replacing the tapi pipeline with tii?

12
Replacing TAPI Pipeline with TII? Iakovos Alhadeff A very nice article by the Diplomat, titled “Modi in Central Asia: Goodbye TAPI, Hello TII?”, July 2015. The article refers to the Indian Prime Minister’s travel to Turkmenistan, and to the Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India Pipeline (TAPI), which has been promoted by India and the USA during the last quite a few years. For a very rough sketch of TAPI see the red line on the following map. It seems that the Indians are a bit tired of waiting TAPI. The construction of the pipeline is very difficult because the pipeline will have to cross Afghanistan and pass through the Talibans before reaching India.

Upload: iakovosal

Post on 11-Aug-2015

34 views

Category:

News & Politics


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Replacing the TAPI Pipeline with TII?

Replacing TAPI Pipeline with TII?

Iakovos Alhadeff

A very nice article by the Diplomat, titled “Modi in Central Asia: Goodbye

TAPI, Hello TII?”, July 2015. The article refers to the Indian Prime

Minister’s travel to Turkmenistan, and to the Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-

Pakistan-India Pipeline (TAPI), which has been promoted by India and the

USA during the last quite a few years. For a very rough sketch of TAPI see

the red line on the following map. It seems that the Indians are a bit tired of

waiting TAPI. The construction of the pipeline is very difficult because the

pipeline will have to cross Afghanistan and pass through the Talibans before

reaching India.

Page 2: Replacing the TAPI Pipeline with TII?

The Indian Prime Minister said that after a deal was reached for Iran’s

nuclear program, an alternative to TAPI should be considered, and more

specifically the TII solution (Turkmenistan-Iran-Pakistan-India). India

would like to avoid Pakistan, her great opponent, and in the past Iran and

India examined the possibility of the Iran-Oman-India Pipeline. See yellow

line on the map. However even this pipeline would have to pass through the

Exclusive Economic Zone of Pakistan, in order to be economically viable.

Therefore it seems that only through Pakistan a pipeline can reach India. The

other option would be a pipeline from Russia and China, but that would

involve China i.e. India’s other great rival. See purple line on the map.

India has of course the option of building LNG plants in order to receive

liquefied natural gas and convert it to its original form. There are already

LNG plants at India’s coasts, but LNG has two disadvantages. The first one

is that it costs a lot more, and the second is that in case of a war, a rival’s

navy can block energy supplies.

China on the other hand, is promoting the Iran-Pakistan pipeline, and at the

same time she is promoting the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC).

Therefore China will be able to receive Iranian oil and natural gas through

her two allies, Iran and Pakistan, without India interfering at all. The China

Pakistan Economic Corridor is a network of roads, railways and pipelines

that will be constructed by Pakistan and China, and it will be mainly

financed by China. The CPEC involves over 40 billion dollars investments.

For a very good article about the energy game between China and India you

can read the Diplomats “Modi and the Sino-Indian Game for Iranian Gas”,

July 2015. See following link.

Page 3: Replacing the TAPI Pipeline with TII?

http :// thediplomat . com /2015/07/ modi - and - the - sino - indian - game - for - iranian -

gas /

The first article that I mentioned wonders whether the TII pipeline solution,

as proposed by India, will also meet the US geopolitical objectives, so that

the Americans can support it too. The Diplomat mentions that theoretically

speaking the TAPI is not dead, but it also says that the TII might be born

from TAPI’s ashes. Even though I do not know whether TAPI is dead for

good, I know for sure that the Americans will not be very happy with

Turkmenistan-Iran-Pakistan-India Pipeline. They might accept it in the end,

but for the Americans the TII is not a replacement for the TAPI. I say that

after taking into account what the Americans expect from Turkmenistan.

Turkmenistan is one of the richest countries in the world in terms of natural

gas reserves. It is the 4th richest country, as you can see at the following

Wikipedia link.

Page 4: Replacing the TAPI Pipeline with TII?

Some other measurements show Turkmenistan in the 6th place, as you can

see in the following table of the Energy Information Administration. I

believe the difference arises when shale gas is also taken into account, but I

am not sure. What is important though is that Turkmenistan is one of the

richest countries in the world in terms of natural gas reserves.

For the time being Turkmenistan is tied to China, which is the main buyer of

Turkmen gas. The only other solution for Turkmenistan is Russia.

Turkmenistan can export its gas to Europe through Russia, but Russia is for

Turkmenistan a competitor, and a lot should be paid to Russia in terms of

transit fees and commissions. Therefore both the United States and

Turkmenistan would like to find another export route for the Turkmen gas.

Turkmenistan wants that in order not to rely completely on China, which

Page 5: Replacing the TAPI Pipeline with TII?

will allow it to get better prices, and the Americans want that because they

do not want such a rich country in natural gas to be totally controlled by

China.

Turkmenistan has two choices. The first one is through the Trans-Caspian

pipeline, the blue line on the map, which will allow Turkmenistan to export

its natural gas to Europe through Turkey, and the other is the TAPI pipeline,

which will allow Turkmenistan to export its gas to Asia. At the following

map you can see the two options that the Americans have in order to send

the Turkmen gas to Europe and Asia, avoiding Russia, Iran and China. The

available routes are between the black lines.

Therefore the Iran solution is not the best one, given that Iran is a

geopolitical rival for the US, and a commercial rival for Turkmenistan.

Turkmenistan would prefer not to count on Iran for one more reason i.e. to

Page 6: Replacing the TAPI Pipeline with TII?

avoid paying transit fees. For Iran however this would be a good deal,

because it would prevent Turkmen gas to flow to Asia on its own, competing

Iran. Also note that Iran and Russia are blocking the Trans-Caspian pipeline,

which could send Turkmen gas to Europe.

The Americans recently reached a deal with the Iranians, about Iran’s

nuclear program. But that does not mean that the Americans and the Iranians

suddenly became best friends. The Americans need the Iranians, in order to

supply their allies in Europe through the Southern Energy Corridor i.e.

through Turkey. The Americans also needed to make an agreement with

Iran, because if Iran’s oil and natural gas comes to the market, the prices of

oil and natural gas will be pushed downwards, which is a very good thing for

the big importers of oil and natural gas i.e. USA, Europe and China. But the

fact that the Americans need the Iranians does not mean that the deal will

work out perfectly. Only time will tell.

Therefore the pipeline proposed by India i.e. the TII, is not really a

replacement for the TAPI pipeline, as far as the Americans are concerned.

For India on the other hand, a traditional Russian ally, and a country which

has very good relations with Iran, the TII is a very good alternative to the

TAPI one. India is a traditional Russian ally, but recently, due to her rivalry

with China, she improved relations with the US as well. That’s why India

did not want to push for a solution that involved Iran, as is the case with the

TII pipeline. But now the Americans have reached a deal with the Iranians.

The Americans do not like the Iranians, but that does not change the fact that

they reached a deal with them. Therefore it is very reasonable for India to

Page 7: Replacing the TAPI Pipeline with TII?

promote a solution that also involves Iran. After all, for how many more

years can India wait for the TAPI pipeline?

On the other hand, for the Americans the TAPI pipeline is good for one

more reason. TAPI would stitch together Turkmenistan, Afghanistan and

Pakistan, and that would be a very positive thing for NATO. One should not

forget that the Taliban have been traditionally supported by the Saudis and

the Pakistanis. Recently, because the TAPI pipeline also hurts the Iranian

interests, the Iranians have been supporting the Taliban too, even though the

Talibans have been a traditional Iranian rival. But today both the Arabs and

the Iranians want to block the TAPI pipeline. If the TAPI was constructed,

the Pakistanis would have a motive to help the US and not the Saudis and

the Iranians in Afghanistan. That’s why the Diplomat says that with the

TAPI the Americans want to “stitch” Afghanistan in Central Asia.

But the TAPI seems to be a very difficult project for the US. After all the

Americans sent their army for almost 10 years in Afghanistan. If they did

not manage to get rid of the Talibans during that time, how on earth are they

ever going to make it? A pipeline network that runs through a country

partially controlled by terrorists, as is the case with Afghanistan, is

condemned to be always full of holes. With the Arabs and the Iranians being

united against TAPI, the Indian proposal might seem to be the only realistic

one. It remains to be seen whether the Americans will give up on the TAPI

pipeline or not, which will heavily depend on how things between the

Americans and the Iranians turn out.

For the first article of the Diplomat that I mention see:

Page 8: Replacing the TAPI Pipeline with TII?

“Modi in Central Asia: Goodbye TAPI, Hello TII?”, Ιούλιος 2015

http://thediplomat.com/2015/07/modi-in-central-asia-goodbye-tapi-hello-tii/