regulating emerging robotic technologies in europe ... · regulating emerging robotic technologies...
TRANSCRIPT
3/19/14
Regulating EmergingRobotic
Technologies in Europe: RoboticsFacing
Law and Ethicswww.robolaw.eu
3/19/14
The RoboLaw project Programme “Capacities” - Call ID “FP7-SCIENCE-IN-SOCIETY-2011-1” Topic: SiS.2011.1.1.1-3 Regulating
emerging scientific and technological developments. EU Financial Contribution: 1.497.966 EUR.
Duration: 27 Months.
PROJECT MAIN OBJECTIVETo investigate the relationship between different form of
regulation and technological developments, starting from the state of the art of existing legal provisions, and aiming to
adapt and create rules for emerging innovative technologies. 4 ) Ludwig Maximilians
Universitat, Munich, Germany
Department of Philosophy
3 ) University of Reading, England (UK)
School of Systems Engineering
2 ) Tilburg University, the Netherlands
Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology, and Society
1 ) Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa, Italy
BioRobotics and DIRPOLIS Institutes
RoboLawConsortium
Kick Off MeetingMarch 5th, 2012
Odense, European Robotics Forum
www.robolaw.eu
3/19/14
The RoboLaw project
The most important outcome of the research will be the “Guidelines on
Regulating Robotics”, addressed to the European Commission (now due by 31 May
2014)
Programme “Capacities” - Call ID “FP7-SCIENCE-IN-SOCIETY-2011-1” Topic: SiS.2011.1.1.1-3 Regulating emerging scientific and technological
developments. EU Financial Contribution: 1.497.966 EUR.Duration: 27 Months.
www.robolaw.eu
3/19/14
OTHER PROJECT ACTORS
External Advisory Board
Prof. Francesco Donato Busnelli: Professor Emeritus of Civil Law at the Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna of Pisa
Prof. José M. Galván Casas, Professor of Moral Teology Pontificia Università della Santa Croce, Roma, Italy
Prof. Martha J. Farah,director of Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Uni Pennsyvania (US)
Prof. Stefano Rodotà: Professor Emeritus of Civil Law at University “La Sapienza” of Rome
Prof. Maxim Stamenov, Head of the Department of General and Applied Linguistics at IBL, Sofia University, Bulgaria.
Supporting External Network
Ryan Calo, Stanford Law School, The Center for Internet and Society
Yueh-Hsuan Weng, Internet Law Center, Bejing University
Masahiro Kobayashi, lawer, Japan
3/19/14
DustCartDustClean
3/19/14 www.dustbot.org
3/19/14
CAM
CAM
CAM
Beacon
Robot
Internet
Remote Server -
AmI Core
Control Service Center
Robot
Robot
Beacon
Beacon
BeaconBeacon
The DustBot Project aimed at designing, developing and testing a system for improving the management of urban hygiene, based on a network of autonomous and cooperating robots, embedded in an Ambient Intelligence infrastructure.
DustBot Objectives
Docking Station
3/19/14
TheDustBot system tested in Peccioli (Italy)
The test campaign:• started on 15th June and
finished on 7th August 2010
• in the very heart of the town, with people and cars
• with real users: 24 families and 10 business activities
3/19/14
RobotLand
• South Korea, Intelligent Robots Development and Distribution Promotion Act, n. 9014 Mar. 28, 2008
• Nevada, Assembly Bill 511 (2011)• Florida, Committee Substitute House Bill
(CS/HB) 1207 (2012)• California, Senate Bill (SB) 1298 (2012)
Fare clic per modificare lo stile del sottotitolo dello schema
3/19/14
WP2INTEGRATION OF
TECHNOLOGY INTO SOCIETY: GOVERNANCE
PATTERNS
Fare clic per modificare lo stile del sottotitolo dello schema
3/19/14
Fare clic per modificare lo stile del sottotitolo dello schema
3/19/14
3/19/14
Table of Contents
Erica Palmerini, Introduction
First Section
Regulating Technology: Theoretical Perspectives
Stefano Rodotà, Technology and Regulation: A Two-way Discourse
Bert-Jaap Koops, Multiple Dimensions of Technology Regulation: an Overview
Fabrizio Cafaggi, Technical Standardization and Transnational private Regulation
Astrid Zei, Rule of Law at Stake: the Increasing Role of Private Norms and Standards in the European Legal System
Amedeo Santosuosso, Is there a Need for a General Theory of Law and Technology?
Antonio Carnevale – Alberto Pirni, The Challenge of Regulating the Emerging Technologies and the Role of Philosophy: Some Methodological Considerations
3/19/14
Table of Contents
Second Section
Regulating Technology: A Case-Scenario Approach
Eleonora Sirsi, Agri-food Technologies and the Law
Alessandra Arcuri, Risk Regulation: Comparing Alternative Regulatory Paradigms
Anton Vedder, Regulating Robotic Technologies: The Problems of Legitimacy and Acceptance of Robots
Marco D'Ostuni, Communication Technologies and the Law: Lessons for Technology Regulation
Elettra Stradella, Internet and the Law: suggestions for Robotics
Michele Passaro, Technical regulation and the role of independent regulatory authorities
Gurvinder S. Virk, The Role of Standardisation in the Regulation of Robotic Technologies
Luca Nocco, Medical guidelines between hard law and soft law
3/19/14
WP3ROADMAPPING ROBOLAW
• D3.2 Inventory of current state of robolaw
• D3.2 A methodology to analyse existing legal provisions
• D3.3 Opportunities and risks of robotics in relation to human values
3/19/14
Workshop on “Opportunities and risks of robotics in relation to human values”, Tilburg, 23-24 April 2013
• Isabelle Audier – Fundamental Rights and Freedoms of Robots
• Andrea Bertolini – Robots as Products Enhancing Human Values
• Rik van den Brule & Pim Haseleger – Roboticists on the edge of the liability cliff: Why robots should build trust
• Angela Di Carlo – Robotic technologies and the human body: rethinking the notion of bodily integrity and its role as a limit to the freedom to use one’s body
• Madeleine de Cock Buning – Autonomous creation: human values and fundamental rights
• Bert-Jaap Koops – Robotics, human enhancement and human rights
• Ronald Leenes – Super Crunchers, Big Data, and Dr. Watson in view of dignity and self determination
• Alberto Pirni – The Challenge of Fairness in relation to Robotic Technologies: Considerations for a Philosophical and Legal Agenda
• Anton Vedder – Will technological innovation save the health care system?
3/19/14
Workshop on “Opportunities and risks of robotics in relation to human values”, Tilburg, 23-24 April 2013
• Madeleine de Cock Buning – Autonomous creation: human values and fundamental rights
• Bert-Jaap Koops – Robotics, human enhancement and human rights
• Ronald Leenes – Super Crunchers, Big Data, and Dr. Watson in view of dignity and self determination
• Alberto Pirni – The Challenge of Fairness in relation to Robotic Technologies: Considerations for a Philosophical and Legal Agenda
• Anton Vedder – Will technological innovation save the health care system?
3/19/14
WP4: INVESTIGATING ON THE LEGAL STATUS OF ROBOTICS
• D4.1 Taxonomy of robotic tecnologies
• D4.2 State-of-the-art in robotic research: case-studies from SSSA Laboratories
• D4.3 Taxonomy of human capabilities in a world of robotics
3/19/14
D4.1 Taxonomy of Robotic Technologies
• Matter or embodiment• Autonomy Level• Function• Environment• Human-robot Interaction
3/19/14
WP5HUMAN ENHANCEMENT, HUMAN
CONDITION, FUTURE TECHNOLOGIES
3/19/14
• D5.1 – An ethical-philosophical analysis of the human enhancement
• D5.2 Workshop TILT, Tilburg University, 15-16 November 2012 on Human Enhancement
• Beyond Therapy v Enhancement? Multidisciplinary analyses of a heated debate (A Vedder – F Lucivero, eds), Pisa University Press, 2013
• D5.4 Ethical and Legal Aspects of Enhancing Human Capabilities Through Robotics, Law, Innovation and Tecnology, Special Issue, vol 5 ( 2) 2013
3/19/14
3/19/14
• Kevin Warwick – Ethical and Social Implications of Robots with Human Brains
• Bert-Jaap Koops – Future technologies and criminal law: Setting boundaries when space, society and self collapse
• Barbara Henry – Embodied imaginaries: From the Golem to the ''post-human condition'‘
• Wendell Wallach – Techno sapiens, moral machines and the combinatorial impact of the emerging technologies
3/19/14
• Noel Sharkey – Delegating the kill decision to autonomous robot weapons
• Julian Nida-Rümelin – Agency- Technology- Responsibility
• Pietro Pietrini – The social brain: Novel insights from neuroscience and genetics
• Bert Gordijn – Human enhancement, moral improvement and future technology
3/19/14
WP6POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS
DEFINING GUIDELINES ON REGULATING ROBOTICS