regent law, may 2013

33
Overview of the Legal Market in the Year 2013 Regent Law Summit May 17, 2013 William D. Henderson Indiana University Maurer School of Law

Upload: william-henderson

Post on 08-May-2015

354 views

Category:

Education


1 download

DESCRIPTION

This presentation was given at the Regent Law Summit in Norfolk, Virginia on May 17, 2013. It summarizes the changes occurring in the legal profession from the end of World War II to the present. It also reviews trend data and entry of nonlawyer entrepreneurs in the legal industry. The presentation ends with a discussion of the implications for legal education.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Regent law, May 2013

Overview of the Legal Marketin the Year 2013

Regent Law SummitMay 17, 2013

William D. HendersonIndiana University Maurer School of Law

Page 2: Regent law, May 2013

Agenda

1. Overview of market2. Q&A3. Issues facing practicing bar

Page 3: Regent law, May 2013

1. Overview

Page 4: Regent law, May 2013

Legal Profession

Circa 1905, 1945, 1985

Page 5: Regent law, May 2013

Legal Services Industry

Legal Industry

Legal Profession

Circa 2012

Asia, Automation, Abundance

Page 6: Regent law, May 2013

Private PracticeCirca 1948

• 163,000 Lawyers

• 45.0% w/ college degrees; 74.5% w/ law degrees

• 1.64 lawyers per firm

• 1.9 % lawyers in firms of 9+ partners

Source: Blaustein, “The 1949 Lawyer Count,” 50 ABA J 370 (1950)

Solos, 61%

Partners, 24%

As-so-ciates

4%Gov’t,

In-House 11%

Lawyers by Role

Page 7: Regent law, May 2013

20th Century

Supply Demand

Sophisticated legal needs

Organizational lawyers

Page 8: Regent law, May 2013

Heinz-Laumann “Two-Hemisphere” Theory

Growth driven by business demand

Corporate Litigation

Office Practice for

Corps

Office Practice for

Persons

Personal Litigation

Growth driven by

Population

1975

Page 9: Regent law, May 2013

Heinz-Laumann “Two-Hemisphere” Theory

Growth driven by business demand

Corporate Litigation

Office Practice for

Corps

Office Practice for

Persons

Personal Litigation

Growth driven by

Population

1995

Page 10: Regent law, May 2013
Page 11: Regent law, May 2013

US Lawyer Population(1951-2000)

0

200,000

400,000

600,000

800,000

1,000,000

1,200,000

1951 1960 1971 1980 1991 2000

Year

Lawyer Population

Page 12: Regent law, May 2013

US Lawyer Population(1951-2000)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

0

200,000

400,000

600,000

800,000

1,000,000

1,200,000

1951 1960 1971 1980 1991 2000

Year

Lawyer Population

Page 13: Regent law, May 2013

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 20100

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

700,000

800,000

900,000

1,000,000

1,100,000

1,200,000

988,898

1,122,723 1,074,994

Total Law Firm Employment, 1998 to 2010

Total Employment Moving average (Total Employment)

Year

Tota

l Num

ber o

f Em

ploy

ees

Generated by William Henderson (June 2012)

Page 14: Regent law, May 2013

19851986

19871988

19891990

19911992

19931994

19951996

19971998

19992000

20012002

20032004

20052006

20072008

20092010

20110

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

Incoming 1L Classes, ABA-Accredited Law Schools1985 to 2011

Incoming 1L Class, All Schools 2-Year Moving Average

Source: ABA Section on Legal Education and Admission to the Bar, Chart generated by William Henderson (July 2012)

15% increase in Law Schools (175 to 201)19% increase in 1L enrollment

Page 15: Regent law, May 2013

19851986

19871988

19891990

19911992

19931994

19951996

19971998

19992000

20012002

20032004

20052006

20072008

20092010

20110%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

% of Entry Level Jobs in Private Practice1985 to 2011

% of Entry Level Jobs in Private Practice 2-Year Moving AverageSource: NALP Bulletin, July 2012, charts generated by William Henderson

Page 16: Regent law, May 2013

Outcomes for the Class of 2011

Bar Passage Required, FTLT;

55.2%

JD Advantaged FTLT, 8.1%

Professional FTLT, 3.9%

Other Outcomes; 32.8%

Page 17: Regent law, May 2013

Outcomes By USN Rank

Top 14

Tier 1

Tier 2

Tier 3

Tier 4

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

83.1%

59.9%

53.6%

48.2%

45.1%

10.9%

30.2%

33.3%

37.3%

41.5%

BarPassage FTLT JD Advantaged FTLT Professional FTLT Other Outcomes

Page 18: Regent law, May 2013

Market in 2013

Supply Demand

Sophisticated

legal needsOrganizational

lawyers

Page 19: Regent law, May 2013

19992000

20012002

20032004

20052006

20072008

20092010

19981999

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

140%

160%

Change in # of Employees since 1998Legal Services Industry

Law Offices vs. All Other Legal Services

Offices of lawyers All other legal services

% G

row

th in

Em

ploy

ees

Since 2004:Law Offices: -47,729 jobsAll Other Legal Services: + 7,696

Generated by William Henderson (June 2012)

Page 20: Regent law, May 2013
Page 21: Regent law, May 2013
Page 22: Regent law, May 2013

Susskind’s Paradigm

Bespoke Standardized Systematized Packaged Commoditized

Needed human capital:• Information technology• Systems engineering• Finance• Marketing• Project Management• Law

Page 23: Regent law, May 2013

Legal Services Industry

Legal Industry

Legal Profession

Circa 2012

Asia, Automation, Abundance

Page 24: Regent law, May 2013

2. Questions

Page 25: Regent law, May 2013

3. Issues facing practicing bar

Page 26: Regent law, May 2013

Law Firms40%

In-House Legal5%

Government20%

Public Interest / Defender

10%

Judiciary15%

Other10%

Page 27: Regent law, May 2013

4. What do we do next?

Page 28: Regent law, May 2013

1. Yellow: Tech and practice management

2. Pink: Externship for practical skills3. Green: Initiative for ethical

formation / character 4. Orange: Marketing and client

development / Market development

Page 29: Regent law, May 2013

Arc Informed by theory and data

Career Arc

Practice Mastery

Time

Arc under Traditional

model

Graduation

“Whether you think you can, or you think you can't--you're right.” Henry Ford.

Page 30: Regent law, May 2013

Skills, Personality,

Drive= Training +

Playing Time+High Performance

High Performing Lawyer Success Formula

Smarts (IQ) +

30

Page 31: Regent law, May 2013

Cognitive Ability

Frequency

Page 32: Regent law, May 2013

Cognitive Ability

Performance

Page 33: Regent law, May 2013

End

Many thanks!

[email protected]