report: field oversight summary report, test pit program ... · field oversight summary report test...

141
(' SDMS Document 105769 a FIELD OVERSIGHT SUMMARY REPORT TEST PIT PROGRAM CORTESE LANDFILL SULLIVAN COUNTY, NEW YORK RI/FS COMPLIANCE OVERSIGHT Prepared for: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Contract No.: 68-W9-0003 Work Assignment No.: C02067 . TES-6 X K ALLIANCE M^^^L TechnologiesCorporation 302383

Upload: vongoc

Post on 29-Mar-2019

229 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

( ' SDMS Document

105769

a

FIELD OVERSIGHT SUMMARY REPORT

TEST PIT PROGRAM

CORTESE LANDFILL

SULLIVAN COUNTY, NEW YORK

RI/FS COMPLIANCE OVERSIGHT

Prepared for:

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Contract No.: 68-W9-0003

Work Assignment No.: C02067 .

TES-6

XK ALLIANCE M ^ ^ ^ L TechnologiesCorporation

302383

Page 2: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

FIELD OVERSIGHT SUMMARY REPORT TEST PIT PROGRAM CORTESE LANDFILL

SULLIVAN COUNTY, NEW YORK RI/FS COMPLL^NCE OVERSIGHT

Prepared for

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Emergency and Remedial Response Division

26 Federal Plaza New York, New York 10278

Work Assignment No.:

EPA Region:

EPA Site/Facility LD. No.:

Contract No.:

Alliance Document No.:

Alliance Project No.:

Alliance Project Manager:

Telephone No.:

Subcontract No.:

Subcontractor Project Manager:

Telephone No.:

EPA Work Assignment Manager:

EPA Telephone No.:

Date Prepared:

C02067

n NYD980528475

68-W9-0003 (TES 6)

A92-470

l-635-200-0-2PX9-()

Jeffrey Healey

(508) 970-5600

N/A

N/A

N/A

Mark Granger

(212) 264-9588

April 23, 1992

ALLIANCE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 291 Broadway, Suite 1206

New York, New York 10007 (212) 349-4616

RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL />4 ALLIANCE

^ 4 J P J | j | ^ Tecnnoiogies Corporaiion

3023S4

Page 3: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

A92-470.txt

RECYCLED PAPER

11

ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL / K ALLIANCE J f J M K | f l ^ Tecnnoiogies CorDoraiion

I 302385

Page 4: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section Page

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1

1.1 Site History 1 1.2 Oversight Project Objectives 1 1.3 Organization 2 1.4 Project Schedule 3

2.0 FIELD OVERSIGHT SUMMARY 3 2.1 Test Pit Excavation Methodology 4 2.2 Soil Sampling 7 2.3 Drum Sampling 8 2.4 QA/QC Sampling 9 2.5 Health and Safety 9

3.0 SUMMARY OF DEVIATIONS 10 3.1 General Overview 10 3.2 Deviations from Golder's Test Pit Program Work Plan 11 3.3 Modification to Alliance's Field Oversight Work Plan 11

4.0 COMPARISON OF EPA/ALLIANCE AND GOLDER SPLIT SAMPLE ANALYTICAL DATA 12 4.1 Introduction 12 4.2 Quality Control Review of EPA/Alliance Data 12 4.3 Split Sample Comparison 17

5.0 CONCLUSIONS 19 5.1 Effectiveness of Test Pit Program 19 5.2 Nature and Extent of Contamination 19 5.3 Split Sample Data Comparison 20

6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 20 6.1 Removal versus Remedial Response 20 6.2 Recommended Investigations 21

A92-470.txt iii

RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL #4. _ . . . _ #4f4 ALLIANCE

^A4K|fffc Tecnnoiogtes Corpcxaiion

3 0 2 3 8 6

Page 5: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED)

Appendices Page

A Photographs A-1 B Validated Analytical Data, Alliance Technologies, Inc B-1 C Field Logbook Pages C-1 D Personnel on Site D-1 E Test Pit Logs E-1 F Golder's Data Tables F-1

TABLES

Number Page

2-1 SoU Sample Locations 8 2-2 Drum Sampling Locations 9 3-1 Air Sampling Locations 10 4-1 Comparison of Golder and Alliance/EPA Split Samples Organics in Soil

(|Lig/Kg) . . . . . . . . . ; 13 4-2 Comparison of Golder and Alliance/EPA Split Samples Inorganics in Soil

(mg/Kg) 15

HGURES

Number Page

2-1 Sampling Location Map 5

A92-470.txt iv

RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL #4 . . . . « . . « _ M k ALLIANCE

^ k W i ^ i L Tecnnoiogies Corporaiion

302387

Page 6: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) authorized Alliance Technologies Corporation (Alliance), under EPA Contract No. 68-W9-0003, Work Assignment No. C02067, to provide RI/FS Compliance Oversight for the Cortese Landfill Site located in Sullivan County, New York. In accordance with the scope of this Work Assignment, EPA requested that Alliance provide oversight of the Test Pit Program conducted February 28, 1991 through March 8, 1991, at the Cortese Landfill by Golder Associates, Inc. (Golder) of Atlanta, Georgia.

1.1 Site History

The Cortese Landfill Site (the Site) is located in Sullivan county within the hamlet of Narrowsburg, New York. The property and landfill area encompass approximately 3.75 acres owned by Mr. John Cortese and a 1.53-acre parcel located along the northern margin of the Cortese property that was purchased by the Town of Tusten in 1973. The Site lies approximately 70 feet south of the Narrowsburg wastewater treatment plant and is bordered to the northeast by a very steep bedrock escarpment and to the southwest by the Conrail railroad track embankment. The Delaware River is approximately 400 feet southwest of the Site.

According to Mr. John Cortese, the Site was in operation from approximately July 1970 to July 1, 1981. The EPA Hazardous Ranking System reports that the landfill received municipal waste from Tusten and neighboring villages and townships at an estimated rate of 3,000 ydVyear. Disposal practices are poorly documented but are alleged to have ranged from burial in trenches to disposal over the landfill surface. According to deposition testimony, industrial wastes were accepted and disposed of at the landfill during 1973. The EPA Hazardous Waste Ranking System reports that these wastes included solvents, paint thinners, paint sludge and waste oils. Disposal is alleged to have included the placement of drums in trenches.

In September 1990, Golder submitted the "Test Pit/Spill Containment Work Plan" describing the proposed method of investigation for three areas at the Site identified to potentially contain buried drums.

1.2 Oversight Project Objectives

The objectives of this report are to summarize information collected during the field oversight activities, and provide summary data that will assist EPA in reviewing the "Test Pit Report" produced by Golder, including:

• Documentation of field observations; • Deviations from the EPA-approved "Test Pit/Spill Containment Work Plan";

A92-470.txt 1

RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL # 4 . . . . . . . « . _

A K ALLIANCE ^K4R|jK4 Tecnnoiogies Corporaiion

302388

Page 7: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

Geological data and interpretation; and Conclusions from field activity.

Alliance also acquired representative split samples and monitored the air quality for Health and Safety purposes. Alliance's responsibilities are detailed in the EPA-approved "Final Oversight Work Plan, Test Pit Program for the Cortese Landfill Site" (Alliance, January 29, 1991).

Due to the low frequency of sampling conducted by Golder, Alliance obtained split samples at a rate of greater than 50 percent. Split samples were analyzed through EPA's Contract Laboratory Program (CLP).

1.3 Organization

This report is organized into five sections and six appendixes.

Section 1, "Introduction," contains general information about the scope of the project and the objectives for this oversight report.

Section 2, "Field Oversight Summary," contains a summary of the field activities and observations that took place during oversight.

Section 3, "Summary of Deviations," contains a summary of deviations from the Golder Work Plan and modifications to Alliance's Work Plan to accommodate field conditions.

Section 4, "Comparison of EPA/Alliance and Golder Split Sample Analytical Data," summarizes findings concluded from the comparison of split sample data presented in this report.

Section 5.0, "Conclusions," contains an analysis of the effectiveness of the field program, and an interpretation of site conditions.

Section 6.0, "Recommendations," contains Alliance's recommendations for possible future investigations and/or remedial actions that may be considered by EPA.

Appendix A, "Photographs," presents a photographic log of the program and includes photos of the drums found in the field and test pits.

Appendix B, "Validated Analytical Data," presents EPA/Alliance's validated split sample data.

Appendix C, "Field Logbook Pages," contains copies of the field logbook pages containing notes and observations made in the field.

A92-470.txt 2

RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL # 4 . . . . . . . ^ „ #4f4 ALLIANCE

#*—: " " 3 0 2 3 8 9

Page 8: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

Appendix D, "Personnel on Site," contains a list of personnel on site each day of activity.

Appendix E, "Test Pit Logs," contains copies of the test pit logs.

Appendix F, "Golder's Data Tables," contains a copy of Golder's data as presented in their report.

1.4 Project Schedule

Three weeks were allotted to complete the test pit program. Work was completed in seven business days. The following table lists the test pit excavations performed by Golder on each working day.

Date

February 28 - March 1, 1991

March 4-5, 1991

March 6, 1991

March 7, 1991

March 8, 1991

Test Pit Excavated

TPl-1

TP2-2

TP3-1

TP3-2

TPl-2

2.0 FIELD OVERSIGHT SUMMARY

As directed by EPA, an Alliance representative was present at the Site to observe test pit excavations and related activities performed by Golder and their subcontractor. Chemical Waste Management (ChemWaste) and to collect representative split samples.

EPA/Alliance took photographs, drew sketches of the excavation areas and described field activities in the logbook. The photographs are located in Appendix A; copies of the logbook pages are located in Appendix C. A table of personnel onsite and activities conducted each day is presented in Appendix D.

The following sections describe the test pit excavation methodology and discuss the field oversight activities and observations.

A92-470.txt

RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL / K ALLIANCE

M ^ M ^ ^ Tecnnoiogtes Gorooraiiori,

3 0 2 3 9 0

Page 9: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

2.1 Test Pit Excavation Methodology

Golder's Test Pit Program Work Plan, Section 3.0, stated a minimum of three test pits and a maximum of six test pits were to be excavated in three proposed test pit investigation areas. These investigation areas, as shown in Figure 2-1, correspond to areas previously identified which contain anomalous geophysical zones and/or disposal trenches observed from historical photographs of landfiUing operations. If drums were encountered in the first test pit excavated in each zone, further excavation was considered unnecessary, as stated in Section 3.1 of Golder's Test Pit Program Work Plan.

ChemWaste excavated the test pits utilizing a top-down approach with a Midiyutani track machine. Excavations were terminated when drums were encountered or the extent of refuse was found. Excavated material was placed at a temporary spoils stockpile located far enough from the test pit so as to not impede slope stability of the test pit walls. An earthen berm was constructed around the stockpiled area. Test pit side walls were sloped 1.5:1. Native soil was confirmed by carefully scraping the pit bottom with the backhoe bucket.

Test pits were backfilled with the excavated material upon completion of sampling. Clean fill was used to cover trash and other debris that was visible at the surface after the test pit program was completed. The excavator and payloader used to move the excavated material were steam cleaned when the program was completed. Although Alliance was not onsite to observe the decontamination operations, Golder assured Alliance they had complied with Section 3.7, Heavy Equipment Decontamination, of their work plan.

2.7.7 Program Implementation

Alliance observed the excavations of five test pits at the Site from February 28 through March 8, 1991. Golder collected seven soil and two drum samples for laboratory analysis. Alliance split six of these samples for analysis through the CLP (five soil and one drum).

Two test pits (TPl-1 and TPl-2) were excavated in Test Pit Investigation Area 1 (TPl), and no drums were encountered in either test pit. In Test Pit Investigation Area 2 (TP2), crushed drums were encountered in the first test pit excavated (TP2-2), therefore, a second test pit was not excavated in this area. In Test Pit Investigation Area 3 (TP3), two test pits were excavated (TP3-1 and TP3-2) and one drum was found in TP3-2.

The following subsection describes observations noted during oversight activities involving test pit excavations. Refer to the photographs presented in Appendix A, the

A92-470.txt 4

RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL # 4 . . . . . . . « » . #4f4 ALLIANCE

M ^ ^ ^ _ Tecnnoiogies Corporation

I 3 0 2 3 9 1

Page 10: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

Test Pit Investigation Area 1

Test Pit Investigation Area 2

Trench 1

Test Pit Investigation Area 3

NOT TO SCALE

Source: Base map taken from SCA Service 3-29-88.

2 - Air Monitoring Locations (relative)

TP3-1 • Test PK Locations

(^A^ - Anomalies from 1987 Geophysics Survey

SAMPLE LOCATION MAP

CORTESE LANDFILL NARROWSBURG, NY

/ K ALLIANCE ^ ^ ^ ^ # 4 Technologies Corpcxaiion

Figure 2-1.

MS32/1/E

Page 11: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

field logbook notes in Appendix C, and the test pit logs in Appendix E for further information and documentation regarding the nature of the test pit excavations.

2.7.2 Test Pit Excavation Observations

Test Pit 1-1

Test Pit 1-1 (TPl-l) contained miscellaneous debris such as tires, metals, wood, asphalt, glass and trash. Excavated material was stored on a stockpile located 50 yards southeast of the test pit.

The excavation continued until a side slope of 1:1.5 was created. Three (3) feet of water accumulated in the test pit prohibiting Golder personnel from entering the test pit to perform magnetometry as specified in Golder's "Test Pit Program Work Plan," Section 3.3. The magnetometer was to be used to determine the presence of buried metallic objects within the side walls of the test pit, and/or beneath the test pit. ChemWaste continued the excavation to verify that native soil had been encountered. Native soil was encountered approximately 10 feet below ground surface (bgs). Alliance photographed and sketched the excavation area..

The total depth of excavation was approximately 11 feet and the top dimensions of the test pit were 54 feet x 42 feet. Soil samples were collected from the bottom of the pit

Test Pit 2-2

Miscellaneous debris including white goods, car parts and refuse were found in Test Pit 2-2 (TP2-2). A single crushed drum was discovered soon after the excavation was initiated. Alliance took a photograph of the crushed drum and the trench the drum had been discovered in. Golder obtained an OVA reading of 135 ppm within the crushed drum.

As the excavation continued, additional crushed drums were encountered by Golder. One drum was found leaking a thick black material. Also found was a spent IV medical waste pack. Alliance took additional photographs of the drums and materials encountered in the test pit. An OVA reading of 1,100 ppm was obtained by Golder in one of the drums.

The test pit was terminated at approximately 14 feet bgs. During the excavation, PID readings were recorded as high as 565 ppm by Golder. Golder measured the oxygen content to be 20.4% on the perimeter of the pit with an LEL meter. Water accumulated at the bottom of the pit from seepage occurring at 6 feet below ground. Native soil was encountered at approximately 10 feet bgs. Golder had an OVA reading of 163 ppm of the native soil.

A92-470.txt 6

RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL # 4 « B B I ^ I B . « 1 ! -

#4% ALLIANCE M W 0 ^ ^ Jecnnoiog.esCo(poraiion__

' 302393

Page 12: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

The backhoe excavated a bucket full of native soil and deposited it on some polyethylene laid out next to the pit in order to collect samples. Alliance recorded 30 ppm on the HNu on this soil.

Soil samples were collected from the bottom of the test pit and the spoils pile. ChemWaste also collected a drum sample which contained all soil.

Test Pit 3-1

Refuse including glass botties, tin cans, plastics, wood, cloth, tires and metal debris was observed between 1 foot and 9 feet bgs in TP3-1. The test pit was terminated at 13 feet bgs. The final dimensions of the test pit were 50' x 42'.

Test Pit 3-2

Test Pit 3-2 (TP3-2) was excavated near the pond, in swampy ground. The test pit filled up with water during the excavation. Refuse was found approximately 6" bgs. At 2 feet bgs, a crushed drum was encountered and removed from the pit Solid resin­like, reddish material remained in the drum. Golder broke the material into pieces with a hammer. Golder and Alliance took pieces of the material for laboratory sampling. The drum was placed back into the test pit at 6.5 feet bgs.

Golder constructed an earthen berm between the pond and the test pit to prevent debris from entering the pond. The test pit was terminated at 13 feet below ground. Soil . samples were collected of the native soil.

Test Pit 1-2

Refuse including glass bottles, wood, tires, and metal debris was encountered at 1 to 5 feet bgs in TPl-2. However, this test pit contained less refuse than that observed in other pits. Soil samples were collected from the bottom of the test pit and from the spoils stockpile. Final dimensions of the test pit were 45.2 x 39 feet.

2.2 Soil Sampling

Golder collected a total of seven soil samples during the test pit program. Five samples were collected from the backhoe bucket of native soil fi"om the bottom of the pit, and two samples were obtained from the spoils stockpile. Samples were analyzed for volatile and semi-volatile organics, pesticides/PCBs, and metals and cyanide.

As directed by EPA, Alliance obtained split samples of five of the seven Golder samples. From TPl-1, Alliance obtained a split sample at 11 feet (TPl 1-Sl). From TP2-2, Alliance obtained two split samples, including TP22-S1 obtained from the bottom of the test pit at 12 feet, and TP22-S2 collected from the spoils pile. From

A92-470.txt 7

RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL m . „ „ A » „ „ „ „ =

M ^ ' ^ ^ Tecnnoiogies Corporauon

302394

Page 13: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

TP3-1, Alliance obtained a split sample for the bottom of the test pit at 13 feet (TP31-S1). From TPl-2, Alliance obtained one split sample from the bottom of the test pit at 8 feet.

The Golder field team used one disposable sampling utensil per sampling location and discarded the utensil into the test pit during backfilling. When a split was required, Golder and Alliance sample containers were alternately filled beginning with the volatile organic fraction until aU sample jars were filled. All samples were obtained as grabs.

Table 2-1 summarizes Golder's and Alliance's soil sample locations, identification numbers (ID nos.) and the dates samples were collected.

2.3 Drum Sampling

Golder collected two drum samples during the test pit program. One drum was sampled in TP2-2 and one in TP3-2. Alliance split one drum sample from TP3-2.

The ChemWaste crew entered TP2-2 and found one drum that contained a thick, black, oil-like substance (See photo. Appendix A). It was determined in the field that sufficient volume of this substance was not available to sample. However, ChemWaste collected a sample for Golder from another drum containing soil. All other drums in TP2-2 were crushed, relatively unweathered and appeared to be empty.

TABLE 2-1. SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS

Test Pit

TPl-1

TPl-1

TP2-2

TP2-2

TP3-1

TP3-2

TPl-2

TPl-2

Sample Location

TPll-Sl (11 ft)

TPl 1-SI (Dup)

TP22-S2 (spoils)

TP22-S1 (12 ft)

TP31-S1 (13 ft)

TP32-S2

TP12-S2 (8 ft)

TP12-S1 (spoils)

Alliance ID (organics/inorganics)

BGH41/MBEZ43

BGH42MBEZ44 (Dup)

BGH43/MBEZ45

BGH44/MBEZ46

BGH45/MBEZ47

N/A

BGH47/MBEZ49

N/A

Golder ID

GB9190

N/A

GB9188

GB9187

GB9191

GB9446

GB9.450

GB9449

Date Collected

3/1/91

3/1/91

3/5/91

3/5/91

3/5/91

3/7/91

3/8/91

3/8/91

A92-470.txt

RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL XI4 ALLIANCE

M^^i^^^ecr]no\ogiesCoijiO[ahor\

302395

Page 14: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

A rusted drum found in TP3-2 did not have a lid and contained a reddish, resin-like material (see photo. Appendix B). The material was solid and had to be broken into pieces with a hammer to collect samples. Therefore, no sample for volatile organic analysis was collected.

Table 2-2 summarizes the drum sample locations and ID nos.:

TABLE 2-2. DRUM SAMPLING LOCATIONS

Test Pit

TP2-2

TP3-2

Sample Location

TP22-S3

TP32-S1

Alliance ID (organics/inorganics)

N/A

BGH46/MBEZ48

Golder ID

GB9189

GB9447

Date Collected

3/6/91

3/7/91

2.4 QA/QC Sampling

Golder was not required by the Test Pit Program Work Plan to collect any QA/C^C samples. Alliance, however, collected a duplicate and MS/MSD sample from TPl-1.

2.5 Health and Safety

ChemWaste conducted daily safety meetings regarding the potential hazards associated with heavy equipment and excavations. Personnel were instructed to make eye contact with the operators before moving near the backhoe or into the pit. Also, ChemWaste personnel were equipped with walkie talkies. The exclusion zone was defined by a snow fence and staked out with caution tape.

Golder personnel and the Alliance representative donned level C protective equipment. The ChemWaste crew donned level B personal protective gear since they were physically excavating and/or entering the test pits.

Air quality was monitored by both Golder and ChemWaste with PID instruments in the breathing zone during excavation activities. In addition, ChemWaste used an LEL/O2 meter.

Golder collected three eight hour continuous air samples each day during excavations except on March 6, 1991 (refer to Section 3.2) as specified in Section 3.8 of Golder's Work Plan. Samples were collected with SUMMA canisters.

A92-470.txt

RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL XK ALLIANCE

M ^ l ^ 4 ^ ^ Tecnnoiogies Corcoraiion

302396

Page 15: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

According to Section 3.8 of Golder's Work Plan, one sample was to be in an upwind location and two downwind. However, the wind changed directions many times during the day, therefore, Golder generally placed one canister on each side of the landfill except by the steep bedrock escarpment. Golder felt it was not necessary to place one here because the escarpment provided a shield from the wind. Figure 2-1 depicts the relative Summa canister locations by number.

Table 3-1 summarizes the air sampling program.

TABLE 3-1. AIR SAMPLE«^G LOCATIONS

Golder ID

Air #2 Air #3 Air #4 Air #5 Air #6 Air #7 Air #8 Air #9 Air #10 Ai r# l l Air #12 Air #13 Air #14 Air #15 Air #16 Air #17 Air #18 Air #19 Air #20 Air #21 Air #22

Location

2 5 7 5 6 7 2 4 5 2 4 6 no vacuum/no sample 6 7 2 6 8 2 3 4

Date

2/28/91 2/28/91 2/28/91 3/1/91 3/1/91 3/1/91 3/4/91 3/4/91 3/4/91 3/5/91 3/5/91 3/5/91 3/6/91 3/6/91 3/6/91 3/7/91 3/7/91 3/7/91 3/8/91 3/8/91 3/8/91

3.0 SUMMARY OF DEVIATIONS

3.1 General Overview

Overall, tasks performed by Golder and observed by Alliance at the site were conducted in a professional manner. The Golder field team conducted the test pit

A92-470.txt

RECYCLED PAPER

10

ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL XK ALLIANCE

M ^ 4 i r ^ Tecnnoiogies Co^Doraiion_

;' 302397

Page 16: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

program with a clear understanding of the tasks to be completed. The Alliance representative communicated daily with Golder field team.

Deviations noted by Alliance during oversight of the test pitting activities are discussed in the following section.

3.2 Deviations from Golder's Test Pit Program Work Plan

• Due to the presence of water in most of the test pits, Golder personnel did not utilize a magnetometer to determine the presence of buried metal at the bottom of the test pits as specified in Section 3.3 of Golder's Test Pit Work Plan. It is noted that water was not encountered in TPl-2, and magnetometry could have been performed. However, the magnetometer was not on site during excavation of TPl-2.

® On March 6, 1991, one of the SUMMA canisters did not have a vacuum. As a result, only two air samples were collected as opposed to three specified in the Test Pit Work Plan, Section 1.2. The laboratory sub-contracted by Golder to supply the canisters did not provide Golder with a spare canister.

» Test pits TPl-1 and TP2-2 were left open overnight A temporary fence was constructed around the pits and a tarpaulin was placed over the spoils pile. The area was patrolled by a night watchman. The Golder Work Plan stated in Section 3.3 that test pits would be backfilled at the end of each day.

• The drums found and sampled in TP3-2 and TP2-2 were not labelled with paint as described in Section 3.3 of the Test Pit Work Plan.

3.3 Modification to Alliance's Field Oversight Work Plan

Two modifications to the procedures outiined in the Alliance Work Plan were necessary to accommodate the conditions encountered in the field.

<» The EPA/Alliance split sample obtained from the drum in TP3-2 was not a representative split. The sample was obtained by hammering the material in the drum and breaking pieces of the material off and placing them in sample containers.

® Golder utilized "disposable" sampling tools during sampling activities, therefore, rinses were not collected. Consequentiy, Alliance did not obtain split rinsate samples as described in Section 7.5 of Alliance's Brossman Short Form found in Appendix A of the Oversight Work Plan.

A92-470.txt 11

RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL XK ALLIANCE

£ ^ ^ $ M ^ S L _TecnnoiogiesCo_rpofaion

3 0 2 3 9 8

Page 17: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

4.0 COMPARISON OF EPA/ALLIANCE AND GOLDER SPLIT SAMPLE ANALYTICAL DATA

4.1 Introduction

Alliance was directed by EPA to collect six soil/drum split samples at the Cortese Landfill site. These samples are listed in Tables 2-1 and 2-2. The split samples were obtained in accordance with Alliance's EPA-approved "Final Oversight Work Plan, Test Pit Program, Cortese Landfill Site", dated January 29, 1991.

The EPA/Alliance samples were analyzed through the EPA Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) for TCL volatiles, TCL semivolatiles, TCL pesticides/PCBs, TAL metals and total cyanide. It can not be confirmed that Golder's split samples were analyzed by similar methods, since only summary tables and no raw data were received for review by Alliance.

The objective for split sample collection during this effort was to quantitatively compare analytical results obtained by Golder to those from the EPA/Alliance samples.

4.2 Quality Control Review of EPA/Alliance Data

Tables 4-1 and 4-2 provide summary tables comparing positive analytical results from the Golder split samples with the validated results of the EPA/Alliance split samples. Validation of the EPA/Alliance data was performed in accordance with Region II guidance by Weston/ESAT and Alliance's subcontractor, ChemTech and approved by the EPA Region n Monitoring Measurements Branch (MMB).

A review of the EPA/AUiance data validation reports indicates that although most of the data were acceptable, several data points were estimated due to laboratory quality control problems.

The following analytes were detected in both the Golder and EPA/Alliance data:

® Volatiles Organics (VOCs): acetone, chloroform, 2-butanone, 4-methyl-2-pentanone, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylene.

" Semivolatiles Organics (SVOCs): phenol, 1,2-dichlorobenzene, benzoic acid and 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene.

» Inorganics: aluminum, arsenic, barium, beryllium, calcium, chromium, copper, iron, lead, magnesium, manganese, nickel, potassium, sodium, vanadium and zinc.

A92-470.txt 12

RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL # 4 . . . . . . . . . #4r4 ALLIANCE

M ^ y ^ S ^ ^ Tecnnoiogies Corporaiion

3 0 2 3 9 9

Page 18: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

Table 4-1. COIVIPARISON OF GOLDER AND EPA/ALLIANCE SPLIT SAMPLES ORGANICS IN SOIL (ug/Kg)

L»J

Analyte

Volatile Organics Methylene chloride Acetone 1,2-Dlchloroethene (total) Chloroform 2-Butanone (MEK) Trichloroethene Benzene 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) 2-Hexanone Tetrachloroethene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylene (total)

Semivolatiles Phenol 2-Chlorophenol 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Dlchlorobenzene 4-Methylphenol Benzoic acid 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene Di-n-Butylphthalate Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate Dl-n-octyl phthalate

Pestlcide/PCBs no compounds detected

mmmi ^mm^mm EPA/Alliance BGH41

6UJ 14 UJ 6U 6U

12U 6U 6U

12U 12U 6U 6U 2J 4J

390 UJ 390 UJ 390 UJ 390 UJ 390 UJ

1900 UJ 390 UJ 390 UJ 390 UJ 390 UJ

Golder GB9190

ND ND

-ND ND ND

— ND ND

— ND ND ND

ND --

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

RPD

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

mnMw^mm^l^&M EPA/Alliance BGH47

6U 13U 6U 6U

12U 6U 6U

12U 12U 6U 6U 6U 6U

390 U 390 U 390 U 390 U 390 U

1900U 390 U 390 U 390 U 390 U

Golder GB9450

5 16 ~

ND ND ND

-ND ND

• -

ND ND ND

ND ~ -

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

RPD

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA / NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

iiiiiiiiiiiiM ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ EPAi/Alliance BGH44

28 U 63 U 5J

17 55 29 3J 9J

12U 5J

120 35

180

390 UJ 390 UJ 120 J 190 J 94 J

1900 UJ 740 J 250 J 190 J 390 UJ

Golder GB9187

14 146

~ 6

144 14 ..

26 ND

~ 54 28

173

ND --

354 ND ND

1180 ND ND ND

RPD

NA NA NA

96* 89* 70*

NA 97*

NA NA

76* 22 4

NA NA NA

60* NA NA

46 NA NA NA

I

o to :

O o

A92-456.WK1

Page 19: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

Table 4 -1 . COMPARISON OF GOLDER AND EPA/ALLIANCE SPLIT SAMPLES ORGANICS IN SOIL (ug/Kg)

(continued)

Analyte

Volatile Organics Methylene chloride Acetone 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) Chloroform 2-Butanone (MEK) Trichloroethene Benzene 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) 2-Hexanone Tetrachloroethene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylene (total)

Semivolatiles Phenol 2-Chlorophenol 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 4-Methylphenoi Benzoic acid 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene Di-n-Butylphthalate Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate Di-n-octyl phthalate

Posticide/PCBs no compounds detected

WMtMmi^^^^mmm EPA/Alliance BGH43

6UJ 92 J

6UJ 6UJ

110J 6UJ 6UJ 8J

11 UJ 6UJ 6UJ 6UJ 6UJ

120 J 380 U 100 J 44 J

380 U 170 J 270 J 380 U 380 U 380 U

Golder GB9188

ND 643

" ND

1320 ND

— 389 110

-ND ND ND

ND -—

ND ND

2494 307 ND ND ND

RPD

NA 150*

NA NA

169* NA NA

192* NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA

174* 13

NA NA NA

m m m i ^ ^ ^ m ^ ^ EPA/Alliance BGH45

6U 43 U

6U 6U

11 U 6U 6U

11 U 11 U 6U 6U 6U 6U

380 UJ 56 J 58 J

380 UJ 380 UJ

1800 UJ 380 UJ 380 UJ 130 J 380 UJ

Golder GB9191

4 93 -

ND ND ND

-ND ND

-ND ND ND

ND -~

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

RPD

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA / NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

m m ^ (omm EPA/Alliance BGH46

2700 340 U 340 U 340 U 340 U

1600 U 340 U 340 U 340 U 340 U

Golder GB9447

5 ND

" ND ND ND

-ND ND ND ND ND ND

9630 " -

ND ND ND ND

1890 ND

1580

RPD

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

112*

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

w o to

o

U " Analyte was not detected at the concentration listed. J =: Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identified during the quality control review. R = Non-detected value was rejected due to laboratory quality control problems. RPD = Relative percent difference; RPD is calculated only when analytes are detected in both samples. * = Results exceed acceptance criteria for field duplicates -- RPD > 50% ND = Analyte was not detected and the detection limit is unknown " = Analyte was not reported NA = Not Applicable

A92-456.WK1

Page 20: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

Table 4-2. COMPARISON OF GOLDER AND EPA/ALLIANCE SPLIT SAMPLES INORGANICS IN SOIL (mg/Kg)

U l

Analyte

Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc

CRDL

40 12 2

40 1

1000 2

10 5

20 0.6

1000 3 8

1000 1000

10 4

iii*iisitiiiiiB ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ EPA/Alliance MBEZ43

10200 4.00 UJ

6.9 53.1 0.51 468 10.1 J 8.8 J

15.0 J 18700

12.3 2680 1180 13.8 J 701

42.8 6.3 U

47.4

Golder GB9190

13200 ~

4.3 71.0 0.51 480 11.0 9.8

12.0 22300

11.0 2740 1650 15.0

1100 ND

15.0 54.0

RPD

26 NA

46 29

0 3 9

11 22 18 11 2

33 8

44 NA NA

13

wmm^^^^^m^m EPA/Alliance MBEZ49

8860 5.50 J 6.1

42.2 0.25 448 8.5 8.5 J

26.1 J 17200

27.3 2920 709 16.0 J 801 31.9 5.4

64.5

Golder GB9450

7900 —

4.5 44.0 0.29 490 7.0 5.8

12.0 13900

11.0 1800 513 11.0 830 ND 8.5

46.0

RPD

11 NA

30 4

15 9

19 • 38 74* 21 85* 47 32 37

4 NA

45 33

mmm^mii^m^m EPA/Alliance MBEZ46

9980 4.3 J 6.3

55.4 0.52 382 9.1 J 9.3 J

11.3 J 17800

12.6 2730

556 16.3 J 904 52.4 6.5

47.5

Golder GB9187

10500 ~

4.4 58.0 0.40 320 8.7 8.0

19.0 18600

11.0 2390

621 15.0 920 ND

11.0 49.0

RPD

5 NA

36 5

26 18 4

15 51

4 14 13 11 8 2

NA 51

3

O i ^ I O I

N> ;

A92-457.WK1

Page 21: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

Table 4-2.

ON

w o to

o

COMPARISON OF GOLDER AND EPA/ALLIANCE SPLIT SAMPLES (continued) INORGANICS IN SOIL (mg/Kg)

Analyte

Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium Sodium Vanadium Zinc

CRDL

40 12 2

40 1

1000 2

10 5

20 0.6

1000 3 8

1000 1000

10 4

'mmm^^mmmmmmmi EPA/Alliance MBEZ45

7790 3.40 UJ

5.9 27.8 0.21 217 7.5 8.0 J

11.5 J 14900

9.4 2760

752 14.4 J 749 71.8 4.7

37.6

Golder GB9188

8530 —

5.3 27.0 0.33 220 7.9 7.4

12.0 16700

8.2 2540

795 13.0 760 63.0 9.9

38.0

RPD

9 NA

11 3

44 1 5 8 4

11 14 8 6

10 1

13 71

1

m m m ^ ^ m ^ ^ ^ EP/VAIIiance MBEZ47

4860 3.80 UJ 4.5

18.2 0.22 U 361 5.4 5.1 J 8.1 J

10200 14.1

1870 193

10.4 J 526 18.2 2.5 37

Golder GB9191

5890 -

2.4 17.0 0.25 440 5.0 4.8

11.0 10500

6.9 1770 210 9.7

520 ND 6.0 38

RPD

19 NA

61 7

NA 20

8 &

30 3

69* 5 8 7 1

NA 82

3

TP32-S1 (drum) EPA/Alliance MBEZ48

22.8 3.80 UJ 0.45 U

13700 0.22 U 27.6

1.1 9.0 J

0.22 U 46.6

1.9 13.2 1.5 1.7

22.6 U 71.9 0.67 U 6.4

Golder GB9447

700 -

ND 11400

ND 100 ND ND 1.9

1300 0.83 210

34 ND 71

75.0 ND

16.0

RPD

187* NA NA

18 NA

113 NA NA NA

186* 78

176 183*

NA NA

4 NA

86

U = Analyte was not detected at the concentration indicated. J = Quantitation is approximate due to limitations identified during the quality control review. R = Non-detected value was rejected due to laboratory quality control problems. RPD = Relative percent difference; RPD is calculated only when analytes are detected in both samples. NA = Not applicable. ND = Analyte was not detected. - = Analyte was not reported * = Results exceed acceptance criteria for field duplicates ~ one value is > 5 x CRDL and RPD > 50% ** = Results exceed acceptance criteria for field duplicates - both values are < 5 x CRDL and absolute difference > 4 x CRDL.

A92-457.WK1

Page 22: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

4.3 Split Sample Comparison

4.3.1 Comparison Acceptance Criteria

Currently, EPA has not published guidance pertaining to the quantitative comparison of split samples which are analyzed by two different laboratories. Consequently, Alliance has developed a comparison procedure that calculates the relative percent difference (RPD) of detected compounds in each data set. An acceptance criteria is then applied to the calculated RPD to evaluate the comparability of the split samples. The acceptance criteria for organics and inorganic results above five times the contract required detection limit (CRDL) is a RPD of 50%. For inorganic results that are below five times the CRDL, the acceptance criteria is an absolute difference of less than four times the CRDL.

Accordingly, Alliance compared the Golder and EPA/Alliance data by leniently applying the above acceptance criteria to RPD calculations. Results below the acceptance criteria were considered adequate comparability.

4.3.2 Comparison Results

A quantitative comparison of the EPA/Alliance and Golder data, utilizing the above comparison procedure, is presented in tables 4.1 and 4.2. A summary of the comparison is given below. Where chemical results were not available from both EPA/Alliance and the Golder, no data comparison is provided.

Sample location TPll -Sl

Volatile Organics - Comparability was acceptable.

Semivolatile Organics - Comparability was acceptable.

Inorganics - Comparability was acceptable.

Sample location TP12.S2

Volatile Organics - Comparability was acceptable.

Semivolatile Organics - Comparability was acceptable.

Inorganics - Comparability was acceptable for all analytes except for copper and lead. The Golder results appeared to be slightly biased towards lower concentrations.

A92-470.txt 17

RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL # 4 . . . . . . . . ^ g^t, ALLIANCE

^•#A«l..Jecnaojpgiesj;;orepia!ign_

I 302404

Page 23: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

Sample location TP22-S1

Volatile Organics - Five of the seven compared compounds had comparabilities outside the acceptance criteria. Of these compounds, the EPA/Alliance results for trichloroethene and toluene were more than twice the Golder reported results.

Semivolatile Organics - Comparability was acceptable for the majority of analytes, however, 1,2-dichlorobenzene had a RPD that was just outside the acceptance criteria. In addition, EPA/Alliance reported below CRQL concentrations for 1,4-dichloro-benzene, 4-methylphenol, di-n-butylphthalate and bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate that were either not detected or not reported by Golder.

Inorganics - Comparability was acceptable.

Sample location TP22-S2 (spois)

Volatile Organics - All three compared analytes, acetone, 2-butanone and 4-raethyl-2-pentanone, had RPDs that were significantly outside the acceptance criteria. The Golder VOC results appeared to be biased towards higher concentrations.

Semivolatile Organics - Comparability was acceptable for the majority of analytes, however, benzoic acid had a RPD that was significantly outside the acceptance criteria. In addition, EPA/Alliance reported below CRQL concentrations for phenol, 1,4-dichlorobenzene and 1,2-dichlorobenzene that were not detected by Golder.

Inorganics - Comparability was acceptable.

Sample location TP31-S1

Volatile Organics - Comparability was acceptable.

Semivolatile Organics - Comparability was acceptable, however, EPA reported below CRQL concentrations for 2-chlorophenol, 1,4-dichlorobenzene and bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate that were not detected by Golder.

Inorganics - Comparability was acceptable for all analytes except for lead.

Sample location TP32-S1 (Drum)

Semivolatile Organics - Comparability was acceptable for all analytes except for, phenol which had a RPD that was significantly outside the acceptance criteria.

A92-470.txt 18

RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL # 4 „ „ . . « „ . « . « . #474 ALLIAiyCE

# i y 4 y 4 Technologies Co-Dorai,on

f 302405

Page 24: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

Inorganics - Comparability was acceptable for all analytes except for aluminum, iron and manganese. Additionally, the Golder positive results appeared to be biased towards higher concentrations.

5.0 CONCLUSIONS

Based upon observations made by Alliance from February 28, 1991 through March 8, 1991, and from the information and data obtained by Alliance subsequent to the field program, the following conclusions are made with regard to the Test Pit Program.

5.1 Effectiveness of Test Pit Program

The test program was effectively implemented and completed by Golder and ChemWaste. In most cases, Golder and ChemWaste followed the procedures specified in Golder's EPA-approved "Test Pit/Spill Containment Work Plan." A number of deviations were noted, however, it is not likely that these deviations diminish the effectiveness of the program. Although the elimination of the magnetometer survey does lessen the amount of information obtained during the program, the test pit excavations allowed Golder and Alliance to gain an effective understanding of the nature of the waste materials deposited in the three investigation areas.

5.2 Nature and Extent of Contamination

The field observations and results of the field screening and laboratory analysis completed by Golder and Alliance provide useful information and data to evaluate the nature and extent of contamination at the Cortese landfill. Based on this information. Alliance concludes that significant levels of contamination do not appear to exist in the three areas investigated during the test pit program. Note, however, that a risk assessment is required prior to determining the true nature of the hazards posed by the site.

The highest levels of VOCs and SVOCs were noted in Investigation Area 2 (TP2-2) in the vicinity of Zones A and B which were previously noted as having anomalous geophysical results. VOCs detected by Golder at low levels included methylene chloride, acetone, 2-butanone, trichloroethane, chloroform, MIBK, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene. A number of these compounds (i.e., 2-butanone) are typical by-products generated during biodegradation of industrial wastes. A number of SVOCs were also detected at slightiy higher levels than the VOCs, however, considering the higher quantitation limits (QLs) established for SVOCs, these levels do not appear significant. With minor exception, VOCs and SVOCs were not detected in Investigation Areas 1 and 3.

In most cases, inorganics were detected at similar concentrations in all three investigation areas. Inorganics detected at the highest concentrations were those

A92-470.txt 19

RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL # 4 . . . . . . . « _ #4f4 ALLIANCE

^ • f f J ^ ^ P J ^ Tecnnoiogies CofpQraiion_

i 302406

Page 25: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

typically identified at elevated levels in municipal landfills including iron, magnesium and manganese. Heavy metals (i.e., lead, chromium, arsenic) were not found at significant levels.

One unusual result was noted. The TP32-S1 drum sample from TP-3 showed relatively high levels of phenol (4630 pg/kg detected by Golder) and barium (13,700 and 11,400 pg/kg detected by Golder and Alliance, respectively). These levels may warrant concern.

5.3 Split Sample Data Comparison

Overall, the qualitative comparability for the two data sets was acceptable, although the quantitative comparabilities for the volatile, semivolatile and inorganics data varied. The following samples were noted as having poor quantitative comparability.

• Sample TP22-S1 - Five of the seven compared volatile organic compounds were not comparable and the EPA/Alliance results for trichloroethene and toluene were more than twice the Golder reported results.

• Sample TP22-S2 - The results for the three compared volatile organics; acetone, 2-butanone and 4-methyl-2-pentanone, were signiflcantiy different.

Because the above samples were soil, the poor comparabilities could be attributed to sample heterogeneity. However, Golder should confirm their results for these samples if the concentrations approach action levels.

No pesticide/PCB results were reported by Golder. It is not clear if the samples were analyzed for pesticide/PCBs or if no pesticide/PCB s were detected. However, since EPA/Alliance did not detect any pesticide/PCBs in their split samples, no further action is required.

6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

6.1 Removal versus Remedial Response

At the request of EPA, Alliance evaluated whether or not a removal action is warranted at the Cortese Landfill site, or whether it would be more appropriate to address potential site hazards during the remedial action phase of the program. Based on the results of the test pit program. Alliance does not believe a removal action is warranted at this time for the following reasons.

A significant number of drums was encountered in Investigation Area 2 only. The majority of the drums were crushed, empty and contained primarily solid materials. It does not appear that significant releases of liquids and/or chemicals are continuing to

A92-470.txt 20

RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL # 4 Ar4 ALLIANCE g^r -^^

I 302407

Page 26: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

occur under these conditions. Further, given the fact that significant levels of contamination were not identified in most samples collected, an imminent human health and/or ecological hazard does not appear to be posed by the materials encountered in the test pits.

There are, however, concerns worth noting. The fairly significant infiltration of water into the excavation areas, whether indicative of "perched" or "shallow" water table conditions, suggests ongoing interaction of landfill wastes with ground water is occurring, and continuing low level releases of contaminants to ground water is likely. Given this scenario, and the fact that the test pit program did not collect and analyze a large number of samples, the extent of the continued leaching of contaminants to ground water and the adjacent waterways is unknown. Therefore, continued investigation of leachate generation and hydrogeologic conditions under the Phase HI remedial investigation is warranted. Further, the "development of alternatives" process should proceed to investigate engineering methods for minimizing leachate generation and the resultant impacts on ground water.

In the event that further sampling of leachate and/or landfiU waste materials reveals significant levels of contamination, alternatives which include excavation and treatment/disposal of "hot spots" encountered within the landfill should be formulated in the feasibility study.

6.2 Recommended Investigations

Further investigative work under the RI/FS program is recommended to evaluate the potential threat that the landfills, drums, and waste material pose to the environment and to human health. Much of the landfill waste is located within the ground water table and the close proximity to adjacent water bodies poses some concern.

Additional sampling of the ground water, surface water, sediments and soil should be conducted to evaluate the extent of contamination associated with the site. The geology and hydrogeology of the site also requires further investigation to ensure that migration pathways can be determined with accuracy.

A baseline risk assessment is recommended to provide an evaluation of the potential threat to human health and the environment in the absence of remedial action. Possible human and environmental receptors should be defined and evaluated in the assessment The FS should then be developed to address all contaminants and migration pathways that pose risk to all environmental and/or human receptors.

A92-470.txt 21

RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL # 4 . . . . . . . . . . #4f4 ALLIANCE

^4#j|j | |f jk Tecnnoiogies Cofpofaiion

302408

Page 27: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

APPENDIX A

PHOTOGRAPHS

A92-470.txt A-1

RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL / 4 . . . . . . . # , P .

Ar4 ALLIANCE ^A4pj||Rk Tecnnoiogies Cofporaiion

( 3 0 2 4 0 9

Page 28: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

® T P l - 1 :

Looking North

® T P l - 1 :

0-1'BGS

302410

Page 29: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

T P l - 1 : 5-BGS

® T P l - 1 :

Newspaper Dated 09 April 1974

r 302411

Page 30: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

© Temporary Spoils

Stockpile

® Air fJlonitoring

Cannister

302412

Page 31: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

® TPl -1

® T P l - 1 :

Native Soil

302413

Page 32: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

® TP 2-2:

Crushed Drum

@

TP 2-2: Monitoring Air

in Drum

MSa&il/G

/ " 302414

Page 33: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

@

TP 2-2: Monitoring Drum

raftS92B!f3i;=5Si

@

TP 2-2: Crushed Drum with Substance Oozing Out, Looking West

302415

Page 34: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

MS2S.'1/G

TP 2-2: Side Trench

@

TP2-2: Side Trench with Perched

Water Table to the Fore

Page 35: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

' V-

TP 2-2: Hand Probe with Thick Oily Substance trom Drum

@

TP 2-2: Sampling Soil

Filled Drum

/^" 302417

Page 36: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

® TP3-1:

1.5'BGS

@

TP3-1: Backhoe Looking North

302418

Page 37: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

@

TP3-1: Looking East

from RR Tracks

TP 3-1: Native Soil

302419

Page 38: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

@

TP 3-1: Pit Completed

TP 3-2: Looking North

302420

Page 39: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

TP3-2

(24)

TP3-2: Drum

^ ^ ' m s m a ^

302421

Page 40: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

(25)

TP3-2: Drum

TP 3-2: Looking West

USiilMG 302422

Page 41: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

(27)

TP3-2: Berm

TP3-2: Material from Drum

302423

Page 42: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

TPl -1

uszmiG 302424

Page 43: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

APPENDIX B

VALIDATED ANALYTICAL DATA,

ALLIANCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

A92-470.txt B-1

RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL / f 4 ALLIANCE

^ A C J | C J k Tecnnoiogies CofDOfaiion

302425

Page 44: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

lA VOL.ATILE CRGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

E.='A SAMPLE NO.

Xab Name: CEIMIC CORP

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 15939

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: 5_.

Level: (low/med!) LOUJ

'/. Moisture: not dec.

(j-p /i- ;) BGH-i 1

Contract: 63D90056

SAS No. : SDG No.: BGH^il

0 Cq/mL) G

Lab Sample ID: 910120-01

Lab File ID: E3240

17

Column: (pack/cap) PACK

Date Received: 03/02/91

Date Analyzed: 03/06/91

Dilution Factor: 1.0

CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: / (uq/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG Q

7d-B7-3 74-33-9 75-01-4 75-00-3 75-09-2 S7-64-1 75-15-0 75-35-4 75-34-3 540-59-0 67-66-3 107-06-2 78-93-3 71-55-6 56-23-5 108-05-4 75-27-4 78-87-5 10061-01-5 79-01-6 124-48-1 79-00-5 71-43-2 10061-02-6 75-25-2 — 108-10-1 591-7S-6 127-18-4 79-34-5 108-88-3 lOS-90-7 100-41-4 100-42-5 1330-20-7

-Chloromethane -Bromomethane -Vinyl Chloride, -Chi oroethane • -Methylene Chloride. -Acetone Carbon Disulfide -1,1-Dichloroethene -1, 1 -D i c h 1 or oet h an e -1, 2-Dichlciroethene (total). -Ch 1 or o for m ' -1.2-Dichl oroethane, -2-Butanone -1. 1, 1-Tr ichloroethane. -Carbon Tetrachlor ide_ -Vinyl Acetate -Br omod i c h1 or omet h ane. •1,2-Dichloropropane -c is-1, 3-Dichl oropropene_ -Tr ichloroethene Dibromochloromethane •1,1, 2-Tr ichl oroethane. -Benzene T r a n s - 1 . 3 - D i c h l o r o p r o o e n e B r o m o f o r m 4 - M e t h y l - 2 - P e n t a n o n e 2 - H e x a n o n e T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e 1 . 1 . 2 , 2 - T e t r a c h l o r o e t h a n e T o l u e n e C h l o r o b e n z s n e E t h y l b e n z e n e S t v r e n e Total Xylenes.

FORM I VOA

12 12 12 12

, - ;3 -14

6 6 . 6

• 6 6 6

. 12 6 6

12 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

12 12

6 . . 6

6 6 2 5 4

r. \ I4t j

r ' ' -

1 1

!U !U !U !U I ' J & J J T

!B - j r ' !U !U :u !U !U !U lU !U !U !U !U !U !U !U !U !U tu !U !U !U !U !U !U !U ! U ! J !U ! J t

1 / 8 7 Rev " \

i 3 0 2 4 2 6

Page 45: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS ,

Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP

lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 15939

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: 5.0 Cg/mL) G.

Level: Qow/med) LOUJ

"A Moisture: not dec. 17

Column (pack/cap) PACK

EPA SAMPLE NO.

BGH<i 1 Contract: 68D900.56

SAS No.: SDG No.: BGH41

Lab Sample ID: 910120-01

Lab File ID: E3240

Date Received: 03/02/91

Date Analyzed: 03/06/91

Dilution Factor: 1.0

Number TICs found: CONCENTRATION UNITS: <uq/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG

CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. G!

r . i l 4 7

FORM I VOA-T IC 1/87 Rev.

302427

Page 46: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

lA VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NO,

Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No. : 15939

Matrix: Csoi1/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (q/mL) G.

Level: (low/med) LOU

y. Moisture: not dec.

BGH42 Contract: 68D90056

SAS No.: . SDG No.: BGH41

Lab Sample ID: 910120-02

Lab File ID: E3241

17

Column: Cpack/cap) PACK

Date Received: 03/02/91

Date Analyzed: 03/06/91

Dilution Factor: 1. 0

CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (uq/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG Q

74-87-3 Ch 1 or omet hane 74-83-9—• Bromomethane 75-01-4 Vinvl Chloride 75-00-3 Chi oroethane T ^ riCl O — Mi-1-fTk...lmnn r^U '\ ^ ^ ^ r \ r - \

/--i '•.'•s z — nethvlene Chloride 67-64-1 • Acetone 75-15-0 Carbon Disul fide 75-35-4 1, 1 -D i c h 1 or oet hen e 75-34-3 1, 1-D ichl oroethane 540-59-0 1.2-Dichloroethene (total) 67-66-3 Ch 1 or o f or m 107-06-2 1.2-D ichl or oet hane 78-93-3 2-Butanone 71-55-6 1. 1. 1-Tr ichl oroethane 56-23-5 Car bon Tet r ac h 1 or i de 108-05-4 Vinvl Acetate 75-27-4 Br omod i c h 1 or omet hane 78-87-5 1.2-DichloroDroRane 10061-01-5 c is-1,3-Dich1 or opr opene 79-01 -6 Tr i c h 1 or oet hene 124-48-1 D i br omoch 1 or omet hane 79-00-5 ~ 1 . 1, 2-Tr ichl oroethane 71-43-2 Benzene 10061-02-6 Trans-1, 3-Dichloroprc.pene ! 75-25-2 Bromoform 108-10-1 4-Methvl-2-Pentanone ! 591-78-6 2-Hexanone 127-18-4 Tetrachloroethene ! 79-34-5 1. 1.2. 2-Tetrachloroethane 108-88-3 Toluene ! 108-90-7 Chi or obenz ene ! 100-41-4 Ethvl benzene 100-42-5 Stvrene ! 1330-20-7 Total Xvlenes !

! 12 ! 12 ! 12 1 12 ! - 4 I 22 ! 6 ! 6 ! 6

6 ! 6 ! 6 I 12

6 ! 6

12 I ' 6

6 ! 6

6 6 6 6 6

. 6 12 12 6 6 6 6 ••

6 : 6 6

1 t

lU !U !U !U IBJ'LiO' IB 'U^T !U !U !U !U !U !U lU !U !U !U !U !U !U lU !U lU ! !U !U I !U I .'U ! !U ! !U ! !U ! ! U • i !U ! !U ! !U ! !U I f • f 1 1

FORM I VOA f, I 155/87 RE

302428

Page 47: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS

EPA SAMPLE NC

Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 15939

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (q/mL) G.

Level: (low/med) LOU

y. Moisture: not dec. 17

Column (pack/cap) PACK

Contract: 63D90056

SAS No.:

BGH42

SDG No.: BGH41

Lab Sample ID: 910120-02

Lab File ID: E32.il

Date Received: 03/02/91

Date Analyzed: 03/06/91

Dilution Factor: 1.0

Number TICs found: 0 CONCENTRATION UNITS: ^ (uq/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG •'

CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q

•m

r . i l 5 8

FORM I VOA-T IC 1 / 8 7 Rev

302429 /

Page 48: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

lA VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

Lab Name: CEIMIC CORf='

EPA SAMPLE NC.

BGH43

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 15939

Contract: 63D90056

SAS No.: SDG No.: BGH41

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (q/mL) G.

Level: (low/med) LOU

y. Moisture: not dec. 13

Column: (pack/cap) PACK

Lab Sample ID: 910120-03

Lab File ID: E3402

Date Received: 03/06/91

Date Analyzed: 03/25/91

Dilution Factor: 1.0

..•,:.-i

CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: '' (uq/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG

7 4 - 8 7 - 3 7 4 - 9 3 - 9 7 5 - 0 1 - 4 7 5 - 0 0 - 3 7 5 - 0 9 - 2 6 7 - 6 4 - 1 7 5 - 1 5 - 0 7 5 - 3 5 - 4 7 5 - 3 4 - 3 5 4 0 - 5 9 - 0 6 7 - 6 6 - 3 1 0 7 - 0 6 - 2 7 8 - 9 3 - 3 7 1 - 5 5 - 6 5 6 - 2 3 - 5 1 0 8 - 0 5 - 4 7 5 - 2 7 - 4 7 8 - 8 7 - 5 1 0 0 6 1 - 0 1 - 5 -7 9 - 0 1 - 6 1 2 4 - 4 8 - 1 7 9 - 0 0 - 5 7 1 - 4 3 - 2 1 0 0 6 1 - 0 2 - 6 -7 5 - 2 5 - 2 1 0 8 - 1 0 - 1 5 9 1 - 7 8 - 6 1 2 7 - 1 8 - 4 7 9 - 3 4 - 5 1 0 8 - 8 8 - 3 1 0 8 - 9 0 - 7 1 0 0 - 4 1 - 4 1 0 0 - 4 2 - 5 1 3 3 0 - 2 0 - 7 —

-Chi o r omet h an e _ -Bromomethane -Viny l C h l o r i d e . -Chi o r o e t h a n e - M e t h v l e n e C h l o r i d e . -Acetone -Carbon Disulfide •1, 1-Dichloroethene. •1, 1-Dichl oroethane. -1,2-Dichloroethene (total). -Ch 1 or o f or m -1,2-Dichloroethane. -2-Butanone •1, 1, 1-Tr ichl oroethane. -Carbon Tetrachloride -Vinyl Acetate. -Br omod i c h 1 or omet hane. •1, 2-Dichloropropane. -c is-1,3-Dichloropropene. -Tr ichloroethene. -D i br omoc h 1 or omet hane. -1, 1, 2-Tr ichloroethant -Benzene -Trans-1, 3-D ichl or opr op ene. -Bromoform -4-Methyl-2-Pentanone. -2-Hexanone •Tetrac hi .1 t r. '?-

•Toluene •Chlorobe •Ethylben •Styrene

oroeth Tetrac

nzene_ zene

ene h 1 or o eth ane

-Total Xvlenes

FORM I VOA

C>\

11 11 11 11

> A 92 6 6 6 6 6 6

110 6 6 11 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 8 11 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

a

!U r-

lU \ lU \ B J J IB - • lU lU !U !U !U !U I I

lU lU !U !U iU !U !U !U IU IU IU !U IJ !U IU IU IU IU IU IU IU

\>

ur!.. 1/87 Re^

302430

Page 49: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS

Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 15939

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: 5.

Level: (low/med) LOW

y. Moisture: not dec.- 13,

Column (pack/cap) PACK

0 (q/mL) G

EPA SAMPLE ND

BGH43 Contract: 68D90056

SAS No.: SDG No.: BGH41

Lab Sample ID: 910120-03

Lab File ID: E3402

Date Received: 03/06/91

Date Analyzed: 03/25/91

Dilution Factor: 1.0

Number TICs found: O CONCENTRATION UNITS: (uq/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG

CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC.

r .K 1 6 3

FORM I VOA-TIC 1 /87 Rev

3 0 2 4 3 1

Page 50: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

lA VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NO.

•' BGH44 Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP Contract: 68D90056 I

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 15939 SAS No.: _ ^ _ _ _ _ SDG No.: BGH41

Matr i x: (soi I / w a t e r) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: 5^

Level: (low/med) LOUJ

y. Moisture: not dec. 16

Column: (pack/cap) PACK

<2 ( q / m L ) G_

Lab Sample ID: 910120-04

Lab F i l e ID: E3272

Date Rece ived : 0 3 / 0 6 / 9 1

Date Analyzed: 0 3 / 1 1 / 9 1

D i l u t i o n F a c t o r : 1.0

CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: ( u g / L or ug /Kq) UG/KG .- G! ?

-

! 74-87-3 Chloromethane ! 74-33-9 Bromomethane I 75-01-4 r Vinvl Chloride ' 7 ^ r ' \ t ' \ ^ ^ — . l^i^ 1 -». . ^ *- t-» T r. n

! 75-09-2 Methvlene Chloride ! 67-64-1 Acetone ! 75-15-0 Carbon Disulfide ! 75-35-4 1. 1-Dichloroethene ! 75-34-3—• 1. 1-Dichl oroethane 1 540-59-0 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) I 67-66-3 Ch 1 or o f or m ! 107-06-2 1, 2-Dichl or oet hane ! 78-93-3 2-Butanone I 71-55-6 1, 1, 1-Tr ichloroethane 1 56-23-5 Carbon Tetrachloride I 108-05-4 Vinvl Acetate 1 75—27-4 Br omod ichl or omet han e ! 73-87-5 • — 1 , 2-Dichl or oqropane I 10061-01-5 cis-1, 3-Dichl oropropene 1 79-01-6 Trichloroethene I 124-48-1 Dibromochl oromethane ; 79-00-5 1. 1. 2-Tr ichl oroethane I 71-43-2 Benzene 1 10061-02-6 Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene I I 75-25-2 Bromoform I 108-10-1— 4-Methvl-2-Pentanone 1 ! 591-78-6 2-Hexanone 1 1 127-18-4 Tetrachloroethene I I 79-34-5 1,1,2,2-TetrachIoroethane I I 108-88-3 Toluene I I 108-90-7 Chlorobenzene 1 ; 100-41-4 Ethylbenzene I 100-42-5— Styrene 1 I 1330-20-7 Total Xvlenes I

FORM I VOA

I 12 ! 12 I 12 I 12 I 28 I 63 • 1 6 ! 6 ! 6 I 5 I 17 I 6 1 55

6 1 6

12 I 6

6 6

29 6 6 3 6 ! 6 ' 9 ! 12 1 5 ! 6 I

120 1 6 1

35 ! 6 !

180 1

" • 171 3024

1

!U IU IU !U •yB:/

IU IU IU IJ I 1

!U 1

1

!U IU U IU u u u u J U T I u U 1 J 1

U I

U 1

U I

1/87

32

Rev

Page 51: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS

EPA SAMPLE NO.

Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 15939

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: 5. 0

Level: (low/med) LOW

y. Moisture: not dec. 16

Column (pack/cap) PACK

(q/mL) G

BGH44 Contract: S8D90056

SAS No.: SDG No.: BGH41

Lab Sample ID: 910120-04

Lab File ID: E3272

Date Received: 03/06/91

Date Analyzed: 03/11/91

Dilution Factor: 1.0

Number TICs found; CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG' /

CAS NUMBER =======:====:=====

1. 000000 2. 000000

COMPOUND NAME

Unknown C3-benzene isomer

RT ========:

25.02 32.06

EST. CONC. =============

21 17

Q

J J

FORM I VOA-TIC - » 1 7 2 302433

1/87 Rev

Page 52: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

lA VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

Lab Name:'CEIMIC CORP

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 15939

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: 5.,

Level: (low/med) LOW

Con tract: 68D90056

EPA SAMPLE NO.

BGH4 =

SAS No.: SDG No.: BGH41

0 (q/mL) G

Lab Sample ID: 910120-0^

Lab File ID: E32S1

Date Received: 03/07/91

12 •/. Moisture: not dec.

Column: (pack/cap) PACK

Date Analyzed: 03/11/91

Dilution Factor: 1.0

'0"-'

CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION (uq/L or uq/Kq)

UNITS: / UG/KG y - 0

• 7 .

I 7 4 - 3 7 - 3 Chloromethane I 11 1 7 4 - 3 3 - 9 Bromomethane I 11 I 7 5 - 0 1 - 4 Vinvl C h l o r i d e I 11 I 7 5 - 0 0 - 3 Chi o r o e t h a n e I 11

I 6 7 - 6 4 - 1 Acetone I " ^ 3 1 7 5 - 1 5 - 0 Carbon D i s u l f i d e I 6 ! 7 5 - 3 5 - 4 1, l - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e I 6 ! 7 5 - 3 4 - 3 • — - — 1 . 1 - D i c h l o r o e t h a n e 1 6 ! 5 4 0 - 5 9 - 0 1 , 2 - D i c h l o r o e t h e n e ( t o t a l ) 1 6 I 6 7 - 6 6 - 3 Chloroform 1 6 I 107 -06 -2 1. 2 -Dich l o r o e t h a n e 1 6

1 / a 3^ J — .£. f u t a n w n e i 11 1 7 1 - 5 5 - 6 1. 1 . 1-Tr i c h l o r o e t h a n e I 6 1 5 6 - 2 3 - 5 - Carbon T e t r a c h l o r i d e I 6 1 108-05-4 Vinvl A c e t a t e I 11 1 7 5 - 2 7 - 4 Br omod i c h l or omet hane 1 6 I 7 8 - 8 7 - 5 1, 2 - D i c h l o r o q r o p a n e I 6 I 10061-01-5 c i s - 1 , 3 - D i c h l o r o p r o p e n e 1 6

1 /:} y 1 o — — 1 r 1'_ n 1 or we u nene i o I 124-48-1 Dibr omoc hi or omet hane I 6 I 7 9 - 0 0 - 5 1, 1, 2-Tr i c h l o r o e t h a n e f 6 1 7 1 - 4 3 - 2 Benzene 1 6 1 10061-02-6 T r a n s - 1 , 3 - D i c h l o r o p r o p e n e I 6 I 7 5 - 2 5 - 2 Bromoform 1 6 1 103-10-1 4 - M e t h v l - 2 - P B n t a n o n e I 11 I 5 9 1 - 7 8 - 6 2-Hexanone 1 11 I 127 -18-4 T e t r a c h l o r o e t h e n e f • 6 1 7 9 - 3 4 - 5 1, 1 , 2 . 2 - T e t r a c h l o r o e t h a n e I 6 1 1 0 8 - 8 8 - 3 —Toluene • 6 1 108 -90 -7 Ch lo robenzene 1 6 I 100-41-4 Ethvl benzene I 6 I 100 -42 -5 S t v r e n e I 6 1 1330-20-7 Tota l Xvlenes 1 6

!U IU IU IU !,BJ L \B^\y IU IU IU IU IU !U IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU lUJ" IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU

FORM I VOA t 190

1/87 Rev

302434

Page 53: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS

Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 15939

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: , 5.0 (q/mL) G_

Lev/el: (low/med) LOW

y. Moisture: not dec. 12

Column (pack/cap) PACK

imtract: 68D9005S

SAS No.:

EPA SAMPLE NC

BGH4 =

SDG No.: BGH41

Lab Sample ID: 910120-05

Lab File ID: E32S1

Date Received: 03/07/91

Date Analvzed: 03/11/91

Dilution Factor: 1.0

Number TICs found: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG

CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q

IS

191

FORM I VOA-TIC 1 /87 Re^

302435

Page 54: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

lA VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NO,

Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP

Lab Code; CEIMIC Case No

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/v/ol:

Lev/el: (low/med) LOW

y. Moisture: not dec. 15

Column: (pack/cap) PACK

1 5939

BGH47 Contract: 63090056

SAS No.: SDG No.: BGH-^l

0 (q/mL) G

Lab Sample ID: 910120-07

Lab File ID: E3270

Date Received: 03/09/91

Date Analyzed: 03/11/91

Dilution Factor: 1.0

CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (uq/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG

74-37-3 74-33-9 75-01-4 75-00-3 75-09-2 67-64-1 75-15-0 75-35-4 75-34-3 540-59-0 67-66-3 107-06-2 78-93-3 71-55-6 56-23-5 108-05-4 75-27-4 73-87-5 10061-01-5 79-01-6 124-48-1 79-00-5 71-43-2 10061-02-6 75-25-2 108-10-1 591-78-6 127-18-4 79-34-5 — 108-88-3 108-90-7 100-41-4 100-42-5 1330-20-7

Ch1 or omet hane Bromomethane Vinyl Chloride. Chioroethane Methylene Chloride. Acetone Carbon Disulfide 1,1-Dichloroethene 1, 1-Dichloroethane . 1, 2-Dichl or oet hene (total). Ch 1 or o f or m 1, 2-Dichl or oet hane • 2-Butanone 1 , 1 , 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e .

-Carbon T e t r a c h l o r i d e Vinyl A c e t a t e

—Bromodich lo rome thane . 1 , 2 - D i c h l o r o p r o p a n e c i s - 1 , 3 - D i c h l o r o p r o p e n e . Tr i c h l o r o e t h e n e D i br omoc h1 or omet hane 1, 1 ,2-Tr i c h l o r o e t h a n e . Benzene

- T r a n s - 1 , 3 -Dich l o r o p r o p e n e . Br omo for m 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone. 2-Hexanone Tetrachloroethene 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane. Toluene Ch1 or obenz ene. Ethylbenzene Styrene Total Xylenes.

FORM I VOA 197 I i.*J • 1/87 Rev.

302436

Page 55: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

IE VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS

Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 15939

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/v/ol: 5.0 (q/mL) G_

Lev/el : (low/med) LOW

y. Moisture: not dec.- i:

Column (pack/cap) PACK

Number TICs found: 0

EPA SAMPLE NC

BGH47 Contract: 63D90056

SAS Hri. : SDG No. : BGH41

Lab Sample ID: 910120-07

Lab File ID: E3270

Date Received: 03/09/91

Date Analyzed: 03/11/91

Dilution Factor: 1.0

•^ I

CONCENTRATION UNITS: (uq/L or ug/Kq) UG/KG . : : [ "

CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q

' I 19S FORM I VOA-TIC 1/87 Re^

302437

Page 56: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

ID PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NG.

Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 15939

Con t r ac t: 68D90056

SAS No.:

BGH41 -rp//-&!'•

Mat r i X: (soi1/wat er) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: 30.

Level: (low/med) LOW

% Moisture: not dec.

Extract ion:

(q/mL) G

SDG No.: BGH41

16 dec

Lab Sample ID: 910120-01

Lab File ID:

Date Received: 03/02/91

Date Extracted: 03/12/91

(SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONC

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 7.0

Date Analyzed: 03/27/91

Dilution Factor: 1. O'l)

CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG Q

319-84-6 319-85-7 319-36-8 58-89-9 76-44-8 309—00-2 1024-57-3 959-98-8 60-57-i 72-55-9 72-20-8 O»JJC:I 1 *if"~65~*9^^~*" 72-54-8 1031-07-8 50-29-3 72-43-5 53494-70-5 5103-71-9 5103-74-2 8001-35-2 12674-11-2 11104-28-2 11141-16-5 53469-21-9 12672-29-6 11097-69-1 11096-82-5

alpha-BHC b e t a - B H C d e l t a - B H C qamma-BHC H e p t a c h l o r A l d r i n H e p t a c h l o r E n d o s u l f a n D i e l d r i n

( L i n d a n e )

e p o x i d e I

4 . 4 ' - D D E E n d r i n E n d o s u l f a n 4 . 4 ' - D D D E n d o s u l f a n 4 , 4 ' - D D T M e t h o x y c h l E n d r i n k e t

I I

SLil f a t e

o r o n e

a l o h a - C h l o r d a n e q a m m a - C h l o r d a n e •Toxaphene A r o c l o r - 1 0 1 6 • A r o c l o r - 1 2 2 1 • A r o c l o r - 1 2 • A r o c l o r - 1 2 • A r o c l o r - 1 2 • A r o c l o r - 1 2 • A r o c l o r - 1 2

3 2 4 2 4 8 5 4 6 0

9, 9, 9. 3. 9,

9, 9, 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 94 19 94 94 90 94 94 94 94 94 90 90

1 1

IU I U ! U I U I U I U I U I U ! U I U I U I U I U I U I U I U I U I U I U I U I U I U I U I U IU IU IU 1 1

- - ;

< j

V i T ;

FORM I PEST

" j ^ i ' ^ . 1/87 Rev

302438

Page 57: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

ID PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EFA SAMPLE ND.

Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No, : 15939

Con tract: 63D90056

SAS No.:

BGH42 . ( ^ ^ ^ )

SDG No.: BGH41

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: 30.2 (g/mL) G_

Level: (low/med) LOW

y. Moisture:, not dec.

Lab Sample ID: 910120-02

Lab File ID:

17 dec

Date Received: 03/02/91

Date Extracted: 03/12/91

Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SQNi:

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pHs 7.9

Date Analyzed: 03/27/91

Dilution Factor; 1.00

CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (uq/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG Q

319-84-6 319-85-7 319-86-8 58-89-9 76-44-8 •— 309-00-2 1024-57-3 959-98-8 60-57-1 72-55-9 72-20-8 33213-65-9 72-54-8 1031-07-8 50-29-3 72-43-5 53494-70-5 5103-71-9 5103-74-2 8001-35-2 12674-11-2 11104-28-2 11141-16-5 53469-21-9 12672-29-6 11097-69-1 11096-82-5

-alpha-BHC. -beta-BHC_ delta-BHC -gamma-BHC (Lindane) -Hep t ac h 1 or -Aldrin -Heptachlor epoxide. -Endosulfan I -Dieldr in -4,4'-DDE -Endrin -Endosulfan II -4,4' -DDD - E n d o s u l f a n s u l f a t e - 4 , 4 ' - D D T . M e t h o x y c h l o r E n d r i n k e t o n e

- a l p h a - C h l o r d a n e . - g a m m a - C h l o r d a n e _ - T o x a p h e n e -Ar oc 1 or - 1 0 1 6 - A r o c l o r - 1 2 2 1 -Ar oc 1 or - 1 2 3 2 Ar oc1 o r - 1 2 4 2 Ar oc1 o r - 1 2 4 8 Ar oc1 o r - 1 2 5 4 Ar oc1 o r - 1 2 6 0

9. 9. 9. 9. 9. 9. 9. 9.

.- 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 96 19 96 96 190 96 96 96 96 96 190 190

6! 6! 61 61 61 6! 6! 6!

1 1 1 1 1

u J-u ; U ; U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U u u u u U 0

FORM I PEST

11 5 1 / 8 7 Rev,

302439

Page 58: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

ID PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP Contract: 68D90056

EPA SAMPLE NO.

BGH43

Lab Code: C-EIMIC Case No,: 15939 SAS No,: SDG No.: BGH41

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol

Level:

30. 1 (g/mL) G_

(low/med) LOW

Lab Sample ID: 910120-03

Lab File ID:

y. Moisture: not dec. 13 dec ,

Date Received: 03/06/91

Date Extracted: 03/15/91

Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONC

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH; 4.7

Date Analyzed: 03/27/91

Dilution Factor: 1.0

CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (uq/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG Q'

319-34-6 319-85-7 319-36-8 58-39-9 76-44-8 309-00-2 1024-57-3 959-98-3 60-57-1 72-55-9 72-20-8

72-54-8 1031-07-8 50-29-3 72-43-5 53494-70-5-5103-71-9 5103-74-2 8001-35-2 12674-11-2 11104-28-2 11141-16-5 53469-21-9 12672-29-6 11097-69-1 11096-82-5

alpha-BH beta-BHC delta-BHC qamma-BHC Heptachlor Aldrin Heptachlor Endosulfan Dieldr in

(Lindane)

epoxide I

4.4'-DDE Endr in Endosulfan 4,4'-DDD

II

-Endosul fan sulfate. -4,4' -DDT .' -Met hex yc h 1 or -Endrin ketone -alpha-Chlordane. -gamma-Chl or dane. -Toxaphene -Aroclor-1016_ - A r o c l o r - 1 2 2 l " -Aroc l o r - 1 2 3 2 . -Ar o d o r - 1 2 4 2 . -Aroc l o r - 1 2 4 8 . - A r o c l o r - 1 2 5 4 . -Aroc l o r - 1 2 6 0

9. 9. 9. 9. 9. 9. 9. 9.

. 13 13 18 18 18 18 18 92 18 92 92 130 92 92 92 92 92 180 180

z* • - .

2 2 *

1 1

!U •-!U !U IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU

IU Y 1 IU cr 1 1 t 1 1

r , 617 FORM I PEST 1/87 Rev.

302440

Page 59: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

ID PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE ND,

Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 15939

BGH44 Con tract: 63D90056

SAS No. : SDG No. : BGH41

Matrix; (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: 30.1 (g/mL) G_

Level: (low/med) LOW

7. Moisture: not dec.

Lab Sample ID: 910120-04

Lab File ID:

Date Received: 03/06/91

16 dec. Date Extracted: 03/15/91

Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONC

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: D « O

Date Analyzed: 03/27/91

Dilution Factor: 1.0

CA'S NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS : ( u a / L o r u g / K q ) UG/KG Q

3 1 9 - 3 4 - 6 3 1 9 - 8 5 - 7 3 1 9 - 8 6 - 8 5 3 - 8 9 - 9 7 6 - 4 4 - 8 3 0 9 - 0 0 - 2 1 0 2 4 - 5 7 - 3 9 5 9 - 9 8 - 8 6 0 - 5 7 - 1 7 2 - 5 5 - 9 7 2 - 2 0 - 8 3 3 2 1 3 - 6 5 - 9 7 2 - 5 4 - 8 1 0 3 1 - 0 7 - 8 5 0 - 2 9 - 3 7 2 - 4 3 - 5 5 3 4 9 4 - 7 0 - 5 5 1 0 3 - 7 1 - 9 5 1 0 3 - 7 4 - 2 8 0 0 1 - 3 5 - 2 1 2 6 7 4 - 1 1 - 2 1 1 1 0 4 - 2 8 - 2 1 1 1 4 1 - 1 6 - 5 5 3 4 6 9 - 2 1 - 9 1 2 6 7 2 - 2 9 - 6 1 1 0 9 7 - 6 9 - 1 1 1 0 9 6 - 8 2 - 5

a l p h a - B H C b e t a - B H C I d e l t a - B H C 1 qamma-BHC ( L i n d a n e ) I H e o t a c h l o r 1 A l d r i n H e p t a c h l o r e p o x i d e E n d o s u l f a n I D i e l d r i n 4 . 4 ' - D D E E n d r i n E n d o s u l f a n I I 4 . 4 ' - D D D E n d o s u l f a n s u l f a t e 4 . 4 ' - D D T • M e t h o x v c h l o r • E n d r i n k e t o n e • a l o h a - C h l o r d a n e •qamma-Chl o r d a n e •Toxaphene • A r o c l o r - 1 0 1 6 • A r o c l o r - 1 2 2 1 •Aroc l o r - 1 2 3 2 •Aroc l o r - 1 2 4 2 •Aroc l o r - 1 2 4 8 - A r o c l o r - 1 2 5 4 -Ar oc 1 o r - 1 2 6 0

9 . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 . 9 , 9 .

19 19 19 19 19 19 19 95 19 95 95 90 95 95 95 95 95 90 90

5 ! 5 I 51 5 ! 51 5 5 5

U ^^ I U , I U . 1 U 1 U I U : I U : 1 U I u ; I U I U 1 U : I U . 1 U ' 1 U i .1 U •• 1

u • I U ^ 1 u ••• 1

U ! I U i I

IU i 1 IU 1 1 IU 1 1 IU t 1 1 u Y 1 IU or 1 1 1 1 1

FORM I PEST

620 1 /87 Rev

3 0 2 4 4 1

Page 60: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

ID PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP Contract: 68090056

EPA SAMPLE NO.

BGH4 =

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No,: 15939 SAS No.; SDG No.: BGH41

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: 30.5 (g/mL) G_

Level: (low/med) LOW

y. Moisture: not dec. 13 dec.

Lab Sample ID: 910120-05

Lab File ID:

Date Received: 03/07/91

Date Extracted: 03/15/91

Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONC

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 6.0

Date Analyzed: 03/27/91

Dilution Factor: 1,0

CAS NO. ::OMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITSi (uq/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG Q

319-34-6 319-35-7 319-36-8 58-89-9 76-44-8 309-00-2 1024-57-3 959-98-8 60-57-1 72-55-9 72-20-8 33213-65-9 72-54-8 1031-07-8 50-29-3 72-43-5 53494-70-5 5103-71-9 5103-74-2 :-8001-35-2 12674-11-2 11104-28-2 11141-16-5 53469-21-9 12672-29-6 11097-69-1 11096-82-5

alpha-BHi: beta-BHC delta-BHC I qamma-BHC (Lindane) Heptachlor Aldrin Heptachlor epoxide ' Endosulfan I Dieldr in 4.4'-DDE Endr in Endosulfan II 4.4'-DDD Endosulfan sulfate 4,4'-DDT Methoxvchlor Endrin ketone alpha-Chlordane qamma-Chlordane •Toxaohene Aroclor-1016 •Aroclor-1221 •Ar oc 1 or -1232 •Aroc lor-1242 •Aroc lor-1248 •Aroclor-1254 •Aroc lor-1260

-

9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0

. 18 . 18 18 18 18 18 18 90 18 90 90 180 90 90 90 90 90 180 180

U IU • U

IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU

J" 1

; I

I

1 1 1 I 1 •'

j *

( i t 1 ! 1

1 !

y ! ^ ;

r. J 62'

FORM I PEST 1/87 Rev.

302442

Page 61: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

ID PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP Contract: 63D90056

EFA SAMPLE ND,

BGH46

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case Nc 15939' SAS N.: SDG Nr BGH41

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: 3'). 0 (g/mL) G_

Level: (low/med) LOW

Lab Sample ID: 910120-06

Lab File ID:

Date Received: 03/08/91

y. Moisture: not dec. dec

Extract ion;

GPC Cleanup:

(SepF/Cont/Sonc)

(Y/N:) N

SONC

Date Extracted: 03/15/91

Date Analyzed: 03/27/91

pH: 8.4 Dilution Factor: 1.00

:;AS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (uq/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG Q

319-84-6 319-85-7 319-86-8 58-39-9 76-44-8 309-00-2 1024-57-3 959-98-8 60-57-1 72-55-9 72-20-8 33213-65-9 72-54-8 1031-07-8 50-29-3 72-43-5 53494-70-5 5103-71-9 5103-74-2 8001-35-2 12674-11-2 11104-23-2 11141-16-5 53469-21-9 12672-29-6 11097-69-1 11096-82-5

-alpha-BHC. -beta-BHC_ -delta-BHC. -qamma-BHC (Lindane) -Heptachl or _ -Aldrin -Heptachlor epoxide. -Endosulfan I -Dieldr in -4, 4' -DDE -Endr in -Endosulfan -4, 4'-DDD

II

-Endosul fan sulfate. -4,4' -DDT \ -Methoxychlor -Endrin ketone -al pha-Chl or dane. -gamma-Ch 1 or dane. -Toxaphene -Aroclor-1016. -Aroclor-1221. -Aroc lor-1232. -Aroclor-1242. -Aroc lor-1248. -Aroclor-1254. -Ar oc 1 or -1260

I

I

1

8. 8. 8. 3. 3. 8. 3. 8. 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 82 16 82 82 160 82 82 82 82 82

. 160 160

•-•

2 2 2

2 2 2

/' 1 1

IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU . IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU !U ( 1

FORM I PEST r . 1 6/^^ Rev

302443

Page 62: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

ID PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP Contract: 63D90056

EPA SAMPLE NG.

BGH47

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case N.p.: 15939 SAS No.

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: 30•5 (g/mL) G

Level; (low/med) LOW

y. Moisture: not dec. 15 dec.

Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONC

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 6.1

SDG No.: BGH41

Lab Sample ID; 910120-07

Lab File ID:

Date Received: 03/09/91

Date Extracted: 03/15/91

Date Analyzed: 03/27/91

Dilution Factor: 1.0

CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS; (uq/L or ug/Kq) UG/KG Q

I 319-34-6 alDha-BHC 1 I 319-85-7 beta-BHC I I 319-86-3 delta-BHC I I 58-39-9 qamma-BHC (Lindane) I ! 76-44-8 Heptachlor 1 I 309-00-2 Aldrin I 1024-57-3 Heptachlor epoxide 1 I 959-98-8 Endosul fan I 1 60-57-1 Dieldr in I 72-55-9 4. 4' -DDE I 72-20-8 Endrin 1 33213-65-9 Endosul fan II 1 72-54-8 4. 4'-DDD I 1031-07-8 Endosul fan sulfate I 50-29-3 4. 4' -DDT I 72-43-5 Methoxvchlor 1 53494-70-5 Endrin ketone 1 5103-71-9 aloha-Chlordane I 5103-74-2 qamma-Chl ordane 1 8001-35-2 Toxaphene I 12674-11 -2 Ar oc 1 or -1016 I 11104-28-2 Aroclor-1221 I 11141-16-5 Aroc lor-1232 1 53469-21 -9 Ar oc 1 or -1242 1 12672-29-6 Aroc lor-1248 I 11097-69-1 Ar oc 1 or -1254 I 11096-82-5 Ar oc 1 or -1260

9. 9. 9. 9. 9. 9. 9. 9. 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 93 19 93 93 190 93 93 93

I 93 93

1 190 I 190

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

U U U U U IU 'U IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU j

FORM I PEST » 628l /87 RE

302444

Page 63: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

ID PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP Con tract: 63D90056

EPA SAMPLE NC.

PBLKOl

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 15939 SAS No.: SDG No.: BGH41

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: ' 30.0 (g/mL) 6_

Level: (low/med) LOW .

y. Moisture: not dec.

Lab Sample ID: P0312-B1

Lab File ID:

Date Received:

dec Date Extracted: 03/12/91

Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONC

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH:

Date Analyzed: 03/27/91

Dilution Factor: 1.00

CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG

319-84-6— 319-85-7— 319-86-3— 58-89-9 76-44-8 309-00-2— 1024-57-3-959-98-8— 60-57-1 72-55-9 72-20-8 1-ftaJ^XO O W ~ ^ '

72-54-8 1031-07-8-50-29-3 72-43-5— 53494-70-5 5103-71-9-5103-74-2-8001-35-2-12674-11-2 11104-28-2 11141-16-5 53469-21-9 12672-29-6 11097-69-1 11096-82-5

-alpha-BHC. -beta-BHC_I -delta-BHC. -qamma-BHC (Lindane) - H e p t a c h l o r . - A l d r i n - H e p t a c h l o r e p o x i d e . - E n d o s u l f a n I -Die l dr i n - 4 , 4 ' -DDE -Endr i n - E n d o s u l f a n I I - 4 , 4 ' -DDD -Endosul fan sulfate. -4,4' -DDT Methoxychlor Endrin ketone -al pha-Chl or dane. -gamma-Chl ordane. -Toxaphene -Aroclor-1016. -Aroclor-122l' -Aroc lor-1232. -Ar oc 1 or -1242. -Aroc lor-1248. -Aroclor-1254. -Aroc lor-1260

Q

f)79

FORM I PEST

302445

JIZS7 Rev,

Page 64: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

ID PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP Contract: 63D90056

EPA SAMPLE NG,

PBLK02

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 15939 SAS No.:

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: 30.0 (g/mL) G_

Level: (low/med) LOW

y. Moisture: not dec.

SDG No.: BGH41

Lab Sample ID: POO 15-B3

Lab File ID:

Date Received:

dec .

Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONC

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH:

Date Extracted: 03/15/91

Date Analyzed: 03/27/91

Dilution Factor: 1.00

CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG Q

319-84-6 alpha-BHC 319-85-7 b et a-BHC 319-86-8 delta-BHC 53-89-9 gamma-BHC (Lindane). 76-44-8 Hep t ac h 1 or \ 309-00-2 Al dr in 1024-57-3 Heptachl or epox ide 959-98-8 Endosul fan I 60-57-1 Dieldr in 72-55-9 4, 4' -DDE 72-20-8 Endr in 33213-65-9 Endosul fan II 72-54-8 4, 4' -DDD 1031-07-8 Endosul fan sul fate_ 50-29-3 4, 4' -DDT 72-43-5 Met h oxyc h 1 or 53494-70-5 Endrin ketone 5103-71-9 al pha-Chl ordane 5103-74-2 gamma-Ch 1 or dane 8001-35-2 toxaphene 12674-11 -2 Ar oc 1 or -1016 11104-28-2 Aroclor-1221 11141-16-5 Ar oc 1 or -1232 53469-21-9 Aroclor-1242 12672-29-6 Ar oc 1 or -1248 11097-69-1 A r o c l o r - 1 2 5 4 11096-82-5 Ar oc 1 or -1260

8. 8. 8. 8. 8. 8. 8. 8-16 16 16 15 16 16 16 80 16 80 80 160 80 80 80 SO 80 160 160

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1

IU IU IU IU IU IU 'U IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU 1 1

BS1

FORM I PEST 1/87 Rev

302446

Page 65: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

ID PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

Lab,Name: CEIMIC CORP

EPA SAMPLE NC

BGH47MS

Lab Code: CEIMIi Case No.: 15939

Contract: 6SD90056

SAS No,: SDG No.: BGH41

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: 30.3 (g/mL) G_

Level: (low/med) LOW

y. M o i s t u r e : not d e c . 15 d e c .

Lab Sample ID: 910120-07MS

Lab F i l e ID:

Date Received: 03/09/91

Date Extracted: 03/15/91

Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONC

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 6.1

Date Analyzed: 03/27/91

Dilution Factor: 1,00

CAS NO, COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG Q

319-84-6— 319-85-7— 319-36-3— 58-89-9 76-44-8 309—00—2— 1024-57-3-959-98-8— 60-57-1 72-55-9 72-20-8

72-54-3 1031-07-B-50-29-3 72-43-5 53494-70-Q 5103-71-9 5103-74-2-8001-35-2-12674-11-2 11104-28-2 11141-15-5 53469-21-9 12572-29-6 11097-69-1 11095-82-5

-alpha-BHC -bet a-BHC -delta-BHC -gamma-BHC (Lindane) -Heptachlor -Aldrin -Heptachlor epoxide. -Endosulfan I -Dieldr in -4,4'-DDE -Endr in -Endosulfan -4,4'-DDD

II

•Endosul fan sulfate. •4, 4'-DDT. Methoxychlor_ Endrin ketone alpha-Chlordane. -gamma-Ch 1 or dane. -Toxaphene -Ar oc 1 or -1015 -Aroclor-1221 -Ar oc1 or-1232 - Ar oc1 or-1242 -Aroclor-1248 -Aroclor-1254 - Ar oc1 or-1260

9, 9. 9. 9. 9. 9. 9, 9. 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 93 19 93 93 190 93 93 93 93 93 190 190

3 3

3 *-* 3 o wJ

1 1

IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU 1

68

FORM I PEST 1/87 Re^

302447

Page 66: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

ID PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NC,

Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No,: 15939

BGH47MSD Contract: 68D90056

SAS No.: SDG No.: BGH41

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: 30.5 (g/mL) G_

Level: (low/med) LOW

X Moisture: not dec. 15 dec.

Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SON'!

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 5. 1

Lab Sample ID; 910120-07MSD

Lab File ID:

Date Received: 03/09/91

Date Extracted: 03/15/91

Date Analyzed: 03/23/91

Dilution Factor: 1.0

CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG Q

319-34-5 319—35—7——-319-S6-3 53-39-9 76-44-3 309-00-2 1024-57-3— 959-93-3 60-57-1 72-55-9 72-20-3 »^* - i ' ~ , •* '-V C =* Ci

72-54-8 1031-07-3— 50-29-3 72-43-5 53494-70-5-5103-71-9— 5103-74-2— 8001-35-2— 12574-11-2-11104-28-2-11141-16-5-53469-21-9-12672-29-5-11097-59-1-11095-32-5-

-alph -beta -delt -gamm -Hept -Aldr -Hept -En do -Diel -4,4' -Endr -En d o -4,4' -En do -4,4' -Meth -Endr -alph -gamm -Toxa -Ar oc -Ar oc -Aroc -Aroc -Aroc -Aroc -Ar oc

a-BHC -BHC a-BHC a-BHC (Lindane). ac h 1 or in achi or epoxide, sulfan I dr in -DDE in ;ulfan •DDD

II

sulfan sulfate -DDT o X y c h 1 or in ketone a-Chlordane. a-Chlordane. phene lor-1016 lor-122l' lor-1232 lor-1242. lor-1248' lor-1254 lor-1260'

9. 9. 9. 9. 9. 9. 9. 9. 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 93 19 93 93 190 93 93 93 93 93 190 190

3 3 3 3 3 3

3

1

IU 1 !U I IU I IU I IU I IU IU 1 IU I IU 1 IU 1 IU I IU 1 IU I IU I IU 1 i U I IU 1 IU ! IU I IU ! IU 1 IU 1 IU 1 IU I IU 1 IU I IU 1 1 1 1 1

CQ7

FORM I PEST 1/87 Rev

302448

Page 67: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

IB SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NO,

Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 15939

BGH41 Contract: 68D90056

SAS No.: SDG No,: BGH41

o>.'. ^

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol

Level: (low/med) LOW

y. Moisture: not dec.

Extract ion:

(g/mL) G

16 dec .

(SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONC

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 7.0

Lab Sample ID: 910120-01

Lab File ID: D5362

Date Received: 03/02/91

Date Extracted: 03/12/91

Date Analyzed: 04/05/91

D i1ut i on Fac t or; 1, 0

CAS NO, COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: /y (uq/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG Q

108-95-2 111-44-4 95-57-8-541-73-1 106-46-7 100-51-6 95-50-1-95-48-7-108-50-1 106-44-5 621-64-7 67-72-1-98-95-3-78-59-1-88-75-5 105-67-9 65-85-0-111-91-1 120-83-2 120-82-1 91-20-3-106-47-8 87-68-3-59-50-7-91-57-6-77-47-4-88-06-2-95-95-4-91-58-7-88-74-4-131-11-3' 208-96-8 606-20-2'

-Phenol • ' -b i 5(2-Ch1 or oet hy1)Et her. -2-Ch 1 or op h en o 1 -1, 3-Dichl or obenz ene. -1,4-Dichlorobenzene. -Benzvl Alcohol -1, 2-Dichl or obenz ene. -2-Methvl phenol -b i s (2-Ch 1 or o i sop r op y 1) Et her. -4-Methylphenol -N-N i t r oso-D i-n-Pr opy1 am i ne. -He X ac h 1 or oet h an e -Nitrobenzene -Isophorone 2-Nitrophenol -2, 4-Dimethylphenol. -Benzolc Ac id -b i s(2-Ch1 oroethoxy)Methane. -2, 4-Dichlorophenol -1,2, 4-Tr ichl or obenz ene. -Naphthalene 4-Ch1 or oan iii ne Hexac h1 or obut ad i ene -4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol. -2-Methylnaphthalene -He X ac h 1 or ocy c 1 open t ad i ene. - 2 , 4 , 6-Tr i c h l o r o p h e n o l - 2 , 4 , 5 - T r i c h l o r o p h e n o l - 2 -Ch lo ronaph tha l ene -2-N i t r oan i 1 i ne -Dimethyl Phthalate. -Acenaphthyl ene 2,6-Dinitrotoluene.

FORM I SV-1 p; 307

390 390 390 390

• .-57 390 390 390

: 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 1900 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 . 390 390 1900 390 1900 390 390 390

IU C IU ; IU ' I U '•••

IBJ-Vi IU IU IU IU i IU \ IU I IU IU i IU I IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU

1/87 Rev

302449

Page 68: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

IC SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NG.

Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP

\

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 15939

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: 30.2 (q/mL) G_

Level: (low/med) LOW

y. Moisture: not dec.

BGH41 Contract: 63D90056

SAS No.: SDG No,; BGH41

Lab Sample ID: 910120-01

Lab File ID: D5362

16 dec

Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONC

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N - pH: 7.0

Date Received: 03/02/91

Date Extracted: 03/12/91

Date Analyzed: 04/05/91

Dilution Factor: 1.0

CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kq) UG/KG

y,. Q-

>

99-09-2 8^1_^^--i o _ _ _ _ _ - _ ^ —^^— —' — — 51-23-5 100-02-7 132-64-9 121-14-2 84-66-2 7005-72-3 86-73-7 100-01-5 534-52-1 85-30-6 101-55-3 118-74-1 87-85-5 85-01-8 120-12-7 84-74-2 206-44-0 129-00-0 85-68-7 91-94-1 56-55-3— 218-01-9 117-81-7 117-84-0 205-99-2 207-08-9 50-32-8 193-39-5— 53-70-3 191-24-2

-3-Nitroanil ine. -Acenaphthene 2,4-Dinitrophenol 4-Nitrophenol Dibenzofuran 2,4-Dinitrotoluene. Diethylphthalate 4-Chlorophenyl-phenyl ether. Fluor ene 4-Nitroanil ine 4,5-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol. N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1). 4-Bromophenyl-phenyl ether_ He X ac h1 or ob en z ene Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene Anthracene Di-n-Butylphthalate. Fluoranthene Pyrene Butyl benzylphthalate 3,3'-Diehi orobenz idine. Benzo(a)Anthracene Chrysene b i s ( 2 - E t h y l h e x y l ) P h t h a l a t e . D i -n -Oc ty l F^hthalate Benzo(b)Fluoranthene Benz o(k)Fluor ant hene Benzo (a) Pyrene . Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene. Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene

(1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine

FORM I SV-2

1900 390 1900 1900 390 390 390 390

. 390 .1900 1900 390 390 390 1900 390 390 390 390 390 390 790 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390

p. I 30 8

f 1

IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU 1 1

J '

) " 1

> • '] 1

I i 1 t 1

\ V.

1

' 1

r ;

1/87 Rev

302450

Page 69: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

IF SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS

Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No. : 1593":

Contract: 63D90056

SAS Nc

EPA SAMPLE NO.

BGH41

SDG No.: BGH41

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: 30.2 (g/mL) G_

Level: (low/med) LOW

y. Moisture: not dec. 16 dec

Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONC

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH; 7.0

Lab Sample ID: 910120-01

Lab File ID: D5362

Date Received: 03/02/91

Date Extracted: 03/12/91

Date Analyzed: 04/05/91

D i1ut i on Fac t or: 1.0

Number TICs found: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (uq/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG

CAS NUMBER

1. 000000 2. 000000

- 3. 123422 4, 000000

COMPOUND NAME

C7H14 isomer Unknown 4-Hydroxy-4-methyl-2-pentano Unknown

RT

4.42 4,88 5.57 7. 17

EST. CONC. G!

240 \^5'' 430 I.B J

22000 IABJ 1200 I B J .'

FORM I SV-TIC

C.I 309 1 /87 Rev

3 0 2 4 5 1

Page 70: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

IB SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NO

Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No. : 15939

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: 30•4 (g/mL) G.

Level: (low/med) LOW

% Moisture: not dec.

I BGH42 Contract: 53D90056 I

SAS No.: _ _ _ _ ^ _ _ SDG No.: BGH41

17 dec .

Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SON':

QFC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 7.9

Lab Sample ID: 910120-02

Lab File ID: D5350

Date Received: 03/02/91

Date Extracted: 03/12/91

Date Analyzed: 04/04/91

Dilution Factor: 1,0

CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (uq/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG

/

2-NitroDhenol

103-95-2 Phenol 111-44-4 9 5 - 5 7 - 3 541 -73 -1 106-46-7 100-51-6 9 5 - 5 0 - 1 9 5 - 4 8 - 7 108-60-1 106 -44 -5 6 2 1 - 6 4 - 7 6 7 - 7 2 - 1 9 8 - 9 5 - 3 7 8 - 5 9 - 1 8 8 - 7 5 - 5 105-67-9 6 5 - 8 5 - 0 111-91-1 120-83-2 120-82-1 9 1 - 2 0 - 3 105-47-8 8 7 - 5 8 - 3 5 9 - 5 0 - 7 9 1 - 5 7 - 6 7 7 - 4 7 - 4 8 3 - 0 6 - 2 9 5 - 9 5 - 4 9 1 - 5 8 - 7 8 8 - 7 4 - 4 131-11-3 2 0 3 - 9 5 - 8 6 0 6 - 2 0 - 2

~ b i 5 ( 2 - C h l o r o e t h y l ) E t h e r . —2-Chl o rophenol

- 1 , 3 -Dichl or obenzene . • 1 , 4-D i ch l or obenzene . -Benzyl Alcohol •1 ,2 -Dich l o r o b e n z e n e . -2-MethvlPhenol - b i s ( 2 - C h l o r o i s o p r o p y l ) E t h e r -4-Met hy loheno l - N - N i t r o s o - D i - n - P r o p y l a m i n e . -Hexac hi o r o e t h a n e -N i t r ob en z ene -Isophorone

-2,4-Dimethylphenol -Benzoic Acid -bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane. -2, 4-Dichlorophenol -1,2, 4-Tr ichl orobenzene. -Naphthalene 4-Ch1 or oan iii ne Hexac h1 or obut ad i ene -4-Chloro-3-Methyl phenol. -2-Methyl naphthalene____ -Hexachlorocyclopentadiene. -2,4,6-Tr ichlorophenol - 2 , 4 , 5-Tr ichlorophenol -2-Chloronaphthalene -2-Nitroanil ine -Dimethyl Phthalate. -Acenaphthyl ene 2.6-Dinitrotoluene

FORM I SV-1

400 400 400 400

: .120 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400

1900 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 •400 1900 400 1900 400 400 400

U ^ U I U i U ! BJ^f, U u u u u u u u i

u i u u i

u i

u u u u u u u u u u u u

1/87 Rev,

r ' 302452

Page 71: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

ll":

SEMIVOLATILE CRGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET EPA SAMPLE- NO.

BGH42 Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP Contract: 63D90056

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 15939 SAS No.: SDG No.: BGH41

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: 30• 4 (q/mL) G_

Level: (low/med) LOW

y. Moisture: not dec.

Lab Sample ID: 910120-02

Lab File ID: D5350

Date Received: 03/02/91

17 dec

Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) >

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH:

SONC

Date Extracted: 03/12/91

7.9

Date Analyzed: 04/04/91

Dilution Factor: 1 . 0

CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (uq/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG Q

99-09-2 83-32-9 51-28-5 100-02-7 132-64-9— 121-14-2 84-66-2 7005-72-3-36-73-7 100-01-6 534-52-1 86-30-6 101-55-3 118-74-1 87-85-5 85-01-8 120-12-7 84-74-2 206-44-0 129-00-0 85-58-7 91-94-1 56-55-3 218-01-9 117-81-7 117-84-0 205-99-2— 207-08-9 50-32-8 193-39-5 53-70-3 191-24-2—

-3-Nitroan iline -Acenaphthene -2,4-Dinitrophenol 4-Nitrophenol

—Dibenzofuran 2,4-Dinitrotoluene. Diethylphthalate

—4-Chlorophenyl-phenyl ether. Fluorene 4-Nitroaniline

^-4, 6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol. N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1). 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether_ Hexachl or obenzene -Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene Anthracene D i - n - B u t y l p h t h a l a t e

~F1 uor a n t h e n e . Pyrene Butyl b e n z y l p h t h a l a t e 3 , 3 ' - D i e h i orobenz i d i n e . Benzo(a)Anthracene Chrysene bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate. Di-n-Octyl Phthalate Benzo(b)Fluoranthene

—--Benzo(k)Fluoranthene —-^-Ben z o (a) Pyr ene

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene. Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene

—Benzo(g ,h , D P e r y l e n e

(1) - Cannot be s e p a r a t e d from Diphenylamine

FORM I SV-2

1900 400 1900 1900 400 400 400

.. 400 400 1900 1900 400 400 400 1900 400 400 400 400 400 400 800 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400

e\ 1319

302453

1

IU , IU IU IU IU

y \

IU -} 1 IU I IU I IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU !U !U IU IU \ I U X 1

5r;

1/ST _Rev

Page 72: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

IF SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS

Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP

EPP, SAMPLE NO.

BGH42

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case Nc 15939

Contract: 63D90056

SAS No.: SDG No. : BGH41

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: 30.4 (g/mL) G_

Lev/el: (low/med) LOW

y. Moisture: not dec. 17 dec ,

Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONi:

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 7,9

Lab Sample ID: 910120-02

Lab File ID: D5350:

Date Received: 03/02/91

Date Extracted: 03/12/91

Date Analyzed: 04/04/91

D i 1 ut i on Fac t or: 1. 0

Number TICs found: CONCENTRATION UNITS: y' (uq/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG

CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC.

1. 000000 2. 000000 «3. 123422 4. 000000

C6H100 isomer Unknown 4 - H y d r o x y - 4 - m e t h y l - 2 - p e n t a n o Unknown

4 . 6 0 5 . 10 5 . 7 7 7 . 3 3

440 440

2 1 0 0 0 1100

ABJ BJ ••

FORM I SV-TIC

C.5 320 1 /87 Rev .

302454

Page 73: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

IB SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NC,

BGH43 Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 15939

Contract: 53D90055

SAS No,: SDG No,: BGH41

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: 30. 0 (g/mL) G_

Level: (low/med) LOW

% Moisture: not dec.

Lab Sample ID: 910120-03

Lab F i l e ID: D5363

Date Received: 03/06/91

13 dec,

Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SON

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH; 4,7

Date Extracted: 03/15/91

Date Analyzed: 04/05/91

Dilution Factor: 1,00

CAS NO, COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: - ^O (uq/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG

103-95-2 -Phenol 111-44-4 95-57-8 541-73-1 106-46-7 100-51-5 95-50-1

bis(2-Chloroethyl )Ethe:r. 2-Chloroohenol

95-43-7-108-60-1 106-44-5 621-54-7 67-72-1-98-95-3-78-59-1-88-75-5 105-67-9 65-85-0-111-91-1 120-83-2 120-82-1 91-20-3-105-47-8 87-68-3-59-50-7-91-57-6-77-47-4-88-06-2-95-95-4-91-50-7-88-74-4-131-11-3 208-95-8 606-20-2

1,3-Dichlorobenzene. 1,4-Dichlorobenzene. Benzyl Alcohol 1,2-Dichlorobenzene. 2-Methylphenol -bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)Ether. -4-Methylphenol. ^ -N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine. -Hexachl or oethane ' -N i t r obenzene -Isophorone 2-Nitrophenol. -2, 4-Dimethylphenol, -Benzoic Acid -bis (2-Ch 1 or oet hoxy) Methane. -2,4-Dichlorophenol -1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene. -Naphthalene 4-Chloroaniline -Hexachlorobutadiene -4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol. -2-Methylnaphthalene -Hexac h1 or oc yc1opent ad i ene. -2,4,5-Tr ichlorophenol -2, 4, 5-Tr ichlorophenol - 2 - C h l o r o n a p h t h a l e n e - 2 - N i t r o a n i l i n e - D i m e t h y l P h t h a l a t e . - A c e n a p h t h y l e n e . 2 , 6 - D i n i t r o t o l u e n e .

FORM I SV-1

r

120 380 330 380 100 380 44

380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 170 380 380 270 380 380 380 380 380 1 380 380 1800 380 I 1800 1 380 I 380 380 I

}2n 302

1 J IU 'U IU J IU J

u u u u u u u u u J

u u J

u u u u u u u u U I

u U I U 1 U I

t 1

1/87

455

' Rev

Page 74: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

IC SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NC.

Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 15939

B6H43 Con tract: 68D90056

SAS No,: SDG No.: BGH41

M a t r i x : ( s o i l / w a t e r ) SOIL

S a m p l e w t / v o l : 3Ci. 0 (g/mL) G_

L e v e l : ( l o w / m e d ) LOW

y. Moisture: not dec. 13 dec,

Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONC

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N - pH: 4.7

Lab Sample ID: 910120-03

Lab File ID: D5363

Date Receiv/ed: 03/06/91

Date Extracted: 03/15/91

Date Analyzed: 04/05/91

D i1ut i on Fac t or: 1. 00

CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS; (uq/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG Q

99-09-2 33-32-9— 51-28-5 100-02-7 132-54-9 121-14-2 34-55-2 7005-72-3 86-73-7 100-01-5 534-52-1 86-30-6 101-55-3 118-74-1 87-86-5 85-01-8 120-12-7 84-74-2 205-44-0 129-00-0 85-68-7 91-94-1 56-55-3 218-01-9 117-81-7 117-84-0 205-99-2 207-08-9 50-32-8 1 9 3 - 3 9 - 5 — — 53-70-3 191-24-2

3-Nitroaniline. Ac enaphthen e 2,4-Dinitrophenol 4-Nitrophenol Dibenzofuran 2,4-Dinitrotoluene -Diethyl phthal ate. 4-Chlorophenyl-phenyl ether Fluorene 4-Nitroanil ine ' 4,5-D i n i t r o-2-Met hylphenol. N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1) 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether_ HeX ac h 1 or obenz ene Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene Anthracene D i - n - B u t y l p h t h a l a t e . F l u o r a n t h e n e Pyr ene Butyl benzylphthalate 3,3'-Dichlorobenz idine. Ben z o (a) An t h r ac en e Chrysene bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate. Di-n-Octyl Phthalate Benzo(b)Fluor ant hen e Benz o(k)Fluor anthene

—Ben z o(a)Pyr ene Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene. Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene_ Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene

1800 380 1800 1800 380 38.0 330 330 330 1800 1300 330 380 380 1800 380 380 380 380 380 380 760 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 380

(1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine r. r33^

u-u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u

FORM I SV-2 1/87 Rev

302456

Page 75: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

IF SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS

Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 15939

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: 30. 0 (g/mL) G_

Level: (low/med) LOW

y. Moisture: not dec. i; dec

EPA SAMPLE NG,

BGH43 Contract: 63D90056

SAS No.: SDG No.: BGH41

Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONf

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 4.7

Lab Sample ID: 910120-03

Lab File ID: D5363

Date Received: 03/06/91

Date Extracted: 03/15/91

Date Analyzed: 04/05/91

Dilution Factor: 1. 00

Number TICs found: 14 CONCENTRATION UNITS; (uq/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG

CAS NUMBER ====

1. 2.

*3. 4. 5. 5. 7. 8. 9,

10. 11. 12. 13. 14.

— „ — g — ^ — _ _ — — — ^

000000 000000 123422 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 142621 103822 000000

1 COMPOUND NAME

'Unknown Unknown 4-Hydroxy-4-methyl-2-pentano Fatty acid methyl ester Unknown Unknown Carboxylic acid Unknown Fatty acid Unknown Unknown Hexanoic acid Benzeneacetic acid Unknown.

RT

4.77 5.02 5.67 7.33 8.44 9.24 10. 15 10, 19 11. 80 12.30 12.42 13,47 14.59 16.20

EST. CONC, =============

460 420

9500 3300 4200 950

2100 1500 5100 950 190

5000 960

2800

1

1 Q 1 — I ^ — — — —

IBJ IBJ I.,ABJ-' ,-IBJ IBJ IBJ IBJ IBJ IBJ IBJ IBJ I J 1 J IBJ i

r, I 331

FORM I SV-TIC 1/87 Rev

302457

Page 76: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

IB . SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP Contract; 63D90056

EPA SAMPLE NC.

BGH44

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 15939

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: 30.5 (g/mL) G_

Level: (low/med) LOW

7. Moisture: not dec.

SAS No

16 dec ,

Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONC

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 6.3

SDG No.; BGH41

Lab Sample ID: 910120-04

Lab File ID: D5364

Date Received: 03/06/91

Date Extracted: 03/15/91

Date Analyzed: 04/05/91

Dilution Factor: 1.0

CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (uq/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG 7. -Q

1 0 3 - 9 5 - 2 1 1 1 - 4 4 - 4 9 5 - 5 7 - 8 -5 4 1 - 7 3 - 1 1 0 6 - 4 6 - 7 1 0 0 - 5 1 - 6 9 5 - 5 0 - 1 -9 5 - 4 8 - 7 -1 0 8 - 5 0 - 1 1 0 6 - 4 4 - 5 5 2 1 - 5 4 - 7 6 7 - 7 2 - 1 -9 8 - 9 5 - 3 -7 8 - 5 9 - 1 -8 8 - 7 5 - 5 1 0 5 - 6 7 - 9 5 5 - 8 5 - 0 -1 1 1 - 9 1 - 1 1 2 0 - 8 3 - 2 1 2 0 - 8 2 - 1 9 1 - 2 0 - 3 -106 -47 -8 8 7 - 5 8 - 3 -5 9 - 5 0 - 7 -9 1 - 5 7 - 6 -7 7 - 4 7 - 4 -8 8 - 0 5 - 2 -9 5 - 9 5 - 4 -9 1 - 5 8 - 7 -8 8 - 7 4 - 4 -131-11-3-2 0 8 - 9 5 - 8 ' 5 0 6 - 2 0 - 2

Phenol -b i s (2 -Ch1 or oe t h y l ) E t he r . - 2 - C h l o r o p h e n o l ' 1 , 3 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e . 1 ,4 -D ich lo robenzBne_ Benzy l A l c o h o l 1 , 2 - D i c h l o r o b e n z e n e . 2 - M e t h y l p h e n o l

-b i s (2-Ch 1 or o i sopr op y 1 ) Et her. -4 -Me thy l pheno l -N-N i t r oso-D i - n -Pr op y 1 am i ne. -Hexac h1 oroet hane -N i t r ob en z en e -1sop hor on e 2-N i t r ophenol. -2, 4-Dimethyl phenol. -Benzoic Acid -bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane. -2,4-Dichlorophenol -1,2, 4-Tr ichl orobenzene. -Naphthalene -4-Chloroaniline -Hexachlorobutadiene -4-Chl or o-3-Met hyl phenol. -2-Methylnaphthalene -Hexach1 or ocyc1opent ad i ene. -2,4, 5-Tr ichlorophenol -2,4, 5-Tr ichlorophenol -2-Chloronaphthalene -2-Nitroaniline -Dimethyl Phthalate. -Acenaphthyl ene^ 2,6-Dinitrotoluene.

FORM I SV-1

390 390 390 390 120 390 190 390 390 94

390 390 390 390 390 390 1900 390 390 740 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 1900 390 1900 390 390 390

1 1

IU : r IU IU IU IJ IU ij-

lU IU

\r IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU i IU 1

IU 1 IU IU 1 IU IU . IU IU IU IU IU IU IU '. IU : 1

j 1 » i i 1 t

; ! j ! t

1

(

/

J

r ' _3M 1/87 Rev

302458

Page 77: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

IC SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NO.

BGH44 Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP Contract: 68D90056

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No. : 15939 SAS No. : SDG No. : BGH41

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: 30.5 (g/mL) G.

Level: (low/med) LOW

V, Moisture: not dec.

Lab Sample ID: 910120-04

Lab File ID: D5364

16 dec.

Date Received: 03/06/91

Date Extracted: 03/15/91

Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONC

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 6.3

Date Analyzed: 04/05/91

Dilution Factor: 1.0

CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: / (.ua/L iz>r uq/Kq) UG/KG Q

99-09-2 83-32-9 51-28-5 100-02-7 132-54-9 121-14-2 84-55-2 7005-72-3 86-73-7 100-01-6 534-52-1 86-30-6 101-55-3 118-74-1 87-85-5 85-01-8 120-12-7 84-74-2 206-44-0 129-00-0—^^ 85-58-7 91-94-1 56-55-3 218-01-9 117-81-7 117-84-0 205-99-2 207-08-9 50-32-8 193-39-5-53-70-3 191-24-2

3-N i t r oan i l.i ne. Acenaphthene 2,4-Din itrophenol 4-Nitrophenol D i b en z o f ur an 2,4-Dinitrotoluene. -Diethyl phthal ate. 4-Chlorophenyl-phenyl ether. Fluorene 4-Nitroaniline 4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol. N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1) 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether_ Hex ac h1 or ob enz ene Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene An t h r ac en e D i - n - B u t y l p h t h a l a t e . Fluoranthene Pyrene^ Butyl benzylphthalate 3,3'-Diehi orobenz idine. Benzo(a)Anthracene Chr ysene bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate. Di-n-Octyl Phthalate Benz o(b)Fluor anthene Benz o(k)Fluor ant hene_ Benz o(a)Pyrene Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene. Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene Benzo(g,h, DPerylene

(1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine

FORM I SV-2

355 i/a-7,Rev

302459

Page 78: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

IF SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS

Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 15939

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: 30.5 (g/mL) G_

Lev/el: (low/med) LOW

% Moisture: not dec. 16

EPA SAMPLE NO,

BGH44 Con tract: 63D90056

SAS No,: SDG No.: BGH41

Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONi:

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 6,

Lab Sample ID: 910120-04

Lab File ID: D5364

Date Received: 03/06/91

Date Extracted: 03/15/91

Date Analvzed: 04/05/91

Dilution Factor: 1. 0

Number TICs found: CONCENTRATION UNITS: (uq/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG

RT ========

4.88 5,55 7, 18 8,25 8.42 10.24 12. 19 13,39 15. 17 16.54 22.54 25.37 25.64 27.47 27.57 27.67 30. 15 32.24 33.21 34.11 I 35.02 37,27 1

I EST. CONC.

I 390 15000

I 980 ' 550 I 430 "

470 I 270

3900 I 6600

1200 510 230

I 230 390 1300 550 430 310 200 230 1 270 • 310 I

t 1

I G!

:= = ^ IBJ

'^-^K 'BJ BJ 'BJ BJ BJ j.N

, j r j

j n BJ BJ BJ BJ BJ J H BJ BJ BJ BJ BJ BJ

I CAS NUMBER } = = = = 1 1, I 2, 1 •s. 1 4. I 5. I 6. 1 7. 1 8. 1 9. 1 10. 1 11. 1 12. I 13. 1 14. 1 15. : 15. I 17, 1 18. 1 19, 1 20. 1 21. I 22.

============ 000000 123422 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 124072 112050 334485 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 57114 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000

COMPOUND NAME

Unknown 4-Hydroxy-4-methyl-2-pentano Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown C7H1402 isomer Octanoic acid Nonanoic acid Decanoic acid Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown. Unknown Octadecanoic acid Unknown Unknown Aliphatic hydrocarbon Aliphatic hydrocarbon Aliphatic hydrocarbon Aliphatic hydrocarbon

FORM I SV-TIC

356

1/87 Rev.

302460

Page 79: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

IB SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NG.

Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 15939

I BGH45 Contract: 63D90056 I

SAS No,: SDG No,: BGH41

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: 30. 3 (q/mL) G

Level: (low/med) LOW

y. Moisture: not dec. 13 dec.

Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONC

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH; 6.0

Lab Sample ID: 910120-05

Lab File ID: ' D5312

Date Received: 03/07/91

Date Extracted: 03/15/91

Date Analyzed: 04/02/91

Dilution Factor: 1.0

CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (uq/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG

/

-: •' ' Q

108-95-2 Phenol 111-44-4 bis (2-Chl or oet hyl) Ether ____ 95-57-8 2-Chlorophenol 541 -73-1 1, 3-D ichl or ob enz ene 106-46-7 1, 4-Dichl or obenzene 100-51-6 Benzyl Alcohol 95-50-1—• 1, 2-Dichlorobenzene 95-48-7 2-Methyl phenol 108-50-1 b i s (2-Ch 1 or o i sop r opy 1 ) Ether. 106-44-5 4-Methylphenol ' ^ _ \ 621 -64-7 —N-N itr oso-D i -n -Pr op y 1 am i ne_ 67-72-1 Hexac hi or oet hane 98-95-3 Nitrobenzene 78—59-1 1 sop hor one 88-75-5— 2-Nitrophenol 105-67-9 2, 4-Dimethyl phenol 55-85-0 Benzoic Ac id 111-91-1 bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane_ 120-83-2 2, 4-D ichl or ophenol 120-82-1 1,2, 4-Tr ichl or obenz ene 91-20-3 Naphthalene 106-47-8 4-Ch 1 or oan i 1 ine 87-68-3 Hexachl orobutadiene ' 59-50-7 4-Chl or o-3-Methyl phenol 91-57-6 2-Methyl naphthalene 77-47-4 Hexac h 1 or oc yc 1 opent ad i ene 88-05-2 2, 4, 6-Tr ichlorophenol 95-95-4 2,4, 5-Tr ichl or ophenol 91-58-7 2-Chl oronaphthal ene 88-74-4 2-Nitroanil ine 131-11-3 Dimethyl Phthalate 208-96-8 Acenaphthyl ene 606-20-2 2,5-Dinitrotoluene

FORM I SV-1

,

380 380 56

330 53

330 380

. 380 330 380 380 330 380 380 • 380 380 1800 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 "380 380 380 1800 380 1800 380 , 380 380 I

0 , '- -O" 1 • 3 o :

1 1

IU T IU \ \ j I IU I I J 1 IU {

'U 1 IU i u j •U i

u \ u i u u u 'U

u IU

u u u u u u u u u u u-u u u f '

U T ! 1 1

1

2461

/87 ' Rev j

Page 80: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

IC SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE ND,

Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 15939

I BGH45 Contract: 68D90056 I .

SAS No.: SDG No.; BGH41

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: 30• 3 (g/mL) G_

Level: (low/med) LOW

y. Moisture: not dec. 13

Lab Sample ID: 910120-05

Lab File ID: D5312

Date Received: 03/07/91

d e'c . Date Extracted: 03/15/91

Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONC

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N "pH: 6,0

Date Analyzed: 04/02/91

D i1ut i on Fac t or: 1 .0

CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG

99-09-2—

51-23-5— 100-02-7-132-54-9-121-14-2-84-56-2— 7005-72-3 86-73-7— 100-01-6-534-52-1-85-30-5— 101-55-3-118-74-1-87-86-5— 85-01-8— 120-12-7-84-74-2 206-44-0-129-00-0— 85-58-7— 91-94-1 — 56-55-3— 218-01-9-117-81-7-117-84-0-205-99-2— 207-08-9-50-32-8— 193-39-5-53-70-3— 191-24-2-

-3-Nitroanil ine_ -Acenaphthene. 2,4-Dinitrophenol 4-Nitrophenol Dibenzofuran 2,4-Dinitrotoluene. -Diethylphthal ate. 4-Chlorophenyl-phenyl ether Fluor ene 4-Nitroaniline. 4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1) 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether_ Hexachlorobenzene Pen t ac h1 or ophenol Phenanthrene Anthracene. D i - n - B u t y l p h t h a l a t e . -Fl uor anthene . Pyrene. Butyl benzylphthalate. 3,3'-Dichlorobenz idine. Benzo(a)Anthracene Chrysene. bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate. Di-n -Oc ty l P h t h a l a t e Benzo(b)Fluoranthene Benz o (k) Fl uor anthene. Benzo(a)Pyrene. Indeno(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene. Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene

1300 380 1300 1800 380 380 380 - 330 380 1800 1300 380 380 380 1800 380 380 380 380 380 380 760 380 380 130 380 380 380 380 380 380 380

(1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine

FORM I SV-2 < 3 8 9

Q

1

IU IU ^ ;

i

IU i I IU \ IU ! I IU ; I IU : I IU . I IU ; I IU • 1 lU i I IU '• 1 IU j 1 IU j I IU I I U ! I l u ; 1 IU 1 IU 1 luj 1 IU i I IU I lU 1 IU i 1 IJ IU IU IU IU IU . IU ^ IU ; 1 1

1

J I

302462

1/87 Rev.

Page 81: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

IF SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS

Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 15939

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: 30.3 (q/mL) 6

Level: (low/med) LOW

y. Moisture: not de

Extract ion:

13 dec

EPA SAMPLE NC.

BGH4 = Contract: 63D90056

SAS No.: SDG No.: BGH4 1

SONC (Sep F/Con t/Son c)

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH; 6.0

Lab Sample ID: 910120-05

Lab File ID: D5312

Date Received: 03/07/91

Date Extracted: 03/15/91

Date Analyzed: 04/02/91

Dilution Factor: 1.0

Number TICs found: 20 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (uq/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG

CAS NUMBER

—.—— — — —. —_-.._ _- __ 1. 000000 2. 000000

^ 3, 123422 4, 000000 5, 000000 5, 10544500 7. 000000 8. 000000 9. 000000

10. 000000 11. 000000 12. 000000 13. 000000 14. 000000 15. 000000 16. 000000 17. 000000 18. 000000 19. 000000 20. 000000 1

I COMPOUND NAME

'C7H14 isomer Unknown 4-Hydroxy-4-methyl-2-pentano Unknown Unknown Sulfur Aliphatic hydrocarbon Aliphatic hv/drocarbon Aliphatic hydrocarbon Aliphatic hydrocarbon Aliphatic hydrocarbon Aliphatic hydrocarbon Unknown Unknown" Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown '

RT

4.20 4.65 5.28 6.93

25.92 26.27 28.94 30.02 32,04 32.99

34.82 36.44 37.52 39.54 40.49 41.41 42.31 42.59 43.93

I EST. CONC.

I 270 300

19000 1000 230 300 190 380 530 530 450 460 190 380 570 570 460 460 1500 2200

1 1

I Q

IBJ IBJ 5 ^ B J '••

IBJ IBJ UA' IBJ IBJ IBJ IBJ IBJ IBJ IBJ IBJ IBJ IBJ IBJ IBJ IBJ IBJ 1 t

FORM I SV-TIC

r , \ 390 1/87 Rev

302463

Page 82: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

13 SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP

EPA SAMPLE NG,

BGH45

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 15939

Contract: 63D90056 !

SAS No.: SDG No.: BGH41

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: 30. 4 (g/mL) G.

Level; (low/med) LOW

% Moisture: not dec. 3 dec .

Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONC

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 6.0

Lab Sample ID: 910120-06

Lab File ID: D5351

Date Received: 03/05/91

Date Extracted: 03/15/91

Date Analyzed: 04/04/91

Dilution Factor: 1.0

CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (uq/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG

2-Ni trophenol.

108-95-2 Phenol 111-44-4 95-57-8-541-73-1 106-45-7 100-51-6 95-50-1-95-43-7-103-50-1 106-44-5 621-54-7 67-72-1-98-95-3-73-59-1-88-75-5-105-67-9-65-85-0-111-91-1-120-83-2-120-82-1-91-20-3-106-47-8 87-68-3-59-50-7-91-57-6-77-47-4-88-06-2-95-95-4-91-58-7-88-74-4-131-11-3 208-95-8 606-20-2

bis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether. 2-Chlorophenol 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene Benzyl Alcohol 1,2-Dichlorobenzene. '2-Met hy 1 phenol -b i s(2-Ch1 or o i sopr opy1)Ether. -4-Methylphenol -N-N i t r oso-D i-n-Propy1 am ine. -Hexachloroethane -Nitrobenzene -Isophorone

-2,4-Dimethylphenol -Benzoic Acid -b i s (2-Chl or oet hoxy) Methane. -2, 4-Dichlorophenol -1, 2, 4-Tr ichl orobenzene. -Naphthalene 4-Ch1 or oan i1ine Hexachlorobutadiene -4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol. -2-Methylnaphthalene -Hexachlorocyclopentadiene. -2,4,6-Tr ichlorophenol -2,4,5-Tr ichlorophenol -2-Chloronaphthaiene -2-Nitroaniline -Dimethyl Phthalate. -Acenaphthylene_ 2,5-Dinitrotoluene.

FORM I SV-1 TTT

2700 340 340 340 340 340 340 340 340 340 340 340 340 340 340 340 1600 340 340 340 340 340 340 340 340 340 340 1600 340 1600 340 340 340

U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U u u u u u u u u u

1/87 FJev

302464

Page 83: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

IC SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE' NG,

Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 15939

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: 30.4 (g/mL) G_

Lev/el: (low/med) LOW

y. Moisture: not dec. 3

BGH46 Contract: 63D90056

SAS No. : SDG No, : BGH41

Lab Sample ID: 910120-06

Lab F i l e ID: D5351

dec

Date Received: 03/06/91

Date Extracted: 03/15/91

Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONC

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N plH: 6.0

Date Analyzed: 04/04/91

D i1ut i on Fac tor; 1.0

CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (uq/L or ug/Kq) UG/KQ Q

99-09-2

51-23-5 100-02-7 132-64-9 121-14-2 84-66-2— 7005-72-3 85-73-7 100-01-6 534-52-1 86-30-5 101-55-3 118-74-1-87-86-5 85-01-8 120-12-7 84-74-2 206-44-0— 129-00-0 85-68-7 91-94-1 55—55—3 218-01-9 117-81-7 117-84-0 205-99-2 207-08-9 50-32-8 193-39-5 53-70-3 191-24-2

3-Nitroaniline. Acenaphthene 2, 4-Din itrophenol. 4-Nitrophenol Dibenzofuran • 2,4-Dinitrotoluene.

—Diethylphthalate 4-Chlorophenyl-phenyl ether. Fluorene 4-Nitroaniline 4, 6-Din itro-'2-Methyl phenol. N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1) 4 - B r o m o p h e n y l - p h e n y l e t h e r _ Hexach lo robenzene P e n t a c h l o r o p h e n o l P h e n a n t h r e n e ; Anthracene D i - n - B u t y l p h t h a l a t e .

—Fluoranthene Pyrene. -Butyl benzyl phthal ate. 3,3'-Dichlorobenz idine, Benzo(a)Anthracene Chr ysene bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate. Di-n -Oc ty l P h t h a l a t e B e n z o ( b ) F l u o r a n t h e n e

—'•—Benzo (k) Fl uor a n t h e n e Ben z o ( a ) P y r e n e ' I n d e n o ( 1 , 2 , 3 - c d ) P y r e n e . Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene

1600 340 1500 1600 340 340 340

: 340 340 1600 1600 340 340 340 1600 340 340 340 340 340 340 580 340 340 340 340 340 340 340 340 340 340

U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U

u u u u u u u

(1) - Cannot be s e p a r a t e d from Diphenylamine

FORM I SV-2

C < t 4 l S

_ i . /.a:T _.I5L<=V

302465

Page 84: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

IF' SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS

EPA SAMPLE NC.

BGH4S Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 15939

t ^ a t r i x : (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: 30.4 (g/mL) G.

Lev/el: (low/med) LOW

y. Moisture: not dec. 3

Contract: 63D90056 I

SAS No.: SDG No,: BGH41

dec

Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONi!

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 6,0

Lab Sample ID:

Lab File ID:

910120-06

Date Received: 03/06/91

Date Extracted: 03/15/91

Date Analyzed: 04/04/91

Dilution Factor: 1,0

• >

Number TICs found: 8 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (uq/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG

CAS NUMBER

1, 000000 2, 000000

-. 3, 123422 4, 000000 5, 000000 6, 000000 7. 000000 8. 000000

COMPOUND NAME

Unknown Unknown 4-Hydroxy-4-methyl-2-pentano Unknown Unknown Unknown C10H140 C13H1202

RT ========

4.62 5, 12 w> > 0%0

6,90 7,33 11.07 15,37 26,94

EST, CONC,

240 1700

26000 240 710' 240 240 370

1 Q

•BJ BJ ABJ BJ BJ BJ BJ BJ

FORM I SV-TIC n , > . 4 l 9

1/87 Re^

302466

Page 85: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

IB SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP

EPA SAMPLE NO,

BGH47

Lab Code: CEIMIC_ Case No.: 15939

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/v/ol: 30. 2

Lev/el: (low/med) LOW

y. Moisture: not dec. 15 dec

(q/mL) G

Contract: 68D90056 I ^___

SAS No.: SDG No,: BGH41

Lab Sample ID: 910120-07

Lab File ID: A7334

Date Received: 03/09/91

Date Extracted: 03/15/91

Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONC

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH:

Date Analvzed: 04/06/91

6. 1 Dilution Factor: 1.0

CAS NO, COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (ug/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG Q

108-95-2 111-44-4 95-57-3 541-73-1 1 0 6 - 4 6 - 7 — — 100-51-5 95-50-1 95-48-7 108-60-1 106-44-5 621-54-7 67-72-1 98-95-3 78-59-1 88-75-5 105-67-9 65-85-0 111-91-1 120-83-2 120-82-1 91-20-3 105-47-8 87-68-3 59-50-7 91-57-5 77-47-4 88-06-2 95-95-4 91-58-7 88-74-4 131-11-3 208-96-8 605-20-2

Phenol -bis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether. -2-Chlorophenol -1, 3-Dichl orobenzene. -1, 4-D ichl or obenz ene. -Benzyl Alcohol -1, 2-Dichl orobenzene. -2-Met hyl phenol -bis (2-Chloroisopropyl )Ether. -4-Methylphenol -N-N itr oso-D i-n-Pr opy1 am i n e. -Hexachloroethane -N i t r ob en z en e -1sophor one

2-N itr ophenol -2,4-Dimethylphenol -Benzoic Acid - b i s (2-Chl o r o e t h o x y ) M e t h a n e . -2, 4 - D i c h l o r o p h e n o l - 1 , 2 , 4-Tr i c h l o r o b e n z e n e . -Naphtha lene 4-Ch1 or oan i 1 i n e Hexachlorobutadiene -4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol. -2-Methylnaphthalene -Hexachlorocyclopentadiene. -2,4,6-Trichlorophenol -2,4,5-Tr ichlorophenol -2-Chloronaphthalene_ -2-Nitroanil ine ^___ -Dimethyl Phthalate. -Acenaphthylene 2,5-Dinitrotoluene

FORM I SV-1

390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 1900 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 •390 390 390 1900 390 1900 390 390 390

t

IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU IU \ \ iT IU IU !U I IU IU 1 IU IU I 1 1

1/87 ' Rev

r.-»- _>1'59 302467

Page 86: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

IC SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NO.

Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP

Lab Code: CEIMIC

Matrix

Case No 1 5939

Con tract: 63D90056

SAS No.:

BGH47

SDG No,: BGH41

(soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: 30.2 (q/mL) G_

Lev/el: (low/med) LOW

y. Moisture: not dec. 15

Lab Sample ID: 910120-07

Lab File ID: A7334

Date Received: 03/09/91

dec Date Extracted: 03/15/91

Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONC

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH; 6.1

Date Analyzed: 04/06/91

Dilution Factor: 1.0

CAS NO. COMPOUND CONCENTRATION UNITS: (uq/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG

99-09-2 83-32-9 51-23-5 100-02-7 132-64-9 121-14-2 34-66-2 7005-72-3 85-73-7 100-01-5 534-52-1 85-30-6 101-55-3 118-74-1 87-86-5 85-01-8 120-12-7 84-74-2 205-44-0 129-00-0 85-68-7 91-94-1 56-55-3 • — 218-01-9 117-81-7 117-84-0 205-99-2 207-08-9—•— 50-32-8 1 9 3 - 3 9 - 5 — — 53-70-3 191-24-2

3-Nitroanil ine. —Acenaphthene — 1 , 4-Dinitrophenol, 4-Nitrophenol Dibenzofuran 2 , 4 - D i n i t r o t o l u e n e . Diethylphthalate 4-Chlorophenyl-phenyl ether. F1uor en e 4-Nitroanil ine ' 4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol. N-Nitrosodiphenylamine C1). 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether_ Hex ac h 1 or ob enz ene Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene An-thracene D i - n - B u t y l p h t h a l a t e . Fluoranthene Pyrene Butv/1 benzyl phthal ate 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine. Benzo(a)Anthracene Chrysene bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate. Di-n-Octyl Phthalate Benzo(b)Fluoranthene Benz o(k)Fluor anthene Ben z o(a)Pyr ene Indenod , 2, 3-cd)Pyrene. Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene Benzo(g,h, DPerylene

1900 390 1900 1900 390 390 390 390 390 1900 1900 390 390 390 1900 390 390 390 390 390 390 780 390 390 390 390

. 390 390 390 390 390 390

(1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine "43^7

U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u. u' u.

FORM I SV-2 302468

_L/97^Rev,

Page 87: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

IF SEMIVOLATILE CRGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS

Lab Name: CEIMIC CORP

15939 Lab Code: CEIMIC Case Nc

Matri.x: (soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol: 30.2 (q/mL) G

Level: (low/med) LOW

•/ Moisture; not dec. 1 =: dec

EPA SAMPLE NO.

BGH47 Contract: 63D90056

SAS No.: SDG No.: BGH41

Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONC

GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 6.1

Lab Sample ID; 910120-07

Lab File ID: A7334

Date Received: 03/09/91

Date Extracted: 03/15/91

Date Analyzed: 04/06/91

Dilution Factor: 1.0

Number TICs found: 12 CONCENTRATION UNITS: (uq/L or uq/Kq) UG/KG

RT

5,55 6, 18 7,82

25, 97 27,34 23.64 30.87 33. 01 33.97 34.92 35.97 38.59

EST. CONC.

190 16000

700 430 740 270 190 160 190 160 270 270

Q

BJ ABJ -BJ J -- J/v BJ BJ BJ BJ BJ BJ BJ

CAS NUMBER

1. 2.

, 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.

10. 11. 12.

000000 123422 000000 57103 10544500 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000

COMPOUND NAME

Unknown 2-Pentanone, 4-Hydroxy-4-Met Unknown Hexadecanoic acid (9CI) Sulfur, mol. (38) (3CI9CI) Unknown Unknown Aliphatic hydrocarbon Aliphatic hydrocarbon Aliphatic hydrocarbon Aliphatic hydrocarbon Aliphatic hydrocarbon

FORM I SV-TIC r. I 434

1/87 Rev.

302469

Page 88: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

INOR'^ANIC ANALYSTS DATA SHZ5T

Lab Name; SKINNEP 5: SHErMAN LAB?.

Lao Cort«SiiiSKINri= Case No. : 1.59.3 => SAS No. :

•"•'-r3S.: nBE2 3 Contract; r^?-"10-0108 "! -I

n a t r i x ^ ^ ^ e k i ' l / u s r e r ' i : fuIL •• .-;«•:•••

Level (low/m^O):

-.i~' G''No. : MBEZ43

L2b Samole ID: 0-305S-01S

Date Received: 03/02/91

Solids:

LOW .

8(1.5

Concentration Units fua/L or mq/Kci dry weiphtl: MG/KG

CAS No.

7i29-~iu.0-

74 1.0-7440-7440-7440-7440-7440-7440-7440-743a-7439-7439-7439-7439-7440-7440-7782-7440-7440-7440-7440-7440-

•90--36-- ~ i' -

- .* " -•41--4-1-•70--47--45--S0--So,

-92--95--96--07--02--09--49-.oo. -23--28--62--t'6-

-5 -0 -O . T

- 7 -7

-2 -.3. -4 -8 -6 -1 -4 -5 -6 -0 -7 _2 -u.

-5 -0 -2 -6

Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Serviiium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt CoDDer Iron Lead Maanesium Manaanese Mercury Nickel Potassium ,Selenium Silver .Sodium Thallium I Vanadium Zinc

'• Cvanide

Anal y t ' Concentrarion 1C

0.47:1.1 42.S01B 0.65:U 6.30!B

47.40! 5.60:U

co.lor Before: BROWN

Color After: BROWN

Comments:

Clarity Before:

Clarity After:

'.n

Texture: MEDIUM

Artifacts: •

• r ,pn I - IN 302470

Page 89: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

EPA

-1^=4 -i-AiirLE r-iij.

INOri?ArJIC ANALYSIS DATA SHE:

Lab Name: SKINNEP -S SHERMAN LASS,.

Case No.: 15939

Ccntracr: 6.S-D0-0108 ' !

Lab CcW«a;,i,-SKINE=

Matri y'^Spi 1/water "i : S-OIL

Level flbu/med"): LOU

^ Solids: B4.

SAS No. : - .sJi S No. : MBE243

Lab Samole ID: 03058-02S

Date Received: 0-3/02/91

Concentration i.lnits I'ua/L or ma/Kq dry weiqhtl: MG/KG

1 CAS N o . 1

: 7429-Qt3-5 ! 74u.0-~6-0

I 7440-35-2 ! 7'.4.40-3' -3 !"440-41-7 . ;7440-41-7 :7^40-70-2 !7440-47-3 17440-4S-4 1 ~.lCi.£? -S0-8

1 7439-?'=^-r,

:743<5-c;2-l ; 7439-05-4 '.7439-96-5 : 7439-«i7-6 !7440-02-0 I 744K)—f'l'-^—7

; 77Py2-a>i-2

1 7440-22-4 : 7440-23-5 17440-28-0 17440-62-2 I 7440-66-O

Analyte 1

Aluminum I Antimony Arsenic Car\urn E'Srvil ium . Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt CoDoer Iron Lead Maqnesium Manqanese Mercury Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Thallium I Vanadium •7 -• - > , -

i.i.nc • Cvanide 1

t

Concentration 1C 1

10500.00! 6.90 IB 5. 90!

'-•3. 10 1

0.49!B 0.23!l.J-

466.O0!B •<;•. Q 0 1

10.3O!B 12.40;

18600.00! 14.10!

2670.00! 145.0.00!

0. 10 ! IJ

14.80! 853.00!B

0.45!U 48.80!B 0.70!U 7.00!B

: 48.80! 5.801U

t 1

0

Nl

T EJ

! S

wT !T f lw

! U

1 1

:M ! 1 :

!P : !p : IF : !P !

:P : IP I

:P : IP : !P : !P : !P ! 1 r 1

IP I

IP 1

lev I IP I IP :

IF ;

IP I

IP 1

IF I

!P •

IP I

:AS •

Color Befor*: BROUN

Color After: BROWN

Comments:

Clarity Before;

Clarity After:

Texture: MEDIUM

ArtifscTs: '•

"^ .

rORM I - IN

3 S o a 9 ^

302471

Page 90: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

:.=A -

fPA iAMFLf NO. INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEE"

Lab Name: SKINNER ^ SHERM^tN LABS. Contract: 6S-D0-0108^-^'ll_l

Lab Code: SKINER Case No. : 15939 SAS No. -.

Matrix.':-"^«il/water"! : SOIL

•,I1BEZ45

'jf Level X*ou/med")

Solids:

LOU

•58.0

. Wo. : MBE243

i_3b Samole ID: 0305S-03S

Date Receivea: O3/06/'51

Concentration Units Cuq/L or mq/Kq dry weiqht): MG/KG

!CAs No. :

17429-90-5 : ' 7440-.36—0 I 7440—3S — 2 : 7440-3"='-3 ;7440-41-7 !7440-41-7 •7440-70-2 '7440-47-3 ;7440-48-4 !7440-50-8 17439-89-6 :7439-92-1 !7439-05-4 I743Q_Q^_5 !7439-97-6 '7440-02-0 I 7440-09-7 ;7782-40-2 :7440-22-4 !7440-23-5 17440-25-0 17440-62-2 ! 7440-r-6-6

Analvte I

Aluminum 1 Antimony Arsenic 1 Barium Behyilium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt CoDoer Iron Lead Maanesium Manqahese Mercury Nickel Pr.tassium

Silver .Sodium !Thallium 1 Vanadium ! Zinc ! Cvanide

1 1

Concentration!C! 1 1

7790.00! : 3.40IU' 5.90! 1

C7 . .50 I B 0.21 IB 0.20IU

217.00 IB 7.50! S.00!B

11.50! 14900.00!

<9.40 1 2760.00! 752.00 1

0.llIU 14.40!

749.00 IB

0.40IU ! 71.80 IB I 0.66IU ! 4.70IB

37.60 I I 5.30:U 1 1 .

0

Nj" J

T ET

NT T

I w

1 1

:ri I 1 t

IP I

: P I IF ' : p • 'P : IP I IP I 'p : IP I IP I IP I IF 1 IP I IP I

lev I IP 1 'P I IF I IP I IP 1 IF I IP I IP I IAS! : ;

Color Before: BROUN

Color After: BROUN

Comments:

Clarity Before:

Clarity After:

Texture: MEDIUM

Arf if cts':. * •

FORM I - IN 3/O0

302472

Page 91: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

EPA - CI

= =A -AMPLE rjM. INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

Lab Mame:--'SKINNER & SHERMAN LABS.

Case No.: 15939

Matrl ji'.jJ .il/uat r'i : SOIL

Level (l^wj/medl: LOU

.- SV. i v, • MBEZ46 Contract: 68-D0-0108-2i'^^iiL-____

Lab Codei^-SKINER SAS No.: -;-Jf M .No- : MBE243

Lab Samole-iTD: 03058-04S

Date Received; 03/06/91

Solids: es. 0

C o n c e n t r a t i o n U n i t s ( u q / L o r mq/Kq o r v w e i q h t l : MG/KG

C o l o r B e f o r e : BROUN

C o l o r , A ^ t e r . : BROUN

C o m m e n t s : . •

I CAS No.

!7429-90-5 :7440-36-0 17440-38-2 ' 7440-3-=--:7440-41-7 17440-41-7 17440-70-2 "" I 7440-47-3 1 7440-4S-4 I 7440-50-O 17439-89-6 17439-02-1 17439-95-4 I 7439-96-5 I7439-07-6 17440-02-0 17440_0Q_7 I 7782-49-2 17440-22-4 17440-23-5 17440-2S-0 17440-62-2 : 7440-c>6-o

BROUN

A.nalvte 1

Aluminum 1 Antimony ' Arsenic ' Bar-!..uni Beryllium Caamium Calcium '" Chromii.jm Cobalt CoDoer Iron Lead Maqnesium Manqanese Mercury Nickel Potassium «.a,l^^-|j_^,ni -

Silver Sodium Thallium 1 Vanadium Zinc 1Cvanide

Claril

1 1

Concentration ICI

9980.00 1 ' 4.30 IE 6. 30 I "5.401. 0.52 IE 0. 20 1II

382.00 IE

0

N7

O.10 1 5" O.30IB 1.1.30 1

17800.00 1 12.60 1

2730.00 1 556.00 1

0. 1 1 1 U 16.301

O04.. 001 B

0.41 ILI 52.401B 0.66 1U

I 6.501B 47.501 5.70 1U

f 1 1

ty Before:

T ET

NT .J

^ .MUt-

I U

IM : 1 1

IP 1 1 e 1 . 1

IF ' ! P , J —

IP IP :p . IP :p IP IF IP IP lev IP IP IF IP IP IF IP IP IAS

Te xture: -. MEDIUM

C l a r i t y A f t e r ; A r t i f pets-:

FORM I IN 3/'='0

302473

Page 92: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

EPA - CLP

•.--A S A M P L E NO. INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

M.-i:

Lab Name:""SKINNER & SHERMAN LABS.

Lab Co<^j^£S.KINER Case No. : 15939

'^atrixj^^pil/water'i ; SOIL

LOU

Contnact : 6S-D0-010S ]^11"'"'

SAS No.: :f^^l>G No. : MBEZ43

Level frbu/med"! :

Lab Samole ID: 03058-055

Date Received: 03/07/91

% Solids:. 86. 1

Concentration Units (uq/L or mq/Kq dry weiqht"): MG/KG

CAS No.

7429-O0-5 . 7440—36-0 7440-38-2 7440-3O-> / U.U.G — u. i —"7

7440-41-7 7440-70-2 7440-47-3 7440-45-4 7440-50-S 7439-89-6 .7439-Q2-1 7459-05-4 ,7430-0^-5 7439-07-6 .7440-02-0 7440-09-7 1 7782-40—'i 7440-22-4 17440-23-5 7440-2S-O 17440-62-2 I 7440—1>6—6

Analyte

Aluminum Antimony Arsenic •Sari urn Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt CoDoer Iron Lead Magnesium Manqanese Mercury Nickel Potassium

Silver Sodium Thallium . Vanadium Zinc iCvanide

1

Concentration ICI 1

4860.00! I 3.801U 4.501 I 18.20 IB 0.221U 0.221U

361.00 IB 5.40! S.IOIB 8.10!

10200.001 I 14.101

1870.00! 193.001

0. IIIU 1 10.401

526.00 IB

I 0.44IU I 18.201B. I 0.651U ! 2.50 IB

37.001 1 5.60IU 1 1 1 »

0

Nj

a-E.T

NO-r

w

1 1

IM I 1 1

"ip"! IP 1 1F ' '.P ' IP I IP 1 IP I IP 1 IP I IP 1 IP I IF I IP I IP 1 lev I IP 1 IP I IF I IP I IP I IF I IP I IP I lASl -1 . 1

Color Before: BROUN

Color =A^er: BROUN

Comments:

Clarity Before:

Clarity After:

Texture: MEDIUM

Art'if act's:

•QRM I - IN 3/90

302474

Page 93: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

U . S . EPA - r.L =

.•-~IFLE iMi", INORGANIC A N A L Y S I S DATA SHEET

- • « - . ' ^

'• r.'....-.. nBEZ4S Lab Name: SKINNER S SHERMAN LABS. Contract: 6S-DO-O10S;-I,__

Lao 9:^3^^^K.INER Case No. : 15939

Matri x-. ' Sra.l/water "i : SOIL

LOU

'n Solids: 87.*

Concentration '.'nits (uq/L or mq/Kq dry w^^iqht"):. MG/KG

1.eVe i "r IVSvJ/med 1

SAS N o . : "^^^'- ' SOG N o . : MSEZ43 " • ~ - -•-.<"• • ^ i - i .

Lab Samole'ID: 0305S-06.S

Date Received: 03/03/91

CAS No,

-'42O-O0-'5 "440- f' —0 7440-38-2 7440-', -3 .' u. (xiy — u. i " ,'

7440-41-7 7440-70-2 7440-47-3 / 4 4 It.; — u 8 — 4 7440-50-8 7439—.8 - —r 7439-C2-1 7439-9 5-u. 7439—o.-N_.=, 74.39-07-6 7440-02-0 7440-0O-T 7782-49-2 7440-22-4 7440-23-5 7440-28-0 7440-62-2 7440—66—6

A.naiyte 1 Concentration

22. 80 3.80 0. 45

1.^700. 00 0.22 0. 22

27.60 1. 10 9. 00 0.22

46. 60 1.90

13.20 1.50 0. 10 1.70

22. 60

0.45 71.90 0.67 0.67 6. 40 5. 50

<j "IM :

M J

fp : IP I IF I !P I IP 1 IP 1 IP I IP 1

7" IP 1 E IP 1

IP I IF I IP I IP 1

N T lev I IP 1 ; p ! IF 1 IP 1 IP 1 IF I IP I IP I I AS I

U

Color Before: BROUN

Color A f ^ r : BROUN

Comments:

Clarity Before;

Clarity After:

Texture: MEDIUM

-Artifocts:

—^>-,o.<. • ••.

FORM 1 - IN _ - 3/00 302475

Page 94: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

u. EPA - CL.=

;r.rA SAMPLE NO. INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

;_3b Name: SKINNER ct SHERMAN LABS.

Case No.: 15939

1/waterl: SOIL

LOU

. 1 . . nBEZ49 C o n t r a c t : 68-D0-O108-3--t»g^''"-

Lab C.:x3«5iiSKINER

Matrix?''^

' eve 1 TXo«/med)

SAS No.; .•:3^a»'lV»o. : MBEZ43

Lab SamDle":?€Dr -03058-075

Date Received: 03/09/91

-OS 84.

Concentration Units (uq/L or mq/Kq dry weiqhtl: MG/KG

1

I CAS No. 1

I 74.29-90-5 17440-36-0 1 7440-38-2 17440-3O-3 :7440-41-7 :7440-41-7 17440-70-2 !7440—47—3 17440-48-4 1 7440-.50-8 17439-89-6 17439-92-1 17439-95-4 17439-96-5 17439-97-6 17440-02-0 17440-0O-7 17782-49-2 17440-22-4 17440-23-5 17440-28-0 17440-62-2 I 7440-66-6 1

1

1 Analyte I

I Aluminum ' I Antimony 1 Arsenic I Barium I Beryllium 1 Cadmium 1 Calcium 1 Chromium 1 Cobalt 1 CoDoer 1 Iron 1 Lead IMaqnesium 1 Manqanese I Mercury I Nickel I Potassium

I Silver I Sodium 1 Thallium I Vanadium I Zinc .ICvanide

1 )

Concentration 1C1 t

8360.00 1 1 5.50 IB 6.101 . '

42.201B' 0.251B' 0.231U

448.00 IB 8. 50 1 8.50IB

26.10 1 17200.00!

27.30! 2920.00! 709.00 1

0.10IU 16.00 1

801.00!B

0.46IU I 31.90 IB : 0.67IU I 5.40 IB • 64.50 I I 5.70IU 1 1

1 1 1 (

Q IM I 1 1

IP I

N c r '^ '• •F I ' == 1 1 P I IP 1 IP I IP 1

^ IP I E J IP 1

:P I IF 1 IP 1 IP 1

N ^ lev I ^ IP I

. IP I

IP I 1 IP I

U IF I I IP I

IP ; I I A S I

1 1

Color Before: BROUN

Color A^j^^r: BROUN

C.imments:

GLASS, ROOTS. STONES

Clarity Before:

Clarity After:

Texture: - MEDIUM

Artifacts:.YES

•'•^

^i0Q»0S

•ORM I - IN 3/J50. 302476

Page 95: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

#

APPENDIX C

FIELD LOGBOOK PAGES

A92-470.txt C-1

RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL / r 4 ALLIANCE

M ^ ^ ^ Tecnnoiogies Cofporaiion

302477

Page 96: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

•fp h z . p 5 9 • ' ( ^ ^

"ENFORCEIIiENTCOIiFiBE™!-'

- ' ' i ^w ^ftttriift::.ii, 'iViA»« i,s if^i. .'ii.%t-' t ui4 ..-;

/ j i i r ^ ^

?^ '5

ise

U O c ^ i L Cjv .<^^

i I 3 5 j 5

om\s

P\«fX

/4<te±

4£A

c^

K J ^ Q u :..^.

v.e

Fre-nV- '^!)OQ^h

IL i i r t 5 . .

^>£i2

(X7f

^ i / ^ e .

-fe

UJlh^iLUL^

cLkz n. X

-B

2r Skfltlrct-

j ^ 2

^ ^

XjuL^'ionJn

ICOSL. V^a-^U

i:

/111

Jcx r ^ i ^ ^ ^ i ••

^ M - ^ i j Q ^ ^ - C ^ d d d .

R

hsc

.11 C

^

Ct .

^ h r j <' -

^ ^

izd

- « j

C./LitiAAiM.i

z^. sS-Cft^ l

v^^ > t

kaicuz

:ni

^ g e W F | e J G

Grl^irf<

Lizu

uk<\^

•3'?-P"G • o n

3t

M MTCJ

p^JL^l

f^

j lc t ru

-^^

i:- ( jn€

V : -

a

£:UZid

i«^ r-€r

fici-

Bi <rr(u(

"rv **-

!Z2^bz/

S c i

a)

^ oH slu/l'/9//[f.$lsd^-/|i//4L

.s_ .

SnulUtiA

dl lA. f

ScJ^a^i

S

/vjAi-e<

^ -4=^ -

zLuMi u. Ul

^

a i

hj

CO

< * OJ o n

S"

ifJyyV^XCu C. Ofjuy^yr- 23 ^<fg ' i /

Page 97: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

rU I ,: ; 2 - ? , f [ - { ) • ' ) I

O l • ' C 1

\ \ ' \ ..cc\ .A .kc__^C. ^J:LC_^.i ^r*JC^.h-£<^t

^ . I 'nck.

„_O:>JL>.

^<l!i>i .„ ._N

_t{)u„o.. M

<[5o Ui p r

Tl

C ' * l l l -Otboui_..rVh

7 ^^•c-

''JL-.a_l+.!i-for GoUg^ •

• j:V ^ . t r - .o k. „3 :^JJ :^VU_ r f f j.|4 t

faJQC<\?J vin b_VAkL

L_j£jC^"l 1L.t|i_t^.(L

V.Cl 5 ^ : i : t c j . „ - . . . S ^ k ^5 - _A,^__Ed.lf^

.^.__Ui

C.i\-fc-

•pCciA 4:\.Qi\'>-

cJL Asj<;'A.<^_^.i_..^tk<L

iC. ^V/"i T '

^ ...o.a V o.c.c\-±[ o f!C„

i I y T

rA spec I i/r^cl. /

4 j : i < j—:

T ( R ' i i - ) 2 3 r t (b '^ i l " 1 ^ ' •'• ,

Pe t i L v

^

' Oo'HA ?_

IL :LS;

\v o^b

c «

:V . J A :

^ t '

Oi >\F' '.

H

V.t

H sj-

•th\

i Z r t d s

^ S l

V€

O. A

a'lLCViS^?

lAJ

i •Al

tUZ.1

lAitds

-F

% } 2 C J

i W i i ^ l l r j .

kx

itm^A

pfi j ioi

1 1 . ^

L L ^

3 ^ .

(>

u.<i

AJ.\

\c}L^i^

^

)ldl\

J l QJUL

• ^ ' i . C ' ^

• ^

|t DC?*'

'lxi'.U.

m ( S - i

^ t n

U t'vyi.7

m v / s < :

. ^ J L

DQ^k^

i-n L ^

' :L j . in

±o__it.

\ j r~

^

^ . S

y c«?

V-oi'

^ : / n

.4/< vc?Ls

.rp_ -7-

.A»'

s [-4

0>(1

~CLB

i grv :

i:

^a,

kL

:a./:

n f - U' 0

^^

•-KgiiM

^

z/: l /L^^l,

- W ^

/,^y.

/ I j j i

1 a l /

\ €

£ :iiL}

Jc

1

aa

-f,U

u.^^

I SI.

xCLjx

oA

C U

iM-a UU

M -{U

f-

a£L<ULIajn.

Ox JO

<xc

A.,

UM

i-AL_€,

LJL -C I

ii^£-V

a j n 3 ^

1-5

CA

(L

dc xM-e.

W' <L!^r\oi\

l i J

a

'iig-

.0

e n <* CM O

n

c i ^

S I •t

c U

^ 3

' ^ t U i l t r j J

Oi)'-

Q ^

' ^ y y i o A A ^ ^ C OCLMA^ ' ^ / 2 S / 9 /

Page 98: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

<1

»030

l l h v ' S ' / U ^ . > < c ^

— ' T - ' -r-

I , i • I ' 1

/o<is

-Tv^-/ L j p ^ ^ ^ ^ 4 /•A / I . . .

O-J -z l>chn^\ -h/^^s r^ti^^l u . ^

- -3

U':1

Ui/zM „_../^^4^_f^ ^„5t?d-k ! i | ^

_ 1 . Q t d ly i:_.-,.. J/rj \:.C.. -_^L>^<:LA<^ ! I - Jy^i-)! .1 ^^.fU^,,^X i- A'LOih.y..^^jXnctr-r^k-

i \

U b± £ \0-ix

Zci-

A-L t^kJL

±c L e~ f ' l ^ (x i S -

iJ^Tiki'L

m

I z -

l U L i L

^'nuia

L

^^fx

^ .

d o

JLL

/ C L - T

AdUi-± k i

M ^

j o A l

4 ^

U ^ ^'-^-U

w

B

, z5 pee, " \ ^ ^

f cL'Jifn

ri^li^jL

JHfLtl

i j n

I 6)tZ/dL_

.ilLx »2ii

Mc/5-- '-

J! j2L i i__! i f^L i2 ]

20

P

f ' - ^ ^ ^ s . .

/c

'J-

k.U

tJd.

A

/7. M/^ t^//

o , "

L!y_

^ i?»2i

^ ' • ^

/ / t ie .i/'^^oi'

k

^? p^o/n

/ ^

/A_

C/oJicl^sL

^^4p

IdirhtC. L\A.

U ' i

m

i .± IscetlAkLi

fac/lje^^

i j l h

U^

(^ fp/K

O CO

o n

r

£^iL^-

h-£^

I.

'T^'Tayu^ C.J2cc.r^yi^ ^/Zfi/^,

?w»^'A"?5i*y^f

Page 99: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

•^''••!i' '^Stf^1'<>i*S%

G

115.1

- • 5 ' .

/ / 3 S

..' ^ . . . ' <-- 5 . ? i.j .. , .

..Cl?.n._..-:^t5....l57'=?.

//.4-4-

h '^o

l^r..

.Ui.^A

^Lfl h. m ^ ^ \ (^_^ T / ' - / . jbf nt _:^..'5

5 ^ />

/ P / 5

. ; 7 L _ _ - _ ^ - /

5 ' C

C3f-<?o^ ? hr^a^4^ : / o r }^/^'^cl-^

jV.f: li !_-<. ^c< J t^.nvL /'<-f _ ^

J ^ ! / / / j ^ z - j J / i / i e ^

0>

-^5d& /2(f r:_

^ m U L . 6-J2uynX V?8 /9 /

£2£;:^4U9: iJ i : ; ; i i^ !*S^;^£; i t ;^^

Lk^.^dA-^r^r^'-^tja^sAi^^^ ^mii ' '» 'p^^^ C . AJcc^f^y?x. Z - Z ^ s j / ? /

Page 100: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

M) \ - j i'-

2?) RV,-)\ y i^'^'j': ^ ^ ) r | f ( ^ ^ ^

" T ? ^

r.-i.r<- .,

) . ' -Of 5'..i.>„0.O

S:TI

' ^ ^ c / ^

V-___^u:n-

a

A A A A

/ ^

'M^ 7fM '•UZ/-7 ^ j i l y J j J ^ '

Tci /WK.--77/-/

c:2»

mm

, . t&'

i v-t-c. ^ / w 4 f e ^ > c p / ' ^ ^ k f / k ^

^ n f ^ U \ A > ' < ^ l/c^J^s

; | /^M rija^^^^*/^ W 3 c^ -

'.•.i mmmi msirmmiii &imML

^ , i^^__ „i:^J«!_^^^-^^rl^)^)/y_

i A(i:

3:^Ve&SA

Ik^lfmiMi

y M ^ ^ ^ r ^ ^ 4

i ' k t . : * / ? a ± ^ U ^ > i l * ^ ' ^ y ) i i S i h i ^

ca.ht\i5Ji(i^

^vcQ:

CLfOi*^^

c^

4

-d^^7

- J T P A - ^

L.ohjJ^'p

hdJiMX^

>?y#

'i-

etc O-C*'

<? #a4.i 4 . ^ ^ ^V^''

Page 101: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

'•\-^'.''*:'-*,' .•:• :^'J^7^'^^'l,•n'^f•lLi^lteii 'hiJ^^mtla»iiSiaii

A(.3^ C W ^ ^ v V h i * < r t L X A A A ^ j j r o f A V

• > >\v. ... t \ '

''If)

m •• h i

.-:•+•! -:1

•fi

4'V\iJ^

^ L 5 _ . ? :

i i

^ ^ L I W L L

_^5J:/

Q _ - L ^

hii^Ln^^si^a. 1 /

fM ^ c

r ^

^ r

-r

^4

l£^v

.iZ.

^Jb

i:/ii/£

^

a

•\L

cr,

w

pa

"i' lL\k._^U,^m •fj ijJ(uUX- IAASLA (f

H-

T - . >

p/i^.

i SJ

a f i ^ ^ .

^ ? o r 4 < L T g t J r r f t S

i a

-/: < j r

l/OC

sA

s<'g$

H

^

ba Z ( : ^ .

0 1 M f l / e 9 t ) " ^ ^

.L£.

.0 /1

Ljrv

Pert

IJLL

^ C

i

E/U

f 5 ^ ^

^ ,

£

,5C,

> % ' . 2 / ^Z^

Sr/^

L,^aM<L

vCr-

ur \ 2 g

Vc

4/s

D_

daAi-i

1 ^

c

i iU

<.JL

4-T't3nt- ^ s c k >

, /

^ ^

o^,

'hie

1^

11

£.

u / '

•//

LQ.

' ^ h n c h i

P-'ra

rcA'ini'f

ic.

/£i^2^'

^ < ? ' l

i g

OK

i

Q^r\VvV?LI

4 /h lC jL

I t i f € A i -

L.

-5^

5^)23^

00

o n

l/*'< Z^iS'^^.

r.U FU [/oc

C.jOuy^.^ ^ h h /

Page 102: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

07.5P.

{'qAciyf ^'Soi-^ ~ ^ - j - I .

l\^ve\. .-^^

H \ a : ^ OkX'<-f VoS-t v'fN \ l - p O P S t:>•^^9rr^<^-rA^.

1)hc>uM

^ «1-

\ f^t-. f ^ £ <

R. iiA-.<?-i;:*r.

01. U.^ i . . . t50l._l._5&.,V:r^.^\:?-^

^ •5) S,^^..^. ^ v ^ c i ^

.>LAci..S><-|.»l^:^

^ 5 ^ j locicLft-^^ ypQ t rovrxfl

C/jfvx p<a . -e 'r' V^^Ac ._a, 3"2-S.

^ ^o'^^..t^:

^ ^ ' ' \ / ^v^^^^ .A^ V .\|i . -w\- ... U)A.s4-g- f « ^

_u

.9!y.3.itc..

I'sA.-JfAj.

oSc huo'iiy-f_i>t>_._ ..'^r^VyNoV^_^

cv»<jui A TV v-\ 4~ r C YV^QV^. -^ tg f p r<"Or>A A

T g

Tim

nrg

e n c ^

'o ovn

W .>A _ ^ ^\ope,4 *Jo!]:.."_-'

U ' j i c>.< _ |\wv<^iKelorrv.iSiiA.

d'l(^rSor^ntl 3L h_ CL['5__ t l i S ndtdtOj ^rr^

X^__3i 'iLni)„

Wtf>u^ C^QM^'^^ 3 / / h i

Page 103: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

-Ml f-i-.'

pjhA

O-S.BO

i ^ 1 ^ -ki-xc^g^

« tV^

n LUVxx!. k TV^^-\ S.^_.'^orrs I-

VL* ucp rfvoS-V o ? ^ C ^

1 o \ "

k) -»- . . . ; ^^ .^ <:« r^:<-A.N

<tVL

/ / « / ,

f'i^'Al.p}^.t^:^ up .Nki.5urt.

f T !

./ / ikX.

^2 .5 .

-£Tn BIT.

inn

U 'b\ope: piSjj rt U U 5

/M<«>i, - ( : . < ^ ^ . ^ . Oyyi

y •\v^<^^

I ^ '

.•l\v

M^fi.

;f^Zi^

\r f

O .?

l 6L^

.^.

ul.

k

0'>4jr

52

M.

^

<h^

4

6 iU'JO.

0:f_£_

^pjieppm^ CM 01

/1 -h

Mx

}<^0l

r-< i\cL.

th.

cat

YiM^Ar^

] > •

LiL'i

ui

f'

\ '> j .{ .^ Aj-yci

I Jr

1 ^ .

i ^

iqj}(ad-rfii-j/ i:.jcsi^x^

•.bnuiZch

^ -x i i i ^^Ql ih^ l^A ' iMM'J^ fd :^ ,

L CdA-L-LAniu^X-x.

t

pkA iXLC

aU'^

i :i?i5 J l £ i /mU-M-^

^I'sSt&A^^M'.

I la^kj i

p/Lihi

5 ^ : i ^ ^ ^'-tkjLjy- pUJ^A^

' ^U .

Uxi

O 3 M fl ^ '^ I ( ^

• ^ .

^x/3Jl

!^£.

a r U

M l

Lt

f n

^ L t n

Jle

Mts,

i l

\L

rjc^

XAUAJ

'Koit^^J^

ds.

mtuti^ m c j i t ^ ' a ^

L O M ^

•-o-y-

caK^'(- S tnd

f OAs

the

f

t<?

P'i: a

6 * h r t

^

i £ i

i ^

Sols. •d iV.

a } \ . .

'Jn ^

in CO • > * CM o n

Ol'fdAu. C. jQuur^ '^/i h /

Page 104: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

'M

[\C Vt'~i •e-r

>!t'.' i.)l h ' t M ' -^ I " I i i U i - 4 t i ( ' P .:>' r-y^^'^h 'B)

.I^i ^

.IP03> ,„. [IWi b^g4_^. s;> pf rv>... -.Kl

l--Tpi.ny^..Bo

S p,

3^ii_ V^ ^ S 6tt..-t>'TLQ .'>3 -i .nVy. \a<JU \ - i

^.. d.\ r._' "_.._.\: <?.<:.Q::'_i' . ....C:t>r\-5'lY.i cJLei. ^'> ^\-

• * y f . 6 - V " -A J

7.^)^

j o

./O/T^J..

cli'yneylS/ L

/)J

- /^•v«_

£/e .....r<j£^^.

D.^

tcOd Ao£_

N.D.

;l<^^iV \<^ .. • \

b.^i.L .1 BJ.LJv^4M^.f}ll o.ns

3o^ i

.V^ .^)M.it:<.....QCC

T ct <' oi4rv)i'

•J .Nirt.tdt'l|..L^y'5Ai:

'A .y/fJA.h'..pICLM r_L^£..0'>^k!CVL^> rd£lL.Q(XI.^S.£dl.^c_

1^

P''^^.-..Mdkr.._^±JPjh^^ >'$s„

• I ^C'}

-!-<:

pe i

tv6 K .4''?-' : ..Fyc^. o.^fjoh ^ .Sir

^ ' " A o X i ^ ^ ' 1^26^^--^

!r>a l.iA.LSi

3hh

K -k ' A o r ^

\^S&

// 5S

yy'4

- / /

f<N-e<^5 .

0^.

l i i ^

r t

^ ' - n i t ^

C

(r

^ ^

; ^

Y-c^Jci/f,

r

a n £.{jLi^

J l . i i^ tn 2 0

AIL ^ j -

7aA-^^

U^-UL

Li-.

iLll

Vbuho

C^Y^'ii/a.

'\"t>

i l f o

Hi

(kfoti^e

Go

^

^^ r J

P-' -ko

e^^^L

m .

Mh ±t

-^L

l ^

^ 1

h u c k e f

E J ^

h o

y u

ye^: 'K^

uns.

<i cAS

'djfi

e^c X.

s,fiJ:dti

^ l a j t o R

^

^LS. d l

jre C\>r 0 6

i ^ JC<L

A -a . ^

u r _ i J a j ? i

4^^

A

£.'iJM'.

•p

0<- .5^/

^

/A ^

/ ^

< } * ^ ^ ^ i ^ i ^ ? _ y t / f c ^ L _ j ; ^

.Ct/|M

170

iJa a-^'a :eA

cuy^

Lu

i2_

-<^

lAuI. '. '-

CA/

rvv

di-

5/c

PM

-7 •U^

: i i ^

f^

' i ! ^ ^

(^/!«f_0L-)J^^ ^ ^

?|n.

6^

/ : O*/'!

l/K'\ X.4

^iLi:=L

^ilS ciai^

si^k. ^ I H W

/i^< f

':yt! V

'EiiZnl.-l^^^L.i A \j,M^\ S<^tdfi^ft^

zC CkAo-^L

L ^ ^ ^

d.

•Z-AJ

1 ^

ti.2iC'itjn

i2S,2^

y^ f c -

CO

rg o n

^

: £

lCr- :^rD^l

LbM^S.

kd

/yj^gjuX- - ^^^^^ 3 / / /9 /

1 ^

Page 105: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

<- tLZ

( J \ i..\f\llL O) I 'hcjio

.Jl:. w A"! tv>?_- _iW: _boA^V$._i iSvAJLi. bU-<^t)l/lfr. 1 j : ^ ;;'

. .X, .-u;x\ cijAle<AL.,6) C^ W^>>^..: : J _. ._.

_ „ Ar^$5r: I..-1. Llg<i_M 1 C\\\S,^s^^^ysm^ J^u?lT^5- .L^- J-.S6Aij^\ ?-. 1. i ^ _

I » f .

-^33-<C3»

TTfl

^4'^Pk^._.|.LOa I l ^ ._C.olkdi€ijLA.Lt - i O t -O )

WxTA

7^ / t ^ ;v i

-h^.\X£.iy4~A<^^^^-r^pl±-\ ^ d l/ia r<, AA^

-i3:Y7.<5_/y.r.!i5;.

. A l L s j r^ kA • fii-r CiLM\ (/ ( : P ^ h ^ b s

/ll/z^A / . Q\. ,P^-MMi j / / / ^ / /yyioj^ C Du^^^^ ^ M ^ /

Page 106: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

.f„ l£^LL_JBiJ<llaa.S^

C c - . r l " t : « ^ . ^ c r > b t ? r W l r U ) > \ \ \ ^ e . U' f \ s ' l p - "^^ ' ^ ^ ° - '

344-

io fX^

..<)..0... ..SAtLt j

j u . .

, V .L ^4 ^ . a

. A i ' . l l j n o A ^V'? .9V<:i A^->£i t t v . - O M y g; : t r . i

y-,^ yi n , , , } , ^ /)<^ M f i f f ^

O S \ ^

ve.

A

j - y x ^

f\v\

: ^ ^

a'z-

o-az^

'S^>eo-i- - Q

j A r C l r v ^ :

Ac

5 . \V< i )

l i l

U f V

f

._&

J2

4 A C

\OJrOL.

K

iUCL.

rO-

£ iV i i i

Vot UilLI

h > u > ^

batfe

• ^^

9 f N C L

<<A^«^a.jd

pioAes

B*-5

Vc

U ^ 4 5

' \ k

1QJ«JL

cXx^

CJ>^

: i _ . ' [WJ

• ^ _ i

Oo

J>60. -/-> V'/.e

Oiizzt^; <^L^

Si^/r u

y.^Ji2AyL

voJv-^. 4—

uJ<Xr\X<Jl- ^ a t j c o r x ' ^ k . O - ' O A A

l^sl

C a

JCCss_fi=ro5

ii b

CfO

:B. \ \ >. k>)U3k

UKU

^;l«/r.^i ( ieiACJLi>

tNC ^ t-Cri

^^ d_

^ O ^

\ r

«io ro ;

XyiOfcjls

( Vg-

"g roVK k l

iLaSi

i

. C < -

€-?(?'' -'

^

U

LX Ji

4

U i /

u

'Vv* .

dytdCL'tM.

UJxU's5^dr£,m\

L

\ 0 |v>M )\i t l ks j f '

1-5

^ ^ ' t O l

;<a. tY

^TC.^v\.\d

i V o v j -

U S i '

'\VxiaV-

^v^<L V \ ' ( -

£ ^ * z j 2 d ^

VjCiCCe:' ' ' ' [ ^

.ic

_IWL4-^k/ i i ±

^ ^

^ i

^ ^

^ .^

pJiX ir>v(f>

AiOiXi

^=iv?-

i>\,

? : 6 t ^ k j

C\

A

^ A i

Srski-

a . i c in(~'ju^t'ir/(4.

! CO CO

o

diA^ini-

.tf; tA/!p-pn>-tf<

Page 107: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

Ill ii<ii mwiiittiiMttmSSm

U ' - > \--'. .'1

, j ^ i.Ar.r? ' ^ 1 / ! • ' ' f A . j l -

y\V c V ' - (2 V)

O:V IA^^V; c«-e<^s__qcA !A|^'f..v^ dlS-fecAor:5_:Ao^ :!%?

--V^<>i5>.ri!ik _- ^^^A^^A X Oft sCiti. ._.^_ti, pAjA.^ _>_

. . 0 > ^ '=>'ill_: ' ! „....] _ „ | '__

o ^ 3 1 CiLrL.Crv^rrD5.„AkS_^_:di.oaiV^.!j^Aii CO T(\\'<\Jl\\^aU.-k'...^.\A\ (O [ !

A<^oV <i jAr 'JMot

^

^^/^/ 'TF./.-.I- ..^jjl..k'.. -.L^-y.:yr/y^±. ::.t:is^^._._ll'2_ ' ^ a ' . d f ^ / L

'^i./l....AU/Uy.....j>.±y'ji > '

yM^y-- < / i i ^ - • ^ % 1 \

CPii iS

Cb^ci3.

^ ^ \

1^)7

•tM

' \ : > , ^ %

SH sii*^:^

C}^L^ k ^ ^

-c

- /

r' /

V ,

0/ '.

0 ^

^ ' T A J l ^

ti

ft.

a

! A l

5HV

b f p w ^

Lsi^.^A^^dO^iJi

o i W t ^ ' i - ^ ^ t ^ t ^ -^»JLAL(WC

^\jl ft^

i t<^ / i

' ^

0 4 X ^ J U ^

vti

f

1 ^ Cfl J - 5 ^ ) 1 2 . ^ 1

1|.^

"El^JSd^

. M ^ l

\lc\{^yJc

L t /

\\s1^s\ICJ^

p_/ct l^ts

i-\ t n t U A f

^ h a

k^

f.

6.^ <.-hj-

Ui^

i t f-* :

(iA\

CO

- ' J '

: n

»«dCs<

^ * " ^ ^ - ^ f /

Page 108: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

'•"•Ii'ia.' "li 'lYii I. limiJiiiiiitmlilitttdltk

(7^ ^'Vick

•vp>r.

(n5 -to.'ilrf^ttt fc^ p'ic.V-( .o y7ir..ya-^.

-. ^^^6-^^k^^C' ' '': p\i A^^^ h ( ^ &.:^

/^'^'^ ^ I ^ ' ^ A ^ ' - i ^ ' ' ^ .<•x^J^ i^^ i^J/^2'l

Vyyii^

/yyioM^ C- lAA^^n. a4 Hrte. 5 /

I.. - ' ^ -

^.-_

/HK-'Xf'

^S:

Gif cy: L J S^ L J ^ ^<: cLi-pi i3J ^

.i>L\vj2>;c

c-^ C.V V

cs; < o »

y M

^ i ;

4

'3 J£ l

bi c^

-I

..2

CSV.

tii A<:

hue

u

iXA:£:^.

i rci

lo.^

>i« .-lie

: ^ ) C A , 1 - Q ^

i_. 'u_,

A ± ik

AAL

\^'^V ^_airjffA\-H'^

ICliO

JZ

1

.?/

i l

t Tt-CA.rAl<L 'rV>::tll/VM<^

r^ IC

iii

u r

.Vs.rU

r v i

^

W^.

W

\o O l

' i

uL

OSJY^ .(A)

_Q; i . i ^

J 5 ^ — 5 J J X.

1 «L^>.

.A:oCl<aL -f^-CfiXAJLAv^'j

.s<uL<j!--^cd

' <

d^m^. ' 5 _fe_'iA Ld cs

rf'^i

v^-

..L

l ^ r o

^Sii^^

i-

HRJ

- ^

S\iJU.Jl.{^J,.(^h^

ag

\£S_i

t^oLilj.

L D.

a i ^

.£^

. ^ ) " ^ l < L ! x

t L

V^'f

(M)

. act LA.

^kkl^jfeo

7 Icn

O

/^?^Z4A^

Page 109: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

- . . - ^ ^ w S M i f t f ^ .

z3) ;_A:

S( .5 f < _v: J ^ A\ i .^-^A. Boo p )trA

^ juoI .JLtL rYv?, g£ 0 2 lOj^k

. \ 3 3 5 L_(rtfw breM^S : &*.„„ifirfinlkJB

y-V \ o

r 1

13 to L 'Oec.ck(L_:Vo :.:>\oipt . 5 ( J ^

. , \ : . . • i . . . I . '

^ ; / . -r^/. Evre.vU:i4d.L'f^y<MsT^!J.ci / ^ r£ . . U p. .

i . , , - ' • / I

Ly^/^t-iyt. r J t^.£/.

I

\3^\ '5.. iCvtAJ r Okl cVvt\^ O2. •\'^r\t<>

r * A ^

1 *• '

J r ,

Hf^efy • /yyioAAA^ C'jOuynyt^ 0^ ^ / f ^ 9 /

Page 110: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

yi/i/A i ) l o t s

O'J M n »'- "^ ' &

-. . flW-^j ' : ...._U- i VI

k i^tyv^^vi M\c^ ^-A 6«::Ta>v::fccn o

—r— ' I -tsu

C3r

-^kJu) .. 6 P / ? r^picOLUd SJ % <.pnh (yJ/_. 3-

Go /M<.-. Go/yCiA. uJ i j I . ^1-. 0? /kcL/ 'M

" ^ ^

'/Mm^^rA 'ioyh^^r^f M A i ^ I •;

Sr

V y g . 0 — "'^M.

Cna:-1^0

n l v^oa

0155

0J)O2

xLas:iS

C:\ v&^ ^_L 0.a^ As,4

I O G

H f jOr i

&V„

tea

b.

U)0-rrA

O f f

'-f. 1 ^

Vai^l^

nrs_S

fi:>

r t^JCLli i

^e.

.t. ;

rrv:L_up-

iijtkju

^\

t

>>.Lt

i3.C

( : A O

. j : \SjLt:-JcbM^sy^

2^'ik

:=fy

,CJA-

rvvxtA\>vko

b a s e .

A::^

;.iu<.:rc^LiA

i:2ifi

i.<ci.A

-A:. 4£= err

.Cf-\\ k c J L

AITML UK)

C,AA

i J S ^

o. :^ , . . . .^ :

ov

ryx i . t

N ^

1 u

lAL

^.g^frv/ ^^^•NCt i At>

/ y > V A t A . G

)•&€--):• v i p

iAi^t

c J t

X

\-r^eg.^

Cx.\

::L

' S -

i t

c_<c:*;io

X..

J3 lAtiC

' ^

T^ki

On

^^ j r ; jW

A<:^.s

- ^

I ' ,

c U f ^ H J ^

.Acdprv

i H i .

W

i.X.

kc 5> VKjbOVJ<LC_

o^rbe

j . f l i .

4o

Vr.

hr:

(.(k.

Us

3c

<()e.r A

Icl c

At;

. 1 , ^ !

.Lief.^

(li.\fA

r»i • i 'pci l

OJ

o

.li J ^ ^ ^

JVl i , J i

1:

QuA^A^ oSM.f^^ '^ t -

Page 111: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

£'*!'\. A;-**:i^i«««»lS««*^;^»a«w^

Page 112: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

f •Tf*'.vf*5P!i?

/ \v\(V

IlUX

113

IL n

l l

^

CJXJia:\.-iL ^

i:

Jlf ^iZvAJll

H ^ .

f<

<3^

i ^ ^ a

JA.

n

ci

S 4 :

M ,

:2Q^'rL

z

i i 4 _ l

L I I I } <

\.^

^^

.!zAr<=.

• i<l

<=

) ^

^ u ^

/V

^ ^ .

J ^ r /

^Li ^ ^

,^-f:'

L <'

' _ L ^

^h^ f^ii-i.

f'^^ktA

A ^

:g f

u^ ! i . .L

-Ur-oL 4.

>} 'A

*">]

c d i ^ y ^ f

dk £ M

^ A pi-

5

k.

Oi

2'>^iM

.)-

^ / .

iv

^

L d

i ^ a _ . > _ ^ :

i e

b

7

z-U£i ,£ i . i^ .

A

I 'scJa O:

A. r M ^ ^

in..

ou

: ^

Li i -

I U l

r / V i ^

u:

UJbos:

rA'^^ '

)1Z

'•'^^iT

hfllt

^Aj A

.fLO.

.:^

i H

tA/o.

f .r_6(> : ;L£

5 . ^ r a ^ i : £ .

- h

h

i ^ k i

/-^4<^

SL

b'JLe.

iUA.

rL i

j - : >

i.*zt.G.

kJX : L

f i u i

^

e i^i

U/y S

mis-

M

^ ' -

^

Z iL i

'J-

* ^ r ^

S,C_,iik

ladrf^^f

fty ^ .

Iii /I/?/

^

u. f^'^

C.U

;: J ^

i^L

R

en

rg

n

f5^

i U ^

lA^ /A

i n 1 n

^ .

/aL.S^5-

1U..

rv«t ^

QJlu./y^' '^^'^<^, f C i M r

iWil^^-''^'i;fe^

Page 113: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

- • ^ ^ i " * '•- • ? . fcilt»iii«4lfal ' (•• '•- ' . .• , .» . :v „ , i> , . : . . ^ i . i ,4^n,

mumsmamm"'

•^ J M t ) ! ' ' •-*)! 1 M ( A I t / r j : :^^i^^ . ^ , " 3 ^

. eo..)U .W„......v.- ..c Q ( J vA p.vj.5.;>(;.'.!j

"A '..i.A. w J - f U ^ -.^:^ _. \tL3 pp.fv,A_.

A"^^-^'^ _ . . . ^ . u / ^ r ^ : : _ [ A J / / / ^ ^ / _ ^ ^ ^ L

/\j3 •ri.^.C._^.C.,/t...Ct.>A/; £2...

/l^.-^ i MM^; 00. i ri'a/4^S..s.u/L.^k

-X.A / -yphl /,itA LJisGoldlJi..^

M r u yy\ S.. J: !_ I i

'Tyid^vcc^^-' JP - -y * ^5/^4/0'

Page 114: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

2 ^ ("Of; A.\ A - I K J C

: _ , . • ; • • ' " ' " ^ J "A" A' T r [ I

AD - V - IC ,.~. <| rf^ ? ! (i^:^^i. Iike.,is/.)

."^-.^ p < ... oiA.'pV>o4O'jAU.i i _1

ri'A- :if;A;M

1

^ S ^ l ^ A .VO

p ^

/la^. .a 11 d /V-f. S^frk^ZA. i ^ _

/BAI Uv.«-;..-rF..Zr.(.. win

\

15 5c ^t?cX.":. , V o C V^ , ! I _ CT

T(?.2--' . . G o .^-K.M ^xPc^K . '^'"

<AT^(j)i^ J^oc - ^ ^ ^ X -

O L

" " " iSv^

W \M?-i

OfioJu^j G. A ^ . ^ ^ ' /?i/2 ^ / -2=1

Ifcio

11.^

4i)_

zi y

¥ \

—,. 41

X.i^vt)Y,_..M

L U : i^-m

yf

M

\

.c^ ^kJA

' ^ •

/

N

mp

LO/L-AL-Ciim

4 i ^

UL -fel^tt

>^

/ •

|y?t- i

i

/

??

bUiu^

i ^ ^ / i

-t A

LU

1 1 • > ; —

\

i-a :

^9-

: ] -

• ^

V

A y

k^ckdt

en

CM

, o cn

. . j .

fypJ Aoa^ (\, Ouy^y^c oS/^/f^9^

;4,iv;^3te;>>i-i'<Tiii/.">3i^'ifil5i>4,;iS«»i^»« ^T^U,* . ' , .

Page 115: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight
Page 116: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

O i y . t - A n e ••) i •n ' ' I :

-c?sis .AK-tii^. __..l y*^ rv Z c rt r-ini-^ tl/V-

b<='i v^o \j ci t 1--1 u r• fsl «^_Mr.P U 4rc>y.

^14 r^^ t u e i XT

0 6 /Hf l /^ ' ^ j

U«*^

' ^- 'r^ _. lO.\A3W<-c\ V'^WU^cv, boMU.s ^ o r So. »>> 9k-

! / )u.rncj<>e'

QlkxiA AoVp>> l pS^..LWc)^£iliift y p ^::l

J 9 p y>Ntl

^5^

" n o&

?» ^ u ^ 5 .VO)cx.S-U_..: ' K ' j r A t : i ^ t : r ^ n j r \ € , l . o n $r fe 1 .^ S

;/T^'

J>ff: Te T

' ^ 5 ' - 7 ; )Oc»te . ^ i ^ -..i.

. 'lo.r^ -TTN^ T^0 k>._.

• 5 *^

-li

U - i -5 u f t .

(}\i

V I ' C;\.>UVNA: A i u , v . < , | i- '^ion'V ($LCft~V.\l^-[

i C J Xdr^^ ^

A\. nQT jfjfi^ Mr....C:dfU<)..e.;. hobmfl' V € tv'^A*.. t ify .$..i.1zj Fd.4^,L.^._Sf^i;<i J 7 F M _

i / J i O )

A)w./ ^ 1;; .-./o r.^/-6Jfl.......|j.i^f_...._llAlALAiM^

ca/n^.. CAI I 5 H O <? .Ai;L.'bar»^ ^ h a l l f A

O t \ t

m. m i ^ c\D, kon/r^ OG ^ " ' ^ 91

fc

i p I 5 t 7 y g ^ ^ o r ^ ! ^

V-V oU)

^)3^> F r ^ n l

^33

^ ^ c ;

/ C ^

c ;

« \ j iO

A r . r S - ' i O A i ^

^

(.)

i

/ /

C^

L'^IQ.

A

u:)

£EX

:^ x_* rvx

Cx

5XUti

s. / /

!a.!

r-f"

'.>)•

^lon

M<

io^

AA

iAv.tVVi

i x r

< \ \

£i A

^ r

/I.l3.>v

fluh

CALU-^CUIJ

i t .^.A 2

Vt'

i ^

rni

i ; ^

CXilAgi

S a

J ^

.F

M

I

'A.

[a •

•M l l

n \ ^

W_ \ \^e

^ve S> \\Mdc

e ^ i i i x i X

^ ib

1 0 -

p f ^ V C S

f

(/a

rL.aii^

3^4

i ^ !

^ • -

•^Ws b c ^

4k ^

kmdi

.£. (ft K

/ t j > r i -

5-7^^ t^'

(.

L Z

^

Ua r 4 K t 1

. « •

££i.

A

/ -

iOil.

oil

-lit [ j ^ k .

a

^

^A^IUiS.

i n 5 > ^ J ! Q ^

IL£A

U

f- -i}i^ i i i

7eJ

3 '

; ^ ^

OV-

cav, V'>-b

v<>.

-r \il±.

'P

Old:

T m i

( : > e / i

^L^

i d

tn^a_

UO

J.^ i/iZ

^ U c ^ _ A^

oX

y^\ k:

a. t v

kjQ.

lVv£

f\

5i-\j. M j

/Jk

to

\ ^ : U 3

Af \ ' ^S

c^

AJt

5 .

K ?<iC

n«A

K.

UJ?

L/e./

r l .

Sl. ^

'77^'

M-ori) fa (jst

d

CO

en

r g .

^)

tJmAjUL. C' d u ^ ^ O 4 M / , ^ 9 ,

Page 117: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

•r7?

:-i,'if^--

•.••SI • • • • ' > l

y'rS; yT-M

Page 118: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

mssaoi IVC. \>

/lA J ' i n ' V / \ v \ c JQ Ou H«\c '^r

.. A O M A A2.?>..'T.dbJ.A;^i 1 i • •

. .1 O/-^:- .' .••k f il.r>^. ^ .__

. ' ~.y... J^..^'? Irr^or^ . . \ ( c\^ljhjy...

V^ih'i'fiM

ST>AS. A^^^ ' ^.iLfi! \D.eku.rNiA:tP3r.l..

: ^ " - " ^ ^ j - ,' • ! - I -

My ^ C W N \lKci... .l€ irxtj AK€ic ir^i... o :il ' (^s . p} ,nlt Bo th M^^^ip,;^^, Ci.'.lQAX

H i ^ ..H^O Of). n '^^t .sc^up:^,Gl_5'M^ So d/^...:&./ItVhci:! (_ ,^^^

^iL.l'... A--sH.l)r':^.....:ir.il{\L<-.nli..'ls.d....±hjJ±i^^

4) r f 4

/ ^mA\aJ C j2uyn^ 06/^fiev

Page 119: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

-Hu-S A M^P

,..:-.

/3^^J ;A-oll 3 H-X^ y \i ..SA>.y> 9Jl^(^ I'A-y"

^ ^ - - i » i

VA- \. r\u '' T| fAiv oj^'^A.e^_\^.(\ "A ~X-'? i;.\._...; J r "

;> .2•?). : .L 1- Vv .Vo AU , C W0. i axCLA: 5fei Ax

n ' ' A i T"' > : U-V,cs\i:.. <-^o^v\6 . ! :_ i :......v cJtw;; sjy;\ 2_.i

l^ '5c

A. - ^ ^ - ^ • ^ - ^ ^ ^ - - ' • - ^ ^ ^ - - ^ - —

J^.UL...'L.'^. /V2..0._r..',Lnn iily /A Ao ^' .J

/Jo l \c:>ni .p, '^h. ,) io . Orp\ojm-^ff:)/}\j7 TF^

(.Jum f/T 00 7r<-,-(-.<'"s -Mknviph^/-'> >' 7'-.// V .'.O / i^3 Si / ^ / / 5 ? . / 0 | tAA/., . ."XE 3: /_.A _.__.. j ^

7 y^ ^. , o ; , ..:......!. _,. ; I , - ^ 1 ^

.P.O \ 4 r u m 5.|. •.i-^u.nA^......MLsoyy:fLL..AtM^p [ ? '*^yn •

/9t74^ C. •~-—-'•'•**'ifc»MW»Mi^>*-%»i<*<> #t»>i

i J ^ , , , . ^ ^ o^ /Mf^/e'--)/

ii»

ij

/ i ? i

Da

i^:..,:^!

£A^L

12

K

^ [ C .

M2.

i i j i U

LAf'^

m i b i

A l l

u c

A b ^ c iL

B

p j i U - L ^ ' l

1

mi

6lk i e j yjhk.

ICk

\t\CU.

1^0'

S:J <li

/ / A / .

//^

7 ^ / ^

i l C ^ J l ^

S^a^-op

^ /L

5 i ^ !?'JLiJ22:L_ii_ii

o . IMP.

nCA- t i

^ ^

f L 4

-?

^ ^

a.f

J i i ^

< l o

1 ^ / 2 ^

6 0

1 ^ .

4-

7:p.i : ^ l ^ i

^^^/- TP

V^A c\i<-t!ci'l o

j i t i ^

iLjb^

Pl

V :A.

) f \

c d

^

k'Jla

MVSJ:

^ /;;r

Al

A\.ti-A

• ^

-u: ilCv

f -4 rulQPi >^<

7/^5

^M^A n^yyjfl

I

-m.?-. (

3 -

n^i6i/u^

* *

Sjii^^

= 1 1 ^

^ l e

/ll^k '^<i

m

v^

oa.'

A-+

.7./

/ U ^ L

Hi . 2

oJt

-5

£L

z>o

i . ^Li

Sx. ]ie^LJ:L.vlJ:.

I >7=?^t' 't'f^

fei-yg-d^

^ ^ ^ _

/-<rJ

<:b/)7

i 3 J i _ l

UfLS

^i£.

^

— A :^La

hn^cL '-

J y

5^=^-1

L L

A

f l I

4'^i l r [ \ - f :

' J l

'iijC^^Ux

kImA.

±

H

L t Li/y

C(,C

.y :

f i

•.yu'.

o Tin

o CO

V\i

>.aj>

^

C . j 2 u y n ^ ^ ^ /W^A"?/

Page 120: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

• - M m

^ . JA\\cD

J5j.?- " ^ c k. <icA T ? 3 - 1

L4:_34

>^e^r

.feplfc ^

:1S

^ • • i i i y

l-YiA/A v \phy / \ t» f ln C \| \ogkcU^ w ^ Y ^ ^

r l |aA^"i^p__y^

I ^ Z J O

- #

LA£3A

Ls>,£.(\^ .._/v^y ^ \.y.a-thyL-L * * E .

A£-/?Z^SL_^.

.S^ik.

t o ; \ \

>^

l iU P4^ frr i^\ l W;

C ^ \ \ t C \ S^rri£)U.

.^£i?._^^.^Z /A

Xni^_/^^£^1^__.

Gjldi'^ 's .ir<nip/e ' ._.G.8i./. ..'

J.ZLMA

<?C. > / * ) _ ...Q

r.-y \r....ciy^y.

P- ± - ^:-7

i . ± ^

~ATEA.

Oo^ T7\

dilCLAl^

i.is±

mplihp'ilM^

y JOCLJLI

lyc_a P OU-e^ S/Ob>ls P \

c. DLC^T^ ' ^ ' ^ i

%

m

tA

l i s v^i

^ ^ i ^

- ^ \ . ^

' cuuyxj 0 - £luyn4\^ 0(o /M/^e°/ /

Page 121: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

'>V/i<\,-JS.^i

.,'7'-T.i?g--^.vW ^

A:O; 0:1 t'i'^f-...y}\. M^-i

^ • i " !

^ ' ^ o c / i ' i 0^'CAtHA

i "JcTx;..^ ""Exrc-WL"./)

;:,..,. : i , A A ! , . : :

f t CVy\lu • ^ V ^ I Ct«AvV3 I y h i i - j V C T J c ^ - ^ ' ^ C v i 4 - f p

li ^r^o^U^^ 1C\OUAM -^

13; u l\A- i l ' ^ / ; ^ . / 3 / / ^ i

i ^ t Lc>c\^^ ^ / - ^ • • / S

i^AahAjx^ ox Qi-iy^^

' CCl2yx_5

07 Hf.

pjil

^'b^ ^ M i ^ C' Qiovrt^..^ o6 I Pf 9 /

Page 122: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight
Page 123: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

•r^fpssm d

rait A' '^^A^^^^^^^^^^H

I'TA ^ ?l..t^.A^.::M..

^ 1 -,v (-.-K AHv'- '>

._„....34lJ.:i...._Ail-..i^...^ 2::^...„ ..t>.f_U yvv^.__l_|)^C.A^

Ar

11 \

.\iZP \\30

p V-f

5^01 eo»

f A l -:! :>d I n ( - 1

, » j i^>'-\.'^

• • 2 A IT

-i..o._clxi

. \ . :.Ui-._..u.a

C oV\S t <7 tA

3" ii-

i '•' K

f i l l .f U"57> A'<: h...^-^-^ /?r

y I ^ . •>;n<v

p J , j } d 5"^U o r pi t i f_ i U j_H

./3.QJ:^..... i?^y

Of^' i . ' .y}.

n - i C'/>^\pU-c^.yt' i£ j / / '':iL-z?>^ I

jiAuc ...... ir.,?,pL .$\... l.' . .L.f. '

/7/\/^-'i(-(\

L MHfi'^l 1 'm,: , nil.. JT/OAA^..

Page 124: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

• • - " • : » ' , • > . >.ioell^.ti

:, l : ^ \ y . r ,

'\\v' k

07H...v3pilJ^ l v o . T v ' i - ^ - - t )5

:>; »^ y (PjpM

<^T5''H^t'

Vyi C < V^JA\ C,J^^-\^^\.C.A ...3.,'(V.W...^t.A4^

-> ^ r. :)OUOA I e r / ^ j : i r k e ^ ^ j l i ,-> f ^ ( .< 'LcZa . t i (X^ .C n o t ^ t^ . t ^^u fd '^Uyt

G. >C i s e t rf hu f c, ^ ( p n ^ ^ A h J A u ^

JS. 'O V\c ^9 . ^ f <=^A.t. \<\QiX.- i A</vN V- \o^r\ or y^T^^M.

' ^_\^_ . ^ x e c c i n , _ J _ _ .1

Lk.!.S..._„ Ef / } /5 j^ ,d pKyMh<} SyX-tr^.p-dt^ ,

^'^y^^uL. C.uJcotti^ ^ ; ;z A-tA/e 9 / f^/laAAyLy \ l ~ DlLA^A^ O^ M^t^c j ,

Page 125: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

•-• ••• • - - . • •^•v>iM«**«i^ . - , - - .^ - ->- ' . : - - : • : • • • ' « : j T ^ f ^ s

'ii-vfl*? W^Sf' fc^i?

' ^ y ^ r- >•• i '

' \ < V • J - . .

[ ijj.'A ..A'lC.. ^t S.vAcAy^.lj.iv.__. i

I i.'\''.l.._.D_ti>:'>!>:' 'A: 2jvfl'.:

.. W e aAb:€|c_-:3i^^0A"|(._..^^'^^

'A^o-; ilRu- Al>_'i5 : io , . ? , \ j .A.'^~,_..

- A V x c P o ^ , e c , e 3 )

fl

.Q..A.__1)iL8_

K . i '

^ z o ' F

L o c n i

Gf-w^^>\Alcy.''i

z.,3,.4|.<v '% A\..^ '<i<\Wkyvv...l?^k' \ '

G\^0( '\.v, J M > ( r 1-) ( C

7^\o ( :_io cvt CVc > '

U

KKI\ 0V\

. \ A c r lf ' g l ^ - ^ (;i

^ > A N ^ L

!*_

k r

m /Qiia

fiS

^tftJ, izuf:. - ^ r - . v ; < j ; ' ^ -

• ^ s - ^ :

•L .

- ^ m

< r>.

i i - l O

r t l

^. i 2 ^ c)?|^/?>^9/^p

063^

o ^ p o

m

'M.''A

\A

&

LA

^

(J

U/i-

II5

2^

^ 4

Lr.-lcue-'^

A.

ivotd.

i ,L£

(UJ^ ^

4 ^ ' £ i

^ .

\ / h jXi}6

mj^

lt.m . & J -6,

¥fi

U

a

^

kA / I d

t.o^^

W^ioi

- ^ f<^^ '

ii: ^

s J ^

6

iib4

^ i ^ f e L i ^ ^

/I.L^

-?

/^^^ i#

( 'AJ

i ^

^ l , ^

U ^, 6 r

I ( J C

^

^

r.

Z / ^ : ^

^ 1 1

^

^ . / ^ i -

i

i j j .

>ijL

JE',

Zli t ^ j m

zs

< A | u . y

fe...

S ^ i ^

i 5^

k / N ^ ^

r ? ) .

l j (

^ ^

p-P^

P

^ c j o zcyf

- ^ .

' ^ y

' ^^

i )

6-

i^f i m ^

K».i:^^//L^

kv,

iib

fei^

iA,

^

:^Ar

b

#

'^^''Mt ]^>^ '

ioo^

' h-

^

- / -

14-

.Mifv^'L^,

1%

pf^rLii-

len

- 'o

nk

m

bM

o IT)

o CO

8.

i l ' -u JL •Ml]

K?

d ^ ^^. / ^ ^ / t / H 0 3 A l ^ /

Page 126: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

\ -

^ J U j , ; 4 1 J . « J W M « l l " * l l * * W C ' < {.'.

I., - ' iV'J / ' / / ' A '

.3. .il 01-, _ avH-.V> . _ : W. . clv.y\hr-j..<) !:?. 1- j p >.^...!a.x—

j / M . (V

PfAlyll:: . ...S'

- • - - j . - ^ - A- - - O . v ^ H . - ' ^ ff T " ! y

. $ ( o p ^

l^ld

-Ojvfc'f}

1 ^ % 1

: \ J O ^

•SFI u l r 1(. Siopjiz. 3. i.clu .a^ ; ....LLM}r ->.

Ga/cLfL.r. .,;.. Go/4(y^ i ^ i h \ y i h A ) . . . X ^

S y c f ^ ^ ^ t o - f Spoyl<7 p i l jL . . J T ^ / £ / ^ L i _ l < ^ .

i f - '

•tni ^ / . / / y i o i .^ /^/ ' l i : : -M«^..A^/"/^C^ . . _

/ '5^<>' Bay/ : , (j/t S /U S/o6jnj2/ Si'clji4 (:^__'^^

" - • - A - ^ A . - - - - ^ . . . . - - . . . - . . ^ - . ^ < ' ^

... / i ^ . ^ \ . . . . J 'A/L^^/yL' i . . . . .S .LdU. .^ . . .^ i : i : . ' ^

Cc'cxy:,/-viy^ \Ji',.r:jil.^..X.:*^.(^....lAl^.L.^l.-Mk.Ck ^

tyy^^.A..^rlJ.x.tL^.^..}Li1^-..^L^ ^ " ' ^ ' ^ ' - - ^

. ' <:tc ^ lZcy>y ':!y].

-K < L A L ? <

-sm

.-^'

SLJ. !

ft 5

J f G ^J

I

i^Zo

• " " % 3 3Sa

..^A:^A....&.j./i...L„...:r' i^.^-lt^p. - I (ly-i • l -j "-v r ^

' / ' ' l a i d r y. \ . . 7 — ,, ,j ; i , , ;4A. 'o / /^^

AS

Ail^

i "^ i:

y!^hMj^

%c^\\\ Il^ra

i A P l ^ l = . /\ii akci^xje^ 'A

j j ^ ^ .

rLA

ILll ^^k ..A' SdS i t t ^X... |_Xi-nr i-£. -5>J. iYX • >

.i^/7-

\ ' ; ;

i 5 3a

:x^iii-

f.A

-?

4 ^

LL y

^-

x -» i /

F.

^ ^

C5;0

yJic.

' ^ U J

^ ^ :

:i^M ^ ^

-z

Z yAtO''

r_UL.i_|_<:di

.p

/ •

^ ' = i _ I S i

— ' - I

-7-

. . ^

i rulpA

:d^

V ^ i / -

00

o

o n

r ± < ^ ^

.L]3±m

..ciA.L:ji^-_lrve_'^

'A-/

. 5 : _ - / : i M , ^

-S/ ^ x

^Wbf\ \£,^

.S^':42:)p£!l4-

iri3d

Liuy^J .t>

i d

{:>cc'Z^£4

2- ixi

i i - / : ^

^A.iL ~Li'^.

' / - :

C^-^o £

iOi^

:S d^

jaLoJ^^itL MikW

" • ' ^^ca^os ' ^^

Page 127: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

•••••^^»v;af»-ri-f-'*-;

^"-'' o 6 M(Nt-A\ ' I ^ I L j ( ^

(5W oe:

7 ('"O'j ^ »iy(lV\fi>vl./\

, .......siy: . .

......I.. VJ t l ,.^, A 0 5 ' ^ i ; D t :

^ i ? i ' ' • ^ -

- ,J3^ lo1,(>

: ! . : -

?56

) --AS.fL'

A>;r>\ J- \oC

/ S s s . I >S^>e Ct// /v-i^Mu/, 3, d o f .^ . .

r\ ,

.-AyhAi/ti^e.S... 'r}<i:<-/.aAe.L I^^&JLOJ^^.

_ /27.<kcA,ixA^rw..\<y-... p.lctCJL.. C ^ ^ k j i s ^ l L \ o i y L y : / j ' I I • i

. : e j c C j i J y ^ i M - ^ . \CLyuLy?U.i... ± . . . p l d l r ^

^ r ^ d j t - f ^ r -W. . . ^ r ^ n . L . l ^ ^ ±..Zi.\i

.... C (^..^^.U.>ll\....deJo..<^U.^...\^ J ij-

W/T^WUX^ C J2cXn.A^ oQ/^/f/2.cji

V

• 'A '

V: .'

• -J

•*-»

k

V .'

Q>

iC IT C\

)

k

Page 128: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

APPENDIX D

PERSONNEL ON SITE

3 0 2 5 1 0 A92-470.txt D-1 I

RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL # 4 #4^4 ALLIANCE

M 4 ^ ^ ^ Tecnnoiogies Corporaiion

Page 129: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

PERSONNEL ON SITE

THURS 28 FEB91

Don Miller Frank Booth Bill Bingham Carl Dannenberger Jeff Gage Frank Buchalski Jerry Bertulis George Renfer Morris Waters Maria Dunn Steve Joyce John Monaco, Jr.

FRI 01 MAR91

Don Miller Frank Booth Bill Bingham Carl Dannenberger Jeff Gage Frank Buchalski Jerry Bertulis George Renfer Morris Waters Maria Dunn

MON 04 MAR91

Carl Dannenburger George Renfer Jerry Bertulis Morris Waters Frank Buchalski Frank Booth Bill Bingham Maria Dunn

COMPANY

Golder Associates Golder Associates Golder Associates Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Alliance, Waste Management Waste Management

Golder Associates Golder Associates Golder Associates Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Alliance

Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Golder Associates Golder Associates Alliance

ACXrVITY

TPl-1 TPl-1 TPl-1 TPl-1 TPl-1 TPl-l TPl-1 TPl-1 TPl-1 TPl-1 TPl-1 TPl-1

TPl-1 TPl-l TPl-l TPl-l TPl-l TPl-1 TPl-1 TPl-1 TPl-l TPl-1

TPl-l TPl-1 TPl-1 TPl-1 TPl-1 TPl-1 TPl-l TPl-l

A92-470.txt

RECYCLED PAPER

D-2

ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL

302511..

# 4 #4 f4

#4W4k fe "™" ' ALLIANCE

es Corporaiion

Page 130: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

PERSONNEL ON SITE

MON 04 MAR91

Carl Dannenberger George Renfer Jerry Bertulis Morris Waters Frank Buchalski Frank Booth BUI Bingham Maria Dunn

TUES 05 MAR91

Carl Dannenberger George Renfer Jerry Bertulis Frank Buchalski Morris Waters Frank Booth BUI Bingham Maria Dunn

WED 06 MAR91

Carl Dannenberger George Renfer Jerry Bertulis Frank Buchalski Morris Waters Frank Booth BUI Bingham Maria Dunn Steve Joyce Pat Spooner Jeff Jeep Debra Rothberg

Frank Queris Barbara Yeoman

COMPANY

Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Golder Associates Golder Associates Alliance

-

Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Golder Associates Golder Associates Alliance

Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Golder Associates Golder Associates Alliance Waste Management Waste Management Waste Management Attorney for Waste Management Waste Management "River Reporter" (newspaper)

ACTIVITY

•TP2-2 TP2-2 TP2-2 TP2-2 TP2-2 TP2-2 •TP2-2 TP2-2

TP2-2 •TP2-2 •TP2-2 •TP2-2 1P2-2 TP2-2 TP2-2 TP2-2

TP3-1 TP3-1 TP3-1 •TP3-1 TP3-1 TP3-1 'TP3-1 •TP3-1 TP3-1 •TP3-1 TP3-1 TP3-1

•l'P3-l •TP3-1

A92-470.txt

RECYCLED PAPER

D-3

ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL

302512

/ K ALLIANCE M ^ ^ M j ^ ^ Tecnnoiogies Corporation

Page 131: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

THURS 07 MAR91

Carl Dannenberger George Renfer Jerry Bertulis Frank Buchalski Morris Waters Frank Booth BUI Bingham Maria Dunn

FRI 08 MAR91

Carl Dannenberger George Renfer Jerry Bertulis Frank Buchalski Morris Waters Frank Booth BUI Bingham Maria Dunn

PERSONNEL ON SITE

COMPANY

Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Golder Associates Golder Associates Alliance

-

Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Chemical Waste Golder Associates Golder Associates Alliance

ACTIVITY

TP3-2 TP3-2 •TP3-2 TP3-2 TP3-2 •TP3-2 'TP3-2 TP3-2

TPl-2 TPl-2 TPl-2 •TPl-2 •TPl-2 TPl-2 lPl-2 •TPl-2

A92-470.txt D-4 3 0 2 5 1 3

RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL XK ALLIANCE

J F ^ ' ^ ^ Tecnnoiogies Corcoraiion

Page 132: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

APPENDIX E

TEST PIT LOGS

3 0 2 5 1 4

A92-470.txt E-1

RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL # 4 . . . . . . . « . „ #4f4 ALLIANCE

M ^ M ^ ^ Tecnnoiogies Corporation

Page 133: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

XK ALLIANCE ^ 4 j f 4 f 4 Tecmacgies Corporaion

A TRC Company

Test Pit Log

Project

Cortese Landfill

Project No.

C02067

Location

Sheet

1 of 1

Date Begun

2 / 2 8 / 9 1

Test Pit No.

T P l - 1

Date Comp. 3 / 1 / 9 1

Client

EPA

Boring Contractor/Foreman

Chemical Waste/Carl Dannenberger

Alliance Geologist

Maria Dunn

Method of Excavation

Bucket/backhoe

Equipment Type

Midiyutani t r a c k mach

Total Depth

11 f ee t

Depth to Water Ground Elevation

Depth Generalized

Strata Description Strata Identification

Reld Testing/ Observations

Lab Sample Identification

*%: TRASH: glass bottles, tin cans, plastic

bags and containers, wood, cloth newspapers, tires, and misc. metal debris, eg, mufflers.

J^.^-^:iQ^L•9!ii?M>;•£i?^^.r»-)^ Perched Water Table J L

(FILL)

PID Reading

i n p i t , b r ea th ing zone, and from bucke

mm

10 ^mm 0 ppm

Brown SILT (DRY) *Sampled

END OF EXCAVATION

15 -*Samples: TPl-l-SS 11 feet

20 -

Organics BGH 41 (MS/MSD) Inorganics MBEZ 43

Duplicate Organics BGH 42 Inorganics MBEZ 44

25

30 -

35 -

Remarks: -1 s i d e s s loped 1.5:1

3 0 2 5 1 5

ws :

Page 134: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

/ r 4 ALLIANCE ^ 4 ) f 4 f 4 Tec-.noiogies CorporaliOT

A TRC Company

Test Pit Log

Project

Cortese L a n d f i l l

Project No.

C02067

Location

Sheet

1 of 1

Date Begun 3/8 /91

Test Pit No.

TPl-2

Date Comp.

3 / 8 / 9 1

Client EPA

Boring Contractor/Foreman Chemical Waste/Carl Dannenberger

Alliance Geologist

Maria Dunn

Method of Excavation

Bucket/backhoe

Equipment Type

Midiyutani t r ack mach Total Depth

8 f e e t Depth to Water Ground Elevation

Depth Generalized

Strata Description Strata Identification

Reld Testing/ Observations

Lab Sample Identification

.'OJ

'*^^fi^&<^<' : 0

sSjss miv^wfrmrm

Brown SILT piD Reading

TRASH: glass bottles, tin cans, plastic bags and containers, wood, cloth, newspapers, tires, misc. metal debris. (FILL)

Orange SILT, some clay. (DRY)

All readin

0 ppm

^Sampled

10

15 -

END OF EXCAVATION

*Sample:

TP1-2-SS 8 feet

Organics BGH 47 Inorganics MBEZ 49

20 -

25 -

30

35

Remarks: All sides sloped 1.5:1 except west side adjacent to access; road No water encountered

302516

Page 135: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

XK ALLIANCE ^ ^ 4 f 4 Tecnnotogies Corporaion

A TRC Company

Test Pit Log

Project

Cortese Landfill

Project No.

C02067

Location

Sheet

1 of 1

Date Begun

3 / 4 / 9 1

Test Pit No.

TP2-2

Date Comp.

3 / 5 / 9 1

Client

EPA Boring Contractor/Foreman Chemical Waste/Carl Dannenberger

Alliance Geologist

Maria Dunn

Method of Excavation

Bucket/backhoe

Equipment Type

Midiyutani t r a c k mach

Total Depth

14 f e e t

Depth to Water Ground Elevation

Depth Generalized

Strata Description Strata Identification

Field Testing/ Observations

Lab Sample Identification

TRASH: glass bottles, tin cans, plastic PID Reading bags and containers, wood, cloth, newspapers, tires, misc. metal debris, medical waste.

(FILL)

Perched Water Table _ 2 —

Brown SILT (DRY)

Drums encountered 10-12 feet on west sid(

Native soil 30 & 120ppm

^D rums 185,9.8, & nnoppm

*Sampled ^Sampled

15

20

25

END OF EXCAVATION

^Samples: TP2-2-SS 12 feet

Organics BGH 44 Inorganics MBEZ 46

TP2-2-SS 14 feet Organics BGH 43 Inorganics MBEZ 45

30

35

Remarks:

—All ; i d e s sloped 1.5:1

3 0 2 5 1 7

Page 136: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

/ K ALLIANCE MkWAW^ Tecnnoiogies Corporaion

A TRC Company

Test Pit Log Client

EPA

Project

C o r t e s e L a n d f i l l

Project No.

C02067

Location

Boring Contractor/Foreman

Chemica l W a s t e / C a r l D a n n e n b e r g e r

Sheet

1 of 1

Date Begun

3 / 6 / 9 1

Test Pit No.

TP3-1

Date Comp.

3 / 6 / 9 1

Alliance Geologist

Mar ia Dunn Method of Excavation

Bucket/backhoe

Equipment Type

M i d i v u t a n i t r a c k mach

Total Depth

13 f e e t

Depth to Water Ground Elevation

Depth Generalized

Strata Description Strata Identification

SILT and Sand

Field Testing/ Observations

Lab Sample Identification

Brown

IRASH

mmrrT'^p' 10 -

glass bottles-, tin cans, plastic bags and containers, wood, cloth, newspapers, tires, misc. metal debris.

(FILL) Perched Water Table ^

Jark gray fine-medium SAND,some cobbles, little silt. (DRY)

PID Reading

Spoils stockpile

0.9-1.6ppm

Bucket of trash Ippm

Perimeter Oppm

*Sampled

15 -

20

25 -

30

35

END OF EXCAVATION

'•^Sample:

TP3-1-SS 13 feet

Organics BGH 45 Inorganics MBEZ 47

Remarks:

— A l l s i d e s s l o p e d 1 .5 :1

3 02 5 1 8

Page 137: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

/ r 4 ALLIANCE ^ 4 J f 4 J f 4 Tecnnoiogies Cocpora;ion

A TRC Company

Test Pit Log

Project

Cortese L a n d f i l l

Project No.

C02067

Location

Sheet

•1 of J

Date Begun 3/7 /91

Test Pit No.

TP3-2

Date Comp. 3/7/91

Client

EPA

Boring Contractor/Foreman

Chemical Waste/Carl Dannenberger

Alliance Geologist

Maria Dunn

Method of Excavation

Bucke t / ba ckhoec

Equipment Type

Midiyutani t r a c k mach

Total Depth

13 fee t

Depth to Water Ground Elevation

Depth Generalized

Strata Description Strata Identification

Field Testing/ Observations

Lab Sample Identification

5 -l"i,

• ^ - 0 . I

Brown SILT 1 Drum found on east side at 2 feet TRASH: glass bottles, tin cans, plastic

bags and containers, wood, cloth newspapers, tires, misc. metal debris.

(FILL)

PID Reading *Drum sampled

from bucket

0.5 & Oppm

Drum

Oppm

10

Dark gray fine-medium SAND, some silt,

15

20

ENT) OF EXCAVATION

^Sample:

TP3-2-DS

Organics BGH 46 (no VOAs) Inorganics MBEZ 48

25 -

30 -

35

Remarks: Excavated next to pond—water encountered from surface. Sides sboped 1.5:1 as much as possible

302519

Page 138: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

APPENDIX F

GOLDER'S DATA TABLES

A92-470.txt F-1

RECYCLED PAPER ENFORCEMENT CONFIDENTIAL # 4 « • • l A n i r ^ c #4^4 ALLIANCE

^A|R|4R^ Tecnnoiogies Corporaiion

302520

Page 139: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

JUNE 1991

DATE

3/1/91

3/5/91

3/5/91

3/5/91 3/6/91 3/7/91

3/7/91 3/8/91 3/8/91

GOLDER SAMPLE*

TP11-S1

TP22-S1

TP22-S2

TP22-S3 TP31-S1 TP32-S1

TP32-S2 TP12-S1 TP12-S2

. TABLE 1 SAMPLE SUMMARY

:.:;.,. ETC •. .:-SAMPLE #

GB9190

GB9187

GBgi88

GB9189 GB9191 GB9447

6B9446 BG9449 GB9450

ANALYSES

V,S,P.M.C

V.S.M.C

V.S.P.M.C

V,S,P,M,C V.S.M.C

V.S,P,M.C

V.S.M.C V.S.M.C V.S.M.C

.ALLIANCE ::v SAMPLE*

BGH 41 BGH 42(DUP)

MBEZ 43 MBEZ44<DUP)

BGH 44 MBEZ 46 BGH 43

MBEZ 45 NONE NONE

BGH 46 MBEZ 48

NONE NONE

BGH 47 MBEZ 49

903-3195

ANALYSES

V.S V.S M.C M.C V.S M.C V.S M.C — — S

M.C — — V.S M.C

V - Volatile organics S s Semivolatile organics P - Pesticides/PCBs M - Metals C - Cyanide

'302521

I

Page 140: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

Jun® 1891

Sample Point

Samplisidait® IPfflrsim(s«8»rs' \ . y ' y : ^ •::-\'\..':

1,2,4-TrlchlorcJ)8n28ne

1.2-Dlchlorob8n28n®

2-IHIe)tanoii8

2-Methytph8nol

4-Methylph8nol

Ac8ton®

Benzoic acW

Chlorofofm

Dl-n-butyt phthalat®

Dl-n-octy l phthalat®

Ethy1b8nz8n®

H8Kachlorob«nz8n®

HsKachlorobutadisns

IVlethyl sthyt Ctision®

Methyl- lso-butyl kslone

Melhylen® chlorld®

Naphthalan®

Phenol

Toluene

Trichloroelhylsn®

bls(2-Ethy1h8Kyl)phlhatate

m-Xylan®

o»p-Kylen®s

' ; . •

TP11-S1

01-Mar-91

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

NO

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

TABLES I .

SUMMARY OF ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DETECTED

Concentrations In mg/ltg

TP12-S1

08-Mar-91

TP12-S2

08-Mar-91

TP22-S1

05-Mar-91

TP22-S2 TP22-S3

05-lWar-91 05-Mar-91

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

0.009

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

0.016

ND

ND

ND

ND

NO

NO

NO

ND

NO

0.005

ND

NO

ND

NO

ND

NO

NO

1.18

0.354

ND

ND

ND

0.146

NO

O.OOS

NO

NO

0.028

NO

NO

0.144

0.026

0.014

NO

ND

0.054

0.014

NO

0.093

0.080

0.307

ND

0.11

NO

ND

0.643

2.494

ND

ND

ND

NO

ND

ND

1.32

0.389

NO

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

5.48

1.36

ND

1.73

1.5

0.55

2.291

ND

2.0

ND

2.036

0.733

0.495

ND

8.12

0.26

1.81

ND

3.54

ND

18.31

1.682

1.632

TP31-S1

06-Mar-91

NO

NO

ND

ND

NO

0.093

NO

ND

ND

ND

ND

NO

NO

ND

ND

0.004

ND

NO

NO

ND

ND

NO

ND

TP32-S1

07-Wlar-91

NO

ND

ND

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

1.89

1.58

NO

NO

NO

ND

NO

0.0(K

NO

9.63

NO

NO

NO

NO

ND

TP32-S2

07-Mar-91

NO

NO

ND

NO

NO

0.051

ND

ND

1.14

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

0.008

NO

ND

ND

ND

NO

ND

NO

903-31(3

Guidance

Cone. (1)

2000

-

-

-

-

8000

-

100

8000

-

8000

-

90

4000

4000

90

-

5000

20000

60

50

200000

-

NOTE: (1) (Proposed 40 CFR 264 Subchapter S Action Levels in mg/kg (Federal Register, Vol 55 No. 145,7/27/90).

conr-ona t»ri

Page 141: Report: Field Oversight Summary Report, Test Pit Program ... · field oversight summary report test pit program cortese landfill sullivan county, new york ri/fs compll^nce oversight

«

Jjjjjk cjri jg-rj

# %

u> o N) Ol to CJ

June 1991

Sample Point

.•::•,;.••. , Sample date

Parametdfs;, ; .

Aluminum

Arsenic

Barium

Beryllium

Calcium

Chromium

Cd)alt

Coppeir

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

l\^anganes®

Mercury

Nickel

Potassium

Sodium

Vanadium

Zinc

; • , / ; • ; ; • ; . • •

V ; . : - : : '•

• • • ' i - : : - : •,':••

• V ' : ' • • • • '

• : • . - • - - : -

- . • • , • : : • . • :

: • • : : ; ' . *

TP11-S1

01-Mar-91

13200

4.3

71

0.51

480

11

9.6

12

22300

11

2740

1650

ND

15

1100

ND

IS

54

NOTE: (1) Proposed 40 CFR 264 Subch

TABLE 3

SUMMARY OF INORGANIC ANALYTES DETECTED

Concentrations In mg/kg

TP12-S1

08-Mar-91

TP12-S2

08-Mar-91

TP22-81

05-Mar-91

TP22-S2

05-Mar-91

TP22-S3

05-Mar-91

TP31-S1

06-Mar-91

8610

2.4

32

0.29

280

7.6

6.8

11

159(K)

5.1

2280

537

ND

12

830

ND

9.7

40

7900

4.5

44

0.29

490

7

5.8

12

13900

11

1800

513

ND

11

830

ND

8.5

46

10500

4.4

58

0.4

320

8.7

8.0

19

18600

11

2390

621

NO

15

920

NO

11

49

8530

5.3

27

0.33

220

7.9

7.4

12

16700

8.2

2540

795

NO

13

760

63

9.9

38

111(K)

3.3

77

0.48

370

9.1

7.4

14

16800

11

2280

923

0.19

14

820

71

11

51

5890

2.4

17

0.25

440

5.0

4.8

11

10500

6.9

1770

210

ND

9.7

520

NO

6.0

38

apter S Action Levels In mg/kg (Federal Register, Vol 55 No. 145,7/27/90).

TP32-81

07-Mar-91

700

ND

11400

ND

1(K)

ND

ND

1.9

13(M)

0.83

210

34

ND

ND

71

75

ND

16

TP32-S2

07-Mar-91

4980

2.2

18

0.17

340

4.2

3.5

6.7

9470

4.4

1520

133

ND

7.7

580

ND

4.7

37

903-3195

Guidance 1

Conc.(l) 1

-

80

4000

0.2

-

400 -

-

-

-

-

-

20

2(KM)

-

-

-

1

1

- 1 ' ^ *

COWr-AICT.tWf