replicating novel carbon nanostructures with 3d macroporous silica template
TRANSCRIPT
Replicating novel carbon nanostructures with 3D macroporous silicatemplate{
Zuocheng Zhou, Qingfeng Yan, Fabing Su and X. S. Zhao*
Received 14th March 2005, Accepted 27th April 2005
First published as an Advance Article on the web 16th May 2005
DOI: 10.1039/b503691g
Three-dimensional macroporous carbon, carbon capsules with and without opening windows,
solid carbon spheres and walnut-like carbon nanostructures were fabricated with macroporous
silica as a template. The relationship between the structures and experimental conditions was
studied. The carbon materials reported here may find application as photonic crystals, drug
delivery systems, catalyst supports, and adsorbents.
Introduction
Over the last few years, templating synthesis of porous solids
has received rapidly growing interest because it allows
one to sophisticatedly control pore size, length scale, and
morphology. A variety of templating strategies that afford
different porous architectures and nanostructures can be found
from a recent review paper.1
The colloidal-crystal-templating approach2,3 offers three-
dimensional (3D) macroporous materials of various composi-
tions with potential applications as photonic crystals,4
biosensors,5 catalysts and adsorbents.3 If a further step is
taken, colloidal-crystal-templated macroporous materials
can be used as exotemplates to guide the formation of other
functional structures that cannot be fabricated using other
different strategies.6 Johnson and co-workers6 were the first to
demonstrate the fabrication of silica nanoparticles by using
a colloidal-crystal-templated porous polymer exotemplate.
Jiang et al.7 described a lost-wax approach to the generation
of a wide variety of highly monodisperse inorganic, polymeric,
metallic solid and core–shell colloids, and hollow colloids with
controllable shell thickness by using macroporous polymers
as an exotemplate. Besides polymeric materials, other macro-
porous materials such as carbon8,9 and silica10 have also been
employed as exotemplates to grow spherical colloids and
periodic 3D structures.
Nanocarbons11 such as ordered nanoporous carbons,
carbon nanotubes, and hollow capsules have been shown to
be promising catalyst supports,12 adsorbents for gas separation
and purification,13 nanodevices,14 and energy storage mate-
rials,15 etc. So far, the methods for fabricating hollow carbon
spheres or capsules reported in the literature involve a multi-
step surface coating process.16–19 Sometimes, special efforts
have to be made to maintain core–shell spheres separated from
each other.17 Recently, the exotemplating method was applied
to prepare porous carbons. Ryoo et al.20 reported the synthesis
of mesoporous carbon with silica molecular sieve as an
exotemplate.
In this paper, we describe a method for the fabrication of a
range of carbon structures including 3D macroporous carbons,
carbon capsules with and without opening windows, solid
carbon spheres and walnut-like carbon structures by using 3D
macroporous silica as a template and an appropriate carbon
precursor.
Experimental
Materials
The chemicals used in this study include styrene (99%,
Aldrich), potassium persulfate (KPS, 99%, Aldrich), sulfuric
acid (98%, Merck), fuming hydrochloric acid (HCl, 37%,
Merck), tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, 98%, Fisher), absolute
ethanol (99.99%, Merck), ammonia solution (NH4OH, 28%,
Fisher), hydrofluoric acid (HF, 49%, J. B. Beaker), sucrose
(98%, Fluka). All the chemicals were used as received without
further purification except that styrene was washed with 10%
sodium hydroxide solution to remove the inhibitor and then
with deionized water to remove the sodium hydroxide.
Preparation of macroporous carbon and carbon capsules
The experimental procedure is schematically illustrated in the
Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI{). The prepara-
tion of 3D macroporous carbon structures and hollow carbon
capsules is described as follows. First, PS spheres synthesized
according to Shim et al.21 were fabricated into a colloidal
crystal using a flow-controlled vertical deposition (FCVD)
method.22 The colloidal crystals were annealed at 105 or 110 uCfor 10 minutes to form necks of different sizes among the
spheres.23 The interstices in the colloidal crystal were then
infiltrated with a silica sol, which was prepared by mixing
tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS), ethanol and 0.1 M HCl
solution with a volume ratio of 1 : 3 : 0.1 and stirring for
4 h. A 3D macroporous silica was obtained after removal
of the PS spheres by calcination at 500 uC for 5 h. The pores
in the macroporous silicas were connected with small channels
{ Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Calculationsof the stop band positions of macroporous silicas before and aftercarbon coating, N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms and pore sizedistribution curve of hollow carbon spheres, reflectance microscopephotographs of pure macroporous silicas and carbon–silica compo-sites, and simulations of photonic band structures of porous silicatemplate and carbon–silica composites. See http://www.rsc.org/supp-data/jm/b5/b503691g/*[email protected]
PAPER www.rsc.org/materials | Journal of Materials Chemistry
This journal is � The Royal Society of Chemistry 2005 J. Mater. Chem., 2005, 15, 2569–2574 | 2569
Publ
ishe
d on
16
May
200
5. D
ownl
oade
d by
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
onne
ctic
ut o
n 29
/10/
2014
11:
02:4
8.
View Article Online / Journal Homepage / Table of Contents for this issue
at the sites of the necks in the colloidal crystals. Second, the
porous silica was infiltrated with a 14.3, 20 or 33.3 wt% sucrose
solution containing 3.85 wt% H2SO4. Sucrose was used as
the carbon precursor because it is easy to handle and cost-
effective.24 The precursor-infiltrated template was heated at
100 uC for 2 h, followed by heating at 160 uC for 5 h to obtain
a polymer–silica composite. The thickness of the coated
polymer layer can be increased by repeating the above process.
Third, removal of the exterior silica shell from the composite
using a 49% HF solution followed by carbonization at 800 uCin N2 for 5 h resulted in either a 3D macroporous carbon or
hollow carbon capsules (HF etching is a hazardous process
and should be handled carefully).
Preparation of solid carbon spheres
The preparation of solid carbon spheres was similar to that of
the porous carbon structures. The only difference was that
after infiltration of sucrose, the sample was dried at room
temperature instead of heated at 100 uC and 160 uC before
subsequent infiltrations. But after the final infiltration step, the
sucrose-infiltrated silica was heated at 100 uC and 160 uC. In
addition to sucrose solution, furfural alcohol (FA) was also
used as a carbon precursor.
Characterization
A JEOL JSM-6700F scanning electron microscope (SEM)
and a JEOL 2010 transmission electron microscope (TEM)
were employed to observe the morphologies of the samples.
N2 Adsorption–desorption isotherms were measured on a
Quantachrome NOVA 1200 system. Samples were degassed
at 200 uC for 2 h before measurement. Photographs of
the samples were taken with an optical microscope (Leica,
DC 300F).
Results and discussion
Fig. 1a shows the SEM image of a sucrose-infiltrated (20 wt%)
macroporous silica after heated at 160 uC for 5 h. It can be
seen that the composite material is a face-centered-cubic (fcc)
colloidal crystal embedded in a continuous phase. An
elemental analysis of this sample with the energy-dispersive
X-ray (EDX) technique showed the presence of carbon,
oxygen, and silicon with atomic percentages of 72.7%,
19.8%, and 7.47%, respectively, indicating that the sample
contains a substantial amount of carbon. From the inset
of Fig. 1a it can be seen that both the shape and the size
of the polymer were precisely replicated from the air holes
of the macroporous silica template, indicating a surface-
templating mechanism,10,25 rather than a volume-templating
mechanism,26 which are, in general, determined by the surface
properties of a porous template and the nature of an infiltrated
precursor. The surface of the macroporous silica used in this
study was hydrophilic in nature. Thus, the carbon precursor
solution could easily wet the silica surface. In addition,
dehydration of sucrose molecules and surface hydroxyl groups
of the silica during the heating steps further promoted surface
coating of the carbon species. After the first cycle of infiltra-
tion and heating, the surface would become less hydrophilic
because of the presence of a layer of polymerized sucrose
network. To enable subsequent coating of the precursor, a
small amount of ethanol was added to the carbon precursor
solution to decrease its surface tension, thus enhancing its
affinity to the earlier coated layer.
A 3D macroporous polymeric material was obtained after
leaching out the silica framework with HF solution. As shown
in Fig. 1b, the fcc periodic structure in Fig. 1a was well
preserved during the wet etching process. In the macroporous
silica template, the air pores are connected with small necks,2
which were also filled with the carbon precursor during the
infiltration process. As a result, after removal of the silica
framework, the polymeric hollow spheres were connected by
the carbon rods templated by the necks, which provide the
mechanical strength of the ordered 3D polymeric structure.
The hollow nature of the polymeric spheres is evident from a
broken sphere indicated by the arrow in Fig. 1b.
Sucrose precursor solutions with concentrations of 33.3 and
14.3 wt% were also used to prepare carbon structures using a
3D macroporous silica template. Fig. 2 shows the SEM images
of the carbon samples fabricated with these two sucrose
solutions. Although the same template was used, different
carbon structures were obtained. With the high-concentration
sucrose solution (33.3 wt.%) (see Fig. 2a), spheres with an
intact surface morphology was obtained. With the low-
concentration sucrose solution (14.3 wt%), spheres with open
windows were obtained. The positions of the windows (see
Fig. 2b) are exactly where the connections of two adjacent
polymeric spheres were. This observation indicates that a
higher concentration of the carbon precursor solution can lead
to thicker shells of the polymeric spheres. Further experiments
showed that further carbonization of the polymeric spheres
with or without windows at 800 uC did not alter the ordered
carbon structures in spite of slight framework shrinkage.
Fig. 1 (a) Low and high (inset) magnification SEM images of the
polymer coated macroporous silica and (b) 3D macroporous polymer
structure after removal of the silica shell. The arrow indicates a broken
hollow sphere.
2570 | J. Mater. Chem., 2005, 15, 2569–2574 This journal is � The Royal Society of Chemistry 2005
Publ
ishe
d on
16
May
200
5. D
ownl
oade
d by
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
onne
ctic
ut o
n 29
/10/
2014
11:
02:4
8.
View Article Online
Upon carbonization at 800 uC, disassembly of the 3D
periodic carbon structures by using sonication yielded
individual carbon capsules as can be seen from the SEM
images in Fig. 3a and b. Both sucrose and FA precursors
produced carbon capsules of uniform diameter. Shown in
Fig. 3c and d are the TEM images of the carbon spheres
fabricated with different infiltration cycles. It can be seen that
the thickness of the carbon shell, which is controllable with
repeating the infiltration–heating cycle, is relatively uniform.
The thickness of the shell after one infiltration, which is
about 21 nm, was increased to about 60 nm after four
infiltrations. However, it must be noted that the shell thickness
can not be increased infinitely with repeated infiltration–
heating cycle. In other words, solid spheres can not be
synthesized using the infiltration–heating method because
repeated infiltration will block the pore necks of the 3D
macroporous silica template, preventing the subsequent
infiltration.8
The above experimental data demonstrate that the method
described here has switched complex chemical means to a
simple physical strategy for fabrication of novel carbon
structures,7 thus can be generalized to prepare various
carbon structures because the silica surface can be easily
wetted by many carbon precursors while no extra efforts to
avoid aggregation of spheres are needed.17
The nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherm of the hollow
carbon spheres with a hollow core size of about 190 nm in
diameter (sucrose as the precursor) is shown in the ESI.{ The
surface area and total pore volume of the hollow carbon
spheres were calculated to be 630 m2 g21 and 0.63 mL g21,
respectively. The large volume of nitrogen adsorbed at the low
relative pressure region, together with a sharp increase in
the volume adsorbed at the relative pressure of about 0.95
due to capillary condensation indicate the existence of both
micropores and macropores in the material. The pore size
distribution data calculated using the Dubinin–Astakhov
method showed that the micropores are uniform with a
narrow pore size distribution centered at about 1.4 nm. The
presence of the micropores is due to the carbonization of the
carbon precursor.27 As a result, the hollow carbon spheres
possess a microporous carbon shell.
In the present work, solid spheres were also obtained by
manipulating experimental parameters. As seen from the
broken edges of the spheres shown in Fig. 4, the spheres have
solid cores. It is believed that the heating process plays an
important part in forming this solid structure. As the
infiltrated sucrose solution was dried at room temperature,
no polymer formed during this process. Thus, the subsequent
infiltrations would allow the precursor solution to dissolve the
solidified sucrose of the previous infiltration. The highest
sucrose concentration used in this work was 33.3 wt%,
however, the solubility of sucrose is about 2.02 g sucrose per
1 g water at 20 uC, which is about 66.9 wt%. As a result, the
sucrose concentration in the pores can be much higher than the
Fig. 2 SEM images of hollow polymer spheres synthesized with
different sucrose concentrations of (a) 33.3 wt% and (b) 14.3 wt%.
Fig. 3 SEM images of hollow carbon spheres synthesized with (a)
sucrose and (b) FA as the carbon precursors. TEM images of carbon
spheres fabricated with 20 wt% sucrose solution as the carbon
precursor after (c) one infiltration and (d) four infiltrations. Fig. 4 SEM image of solid polymer spheres.
This journal is � The Royal Society of Chemistry 2005 J. Mater. Chem., 2005, 15, 2569–2574 | 2571
Publ
ishe
d on
16
May
200
5. D
ownl
oade
d by
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
onne
ctic
ut o
n 29
/10/
2014
11:
02:4
8.
View Article Online
original precursor solution due to dissolving of the solidified
sucrose, which led to a high viscosity. In addition, the pore
necks which were blocked by the solidified sucrose can be
re-opened by such a dissolving process, facilitating the sub-
sequent infiltrations. Thus after several infiltration cycles, the
pores were fully filled with sucrose solution of high concentra-
tion and viscosity. During the final heating steps at 100 uC and
160 uC, the precursor would not coat on the inner surface of
the silica macropores due to the high viscosity of the sucrose
solution. Instead, the precursor would crosslink to form
solid spheres.
Ordered 3D macroporous silica has been observed to display
a photonic bandgap.2 Upon coating with carbon, its optical
properties are believed to change. Shown in the ESI{ are the
optical photographs of porous silicas with different pore sizes
(220 and 300 nm) before and after coating of one layer of
carbon. After coating, the colors became green and red,
respectively, indicating a red shift of the reflective wavelength.
Because of the presence of different faces of the fcc structure,
multi-colors are seen on the iridescent surfaces. The color
changes can be explained with Bragg’s equation:28
l~2dhkl
ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
n2eff{ sin2 h
q
(1)
where l is the wavelength of the stop band maximum, dhkl is
the inter-planar spacing, neff is the effective refractive index of
the structure, and h is the angle of incident light to the normal
surface. To demonstrate, here we use the [111] direction as the
dominant light-incident direction, the inter-planar spacing can
be calculated with the following equation:
dhkl~d111~ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
2=3ð ÞDp
(2)
where D is the pore diameter of the porous silica. The effective
refractive index of the structure is related to the volume
fractions of carbon, silica and air that can be obtained from
the following equation:28
neff 5 nairfair + ncarbonfcarbon + nsilicafsilica (3)
where f is the volume fraction of the compositional materials.
The refractive indexes of carbon, silica and air are taken as
2.1,29 1.4 and 1.
The calculated results (see ESI{ for details of calculation)
showed that before infiltration, the wavelengths of the stop
bands of the macroporous silicas with pore diameters of 220
and 300 nm are 397 and 541 nm, respectively. Upon one-time
infiltration, the wavelengths will increase to 534 and 730 nm,
respectively. The calculated wavelengths of the reflectance
waves are consistent with the dominating colors of the sample
surfaces shown in the ESI.{Because carbon has a higher refractive index than air, when
the partial volume of the silica voids is occupied by a layer of
carbon, the effective refractive index of the carbon-coated
silica will increase. Thus, the refractive index of the carbon-
coated 3D silica structures can be finely tuned for photonic
applications. With a plane wave expansion (PWE) method,30
the photonic band structures of a macroporous silica before
and after coating of carbon of different thicknesses were
simulated and are shown in ESI.{ It can be seen that by
manipulating the thickness of the carbon shell, the photonic
band structures can be varied (e.g. the mid-gap frequency and
the gap-width of the pseudo-gap at the L point changes
with the variation of the thickness of coated carbon layer).
Thus, the strategy described in this work offers a route to
finely tuning the optical properties of 3D photonic crystals.
The size of the necks between the air holes of the
macroporous silica template and the thickness of the coated
carbon shell are two important parameters determining the
structure of the resultant carbons. As schematically illustrated
in Fig. 5a, if the size of the necks of the macroporous silica
template is relatively large, a carbon precursor will coat on the
surfaces of both the interior pores and the necks. The resultant
carbon will be an integrated macroporous carbon structure
instead of individual hollow carbon spheres. This has been
confirmed by the SEM image of a macroporous carbon
templated by a porous silica with a neck size of 100 nm
(Fig. 5b). On the other hand, if the size of the necks of the
macroporous silica is relatively small, the necks will be
blocked by the carbon precursor. Thus, when the macroporous
carbon is disassembled, individual hollow carbon spheres can
be obtained, which has been confirmed by the SEM image of
a carbon structure templated by a porous silica with a neck
size of 20 nm (Fig. 5c).
The thickness of the coated carbon is also important to the
structure of the resultant carbon. Upon disassembly by
sonication, the carbon spheres from which the 3D carbon
structure was made up of are separated because of the strong
Fig. 5 (a) Schematic illustration of coating mechanisms in porous
silica templates with different neck sizes. SEM images of hollow
spheres with (b) and without open windows (c).
2572 | J. Mater. Chem., 2005, 15, 2569–2574 This journal is � The Royal Society of Chemistry 2005
Publ
ishe
d on
16
May
200
5. D
ownl
oade
d by
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
onne
ctic
ut o
n 29
/10/
2014
11:
02:4
8.
View Article Online
mechanical force applied during sonication. Normally, frac-
ture occurs across inter-sphere walls because the stress there is
stronger than that of other places.25 Thus, if the carbon shell is
thin, the wall between the two spheres will belong to only one
of them when breaking up takes place. It should be noted that
in a fcc structure each sphere connects with twelve neighbors.
So it is not easy to obtain hollow carbon spheres without
opened windows. However, if the carbon shell is thick enough,
the shared carbon wall will break into two pieces and keep
both spheres intact at the broken site. Here this breaking is not
even as can be seen from the SEM image shown in Fig. 5c. The
concave surfaces of the spheres are due to loss of carbon
during disassembly. From the above discussion it can be
concluded that by precisely controlling the thickness of the
coated carbon shell and the size of the necks of the porous
silica template, either 3D macroporous carbon structures or
individual hollow carbon spheres can be prepared.
In this work a walnut-like carbon structure was also
obtained as shown in Fig. 6a. According to the experiment,
the structure was only obtained when the concentration of the
sucrose solution is high (33.3 wt%) and the necks among
the template pores are relative large (larger than 50 nm).
Apparently, it resembles the morphology of the carbon
structure shown in Fig. 5b. However, a closer look revealed
that the hollow body is separated into several cells with
partition carbon walls. The scheme shown in Fig. 6b can be
used to help understand the formation of this carbon structure.
Heating of the sucrose solution infiltrated in the 3D macro-
porous silica at 100 uC produces small bubbles, which will
coalesce to form large bubbles in the regions of the necks. With
further evaporation of the solvent, larger bubbles will continue
to grow at the expense of smaller ones. In the meantime, the
viscosity of the sucrose solution increases, resulting in
solidification of the solution. When the solidified precursor is
rigid enough, the bubbles separated by the solidified precursor
are no longer growing. Eventually, hollow spheres with
partition walls can be obtained.
Conclusion
In summary, template synthesis of novel carbon structures
including 3D macroporous carbon, micron-scale hollow
carbon spheres with and without partition carbon walls,
and carbon solid spheres has been demonstrated. Instead of
involving complex chemical coating steps, the method
described here is simple and versatile, allowing one to fabricate
various carbon structures simply by controlling the neck size of
a 3D macroporous silica template and fabrication parameters
such as concentration and infiltration time of carbon
precursor, neck size of the porous silica template.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Agency for Science, Technology
and Research (A*STAR) of Singapore.
Zuocheng Zhou, Qingfeng Yan, Fabing Su and X. S. Zhao*Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, NationalUniversity of Singapore, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore 119260.E-mail: [email protected]; Fax: +65-67791936; Tel: +65-67794727
References
1 F. Schuth, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 3604.2 A. Stein, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2001, 44–45, 227.3 A. Stein, Adv. Mater., 2003, 15, 763.4 C. Lopez, Adv. Mater., 2003, 15, 1679.5 S. A. Asher, V. L. Alexeev, A. V. Goponenko, A. C. Sharma,
I. K. Lednev, C. S. Wilcox and D. N. Finegold, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,2003, 125, 3322.
6 S. A. Johnson, P. J. Ollivier and T. E. Mallouk, Science, 1999, 283,963.
7 P. Jiang, J. F. Bertone and V. L. Colvin, Science, 2001, 291, 453.8 Z. Lei, J. Li, Y. Ke, Y. Zhang, H. Zhang, F. Li and J. Xing,
J. Mater. Chem., 2001, 11, 2930.9 H. Wang, J.-S. Yu, X.-D. Li and D.-P. Kim, Chem. Commun.,
2004, 2352.10 H. Mıguez, N. Tetreault, S. M. Yang, V. Kitaev and G. A. Ozin,
Adv. Mater., 2003, 15, 597.11 M. Inagaki, K. Kaneko and T. Nishizawa, Carbon, 2004, 42, 1401.12 S. H. Joo, S. J. Choi, I. Oh, J. Kwak, Z. Liu, O. Terasaki and
R. Ryoo, Nature, 2001, 412, 169.13 T. Kyotani, Carbon, 2000, 38, 269.14 P. G. Collins, A. Zettl, H. Bando, A. Thess and R. E. Smalley,
Science, 1997, 278, 100.15 A. C. Dillon and M. J. Heben, Appl. Phys. A, 2001, 72, 133.16 J. Jang and B. Lim, Adv. Mater., 2002, 14, 1390.17 J. Jang and H. Ha, Chem. Mater., 2003, 15, 2109.18 M. Kim, S. B. Yoon, K. Sohn, J. Y. Kim, C.-H. Shin, T. Hyeon
and J.-S. Yu, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2003, 63, 1.19 S. B. Yoon, K. Sohn, J. Y. Kim, C.-H. Shin, J.-S. Yu and T. Hyeon,
Adv. Mater., 2002, 14, 19.20 R. Ryoo, S. H. Joo and S. Jun, J. Phys. Chem. B, 1999, 103, 7743.21 S.-E. Shim, Y.-J. Cha, J.-M. Byun and S. Choe, J. Appl. Polym.
Sci., 1999, 71, 2259.22 Z. Zhou and X. S. Zhao, Langmuir, 2004, 20, 1524.23 B. Gates, S. H. Park and Y. Xia, Adv. Mater., 2000, 12, 653.24 S. Jun, S. H. Joo, R. Ryoo, M. Kruk, M. Jaroniec, Z. Liu,
T. Ohsuna and O. Terasaki, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 10712.
Fig. 6 (a) SEM image of walnut-like novel carbon hollow spheres
with separated cells (the arrow indicates partition wall). (b) Schematic
illustration of the formation of the walnut-like carbon hollow spheres.
This journal is � The Royal Society of Chemistry 2005 J. Mater. Chem., 2005, 15, 2569–2574 | 2573
Publ
ishe
d on
16
May
200
5. D
ownl
oade
d by
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
onne
ctic
ut o
n 29
/10/
2014
11:
02:4
8.
View Article Online
25 A. A. Zakhidov, R. H. Baughman, Z. Iqbal, C. Cui, I. Khayrullin,S. O. Dantas, J. Marti and V. G. Ralchenko, Science, 1998, 282, 897.
26 J. C. Kim, Y. N. Kim, E. O. Chi, N. H. Hur, S. B. Yoon andJ.-S. Yu, J. Mater. Res., 2003, 18, 780.
27 Z. Lei, Y. Zhang, H. Wang, Y. Ke, J. Li, F. Li and J. Xing,J. Mater. Chem., 2001, 11, 1975.
28 R. C. Schroden, M. Al-Daous, C. F. Blanford and A. Stein, Chem.Mater., 2002, 14, 3305.
29 M. W. Perpall, K. P. U. Perera, J. DiMaio, J. Ballato, S. H. Foulgerand D. W. Smith, Langmuir, 2003, 19, 7153.
30 R. D. Meade, A. M. Rappe, K. D. Brommer, J. D. Joannopoulosand O. L. Alerhand, Phys. Rev. B, 1993, 48, 8434.
2574 | J. Mater. Chem., 2005, 15, 2569–2574 This journal is � The Royal Society of Chemistry 2005
Publ
ishe
d on
16
May
200
5. D
ownl
oade
d by
Uni
vers
ity o
f C
onne
ctic
ut o
n 29
/10/
2014
11:
02:4
8.
View Article Online