I

(1!

"

:'IELD VERifY 'J..C ~OEH & "'I:L2 lE"T]-,; PRI~P TC ORCORI"G G.'BLE

<. ""KI"Y RCUO t-"0 LEr.GTI< QF RBE-" & '">JJL£ PRIOR 'C Cl•T"WC ADJCST I'OICATEO RGUf>o AS HEQUI"l£; ro Cl£\R '.<:O'Y,NG CBOiPCCI'GNO ANO MiJ>rTAJN RC.Ol,IOEJ G-~·ilj.,,CE if O<ISTior, EO'" PM£".

f':RI'Y "GOEL NU~OCH OF '"-!_ MTc:"'w; WlfH AT&t ~CE!lUN. 5':: Di:TAol n 'IV

ANTC,N>S [RICSSQN AJR-21 (' roo•: 78" L•.lNG ' 4 0 ' "'ICC , ~ o" CC[P, '-"Gclf " 1 c• C .SO

o· oc~"LT-- ----(5·0'1''' """'"'"''

,,·-a·,"'"'"" 3P'-'" --. GlT.INE Gf ""'GPINO ' AT .J'"ST BR.',GH

SECTOR •c

"''"''"''" ""

ANTENNA PLAN """'--"'"'"-f"-Q"

--------.,·---,~----,.- ______ ,, . ·-

(/i ' '

',. ,. ___ ,_<Aor;·,,,,,--,~--,T 1GP OF ,,,HI'C'S ~

/

24' ""-""'''' ,-__ reP nc oocc

pRG>OS£0 A[JoT M081l1TY -­AN-F>'"'> & PP"' l'N1CS ~0U'lE0 TO JC'-'' "ONOPit'£ SOE AWF.,,\A P:.'N 0'1 T>IO S~ld

~Qt10PIN0 """' --. 0'""'V J.J ,P.Ao'CHB Pfe F•_Xll (~l"·"l" >Oi

C 0,GPOSE: :o) ,. Fvs-­CCNDUIT '·OR AHT "08ru;Y

""" ce--"-

t -- _!_ ___ /-

----""''''"'"' """"'"''"''---

,---OH"C- GAACC

TOP 0~ 'OODN_G

MONOPINE- ELEVATION

,_ _______________ , --------------·--

~~

~-·

'""' _,, ' " '"' ' ' " -. ),

-

ll'_l'l'll.lll''lllllll'lll', 1 ••• 111.,1

··==

-~" E::i at&t ~MOBILITY

7l.l7 rR>OE SlilEET, EAST, '001< lf1" 'iAN Dt~GO, U 90'121-4iQ2

=~,==

'-' om

-I '"''I"'

- -------

"'

=~,==

CADMAN PARK

°F.0JE~T NUMaER

SD0458 433C II'ORA~~ AY<

SAN OIE·JO, C~ 92117

SAN D:ESC COUNH

=~"

11/15/" 11/'-'1''' 12/'0 ,,,

'''/"/f1 03,'21/11 e</11/11 01,05/" "/"/" 00/C·L/" no/»1/13 ro/''/" " ""'I" 05/20/1 •I ce/22, 1;

gox " R(VIlW ['obJ ~'>L ZO (ioo) ''"'L PCVIS<O lC :•c'! c,-. coY"'"" c~,; RC'•ISiCO '''"' 20 (oi) DISCO FI"L lO (ooo)

"'''"" ZO !< (ol) 'CV";>O '-J t1< (Jab\

'"''"'" 2J 16 (ol) '"15EO lO F (cl REV'"" lO 18 (c)·~ REV'OEO lO #' (')

"''''" zo 110 Uc<) "''''" lO ,>1 r (kmt;•

==" S'·ICl' IIILC

MONOPINE ELEVATION &

P..NTENNA PLAN I

~~:==='"·=·=·""':.: ... : .. ==I ~~ I A-5

l~-------

Page 34: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

BACK VIEW

NO DF.TAIL Ttl IS SP.'CE

NO DETAIL THIS 5PACE

l<CDETAIL hiS Si'AGe

~,'l'+' ' ' PLAN VIEW

',,.,· --.~ r-. I

_..t=:._:· -,

FRON"H10W

RRUS-11

71o ,.._ ! ·-·-· I I i

I ' I (. I .

--·---::::-~

SIDE VIEW

NO DEfAK THIS SPACE

NO OET~JL TKIS SPACE

NO OET~IL T~IS SPACE

' ,. ~r

~~ r11

,, II ~I j___c:~

TOF Vi'CN

··~GHT· ;,-,, LOS

""''"' -P"C" CXIST''~

/ -""'"'"" 'N·KI''" ~(j MATCH LVI "G Ao.AC,NT oueFKE_ •"-EN "'""'"'" ' 0·' PC \CC

. ''''"'·IN·O fA.'£

'·-~ :2 , "· """'"'uc;r, ;_;lfJfc.o"'""C B.<R

NO DETAJL THIS SPACE

HOOETAJL Tl-'LS SPACE

S!"

·i- -~

":"'>. ~~· 0 ;;j '.'>¢.;.;;:i-'

WEJG.<T. 30,c L%

OiODETNL THISSl'ACE

/o!ODETAil ThiS SPACE

-',---·

I

''<0PCSO:­f"'LX f"•'J"C-': SOC>" C(o'.[p

>.<0C"0 All

"' "''"" PRO,Sfn ,...____; G'LV~<,[J

o•c:. "'""

PP.OPOSOD "'"OPINC

"'" '"'"'

?RC?0SZC

' I •

'~~~~c~~~" f I"

-""""'"' OP.>eU

]"i """s·'' ''" so:roFI

4<:'

" .. p;o~J£ (J1 IC''' 10"

'"'"'"'"-"'

19"-fl"

-".)"Gi (2, 9"' l<" / "/oNC<CUS

_, "" "" '"""' c '"""' 00 " '0'

''llllljl''''''lllli .. lllll!j! ''111,,,11 .· .

~ Sat&t ~MOBILITY

==··== AP 01i0''Ac0

"'"

SD0458 433G MORA·J- AVF.,

~AN DIE•3rl, CA 9~ff .'

SAN DIEGO GCU:Hv ==o .. ~=~~ 11/15, ,o "/C'/1G ''/"/" o</15/"1

•"/21/1 I 0'/'Z' 11 C·+/00/13 U</19/1-' "/0•/<3 ·0>/,0/" 1•]/10,-'1]

12/00/" 05/ZO,"< "/'2/' 4

DPW:NG D~ES

'"" '" '""'·'' ""') PINAc 7.0 Joo) FIN<L A£'/ISCD ZD !coo) O:fl' COli"'"'" ("'0) "C!I<'D '"'"'C ?0 {ol,

ec;rsD ''"" lO (cop, ;~, "0 ZD !'< ~dl RE\'!eEO D -f'S (iob)

'"'""' , ,, (cl} CEVISCD lO ;l;l (') ,CVISCJ zo '" (-1)~• RCV'"O ZD fO (ol)

"''"" zo li''J [d) ,,-.11 "'' ;1 J/1 I ko}

··== OYOOT TJ[_E

MONOTREE DET/\lLS

==,==j

==··==~

A-6 j

Page 35: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

[-----·-~~--~~----~~

-~--

- -----PLANTING NOTES

".~ 3'"- (e)&­

"=· (Jl "' '"'~ >LANro' LVA'lG-" Wl'h G~aCNCJ Cuv<:e

- ! -..., I I I

CX.""N~ SI<IOLE 'ITOR'r CI<''RCH

FACII.I'f

I L--~

~~~pSCAPE DEVELOPMENT PLAN

,,o-,-C· ""'''''·"- ,.. '"-L' , c

0

' ·.'!

,, ,, ' ,, '

1 .--ox"-'~" -,~CAR"""" '''" j_/ J">' -0-•J' TALL "Q RfWJN

,, ,, ' 1 '

/-EX,OT·O:; PU~"LE HOPSFCI: llLJSH ';~RU8 'l'' 7'-Q" Th.!_ TC 'f'k"N

- PROP0SEO CQNC.H:c> f-'r"i ST,_,O,oi<O {1"°C>~ 0F 3;·

WATER CONSERVATION NOTES '

) ----·-------

'""'' ._,' ' ' ""

''ill'l!ll',ji"Jjjl!' 1.,'11·1·1' i]l) :1.1-1

=='"==

.,;;_;, ~at&t ~-~ MOBil..ITY

73.l7 -PAC•C: SrFiEU, l 0\Si, WJ·~·I ':•i~L SMI C'iECG. ~A 92121-;z·-·2

==,==

ZONI"G

~--

l===h==

CADMAN PARK

1' /10; ,_ I "3/10

12/15/'0 02/15/11 .,, 21 /f1 0</ll/" 04/':5113 04/19/'-' 00/04/.3 •38/l•.•/15 10/IG/1> :U.o;u

""" -,_ "'/"/-<

''" tr. "'''FW ';oo) ""' ZO Uob)

""" ""'''"'0 :o (,-,,; c•;r co""""~' (-a,)

-""'"" "·""' w H RE<:SCO '"·'L ZC· (oop)

"'""Ll n ,, ,-,· RC'."IS'C ZD i'S "'": RC·!ISCC ZO ~o (ol) <E<'ISED IC #7 (•') Of',IO(D ZD f'l (")CO

"''' 0'0 ZJ "' (oo)<> ,.,,-," i/10 "''

"'''"" ZO #11 ("m·J

=="

LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT PLAN

"

"''"""' "kr,' .,,

..

I L," i

)> ~

I ~

" " ~ 3

I " " I " ' "' ' I ' ! "

Page 36: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

I ·:O"'•I<TAU CHIJO:H (~,;.::;F~CS :<' CH~I:') PPOI~C 00..1'-WE.>r R[GION

I

ASSO:,sJP,'·; PA'l."~~l N~MDER(5) JOO-"CI-00-'0

I 8<~·s OF 8·-ARI'iC~ (N,\0 8.1. Ee•>cC 20C2;

' 'C'E~ 8EA~"'"s S~-1\'lt; ><CREON '"~ E?CLl' c~ :>CUC NC:lili AS I · ~~,~~"Kffi BY G.C.S C.:S.!O'RVATlOIIS, USING "'""BU: 5'G':/50G~

~~ 1

~:cs~~~~; ~~:v::,_::~ "·:::,::":'"'c' uc s~ '"'A~ 1,

I

IOI.EVATIDN> AR~ S,,S£0 ·J~ WE ~11'1 ·JF Sl<." ~ILGO'S BO"C"MA'iK

AVCNUC """ KA~LOQP A'JENU[ EIO~TIO\i ~EN() 3La <J' I

flO 1J+51 LOCA'EC IN Tt-.E IHOOP o= T"[ "TERS<:C%N (>f "C•PAG' I

II I

II-SITE-DATA-- ______ J ~-~ E-'~~c~-,~QG~;F-g~src~;le~'i'~~o~~t:'cc~);~~;',',~~c:;, ~~rcg·~·,.:;-1

ronel, 1604F Co,'lrouoi:,- ·Pur~' '''"''' r;tc•73C I TOo ,r.icod ZcM ~eSi).OQbor .'cr tOis g,'e '" zeN"-~ ,

I I 'I

1.

I

f---- ----------- -- --j ' FE!J,\ FLOOD ZONE INfOR1lATION .

r-:L[ RE,<lr.l N():\:Sc-- -- -- ---- -- -- ---

'HE FG-.LC\\,~G EASE~~"TS CFFO~- 'OAJD PMCOl AND iRl SI-O~N HEREO~ S2E PROciWifJARY TITLO RtPOO~ N0-'21700'J< foR>7'RE:: BY LMfYERS DfCJ;; COMPANY A!JQ DA"CCO SEPT[MB~P. 8, 2C'U FCi'. GlH•~ JOCIJMC.'~;s (NON~EASeMaiTs) <FEC'INC SAl~ PROPERTY. -

!r;'~ ~2- An •o•<n-,ont for'-" pucpo,0s shown he·<>w ,cd ,;gt-t• ,o.,d..,,al u-.orel~ co oho., '-' "" alfec.,O foe ""oko~i"" or '"' <<OO"o•d moo snown bofcw llopoM 00 No, ~r~s F;OO•moot P"'PO'-'" ._,,.'"""' 'n oco"·"f (A.S SHOWN C.EJ'.E:Jii) -

!'IE:' #+ - Ao oa•emed foe ho pc·rpooo sOown bea. ocd "~''-' ,no•Ocntol ''""" O$ '"' f0rth in o doc,moct ~mnte; tao Son Diogo Go; & <lo~l"o Co-npq0 , Punoa•<" '"'"· w;,, -R=..--;oJ- Apco 1<. '"'" m Be<>k 5605. ~m;• 183 of Df"o'al Rcoo,C; (AS SHO~~ "'8lECN)

:':"D OF E>SEME~IS

[=TiT ill K~PQRT NOTES ---- _j

I LOT: ,3~7. 3+48, ,,NO 3L4' QC CL"-i'lE>lO', UNIT OC· ~~- IN ''li'C 'OI< lf 5~N c1~_90, CCU~IY OF SAN CIE·O~. STA'"l; OF GAUF'C•?N·\. ACOOR)ING TQ M,P_ T-i~RoQF NO. 31 15, FILED IN -:li~ O"ACE OF D·E CQl;t< If 'lEC'JHOER

' OF ~'-" )ILGQ CCUN"I. OCTOXR n. lOS•

JAV t!<'GG 'J';~>EO 9•WJ"I Ol,l'_'.[CT

.'oi'>t 1.> J- C?•]- 02-0•)

,'II

'!I ?RoP!::RTY c.EC-:i~ DFSCRIP'iToN' - ---' ---

____J_I__

!

_ ___ L __

==---_----==

" ,., •. _,, ' ''"\ __ -----, ---,

' ' ' I I I

Q\iERAU. SITJ\ p;,._\N

; I I I I

' ' '

' '

-·-

VJC!NlTY MAP

'I

I I I I I I

' I I

' I I I I

1. • • I

I~ I .~

I

I

I

I

" •

"' ~c ~ cc ce MVA

" RT~O

" '" T'P on-2 ;meo

"

---

2-F.CTRC Bot

FC:'KE

i"TRE HfJR~'lT

F'JUND MOW\<E>l

GAS ~lliR

GAS y~-~_•,(

NLE"

IRRI<>ATIGN '{'i.'iE

L!GIIT 8UinNG

l,s'"'~ I 1'o3(]' I

-··-··-~---

,~, u<:f.E:l\'!:'

• •

i'~'IC~ OF C"<B ::u::CTRrCA:. e,BIOET £0GF. Of' eAY,VEioT CLG'N"t.l CIP8 &-CUTE"< "GH" PGcO T~P •I,IC '1<UL'C G~JUr<C OLG'i'TJ" ';Oc•· mr· 0'D£hN< T~P 0" CU.':" T;!OE TCO Dl'CIC•"CJO ~<" CQP ?"'--" ICE"' T:lP COO FCRCL'S ,,AlL TC'

'a-ca, soor El'-''·'-nO.'•

13·

PREPAKE~ FOR

·~· ~ -j at&t ~ M081LITY

oqL5 ~US.>; 8GUL£V'.R[I SAN 0)(00. ~A n121

Page 37: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

. ----

-

SITF ,_:;t:f\IE,:;;· '"·~

IlL"

s IF'·LV II·Jf:-1];::',-:_. 'A l

Page 38: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

.:~

~ at&t

500458 Cadman Park 4330 Moraga Ave. San Diego, CA 92117

Page 39: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

L i l

.::z.;,.~

~ at&t

500458 cadman Park 4330 Moraga Ave. San Diego, CA 92117

r----------Existing Verlzon equipment enclosure

,..-----Proposetd equipment enclosure matching Verizon enclosure

,..---Proposed walkway and guard rail

Photosimulation of proposed telecommunications site

Page 40: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

ATTACHMENT 11

P Jeff Barfield-Chair A Fiona These ira -Vice Chair P Delana Hardacre-Secretary P Susan Mournian-Treasurer

ClairemQnt community(>ianning Group

Minutes of the Meeting of February 18,2014

North Clairemont Friendship Center

P Jack Carpenter PRichard Jensen A Keith Hartz P Billy Paul P Debra Howell P Michael Puente P Travis Jaedtke P Mar~ie Schmidt

P- Present A ,Jl,bsent L-Late

Item 1. Call to Order I Roll Call

P Donald Steele A Jacob Welhouse A Scott Wentworth

Meeting was called to order at 6:35 p.m. by Chair Jeff Barfield. Roll call vvas taken and a quorum present

hem 2. Non-Agenda Public Comment Issues that are not on the agenda and are within the jurisdiction of the Clairemont Community Planning Group. NOTE: 3-minutc time limit per speaker.

l'ublic: Carol Kim announced her candidacy rw1ning for SD Council District 6

Committee Members: Billy Paul- We talked about the Coastal rail trail last month. It goes from UTC ai1d will end at Gilman Drive trail. Along Santa Fe Street by the creek it will have its O\Vll bridge w cross the street. It wiJI go under the 1-5 · bridge and connect to Mike Gotch Bridge in Bay Park.

Delana Hardacre- At the February Town Council meeting the police department annotmced that they caught tV.'O suspects in Bay Park that they beJieve broke into numerous cars on February 3m and 4tl'. They wanted to encourage the community if you or anyone you know had your car broken into and propetty stolen, please call the police department as they have numerous stolen items that needed to be identified.

Susan Moumian- ATT wants to erect a 54' monopine tree at Tecolote Park. That will go to Linda Vista CPC to be voted on.

Item 3. Modifications to the Agenda- Requires 2/3 approval.

None

Item 4. ApproYal of Minutes

Motion to approve minutes for January 21,2014, by Jack Carpenter, second by Margie Schmidt.

Vote: 8-0-3 Approved

Item 5. Council Representative Reports

District 2 Council Report (Ian Clampctt, Community Liaison. iclampett(?lsandiego.gov)

The tentative date for swearing in of Kevin Faulconer will be March 3'd. There will be about a 2 week application process for an appointee to take care of vacant district (6 week process). There wlll no special

Clairemont Community Planning Group Meeting Minutes Febru:.ny18, 201-1-

Page 1

Page 41: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

ATTACHMENT 11

dection to fill Kevin's spot. Until appointee filled, and if you live in Kevin's area and don't know who to contact, you can continue io contact Jan until things have settled dmvn.

Ian will be going to wort< for Kevin. A question was asked if Kevin would keep open office hours- Jan not sure. He \\ill relay that to mayor elect.

Don STeele commented that he has been very pleased \.vith Ian's prepamtion and responses to things during his support to the District

District 6 Council Report (Ernie Navarro and Shirley Owen, Com1mmity Liaison, [email protected])

Emie Navarro- a rail study is being done along the Morena corridor. Will start to look at Clairemont and Balboa corridor for trolley. FYI- Local environment recycle will take place in the Mount streets next Tuesday, February 25th. Jfyou want more information on where and when, email Ernie.

Shirley Owen- There is a major cleanup for Clairemont scheduled for Saturday, JU11e 14th at Madison HS.

Item 6. Information Items

None

ltem 7. Workshop Items

None

Item 8. Potential Action Items

301. AT&T Cadman Park- Clairemont Christian Church Telecommunication Facility, (Shelley Kilbourne) Possible reconsideration of previous recommendation to approve.

Jeff Barfield- Explained Simon Tfu called and said they jumped the gun and came to us for approval before notices were sent out to the neighbors. He asked if we would reconsider.

Don Steele made motion to reconsider if notices and processes were not followed, seconded by Billy Paul.

Vote: 11-0~0 Approved

Shelley Kilbomnc said the proposal is to add a 30' monopine tree with 12 antennas and an equipment enclosure (similar to vvhat Verizon already has on property). They tried to upgrade property with landscaping, parking lot improvements and light standards along the southern property line. Will be adding 54 shrubs, 15 trees and ground cover in the parking lot. They suggested Purple Orchid tree; the Committee suggested Evergreen Pear.

Q. Richard Jensen- Are there any changes since November meeting? A. Shelley Kilbourne- None

Q. Billy Paul -Does the homeowner want chain link fence or do they want something else? A. Shelley K. -Have not heard anyihing to date.

Q. Debra Hovvell-ln your 2"d view, what have you done so the homeowner doesn't have to look at the building? A. Shelley K.- They arc putting in shrubs. It will look the same as the back ofthc Verizon building.

Cloiremont Community Planning Group Meeting Minutes February 18,2014

Page 2

Page 42: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

~

ATTACHMENT 11

Q, Billy Paul -What is the noise level? A. Shelley K.- They have had a study done and <Jre in compliance.

Q. Susan Mourn ian- Is there any way they don't have look like white trailers? Can you paint them another color? A. Shelley K.- They are vvorking to match the.color scheme with the church.

Q. Steve Innis·- Will they be replacing lighting in the parking lot? Have you done a study to see how it >vould affect the neighbors? A. Shelley K.- Yes, it will shine down directly on the parking lot and they \villlook nicer than the C!lrrent ones.

Michim Lindsey (represents homeowner, .Michael Stephana, directly next to the church) -lvlr. Stephana did some research and fotmd devaluation of homeowner property, and he also has a radiation concern. They measured the radiation from fljs properly line which is several hundred feet different and doesn't feel their readings were accurate. He is also concerned about placement of lights that are directly next to his property. He mentioned he did not get the public notice in 2009 in time to properly comment when some of the previous things \Vere done. Has concern of children drinking/smoking in the area, particularly behind the buildings.

Shelley K. responded to Mr. Stephana's concerns. The RF study was updated and took into consideration the new stmcture. Numbers in the study are correct. The light placement is not changing from the one that currently exists there now. The public notice in 2009 project was closed in 2010 and reopened in 2013. Kids smoking and drinking on church property- he might want to talk to the church about that concern. Reduction of property value- there are studies that actually go both ways. People buy next to cell phone towers to get good reception.

Maureen Smith (next door neighbor to Michael Stephana)- There is already a homeless issue behind the buildings- concemed it will get worse.

Shelley K -They wi.\1 work with the church to see if they can come up with a solution. -J.hey could possibly put a fence between the two enclosures to help with people getting in between.

Albert Bain- Church spokesperson commented he hadn't noticed any increase in homeless people being there. In fact, he felt it had gotten better.

Motion by Don Steele to approve the project as proposed, seconded by Billy Paul.

Amendment to the Motion made by Susan Moumian -In addition to approving pn~ject as proposed, a 6 foot solid fence should be added (just where there is no solid fence now) between property owners Stephana, Smith and Hobbs and church property and caging the area with a lock between the buildings.

Vote: 10-1-0 - Approved.

302. Revisions to Council Policy 600~24, CPC Recommendation (Jeff Barfield, Chair)

Jeff Barfield- The City Planning Committee (CPC) approved a draft revision to the Council policy (how \Ve operate and function and enforce the Brown Act). The CPC approved and sent to the City. The City made changes and is going back to the CPC in March. They wanl recommendations yes or no on the revisions from all the planning groups.

CID.,iremont Community Planning Group Meeting Minutes feGruary 18, 2014

Page 3

Page 43: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

ATTACHMENT 11

Jeff mailed out a copy of the revision to the CCPC to review for this meeting. Since it was such a lengthy document and we all hadn't had a chance to revie\v, Je.tf suggested we read and send him an emai I with any comments.

Motion by Don Steele to continue this discussion at our next meeting in March, seconded by Richard Jensen.

Vote: 11-0-0 Approved

Item 9. Reports to Groun Airports (Keith Hartz)

None -No meeting

BACAC (Billy Paul)

None

Chair (Jeff Barfield)

CCPC elections \Vill be in March. Up for election are even numbers years. There are 9 on even years and 5 odd years. We also need committee members to man the elections.

CPC Report (Jeff Barfield)

At the last meeting the staff issued a Climate Action Plan (draft) which did not get voted on. Staff is trying to figure out how to reduce green house gas.

Jeff Barfield feels he will be confinned on the Parking board.

Development Services Department (Brian Schocnfisch)

None

Parking (Susan Moumian)

None

Project Review (Jack Carpenter)

None

Secretary (De lana Hardacre)

None

Town Council (Delana Hardacre)

Mentioned car break-ins dming Non-Agenda Public Comments

Traffic & Transportation (Billy Paul)

None

Clairemont Community Planning Group Meeting Minutes February 18,2014

Page 44: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

ATTACHMENT 11

Treasurer (Susan Moumian)

$272.00 Balance

Vice Chair (Fiona Thescira)

None

Vision Task Force (Jack Carpenter)

Concerns: Vehicle noise, understand there is an updated City Bike plan (would like to see the one for Clairemont). Traffic control- all we do is band-aide. We should demand that this be addressed. The trolley stop at Balboa- There is no parking on the East side of tracks. No plan for pedestrian bridge right now.

Jeff Barfield will contact both .MB and PB about tills issue to have combined workshop to address these deficiencies.

Additional Items:

Adjournment at 8:33PM

Cbiremont Community Planning Group Meeting Minutes February 18, 2014

Page 5

Page 45: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

ATTACHMENT 12

City of San D iego Development Services 1222 F irst Ave., MS-302 San Diego, CA 92101

THa C <N ~ S... Oo<oo (619) 446-5000

Ownership Disclosure Statement

Approval Type: Check appropriate box for type of approval (s) requested· IX Neighborhood Use Permit r Coastal Development Permit

r Neighborhood Development Permit r Site Development Permit r Planned Development Perm1t r Condilional Use Permit r Variance I Tentative Map I Vesting Tentative Map I Map Waiver j Land Use Plan Amendment • I Other

Project Title Project No. For City Use Only

SD0458 Cadman Park

Project Address:

4330 Moraga Avenue

Part I - To be complete d when property is held by lnd ividual(s)

Ell£ ~i~aiog lb!: Ql);oc~biR Oi=~lc=~!e Slah:ro~:al lbc !l:o:ac£!=l a~~oQ:D:I~:sJge lbal ao aRRii~ll li!la [Q[ a Pe!roit CJIIP.Jlt.Q.Ibcc ro11t1ec 11:1 idcotifiad abc~e: ~ill be filed wilb tbe CiiJ! Q( San QiegQ co tbe :;ubie~l pcOR!:Hjl£ l'tilb !be iDI!lcl lo C£lcocd ao eocurobcao~e agaiosttbe pcoped)l. Please list below lhe owner(s) and tenanl(s) (if applicable) of the above referenced property. The list must include the names and addresses of all persons who have an interest in the property. recorded or otherwise, and state the type of property interest (e.g., tenants who will benefit from the permit, all individuals who own the property). 8 :;igoatuce is caauices:l cf al teas! QOe Q[ lhe P!llPec!~ a~oecs. Attach additional pages if needed. A signature from the Assistant Executive Director of the San Diego Redevelopment Agency shalt be required for all project parcels for which a Disposition and 0AvAinpmAnt AgmAmP.nl (f)OA) hilt< hP.P.n :'lp[JrnvA<l I P."XP.r.uiP.rl hy thP. r.ily Cnunr.il NntP.· ThP. ;,pplir,;,nt is rP.t<pnnsihiP. fnr nntifying thA ProjP.r.l Manager of any changes in ownership during the time the application is being processed or considered. Changes in ownership are to be given to the Project Manager at least thirty days prior to any public hearing on the subject property. Failure to provide accurate and current ownership information could result in a delay in the hearing process_

Additional pages attached 1 Y es 1 No

!\lame ollnalvtoual (type or pnnt): !\lame ollnalvtoua l1type or pnnt):

I owner r TenanVLessee l Redevelopment Agency r Owner I TenonVLcscee j Redevelopment Agency

~tree! Address: Street Address:

City/State/Zip: C~y/ State1Z1p:

Phone No: Fox No: Phone No: Fax No:

S1gnalure : Date: S1gnature: Dale:

Name of Individual (type or print}: Name of Individual (type or print):

I Owner !Tenantllessee I Redevelopment Agency I Owner I Tenantllessee I Redevelopment Agency

Sheet AtJl11e,;;;, Street Addres$.

City/State/Zip: City/Slate/Zip:

Phone No: Fax No: Phone No: Fax No:

Siynoture . Dolt<. Siyuaturt! : Date:

Printtlu on rtlcycted paper Vis1t our wt:b ;;ite al m~go,goylaeY.elQJlmeJll:.SeJYJ.ces

Upon request. thiS information is ava1lable in alternative formats for persons with disabilities

DS-318 (5·05)

I

Page 46: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

ATTACHMENT 12

Project Ti tle: I Project No. (For City Use Only)

I Part II ·To be completed when property is held by a corporation or partnership

legal Status (p lease check) :

ifcorporation ~limited Liability -or- l General) What State? ___ Corporate Identification No. ______ _

)Partnership

By signing the Ownership Disclosure Statement the owner(s) acknowledge that an application for a permit map or other matter. as identified above will be filed with the City of San Diego on the subject property with the intent to record an encumbrance against Jl:!.e...pmQ.!l11y .. Please list below the names, titles and addresses of all persons who have an interest in the property, recorded or otherwise, and state the type of property interest (e.g., tenants who will benefit from the permit. all corporate officers, and all partners in a partnership who own the property). A signature is reauired o! at least one of the corporate officers or partners who own the p.IQ~. Attach additional pages if needed. Note: The applicant is responsible for notifying the Project Manager of any changes in ownership during the time the application is being processed or considered. Changes in ownership are to be given to the Project Manager at least thirty days prior to any public hearing on the subject property. Failure to provide accurate and current ownership information could result in a delay in the hearing process. Additional pages attached I Yes ) No

Corporate/Partnership Name (type or print): Christian Church Pacific Southwest Region

fV"awner I TenanVlessee

Street Address: 4330 Moraga Avenue

City/State/Zip: San Diego. CA 92117

Phone No:

619-247-5100 Fax No:

Sogn~-~ale:

Corporate/Partnership Name (type or print):

I Owner I Tenantllessee

Street Address:

City/Stale/Zip:

Phone No: Fax No:

Name of Corporate Officer/Partner (type or print):

Tille (type or print):

Signature : Date:

Corporate/Partnership Name (type or print):

I OwnAr I T~>n,.nt/1 P.~~P.P.

Street Address:

Ci ty/State/Zip:

Phone No: Fax No:

Name or Corpooate CltocerrPartner (type or pnnl)·

Tille (type or print):

Signature : Date.

Corporate/Partnership Name (type or print):

r Owner J Tenanl/lessee

Street Address:

City/StatefZip:

Phone No: Fax No:

Nomo of Corporoto Officor/Portnor (typo or print):

Title (type or print):

Signature : Date:

Corporate/Partnership Name (type or print):

r Owner r· Tenani/Lessee

Street Address:

C~y/StatefZip:

Phone No: F<tx Nu.

Name of Corporate Officer/Partner (type or print):

Title (type or print):

Siyn<ttur~ . Date:

Cuq.Jurale/Petrtner::;loip Narne (type ur j)rinl):

tOwner t Tenani/Lessee

Street Address:

City/State/Zip:

Phone No· Fax No:

Name of Corporate Officer/Partner (type or print)

Title. (type or print):

Signature Date:

I

Page 47: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

Date Action

07/0112013 First Submittal

AT&T Cadman Park PROJECT CHRONOLOGY

PTS #347884 fNT #24003908

Description

Project Deemed Complete

Requested redesign with

07/31/2013 First Assessment Letter antenna size reduction

12/24/2013 Second Submittal

Second Assessment Requested redesign with

02/ 11/2014 Letter

antenna size reduction

06/27/2014 Third Submittal

Plan Corrections 08/04/2014 Third Assessment Letter

09/24/20 14 Fourth Submittal

Environmental Determination issued on 12/9/20 14

11 /06/2014 All issues resolved

01 /21/2015 Hearing Officer Hearing

Total Staff Time: Including City Holidays and

Furlough

Total Applicant Time: Including City Holidays and

Furlough

Total Project Running Time: From Deemed Complete to PC

Hearing

ATTACHMENT 13

City Review Applicant R esponse

30 days

147 days

49 days

136 days

39 days

51 days

43 days

76 days

131 days

410 days

541 days

Page 48: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

PLAN co~! Telecommunications Project Management

AT&T Cadman Park/Ciairemont Christian Church Draft Findings

Conditional Use Permit

ATTACHMENT 14

1. The proposed development will not adversely affect the applicable land use plan;

The Clairemont Mesa Community Plan does not specifically address WCF's, but the City's General Plan requires that the visual impact of wireless facilities be minimized by concealing wireless facilities in existing structures or by using screening techniques to hide or blend the facilities into the surrounding area. The plan also calls for these facilities to be designed to be aesthetically pleasing and respectful of the neighborhood context. The plan also states that equipment associated with wireless facilities should be concealed from view. The project proposed to camouflage antennas on a 30 foot tall faux pine tree. The proposed faux tree is located at the rear of the property and surrounded by existing trees on site as well as the addition of fifteen (15) new trees to further integrate the faux tree on the property. The equipment associated with the facility is located on the ground adjacent to the faux tree. Based on the design of this project, the WCF will not adversely affect the applicable land use plans.

2. The proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare;

The Telecommunication Act of 1996 preempts local governments from regulating the "placement, construction and modification of wireless communication facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of Radio Frequency (RF) emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the Federal Communication Commission's (FCC) standards for such emissions." The proposed project would be consistent with the FCC's regulations for wireless facilities.

3. The proposed development will comply to the maximum extent feasible with the regulations of the Land Development Code;

The project complies with the applicable deve lopment regulations of the Land Development Code and the City of San Diego Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) Regulations. This section of the code requires that WCFs be minimally visible through the use of architecture, landscape, and siting solutions. WCFs are

302 State Place Escondido, CA 92029 619-208-4685 mobile 760-735-4913 fax

Page 49: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

AT&T- Cadman Park Page 2

ATTACHMENT 14

permitted as faux landscape, such as the proposed faux pine tree, when existing tress of similar size and species are present or when trees of a similar species that will reach the same size of the faux tree are proposed. Existing trees are present on site and fifteen ( 15) additional trees are being provided as part of the project to help screen and integrate the faux tree. Therefore, this project complies with the applicable regulations ofthe Land Development Code.

4. The proposed use is appropriate at the proposed location

WCFs are permitted in residential zones, with a non-residential use where antennas are less than 1 00 feet from the property line of a day care, elementary school, middle school or residential use with the processing of a Conditional Use Permit, Process 3. Consistent with Council Policy 600-43, WCFs are more preferred on property zoned as a commercial or industrial and less preferred on properties zoned for agricultural, residential and open space uses. However, wireless carriers are required to provide coverage within their license area, which sometimes necessitates locating in a less preferred location. In this case, the WCF has been designed as a faux tree, situated at the rear of the property with existing and proposed trees and other landscape material and will not disrupt the surrounding uses. Therefore, the proposed use is appropriate at the proposed location.

Neighborhood Development Permit

1. The proposed development will not adversely affect the applicable land use plan;

The Clairemont Mesa Community Plan does not specifically address WCF's, but the City's General Plan requires that the visual impact of wireless facilities be minimized by concealing wireless facilities in existing structures or by using screening techniques to hide or blend the facilities into the surrounding area. The plan also calls for these facilities to be designed to be aesthetically pleasing and respectful of the neighborhood context. The plan also states that equipment associated with wireless facilities should be concealed from view. The project proposed to camouflage antennas on a 30 foot tall faux pine tree. The proposed faux tree is located at the rear of the property and surrounded by existing trees on site as well as the addition of fifteen ( 15) new trees to further integrate the faux tree on the property. The equipment associated with the facility is located on the ground adjacent to the faux tree. Based on the design of this project, the WCF will not adversely affect the applicable land use plans.

2. The proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare;

Page 50: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

AT&T - Cadman Park Page 3

ATTACHMENT 14

The Telecommunication Act of 1996 preempts local governments from regulating the "placement, construction and modification of wireless communication facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of Radio Frequency (RF) emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the Federal Communication Commission's (FCC) standards for such emissions." The proposed project would be consistent with the FCC's regulations for wireless facilities.

3. The proposed development will comply to the maximum extent feasible with the regulations of the Land Development Code;

The project complies with the applicable development regulations of the Land Development Code and the City of San Diego Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) Regulations. This section of the code requires that WCFs be minimally visible through the use of architecture, landscape, and siting solutions. WCFs are permitted as faux landscape, such as the proposed faux pine tree, when existing tress of similar size and species are present or when trees of a similar species that will reach the same size of the faux tree are proposed. Existing trees are present on site and fifteen ( 15) additional trees are being provided as part of the project to help screen and integrate the faux tree. Therefore, this project complies with the applicable regulations of the Land Development Code.

Page 51: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

SITE JlJSTIFICATION AT&T

Cadman Park 4330 Moraga Avenue

ATTACHMENT 15

The project proposes to install a wireless communication facility at a church property located at 4330 Moraga Avenue in the Clairemont Mesa Community Plan area. The proposed facility is to install twelve (12) antennas on a 30 foot monopine and an equipment enclosure on the ground adjacent to the existing Verizon Wireless equipment enclosure.

The subject property is zoned RM-1-1 and is developed with a church and two other wireless communication facilities. The property is surrounded by residential development and an elementary school.

SITE DESIGN

The antennas will be mounted on a 30 foot mono pine on the south end of the church building adjacent to the parking lot. The associated equipment will also be located on the ground adjacent to the existing Verizon Wireless equipment enclosure. AT &T's enclosure has been designed to match both Verizon's building as well as the church.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS/SITE JlJSTIFICA TION

The proposed facility will provide increased wireless service coverage and capacity to AT&T customers in the surrounding area. The coverage will include the surrounding residential development area surrounding the project site. Coverage plots have been provided to show the existing and proposed service to the area.

PREFERENCE 2 LOCATION

The property is a preference 2 location because it is zoned for residential uses but is development with a non-residential use. The process is a Conditional Use Permit because the proposed wireless communication facility is located within 100 feet from the adjacent school property line.

Verizon Wire less and T-Mobile are currently located on this property.

Page 52: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

.gs -120

Coverage Levels:

6est Sigllll LoVl!l (d6m) ••-84 6est 59'101 Level (<Dn) ••-92 ee.t sq,.t LeVl!l (<Dn) ~-98

eest 59'1111 Levd (<Dn) ~~120

-92 .gs -120

eest sq.a~ eeet Sq>ol LeVl!l (d6m) •-.84

Best ~Level (dBm) >•-92 Best Sq\ol LeVl!l (dam) ·~-98

Best Siglal Level (cllrn) ••· t 20

500458 Cadman Park 4330 Moraga Ave. San Diego, CA 92117

Proposed coverage

Page 53: REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER - San Diego · 2015-11-14 · REPORT TO THE HEARING OFFICER HEARING DATE: January21, 2015 REPORT NO. HO 15-005 ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT:

500458 Cadman Park ~~

;:"at&t z

4330 Moraga Ave. San Diego, CA 92117

j,:.f

~

= u < E­E-<

-

Legend

0 Search Ring * Selected Site

OExisting sites within 1 mile radius:

No existing sites within 1 mile

0 Alternative Sites:

No alternative sites

4/ 15/ 2013

-

L~end

Clb at San Or.go l!kuiiCIIfy C )C~P\li)AIMt ,_ ... ---• CC.1.3 • CC-A -1 • CC.O-S

CH-1-2 C0- 1-1 CP 1-1

• C....~C..UUtRt.lt' f CV-1.'}

• l .l l •'-:l-1 1511 .. 16PO.HC-N '-"""J.t.N a.A'().VC..N Ot-1-1 C')P. t .t

OP-1.1 HM-1 1 RM- 1-3 RM-2-!­~1."1

• qf.l 410 • qt,&.~ l2

RS-1 1 ... , RS- 1-"1 R~- 1 -.C

~•-eo ctS-1-1

r--- l 1;;:;:;:::-=:::::::.:... ~-;;= .:;:;;,-.:.:..-:-.,;:,:::;;,J

.. ~='= <!'-~~ ----· ~~-

MISSION BAY PARK

I -------~---- -·-- - - ~.J l fl wc:=t " IJ I I «'; ' 1 _,__\ ~~

City of San Diego Development Services Department . ... - -

,... --- - 3

GRID SCALE. 800

DATE 1211012008 5.07 '30 PM