8.5755 ELLIOTT 010

REPORT ON

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

OF

PERRON CLAIMS

ELLIOT AND HARKER TOWNSHIPS

DISTRICT OF COCHRANE

LARDER 1AKE MINING DIVISION

FOR

A. H. PERRON

BY

T. ATHERTON B.Se.

H. E. NEAL 6. ASSOCIATES LTD.

TORONTO - CANADA

RECEIVEDAUG \ 6 1983

MINING LANDS SECTION

JULY 1983

320eSNWeCi92 2.5755 ELLIOTT O10C

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 SUMMARY l

2.O INTRODUCTION 2

3.0 THE PROPERTY 3

4.0 LOCATION AND ACCESS 4

5.0 PREVIOUS WORK 5

6.0 GEOLOGY 6

6.1 General Geology 6

6.2 Geology of the Claim Group 7

6.2.1 Basalt and Andesite 7

6.2.2 Dacite 8

6.2.3 Rhyolite 8

6.2.4 Intrusive Rocks 9

6.3 Structure 9

6.4 Mineralization 10

7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 11

8.0 REFERENCES 12

l.O SUMMARY

The geological survey in Elliot and Harker Township was conducted

by H. E. Neal 6 Associates Ltd. personnel during July, 1983. The

survey was on behalf of A. H. Perron of Kirkland Lake. The survey

was conducted over a grid cut in the bush at a line interval of

400 feet covering 12 unpatented mining claims.

The survey showed the claim group to be underlain mainly by

basalt. Some andesite, rhyolite, dacite and intrusive rocks are

also present. Two outcrops contain large quartz veins with

associated sulphide mineralization. The largest quartz vein is

45 feet long and is located on 24E-9. The other outcrop (20E-4)

is a crystalline rhyolite and contains a stockwork of mineralized

quartz veins.

The geology is similar to that of the former Toronto Harker and

Iris Gold Mines properties in Harker Township. Gold mineralization

was found in the rhyolite on both properties.

Future work should include stripping and blasting of the

mineralized quartz veins.

- 2 -

2.0 INTRODUCTION;

The unpatented claims held by A.H. Perron of Kirkland Lake, Ontario

consist of 11 contiguous claims in Elliot and Harker Townships and

one isolated claim (L5452519 in Harker Township. The geological

survey was conducted by H.E. Neal S Associates Ltd. personnel during

July 1983. Personnel consisted of the author and an assistant. The

survey was done to locate and evaluate the presence of economic minerals.

The survey was conducted over a grid with picket lines every 400 feet.

ONTARIO

H E NE.AL B ASSOCIATLS LTD

- 3 -

3 - 0 THE PROPERTY;

The property consists of 11 contiguous unpatented mining claims in

Elliot and Harker Townships and one unpatented mining claim in Harker

Township. The claims are lasted below and are shown on the accompanying

property map:

Claim No. Township

L545251 Harker l

L545252 and L545253 Harker 2

L545254 to L545260 incl. Elliot 7

L547461 Elliot l

L547462 Harker l

All of the claims except L545251 are contiguous.

The claims are held by A.H. Perron of Kirkland Lake, Ontario and all

are being submitted for assessment credits.

LOCATION

S C ALT. 1 in. To

MEAL A ASSOCIATES

- A -

LOCATION AND ACCESS;

The 12 claims are located in Harker and Elliot Townships, District

of Cochrane in the Larder Lake Mining Division. The claims are

located between the 9 and 10 mile posts along the Harker, Elliot

Township boundary. The claims are located 30 miles southeast of

Matheson, Ontario. Access to the claims is by Highway 101 east from

Matheson and south through Harker Township by logging road to within

3h miles of the property by truck. Direct access to the claims is

by all terrain vehicle.

. L A- - -4 l * ' ' -' v V l

'- '

U - -l- .

HARKER TWPELLIOT TWP ' t

545260 |5-J?.259 ^OS-^Oe ' 00 5?5 5 Jf 4 5 Z 54

L , l. ! L

54V46I !545?5(* 1 54S?57

ELLIOT 8. HARKER CLAIMS

PROPERTY MAP

SCALE 1 TO 1/2 MILE

H.E, MEAL A ASSOCIATES LTD.

- 5 -

5.0 PREVIOUS WORK;

1947 - Trenching and blasting of several trenches by the Good Fish

Mining Company Limited and Iris Gold Mines Limited. Several

mineralized quartz veins were sampled.

1982 - Ground magnetic and VLF-EM surveys were conducted over the

claims covered by the present survey for A.H. Perron.

x 6 :-

6.0 GEOLOGY ;

General Geology

The rocks in Elliot and Harker Townships are Archean in age and aret

part of the Abitibi greenstone belt. The townships and surrounding

area are underlain by a complex assemblage of volcanic, sedimentary

and plutonic rocks. The map area is part of a larger area that is

bounded by the Destor Porcupine Fault to the north and the Larder Lake

Fault to the south. The rocks make up part of a large synclinorium

that trends east-west from Noranda to west of Timmins.

The volcanic rocks underlying the two townships are tholeitic mafic

to felsic lavas. These rocks are older than the calc-alkaline rocks

that underly the south part of Elliot Township.

The intrusive rocks in the area range from felsics to mafic in

composition.

Faulting is divided into three major sets. The oldest set is southwest

trending strike faults. These are intersected and offset by northwest

and northeast trending cross faults.

6.2 Geology of the Claim Group

The claim group is underlain by a series of southwest striking felsic

to mafic volcanics. These rocks are intruded by a northeast trending

diabase dike that is probably middle to late Precambrian (Matachewan)

in age.

6.2.1 Basalt and Andjesite

Most of the outcrops that occur in the claim group are basalt and

andesite. These rocks range from massive fine grained to coarse

diabasic flows which are the most common varieties to the pillowed,

spherulitic and fragmental varieties.

The massive fine grained to diabasic lavas are best exposed on the

Elliot Township claims although they are common in the Harker claims

also. They have a massive blocky texture. Pyrite occurs as widely

disseminated cubes and small flecks throughout the rock and is generally

less than 17,. A porphyritic diabasic basalt is located on the north

side of outcrop 4W-2. Large feldspars up to l inch occur on the outcrop.

Pillow lavas up to 30 feet in width occur. The pillows can be

spherulitic as in outcrop 20W-4 or as dark green to grey as in BL-13E.

All pillows face south.

The spherulitic lava and pillow lavas contain spherules up to ^ inch

- 8 -

but are generally less than ^ inch. These lavas were not seen in

the Elliot Township claims.

Fragmental lavas are common on claim L545251 as agglomerate or flow

top breccias. The flows are quite thick and the rocks could be one

or the other. Outcrops of hyaloclastite occurs on outcrop 24W-5 and

BL-16W. The fragments are ringed and concentric in appearance. The

fragments are mainly composed of chert.

6.2.2 Dacite

Dacite occurs as a medium grey to green brittle rock in outcrop

32W-1 and 20W-1 and 2. The dacite in these outcrops is massive

textured and barren of pyrite. This rock is not common in the claim

group and may be altered andesite.

6.2.3 Rhyolite

Rhyolite occurs in scattered outcrops throughout the claim group.

The outcrop distribution indicates three and possibly four separate

bands. The rhyolite is mainly pink to black to bluish grey with a

fine grained massive texture. Pyrite is generally less than IK although

a pink crystalline outcrop (20E-4) contains up to 2% coarse cubes of

pyrite. Covellite and specularite are also present in this outcrop. The

pyrite occurs mainly along fracture planes.

- 9 -

6.2.4 Intrusive Rocks

The intrusive rocks that occur on the property are diabase, gabbro

and lamprophyre.

i

The diabase occurs as a northeast trending dike up to 75 feet wide and

extensively exposed on claim L545251. The rock ranges from a black

fine grained texture near the contacts to coarse grained in the centre

of the intrusive.

One outcrop of gabbro occurs on outcrop 12E-3. This is a coarse grained

rock with a salt and pepper texture. No pyrite was seen in this rock.

Lamprophyre dikes occur on outcrops BL-14E and BL-12E. The lamprophyre

on outcrop BL-14E is l" to 2" wide. On outcrop BL-12E is a little over

6 . 3 Structure

Two northwest trending faults were observed on outcrop BL-14E and 28E-5.

The faults are right lateral in movement and are probably subsidiary

to larger northwest trending faults located in the area. Another larger

northwest trending fault is suggested by the magnetometer map in the

vicinity of line 4E where a small stream occupies a wide depression.

The rocks strike 65 to 75 and have dips ranging from vertical to

80 south. These are probably part of the north limb of a steep syncline

to the south.

- 10 -

6.4 Mineraliza t ion

Large quartz veins occur in two places in claim L545251. They occur

on outcrops 20E-4 and 24E-9. The quartz vein on outcrop 24E-9 is

about 40 feet long and is' exposed in a trench. The quartz is white

to grey and contains wall rock fragments up to 3 inches. Pyrite

concentrations are up to 1/& and occur as coarse cubes. Chalcopyrite

covellite and specularite are also present in small quantities. The

wall rock is a silicified, carbonatized basalt.

Outcrop 20E-4 is a pink coarse to fine crystalline rhyolite. Quartz

veins up to 2 inches occur as a stockwork throughout the outcrop.

Pyrite occurs as coarse disseminated cubes up to 2%. Specularite and

chalcopyrite are rare but are present as occasional flecks. There is

no evidence of any previous work on this outcrop.

Grab samples were taken from each location and sent for assay. The

results are not available at present.

- 11 -

7 ' 0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:

The geology of the unpatented claims is similar to the geology on

the adjacent Iris Gold Mines property to the east. The rhyolite on

the Iris property has returned significant gold values in the past

(Storen 1947).

Other trenches found during the present survey were too overgrown and

caved and nothing was seen in them. No assays by the Goodfish Mining

Company were reported.

Future work on the property should include reopening the trench on outcrop

24E-9, in claim L545251 and blasting and sampling of the trench and outcrop

20E-4.

Peter G. Atherton B.Se.

H.E. Neal 6. Associates Ltd.

- 12 -

8.0 REFERENCES:

JENSEN L.S. 1971e: Elliot Township, District of Cochrane;Ont. Dept. Mines and Northern Affairs, Prelim, mapP.705, Geol. Surv. scale l inch to ^ mile. Geology 1971.

1978: Geology of Thackeray, Elliot, Tannahill and Dokis Townships, District of Cochrane; Ontario Geological Survey Report 165,71p. Accompanied by Maps 2367, 2368, scale 1:31680 (l inch to h mile).

SATTERLY, J. 1951: Geology of Harker Township, District of Cochrane; Ont. Dept. Mines (Vol. 60, Pt. 7 p. 1-47 (published 1952).

CERTIFICATE

I, Peter G. Athttrton of 5425 Croydon Road, Burlington, Ontario,

do hereby certify that:

ii1. I am a graduate geologist residing at the above address.

2. I am a graduate of Brock University in Geology and have

worked for H.E. Nea.l S Associates Ltd. in that capacity

since 1975.

3. I have no interest directly or indirectly nor do l expect

to have any interest in the properties held by

Alex H. Perron.

A. My report is based on personal examination of the property

and supervision of the surveys being conducted on the

property.

Dated this 9th day of August, 1983 at Toronto, Ontario.

Signed

P.G. Atherton B.Se.Geologist,U.K. Neal 6 Associates Ltd.

ntario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

File.

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Sui

Township o

Claim Hold

Survey Con

Author of I

Address of

Covering D(

Total Miles

SPECIAL

vey(s)

r Area Harker and Elliot

er(s) Alex E. Perron

H. E. ipanyNeal St Associates Ltd.

, Peter G. Atherton B. Se. leporr . - . ,C/ O H, L. Meal tt Associates jjtu. Aiithr606-55 Otieen Street East, Toronto.

ites of Surv

of Line Cul

, PROVISICCREDITS REQUEST

July ey

)NS TED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.

ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

AIRBORNE CREDITS

Magnetome

HATKr Au

Res. Geol.

tpr

a A, 1QR

Previous SurveysFile No.

..................

Type

.................

17, 1983 to Aug. 4, 1983({incoming to office)

DAYS~ , . , per claim Geophysical

F.lprtrnm^gnptir

Magn''t"'p''tT , ,,,,, , ,, , , ...,.M.,

Rfldiomptric,

20Gpolngiral

(Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)

Electromagi (enter (!

^ SIGN,*

lays per claim)

.TT IR P.- ^^.-^ ^fc/Author of Report or Agent

Qualifications

Date Claim Holder

.................

W6 j B '15S3

....MNWfi.iAWOs..^^....

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

L 545251

lpr L*5 545252 (number)

L 545253

L 545254

L 545255

L 545256

L 545257

L 545258

L 545259

L 545260

L 547461

L 547462

TOTAL CLAIMS 12 -,

Number of Stations.

Station interval ——— Profile scale ^——^

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

.Number of Readings

.Line spacing ————.

Contour interval.

UH Wz;O

Instrument

Accuracy — Scale constant.

Diurnal correction method.Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station location and value ——-—

y Instrument

.ECTROMAGNET1CV.J] rnnfignratinn

Toil separation

AccuracyMethod: d Fixed transmitter O Shoot back D In lineFreniienrv

D Parallel line

Parameters measured.

o

InstrumentScale constant.

Corrections made.

Base station value and location .

Elevation accuracy.

l**\ wHM

H<Nk— i

K

3 2QWgl—*

Q2

JjH

Hh— 4

>̂—4

H00^-HW

tt!

Instrument ——^————. Method D Time Domain

Parameters — On time ——— - Off time .

[D Frequency Domain _ Frequency _____ Range ..——————

time.

— Integration time.

Power.Electrode array— Electrode spacing .

Type of electrode

SELF POTENTIAL

Instrument———————————————————————————————————————— Range.Survey Method —————————————————————————————————————————

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRIC

Instrument.Values measured.Energy windows (levels)————-—-—---^——.————^—.—————..——————...—

Height of instrument____________________________Background Count. Size of detector————.—————^-————————————-—————————.—Overburden -—-—————-——-.-——--————^^-^————.—^-———.-——..—

(type, depth - include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.)

Type of survey_______________________Instrument ______^-_____——_-____——Accuracy———————————-^———.—^———.——.

Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS

Type of survey(s)——— Instrument(s) —————

(specify for each type of survey) Accuracy—-——-——————————

(specify for each type of survey) Aircraft used.———^——--————————-————^—-—-——————

Sensor altitude.Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude______________________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area__________________________Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples- Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material)

Average Sample Weight.——————— Method of Collection————————

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development- Sample Depth————— Terrain—————————

Drainage Development——————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

ANALYTICAL METHODS Values expressed in: per cent

p. p. m. p. p. b.

D D D

Cu, Pb,

Others^.

Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle)

Field Analysis (.Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used ——

Field Laboratory Analysis No. ——————————

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis -^——

Extraction Method. Analytical Method .

Reagents Used ——

Commercial Laboratory (. Name of Laboratory— Extraction Method^—. Analytical Method —— Reagents Used ————

.tests)

.tests)

-tests)

General. General.

^ntftrir ^ yNGjochemicat and^xpendituresjj

Claim HoldertJ

J

2,5755 ELLIOTT

l A900

Add roi

-r-Date of Survey (from tt to) d/ 07 /?J l //- d^ tf- Day l Mo. j Yr. | Day | Mo. | Yr.

Survey Company

Name and Addreii of Author (of Geo Technical report)

Total Miles of line Cut

For first survey:Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For feactl'ttuxmroiiai auivcy-

using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here

MININGAirborne Credits

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

eter

Geological

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

.u* Claim

Claim

Days per Claim

Days per Claim

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed

Performed on Clalm(s)

S H- 15

Instructions Totel Days Credits may be apportioned at th choice. Enter number of days credits per clal

K— ...M.......... l - l IK l

s

e claim holder's m selected

, 1 1

Date Recorded Holder or Agent (Signature)

Certfffcation Verifying Report of Work

Prefix Number

Prefix

/

NumbertfSJ

Days Cr. j l Prefix T Number

Days Cr. Prefix

i A

i -A

Number

Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.

Days Cr.

Days Cr.

Total Davs Cr.lDate Recorded

l hereby certify thet l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the fact* let forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed tame during and/or after iti completion and the annexed report is true.

Name end Postal Addrasi of Parson Certifying

! G, -Certified by (Signature)Date Certified

H. E. MEAL fc ASSOCIATES LTD.Mineral Consultants

Ste. 606 , 55 Queen Street Best, Toronto, Canada M5C 1 R6 Telephone: (416) 368-0166

August 12, 1983

Mr, E. F. Anderson,Director, ,Land Management Branch,Whitney Block, Room 6^50,Queens Park, Ayg j gToronto, Ontario

M7A 1W3 MNING LANDS SECTION

Dear Sir: Re: A1ex Perron CI ai m s

Enclosed please find the following reportssubmitted for assessment work credits by H. E. Neal t Associates Ltd. on behalf of Alex H. Perron:

2 copies - Report on Geological Survey of Perron Claims, Elliot and Harker Townships, District of Cochrane, Larder Lake Mining Division, Ontario

2 maps - Scale 1 inch to 200 feet( one map to accompany each report )

Yours very truly,

Peter G. Atherton B.Se.H. E. Neal S Associates Ltd.

Ministryof Geotechnical

Ontario ^ Approval

\File

J.S7SS

/W* A 3-Mining Lands Comments

DTo: Geophysics

Comments

l l Approved | | Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature

To: Geology- Expenditures Mf-

Comments

0Approved [ ) Wish to see again with corrections V//DTo: Geochemistry

Comments

l l Approved [ | Wish to see agai n with correctionsDate Signature

j [To: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block. {Tel: 5-1380)

1693 (81/10)

2.5755

August 19, 1983

Mr. George KoleszarMining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources4 Government Road EastP.O. Box 984Kirkland Lake, OntarioP2N 1A2

Dear Sir:

We have received reports and maps for a Geological Survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) on mining claims L 545251 et al 1n the Townships of Harker and Elliot.

This material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be Issued.

We do not have a copy of the report of work which 1s normally filed with you prior to the submission of this technical data. Please forward a copy as soon as possible.

Yours very truly,

E. F. AndersonDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Telephone: (416) 965-1380

A. Barr/as

cc Alex E. PerronKirkland Lake, Ontario

Peter Atherton Toronto, Ontario

v^ ts

! lM

c*O

.COO

*

r-s

HARKER TWP M. 353

7M 8M 9M IOM II M

5M

4M

ro*

S

Q-

I-

o:UJ

ox

3M

2M-

IR 78380 57SC4C

'S98751(578 852 57838 l 678045

... ..[.... i.... J ... J . .L l - ' u j L j L ]

598756 ir,98752| S788531578867' 378S6sl

5987371 598755| 598753 578869 i

598754(578870,

. . J . - . .

L^ L, L, L* S s s259' 545?56 '54^255 Z45Z i I - ^

545259

579122 ^47y /^^1 I54^?.58!5T5257|I

— i- —— ™ 667848 :667840 16678397--tTT l "l l

6S7847 ,: 66784I 1664030— — - - - - - J~ ,L :L i

667846 667642 654032

66 70 7 G

S64Q29

6 04 O

Dickson Lake

\----T

2M 3M 4M

CLIFFORD TWP M. 338

I7M

- - ISM

-I5M

- I4M

o o ro

48 0 2l'45'

79 0 45 30

NOTES

400' surface nghls reservation along the shores of all lakes and rivers

LEGEND

PATENTED LAND

PATENTED FOR SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY

LEASE

LICENSE OF OCCUPATION

CROWN LAND SALES

LOCATED LAND

CANCELLED

MINING RIGHTS ONLY

SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY

HIGHWAY ft ROUTE NO.

ROADS

TRAILS

RAILWAYS

POWER LINES

MARSH OR MUSKEG

MINES ^

"used only with summer resorl locations or when s,pace is limited

L.O.

C.S,

Loc. C.

M.RO.

S.R.O.

TOWNSHIP OF

ELLIOTTDISTRICT OF

COCHRANE

LARDER LAKEMINING DIVISION

SCALE : 1 INCH 40 CHAINS (1/2 MILE}

DR. JBK

DATC 2QAug7lPLAN NO, M. 347

MINISTR 1.' Or NATURAL RESOURCES

2.5755 ELLIOTT 300

rot

Oencc (T < o

LAMPLUGH TWP M-358

2M IM

--24 ML j L j- L ^\~ L

5Z54I6 I 5 06260I 506^IL 70960 /S/© \70957\ 70956 \55^72 40536 55173 55174 55171 55778

506262 |506263

LL l L l L

506265 l 506264

-W---!——-4^43"' 40540

6525I2I6325I3

* i-1525488 \5254E9 439281 4Q544 29746 10694

L i L i L i L566^ j i 586468 J s 29369 s 29370 ' 529371 '529372! 529373

NOi (661904 i 661901 ,586435 1529379 ,529378152937s 578865,^, .i. lil \34846

--J--4---t----\ ̂ -^—— l L. uL 34847 \ 52729 \30279 \30I53

l 661902 1529381 529380 1529377 '529376

f 34^566 I6345C7 '684568 1684569 |664570x--\ 34848

'579HO 1579^1091 57910^ - IL

l"^...^ ' l l

6S4575 .684574 l 684573 66457? If84571 / 34849 32642 327284 ,61I393I

, , -, ^[684576 684577 6 8-578 | 634579 'H 34350

~ "***" **~ —" ~-

&43330 "643331 512906 522 S 65r""' ~~c~

L -^ '---./i") 1 -"C-l — - - -,l L j|684584 j 664585

O, l — — — —— — — —(T. ' 641388 . , l

-I44|4'4445 | 414446 1430914 (430915(430*6'430917 l Co

765897 7G5895 ,^ .- -. . -. ..

L , L l L /63458S \6B4587 15830S3I 583096 ! JIL— ~l - M l 5882541588Z55

1641395 1641396 164(397 '641^981 l

5791061 579105' 579Q95. 57^094 579093 ! 583094 l 583095

^ •641399X579096'

L ~! l 7 ~~| 579097 1579098 579099 5791 00 ' 5 7 910 i '598854

579585 L1~I ~ r L~"|"L " i59Pr^*,

641407 l 641408 64I4D9

512651 5IZ65B 1512659. 512660 i 599066641415 , 641414

I7GQ964 760394- ,

LFl?l5llJt::4 ^]c4-:" "" ^266, 599069342&I6 542612 3426136S9790 ' \""L^\

7S0965 l 7603,95 '

- -. t 'LV L , L

579^07" 5798 06 \579805565531 i ^^i

\ . |76096*i U 760396

1637027 637032 '657035 .. . .760967 '760397

l. ..L . 565532 l 579808

760968 |78039fl 669795

i ! ' ' - L'637029 J637050i637037| 637038 1 637 047 !

\562llb 15621/19 [562111 '562108

2I2Q '5621^2 562109

1562 114 1562 12. \ 1562 113 l l l

ELLIOTT TWP M-347

CDm ro

CL

lO

OI

THE TOWNSHIP OF

HARKERDISTRICT OF

COCHRANE

LARDER LAKEMINING DIVISION

SCALE: 1-INCH 40 CHAINS

LEGEND

PATENTED LAND

CROWN LAND SALE

LEASES

LOCATED LANDLICENSE OF OCCUPATIONMINING RIGHTS ONLYSURFACE RIGHTS ONLY

ROADSIMPROVED ROADSKING'S HIGHWAYS

RAILWAYSPOWER LINESMARSH OR MUSKEGMINESCANCELUnPATENTED S.R.O.

or

ce

NOTES400* Surface Rights reservation along the shores of all lakes and rivers.

PLAN NO, -

ONTARIO

MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCESSURVEYS AND MAPPING BRANCH

32D05NW0092 2.5755 ELLIOTT 210

HARKER TWP.

ELLIOTT TWP.

KEY MAP

SCALE, i ,nch to 2 miles

11* W

Mag

spherulitic pillow

LEGEND

BASALT a, fine grained massive b/ diabasic,

gabbroic massive 9 pillow lava dj spherulitic lava

e) spherulitic pillow lava f) How top breccia

g) hyaloclastite h) vesicular

ANDESITE a) fine grained massive

DACITE a) fine grained massive

RHYOLITE a) fine grained massive

lava h; vesicular

a DIABASE 41 GABBRO

LAMPROPHYRE

SYMBOLSLOCATED CLAIM POSTS

ASSUMED CLAIM POSTS

SAMPLE NUMBERS

OUTCROP and OUTCROP AREA

SMALL OUTCROP

JOINTING- vertical and inclined

STRIKE- vertical and inclined

LOGGING ROAD

TRAIL

TRENCH

FAULT- KNOWN , ASSUMED

CONTACT- KNOWN , ASSUMED

PILLOW

INTERMITTENT STREAM

SWAMP

SLOPE

POPLAR

SPRUCE

ALEX H. PERRON

ELLIOTT AND HARKER CLAIMS

ELLIOTT AND HARKER TOWNSHIPS

GEOLOGICAL MAP

200 l—

400——l

600

1 INCH TO 200 FEET

H.E. NEAL 8. ASSOCIATES LTD.

TORONTO CANADA

DRAWN BY S.D APPROVED BY H E.N.

DRAWING No83-6-1

DATE.JULY 1983

32D05NVM92 2.5755 ELLIOTT 220-