replies of rti for the month of december'17 for the month of december...replies of rti...

47
REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES OF RTI APPEALS I Vaibhav Singhai 11/12/2017 I II Sudhir Kumar Bommana 11/12/2017 II III Suvajit Pal 18/12/2017 III IV Suvajit Pal 27/12/2017 IV V Avnish Sharma 27/12/2017 V VI Chinthu Joginarayana Rao 28/12/2017 VI LIST REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATIONS 1 Rajiv Kumar Tripathi 11/12/2017 1 2 Kishan Kumar Das 04/12/2017 2 3 Somay Mardi 19/12/2017 3 4 Partha Malick 08/12/2017 4 5 Sobhit Kumar 08/12/2017 5 6 Sagir Hossain 08/12/2017 6 7 Sudhir Kumar Bommana 08/12/2017 7 8 Arijit Chakraborty 08/12/2017 8 9 Uday Kumar Soni 11/12/2017 9 10 Arijit Chakraborty 11/12/2017 10 11 Avnish Sharma 11/12/2017 11 12 Roshan Kumar Maurya 11/12/2017 12 13 Nandu Shaw 11/12/2017 13 14 Roshan Kumar Maurya 11/12/2017 14 15 Sudhir Kumar Bommana 14/12/2017 15 16 Ashutosh Sharma 14/12/2017 16 17 Vinay Kumar 14/12/2017 17 18 Mohit Kumar Gupta 14/12/2017 18 19 Suvajit Pal 14/12/2017 19 20 Suvajit Pal 15/12/2017 20 21 Gourab Paul 19/12/2017 21 22 Piyush 15/12/2017 22 23 Ankit Gautam 15/12/2017 23 24 Suvajit Pal 18/12/2017 24 25 Sourav Swarnakar 18/12/2017 25 26 Sanjay Prasad 19/12/2017 26 27 Satish Kumar 18/12/2017 27 28 Amit Shekhar 19/12/2017 28 29 Chinthu Joginarayana Rao 26/12/2017 29 30 Khushid Alam 26/12/2017 30 31 Sudhir Kumar Bommana 28/12/2017 31 32 Sudhir Kumar Bommana 28/12/2017 32 33 Maneesh Kumar 28/12/2017 33 34 Surojit Biswas 08/12/2017 34 35 Ramveer Singh 15/12/2017 35 36 Subrata Dinda 14/12/2017 36 37 Statish Kumar 15/12/2017 37 38 Suvajit Pal 18/12/2017 38 39 Nitya Ranjan Nayak 26/12/2017 39 40 Partha Malick 08/12/2017 40

Upload: others

Post on 22-May-2020

17 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

 

REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018

  Name  Replied date  Page Nos. 

LIST REPLIES OF RTI APPEALS I Vaibhav Singhai 11/12/2017 I II Sudhir Kumar Bommana 11/12/2017 II III Suvajit Pal 18/12/2017 III IV Suvajit Pal 27/12/2017 IV V Avnish Sharma 27/12/2017 V VI Chinthu Joginarayana Rao 28/12/2017 VI LIST REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATIONS 1 Rajiv Kumar Tripathi 11/12/2017 1 2 Kishan Kumar Das 04/12/2017  2 3 Somay Mardi 19/12/2017  3 4 Partha Malick 08/12/2017  4 5 Sobhit Kumar 08/12/2017  5 6 Sagir Hossain 08/12/2017  6 7 Sudhir Kumar Bommana 08/12/2017  7 8 Arijit Chakraborty 08/12/2017  8 9 Uday Kumar Soni 11/12/2017  9 10 Arijit Chakraborty 11/12/2017  10 11 Avnish Sharma 11/12/2017  11 12 Roshan Kumar Maurya 11/12/2017  12 13 Nandu Shaw 11/12/2017  13 14 Roshan Kumar Maurya 11/12/2017  14 15 Sudhir Kumar Bommana 14/12/2017  15 16 Ashutosh Sharma 14/12/2017  16 17 Vinay Kumar 14/12/2017  17 18 Mohit Kumar Gupta 14/12/2017  18 19 Suvajit Pal 14/12/2017  19 20 Suvajit Pal 15/12/2017  20 21 Gourab Paul 19/12/2017  21 22 Piyush 15/12/2017  22 23 Ankit Gautam 15/12/2017  23 24 Suvajit Pal 18/12/2017  24 25 Sourav Swarnakar 18/12/2017  25 26 Sanjay Prasad 19/12/2017  26 27 Satish Kumar 18/12/2017  27 28 Amit Shekhar 19/12/2017  28 29 Chinthu Joginarayana Rao 26/12/2017  29 30 Khushid Alam 26/12/2017  30 31 Sudhir Kumar Bommana 28/12/2017  31 32 Sudhir Kumar Bommana 28/12/2017  32 33 Maneesh Kumar 28/12/2017  33 34 Surojit Biswas 08/12/2017  34 35 Ramveer Singh 15/12/2017  35 36 Subrata Dinda 14/12/2017  36 37 Statish Kumar 15/12/2017  37 38 Suvajit Pal 18/12/2017  38 39 Nitya Ranjan Nayak 26/12/2017  39 40 Partha Malick 08/12/2017  40

 

Page 2: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

 

Page No. I 

ACTION HISTORY OF RTI FIRST APPEAL No.SSCER/A/2017/60029

Applicant Name vaibhav singhai

Text of Appeal

Now, The tentative answer keys of PHASE-IV are already released and it has been 3 week since examination. Please provide information What is the result date of below examination :- 1. Examination for Selection Posts (Phase IV) (CBE) for graduate level GL-IVC that was held on 18.11.2017 at Kolkata.

Reply of Appeal

To Shri Vaibhav Singhai, F-07/04 Godrej Hill Side Colony VI, Khorli, West Mumbai, Pin-400079 Subject: Appeal under RTI Act, 2005. Sir, This has reference to your online Appeal filed under RTI Act 2005 vide Registration No. SSCER/A/2017/60029 dated 08.12.2017 in respect to your RTI application bearing Registration No.SSCER/R/2017/50363 dated 20/11/2017. In this context, it is informed that the result and statement of marks of all the candidates who appeared in the CBM Exam held on 18/11/2017 will be declared separately for each category of the posts advertised under Phase-IV recruitment, 2017 after completion of the recruitment process, which will be published on the official website www.sscer.org. You are therefore asked to check the website of SSC (ER), Kolkata from time to time for the desired information. (Postal reply is also attached herewith) 2. Hence, your aforesaid Appeal dated 08.12.2017 stands disposed of. Yours faithfully, Priyanka Basu Ingty Regional Director & Appellate Authority

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 FIRST APPEAL RECEIVED

08/12/2017

2 APPEAL FORWARDED TO CONCERNED FIRST

APPELLATE AUTHORITY

09/12/2017 Nodal Officer Online

3 APPEAL DISPOSED OF 11/12/2017 FAA - PRIYANKA

BASU INGTY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 3: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

 

        Page No.II ACTION HISTORY OF RTI FIRST APPEAL No.SSCER/A/2017/60030

Applicant Name SUDHIR KUMAR BOMMANA

Text of Appeal Respected Sir/madam, Please find the First appeal attached herewith for your kind reference.. Thanks and regards.

Reply of Appeal

To Shri Sudhir Kumar Bommana,Ganges MFG Co Ltd, New Staff QR No. 8, Bansberia, Hoogly - 712502 Subject: Appeal under RTI Act, 2005. Sir, With reference to your online Appeal No. SSCER/A/2017/60030 dated 10/12/2017 filed under RTI Act 2005, it is intimated that as per records, your candidature stands cancelled as on date. As for information sought by you vide Point 2, it is informed that this Office has filed a Writ Petition before the Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta against the Order of Hon’ble CAT, Kolkata in OA No. 350/01097/2014 and hence, the said Order has not been implemented. Further, as for any action to be taken in pursuant to Order dated 19/07/2017 in Civil Appeal No. (s) 2836-2838 of 2017 in case of Ms. Sudesh & Other and dismissal of Review Petition (C ) No. 2417-2419 of 2017 by the Apex Court is concerned, this office will follow the directions of the Headquarter as and when the same is received towards revival of your candidature. Therefore, your appeal dated 10/12/2017 stands disposed of. Yours faithfully, Priyanka Basu Ingty, Regional Director & Appellate Authority

SN. Action Taken Date of Action Action Taken By Remarks

1 FIRST APPEAL RECEIVED

10/12/2017

2 APPEAL FORWARDED TO CONCERNED FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY

11/12/2017 Nodal Officer Online

3 APPEAL DISPOSED OF 11/12/2017 FAA - PRIYANKA

BASU INGTY

Page 4: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

Page No.III ACTION HISTORY OF RTI FIRST APPEAL No.SSCER/A/2017/60031

Applicant Name SUVAJIT PAL

Text of Appeal

Respected Madam, With respect to my RTI having registration number SSCER/R/2017/50402 your department answered me that no post preference were given for the advertisement ER01/2016. Therefore, the candidature of candidates are considered in respect of each of the particular categories of post they applied for separately. But my query is that if the reply is true then how some of the candidates could not find place in final merit panel though they secure higher marks than the cut off marks in their categories. As for example the result of ER11616 published on 29th of november, 2017 clearly shows this matter. With regards, Suvajit Pal

Reply of Appeal

No. SSCER/A/2017/60032 Dated the 18th December, 2017 To, Shri Suvajit Pal, C/O Sushil Kumar Pal, Rabindrapally, Suri, P.O. Suri, Dist- Birbhum, West Bengal-731101 Sub:- Information under RTI Act, 2005-reg. Sir, This is in reference to your appeal bearing Regd. No. SSCER/A/2017/60032 dated 15/12/2017 against your application bearing Regd. No. SSCER/A/2017/50402 dated 14/12/2017 under RTI Act, 2005. In this regard, it is informed that the provisionally eligible candidates were called for document verification on the basis of scores obtained by the candidates in the CBM Exam held on 16/07/2017 in respect of post category ER11616 under Advt. No. ER01/2016. Candidature of the candidates are verified on the basis of documents submitted by the candidates during document verification. If any candidate does not fulfill the requirement or fails to produce any documents during Document verification or absent during document verification, his/her candidature is not considered for formulation of merit list despite of having the required marks, which was clearly indicated at para-3 of the Notice No. 5/1/ER11516/2016-Rectt. dated 15th December, 2017 while publication of result, which is available on the website of the SSC(ER), Kolkata i.e. www.sscer.org. Hence, your appeal is disposed of. Yours faithfully, (Priyanka Basu Ingty) Regional Director(ER) & Appellate Authority

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 FIRST APPEAL RECEIVED

14/12/2017

2 APPEAL FORWARDED TO CONCERNED FIRST

APPELLATE AUTHORITY

15/12/2017 Nodal Officer Online

3 APPEAL DISPOSED OF 18/12/2017 FAA - PRIYANKA

BASU INGTY

 

Page 5: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

        

Page No.IV 

ACTION HISTORY OF RTI FIRST APPEAL No.SSCER/A/2017/60032

Applicant Name SUVAJIT PAL

Text of Appeal

Respected Sir/Madam, With respect to my RTI having registration no SSCER/R/2017/50403 it is informed that there is no information regarding ER-01/ 2016 about waiting list. Now my query is that what happen when one candidate is named in more than one final merit list. As we know that it is not possible for any candidate to join simulationsly two or three posts as preference s are not given. When one candidate will join in a post then automatically other posts will remain vacant for which he is qualified. Would you please clarify the recruitment procedure. We are in a bad situation as we are all job seeker.

Reply of Appeal

This is with reference to your appeal bearing Regd. No. SSCER/A/2017/60032 dated 14/12/2017 against your application bearing Regd. No. SSCER/R/2017/50403 dated 14/12/2017 under RTI Act, 2005. In this regard, it is informed that the candidature of each individual candidate is considered for each post for which he has applied for and appeared in the Examination & document verification. If a candidate scores higher than others in more than one post for which he has applied for then he could be selected for all those posts for which he has applied for separately. Candidates are considered as per their merit against each post they have applied for. Hence your appeal is disposed of.

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 FIRST APPEAL RECEIVED

15/12/2017

2 APPEAL FORWARDED TO CONCERNED FIRST

APPELLATE AUTHORITY

18/12/2017 Nodal Officer Online

3 APPEAL DISPOSED OF 27/12/2017 FAA - PRIYANKA

BASU INGTY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 6: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

 

Page No. V 

ACTION HISTORY OF RTI FIRST APPEAL No.SSCER/A/2017/60033

Applicant Name avnish sharma

Text of Appeal Please give me priper answer.

Reply of Appeal

This has reference to your Online RTI Appeal vide Reg. No.SSCER/A/2017/60033, dated 22.12.2017 under the RTI Act in connection with the reply of the CPIO on your On-line RTI Application vide Registration No. SSCER/R/2017/50394, dated 09.12.2017. As desired, following Point-wise information is placed below- Point(1): Status of your candidature has been uploaded at the Website of SSC(ER) i.e. www.sscer.org. Point(2): Has not been decided yet. Point(3): For the candidates under SSC(ER), Examination Centre would be in Kolkata. Point(4): Before the conduct of the Examination. The Date of Examination has not been fixed yet. In this regard, it is also intimated that all the information would be made available at he Website of the Staff Selection Commission (Eastern Region) i.e. www.sscer.org. You are, therefore, requested to visit the Website of the SSC(ER) as stated above from time to time in order to obtain your desired information.

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 FIRST APPEAL RECEIVED

22/12/2017

2 APPEAL FORWARDED TO CONCERNED FIRST

APPELLATE AUTHORITY

22/12/2017 Nodal Officer Online

3 APPEAL DISPOSED OF 27/12/2017 FAA - PRIYANKA

BASU INGTY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 7: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

 

Page‐VI 

ACTION HISTORY OF RTI FIRST APPEAL No.SSCER/A/2017/60034

Applicant Name CHINTHU JOGINARAYANA RAO

Text of Appeal

I could not get the required data, in the attachment i describes that. I need the details of candidates choose which post and what about the remaining vacancies left. What the criteria for left vacancies, does those left as backlogs or else filled with the next qualified candidates. If those are filled by next qualified candidates, how much time it will taken to complete. If those are completed than who are those persons.

Reply of Appeal

This is with reference to your appeal bearing Regd. No. SSCER/A/2017/60034 dated 26/12/2017 against your application bearing Regd. No. SSCER/R/2017/50416 dated 23/12/2017 under RTI Act, 2005. In this regard, it is informed that the candidature of each individual candidate is considered for each post for which he has applied for and appeared in the Examination & document verification. If a candidate scores higher than others in more than one post for which he has applied for, then he could be selected for all those posts for which he has applied for separately. Candidates are considered as per their merit against each post they have applied for. Sofar as unfilled vacancies due to not joining of selected candidates are concerned, it is stated that this office has ‘Nil’ information as per records. Hence, your appeal stands disposed of.

SN. Action Taken Date of Action Action Taken By Remarks

1 FIRST APPEAL RECEIVED

26/12/2017

2 APPEAL FORWARDED TO CONCERNED FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY

26/12/2017 Nodal Officer Online

3 APPEAL DISPOSED OF 28/12/2017 FAA - PRIYANKA

BASU INGTY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 8: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

Page No. 1 

F.12013/176/2017/Legal/2017- RTI (Exam) Dated: 11/12/2017 To

Shri Rajiv Kumar Tripathi HIG – A 326, Sector – A ADA Colony Shantipuram PO - Phaphamau Allahabad, (UP) - 211013

Subject:- Information sought under RTI Act, 2005 – regarding Sir,

I am to refer to your Application under RTI Act, 2005 dated 15/11/2017, forward to this office by the SSC (HQ) vide letter No. 2/2/2017-P&P-II dated 06/12/2017 and to provide the following information to you:

i. Eligibility of a candidate on the basis of documents submitted by her/him is checked during document verification stage and all such documents are maintained in her/his dossier. Information sought by you viz., medium of instruction/examination at various stages of academic qualifications acquired by candidates, etc. are neither compiled not maintained in this office. Hence, information sought by you vide Para (a, b, c, o, p, q) are not available as part of record of this office, for disclosure.

ii. As far as the information sought vide Para (d) is concerned, instructions given in the Notice of the Commission was considered and no candidate, who appeared in the document verification without requisite documents was separately issued any letter asking to produce the same at later stage.

iii. The matter sought vide Para (r) and (s) relates to Policy adopted by the Commission and furnishing of copies of note sheet/ documents leading to such decision. Hence, a copy of this RTI application is forwarded to the SSC (HQ) under Section 6(3) of the RTI Act, 2005 to provide information sought by you vide para (r) and (s) directly to you, if available.

iv. As per roll number provided by you, you are not a candidate from this region. Hence, information pertaining to para (t) and (u) are not available in this office, for disclosure.

2. You may prefer the First Appeal to Ms. Priyanka Basu Ingty, Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission (Eastern Region), Kolkata, the Appellate Authority within thirty from the date of receipt of this letter.

Yours faithfully,

sd/- (Dipankar Dutta)

Deputy Director and CPIO

Copy to: The Under Secretary and CPIO, P&&-II Section, Block No. 12, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi – 110003. A copy of this RTI application is forwarded to the SSC (HQ) under Section 6(3) of the RTI Act, 2005 to provide information sought vide para (r) and (s) directly to the applicant, with a copy of the reply endorsed to this office.

(Dipankar Dutta)

Deputy Director and CPIO

Page 9: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

Page No. 2

F.12013/160/2017/Legal/RTI (Exam-II) Dated: 04/12/2017 To

Shri Kishan Kumar Das 100/7, Command Hospital Complex Alipore Kolkata - 700027

Subject:- Information sought under RTI Act, 2005 – regarding Sir,

I am to refer to your Application under RTI Act, 2005 dated nil, received in this office on 28/11/2017, and to inform you that dossiers containing the applications and copies of documents like caste certificate, etc., of all the selected candidates have been sent to the concerned administrative authorities. Scanned copies of documents of nominated candidates of the relevant examinations for the year 2014 and 2016 are currently available which shows that the mentioned candidates for these years belongs to reserved category. However, copies of caste certificate of these candidates are held by the Commission in fiduciary capacity and hence, is exempted from disclosure under section 8 (e) of the RTI Act, 2005

2. You may prefer the First Appeal to Ms. Priyanka Basu Ingty, Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission (Eastern Region), Kolkata, the Appellate Authority within thirty from the date of receipt of this letter.

Yours faithfully,

(Dipankar Dutta) Deputy Director and CPIO

  

 

 

 

 

Page 10: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

 

Page No. 3 

F.12013/179/2017/Legal/RTI/CPIO(Exam-II) Dated: 19.12.2017 To Shri Somay Mardi C/o- Tika Ram Mardi Vill- Rajnagar Mess Tampo P.O- Chaibasa Dist – West Singbhum Jharkhand - 833201

Subject:- Information sought under RTI Act, 2005 – regarding Sir, I am to refer to your Application under RTI Act, 2005 dated 13/12/2017 (received in this office on 18.12.2017), and to state that as per the write up of force allocation of Constable (GD) Examination, 2015 available on the website of CRPF authority www.crpf.nic.in, www.crpf.gov.in and www.crpfindia.co.in, the marks secured in written part of the examination by the last selected male candidates belonging to ST category for Naxal vacancies of Jharkhand in various forces are as under:-

Post & Code Marks obtained by the last selected ST male candidate for Naxal vacancies of Jharkhand (Total/Part A)

BSF (A) 58/18 CISF (B) 54/20 CRPF (C) 52/20 SSB (D) 53/14 ITBPF (E) 53/19 Assam Rifles (F) 54/18 NIA (G) No vacancy SSF (H) No vacancy

2. The document verification of the candidates called for Medical Examination and preparation of verified data for final processing of result for Constable (GD) Examination, 2015 have been done by the CRPF authority. As per the verified data received from them, you are an ST candidate belonging to Naxal affected district of Jharkhand. You obtained total 50 marks and 15 marks in part A of the written examination. Since the marks secured by you in the written examination is less than the marks obtained by the last selected candidate corresponding to your category, state and vacancy type for all of the above mentioned forces, your name has not been figured in the final merit list.

3. You may prefer the First Appeal to Ms. Priyanka Basu Ingty, Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission (Eastern Region), Kolkata, the Appellate Authority within thirty from the date of receipt of this letter.

4. Hindi version follows. Yours faithfully,

(Dipankar Dutta)

CPIO and Deputy Director

 

 

Page 11: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

Page No. 4 ACTION HISTORY OF RTI REQUEST No.SSCER/R/2017/50382

Applicant Name Partha Malick

Text of Application 1. Current status of the dossiers of the selected candidates in the CGLE 2016 2. Kindly provide the Official notice from SSC HQ instructing to start the nomination process again

Reply of Application the dossiers of the candidates pertaining to SSC, Eastern Region selected through CGL Examination 2016 have already been sent to the concerned user departments

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 RTI REQUEST RECEIVED

30/11/2017 Nodal Officer

2 REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO

01/12/2017 Nodal Officer Forwarded to CPIO(s) : (1) DIPANKAR DUTTA

3 REQUEST DISPOSED OF

08/12/2017 DIPANKAR DUTTA-(CPIO)

 

 

 

Page 12: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

 Page No. 5

ACTION HISTORY OF RTI REQUEST No.SSCER/R/2017/50383

Applicant Name Sobhit Kumar

Text of Application

I sobhit kumar have appeared in ssc mts 2016exam. Sir I lost my admitcard so please send my admitcard of this exam to my email id. My registration number is 60000711050. Name sobhit kumar date of birth 24/03/1992. Father name murari parsad. Email id. [email protected]

Reply of Application

admit cards are uploaded on the website of Eastern Region of the Commission. The same are available on the website till the last date of the examination. Hard copy of the admit card is not maintained. However, your roll number for the examination is 4410003975

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 RTI REQUEST RECEIVED

01/12/2017 Nodal Officer

2 REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO

01/12/2017 Nodal Officer Forwarded to CPIO(s) : (1) DIPANKAR DUTTA

3 REQUEST DISPOSED OF

08/12/2017 DIPANKAR DUTTA-(CPIO)

                                 

 

 

  

Page 13: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

  

Page No. 6 

ACTION HISTORY OF RTI REQUEST No.SSCER/R/2017/50386

Applicant Name Sagir Hossain

Text of Application How many candidates have appeared in the Eastern Region CHSL 2016 exam skill test out of 4400 candidates dated from 27 Nov to 4 December.

Reply of Application number of candidates appeared for Type Test in Eastern Region of SSC is 3408 and 312 candidates appeared for DEST

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 RTI REQUEST RECEIVED

05/12/2017 Nodal Officer

2 REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO

07/12/2017 Nodal Officer Forwarded to CPIO(s) : (1) DIPANKAR DUTTA

3 REQUEST DISPOSED OF

08/12/2017 DIPANKAR DUTTA-(CPIO)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 14: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

 

Page No. 7 

ACTION HISTORY OF RTI REQUEST No.SSCER/R/2017/50388

Applicant Name SUDHIR KUMAR BOMMANA

Text of Application Respected Sir, please find the RTI application attached herewith for your kind reference.. Thanks and regads..

Reply of Application

1. As regards the status of your candidature for the CGL Examination 2012 it is stated that your candidature stands cancelled as on date. 2. Further action in regard to your candidature for CGL Examination 2012 will be taken if and when any instruction is received from the Headquarter of the Commission

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 RTI REQUEST RECEIVED

06/12/2017 Nodal Officer

2 REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO

07/12/2017 Nodal Officer Forwarded to CPIO(s) : (1) DIPANKAR DUTTA

3 REQUEST DISPOSED OF

08/12/2017 DIPANKAR DUTTA-(CPIO)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 15: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

 

Page No. 8  

ACTION HISTORY OF RTI REQUEST No.SSCER/R/2017/50389

Applicant Name ARIJIT CHAKRABORTY

Text of Application

Respected Sir, I am a successful candidate of SSC-CGL Exam 2016. Four months have passed since the Final Result was published. Please tell me when will the DOSSIERS of the Selected Candidates from the Eastern Region be forwarded to the respective departments... Thank you, Regards.

Reply of Application the dossiers of the candidates pertaining to SSC, Eastern Region selected through CGL Examination 2016 have already been sent to the concerned user departments

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 RTI REQUEST RECEIVED

06/12/2017 Nodal Officer

2 REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO

07/12/2017 Nodal Officer Forwarded to CPIO(s) : (1) DIPANKAR DUTTA

3 REQUEST DISPOSED OF

08/12/2017 DIPANKAR DUTTA-(CPIO)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 16: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

 

Page No. 9  

ACTION HISTORY OF RTI REQUEST No.SSCER/R/2017/50391

Applicant Name uday kumar soni

Text of Application 1. sir i am graduate in english honours. I have to know whether i am eligible in junior hindi translator for the post code F. My mark sheet is enclosed herewith. kindly inform me at the earliest please.

Reply of Application

as per notice of the Junior Hindi Translators, Junior Translators, Senior Hindi Translator and Hindi Pradhyapak Examination, 2017, the EQ for the post Junior Translator / Junior Hindi Translator in subordinate offices who have not yet adopted Model RRs of DoP&T for JT/JHT (Post Code F) is as under: Masters degree of a recognized University in Hindi or English with English or Hindi as a compulsory or elective subject at degree level, OR Bachelors degree with Hindi and English as main subjects (which includes the term compulsory and elective) Note: Candidates must ensure that they have studied English and Hindi as main subjects and not a paper in all the three years of Bachelor of Arts pass course. Eligibility of a candidate for the above-mentioned post has to be determined in the light of the EQ described above. It is also informed that under RTI Act 2005 the CPIO is not supposed to make any comments or give any opinion on any issue

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 RTI REQUEST RECEIVED

08/12/2017 Nodal Officer

2 REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO

09/12/2017 Nodal Officer Forwarded to CPIO(s) : (1) DIPANKAR DUTTA

3 REQUEST DISPOSED OF

11/12/2017 DIPANKAR DUTTA-(CPIO)

             

Page 17: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

 

Page No. 10 

ACTION HISTORY OF RTI REQUEST No.SSCER/R/2017/50392

Applicant Name ARIJIT CHAKRABORTY

Text of Application

Respected Sir, I have received your reply today, that all the dossiers of the Selected Candidates in SSC-CGL Exam 2016 from Eastern Region have been sent to the respective departments. Kindly tell me, when will the Nomination List be uploaded on the SSC-ER website... Thank you, Regards.

Reply of Application

the list of candidates whose dossiers have been forwarded to the concerned user departments along with the name and address of the officer to whom the dossiers have been sent will be uploaded on the website of SSC, Eastern Region in a day or two

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 RTI REQUEST RECEIVED

08/12/2017 Nodal Officer

2 REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO

09/12/2017 Nodal Officer Forwarded to CPIO(s) : (1) DIPANKAR DUTTA

3 REQUEST DISPOSED OF

11/12/2017 DIPANKAR DUTTA-(CPIO)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 18: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

 

Page No. 11 

 

ACTION HISTORY OF RTI REQUEST No.SSCER/R/2017/50394

Applicant Name avnish sharma

Text of Application

sir i want to know about (1) my rank (as number of candidate applied , also category wise ) in advertisement no 02/2017 for post of ER 20517 ( laboratory assistant ) my registration no is 61000300681 my name is AVNISH SHARMA S/O MANMOHAN SHARMA, DOB is 14/11/1998. (2) how many candidate will be called for computer based exam for above post . (3) where will be my examination centre , it may be jaipur or delhi . (4) when will publish finally eligible student list of above post.

Reply of Application

(1) my rank (as number of candidate applied , also category wise ) in advertisement no 02/2017 for post of ER 20517 ( laboratory assistant ) my registration no is 61000300681 my name is AVNISH SHARMA S/O MANMOHAN SHARMA, DOB is 14/11/1998. (2) how many candidate will be called for computer based exam for above post . (3) where will be my examination centre , it may be jaipur or delhi . (4) when will publish finally eligible student list of above post.

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 RTI REQUEST RECEIVED

09/12/2017 Nodal Officer

2 REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO

11/12/2017 Nodal Officer Forwarded to CPIO(s) : (1) LAKSHMI KANTA HALDER

3 REQUEST DISPOSED OF

11/12/2017 LAKSHMI KANTA

HALDER-(CPIO)

Page 19: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

Page No. 12 

ACTION HISTORY OF RTI REQUEST No.SSCER/R/2017/50395

Applicant Name Roshan Kumar Maurya

Text of Application

Dear Sir/Madam, In recruitment of selection post Graduate level advt no-01/2016 many candidates were selected for Document verification for morethan one post. 1- So what will be procedure for common candidates in final selection. 2- Are they will be select in only one post preference filled by them at a time of documents verification Or in all in which they were called for documents verification. 3-what happen if one candidate will be select in more than on post. 4- Is SSC will release any waitlist.

Reply of Application

the following Point-wise information is place below for your- Point(1, Point(2) and Point(3)- The candidature of candidates are considered in respect of each of the particular catagories of Posts they applied for separately. In other words, candidates applied for a particular Post are considered for that particular post only. The candidates applied for different categories of posts are considered as Common candidates for the purpose of conduct of Examination and for document verification. Point(4)- No information is avail able as on date. In this context, it is also stated that the definition of information cannot include within its fold answers to the question- why, which would be same thing as asking the reason for a justification for a particular thing. The Public Information Authorities cannot expect to communicate to the citizen the reason why a certain thing was done or not done in the sense of justification because the citizen makes a requisition about information. Justification is matter within the domain of adjudicating authorities and cannot properly be classified as information.

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 RTI REQUEST RECEIVED

10/12/2017 Nodal Officer

2 REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO

11/12/2017 Nodal Officer Forwarded to CPIO(s) : (1) LAKSHMI KANTA HALDER

3 REQUEST DISPOSED OF

11/12/2017 LAKSHMI KANTA

HALDER-(CPIO)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 20: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

Page No. 13 

ACTION HISTORY OF RTI REQUEST No.SSCER/R/2017/50396

Applicant Name nandu shaw

Text of Application

MY SELF NANDU SHAW ROLL NO-2611700260 , RECENTLY YOU HAVE UPLOADED THE RESULT OF SSCER SELECTION POST 01/2016 FOR POST CODE 11716 .MY NAME HAS BEEN NOMINATED FOR THE SSCER 01/2016 SELECTION POST FOR THE POST CODE 11716 , BUT IN GIVEN LIST THERE ARE TOTAL 19 CANDIDATES NAMED HAS BEEN ON PROVISIONLA SELECTED LIST , BUT ALMOST 3-4 CANDIDATES WHOSE NAME HAS BEEN PROVISIONAL SELECTED IN OTHER POST LIKE 11616,11716 ,AND 11314, ON THE BASIS OF MARKS GOT IN CBM EXAM MY NAME IS AT 20 TH NUMBER .I HAVE TALKED A FRIEND NAMED GIRISH KUMAR THAKUR ROLL NO -2611700008, HIS NAME IS IN THREE POST IN PROVISIONAL SELECTED LIST FOR POST CODE 11616,11716 AND 11314 BUT HE TOLD ME THAT HE WILL JOIN POST CODE 11616 , IF SSC WILL NEED IT IN WRITTEN THEN HE CAN ALSO PROVIDE , IS THERE ANY WAITING LIST . IF SUCH CANDIDATE NAMED GIRISH KUMAR THAKUR WILL SUBMIT A LETTER THAT HE WILL JOIN POST CODE 11616 , ON THAT CASE WILL MY NAME CAN BE CONSIDERED. KINDLY ACCEPT MY REQUEST I WILL BE VERY THANKFULL OF YOU.

Reply of Application

the following information is place below for your- The candidature of candidates are considered in respect of each of the particular catagories of Posts they applied for separately. In other words, candidates applied for a particular Post are considered for that particular post only. The candidates applied for different categories of posts are considered as Common candidates for the purpose of conduct of Examination and for document verification. In this context, it is also stated that the definition of information cannot include within its fold answers to the question- why, which would be same thing as asking the reason for a justification for a particular thing. The Public Information Authorities cannot expect to communicate to the citizen the reason why a certain thing was done or not done in the sense of justification because the citizen makes a requisition about information. Justification is matter within the domain of adjudicating authorities and cannot properly be classified as information.

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 RTI REQUEST RECEIVED

11/12/2017 Nodal Officer

2 REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO

11/12/2017 Nodal Officer Forwarded to CPIO(s) : (1) LAKSHMI KANTA HALDER

3 REQUEST DISPOSED OF

11/12/2017 LAKSHMI KANTA

HALDER-(CPIO)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 21: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

Page No. 14 

ACTION HISTORY OF RTI REQUEST No.SSCER/R/2017/50397

Applicant Name Roshan Kumar Maurya

Text of Application

Dear Sir/Madam, In recruitment of selection post Graduate level advt no-01/2016 many candidates were selected for Document verification for more than one post. 1- So what will be procedure for common candidates in final selection. 2- Are they will be select in only one post preference filled by them at a time of documents verification Or in all in which they were called for documents verification. 3-what happen if one candidate will be select in more than on post. 4- Is SSC will release any waitlist.

Reply of Application

the following Point-wise information is place below for your- Point(1), Point(2) and Point(3)- The candidature of candidates are considered in respect of each of the particular catagories of Posts they applied for separately. In other words, candidates applied for a particular Post are considered for that particular post only. The candidates applied for different categories of posts are considered as Common candidates for the purpose of conduct of Examination and for document verification. Point(3)- It is up to the candidates, selected for more than one Posts, to decide which Post they would like to join. Point(4)- No information is avail able as on date. In this context, it is also stated that the definition of information cannot include within its fold answers to the question- why, which would be same thing as asking the reason for a justification for a particular thing. The Public Information Authorities cannot expect to communicate to the citizen the reason why a certain thing was done or not done in the sense of justification because the citizen makes a requisition about information. Justification is matter within the domain of adjudicating authorities and cannot properly be classified as information.

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 RTI REQUEST RECEIVED

11/12/2017 Nodal Officer

2 REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO

11/12/2017 Nodal Officer Forwarded to CPIO(s) : (1) LAKSHMI KANTA HALDER

3 REQUEST DISPOSED OF

11/12/2017 LAKSHMI KANTA

HALDER-(CPIO)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 22: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

  

Page No. 15 

ACTION HISTORY OF RTI REQUEST No.SSCER/R/2017/50398

Applicant Name SUDHIR KUMAR BOMMANA

Text of Application Respected Sir/Madam, please find the RTI application attached herewith for your kind reference and action. Thanks and Regards.

Reply of Application as per the records available with this Office, following Point-wise information is forwarded herewith for your information- Point(i)- WPCT NO.85/2017, filed on 13.04.2017. Point(2)- Pending as on date.

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 RTI REQUEST RECEIVED

11/12/2017 Nodal Officer

2 REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO

12/12/2017 Nodal Officer Forwarded to CPIO(s) : (1) DIPANKAR DUTTA

3 REQUEST TRANSFERRED TO

OTHER CPIO

13/12/2017 DIPANKAR DUTTA-(CPIO)

Transferred to CPIO(s) : (1) LAKSHMI KANTA HALDER

4 REQUEST FORWARDED TO

DEEMED PIO

14/12/2017 LAKSHMI KANTA

HALDER-(CPIO)

Forwarder to DPIO(s) : 1)PROSENJIT BOSE (Recruitment)

5 REQUEST DISPOSED OF

14/12/2017 LAKSHMI KANTA

HALDER-(CPIO)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 23: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

 

Page No. 16 

ACTION HISTORY OF RTI REQUEST No.SSCER/R/2017/50399

Applicant Name ASHUTOSH SHARMA

Text of Application Please provide me with the recruitment (exam ) status for the post of Scientific Assistant (Chemical), Postcode- ER10917, Advertisement no- ER01/2017.

Reply of Application

the Computer Based Examination for the said post category ER10916 was conducted on 18/11/2017. All the relevant information in regard to further development in the recruitment process for the said post category along with other post categories advertised under ADVT No. ER-01/2017 would be made available/published individually at the Website of the Staff Selection Commission, Eastern Region i.e. www.sscer.org. You are, therefore, requested to visit the Website of the SSC(ER) as stated above from time to time in order to obtain the desired information.

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 RTI REQUEST RECEIVED

12/12/2017 Nodal Officer

2 REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO

13/12/2017 Nodal Officer Forwarded to CPIO(s) : (1) LAKSHMI KANTA HALDER

3 REQUEST FORWARDED TO

DEEMED PIO

13/12/2017 LAKSHMI KANTA

HALDER-(CPIO)

Forwarder to DPIO(s) : 1)PROSENJIT BOSE (Recruitment)

4 INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM

DEEMED PIO

14/12/2017 PROSENJIT BOSE

(Recruitment)-(DPIO)

5 REQUEST DISPOSED OF

14/12/2017 LAKSHMI KANTA

HALDER-(CPIO)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 24: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

 

Page No. 17 

ACTION HISTORY OF RTI REQUEST No.SSCER/R/2017/50400

Applicant Name Vinay Kumar

Text of Application

Respected Sir/Madam, I have some queries regarding ssc cgl examination.Please provide answers. 1. Is joining process of ssc cgl 2016 going on. 2. Has dossiers sending process started. If yes, then when nomination will be uploaded on website.

Reply of Application

dossiers of the candidates selected through CGL Exam 2016 have been sent to the concerned user departments. A list of the candidates whose dossiers have been sent and the names and addresses of the officers of the respective departments to whom the dossiers have been sent is available on the website of SSC, Eastern Region www.sscer.org

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 RTI REQUEST RECEIVED

13/12/2017 Nodal Officer

2 REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO

13/12/2017 Nodal Officer Forwarded to CPIO(s) : (1) DIPANKAR DUTTA

3 REQUEST DISPOSED OF

14/12/2017 DIPANKAR DUTTA-(CPIO)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 25: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

 

Page No. 18 ACTION HISTORY OF RTI REQUEST No.SSCER/R/2017/50401

Applicant Name MOHIT KUMAR GUPTA

Text of Application HOW MANY STUDENTS APPEARED IN THE SSC MTS EXAMINATION FROM WEST BENGAL STATE WHICH WAS HELD IN THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER AND OCTOBER 2017

Reply of Application the information sought by you is not available since the record of number of candidates appeared from different States in an examination is not maintained in the office of SSC, Eastern Region

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 RTI REQUEST RECEIVED

13/12/2017 Nodal Officer

2 REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO

14/12/2017 Nodal Officer Forwarded to CPIO(s) : (1) DIPANKAR DUTTA

3 REQUEST DISPOSED OF

14/12/2017 DIPANKAR DUTTA-(CPIO)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 26: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

 

Page No. 19 

ACTION HISTORY OF RTI REQUEST No.SSCER/R/2017/50402

Applicant Name SUVAJIT PAL

Text of Application

QUERY ABOUT SELECTION POST OF ADVERTISE NUMBER ER-01/2016. Respected Sir/Madam Thank you very much for publishing details of results for the above said post. One thing which I cant understand how could a candidate be selected for two different post simultaneously because we were given a option form and it is followed strictly for other people. I would therefore request you to kindly look into thematter so that a genuine candidate could be given a fair chance. For your convenience I am sending you two PDF files of the results. The results clearly shows that some candidate managed to get in the final merit list for more than one posts. Waiting for your kind reply. Sincerely Yours, Suvajit Pal.

Reply of Application

the result of each category of the posts advertised under ADVT. No. ER01/2016, which are published on the website of the SSC,ER, Kolkata have been processed based on the marks obtained by the candidates in the CBM Examination held on 16/07/2017 and are found provisionally eligible during the Document Verification held for the respective posts from 04/09/2017 to 07/09/2017 and 15/09/2017. Although, during the time of the document verification the post preference were obtained from the candidates, but it could not be taken into consideration for none of the posts. Therefore, the candidature of candidates are considered in respect of each of the particular catagories of Posts they applied for separately. In other words, candidates applied for a particular Post are considered for that particular post only. The candidates applied for different categories of posts are considered as Common candidates for the purpose of conduct of Examination and for document verification only.

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 RTI REQUEST RECEIVED

14/12/2017 Nodal Officer

2 REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO

14/12/2017 Nodal Officer Forwarded to CPIO(s) : (1) LAKSHMI KANTA HALDER

3 REQUEST FORWARDED TO

DEEMED PIO

14/12/2017 LAKSHMI KANTA

HALDER-(CPIO)

Forwarder to DPIO(s) : 1)PROSENJIT BOSE (Recruitment)

4 REQUEST UNDER PROCESS BY DEEMED

PIO

14/12/2017 PROSENJIT BOSE

(Recruitment)-(DPIO)

5 INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM

DEEMED PIO

14/12/2017 PROSENJIT BOSE

(Recruitment)-(DPIO)

6 REQUEST DISPOSED OF

14/12/2017 LAKSHMI KANTA

HALDER-(CPIO)

 

 

 

Page 27: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

 

Page No. 20

ACTION HISTORY OF RTI REQUEST No.SSCER/R/2017/50403

Applicant Name SUVAJIT PAL

Text of Application

Respected Sir/Madam With due respect I beg to know that will any waiting list be published for the vide Advertisement ER11616 of Advt No. ER-01/2016. If it will be published then how long it will take to be published. Yours Sincerely, Suvajit.

Reply of Application as per record, no information is available regarding publication of the waiting list in respect to post category ER11616.

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 RTI REQUEST RECEIVED

14/12/2017 Nodal Officer

2 REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO

15/12/2017 Nodal Officer Forwarded to CPIO(s) : (1) LAKSHMI KANTA HALDER

3 REQUEST FORWARDED TO

DEEMED PIO

15/12/2017 LAKSHMI KANTA

HALDER-(CPIO)

Forwarder to DPIO(s) : 1)PROSENJIT BOSE (Recruitment)

4 INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM

DEEMED PIO

15/12/2017 PROSENJIT BOSE

(Recruitment)-(DPIO)

5 REQUEST DISPOSED OF

15/12/2017 LAKSHMI KANTA

HALDER-(CPIO)

Page 28: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

Page No. 21

ACTION HISTORY OF RTI REQUEST No.SSCER/R/2017/50404

Applicant Name gourab paul

Text of Application

sir I have an obc certificate issued by sdo barrackpore, west bangal. I belongs to kumbhakar sub cast. Do this sub cast belong to central obc list. And is the certificate is valid to get chance in any ssc exam in obc category. if not then from which authority should i issue my certificate at the time of document verification. the scan copy of the certificate is attached for your perusal. Thank you.

Reply of Application

the lists of OBCs for different states recognised by the Central Government along with the relevant Resolutions are available on the website www.ncbc.nic.in. You are advised to go through the lists on the said website for information regarding inclusion of the community mentioned in your application in the Central list of OBC. As regards the validity of the certificate mentioned in your application it is stated that under RTI Act 2005 the CPIO is not supposed to give any opinion or interpret any information. You are advised to go through the notice of the examination you will apply for and the relevant notices regarding OBC certificate published by the Commission on the website www.ssc.nic.in

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 RTI REQUEST RECEIVED

14/12/2017 Nodal Officer

2 REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO

15/12/2017 Nodal Officer Forwarded to CPIO(s) : (1) DIPANKAR DUTTA

3 REQUEST DISPOSED OF

19/12/2017 DIPANKAR DUTTA-(CPIO)

 

 

Page 29: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

 

Page No. 22 

ACTION HISTORY OF RTI REQUEST No.SSCER/R/2017/50405

Applicant Name Piyush

Text of Application

Emp. No. Er1/2016 cat. Er11516 (je).. DGQA need qualification electronics and telecommunications but if any candidate have qualification only diploma in electronics engg and candidate select in final list after document verification exam result. That condition candidate qualification allow or not allow in next processes.

Reply of Application

the essential eligibility condition attached to post category ER11516 are- i. Bachelors Degree in Science with Physics/Chemistry/Electronics/Computer Science from a recognised University OR Diploma in Mechanical/Electrical/Electronics and Telecommunication/Instrumentation/ IT Engineering from a recognised University or State Board of Technical Education and ii. One year experience in Production or Development or Quality assurance in the relevant field from a recognised Organisation or Undertaking. The candidate having above EQs were considered for final selection however, their candidature is purely provisional and subject to further verification by the user department.

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 RTI REQUEST RECEIVED

15/12/2017 Nodal Officer

2 REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO

15/12/2017 Nodal Officer Forwarded to CPIO(s) : (1) LAKSHMI KANTA HALDER

3 REQUEST FORWARDED TO

DEEMED PIO

15/12/2017 LAKSHMI KANTA

HALDER-(CPIO)

Forwarder to DPIO(s) : 1)PROSENJIT BOSE (Recruitment)

4 INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM

DEEMED PIO

15/12/2017 PROSENJIT BOSE

(Recruitment)-(DPIO)

5 REQUEST DISPOSED OF

15/12/2017 LAKSHMI KANTA

HALDER-(CPIO)

 

   

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 30: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

 

Page No. 23 ACTION HISTORY OF RTI REQUEST No.SSCER/R/2017/50406

Applicant Name ANKIT GAUTAM

Text of Application

What is the result date of below examination :- Examination for Selection Posts (Phase IV) (CBE) for graduate level GL-IVC that was held on 18.11.2017 at Kolkata. Also please share the answer sheet for Registration No. 61000475920 against the ER 01/2017

Reply of Application

the final result has not been declared yet. It is further informed that the result and statement of marks of all the candidates who appeared in the CBM Exam held on 18/11/2017 will be declared separately for each category of the posts advertised under Phase-IV recruitment, 2017 after completion of the recruitment process, which will be published on the official website www.sscer.org. You are therefore asked to check the website of SSC, ER, Kolkata from time to time for the desired information.

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 RTI REQUEST RECEIVED

15/12/2017 Nodal Officer

2 REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO

15/12/2017 Nodal Officer Forwarded to CPIO(s) : (1) LAKSHMI KANTA HALDER

3 REQUEST FORWARDED TO

DEEMED PIO

15/12/2017 LAKSHMI KANTA

HALDER-(CPIO)

Forwarder to DPIO(s) : 1)PROSENJIT BOSE (Recruitment)

4 INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM

DEEMED PIO

15/12/2017 PROSENJIT BOSE

(Recruitment)-(DPIO)

5 REQUEST DISPOSED OF

15/12/2017 LAKSHMI KANTA

HALDER-(CPIO)

Page 31: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

Page No. 24 ACTION HISTORY OF RTI REQUEST No.SSCER/R/2017/50407

Applicant Name SUVAJIT PAL

Text of Application

Respected Sir/Madam First of all thank you very much that you gave reply to my previous RTIs. Unfortunately the replies does not seem to be satisfactory to me. I agreed what you have said that no post preferences were given though it was obtained during document verifications. But would you please clarify that if this is matter then how some candidates could not manage to enter the final merit panel in spite of having higher marks than cut off in their own category. It is not reasonable that post preferences were given for some students only. The total procedure is confusing for us. We are deliberately want to know what the actual matter is. Results of ER11616, ER11716 clearly show that some candidates inspite of securing higher marks could not enter in final merit list. On the hand one candidate managed to enter in both the panel. This is actual cause of our confusion. Would you please clarify this. SSC should not follow two different biased procedure. Thanking You, Suvajit.

Reply of Application

it is informed that the provisionally eligible candidates were called for document verification on the basis of scores obtained by the candidates in the CBM Exam held on 16/07/2017 in respect of post category ER11616 & ER11716 under Advt. No. ER01/2016. Candidature of the candidates are verified on the basis of documents submitted by the candidates during document verification. If any candidate does not fulfill the requirement or fails to produce any documents during Document verification or is absent during document verification, his/her candidature is not considered for formulation of merit list despite having the required marks, which was clearly indicated at para-3 of the Notice during publication of result. This is also available on the website of the SSC(ER), Kolkata i.e. www.sscer.org. So far as your query about clarification, it is stated that the definition of information cannot include within its fold answers to the question- why, which would be same thing as asking the reason for a justification for a particular thing. It is important to note that as per the guidelines to the RTI Act, 2005 issued by DoP&T vide its O.M. No. 1/32/2013-IR dated 28th November, 2013, only such information can be supplied under the Act that is available and existing and is held by the public authority or is held under the control of the public authority. The Public Information Officer is not supposed to create information that is not a part of the record of the public authority. The Public Information Officer is also not required to furnish information which require drawing of inference and/or making of assumptions or to interpret information or to solve the problems raised by the applicants or to furnish replies to hypothetical questions.

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 RTI REQUEST RECEIVED

15/12/2017 Nodal Officer

2 REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO

18/12/2017 Nodal Officer Forwarded to CPIO(s) : (1) LAKSHMI KANTA HALDER

3 REQUEST FORWARDED TO

DEEMED PIO

18/12/2017 LAKSHMI KANTA

HALDER-(CPIO)

Forwarder to DPIO(s) : 1)PROSENJIT BOSE (Recruitment)

4 INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM

DEEMED PIO

18/12/2017 PROSENJIT BOSE

(Recruitment)-(DPIO)

5 REQUEST DISPOSED OF

18/12/2017 LAKSHMI KANTA

HALDER-(CPIO)

Page 32: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

Page No. 25 

ACTION HISTORY OF RTI REQUEST No.SSCER/R/2017/50409

Applicant Name SOURAV SWARNAKAR

Text of Application INFORMATION is required regarding TOTAL NUMBER OF CANDIDATES APPEARED FOR THE POST OF ER10717 (SCIENTIFIC ASSISTANT ELECTRICAL) ADVT. NO.-01/2017.

Reply of Application

any candidate could appear for the CBM Examination from any of the Regional Offices of the Commission for which he/she be a valid candidate and his/her attendance is also be considered for the identical Essential Qualoification (Matric/Higher Secondary/ Graduate & Post Graduate) Level Posts applied under other Regional Offices and consided as a valid candidate for the examination. Further, the details about the number of candidates appeared in the examination and the Score of all candidates who appeared on the CBM Based Examination (Matric/Higher Secondary/ Graduate & Post Graduate) Level for all the Categories of Posts (Matric/Higher Secondary/ Graduate & Post Graduate Level Posts) are published as and when the Recruitment Process is over in respect of each categories of Posts separately at the Website of the Staff Selection Commission (Eastern Region) i.e. www.sscer.org.

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 RTI REQUEST RECEIVED

16/12/2017 Nodal Officer

2 REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO

18/12/2017 Nodal Officer Forwarded to CPIO(s) : (1) LAKSHMI KANTA HALDER

3 REQUEST FORWARDED TO

DEEMED PIO

18/12/2017 LAKSHMI KANTA

HALDER-(CPIO)

Forwarder to DPIO(s) : 1)PROSENJIT BOSE (Recruitment)

4 INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM

DEEMED PIO

18/12/2017 PROSENJIT BOSE

(Recruitment)-(DPIO)

5 REQUEST DISPOSED OF

18/12/2017 LAKSHMI KANTA

HALDER-(CPIO)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 33: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

 

 

Page No. 26 ACTION HISTORY OF RTI REQUEST No.SSCER/R/2017/50411

Applicant Name Sanjay Prasad

Text of Application Please intimate the document verification schedule of Stenographer C & D Exam-2016.

Reply of Application information sought by you is not available

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 RTI REQUEST RECEIVED

18/12/2017 Nodal Officer

2 REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO

18/12/2017 Nodal Officer Forwarded to CPIO(s) : (1) DIPANKAR DUTTA

3 REQUEST DISPOSED OF

19/12/2017 DIPANKAR DUTTA-(CPIO)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 34: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

 

Page No. 27 ACTION HISTORY OF RTI REQUEST No.SSCER/R/2017/50412

Applicant Name Satish Kumar

Text of Application

Regarding Reply of RTI application No. SSCER/R/2017/80117 And Advt No. SSCER /01/2016 Respected sir, Please tell me briefly what were the reason that you did not consider the application for the preference of post given by the candidate. If you took the application for the preference of post by candidate then you should recognize it. If you do not have to recognize it then why did you take it from the candidates. As you know one candidate will join for only one post then you have to shortlist the candidate for final result by preference given by them. In this process other posts for which the candidate is selected will remain vacant except only one. Do you not understand this. Please Clear my all doubts with valid reasons.

Reply of Application

the result of each category of the posts advertised under ADVT. No. ER01/2016, which are published on the website of the SSC,ER, Kolkata have been processed based on the marks obtained by the candidates in the CBM Examination held on 16/07/2017 and are found provisionally eligible during the Document Verification held for the respective posts from 04/09/2017 to 07/09/2017 and 15/09/2017. Although, during the time of the document verification the post preference were obtained from the candidates, but it could not be taken into consideration for none of the posts. Therefore, the candidature of candidates are considered in respect of each of the particular catagories of Posts they applied for separately. In other words, candidates applied for a particular Post are considered for that particular post only. The candidates applied for different categories of posts are considered as Common candidates for the purpose of conduct of Examination and for document verification only. So far as your query about clarification, it is stated that the definition of information cannot include within its fold answers to the question- why, which would be same thing as asking the reason for a justification for a particular thing. It is important to note that as per the guidelines to the RTI Act, 2005 issued by DoP&T vide its O.M. No. 1/32/2013-IR dated 28th November, 2013, only such information can be supplied under the Act that is available and existing and is held by the public authority or is held under the control of the public authority. The Public Information Officer is not supposed to create information that is not a part of the record of the public authority. The Public Information Officer is also not required to furnish information which require drawing of inference and/or making of assumptions or to interpret information or to solve the problems raised by the applicants or to furnish replies to hypothetical questions.

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 RTI REQUEST RECEIVED

18/12/2017 Nodal Officer

2 REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO

18/12/2017 Nodal Officer Forwarded to CPIO(s) : (1) LAKSHMI KANTA HALDER

3 REQUEST DISPOSED OF

18/12/2017 LAKSHMI KANTA

HALDER-(CPIO)

 

 

 

Page 35: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

 

Page No. 28 ACTION HISTORY OF RTI REQUEST No.SSCER/R/2017/50413

Applicant Name AMIT SHEKHAR

Text of Application

Sir, Please give me information about the nomination list of cgl 2016 recently published by ssc eastern region -- is this list based on the result published by ssc on 5th August,2017 or it is based on new result if prepared after the recent verdict of CAT regarding cgl 2016. Thanks.

Reply of Application the list is as per the result published by the Commission on 5th August,2017. No revised result has been published by the Commission thereafter

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 RTI REQUEST RECEIVED

18/12/2017 Nodal Officer

2 REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO

19/12/2017 Nodal Officer Forwarded to CPIO(s) : (1) DIPANKAR DUTTA

3 REQUEST DISPOSED OF

19/12/2017 DIPANKAR DUTTA-(CPIO)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 36: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

 

Page No. 29 ACTION HISTORY OF RTI REQUEST No.SSCER/R/2017/50416

Applicant Name CHINTHU JOGINARAYANA RAO

Text of Application

Querry regarding result of ER/13116/2016, few of the candidates provisionally selected are selected for more than one job in same region and same job in different region. Please provide me the data for which region and which post they choose and what about the vacancies left there. How could you call the people for left vacancies, if those are filled can you please provide the data for me.

Reply of Application

the candidature of each individual candidate has considered for each particular post for which he/she has applied for and appeared in the CBM Examination & document verification. Thereafter, the candidates are considers on the basis of the scores of the examination. If a candidates scores higher than others, he/she could be selected for the posts for which he/she applied for separately. So far as the information, as as you have inquired upon, about the data for which Region and which post the candidates choose and what about the vacancies left and calling candidates for such vacancies, it is intimated that there is no such valid information is available with this Office.

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 RTI REQUEST RECEIVED

23/12/2017 Nodal Officer

2 REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO

26/12/2017 Nodal Officer Forwarded to CPIO(s) : (1) LAKSHMI KANTA HALDER

3 REQUEST DISPOSED OF

26/12/2017 LAKSHMI KANTA

HALDER-(CPIO)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 37: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

Page No. 30 ACTION HISTORY OF RTI REQUEST No.SSCER/R/2017/50421

Applicant Name Khurshid Alam

Text of Application

1) Regarding the result of advertisement number ER 01/2016, as there are many seats which are going to be vacant after joining the candidates who have got selected in more than one post, I just want to know whether ssc is going to release or not any reserve / waiting list. If not then what is the process of filling the vacant seats. 2) How this is possible that a candidate with roll number 2611300173 who have not been called for document verification is enlisted in marks statement list of category number ER11316. 3) Please find the attached voter Id.

Reply of Application

the candidature of each individual candidate has considered for each particular post for which he/she has applied for and appeared in the CBM Examination & document verification. Thereafter, the candidates are considers on the basis of the scores of the examination. If a candidates scores higher than others, he/she could be selected for the posts for which he/she applied for separately. So far as publication of Waiting Merit List, as as you have inquired upon, it is intimated that as per the records, no such information is available with this Office. So far as filling up of vacancies, it is stated that the vacancies are advertised on the basis of the requisitions submitted by the User Department.So far as publication of Marks of candidates is concerned, it is intimated that Marks of all the candidates in respect of aparticular category of post are being uploaded at the website of SSC(ER), Kolkata for information. However, Marks/Scores in the CBM Examination of those candidates who did not appeared for the Document Verification or who do not fulfilled all the Criteria as per the Notice of Recruitment, have not been considered.

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 RTI REQUEST RECEIVED

24/12/2017 Nodal Officer

2 REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO

26/12/2017 Nodal Officer Forwarded to CPIO(s) : (1) LAKSHMI KANTA HALDER

3 REQUEST DISPOSED OF

26/12/2017 LAKSHMI KANTA

HALDER-(CPIO)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 38: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

Page No. 31 ACTION HISTORY OF RTI REQUEST No.SSCER/R/2017/50423

Applicant Name SUDHIR KUMAR BOMMANA

Text of Application Respected Sir, Please find the original RTI application attached herewith for your kind reference and action. Thanks and regards..

Reply of Application

the following point-wise information is placed below- Point-1 and 2- Yes, you have been communicated by the Govt. Counsel along with your desired documents through Speed Post. A copy of the communication made by the Govt. Counsel is attached herewith for ready reference.

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 RTI REQUEST RECEIVED

26/12/2017 Nodal Officer

2 REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO

26/12/2017 Nodal Officer Forwarded to CPIO(s) : (1) LAKSHMI KANTA HALDER

3 REQUEST DISPOSED OF

28/12/2017 LAKSHMI KANTA

HALDER-(CPIO)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 39: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

 

 

Page No. 32 

ACTION HISTORY OF RTI REQUEST 

No.SSCER/R/2017/50424 

Applicant Name SUDHIR KUMAR BOMMANA

Text of Application Respected Sir, Please find the Original RTI application attached here with for your kind reference .. Thanks and regards..

Reply of Application

the following point-wise information is placed below- Point-1 and 2- Yes, you have been communicated by the Govt. Counsel along with your desired documents through Speed Post. A copy of the communication made by the Govt. Counsel is attached herewith for ready reference.

SN. Action Taken Date of

Action Action

Taken By Remarks

1 RTI REQUEST RECEIVED

25/12/2017 Nodal Officer

2 REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO

28/12/2017 Nodal Officer Forwarded to CPIO(s) : (1) LAKSHMI KANTA HALDER

3 REQUEST DISPOSED OF

28/12/2017 LAKSHMI KANTA

HALDER-(CPIO)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 40: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

 

 

Page No. 33 

ACTION HISTORY OF RTI REQUEST No.SSCER/R/2017/50427

Applicant Name MANEESH KUMAR

Text of Application

Resp. Sir/ Medam , regarding to final slection of SSC ER ADV no. 5/1/ER11316/2016-Rectt. & Date 19.12.2017 In case of Tie Condition of Two Candidates same scored marks , Candidate Having Larger Age will select in final result , Here Two Candidates have same marks age given below 1. Vikash Kumar sr. No. 68 Roll No. 2611301016 Final Score marks 53.5 Date of Birth 15.06.1990 2. Maneesh Kumar Sr. No. 71 Roll no 2611301060 Final Score Marks 53.5 Date of Birth 04.07.1988 (LARGER AGE ) But Final Slected Candidate Vikash Kumar against cat. -06 which has lower age Please provied me the rule/condition by which this selection performed Releated Documents Submitted. Thanks & Regards, Maneesh Kumar

Reply of Application

as have been apprised in your aforesaid RTI application, the finally selected candidate named as Shri Vikash Kumar, bearing Roll No. 2611301537, have scored 82.5 marks in the CBM Exam held on 16/07/2017, enlisted at Sl. No. 106 in the mark statement uploaded on the website vide Notice No. 5/1/ER11316/2016-Rectt. Dated 19/12/2017, and has been selected in the final merit list against OBC vacancy. Whereas, Shri Vikash Kumar, bearing Roll No. 2611301016 and you applied for the said post as SC candidate.

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 RTI REQUEST RECEIVED

27/12/2017 Nodal Officer

2 REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO

28/12/2017 Nodal Officer Forwarded to CPIO(s) : (1) LAKSHMI KANTA HALDER

3 REQUEST DISPOSED OF

28/12/2017 LAKSHMI KANTA

HALDER-(CPIO)

Page 41: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

 

Page No. 34 

ACTION HISTORY OF RTI REQUEST No.SSCER/R/2017/80114

Applicant Name SUROJIT BISWAS

Text of Application

CHSLE 2016 SKILL TEST SSCER Candidate Name SUROJIT BISWAS Roll No -4410012711 sms received for admit card download on 24-11-2017 at 1824hrs earlier no message or communication regarding skill test schedule by clicking admit card download link by roll no the admit card downloaded of another candidate named saddam hussian having another roll no. Tried for 4 hours ,20 times , same result. Then at night the link of downloading admit card vanishes. Again on 25.11.2017 at 11:01 hrs again sms received for admit card download Visited SSCER website the link of downloading admit card activated but failed to download admit card by trying several times every time sscer website flashes message took too long to respond Meanwhile by inquiring with fellow candidates i came to know that my name is on the slot of 27 nov 2017 0830 hrs batch and they too unable to download the admit cards. Tried for 4 hours ,20 times , same result. Then at night the link of downloading admit card vanishes. Again on 25.11.2017 at 11:01 hrs , again sms received for admit card download . Visited sscer website , the link of downloading admit card activated but failed to download admit card by trying several times , every time sscer website flashes message took too long to respond . Meanwhile by inquiring with fellow candidates i came to know that my name is on the slot of 27 nov 2017 0830 hrs batch and they too unable to download the admit cards. Still at 0005 Hrs on 26.11.2017 , couldnt download admit card . 24 Nov and 26 Nov 2017 are weekly holiday as Saturday and Sunday, SSCER help line no (both Landline and Mobile didnt receiving any call from 24 Nov 2017 Afternoon. Please provide information regarding (i) What is the date and time SSCER uploaded ADMIT CARD download link for CHSLE 2016 SKILL TEST for candidates whose SKILL TEST on 27 Nov 2017 at 0830 Hrs (ii) What are the steps taken by SSCER in rectifying the problem of showing other candidates Admit card when my roll no 4410012711 entered in downloading admit card. (iii) What are the steps taken by SSCER after rectifying the problem of showing other candidates Admit card and what are the communications sent by SSCER except sending same email and sms which are sent on 24 Nov 2017 at 1824 Hrs .(iv) why the SSCER helpline not responding . (v) How i can appear for SKILL Test , CHSLE on 27 Nov 2017 without Admit card and to which office /designated person i could approach as it is holiday on 25 and 26 Nov 2017 is holiday. All the communications from SSCER, the website ADMIT CARD download page screenshot and emails of other candidates are attached as supporting documents.

Reply of Application reply to the same application received online vide registration number SSCER/R/2017/50374 has already been given to you. Please go through the said reply for your information

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 RTI REQUEST RECEIVED

05/12/2017 Nodal Officer SSCOM/R/2017/84475

2 REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO

05/12/2017 Nodal Officer Forwarded to CPIO(s) : (1) DIPANKAR DUTTA

3 REQUEST DISPOSED OF

08/12/2017 DIPANKAR DUTTA-(CPIO)

 

 

Page 42: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

 

Page No. 35 

ACTION HISTORY OF RTI REQUEST No.SSCER/R/2017/80115

Applicant Name RAMVEER SINGH

Text of Application Please furnish information.

Reply of Application

point-wise reply to your queries is given below: 1. Your dossier has been sent to Shri Yoginder Kumar, Administrative Officer, Direcorate of Forensic Science Services, M/o Home Affairs, Block-9, 8th Floor, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110003. 2. You have been nominated to the Department of Forensic Science Service, M/o Home Affairs. Further action regarding your appointment to the post of Stenographer Grade C will be taken by the Department of Forensic Science Service. 3 & 4. You have been nominated against the vacancy of the year 2017

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 RTI REQUEST RECEIVED

12/12/2017 Nodal Officer SSCOM/R/2017/03787

2 REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO

13/12/2017 Nodal Officer Forwarded to CPIO(s) : (1) DIPANKAR DUTTA

3 REQUEST DISPOSED OF

15/12/2017 DIPANKAR DUTTA-(CPIO)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 43: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

Page No. 36 

ACTION HISTORY OF RTI REQUEST No.SSCER/R/2017/80116

Applicant Name subrata dinda

Text of Application

Dear Sir, I, Subrata Dinda, qualified in SSC CGL 2016 for the post of Auditor in Offices Under CAG. It has been almost four months since final result has been published but I have not received any information regarding the further process of recruitment. I want to know what is the status of appointment procedure.

Reply of Application

dossiers of the candidates selected through CGL Exam 2016 have been sent to the concerned user departments. A list of the candidates whose dossiers have been sent and the names and addresses of the officers of the respective departments to whom the dossiers have been sent is available on the website of SSC, Eastern Region www.sscer.org

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 RTI REQUEST RECEIVED

13/12/2017 Nodal Officer SSCOM/R/2017/58108

2 REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO

13/12/2017 Nodal Officer Forwarded to CPIO(s) : (1) DIPANKAR DUTTA

3 REQUEST DISPOSED OF

14/12/2017 DIPANKAR DUTTA-(CPIO)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 44: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

 

Page No. 37 

ACTION HISTORY OF RTI REQUEST No.SSCER/R/2017/80117

Applicant Name Satish Kumar

Text of Application

Regarding Advt. No. SSCER 01/2016 Respected sir, At the time of document verification of above said Advt.all the candidate fill the form of preference for the post as they may be selected for only one post if selected for more than one post or category. But in the results declared one candidate is selected for more than one post in the same region even selected in different region also. In this process the candidate having lower merit will not get chance and the candidate selected for more than one post will join for only one. Thus all other category of post he selected will still remain vacant. Then please describe briefly to eliminate above faulty process of recruitment. In this process candidate in Lower merit will not be getting the chance to be selected and the vacancy is going to be vacant also. Please reply me clearly with valid answers and tell me whether the wait list of candidate be declared or not. What was the purpose of filling the form of preference of post or category at the time of document verification. Thank-you

Reply of Application

the result of each category of the posts advertised under ADVT. No. ER01/2016, which are published on the website of the SSC,ER, Kolkata have been processed based on the marks obtained by the candidates in the CBM Examination held on 16/07/2017 and are found provisionally eligible during the Document Verification held for the respective posts from 04/09/2017 to 07/09/2017 and 15/09/2017. Although, during the time of the document verification the post preference were obtained from the candidates, but it could not be taken into consideration for none of the posts. Therefore, the candidature of candidates are considered in respect of each of the particular catagories of Posts they applied for separately. In other words, candidates applied for a particular Post are considered for that particular post only. The candidates applied for different categories of posts are considered as Common candidates for the purpose of conduct of Examination and for document verification only. So far as declaration of thewaiting list of the candidates is concerned, no such information is available as per records.

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 RTI REQUEST RECEIVED

14/12/2017 Nodal Officer SSCOM/R/2017/58164

2 REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO

14/12/2017 Nodal Officer Forwarded to CPIO(s) : (1) LAKSHMI KANTA HALDER

3 REQUEST FORWARDED TO

DEEMED PIO

14/12/2017 LAKSHMI KANTA

HALDER-(CPIO)

Forwarder to DPIO(s) : 1)PROSENJIT BOSE (Recruitment)

4 INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM

DEEMED PIO

15/12/2017 PROSENJIT BOSE

(Recruitment)-(DPIO)

5 REQUEST DISPOSED OF

15/12/2017 LAKSHMI KANTA

HALDER-(CPIO)

 

 

Page 45: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

 

Page‐ 38 

ACTION HISTORY OF RTI REQUEST No.SSCER/R/2017/80118

Applicant Name SUVAJIT PAL

Text of Application

QUERY ABOUT SELECTION POST OF ADVERTISE NUMBER ER-01/2016 Respected Sir/Madam, It is to inform you that some candidates have been selected for more than one two posts e.g. ER12916 and ER11616 simultaneously although all the candidates called for documents verification were given an option form so that one could be selected for a particular post not more than one. The rule is followed strictly for other applicants. I have sent mail for query to SSCER several times but they remain silent to me. I would therefore request you to kindly look into the matter so that a fresh candidate could be selected. For your convenience I am sending you two PDF files of the results. Waiting for kind reply. Yours sincerely, Suvajit Pal.

Reply of Application

the result of each category of the posts advertised under ADVT. No. ER01/2016, which are published on the website of the SSC,ER, Kolkata have been processed based on the marks obtained by the candidates in the CBM Examination held on 16/07/2017 and are found provisionally eligible during the Document Verification held for the respective posts from 04/09/2017 to 07/09/2017 and 15/09/2017. Although, during the time of the document verification the post preference were obtained from the candidates, but it could not be taken into consideration for none of the posts. Therefore, the candidature of candidates are considered in respect of each of the particular catagories of Posts they applied for separately. In other words, candidates applied for a particular Post are considered for that particular post only. The candidates applied for different categories of posts are considered as Common candidates for the purpose of conduct of Examination and for document verification only. Further, candidature of the candidates are verified on the basis of documents submitted by the candidates during document verification. If any candidate does not fulfill the requirement or fails to produce any documents during Document verification or is absent during document verification, his/her candidature is not considered for formulation of merit list despite having the required marks.

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 RTI REQUEST RECEIVED

18/12/2017 Nodal Officer SSCOM/R/2017/58157

2 REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO

18/12/2017 Nodal Officer Forwarded to CPIO(s) : (1) LAKSHMI KANTA HALDER

3 REQUEST DISPOSED OF

18/12/2017 LAKSHMI KANTA

HALDER-(CPIO)

 

 

 

 

Page 46: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

 

Page‐39 

ACTION HISTORY OF RTI REQUEST No.SSCER/R/2017/80119

Applicant Name NITYA RANJAN NAYAK

Text of Application

Respected Sir/Madam, I beg to state that I want to know an information regarding the publication of the results of the advertisement ER-01/2016. As many candidates are selected in more than one posts so will any second merit lists be published. It is clear that one or more posts will remain vacant after their joining as they are selected in many posts. With regards, Nitya Ranjan Nayak.

Reply of Application

the candidature of each individual candidate has considered for each particular post for which he/she has applied for and appeared in the CBM Examination & document verification. Thereafter, the candidates are considers on the basis of the scores of the examination. If a candidates scores higher than others, he/she could be selected for the posts for which he/she applied for separately. So far as publication of Second Merit List, as as you have inquired upon, it is intimated that as per the records, no such information is available with this Office.

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 RTI REQUEST RECEIVED

22/12/2017 Nodal Officer SSCOM/R/2017/58312

2 REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO

22/12/2017 Nodal Officer Forwarded to CPIO(s) : (1) LAKSHMI KANTA HALDER

3 REQUEST DISPOSED OF

26/12/2017 LAKSHMI KANTA

HALDER-(CPIO)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 47: Replies of RTI for the month of December'17 for the month of December...REPLIES OF RTI APPLICATION / APPEAL FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER ’2018 Name Replied date Page Nos. LIST REPLIES

 

Page‐40 

ACTION HISTORY OF RTI REQUEST No.SSCER/R/2017/50382

Applicant Name Partha Malick

Text of Application 1. Current status of the dossiers of the selected candidates in the CGLE 2016 2. Kindly provide the Official notice from SSC HQ instructing to start the nomination process again

Reply of Application the dossiers of the candidates pertaining to SSC, Eastern Region selected through CGL Examination 2016 have already been sent to the concerned user departments

SN. Action Taken Date of Action

Action Taken By Remarks

1 RTI REQUEST RECEIVED

30/11/2017 Nodal Officer

2 REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO

01/12/2017 Nodal Officer Forwarded to CPIO(s) : (1) DIPANKAR DUTTA

3 REQUEST DISPOSED OF

08/12/2017 DIPANKAR DUTTA-(CPIO)