report title. edit this under document properties...prysmian power cables & systems australia pty...

es EnvironmentalStrategiesPROVIDING BENEFITS

www.environmentalstrategies.com.au

> PROVIDING BENEFITSes

Prysmian Power Cables & Systems Australia Pty Ltd, February 2016 Groundwater Monitoring Event, 1 Heathcote Road, Liverpool, NSW 16021

Document Information

Client: Prysmian Power Cables & Systems Australia Pty Ltd

Project: Groundwater Monitoring Event (GME) - Liverpool

Project Number: 16021

Report Title: February 2016 Groundwater Monitoring Event.

1 Heathcote Road, Liverpool NSW

Date: 19 February 2016

Document Name: 16021RP01-Final

Revision Number Revision 0

Written By:

Colin Biggs

Environmental Scientist

Reviewed By:

Dean Stafford

Senior Environmental Scientist

Prysmian Power Cables & Systems Australia Pty Ltd, February 2016 Groundwater Monitoring Event, 1 Heathcote Road, Liverpool, NSW 16021

Table of Contents

Executive Summary ............................................................................... i

1 Introduction ................................................................................... 1

2 Site Condition and Surrounding Environment ................................. 4

3 Sampling and Analysis Plan and Sampling Methodology ................ 6

4 Field Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) .................... 7

5 Laboratory QA/QC .......................................................................... 9

6 Assessment Criteria ...................................................................... 10

7 Results ......................................................................................... 12

8 Conclusions and Recommendations ............................................. 14

9 References ................................................................................... 15

Appendices Appendix A Figures Appendix B Groundwater Result Summary Tables Appendix C Groundwater Field Sheets Appendix D Laboratory Certificates

Prysmian Power Cables & Systems Australia Pty Ltd, February 2016 Groundwater Monitoring Event, 1 Heathcote Road, Liverpool, NSW i 16021

Executive Summary

Environmental Strategies Pty Limited (ES) was commissioned by Prysmian Cables & Systems Australia Pty Ltd (Prysmian) to conduct a Groundwater Monitoring Event (GME) in accordance with the ES (November 2013) Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for a portion of the site known as the coolant leak area located at 1 Heathcote Road, Liverpool NSW (the site). The site location is provided on Figure 1, Appendix A and the site layout in Figure 2, Appendix A.

A coolant leak was first identified in February 2012 within Factory 2 of the site, where an estimated 10,000 – 11,000L of coolant (hydrocarbon/water mixture) was lost to the subsurface due to a fault that had developed within an in-ground concrete pit.

Prysmian made a commitment to conduct monthly monitoring of groundwater around the in-ground pit for an initial three (3) month period with the last event occurring in February 2014. The data trends at the end of the three months of monitoring indicated that the groundwater was not impacted by the leaking pit.

The NSW EPA voiced concerns that the identified petroleum hydrocarbons in the soil may migrate to underlying groundwater. ES concluded that the hydrocarbons in soil have not impacted underlying groundwater at the time and are unlikely to migrate into the deeper soil profile. Nevertheless, as a due diligence measure, the Remedial Action Plan (RAP) prepared by Prysmian Group (June 2013) recommended that ongoing groundwater monitoring be incorporated into the site’s EMP. A less frequent monitoring period was justified and a 12 monthly groundwater monitoring program was adopted. However if groundwater at any time is shown to have been impacted by the contaminants of concern as triggered by the assessment criteria, then contingency options will be assessed.

This report presents the results of the 12 monthly GME.

The results of the February 2016 GME are summarised as follows:

Groundwater analytical results reported all contaminants of concern (total recoverable hydrocarbons (TRH), benzene, ethylbenzene, xylenes and naphthalene (BTEXN)) were either below laboratory limit of reporting (LOR) or the adopted groundwater acceptance criteria (GAC);

With the exception of copper at MW4 (5ug/L), concentrations of heavy metals were reported below the GAC;

Given that no hydrocarbons were reported above the adopted groundwater criteria, this indicates that groundwater has not been impacted by the leaking coolant tank.

Based on the above conclusions, and the results of the ES (June 2013) Supplementary Soil and Groundwater Investigation, ES consider that the coolant leak has not impacted the underlying groundwater and recommends that no further groundwater monitoring (other than that conducted as part of the facility’s due diligence) is required.

Prysmian Power Cables & Systems Australia Pty Ltd, February 2016 Groundwater Monitoring Event, 1 Heathcote Road, Liverpool, NSW 1 16021

1 Introduction

1.1 Background

Environmental Strategies Pty Limited (ES) was commissioned by Prysmian Cables & Systems Australia Pty Ltd (Prysmian) to conduct 12 monthly Groundwater Monitoring Events (GMEs) as specified in an ES (November 2013) Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for a portion of the site known as the coolant leak area located at 1 Heathcote Road, Liverpool NSW (the site). The site location is provided on Figure 1, Appendix A and the site layout in Figure 2, Appendix A.

A coolant leak was first identified in February 2012 within Factory 2 of the site, where an estimated 10,000 – 11,000L of coolant (hydrocarbon/water mixture) was lost to the subsurface due to a fault that had developed within an in-ground concrete pit. Following submission of a pollution incident report and sampling plan by MJM Environmental, Benbow Environmental (BE) were commissioned in July 2012 to undertake an Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) to investigate the extent of the release.

Investigations of soil and groundwater were undertaken by Benbow Environmental Pty Ltd (BE) and ES in 2013.

The results of the BE (January 2013) Environmental Site Assessment and the ES (June 2013) Supplementary Soil and Groundwater Investigation can be summarised as follows:

Soil results as reported by BE showed that sample locations 7, 8 and 9 contained contaminant concentrations below health based criteria but exceed the NEPM (2013) Commercial/Industrial Management Limits for coarse soil at depths ranging between 2 and 4.5m below ground level (bgl);

Impacted soils are localised to the southern and eastern portion of the in-ground pit, between 2 and 4.5m bgl;

The results of the ES soil investigation reported no exceedances of hydrocarbons in soil above the adopted criteria (or concentrations above laboratory detection limits) at depths greater than 4.5m bgl;

Groundwater analytical results reported all contaminants of concern (TRH, BTEX, PAH and heavy metals) below laboratory reporting limits and the adopted groundwater acceptance criteria (GAC) with the exception of copper and zinc, for which reported concentrations were marginally above the GAC. ES consider that the concentrations of copper and zinc detected in groundwater are unlikely to be related to the coolant use/spill. The concentrations of copper and zinc are likely representative of local background levels and are unlikely to pose a risk to human health and the environment;

No TRH concentrations were reported above the adopted groundwater criteria indicating that groundwater had not been impacted by the leaking coolant tank; and

The soil and groundwater around the tank were considered suitable for the continued commercial/industrial land use.

Following the submission of BE (January 2013), ES (June 2013) and a Remedial Action Plan (RAP) prepared by Prysmian (June 2013), the NSW EPA voiced concerns that the identified petroleum hydrocarbons in soil may migrate to underlying groundwater.

A letter report was prepared by ES (August 2013) discussing the hydrocarbon impacted soil and its potential to migrate to the underlying groundwater. ES concluded that the hydrocarbons in soil have not impacted underlying groundwater and are unlikely to migrate into the deeper soil profile. Nevertheless, as a due diligence measure, the Remedial Action


Plan (RAP) prepared by Prysmian Group (June 2013) recommended that ongoing groundwater monitoring be incorporated into the site’s EMP with a contingency plan should groundwater impact be detected from this event in the future.

Prysmian made a commitment to conduct monthly monitoring of groundwater around the in-ground pit for three (3) months. At the end of the three months of monitoring, the data trends indicated that the groundwater was not impacted by the leaking pit. For due diligence measures Prysmian decided that a 12 monthly groundwater monitoring program was justified providing that if groundwater at any time shows to have been impacted by the contaminants of concern as triggered by the assessment criteria, then contingency options will be assessed.

This report presents the results of the February 2016 GME.

1.2 Objective

Within the original scope provided, the objective of the GME was to:

Determine whether groundwater had been impacted from localised leak of ‘coolant’ and if these impacts, if present, exceeded the adopted human health and environmental criteria or otherwise.

1.3 Scope of Works

ES completed the following scope of works:

Preparation of a Job Hazard Analysis (JHA);

Gauging to depth of water (and light non-aqueous phase liquids (LNAPLs) if present) in five (5) monitoring wells;

Measurement of field groundwater quality parameters (dissolved oxygen (DO), electrical conductivity (EC), pH, redox potential (Eh) and temperature) of stabilised purged groundwater;

Sampling of groundwater from all five (5) accessible groundwater monitoring wells using micro-purge pump and submitted to NATA accredited laboratory Envirolab for analysis of Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons (TRH C6-C40), Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Xylenes and naphthalene (BTEXN) and Arsenic, Cadmium, Chromium, Copper, Lead, Mercury, Nickel, Zinc (Metals);

Collection of Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) (collected at a rate of 1:20) including one duplicate, one triplicate and forward these to a NATA accredited laboratory for analysis;

Assessment of analytical data against the following guidelines:

- NEPC (2013) NEPM Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater; and

- ANZECC (2000) 95% freshwater guidelines

Preparation of a report detailing the findings of the GME.

1.4 Limitations

This report is based on the Scope of Work outlined in Section 1.3. ES prepared this report in a manner consistent with the normal level of care and expertise exercised by members of the environmental assessment profession.

This report relates only to the objectives stated and does not relate to any other work undertaken for the Client. It is a report based on the concentrations of contaminants observed in groundwater only as reported to ES. These conditions stated in this report may change with time and space. The stated absence of any identified hazardous or toxic


materials on any part of the subject property should not be interpreted as a guarantee that such materials do not exist on the site.

All conclusions regarding the property area are the professional opinions of ES, subject to the qualifications in the report. Whilst normal assessments of data reliability have been made, ES assumes no responsibility or liability for errors in any data obtained from regulatory agencies, statements from sources outside of ES, or developments resulting from situations outside the scope of this project. The client acknowledges that this report is for the exclusive use of the client.


2 Site Condition and Surrounding Environment

2.1 Site Identification

The site occupies an area of approximately 15.3 hectares and is currently owned by Prysmian.

The site location is shown in Figure 1, Appendix A and the site layout at time of sampling is shown in Figure 2 and well locations are presented in Figure 3, Appendix A.

Table 2.1 provides a summary of the site details. Result summary tables are included in Appendix B.

Table 2.1: Summary of Site Details

Characteristic Detail

Property Street Address 1 Heathcote Road, Liverpool, NSW

Property Lot / DP Lot 200, DP1009044

Property Local Government Area

Liverpool City Council

Property Current Land use Commercial/Industrial

Property Area 15.3 Ha

Property Zoning Light Industrial (IN2)

Coordinates for the approximate corners of the subject site

(MGA 56)

Easting: 308697.509

Northing: 6244183.467

Easting: 308723.284

Northing: 6244172.381

Easting: 308678.953

Northing: 6244144.078

Easting: 308705.477

Northing: 6244132.76

Subject Site Area Approximately 1,120m2

The property is bounded to the south by Newbridge Road beyond which lies Moorebank Avenue, Georges River to the west, Joyce’s Foam products and Bridgewater Business Estate to the east and vacant land to the north.

The subject site is bounded by Factory 1 to the west, the centre line of Factory 2 to the east, the access road to the south and the third bay (as specified by the saw tooth roofing panels) of Factory 2 to the North. The subject site area is approximately 1,120m2.

2.2 Possible Contaminant Sources on the Site

An inspection was limited to Factory 2 (the cable drawing building), refer to Figure 2, Appendix A for site layout. Possible contamination sources in this area included the coolant tank (which was replaced immediately after the leak was notified in February 2012) and the coolant mixture itself (Houghto Draw WD4100) which is stored in drums along the south wall, near to the second entrance door. The composition of the coolant includes several petroleum based compounds and additives and requires dilution with water. The time weighted exposure limit for Houghto Draw WD4100 is listed as 5 mg/m3.


Other potential sources on site include the copper wire which is used in the copper drawing process.

2.3 Location of Chemical Spills On-site

Excluding the coolant leak under investigation, no additional spills are known to have occurred within Factory 2 of the Prysmian facility.

2.4 Local Sensitive Environments

The nearest sensitive environmental receptors to the site are:

Georges River located immediately to the west of the site; and

Reserve land located immediately to the north of the site.

2.5 Local Hydrogeology

Based on previous GME events standing groundwater onsite was on average approximately 6m below ground surface. Following survey of the wells groundwater was calculated to flow in a north westerly direction towards the Georges River.


3 Sampling and Analysis Plan and Sampling Methodology

This section outlines the methodology adopted by ES during the GME. This section also provides details on the sampling and analysis, description of field equipment used, decontamination procedures, field and laboratory quality assurance and control, laboratory analytical methods and sample preservation.

3.1 Groundwater

3.1.1 Groundwater Gauging, Purging and Sampling

Groundwater gauging, purging and sampling was completed by ES’ Environmental Scientist Colin Biggs on 8th February 2016.

Samples were collected from the five (5) wells in the vicinity of the reported coolant leak. Refer to Figure 3, Appendix A.

Prior to sampling, all wells were gauged with an interface probe to measure groundwater levels and detect the presence of light non-aqueous phase liquids (LNAPL). All monitoring wells were then purged using a peristaltic pump to ensure minimal losses of volatile organic compounds.

Water quality parameters recorded included pH, redox potential (Eh), electrical conductivity, dissolved oxygen and temperature. All wells were purged until groundwater parameters stabilised to within suitable limits.

Samples were placed directly into appropriately preserved laboratory supplied sampling containers. The sample for metals analysis was filtered in the field using a 0.45micron millipore filter unit prior to analysis.

Disposable tubing was used at each monitoring well and the interface probe was thoroughly decontaminated between gauging events with a phosphate free detergent (Decon 90) and rinsed with potable water. Field records of purging and sampling event are provided in Appendix C.

3.1.2 Field QA/QC

The following procedures were followed during fieldwork to ensure quality control:

Water samples were collected in laboratory supplied bottles with Teflon seals;

Samples were collected from disposable equipment to prevent cross contamination between sampling locations;

Samples were placed in an ice-filled esky to keep them below 4oC in accordance with US EPA SW 846 and AS4482-2 (2005); and

Samples were transferred to the laboratory under a completed chain-of-custody.


4 Field Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC)

4.1 Chain of Custody

Samples were transferred to the laboratory under chain-of-custody procedures. The details included on the chain-of-custody forms included the following:

Job name and number Date results are required List of samples Preservation method Analysis required Release signature and date Date sampled Acceptance signature and date

4.2 Statement of Duplicate Frequency

The following are QA/QC samples were collected for this project:

DUP1 and TRIP1 were a groundwater intra-laboratory and inter-laboratory duplicate of MW2.

Precision of analytical techniques is measured by the relative percent difference (RPD) between duplicate results. Acceptable precision shown by intra-laboratory and inter-laboratory duplicate samples is:

Precision is measured using the standard deviation ‘SD’ or Relative Percent Difference ‘%RPD’. Replicate data for field duplicates of organics is expected to be as follows:

RPD criteria of 50% or less, for concentrations > or = 10 times EQL; RPD criteria of 75% or less, for concentrations between 5 and 10 times the EQL; and RPD criteria of 100% or less, for concentrations < 5 times EQL.

Replicate data for field duplicates for inorganics, including metals is expected to be as follows:

RPD criteria of 30% or less, for concentrations > or = 10 times EQL; RPD criteria of 75% or less, for concentrations between 5 and 10 times the EQL; and RPD criteria of 100% or less, for concentrations < 5 times EQL.

A summary of the Relative Percent Differences (RPDs) calculations are presented in Table 2a, Appendix B. ES notes that RPDs were only calculated for groups of compounds with detections above the laboratory detection limits.

All RPDs for groundwater were within acceptable ranges with the exception of the following;

Primary sample (MW2) and DUP1 RPD exceedance 80% for Zinc

The RPD exceedance for zinc marginally exceeds the 75% criteria. Given that the concentrations of all contaminants of concern were below the adopted GAC, ES considers the minor RPD exceedance does not affect the validity of the data collected.

Overall, there is an acceptable level of agreement between original and duplicate samples indicating that field procedures were adequate in obtaining representative samples and minimising the potential for cross‐contamination.

4.3 Background Sample Results

Background samples were not collected as part of this investigation.

4.4 Rinsate Sample Results

A rinsate sample was not collected from the final decontamination of the interface probe and purged water bucket. Dedicated sampling materials and best practice sampling methods were


adequate to prevent the potential for cross contamination to occur during groundwater sampling.

4.5 Trip Blank

Trip Blank samples were not collected as part of this investigation.

4.6 Trip Spike Results

Trip Spike samples were not collected as part of this investigation.

4.7 Field Instrument Calibration

Field instruments were calibrated prior to use on site.


5 Laboratory QA/QC

Chain-of-custody forms are included in Appendix E.

5.1 Holding Times

Holding times are included on the laboratory reports in Appendix E. All samples were received and analysed within the specified holding times.

5.2 Laboratory Analytical Methods

The analytical methods used by Envirolab are summarised below:

Table 5.2: Envirolab Laboratory Methods for Water

Analyte Method PQL (ug/kg)

BTEXN Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylene Naphthalene

Org-016 Water samples are analysed directly by purge and trap GC-MS

1 1 1 3 1

TRH C6-C10 >C10-C16 >C16-C34 >C34-C40

Org-016 Water samples are analysed directly by purge and trap GC-MS GC.3 Water samples are extracted with Dichloromethane and analysed by GC-FID.

10 50

100 100

Metals As Ca Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn Hg

Metals-022 ICP-MS Determination of various metals by ICP-MS. Metals-021 CVAAS Determination of Mercury by Cold Vapour AAS.

1

0.1 1 1 1 1 1

0.05

5.3 Laboratory Accreditation for Analytical Methods Used

The primary laboratory used for this project was Envirolab Services (Envirolab). Envirolab is accredited by NATA to ISO 17025, accreditation number 2901.

The secondary laboratory used was ALS Sydney. ALS are accredited by NATA to ISO 17025, accreditation number 825.

5.4 Percent Recoveries of Spikes and Surrogates

Laboratory QA/QC is provided on the laboratory reports in Appendix D. All spikes and surrogates were within acceptable ranges.

5.5 Laboratory duplicate results

All Envirolab laboratory duplicates were within acceptable ranges. All ALS laboratory duplicates were within acceptable ranges.

5.6 Laboratory blank results

All Envirolab and ALS laboratory blank results were within acceptable ranges.


6 Assessment Criteria

6.1 Rationale for Selection of Water Assessment Criteria

In accordance with the NEPM (2013) Schedule B(6) The Framework for Risk Based Assessment of Groundwater Contamination it was necessary to determine the relevant environmental values and hence appropriate guideline assessment criteria for the site.

To determine the most appropriate groundwater guideline the following environmental values have been considered and are presented in Table 6.1. These have been referenced from Appendix 2 of NSW DEC (2007) Guidelines for the Assessment and Management of Groundwater Contamination and the NEPM (2013) Schedule B (6).

Table 6.1 Assessment of Environmental Values Associated with Site Groundwater

Environmental Values

ES Comment

Aquatic Ecosystems (Freshwater)

The closest surface water receptor is the Georges River located along the western boundary of the site. The Georges River would be classed as a beneficial receptor of groundwater and should be protected. This is classed as a freshwater environment.

Human Uses (Drinking Water)

No registered groundwater bores for domestic use were identified within 500km of the site. EC measurements of the groundwater monitoring bores indicated a TDS


Table 6.2 Groundwater Assessment Criteria

Analyte GAC (ug/L) at Depth Source

4 to C10-C16 (minus naphthalene)

6,000

NL

NEPM (2013) HSL D 1

NEPM (2013) HSL D 1

Naphthalene 16 ANZECC (2000) 95% Freshwater

Arsenic (V)

Cadmium

Chromium (VI)

Copper

Lead

Nickel

Zinc

Mercury

24

0.7

27

1.3

4.4

7

15

0.1

ANZECC (2000) 95% Freshwater







ANZECC (2000) 95% Freshwater Notes: 1 The site’s geology consists of clayey sand. The HSLs for a sand matrix have been adopted for all depth profiles for the sake

of conservatism NL – Non-limiting. No limit specified. HSL – Health Based Screening Level. Site standing groundwater is at approximately 5.86 to 6.25m below ground level. The 4 to


7 Results

The following section presents an overview of the field observations for groundwater encountered during the February 2016 GME. Copies of groundwater sampling field sheets are included in Appendix C.

7.1 Groundwater Gauging Results

Groundwater gauging results are summarised below:

LNAPL was not detected in any of the monitoring wells sampled; and Depth to groundwater ranged between 5.741m below top of casing (btoc) at MW1 and

6.153m btoc at MW5. Refer to Table 1 Appendix B for corrected water relative levels (RLs).

7.2 Groundwater Quality Results

During sampling the groundwater was observed to be light brown to dark brown in colour, odourless with suspended clay particles. No sheens were observed in any of the purged water. The groundwater field parameters for the site are summarised in Table 7.2 below:

Table 7.2: Physiochemical Field Parameters

Monitoring well ID

Date Temp (oC)

pH

pH units

Dissolved Oxygen (ppm)

Redox/ORP (mV)

Conductivity

(µS/cm)

MW1 08/02/2016 23.2 5.54 3.15 229 700

MW2 08/02/2016 21.3 5.79 2.57 164 287

MW3 08/02/2016 20.3 5.64 1.96 174 472

MW4 08/02/2016 21.2 5.31 1.29 250 561

MW5 08/02/2016 21.2 5.29 0.94 218 305

Table 7.2 indicates the following groundwater conditions: The temperature of the groundwater ranged from 21.2 to 23.2oC; pH ranged from 5.29 to 5.79 pH units indicating slightly acidic groundwater conditions; Dissolved oxygen in the groundwater ranged from 0.94 and 3.15 ppm indicating

generally aerobic conditions; ORP (oxidation reduction potential) levels measured from 164 to 250mV (using a

Ag/AgCl electrode), which indicates oxidising conditions. ORP (or Redox) is a measure of a water system’s capacity to either release or gain electrons in chemical reactions. The process of oxidation involves losing electrons while reduction involves gaining electrons; and

Conductivity levels were between 287 and 700 (µS/cm), which indicates fresh groundwater conditions.

The following presents a summary of results for groundwater samples. Result summary tables are included in Appendix B, with copies of laboratory certificates included in Appendix D.


7.3 Groundwater Analytical Results

7.3.1 Heavy Metals

Concentrations of heavy metals in all groundwater samples submitted for analysis were reported below the GAC with the exception of copper at MW4.

7.3.2 BTEXN

Concentrations of BTEXN in all groundwater samples submitted for analysis were reported below laboratory detection limits with the exception of Toluene (2µg/L) in MW 1 which is below the adopted GAC.

7.3.3 TRH

Concentrations of TRH in all groundwater samples submitted for analysis were reported below laboratory detection limits and the adopted GAC.

7.3.4 Discussion

The results of this investigation indicate that with the exception of a low level detection of Toluene in MW1, no detectable petroleum hydrocarbon contamination was present in any of the up-gradient or down-gradient monitoring well locations above the adopted groundwater acceptance criteria (GAC).

The recent groundwater monitoring data was compared to that of the previous GME events that occurred in September 2013, December 2013, February 2014 and February 2015. Table 3 Appendix B shows a comparison of analytical results from these four rounds.

ES consider that the concentrations of copper, nickel and zinc detected in groundwater are unlikely to pose a risk to human health and the environment and are likely representative of local background levels.


8 Conclusions and Recommendations

8.1 Conclusions

The following conclusions can be made from the February 2016 GME conducted at the site located at 1 Heathcote Road, Liverpool:

Groundwater analytical results reported all contaminants of concern (TRH, and BTEXN) below laboratory detection limits and the adopted groundwater acceptance criteria (GAC)

With the exception of copper at MW4 (5ug/L), concentrations of heavy metals were reported below the GAC. ES consider that the concentrations of copper, nickel and zinc detected in groundwater are unlikely to pose a risk to human health and the environment and are likely representative of local background levels;

No TRH concentrations were reported above the adopted groundwater criteria indicating that groundwater has not been impacted by the leaking coolant tank;

Toluene was detected above the LOR at one monitoring well (MW1); and

This GME is the fifth (5) monitoring event after the preparation of the RAP and confirms the findings of the ES (June 2013) report, that the groundwater has not been impacted by the leaky coolant tank.

8.2 Recommendations

Based on the above conclusions, and the results of the ES (June 2013) Supplementary Soil and Groundwater Investigation, ES consider that the coolant leak has not impacted the underlying groundwater and recommends that no further groundwater monitoring (other than that conducted as part of the facility’s due diligence) is required.

8.3 Extent of Uncertainties in the Results

The sampling methodologies used by ES during this assessment have been designed to limit uncertainty in the results. ES is confident that the results of this assessment give an accurate representation of the current status of the site but note that in all subsurface investigations the potential remains for variation between sampling points and conditions different from that reported here may exist on site.


9 References

Australian (2004) Drinking Water Guidelines

ANZECC (2000) Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality. Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council & National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia;

ANZECC/NHMRC (1992) Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for the Assessment and Management of Contaminated Sites;

Benbow Environmental Pty Ltd (January 2013) Environmental Site Assessment, 1 Moorebank Road, Liverpool, NSW 121081_Rep_Final

Department of Environment and Climate Change (2009) Guidelines on the Duty to Report Contamination Under the Contaminated Land Management Act 1997;

Environmental Strategies Pty Ltd (20 June 2013) Supplementary Soil and Groundwater Investigation, 1 Heathcote Road, Liverpool NSW. Ref:13055RP01_FINAL;

Environmental Strategies Pty Ltd (6 November 2013) Groundwater Monitoring Event, 1 Heathcote Road, Liverpool NSW.Ref: 13055aRP01_FINAL;

Environmental Strategies Pty Ltd (25 November 2013) Environmental Management Plan (EMP), 1 Heathcote Road, Liverpool NSW.Ref: 13055bRP01_EMP (Rev1) FINAL;

Environmental Strategies Pty Ltd (13 January 2014) Groundwater Monitoring Event, 1 Heathcote Road, Liverpool NSW.Ref: 113055aRP02_FINAL;

Environmental Strategies Pty Ltd (21 March 2014) Groundwater Monitoring Event, 1 Heathcote Road, Liverpool NSW.Ref: 13055aRP03_FINAL;

Environmental Strategies Pty Ltd (11 February 2015) Groundwater Monitoring Event, 1 Heathcote Road, Liverpool NSW.Ref: 15001RP01_FINAL;

National Environment Protection Council (1999) Revised National Environment Protection Measure (NEPM) 2013 – Assessment of Site Contamination Schedule B (1) and B (2);

NSW Environment Protection Authority (2006) Guidelines for the Site Auditor Scheme Environment Protection Authority;

NSW Environment Protection Authority (1995) Sampling Design Guidelines. Environment Protection Authority, Chatswood;

NSW DEC (2007) Guidelines for the Assessment and Management of Groundwater Contamination;

NSW DECC (2009) Guidelines on the Duty to Report Contamination under the Contaminated Land Management Act 1997.

APPENDIX A Figures

1 FIGURESite Location

HA1 Hand Auger Location

KEY

N

TP24

TP23TP22

TP21

TP19 TP18

TP16TP17

TP2TP3

TP7

TP6

TP8

TP4

TP12 TP11 TP10TP14

BH1/MW1

BH2/MW2

BH5/MW5

TP13

SP1SP2

BH4/MW4

Prysmian 1 Heathcote Road, Liverpool NSW

Site Location

SITE LOCATION

N

2Site Layout

Prysmian1 Heathcote Road, Liverpool, NSW

FIG

UR

E

Groundwater Monitoring Well

New Groundwater Monitoring Well

Site Boudary

MW17

MW6

MW7

MW4

MW32

MW10A

MW8

MW9MW31

MW15

MW11MW5

MW14 MW13

MW1

MW3

MW2A

MW33

MW22

MW18

MW19 MW21

MW20

MW23

MW24

MW23MW25

MW26MW27

Ė ŌMÕŘPÑ Concentration (ug/L)

Benzene 65

Toluene 514

Ethylbenzene 558

Xylene 2840

Naphthalene 112

ĖŌMÕŘPÑ Concentration (ug/L)

Benzene 92

Toluene 454

Ethylbenzene 55

Xylene 443


Benzene 59

Toluene 249

Ethylbenzene 50

Xylene 313

MW12


Benzene 2150

Toluene 7480

Ethylbenzene 1580

Xylene 6700

Naphthalene 223


Benzene 92

Toluene 454

Ethylbenzene 55

Xylene 443


Benzene 637

Toluene 1690

Ethylbenzene 434

Xylene 3670

Naphthalene 128


Benzene 5740

Toluene 10400

Ethylbenzene 1020

Xylene 8780

Naphthalene 136


Benzene 12800

Toluene 26000

Ethylbenzene 1420

Xylene 14000

Naphthalene 246


Benzene 37000

Toluene 63100

Ethylbenzene 2360

Xylene 15500

Naphthalene 301


Benzene 16300

Toluene 53200

Ethylbenzene 2300

Xylene 15500

Naphthalene 235

MW29Ė ŌMÕŘPÑ Concentration (ug/L)Benzene 16000

Toluene 31400

Ethylbenzene 2480

Xylene 13800

Naphthalene 222


Benzene 2240

Toluene 6660

Ethylbenzene 923

Xylene 9850

Naphthalene 228


Benzene 7030

Toluene 12300

Ethylbenzene 1150

Xylene 9360

Naphthalene 165


Benzene 17400

Toluene 34900

Ethylbenzene 2280

Xylene 13790

Naphthalene 236


Benzene 748

Toluene 609

Ethylbenzene 204

Xylene 1270

Naphthalene 81


Benzene 69

Toluene 525

Ethylbenzene 337

Xylene 1729

Naphthalene 65


Benzene 65

Toluene 514

Ethylbenzene 558

Xylene 2840

Naphthalene 112


Benzene 85

Toluene 605

Ethylbenzene 136

Xylene 725

Naphthalene 33

0 50

Metres

SCALE

Ĩ Ĭ Ģ İ OÒŃÔŌÑŒŒ ĂÖ Å

0.71


5.79


0.008

MW30


0.015

Factory 3

KEY

Factory 4 Factory 6 Factory 6 Factory 6

Factory 1

Factory 2

Factory 3 Factory

4

Factory 5

Factory 6 Factory

7

Factory 6

Factory 6 Factory

7

Area of Concern

APPENDIX B Groundwater Results Summary Tables

Table 1: Survey Data

Well ID TOC (m BGL) RL (Assumed Height Datum) DTW (m bTOC) Water RL

MW1 0.015 8.23 5.741 2.489

MW2 0.01 8.329 5.878 2.451

MW3 0.023 8.179 5.85 2.329

MW4 0.015 8.551 6.145 2.406

MW5 0.016 8.483 6.153 2.33

TOC - Top of casing

RL - Relative Level

bTOC - below top of casing

BGL - below ground level

Table 2Results Summary

16021Groundwater Monitoring Event

Prysmian ‐ 1 Heathcote Road, Liverpool NSW

Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead Mercury Nickel ZincDissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved

µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L1 0.1 1 1 1 0.05 1 124 0.7 27 1.3 4.4 0.1 7 15

Location Date Sampled Type Of Sample Metals-021 CV-AASMW1 8/02/2016 Water




Location Date Sampled Type Of SampleMW1 8/02/2016 WaterMW2 8/02/2016 WaterMW3 8/02/2016 WaterMW4 8/02/2016 WaterMW5 8/02/2016 Water

Number of Guideline Exceedances(Detects

ANZECC (2000) 95% Freshwater NEPM (2013) HSL D Sand

Minimum DetectsAverage Consentration Medium ConsentrationStandard DeviationNumber of Guideline Exceedances

Number of SamplesNumber of DetectsMaximum ConsentrationMaximum DetectsMinimum Consentration

TRH C6 - C10 TRH C6 - C10 TRH >C10 - C16 TRH >C10 - C16 TRH >C16 - C34 TRH >C34 - C40 less BTEX (F1) less Naphthalene (F2)

µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L10 10 50 50 100 100

6 000 NLOrg-016 Org-016 Org-003 Org-003 Org-003 Org-003




Location Date Sampled Type Of SampleMW1 8/02/2016 WaterMW2 8/02/2016 WaterMW3 8/02/2016 WaterMW4 8/02/2016 WaterMW5 8/02/2016 Water

Number of Guideline Exceedances(Detects

ANZECC (2000) 95% Freshwater NEPM (2013) HSL D Sand

Minimum DetectsAverage Consentration Medium ConsentrationStandard DeviationNumber of Guideline Exceedances

Number of SamplesNumber of DetectsMaximum ConsentrationMaximum DetectsMinimum Consentration

Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene m+p-xylene o-xylene Naphthalene

µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L1 1 1 2 1 1

5 000 NL NL NL NL 16Org-016 Org-016 Org-016 Org-016 Org-016 Org-013

Table 2a

RPD Exceedances

16021

Groundwater Monitoring Event

Prysmian - 1 Heathcote Road, Liverpool NSW

Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead Mercury Nickel Zinc TRH C6 - C10

Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved

µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L

24 0.7 27 1.3 4.4 0.1 7 15

MW2 8/02/2016 Water

Table 2a

RPD Exceedances

16021



TRH C6 - C10 TRH >C10 - C16 TRH >C10 - C16 TRH >C16 - C34 TRH >C34 - C40 Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene m+p-xylene o-xylene Naphthalene

less BTEX (F1) less Naphthalene (F2)

µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L

6 000 NL 5 000 NL NL NL NL 16

16021



Table 3: Summary Groundwater Results

Ars

en

ic (

Fil

tere

d)

Cad

miu

m (

Fil

tere

d)

Ch

rom

ium

(II

I+V

I) (

Fil

tere

d)

Co

pp

er

(Fil

tere

d)

Le

ad

(F

ilte

red

)

Me

rcu

ry (

Fil

tere

d)

Nic

ke

l (F

ilte

red

)

Zin

c (

Fil

tere

d)

C6-C

10

C6-C

10

le

ss

BT

EX

(F

1)

>C

10

-C16

>C

10

-C16

le

ss

Na

ph

tha

len

e (

F2

)

>C

16

-C34

>C

34

-C40

Ben

ze

ne

Eth

ylb

en

ze

ne

To

lue

ne

Xy

len

e (

m &

p)

Xy

len

e (

o)

Xy

len

es

Nap

hth

ale

ne

ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/L ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l ug/l µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L

EQL 1 0.1 1 1 1 0.05 10 1 10 10 50 50 100 100 1 1 1 2 2 3 1

ANZECC 2000 FW 95% 24 0.7 27 1.3 4.4 0.1 7 15 16

HSL-A/B, 4m to

APPENDIX C Groundwater Field Sheets

APPENDIX D Laboratory Certificates

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS 141327

Client:

Environmental Strategies Pty Ltd

Suite 15201, Locomotive Workshop2 Locomotive StEveleighNSW 2015

Attention: Dean Stafford, Colin Biggs

Sample log in details:

Your Reference: 16021No. of samples: 6 watersDate samples received / completed instructions received 09/02/16 / 09/02/16

Analysis Details:

Please refer to the following pages for results, methodology summary and quality control data.Samples were analysed as received from the client. Results relate specifically to the samples as received.Results are reported on a dry weight basis for solids and on an as received basis for other matrices.Please refer to the last page of this report for any comments relating to the results.

Report Details:

Date results requested by: / Issue Date: 16/02/16 / 16/02/16Date of Preliminary Report: Not IssuedNATA accreditation number 2901. This document shall not be reproduced except in full.Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025. Tests not covered by NATA are denoted with *.

Results Approved By:

Page 1 of 9Envirolab Reference: 141327Revision No: R 00

Client Reference: 16021

vTRH(C6-C10)/BTEXN in Water Our Reference: UNITS 141327-1 141327-2 141327-3 141327-4 141327-5Your Reference ------------

-MW1 MW2 MW3 MW4 MW5

Date Sampled ------------ 08/02/2016 08/02/2016 08/02/2016 08/02/2016 08/02/2016Type of sample Water Water Water Water Water

Date extracted - 09/02/2016 09/02/2016 09/02/2016 09/02/2016 09/02/2016

Date analysed - 10/02/2016 10/02/2016 10/02/2016 10/02/2016 10/02/2016

TRH C6 - C9 µg/L


svTRH (C10-C40) in Water Our Reference: UNITS 141327-1 141327-2 141327-3 141327-4 141327-5Your Reference ------------



Date extracted - 10/02/2016 10/02/2016 10/02/2016 10/02/2016 10/02/2016

Date analysed - 10/02/2016 10/02/2016 10/02/2016 10/02/2016 10/02/2016

TRH C10 - C14 µg/L


HM in water - dissolved Our Reference: UNITS 141327-1 141327-2 141327-3 141327-4 141327-5Your Reference ------------



Date prepared - 10/02/2016 10/02/2016 10/02/2016 10/02/2016 10/02/2016

Date analysed - 10/02/2016 10/02/2016 10/02/2016 10/02/2016 10/02/2016

Arsenic-Dissolved µg/L


Method ID Methodology Summary

Org-016 Soil samples are extracted with methanol and spiked into water prior to analysing by purge and trap GC-MS. Water samples are analysed directly by purge and trap GC-MS. F1 = (C6-C10)-BTEX as per NEPM B1 Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater.

Org-013 Water samples are analysed directly by purge and trap GC-MS.

Org-003 Soil samples are extracted with Dichloromethane/Acetone and waters with Dichloromethane and analysed by GC-FID. F2 = (>C10-C16)-Naphthalene as per NEPM B1 Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater (HSLs Tables 1A (3, 4)). Note Naphthalene is determined from the VOC analysis.

Metals-022 ICP-MS Determination of various metals by ICP-MS.

Metals-021 CV-AAS

Determination of Mercury by Cold Vapour AAS.



QUALITY CONTROL UNITS PQL METHOD Blank Duplicate Sm#

Duplicate results Spike Sm# Spike % Recovery

vTRH(C6-C10)/BTEXN in Water

Base ll Duplicate ll %RPD

Date extracted - 09/02/2016

141327-1 09/02/2016 || 10/02/2016 LCS-W2 09/02/2016

Date analysed - 10/02/2016

141327-1 10/02/2016 || 10/02/2016 LCS-W2 10/02/2016

TRH C6 - C9 µg/L 10 Org-016


QUALITY CONTROL UNITS PQL METHOD Blank Duplicate Sm#

Duplicate results Spike Sm# Spike % Recovery

HM in water - dissolved Base ll Duplicate ll %RPD

Mercury-Dissolved µg/L 0.05 Metals-021 CV-AAS


Report Comments:

Asbestos ID was analysed by Approved Identifier: Not applicable for this jobAsbestos ID was authorised by Approved Signatory: Not applicable for this job

INS: Insufficient sample for this test PQL: Practical Quantitation Limit NT: Not testedNR: Test not required RPD: Relative Percent Difference NA: Test not required: Greater than LCS: Laboratory Control Sample



Quality Control Definitions

Blank: This is the component of the analytical signal which is not derived from the sample but from reagents, glassware etc, can be determined by processing solvents and reagents in exactly the same manner as for samples. Duplicate : This is the complete duplicate analysis of a sample from the process batch. If possible, the sampleselected should be one where the analyte concentration is easily measurable. Matrix Spike : A portion of the sample is spiked with a known concentration of target analyte. The purpose of the matrix spike is to monitor the performance of the analytical method used and to determine whether matrix interferences exist. LCS (Laboratory Control Sample) : This comprises either a standard reference material or a control matrix (such as a blanksand or water) fortified with analytes representative of the analyte class. It is simply a check sample. Surrogate Spike: Surrogates are known additions to each sample, blank, matrix spike and LCS in a batch, of compoundswhich are similar to the analyte of interest, however are not expected to be found in real samples.

Laboratory Acceptance Criteria

Duplicate sample and matrix spike recoveries may not be reported on smaller jobs, however, were analysed at a frequencyto meet or exceed NEPM requirements. All samples are tested in batches of 20. The duplicate sample RPD and matrixspike recoveries for the batch were within the laboratory acceptance criteria.Filters, swabs, wipes, tubes and badges will not have duplicate data as the whole sample is generally extracted during sample extraction.Spikes for Physical and Aggregate Tests are not applicable.For VOCs in water samples, three vials are required for duplicate or spike analysis.

Duplicates: 5xPQL - 0-50% RPD is acceptable.Matrix Spikes, LCS and Surrogate recoveries: Generally 70-130% for inorganics/metals; 60-140%for organics (+/-50% surrogates) and 10-140% for labile SVOCs (including labile surrogates), ultra trace organics and speciated phenols is acceptable.

In circumstances where no duplicate and/or sample spike has been reported at 1 in 10 and/or 1 in 20 samples respectively, the sample volume submitted was insufficient in order to satisfy laboratory QA/QC protocols.

When samples are received where certain analytes are outside of recommended technical holding times (THTs), the analysis has proceeded. Where analytes are on the verge of breaching THTs, every effort will be made to analyse within the THT or as soon as practicable.

Where sampling dates are not provided, Envirolab are not in a position to comment on the validityof the analysis where recommended technical holding times may have been breached.


2 2

.00

Tru

e

Envir

onm

ental

CE

RT

IFIC

AT

E O

F A

NA

LY

SIS

Wo

rk O

rde

r:

Pa

ge

:1

of 4

ES

1603020

::

La

bo

rato

ryC

lien

tE

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L S

TR

AT

EG

IES

Envi

ronm

enta

l Div

isio

n S

ydney

::

Conta

ctC

onta

ct D

EA

N S

TA

FF

OR

D

::

Ad

dre

ssA

dd

ress

SU

ITE

2, LE

VE

L 1

20 C

HA

ND

OS

ST

RE

ET

ST

LE

ON

AR

DS

NS

W A

US

TR

ALIA

2065

277-2

89 W

oodpark

Road S

mith

field

NS

W A

ust

ralia

2164

::

E-m

ail

E-m

ail

deansta

fford

@envi

ronm

enta

lstr

ate

gie

s.com

.au

::

Te

lep

ho

ne

Te

lep

ho

ne

+61 0

2 9

437 4

587

+61-2

-8784 8

555

::

Fa

csim

ileF

acs

imile

----

+61-2

-8784 8

500

:P

roje

ct--

--Q

C L

eve

l:

NE

PM

2013 B

3 &

ALS

QC

Sta

ndard

:O

rde

r n

um

be

r16021

Da

te S

am

ple

s R

ece

ive

d:

10-F

eb-2

016 1

9:0

0

:C

-O-C

nu

mb

er

----

Da

te A

na

lysi

s C

om

me

nce

d:

11-F

eb-2

016

Sa

mp

ler

:C

OLIN

BIG

GS

Issu

e D

ate

:18-F

eb-2

016 1

5:5

1

Site

:2015 S

erv

ices C

ata

logue

1:

No

. o

f sa

mp

les

rece

ive

d

Qu

ote

nu

mb

er

:--

--1

:N

o.

of

sam

ple

s a

na

lyse

d

This

report

supers

edes

any p

revi

ous

report

(s)

with

this

refe

rence

. R

esu

lts a

pply

to the s

am

ple

(s)

as

subm

itted.

This

Cert

ificate

of A

naly

sis c

onta

ins

the follo

win

g in

form

atio

n:

l

Genera

l C

om

ments

l

Analy

tical R

esu

lts

Sig

nato

ries

This

docu

ment

has

been

ele

ctro

nic

ally

si

gned

by

the

auth

orize

d

signato

ries

indic

ate

d

belo

w.

Ele

ctro

nic

si

gnin

g

has

been

carr

ied o

ut in

com

plia

nce

with

pro

cedure

s sp

eci

fied in

21 C

FR

Part

11.

Sig

na

torie

sA

ccre

dita

tion

Ca

teg

ory

Po

sitio

n

Pabi S

ubba

Senio

r O

rganic

Chem

ist

Syd

ney

Org

anic

s, S

mith

field

, N

SW

Shobhna C

handra

Meta

ls C

oord

inato

rS

ydney

Inorg

anic

s, S

mith

field

, N

SW

NA

TA

Acc

red

ited

La

bo

rato

ry 8

25

Acc

red

ited

fo

r co

mp

lian

ce w

ith

ISO

/IE

C 1

70

25

.

R I

G H

T

S O

L U

T I

O N

S |

R I

G H

T

P A

R T

N E

R

2 o

f 4

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

ES

16

03

02

0

----

:P

roje

ct

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

AL S

TR

AT

EG

IES

Gen

era

l C

om

men

ts

Th

e

an

aly

tica

l p

roce

du

res

use

d

by

the

E

nvi

ron

me

nta

l D

ivis

ion

h

ave

b

ee

n

de

velo

pe

d

fro

m

est

ab

lish

ed

in

tern

atio

na

lly

reco

gn

ize

d

pro

ced

ure

s su

ch

as

tho

se

pu

blis

he

d

by

the

U

SE

PA

, A

PH

A,

AS

a

nd

N

EP

M.

In

ho

use

de

velo

pe

d p

roce

du

res

are

em

plo

yed

in t

he

ab

sen

ce o

f d

ocu

me

nte

d s

tan

da

rds

or

by c

lien

t re

qu

est

.

Wh

ere

mo

istu

re d

ete

rmin

atio

n h

as

be

en

pe

rfo

rme

d,

resu

lts a

re r

ep

ort

ed

on

a d

ry w

eig

ht

ba

sis

.

Wh

ere

a r

ep

ort

ed

less

th

an

(<

) re

sult

is h

igh

er

tha

n t

he

LO

R,

this

ma

y b

e d

ue

to

prim

ary

sa

mp

le e

xtra

ct/d

ige

sta

te d

ilutio

n a

nd

/or

insu

ffic

ien

t sa

mp

le f

or

an

aly

sis.

Wh

ere

th

e L

OR

of

a r

ep

ort

ed

re

sult

diff

ers

fro

m s

tan

da

rd L

OR

, th

is m

ay

be

du

e t

o h

igh

mo

istu

re c

on

ten

t, in

suff

icie

nt

sam

ple

(re

du

ced

we

igh

t e

mp

loye

d)

or

ma

trix

inte

rfe

ren

ce.

Wh

en

sa

mp

ling

tim

e in

form

atio

n is

no

t p

rovi

de

d b

y th

e c

lien

t, s

am

plin

g d

ate

s a

re s

ho

wn

with

ou

t a

tim

e c

om

po

ne

nt.

In

th

ese

inst

an

ces,

th

e t

ime

co

mp

on

en

t h

as

be

en

ass

um

ed

by t

he

lab

ora

tory

fo

r p

roce

ssin

g p

urp

ose

s.

CA

S N

um

be

r =

CA

S r

eg

istr

y n

um

be

r fr

om

da

tab

ase

ma

inta

ine

d b

y C

he

mic

al A

bst

ract

s S

erv

ice

s. T

he

Ch

em

ica

l Ab

stra

cts

Se

rvic

e is

a d

ivis

ion

of

the

Am

erica

n C

he

mic

al S

ocie

ty.

LO

R =

Lim

it o

f re

po

rtin

g

^ =

Th

is r

esu

lt is

co

mp

ute

d f

rom

ind

ivid

ua

l an

aly

te d

ete

ctio

ns

at

or

ab

ove

th

e le

vel o

f re

po

rtin

g

ø =

AL

S is

no

t N

AT

A a

ccre

dite

d f

or

the

se t

est

s.

Ke

y :

3 o

f 4

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

ES

16

03

02

0

----

:P

roje

ct

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

AL S

TR

AT

EG

IES

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

----

----

----

----

TR

IP 1

Clie

nt

sam

ple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

WA

TE

R

(M

atr

ix:

WA

TE

R)

----

----

----

----

[08

-Fe

b-2

01

6]

Clie

nt

sam

plin

g d

ate

/ t

ime

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

ES

16

03

02

0-0

01

Un

itL

OR

CA

S N

um

be

rC

om

po

un

d

Re

sult

Re

sult

Resu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

lt

EG

020F

: D

isso

lved

Meta

ls b

y IC

P-M

S

<0

.00

1A

rse

nic

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-3

8-2

<0

.00

01

Ca

dm

ium

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

01

74

40

-43

-9

<0

.00

1C

hro

miu

m--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

01

74

40

-47

-3

0.0

01

Co

pp

er

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

17

44

0-5

0-8

0.0

02

Nic

ke

l--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

01

74

40

-02

-0

<0

.00

1L

ea

d--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

01

74

39

-92

-1

<0

.00

5Z

inc

----

----

----

----

mg

/L0

.00

57

44

0-6

6-6

EG

035F

: D

isso

lved

Merc

ury

by F

IMS

<0

.00

01

Me

rcu

ry--

----

----

----

--m

g/L

0.0

00

17

43

9-9

7-6

EP

080/0

71:

To

tal P

etr

ole

um

Hyd

rocarb

on

s

<2

0--

----

----

----

--µ

g/L

20

----

C6

- C

9 F

rac

tio

n

<5

0--

----

----

----

--µ

g/L

50

----

C1

0 -

C1

4 F

rac

tio

n

<1

00

----

----

----

----

µg

/L1

00

----

C1

5 -

C2

8 F

rac

tio

n

<5

0--

----

----

----

--µ

g/L

50

----

C2

9 -

C3

6 F

rac

tio

n

<5

0^

----

----

----

----

µg

/L5

0--

--C

10

- C

36

Fra

cti

on

(s

um

)

EP

080/0

71:

To

tal R

eco

vera

ble

Hyd

rocarb

on

s -

NE

PM

2013 F

racti

on

s

<2

0C

6 -

C1

0 F

rac

tio

n--

----

----

----

--µ

g/L

20

C6

_C

10

<2

0^

C6

- C

10

Fra

cti

on

m

inu

s B

TE

X

(F1

)

----

----

----

----

µg

/L2

0C

6_

C1

0-B

TE

X

<1

00

----

----

----

----

µg

/L1

00

----

>C

10

- C

16

Fra

cti

on

<1

00

----

----

----

----

µg

/L1

00

----

>C

16

- C

34

Fra

cti

on

<1

00

----

----

----

----

µg

/L1

00

----

>C

34

- C

40

Fra

cti

on

<1

00

^ --

----

----

----

--µ

g/L

10

0--

-->

C1

0 -

C4

0 F

rac

tio

n (

su

m)

<1

00

^ --

----

----

----

--µ

g/L

10

0--

-->

C1

0 -

C1

6 F

rac

tio

n m

inu

s N

ap

hth

ale

ne

(F2

)

EP

080:

BT

EX

N

<1

Be

nze

ne

----

----

----

----

µg

/L1

71

-43

-2

<2

To

lue

ne

----

----

----

----

µg

/L2

10

8-8

8-3

<2

Eth

ylb

en

zen

e--

----

----

----

--µ

g/L

21

00

-41

-4

<2

me

ta-

& p

ara

-Xy

len

e--

----

----

----

--µ

g/L

21

08

-38

-3 1

06

-42

-3

<2

ort

ho

-Xy

len

e--

----

----

----

--µ

g/L

29

5-4

7-6

<2

^ T

ota

l X

yle

ne

s--

----

----

----

--µ

g/L

21

33

0-2

0-7

<1

^ --

----

----

----

--µ

g/L

1--

--S

um

of

BT

EX

<5

Na

ph

tha

len

e--

----

----

----

--µ

g/L

59

1-2

0-3

4 o

f 4

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

ES

16

03

02

0

----

:P

roje

ct

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

AL S

TR

AT

EG

IES

An

aly

tical R

esu

lts

----

----

----

----

TR

IP 1

Clie

nt

sam

ple

ID

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

WA

TE

R

(M

atr

ix:

WA

TE

R)

----

----

----

----

[08

-Fe

b-2

01

6]

Clie

nt

sam

plin

g d

ate

/ t

ime

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

ES

16

03

02

0-0

01

Un

itL

OR

CA

S N

um

be

rC

om

po

un

d

Re

sult

Re

sult

Resu

ltR

esu

ltR

esu

lt

EP

080S

: T

PH

(V)/

BT

EX

Su

rro

gate

s

92

.41

.2-D

ich

loro

eth

an

e-D

4--

----

----

----

--%

21

70

60

-07

-0

10

5T

olu

en

e-D

8--

----

----

----

--%

22

03

7-2

6-5

11

04

-Bro

mo

flu

oro

be

nze

ne

----

----

----

----

%2

46

0-0

0-4

Fa

lse 2

2.0

0T

rue

Envir

onm

ental

QU

AL

ITY

CO

NT

RO

L R

EP

OR

TW

ork

Ord

er

:E

S1603020

Pa

ge

:1

of 6

::

La

bo

rato

ryC

lien

tE

nvi

ronm

enta

l Div

isio

n S

ydney

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

AL

ST

RA

TE

GIE

S

:C

onta

ct D

EA

N S

TA

FF

OR

D:

Conta

ct

:A

dd

ress

SU

ITE

2, LE

VE

L 1

20 C

HA

ND

OS

ST

RE

ET

ST

LE

ON

AR

DS

NS

W A

US

TR

ALIA

2065

Ad

dre

ss:

277-2

89 W

oodpark

Road S

mith

field

NS

W A

ust

ralia

2164

::

E-m

ail

E-m

ail

deanst

afford

@envi

ronm

enta

lstr

ate

gie

s.co

m.a

u

::

Te

lep

ho

ne

+61 0

2 9

437 4

587

+61-2

-8784 8

555

:T

ele

ph

on

e

::

Fa

csim

ileF

acs

imile

----

+61-2

-8784 8

500

QC

Le

vel

:N

EP

M 2

013 B

3 &

ALS

QC

Sta

ndard

:P

roje

ct--

--

Da

te S

am

ple

s R

ece

ive

d:10-F

eb-2

016

:O

rde

r n

um

be

r16021

Da

te A

na

lysi

s C

om

me

nce

d:11-F

eb-2

016

:C

-O-C

nu

mb

er

----

Issu

e D

ate

:18-F

eb-2

016

Sa

mp

ler

:C

OLIN

BIG

GS

No

. o

f sa

mp

les

rece

ive

d1

:S

ite:

2015 S

erv

ices

Cata

logue

No

. o

f sa

mp

les

an

aly

sed

1:

Qu

ote

nu

mb

er

:--

--

This

report

supers

edes

any

pre

vious

report

(s)

with

this

refe

rence. R

esu

lts a

pply

to the s

am

ple

(s)

as

subm

itted.

This

Qualit

y C

ontr

ol R

eport

conta

ins the follo

win

g in

form

atio

n:

l

La

bo

rato

ry D

up

lica

te (

DU

P)

Re

po

rt;

Re

lativ

e P

erc

en

tag

e D

iffe

ren

ce (

RP

D)

an

d A

cce

pta

nce

Lim

its

l

Me

tho

d B

lan

k (M

B)

an

d L

ab

ora

tory

Co

ntr

ol S

pik

e (

LC

S)

Re

po

rt;

Re

cove

ry a

nd

Acc

ep

tan

ce L

imits

l

Ma

trix

Sp

ike

(M

S)

Re

po

rt;

Re

cove

ry a

nd

Acc

ep

tan

ce L

imits

Sig

nato

ries

This

docu

ment

has

been

ele

ctro

nic

ally

si

gned

by

the

auth

orize

d

signato

ries

indic

ate

d

belo

w.

Ele

ctro

nic

si

gnin

g

has

been

carr

ied

out

in

com

plia

nce

with p

rocedure

s speci

fied in

21 C

FR

Part

11.

Sig

na

torie

sA

ccre

dita

tion

Ca

teg

ory

Po

sitio

n

Pa

bi S

ub

ba

Se

nio

r O

rga

nic

Ch

em

ist

Syd

ne

y O

rga

nic

s,

Sm

ithfie

ld,

NS

W

Sh

ob

hn

a C

ha

nd

raM

eta

ls C

oo

rdin

ato

rS

ydn

ey I

no

rga

nic

s,

Sm

ithfie

ld,

NS

W

NA

TA

Acc

red

ited

La

bo

rato

ry 8

25

Acc

red

ited

fo

r

com

plia

nce

with

ISO

/IE

C 1

70

25

.

R I

G H

T

S O

L U

T I

O N

S |

R I

G H

T

P A

R T

N E

R

2 o

f 6

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

ES

16

03

02

0

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

AL

ST

RA

TE

GIE

S

----

:P

roje

ct

Gen

era

l C

om

men

ts

Th

e

an

aly

tica

l p

roce

du

res

use

d

by

the

E

nvi

ron

me

nta

l D

ivis

ion

h

ave

b

ee

n

de

ve

lop

ed

fr

om

e

sta

blis

he

d

inte

rna

tion

ally

re

cog

niz

ed

p

roce

du

res

such

a

s th

ose

p

ub

lish

ed

b

y

the

U

SE

PA

, A

PH

A,

AS

a

nd

N

EP

M.

In

ho

use

de

velo

pe

d p

roce

du

res

are

em

plo

yed

in t

he

ab

sen

ce o

f d

ocu

me

nte

d s

tan

da

rds

or

by

clie

nt

req

ue

st.

Wh

ere

mo

istu

re d

ete

rmin

atio

n h

as

be

en

pe

rfo

rme

d,

resu

lts a

re r

ep

ort

ed

on

a d

ry w

eig

ht

ba

sis.

Wh

ere

a r

ep

ort

ed

less

th

an

(<

) re

sult

is h

igh

er

tha

n t

he

LO

R,

this

ma

y b

e d

ue

to

prim

ary

sa

mp

le e

xtra

ct/d

ige

sta

te d

ilutio

n a

nd

/or

insu

ffic

ien

t sa

mp

le f

or

an

aly

sis.

Wh

ere

th

e L

OR

of

a r

ep

ort

ed

re

su

lt d

iffe

rs f

rom

sta

nd

ard

LO

R,

this

ma

y b

e d

ue

to

hig

h m

ois

ture

co

nte

nt,

insu

ffic

ien

t sa

mp

le (

red

uce

d w

eig

ht

em

plo

ye

d)

or

ma

trix

inte

rfe

ren

ce.

An

on

ymo

us

= R

efe

rs t

o s

am

ple

s w

hic

h a

re n

ot

spe

cific

ally

pa

rt o

f th

is w

ork

ord

er

bu

t fo

rme

d p

art

of

the

QC

pro

cess

lot

CA

S N

um

be

r =

CA

S r

eg

istr

y n

um

be

r fr

om

da

tab

ase

ma

inta

ine

d b

y C

he

mic

al A

bst

ract

s S

erv

ice

s. T

he

Ch

em

ica

l Ab

stra

cts

Se

rvic

e is

a d

ivis

ion

of

the

Am

erica

n C

he

mic

al S

ocie

ty.

LO

R =

Lim

it o

f re

po

rtin

g

RP

D =

Re

lativ

e P

erc

en

tag

e D

iffe

ren

ce

#

= I

nd

ica

tes

faile

d Q

C

Ke

y :

3 o

f 6

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

ES

16

03

02

0

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

AL

ST

RA

TE

GIE

S

----

:P

roje

ct

Lab

ora

tory

Du

plicate

(D

UP

) R

ep

ort

Th

e

qu

alit

y co

ntr

ol

term

L

ab

ora

tory

D

up

lica

te

refe

rs

to

a

ran

do

mly

se

lect

ed

in

tra

lab

ora

tory

sp

lit.

La

bo

rato

ry

du

plic

ate

s p

rovi

de

in

form

atio

n

reg

ard

ing

m

eth

od

p

recis

ion

a

nd

sa

mp

le

he

tero

ge

ne

ity.

Th

e

pe

rmitt

ed

ra

ng

es

for

the

R

ela

tive

P

erc

en

t D

evi

atio

n

(RP

D)

of

La

bo

rato

ry

Du

plic

ate

s a

re

spe

cifie

d

in

AL

S

Me

tho

d

QW

I-E

N/3

8 a

nd

a

re

de

pe

nd

en

t o

n

the

m

ag

nitu

de

o

f re

sults

in

co

mp

ariso

n

to

the

le

ve

l o

f re

po

rtin

g:

Re

su

lt <

1

0 t

ime

s

LO

R:

No

Lim

it; R

esu

lt b

etw

ee

n 1

0 a

nd

20

tim

es

LO

R:-

0%

- 5

0%

; R

esu

lt >

20

tim

es L

OR

:0%

- 2

0%

.

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

WA

TE

RL

ab

ora

tory

Du

pli

ca

te (

DU

P)

Re

po

rt

Ori

gin

al

Re

su

ltR

PD

(%

)L

ab

ora

tory

sa

mp

le I

DC

lie

nt

sa

mp

le I

DM

eth

od:

Co

mp

ou

nd

CA

S N

um

be

rL

OR

Un

itD

up

lic

ate

Re

su

ltR

ec

ov

ery

Lim

its

(%

)

EG

020F

: D

isso

lved

Meta

ls b

y IC

P-M

S (Q

C L

ot:

360815)

EG

02

0A

-F:

Ca

dm

ium

74

40

-43

-90

.00

01

mg

/L<

0.0

00

1<

0.0

00

10

.00

No

Lim

itT

RIP

1

ES

16

03

02

0-0

01

EG

02

0A

-F:

Ars

en

ic7

44

0-3

8-2

0.0

01

mg

/L<

0.0

01

<0

.00

10

.00

No

Lim

it

EG

02

0A

-F:

Ch

rom

ium

74

40

-47

-30

.00

1m

g/L

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

0.0

0N

o L

imit

EG

02

0A

-F:

Co

pp

er

74

40

-50

-80

.00

1m

g/L

0.0

01

0.0

01

0.0

0N

o L

imit

EG

02

0A

-F:

Le

ad

74

39

-92

-10

.00

1m

g/L

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

0.0

0N

o L

imit

EG

02

0A

-F:

Nic

kel

74

40

-02

-00

.00

1m

g/L

0.0

02

0.0

01

0.0

0N

o L

imit

EG

02

0A

-F:

Zin

c7

44

0-6

6-6

0.0

05

mg

/L<

0.0

05

0.0

05

0.0

0N

o L

imit

EG

02

0A

-F:

Ca

dm

ium

74

40

-43

-90

.00

01

mg

/L0

.00

05

0.0

00

40

.00

No

Lim

itA

no

nym

ou

s E

S1

60

30

72

-01

0

EG

02

0A

-F:

Ars

en

ic7

44

0-3

8-2

0.0

01

mg

/L<

0.0

01

<0

.00

10

.00

No

Lim

it

EG

02

0A

-F:

Ch

rom

ium

74

40

-47

-30

.00

1m

g/L

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

0.0

0N

o L

imit

EG

02

0A

-F:

Co

pp

er

74

40

-50

-80

.00

1m

g/L

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

0.0

0N

o L

imit

EG

02

0A

-F:

Le

ad

74

39

-92

-10

.00

1m

g/L

<0

.00

1<

0.0

01

0.0

0N

o L

imit

EG

02

0A

-F:

Nic

kel

74

40

-02

-00

.00

1m

g/L

0.1

00

0.0

97

2.7

90

% -

20

%

EG

02

0A

-F:

Zin

c7

44

0-6

6-6

0.0

05

mg

/L0

.34

50

.34

30

.49

20

% -

20

%

EG

035F

: D

isso

lved

Merc

ury

by F

IMS

(Q

C L

ot:

360816)

EG

03

5F

: M

erc

ury

74

39

-97

-60

.00

01

mg

/L<

0.0

00

1<

0.0

00

10

.00

No

Lim

itA

no

nym

ou

s E

S1

60

32

29

-02

3

EP

080/0

71:

To

tal P

etr

ole

um

Hyd

rocarb

on

s (Q

C L

ot:

361993)

EP

08

0:

C6

- C

9 F

ract

ion

----

20

µg

/L1

44

01

42

01

.55

0%

- 2

0%

An

on

ymo

us

ES

16

03

08

0-0

01

EP

08

0:

C6

- C

9 F

ractio

n--

--2

0µ

g/L

<2

0<

20

0.0

0N

o L

imit

An

on

ymo

us

ES

16

03

08

5-0

01

EP

080/0

71:

To

tal R

eco

vera

ble

Hyd

rocarb

on

s -

NE

PM

2013 F

racti

on

s (Q

C L

ot:

361993)

EP

08

0:

C6

- C

10

Fra

ctio

nC

6_

C1

02

0µ

g/L

14

90

14

60

1.4

80

% -

20

%A

no

nym

ou

s E

S1

60

30

80

-00

1

EP

08

0:

C6

- C

10

Fra

ctio

nC

6_

C1

02

0µ

g/L

<2

0<

20

0.0

0N

o L

imit

An

on

ymo

us

ES

16

03

08

5-0

01

EP

080:

BT

EX

N (Q

C L

ot:

361993)

EP

08

0:

Be

nze

ne

71

-43

-21

µg

/L<

1<

10

.00

No

Lim

itA

no

nym

ou

s E

S1

60

30

80

-00

1

EP

08

0:

Eth

ylb

en

zen

e1

00

-41

-42

µg

/L<

2<

20

.00

No

Lim

it

EP

08

0:

me

ta-

& p

ara

-Xyl

en

e1

08

-38

-3

10

6-4

2-3

2µ

g/L

<2

<2

0.0

0N

o L

imit

EP

08

0:

ort

ho

-Xyle

ne

95

-47

-62

µg

/L<

2<

20

.00

No

Lim

it

EP

08

0:

To

lue

ne

10

8-8

8-3

2µ

g/L

<2

<2

0.0

0N

o L

imit

EP

08

0:

Na

ph

tha

len

e9

1-2

0-3

5µ

g/L

<5

<5

0.0

0N

o L

imit

EP

08

0:

Be

nze

ne

71

-43

-21

µg

/L<

1<

10

.00

No

Lim

itA

no

nym

ou

s E

S1

60

30

85

-00

1

EP

08

0:

Eth

ylb

en

zen

e1

00

-41

-42

µg

/L<

2<

20

.00

No

Lim

it

EP

08

0:

me

ta-

& p

ara

-Xyl

en

e1

08

-38

-3

10

6-4

2-3

2µ

g/L

<2

<2

0.0

0N

o L

imit

EP

08

0:

ort

ho

-Xyle

ne

95

-47

-62

µg

/L<

2<

20

.00

No

Lim

it

4 o

f 6

:P

ag

e

Wo

rk O

rde

r: :

Clie

nt

ES

16

03

02

0

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

AL

ST

RA

TE

GIE

S

----

:P

roje

ct

Su

b-M

atr

ix:

WA

TE

RL

ab

ora

tory

Du

pli

ca

te (

DU

P)

Re

po

rt

Ori

gin

al

Re

su

ltR

PD

report title. edit this under document properties...prysmian power cables & systems australia pty...

Documents