report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · summary report nba 2019—2020 teams rankings...

44
SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS........................................................................................ 2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS............................................................................ 4 ATTACKS ANALYSIS..................................................................................... 6 DEFENSE ANALYSIS..................................................................................... 8 REBOUNDS, TURNOVERS, STEALS, FOULS.................................. 10 FIELD GOALS PLAYTYPES IN ATTACK............................................ 12 FIELD GOALS PLAYTYPES IN DEFENSE......................................... 14 PLAYERS RANKINGS POINTS, ASSISTS, ATTACKS................................................................ 16 REBOUNDS, TURNOVERS, FOULS, DEFENSE............................... 17 FIELD GOALS PLAYTYPES..................................................................... 18 COMPARABLE TABLE BOXSCORE. CENTERS............................................................................... 19 BOXSCORE. FORWARDS.......................................................................... 21 BOXSCORE. GUARDS................................................................................. 26 FG PLAYTYPES. CENTERS...................................................................... 32 FG PLAYTYPES. FORWARDS................................................................. 34 FG PLAYTYPES. GUARDS........................................................................ 39

Upload: others

Post on 13-Oct-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

S U M M A R Y R E P O R T

N B A

2019—2020

T E A M S R A N K I N G S

P O I N T S A N A L Y S I S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

F I E L D G O A L S A N A L Y S I S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4

A T T A C K S A N A L Y S I S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

D E F E N S E A N A L Y S I S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

R E B O U N D S , T U R N O V E R S , S T E A L S , F O U L S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 0

F I E L D G O A L S P L A Y T Y P E S I N A T T A C K. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 2

F I E L D G O A L S P L A Y T Y P E S I N D E F E N S E. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 4

P L A Y E R S R A N K I N G S

P O I N T S , A S S I S T S , A T T A C K S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 6

R E B O U N D S , T U R N O V E R S , F O U L S , D E F E N S E. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 7

F I E L D G O A L S P L A Y T Y P E S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 8

C O M P A R A B L E T A B L E

B O X S C O R E . C E N T E R S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 9

B O X S C O R E . F O R W A R D S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1

B O X S C O R E . G U A R D S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 6

F G P L A Y T Y P E S . C E N T E R S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2

F G P L A Y T Y P E S . F O R W A R D S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4

F G P L A Y T Y P E S . G U A R D S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 9

Page 2: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0P O I N T S A N A L Y S I S

InStat IndexInStatIndex

Matchesplayed

1 Bucks 301 65

2 Raptors 300 64

3 Rockets 299 64

4 Celtics 298 64

5 Clippers 296 64

6 Nuggets 296 65

7 76ers 296 65

8 Jazz 296 64

9 Lakers 295 63

10 Thunder 294 64

11 Heat 294 65

12 Pacers 294 65

13 Trail Blazers 294 66

14 Spurs 292 63

15 Mavericks 291 67

16 Pelicans 291 64

17 Warriors 290 65

18 Nets 290 64

19 Magic 289 65

20 Kings 289 64

21 Timberwolves 288 64

22 Grizzlies 288 65

23 Pistons 287 66

24 Hornets 286 65

25 Wizards 286 64

26 Suns 286 65

27 Cavaliers 285 65

28 Bulls 283 65

29 Hawks 283 67

30 Knicks 283 66 A V E R A G E 291 65

Points/100 poss

1 Bucks 118.65 104.98

2 Rockets 118.12 106.47

3 Mavericks 116.36 107.38

4 Clippers 116.19 104.68

5 Pelicans 116.19 102.80

6 Wizards 115.61 103.94

7 Lakers 114.33 104.51

8 Trail Blazers 113.64 104.04

9 Timberwolves 113.25 100.27

10 Spurs 113.16 104.67

11 Celtics 113.00 104.23

12 Raptors 112.98 103.65

13 Grizzlies 112.63 101.24

14 Suns 112.55 101.86

15 Heat 112.15 103.84

16 Hawks 111.76 98.53

17 Jazz 111.03 103.54

18 Thunder 110.77 101.98

19 Nets 110.77 99.59

20 Nuggets 110.40 102.72

21 76ers 109.58 101.79

22 Pacers 109.34 102.51

23 Kings 108.98 101.57

24 Pistons 107.24 100.38

25 Cavaliers 106.88 98.43

26 Bulls 106.85 98.67

27 Magic 106.37 100.08

28 Warriors 106.34 97.85

29 Knicks 105.80 98.53

30 Hornets 102.88 97.87 A V E R A G E 111.46 102.10

Opp Points/100 poss

1 Raptors 106.53 96.65

2 Celtics 106.81 98.42

3 Lakers 106.92 97.76

4 Magic 107.34 101.78

5 Bucks 107.35 95.29

6 76ers 107.37 100.53

7 Pacers 107.40 99.92

8 Nuggets 107.45 100.88

9 Jazz 107.86 101.06

10 Thunder 108.31 100.64

11 Heat 108.92 102.26

12 Hornets 109.63 104.16

13 Clippers 109.67 98.46

14 Bulls 109.92 101.27

15 Mavericks 110.31 102.34

16 Pistons 110.80 104.06

17 Kings 110.91 102.24

18 Nets 111.41 100.29

19 Knicks 112.26 104.38

20 Grizzlies 113.71 102.58

21 Suns 113.92 102.86

22 Rockets 114.38 101.64

23 Cavaliers 114.78 106.82

24 Spurs 114.92 105.45

25 Warriors 115.05 104.73

26 Trail Blazers 115.24 105.01

27 Pelicans 117.02 103.31

28 Timberwolves 117.55 104.10

29 Wizards 119.66 107.02

30 Hawks 119.73 106.28 A V E R A G E 111.44 102.07

+/-/100 poss

1 Bucks 11.3 9.7

2 Lakers 7.4 6.7

3 Clippers 6.5 6.2

4 Raptors 6.5 7.0

5 Celtics 6.2 5.8

6 Mavericks 6.1 5.0

7 Rockets 3.7 4.8

8 Heat 3.2 1.6

9 Jazz 3.2 2.5

10 Nuggets 3.0 1.8

11 Thunder 2.5 1.3

12 76ers 2.2 1.3

13 Pacers 1.9 2.6

14 Nets -0.6 -0.7

15 Pelicans -0.8 -0.5

16 Magic -1.0 -1.7

17 Grizzlies -1.1 -1.3

18 Suns -1.4 -1.0

19 Trail Blazers -1.6 -1.0

20 Spurs -1.8 -0.8

21 Kings -1.9 -0.7

22 Bulls -3.1 -2.6

23 Pistons -3.6 -3.7

24 Wizards -4.1 -3.1

25 Timberwolves -4.3 -3.8

26 Knicks -6.5 -5.9

27 Hornets -6.8 -6.3

28 Hawks -8.0 -7.7

29 Cavaliers -7.9 -8.4

30 Warriors -8.7 -6.9

2

Page 3: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0P O I N T S A N A L Y S I S

Points off turnovers

1 Bulls 16.97

2 Raptors 15.66

3 Wizards 14.77

4 Lakers 14.60

5 Rockets 14.42

6 Kings 13.83

7 Pacers 13.83

8 Suns 13.80

9 Celtics 13.67

10 Pelicans 13.42

11 Magic 13.26

12 Grizzlies 13.20

13 Nuggets 13.14

14 Hawks 13.07

15 76ers 13.06

16 Thunder 13.00

17 Hornets 12.97

18 Clippers 12.81

19 Warriors 12.77

20 Timberwolves 12.64

21 Bucks 12.52

22 Knicks 12.35

23 Pistons 12.32

24 Heat 12.09

25 Nets 11.73

26 Cavaliers 11.68

27 Mavericks 11.67

28 Jazz 11.38

29 Spurs 11.37

30 Trail Blazers 10.77 A V E R A G E 13.09

Paint pointsShare

1 Grizzlies 54.12 48.1%

2 Lakers 51.52 45.1%

3 Hawks 49.52 44.3%

4 Bucks 48.95 41.3%

5 Timberwolves 48.44 42.8%

6 Pelicans 48.34 41.6%

7 Pacers 48.28 44.2%

8 Cavaliers 48.25 45.1%

9 Nets 48.12 43.4%

10 Bulls 48.09 45.0%

11 Nuggets 47.78 43.3%

12 Knicks 47.52 44.9%

13 Pistons 47.45 44.2%

14 Celtics 47.19 41.8%

15 Raptors 47.00 41.6%

16 Clippers 46.75 40.2%

17 Suns 46.43 41.3%

18 Rockets 46.31 39.2%

19 Jazz 46.19 41.6%

20 76ers 46.12 42.1%

21 Wizards 46.03 39.8%

22 Kings 44.69 41.0%

23 Hornets 44.65 43.4%

24 Thunder 44.34 40.0%

25 Magic 43.75 41.1%

26 Mavericks 43.52 37.4%

27 Heat 43.05 38.4%

28 Trail Blazers 42.36 37.3%

29 Warriors 42.18 39.7%

30 Spurs 41.84 37.0% A V E R A G E 46.63 41.8%

Second chance pointsShare

1 Knicks 10.53 10.0%

2 Pelicans 10.53 9.1%

3 Mavericks 10.46 9.0%

4 Nuggets 10.18 9.2%

5 Hornets 10.11 9.8%

6 Lakers 10.10 8.8%

7 Grizzlies 10.05 8.9%

8 Kings 9.77 9.0%

9 Bulls 9.74 9.1%

10 Cavaliers 9.58 9.0%

11 Clippers 9.58 8.2%

12 Wizards 9.52 8.2%

13 Trail Blazers 9.47 8.3%

14 Hawks 9.43 8.4%

15 76ers 9.26 8.5%

16 Rockets 9.25 7.8%

17 Bucks 9.18 7.7%

18 Celtics 9.12 8.1%

19 Timberwolves 9.09 8.0%

20 Nets 9.09 8.2%

21 Jazz 9.03 8.1%

22 Warriors 8.91 8.4%

23 Raptors 8.89 7.9%

24 Magic 8.85 8.3%

25 Suns 8.74 7.8%

26 Pistons 8.74 8.1%

27 Pacers 8.45 7.7%

28 Heat 7.60 6.8%

29 Spurs 7.44 6.6%

30 Thunder 7.03 6.3% A V E R A G E 9.26 8.3%

Starting lineup pointsShare

1 Rockets 90.11 76.3%

2 Trail Blazers 87.02 76.6%

3 Celtics 85.83 76.0%

4 Suns 82.42 73.2%

5 Raptors 80.97 71.7%

6 Bucks 79.29 66.8%

7 Pelicans 79.23 68.2%

8 Jazz 79.09 71.2%

9 76ers 78.22 71.4%

10 Hawks 77.79 69.6%

11 Mavericks 77.21 66.4%

12 Nets 75.56 68.2%

13 Lakers 75.35 65.9%

14 Timberwolves 75.27 66.5%

15 Nuggets 74.66 67.6%

16 Pacers 74.54 68.2%

17 Cavaliers 73.40 68.7%

18 Kings 72.48 66.5%

19 Thunder 71.34 64.4%

20 Grizzlies 71.23 63.2%

21 Heat 70.82 63.1%

22 Magic 69.57 65.4%

23 Hornets 69.05 67.1%

24 Bulls 68.58 64.2%

25 Spurs 68.10 60.2%

26 Warriors 66.57 62.6%

27 Wizards 66.09 57.2%

28 Clippers 64.69 55.7%

29 Knicks 63.59 60.1%

30 Pistons 61.45 57.3% A V E R A G E 74.32 66.7%

Bench pointsShare

1 Clippers 51.50 44.3%

2 Wizards 49.52 42.8%

3 Pistons 45.79 42.7%

4 Spurs 45.06 39.8%

5 Knicks 42.21 39.9%

6 Grizzlies 41.40 36.8%

7 Heat 41.34 36.9%

8 Warriors 39.77 37.4%

9 Thunder 39.42 35.6%

10 Bucks 39.35 33.2%

11 Mavericks 39.15 33.6%

12 Lakers 38.98 34.1%

13 Bulls 38.26 35.8%

14 Timberwolves 37.98 33.5%

15 Pelicans 36.95 31.8%

16 Magic 36.80 34.6%

17 Kings 36.50 33.5%

18 Nuggets 35.74 32.4%

19 Nets 35.20 31.8%

20 Pacers 34.80 31.8%

21 Hawks 33.97 30.4%

22 Hornets 33.83 32.9%

23 Cavaliers 33.48 31.3%

24 Raptors 32.02 28.3%

25 Jazz 31.94 28.8%

26 76ers 31.37 28.6%

27 Suns 30.14 26.8%

28 Rockets 28.02 23.7%

29 Celtics 27.17 24.0%

30 Trail Blazers 26.62 23.4% A V E R A G E 37.14 33.3%

3

Page 4: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0F I E L D G O A L S A N A L Y S I S

Field goals

1 Lakers 42.9 —88.5 48.5%

2 Bucks 43.5 —91.2 47.7%

3 Pacers 42.2 —88.4 47.7%

4 Jazz 40.1 —84.6 47.4%

5 Thunder 40.3 —85.2 47.3%

6 Grizzlies 42.8 —91.0 47.0%

7 Nuggets 41.8 —88.9 47.0%

8 Heat 39.6 —84.3 47.0%

9 Spurs 42.1 —89.5 47.0%

10 76ers 40.8 —87.8 46.5%

11 Clippers 41.6 —89.6 46.4%

12 Suns 40.8 —87.9 46.4%

13 Mavericks 41.6 —90.0 46.2%

14 Pelicans 42.6 —92.2 46.2%

15 Trail Blazers 41.9 —90.9 46.1%

16 Kings 40.4 —87.9 46.0%

17 Celtics 41.2 —89.6 46.0%

18 Wizards 41.9 —91.0 46.0%

19 Pistons 39.3 —85.7 45.9%

20 Raptors 40.6 —88.5 45.9%

21 Cavaliers 40.3 —88.0 45.8%

22 Rockets 41.1 —90.7 45.3%

23 Knicks 40.0 —89.2 44.8%

24 Hawks 40.6 —90.6 44.8%

25 Bulls 39.6 —88.7 44.6%

26 Nets 40.0 —90.1 44.4%

27 Magic 39.2 —88.8 44.1%

28 Timberwolves 40.4 —91.6 44.1%

29 Warriors 38.6 —88.1 43.8%

30 Hornets 37.3 —86.0 43.4% A V E R A G E 40.8 — 88.8 45.9%

3-pt field goals

1 Heat 13.4 —34.9 38.4%

2 Jazz 13.2 —34.4 38.4%

3 Raptors 13.8 —37.0 37.3%

4 Trail Blazers 12.6 —33.8 37.3%

5 Spurs 10.7 —28.8 37.2%

6 Pelicans 14.0 —37.6 37.2%

7 Wizards 12.3 —33.1 37.2%

8 Mavericks 15.3 —41.5 36.9%

9 Clippers 12.2 —33.2 36.7%

10 Pistons 12.0 —32.7 36.7%

11 Pacers 10.0 —27.5 36.4%

12 Kings 12.6 —34.7 36.3%

13 Celtics 12.4 —34.3 36.2%

14 76ers 11.4 —31.7 36.0%

15 Nuggets 10.9 —30.5 35.7%

16 Lakers 11.2 —31.5 35.6%

17 Bucks 13.7 —38.7 35.4%

18 Thunder 10.4 —29.4 35.4%

19 Hornets 12.1 —34.4 35.2%

20 Suns 11.2 —31.8 35.2%

21 Cavaliers 11.2 —31.9 35.1%

22 Grizzlies 10.9 —31.1 35.0%

23 Rockets 15.4 —44.3 34.8%

24 Bulls 12.2 —35.2 34.7%

25 Magic 10.9 —32.1 34.0%

26 Nets 12.9 —37.9 34.0%

27 Knicks 9.6 —28.4 33.8%

28 Timberwolves 13.3 —39.7 33.5%

29 Warriors 10.4 —31.3 33.2%

30 Hawks 12.0 —36.1 33.2% A V E R A G E 12.1 — 34.0 35.6%

2-pt field goals

1 Bucks 29.8 —52.5 56.8%

2 Lakers 31.8 —57.1 55.7%

3 Rockets 25.7 —46.4 55.4%

4 Mavericks 26.3 —48.5 54.2%

5 Jazz 27.0 —50.2 53.8%

6 Thunder 29.9 —55.8 53.6%

7 Grizzlies 31.8 —59.9 53.1%

8 Heat 26.3 —49.5 53.1%

9 Pacers 32.2 —60.8 53.0%

10 Nuggets 31.0 —58.5 53.0%

11 Suns 29.6 —56.1 52.8%

12 Hawks 28.6 —54.5 52.5%

13 76ers 29.4 —56.1 52.4%

14 Pelicans 28.6 —54.6 52.4%

15 Clippers 29.5 —56.4 52.3%

16 Timberwolves 27.1 —51.9 52.2%

17 Kings 27.7 —53.2 52.1%

18 Raptors 26.8 —51.4 52.1%

19 Celtics 28.8 —55.3 52.1%

20 Nets 27.1 —52.2 51.9%

21 Cavaliers 29.1 —56.1 51.9%

22 Spurs 31.4 —60.7 51.7%

23 Pistons 27.3 —53.0 51.5%

24 Trail Blazers 29.3 —57.0 51.4%

25 Bulls 27.4 —53.5 51.2%

26 Wizards 29.6 —57.9 51.1%

27 Knicks 30.4 —60.8 50.0%

28 Magic 28.3 —56.7 49.9%

29 Warriors 28.2 —56.9 49.6%

30 Hornets 25.2 —51.6 48.8% A V E R A G E 28.7 — 54.8 52.4%

Free throws

1 Suns 19.8 —24.0 82.5%

2 Spurs 18.4 —22.8 80.7%

3 Warriors 18.7 —23.2 80.6%

4 Celtics 18.3 —22.8 80.3%

5 Trail Blazers 17.4 —21.7 80.2%

6 Raptors 18.1 —22.6 80.1%

7 Thunder 19.8 —24.8 79.8%

8 Clippers 20.8 —26.2 79.4%

9 Hawks 18.5 —23.4 79.1%

10 Pacers 15.1 —19.1 79.1%

11 Rockets 20.5 —26.0 78.8%

12 Wizards 19.5 —24.8 78.6%

13 Heat 19.5 —25.1 77.7%

14 Nuggets 15.9 —20.5 77.6%

15 Mavericks 17.9 —23.1 77.5%

16 Jazz 17.6 —22.8 77.2%

17 Magic 17.0 —22.1 76.9%

18 Kings 15.6 —20.3 76.8%

19 Grizzlies 16.2 —21.3 76.1%

20 Cavaliers 15.1 —19.9 75.9%

21 Bulls 15.5 —20.5 75.6%

22 Timberwolves 19.1 —25.4 75.2%

23 76ers 16.6 —22.1 75.1%

24 Hornets 16.2 —21.6 75.0%

25 Nets 18.0 —24.1 74.7%

26 Bucks 17.8 —24.0 74.2%

27 Pistons 16.6 —22.4 74.1%

28 Lakers 17.3 —23.7 73.0%

29 Pelicans 16.9 —23.2 72.8%

30 Knicks 16.3 —23.5 69.4% A V E R A G E 17.7 — 22.9 77.3%

Assists

1 Suns 27.2

2 Pelicans 27.0

3 Grizzlies 26.9

4 Nuggets 26.5

5 Heat 26.0

6 Lakers 25.9

7 76ers 25.8

8 Pacers 25.7

9 Bucks 25.6

10 Warriors 25.5

11 Raptors 25.4

12 Wizards 25.2

13 Mavericks 24.4

14 Spurs 24.2

15 Pistons 24.0

16 Magic 23.9

17 Nets 23.9

18 Hornets 23.8

19 Clippers 23.8

20 Hawks 23.8

21 Timberwolves 23.7

22 Bulls 23.4

23 Kings 23.2

24 Cavaliers 22.9

25 Celtics 22.7

26 Jazz 22.2

27 Knicks 22.1

28 Thunder 21.9

29 Rockets 21.5

30 Trail Blazers 20.2 A V E R A G E 24.3

4

Page 5: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0F I E L D G O A L S A N A L Y S I S

Field goals - zones efficiency

59.0%

39.5% 37.8%39.9% 39.2%

39.4% 40.8%

43.4%

39.3% 41.5%

41.9%

35.6% 34.2%

34.4%

100% — %FG - LEAGUE AVERAGE

Field goals - share by zones

38.3%

4.6% 4.2%1.0% 1.0%

3.9% 4.1%

6.3%

2.2% 2.2%

2.9%

11.5% 10.8%

7.1%

100% — %FG - LEAGUE AVERAGE

5

Page 6: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0A T T A C K S A N A L Y S I S

Positional attacksPoints Turnovers

1 Mavericks 52.1 —99.3 52.5% 89.8 11.7

2 Bucks 50.4 —97.7 51.6% 87.0 12.9

3 Trail Blazers 51.5 —99.6 51.7% 86.7 11.8

4 Pelicans 50.1 —99.4 50.4% 85.8 14.2

5 Clippers 51.6 —99.0 52.1% 85.2 13.1

6 Spurs 50.4 —97.7 51.6% 84.9 10.6

7 Rockets 48.3 —96.8 49.9% 84.6 12.7

8 Pacers 49.4 —96.0 51.5% 84.2 11.7

9 Nuggets 51.0 —96.1 53.1% 84.0 12.1

10 Timberwolves 50.4 —101.6 49.6% 83.9 13.5

11 Jazz 50.9 —96.9 52.5% 83.6 13.2

12 Wizards 50.4 —98.0 51.4% 83.1 12.3

13 Heat 50.6 —98.0 51.6% 82.8 13.3

14 Lakers 50.0 —95.2 52.5% 82.4 13.1

15 Kings 48.5 —96.5 50.3% 82.2 12.9

16 Celtics 49.0 —95.2 51.5% 82.2 12.1

17 Hawks 50.2 —101.5 49.5% 82.0 14.2

18 Cavaliers 49.1 —98.0 50.1% 82.0 14.9

19 Thunder 52.2 —97.7 53.4% 81.9 11.9

20 Nets 49.5 —99.7 49.6% 81.9 14.1

21 Grizzlies 49.1 —96.6 50.8% 81.4 13.3

22 76ers 49.8 —95.6 52.1% 81.3 12.3

23 Suns 50.2 —98.3 51.1% 80.5 13.7

24 Knicks 49.1 —96.7 50.8% 79.7 12.7

25 Pistons 47.9 —95.2 50.3% 79.6 13.6

26 Magic 47.6 —96.0 49.6% 79.5 11.4

27 Raptors 45.8 —92.9 49.3% 78.6 12.6

28 Bulls 45.8 —94.6 48.4% 77.6 13.6

29 Warriors 47.0 —96.9 48.5% 76.5 13.3

30 Hornets 46.0 —93.8 49.0% 75.9 12.9 A V E R A G E 49.5 — 97.2 50.9% 82.3 12.8

TransitionsPoints

Turnovers

1 Raptors 9.9—16.1 61.5% 16.3 1.8

2 Grizzlies 8.9—14.6 61.0% 14.9 1.9

3 Lakers 8.9—14.2 62.7% 14.5 1.9

4 Bulls 8.2—13.7 59.9% 13.8 1.8

5 Bucks 8.8—15.3 57.5% 13.7 1.9

6 Pelicans 7.9—13.6 58.1% 13.5 2.0

7 Wizards 7.6—13.3 57.1% 13.0 1.6

8 Rockets 8.3—14.1 58.9% 13.0 1.8

9 Celtics 7.9—13.2 59.8% 12.6 1.5

10 Suns 7.7—12.2 63.1% 12.3 1.4

11 76ers 6.9—12.1 57.0% 11.7 1.9

12 Hawks 6.9—11.9 58.0% 11.3 1.9

13 Kings 6.5—10.8 60.2% 11.2 1.4

14 Warriors 6.8—11.7 58.1% 11.1 1.5

15 Pistons 6.7—11.6 57.8% 11.1 1.8

16 Nets 6.7—11.6 57.8% 10.9 1.3

17 Hornets 6.7—11.3 59.3% 10.6 1.6

18 Nuggets 6.4—11.4 56.1% 10.5 1.5

19 Timberwolves 6.6—11.4 57.9% 10.3 1.8

20 Clippers 7.1—12.0 59.2% 10.2 1.6

21 Pacers 6.4—10.7 59.8% 10.1 1.3

22 Spurs 6.1—10.4 58.7% 9.9 1.5

23 Heat 6.3—10.0 63.0% 9.9 1.4

24 Magic 6.5—10.3 63.1% 9.9 1.2

25 Knicks 6.5—10.7 60.7% 9.9 1.5

26 Cavaliers 6.4—10.6 60.4% 9.8 1.5

27 Jazz 5.8—10.4 55.8% 9.8 1.6

28 Trail Blazers 5.5—9.7 56.7% 9.6 1.2

29 Thunder 6.1—10.9 56.0% 9.0 1.4

30 Mavericks 5.3—9.0 58.9% 8.7 1.0 A V E R A G E 7.1 — 12.0 59.2% 11.4 1.6

Baseline combinationsPoints

Turnovers

1 Heat 1.0—1.9 52.6% 1.7 0.3

2 Pelicans 0.8—1.8 44.4% 1.7 0.3

3 Clippers 0.9—1.6 56.3% 1.6 0.2

4 Knicks 0.9—1.7 52.9% 1.6 0.3

5 Celtics 1.0—1.8 55.6% 1.6 0.2

6 Timberwolves 0.9—1.6 56.3% 1.5 0.2

7 Thunder 0.7—1.4 50.0% 1.5 0.2

8 Cavaliers 0.8—1.7 47.1% 1.5 0.3

9 Lakers 0.7—1.2 58.3% 1.5 0.2

10 Nets 0.9—1.9 47.4% 1.5 0.4

11 Nuggets 0.8—1.5 53.3% 1.4 0.2

12 Pistons 0.7—1.5 46.7% 1.4 0.2

13 Rockets 0.8—1.7 47.1% 1.4 0.2

14 Pacers 0.7—1.4 50.0% 1.4 0.2

15 Grizzlies 0.7—1.3 53.8% 1.4 0.2

16 Mavericks 0.8—1.6 50.0% 1.4 0.1

17 Hawks 0.8—1.7 47.1% 1.3 0.3

18 Spurs 0.7—1.1 63.6% 1.3 0.1

19 Bucks 0.6—1.1 54.5% 1.2 0.2

20 76ers 0.6—1.1 54.5% 1.2 0.2

21 Suns 0.6—1.3 46.2% 1.1 0.2

22 Magic 0.7—1.5 46.7% 1.1 0.2

23 Bulls 0.7—1.5 46.7% 1.1 0.2

24 Raptors 0.6—1.6 37.5% 1.1 0.3

25 Kings 0.5—1.2 41.7% 1.0 0.2

26 Hornets 0.6—1.4 42.9% 1.0 0.2

27 Jazz 0.6—1.3 46.2% 0.9 0.2

28 Trail Blazers 0.6—1.3 46.2% 0.9 0.2

29 Wizards 0.6—1.3 46.2% 0.9 0.1

30 Warriors 0.4—1.1 36.4% 0.8 0.1 A V E R A G E 0.7 — 1.5 46.7% 1.3 0.2

Sideline combinationsPoints

Turnovers

1 Hornets 3.5—7.0 50.0% 6.1 1.0

2 Nets 3.4—6.6 51.5% 6.0 0.8

3 Mavericks 3.2—6.7 47.8% 5.7 0.9

4 Cavaliers 3.3—6.7 49.3% 5.6 1.0

5 Pistons 3.3—6.5 50.8% 5.6 0.9

6 Bucks 3.0—5.8 51.7% 5.5 0.9

7 Thunder 3.5—6.9 50.7% 5.5 1.0

8 Knicks 3.1—5.8 53.4% 5.5 0.8

9 Clippers 3.3—6.7 49.3% 5.4 1.0

10 Kings 3.0—6.1 49.2% 5.3 0.7

11 Lakers 2.9—6.0 48.3% 5.3 0.9

12 Heat 3.1—6.4 48.4% 5.2 0.9

13 Raptors 3.0—6.1 49.2% 5.2 0.9

14 Suns 3.2—6.6 48.5% 5.2 1.1

15 Celtics 3.1—5.9 52.5% 5.2 0.6

16 Grizzlies 3.1—6.4 48.4% 5.2 0.9

17 Trail Blazers 2.7—6.0 45.0% 5.0 0.9

18 Jazz 2.9—6.1 47.5% 5.0 0.9

19 Hawks 2.9—6.4 45.3% 5.0 0.9

20 Pelicans 3.0—6.5 46.2% 4.9 0.8

21 Bulls 2.7—5.5 49.1% 4.9 0.9

22 Pacers 3.0—6.0 50.0% 4.8 0.8

23 Nuggets 3.0—6.5 46.2% 4.8 0.8

24 Warriors 2.7—5.9 45.8% 4.7 0.8

25 Timberwolves 2.8—5.7 49.1% 4.6 0.8

26 76ers 3.1—6.2 50.0% 4.6 0.9

27 Wizards 2.8—5.9 47.5% 4.5 0.9

28 Magic 2.6—5.5 47.3% 4.4 0.7

29 Spurs 2.5—5.1 49.0% 4.1 0.5

30 Rockets 1.9—4.3 44.2% 3.3 0.5 A V E R A G E 3.0 — 6.1 49.2% 5.1 0.8

6

Page 7: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0A T T A C K S A N A L Y S I S

Uncontested FG

1 Trail Blazers 7.7—16.8 45.8%

2 Jazz 6.1—13.8 44.2%

3 Pelicans 7.6—17.6 43.2%

4 Thunder 6.9—16.0 43.1%

5 Wizards 6.9—16.2 42.6%

6 Heat 7.0—16.5 42.4%

7 Nuggets 7.0—16.5 42.4%

8 Raptors 7.5—17.9 41.9%

9 Cavaliers 6.6—16.0 41.3%

10 76ers 7.3—17.7 41.2%

11 Clippers 6.7—16.4 40.9%

12 Bulls 6.5—16.0 40.6%

13 Spurs 6.3—15.6 40.4%

14 Pacers 7.7—19.1 40.3%

15 Kings 8.0—19.9 40.2%

16 Celtics 7.0—17.4 40.2%

17 Pistons 5.9—14.7 40.1%

18 Mavericks 6.9—17.2 40.1%

19 Lakers 6.5—16.3 39.9%

20 Bucks 8.6—21.6 39.8%

21 Suns 7.1—17.9 39.7%

22 Nets 6.1—15.6 39.1%

23 Grizzlies 6.1—15.6 39.1%

24 Hawks 6.3—16.3 38.7%

25 Hornets 5.9—15.4 38.3%

26 Warriors 6.0—15.7 38.2%

27 Rockets 7.1—18.6 38.2%

28 Magic 7.7—20.5 37.6%

29 Timberwolves 5.8—15.6 37.2%

30 Knicks 5.5—14.9 36.9% A V E R A G E 6.8 — 16.8 40.5%

Contested FG

1 Lakers 33.4 —69.2 48.3%

2 Pacers 32.2 —67.0 48.1%

3 Bucks 32.0 —66.7 48.0%

4 Grizzlies 34.6 —73.2 47.3%

5 Jazz 32.2 —69.0 46.7%

6 Spurs 33.2 —71.3 46.6%

7 Thunder 31.2 —67.0 46.6%

8 Heat 30.5 —65.6 46.5%

9 Nuggets 32.6 —70.3 46.4%

10 Suns 31.4 —67.8 46.3%

11 76ers 31.4 —67.9 46.2%

12 Kings 30.4 —66.1 46.0%

13 Celtics 32.1 —70.1 45.8%

14 Mavericks 32.0 —70.0 45.7%

15 Clippers 32.0 —70.3 45.5%

16 Pistons 31.1 —68.7 45.3%

17 Cavaliers 31.7 —70.1 45.2%

18 Wizards 32.7 —72.4 45.2%

19 Pelicans 32.5 —72.1 45.1%

20 Rockets 31.2 —69.3 45.0%

21 Raptors 30.6 —68.1 44.9%

22 Hawks 32.2 —72.1 44.7%

23 Knicks 32.0 —71.7 44.6%

24 Trail Blazers 31.9 —71.7 44.5%

25 Magic 29.2 —66.0 44.2%

26 Bulls 31.1 —70.7 44.0%

27 Nets 31.6 —72.3 43.7%

28 Timberwolves 32.1 —73.4 43.7%

29 Warriors 30.3 —70.0 43.3%

30 Hornets 29.0 —68.2 42.5% A V E R A G E 31.7 — 69.6 45.5%

7

Page 8: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0D E F E N S E A N A L Y S I S

Opp PointsPoints /100 poss

1 Raptors 106.53 96.65

2 Celtics 106.81 98.42

3 Lakers 106.92 97.76

4 Magic 107.34 101.78

5 Bucks 107.35 95.29

6 76ers 107.37 100.53

7 Pacers 107.40 99.92

8 Nuggets 107.45 100.88

9 Jazz 107.86 101.06

10 Thunder 108.31 100.64

11 Heat 108.92 102.26

12 Hornets 109.63 104.16

13 Clippers 109.67 98.46

14 Bulls 109.92 101.27

15 Mavericks 110.31 102.34

16 Pistons 110.80 104.06

17 Kings 110.91 102.24

18 Nets 111.41 100.29

19 Knicks 112.26 104.38

20 Grizzlies 113.71 102.58

21 Suns 113.92 102.86

22 Rockets 114.38 101.64

23 Cavaliers 114.78 106.82

24 Spurs 114.92 105.45

25 Warriors 115.05 104.73

26 Trail Blazers 115.24 105.01

27 Pelicans 117.02 103.31

28 Timberwolves 117.55 104.10

29 Wizards 119.66 107.02

30 Hawks 119.73 106.28 A V E R A G E 111.44 102.07

Opponents field goals

1 Bucks 38.7 —93.8 41.3%

2 Raptors 37.9 —88.4 42.9%

3 Clippers 39.4 —90.2 43.7%

4 Celtics 38.3 —86.8 44.1%

5 Nets 41.2 —93.2 44.2%

6 Lakers 39.0 —87.8 44.4%

7 Heat 38.9 —87.0 44.7%

8 Pacers 39.5 —88.2 44.8%

9 Grizzlies 40.8 —90.8 44.9%

10 Jazz 40.3 —89.2 45.2%

11 Trail Blazers 41.6 —92.1 45.2%

12 Mavericks 41.4 —91.2 45.4%

13 Thunder 41.1 —89.9 45.7%

14 Nuggets 39.6 —86.3 45.9%

15 Rockets 42.2 —91.5 46.1%

16 76ers 39.6 —85.6 46.3%

17 Knicks 39.9 —86.0 46.4%

18 Magic 40.1 —86.5 46.4%

19 Pelicans 42.9 —92.3 46.5%

20 Kings 39.9 —85.4 46.7%

21 Spurs 42.2 —89.8 47.0%

22 Suns 41.4 —87.3 47.4%

23 Timberwolves 43.1 —90.5 47.6%

24 Warriors 42.2 —88.6 47.6%

25 Hornets 41.7 —87.5 47.7%

26 Hawks 43.3 —90.7 47.7%

27 Bulls 39.5 —82.6 47.8%

28 Pistons 41.9 —87.4 47.9%

29 Wizards 43.4 —88.7 48.9%

30 Cavaliers 43.9 —89.4 49.1% A V E R A G E 40.8 — 88.8 45.9%

Opp 3-pt field goals

1 Raptors 13.0 —38.5 33.8%

2 Clippers 12.0 —35.3 34.0%

3 Lakers 11.3 —33.1 34.1%

4 Celtics 11.8 —34.5 34.2%

5 Thunder 11.4 —33.2 34.3%

6 Mavericks 11.8 —34.3 34.4%

7 Heat 13.1 —38.1 34.4%

8 Nuggets 11.6 —33.7 34.4%

9 Pacers 11.5 —33.2 34.6%

10 Nets 12.1 —34.7 34.9%

11 Rockets 12.3 —35.2 34.9%

12 Jazz 11.1 —31.6 35.1%

13 76ers 10.2 —29.0 35.2%

14 Hornets 12.4 —35.2 35.2%

15 Bulls 11.2 —31.7 35.3%

16 Bucks 13.7 —38.7 35.4%

17 Kings 12.3 —34.6 35.5%

18 Pelicans 12.1 —34.0 35.6%

19 Pistons 10.7 —29.7 36.0%

20 Hawks 11.9 —32.8 36.3%

21 Grizzlies 12.8 —35.3 36.3%

22 Timberwolves 11.6 —31.9 36.4%

23 Suns 11.8 —32.2 36.6%

24 Magic 12.4 —33.5 37.0%

25 Spurs 13.1 —34.9 37.5%

26 Cavaliers 12.4 —33.0 37.6%

27 Trail Blazers 13.3 —35.3 37.7%

28 Wizards 12.5 —33.1 37.8%

29 Knicks 13.3 —35.0 38.0%

30 Warriors 13.5 —34.8 38.8% A V E R A G E 12.1 — 34.0 35.6%

Opp Free throws

1 76ers 18.0 —24.3 74.1%

2 Knicks 19.2 —25.7 74.7%

3 Mavericks 15.6 —20.7 75.4%

4 Nuggets 16.7 —22.1 75.6%

5 Bulls 19.7 —26.0 75.8%

6 Hornets 14.0 —18.4 76.1%

7 Clippers 18.9 —24.8 76.2%

8 Celtics 18.4 —24.1 76.3%

9 Rockets 17.8 —23.3 76.4%

10 Nets 16.9 —22.1 76.5%

11 Spurs 17.4 —22.7 76.7%

12 Raptors 17.7 —23.0 77.0%

13 Cavaliers 14.7 —19.1 77.0%

14 Jazz 16.1 —20.9 77.0%

15 Hawks 21.2 —27.5 77.1%

16 Wizards 20.3 —26.3 77.2%

17 Trail Blazers 18.8 —24.3 77.4%

18 Magic 14.8 —19.1 77.5%

19 Pistons 16.2 —20.9 77.5%

20 Lakers 17.7 —22.8 77.6%

21 Heat 18.1 —23.3 77.7%

22 Suns 19.3 —24.7 78.1%

23 Warriors 17.1 —21.9 78.1%

24 Timberwolves 19.7 —25.2 78.2%

25 Pelicans 19.1 —24.4 78.3%

26 Bucks 16.2 —20.6 78.6%

27 Pacers 17.0 —21.6 78.7%

28 Grizzlies 19.3 —24.5 78.8%

29 Kings 18.9 —23.8 79.4%

30 Thunder 14.8 —18.6 79.6% A V E R A G E 17.7 — 22.9 77.3%

Opp Assists

1 Jazz 21.3

2 Celtics 22.1

3 Nets 22.3

4 76ers 22.8

5 Thunder 23.0

6 Pacers 23.0

7 Lakers 23.2

8 Clippers 23.5

9 Bucks 23.5

10 Mavericks 23.7

11 Suns 23.7

12 Timberwolves 24.2

13 Knicks 24.2

14 Kings 24.3

15 Magic 24.4

16 Pistons 24.5

17 Pelicans 24.6

18 Trail Blazers 24.6

19 Heat 24.7

20 Grizzlies 24.7

21 Hawks 24.8

22 Nuggets 25.0

23 Rockets 25.3

24 Bulls 25.3

25 Wizards 25.4

26 Spurs 25.6

27 Raptors 25.6

28 Cavaliers 26.0

29 Warriors 26.1

30 Hornets 26.5 A V E R A G E 24.3

8

Page 9: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0D E F E N S E A N A L Y S I S

Opp Points off turnovers

1 Mavericks 11.22

2 Pacers 11.26

3 Celtics 11.31

4 Trail Blazers 11.33

5 Magic 11.55

6 Spurs 11.98

7 Nuggets 12.20

8 76ers 12.42

9 Suns 12.43

10 Wizards 12.50

11 Thunder 12.53

12 Bucks 12.54

13 Kings 12.56

14 Clippers 12.83

15 Hornets 12.83

16 Raptors 12.91

17 Nets 13.19

18 Knicks 13.27

19 Jazz 13.38

20 Bulls 13.48

21 Lakers 13.67

22 Warriors 13.77

23 Pistons 13.92

24 Timberwolves 13.95

25 Rockets 14.05

26 Grizzlies 14.22

27 Heat 14.38

28 Hawks 14.88

29 Pelicans 15.72

30 Cavaliers 16.35 A V E R A G E 13.09

Opp Paint points

1 Bucks 36.77

2 Raptors 40.78

3 Celtics 42.59

4 Heat 42.68

5 Clippers 42.88

6 Knicks 43.09

7 Magic 43.78

8 Lakers 44.38

9 Nets 44.56

10 Grizzlies 44.62

11 Jazz 44.75

12 Kings 45.59

13 Trail Blazers 45.82

14 Pacers 46.34

15 Spurs 46.41

16 76ers 47.08

17 Thunder 47.34

18 Nuggets 47.63

19 Mavericks 47.73

20 Warriors 48.22

21 Suns 48.62

22 Bulls 48.89

23 Hornets 48.95

24 Timberwolves 50.28

25 Wizards 50.44

26 Pistons 51.00

27 Rockets 51.03

28 Pelicans 51.59

29 Hawks 52.03

30 Cavaliers 52.58 A V E R A G E 46.62

Opp Second chance points

1 Bucks 7.60

2 76ers 7.91

3 Magic 8.29

4 Kings 8.30

5 Heat 8.35

6 Suns 8.52

7 Lakers 8.57

8 Nuggets 8.68

9 Clippers 8.89

10 Bulls 8.92

11 Cavaliers 8.95

12 Knicks 8.97

13 Jazz 8.98

14 Pacers 9.15

15 Nets 9.16

16 Pelicans 9.17

17 Raptors 9.22

18 Celtics 9.36

19 Grizzlies 9.40

20 Thunder 9.48

21 Rockets 9.56

22 Warriors 9.71

23 Hornets 9.85

24 Pistons 9.85

25 Spurs 9.87

26 Timberwolves 10.11

27 Wizards 10.27

28 Hawks 10.36

29 Mavericks 10.42

30 Trail Blazers 11.85 A V E R A G E 9.26

Opp Uncontested FG

1 Nuggets 5.6—15.6 35.9%

2 Kings 6.3—17.4 36.2%

3 Heat 6.3—17.2 36.6%

4 Clippers 6.7—17.8 37.6%

5 Raptors 7.0—18.4 38.0%

6 Nets 7.4—19.4 38.1%

7 Thunder 6.7—17.4 38.5%

8 Hornets 6.9—17.3 39.9%

9 Mavericks 6.6—16.5 40.0%

10 Celtics 6.4—16.0 40.0%

11 Bucks 9.2—22.9 40.2%

12 Pacers 6.7—16.6 40.4%

13 76ers 6.9—17.0 40.6%

14 Rockets 7.1—17.5 40.6%

15 Cavaliers 7.2—17.7 40.7%

16 Grizzlies 7.2—17.5 41.1%

17 Knicks 6.8—16.5 41.2%

18 Lakers 6.6—16.0 41.3%

19 Hawks 6.4—15.5 41.3%

20 Bulls 5.8—14.0 41.4%

21 Jazz 5.4—13.0 41.5%

22 Timberwolves 6.0—14.4 41.7%

23 Magic 8.9—21.3 41.8%

24 Suns 6.5—15.5 41.9%

25 Trail Blazers 8.3—19.7 42.1%

26 Pistons 6.6—15.5 42.6%

27 Spurs 6.8—15.9 42.8%

28 Wizards 6.7—15.6 42.9%

29 Pelicans 6.7—15.5 43.2%

30 Warriors 6.7—14.6 45.9% A V E R A G E 6.8 — 16.8 40.5%

Opp Contested FG

1 Bucks 27.6 —68.9 40.1%

2 Raptors 28.5 —67.5 42.2%

3 Celtics 29.6 —68.6 43.1%

4 Clippers 30.3 —70.0 43.3%

5 Lakers 30.4 —69.7 43.6%

6 Grizzlies 31.2 —70.9 44.0%

7 Trail Blazers 30.8 —70.0 44.0%

8 Nets 31.7 —71.8 44.2%

9 Pacers 30.9 —69.7 44.3%

10 Jazz 32.9 —74.1 44.4%

11 Heat 29.9 —67.1 44.6%

12 Mavericks 32.7 —72.5 45.1%

13 Pelicans 33.8 —74.4 45.4%

14 Rockets 32.6 —71.4 45.7%

15 76ers 30.3 —66.3 45.7%

16 Thunder 32.2 —70.3 45.8%

17 Knicks 30.7 —67.1 45.8%

18 Magic 28.9 —62.9 45.9%

19 Spurs 33.1 —71.6 46.2%

20 Warriors 33.2 —71.6 46.4%

21 Nuggets 31.9 —68.7 46.4%

22 Suns 32.1 —69.0 46.5%

23 Hawks 33.9 —72.1 47.0%

24 Timberwolves 34.8 —73.7 47.2%

25 Pistons 32.8 —69.4 47.3%

26 Bulls 31.4 —66.2 47.4%

27 Kings 31.1 —65.6 47.4%

28 Hornets 32.3 —67.8 47.6%

29 Wizards 33.8 —70.1 48.2%

30 Cavaliers 34.7 —69.6 49.9% A V E R A G E 31.7 — 69.6 45.5%

9

Page 10: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0R E B O U N D S , T U R N O V E R S , S T E A L S , F O U L S

Rebounds

1 Bucks 51.48 53.0%

2 Lakers 46.02 52.1%

3 76ers 45.48 52.1%

4 Clippers 48.05 51.4%

5 Nets 48.42 51.4%

6 Jazz 45.14 51.4%

7 Heat 44.37 51.3%

8 Knicks 46.44 51.3%

9 Pelicans 47.03 51.1%

10 Mavericks 46.97 50.9%

11 Grizzlies 46.60 50.9%

12 Celtics 46.02 50.9%

13 Nuggets 44.31 50.7%

14 Cavaliers 44.32 50.7%

15 Suns 43.25 49.8%

16 Magic 44.49 49.8%

17 Raptors 45.23 49.5%

18 Kings 42.53 49.3%

19 Spurs 44.41 49.3%

20 Thunder 42.86 49.1%

21 Trail Blazers 45.53 49.0%

22 Pistons 41.70 48.9%

23 Pacers 42.94 48.9%

24 Rockets 44.84 48.7%

25 Timberwolves 44.91 48.6%

26 Hornets 42.82 48.3%

27 Hawks 43.36 48.0%

28 Warriors 42.88 47.9%

29 Bulls 41.94 47.9%

30 Wizards 41.73 47.4% A V E R A G E 44.87 50.0%

Offensive rebounds

1 Knicks 12.08 25.9%

2 Nuggets 10.78 24.7%

3 Cavaliers 10.89 24.7%

4 Lakers 10.51 24.4%

5 Pelicans 11.30 24.4%

6 Clippers 11.02 24.1%

7 Hornets 11.02 23.9%

8 Celtics 10.73 23.9%

9 76ers 10.38 23.8%

10 Nets 10.83 23.5%

11 Mavericks 10.58 23.4%

12 Grizzlies 10.48 23.3%

13 Bulls 10.55 23.0%

14 Pistons 9.76 22.7%

15 Magic 10.37 22.5%

16 Suns 9.91 22.4%

17 Rockets 10.28 22.2%

18 Trail Blazers 10.17 22.2%

19 Wizards 10.09 22.1%

20 Timberwolves 10.58 22.1%

21 Kings 9.67 21.9%

22 Raptors 9.73 21.7%

23 Hawks 9.94 21.6%

24 Warriors 9.94 21.4%

25 Jazz 8.89 21.2%

26 Bucks 9.45 20.8%

27 Pacers 8.88 20.4%

28 Heat 8.42 20.3%

29 Thunder 8.25 19.6%

30 Spurs 8.79 19.5% A V E R A G E 10.14 22.5%

Defensive rebounds

1 Bucks 42.03 81.6%

2 76ers 35.09 80.5%

3 Heat 35.95 79.6%

4 Spurs 35.62 79.3%

5 Jazz 36.25 79.1%

6 Magic 34.12 79.1%

7 Knicks 34.36 78.4%

8 Lakers 35.51 78.4%

9 Suns 33.34 78.2%

10 Kings 32.86 78.1%

11 Nets 37.59 78.0%

12 Pelicans 35.73 77.9%

13 Grizzlies 36.12 77.5%

14 Cavaliers 33.43 77.5%

15 Clippers 37.03 77.4%

16 Celtics 35.28 77.4%

17 Mavericks 36.39 77.3%

18 Timberwolves 34.33 77.1%

19 Pacers 34.06 77.0%

20 Thunder 34.61 76.9%

21 Nuggets 33.52 76.8%

22 Warriors 32.94 76.2%

23 Raptors 35.50 76.2%

24 Pistons 31.92 75.8%

25 Rockets 34.56 75.4%

26 Bulls 31.38 75.3%

27 Trail Blazers 35.36 75.0%

28 Hawks 33.42 74.9%

29 Wizards 31.64 74.7%

30 Hornets 31.78 74.3% A V E R A G E 34.7 77.4%

Turnovers

1 Cavaliers 16.60

2 Pelicans 16.34

3 Hawks 16.21

4 Nets 15.59

5 Bulls 15.54

6 Pistons 15.36

7 Timberwolves 15.31

8 Grizzlies 15.28

9 Lakers 15.17

10 Suns 15.14

11 Bucks 14.95

12 Clippers 14.91

13 Warriors 14.86

14 Heat 14.85

15 Jazz 14.80

16 Hornets 14.58

17 Rockets 14.55

18 Raptors 14.45

19 Kings 14.30

20 Knicks 14.27

21 76ers 14.25

22 Wizards 14.06

23 Nuggets 13.65

24 Celtics 13.64

25 Thunder 13.47

26 Pacers 13.06

27 Trail Blazers 13.05

28 Mavericks 12.82

29 Magic 12.72

30 Spurs 12.30 A V E R A G E 14.54

Steals

1 Bulls 10.05

2 Raptors 8.89

3 Timberwolves 8.69

4 Lakers 8.63

5 Rockets 8.53

6 Magic 8.37

7 Celtics 8.31

8 76ers 8.20

9 Warriors 8.18

10 Nuggets 8.11

11 Wizards 8.11

12 Grizzlies 7.97

13 Hawks 7.81

14 Suns 7.78

15 Kings 7.70

16 Knicks 7.62

17 Thunder 7.62

18 Pelicans 7.62

19 Pistons 7.48

20 Heat 7.45

21 Bucks 7.32

22 Spurs 7.24

23 Pacers 7.23

24 Clippers 7.16

25 Cavaliers 6.86

26 Hornets 6.57

27 Nets 6.44

28 Mavericks 6.25

29 Trail Blazers 6.08

30 Jazz 5.92 A V E R A G E 7.67

10

Page 11: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0R E B O U N D S , T U R N O V E R S , S T E A L S , F O U L S

FoulsOn shots

1 Hawks 23.13 10.0

2 Wizards 22.53 10.2

3 Knicks 22.17 10.5

4 Clippers 22.09 11.6

5 Suns 22.06 9.8

6 Kings 21.83 8.9

7 Bulls 21.78 9.1

8 Rockets 21.56 11.5

9 Raptors 21.42 9.9

10 Celtics 21.39 9.7

11 Timberwolves 21.33 11.3

12 Trail Blazers 21.30 9.3

13 Pelicans 20.98 10.3

14 Grizzlies 20.78 9.6

15 76ers 20.66 9.4

16 Nets 20.62 10.1

17 Lakers 20.59 10.2

18 Heat 20.37 10.5

19 Warriors 20.08 10.4

20 Nuggets 20.05 8.8

21 Jazz 20.02 9.3

22 Pistons 19.64 9.6

23 Pacers 19.54 8.5

24 Spurs 19.24 10.4

25 Bucks 19.17 10.9

26 Mavericks 19.00 9.9

27 Thunder 18.83 9.3

28 Hornets 18.78 9.4

29 Cavaliers 18.26 8.3

30 Magic 17.58 9.6 A V E R A G E 20.56 9.9

Good fouls

1 Mavericks 9.69 51.1%

2 Cavaliers 8.88 48.6%

3 Kings 10.55 48.6%

4 Warriors 9.65 48.3%

5 Rockets 10.42 48.1%

6 Pistons 9.38 48.0%

7 Lakers 9.79 47.6%

8 Spurs 9.11 47.4%

9 Celtics 10.08 47.2%

10 Timberwolves 9.97 46.9%

11 Knicks 10.39 46.8%

12 Hawks 10.76 46.8%

13 Suns 10.32 46.6%

14 Nets 9.61 46.6%

15 Jazz 9.28 46.5%

16 Pacers 8.95 46.2%

17 Pelicans 9.69 46.2%

18 Clippers 10.06 45.7%

19 Magic 7.98 45.5%

20 Nuggets 9.14 45.3%

21 Hornets 8.48 45.2%

22 Trail Blazers 9.59 45.1%

23 Grizzlies 9.29 44.7%

24 Thunder 8.33 44.1%

25 Wizards 9.77 43.6%

26 Bulls 9.35 43.1%

27 Heat 8.65 42.6%

28 Bucks 7.98 41.7%

29 76ers 8.51 41.1%

30 Raptors 8.19 38.3% A V E R A G E 9.39 45.6%

Bad fouls

1 Raptors 13.14 61.2%

2 76ers 12.00 58.0%

3 Bucks 10.95 57.3%

4 Heat 11.62 56.9%

5 Bulls 12.34 56.4%

6 Wizards 12.58 56.0%

7 Thunder 10.36 55.3%

8 Trail Blazers 11.56 54.5%

9 Grizzlies 11.29 54.3%

10 Hornets 10.20 54.3%

11 Magic 9.51 54.0%

12 Clippers 11.88 53.8%

13 Pacers 10.45 53.8%

14 Nets 10.98 53.4%

15 Pelicans 11.17 53.3%

16 Nuggets 10.71 53.2%

17 Hawks 12.28 53.2%

18 Timberwolves 11.27 53.1%

19 Jazz 10.55 53.0%

20 Celtics 11.20 52.3%

21 Suns 11.48 52.0%

22 Pistons 10.17 52.0%

23 Knicks 11.50 51.8%

24 Spurs 9.86 51.6%

25 Lakers 10.59 51.5%

26 Kings 11.17 51.4%

27 Cavaliers 9.29 50.8%

28 Warriors 10.23 50.7%

29 Rockets 10.89 50.5%

30 Mavericks 9.24 48.4% A V E R A G E 11.02 53.4%

Technical fouls

1 Trail Blazers 0.86

2 Raptors 0.77

3 Knicks 0.71

4 Wizards 0.70

5 Grizzlies 0.68

6 Jazz 0.62

7 Warriors 0.60

8 Bucks 0.59

9 Nets 0.57

10 Rockets 0.56

11 Lakers 0.55

12 Clippers 0.52

13 Celtics 0.52

14 Hawks 0.52

15 Suns 0.51

16 76ers 0.51

17 Bulls 0.51

18 Pelicans 0.45

19 Hornets 0.45

20 Mavericks 0.42

21 Pistons 0.42

22 Kings 0.41

23 Spurs 0.41

24 Timberwolves 0.38

25 Thunder 0.36

26 Magic 0.35

27 Pacers 0.35

28 Heat 0.31

29 Nuggets 0.29

30 Cavaliers 0.26 A V E R A G E 0.51

Blockshots

1 Lakers 6.73

2 Trail Blazers 6.15

3 Bucks 6.06

4 Timberwolves 5.67

5 Grizzlies 5.60

6 Celtics 5.56

7 Magic 5.54

8 Spurs 5.40

9 76ers 5.35

10 Rockets 5.14

11 Pelicans 5.11

12 Pacers 5.11

13 Hawks 5.06

14 Mavericks 5.01

15 Thunder 4.98

16 Raptors 4.94

17 Clippers 4.91

18 Knicks 4.67

19 Nuggets 4.60

20 Nets 4.53

21 Warriors 4.51

22 Pistons 4.45

23 Heat 4.43

24 Wizards 4.28

25 Kings 4.27

26 Hornets 4.14

27 Bulls 4.11

28 Suns 4.02

29 Jazz 3.97

30 Cavaliers 3.18 A V E R A G E 4.92

11

Page 12: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0F I E L D G O A L S P L A Y T Y P E S I N A T T A C K

Pick`n`rolls HandlerShare

1 Jazz 9.0—20.8 43% 24%

2 Celtics 8.6—19.0 45% 23%

3 Trail Blazers 8.7—20.4 43% 23%

4 Thunder 8.4—17.2 49% 23%

5 Cavaliers 7.0—16.5 42% 20%

6 Mavericks 7.4—15.6 47% 20%

7 Clippers 7.7—17.5 44% 20%

8 Pacers 7.3—16.5 44% 19%

9 Magic 6.6—16.2 41% 19%

10 Hawks 7.0—17.6 40% 19%

11 Bulls 6.6—16.1 41% 18%

12 Nets 6.8—17.0 40% 18%

13 Kings 6.3—14.9 42% 18%

14 Grizzlies 6.3—14.9 42% 17%

15 Pistons 6.1—14.1 43% 17%

16 Spurs 6.4—14.8 43% 17%

17 Wizards 6.4—15.2 42% 17%

18 Heat 6.1—15.1 40% 16%

19 Warriors 5.7—14.3 40% 16%

20 Timberwolves 5.7—13.9 41% 16%

21 Knicks 5.4—13.7 39% 15%

22 Suns 5.1—12.0 43% 14%

23 Pelicans 5.2—13.5 39% 14%

24 Hornets 4.8—12.9 37% 14%

25 Lakers 5.1—12.0 43% 13%

26 Nuggets 4.9—12.5 39% 13%

27 Bucks 4.8—10.7 45% 12%

28 76ers 4.3—10.4 41% 12%

29 Raptors 4.0—10.0 40% 11%

30 Rockets 3.5—7.6 46% 9% A V E R A G E 6.2 — 14.8 42% 17%

Pick`n`rolls RollerShare

1 Hawks 2.7—4.0 68% 7%

2 Grizzlies 2.3—3.4 68% 6%

3 Knicks 2.1—2.6 81% 6%

4 Hornets 2.0—3.3 61% 6%

5 Nets 2.3—3.3 70% 6%

6 Clippers 2.3—3.2 72% 6%

7 Pacers 2.1—3.2 66% 6%

8 Heat 2.1—3.1 68% 6%

9 Trail Blazers 1.9—3.1 61% 5%

10 Thunder 1.9—2.6 73% 5%

11 Cavaliers 1.6—2.6 62% 5%

12 Jazz 1.9—2.8 68% 5%

13 Pistons 1.9—3.0 63% 5%

14 Nuggets 1.8—2.4 75% 5%

15 Wizards 1.8—2.8 64% 5%

16 Raptors 1.7—2.8 61% 5%

17 Suns 1.8—2.8 64% 5%

18 Pelicans 2.0—2.9 69% 5%

19 Mavericks 2.0—2.5 80% 5%

20 Bulls 1.7—3.0 57% 5%

21 Kings 1.6—2.4 67% 4%

22 Bucks 1.7—2.7 63% 4%

23 Celtics 1.3—2.1 62% 4%

24 Lakers 1.6—2.2 73% 4%

25 Warriors 1.4—2.1 67% 4%

26 Magic 1.4—2.3 61% 4%

27 Rockets 1.1—1.8 61% 3%

28 Timberwolves 1.1—1.9 58% 3%

29 Spurs 0.8—1.0 80% 2%

30 76ers 0.7—1.2 58% 2% A V E R A G E 1.7 — 2.6 65% 5%

Catch and shootsShare

1 Mavericks 8.3—21.3 39% 22%

2 Suns 7.8—21.3 37% 21%

3 76ers 7.5—20.1 37% 21%

4 Pistons 7.3—18.6 39% 21%

5 Pelicans 7.6—19.5 39% 20%

6 Raptors 7.4—19.6 38% 20%

7 Timberwolves 7.0—20.9 33% 20%

8 Cavaliers 6.6—17.1 39% 19%

9 Spurs 7.0—17.8 39% 19%

10 Bulls 6.9—19.1 36% 19%

11 Hornets 6.4—16.6 39% 19%

12 Kings 7.0—18.0 39% 19%

13 Wizards 7.1—17.8 40% 19%

14 Rockets 7.3—20.7 35% 19%

15 Jazz 6.5—16.3 40% 18%

16 Bucks 7.2—19.3 37% 18%

17 Nets 6.6—18.3 36% 18%

18 Nuggets 6.6—17.4 38% 18%

19 Lakers 6.7—17.1 39% 18%

20 Heat 6.7—17.5 38% 18%

21 Clippers 6.7—17.4 39% 18%

22 Grizzlies 6.5—17.1 38% 17%

23 Knicks 6.1—16.7 37% 17%

24 Thunder 6.3—16.9 37% 17%

25 Trail Blazers 6.2—15.4 40% 17%

26 Hawks 6.3—18.5 34% 17%

27 Warriors 5.5—15.7 35% 16%

28 Magic 5.6—16.2 35% 16%

29 Pacers 6.2—15.9 39% 16%

30 Celtics 5.6—15.2 37% 15% A V E R A G E 6.7 — 18.0 37% 18%

Catch and drivesShare

1 Spurs 4.8—9.4 51% 13%

2 Timberwolves 3.9—8.4 46% 11%

3 Hornets 3.4—8.4 40% 10%

4 Grizzlies 3.3—6.4 52% 9%

5 Jazz 3.3—6.3 52% 9%

6 Kings 3.1—7.1 44% 9%

7 Pelicans 3.6—7.9 46% 9%

8 76ers 3.2—6.4 50% 9%

9 Warriors 3.3—7.2 46% 9%

10 Wizards 3.4—7.4 46% 9%

11 Celtics 3.2—6.9 46% 9%

12 Thunder 3.3—6.6 50% 9%

13 Nets 3.1—6.2 50% 8%

14 Hawks 2.9—6.8 43% 8%

15 Rockets 3.1—6.3 49% 8%

16 Pacers 2.9—6.0 48% 8%

17 Bulls 3.0—6.7 45% 8%

18 Mavericks 2.9—6.4 45% 8%

19 Suns 2.9—6.3 46% 8%

20 Knicks 2.7—6.7 40% 8%

21 Pistons 2.4—5.9 41% 7%

22 Lakers 2.7—5.3 51% 7%

23 Magic 2.4—5.2 46% 7%

24 Raptors 2.4—5.8 41% 7%

25 Nuggets 2.6—5.9 44% 7%

26 Bucks 2.8—5.3 53% 7%

27 Heat 2.2—4.9 45% 6%

28 Cavaliers 2.0—4.9 41% 6%

29 Clippers 2.4—5.1 47% 6%

30 Trail Blazers 2.0—4.8 42% 5% A V E R A G E 3.0 — 6.4 47% 8%

Screen offsShare

1 Warriors 3.1—7.8 40% 9%

2 Magic 3.2—7.1 45% 9%

3 Jazz 2.4—4.9 49% 7%

4 Pacers 2.6—5.7 46% 7%

5 Celtics 2.1—4.9 43% 6%

6 Raptors 2.3—5.2 44% 6%

7 Kings 2.3—6.0 38% 6%

8 Lakers 2.1—5.4 39% 6%

9 Pelicans 2.5—6.4 39% 6%

10 Wizards 2.1—5.1 41% 6%

11 Clippers 2.3—5.2 44% 6%

12 Nets 2.2—5.7 39% 6%

13 Heat 2.4—5.2 46% 6%

14 Suns 2.0—4.3 47% 5%

15 Cavaliers 1.6—3.6 44% 5%

16 Bucks 2.1—4.5 47% 5%

17 Spurs 2.0—4.4 45% 5%

18 Pistons 1.7—4.2 40% 5%

19 Mavericks 1.9—4.7 40% 5%

20 76ers 1.9—4.3 44% 5%

21 Trail Blazers 1.7—3.8 45% 5%

22 Knicks 1.7—4.6 37% 5%

23 Hornets 1.6—4.7 34% 5%

24 Nuggets 1.8—4.0 45% 5%

25 Bulls 1.5—4.0 38% 4%

26 Timberwolves 1.6—4.0 40% 4%

27 Rockets 1.4—3.1 45% 4%

28 Grizzlies 1.5—3.9 38% 4%

29 Thunder 1.0—2.3 43% 3%

30 Hawks 0.9—2.6 35% 2% A V E R A G E 2.0 — 4.7 43% 5%

12

Page 13: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0F I E L D G O A L S P L A Y T Y P E S I N A T T A C K

Post upsShare

1 76ers 3.8—8.3 46% 10%

2 Bucks 3.7—7.2 51% 9%

3 Spurs 3.3—7.1 46% 9%

4 Nuggets 3.4—6.0 57% 9%

5 Lakers 3.0—6.2 48% 8%

6 Knicks 2.8—6.1 46% 8%

7 Clippers 2.6—5.4 48% 7%

8 Raptors 2.4—5.2 46% 7%

9 Magic 2.4—5.9 41% 7%

10 Pistons 2.3—4.8 48% 6%

11 Cavaliers 2.1—4.5 47% 6%

12 Grizzlies 2.2—4.6 48% 6%

13 Suns 2.2—4.6 48% 6%

14 Trail Blazers 2.4—5.4 44% 6%

15 Pacers 2.4—5.0 48% 6%

16 Celtics 1.9—4.0 48% 5%

17 Kings 1.8—4.2 43% 5%

18 Hornets 1.8—4.2 43% 5%

19 Warriors 1.8—3.9 46% 5%

20 Heat 1.3—2.9 45% 4%

21 Timberwolves 1.6—3.6 44% 4%

22 Bulls 1.3—2.9 45% 4%

23 Hawks 1.5—2.8 54% 4%

24 Thunder 1.4—3.3 42% 4%

25 Mavericks 1.4—3.8 37% 4%

26 Pelicans 1.6—3.2 50% 4%

27 Rockets 1.1—2.3 48% 3%

28 Jazz 0.9—2.0 45% 2%

29 Wizards 0.9—2.0 45% 2%

30 Nets 0.6—1.3 46% 2% A V E R A G E 2.1 — 4.4 48% 6%

TransitionsShare

1 Raptors 7.6—12.9 59% 21%

2 Grizzlies 6.2—11.1 56% 16%

3 Wizards 5.9—11.3 52% 16%

4 Rockets 5.9—10.8 55% 16%

5 Lakers 6.2—10.8 57% 16%

6 Bulls 5.8—10.0 58% 16%

7 Suns 5.8—10.1 57% 16%

8 Pelicans 6.2—11.3 55% 16%

9 Bucks 5.9—11.6 51% 15%

10 76ers 5.3—9.2 58% 15%

11 Celtics 5.4—9.7 56% 15%

12 Hawks 5.6—10.4 54% 15%

13 Pistons 4.8—8.7 55% 14%

14 Hornets 4.7—8.8 53% 14%

15 Warriors 4.9—8.5 58% 14%

16 Nets 4.8—9.3 52% 13%

17 Cavaliers 4.5—8.2 55% 13%

18 Timberwolves 4.8—8.7 55% 13%

19 Kings 4.7—8.3 57% 13%

20 Pacers 4.7—8.6 55% 13%

21 Clippers 4.7—8.7 54% 13%

22 Magic 4.5—8.1 56% 13%

23 Nuggets 4.9—9.0 54% 13%

24 Trail Blazers 4.3—8.2 52% 12%

25 Knicks 4.3—8.5 51% 12%

26 Spurs 4.4—7.8 56% 12%

27 Heat 4.6—7.7 60% 12%

28 Jazz 4.3—7.8 55% 12%

29 Thunder 4.1—8.0 51% 11%

30 Mavericks 3.7—7.0 53% 10% A V E R A G E 5.1 — 9.3 55% 14%

IsolationsShare

1 Rockets 9.9—23.4 42% 26%

2 Trail Blazers 5.5—12.7 43% 15%

3 Thunder 5.0—12.3 41% 14%

4 Mavericks 4.8—11.4 42% 13%

5 Knicks 4.2—10.2 41% 12%

6 Bucks 4.8—10.8 44% 12%

7 Nets 4.4—11.9 37% 12%

8 Clippers 4.0—9.9 40% 11%

9 Timberwolves 3.8—8.8 43% 11%

10 Kings 3.8—9.2 41% 11%

11 Lakers 4.3—10.4 41% 11%

12 Cavaliers 3.6—9.2 39% 10%

13 Jazz 3.7—9.0 41% 10%

14 Spurs 3.8—8.5 45% 10%

15 Bulls 3.6—9.3 39% 10%

16 Celtics 3.8—10.1 38% 10%

17 Wizards 3.8—10.0 38% 10%

18 76ers 3.4—7.4 46% 9%

19 Pelicans 3.4—8.3 41% 9%

20 Nuggets 3.2—8.3 39% 9%

21 Pistons 3.2—7.9 41% 9%

22 Raptors 3.3—8.7 38% 9%

23 Hawks 3.4—8.4 40% 9%

24 Grizzlies 3.3—8.4 39% 9%

25 Warriors 2.9—8.3 35% 8%

26 Hornets 2.7—7.2 38% 8%

27 Pacers 3.0—6.8 44% 8%

28 Heat 3.0—7.3 41% 8%

29 Magic 2.1—5.5 38% 6%

30 Suns 2.3—5.7 40% 6% A V E R A G E 3.9 — 9.5 41% 11%

Hand offsShare

1 Heat 3.9—8.4 46% 11%

2 Nuggets 3.2—7.4 43% 9%

3 Magic 2.9—6.5 45% 8%

4 Spurs 2.7—6.1 44% 7%

5 Pelicans 2.6—5.7 46% 7%

6 76ers 2.5—6.0 42% 7%

7 Warriors 2.6—6.6 39% 7%

8 Knicks 2.3—5.6 41% 7%

9 Grizzlies 2.6—6.7 39% 7%

10 Hawks 2.6—6.3 41% 7%

11 Bucks 2.7—6.0 45% 7%

12 Pacers 2.7—5.9 46% 7%

13 Timberwolves 2.5—6.2 40% 7%

14 Cavaliers 2.6—6.5 40% 7%

15 Bulls 2.0—5.0 40% 6%

16 Pistons 2.2—5.1 43% 6%

17 Suns 2.2—5.3 42% 6%

18 Hornets 2.0—4.8 42% 6%

19 Wizards 2.2—5.1 43% 6%

20 Jazz 2.0—4.4 45% 5%

21 Lakers 1.8—4.1 44% 5%

22 Celtics 1.8—4.4 41% 5%

23 Mavericks 1.8—3.8 47% 5%

24 Nets 1.8—4.0 45% 5%

25 Thunder 1.9—4.1 46% 5%

26 Trail Blazers 1.7—3.7 46% 5%

27 Kings 1.4—3.7 38% 4%

28 Raptors 1.3—3.1 42% 4%

29 Clippers 1.5—3.6 42% 4%

30 Rockets 1.0—2.5 40% 3% A V E R A G E 2.2 — 5.2 42% 6%

CutsShare

1 Heat 4.7—6.6 71% 13%

2 Suns 4.6—7.1 65% 13%

3 Nuggets 4.7—6.5 72% 13%

4 Lakers 4.6—6.3 73% 12%

5 Nets 4.3—6.1 70% 12%

6 Kings 4.0—5.9 68% 11%

7 76ers 3.9—5.4 72% 11%

8 Warriors 4.0—6.1 66% 11%

9 Wizards 4.1—6.2 66% 11%

10 Hornets 3.8—5.9 64% 11%

11 Magic 3.7—5.5 67% 11%

12 Timberwolves 3.8—5.5 69% 11%

13 Cavaliers 3.9—6.1 64% 11%

14 Thunder 3.6—5.0 72% 10%

15 Pistons 3.5—5.4 65% 10%

16 Hawks 3.7—5.2 71% 10%

17 Raptors 3.8—5.7 67% 10%

18 Pacers 3.7—5.4 69% 10%

19 Pelicans 3.8—5.3 72% 10%

20 Grizzlies 3.7—5.4 69% 10%

21 Bucks 3.7—5.4 69% 9%

22 Clippers 3.4—4.7 72% 9%

23 Bulls 3.3—4.8 69% 9%

24 Knicks 3.3—4.6 72% 9%

25 Rockets 3.6—5.2 69% 9%

26 Celtics 3.3—4.9 67% 9%

27 Mavericks 2.9—3.9 74% 8%

28 Trail Blazers 2.8—3.9 72% 8%

29 Jazz 2.9—4.2 69% 8%

30 Spurs 2.5—3.6 69% 7% A V E R A G E 3.7 — 5.4 69% 10%

13

Page 14: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0F I E L D G O A L S P L A Y T Y P E S I N D E F E N S E

Pick`n`rolls HandlerShare

1 Jazz 8.4—20.2 42% 23%

2 Bucks 7.9—20.0 40% 23%

3 Nets 8.1—19.0 43% 22%

4 76ers 7.8—19.1 41% 22%

5 Clippers 7.0—17.1 41% 20%

6 Timberwolves 7.5—17.3 43% 19%

7 Pelicans 7.2—16.9 43% 19%

8 Magic 6.7—16.0 42% 19%

9 Cavaliers 6.9—15.2 45% 18%

10 Spurs 6.9—16.4 42% 18%

11 Pistons 6.8—15.5 44% 18%

12 Grizzlies 6.7—16.6 40% 18%

13 Thunder 6.7—15.8 42% 18%

14 Pacers 6.3—15.1 42% 18%

15 Trail Blazers 6.6—16.3 40% 18%

16 Suns 6.6—15.2 43% 18%

17 Mavericks 6.3—14.8 43% 17%

18 Hawks 6.6—14.8 45% 17%

19 Wizards 6.6—14.7 45% 17%

20 Lakers 5.7—13.4 43% 16%

21 Celtics 5.6—13.8 41% 16%

22 Warriors 5.8—13.5 43% 15%

23 Kings 5.4—12.1 45% 15%

24 Knicks 5.4—13.7 39% 15%

25 Heat 5.1—12.4 41% 15%

26 Nuggets 4.5—10.9 41% 13%

27 Hornets 4.7—10.2 46% 13%

28 Raptors 4.3—10.4 41% 12%

29 Rockets 4.5—11.1 41% 12%

30 Bulls 2.6—6.1 43% 7% A V E R A G E 6.2 — 14.8 42% 17%

Pick`n`rolls RollerShare

1 Pelicans 2.2—3.3 67% 6%

2 76ers 2.1—3.1 68% 6%

3 Pacers 2.0—3.1 65% 6%

4 Nuggets 2.3—3.4 68% 6%

5 Clippers 1.9—2.8 68% 5%

6 Pistons 1.9—2.9 66% 5%

7 Warriors 1.8—2.9 62% 5%

8 Wizards 2.0—2.9 69% 5%

9 Knicks 1.7—2.5 68% 5%

10 Kings 1.7—2.3 74% 5%

11 Magic 1.9—2.9 66% 5%

12 Spurs 1.8—2.6 69% 5%

13 Bulls 1.7—2.5 68% 5%

14 Thunder 1.9—2.9 66% 5%

15 Trail Blazers 2.0—3.0 67% 5%

16 Suns 1.8—2.6 69% 5%

17 Timberwolves 1.9—2.9 66% 5%

18 Cavaliers 2.1—3.3 64% 5%

19 Mavericks 1.7—2.4 71% 5%

20 Bucks 1.5—2.7 56% 4%

21 Jazz 1.6—2.6 62% 4%

22 Grizzlies 1.6—2.3 70% 4%

23 Lakers 1.5—2.2 68% 4%

24 Hornets 1.6—2.4 67% 4%

25 Nets 1.4—2.3 61% 4%

26 Hawks 1.5—2.2 68% 4%

27 Rockets 1.7—2.4 71% 4%

28 Heat 1.3—2.0 65% 4%

29 Celtics 1.5—2.3 65% 4%

30 Raptors 1.0—1.7 59% 3% A V E R A G E 1.7 — 2.6 65% 5%

Catch and shootsShare

1 Raptors 9.1—25.5 36% 26%

2 Heat 7.5—22.1 34% 22%

3 Bucks 7.5—20.5 37% 21%

4 Kings 7.5—19.8 38% 21%

5 Warriors 8.0—18.4 43% 21%

6 Hornets 7.9—21.2 37% 21%

7 Spurs 7.7—19.1 40% 20%

8 Grizzlies 6.9—18.3 38% 19%

9 Nuggets 6.6—18.7 35% 19%

10 Bulls 6.5—17.8 37% 19%

11 Mavericks 6.9—18.1 38% 19%

12 Celtics 6.5—18.3 36% 19%

13 Nets 7.1—18.8 38% 19%

14 Magic 6.9—17.8 39% 19%

15 Rockets 7.3—19.7 37% 19%

16 Trail Blazers 6.8—17.4 39% 19%

17 Knicks 6.7—16.4 41% 18%

18 Pacers 6.4—17.3 37% 18%

19 Hawks 6.8—16.8 40% 18%

20 Lakers 6.4—18.1 35% 18%

21 Pistons 6.2—15.7 39% 17%

22 Clippers 6.2—18.1 34% 17%

23 Thunder 6.1—17.1 36% 17%

24 Wizards 6.6—17.2 38% 17%

25 Pelicans 6.2—16.6 37% 16%

26 Cavaliers 6.3—15.8 40% 16%

27 Suns 6.1—16.2 38% 16%

28 Timberwolves 6.0—15.7 38% 15%

29 76ers 5.0—13.3 38% 14%

30 Jazz 5.1—13.9 37% 14% A V E R A G E 6.7 — 18.0 37% 18%

Catch and drivesShare

1 Heat 3.9—8.1 48% 11%

2 Raptors 3.7—8.4 44% 11%

3 Kings 3.8—7.5 51% 10%

4 Hornets 3.7—8.1 46% 10%

5 Suns 3.7—7.2 51% 10%

6 Bulls 3.0—6.4 47% 9%

7 Nuggets 3.2—6.5 49% 9%

8 Warriors 3.6—7.8 46% 9%

9 Magic 3.1—6.4 48% 9%

10 Rockets 3.4—7.0 49% 9%

11 Mavericks 2.9—6.3 46% 8%

12 Spurs 3.0—6.1 49% 8%

13 Pistons 3.0—6.2 48% 8%

14 Hawks 3.1—6.7 46% 8%

15 Pacers 2.7—6.5 42% 8%

16 Lakers 2.7—6.8 40% 8%

17 Clippers 2.9—6.2 47% 8%

18 Bucks 2.3—5.8 40% 7%

19 Jazz 2.4—5.2 46% 7%

20 Cavaliers 2.9—5.7 51% 7%

21 Grizzlies 2.7—5.8 47% 7%

22 Pelicans 2.9—6.3 46% 7%

23 76ers 2.4—5.2 46% 7%

24 Wizards 2.8—6.2 45% 7%

25 Knicks 2.6—5.6 46% 7%

26 Thunder 2.5—5.4 46% 7%

27 Trail Blazers 2.6—6.4 41% 7%

28 Timberwolves 2.8—6.1 46% 7%

29 Celtics 2.5—5.3 47% 7%

30 Nets 2.3—5.7 40% 6% A V E R A G E 3.0 — 6.4 47% 8%

Screen offsShare

1 Grizzlies 2.5—5.6 45% 7%

2 Knicks 2.5—5.7 44% 7%

3 76ers 2.1—4.8 44% 6%

4 Wizards 2.4—4.8 50% 6%

5 Bulls 2.0—4.4 45% 6%

6 Nuggets 2.0—4.6 43% 6%

7 Raptors 1.9—4.4 43% 6%

8 Magic 2.1—4.8 44% 6%

9 Thunder 2.1—5.1 41% 6%

10 Suns 2.3—5.3 43% 6%

11 Jazz 2.2—5.0 44% 6%

12 Timberwolves 2.3—5.0 46% 6%

13 Cavaliers 2.3—5.5 42% 6%

14 Heat 1.9—4.9 39% 6%

15 Spurs 2.0—4.7 43% 5%

16 Bucks 1.9—4.7 40% 5%

17 Kings 1.9—4.5 42% 5%

18 Mavericks 1.8—4.4 41% 5%

19 Clippers 1.8—4.8 38% 5%

20 Pelicans 2.0—4.7 43% 5%

21 Hornets 1.9—4.5 42% 5%

22 Pistons 1.8—4.6 39% 5%

23 Nets 1.7—4.1 41% 5%

24 Trail Blazers 2.0—4.8 42% 5%

25 Hawks 1.8—4.3 42% 5%

26 Pacers 1.8—4.8 38% 5%

27 Celtics 1.9—4.9 39% 5%

28 Warriors 1.7—4.2 40% 4%

29 Lakers 1.5—4.3 35% 4%

30 Rockets 1.5—3.2 47% 4% A V E R A G E 2.0 — 4.7 43% 5%

14

Page 15: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0F I E L D G O A L S P L A Y T Y P E S I N D E F E N S E

Post upsShare

1 Mavericks 3.0—6.3 48% 8%

2 Bulls 2.8—5.7 49% 8%

3 Celtics 2.6—5.3 49% 7%

4 Rockets 2.7—5.9 46% 7%

5 Timberwolves 2.4—4.6 52% 6%

6 Pacers 2.1—4.6 46% 6%

7 Hawks 2.4—5.0 48% 6%

8 Suns 2.1—4.2 50% 6%

9 Pelicans 2.3—5.4 43% 6%

10 Thunder 2.3—5.0 46% 6%

11 Jazz 2.2—4.8 46% 6%

12 Nets 2.2—4.4 50% 6%

13 Spurs 2.3—4.7 49% 6%

14 Kings 2.0—4.7 43% 6%

15 Hornets 2.1—4.0 53% 6%

16 Heat 1.9—3.9 49% 6%

17 Cavaliers 1.9—3.9 49% 5%

18 Grizzlies 1.8—3.7 49% 5%

19 Warriors 1.9—3.8 50% 5%

20 Wizards 2.1—4.4 48% 5%

21 Knicks 2.0—4.2 48% 5%

22 Nuggets 1.9—4.1 46% 5%

23 Pistons 2.0—4.1 49% 5%

24 Magic 1.8—3.9 46% 5%

25 Trail Blazers 1.7—4.1 41% 5%

26 Clippers 1.9—4.3 44% 5%

27 76ers 1.5—3.2 47% 4%

28 Lakers 1.5—3.8 39% 4%

29 Raptors 1.3—3.3 39% 4%

30 Bucks 1.3—3.2 41% 4% A V E R A G E 2.1 — 4.4 48% 6%

TransitionsShare

1 Cavaliers 6.9—11.5 60% 18%

2 Rockets 6.7—11.5 58% 17%

3 Lakers 5.4—10.0 54% 16%

4 Pelicans 6.2—10.2 61% 16%

5 Hawks 6.2—10.8 57% 16%

6 Knicks 5.9—9.9 60% 16%

7 Nuggets 5.3—9.7 55% 15%

8 Trail Blazers 5.6—10.8 52% 15%

9 Grizzlies 5.1—9.4 54% 14%

10 76ers 5.0—8.7 57% 14%

11 Wizards 5.3—9.2 58% 14%

12 Clippers 4.8—8.7 55% 14%

13 Pistons 5.4—9.9 55% 14%

14 Celtics 5.0—9.6 52% 14%

15 Hornets 4.9—8.8 56% 13%

16 Magic 4.5—7.9 57% 13%

17 Thunder 4.6—8.4 55% 13%

18 Warriors 4.9—9.1 54% 13%

19 Suns 4.8—9.4 51% 13%

20 Pacers 4.5—8.6 52% 13%

21 Mavericks 4.9—9.3 53% 13%

22 Timberwolves 5.2—9.2 57% 13%

23 Raptors 4.5—8.8 51% 13%

24 Spurs 4.8—8.6 56% 13%

25 Bucks 4.4—9.0 49% 13%

26 Jazz 4.6—8.2 56% 13%

27 Heat 4.4—8.1 54% 13%

28 Bulls 4.5—8.1 56% 13%

29 Nets 4.6—9.3 49% 12%

30 Kings 4.4—7.9 56% 12% A V E R A G E 5.1 — 9.3 55% 14%

IsolationsShare

1 Bulls 4.7—10.9 43% 13%

2 Celtics 4.0—9.9 40% 12%

3 Wizards 4.6—10.0 46% 12%

4 Jazz 4.4—11.0 40% 12%

5 Rockets 4.5—11.4 39% 12%

6 Suns 4.5—10.6 42% 12%

7 Lakers 4.1—10.2 40% 12%

8 Thunder 4.5—10.5 43% 12%

9 Warriors 4.5—11.1 41% 12%

10 Timberwolves 4.4—10.3 43% 11%

11 Kings 4.0—9.6 42% 11%

12 Hawks 4.3—10.4 41% 11%

13 Nets 4.3—10.2 42% 11%

14 Mavericks 4.2—11.0 38% 11%

15 Nuggets 3.9—9.6 41% 11%

16 Knicks 4.1—10.1 41% 11%

17 Clippers 3.4—8.9 38% 10%

18 Hornets 3.9—9.0 43% 10%

19 Pistons 3.9—8.4 46% 10%

20 Pacers 3.6—8.7 41% 10%

21 76ers 3.3—8.7 38% 9%

22 Pelicans 3.6—9.2 39% 9%

23 Magic 3.1—7.5 41% 9%

24 Trail Blazers 3.4—8.3 41% 9%

25 Spurs 3.6—9.5 38% 9%

26 Bucks 3.1—8.1 38% 9%

27 Cavaliers 3.6—8.1 44% 9%

28 Grizzlies 3.4—8.9 38% 9%

29 Raptors 2.7—7.3 37% 8%

30 Heat 2.8—7.7 36% 8% A V E R A G E 3.9 — 9.5 41% 11%

Hand offsShare

1 76ers 2.7—6.2 44% 8%

2 Magic 2.7—6.2 44% 8%

3 Cavaliers 2.8—6.5 43% 7%

4 Jazz 2.6—5.7 46% 7%

5 Timberwolves 2.7—5.7 47% 7%

6 Pacers 2.3—5.7 40% 7%

7 Bucks 2.5—6.2 40% 7%

8 Trail Blazers 2.6—5.9 44% 7%

9 Grizzlies 2.2—5.6 39% 6%

10 Wizards 2.2—4.7 47% 6%

11 Spurs 2.2—5.3 42% 6%

12 Lakers 2.2—5.1 43% 6%

13 Bulls 2.1—4.5 47% 6%

14 Mavericks 2.2—5.1 43% 6%

15 Pelicans 2.4—5.3 45% 6%

16 Clippers 2.2—5.6 39% 6%

17 Knicks 2.2—5.5 40% 6%

18 Pistons 2.3—5.4 43% 6%

19 Nets 2.2—6.0 37% 6%

20 Thunder 2.3—5.5 42% 6%

21 Suns 2.1—4.1 51% 6%

22 Hawks 2.2—5.4 41% 6%

23 Rockets 2.2—5.2 42% 6%

24 Heat 1.9—4.4 43% 6%

25 Warriors 2.0—4.5 44% 5%

26 Hornets 1.7—4.2 40% 5%

27 Nuggets 1.9—4.6 41% 5%

28 Kings 1.8—4.6 39% 5%

29 Raptors 1.6—3.5 46% 5%

30 Celtics 1.9—4.5 42% 5% A V E R A G E 2.2 — 5.2 42% 6%

CutsShare

1 Bulls 5.2—6.9 75% 15%

2 Hornets 5.0—7.0 71% 13%

3 Raptors 4.4—6.9 64% 13%

4 Heat 3.7—5.2 71% 11%

5 Lakers 3.8—5.9 64% 11%

6 76ers 3.8—5.3 72% 11%

7 Wizards 4.2—5.9 71% 11%

8 Pistons 4.1—6.1 67% 11%

9 Nuggets 4.0—5.8 69% 11%

10 Grizzlies 3.6—5.6 64% 10%

11 Spurs 3.8—5.5 69% 10%

12 Kings 3.8—5.3 72% 10%

13 Pelicans 3.7—5.3 70% 10%

14 Warriors 4.0—5.5 73% 10%

15 Clippers 3.4—5.1 67% 10%

16 Nets 3.6—5.3 68% 10%

17 Thunder 3.5—5.3 66% 10%

18 Suns 3.6—4.9 73% 10%

19 Hawks 3.9—5.7 68% 10%

20 Pacers 3.5—4.9 71% 10%

21 Rockets 3.9—5.6 70% 10%

22 Knicks 3.4—4.9 69% 9%

23 Magic 3.2—4.5 71% 9%

24 Trail Blazers 3.3—5.1 65% 9%

25 Mavericks 3.2—4.9 65% 9%

26 Timberwolves 3.6—4.9 73% 9%

27 Cavaliers 3.7—5.3 70% 9%

28 Celtics 3.2—4.8 67% 9%

29 Jazz 2.8—4.5 62% 8%

30 Bucks 2.5—4.2 60% 7% A V E R A G E 3.7 — 5.4 69% 10%

15

Page 16: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0P O I N T S , A S S I S T S , A T T A C K S

InStat IndexInStatIndex

Matchesplayed

1 Antetokounmpo BUC 333 57

2 Harden ROC 324 61

3 James LAK 321 60

4 Westbrook ROC 320 53

5 Leonard CLI 317 51

6 Middleton BUC 313 55

7 Davis LAK 313 56

8 Lillard TB 312 59

9 Doncic MAV 311 54

10 Jokic NUG 311 65

PointsPoints /100 poss

1 Harden ROC 34.36 41.14

2 Beal WIZ 30.60 36.93

3 Antetokounmpo BUC 29.65 40.18

4 Young HAW 29.63 35.27

5 Doncic MAV 28.69 38.05

6 Lillard TB 28.42 34.28

7 Westbrook ROC 27.51 32.58

8 Leonard CLI 26.75 36.57

9 Towns TIM 26.43 33.33

10 Davis LAK 26.18 33.73

Field goals

1 Antetokounmpo BUC 10.9—20.0 55%

2 Westbrook ROC 10.7—22.6 47%

3 Beal WIZ 10.4—22.9 45%

4 Irving NET 10.0—20.9 48%

5 Harden ROC 9.9 —22.7 44%

6 James LAK 9.7 —19.5 50%

7 Doncic MAV 9.5 —20.5 46%

8 Leonard CLI 9.3 —19.8 47%

9 Young HAW 9.1 —20.8 44%

10 Davis LAK 9.1 —17.8 51%

2-pt field goals

1 Westbrook ROC 9.8—18.9 52%

2 Antetokounmpo BUC 9.5—15.2 63%

3 Williamson PEL 8.7—14.7 59%

4 Ayton SUN 8.5—15.5 55%

5 DeRozan SPU 8.1—15.2 53%

6 Davis LAK 7.9—14.3 55%

7 Harrell CLI 7.5—12.6 60%

8 James LAK 7.5—13.2 57%

9 Beal WIZ 7.4—14.4 51%

10 Drummond CAV 7.3—13.1 56%

3-pt field goals

1 Harden ROC 4.4—12.6 35%

2 Hield KIN 3.8—9.7 39%

3 Lillard TB 3.8—9.7 39%

4 Robinson HEA 3.7—8.4 44%

5 Bertans WIZ 3.7—8.7 43%

6 Russell TIM 3.5—9.6 36%

7 Graham HOR 3.5—9.3 38%

8 Young HAW 3.4—9.5 36%

9 Towns TIM 3.3—7.9 42%

10 Walker CEL 3.3—8.8 38%

Free throws

1 Curry WAR 5.2 —5.2 100%

2 Booker SUN 6.5 —7.2 90.3%

3 Leonard CLI 6.1 —6.8 89.7%

4 Lillard TB 6.6 —7.4 89.2%

5 Harden ROC 10.2 —11.8 86.4%

6 Young HAW 8.0 —9.3 86.0%

7 Davis LAK 6.9 —8.1 85.2%

8 Beal WIZ 6.8 —8.0 85.0%

9 Butler HEA 7.6 —9.1 83.5%

10 DeRozan SPU 5.5 —6.6 83.3%

Assists

1 James LAK 10.6

2 Young HAW 9.3

3 Rubio SUN 8.9

4 Doncic MAV 8.7

5 Simmons 76E 8.2

6 Lillard TB 7.7

7 Lowry RAP 7.7

8 Graham HOR 7.5

9 Harden ROC 7.4

10 Payton KNI 7.2

Uncontested FG

1 Redick PEL 1.9—3.6 52.8%

2 McCollum TB 1.9—3.6 52.8%

3 Kennard PIS 1.9—3.6 52.8%

4 Fournier MAG 1.8—4.1 43.9%

5 Hield KIN 1.8—4.4 40.9%

6 Graham HOR 1.7—4.2 40.5%

7 Beal WIZ 1.7—4.1 41.5%

8 Schroder THU 1.6—3.3 48.5%

9 Walker CEL 1.6—3.7 43.2%

10 Middleton BUC 1.6—3.3 48.5%

Contested FG

1 Westbrook ROC 8.7—18.6 46.8%

2 Antetokounmpo BUC 8.4—15.8 53.2%

3 Irving NET 8.1—17.2 47.1%

4 Beal WIZ 8.1—18.1 44.8%

5 Doncic MAV 7.9—17.6 44.9%

6 Williamson PEL 7.9—13.9 56.8%

7 Harden ROC 7.8—18.9 41.3%

8 Ayton SUN 7.8—14.4 54.2%

9 James LAK 7.8—16.0 48.8%

10 Leonard CLI 7.4—16.2 45.7%

+/-Averageper match

1 Antetokounmpo BUC 650.0 11.4

2 Middleton BUC 495.0 9.0

3 James LAK 484.0 8.1

4 Lopez BUC 479.0 7.9

5 Bledsoe BUC 453.0 8.1

6 Tatum CEL 444.0 7.5

7 Matthews BUC 425.0 6.9

8 DiVincenzo BUC 410.0 6.9

9 Leonard CLI 394.0 7.7

10 Siakam RAP 362.0 6.8

Blockshots

1 Whiteside TB 3.05

2 Lopez BUC 2.44

3 Isaac MAG 2.44

4 Davis LAK 2.34

5 Turner PAC 2.15

6 Porzingis MAV 2.12

7 Gobert JAZ 2.00

8 Robinson KNI 1.95

9 Capela ROC 1.79

10 Drummond CAV 1.60

Blockshots against

1 Sexton CAV 1.82

2 Williamson PEL 1.63

3 Drummond CAV 1.63

4 LaVine BUL 1.40

5 Harden ROC 1.39

6 Westbrook ROC 1.43

7 Morant GRI 1.42

8 Waiters HEA 1.33

9 Oubre Jr. SUN 1.32

10 Young HAW 1.33

RatingNet rating

Offensiverating

Defensiverating

1 Antetokounmpo BUC 14.4 105.8 91.4

2 DiVincenzo BUC 12.9 106.3 93.3

3 Bledsoe BUC 12.4 106.4 94.0

4 Middleton BUC 12.1 106.2 94.1

5 Matthews BUC 11.3 103.6 92.3

6 Lopez BUC 11.3 105.0 93.7

7 Hill BUC 10.5 107.5 97.1

8 Davis RAP 10.4 105.6 95.2

9 Leonard CLI 10.1 106.9 96.8

10 Gasol RAP 10.1 103.3 93.2

16

Page 17: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0R E B O U N D S , T U R N O V E R S , F O U L S , D E F E N S E

Rebounds

1 Drummond CAV 15.18

2 Whiteside TB 14.26

3 Capela ROC 13.85

4 Gobert JAZ 13.76

5 Antetokounmpo BUC 13.60

6 Sabonis PAC 12.50

7 Ayton SUN 12.07

8 Embiid 76E 11.86

9 Valanciunas GRI 11.23

10 Vucevic MAG 10.91

Offensive rebounds

1 Capela ROC 4.36

2 Drummond CAV 4.42

3 Ayton SUN 4.17

4 Thompson CAV 3.98

5 Whiteside TB 4.02

6 Gobert JAZ 3.47

7 Adams THU 3.45

8 Carter BUL 3.23

9 Sabonis PAC 3.15

10 Favors PEL 3.24

Defensive rebounds

1 Antetokounmpo BUC 11.32

2 Drummond CAV 10.75

3 Gobert JAZ 10.29

4 Whiteside TB 10.25

5 Capela ROC 9.49

6 Sabonis PAC 9.35

7 Embiid 76E 9.05

8 Love CAV 8.80

9 Vucevic MAG 8.52

10 Valanciunas GRI 8.15

Turnovers

1 Young HAW 4.77

2 Harden ROC 4.48

3 Westbrook ROC 4.40

4 Doncic MAV 4.20

5 James LAK 4.00

6 Booker SUN 3.94

7 Antetokounmpo BUC 3.68

8 Drummond CAV 3.60

9 Simmons 76E 3.56

10 Beal WIZ 3.40

Steals

1 Simmons 76E 2.13

2 Dunn BUL 1.94

3 Drummond CAV 1.93

4 Murray SPU 1.76

5 Harden ROC 1.75

6 VanVleet RAP 1.81

7 Leonard CLI 1.80

8 Butler HEA 1.74

9 Westbrook ROC 1.70

10 Holiday PEL 1.60

FoulsOn shots

1 Mika KIN 5.00 3.0

2 Jackson GRI 4.04 1.7

3 Holmes KIN 3.87 1.5

4 Brooks GRI 3.80 1.2

5 Collins TB 3.67 2.0

6 Carter BUL 3.74 1.5

7 Wagner WIZ 3.53 1.2

8 Westbrook ROC 3.51 1.0

9 Drummond CAV 3.47 1.1

10 Theis CEL 3.45 1.4

Good foulsShare

1 Holmes KIN 2.21 57%

2 Mika KIN 2.00 40%

3 Reid TIM 1.77 64%

4 Winslow HEA 1.82 53%

5 Oubre Jr. SUN 1.75 52%

6 Tucker ROC 1.78 54%

7 Jackson GRI 1.83 45%

8 Theis CEL 1.76 51%

9 Bagley III KIN 1.69 51%

10 Mulder WAR 1.71 60%

Bad foulsShare

1 Mika KIN 3.00 60%

2 Simmons 76E 2.26 71%

3 Jackson GRI 2.19 54%

4 Carter BUL 2.21 59%

5 Brooks GRI 2.20 58%

6 Wagner WIZ 2.16 61%

7 Antetokounmpo BUC 2.14 70%

8 Embiid 76E 1.98 58%

9 Siakam RAP 1.96 69%

10 Drummond CAV 2.02 58%

Technical fouls

1 Westbrook ROC 0.25

2 Lowry RAP 0.25

3 Green WAR 0.33

4 Lopez BUC 0.25

5 Whiteside TB 0.34

6 Valanciunas GRI 0.31

7 Siakam RAP 0.15

8 Young HAW 0.18

9 Howard LAK 0.16

10 Jackson GRI 0.17

Fouls sufferedShootingshare

1 Antetokounmpo BUC 8.23 42%

2 Harden ROC 7.56 50%

3 Young HAW 7.62 36%

4 Doncic MAV 7.11 38%

5 Embiid 76E 6.80 41%

6 Butler HEA 6.72 49%

7 Davis LAK 6.29 35%

8 Booker SUN 6.19 33%

9 Beal WIZ 6.09 45%

10 Williamson PEL 6.00 52%

Opp PointsPoints /100 poss

1 Ayton SUN 19.7 25.9

2 Towns TIM 19.4 24.9

3 Drummond CAV 19.1 26.3

4 Gobert JAZ 19.0 24.8

5 Lopez BUC 18.9 30.2

6 Vucevic MAG 18.4 25.6

7 Collins HAW 18.1 23.3

8 Embiid 76E 17.7 26.3

9 Whiteside TB 17.6 25.0

10 Mika KIN 17.0 37.8

Opponents field goals

1 Drummond CAV 7.7—15.5 50%

2 Gobert JAZ 7.6—19.4 39%

3 Towns TIM 7.6—16.5 46%

4 Vucevic MAG 7.5—15.0 50%

5 Lopez BUC 7.3—17.8 41%

6 Ayton SUN 7.3—18.5 39%

7 Embiid 76E 7.2—15.3 47%

8 Capela ROC 7.1—16.3 44%

9 Whiteside TB 7.0—16.8 42%

10 Jokic NUG 6.8—13.8 49%

Opp 3-pt field goals

1 Embiid 76E 6.5—12.7 51%

2 Vucevic MAG 6.3—12.1 52%

3 Drummond CAV 6.3—12.4 51%

4 Gobert JAZ 6.3—15.7 40%

5 Towns TIM 6.0—12.5 48%

6 Capela ROC 6.0—12.8 47%

7 Whiteside TB 5.9—14.2 42%

8 Allen NET 5.6—12.0 47%

9 Ayton SUN 5.6—12.7 44%

10 Lopez BUC 5.6—13.2 42%

Opp 2-pt field goals

1 Siakam RAP 2.1—6.4 33%

2 Fox KIN 2.0—5.0 40%

3 Mika KIN 2.0—2.0 100%

4 Brown CEL 2.0—5.6 36%

5 Sexton CAV 1.9—5.0 38%

6 Barnes KIN 1.9—4.9 39%

7 Oladipo PAC 1.9—4.3 44%

8 Brooks GRI 1.9—4.8 40%

9 VanVleet RAP 1.9—5.6 34%

10 Nunn HEA 1.9—4.4 43%

17

Page 18: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0F I E L D G O A L S P L A Y T Y P E S

Pick`n`rolls Handler

1 Irving NET 4.1—8.5 48%

2 Young HAW 4.1—9.6 43%

3 Lillard TB 4.1—9.0 46%

4 Mitchell JAZ 3.9—8.6 45%

5 Doncic MAV 3.8—7.9 48%

6 Walker CEL 3.7—7.9 47%

7 Rose PIS 3.7—7.5 49%

8 Paul THU 3.3—5.8 57%

9 Russell TIM 3.1—7.3 42%

10 McCollum TB 3.1—6.9 45%

Pick`n`rolls Roller

1 Sabonis PAC 1.7—2.5 68%

2 Ayton SUN 1.7—2.5 68%

3 Whiteside TB 1.5—2.4 63%

4 Collins HAW 1.5—2.3 65%

5 Allen NET 1.4—2.0 70%

6 Holmes KIN 1.3—1.7 76%

7 Harrell CLI 1.3—1.7 76%

8 Gobert JAZ 1.3—1.9 68%

9 Robinson KNI 1.2—1.4 86%

10 Adebayo HEA 1.2—1.9 63%

Pick`n`pops

1 Aldridge SPU 1.3—3.0 43%

2 Vucevic MAG 1.0—2.4 42%

3 Sabonis PAC 0.9—1.9 47%

4 Ibaka RAP 0.8—1.8 44%

5 Porzingis MAV 0.8—1.8 44%

6 Towns TIM 0.8—2.0 40%

7 Jokic NUG 0.7—1.6 44%

8 Collins TB 0.7—0.7 100%

9 Turner PAC 0.6—1.9 32%

10 Embiid 76E 0.6—1.4 43%

Post ups

1 Jokic NUG 2.1—3.3 64%

2 Embiid 76E 2.0—4.1 49%

3 Aldridge SPU 1.9—4.3 44%

4 Ayton SUN 1.8—3.7 49%

5 Vucevic MAG 1.5—3.5 43%

6 Drummond CAV 1.5—2.8 54%

7 Siakam RAP 1.5—3.2 47%

8 Sabonis PAC 1.5—2.8 54%

9 Davis LAK 1.5—3.2 47%

10 Williamson PEL 1.5—2.7 56%

Isolations

1 Harden ROC 5.4—13.1 41%

2 Westbrook ROC 3.5—7.8 45%

3 Doncic MAV 2.7—5.9 46%

4 Lillard TB 2.4—5.0 48%

5 Antetokounmpo BUC 2.2—4.6 48%

6 Irving NET 2.1—4.4 48%

7 James LAK 2.0—4.8 42%

8 Young HAW 1.8—4.4 41%

9 Leonard CLI 1.7—3.8 45%

10 Dinwiddie NET 1.6—4.2 38%

Catch and shoots

1 Gallinari THU 1.9—4.5 42%

2 Bertans WIZ 1.9—4.1 46%

3 Porzingis MAV 1.7—4.3 40%

4 Covington ROC 1.7—4.8 35%

5 Love CAV 1.6—3.6 44%

6 Hardaway Jr. MAV 1.6—3.6 44%

7 Jackson GRI 1.6—3.5 46%

8 McLemore ROC 1.5—3.7 41%

9 Robinson HEA 1.5—3.3 45%

10 Towns TIM 1.5—3.8 39%

Catch and drives

1 Westbrook ROC 1.1—2.0 55%

2 Brown CEL 1.0—1.8 56%

3 Williamson PEL 1.0—2.4 42%

4 Holiday PEL 0.9—2.0 45%

5 Gilgeous-Alexander THU 0.9—1.6 56%

6 DeRozan SPU 0.9—1.3 69%

7 Powell RAP 0.9—1.5 60%

8 Antetokounmpo BUC 0.8—1.4 57%

9 Tatum CEL 0.8—1.7 47%

10 Kuzma LAK 0.8—1.3 62%

Screen offs

1 Ross MAG 1.3—3.3 39%

2 George CLI 1.1—2.6 42%

3 Redick PEL 1.1—2.5 44%

4 Bogdanovic JAZ 1.1—2.1 52%

5 McDermott PAC 1.1—2.2 50%

6 Beal WIZ 1.0—2.4 42%

7 Hield KIN 1.0—2.5 40%

8 Harris NET 1.0—2.4 42%

9 Fournier MAG 1.0—2.1 48%

10 Booker SUN 0.9—1.7 53%

Hand offs

1 Robinson HEA 1.1—2.1 52%

2 Beal WIZ 1.0—2.1 48%

3 Fournier MAG 1.0—1.9 53%

4 Harris NUG 1.0—2.2 45%

5 Murray NUG 1.0—2.2 45%

6 Wiggins WAR 0.9—1.8 50%

7 Redick PEL 0.8—1.7 47%

8 Brooks GRI 0.8—2.0 40%

9 Herro HEA 0.8—1.8 44%

10 Nunn HEA 0.8—1.6 50%

Transitions

1 Antetokounmpo BUC 2.2—3.5 63%

2 Westbrook ROC 2.1—4.0 53%

3 Siakam RAP 1.9—2.9 66%

4 Williamson PEL 1.8—2.6 69%

5 James LAK 1.8—2.6 69%

6 Simmons 76E 1.7—2.8 61%

7 Powell RAP 1.6—2.4 67%

8 Fox KIN 1.6—2.5 64%

9 Booker SUN 1.6—2.8 57%

10 Brown CEL 1.5—2.4 63%

Cuts

1 Capela ROC 2.7—3.8 71%

2 Williamson PEL 2.0—2.5 80%

3 Gobert JAZ 1.7—2.3 74%

4 Holmes KIN 1.6—2.2 73%

5 Adebayo HEA 1.5—2.1 71%

6 Whiteside TB 1.5—1.9 79%

7 Ayton SUN 1.5—2.3 65%

8 Simmons 76E 1.5—2.0 75%

9 Allen NET 1.4—2.0 70%

10 Collins HAW 1.3—1.9 68%

Putbacks

1 Whiteside TB 1.9—2.8 68%

2 Drummond CAV 1.6—2.9 55%

3 Valanciunas GRI 1.4—2.1 67%

4 Ayton SUN 1.4—2.5 56%

5 Robinson KNI 1.3—2.1 62%

6 Gobert JAZ 1.3—2.0 65%

7 Towns TIM 1.3—1.8 72%

8 Holmes KIN 1.2—1.9 63%

9 Harrell CLI 1.1—1.8 61%

10 Collins HAW 1.1—1.7 65%

18

Page 19: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0B O X S C O R E . C E N T E R S

CentersR E B O U N D S F O U L S

InStatIndex Matches Minutes Points /100 poss Assists Field goals 3-pt field goals Free throws Total Offense Defense Turnov Steals Fouls Reason Unreason Tech Against BLK

BLKagainst Opp Points Opponents field goals +/- Net rating

1 Jokic NUG 311 65 32:16 20.2 28.4 6.9 8—15 53% 1.1—3.5 31% 3.4—4.1 83% 10.2 2.4 7.8 3.1 1.2 3.1 1.5 1.5 0.1 5.0 0.7 0.5 16.8 6.8—13.8 49% 246.0 2.8

2 Embiid 76E 309 44 30:08 23.4 34.3 3.1 8—16 50% 1.3—3.6 36% 7.1—8.7 82% 11.9 2.8 9.1 3.1 0.8 3.4 1.3 2.0 0.1 6.8 1.3 0.8 17.7 7.2—15.3 47% 131.0 2.7

3 Towns TIM 308 35 33:55 26.4 33.3 4.4 9—18 50% 3.3—7.9 42% 5.1—6.4 80% 10.8 2.7 8.1 3.1 1.0 3.4 1.5 1.8 0.1 5.5 1.2 1.0 19.4 7.6—16.5 46% -15.0 -2.4

4 Gobert JAZ 307 62 34:35 15.1 19.5 1.5 6—8 75% — 3.7—5.9 63% 13.8 3.5 10.3 1.9 0.7 3.2 1.5 1.7 0.2 5.5 2.0 0.7 19.0 7.6—19.4 39% 260.0 4.3

5 Adebayo HEA 306 65 34:22 16.2 21.3 5.2 6—11 55% 0 —0.2 0% 3.6—5.3 68% 10.5 2.5 8.0 2.9 1.2 2.6 1.1 1.5 — 4.6 1.3 0.8 14.9 5.6—13.4 42% 210.0 1.5

6 Whiteside TB 304 61 31:19 16.3 23.1 1.2 7—11 64% 0.1—0.1 100% 2.5—3.7 68% 14.3 4.0 10.3 1.9 0.4 2.9 1.5 1.4 0.3 3.4 3.1 0.6 17.6 7.0—16.8 42% 97.0 1.9

7 Capela ROC 302 39 32:38 13.9 18.4 1.2 6—10 60% — 1.4—2.6 54% 13.9 4.4 9.5 1.6 0.9 2.6 1.2 1.4 — 2.6 1.8 1.0 16.6 7.1—16.3 44% 57.0 4.1

8 Kanter CEL 301 51 17:28 8.2 20.9 1.0 3—6 50% 0 —0.1 0% 1.2—1.8 67% 7.8 2.8 5.0 1.0 0.4 1.7 0.7 0.9 — 1.6 0.8 0.6 9.1 3.6—8.2 44% 165.0 6.4

9 Vucevic MAG 301 54 32:40 19.5 26.9 3.7 8—17 47% 1.5—4.6 33% 2.1—2.7 78% 10.9 2.4 8.5 1.4 0.9 2.2 1.2 1.0 0.1 2.6 0.8 0.8 18.4 7.5—15.0 50% 2.0 -0.4

10 Adams THU 301 58 26:58 10.9 17.9 2.4 5—8 63% 0 —0.1 0% 1.9—3.2 59% 9.3 3.5 5.9 1.5 0.9 1.9 0.9 1.0 0.1 3.2 1.1 0.5 15.1 6.2—13.2 47% 144.0 1.5

11 Horford 76E 298 60 30:46 12.0 17.6 4.1 5—11 45% 1.5—4.4 34% 0.9—1.2 75% 6.9 1.5 5.3 1.1 0.9 2.2 0.9 1.3 0.1 1.3 0.9 0.3 15.1 6.0—13.0 46% 122.0 2.6

12 Zubac CLI 298 64 18:04 8.0 19.4 1.1 3—5 60% — 1.7—2.2 77% 7.3 2.7 4.6 0.8 0.2 2.3 1.1 1.1 0.1 1.6 1.0 0.4 11.6 4.3—10.5 41% 185.0 7.4

13 Lopez BUC 297 61 26:32 11.0 17.4 1.5 4—9 44% 1.4—4.7 30% 1.6—2.0 80% 4.3 0.7 3.7 1.1 0.7 2.4 1.5 0.9 0.3 1.8 2.4 0.3 18.9 7.3—17.8 41% 479.0 11.3

14 Drummond CAV 297 57 32:57 17.7 24.2 2.6 7—14 50% 0.1—0.6 17% 3.0—5.2 58% 15.2 4.4 10.8 3.6 1.9 3.5 1.4 2.0 0.2 4.5 1.6 1.6 19.1 7.7—15.5 50% -198.0 -6.0

15 Valanciunas GRI 297 62 26:16 14.9 24.4 1.8 6—11 55% 0.5—1.3 38% 2.0—2.7 74% 11.2 3.1 8.2 1.8 0.5 2.6 1.1 1.5 0.3 2.6 1.1 0.6 15.1 5.9—13.0 45% -1.0 -0.9

16 Gasol RAP 296 36 27:29 7.6 12.2 3.4 3—7 43% 1.4—3.5 40% 0.7—1.0 70% 6.3 0.8 5.5 1.2 0.8 2.8 1.3 1.5 0.1 1.9 0.9 0.2 14.7 5.9—12.8 46% 238.0 10.1

17 Jordan NET 295 56 22:03 8.3 16.4 1.9 3—5 60% — 1.5—2.2 68% 10.0 2.5 7.5 1.4 0.3 2.0 1.2 0.9 0.2 2.3 0.9 0.3 10.2 3.7—9.9 37% -41.0 -1.4

18 Hartenstein ROC 295 23 11:34 4.7 17.5 0.8 2—3 67% 0 —0.3 0% 0.8—1.2 67% 3.9 1.3 2.7 0.7 0.4 1.7 0.7 1.0 — 1.2 0.5 0.1 8.8 3.3—7.5 44% 40.0 9.6

19 Plumlee NUG 294 53 17:01 7.2 18.9 2.3 3—5 60% 0 —0.1 0% 1.4—2.6 54% 5.3 1.7 3.6 1.4 0.5 2.3 1.1 1.2 — 2.3 0.6 0.3 10.7 4.0—8.5 47% -8.0 1.4

20 Allen NET 294 64 25:43 10.6 18.1 1.3 4—6 67% 0 —0.1 0% 2.3—3.7 62% 9.5 3.1 6.4 1.1 0.6 2.3 1.2 1.1 0.1 3.6 1.3 0.6 15.3 6.3—14.5 43% 27.0 —

21 Chandler ROC 294 26 8:36 1.3 6.5 0.2 1—1 100% — 0.2—0.5 40% 2.5 1.0 1.6 0.3 0.2 1.2 0.6 0.5 — 0.6 0.4 — 4.7 1.7—3.9 44% 29.0 3.3

22 Howard LAK 294 62 19:13 7.6 17.6 0.7 3—4 75% 0.1—0.1 100% 1.4—2.9 48% 7.3 2.5 4.9 1.2 0.4 3.2 1.4 1.8 0.2 2.8 1.2 0.2 10.7 3.8—8.8 43% 170.0 5.5

23 Bradley JAZ 293 50 10:41 4.7 19.6 0.3 2—3 67% — 0.5—0.8 63% 4.3 1.8 2.5 0.5 0.2 2.0 1.2 0.8 0.1 0.6 0.5 0.3 8.1 2.9—6.7 43% 19.0 2.9

24 Lopez BUC 293 60 14:27 5.5 16.6 0.7 2—5 40% 0.6—1.6 38% 0.4—0.7 57% 2.4 0.8 1.6 0.9 0.2 1.3 0.5 0.8 0.1 0.9 0.7 0.1 9.7 3.9—8.7 45% 38.0 1.7

25 Marjanovic MAV 293 36 9:25 6.4 30.6 0.4 3—5 60% 0.1—0.4 25% 1.0—1.3 77% 4.3 1.5 2.8 0.8 0.2 1.3 0.7 0.6 — 1.2 0.2 0.3 5.4 2.0—4.1 49% 61.0 7.5

26 Poeltl SPU 292 58 16:38 5.3 13.9 1.7 2—4 50% — 0.6—1.3 46% 5.3 1.8 3.5 0.8 0.5 1.7 0.8 0.8 — 1.3 1.5 0.4 10.0 3.7—8.8 42% 58.0 2.7

27 Cauley-Stein MAV 291 54 20:20 7.3 16.1 1.3 3—6 50% — 0.7—1.2 58% 5.8 1.6 4.3 0.8 0.9 2.2 1.2 1.0 0.1 1.3 1.1 0.3 11.6 4.4—9.9 44% -131.0 -3.3

28 McGee LAK 291 61 16:41 6.8 17.7 0.6 3—5 60% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.8—1.2 67% 5.8 1.8 4.0 0.8 0.5 2.4 1.1 1.3 0.1 1.3 1.5 0.3 9.9 3.8—8.6 44% 187.0 8.8

29 Fall CEL 291 6 4:04 3.2 33.4 — 2—2 100% — 0.2—0.5 40% 1.7 — 1.7 0.5 — 0.8 — 0.8 — 0.5 0.3 0.2 2.8 0.8—2.2 36% 7.0 9.2

30 Thompson CAV 291 57 30:02 12.0 17.8 2.1 5—10 50% 0.2—0.4 50% 1.7—2.8 61% 10.1 4.0 6.1 1.8 0.6 2.2 1.1 1.1 0.1 2.9 0.8 1.1 14.7 5.8—13.4 43% -384.0 -11.5

31 Hernangomez HOR 290 31 12:06 6.1 23.1 0.9 2—5 40% 0.2—0.7 29% 1.2—1.9 63% 4.3 1.4 2.9 0.9 0.4 1.0 0.6 0.5 — 1.5 0.2 0.3 6.4 2.6—5.2 50% -18.0 -2.8

32 Corness Olynyk HEA 289 59 18:25 7.7 18.3 1.7 3—5 60% 1.4—3.1 45% 1.2—1.4 86% 4.4 0.6 3.8 1.1 0.6 2.4 1.1 1.4 — 1.5 0.3 0.2 9.3 3.3—6.7 49% 90.0 2.1

33 Bryant WIZ 289 39 23:46 12.1 22.0 2.0 5—8 63% 0.6—1.5 40% 1.9—2.5 76% 6.7 1.9 4.8 1.3 0.4 2.2 0.9 1.3 0.2 2.2 0.9 0.3 13.8 5.5—11.2 49% -143.0 -6.9

34 Dieng GRI 289 58 17:27 7.4 18.7 1.2 3—6 50% 0.9—2.5 36% 1.1—1.4 79% 5.8 1.5 4.3 1.0 0.8 1.9 0.8 1.2 — 1.6 1.0 0.3 9.9 3.9—8.8 44% -105.0 -3.0

35 Bitadze PAC 288 49 8:22 3.1 16.2 0.4 1—3 33% 0.1—0.7 14% 0.5—0.7 71% 1.9 0.4 1.5 0.5 0.1 1.2 0.6 0.6 — 0.5 0.7 — 5.7 2.2—5.2 42% -18.0 -1.8

36 Okafor PEL 288 28 15:09 7.6 21.7 1.3 3—5 60% 0 —0.1 0% 1.3—2.1 62% 4.3 1.6 2.7 1.3 0.3 2.3 0.7 1.5 — 2.0 0.7 0.5 10.0 3.9—8.2 48% -111.0 -11.3

37 Robinson KNI 288 61 23:06 9.6 18.7 0.6 4—6 67% — 1.4—2.4 58% 7.1 3.1 4.0 0.6 0.9 3.2 1.7 1.4 0.1 2.1 2.0 0.3 14.0 4.8—11.4 42% -101.0 -3.3

38 Poirier CEL 288 21 5:24 1.9 15.2 0.3 1—2 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.3—0.3 100% 1.6 0.5 1.1 0.3 0.1 1.1 0.5 0.6 — 0.4 0.3 0.2 4.4 1.5—3.3 45% -12.0 -3.9

39 Zizic CAV 287 22 10:02 4.4 19.3 0.3 2—3 67% — 0.6—0.9 67% 3.0 0.8 2.2 0.5 0.3 1.2 0.6 0.7 — 1.0 0.2 0.2 5.8 2.2—4.6 48% 14.0 1.7

40 Biyombo HOR 287 53 19:25 7.4 17.9 0.9 3—5 60% — 1.7—2.8 61% 5.8 2.3 3.6 0.9 0.2 2.2 1.0 1.2 — 2.5 0.9 0.6 8.9 3.5—8.1 43% -152.0 -4.5

41 Birch MAG 287 40 19:21 3.8 8.9 0.9 1—3 33% — 1.0—1.7 59% 4.4 1.7 2.7 0.7 0.4 1.8 0.8 1.0 — 1.5 0.5 0.2 8.6 3.2—7.2 44% -89.0 -7.7

42 Len KIN 286 49 18:18 8.3 19.5 0.9 3—6 50% 0.3—1.1 27% 1.2—1.9 63% 6.0 1.9 4.0 1.1 0.5 2.3 1.2 1.1 0.1 1.5 0.9 0.5 11.5 4.4—10.3 43% -120.0 -6.7

43 Patton THU 285 5 4:51 1.8 15.3 0.4 1—2 50% 0.2—0.8 25% — 1.0 0.2 0.8 0.4 — 0.8 0.2 0.6 — 0.2 — — 4.4 1.8—2.4 75% -16.0 -25.1

44 Brown TB 284 9 3:39 1.2 14.1 0.1 0—1 0% — 0.3—0.9 33% 1.6 0.3 1.2 0.3 0.1 0.8 0.2 0.6 0.1 0.6 0.1 — 4.0 1.2—2.1 57% -33.0 -49.4

45 Mahinmi WIZ 284 38 21:13 7.5 15.4 1.3 3—6 50% 0.1—0.7 14% 1.8—3.0 60% 5.8 2.1 3.7 1.2 0.8 3.0 1.4 1.6 0.1 2.7 1.2 0.6 12.6 4.7—10.0 47% -82.0 -3.8

46 Dedmon HAW 284 44 17:34 5.8 14.7 0.5 2—6 33% 0.5—2.4 21% 0.7—0.8 88% 5.6 1.3 4.3 1.3 0.6 3.0 1.4 1.6 0.1 1.2 0.9 0.3 9.6 3.3—7.6 43% -28.0 -0.6

47 Pasecniks WIZ 283 23 17:36 6.3 15.7 0.7 2—5 40% 0 —0.1 0% 1.4—2.4 58% 4.3 1.7 2.6 1.0 0.3 2.8 0.8 2.0 0.1 2.5 0.6 0.1 10.7 4.0—8.4 48% -3.0 0.1

19

Page 20: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0B O X S C O R E . C E N T E R S

CentersR E B O U N D S F O U L S

InStatIndex Matches Minutes Points /100 poss Assists Field goals 3-pt field goals Free throws Total Offense Defense Turnov Steals Fouls Reason Unreason Tech Against BLK

BLKagainst Opp Points Opponents field goals +/- Net rating

48 Jones HAW 279 49 16:27 5.8 15.2 0.6 2—3 67% 0—0.2 0% 1.1—1.5 73% 3.7 1.3 2.4 0.6 0.5 2.9 1.4 1.5 — 1.4 0.7 0.5 11.8 4.2—8.1 52% -258.0 -13.7

49 Bolden CAV — 1 2:49 — — — — — — 2.0 — 2.0 — 1.0 1.0 1.0 — — — — — 2.0 0 —1.0 0% 4.0 57.1

20

Page 21: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0B O X S C O R E . F O R W A R D S

ForwardsR E B O U N D S F O U L S

InStatIndex Matches Minutes Points /100 poss Assists Field goals 3-pt field goals Free throws Total Offense Defense Turnov Steals Fouls Reason Unreason Tech Against BLK

BLKagainst Opp Points Opponents field goals +/- Net rating

1 Antetokounmpo BUC 333 57 30:49 29.7 40.2 5.8 11—20 55% 1.5—4.8 31% 6.3—10.0 63% 13.6 2.3 11.3 3.7 1.1 3.0 0.9 2.1 0.1 8.2 1.0 1.1 9.6 3.3—9.9 33% 650.0 14.4

2 James LAK 321 60 34:51 25.7 32.4 10.6 10—20 50% 2.2—6.3 35% 4.0—5.7 70% 7.8 1.0 6.9 4.0 1.2 1.8 0.7 1.0 — 5.1 0.5 0.9 7.3 2.7—6.9 39% 484.0 9.9

3 Leonard CLI 317 51 32:08 26.8 36.6 5.0 9 —20 45% 2.1—5.7 37% 6.1—6.8 90% 7.3 1.0 6.3 2.8 1.8 1.9 0.6 1.3 0.1 5.7 0.6 0.7 9.8 3.8—9.4 40% 394.0 10.1

4 Middleton BUC 313 55 30:08 21.1 29.5 4.0 8 —15 53% 2.4—5.8 41% 3.2—3.6 89% 6.2 0.7 5.5 2.1 0.9 2.2 0.8 1.5 — 2.6 0.1 0.6 8.6 3.0—7.3 41% 495.0 12.1

5 Davis LAK 313 56 33:41 26.2 33.7 3.1 9 —18 50% 1.2—3.5 34% 6.9—8.1 85% 9.2 2.3 7.0 2.5 1.5 2.5 1.4 1.0 0.1 6.3 2.3 0.7 14.3 5.1—13.9 37% 285.0 5.7

6 Doncic MAV 311 54 33:20 28.7 38.0 8.7 9 —21 43% 2.9—9.1 32% 6.8—9.1 75% 9.3 1.3 8.0 4.2 1.1 2.5 1.0 1.4 0.1 7.1 0.2 1.0 10.5 3.9—8.3 47% 261.0 5.3

7 Siakam RAP 311 53 35:32 23.6 29.3 3.6 9 —19 47% 2.2—6.1 36% 4.2—5.2 81% 7.5 1.1 6.5 2.5 1.0 2.8 0.9 2.0 0.2 4.0 0.9 1.0 15.5 5.6—13.5 41% 362.0 9.2

8 Tatum CEL 311 59 34:38 23.6 30.1 3.0 8 —19 42% 2.8—7.1 39% 3.8—4.7 81% 7.1 1.0 6.2 2.2 1.5 2.0 0.7 1.3 0.1 3.7 0.9 1.0 10.2 3.8—9.0 42% 444.0 8.7

9 Sabonis PAC 309 62 34:40 18.5 24.2 4.9 7 —14 50% 0.3—1.1 27% 3.5—4.8 73% 12.5 3.2 9.4 2.8 0.8 3.2 1.1 2.0 — 4.8 0.5 0.9 16.0 6.2—13.8 45% 166.0 3.7

10 Harrell CLI 309 63 27:45 18.6 28.8 1.7 7 —13 54% 0 —0.3 0% 3.7—5.6 66% 7.1 2.6 4.5 1.7 0.6 2.3 1.2 1.1 0.2 4.7 1.1 1.1 14.0 5.3—13.4 40% 244.0 6.4

11 Williamson PEL 308 19 29:42 23.6 33.5 2.2 9 —15 60% 0.3—0.7 43% 5.2—8.0 65% 6.8 2.9 3.9 2.7 0.8 1.7 0.7 1.0 0.1 6.0 0.5 1.6 12.1 4.8—11.1 43% 120.0 10.4

12 Simmons 76E 308 54 35:45 16.7 20.6 8.2 7 —11 64% 0 —0.1 0% 3.3—5.3 62% 7.8 2.0 5.8 3.6 2.1 3.2 0.9 2.3 0.1 4.9 0.6 0.5 12.0 4.3—10.4 41% 78.0 0.9

13 Butler HEA 306 54 34:14 20.3 26.8 6.1 6 —13 46% 0.5—2.2 23% 7.6—9.1 84% 6.6 1.8 4.8 2.2 1.7 1.4 0.5 0.9 — 6.7 0.5 0.8 10.6 3.9—9.9 39% 225.0 2.7

14 Hayward CEL 306 45 33:21 17.3 22.7 4.1 7 —13 54% 1.6—4.2 38% 2.1—2.5 84% 6.5 1.0 5.6 1.8 0.8 1.8 0.8 1.0 — 2.4 0.4 0.8 9.3 3.5—8.0 44% 277.0 7.2

15 Mitchell JAZ 305 63 34:21 24.2 31.5 4.2 9 —20 45% 2.5—6.8 37% 4.0—4.6 87% 4.4 0.7 3.7 2.6 1.1 2.4 1.1 1.3 0.1 3.7 0.2 0.7 10.9 3.8—8.1 47% 91.0 1.7

16 Brown CEL 304 50 34:01 20.5 27.1 2.1 8 —15 53% 2.1—5.6 38% 3.2—4.3 74% 6.4 1.1 5.3 2.3 1.1 3.1 1.5 1.6 0.1 3.4 0.3 1.2 13.8 4.8—11.3 42% 194.0 6.2

17 Ibaka RAP 304 50 27:32 16.0 25.8 1.5 6 —12 50% 1.3—3.3 39% 1.8—2.4 75% 8.3 2.1 6.2 2.0 0.5 2.7 0.9 1.8 0.1 1.8 0.9 0.4 13.8 5.4—13.0 42% 125.0 5.1

18 Harris 76E 304 65 34:31 19.4 25.2 3.2 8 —16 50% 1.8—5.0 36% 2.4—2.9 83% 6.8 0.9 5.9 1.5 0.7 2.3 1.2 1.1 — 2.3 0.5 0.8 12.0 4.3—9.5 45% 129.0 1.9

19 George CLI 303 42 29:07 21.0 31.3 3.9 7 —16 44% 3.2—8.0 40% 3.9—4.5 87% 5.7 0.5 5.2 2.7 1.3 2.4 1.0 1.4 — 3.6 0.5 0.8 11.4 4.1—9.2 45% 209.0 7.0

20 Aldridge SPU 302 53 33:03 18.9 26.0 2.4 7 —15 47% 1.2—2.9 41% 3.0—3.6 83% 7.3 1.9 5.4 1.4 0.7 2.4 1.2 1.2 — 3.1 1.6 0.3 16.6 6.6—15.3 43% -125.0 -1.9

21 Ingram PEL 302 56 34:15 24.3 30.1 4.3 8 —18 44% 2.5—6.3 40% 5.1—5.9 86% 6.3 0.9 5.4 3.1 1.0 2.9 1.3 1.6 0.1 5.1 0.6 0.9 13.4 4.8—10.7 45% — -0.5

22 Gallinari THU 301 55 30:44 19.2 27.7 2.0 6 —14 43% 3.0—7.3 41% 4.3—4.8 90% 5.5 0.6 4.9 1.3 0.8 1.2 0.6 0.6 0.1 3.9 0.1 0.6 10.1 4.0—8.5 47% 191.0 2.7

23 Theis CEL 300 58 23:54 9.3 17.3 1.7 4 —7 57% 0.5—1.4 36% 1.4—1.8 78% 6.6 2.3 4.3 0.8 0.6 3.5 1.8 1.7 0.1 2.1 1.3 0.5 14.5 5.3—12.3 43% 199.0 6.6

24 Bogdanovic JAZ 300 63 33:05 20.2 27.3 2.1 7 —15 47% 3.0—7.3 41% 4.0—4.4 91% 4.1 0.6 3.5 2.5 0.5 1.8 0.9 0.9 0.1 3.1 0.1 1.1 10.0 3.8—8.3 46% 268.0 4.4

25 Barton NUG 300 53 33:16 15.3 20.6 3.8 6 —13 46% 1.9—5.1 37% 1.8—2.3 78% 6.3 1.3 4.9 1.6 1.1 2.2 0.9 1.2 — 2.0 0.5 0.8 12.0 4.3—9.8 44% 222.0 3.7

26 Ayton SUN 299 30 33:11 19.0 24.9 1.9 9 —16 56% 0 —0.1 0% 2.0—2.6 77% 12.1 4.2 7.9 2.4 0.7 3.2 1.5 1.7 0.1 2.7 1.6 1.0 19.7 7.3—18.5 39% 37.0 1.3

27 Warren PAC 298 61 32:21 18.7 26.4 1.4 8 —14 57% 1.1—3.0 37% 2.5—3.1 81% 4.0 1.0 3.0 1.3 1.2 2.8 1.0 1.7 0.1 2.5 0.5 0.5 10.1 3.4—7.5 45% 53.0 2.6

28 Porzingis MAV 298 51 31:19 19.2 27.1 1.7 7 —16 44% 2.5—7.1 35% 3.5—4.5 78% 9.5 1.8 7.7 1.7 0.7 3.1 1.6 1.5 0.2 3.6 2.1 0.6 16.6 6.1—14.5 42% 296.0 6.7

29 Hollis-Jefferson RAP 298 52 19:13 7.2 16.7 1.8 3 —6 50% 0 —0.4 0% 1.8—2.5 72% 4.9 2.0 2.9 0.9 0.8 2.0 0.7 1.3 — 2.1 0.4 0.5 8.4 3.0—7.1 42% 84.0 5.7

30 Anderson ROC 298 2 6:59 2.5 15.6 1.0 1 —4 25% 0.5—2.5 20% — 3.5 — 3.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 — — — — — 2.5 1.0—2.0 50% 7.0 38.7

31 Davis RAP 298 64 16:59 7.7 20.2 1.7 3 —6 50% 1.4—3.5 40% 0.7—0.8 88% 3.4 0.7 2.7 1.0 0.5 1.6 0.5 1.1 — 0.7 0.2 0.4 6.1 2.0—5.0 40% 224.0 10.4

32 Holmes KIN 297 39 28:51 12.8 20.4 1.0 5 —8 63% — 2.1—2.6 81% 8.4 3.1 5.3 1.3 1.0 3.9 2.2 1.7 0.1 2.4 1.4 0.3 13.7 5.1—11.7 44% 25.0 3.0

33 Winslow HEA 297 11 32:01 11.3 15.2 4.0 5 —12 42% 0.6—2.5 24% 1.6—2.5 64% 6.6 1.5 5.1 2.2 0.7 3.5 1.8 1.6 — 2.0 0.4 0.4 11.7 3.6—9.4 38% 53.0 7.2

34 Anunoby RAP 296 63 30:06 10.7 15.8 1.6 4 —8 50% 1.3—3.4 38% 0.9—1.4 64% 5.4 1.2 4.2 1.2 1.4 2.5 0.9 1.6 0.1 1.2 0.7 0.8 11.1 3.8—8.5 45% 227.0 7.0

35 Ilyasova BUC 296 56 16:04 6.8 18.1 0.8 2 —5 40% 0.8—2.2 36% 1.1—1.3 85% 4.9 1.1 3.8 0.6 0.4 1.6 0.9 0.6 — 1.3 0.3 0.3 6.7 2.2—5.5 40% 119.0 6.6

36 Millsap NUG 296 44 24:22 12.0 22.1 1.6 4 —9 44% 1.1—2.5 44% 2.4—2.9 83% 5.9 2.0 3.9 1.4 0.9 2.9 1.3 1.6 — 2.4 0.6 0.7 12.3 4.3—10.1 43% 238.0 7.8

37 Ingles JAZ 296 64 29:54 9.8 14.6 5.1 3 —8 38% 1.9—4.8 40% 1.0—1.3 77% 4.0 0.4 3.6 1.9 0.9 2.1 0.8 1.3 0.1 1.7 0.1 0.3 9.2 3.4—7.7 44% 236.0 4.5

38 LeVert NET 296 39 29:02 17.7 26.4 4.1 6 —16 38% 1.9—4.9 39% 3.0—4.1 73% 4.1 1.1 3.0 2.5 1.1 1.8 0.7 1.1 — 3.3 0.2 1.0 10.1 3.8—8.0 48% -15.0 -1.0

39 Boucher RAP 296 55 13:10 6.3 21.4 0.4 2 —5 40% 0.5—1.8 28% 1.5—1.9 79% 4.4 1.7 2.7 0.4 0.4 1.9 0.8 1.1 0.1 1.5 1.0 0.3 8.0 2.9—7.0 41% 85.0 7.2

40 Williams III CEL 296 23 13:49 4.3 13.8 1.0 2 —3 67% — 0.6—1.1 55% 4.7 1.5 3.2 0.8 0.9 1.8 1.1 0.7 0.1 1.0 1.1 — 6.8 2.3—6.1 38% -5.0 3.9

41 Hernandez RAP 296 4 2:50 1.0 16.0 — 0 —1 0% 0 —0.3 0% 0.5—0.5 100% 1.8 0.5 1.3 0.3 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.3 — 0.3 — — 2.5 0.5—0.8 63% 1.0 8.2

42 Cancar NUG 295 14 3:15 1.2 17.8 0.2 0 —1 0% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.3—0.3 100% 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.4 0.1 — 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.7 0.5—1.4 36% -8.0 2.3

43 Favors PEL 295 45 24:11 9.2 16.4 1.7 4 —7 57% 0 —0.2 0% 0.8—1.4 57% 9.8 3.2 6.6 1.1 0.6 2.2 1.2 1.0 — 1.6 1.0 0.4 13.9 5.4—12.0 45% 147.0 5.2

44 Collins HAW 295 41 33:14 21.7 27.9 1.5 9 —15 60% 1.5—3.6 42% 2.9—3.7 78% 10.2 2.9 7.3 1.8 0.8 3.4 1.4 1.9 — 3.6 1.6 1.3 18.1 6.7—15.3 44% -164.0 -5.4

45 Anthony TB 295 52 31:11 14.5 20.9 1.5 6 —13 46% 1.4—3.7 38% 2.2—2.6 85% 6.0 1.2 4.8 1.7 0.8 2.7 0.8 1.9 0.1 2.6 0.4 0.7 10.1 3.5—8.0 44% 2.0 1.2

46 Brissett RAP 294 19 7:07 1.8 11.4 0.4 1 —2 50% 0.1—0.7 14% 0.4—0.5 80% 1.3 0.4 0.9 0.4 0.2 1.0 0.4 0.5 — 0.4 0.1 0.3 2.3 0.6—2.1 29% 34.0 13.5

47 Antetokounmpo BUC 294 18 5:13 2.5 19.8 0.5 1 —2 50% 0 —0.4 0% 0.4—0.8 50% 1.1 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.3 0.7 0.3 0.4 — 0.7 0.1 0.2 2.4 0.8—1.9 42% -22.0 -10.1

21

Page 22: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0B O X S C O R E . F O R W A R D S

ForwardsR E B O U N D S F O U L S

InStatIndex Matches Minutes Points /100 poss Assists Field goals 3-pt field goals Free throws Total Offense Defense Turnov Steals Fouls Reason Unreason Tech Against BLK

BLKagainst Opp Points Opponents field goals +/- Net rating

48 Roby THU 294 3 3:48 — — — — — — 0.7 — 0.7 0.3 — 0.3 — 0.3 — — — — 1.0 0.3—1.7 18% -4.0 -11.2

49 Paschall WAR 294 60 27:31 14.0 22.4 2.1 5—11 45% 0.6—2.2 27% 2.7—3.5 77% 4.7 1.4 3.3 1.6 0.5 2.1 1.0 1.1 — 2.8 0.2 0.9 9.9 3.6—8.1 44% -366.0 -9.1

50 Chriss WAR 294 59 20:18 9.3 20.3 1.9 4—7 57% 0.1—0.7 14% 2.1—2.6 81% 6.2 2.0 4.3 1.4 0.7 2.1 1.0 1.1 0.1 2.3 1.1 0.4 11.2 4.3—9.6 45% -226.0 -8.1

51 Jr. NUG 294 48 14:03 7.5 23.2 0.7 3—6 50% 0.9—2.1 43% 0.7—0.9 78% 4.2 1.2 3.0 0.7 0.4 1.6 0.8 0.7 — 0.8 0.4 0.4 6.4 2.2—4.7 47% 12.0 -1.3

52 Noel THU 294 55 18:26 7.7 18.9 1.0 3—5 60% 0 —0.1 0% 1.4—1.8 78% 4.9 1.5 3.4 1.0 1.0 2.6 1.3 1.3 — 1.8 1.4 0.1 10.5 4.1—9.7 42% 32.0 2.7

53 Gordon MAG 293 58 32:58 14.4 19.7 3.7 5—13 38% 1.2—3.9 31% 2.4—3.5 69% 7.6 1.8 5.8 1.6 0.9 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.1 3.2 0.6 0.7 11.0 4.1—9.9 41% -94.0 -2.6

54 Randle KNI 293 64 32:21 19.5 27.0 3.1 7—16 44% 1.0—3.6 28% 4.0—5.5 73% 9.7 2.4 7.3 3.0 0.8 2.8 1.1 1.7 0.1 4.4 0.4 1.0 12.6 4.5—10.1 45% -248.0 -5.4

55 Wilson BUC 293 31 9:02 3.2 15.4 0.7 1—3 33% 0.5—1.8 28% 0.2—0.3 67% 2.2 0.3 1.9 0.5 0.1 0.8 0.5 0.4 — 0.4 0.2 0.1 4.2 1.5—3.8 39% -36.0 -6.8

56 Grant NUG 293 64 26:08 11.6 20.0 1.2 4—9 44% 1.4—3.4 41% 2.0—2.7 74% 3.5 0.8 2.7 0.9 0.7 2.2 1.0 1.2 — 2.5 0.8 0.5 9.4 3.5—8.5 41% -77.0 -1.6

57 Johnson RAP 293 20 4:49 1.3 11.7 0.4 0—2 0% 0.2—0.7 29% 0.3—0.3 100% 1.1 0.2 0.9 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.2 — 0.2 0.1 0.3 2.3 0.8—1.9 42% -11.0 -4.5

58 Labissiere TB 293 33 17:09 5.8 14.6 1.3 2—4 50% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.8—1.0 80% 5.1 2.0 3.1 0.9 0.2 2.7 1.2 1.5 0.1 1.0 0.9 0.2 11.4 4.3—9.2 47% 12.0 2.8

59 Robinson HEA 292 65 29:55 13.3 19.9 1.4 4—9 44% 3.7—8.4 44% 0.7—0.8 88% 3.3 0.2 3.1 0.9 0.5 2.8 1.2 1.6 — 1.1 0.2 0.1 11.8 4.0—8.8 45% 313.0 5.2

60 Metu SPU 292 16 4:32 2.9 28.5 0.4 1—2 50% 0 —0.1 0% 0.4—0.5 80% 1.6 0.6 1.0 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.2 — 0.3 0.3 0.1 2.3 0.9—2.0 45% 12.0 3.2

61 Ellenson NET 292 5 3:03 0.4 5.3 0.2 0—1 0% 0 —0.8 0% — 1.2 0.4 0.8 — — 0.2 0.2 — — — — 0.2 0.6 0.2—1.4 14% 12.0 28.8

62 Green CLI 292 55 20:30 6.5 13.5 0.8 2—5 40% 1.4—3.7 38% 0.6—0.8 75% 6.4 1.4 5.0 0.8 0.5 2.6 1.4 1.2 — 0.7 0.4 0.3 8.6 2.7—6.4 42% 138.0 5.9

63 Miller RAP 292 25 '5 0.9 8.1 0.3 0—1 0% 0.2—0.8 25% 0 —0.2 0% 0.6 — 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.5 — 0.4 — 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.9 0.7—1.7 41% 52.0 15.6

64 Kuzma LAK 292 54 24:36 12.5 22.4 1.3 5—11 45% 1.3—4.4 30% 1.8—2.4 75% 4.4 0.9 3.6 1.6 0.4 2.0 1.1 0.9 — 1.7 0.4 0.4 10.5 3.9—8.2 48% 169.0 6.0

65 Williams CEL 292 62 15:39 3.5 10.0 1.0 1—3 33% 0.3—1.4 21% 0.6—0.8 75% 2.7 1.0 1.7 0.7 0.4 2.4 1.2 1.2 — 0.9 0.6 0.2 8.3 2.8—6.9 41% 143.0 7.6

66 Powell MAV 292 40 26:32 9.4 15.9 1.5 4—6 67% 0.3—1.0 30% 1.9—2.8 68% 5.7 1.9 3.9 0.9 0.9 2.5 1.3 1.3 0.1 2.9 0.5 0.4 15.4 5.8—13.3 44% 186.0 6.1

67 Scott 76E 292 63 17:42 5.7 14.4 0.8 2—5 40% 1.2—3.3 36% 0.4—0.5 80% 3.6 0.9 2.6 0.4 0.3 1.4 0.6 0.8 — 0.4 0.1 0.1 5.2 1.8—4.0 45% 115.0 4.1

68 Turner PAC 292 55 29:24 11.8 18.5 1.1 4—9 44% 1.4—4.2 33% 2.0—2.6 77% 6.6 1.3 5.3 1.2 0.8 2.5 1.3 1.2 — 2.5 2.2 0.3 14.9 5.8—13.0 45% 13.0 1.6

69 Clarke GRI 292 50 21:45 12.0 24.1 1.4 5—8 63% 0.4—1.0 40% 1.5—1.9 79% 5.8 1.6 4.2 0.9 0.5 1.6 0.9 0.7 — 1.4 0.8 0.3 9.8 3.7—8.6 43% 6.0 1.5

70 Wood PIS 291 62 21:22 13.1 27.4 0.9 5—8 63% 0.9—2.2 41% 2.9—3.9 74% 6.2 1.6 4.6 1.4 0.6 1.6 0.7 0.9 0.1 3.5 0.9 0.5 11.6 4.5—10.4 43% 67.0 2.5

71 House ROC 291 58 29:57 10.2 14.8 1.4 4—8 50% 2.0—5.4 37% 1.2—1.5 80% 4.1 0.9 3.3 0.8 1.1 2.0 1.1 1.0 0.1 1.3 0.6 0.3 13.9 5.2—10.5 50% 106.0 4.1

72 Morgan JAZ 291 16 4:28 1.2 11.8 0.1 1—1 100% 0.1—0.3 33% — 1.3 0.4 0.9 0.2 — 0.4 0.3 0.2 — 0.1 0.1 — 1.9 0.8—2.1 38% 20.0 13.0

73 McDermott PAC 291 62 20:02 10.4 23.0 1.1 4—8 50% 1.9—4.3 44% 0.7—0.8 88% 2.5 0.4 2.2 0.7 0.2 1.7 0.9 0.9 — 0.8 0.1 0.4 7.3 2.5—5.9 42% 118.0 4.8

74 Sefolosha ROC 291 41 10:41 2.2 9.1 0.6 1—2 50% 0.4—1.3 31% 0.1—0.2 50% 2.3 0.5 1.8 0.4 0.6 1.1 0.5 0.6 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.1 5.2 1.8—4.1 44% 32.0 4.9

75 Reid TIM 291 30 16:32 9.0 23.2 1.2 3—8 38% 1.1—3.2 34% 1.2—1.8 67% 4.2 1.2 3.0 0.7 0.6 2.8 1.8 1.0 0.1 1.6 0.7 0.5 10.2 3.6—8.5 42% 6.0 0.6

76 Isaac MAG 291 32 29:36 12.0 18.3 1.3 5—10 50% 0.9—2.8 32% 1.8—2.3 78% 6.9 1.8 5.1 1.5 1.5 2.5 1.3 1.2 — 2.4 2.4 0.3 11.2 4.0—10.4 38% 8.0 0.3

77 Griffin PIS 291 18 28:28 15.5 24.6 3.3 5—14 36% 1.5—6.2 24% 4.2—5.4 78% 4.7 0.9 3.7 2.3 0.4 1.5 0.7 0.8 0.1 5.4 0.4 1.0 10.6 3.7—8.6 43% -26.0 -4.5

78 Bagley III KIN 290 13 25:39 14.2 24.7 0.9 6—13 46% 0.3—1.7 18% 1.9—2.4 79% 7.5 2.3 5.2 1.4 0.5 3.3 1.7 1.6 0.1 2.7 0.9 1.2 13.0 4.6—10.9 42% -89.0 -12.9

79 Gay SPU 290 60 21:27 10.0 20.6 1.7 4—8 50% 1.0—3.1 32% 1.7—1.9 89% 5.4 0.9 4.5 1.3 0.4 1.5 0.7 0.8 — 1.5 0.5 0.3 10.1 3.6—8.0 45% -16.0 -1.1

80 Patterson CLI 290 51 11:53 4.6 16.5 0.6 1—4 25% 1.1—2.8 39% 0.5—0.7 71% 2.3 0.6 1.8 0.3 0.2 0.8 0.3 0.5 — 0.6 0.1 — 4.3 1.7—3.7 46% 65.0 4.1

81 Green ROC 290 40 18:50 8.4 19.8 0.8 3—7 43% 1.2—3.5 34% 1.4—1.8 78% 2.9 0.6 2.3 0.9 0.5 1.6 0.8 0.9 — 1.5 0.4 0.3 8.5 3.2—7.3 44% -48.0 -1.3

82 Johnson SPU 290 9 10:13 4.6 19.6 0.7 2—3 67% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.8—1.1 73% 1.9 0.6 1.3 0.3 0.6 1.0 0.3 0.7 — 0.7 0.1 0.2 4.6 1.4—3.2 44% 24.0 14.6

83 Hervey THU 290 7 2:47 0.3 4.2 0.1 0—2 0% 0 —1.1 0% — 0.3 — 0.3 — — 0.1 — 0.1 — — — — 0.6 0.3—0.7 43% -6.0 -12.5

84 Kabengele CLI 290 12 5:23 3.5 29.6 0.2 1—3 33% 0.8—1.7 47% 0.4—0.4 100% 0.9 0.1 0.8 0.2 0.2 0.8 0.6 0.2 — 0.3 0.2 0.3 4.1 1.5—3.2 47% -1.0 2.1

85 Green WAR 290 43 28:24 8.0 12.6 6.2 3—7 43% 0.8—3.0 27% 1.5—1.9 79% 6.1 0.5 5.7 2.3 1.4 2.5 1.4 1.1 0.3 1.9 0.7 0.3 12.8 4.6—10.5 44% -198.0 -4.4

86 Jones Jr HEA 290 51 24:26 8.9 16.6 1.1 3—6 50% 0.7—2.5 28% 1.7—2.2 77% 4.1 1.1 3.0 0.5 1.1 2.2 0.9 1.3 — 1.9 0.7 0.2 9.8 3.3—8.7 38% -39.0 -0.4

87 Carroll ROC 290 21 '11 3.5 14.1 0.9 1—3 33% 0.3—1.3 23% 1.1—1.7 65% 2.3 0.5 1.8 0.8 0.2 1.3 0.7 0.7 — 1.1 0.2 0.1 4.6 1.7—4.1 41% 35.0 8.1

88 Niang JAZ 290 58 13:17 5.8 19.4 0.6 2—5 40% 1.3—3.2 41% 0.3—0.4 75% 1.9 0.2 1.7 0.4 0.2 1.1 0.5 0.6 — 0.4 0.1 0.2 5.3 2.0—3.9 51% -45.0 -2.8

89 Tucker ROC 289 64 34:22 7.1 9.1 1.5 3—6 50% 1.5—4.1 37% 0.6—0.7 86% 6.9 1.6 5.3 1.0 1.1 3.3 1.8 1.5 0.1 1.5 0.5 0.1 16.2 5.8—13.3 44% 148.0 4.5

90 Muscala THU 289 41 11:59 4.6 16.7 0.9 2—4 50% 1.1—2.9 38% 0.4—0.5 80% 2.3 0.3 2.0 0.3 0.2 1.3 0.5 0.7 — 0.9 0.3 0.1 7.9 3.0—6.2 48% -18.0 -3.1

91 Bender WAR 289 16 17:50 6.7 16.3 1.8 3—6 50% 0.9—2.7 33% 0.6—0.9 67% 4.6 1.0 3.6 1.3 0.3 2.6 1.4 1.2 0.1 1.3 0.6 0.5 12.5 4.5—10.5 43% -5.0 -2.0

92 Spellman WAR 289 49 18:05 7.5 18.4 0.9 3—6 50% 0.9—2.2 41% 1.5—1.9 79% 4.4 1.5 2.9 1.0 0.6 1.3 0.6 0.7 — 1.3 0.5 0.4 9.0 3.5—7.6 46% -144.0 -6.8

93 Barnes KIN 289 64 34:51 14.7 18.8 2.3 5—11 45% 1.5—3.8 39% 3.1—3.8 82% 4.8 1.0 3.9 1.3 0.6 1.3 0.6 0.7 — 3.1 0.2 0.6 12.1 4.6—10.2 45% -54.0 -0.5

94 Johnson PAC 289 13 4:09 1.4 14.5 0.2 1—1 100% — 0.3—0.5 60% 1.6 0.6 1.0 0.2 — 0.5 0.2 0.3 — 0.5 — 0.3 1.9 0.6—1.4 43% 9.0 8.1

22

Page 23: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0B O X S C O R E . F O R W A R D S

ForwardsR E B O U N D S F O U L S

InStatIndex Matches Minutes Points /100 poss Assists Field goals 3-pt field goals Free throws Total Offense Defense Turnov Steals Fouls Reason Unreason Tech Against BLK

BLKagainst Opp Points Opponents field goals +/- Net rating

95 Hayes PEL 289 56 16:59 7.5 18.7 1.0 3—4 75% 0 —0.1 0% 2.0—3.1 65% 4.0 1.5 2.5 0.8 0.4 2.5 1.3 1.2 0.1 2.3 1.0 0.3 10.2 3.6—8.3 43% -56.0 -1.2

96 Morris CLI 289 55 31:16 17.4 25.2 1.4 6—14 43% 2.4—5.9 41% 3.2—3.8 84% 5.1 1.0 4.0 1.6 0.7 2.9 1.2 1.7 0.2 2.8 0.5 0.4 10.9 3.7—8.5 44% -36.0 -0.6

97 Love CAV 289 56 31:37 17.6 24.5 3.2 6—13 46% 2.6—7.0 37% 3.3—3.9 85% 9.8 1.0 8.8 2.5 0.5 1.6 1.0 0.7 — 2.9 0.3 0.5 14.1 5.7—11.4 50% -278.0 -9.8

98 Leaf PAC 289 25 7:44 2.9 16.0 0.2 1—3 33% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.3—0.5 60% 2.6 0.8 1.8 0.2 0.2 0.7 0.4 0.4 — 0.4 0.1 0.2 4.5 1.7—3.3 52% -3.0 -3.6

99 Bamba MAG 289 60 14:28 5.5 17.2 0.7 2—5 40% 0.6—1.7 35% 0.5—0.8 63% 5.0 1.7 3.4 0.7 0.4 1.9 1.0 0.9 — 0.9 1.3 0.4 8.7 3.2—7.3 44% 44.0 -0.2

100 Covington ROC 289 62 30:04 12.8 18.6 1.2 5—10 50% 2.4—6.8 35% 1.4—1.7 82% 6.4 0.9 5.5 1.5 1.4 3.2 1.7 1.5 0.1 1.8 1.3 0.3 13.8 4.9—10.8 45% -9.0 0.8

101 Johnson TIM 289 32 19:23 8.4 18.9 2.3 3—7 43% 1.0—2.8 36% 1.0—1.5 67% 3.7 0.7 2.9 1.5 0.7 2.5 1.0 1.4 — 1.1 1.0 0.4 11.3 4.0—8.5 47% -75.0 -4.0

102 Zeller HOR 289 58 23:07 11.1 21.8 1.6 4—8 50% 0.3—1.3 23% 2.1—3.1 68% 7.1 2.8 4.3 1.3 0.7 2.4 1.1 1.3 0.1 3.1 0.5 0.8 13.0 5.3—9.9 54% -223.0 -9.4

103 Jackson GRI 288 54 '28 16.9 25.8 1.4 6—13 46% 2.5—6.3 40% 2.3—3.1 74% 4.7 1.0 3.7 1.8 0.6 4.0 1.8 2.2 0.1 3.1 1.6 1.1 16.2 5.5—12.7 43% -107.0 -4.0

104 Nader THU 288 48 15:45 6.0 16.8 0.7 2—5 40% 0.8—2.2 36% 1.0—1.3 77% 1.9 0.3 1.6 0.7 0.4 1.4 0.7 0.7 — 0.9 0.4 0.2 5.6 2.0—5.0 40% -62.0 -3.7

105 Ojeleye CEL 288 61 14:38 3.1 9.7 0.5 1—3 33% 0.6—1.6 38% 0.4—0.5 80% 2.0 0.4 1.6 0.2 0.3 1.0 0.5 0.5 — 0.7 0.1 0.2 5.9 2.2—4.8 46% -8.0 1.7

106 Sampson PAC 288 26 13:05 4.2 14.3 0.4 2—3 67% 0.1—0.5 20% 0.4—0.8 50% 2.3 0.6 1.7 0.3 0.4 1.7 0.9 0.8 — 0.8 0.3 0.2 6.7 2.1—4.8 44% 16.0 0.8

107 Vanderbilt TIM 288 11 4:15 1.1 10.9 0.2 0—1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.2 100% 0.8 0.3 0.6 0.7 0.3 0.6 0.2 0.4 — 0.1 0.1 — 1.3 0.4—1.2 33% -28.0 -24.4

108 Craig NUG 288 50 17:24 5.0 13.2 0.7 2—4 50% 0.7—2.2 32% 0.4—0.6 67% 3.2 1.0 2.2 0.4 0.4 2.2 0.9 1.3 — 0.6 0.6 0.2 8.0 2.6—6.2 42% -143.0 -5.3

109 Motley CLI 288 13 3:09 2.2 30.1 0.6 1—1 100% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.4—0.5 80% 0.8 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.2 — 0.4 — 0.1 1.8 0.6—1.5 40% 3.0 8.6

110 O'Neale JAZ 288 64 29:06 6.3 9.6 2.5 2—5 40% 1.3—3.3 39% 0.6—0.8 75% 5.3 0.3 5.0 0.8 0.7 2.8 1.4 1.5 0.1 1.0 0.4 0.2 14.1 5.3—11.4 46% 208.0 4.6

111 Bjelica KIN 288 64 28:25 11.9 18.9 2.8 4—9 44% 2.0—4.6 43% 0.9—1.1 82% 6.5 1.6 4.8 1.4 0.8 3.0 1.6 1.4 — 1.3 0.5 0.4 15.1 5.6—11.2 50% -38.0 -0.3

112 Nance Jr. CAV 288 56 26:09 10.1 17.2 2.2 4—8 50% 1.0—2.8 36% 0.9—1.3 69% 7.3 1.9 5.4 1.1 1.0 1.6 0.9 0.8 — 1.8 0.4 0.3 9.8 3.8—7.8 49% -158.0 -5.7

113 Oubre Jr. SUN 288 56 34:30 18.7 23.5 1.5 7—15 47% 1.9—5.5 35% 3.4—4.4 77% 6.5 1.2 5.2 1.5 1.2 3.4 1.8 1.6 0.2 3.6 0.7 1.3 12.5 4.3—9.2 47% -27.0 -0.3

114 Ennis MAG 288 61 17:20 6.0 15.3 0.9 2—5 40% 0.8—2.3 35% 1.0—1.3 77% 3.3 1.0 2.3 0.7 0.4 1.8 0.7 1.1 — 1.2 0.3 0.3 6.9 2.3—4.6 50% -4.0 1.2

115 Lyles SPU 288 63 20:10 6.4 14.4 1.1 2—5 40% 1.0—2.7 37% 0.5—0.7 71% 5.7 1.1 4.6 0.6 0.4 1.6 0.8 0.8 — 0.7 0.4 0.3 8.8 3.3—6.9 48% -56.0 -0.2

116 O'Quinn 76E 288 26 9:57 3.4 14.8 1.4 1—3 33% 0.3—0.9 33% 0.4—0.7 57% 3.8 1.2 2.5 0.7 0.2 1.4 0.6 0.8 0.2 0.7 0.8 — 6.4 2.5—5.3 47% -52.0 -10.4

117 Finney-Smith MAV 288 64 29:38 9.3 14.1 1.6 3—7 43% 1.6—4.1 39% 1.1—1.5 73% 5.5 1.9 3.5 1.0 0.7 2.4 1.4 1.0 — 1.3 0.6 0.4 11.9 4.3—10.7 40% 284.0 6.6

118 Ross MAG 288 63 27:21 14.8 24.2 1.2 5—12 42% 2.6—7.2 36% 2.2—2.6 85% 3.3 0.2 3.1 1.0 1.1 1.5 0.6 0.9 — 1.7 0.3 0.6 8.5 3.0—6.4 47% -67.0 -3.4

119 Vonleh NUG 288 33 11:02 3.9 14.9 0.8 2—3 67% 0.1—0.5 20% 0.7—0.9 78% 3.7 1.1 2.6 0.6 0.3 1.2 0.5 0.7 0.1 1.0 0.2 0.2 5.8 2.3—4.9 47% -54.0 -6.0

120 Lee WAR 287 14 30:21 12.1 17.9 2.9 4—10 40% 1.1—4.1 27% 2.9—3.1 94% 5.8 0.9 4.9 1.8 1.3 2.9 1.3 1.6 — 2.9 0.1 0.5 13.1 4.9—9.4 52% 17.0 2.7

121 Brantley JAZ 287 5 2:41 — — 0.4 — — — 1.0 — 1.0 0.4 — 0.4 0.2 0.2 — — 0.4 — 1.8 0.8—1.6 50% — -2.5

122 Carter BUL 287 43 28:59 11.3 17.3 1.2 4—8 50% 0.1—0.7 14% 2.6—3.5 74% 9.4 3.2 6.2 1.7 0.8 3.7 1.5 2.2 0.1 3.4 0.9 0.7 13.1 4.7—9.9 47% -26.0 -1.4

123 Leonard HEA 287 49 20:08 6.1 13.9 1.1 2—5 40% 1.0—2.4 42% 0.4—0.5 80% 5.0 0.5 4.5 0.7 0.3 2.1 1.0 1.1 — 1.0 0.3 0.2 11.7 4.4—8.9 49% 87.0 3.5

124 Kleber MAV 287 66 25:40 9.2 15.9 1.2 3—7 43% 1.6—4.3 37% 1.1—1.2 92% 5.4 1.5 3.9 0.7 0.3 2.3 1.3 1.0 — 1.2 1.2 0.2 13.1 5.0—11.7 43% 128.0 3.4

125 Brooks GRI 287 65 28:27 15.7 23.8 2.0 6—14 43% 2.0—5.5 36% 2.2—2.7 81% 3.3 0.9 2.3 1.7 0.9 3.8 1.6 2.2 0.1 2.3 0.4 0.5 13.2 4.2—9.7 43% -36.0 -1.1

126 Jackson GRI 287 18 19:50 10.5 22.6 1.8 4—9 44% 1.3—4.0 33% 1.7—2.5 68% 3.2 0.6 2.6 1.5 1.1 2.1 0.9 1.0 0.2 2.2 0.5 0.5 8.8 2.9—6.3 46% 25.0 2.3

127 Bell GRI 287 29 8:52 3.2 15.8 0.5 1—2 50% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.7—1.1 64% 2.8 1.0 1.8 0.8 0.1 0.6 0.3 0.3 — 0.8 0.4 0.1 4.6 1.8—3.9 46% -7.0 -2.0

128 Giles KIN 287 38 15:15 7.0 20.7 1.3 3—5 60% — 0.9—1.1 82% 4.2 0.9 3.3 0.9 0.6 2.6 1.5 1.1 0.1 1.4 0.4 0.3 10.1 3.3—6.1 54% -101.0 -6.8

129 Samanic SPU 287 1 '12 — — 3.0 0—4 0% 0 —2.0 0% — 2.0 — 2.0 — — — — — — 1.0 — 1.0 2.0 1.0—3.0 33% 6.0 24.7

130 Mika KIN 287 1 19:03 6.0 14.0 — 2—3 67% — 2.0—2.0 100% 7.0 2.0 5.0 — — 5.0 2.0 3.0 — 1.0 — — 17.0 5.0—7.0 71% 8.0 22.9

131 Swanigan TB 287 27 10:37 2.4 9.9 1.1 1—2 50% 0 —0.1 0% 0.3—0.6 50% 3.7 1.0 2.7 1.3 0.1 2.3 1.0 1.3 — 1.0 0.3 0.1 6.8 2.5—5.3 47% -50.0 -5.7

132 Morris LAK 287 52 21:15 10.1 21.1 1.4 4—8 50% 1.6—4.1 39% 1.3—1.6 81% 3.8 0.6 3.2 1.4 0.5 2.3 1.2 1.1 0.1 1.4 0.3 0.3 8.7 2.9—6.5 45% -105.0 -4.7

133 Cook CAV 286 11 3:11 1.7 24.7 0.1 1—1 100% — 0.5—0.6 83% 0.9 0.4 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.2 — 0.3 — — 1.5 0.3—0.7 43% -14.0 -19.7

134 Parker KIN 286 33 25:47 14.7 24.3 1.8 6—12 50% 0.9—3.5 26% 1.7—2.2 77% 6.0 1.7 4.3 1.9 1.3 2.9 1.4 1.5 — 1.9 0.5 1.0 13.8 5.2—10.1 51% -130.0 -8.1

135 Prince NET 286 64 29:02 12.1 18.1 1.8 4—12 33% 2.3—6.8 34% 1.1—1.4 79% 5.9 0.8 5.1 2.0 0.9 2.5 1.1 1.4 0.1 1.5 0.4 0.4 11.1 4.2—9.3 45% 70.0 0.6

136 Little TB 286 48 11:57 3.6 13.1 0.5 1—3 33% 0.3—1.2 25% 0.6—0.9 67% 2.3 0.7 1.6 0.3 0.3 1.5 0.8 0.7 — 0.7 0.3 0.3 5.8 1.9—4.2 45% -54.0 -3.1

137 Bazemore KIN 286 64 25:02 8.7 15.2 1.3 3—8 38% 1.2—3.5 34% 1.7—2.2 77% 4.3 0.4 3.9 1.3 1.1 2.8 1.4 1.4 0.1 2.3 0.6 0.5 11.5 3.7—8.6 43% 27.0 2.0

138 Harkless KNI 286 62 22:59 5.8 10.9 1.1 2—5 40% 0.6—1.6 38% 0.6—1.1 55% 3.9 0.9 3.0 0.9 0.9 2.4 1.3 1.1 — 0.9 0.5 0.2 10.9 3.5—7.5 47% 16.0 —

139 Clark MAG 286 35 12:09 3.2 11.7 0.4 1—3 33% 0.8—2.5 32% 0.2—0.3 67% 2.4 0.8 1.7 0.1 0.1 0.9 0.5 0.4 — 0.3 0.4 — 5.0 1.9—4.2 45% -3.0 1.1

140 Ariza TB 286 53 28:10 8.0 12.6 1.7 3—6 50% 1.5—3.9 38% 1.2—1.4 86% 4.7 0.6 4.0 1.1 1.3 2.1 0.8 1.3 — 1.5 0.3 0.2 9.0 3.1—7.5 41% -10.0 0.6

141 Dudley LAK 286 40 7:48 1.5 8.6 0.5 1—1 100% 0.4—0.9 44% 0.1—0.1 100% 1.1 0.1 1.0 0.2 0.3 0.9 0.5 0.5 — 0.2 0.1 0.1 3.9 1.3—3.2 41% 3.0 2.6

23

Page 24: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0B O X S C O R E . F O R W A R D S

ForwardsR E B O U N D S F O U L S

InStatIndex Matches Minutes Points /100 poss Assists Field goals 3-pt field goals Free throws Total Offense Defense Turnov Steals Fouls Reason Unreason Tech Against BLK

BLKagainst Opp Points Opponents field goals +/- Net rating

142 Wagner WIZ 286 38 18:37 9.3 21.1 1.3 3—6 50% 0.6—1.8 33% 1.8—2.2 82% 5.0 1.3 3.7 1.5 0.6 3.5 1.4 2.2 0.2 2.6 0.5 0.5 11.7 4.1—7.9 52% -37.0 -1.3

143 Kaminsky SUN 286 32 22:21 11.0 21.3 2.2 4—9 44% 1.2—3.5 34% 1.8—2.8 64% 5.1 0.9 4.1 1.0 0.5 2.1 1.2 1.0 — 2.2 0.3 0.6 11.4 4.4—9.4 47% -35.0 -1.9

144 Williams BUC 285 52 19:27 6.1 14.3 1.1 2—5 40% 1.0—2.8 36% 0.9—1.0 90% 2.9 0.4 2.5 0.5 0.6 1.8 0.7 1.0 — 1.0 0.5 0.2 7.7 2.8—6.2 45% -93.0 -2.5

145 Smailagic WAR 285 14 9:55 4.2 18.4 0.9 1—3 33% 0.2—0.9 22% 1.1—1.4 79% 2.0 0.7 1.3 0.8 0.2 1.0 0.6 0.4 — 1.4 0.3 0.1 6.5 2.5—4.5 56% -8.0 -3.2

146 Looney WAR 285 20 13:05 3.4 11.8 1.1 1—4 25% 0.1—0.7 14% 0.5—0.6 83% 3.3 1.4 1.9 0.6 0.6 1.7 0.8 1.0 0.1 0.6 0.3 0.3 6.2 2.2—5.3 42% -99.0 -14.0

147 Uthoff GRI 285 4 3:26 1.0 13.3 — 0—2 0% 0 —1.0 0% 0.5—0.5 100% 0.3 0.3 — — 0.3 0.3 0.3 — — 0.3 — — 1.0 0.3—1.0 30% 9.0 20.4

148 Broekhoff MAV 285 17 10:48 4.2 17.0 0.7 1—3 33% 1.2—3.0 40% 0.4—0.5 80% 2.6 0.4 2.2 0.4 0.3 0.9 0.7 0.2 — 0.2 0.2 0.2 3.5 1.1—2.8 39% -1.0 -1.8

149 Davis JAZ 285 25 10:42 1.3 5.6 0.4 1—1 100% — 0.2—0.4 50% 3.8 1.2 2.6 0.6 0.4 2.2 1.1 1.0 — 0.6 0.4 0.1 8.0 2.6—5.6 46% -86.0 -13.2

150 Eubanks SPU 285 14 9:18 3.6 17.2 0.4 2—2 100% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.6—0.8 75% 2.5 0.6 1.9 0.7 0.1 1.5 0.8 0.7 0.1 0.6 0.4 0.1 7.4 2.7—5.1 53% -43.0 -12.2

151 Bertans WIZ 285 54 29:22 15.4 22.5 1.7 5—11 45% 3.7—8.7 43% 1.9—2.3 83% 4.6 0.7 3.9 1.1 0.7 2.6 1.2 1.3 0.1 2.4 0.6 0.4 14.0 5.3—10.7 50% -13.0 0.6

152 Anderson GRI 285 59 19:19 5.7 12.7 2.2 2—5 40% 0.3—1.1 27% 0.7—1.1 64% 4.3 0.9 3.4 1.0 0.7 1.4 0.7 0.7 — 1.0 0.5 0.2 6.8 2.3—6.4 36% -102.0 -3.5

153 Washington HOR 285 58 30:19 12.3 18.5 2.1 5—10 50% 1.5—4.0 38% 1.5—2.4 63% 5.4 1.0 4.4 1.6 0.9 2.7 1.3 1.4 0.1 2.3 0.8 0.7 13.9 5.2—11.3 46% -218.0 -6.5

154 Kurucs NET 285 40 12:32 4.1 13.7 0.8 2—3 67% 0.6—1.6 38% 0.4—0.7 57% 2.4 0.5 2.0 0.9 0.4 1.7 0.7 1.0 — 0.6 0.1 0.3 4.6 1.5—3.8 39% -26.0 -2.6

155 Tolliver GRI 285 47 15:35 3.7 10.3 0.7 1—3 33% 0.9—2.6 35% 0.4—0.5 80% 2.8 0.6 2.2 0.7 0.3 1.4 0.6 0.7 — 0.6 0.2 0.1 6.0 2.3—5.5 42% -107.0 -7.8

156 Layman TIM 285 23 21:58 9.2 17.5 0.7 4—8 50% 1.0—3.2 31% 1.0—1.4 71% 2.5 0.7 1.7 1.1 0.7 2.0 0.7 1.3 — 1.3 0.4 0.2 9.5 3.3—7.4 45% 21.0 1.5

157 Baynes SUN 285 42 22:15 11.5 22.4 1.6 4—9 44% 1.4—4.0 35% 1.3—1.8 72% 5.7 1.7 4.0 1.2 0.3 3.3 1.4 1.8 0.1 2.3 0.6 0.4 15.3 5.7—11.1 51% -46.0 -1.1

158 Martin HOR 284 20 17:02 5.9 16.1 1.3 2—5 40% 1.1—2.1 52% 0.9—1.1 82% 2.1 0.6 1.6 0.9 0.6 1.8 0.7 1.1 0.1 1.3 0.4 0.2 6.4 2.2—5.4 41% 13.0 2.7

159 Hachimura WIZ 284 41 29:40 13.4 19.6 1.7 5—11 45% 0.5—1.8 28% 2.2—2.7 81% 6.1 1.6 4.5 1.0 0.8 2.2 1.0 1.2 0.1 2.3 0.2 1.2 14.2 5.4—10.1 53% -200.0 -7.0

160 Gabriel TB 284 28 7:34 2.1 12.2 0.3 1—2 50% 0.2—0.7 29% 0.5—0.7 71% 1.6 0.6 1.0 0.6 0.3 1.3 0.4 0.9 — 0.6 0.2 0.1 3.3 1.2—2.4 50% -40.0 -7.0

161 Henson PIS 284 40 '15 5.5 16.6 1.4 2—4 50% 0.2—0.9 22% 0.6—1.2 50% 4.1 1.2 2.9 0.9 0.6 2.0 1.0 1.0 — 1.3 1.1 0.3 9.0 3.4—7.2 47% -17.0 0.2

162 Caboclo ROC 284 27 8:05 2.7 14.2 0.4 1—3 33% 0.2—1.0 20% 0.2—0.2 100% 2.0 0.8 1.2 0.3 0.4 0.9 0.3 0.6 — 0.3 0.6 0.1 4.6 1.7—3.8 45% -18.0 -2.2

163 Hernangomez TIM 284 48 17:22 6.0 14.8 0.8 2—5 40% 0.9—2.7 33% 0.9—1.5 60% 4.1 0.9 3.2 0.7 0.4 1.4 0.6 0.7 — 1.5 0.2 0.3 9.8 3.8—7.2 53% -53.0 -2.8

164 Williams WIZ 284 11 12:15 3.2 11.6 0.6 1—2 50% 0 —0.2 0% 0.3—0.5 60% 3.9 1.4 2.6 0.4 0.1 1.0 0.3 0.7 — 0.9 0.6 0.3 3.7 1.3—3.3 39% -47.0 -14.5

165 Diallo SUN 284 44 10:37 4.8 20.1 0.5 2—3 67% 0 —0.1 0% 0.7—0.8 88% 2.9 0.7 2.3 0.7 0.2 1.2 0.7 0.6 — 0.8 0.3 0.3 5.8 2.2—4.7 47% -55.0 -4.2

166 Gafford BUL 284 43 14:12 5.1 16.1 0.5 2—3 67% — 0.7—1.4 50% 2.5 1.2 1.3 0.7 0.3 2.3 1.2 1.0 — 1.4 1.3 0.2 7.6 2.6—6.3 41% -30.0 -0.6

167 Melli PEL 284 52 17:05 6.8 17.0 1.2 2—5 40% 1.3—3.5 37% 0.9—1.2 75% 3.0 0.7 2.3 0.8 0.6 2.0 1.1 0.9 — 1.6 0.4 0.1 10.0 3.5—6.8 51% -92.0 -6.3

168 Portis KNI 284 66 21:06 10.1 21.3 1.5 4—9 44% 1.0—2.9 34% 1.1—1.4 79% 5.2 1.3 3.9 1.1 0.4 1.7 0.7 0.9 0.1 1.4 0.3 0.4 9.1 3.3—7.7 43% -186.0 -7.5

169 Iwundu MAG 284 45 17:51 5.3 13.3 1.0 2—4 50% 0.5—1.5 33% 1.4—1.7 82% 2.5 0.5 2.0 0.4 0.6 1.4 0.6 0.8 — 1.1 0.3 0.3 6.9 2.5—5.8 43% 35.0 1.1

170 Bates-Diop NUG 284 39 17:03 6.6 17.0 0.7 2—5 40% 0.8—2.4 33% 1.3—1.8 72% 2.9 0.5 2.3 0.4 0.4 1.0 0.6 0.4 — 1.2 0.5 0.4 7.2 2.6—5.5 47% -162.0 -10.6

171 Kidd-Gilchrist MAV 284 21 10:59 2.5 10.8 0.6 1—3 33% 0.2—1.0 20% 0.4—0.5 80% 2.6 0.6 2.1 0.6 0.1 1.5 0.7 0.8 — 0.4 0.2 0.1 4.2 1.3—3.7 35% 3.0 7.5

172 Johnson MAG 284 7 6:15 1.9 12.4 0.3 1—3 33% 0.1—0.9 11% 0.3—0.3 100% 0.9 0.1 0.7 0.4 0.4 — — — — 0.1 — — 1.7 0.7—1.4 50% -16.0 -16.1

173 Saric SUN 284 58 24:55 10.1 17.5 1.9 4—8 50% 1.3—3.7 35% 1.4—1.6 88% 6.0 1.6 4.4 1.2 0.6 2.3 1.1 1.2 — 2.0 0.3 0.6 12.2 4.6—10.0 46% -76.0 -3.1

174 Markkanen BUL 283 50 29:44 14.7 21.9 1.5 5—12 42% 2.2—6.3 35% 2.5—3.1 81% 6.3 1.2 5.1 1.6 0.9 2.0 0.8 1.2 — 2.4 0.5 0.8 13.6 5.4—11.3 48% -63.0 -1.8

175 Crowder HEA 283 58 29:13 10.4 15.3 2.6 3—9 33% 2.0—6.1 33% 1.6—2.1 76% 6.0 0.8 5.2 1.1 1.1 2.2 1.1 1.1 0.1 2.0 0.4 0.3 11.6 4.2—9.0 47% -142.0 -4.0

176 Watanabe GRI 283 16 6:09 1.9 13.6 0.3 1—2 50% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.2—0.5 40% 1.1 0.4 0.7 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.4 0.2 — 0.3 0.1 0.1 3.4 1.2—2.3 52% 4.0 1.0

177 King PIS 283 10 6:13 2.0 14.0 0.5 1—2 50% 0.4—1.1 36% 0 —0.3 0% 1.0 0.1 0.9 0.2 0.2 1.0 0.6 0.4 0.1 0.2 — 0.1 2.4 0.6—1.4 43% 19.0 10.2

178 Okpala HEA 283 5 5:12 1.4 13.5 0.2 1—1 100% 0 —0.2 0% 0.2—0.4 50% 1.0 0.2 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.2 — 2.6 0.8—2.0 40% -15.0 -22.7

179 Martin HOR 283 47 18:42 4.9 12.2 2.0 2—4 50% 0.4—1.5 27% 0.9—1.4 64% 3.3 0.8 2.5 0.9 0.8 1.6 0.7 0.9 — 1.6 0.2 0.2 8.2 3.0—6.9 43% -80.0 -2.7

180 Jefferson MAG 283 17 4:33 0.9 8.6 0.2 0—1 0% — 0.3—0.8 38% 1.4 0.6 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.3 — 0.5 0.2 0.1 1.5 0.6—1.7 35% 10.0 3.8

181 Chandler NET 283 35 20:59 5.9 12.5 1.2 2—5 40% 1.1—3.5 31% 0.6—0.7 86% 4.1 0.3 3.8 0.9 0.4 2.3 1.2 1.1 — 0.5 0.3 0.1 9.3 3.3—7.6 43% -118.0 -5.2

182 Porter Jr. BUL 283 14 23:08 12.1 23.1 1.9 5—10 50% 1.7—4.4 39% 1.4—1.9 74% 3.4 0.9 2.5 0.8 1.1 2.2 1.0 1.2 — 1.6 0.4 0.3 9.6 3.1—6.7 46% 23.0 3.0

183 Martin TIM 283 31 15:46 6.4 17.1 0.7 2—6 33% 0.8—3.1 26% 1.0—1.0 100% 3.1 0.4 2.7 0.7 0.3 1.7 0.7 0.9 — 0.8 0.3 0.1 6.7 2.2—5.1 43% -35.0 -3.1

184 Gibson KNI 282 62 16:25 6.1 17.0 0.8 3—5 60% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.7—0.9 78% 4.3 1.7 2.5 0.7 0.4 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.1 1.0 0.5 0.3 8.0 2.8—6.5 43% -262.0 -10.5

185 Maker PIS 282 60 12:58 4.7 16.5 0.7 2—3 67% 0.4—1.1 36% 1.2—1.8 67% 2.8 0.9 1.9 0.8 0.4 1.7 0.9 0.8 — 1.5 0.7 0.2 8.6 3.2—7.0 46% -140.0 -7.1

186 Wade CAV 282 8 6:33 2.0 13.1 0.3 1—1 100% 0.3—0.5 60% — 2.0 0.3 1.8 0.3 — 0.5 0.1 0.4 — — 0.5 — 3.0 1.1—2.6 42% -11.0 -14.2

187 Brown Jr. WIZ 282 61 24:56 9.7 16.9 2.3 4—8 50% 0.8—2.4 33% 1.4—1.9 74% 5.3 1.1 4.3 1.1 1.2 1.8 0.8 1.0 — 1.5 0.1 0.6 11.4 4.2—8.1 52% -166.0 -4.2

188 Claxton NET 282 15 12:20 4.4 15.2 1.1 2—3 67% 0.1—0.5 20% 0.7—1.4 50% 2.9 1.3 1.7 0.6 0.1 0.9 0.2 0.7 0.1 1.3 0.5 0.3 7.0 2.8—6.7 42% -67.0 -17.1

24

Page 25: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0B O X S C O R E . F O R W A R D S

ForwardsR E B O U N D S F O U L S

InStatIndex Matches Minutes Points /100 poss Assists Field goals 3-pt field goals Free throws Total Offense Defense Turnov Steals Fouls Reason Unreason Tech Against BLK

BLKagainst Opp Points Opponents field goals +/- Net rating

189 Fernando HAW 282 56 12:44 4.3 14.5 0.9 2—4 50% 0.1—0.7 14% 0.5—0.9 56% 3.6 1.2 2.4 0.8 0.3 1.9 0.9 1.0 0.1 1.0 0.3 0.4 8.4 2.8—6.3 44% -91.0 -6.5

190 Miles WIZ 282 10 16:15 6.4 16.5 1.1 2—6 33% 1.1—3.5 31% 1.5—2.0 75% 1.2 0.4 0.8 0.4 1.0 1.4 0.5 0.9 — 1.6 0.4 0.2 6.7 2.1—4.6 46% -3.0 0.9

191 Hill HEA 282 54 18:22 5.4 12.7 1.8 2—5 40% 1.1—2.9 38% 0.6—0.8 75% 2.9 0.5 2.4 0.9 0.7 1.4 0.7 0.8 — 0.8 0.2 0.1 7.4 2.6—5.4 48% -56.0 -1.6

192 Young BUL 281 64 24:45 10.3 18.4 1.8 4—9 44% 1.2—3.5 34% 0.7—1.1 64% 5.0 1.5 3.5 1.6 1.4 2.1 1.0 1.1 0.1 1.5 0.4 0.7 12.1 4.3—9.2 47% -202.0 -5.6

193 Osman CAV 281 65 29:22 11.1 16.7 2.3 4—9 44% 1.9—4.9 39% 1.0—1.5 67% 3.5 0.6 2.9 1.4 0.8 2.5 1.3 1.2 — 1.8 0.3 0.5 11.3 4.2—8.8 48% -345.0 -9.3

194 Jeffries KIN 281 6 3:14 1.2 15.3 — 1—1 100% 0.2—0.7 29% — 0.2 0.2 — — 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.2 — 0.2 — 0.2 1.0 0.2—0.5 40% 1.0 2.2

195 Schofield WIZ 281 27 10:51 3.1 12.4 0.5 1—3 33% 0.5—1.7 29% 0.3—0.5 60% 1.3 0.2 1.0 0.3 0.3 1.5 0.9 0.6 — 0.5 0.1 0.2 5.0 1.7—3.5 49% -36.0 -5.1

196 Aminu MAG 281 18 21:06 4.3 9.1 1.2 1—5 20% 0.5—1.9 26% 1.1—1.6 69% 4.8 1.3 3.6 1.0 0.9 1.5 0.5 1.0 — 1.6 0.4 0.2 9.1 3.2—7.0 46% -38.0 -6.8

197 Brown HAW 280 3 7:02 3.7 23.9 0.3 1—3 33% 0.7—1.3 54% 1.0—1.0 100% 1.0 0.3 0.7 — — — — — — 1.0 0.3 — 3.0 1.3—3.7 35% 24.0 47.4

198 Cheatham PEL 280 3 10:10 1.3 6.0 0.7 1—2 50% 0 —0.3 0% — 2.0 0.3 1.7 1.0 — 1.7 1.3 0.3 — — 0.3 — 6.0 1.7—5.3 32% -30.0 -39.9

199 McDaniels HOR 280 16 18:20 5.6 14.3 0.8 2—4 50% 0.6—1.5 40% 0.9—1.1 82% 4.1 0.9 3.1 0.8 0.5 2.3 1.0 1.3 0.1 1.0 0.2 0.2 9.5 3.6—6.9 52% -22.0 -1.3

200 Felicio BUL 280 22 17:32 3.9 10.2 0.7 2—2 100% 0 —0.1 0% 0.8—1.1 73% 4.7 2.5 2.2 0.8 0.5 1.6 0.4 1.1 0.1 0.9 0.1 0.3 9.6 4.0—6.6 61% -57.0 -5.9

201 Brazdeikis KNI 279 9 5:56 1.9 16.2 0.4 1—2 50% 0.1—1.0 10% 0.4—0.6 67% 0.6 0.2 0.3 0.2 — 0.3 0.2 0.1 — 0.4 0.1 — 1.7 0.6—1.6 38% -11.0 -4.1

202 McKinnie CAV 279 40 14:47 4.6 13.5 0.4 2—4 50% 0.4—1.6 25% 0.6—0.8 75% 2.8 0.9 1.9 0.7 0.6 1.8 0.7 1.1 — 0.7 0.2 0.4 5.7 1.8—3.7 49% -99.0 -8.4

203 Owens SUN 279 3 5:09 1.3 12.5 — 0—2 0% 0 —0.7 0% 0.7—0.7 100% 1.0 0.7 0.3 — 0.3 0.3 — 0.3 — 0.3 — — 3.3 1.3—3.0 43% -16.0 -35.4

204 Reddish HAW 279 58 26:44 10.5 16.6 1.5 4—10 40% 1.4—4.3 33% 1.7—2.2 77% 3.7 0.6 3.1 1.6 1.1 2.3 1.1 1.1 — 1.9 0.5 0.9 11.1 3.8—8.3 46% -244.0 -7.4

205 Hunter HAW 279 63 31:59 12.4 16.5 1.7 4—11 36% 1.7—4.8 35% 1.8—2.3 78% 4.5 0.7 3.8 1.6 0.7 2.9 1.1 1.8 — 2.1 0.3 0.8 13.6 4.9—10.7 46% -266.0 -6.1

206 Bullock KNI 279 29 23:36 8.1 15.5 1.5 3—8 38% 1.3—3.8 34% 0.6—0.7 86% 2.3 0.5 1.9 0.7 0.9 1.9 1.0 0.9 — 0.8 0.1 0.3 8.5 2.8—5.6 50% -80.0 -4.8

207 Anderson NET 278 3 5:39 1.0 7.3 — 0—2 0% 0 —1.0 0% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.7 — 0.7 — — 0.7 0.3 0.3 — 0.3 0.3 — 0.7 0 —0.7 0% -8.0 -23.9

208 Hall PIS 278 4 11:58 1.5 5.9 0.5 0—1 0% — 1.0—1.5 67% 3.8 1.5 2.3 0.5 0.3 2.3 1.3 1.0 — 1.5 0.3 0.3 6.5 1.8—4.5 40% -27.0 -24.3

209 Kornet BUL 278 36 15:23 6.0 17.4 0.9 2—5 40% 0.9—3.0 30% 0.6—0.8 75% 2.3 0.6 1.7 0.4 0.3 1.5 0.8 0.7 — 0.7 0.7 0.2 10.0 4.1—7.8 53% -40.0 -4.5

210 Bembry HAW 278 43 21:18 5.8 11.6 1.9 2—5 40% 0.4—1.5 27% 0.6—1.1 55% 3.6 0.8 2.8 1.4 1.3 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.1 1.1 0.4 0.4 8.4 3.1—6.1 51% -252.0 -11.7

211 Kidd JAZ 278 4 3:50 — — 0.3 0—1 0% 0 —0.3 0% — 0.8 — 0.8 0.5 — 0.8 0.5 0.3 — — — 0.5 1.8 0.5—2.5 20% -1.0 -0.4

212 Knox KNI 277 65 17:55 6.4 15.9 1.0 2—6 33% 1.0—3.1 32% 1.0—1.5 67% 2.9 0.4 2.4 0.7 0.4 1.6 0.7 0.9 — 1.2 0.4 0.3 6.9 2.3—5.2 44% -177.0 -6.3

213 Parsons HAW 277 5 10:51 2.8 10.7 0.6 1—4 25% 0.8—2.8 29% — 1.4 0.2 1.2 0.6 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 — 0.4 0.2 — 3.0 1.2—2.2 55% -40.0 -30.5

214 Doumbouya PIS 277 37 20:23 6.6 14.8 0.5 2—6 33% 0.8—2.7 30% 0.8—1.2 67% 3.3 0.6 2.7 0.9 0.5 2.2 0.9 1.3 — 1.1 0.2 0.8 8.4 3.2—6.1 52% -178.0 -8.5

215 Haslem HEA 277 3 6:51 1.7 11.1 0.3 0—2 0% 0 —0.7 0% 1.0—1.3 77% 2.7 — 2.7 — — 1.0 0.3 0.7 — 1.0 — — 5.0 1.7—2.3 74% -16.0 -30.9

216 Bolden SUN 275 7 6:44 1.4 8.9 — 1—2 50% 0 —0.6 0% 0.3—0.6 50% 1.3 0.4 0.9 0.3 0.4 1.4 0.1 1.3 — 0.4 0.3 0.1 5.3 1.6—3.1 52% 1.0 -5.5

217 Howard ROC 274 2 6:38 — — 0.5 0—2 0% 0 —2.0 0% — 1.0 — 1.0 0.5 — 0.5 0.5 — — — — — 3.5 1.0—1.5 67% -16.0 -51.6

218 Bowen PAC 273 5 5:46 0.8 6.0 — 0—2 0% 0 —0.4 0% — 1.4 0.2 1.2 0.2 — 0.4 0.4 — — 0.2 — 0.2 2.4 0.8—1.4 57% 13.0 15.6

219 Antetokounmpo LAK — 3 1:42 — — 0.3 — — — 0.3 — 0.3 — — — — — — — — — 3.0 1.3—1.7 76% -2.0 -16.8

220 Law MAG — 2 1:51 — — — 0—1 0% 0 —0.5 0% 0 —1.0 0% — — — — — — — — — 0.5 — — 1.0 0.5—0.5 100% 3.0 12.9

25

Page 26: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0B O X S C O R E . G U A R D S

GuardsR E B O U N D S F O U L S

InStatIndex Matches Minutes Points /100 poss Assists Field goals 3-pt field goals Free throws Total Offense Defense Turnov Steals Fouls Reason Unreason Tech Against BLK

BLKagainst Opp Points Opponents field goals +/- Net rating

1 Harden ROC 324 61 36:38 34.4 41.1 7.4 10—23 43% 4.4—12.6 35% 10.2 —11.8 86% 6.3 1.0 5.3 4.5 1.8 3.4 1.4 2.0 0.1 7.6 0.9 1.4 14.9 5.7—13.2 43% 254.0 6.8

2 Westbrook ROC 320 53 36:01 27.5 32.6 7.0 11—23 48% 1.0—3.8 26% 5.1 —6.6 77% 8.0 1.8 6.3 4.4 1.7 3.5 1.6 1.8 0.3 4.8 0.3 1.4 10.8 3.7—7.9 47% 143.0 4.8

3 Lillard TB 312 59 36:17 28.4 34.3 7.7 9 —20 45% 3.8—9.7 39% 6.6 —7.4 89% 4.2 0.5 3.7 2.8 1.0 1.6 0.8 0.9 0.1 5.9 0.3 1.3 11.0 4.0—9.3 43% 65.0 0.9

4 Lowry RAP 309 52 36:32 19.7 23.8 7.7 6 —14 43% 2.9—8.3 35% 4.9 —5.7 86% 4.9 0.6 4.2 3.0 1.4 3.2 1.5 1.7 0.3 5.6 0.4 0.8 12.1 4.0—9.7 41% 254.0 6.9

5 Irving NET 309 20 32:51 27.4 35.6 6.4 10—21 48% 2.8—7.1 39% 4.7 —5.1 92% 5.2 1.1 4.1 2.7 1.4 2.7 1.5 1.2 — 4.9 0.5 0.9 10.2 3.7—8.3 45% -9.0 -0.1

6 Bledsoe BUC 309 56 27:14 15.5 23.8 5.4 6 —12 50% 1.3—3.6 36% 2.8 —3.5 80% 4.6 0.8 3.9 2.5 0.9 2.1 0.6 1.5 0.1 2.9 0.5 0.7 9.1 3.4—8.5 40% 453.0 12.4

7 VanVleet RAP 306 48 35:49 17.6 21.8 6.6 6 —15 40% 2.7—7.0 39% 2.9 —3.5 83% 3.8 0.4 3.4 2.3 1.8 2.4 1.1 1.3 — 3.4 0.3 0.9 12.4 4.4—10.5 42% 191.0 5.4

8 Paul THU 305 63 31:49 17.7 24.6 6.7 6 —13 46% 1.6—4.4 36% 3.6 —4.0 90% 5.0 0.3 4.7 2.2 1.5 2.2 1.2 0.9 0.1 3.4 0.1 0.1 9.0 3.3—7.2 46% 297.0 5.0

9 DeRozan SPU 304 61 34:16 22.2 29.3 5.5 8 —16 50% 0.1—0.5 20% 5.5 —6.6 83% 5.7 0.7 5.1 2.4 1.1 2.7 1.3 1.4 0.2 5.0 0.2 1.0 11.1 3.8—7.3 52% -141.0 -2.1

10 Curry WAR 304 5 27:51 20.8 30.4 6.6 7 —16 44% 2.4—9.8 24% 5.2 —5.2 100% 5.2 0.8 4.4 3.2 1.0 2.2 0.4 1.8 0.2 3.8 0.4 0.8 8.4 2.8—4.8 58% -43.0 -14.6

11 Walker CEL 304 50 31:50 21.2 29.5 4.8 7 —17 41% 3.3—8.8 38% 3.9 —4.5 87% 4.0 0.7 3.4 2.2 0.9 1.5 0.9 0.6 0.1 4.0 0.5 1.2 12.5 4.5—10.1 45% 235.0 5.9

12 Williams CLI 303 60 29:19 18.7 27.1 5.7 6 —15 40% 1.8—4.9 37% 4.6 —5.4 85% 3.1 0.5 2.6 2.9 0.7 1.4 0.7 0.6 0.1 4.2 0.2 0.8 7.7 2.9—6.8 43% 211.0 4.0

13 Mitrou-Long PAC 303 3 14:12 4.7 13.9 2.3 2 —5 40% 0.7—3.7 19% — 2.0 — 2.0 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.3 — — 1.0 0.3 — 3.3 1.3—5.3 25% 18.0 13.3

14 Beal WIZ 302 57 '36 30.6 36.9 6.1 10—23 43% 3.0—8.5 35% 6.8 —8.0 85% 4.3 0.9 3.4 3.4 1.3 2.2 0.9 1.3 0.2 6.1 0.4 0.9 12.5 4.4—10.0 44% -206.0 -3.9

15 Murray NUG 302 55 32:45 18.8 25.8 4.8 7 —15 47% 1.9—5.5 35% 2.9 —3.2 91% 4.0 0.8 3.2 2.3 1.2 1.8 0.9 0.8 — 3.2 0.3 0.5 12.4 4.6—9.8 47% 247.0 3.5

16 McCollum TB 302 62 35:56 22.5 27.7 4.3 9 —20 45% 2.8—7.5 37% 2.0 —2.7 74% 4.1 0.7 3.5 1.9 0.8 2.6 1.2 1.4 0.1 2.0 0.6 0.9 14.1 4.9—11.6 42% 26.0 1.4

17 Powell RAP 301 44 28:49 16.4 24.9 1.8 6 —12 50% 2.1—5.3 40% 2.5 —3.0 83% 3.6 0.5 3.1 1.4 1.3 2.1 0.7 1.4 0.1 2.3 0.4 0.7 8.9 3.0—7.5 40% 177.0 7.9

18 Brogdon PAC 301 48 30:37 16.3 24.1 7.1 6 —14 43% 1.3—4.1 32% 3.0 —3.4 88% 4.7 0.9 3.9 2.4 0.7 1.8 1.0 0.8 — 2.6 0.2 1.0 10.0 3.8—9.0 42% 97.0 2.5

19 Young HAW 301 60 35:19 29.6 35.3 9.3 9 —21 43% 3.4—9.5 36% 8.0 —9.3 86% 4.2 0.5 3.7 4.8 1.1 1.7 0.7 1.0 0.2 7.6 0.1 1.3 11.9 4.6—9.1 51% -228.0 -5.6

20 DiVincenzo BUC 301 59 23:02 9.4 17.4 2.3 4 —8 50% 1.3—3.8 34% 1.0 —1.3 77% 5.0 1.0 4.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 0.6 1.0 — 1.4 0.3 0.4 8.1 2.8—6.5 43% 410.0 12.9

21 Schroder THU 301 63 30:59 19.0 27.1 4.1 7 —15 47% 1.9—5.1 37% 3.1 —3.7 84% 3.8 0.3 3.4 2.5 0.7 2.2 0.8 1.3 0.1 3.1 0.2 0.8 10.2 3.6—8.2 44% 240.0 4.8

22 Gilgeous-Alexander THU 300 63 35:09 19.3 24.3 3.4 7 —15 47% 1.2—3.5 34% 4.0 —5.0 80% 6.2 0.8 5.4 1.8 1.1 1.7 0.7 1.0 — 4.5 0.7 0.9 12.4 4.9—10.5 47% 150.0 1.4

23 Holiday PEL 300 55 34:57 19.6 24.1 6.9 8 —17 47% 2.1—5.9 36% 2.2 —3.1 71% 4.9 1.3 3.6 3.0 1.6 2.3 1.0 1.3 — 2.6 0.8 1.0 13.5 5.0—11.9 42% 39.0 1.6

24 Smart CEL 300 53 32:28 13.5 18.3 4.8 5 —12 42% 2.4—7.0 34% 2.0 —2.4 83% 3.8 0.7 3.1 1.7 1.6 2.7 1.1 1.6 0.2 2.6 0.5 0.4 11.2 3.6—9.2 39% 244.0 5.5

25 Hill BUC 300 52 21:09 9.6 19.8 2.9 3 —6 50% 1.4—2.9 48% 1.3 —1.6 81% 3.0 0.9 2.1 0.9 0.8 1.4 0.6 0.8 — 1.6 0.1 0.4 9.0 3.0—7.2 42% 276.0 10.5

26 Dinwiddie NET 300 64 31:11 20.6 28.9 6.7 7 —16 44% 1.9—6.3 30% 5.4 —7.0 77% 3.4 0.5 2.9 2.6 0.6 2.8 1.1 1.6 0.1 4.6 0.3 0.9 11.8 4.2—9.3 45% 54.0 0.3

27 Fox KIN 299 45 31:41 20.5 28.4 6.7 7 —15 47% 1.0—3.4 29% 4.8 —6.8 71% 4.0 0.7 3.3 3.2 1.4 2.8 1.4 1.4 0.1 5.6 0.5 0.9 12.8 4.6—9.7 47% -80.0 -1.8

28 Russell TIM 299 45 32:17 23.1 31.0 6.2 8 —19 42% 3.5—9.6 36% 3.6 —4.4 82% 4.0 0.4 3.6 3.3 1.0 1.9 1.0 0.9 0.1 3.5 0.3 0.4 12.1 4.4—8.7 51% -252.0 -6.2

29 Booker SUN 299 62 36:09 26.1 31.3 6.6 9 —18 50% 2.0—5.7 35% 6.5 —7.2 90% 4.2 0.4 3.7 3.9 0.8 3.0 1.1 1.8 0.2 6.2 0.3 1.0 11.9 4.2—9.4 45% 44.0 0.3

30 Dragic HEA 298 54 28:22 16.1 25.1 5.1 5 —12 42% 2.2—5.8 38% 3.2 —4.1 78% 3.0 0.4 2.6 2.5 0.6 1.9 0.7 1.2 — 3.1 0.2 0.5 8.5 2.8—7.0 40% 109.0 0.6

31 Waiters HEA 298 3 14:01 9.3 29.8 1.0 3 —9 33% 2.7—5.7 47% 0 —0.3 0% 3.7 — 3.7 1.0 — 1.7 1.0 0.7 — 0.7 0.7 1.3 4.7 1.0—5.0 20% 12.0 10.7

32 Rose PIS 297 50 25:57 18.0 30.6 5.6 7 —15 47% 0.9—3.0 30% 2.4 —2.8 86% 2.4 0.5 1.9 2.5 0.8 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.1 2.3 0.3 1.1 9.6 3.7—7.7 48% -77.0 -2.9

33 Morant GRI 297 59 30:01 17.6 25.3 6.9 7 —14 50% 0.9—2.4 38% 3.5 —4.5 78% 3.5 0.8 2.8 3.2 1.0 1.5 0.7 0.8 — 3.9 0.3 1.4 9.9 3.6—8.9 40% -13.0 -1.2

34 Gordon ROC 297 34 28:40 14.5 21.6 1.6 5 —13 38% 2.7—8.4 32% 2.3 —3.0 77% 1.9 0.2 1.7 1.1 0.6 2.0 1.2 0.9 — 2.3 0.3 0.8 7.1 2.3—6.3 37% 20.0 2.5

35 Conley JAZ 296 41 28:34 13.8 21.5 4.3 5 —12 42% 2.0—5.2 38% 2.3 —2.9 79% 3.2 0.7 2.6 1.9 0.8 2.2 1.1 1.1 — 3.0 0.1 0.3 11.8 4.3—8.8 49% 49.0 1.0

36 Wiggins WAR 296 54 34:24 21.8 27.4 3.6 8 —18 44% 2.1—6.2 34% 3.5 —5.0 70% 5.1 1.2 3.9 2.4 0.9 2.3 1.3 1.0 — 3.9 0.9 1.0 14.6 5.0—11.1 45% -197.0 -5.0

37 Clarkson JAZ 296 63 24:09 15.1 28.1 2.0 6 —12 50% 2.1—5.6 38% 1.9 —2.3 83% 2.7 0.8 1.9 1.3 0.8 1.4 0.6 0.9 0.1 1.8 0.2 0.7 7.2 2.6—6.3 41% 10.0 -0.6

38 Milton 76E 295 32 19:06 9.5 22.5 2.2 3 —7 43% 1.5—3.3 45% 1.2 —1.6 75% 2.1 0.3 1.8 1.2 0.5 2.1 1.2 0.9 — 1.3 0.2 0.3 7.4 2.2—4.7 47% 13.0 -0.2

39 Richardson 76E 295 48 30:41 13.8 20.0 3.1 5 —12 42% 1.5—4.5 33% 2.1 —2.7 78% 3.4 0.8 2.6 1.9 1.0 2.5 1.0 1.5 — 3.2 0.7 0.7 11.1 4.0—9.4 43% 114.0 1.9

40 LaVine BUL 295 60 34:37 25.5 32.8 4.2 9 —20 45% 3.1—8.1 38% 4.5 —5.6 80% 4.8 0.7 4.1 3.4 1.5 2.2 0.8 1.4 0.1 4.0 0.5 1.4 11.2 3.8—9.2 41% -187.0 -4.6

41 Beverley CLI 295 48 '27 7.9 12.8 3.7 3 —7 43% 1.6—4.1 39% 0.6 —0.9 67% 5.4 1.2 4.3 1.3 1.0 3.1 1.2 1.9 0.2 1.7 0.5 0.1 9.8 3.2—7.9 41% 262.0 9.0

42 Morris NUG 295 65 21:33 8.5 17.6 3.5 3 —7 43% 0.8—2.2 36% 0.8 —1.0 80% 1.7 0.3 1.4 0.7 0.8 1.0 0.5 0.5 — 0.9 0.3 0.4 5.4 2.1—4.6 46% 70.0 2.5

43 Thomas RAP 295 33 9:44 4.6 20.1 0.5 2 —3 67% 1.1—2.3 48% 0.2 —0.3 67% 1.5 0.2 1.2 0.4 0.2 0.9 0.5 0.5 — 0.2 — 0.2 3.8 1.2—2.6 46% 22.0 0.5

44 Brown BUC 295 45 14:44 5.0 14.5 1.0 2 —5 40% 0.8—2.5 32% 0.6 —0.8 75% 3.6 0.6 3.0 0.8 0.5 1.0 0.4 0.6 — 0.7 0.2 0.6 5.3 1.8—4.4 41% 96.0 6.2

45 Korver BUC 294 50 16:43 6.7 16.9 1.2 2 —5 40% 1.7—4.1 41% 0.6 —0.7 86% 2.1 0.3 1.8 0.9 0.4 1.4 0.7 0.7 — 0.6 0.2 0.1 5.3 1.9—4.7 40% 151.0 6.7

46 Matthews BUC 294 62 24:34 7.5 12.8 1.5 3 —6 50% 1.6—4.5 36% 0.8 —1.0 80% 2.6 0.3 2.2 0.7 0.6 1.5 0.6 0.9 0.1 1.2 0.2 0.3 8.2 3.0—7.1 42% 425.0 11.3

47 Rivers ROC 294 60 23:25 8.5 15.6 1.6 3 —7 43% 1.4—3.9 36% 1.0 —1.5 67% 2.4 0.5 2.0 0.6 0.7 1.9 0.9 1.0 — 1.5 0.2 0.4 8.1 2.8—6.1 46% 122.0 3.8

26

Page 27: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0B O X S C O R E . G U A R D S

GuardsR E B O U N D S F O U L S

InStatIndex Matches Minutes Points /100 poss Assists Field goals 3-pt field goals Free throws Total Offense Defense Turnov Steals Fouls Reason Unreason Tech Against BLK

BLKagainst Opp Points Opponents field goals +/- Net rating

48 Jackson CLI 294 23 24:08 12.9 24.4 4.4 5—11 45% 2.0—4.9 41% 1.6—1.9 84% 2.9 0.7 2.3 1.7 0.5 1.7 0.8 0.8 0.1 1.9 0.2 0.6 9.4 3.6—8.1 44% 92.0 7.9

49 Rondo LAK 294 48 20:30 7.1 15.4 5.0 3—7 43% 0.9—2.6 35% 0.6—0.9 67% 3.0 0.5 2.5 1.9 0.9 1.2 0.7 0.5 — 1.0 — 0.3 5.4 2.0—4.2 48% 44.0 2.2

50 Dozier NUG 294 21 11:07 4.1 16.1 1.4 2—4 50% 0.3—1.3 23% 0.3—0.5 60% 1.4 0.2 1.2 0.5 0.3 1.3 0.8 0.5 — 0.6 0.2 0.2 3.2 1.1—2.7 41% -10.0 -1.7

51 Graham HOR 294 63 35:06 18.2 23.8 7.5 6—15 40% 3.5—9.3 38% 3.0—3.7 81% 3.4 0.7 2.7 2.9 1.0 1.8 0.9 0.9 — 4.0 0.3 0.5 10.6 4.0—8.7 46% -185.0 -4.0

52 Burke 76E 294 25 13:07 5.9 20.6 2.1 2—5 40% 0.6—1.5 40% 0.5—0.8 63% 1.4 0.6 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.8 0.3 0.6 0.1 0.8 — 0.3 4.6 1.7—3.6 47% 40.0 5.9

53 Nunn HEA 294 62 29:44 15.6 23.7 3.4 6—14 43% 2.1—5.8 36% 1.2—1.5 80% 2.8 0.4 2.4 1.6 0.8 2.3 0.9 1.4 — 1.3 0.2 0.9 12.6 4.4—9.2 48% 111.0 1.1

54 McConnell PAC 294 63 18:50 6.5 15.3 5.0 3—6 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.5—0.6 83% 2.6 0.5 2.1 1.4 0.7 1.1 0.6 0.5 — 0.9 0.2 0.3 5.8 2.0—4.7 43% 28.0 2.3

55 Burks 76E 293 59 27:19 15.1 24.7 2.9 5—12 42% 1.7—4.6 37% 3.8—4.3 88% 4.4 0.7 3.7 1.4 1.0 2.1 0.9 1.2 — 3.4 0.3 0.7 9.0 3.1—6.8 46% -272.0 -7.2

56 Mason III BUC 293 6 8:35 2.3 11.5 1.8 1—3 33% 0.3—1.7 18% 0.3—0.7 43% 1.3 0.5 0.8 1.0 0.3 0.7 0.3 0.3 — 0.5 — 0.5 2.5 0.5—2.2 23% -10.0 -12.8

57 McLemore ROC 293 63 22:48 9.8 18.8 0.9 3—7 43% 2.4—6.2 39% 0.8—1.0 80% 2.2 0.3 1.9 0.7 0.6 2.1 0.9 1.1 0.1 0.8 0.2 0.2 9.2 3.3—6.6 50% 207.0 7.1

58 Connaughton BUC 293 61 18:21 5.1 11.9 1.5 2—4 50% 0.7—2.3 30% 0.4—0.6 67% 4.2 0.9 3.3 0.8 0.3 1.0 0.4 0.5 — 0.6 0.5 0.3 8.2 3.0—7.4 41% 84.0 3.7

59 Hood TB 293 21 29:27 11.0 16.3 1.5 4—8 50% 1.7—3.4 50% 1.0—1.3 77% 3.5 0.5 3.0 0.9 0.8 2.2 0.8 1.3 0.1 1.6 0.1 0.2 9.5 3.5—7.0 50% 5.0 1.8

60 Oladipo PAC 293 13 26:03 13.8 23.9 2.9 5—12 42% 1.6—5.3 30% 2.5—3.2 78% 3.2 0.5 2.6 2.2 0.9 1.6 0.9 0.8 — 3.2 0.2 0.5 10.4 3.6—7.9 46% 2.0 1.1

61 Mills SPU 293 63 22:35 11.7 22.6 1.8 4—9 44% 2.4—6.2 39% 1.5—1.7 88% 1.6 0.3 1.3 0.8 0.8 1.6 0.8 0.7 — 1.8 0.1 0.3 6.7 2.4—5.7 42% 106.0 3.1

62 Harris NUG 293 56 31:46 10.4 14.8 2.1 4—9 44% 1.3—3.8 34% 1.3—1.6 81% 2.9 0.5 2.5 1.1 1.4 2.1 0.9 1.2 — 1.5 0.3 0.5 9.0 2.9—7.3 40% 120.0 1.7

63 Hardaway Jr. MAV 292 63 28:48 15.8 24.2 1.9 5—13 38% 2.9—7.2 40% 1.9—2.4 79% 3.1 0.4 2.8 1.0 0.7 1.7 1.0 0.7 0.1 2.1 0.1 0.7 10.2 3.8—8.5 45% 343.0 7.0

64 Mudiay JAZ 292 48 15:40 7.3 20.8 2.2 3—6 50% 0.6—1.6 38% 1.1—1.4 79% 2.4 0.4 2.0 1.3 0.4 1.3 0.5 0.8 — 1.4 0.2 0.5 5.4 1.9—4.3 44% 14.0 0.9

65 Ball PEL 292 56 32:24 12.4 16.3 7.0 5—11 45% 2.5—6.5 38% 0.7—1.2 58% 6.2 1.1 5.1 3.0 1.4 2.0 0.8 1.1 — 1.2 0.5 0.5 14.0 5.3—11.1 48% 28.0 —

66 Wanamaker CEL 292 63 19:18 6.6 15.2 2.5 2—5 40% 0.5—1.4 36% 1.7—1.8 94% 2.0 0.3 1.7 1.1 0.8 1.9 0.9 1.0 — 1.4 0.2 0.4 7.8 2.7—5.8 47% 67.0 3.5

67 Korkmaz 76E 292 64 21:50 9.7 19.7 1.1 3—8 38% 2.0—5.0 40% 0.8—1.1 73% 2.3 0.3 2.1 0.8 0.6 1.4 0.6 0.8 — 1.2 0.2 0.1 7.0 2.5—6.0 42% 88.0 1.5

68 Clemons ROC 292 29 8:40 4.9 24.3 0.8 2—4 50% 1.1—3.2 34% 0.2—0.2 100% 0.8 0.1 0.7 0.6 0.2 0.7 0.3 0.4 — 0.5 0.1 0.1 3.4 1.3—3.1 42% -40.0 -5.7

69 Burton THU 292 2 11:21 4.0 15.1 0.5 2—5 40% 0 —2.5 0% 1.0—1.0 100% 4.5 1.0 3.5 — — 1.5 — 1.5 — 1.0 — — 4.5 1.0—3.5 29% 10.0 22.7

70 Murray SPU 292 58 24:55 10.7 19.5 4.0 4—9 44% 0.6—1.6 38% 1.3—1.6 81% 5.8 1.2 4.6 1.9 1.8 2.2 0.9 1.3 — 1.6 0.3 0.6 11.0 4.1—8.4 49% -188.0 -3.1

71 Rubio SUN 292 57 31:36 13.1 17.7 8.9 4—11 36% 1.2—3.3 36% 3.1—3.6 86% 4.7 0.7 3.9 2.7 1.5 2.5 1.3 1.2 — 3.5 0.2 0.7 11.3 4.1—8.7 47% 130.0 3.0

72 Kennard PIS 292 28 32:56 15.8 21.6 4.1 5—12 42% 2.6—6.5 40% 2.4—2.7 89% 3.5 0.3 3.2 1.5 0.4 2.3 1.3 1.0 — 1.9 0.2 0.5 9.6 3.4—7.8 44% -20.0 -3.6

73 Hield KIN 292 64 31:56 19.8 27.9 3.0 7—17 41% 3.8—9.7 39% 1.8—2.1 86% 4.9 0.9 4.0 2.4 1.0 2.3 1.0 1.3 — 1.4 0.3 0.7 13.4 4.9—10.4 47% -51.0 -0.5

74 Herro HEA 292 47 27:13 12.9 21.1 1.9 5—11 45% 2.1—5.4 39% 1.4—1.7 82% 4.0 0.3 3.7 1.5 0.7 1.2 0.6 0.6 — 1.3 0.2 0.5 8.9 3.4—7.7 44% -24.0 -3.1

75 Curry MAV 291 59 24:33 12.6 22.8 2.0 5—9 56% 2.3—5.1 45% 1.3—1.5 87% 2.4 0.4 2.0 1.0 0.6 1.7 0.9 0.8 — 1.1 0.1 0.2 7.3 2.7—6.0 45% 189.0 5.0

76 Lamb PAC 291 46 27:50 12.5 20.4 2.0 5—10 50% 1.2—3.4 35% 2.0—2.4 83% 4.3 0.5 3.8 1.1 1.2 2.2 1.1 1.1 — 2.2 0.5 0.3 10.7 3.9—8.5 46% -2.0 -0.2

77 Bradley LAK 291 49 24:09 8.7 15.6 1.2 3—8 38% 1.3—3.5 37% 0.4—0.5 80% 2.3 0.4 2.0 1.0 0.9 2.2 1.0 1.2 — 0.5 0.1 0.5 7.4 2.5—6.3 40% 182.0 7.9

78 Strus BUL 291 2 3:07 2.5 33.3 — 1—2 50% 0 —0.5 0% 0.5—0.5 100% 0.5 0.5 — — — 0.5 — 0.5 — 0.5 — — 1.0 0 —1.5 0% 15.0 119.6

79 Langford CEL 291 27 11:03 2.6 10.3 0.2 1—2 50% 0.2—0.9 22% 0.6—0.9 67% 1.2 0.5 0.7 0.3 0.3 1.1 0.5 0.6 — 0.6 0.2 0.3 3.5 1.0—3.0 33% 49.0 4.1

80 White SPU 291 61 24:02 10.4 19.0 3.4 3—8 38% 0.9—2.6 35% 2.5—2.9 86% 3.2 0.5 2.7 1.2 0.7 2.2 1.0 1.1 — 2.9 0.9 0.4 12.5 4.4—10.2 43% -1.0 -0.3

81 Williams-Goss JAZ 291 10 2:45 0.4 6.2 0.4 0—1 0% 0 —0.2 0% 0.2—0.2 100% 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 — 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1—0.6 17% 7.0 8.3

82 Redick PEL 291 54 26:25 14.9 23.9 2.0 5—10 50% 2.9—6.4 45% 2.7—3.0 90% 2.6 0.2 2.4 1.2 0.4 1.6 0.7 0.9 — 2.5 0.2 0.3 7.5 2.6—5.2 50% 9.0 0.1

83 Diallo THU 291 38 18:21 6.1 14.6 0.6 3—6 50% 0.2—0.9 22% 0.7—1.2 58% 3.3 0.8 2.5 1.0 0.8 2.2 0.8 1.3 0.1 1.3 0.2 0.5 6.6 2.2—5.7 39% 17.0 0.2

84 Fultz MAG 291 64 28:20 12.1 19.2 5.2 5—11 45% 0.5—1.9 26% 1.6—2.2 73% 3.3 0.5 2.8 2.1 1.3 2.0 0.8 1.2 — 2.0 0.2 0.7 11.6 4.2—8.9 47% -48.0 -1.5

85 Waters CEL 291 10 8:55 3.3 16.3 1.2 1—4 25% 0.3—1.7 18% 0.6—0.6 100% 0.9 — 0.9 1.0 0.5 1.1 0.3 0.8 — 0.4 0.2 — 3.4 1.0—2.9 34% 27.0 14.2

86 Neto 76E 290 49 11:30 4.3 16.9 1.6 2—4 50% 0.6—1.5 40% 0.5—0.6 83% 1.1 0.2 0.8 0.8 0.5 0.9 0.6 0.3 — 1.1 0.1 0.2 5.1 1.9—4.1 46% 18.0 0.3

87 Harris NET 290 63 30:52 13.9 19.4 2.1 5—11 45% 2.4—5.9 41% 1.0—1.3 77% 4.4 1.0 3.4 1.5 0.6 2.2 1.2 1.0 — 1.2 0.3 0.9 11.3 4.1—8.7 47% 110.0 0.5

88 McCaw RAP 290 37 24:30 4.6 8.3 2.1 2—4 50% 0.6—2.0 30% 0.4—0.5 80% 2.4 0.5 1.8 0.8 1.1 1.7 0.7 1.0 — 0.4 0.1 0.2 8.0 2.7—5.9 46% -1.0 0.9

89 Fournier MAG 290 61 31:41 18.8 26.9 3.2 7—14 50% 2.7—6.7 40% 2.8—3.4 82% 2.7 0.3 2.4 2.0 1.1 2.4 1.1 1.3 — 2.7 0.2 0.5 12.3 4.7—9.1 52% -116.0 -3.4

90 Hannahs GRI 290 2 6:43 6.0 42.9 — 2—5 40% 1.0—1.5 67% 1.0—1.0 100% 0.5 — 0.5 — — 0.5 — 0.5 — 0.5 — — 4.0 1.5—3.0 50% 5.0 30.6

91 Green CEL 290 44 9:26 2.9 13.6 0.5 1—2 50% 0.1—0.5 20% 0.5—0.8 63% 1.8 0.4 1.4 0.4 0.5 0.8 0.3 0.5 — 0.6 0.2 0.1 3.2 1.0—2.4 42% -2.0 1.2

92 Beasley TIM 290 55 21:59 11.2 22.1 1.4 4—10 40% 2.0—5.0 40% 1.0—1.2 83% 2.7 0.3 2.4 1.1 0.7 1.4 0.4 1.0 0.1 1.1 0.2 0.5 6.6 2.4—4.9 49% -50.0 -2.0

93 Caldwell-Pope LAK 290 63 25:27 9.5 16.5 1.7 3—7 43% 1.4—3.5 40% 1.2—1.5 80% 2.1 0.6 1.5 0.9 0.9 1.8 0.9 0.9 0.1 1.3 0.2 0.2 9.4 3.3—7.2 46% 216.0 6.5

94 Augustin MAG 290 49 24:55 10.4 18.8 4.5 3—8 38% 1.2—3.6 33% 2.8—3.2 88% 2.2 0.4 1.9 1.4 0.6 1.1 0.6 0.6 — 2.3 — 0.5 6.4 2.4—6.0 40% 68.0 0.9

27

Page 28: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0B O X S C O R E . G U A R D S

GuardsR E B O U N D S F O U L S

InStatIndex Matches Minutes Points /100 poss Assists Field goals 3-pt field goals Free throws Total Offense Defense Turnov Steals Fouls Reason Unreason Tech Against BLK

BLKagainst Opp Points Opponents field goals +/- Net rating

95 Shayok 76E 290 2 5:11 1.5 12.5 0.5 1—3 33% 0.5—1.5 33% — 1.5 — 1.5 0.5 — — — — — — — 0.5 1.0 0.5—3.0 17% -10.0 -36.0

96 Rozier HOR 290 63 34:17 18.0 24.2 4.1 6—15 40% 2.7—6.8 40% 2.6—3.0 87% 4.4 0.8 3.6 2.2 0.9 2.0 0.9 1.1 0.1 2.5 0.2 0.7 12.2 4.5—9.3 48% -391.0 -8.7

97 Bogdanovic KIN 290 53 28:30 14.4 22.9 3.2 5—12 42% 2.6—7.2 36% 1.4—2.0 70% 3.2 0.3 2.9 1.7 1.0 2.2 1.0 1.2 — 2.1 0.3 0.5 10.1 3.5—8.3 42% -56.0 -1.3

98 Brunson MAV 290 57 17:55 8.2 20.3 3.2 3—7 43% 0.8—2.1 38% 1.1—1.3 85% 2.3 0.4 2.0 1.1 0.4 1.3 0.5 0.8 — 2.1 0.1 0.2 7.1 2.6—5.4 48% 172.0 6.5

99 Sexton CAV 290 65 32:44 20.7 28.0 3.0 8—17 47% 1.5—3.9 38% 3.5—4.1 85% 3.2 1.0 2.2 2.5 1.0 2.2 1.0 1.2 — 3.9 0.1 1.8 13.4 4.9—10.2 48% -405.0 -10.4

100 Barea Mora MAV 289 26 15:01 7.5 22.3 3.8 3—7 43% 1.1—2.9 38% 0.7—0.7 100% 1.9 0.4 1.5 1.4 0.2 1.0 0.4 0.5 — 1.4 0.1 0.2 3.4 1.3—3.3 39% 40.0 4.9

101 Lee WAR 289 35 28:32 12.9 19.8 2.6 4—10 40% 2.0—5.2 38% 2.0—2.3 87% 4.5 0.6 4.0 1.2 0.9 2.2 1.1 1.1 — 2.5 0.1 0.4 11.5 4.1—7.9 52% -150.0 -5.8

102 Caruso LAK 289 58 17:48 5.5 13.4 1.8 2—4 50% 0.7—1.8 39% 1.0—1.3 77% 2.0 0.2 1.7 0.8 1.1 1.5 0.7 0.8 — 1.5 0.3 0.4 8.1 3.0—6.7 45% 225.0 9.7

103 Walker IV SPU 289 53 14:28 5.6 17.5 0.9 2—5 40% 0.6—1.3 46% 0.7—1.0 70% 2.2 0.4 1.8 0.6 0.5 1.3 0.7 0.6 — 0.9 0.3 0.3 6.0 2.1—4.3 49% -20.0 0.9

104 Shamet CLI 289 47 27:26 9.7 15.5 1.8 3—7 43% 2.2—5.7 39% 1.2—1.3 92% 2.0 0.1 1.9 0.8 0.4 2.8 1.3 1.5 — 1.3 0.2 0.3 12.2 4.2—8.9 47% 128.0 6.1

105 Edwards CEL 289 35 '9 3.0 14.6 0.6 1—3 33% 0.6—1.9 32% 0.3—0.4 75% 1.2 0.2 1.1 0.4 0.3 0.9 0.5 0.5 — 0.4 0.1 0.1 3.4 1.1—2.5 44% -44.0 -6.5

106 Ponds RAP 288 4 2:39 2.3 36.0 0.5 1—1 100% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.5—0.5 100% 0.3 — 0.3 — — 0.5 0.3 0.3 — 0.3 0.3 — 1.5 0.3—0.5 60% — -9.7

107 Robinson III 76E 288 60 29:04 11.7 18.1 1.6 5—10 50% 1.2—3.2 38% 1.2—1.4 86% 4.3 1.3 3.0 0.9 0.9 1.6 0.6 1.0 — 1.0 0.2 0.7 12.1 4.4—9.4 47% -295.0 -5.6

108 Belinelli SPU 288 52 14:56 5.8 17.1 1.2 2—5 40% 1.1—3.0 37% 0.6—0.8 75% 1.7 0.1 1.6 0.3 0.2 0.8 0.4 0.4 — 0.8 — 0.1 4.7 1.7—3.6 47% 33.0 2.0

109 Napier WIZ 288 51 24:10 10.3 18.4 4.9 3—8 38% 1.4—4.3 33% 2.3—2.8 82% 2.9 0.5 2.4 2.2 1.3 1.8 0.9 0.9 — 2.6 0.2 0.3 9.6 3.5—6.8 51% -62.0 -2.8

110 Wright MAV 288 65 21:41 7.3 14.8 3.3 3—6 50% 0.7—1.8 39% 1.1—1.4 79% 4.0 1.0 3.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 0.6 0.7 — 1.3 0.4 0.5 7.5 2.8—6.0 47% 45.0 0.9

111 Moore PEL 288 51 18:47 8.6 19.7 1.5 3—8 38% 1.2—3.1 39% 0.6—0.8 75% 2.4 0.6 1.8 0.7 0.6 1.5 0.8 0.7 — 0.8 0.2 0.3 6.3 2.3—4.9 47% -30.0 -1.4

112 McRae PIS 288 37 21:12 11.5 23.6 2.5 4—10 40% 1.2—3.4 35% 2.2—3.0 73% 3.3 0.5 2.9 1.2 0.6 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.1 2.3 0.4 0.6 7.6 2.5—6.0 42% -73.0 -3.7

113 Smith WIZ 288 60 26:10 10.5 17.3 4.7 4—10 40% 0.9—2.5 36% 0.8—1.2 67% 3.1 0.5 2.6 1.3 0.9 1.4 0.7 0.8 — 1.2 0.4 0.3 9.5 3.5—7.7 45% -111.0 -3.1

114 Teague HAW 288 59 24:49 10.9 18.9 5.2 4—8 50% 0.7—2.0 35% 2.9—3.4 85% 2.4 0.5 2.0 1.9 0.8 1.8 0.8 1.0 — 2.7 0.3 0.7 9.0 3.1—6.5 48% -161.0 -5.5

115 Bowman WAR 288 45 22:33 7.4 14.7 2.9 3—7 43% 0.7—2.4 29% 0.8—0.9 89% 2.6 0.5 2.1 1.5 1.0 2.3 0.9 1.3 — 1.2 0.2 0.4 10.1 3.6—7.8 46% -175.0 -6.6

116 Coffey CLI 288 13 7:30 2.2 12.6 0.7 1—3 33% 0.1—0.5 20% 0.1—0.2 50% 1.0 0.3 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.9 0.5 0.3 — 0.2 0.1 0.2 3.2 0.9—2.2 41% -8.0 -0.8

117 McLaughlin TIM 288 30 19:42 7.6 16.4 4.2 3—6 50% 1.0—2.5 40% 0.9—1.3 69% 1.6 0.2 1.4 1.0 1.1 1.0 0.4 0.6 — 1.6 0.1 0.5 7.4 2.9—5.9 49% -70.0 -7.2

118 Green LAK 288 61 25:02 8.2 14.2 1.4 3—7 43% 1.9—4.9 39% 0.5—0.7 71% 3.4 0.7 2.7 0.9 1.2 2.1 0.8 1.3 — 0.9 0.5 0.1 13.0 4.8—9.9 48% 306.0 7.7

119 Thybulle 76E 288 57 19:27 4.7 10.7 1.3 2—4 50% 0.9—2.5 36% 0.4—0.7 57% 1.5 0.6 0.9 0.8 1.4 2.1 0.8 1.3 — 0.7 0.7 0.1 7.8 2.6—6.3 41% 22.0 0.6

120 Sumner PAC 288 14 14:50 5.6 17.1 1.5 2—5 40% 0.4—1.2 33% 0.6—0.9 67% 1.6 0.3 1.4 0.8 0.8 1.5 0.6 0.9 — 1.1 0.5 0.1 4.8 1.4—3.4 41% -43.0 -6.9

121 Payton KNI 288 45 27:39 10.0 16.1 7.2 4—10 40% 0.3—1.5 20% 1.1—1.9 58% 4.7 1.2 3.5 2.1 1.6 2.0 0.9 1.0 — 1.7 0.4 1.0 10.9 3.8—9.0 42% -86.0 -3.8

122 Pelle 76E 287 20 8:56 2.1 10.7 0.4 1—2 50% — 0.3—0.6 50% 3.0 0.8 2.2 0.7 0.1 2.0 0.9 1.1 0.1 0.5 1.2 0.2 6.9 2.5—5.4 46% -61.0 -13.9

123 Jones GRI 287 65 18:57 7.5 16.8 4.4 3—7 43% 0.7—1.9 37% 0.7—0.9 78% 1.6 0.1 1.4 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.2 0.5 — 0.8 0.1 0.4 6.0 2.3—5.3 43% -44.0 -1.7

124 Chiozza NET 287 21 11:53 4.0 14.4 2.2 2—4 50% 0.9—2.0 45% 0.1—0.1 100% 1.7 0.3 1.4 0.8 0.8 1.1 0.3 0.8 — 0.4 0.1 0.2 4.2 1.3—3.1 42% 66.0 10.8

125 Trent Jr TB 287 53 19:59 7.7 17.0 0.9 3—7 43% 1.5—3.8 39% 0.6—0.7 86% 1.7 0.4 1.3 0.4 0.7 1.3 0.6 0.7 — 0.8 0.3 0.2 7.2 2.5—5.5 45% -115.0 -3.0

126 Frazier ROC 287 8 8:14 1.8 9.0 0.1 1—1 100% 0.3—1.0 30% 0.5—0.8 63% 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 1.6 1.0 0.6 — 0.5 — 0.1 4.6 1.1—2.0 55% -27.0 -17.4

127 Mulder WAR 287 7 29:06 11.0 16.8 1.1 4—9 44% 2.3—7.3 32% 1.3—1.7 76% 3.3 0.4 2.9 0.7 0.3 2.9 1.7 1.1 — 1.3 0.1 — 11.9 3.7—8.9 42% 23.0 2.4

128 Vincent HEA 287 6 6:56 2.0 13.2 0.5 1—3 33% 0.7—2.7 26% — 0.5 — 0.5 — 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 — 0.3 — 0.3 2.7 0.8—2.3 35% -6.0 -7.7

129 Carter-Williams MAG 287 42 18:23 7.2 17.6 2.4 3—6 50% 0.5—1.6 31% 1.7—2.1 81% 3.4 1.1 2.3 1.1 1.1 1.9 0.7 1.2 0.1 2.5 0.5 0.5 8.2 2.9—6.2 47% 28.0 0.9

130 Hezonja TB 287 47 16:19 4.8 12.7 0.9 2—4 50% 0.5—1.4 36% 0.9—1.1 82% 3.5 0.6 2.9 0.8 0.6 1.9 0.8 1.1 0.1 1.0 0.2 0.3 7.1 2.2—5.5 40% -153.0 -7.5

131 Hall THU 287 5 3:57 1.0 10.9 0.6 0—1 0% 0 —0.4 0% 0.6—0.8 75% 0.2 — 0.2 0.2 — 0.2 — 0.2 — 0.6 — — 1.8 0.8—1.0 80% 20.0 45.2

132 Nwaba NET 287 20 13:22 5.2 17.2 0.4 2—4 50% 0.6—1.4 43% 0.9—1.4 64% 2.2 0.4 1.8 0.4 0.6 1.6 0.8 0.9 — 0.9 0.6 0.3 6.7 2.1—5.0 42% 33.0 8.6

133 Poole WAR 287 57 22:20 8.8 17.3 2.3 3—9 33% 1.3—4.7 28% 1.7—2.1 81% 2.1 0.2 1.9 1.3 0.6 1.7 0.8 0.8 — 1.9 0.2 0.6 6.7 2.4—5.0 48% -201.0 -7.2

134 McGruder CLI 287 50 14:58 3.2 9.2 0.6 1—3 33% 0.4—1.6 25% 0.3—0.6 50% 2.6 0.5 2.1 0.4 0.4 1.4 0.6 0.7 — 0.6 0.2 0.3 5.3 1.8—4.2 43% 3.0 2.6

135 Konchar GRI 287 15 11:09 3.4 13.3 1.4 2—2 100% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 3.1 1.2 1.9 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.3 — 0.4 0.2 0.1 4.7 1.6—3.5 46% 32.0 4.0

136 Pargo WAR 287 3 14:47 8.3 26.6 2.7 4—7 57% 1.0—2.3 43% 0 —0.3 0% 1.0 0.3 0.7 1.3 0.3 2.7 0.7 1.7 — 0.7 — — 8.3 2.3—3.0 77% — 10.5

137 Weatherspoon SPU 287 3 '5 — — 0.3 0—1 0% 0 —0.3 0% — 0.3 — 0.3 0.3 — — — — — — — — 1.0 0.3—0.7 43% 4.0 11.4

138 Iguodala HEA 286 14 18:30 4.4 10.0 2.0 2—4 50% 0.6—1.7 35% 0.1—0.6 17% 3.7 0.7 3.0 1.3 0.6 2.0 0.9 1.1 0.1 0.8 1.1 0.1 6.4 1.9—6.1 31% -24.0 -2.8

139 Dort THU 286 29 21:55 6.2 12.7 0.7 2—5 40% 0.8—2.5 32% 1.0—1.2 83% 1.9 0.5 1.3 0.5 0.8 2.7 1.0 1.6 — 1.7 0.1 0.3 9.1 3.1—7.6 41% 50.0 2.9

140 Hart PEL 286 57 27:25 10.2 15.9 1.6 4—8 50% 2.0—5.7 35% 1.2—1.6 75% 6.5 1.0 5.5 1.1 1.0 2.5 1.2 1.4 0.1 1.4 0.4 0.4 12.5 4.5—10.1 45% -86.0 -1.6

141 Forbes SPU 286 63 25:10 11.2 20.3 1.7 4—9 44% 2.4—6.1 39% 1.2—1.4 86% 2.0 0.2 1.8 0.9 0.6 1.8 0.7 1.1 — 0.9 — 0.5 10.1 3.6—7.3 49% -207.0 -4.8

28

Page 29: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0B O X S C O R E . G U A R D S

GuardsR E B O U N D S F O U L S

InStatIndex Matches Minutes Points /100 poss Assists Field goals 3-pt field goals Free throws Total Offense Defense Turnov Steals Fouls Reason Unreason Tech Against BLK

BLKagainst Opp Points Opponents field goals +/- Net rating

142 Culver TIM 286 63 23:58 9.2 16.5 1.8 4—9 44% 1.1—3.5 31% 0.9—1.8 50% 3.4 1.1 2.3 1.3 0.9 2.0 0.8 1.1 — 1.5 0.6 0.8 8.5 3.0—6.6 45% -92.0 -2.8

143 Macon HEA 286 4 3:33 0.8 10.3 0.3 0—1 0% 0.3—0.5 60% — — — — 0.5 — 0.3 0.3 — — — — — 1.0 0.3—1.3 23% — 7.1

144 Simons TB 286 65 21:31 8.8 17.8 1.5 3—8 38% 1.1—3.4 32% 1.2—1.4 86% 2.3 0.4 1.9 1.0 0.4 2.0 1.0 1.1 — 1.2 0.2 0.6 10.0 3.5—7.6 46% -262.0 -8.2

145 Melton GRI 286 52 19:26 8.1 17.9 3.1 3—7 43% 0.7—2.3 30% 1.7—2.0 85% 3.7 0.7 3.0 1.5 1.2 1.8 0.7 1.0 — 1.8 0.3 0.4 9.1 3.1—5.9 53% 121.0 5.0

146 Daniels NUG 286 42 10:48 4.1 16.9 0.3 1—4 25% 1.0—2.7 37% 0.2—0.4 50% 1.1 0.3 0.8 0.2 0.2 0.7 0.3 0.4 — 0.3 0.1 0.1 3.4 1.2—3.0 40% 3.0 0.6

147 Thomas WIZ 285 39 23:01 12.2 22.8 3.6 4—11 36% 2.0—4.7 43% 1.5—1.9 79% 1.7 0.3 1.4 1.9 0.3 1.9 1.0 0.8 0.1 1.7 0.2 0.8 8.7 2.8—6.5 43% -193.0 -9.1

148 Burton THU 285 32 8:09 2.7 14.6 0.3 1—3 33% 0.3—1.3 23% 0.1—0.3 33% 1.2 0.1 1.1 0.4 0.2 0.8 0.4 0.4 — 0.3 0.3 0.2 3.5 1.3—2.7 48% -84.0 -12.3

149 Temple NET 285 55 28:06 10.3 15.9 2.5 4—10 40% 2.0—6.3 32% 1.0—1.3 77% 3.5 0.5 3.0 1.1 0.9 1.8 0.7 1.1 — 1.4 0.5 0.5 11.4 4.2—9.7 43% -39.0 -1.3

150 Mann CLI 285 35 7:48 1.6 8.8 1.1 1—2 50% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.3—0.3 100% 0.9 0.1 0.8 0.4 0.2 1.1 0.3 0.7 — 0.4 0.1 0.2 3.1 1.1—2.3 48% 3.0 2.7

151 Mykhailiuk PIS 285 56 22:35 9.0 17.8 1.9 3—7 43% 2.1—5.1 41% 1.0—1.3 77% 1.9 0.3 1.6 1.1 0.7 1.6 0.7 0.8 — 1.0 0.1 0.4 6.8 2.5—5.5 45% -6.0 -0.9

152 Brown PIS 285 58 28:09 8.9 14.5 4.0 3—8 38% 0.6—1.6 38% 1.5—2.1 71% 4.8 1.1 3.7 1.8 1.1 2.8 1.3 1.5 — 1.8 0.5 0.7 12.1 4.3—9.6 45% -141.0 -3.5

153 Nowell TIM 285 15 10:06 3.8 15.7 1.3 1—4 25% 0.2—1.7 12% 1.1—1.1 100% 0.9 0.2 0.7 0.2 0.2 0.7 0.3 0.5 — 0.7 0.1 0.1 3.1 0.9—2.1 43% 11.0 2.0

154 Robinson WIZ 285 55 13:37 3.7 11.2 1.2 1—4 25% 0.6—1.9 32% 0.4—0.5 80% 2.0 0.2 1.8 0.6 0.4 1.5 0.7 0.8 — 0.6 0.3 0.2 5.4 1.8—4.7 38% 27.0 3.1

155 Walton Jr. PIS 285 26 9:34 2.0 9.4 1.0 1—2 50% 0.4—1.0 40% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.6 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.8 0.4 0.4 — 0.4 — — 3.3 1.2—2.6 46% -8.0 -0.5

156 Frazier PIS 285 28 12:41 3.5 12.2 3.4 1—3 33% 0.4—1.1 36% 0.7—0.9 78% 1.2 0.3 0.9 1.3 0.5 1.5 0.6 0.9 — 1.1 0.1 0.1 5.0 1.7—3.6 47% -61.0 -7.1

157 Satoransky BUL 285 65 28:47 9.9 15.3 5.5 4—8 50% 1.0—3.1 32% 1.6—1.9 84% 3.9 1.2 2.7 2.0 1.3 2.1 1.1 1.0 0.1 2.2 0.1 0.5 9.7 3.5—7.1 49% -69.0 -2.1

158 Martin NET 285 3 5:20 0.7 5.6 0.7 0—2 0% 0 —0.3 0% — 0.7 — 0.7 — 0.3 — — — — — 0.3 — 1.0 0.3—1.3 23% 2.0 5.6

159 James KIN 284 34 6:25 2.5 17.4 0.5 1—2 50% 0.3—0.8 38% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.9 0.2 0.7 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.2 — 0.6 0.3 0.1 2.1 0.7—1.9 37% -21.0 -0.5

160 Monk HOR 284 55 21:19 10.3 21.8 2.0 4—9 44% 1.1—3.7 30% 1.5—1.8 83% 2.8 0.5 2.4 1.4 0.5 1.4 0.6 0.8 0.1 1.5 0.3 0.5 7.4 2.8—5.9 47% -236.0 -10.5

161 Joseph KIN 284 64 24:01 6.3 12.1 3.4 2—6 33% 0.7—2.1 33% 0.8—0.9 89% 2.6 0.6 2.0 1.0 0.7 1.9 1.0 0.9 — 1.5 0.3 0.2 10.0 3.6—7.8 46% -43.0 0.6

162 Luwawu-Cabarrot NET 284 39 17:11 6.3 16.2 0.6 2—5 40% 1.0—2.8 36% 1.3—1.6 81% 2.3 0.6 1.7 0.9 0.4 2.1 1.0 1.1 — 1.2 0.2 0.5 7.4 2.5—5.9 42% -76.0 -3.1

163 Bridges HOR 284 65 30:41 13.0 19.5 1.8 5—12 42% 1.5—4.6 33% 1.6—2.0 80% 5.5 1.3 4.2 1.4 0.6 2.0 0.8 1.2 0.1 1.6 0.7 0.7 13.1 4.9—11.1 44% -397.0 -8.8

164 Evans TIM 284 29 14:26 4.4 13.6 1.1 2—5 40% 0.5—1.3 38% 0.9—1.0 90% 1.4 0.3 1.1 0.9 0.4 1.4 0.8 0.7 — 0.9 0.4 0.4 6.9 2.4—5.2 46% -99.0 -8.8

165 Okogie TIM 284 62 24:58 8.6 14.7 1.6 3—6 50% 0.7—2.5 28% 2.5—3.1 81% 4.3 1.4 2.9 1.4 1.1 2.2 1.0 1.3 0.1 2.4 0.4 0.6 10.3 3.7—8.1 46% -162.0 -4.4

166 Tucker JAZ 284 14 5:32 1.4 11.0 0.2 1—1 100% 0 —0.4 0% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.9 0.1 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.3 — 0.7 — 0.1 3.1 1.1—1.7 65% -7.0 -3.4

167 Randle WAR 283 3 13:03 1.7 5.6 1.7 0—1 0% 0 —0.7 0% 1.7—2.0 85% 0.7 — 0.7 — 0.7 1.0 0.7 0.3 — 1.0 — 0.3 5.0 2.0—2.7 74% — 1.2

168 Jackson PEL 283 51 12:53 5.6 18.0 0.8 2—5 40% 0.8—2.4 33% 0.9—1.3 69% 1.4 0.4 1.0 0.8 0.3 1.3 0.5 0.8 — 0.9 0.1 0.2 5.7 2.0—4.3 47% -81.0 -5.1

169 Galloway PIS 283 66 25:45 10.3 17.8 1.5 4—8 50% 2.0—5.0 40% 1.1—1.3 85% 2.3 0.5 1.8 0.6 0.7 1.5 0.7 0.7 — 1.2 0.2 0.2 8.8 3.4—7.3 47% -138.0 -4.7

170 Alexander-Walker PEL 283 41 12:13 5.2 18.2 1.8 2—6 33% 1.0—2.9 34% 0.4—0.7 57% 2.0 0.2 1.8 1.0 0.3 1.1 0.4 0.7 — 0.9 0.2 0.4 6.1 2.2—4.3 51% -63.0 -3.9

171 Pinson NET 283 33 11:06 3.6 14.6 1.7 1—5 20% 0.5—2.4 21% 0.5—0.5 100% 1.6 0.3 1.3 1.0 0.5 1.1 0.5 0.6 — 0.7 0.1 0.4 4.7 1.6—3.6 44% -40.0 -2.7

172 Allen KNI 283 10 11:42 5.0 18.7 2.1 2—4 50% 0.5—1.6 31% 0.7—1.1 64% 0.9 0.2 0.7 0.8 0.5 0.7 0.4 0.3 — 0.7 0.1 0.2 4.4 1.7—3.5 49% -21.0 -9.9

173 Musa NET 283 35 11:34 4.2 16.0 0.9 1—4 25% 0.4—1.9 21% 0.9—1.3 69% 2.0 0.5 1.5 0.8 0.3 0.7 0.2 0.6 — 1.1 — 0.3 4.5 1.6—3.5 46% -41.0 -4.8

174 Cleveland MAV 283 6 3:44 0.8 10.4 0.2 0—1 0% 0 —0.2 0% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.5 — 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 — 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 0 —0.3 0% -11.0 -25.5

175 Lee MAV 283 24 14:24 4.5 13.9 0.5 2—3 67% 0.9—1.9 47% 0.3—0.3 100% 1.3 0.3 1.0 0.4 0.7 1.4 0.5 0.8 — 0.2 0.2 — 5.4 2.0—4.3 47% 39.0 7.3

176 White BUL 283 65 25:43 13.2 22.6 2.7 5—12 42% 2.1—5.9 36% 1.6—2.0 80% 3.6 0.5 3.2 1.7 0.8 1.8 0.8 1.0 0.1 1.9 0.1 1.0 9.3 3.3—6.2 53% -154.0 -4.1

177 Mathews WIZ 283 18 12:38 5.4 19.2 0.6 1—3 33% 1.1—2.6 42% 1.7—1.9 89% 1.3 0.3 1.0 0.5 0.4 1.8 0.7 1.1 — 1.6 0.1 0.2 5.1 1.4—3.6 39% 35.0 12.0

178 Mokoka BUL 283 11 10:05 2.9 12.8 0.4 1—3 33% 0.6—1.4 43% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.4 1.6 0.6 0.9 — 0.4 — 0.3 4.1 1.1—3.1 35% 50.0 21.4

179 Exum CAV 282 35 13:52 4.5 14.8 1.1 2—3 67% 0.4—1.2 33% 0.9—1.2 75% 1.9 0.3 1.6 0.9 0.3 1.1 0.6 0.5 — 1.1 0.3 0.2 5.4 1.9—4.5 42% -110.0 -8.6

180 Williams PEL 282 35 22:16 3.8 7.4 1.5 1—4 25% 0.7—2.8 25% 0.3—0.7 43% 5.1 1.4 3.7 0.6 0.7 2.3 1.1 1.2 0.1 0.8 0.6 0.2 10.0 3.4—8.1 42% -50.0 -1.9

181 Ferguson THU 282 50 23:28 4.2 8.1 0.9 1—4 25% 0.9—3.1 29% 0.3—0.4 75% 1.5 0.5 1.0 0.6 0.5 2.9 1.2 1.7 — 0.7 0.3 0.1 10.8 3.6—8.4 43% -112.0 -3.2

182 Frazier Jr. MAG 282 15 3:12 1.2 16.4 0.1 0—1 0% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.1 0.5 — 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.5 0.4—1.0 40% 4.0 0.5

183 Robinson WIZ 282 9 5:25 1.4 12.3 0.8 1—1 100% 0.3—0.6 50% — 0.6 0.1 0.4 0.3 — 0.2 0.2 — — 0.1 0.1 — 1.0 0.3—1.0 30% 31.0 27.9

184 Magette MAG 282 8 4:43 1.5 14.1 0.5 1—2 50% 0.1—0.5 20% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.8 0.1 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.3 — 0.4 0.1 — 0.8 0.4—1.3 31% 1.0 -3.8

185 Bridges SUN 282 65 27:18 8.7 13.9 1.8 3—6 50% 0.9—2.5 36% 1.4—1.6 88% 4.0 0.9 3.1 1.0 1.5 2.2 1.0 1.2 — 1.8 0.6 0.4 10.7 3.9—8.4 46% 47.0 1.7

186 Bacon HOR 282 39 17:37 5.7 14.6 1.3 2—6 33% 0.5—1.7 29% 0.9—1.4 64% 2.6 0.4 2.2 1.0 0.6 1.4 0.5 0.9 0.1 1.1 0.1 0.5 5.5 2.0—4.5 44% -132.0 -8.7

187 Guduric GRI 282 42 11:20 4.1 15.5 1.1 1—4 25% 0.6—1.9 32% 0.6—0.6 100% 1.7 0.3 1.4 0.9 0.3 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.7 0.2 0.3 4.1 1.4—3.0 47% -35.0 -4.1

188 Knight PIS 282 25 18:29 7.3 17.6 2.8 2—7 29% 1.8—5.2 35% 0.8—1.4 57% 1.6 0.2 1.5 1.5 0.4 1.6 0.7 0.9 — 1.7 0.1 0.3 6.0 2.1—4.1 51% -71.0 -9.6

29

Page 30: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0B O X S C O R E . G U A R D S

GuardsR E B O U N D S F O U L S

InStatIndex Matches Minutes Points /100 poss Assists Field goals 3-pt field goals Free throws Total Offense Defense Turnov Steals Fouls Reason Unreason Tech Against BLK

BLKagainst Opp Points Opponents field goals +/- Net rating

189 Dunn BUL 282 51 24:44 7.3 13.2 3.4 3—7 43% 0.6—2.2 27% 0.8—1.1 73% 3.7 0.5 3.2 1.4 1.9 3.1 1.2 1.9 — 1.1 0.4 0.4 10.4 3.3—7.8 42% -21.0 -0.3

190 Batum HOR 282 22 22:58 3.6 7.3 2.9 1—4 25% 0.6—2.2 27% 0.4—0.5 80% 4.6 1.1 3.4 1.0 0.8 1.9 0.8 1.0 — 1.1 0.4 0.1 8.3 3.1—7.6 41% -48.0 -1.4

191 Allen GRI 282 30 16:35 7.4 18.9 1.4 3—6 50% 1.1—3.0 37% 1.0—1.2 83% 2.2 0.2 2.0 0.8 0.2 1.2 0.7 0.5 — 1.4 — 0.3 6.2 2.1—5.2 40% -72.0 -7.1

192 Harrison BUL 281 43 11:16 4.9 19.2 1.1 2—4 50% 0.4—1.0 40% 0.9—1.2 75% 2.0 0.5 1.5 0.4 0.8 1.3 0.4 0.8 — 1.0 0.4 0.3 4.8 1.6—3.7 43% 61.0 7.0

193 Bone PIS 281 10 5:18 1.2 10.6 0.8 1—2 50% 0.2—1.0 20% — 0.4 — 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.3 0.2 — — — 0.1 1.7 0.5—0.9 56% — 1.7

194 Dellavedova CAV 281 57 14:25 3.1 9.6 3.2 1—3 33% 0.4—1.6 25% 0.6—0.7 86% 1.3 0.3 1.0 1.0 0.4 1.4 0.6 0.8 — 0.8 — 0.1 5.1 1.9—4.4 43% -12.0 -0.3

195 Snell PIS 281 59 27:48 8.0 13.0 2.2 3—6 50% 1.7—4.3 40% 0.5—0.5 100% 1.9 0.2 1.7 0.5 0.5 1.7 0.8 0.9 — 0.8 0.3 0.2 10.5 4.0—8.4 48% -168.0 -6.1

196 Dotson KNI 281 48 17:25 6.8 17.3 1.2 3—6 50% 1.2—3.4 35% 0.5—0.7 71% 1.9 0.2 1.7 0.4 0.5 0.9 0.5 0.4 — 0.6 0.1 0.2 5.4 1.9—4.5 42% -86.0 -5.8

197 Valentine BUL 281 36 13:33 6.8 22.8 1.3 3—7 43% 1.3—3.8 34% 0.2—0.2 100% 2.1 0.3 1.8 0.7 0.7 1.4 0.7 0.7 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 6.0 2.0—4.3 47% -39.0 -2.5

198 Shumpert NET 281 13 18:30 4.2 10.2 0.9 2—5 40% 0.6—2.5 24% 0.3—0.6 50% 2.6 0.7 1.9 0.8 0.9 1.6 0.6 1.0 — 0.8 0.2 0.2 5.3 1.8—4.8 38% -50.0 -5.6

199 Bonga WIZ 281 58 17:40 4.6 11.3 1.1 2—3 67% 0.4—1.0 40% 0.9—1.1 82% 3.2 1.0 2.1 0.7 0.6 2.3 1.0 1.3 — 1.4 0.3 0.1 9.3 3.1—6.2 50% 22.0 1.8

200 Goodwin HAW 281 34 12:43 6.1 20.8 1.5 2—6 33% 0.8—2.6 31% 0.8—0.9 89% 2.2 0.3 1.8 0.9 0.4 1.3 0.5 0.8 — 0.9 0.1 0.4 5.5 1.9—4.0 48% -128.0 -13.2

201 Carter SUN 281 50 15:05 4.6 13.6 1.3 2—4 50% 0.9—2.3 39% 0.4—0.5 80% 1.9 0.5 1.5 0.6 0.7 1.5 0.7 0.8 — 0.7 0.3 0.2 5.9 1.9—4.5 42% -85.0 -3.3

202 Porter CAV 281 50 23:05 10.0 19.3 2.2 4—8 50% 1.1—3.2 34% 1.5—2.0 75% 3.3 0.5 2.8 1.9 0.9 2.7 1.2 1.5 0.1 1.8 0.2 0.6 11.0 3.7—7.8 47% -296.0 -11.4

203 Barrett KNI 281 56 30:15 14.3 21.2 2.5 5—13 38% 1.1—3.5 31% 2.8—4.5 62% 4.9 0.9 4.1 2.3 1.0 2.2 1.0 1.1 — 3.5 0.3 1.1 12.8 4.8—9.4 51% -327.0 -8.8

204 Johnson SUN 281 49 20:17 8.1 17.4 1.1 3—7 43% 1.8—4.7 38% 0.7—0.9 78% 2.8 0.8 2.0 0.6 0.6 1.5 0.7 0.8 — 0.8 0.3 0.3 8.0 2.8—5.9 47% -75.0 -3.0

205 Garland CAV 281 59 30:46 12.3 17.8 3.8 5—12 42% 1.8—5.0 36% 1.1—1.2 92% 1.9 0.4 1.5 2.6 0.7 1.5 0.8 0.8 — 1.5 0.1 0.7 12.2 4.9—9.5 52% -300.0 -9.3

206 Huerter HAW 281 57 30:51 12.0 16.7 3.8 4—11 36% 2.2—5.9 37% 0.9—1.1 82% 4.0 0.6 3.4 1.6 0.9 2.4 1.2 1.3 — 1.0 0.5 0.3 12.4 4.4—8.9 49% -241.0 -5.3

207 Watson RAP 280 5 5:11 0.2 1.4 1.0 0—2 0% 0 —0.8 0% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.8 — 0.8 — 0.2 0.2 0.2 — — 0.4 0.2 0.2 1.2 0.4—0.8 50% 11.0 0.7

208 Turner HAW 280 19 13:17 3.3 10.4 1.9 1—4 25% 0 —0.3 0% 0.6—0.7 86% 2.0 0.4 1.5 1.4 0.5 1.1 0.5 0.6 — 0.7 0.4 0.2 5.9 2.1—5.5 38% -65.0 -14.1

209 Graham HAW 280 55 16:56 4.4 11.5 0.8 2—4 50% 0.6—2.2 27% 0.7—1.0 70% 2.8 1.0 1.8 0.5 0.5 1.9 0.7 1.2 0.1 1.1 0.1 0.4 7.0 2.4—5.3 45% -147.0 -4.4

210 Trier KNI 280 24 12:08 6.5 23.7 1.1 2—4 50% 0.8—2.2 36% 1.4—1.8 78% 1.3 0.3 1.0 1.0 0.1 1.2 0.4 0.7 — 1.2 0.2 0.3 5.3 1.8—3.5 51% -70.0 -8.7

211 Wade CAV 280 4 4:48 1.0 8.7 — 1—1 100% — 0 —0.3 0% 0.8 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.8 0.3 0.5 — 0.5 — — 2.0 0.8—2.3 35% 2.0 1.7

212 Gray PEL 280 2 11:45 1.0 3.8 1.0 1—1 100% — — 1.0 0.5 0.5 2.5 — 0.5 0.5 — — 0.5 — — 3.0 1.0—3.0 33% -9.0 -12.6

213 Okobo SUN 280 54 13:06 4.0 13.7 2.1 1—3 33% 0.5—1.3 38% 0.9—1.2 75% 1.6 0.3 1.3 0.7 0.5 1.0 0.4 0.6 — 1.1 0.1 0.1 6.1 2.3—4.2 55% -64.0 -3.8

214 Carter HAW 279 60 14:36 5.0 14.6 0.8 2—5 40% 1.0—3.4 29% 0.4—0.5 80% 2.1 0.3 1.8 0.6 0.4 1.5 0.8 0.7 — 0.6 0.4 0.1 5.5 1.7—4.1 41% -133.0 -9.1

215 Smith 76E 279 7 4:45 1.1 10.1 0.3 0—2 0% 0 —0.4 0% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.3 — 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.1 0.3 — 0.3 — 0.1 3.4 1.0—1.4 71% -16.0 -28.0

216 Smith Jr. KNI 279 34 15:44 5.5 15.7 2.9 2—6 33% 0.5—1.6 31% 0.8—1.6 50% 2.3 0.6 1.7 1.7 0.9 1.9 0.9 1.0 0.1 1.5 0.2 0.3 7.0 2.4—5.1 47% -192.0 -15.8

217 Ellington KNI 279 36 15:30 5.1 14.8 1.2 2—5 40% 1.4—3.9 36% 0.3—0.4 75% 1.8 0.1 1.7 0.5 0.4 1.1 0.6 0.5 — 0.7 0.1 0.1 5.1 1.6—3.9 41% -15.0 -1.6

218 Johnson SUN 279 32 16:07 5.7 15.5 1.5 2—5 40% 0.8—2.6 31% 0.8—1.0 80% 1.7 0.3 1.3 0.8 0.4 1.3 0.8 0.5 — 0.9 0.3 0.3 6.8 2.5—5.4 46% -100.0 -4.9

219 Newman CAV 279 1 3:42 2.0 28.6 — 0—2 0% 0 —1.0 0% 2.0—2.0 100% — — — 1.0 — — — — — 1.0 — — — — -3.0 -30.4

220 Jerome SUN 279 28 11:11 3.5 13.8 1.6 1—4 25% 0.5—1.7 29% 0.4—0.5 80% 1.5 0.2 1.3 0.6 0.5 1.0 0.5 0.5 — 0.4 0.1 0.3 5.7 2.2—4.0 55% -104.0 -13.0

221 Arcidiacono BUL 279 58 15:57 4.5 12.5 1.7 2—4 50% 0.9—2.4 38% 0.5—0.7 71% 1.9 0.4 1.5 0.6 0.5 1.6 0.7 0.9 — 1.3 — 0.2 5.3 1.7—3.9 44% -78.0 -1.7

222 Ntilikina KNI 278 57 20:43 6.3 13.7 3.0 2—6 33% 0.8—2.4 33% 0.9—1.0 90% 2.1 0.4 1.7 1.3 1.0 2.5 1.3 1.2 — 1.2 0.3 0.3 8.6 2.9—6.1 48% -100.0 -2.6

223 Hutchison BUL 278 28 18:48 7.8 18.2 0.9 3—6 50% 0.4—1.4 29% 1.6—2.8 57% 3.8 0.6 3.1 1.0 1.0 1.7 0.6 1.0 — 2.2 0.2 0.6 8.0 3.0—5.9 51% -143.0 -9.7

224 Wallace HAW 278 14 11:29 2.9 10.9 0.9 1—3 33% 0.1—1.1 9% 0.8—1.2 67% 1.6 0.2 1.4 0.6 0.5 1.4 0.6 0.7 — 0.9 0.1 0.4 3.9 1.0—2.5 40% -32.0 -8.7

225 Payton II WIZ 278 29 14:51 3.9 11.4 1.6 2—4 50% 0.5—1.6 31% 0.1—0.3 33% 2.7 0.9 1.8 0.7 1.1 1.9 0.6 1.3 — 0.4 0.2 0.2 6.8 2.2—4.9 45% -138.0 -12.5

226 Chealey HOR 278 4 8:22 0.5 2.8 0.3 0—2 0% 0 —0.8 0% 0.5—0.5 100% — — — 0.5 1.0 0.5 0.5 — — 0.3 — 0.3 2.0 0.8—1.5 53% -18.0 -22.8

227 Crabbe TIM 277 37 17:40 4.7 11.2 0.9 2—5 40% 1.0—3.2 31% 0.3—0.4 75% 2.1 0.3 1.8 0.5 0.4 1.3 0.5 0.8 — 0.4 0.1 0.2 5.2 1.8—3.6 50% -221.0 -15.1

228 Jones HAW 277 6 13:15 3.7 11.9 0.5 1—2 50% 0.2—0.2 100% 1.5—1.7 88% 3.8 1.7 2.2 — 0.7 1.7 0.3 1.3 — 1.2 0.7 0.3 10.0 3.7—7.5 49% 10.0 6.9

229 Norvell Jr. WAR 276 5 8:10 2.0 10.6 0.6 1—2 50% 0.6—1.6 38% 0.2—0.2 100% 1.2 — 1.2 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.8 — — 0.4 — — 5.0 1.8—2.6 69% -27.0 -26.0

230 Mooney CAV 275 4 4:42 0.5 4.8 0.3 0—1 0% 0 —0.5 0% — 0.8 — 0.8 — 0.5 0.3 0.3 — — 0.3 0.3 — 0.8 0.3—1.5 20% 7.0 16.7

231 Thomas PIS 274 8 7:40 2.1 12.3 0.4 1—2 50% 0.6—1.8 33% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.1 0.1 — 0.4 0.4 1.1 0.9 0.3 — 0.3 — — 3.4 1.1—1.8 61% -37.0 -30.0

232 Oni JAZ — 5 2:08 — — — — 0 —0.2 0% — 0.4 — 0.4 0.2 — — — — — — — — 0.4 0.2—0.8 25% -17.0 -56.9

233 Harper SUN — 3 2:38 0.7 11.2 — 0—1 0% 0 —0.7 0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -11.0 -53.6

234 Guy KIN — 2 1:59 1.0 20.0 — 1—1 100% 0 —0.5 0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 —0.5 0% -3.0 -18.2

235 Reaves MAV — 2 0:44 — — — 0—1 0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -5.0 -125.0

30

Page 31: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0B O X S C O R E . G U A R D S

GuardsR E B O U N D S F O U L S

InStatIndex

Matches Minutes Points

/100poss Assists Field goals 3-pt field goals Free throws Total Offense

Defense Turnov Steals Fouls Reason

Unreason Tech Against BLK

BLKagainst

OppPoints

Opponents fieldgoals +/- Net rating

236 Horton-Tucker LAK — 2 2:40 — — 1.0 0—1 0% 0—0.5 0% — — — — — 0.5 — — — — — — — — 0—1.5 0% -7.0 -70.0

237 Wright-Foreman JAZ — 1 1:33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2.0 66.7

31

Page 32: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0F G P L A Y T Y P E S . C E N T E R S

CentersField goals Pick`n`rolls Handler Pick`n`rolls Roller Pick`n`pops Post ups Isolations Catch and shoots Catch and drives Screen off Hand off Transitions Cuts Putbacks

1 Jokic NUG 7.9—14.9 53% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.8—1.1 73% 0.7—1.6 44% 2.1—3.3 64% 0.7—1.7 41% 0.8—2.3 35% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.4—0.9 44% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.6—0.9 67% 1.0—1.4 71%

2 Embiid 76E 7.6—16.0 48% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.6—1.4 43% 2.0—4.1 49% 1.3—2.7 48% 1.0—2.8 36% 0.4—0.8 50% 0.4—0.6 67% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.4—0.6 67% 0.8—1.3 62%

3 Towns TIM 9.0—17.8 51% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.6—0.9 67% 0.8—2.0 40% 1.2—2.4 50% 0.9—1.8 50% 1.5—3.8 39% 0.7—1.6 44% 0.5—0.9 56% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.8—0.9 89% 1.3—1.8 72%

4 Gobert JAZ 5.7—8.2 70% 0.1—0.1 100% 1.3—1.9 68% 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.2 100% 0.3—0.3 100% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.4—0.4 100% 1.7—2.3 74% 1.3—2.0 65%

5 Adebayo HEA 6.3—11.1 57% 0.2—0.5 40% 1.2—1.9 63% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.4—0.9 44% 0.7—1.2 58% 0.3—0.8 38% 0.5—1.0 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.4—0.7 57% 1.5—2.1 71% 0.6—0.9 67%

6 Whiteside TB 6.9—11.1 62% 0.1—0.1 100% 1.5—2.4 63% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.8—1.7 47% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.1 100% 1.5—1.9 79% 1.9—2.8 68%

7 Capela ROC 6.3—10.0 63% 0 —0.1 0% 1.1—1.6 69% — 0.3—0.6 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.8—1.2 67% 2.7—3.8 71% 1.0—2.1 48%

8 Kanter CEL 3.5—6.1 57% — 0.3—0.4 75% 0 —0.1 0% 0.8—1.5 53% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.3 33% — — 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.2 100% 0.8—1.1 73% 1.1—2.1 52%

9 Vucevic MAG 7.9—16.8 47% 0.1—0.1 100% 1.1—1.8 61% 1.0—2.4 42% 1.5—3.5 43% 0.2—0.3 67% 1.0—3.2 31% 0.4—0.6 67% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.4—0.8 50% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.9—1.4 64% 0.7—1.4 50%

10 Adams THU 4.5—7.7 58% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.9—1.3 69% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.8—1.8 44% 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.2—0.4 50% 1.1—1.6 69% 0.7—1.5 47%

11 Horford 76E 4.8—10.9 44% — 0.2—0.3 67% 0.6—1.5 40% 1.0—2.2 45% 0.3—0.6 50% 1.1—3.2 34% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.4—0.5 80% 0.3—0.5 60%

12 Zubac CLI 3.1—5.2 60% — 0.8—1.2 67% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.3 33% — 0.1—0.2 50% — — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.8—1.2 67% 0.8—1.6 50%

13 Lopez BUC 4.0—9.4 43% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.9—1.6 56% 0.2—0.3 67% 1.0—3.5 29% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.2—0.3 67%

14 Drummond CAV 7.3—13.8 53% 0 —0.1 0% 1.0—1.8 56% 0 —0.1 0% 1.5—2.8 54% 0.6—1.4 43% 0.1—0.6 17% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.6—0.8 75% 1.3—2.0 65% 1.6—2.9 55%

15 Valanciunas GRI 6.2—10.6 58% 0 —0.1 0% 0.9—1.3 69% 0.1—0.3 33% 1.4—2.4 58% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.5—1.2 42% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.2—0.3 67% 1.1—1.5 73% 1.4—2.1 67%

16 Gasol RAP 2.8—6.6 42% — 0.3—0.4 75% 0.2—1.0 20% 0.4—0.9 44% 0.1—0.1 100% 1.1—2.8 39% 0 —0.2 0% — 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.1—0.2 50%

17 Jordan NET 3.4—5.1 67% — 0.8—1.1 73% — 0.2—0.2 100% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100% 1.2—1.6 75% 0.7—1.4 50%

18 Hartenstein ROC 1.9—3.0 63% — 0.5—0.7 71% — — — 0 —0.2 0% — — — 0.1—0.2 50% 1.0—1.2 83% 0.4—0.6 67%

19 Plumlee NUG 2.9—4.8 60% — 0.7—0.9 78% 0 —0.1 0% 0.4—0.9 44% 0.1—0.3 33% 0 —0.2 0% 0.1—0.2 50% — 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.6—0.8 75% 0.6—0.8 75%

20 Allen NET 4.2—6.5 65% 0.1—0.1 100% 1.4—2.0 70% — 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.3 67% 1.4—2.0 70% 0.8—1.4 57%

21 Chandler ROC 0.5—0.7 71% — 0.1—0.2 50% — — — — — — — — 0.2—0.2 100% 0.1—0.1 100%

22 Howard LAK 3.1—4.2 74% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.3—0.4 75% — 0.2—0.2 100% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.2 100% 0.2—0.2 100% 1.0—1.4 71% 1.0—1.4 71%

23 Bradley JAZ 2.1—3.1 68% — 0.6—0.9 67% — 0.1—0.2 50% — 0 —0.1 0% — — — 0.2—0.2 100% 0.5—0.7 71% 0.6—1.0 60%

24 Lopez BUC 2.3—4.6 50% — 0.4—0.5 80% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.7—1.3 54% — 0.5—1.4 36% 0.1—0.1 100% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.2—0.5 40%

25 Marjanovic MAV 2.7—4.8 56% — 0.5—0.6 83% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.7—1.5 47% 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.5 40% — — — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.9—1.2 75%

26 Poeltl SPU 2.3—3.7 62% — 0.4—0.6 67% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.3 33% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.3 67% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.9—1.1 82% 0.4—0.8 50%

27 Cauley-Stein MAV 3.3—5.6 59% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.8—1.0 80% 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.4 25% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.3—0.4 75% 1.1—1.4 79% 0.3—0.5 60%

28 McGee LAK 3.0—4.6 65% — 0.4—0.6 67% — 0.1—0.4 25% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.3—0.4 75% 1.1—1.5 73% 0.5—0.9 56%

29 Fall CEL 1.5—2.0 75% — 0.8—0.8 100% — 0.3—0.7 43% — — — — — — 0.3—0.5 60% —

30 Thompson CAV 5.1—9.9 52% 0 —0.1 0% 0.8—1.4 57% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.7—1.4 50% 0.4—1.1 36% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.4—0.5 80% 1.0—1.7 59% 1.1—2.0 55%

31 Hernangomez HOR 2.4—4.6 52% — 0.4—0.6 67% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.3—0.9 33% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.1—0.3 33% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.6—0.8 75% 0.6—0.9 67%

32 Corness Olynyk HEA 2.6—5.4 48% 0 —0.2 0% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.8—1.8 44% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.1—0.3 33%

33 Bryant WIZ 4.8—8.2 59% 0 —0.1 0% 1.0—1.4 71% 0.4—1.0 40% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.8—1.7 47% 0.2—0.2 100% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.4—0.5 80% 0.8—1.1 73% 0.7—1.1 64%

34 Dieng GRI 2.7—5.9 46% — 0.3—0.5 60% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.7—1.8 39% 0.3—0.5 60% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.3—0.5 60%

35 Bitadze PAC 1.2—2.6 46% 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.2 100% 0.2—0.6 33% 0 —0.1 0% — 0.2—0.8 25% — — — — 0.4—0.5 80% 0.1—0.2 50%

36 Okafor PEL 3.1—5.1 61% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.6—0.9 67% — 0.5—1.2 42% 0.3—0.5 60% — 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.4—0.6 67% 0.4—0.7 57%

37 Robinson KNI 4.1—5.6 73% 0.1—0.1 100% 1.2—1.4 86% — 0 —0.1 0% — — — — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.4—0.5 80% 1.1—1.4 79% 1.3—2.1 62%

38 Poirier CEL 0.8—1.6 50% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.3 33% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100% — — 0.2—0.2 100% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.3 33%

39 Zizic CAV 1.9—3.3 58% 0 —0.1 0% 0.3—0.6 50% — 0.2—0.7 29% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.2 100% 0.6—0.9 67% 0.4—0.5 80%

40 Biyombo HOR 2.9—5.3 55% 0 —0.1 0% 0.6—1.1 55% 0 —0.1 0% 0.3—0.5 60% — 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.3 67% 1.1—1.8 61% 0.4—0.9 44%

41 Birch MAG 1.4—2.9 48% — 0.3—0.5 60% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.5—1.1 45% 0.4—0.7 57%

42 Len KIN 3.4—6.2 55% — 0.7—1.0 70% 0 —0.2 0% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.3—1.1 27% 0.2—0.4 50% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.3 67% 1.0—1.4 71% 0.6—1.1 55%

43 Patton THU 0.8—2.0 40% — 0.2—0.2 100% — 0 —0.2 0% — 0.2—1.0 20% 0 —0.2 0% — — — 0.4—0.4 100% —

44 Brown TB 0.4—1.1 36% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100% — 0.1—0.2 50% — — — — 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50%

45 Mahinmi WIZ 2.7—5.5 49% — 0.3—0.7 43% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.4 50% 0 —0.2 0% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.1—0.3 33% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.8—1.6 50% 0.7—1.3 54%

46 Dedmon HAW 2.3—5.8 40% — 0.5—0.9 56% 0.2—0.8 25% 0.1—0.3 33% — 0.4—1.8 22% 0 —0.1 0% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.4—0.8 50%

47 Pasecniks WIZ 2.4—4.6 52% — 0.5—0.8 63% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.3—0.4 75% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.4 0% 0.1—0.2 50% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.7—1.0 70% 0.6—1.0 60%

32

Page 33: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0F G P L A Y T Y P E S . C E N T E R S

CentersField goals Pick`n`rolls Handler Pick`n`rolls Roller Pick`n`pops Post ups Isolations Catch and shoots Catch and drives Screen off Hand off Transitions Cuts Putbacks

48 Jones HAW 2.4—3.5 69% 0—0.1 0% 1.0—1.2 83% 0—0.1 0% 0—0.2 0% — 0.1—0.2 50% 0—0.1 0% — — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.6—0.9 67% 0.4—0.6 67%

49 Bolden CAV — — — — — — — — — — — — —

33

Page 34: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0F G P L A Y T Y P E S . F O R W A R D S

ForwardsField goals Pick`n`rolls Handler Pick`n`rolls Roller Pick`n`pops Post ups Isolations Catch and shoots Catch and drives Screen off Hand off Transitions Cuts Putbacks

1 Antetokounmpo BUC 10.9 —20.0 55% 0.5—1.0 50% 0.7—1.0 70% 0.1—0.3 33% 1.4—2.6 54% 2.2—4.6 48% 0.4—1.0 40% 0.8—1.4 57% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.3—0.6 50% 2.2—3.5 63% 0.8—1.2 67% 1.1—1.5 73%

2 James LAK 9.7 —19.5 50% 2.3—5.0 46% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0% 1.2—2.2 55% 2.0—4.8 42% 0.6—1.4 43% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.4—0.8 50% 0.2—0.8 25% 1.8—2.6 69% 0.4—0.5 80% 0.4—0.6 67%

3 Leonard CLI 9.3 —19.8 47% 2.6—5.7 46% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 1.0—2.0 50% 1.7—3.8 45% 0.9—2.4 38% 0.6—1.0 60% 0.4—1.0 40% 0.3—0.9 33% 1.0—1.8 56% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.2—0.4 50%

4 Middleton BUC 7.7 —15.5 50% 1.8—3.7 49% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 1.0—1.8 56% 0.9—2.5 36% 1.0—2.1 48% 0.6—0.8 75% 0.5—1.0 50% 0.6—0.9 67% 0.9—1.7 53% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.2—0.3 67%

5 Davis LAK 9.1 —17.8 51% 0.1—0.5 20% 0.7—1.0 70% 0.5—1.0 50% 1.5—3.2 47% 1.2—2.5 48% 1.0—2.6 38% 0.4—0.8 50% 0.4—1.1 36% 0.2—0.4 50% 1.0—1.6 63% 1.0—1.2 83% 0.9—1.5 60%

6 Doncic MAV 9.5 —20.5 46% 3.8—7.9 48% — — 0.4—0.9 44% 2.7—5.9 46% 0.3—1.0 30% 0.4—0.8 50% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.5—0.9 56% 0.6—1.3 46% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.4—0.6 67%

7 Siakam RAP 8.7 —18.9 46% 0.9—2.3 39% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.2—0.5 40% 1.5—3.2 47% 1.3—3.7 35% 1.0—2.5 40% 0.4—1.1 36% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.2—0.6 33% 1.9—2.9 66% 0.5—0.6 83% 0.3—0.6 50%

8 Tatum CEL 8.5 —18.9 45% 2.0—4.4 45% — 0.2—0.3 67% 0.5—1.2 42% 1.6—3.9 41% 0.9—2.1 43% 0.8—1.7 47% 0.5—1.2 42% 0.4—1.0 40% 1.1—1.9 58% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.2—0.6 33%

9 Sabonis PAC 7.4 —13.7 54% — 1.7—2.5 68% 0.9—1.9 47% 1.5—2.8 54% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.5—1.3 38% 0.3—0.5 60% 0 —0.1 0% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.8—1.3 62% 1.0—1.7 59%

10 Harrell CLI 7.5 —12.8 59% 0.3—0.4 75% 1.3—1.7 76% 0.1—0.3 33% 1.2—2.4 50% 0.8—1.8 44% 0 —0.1 0% 0.3—0.8 38% 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.1 0% 0.9—1.4 64% 1.3—1.7 76% 1.1—1.8 61%

11 Williamson PEL 9.1 —15.4 59% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.8—1.2 67% 0 —0.2 0% 1.5—2.7 56% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.2—0.7 29% 1.0—2.4 42% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.2 50% 1.8—2.6 69% 2.0—2.5 80% 1.1—1.8 61%

12 Simmons 76E 6.7 —11.5 58% 0.7—1.4 50% 0.2—0.4 50% 0 —0.1 0% 0.6—1.4 43% 0.7—1.3 54% 0 —0.1 0% 0.5—0.8 63% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 1.7—2.8 61% 1.5—2.0 75% 0.4—0.8 50%

13 Butler HEA 6.1 —13.4 46% 1.6—4.4 36% 0.1—0.2 50% — 0.6—1.2 50% 0.8—2.1 38% 0.2—0.7 29% 0.5—0.9 56% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.9—1.2 75% 0.6—0.9 67% 0.2—0.5 40%

14 Hayward CEL 6.8 —13.5 50% 1.6—3.4 47% — 0 —0.2 0% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.6—1.2 50% 0.9—2.2 41% 0.6—1.0 60% 0.6—1.2 50% 0.5—1.0 50% 0.9—1.4 64% 0.6—0.8 75% 0.3—0.5 60%

15 Mitchell JAZ 8.9 —19.6 45% 3.9—8.6 45% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 1.2—3.3 36% 0.8—1.8 44% 0.8—1.4 57% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.7—1.4 50% 0.7—1.5 47% 0.2—0.2 100% 0.2—0.3 67%

16 Brown CEL 7.6 —15.5 49% 0.9—2.0 45% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.4—0.8 50% 0.9—2.2 41% 1.2—3.0 40% 1.0—1.8 56% 0.4—0.8 50% 0.2—0.7 29% 1.5—2.4 63% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.4—0.7 57%

17 Ibaka RAP 6.5 —12.4 52% 0 —0.1 0% 1.0—1.6 63% 0.8—1.8 44% 0.4—1.0 40% 0.1—0.3 33% 1.1—3.0 37% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.4—0.6 67% 1.1—1.6 69% 0.8—1.2 67%

18 Harris 76E 7.6 —16.1 47% 1.2—2.8 43% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.9—1.8 50% 0.8—2.0 40% 1.0—2.6 38% 0.7—1.3 54% 0.5—1.2 42% 0.5—1.3 38% 1.0—1.6 63% 0.5—0.7 71% 0.3—0.6 50%

19 George CLI 7.0 —16.1 43% 1.9—4.3 44% — — 0.3—0.7 43% 0.9—2.5 36% 0.9—2.4 38% 0.2—0.5 40% 1.1—2.6 42% 0.5—0.9 56% 0.8—1.5 53% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.2 50%

20 Aldridge SPU 7.4 —14.9 50% 0 —0.1 0% 0.3—0.3 100% 1.3—3.0 43% 1.9—4.3 44% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.9—2.5 36% 0.3—0.8 38% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.6—0.9 67% 0.8—1.3 62%

21 Ingram PEL 8.4 —17.9 47% 1.4—3.2 44% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.4—0.9 44% 1.5—3.2 47% 1.5—3.6 42% 0.6—1.2 50% 0.5—1.3 38% 0.5—1.0 50% 1.2—2.1 57% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.2—0.3 67%

22 Gallinari THU 6.0 —13.6 44% 0.6—1.2 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.5—1.0 50% 0.6—1.4 43% 0.6—1.8 33% 1.9—4.5 42% 0.4—0.8 50% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.3—0.3 100% 0.1—0.3 33%

23 Theis CEL 3.7 —6.6 56% 0 —0.1 0% 0.8—1.3 62% 0.3—0.5 60% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.5—1.2 42% 0.1—0.1 100% — 0.1—0.2 50% 0.4—0.4 100% 0.9—1.5 60% 0.6—1.0 60%

24 Bogdanovic JAZ 6.6 —14.8 45% 0.9—2.3 39% — 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.7—1.8 39% 1.4—3.5 40% 0.5—1.1 45% 1.1—2.1 52% 0.4—0.9 44% 1.0—1.7 59% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.2 50%

25 Barton NUG 5.8 —13.0 45% 1.5—3.5 43% — — 0 —0.1 0% 0.6—1.7 35% 1.0—2.3 43% 0.3—0.6 50% 0 —0.2 0% 0.4—0.9 44% 1.0—2.1 48% 0.5—0.6 83% 0.4—0.8 50%

26 Ayton SUN 8.5 —15.5 55% 0 —0.1 0% 1.7—2.5 68% 0.2—0.6 33% 1.8—3.7 49% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.6—1.7 35% 0.2—0.2 100% 0.2—0.3 67% 0 —0.1 0% 0.7—0.9 78% 1.5—2.3 65% 1.4—2.5 56%

27 Warren PAC 7.5 —14.3 52% 1.1—2.4 46% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.5—1.1 45% 1.0—2.4 42% 0.8—1.5 53% 0.7—1.3 54% 0.5—0.8 63% 1.4—2.2 64% 0.8—1.1 73% 0.5—0.7 71%

28 Porzingis MAV 6.7 —15.9 42% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.8—1.8 44% 0.7—2.0 35% 0.3—1.1 27% 1.7—4.3 40% 0.5—1.4 36% 0.4—1.3 31% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.7—0.9 78% 0.7—1.1 64%

29 Hollis-Jefferson RAP 2.7 —5.7 47% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.4 50% 0 —0.1 0% 0.4—0.6 67% 0.1—0.4 25% 0 —0.3 0% 0.2—0.5 40% — — 0.4—0.8 50% 0.9—1.5 60% 0.4—1.0 40%

30 Anderson ROC 1.0 —3.5 29% — — 0 —0.5 0% — — 0.5—2.0 25% 0.5—1.0 50% — — — — —

31 Davis RAP 2.8 —6.1 46% 0.3—0.8 38% — — — 0.2—0.3 67% 0.9—2.1 43% 0 —0.2 0% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.6—1.1 55% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.3—0.4 75%

32 Holmes KIN 5.4 —8.3 65% 0 —0.1 0% 1.3—1.7 76% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.3—0.4 75% 0 —0.1 0% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.1—0.5 20% 0.1—0.1 100% — 0.3—0.4 75% 1.6—2.2 73% 1.2—1.9 63%

33 Winslow HEA 4.6 —11.6 40% 0.9—2.6 35% 0 —0.1 0% — 0.4—0.6 67% 0.3—1.0 30% 0.4—1.8 22% 0.5—1.5 33% 0.1—0.5 20% 0.6—0.9 67% 0.5—1.0 50% 0.7—1.0 70% 0.4—0.6 67%

34 Anunoby RAP 4.2 —8.3 51% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.1 100% — 0.2—0.5 40% 0.1—0.3 33% 1.1—2.7 41% 0.5—1.0 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 1.0—1.5 67% 0.5—0.7 71% 0.3—0.4 75%

35 Ilyasova BUC 2.4 —5.2 46% 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.2 50% — 0.6—1.5 40% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.5—0.7 71% 0.3—0.5 60%

36 Millsap NUG 4.3 —8.8 49% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.4—1.0 40% 0.4—1.1 36% 0.8—1.8 44% 0.4—0.8 50% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.9—1.2 75% 0.5—0.8 63%

37 Ingles JAZ 3.4 —7.7 44% 1.3—3.1 42% — 0 —0.1 0% — 0.3—0.8 38% 0.6—1.6 38% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.3—0.5 60% — —

38 LeVert NET 6.5 —15.6 42% 2.3—5.7 40% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.3 33% 1.2—3.7 32% 0.7—1.7 41% 0.3—0.9 33% 0 —0.2 0% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.8—1.4 57% 0.4—0.6 67% 0.3—0.5 60%

39 Boucher RAP 2.2 —4.7 47% — 0.4—0.6 67% 0.2—0.6 33% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.3—1.1 27% 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.2 0% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.3—0.3 100% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.5—1.0 50%

40 Williams III CEL 1.8 —2.6 69% 0 —0.1 0% 0.6—0.8 75% — — — 0 —0.1 0% — — — 0.1—0.2 50% 0.6—0.7 86% 0.4—0.7 57%

41 Hernandez RAP 0.3 —1.3 23% — 0 —0.3 0% 0 —0.3 0% — 0 —0.3 0% — — — — 0.3—0.3 100% — 0 —0.3 0%

42 Cancar NUG 0.4 —1.1 36% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100% — 0 —0.1 0% — 0 —0.1 0%

43 Favors PEL 4.2 —6.7 63% 0 —0.1 0% 0.9—1.3 69% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.2 100% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.5 20% 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.3—0.4 75% 1.3—2.0 65% 1.0—1.6 63%

44 Collins HAW 8.6 —14.8 58% 0.2—0.2 100% 1.5—2.3 65% 0.5—1.1 45% 0.6—1.1 55% 0.3—0.6 50% 1.1—2.7 41% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.4—0.7 57% 1.0—1.5 67% 1.3—1.9 68% 1.1—1.7 65%

45 Anthony TB 5.5 —13.0 42% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.4—1.0 40% 1.3—3.0 43% 1.0—2.4 42% 1.1—2.6 42% 0.4—0.9 44% 0 —0.2 0% 0 —0.2 0% 0.5—0.8 63% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.3—0.7 43%

46 Brissett RAP 0.6 —1.8 33% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% — — 0 —0.2 0% 0.1—0.6 17% 0 —0.3 0% — — 0.2—0.3 67% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.2—0.2 100%

47 Antetokounmpo BUC 1.1 —2.0 55% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.1 100% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.3 0% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.3—0.3 100% 0.2—0.2 100%

34

Page 35: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0F G P L A Y T Y P E S . F O R W A R D S

ForwardsField goals Pick`n`rolls Handler Pick`n`rolls Roller Pick`n`pops Post ups Isolations Catch and shoots Catch and drives Screen off Hand off Transitions Cuts Putbacks

48 Roby THU 0 —0.3 0% — — — — — — — — 0 —0.3 0% — — —

49 Paschall WAR 5.3—10.7 50% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.7—1.2 58% 0.9—1.7 53% 0.6—1.9 32% 0.8—1.5 53% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.5—0.9 56% 0.7—0.9 78% 0.4—0.6 67%

50 Chriss WAR 3.6—6.5 55% 0 —0.1 0% 0.6—1.0 60% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.3—0.7 43% 0 —0.2 0% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.5—0.7 71% 0.9—1.1 82% 0.6—1.3 46%

51 Jr. NUG 2.9—5.9 49% 0 —0.2 0% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.5 20% 0.7—1.3 54% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.4—0.6 67% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.5—0.8 63% 0.4—0.5 80% 0.4—0.8 50%

52 Noel THU 3.2—4.7 68% — 0.9—1.1 82% 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.1—0.2 50% — 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.2 100% 1.2—1.6 75% 0.4—0.7 57%

53 Gordon MAG 5.4—12.5 43% 0.4—1.5 27% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0% 0.8—1.8 44% 0.5—1.3 38% 0.7—2.0 35% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.3—0.9 33% 0.8—1.5 53% 0.7—0.8 88% 0.6—1.1 55%

54 Randle KNI 7.2—15.7 46% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.4—0.5 80% 0.3—0.7 43% 1.2—2.3 52% 1.3—3.2 41% 0.8—2.7 30% 0.6—1.3 46% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.6—1.2 50% 0.7—1.0 70% 0.7—1.3 54%

55 Wilson BUC 1.3—3.3 39% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.3 33% 0 —0.2 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.4—1.2 33% 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.2 50%

56 Grant NUG 4.1—8.7 47% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.2—0.6 33% 1.1—2.7 41% 0.4—1.0 40% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.6—0.8 75% 0.2—0.3 67%

57 Johnson RAP 0.5—1.6 31% 0.1—0.1 100% — — 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.7 29% 0 —0.2 0% — — 0.1—0.3 33% — 0.1—0.1 100%

58 Labissiere TB 2.5—4.4 57% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.5—0.7 71% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.3—0.6 50% — 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.5—0.7 71% 0.4—0.9 44%

59 Robinson HEA 4.4—9.5 46% 0.1—0.2 50% — 0 —0.1 0% — 0.1—0.1 100% 1.5—3.3 45% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.8—2.0 40% 1.1—2.1 52% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.3—0.3 100% —

60 Metu SPU 1.3—2.2 59% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.3 33% — 0.1—0.1 100% — 0.3—0.3 100% 0.2—0.4 50% — — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.3—0.3 100% 0.3—0.4 75%

61 Ellenson NET 0.2—1.4 14% — 0 —0.2 0% 0 —0.2 0% — — 0 —0.6 0% — — — — — 0.2—0.4 50%

62 Green CLI 2.3—5.5 42% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.2—0.3 67% — 0.9—2.6 35% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.4—0.6 67%

63 Miller RAP 0.3—1.0 30% — — — — — 0.2—0.6 33% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100% — — — —

64 Kuzma LAK 4.7—10.9 43% 0.4—1.1 36% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.4—1.3 31% 0.9—2.5 36% 0.8—1.3 62% 0.2—0.9 22% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.6—1.3 46% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.3—0.5 60%

65 Williams CEL 1.3—3.1 42% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.3 67% 0 —0.2 0% 0.3—1.1 27% 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.3—0.5 60%

66 Powell MAV 3.7—5.8 64% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.9—1.1 82% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.9 22% 0.4—0.6 67% — 0.2—0.3 67% 0.2—0.2 100% 1.1—1.4 79% 0.4—0.6 67%

67 Scott 76E 2.1—5.1 41% — — 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.3 33% 0 —0.1 0% 0.9—2.4 38% 0.2—0.2 100% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.2—0.4 50%

68 Turner PAC 4.2—9.4 45% 0 —0.1 0% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.6—1.9 32% 0.8—1.5 53% 0.1—0.2 50% 1.1—2.9 38% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.4—0.6 67%

69 Clarke GRI 5.1—8.1 63% 0 —0.1 0% 1.2—1.7 71% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.5—1.2 42% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.8—1.0 80% 0.9—1.2 75% 0.6—1.1 55%

70 Wood PIS 4.7—8.2 57% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.7—1.0 70% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.2—0.7 29% 0.7—1.6 44% 0.5—0.7 71% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.7—1.0 70% 0.5—0.7 71% 0.6—0.9 67%

71 House ROC 3.6—8.3 43% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.4 25% — 0.2—0.6 33% 1.3—3.7 35% 0.4—0.8 50% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.7—1.2 58% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.1—0.2 50%

72 Morgan JAZ 0.6—1.1 55% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.1 100% — — — 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.3 33%

73 McDermott PAC 3.9—7.9 49% 0.1—0.3 33% — — — — 0.9—1.9 47% 0.2—0.4 50% 1.1—2.2 50% 0.7—1.7 41% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.5—0.6 83% 0.2—0.2 100%

74 Sefolosha ROC 0.9—2.2 41% 0 —0.1 0% — 0.1—0.2 50% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.9 22% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.2 100% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.2 50%

75 Reid TIM 3.3—8.1 41% — 0.6—1.0 60% 0.2—1.0 20% 0.3—0.8 38% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.7—1.9 37% 0.2—0.5 40% — 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.5—0.8 63% 0.3—0.7 43%

76 Isaac MAG 4.7—10.1 47% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.7—2.3 30% 0.6—1.4 43% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.7—1.0 70% 0.5—0.8 63% 0.7—1.4 50%

77 Griffin PIS 4.9—13.8 36% 0.8—2.2 36% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.7 29% 0.8—2.1 38% 1.0—2.6 38% 0.2—1.6 13% 0.2—0.9 22% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.4—1.0 40% 0.6—1.1 55% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.2—0.6 33%

78 Bagley III KIN 6.0—12.9 47% 0.1—0.1 100% 1.0—1.6 63% 0.4—0.6 67% 0.5—1.6 31% 0.5—1.6 31% 0.3—1.7 18% 0.5—1.3 38% 0 —0.2 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.8—0.9 89% 0.8—1.3 62% 1.1—1.5 73%

79 Gay SPU 3.7—8.4 44% 0.4—0.8 50% — 0.2—0.4 50% 0.3—0.8 38% 0.4—1.0 40% 0.7—2.4 29% 0.7—1.2 58% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.4 50%

80 Patterson CLI 1.5—3.7 41% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.4 25% 0 —0.1 0% — 0.8—2.0 40% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.2 50%

81 Green ROC 2.9—6.5 45% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.9—2.5 36% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.4—0.5 80% 0.2—0.3 67%

82 Johnson SPU 1.8—3.4 53% 0.2—0.3 67% — — — 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.2—0.8 25% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.6—0.7 86% 0 —0.2 0% 0.2—0.3 67%

83 Hervey THU 0.1—1.6 6% — — 0 —0.1 0% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.7 0% — — 0 —0.6 0% — — —

84 Kabengele CLI 1.2—2.7 44% 0 —0.1 0% 0.3—0.3 100% 0.1—0.2 50% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.5—1.2 42% 0 —0.3 0% 0 —0.1 0% — 0.3—0.3 100% 0 —0.1 0% —

85 Green WAR 2.9—7.3 40% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.2—0.7 29% 0.8—2.7 30% 0.3—0.8 38% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.4—0.6 67% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.1—0.2 50%

86 Jones Jr HEA 3.3—6.3 52% 0 —0.2 0% 0.3—0.3 100% — 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0.5—2.0 25% 0.2—0.3 67% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.8—1.2 67% 0.9—1.2 75% 0.3—0.5 60%

87 Carroll ROC 1.0—2.6 38% 0.1—0.1 100% — — 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.3—0.9 33% 0.2—0.4 50% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0.3—0.5 60% — 0 —0.1 0%

88 Niang JAZ 2.1—4.6 46% 0.1—0.2 50% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 1.0—2.3 43% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.3—0.6 50% — 0.1—0.1 100%

89 Tucker ROC 2.5—5.9 42% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.3 33% — 0 —0.1 0% 1.3—3.4 38% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.2—0.3 67%

90 Muscala THU 1.6—3.9 41% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.2 100% 0.4—1.3 31% 0 —0.1 0% — 0.6—1.6 38% 0 —0.1 0% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.1 100%

91 Bender WAR 2.6—5.8 45% — 0.3—0.6 50% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.5—1.6 31% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.6—0.8 75% 0.1—0.5 20%

92 Spellman WAR 2.6—6.0 43% — 0.1—0.3 33% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.7—2.0 35% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.4—0.9 44%

93 Barnes KIN 5.1—11.1 46% 0.4—0.9 44% 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.8—1.7 47% 0.4—1.0 40% 1.0—2.5 40% 0.8—1.6 50% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.5—0.9 56% 0.5—0.7 71% 0.2—0.3 67%

94 Johnson PAC 0.5—1.2 42% — — — 0 —0.2 0% 0.1—0.2 50% — 0 —0.1 0% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.2 100% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.2 50%

35

Page 36: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0F G P L A Y T Y P E S . F O R W A R D S

ForwardsField goals Pick`n`rolls Handler Pick`n`rolls Roller Pick`n`pops Post ups Isolations Catch and shoots Catch and drives Screen off Hand off Transitions Cuts Putbacks

95 Hayes PEL 2.8—4.2 67% — 0.7—1.1 64% — 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100% — — 0.2—0.2 100% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.9—1.1 82% 0.5—0.9 56%

96 Morris CLI 5.9—13.7 43% 1.0—2.4 42% — 0.1—0.2 50% 0.4—1.1 36% 1.0—2.2 45% 1.3—2.8 46% 0.3—1.2 25% 0.5—1.2 42% 0.6—1.2 50% 0.4—0.8 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.4 50%

97 Love CAV 5.8—13.0 45% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.6—1.3 46% 0.8—1.9 42% 0.6—1.1 55% 1.6—3.6 44% 0.3—0.8 38% 0.4—1.1 36% 0.4—1.0 40% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.2—0.4 50%

98 Leaf PAC 1.2—2.8 43% — 0.2—0.2 100% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.3 67% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.1 0% — 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.6 33%

99 Bamba MAG 2.2—4.7 47% 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.3—0.9 33% 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.1 0% 0.4—1.0 40% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0.5—0.7 71% 0.7—1.0 70%

100 Covington ROC 4.5—10.4 43% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.2 50% — 0.1—0.4 25% 1.7—4.8 35% 0.7—1.3 54% 0.2—0.7 29% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.7—1.2 58% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.2—0.3 67%

101 Johnson TIM 3.2—6.7 48% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.4—1.0 40% 0.6—1.6 38% 0.3—0.7 43% 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.2 100% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.2—0.4 50%

102 Zeller HOR 4.3—8.3 52% 0 —0.1 0% 0.8—1.1 73% 0.2—0.7 29% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.2—0.8 25% 0.3—0.8 38% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.4—0.5 80% 1.0—1.5 67% 0.8—1.4 57%

103 Jackson GRI 6.1—13.0 47% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.4—0.8 50% 0.7—1.5 47% 0.5—1.4 36% 1.6—3.5 46% 0.4—0.8 50% 0.4—0.9 44% 0.4—0.9 44% 0.5—0.8 63% 0.5—0.8 63% 0.3—0.4 75%

104 Nader THU 2.1—4.6 46% 0.1—0.4 25% — 0.1—0.1 100% — 0 —0.2 0% 0.5—1.6 31% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.2—0.2 100% 0.1—0.1 100%

105 Ojeleye CEL 1.1—2.6 42% 0.1—0.1 100% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.2 0% 0.5—1.3 38% 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.1 100%

106 Sampson PAC 1.9—3.2 59% — — 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.2 0% — 0.1—0.6 17% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.1—0.1 100% — 0.3—0.5 60% 0.7—0.8 88% 0.2—0.3 67%

107 Vanderbilt TIM 0.5—0.7 71% — 0.1—0.2 50% — — — 0 —0.1 0% — — — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.2 100% 0.1—0.2 50%

108 Craig NUG 1.9—4.1 46% — — — — 0 —0.1 0% 0.7—1.9 37% 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0.4—0.6 67% 0.4—0.5 80% 0.2—0.4 50%

109 Motley CLI 0.9—1.2 75% — 0.2—0.2 100% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.2 100% 0.1—0.2 50%

110 O'Neale JAZ 2.2—5.0 44% 0 —0.1 0% — 0 —0.1 0% — 0.1—0.2 50% 1.0—2.5 40% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.5—0.9 56% 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.1 0%

111 Bjelica KIN 4.5—9.4 48% 0.1—0.3 33% — 0.4—0.8 50% 0.4—0.8 50% 0.3—0.5 60% 1.1—2.5 44% 0.4—1.0 40% 0.3—1.0 30% 0 —0.2 0% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.5—0.6 83% 0.6—1.1 55%

112 Nance Jr. CAV 4.1—7.7 53% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.9—2.3 39% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.5—0.6 83% 0.6—0.9 67% 0.7—1.1 64%

113 Oubre Jr. SUN 6.7—14.7 46% 1.0—2.1 48% — — 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.7 29% 1.4—3.8 37% 0.6—1.2 50% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.6—1.4 43% 1.3—2.4 54% 0.7—1.3 54% 0.5—0.8 63%

114 Ennis MAG 2.1—4.8 44% 0.1—0.2 50% — — — 0.1—0.2 50% 0.5—1.5 33% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.5—0.9 56% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.3—0.5 60%

115 Lyles SPU 2.4—5.4 44% 0.1—0.1 100% — 0.1—0.4 25% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0.9—2.2 41% 0.6—1.1 55% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.3—0.5 60%

116 O'Quinn 76E 1.4—2.8 50% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.4 25% 0 —0.2 0% 0.2—0.2 100% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.4—0.5 80% 0.2—0.4 50%

117 Finney-Smith MAV 3.3—7.1 46% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.3 33% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.3 33% 1.2—3.1 39% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.5—0.8 63% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.4—0.8 50%

118 Ross MAG 5.0—12.3 41% 0.9—2.4 38% — — — 0.2—0.8 25% 0.9—2.4 38% 0.2—0.5 40% 1.3—3.3 39% 0.5—1.1 45% 0.6—1.2 50% 0.3—0.3 100% 0 —0.1 0%

119 Vonleh NUG 1.5—2.7 56% — 0.2—0.4 50% 0 —0.2 0% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.2—0.2 100% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.2—0.2 100% — 0.1—0.1 100% — 0.3—0.4 75% 0.2—0.3 67%

120 Lee WAR 4.1—10.4 39% 0.2—0.7 29% — — — 0 —0.1 0% 0.8—1.9 42% 0.7—1.6 44% 0.7—2.3 30% 0.3—1.1 27% 0.5—1.2 42% 0.5—0.9 56% 0.3—0.4 75%

121 Brantley JAZ — — — — — — — — — — — — —

122 Carter BUL 4.3—8.0 54% — 0.7—1.3 54% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.5—1.1 45% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.3—1.0 30% 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.4—0.5 80% 0.9—1.5 60% 0.8—1.3 62%

123 Leonard HEA 2.4—4.6 52% — 0.2—0.3 67% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.7—1.8 39% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.5—0.7 71% 0.1—0.1 100%

124 Kleber MAV 3.2—7.1 45% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.6—0.8 75% 0.4—0.9 44% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100% 1.2—3.1 39% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.2 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.2—0.5 40%

125 Brooks GRI 5.7—14.2 40% 1.1—2.8 39% — — 0.1—0.3 33% 0.5—1.5 33% 1.0—2.5 40% 0.7—1.4 50% 0.5—1.2 42% 0.8—2.0 40% 0.7—1.8 39% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.4 50%

126 Jackson GRI 3.8—8.6 44% 0.4—0.9 44% — — 0 —0.1 0% 0.3—0.8 38% 0.9—2.4 38% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.7 14% 1.1—1.5 73% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.2—0.5 40%

127 Bell GRI 1.2—2.3 52% — 0.1—0.3 33% 0 —0.1 0% — 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.2—0.2 100% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.4—0.5 80% 0.2—0.4 50%

128 Giles KIN 3.1—5.5 56% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.5—0.6 83% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.3—0.8 38% 0.1—0.2 50% — 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.9—1.3 69% 0.3—0.5 60%

129 Samanic SPU 0 —4.0 0% — — — — — 0 —1.0 0% — — 0 —2.0 0% 0 —1.0 0% — —

130 Mika KIN 2.0—3.0 67% — 1.0—2.0 50% — — — — — — — — 1.0—1.0 100% —

131 Swanigan TB 1.0—1.7 59% — 0.2—0.3 67% 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.3 67% — 0 —0.1 0% — — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.2 100% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.3 33%

132 Morris LAK 3.7—8.2 45% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.6—1.2 50% 0.2—0.5 40% 1.2—3.1 39% 0.4—0.9 44% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.1—0.4 25%

133 Cook CAV 0.6—0.9 67% — 0.3—0.4 75% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0% — — — — 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100%

134 Parker KIN 6.0—12.1 50% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.5—0.8 63% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.6—2.5 24% 0.6—1.3 46% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.4—0.8 50% 1.0—1.5 67% 1.1—1.5 73% 0.8—1.2 67%

135 Prince NET 4.4—11.6 38% 0.4—1.0 40% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.4—1.2 33% 1.3—3.7 35% 0.8—1.8 44% 0.3—1.0 30% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.6—1.4 43% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.2 50%

136 Little TB 1.4—3.2 44% 0 —0.1 0% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.3—1.0 30% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.2—0.3 67%

137 Bazemore KIN 2.9—7.6 38% 0.4—1.5 27% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.8—2.4 33% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.5—1.1 45% 0.2—0.4 50% 0 —0.1 0%

138 Harkless KNI 2.3—4.6 50% 0.2—0.4 50% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.4—1.4 29% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0% 0.4—0.5 80% 0.6—0.8 75% 0.2—0.4 50%

139 Clark MAG 1.1—2.9 38% — — 0 —0.2 0% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.7—1.9 37% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100%

140 Ariza TB 2.7—6.1 44% 0.1—0.3 33% — 0 —0.1 0% — 0 —0.2 0% 0.9—2.6 35% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.7—1.3 54% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.2 100%

141 Dudley LAK 0.5—1.2 42% — — 0 —0.1 0% — — 0.4—0.8 50% 0 —0.2 0% — — 0 —0.2 0% — —

36

Page 37: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0F G P L A Y T Y P E S . F O R W A R D S

ForwardsField goals Pick`n`rolls Handler Pick`n`rolls Roller Pick`n`pops Post ups Isolations Catch and shoots Catch and drives Screen off Hand off Transitions Cuts Putbacks

142 Wagner WIZ 3.5—6.0 58% — 0.7—1.1 64% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.6—1.5 40% 0.2—0.3 67% 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.8—1.1 73% 0.4—0.6 67%

143 Kaminsky SUN 4.0—8.7 46% — 0.5—1.0 50% 0.4—0.9 44% 0.3—0.8 38% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.9—2.4 38% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.1—0.3 33% 0 —0.3 0% 0.6—0.9 67% 0.3—0.4 75%

144 Williams BUC 2.1—4.8 44% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.3—0.6 50% — 0.8—1.7 47% 0.1—0.4 25% 0 —0.3 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.2 50%

145 Smailagic WAR 1.4—2.9 48% — 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.3—0.4 75% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.2 100% 0.2—0.3 67%

146 Looney WAR 1.5—4.0 38% 0 —0.1 0% — 0.2—0.4 50% 0.2—0.4 50% 0 —0.2 0% 0.1—0.7 14% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.1 0% 0.4—0.6 67% 0.4—0.9 44%

147 Uthoff GRI 0.3—1.8 17% — — 0 —0.3 0% 0 —0.3 0% — 0 —0.8 0% — — — 0.3—0.5 60% — —

148 Broekhoff MAV 1.3—3.5 37% 0.2—0.2 100% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0.5—1.5 33% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.5 40% 0 —0.2 0% —

149 Davis JAZ 0.6—1.3 46% — 0.1—0.2 50% — 0 —0.1 0% — — — — — — 0 —0.5 0% 0.3—0.4 75%

150 Eubanks SPU 1.5—2.0 75% — 0.3—0.4 75% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.2 50% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100% — — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.5—0.6 83% 0.2—0.4 50%

151 Bertans WIZ 4.9—11.3 43% 0.1—0.3 33% — 0.2—0.4 50% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.3 0% 1.9—4.1 46% 0.3—0.8 38% 0.7—1.7 41% 0.3—0.8 38% 0.9—1.8 50% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.2—0.3 67%

152 Anderson GRI 2.3—4.8 48% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.3—0.8 38% 0.3—0.5 60% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.4—0.8 50% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.2—0.4 50%

153 Washington HOR 4.6—10.2 45% 0 —0.1 0% 0.6—0.9 67% 0.3—1.0 30% 0.5—1.2 42% 0.1—0.3 33% 1.1—2.8 39% 0.6—1.3 46% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.4—0.6 67% 0.5—0.9 56% 0.3—0.5 60%

154 Kurucs NET 1.5—3.4 44% 0 —0.2 0% — 0 —0.1 0% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.4—1.2 33% 0.3—0.5 60% — 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.4—0.5 80% 0.1—0.1 100%

155 Tolliver GRI 1.2—3.4 35% — 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.5 40% — — 0.5—1.7 29% 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0%

156 Layman TIM 3.6—7.8 46% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.1—0.1 100% — 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.5—1.5 33% 0.5—1.0 50% 0.5—1.0 50% 0.4—0.8 50% 0.7—1.0 70% 0.4—0.6 67% 0.1—0.3 33%

157 Baynes SUN 4.4—9.1 48% 0 —0.1 0% 0.6—0.9 67% 0.5—1.3 38% 0.5—0.9 56% 0 —0.1 0% 0.8—2.3 35% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.7—1.1 64% 0.6—1.2 50%

158 Martin HOR 2.0—4.7 43% 0.1—0.5 20% — 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.8—1.4 57% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.2—0.8 25% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.4 50%

159 Hachimura WIZ 5.3—11.1 48% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.3—1.0 30% 0.5—1.0 50% 0.5—1.8 28% 0.6—1.6 38% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.9—1.6 56% 1.0—1.4 71% 0.6—0.9 67%

160 Gabriel TB 0.7—1.6 44% — — 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.1—0.2 50% — 0 —0.1 0% — 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.2 50%

161 Henson PIS 2.4—4.2 57% — 0.6—0.8 75% 0 —0.2 0% 0.2—0.3 67% — 0.2—0.8 25% 0 —0.1 0% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.8—1.2 67% 0.5—0.6 83%

162 Caboclo ROC 1.2—2.9 41% — 0.2—0.4 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.2 50% — 0.2—0.9 22% 0.1—0.2 50% — 0 —0.2 0% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.2—0.2 100% 0.2—0.3 67%

163 Hernangomez TIM 2.1—5.1 41% — — 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0.6—1.8 33% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.2—0.5 40%

164 Williams WIZ 1.5—2.3 65% — 0.2—0.2 100% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0% — 0.1—0.5 20% — — 0.1—0.2 50% — 0.5—0.6 83% 0.6—0.6 100%

165 Diallo SUN 2.0—3.1 65% — 0.4—0.6 67% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0% 0.3—0.3 100% 0.4—0.6 67% 0.2—0.3 67%

166 Gafford BUL 2.2—3.1 71% — 0.5—0.7 71% — 0.2—0.3 67% — — 0.1—0.1 100% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.7—1.0 70% 0.6—0.8 75%

167 Melli PEL 2.4—5.4 44% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 1.0—2.2 45% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.1—0.3 33% 0 —0.2 0% 0.1—0.5 20% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.2 50%

168 Portis KNI 4.0—8.9 45% — 0.2—0.3 67% 0.4—1.0 40% 0.8—1.7 47% 0.2—0.7 29% 1.0—2.3 43% 0.5—0.8 63% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.4—0.9 44%

169 Iwundu MAG 1.7—4.3 40% 0.3—0.7 43% — — — 0.1—0.3 33% 0.3—1.1 27% 0.2—0.5 40% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.2 50%

170 Bates-Diop NUG 2.3—5.3 43% 0.1—0.2 50% — 0 —0.1 0% — 0.1—0.3 33% 0.6—2.0 30% 0.2—0.6 33% — 0.1—0.3 33% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.5—0.6 83% 0.3—0.4 75%

171 Kidd-Gilchrist MAV 0.9—2.8 32% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—1.1 18% 0.1—0.6 17% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.2—0.2 100%

172 Johnson MAG 0.7—2.6 27% 0 —0.3 0% — — — 0 —0.4 0% 0.1—0.6 17% 0.1—0.4 25% — 0 —0.3 0% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.1—0.1 100% —

173 Saric SUN 3.7—8.1 46% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.1—0.3 33% 1.0—2.9 34% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.6—1.0 60% 0.3—0.5 60%

174 Markkanen BUL 5.0—11.8 42% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.4—1.2 33% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.3—0.6 50% 1.3—3.7 35% 0.4—0.9 44% 0.5—1.3 38% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.6—1.0 60% 0.5—0.6 83% 0.5—0.7 71%

175 Crowder HEA 3.4—8.8 39% 0.3—0.7 43% — 0.1—0.1 100% — 0.1—0.3 33% 0.8—3.0 27% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.2—0.7 29% 0.3—0.9 33% 0.7—1.3 54% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.3—0.5 60%

176 Watanabe GRI 0.8—1.8 44% 0.1—0.1 100% — — — 0.1—0.3 33% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.1—0.1 100% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.1—0.2 50% —

177 King PIS 0.8—2.1 38% 0.1—0.2 50% — 0.1—0.1 100% — — 0.4—1.0 40% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.2 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100%

178 Okpala HEA 0.6—1.0 60% — — — — — 0 —0.2 0% — — — 0.4—0.4 100% 0.2—0.2 100% 0 —0.2 0%

179 Martin HOR 1.9—4.2 45% 0.2—0.4 50% — — — 0.2—0.3 67% 0.2—1.1 18% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.6—0.8 75% 0.3—0.3 100% 0.2—0.2 100%

180 Jefferson MAG 0.3—0.8 38% — 0.1—0.1 100% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100% — — 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100%

181 Chandler NET 2.1—5.2 40% 0.2—0.3 67% — 0.2—0.4 50% 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.8—2.7 30% 0.3—0.3 100% 0 —0.2 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0%

182 Porter Jr. BUL 4.5—10.0 45% 1.4—2.6 54% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.7 14% 0.8—2.1 38% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.6—0.9 67% 0.4—0.9 44% 0.5—0.9 56% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.1—0.2 50%

183 Martin TIM 2.3—5.9 39% 0.2—0.6 33% — — — 0.1—0.2 50% 0.4—1.9 21% 0.4—0.8 50% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.2—0.7 29% 0.5—0.8 63% 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.1 0%

184 Gibson KNI 2.7—4.6 59% — 0.4—0.5 80% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.1—0.3 33% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.6—0.8 75% 0.5—0.8 63%

185 Maker PIS 1.6—3.2 50% — 0.2—0.4 50% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0% 0.3—1.0 30% 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.4—0.6 67% 0.2—0.3 67%

186 Wade CAV 0.9—1.3 69% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.3 33% — — 0.1—0.1 100% — — — 0.3—0.5 60% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100%

187 Brown Jr. WIZ 3.8—8.3 46% 0.6—1.4 43% — — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.3—0.9 33% 0.7—1.8 39% 0.5—1.0 50% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.8—1.4 57% 0.4—0.5 80% 0.2—0.4 50%

188 Claxton NET 1.8—3.2 56% — 0.5—0.9 56% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.5 20% 0.1—0.1 100% — — 0.2—0.3 67% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.4—0.6 67%

37

Page 38: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0F G P L A Y T Y P E S . F O R W A R D S

ForwardsField goals Pick`n`rolls Handler Pick`n`rolls Roller Pick`n`pops Post ups Isolations Catch and shoots Catch and drives Screen off Hand off Transitions Cuts Putbacks

189 Fernando HAW 1.8—3.6 50% — 0.3—0.5 60% — 0.2—0.3 67% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.6 17% 0.1—0.3 33% 0 —0.1 0% — 0.2—0.3 67% 0.5—0.6 83% 0.4—0.7 57%

190 Miles WIZ 1.9—5.9 32% 0.1—0.2 50% — — — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.8—1.9 42% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.3—1.0 30% 0 —0.6 0% 0.1—0.8 13% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.3 33%

191 Hill HEA 1.9—4.6 41% 0 —0.1 0% — 0.1—0.3 33% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.8—2.1 38% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.1 100%

192 Young BUL 4.2—9.5 44% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.5—1.0 50% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.9—2.5 36% 0.4—1.0 40% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.6—0.8 75% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.5—0.8 63%

193 Osman CAV 4.1—9.4 44% 0.7—1.6 44% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.6 33% 1.1—2.9 38% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.4—1.1 36% 0.6—1.0 60% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.1—0.3 33%

194 Jeffries KIN 0.5—1.2 42% 0 —0.2 0% — — — — 0.2—0.7 29% 0.2—0.2 100% — — — 0.2—0.2 100% —

195 Schofield WIZ 1.1—2.7 41% — 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.2 0% 0.5—1.6 31% 0 —0.1 0% — — 0.2—0.2 100% 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.2 0%

196 Aminu MAG 1.4—4.7 30% 0.1—0.3 33% — 0 —0.2 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.3 0% 0.5—1.7 29% 0 —0.3 0% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.2—0.6 33%

197 Brown HAW 1.0—3.0 33% — — — — 0 —0.7 0% 0.7—1.0 70% 0.3—0.7 43% — 0 —0.3 0% — — 0 —0.3 0%

198 Cheatham PEL 0.7—1.7 41% 0.3—0.3 100% — — — — 0 —0.7 0% — — — 0.3—0.3 100% 0 —0.3 0% —

199 McDaniels HOR 2.1—4.4 48% 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.1 0% — 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.1 0% 0.4—1.1 36% 0.4—0.9 44% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.4—0.5 80%

200 Felicio BUL 1.6—2.5 64% — 0.2—0.5 40% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.7—1.0 70%

201 Brazdeikis KNI 0.7—2.4 29% 0 —0.2 0% — — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.9 0% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.2 0% 0.1—0.1 100% — 0 —0.1 0%

202 McKinnie CAV 1.8—4.3 42% 0.1—0.2 50% — — 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.2 0% 0.3—1.4 21% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.3—0.3 100% 0.3—0.5 60%

203 Owens SUN 0.3—1.7 18% — — — — — 0 —0.7 0% 0 —0.3 0% — — — — 0.3—0.7 43%

204 Reddish HAW 3.7—9.6 39% 0.6—1.8 33% — 0 —0.1 0% — 0.3—0.7 43% 1.0—2.9 34% 0.4—0.8 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.4—1.1 36% 0.5—1.3 38% 0.2—0.2 100% 0.1—0.3 33%

205 Hunter HAW 4.4—10.8 41% 0.7—1.9 37% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.3—0.8 38% 1.2—3.1 39% 0.5—1.2 42% 0.1—0.5 20% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.6—1.2 50% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.3 33%

206 Bullock KNI 3.1—7.7 40% 0.6—1.3 46% — — — 0 —0.1 0% 0.8—2.2 36% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.5—0.9 56% 0.4—0.8 50% 0.5—1.3 38% 0.2—0.3 67% 0 —0.2 0%

207 Anderson NET 0.3—2.0 15% 0 —0.3 0% — 0 —0.3 0% — — 0 —0.3 0% 0 —0.3 0% — 0.3—0.3 100% 0 —0.3 0% — —

208 Hall PIS 0.3—1.0 30% — 0 —0.3 0% — — — — — — — — — 0.3—0.8 38%

209 Kornet BUL 2.3—5.2 44% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.6—0.8 75% 0.1—0.6 17% 0 —0.1 0% — 0.7—2.0 35% 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.4—0.6 67% 0.1—0.3 33%

210 Bembry HAW 2.4—5.3 45% 0.1—0.6 17% — — 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.3—1.2 25% 0.4—0.8 50% 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.6—1.0 60% 0.4—0.5 80% 0.2—0.3 67%

211 Kidd JAZ 0 —0.8 0% — — — — — 0 —0.3 0% 0 —0.5 0% — — — — —

212 Knox KNI 2.2—6.2 35% 0.4—1.0 40% — — — 0.1—0.4 25% 0.7—2.0 35% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.1—0.5 20% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.2 50%

213 Parsons HAW 1.0—3.6 28% 0 —0.2 0% — — — — 0.8—2.0 40% — — 0 —0.4 0% 0 —0.2 0% 0 —0.2 0% 0.2—0.2 100%

214 Doumbouya PIS 2.5—6.4 39% 0.1—0.3 33% — 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.6—2.2 27% 0.2—0.5 40% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.4—0.9 44% 0.6—0.9 67% 0.1—0.2 50%

215 Haslem HEA 0.3—2.0 15% — 0 —0.3 0% — 0.3—0.3 100% 0 —0.3 0% 0 —0.7 0% — — 0 —0.3 0% — — —

216 Bolden SUN 0.6—1.6 38% — 0 —0.1 0% — 0 —0.1 0% — 0 —0.6 0% — — — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.3—0.4 75%

217 Howard ROC 0 —2.0 0% 0 —0.5 0% — — — — 0 —1.0 0% — — — 0 —0.5 0% — —

218 Bowen PAC 0.4—1.8 22% — — — 0 —0.2 0% — 0 —0.6 0% — 0.4—0.4 100% — 0 —0.4 0% — 0 —0.2 0%

219 Antetokounmpo LAK — — — — — — — — — — — — —

220 Law MAG 0 —0.5 0% — — — — — 0 —0.5 0% — — — — — —

38

Page 39: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0F G P L A Y T Y P E S . G U A R D S

GuardsField goals Pick`n`rolls Handler Pick`n`rolls Roller Pick`n`pops Post ups Isolations Catch and shoots Catch and drives Screen off Hand off Transitions Cuts Putbacks

1 Harden ROC 9.9 —22.7 44% 1.7—3.5 49% — 0 —0.2 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 5.4—13.1 41% 0.3—0.8 38% 0.5—0.9 56% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.5 40% 1.2—2.3 52% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.2—0.4 50%

2 Westbrook ROC 10.7 —22.6 47% 1.2—2.5 48% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.8—2.0 40% 3.5—7.8 45% 0.6—1.9 32% 1.1—2.0 55% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.4 25% 2.1—4.0 53% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.3—0.8 38%

3 Lillard TB 9.0 —19.6 46% 4.1—9.0 46% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 2.4—5.0 48% 0.5—1.3 38% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.4—0.9 44% 0.6—1.3 46% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.3 33%

4 Lowry RAP 5.9 —14.2 42% 1.4—3.3 42% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.8—1.9 42% 0.9—2.1 43% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.6—1.6 38% 0.3—0.8 38% 1.4—2.8 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.1 0%

5 Irving NET 10.0 —20.9 48% 4.1—8.5 48% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.3—0.5 60% 2.1—4.4 48% 0.5—1.1 45% 0.4—0.5 80% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.7—1.5 47% 1.1—2.3 48% 0.4—0.6 67% 0.2—0.3 67%

6 Bledsoe BUC 5.7 —11.9 48% 1.5—3.0 50% — — 0 —0.2 0% 1.2—2.4 50% 0.4—1.2 33% 0.5—0.8 63% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.3—0.5 60% 1.3—2.6 50% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.1—0.2 50%

7 VanVleet RAP 6.0 —14.7 41% 1.4—3.7 38% — 0 —0.1 0% — 1.0—2.8 36% 1.0—2.7 37% 0.1—0.5 20% 0.6—1.2 50% 0.2—0.8 25% 1.3—2.4 54% 0.1—0.2 50% —

8 Paul THU 6.3 —12.8 49% 3.3—5.8 57% — — 0 —0.1 0% 1.4—3.4 41% 0.4—0.9 44% 0.3—0.5 60% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.6—1.2 50% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100%

9 DeRozan SPU 8.3 —15.7 53% 2.5—4.8 52% — 0 —0.1 0% 1.2—2.3 52% 1.6—3.3 48% 0.3—0.9 33% 0.9—1.3 69% 0.5—0.8 63% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.7—1.1 64% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.1 100%

10 Curry WAR 6.6 —16.4 40% 1.2—4.0 30% — — — 1.0—1.6 63% 0.8—1.4 57% 0.6—1.8 33% 0.6—3.0 20% 0.4—1.4 29% 0.8—1.0 80% 0.8—1.2 67% 0.4—0.4 100%

11 Walker CEL 7.0 —16.6 42% 3.7—7.9 47% — 0 —0.1 0% — 0.7—2.1 33% 0.5—1.4 36% 0.2—0.7 29% 0.6—1.5 40% 0.4—0.9 44% 0.5—1.6 31% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.2 50%

12 Williams CLI 6.1 —14.7 41% 2.9—6.7 43% — 0 —0.1 0% — 0.8—2.4 33% 0.6—1.3 46% 0.3—0.8 38% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.3—0.9 33% 0.7—1.5 47% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100%

13 Mitrou-Long PAC 2.0 —5.3 38% 1.0—2.0 50% — — — — 0.3—1.3 23% — 0 —0.3 0% — 0.7—1.7 41% — —

14 Beal WIZ 10.4 —22.9 45% 3.0—6.5 46% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.4 50% 1.6—3.7 43% 0.8—1.9 42% 0.7—1.5 47% 1.0—2.4 42% 1.0—2.1 48% 1.4—2.7 52% 0.5—0.8 63% 0.2—0.4 50%

15 Murray NUG 7.0 —15.4 45% 2.0—4.8 42% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.9—1.9 47% 0.6—1.6 38% 0.4—0.9 44% 0.4—0.9 44% 1.0—2.2 45% 0.7—1.4 50% 0.5—0.7 71% 0.1—0.2 50%

16 McCollum TB 8.9 —19.6 45% 3.1—6.9 45% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 1.5—3.6 42% 1.1—2.4 46% 0.5—1.1 45% 0.8—1.7 47% 0.4—0.9 44% 0.9—1.8 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.4 50%

17 Powell RAP 5.9 —11.7 50% 0.5—1.3 38% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.6 33% 1.0—2.6 38% 0.9—1.5 60% 0.8—1.6 50% 0.3—0.6 50% 1.6—2.4 67% 0.4—0.5 80% 0.1—0.3 33%

18 Brogdon PAC 6.0 —13.7 44% 2.8—6.4 44% — — 0 —0.1 0% 1.3—2.7 48% 0.3—1.0 30% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.4—1.1 36% 0.4—1.0 40% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.3 33%

19 Young HAW 9.1 —20.8 44% 4.1—9.6 43% — — — 1.8—4.4 41% 0.6—1.2 50% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.5—1.3 38% 1.3—2.8 46% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50%

20 DiVincenzo BUC 3.5 —7.6 46% 0.5—1.3 38% — — — 0.3—0.6 50% 0.7—1.9 37% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.7—1.3 54% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.2—0.4 50%

21 Schroder THU 7.0 —15.0 47% 2.2—5.0 44% — 0 —0.1 0% — 1.1—2.5 44% 1.3—3.2 41% 0.6—0.9 67% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.6—1.1 55% 0.6—1.3 46% 0.2—0.3 67% 0 —0.1 0%

22 Gilgeous-Alexander THU 7.0 —14.8 47% 2.2—4.7 47% — — 0.1—0.1 100% 1.5—3.6 42% 0.6—1.3 46% 0.9—1.6 56% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.4—0.9 44% 1.0—1.7 59% 0.2—0.4 50% 0 —0.1 0%

23 Holiday PEL 7.7 —17.0 45% 1.8—4.6 39% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.3 33% 1.4—3.0 47% 0.7—1.8 39% 0.9—2.0 45% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.7—1.4 50% 1.2—2.0 60% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.2—0.4 50%

24 Smart CEL 4.5 —11.9 38% 1.3—2.8 46% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.4—1.3 31% 1.1—3.3 33% 0.3—0.8 38% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.5—1.4 36% 0.2—0.2 100% 0 —0.2 0%

25 Hill BUC 3.4 —6.4 53% 0.9—1.7 53% — — — 0.4—0.8 50% 0.7—1.4 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.5—0.8 63% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.2—0.3 67%

26 Dinwiddie NET 6.6 —16.0 41% 2.5—6.2 40% — — 0.1—0.1 100% 1.6—4.2 38% 0.6—1.8 33% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.9—1.8 50% 0.2—0.2 100% 0.1—0.1 100%

27 Fox KIN 7.3 —15.5 47% 2.2—5.5 40% — — 0 —0.1 0% 1.5—3.0 50% 0.4—1.5 27% 0.6—1.2 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.6 33% 1.6—2.5 64% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.2 50%

28 Russell TIM 8.0 —18.7 43% 3.1—7.3 42% — — 0.1—0.2 50% 1.3—3.1 42% 0.7—1.8 39% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.8—1.8 44% 0.6—1.5 40% 0.8—1.7 47% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.1 100%

29 Booker SUN 8.8 —18.1 49% 2.0—4.3 47% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.4—0.9 44% 1.2—2.8 43% 0.6—1.5 40% 0.4—0.9 44% 0.9—1.7 53% 0.7—1.6 44% 1.6—2.8 57% 0.7—0.8 88% 0.1—0.2 50%

30 Dragic HEA 5.4 —12.2 44% 1.8—4.2 43% — — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.7—1.5 47% 0.9—2.6 35% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.8—1.7 47% 0.6—1.2 50% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.1—0.1 100%

31 Waiters HEA 3.3 —8.7 38% 0.3—0.7 43% — — — 1.0—2.7 37% 1.3—2.7 48% 0 —0.3 0% — 0 —1.0 0% 0.3—1.0 30% — —

32 Rose PIS 7.4 —15.0 49% 3.7—7.5 49% — — 0.1—0.2 50% 1.3—2.7 48% 0.4—1.0 40% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.8—1.6 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.2 50%

33 Morant GRI 6.7 —13.6 49% 2.9—6.3 46% — — 0 —0.1 0% 1.0—2.2 45% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.4—0.6 67% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.2—0.5 40% 1.0—1.6 63% 0.4—0.6 67% 0.3—0.4 75%

34 Gordon ROC 4.8 —12.9 37% 0.6—1.3 46% — 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.1 0% 0.9—2.1 43% 1.0—4.0 25% 0.6—1.4 43% 0.4—0.9 44% 0.4—1.1 36% 0.5—1.3 38% 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.1 0%

35 Conley JAZ 4.8 —11.9 40% 1.9—5.4 35% — 0 —0.1 0% — 0.5—1.2 42% 0.8—1.8 44% 0.4—0.8 50% 0.2—0.7 29% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.5—1.0 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100%

36 Wiggins WAR 8.1 —18.1 45% 2.3—5.7 40% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.4—0.8 50% 0.9—2.5 36% 0.8—2.4 33% 0.3—0.8 38% 0.5—1.0 50% 0.9—1.8 50% 0.8—1.2 67% 0.7—0.9 78% 0.3—0.5 60%

37 Clarkson JAZ 5.6 —12.0 47% 1.4—3.0 47% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.9—2.0 45% 1.0—2.3 43% 0.4—0.8 50% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.4—1.1 36% 0.5—1.0 50% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.3—0.4 75%

38 Milton 76E 3.4 —6.8 50% 0.7—1.3 54% — 0.1—0.1 100% — 0.1—0.3 33% 1.0—2.1 48% 0.3—0.8 38% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.5—1.0 50% 0.2—0.3 67% 0 —0.1 0%

39 Richardson 76E 5.1 —12.0 43% 1.5—3.6 42% — — 0.1—0.2 50% 0.4—0.8 50% 0.8—2.5 32% 0.4—0.8 50% 0.5—0.9 56% 0.6—1.4 43% 0.5—0.9 56% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.2—0.3 67%

40 LaVine BUL 9.0 —20.0 45% 2.5—6.2 40% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.4 25% 1.5—3.9 38% 0.6—1.7 35% 0.6—1.2 50% 0.6—1.2 50% 0.7—1.6 44% 1.4—2.3 61% 0.7—0.9 78% 0.2—0.3 67%

41 Beverley CLI 2.9 —6.8 43% 0.6—1.3 46% — 0.1—0.1 100% — 0.2—0.4 50% 1.3—3.1 42% 0.3—0.5 60% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.2 0% 0.3—0.6 50% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50%

42 Morris NUG 3.4 —7.5 45% 1.3—2.8 46% — — — 0.3—0.6 50% 0.4—1.3 31% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.6—1.0 60% 0.3—0.4 75% 0 —0.1 0%

43 Thomas RAP 1.6 —3.4 47% 0.2—0.2 100% — — — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.5—1.0 50% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.5—0.9 56% 0 —0.2 0% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.1—0.2 50% —

44 Brown BUC 1.8 —4.8 38% 0.2—0.7 29% — — 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.5—1.4 36% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.2—0.7 29% 0.2—0.2 100% 0.1—0.3 33%

45 Korver BUC 2.2 —5.2 42% 0.1—0.3 33% — 0.1—0.2 50% — — 0.7—1.6 44% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.4—0.9 44% 0.5—1.0 50% 0.1—0.4 25% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0%

46 Matthews BUC 2.6 —6.5 40% 0.2—0.3 67% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.9—2.1 43% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.3—0.9 33% 0.3—0.9 33% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.1 100%

47 Rivers ROC 3.0 —7.2 42% 0.3—0.9 33% — 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0.9—2.1 43% 0.8—2.1 38% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.4—0.8 50% — 0.1—0.1 100%

39

Page 40: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0F G P L A Y T Y P E S . G U A R D S

GuardsField goals Pick`n`rolls Handler Pick`n`rolls Roller Pick`n`pops Post ups Isolations Catch and shoots Catch and drives Screen off Hand off Transitions Cuts Putbacks

48 Jackson CLI 4.7—11.2 42% 1.7—4.4 39% — — 0 —0.1 0% 0.5—1.3 38% 1.0—2.3 43% 0.3—0.7 43% 0 —0.2 0% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.4—1.0 40% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.1 100%

49 Rondo LAK 2.9—6.8 43% 1.2—2.8 43% — — — 0.5—1.1 45% 0.4—1.3 31% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100%

50 Dozier NUG 1.7—4.3 40% 0.3—1.1 27% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.4—0.8 50% 0.1—0.5 20% 0.1—0.4 25% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.4—0.4 100% 0 —0.1 0%

51 Graham HOR 5.8—15.3 38% 2.2—5.9 37% — 0 —0.1 0% — 0.7—2.2 32% 1.0—2.2 45% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.4—1.0 40% 0.4—1.1 36% 0.8—1.6 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100%

52 Burke 76E 2.4—5.1 47% 0.7—1.9 37% — — — 0.4—0.7 57% 0.4—1.0 40% 0.3—0.3 100% 0 —0.2 0% 0.2—0.4 50% 0 —0.2 0% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.2 50%

53 Nunn HEA 6.1—13.7 45% 2.0—4.3 47% — — 0 —0.1 0% 0.4—1.2 33% 1.0—2.7 37% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.5—1.1 45% 0.8—1.6 50% 0.9—1.5 60% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.1—0.1 100%

54 McConnell PAC 3.0—5.7 53% 1.4—2.5 56% — — 0 —0.1 0% 0.5—0.8 63% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.1—0.3 33% 0 —0.1 0%

55 Burks 76E 4.8—11.9 40% 1.6—4.0 40% — — 0.2—0.5 40% 0.4—1.3 31% 0.5—1.5 33% 0.3—0.9 33% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.4—1.2 33% 0.5—1.0 50% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.2 50%

56 Mason III BUC 0.8—3.2 25% 0.2—0.3 67% — — — 0.2—0.8 25% 0 —1.2 0% 0 —0.2 0% 0.2—0.2 100% 0.2—0.2 100% 0.2—0.3 67% — —

57 McLemore ROC 3.3—7.5 44% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.3 33% — 0.1—0.2 50% 1.5—3.7 41% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.4—0.8 50% 0 —0.2 0% 0.6—1.0 60% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.1 100%

58 Connaughton BUC 2.0—4.3 47% 0 —0.2 0% — — — 0.1—0.2 50% 0.5—1.5 33% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.4—0.6 67% 0.3—0.3 100%

59 Hood TB 4.1—8.2 50% 0.4—0.9 44% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.3—0.9 33% 0.9—1.3 69% 1.1—2.3 48% 0.4—0.9 44% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.5—0.9 56% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100%

60 Oladipo PAC 4.9—12.3 40% 2.2—4.9 45% — — 0 —0.1 0% 0.3—1.1 27% 0.5—1.9 26% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.5—1.2 42% 0.8—1.9 42% 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.1 0%

61 Mills SPU 3.9—9.1 43% 0.9—2.2 41% — 0.1—0.1 100% — 0.2—0.4 50% 1.0—2.2 45% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.4—1.2 33% 0.5—1.2 42% 0.6—1.0 60% 0.1—0.1 100% —

62 Harris NUG 3.9—9.3 42% 0.3—1.1 27% — — 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.7—2.0 35% 0.5—0.9 56% 0.2—0.4 50% 1.0—2.2 45% 0.7—1.4 50% 0.4—0.6 67% 0 —0.1 0%

63 Hardaway Jr. MAV 5.5—12.6 44% 1.0—2.2 45% — 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.2 0% 0.6—1.5 40% 1.6—3.6 44% 0.4—1.0 40% 0.6—1.4 43% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.5—1.1 45% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.2 50%

64 Mudiay JAZ 2.8—6.0 47% 0.8—1.7 47% — — 0.2—0.4 50% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.3—0.9 33% 0.5—0.9 56% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.4—0.8 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0%

65 Ball PEL 4.6—11.3 41% 0.8—2.5 32% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.8 25% 1.5—3.5 43% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.8—1.4 57% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.3—0.5 60%

66 Wanamaker CEL 2.2—5.1 43% 0.5—1.5 33% — — — 0.1—0.4 25% 0.4—0.8 50% 0.3—0.8 38% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.6—1.0 60% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0%

67 Korkmaz 76E 3.5—8.0 44% 0.3—0.7 43% — 0.1—0.3 33% — 0 —0.2 0% 1.2—2.7 44% 0.3—0.8 38% 0.4—0.8 50% 0.4—1.1 36% 0.4—0.8 50% 0.2—0.2 100% 0.1—0.1 100%

68 Clemons ROC 1.8—4.3 42% 0.4—0.8 50% — 0 —0.1 0% — 0.2—0.8 25% 0.3—1.0 30% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.1—0.2 50% —

69 Burton THU 1.5—5.0 30% 0.5—0.5 100% — — — 0.5—0.5 100% 0 —2.0 0% 0 —0.5 0% — — 0 —1.0 0% — 0.5—0.5 100%

70 Murray SPU 4.4—9.3 47% 1.1—2.6 42% — — 0 —0.1 0% 0.8—1.7 47% 0.6—1.3 46% 0.6—1.2 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.8—1.2 67% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.3—0.5 60%

71 Rubio SUN 4.4—10.7 41% 1.5—3.6 42% — — — 0.4—1.1 36% 1.0—2.4 42% 0.4—1.0 40% 0 —0.1 0% 0.3—0.9 33% 0.6—1.1 55% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.2 50%

72 Kennard PIS 5.4—12.2 44% 1.5—3.1 48% — — 0 —0.1 0% 0.3—0.9 33% 1.3—3.0 43% 0.3—0.8 38% 0.4—0.8 50% 0.6—1.6 38% 0.6—1.4 43% 0.4—0.5 80% 0.1—0.1 100%

73 Hield KIN 7.1—16.7 43% 1.6—3.9 41% — 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0.8—2.1 38% 1.3—2.8 46% 0.4—0.9 44% 1.0—2.5 40% 0.4—1.0 40% 1.1—2.2 50% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.2—0.4 50%

74 Herro HEA 4.7—11.3 42% 1.0—3.0 33% — — 0 —0.1 0% 0.4—1.1 36% 0.9—1.7 53% 0.3—0.9 33% 0.6—1.1 55% 0.8—1.8 44% 0.5—0.8 63% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.1 100%

75 Curry MAV 4.5—9.0 50% 1.0—2.0 50% — 0 —0.1 0% — 0.3—0.9 33% 1.4—2.8 50% 0.5—1.0 50% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.6—1.1 55% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100%

76 Lamb PAC 4.7—10.4 45% 1.6—3.4 47% — — 0 —0.1 0% 0.5—1.4 36% 0.7—1.7 41% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.4—0.8 50% 0.5—1.0 50% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.3—0.4 75%

77 Bradley LAK 3.5—7.8 45% 0.5—1.1 45% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100% — 0.1—0.3 33% 0.7—2.2 32% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.4—0.9 44% 0.6—1.2 50% 0.3—0.5 60% 0 —0.1 0%

78 Strus BUL 1.0—1.5 67% — — — — — 0 —0.5 0% — — — 0.5—0.5 100% — 0.5—0.5 100%

79 Langford CEL 0.9—2.4 38% 0.1—0.2 50% — — — — 0.1—0.7 14% 0.1—0.4 25% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.2—0.3 67%

80 White SPU 3.5—7.6 46% 0.9—2.1 43% — — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.3—0.8 38% 0.6—1.4 43% 0.5—1.1 45% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.5—0.8 63% 0.2—0.2 100% 0.1—0.1 100%

81 Williams-Goss JAZ 0.1—0.7 14% 0 —0.1 0% — — 0 —0.1 0% — 0 —0.3 0% — 0.1—0.1 100% — 0 —0.1 0% — —

82 Redick PEL 4.7—10.3 46% 0.4—1.1 36% — 0.1—0.1 100% — 0.1—0.4 25% 0.7—1.4 50% 0.4—1.0 40% 1.1—2.5 44% 0.8—1.7 47% 0.8—1.5 53% 0.1—0.2 50% —

83 Diallo THU 2.6—5.8 45% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.3 67% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.3—1.0 30% 0.5—1.0 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.7—1.2 58% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.3—0.6 50%

84 Fultz MAG 5.0—10.6 47% 1.8—4.0 45% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.3—1.3 23% 0.4—0.8 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.3—0.8 38% 1.0—1.5 67% 0.4—0.6 67% 0.1—0.2 50%

85 Waters CEL 1.2—3.5 34% 0.6—1.2 50% — — — 0.3—0.8 38% 0.1—0.8 13% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.2 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.1 100% —

86 Neto 76E 1.6—3.6 44% 0.4—1.0 40% — — — 0.1—0.4 25% 0.4—0.8 50% 0.2—0.4 50% — 0.2—0.3 67% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.1 100% —

87 Harris NET 5.3—11.2 47% 0.3—0.8 38% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.3 33% 1.2—2.7 44% 0.6—1.2 50% 1.0—2.4 42% 0.5—1.2 42% 0.6—1.0 60% 0.4—0.6 67% 0.2—0.4 50%

88 McCaw RAP 1.8—4.4 41% 0.2—0.6 33% — — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.7—1.7 41% 0.2—0.5 40% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.1—0.2 50%

89 Fournier MAG 6.7—14.3 47% 1.8—4.2 43% — — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.4—0.9 44% 1.0—2.3 43% 0.5—0.9 56% 1.0—2.1 48% 1.0—1.9 53% 0.7—1.3 54% 0.3—0.3 100% 0.1—0.1 100%

90 Hannahs GRI 2.0—4.5 44% 0.5—1.0 50% — — — 0 —0.5 0% 0.5—1.0 50% 0.5—1.5 33% — 0.5—0.5 100% — — —

91 Green CEL 1.1—2.2 50% 0.1—0.2 50% — — — — 0.1—0.4 25% 0.2—0.3 67% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.4—0.5 80% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.3 33%

92 Beasley TIM 4.1—9.7 42% 0.5—1.5 33% — 0 —0.1 0% — 0.2—0.7 29% 1.0—2.3 43% 0.6—1.1 55% 0.3—0.9 33% 0.4—1.2 33% 0.9—1.4 64% 0.2—0.3 67% 0 —0.1 0%

93 Caldwell-Pope LAK 3.5—7.4 47% 0.3—0.7 43% — 0 —0.1 0% — 0.1—0.2 50% 1.0—2.4 42% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.4—0.8 50% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.8—1.3 62% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.2 50%

94 Augustin MAG 3.2—8.1 40% 1.6—4.0 40% — — 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.8 25% 0.5—1.2 42% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.2—0.6 33% — —

40

Page 41: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0F G P L A Y T Y P E S . G U A R D S

GuardsField goals Pick`n`rolls Handler Pick`n`rolls Roller Pick`n`pops Post ups Isolations Catch and shoots Catch and drives Screen off Hand off Transitions Cuts Putbacks

95 Shayok 76E 0.5—2.5 20% 0 —0.5 0% — — — — 0 —1.0 0% — — — 0.5—0.5 100% — —

96 Rozier HOR 6.3—15.0 42% 1.5—3.9 38% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0% 0.8—1.7 47% 1.2—2.6 46% 0.4—1.2 33% 0.6—1.5 40% 0.4—1.2 33% 1.0—2.0 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.3 67%

97 Bogdanovic KIN 5.2—12.0 43% 1.2—2.6 46% — 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.2 0% 0.6—1.4 43% 1.3—3.1 42% 0.4—0.8 50% 0.5—1.2 42% 0.5—1.1 45% 0.4—0.9 44% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.1—0.1 100%

98 Brunson MAV 3.2—6.8 47% 1.0—2.0 50% — — 0 —0.1 0% 0.5—1.3 38% 0.4—1.0 40% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100%

99 Sexton CAV 7.9—16.7 47% 2.5—5.6 45% — — 0 —0.1 0% 1.0—2.5 40% 0.8—1.8 44% 0.3—0.9 33% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.6—1.2 50% 1.5—2.6 58% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.4—0.6 67%

100 Barea Mora MAV 2.9—6.9 42% 1.4—3.1 45% — — 0 —0.2 0% 0.5—1.4 36% 0.3—0.9 33% 0.1—0.2 50% — 0.2—0.6 33% 0.1—0.4 25% — 0.1—0.1 100%

101 Lee WAR 4.5—10.5 43% 0.4—1.1 36% — — — 0.1—0.3 33% 1.1—2.8 39% 0.7—1.2 58% 0.7—1.8 39% 0.5—1.1 45% 0.6—1.3 46% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.1—0.2 50%

102 Caruso LAK 1.9—4.5 42% 0.3—0.9 33% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% — 0.2—0.3 67% 0.5—1.3 38% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.4—0.6 67% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.1 100%

103 Walker IV SPU 2.2—5.0 44% 0.2—0.7 29% — — — 0.2—0.4 50% 0.5—1.1 45% 0.3—0.7 43% 0 —0.1 0% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.5—1.3 38% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.3 33%

104 Shamet CLI 3.1—7.5 41% 0.4—0.9 44% — 0.2—0.2 100% — 0.1—0.3 33% 1.2—2.7 44% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.6—1.4 43% 0.1—0.5 20% 0.2—0.8 25% 0.1—0.1 100% —

105 Edwards CEL 1.1—3.2 34% 0.3—0.7 43% — 0 —0.1 0% — 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.3 33% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0%

106 Ponds RAP 0.8—1.3 62% 0 —0.3 0% — — — 0.3—0.3 100% — — — 0.3—0.3 100% 0.3—0.3 100% 0 —0.3 0% —

107 Robinson III 76E 4.7—9.6 49% 0.3—0.8 38% — 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.5 20% 0.9—2.1 43% 0.5—1.0 50% 0.6—1.2 50% 0.3—0.9 33% 1.0—1.7 59% 0.4—0.9 44% 0.3—0.4 75%

108 Belinelli SPU 2.0—5.2 38% 0.3—0.9 33% — — — 0 —0.1 0% 0.6—1.6 38% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.4—1.1 36% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.2—0.3 67% —

109 Napier WIZ 3.3—8.1 41% 1.1—2.8 39% — — — 0.6—1.2 50% 0.5—1.4 36% 0.2—0.4 50% 0 —0.3 0% 0.1—0.5 20% 0.7—1.1 64% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100%

110 Wright MAV 2.7—5.9 46% 0.7—1.4 50% — — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.5—1.0 50% 0.4—1.0 40% 0.2—0.5 40% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.5—0.9 56% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.2—0.3 67%

111 Moore PEL 3.4—8.0 43% 0.4—1.2 33% 0 —0.1 0% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.8—1.9 42% 0.5—0.9 56% 0.5—1.2 42% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.4—0.9 44% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.3 67%

112 McRae PIS 4.0—9.9 40% 1.2—3.0 40% — — — 0.6—1.7 35% 0.6—1.6 38% 0.4—0.9 44% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.5—1.0 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.2 50%

113 Smith WIZ 4.4—9.7 45% 1.1—2.7 41% — — — 1.1—2.4 46% 0.6—1.6 38% 0.4—0.9 44% — 0.2—0.3 67% 0.8—1.4 57% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0%

114 Teague HAW 3.6—8.3 43% 1.4—3.2 44% — — 0 —0.1 0% 0.8—2.0 40% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.5—1.0 50% — 0 —0.1 0%

115 Bowman WAR 3.0—7.2 42% 0.9—2.2 41% — — — 0.2—0.7 29% 0.3—1.1 27% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.5—0.8 63% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.1 100%

116 Coffey CLI 1.0—2.5 40% 0.2—0.9 22% — — — — 0 —0.2 0% 0.3—0.6 50% — 0.2—0.2 100% 0.2—0.3 67% — 0 —0.2 0%

117 McLaughlin TIM 2.9—5.9 49% 0.9—1.8 50% — — — 0.2—0.5 40% 0.6—1.3 46% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.4—0.8 50% — —

118 Green LAK 2.9—6.9 42% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0% — 0.1—0.2 50% 1.2—2.8 43% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.2—0.8 25% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.6—1.2 50% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.2 50%

119 Thybulle 76E 1.7—4.1 41% 0 —0.1 0% — — — — 0.7—1.9 37% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.1 0%

120 Sumner PAC 2.3—4.6 50% 0.2—0.9 22% — — 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.4—1.0 40% 0.3—0.4 75% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.3 33% 1.0—1.3 77% — 0.1—0.1 100%

121 Payton KNI 4.3—9.8 44% 1.6—4.0 40% — — — 0.7—1.4 50% 0.2—0.9 22% 0.3—0.8 38% 0 —0.1 0% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.5—1.0 50% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.2—0.4 50%

122 Pelle 76E 0.9—1.8 50% 0 —0.1 0% 0.3—0.5 60% — 0.1—0.1 100% — — — — — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.4—0.8 50%

123 Jones GRI 3.0—6.6 45% 1.2—2.7 44% — — — 0.2—0.6 33% 0.3—0.8 38% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.7—1.2 58% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0%

124 Chiozza NET 1.5—3.7 41% 0.1—0.8 13% — 0.1—0.1 100% — 0.2—0.7 29% 0.5—1.0 50% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.5 20% — 0.1—0.1 100%

125 Trent Jr TB 2.8—6.6 42% 0.4—1.0 40% — — 0.1—0.2 50% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.9—2.1 43% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.4—1.2 33% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100%

126 Frazier ROC 0.5—1.4 36% — — — — 0 —0.1 0% 0.3—0.6 50% — 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.3 0% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100% —

127 Mulder WAR 3.7—9.4 39% 0.3—0.6 50% — — — — 1.3—3.9 33% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.3—2.3 13% 0.6—1.0 60% 0.6—0.6 100% 0.1—0.3 33% —

128 Vincent HEA 0.7—3.2 22% 0 —0.2 0% — — — — 0.7—1.5 47% — 0 —0.5 0% 0 —1.0 0% — — —

129 Carter-Williams MAG 2.5—5.8 43% 0.3—0.8 38% — — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.4—1.4 29% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.6—1.0 60% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.1—0.4 25%

130 Hezonja TB 1.7—4.0 43% 0.2—0.6 33% — 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.2 0% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.2—0.9 22% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0% 0.6—0.9 67% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.2 50%

131 Hall THU 0.2—1.0 20% 0.2—0.2 100% — — — 0 —0.2 0% 0 —0.2 0% 0 —0.2 0% 0 —0.2 0% — — — —

132 Nwaba NET 1.9—3.6 53% 0.1—0.1 100% — — — 0.1—0.3 33% 0.5—1.3 38% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.5—0.8 63% 0.3—0.3 100% 0.1—0.3 33%

133 Poole WAR 2.9—8.8 33% 0.7—1.8 39% — — — 0.3—0.9 33% 0.4—1.6 25% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.6—1.5 40% 0.4—1.2 33% 0.3—0.8 38% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0%

134 McGruder CLI 1.2—3.1 39% 0.1—0.2 50% — — — — 0.3—1.1 27% 0.3—0.7 43% 0 —0.2 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.3 33% 0 —0.1 0%

135 Konchar GRI 1.5—2.3 65% 0.1—0.1 100% — — — — 0.1—0.5 20% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.5—0.5 100% 0.5—0.5 100%

136 Pargo WAR 3.7—7.3 51% 1.0—1.7 59% — — — 1.3—3.3 39% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.3—0.3 100% 0 —0.3 0% — — — 0 —0.3 0%

137 Weatherspoon SPU 0 —1.0 0% 0 —0.7 0% — — — — — — — 0 —0.3 0% — — —

138 Iguodala HEA 1.8—3.6 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.4—1.4 29% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0% 0.5—0.8 63% 0.3—0.4 75% —

139 Dort THU 2.2—5.4 41% 0.1—0.1 100% — — — 0.1—0.3 33% 0.6—1.9 32% 0.3—0.8 38% 0 —0.2 0% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.5—0.9 56% 0.4—0.5 80% 0.1—0.3 33%

140 Hart PEL 3.5—8.4 42% 0.1—0.4 25% — — — 0.1—0.3 33% 1.3—3.6 36% 0.5—0.9 56% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.1—0.3 33% 1.0—1.9 53% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100%

141 Forbes SPU 3.8—9.2 41% 0.4—1.1 36% — — — 0.1—0.4 25% 1.2—3.0 40% 0.6—1.2 50% 0.4—0.9 44% 0.6—1.4 43% 0.4—0.9 44% — 0.1—0.1 100%

41

Page 42: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0F G P L A Y T Y P E S . G U A R D S

GuardsField goals Pick`n`rolls Handler Pick`n`rolls Roller Pick`n`pops Post ups Isolations Catch and shoots Catch and drives Screen off Hand off Transitions Cuts Putbacks

142 Culver TIM 3.7—9.1 41% 0.6—1.7 35% — — 0.2—0.3 67% 0.4—0.9 44% 0.6—1.9 32% 0.3—0.8 38% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.3—0.9 33% 0.4—1.1 36% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.3—0.5 60%

143 Macon HEA 0.3—0.8 38% 0 —0.3 0% — — — — 0.3—0.5 60% — — — — — —

144 Simons TB 3.3—8.1 41% 1.0—2.5 40% — — — 0.4—1.2 33% 0.6—1.8 33% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.4—0.8 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100%

145 Melton GRI 2.9—6.8 43% 0.4—1.2 33% — — 0 —0.1 0% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.4—1.1 36% 0.2—0.6 33% 0 —0.2 0% 0.1—0.6 17% 0.8—1.5 53% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.2—0.3 67%

146 Daniels NUG 1.5—3.8 39% 0.1—0.4 25% — 0 —0.1 0% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.6—1.4 43% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.1 100%

147 Thomas WIZ 4.4—10.7 41% 1.5—3.6 42% — — — 0.2—1.0 20% 1.0—2.1 48% 0.6—1.2 50% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.2—0.7 29% 0.4—1.3 31% — 0.1—0.1 100%

148 Burton THU 1.1—3.0 37% 0.1—0.2 50% — — — 0.1—0.3 33% 0.3—0.9 33% 0.2—0.5 40% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.2—0.3 67% —

149 Temple NET 3.6—9.5 38% 0.3—1.3 23% — 0.1—0.2 50% — 0.3—0.8 38% 1.1—3.2 34% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.4—1.1 36% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.6—1.1 55% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.2 50%

150 Mann CLI 0.6—1.5 40% 0.1—0.4 25% — — 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.2 0% 0.1—0.3 33% 0 —0.1 0% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0%

151 Mykhailiuk PIS 3.0—7.2 42% 0.2—0.7 29% — — — 0.1—0.3 33% 1.1—2.3 48% 0.1—0.5 20% 0.3—0.9 33% 0.3—0.9 33% 0.6—1.2 50% 0.1—0.1 100% —

152 Brown PIS 3.4—7.8 44% 0.7—2.0 35% — — 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.7 29% 0.5—1.5 33% 0.2—0.6 33% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.7—1.1 64% 0.5—0.9 56% 0.4—0.6 67%

153 Nowell TIM 1.3—3.5 37% 0.3—0.5 60% — — — 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—1.2 8% 0.1—0.3 33% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.2—0.4 50% —

154 Robinson WIZ 1.4—3.9 36% 0.4—0.9 44% — — — 0.1—0.3 33% 0.3—1.2 25% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.1—0.1 100% —

155 Walton Jr. PIS 0.7—1.5 47% 0.1—0.2 50% — — — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.4—0.8 50% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.2 0% — —

156 Frazier PIS 1.2—3.4 35% 0.3—1.4 21% — — — 0.2—0.6 33% 0.2—0.4 50% 0 —0.1 0% — 0.1—0.2 50% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.1—0.1 100% —

157 Satoransky BUL 3.7—8.5 44% 1.0—2.3 43% — — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.4—0.9 44% 0.8—2.3 35% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.6—1.1 55% 0.2—0.2 100% 0.1—0.3 33%

158 Martin NET 0.3—1.7 18% — — — — 0 —0.7 0% 0 —0.3 0% 0.3—0.7 43% — — — — —

159 James KIN 1.0—2.3 43% 0.1—0.2 50% — — — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.7 29% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.2 0% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.2 50% —

160 Monk HOR 3.9—8.8 44% 0.6—1.4 43% — 0.1—0.2 50% — 0.2—0.9 22% 0.6—1.7 35% 0.7—1.1 64% 0.3—1.0 30% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.6—1.2 50% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.2—0.2 100%

161 Joseph KIN 2.4—5.8 41% 0.8—1.8 44% — — 0 —0.1 0% 0.3—0.9 33% 0.5—1.5 33% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.1 100%

162 Luwawu-Cabarrot NET 2.0—5.0 40% 0.1—0.3 33% — — — 0.1—0.2 50% 0.8—2.2 36% 0.1—0.5 20% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.2 50%

163 Bridges HOR 4.9—11.6 42% 0.3—0.7 43% 0—0.1 0% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.4—0.9 44% 0.5—1.1 45% 1.1—3.1 35% 0.7—1.7 41% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.6—1.1 55% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.4—0.7 57%

164 Evans TIM 1.6—4.6 35% 0.5—1.9 26% — — — 0 —0.2 0% 0.4—1.0 40% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0%

165 Okogie TIM 2.7—6.5 42% 0 —0.3 0% — — — 0.2—0.3 67% 0.5—1.7 29% 0.5—1.1 45% 0 —0.2 0% 0.2—0.7 29% 0.6—1.0 60% 0.4—0.5 80% 0.3—0.6 50%

166 Tucker JAZ 0.6—1.4 43% 0.1—0.2 50% — — — 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.4 0% 0.3—0.4 75% — — 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100%

167 Randle WAR 0 —1.3 0% 0 —0.3 0% — — — — 0 —0.7 0% 0 —0.3 0% — — — — —

168 Jackson PEL 1.9—5.1 37% 0.4—1.2 33% — — — 0.1—0.3 33% 0.4—1.5 27% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0%

169 Galloway PIS 3.6—8.2 44% 0.2—0.6 33% — 0.1—0.2 50% — 0.1—0.2 50% 1.3—2.9 45% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.6—1.3 46% 0.4—1.0 40% 0.6—1.0 60% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0%

170 Alexander-Walker PEL 1.9—5.6 34% 0.6—1.7 35% — — 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.6 17% 0.6—1.5 40% 0 —0.3 0% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.4 25% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100%

171 Pinson NET 1.4—4.7 30% 0.4—1.4 29% — — — 0.4—1.1 36% 0.3—1.2 25% — — 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.6 33% 0 —0.2 0% —

172 Allen KNI 1.9—4.4 43% 1.1—1.9 58% — — 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.3 0% 0.3—1.0 30% 0.2—0.4 50% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% — —

173 Musa NET 1.4—4.0 35% 0.2—0.6 33% — — — 0.1—0.4 25% 0.3—1.2 25% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.1 100% — 0.3—0.7 43% 0.2—0.2 100% 0.1—0.3 33%

174 Cleveland MAV 0.3—1.0 30% — — — — 0.2—0.2 100% 0 —0.2 0% 0 —0.2 0% — 0 —0.2 0% 0.2—0.3 67% — —

175 Lee MAV 1.7—3.4 50% 0.2—0.4 50% — — — 0.4—0.5 80% 0.5—1.1 45% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.1—0.3 33% — 0.2—0.5 40% 0 —0.1 0% —

176 White BUL 4.8—12.2 39% 1.3—3.5 37% — 0 —0.1 0% — 0.7—1.7 41% 1.1—2.8 39% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.1—0.5 20% 0.3—0.8 38% 0.9—1.9 47% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0%

177 Mathews WIZ 1.3—3.1 42% 0.1—0.1 100% — — — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.4—1.3 31% 0.2—0.2 100% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.1—0.2 50% 0 —0.1 0% —

178 Mokoka BUL 1.1—2.6 42% 0.1—0.1 100% — 0.1—0.2 50% — — 0.3—1.0 30% 0.2—0.5 40% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.3—0.4 75% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.3 33%

179 Exum CAV 1.6—3.4 47% 0.5—1.0 50% — — — 0.1—0.3 33% 0.2—0.7 29% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100%

180 Williams PEL 1.4—4.2 33% — — — — 0 —0.1 0% 0.6—2.2 27% 0.1—0.4 25% — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.2—0.3 67%

181 Ferguson THU 1.5—4.0 38% 0 —0.1 0% — 0.1—0.1 100% — — 0.7—2.1 33% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.1—0.1 100% —

182 Frazier Jr. MAG 0.4—1.1 36% 0 —0.2 0% — — — 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.2 50% — 0.1—0.1 100% — — —

183 Robinson WIZ 0.6—1.3 46% 0.2—0.6 33% — — — 0 —0.2 0% 0.2—0.3 67% — — 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.1 0% — —

184 Magette MAG 0.6—1.9 32% 0.1—0.4 25% — — — 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.3 0% 0 —0.1 0% — 0.1—0.6 17% 0.3—0.3 100% — 0.1—0.1 100%

185 Bridges SUN 3.2—6.3 51% 0.1—0.3 33% — 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0.8—2.2 36% 0.3—0.8 38% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.7—1.1 64% 0.8—0.9 89% 0.2—0.3 67%

186 Bacon HOR 2.2—6.3 35% 0.3—1.1 27% — — 0.1—0.2 50% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.3—1.0 30% 0.5—1.4 36% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.4—0.9 44% — 0.1—0.2 50%

187 Guduric GRI 1.5—3.7 41% 0.1—0.6 17% — — 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.3—1.1 27% 0.2—0.3 67% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.4—0.6 67% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100%

188 Knight PIS 2.4—6.7 36% 0.9—2.1 43% — — — 0.4—1.2 33% 0.8—2.1 38% — 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.6 17% 0.1—0.2 50% — —

42

Page 43: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0F G P L A Y T Y P E S . G U A R D S

GuardsField goals Pick`n`rolls Handler Pick`n`rolls Roller Pick`n`pops Post ups Isolations Catch and shoots Catch and drives Screen off Hand off Transitions Cuts Putbacks

189 Dunn BUL 3.0—6.7 45% 0.5—1.6 31% — — — 0.3—0.7 43% 0.5—1.6 31% 0.5—0.9 56% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.7—1.0 70% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.2 50%

190 Batum HOR 1.3—3.7 35% 0.1—0.6 17% — — — — 0.5—1.2 42% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.6 17% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.2—0.3 67%

191 Allen GRI 2.6—5.9 44% 0.4—0.9 44% — — — 0.1—0.3 33% 0.6—1.6 38% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.2—0.7 29% 0.7—1.3 54% — 0.1—0.1 100%

192 Harrison BUL 1.8—3.8 47% 0.3—0.5 60% — — — 0.2—0.5 40% 0.3—0.7 43% 0.2—0.7 29% — 0.1—0.3 33% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.2 50%

193 Bone PIS 0.5—1.9 26% 0.1—0.3 33% — — — 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.5 20% 0.1—0.3 33% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.2 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100% —

194 Dellavedova CAV 1.1—3.1 35% 0.4—1.0 40% — — — 0 —0.1 0% 0.3—1.0 30% 0 —0.1 0% — 0.1—0.3 33% 0 —0.2 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.1 100%

195 Snell PIS 2.9—6.5 45% 0.3—0.6 50% — — — 0.1—0.2 50% 1.0—2.6 38% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.3—0.9 33% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.1—0.2 50% —

196 Dotson KNI 2.5—6.1 41% 0.3—0.8 38% — — — 0.3—0.7 43% 0.5—1.3 38% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.3—0.8 38% 0.4—0.7 57% 0.4—1.0 40% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100%

197 Valentine BUL 2.7—6.6 41% 0.9—1.9 47% — — — 0.1—0.5 20% 0.8—1.9 42% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.2—0.7 29% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100%

198 Shumpert NET 1.6—5.0 32% 0.1—0.6 17% — — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.7 14% 0.2—1.4 14% 0.2—0.5 40% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.5—0.9 56% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.1—0.2 50%

199 Bonga WIZ 1.7—3.2 53% 0 —0.1 0% — — — 0.1—0.2 50% 0.3—0.8 38% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.1—0.1 100% — 0.3—0.6 50% 0.3—0.4 75% 0.2—0.4 50%

200 Goodwin HAW 2.2—5.6 39% 0.6—1.3 46% — — — 0.4—0.8 50% 0.3—1.3 23% 0.1—0.5 20% 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.4—0.9 44% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.2 50%

201 Carter SUN 1.6—4.1 39% 0.4—0.8 50% — — — 0.1—0.3 33% 0.6—1.6 38% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.3—0.5 60% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.2 50%

202 Porter CAV 3.7—8.4 44% 0.7—2.1 33% — — 0 —0.1 0% 0.6—1.6 38% 0.6—1.4 43% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.8—1.2 67% 0.4—0.5 80% 0.1—0.2 50%

203 Barrett KNI 5.2—13.0 40% 1.1—3.0 37% — — 0.3—0.6 50% 0.5—1.3 38% 0.8—2.2 36% 0.5—1.4 36% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.3—0.9 33% 1.0—1.8 56% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.3—0.4 75%

204 Johnson SUN 2.8—6.7 42% 0.1—0.2 50% — 0.1—0.1 100% — — 1.3—3.4 38% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.5—0.9 56% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.2—0.3 67%

205 Garland CAV 4.8—11.9 40% 1.9—4.6 41% — — — 0.4—1.2 33% 0.8—2.0 40% 0.4—0.8 50% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.6—1.2 50% 0.2—0.8 25% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.2 50%

206 Huerter HAW 4.4—10.7 41% 1.2—2.6 46% — 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.8 25% 1.1—2.5 44% 0.2—0.7 29% 0.2—0.8 25% 0.5—1.4 36% 0.6—1.3 46% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.2 50%

207 Watson RAP 0 —1.6 0% 0 —0.2 0% — — — — 0 —0.6 0% 0 —0.4 0% — 0 —0.2 0% — 0 —0.2 0% —

208 Turner HAW 1.3—3.5 37% 0.3—1.0 30% — — 0.2—0.5 40% 0.2—0.4 50% 0 —0.3 0% 0.3—0.8 38% 0.1—0.1 100% 0 —0.2 0% 0.2—0.2 100% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100%

209 Graham HAW 1.6—4.4 36% 0 —0.1 0% — — 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.2 0% 0.5—1.8 28% 0.3—0.7 43% 0 —0.2 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.2—0.4 50%

210 Trier KNI 2.1—4.4 48% 0.7—1.2 58% — — — 0.2—0.5 40% 0.4—1.1 36% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.3—0.5 60% 0 —0.1 0% —

211 Wade CAV 0.5—0.8 63% — — — — — — — — 0 —0.3 0% — 0.3—0.3 100% 0.3—0.3 100%

212 Gray PEL 0.5—1.0 50% 0.5—1.0 50% — — — — — — — — — — —

213 Okobo SUN 1.3—3.4 38% 0.2—0.8 25% — — — 0.2—0.4 50% 0.3—0.8 38% 0.2—0.4 50% — 0.2—0.3 67% 0.2—0.4 50% 0 —0.1 0% —

214 Carter HAW 1.8—5.1 35% 0.1—0.4 25% 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.5—1.9 26% 0.1—0.4 25% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.2—0.4 50% — 0.1—0.1 100%

215 Smith 76E 0.4—1.6 25% 0 —0.1 0% — — — — 0 —0.4 0% 0.1—0.4 25% — — 0 —0.3 0% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100%

216 Smith Jr. KNI 2.1—6.2 34% 0.6—2.4 25% — — 0 —0.2 0% 0.5—1.5 33% 0.1—0.5 20% 0.2—0.2 100% 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.2—0.7 29% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.2 100%

217 Ellington KNI 1.7—4.8 35% 0.1—0.2 50% — — — 0 —0.2 0% 0.3—1.0 30% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.4—1.4 29% 0.3—1.0 30% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100%

218 Johnson SUN 2.1—5.3 40% 0.2—0.6 33% — — — 0.2—0.3 67% 0.6—2.0 30% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.2—0.7 29% 0.2—0.3 67% 0.1—0.1 100%

219 Newman CAV 0 —2.0 0% 0 —2.0 0% — — — — — — — — — — —

220 Jerome SUN 1.3—3.8 34% 0.4—1.3 31% — — 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.4—1.1 36% 0.1—0.4 25% — 0.1—0.3 33% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100%

221 Arcidiacono BUL 1.6—3.8 42% 0.3—0.6 50% — — — 0.1—0.2 50% 0.6—1.5 40% 0.1—0.3 33% 0 —0.2 0% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.1—0.1 100%

222 Ntilikina KNI 2.3—5.8 40% 0.9—2.0 45% — — — 0.2—0.6 33% 0.6—1.6 38% 0.2—0.4 50% 0.1—0.1 100% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.1—0.1 100% —

223 Hutchison BUL 2.9—6.3 46% 0.2—0.6 33% — — 0 —0.1 0% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.4—1.3 31% 0.8—1.4 57% 0.1—0.2 50% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.6—1.0 60% 0.3—0.6 50% 0.1—0.3 33%

224 Wallace HAW 1.0—3.2 31% 0.2—0.8 25% — — — 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.6 0% 0.1—0.4 25% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.3 33% 0.5—0.7 71% 0.1—0.1 100% —

225 Payton II WIZ 1.7—4.0 43% 0.1—0.2 50% — — — 0 —0.1 0% 0.5—1.5 33% 0.1—0.3 33% — 0.1—0.2 50% 0.6—0.8 75% 0.3—0.5 60% 0.1—0.5 20%

226 Chealey HOR 0 —1.5 0% — — — — 0 —0.3 0% 0 —0.5 0% 0 —0.3 0% — 0 —0.3 0% 0 —0.3 0% — —

227 Crabbe TIM 1.7—4.8 35% 0.1—0.2 50% — 0 —0.1 0% — 0 —0.1 0% 0.7—1.8 39% 0.2—0.6 33% 0.2—0.5 40% 0.3—0.9 33% 0.2—0.5 40% 0 —0.1 0% 0.1—0.1 100%

228 Jones HAW 1.0—1.7 59% — 0.3—0.3 100% — — — 0.2—0.2 100% 0 —0.2 0% — — — 0.3—0.7 43% 0.2—0.2 100%

229 Norvell Jr. WAR 0.6—2.4 25% — — — 0 —0.2 0% 0 —0.2 0% 0.2—1.0 20% — 0.2—0.6 33% — 0.2—0.2 100% — —

230 Mooney CAV 0.3—1.0 30% — — — — 0 —0.3 0% 0 —0.5 0% 0.3—0.3 100% — — — — —

231 Thomas PIS 0.6—2.1 29% 0 —0.1 0% — — — 0 —0.1 0% 0.6—1.1 55% 0 —0.4 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% 0 —0.1 0% — —

232 Oni JAZ 0 —0.4 0% 0 —0.2 0% — — — — 0 —0.2 0% — — — — — —

233 Harper SUN 0.3—1.3 23% 0.3—0.3 100% — — — — 0 —0.7 0% 0 —0.3 0% — — — — —

234 Guy KIN 0.5—1.0 50% — — — — — 0 —0.5 0% — — 0.5—0.5 100% — — —

235 Reaves MAV 0 —0.5 0% 0 —0.5 0% — — — — — — — — — — —

43

Page 44: Report summary report - advanceprobasketball.com · SUMMARY REPORT NBA 2019—2020 TEAMS RANKINGS POINTS ANALYSIS.....2 FIELD GOALS ANALYSIS ... 13 Trail Blazers 294 66 14 Spurs 292

N B A . 2 0 1 9 — 2 0 2 0F G P L A Y T Y P E S . G U A R D S

GuardsField goals Pick`n`rolls Handler Pick`n`rolls Roller Pick`n`pops Post ups Isolations Catch and shoots Catch and drives Screen off Hand off Transitions Cuts Putbacks

236 Horton-Tucker LAK 0—0.5 0% — — — — 0—0.5 0% — — — — — — —

237 Wright-Foreman JAZ — — — — — — — — — — — — —

44