the use of full-field measurement methods in composite material
TRANSCRIPT
The use of full-field measurement methods in composite material
characterization: interest and limitations
Michel Grediac*
Laboratorie d’Etudes et de Recherches en Mecanique des Structures, Universite Blaise Pascal Clermont II, 24,
Avenue des Landais, BP 206, Aubiere Cedex 63174, France
Abstract
An overview of the use of full-field measurement techniques for composite material and structure characterization reported in the recent
literature is presented in this paper. The features of the main types of measurement techniques are first briefly described. Specific advantages
of using these techniques in a context of composite material characterization are then highlighted. Critical issues that require further research
and development are finally examined.
q 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Identification; B. Mechanical properties; D. Mechanical testing; D. Physical methods of analysis
1. Introduction
During the two last decades, the improvement in image
processing with microcomputers has caused non-contact
measurement techniques to become more and more
popular in the experimental mechanics community. Some
full-field measurement techniques like moire, interfero-
metry or photoelasticimetry were known and used
beforehand. These techniques suffered however from the
non-automatic processing of the fringe patterns they
provided, leading to some heavy, boring and unreliable
by-hand manipulations before obtaining relevant infor-
mation in terms of displacement or strain. In the recent
past, thanks to the dramatic advances in microcomputer
and camera technology, many research groups devoted to
optics, experimental mechanics or data processing have
been developing suitable techniques based on the use of
optical devices, digital cameras, algorithms and softwares
which automatically process images. These techniques
directly provide displacement or strain contours onto
specimens under testing. Temperature fields are also
available thanks to infrared scanning cameras. Such
measurements constitute in fact a new type of tool for
researchers in mechanics of solids, which is especially
interesting in the field of composite material characteriz-
ation. Indeed, composites present some features like
heterogeneities at different scales which render such full-
field measurements very attractive.
It must be emphasized that the above techniques of
strain/displacement components deliver extensometric
informations of deformed surfaces. It is somewhat different
of similar approaches devoted to morphology characteriz-
ation of materials. In this last case, images are captured
directly or through a microscope, digitized and processed to
obtain various geometrical properties of the surface under
investigation. Percentage and orientation of fibers [1],
morphological features of braided composites [2], micro-
crack properties [3] are some examples of use of this type of
image analyses but this point is not addressed in this paper.
The aim here is to examine the interest and the
limitations of full-field measurement techniques in compo-
site materials characterization. The main techniques avail-
able and their main features are presented in the first part of
the paper. Their application in the field of composite
material characterization is addressed in the second part.
The numerical processing of these fields to identify
parameters of constitutive equations is eventually discussed
in the last part of the paper.
2. Full-field measurement techniques
Several types full-field techniques have been proposed
and used in composite material characterization in the
last decade. The nature of the measurements can be
1359-835X/$ - see front matter q 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.01.019
Composites: Part A 35 (2004) 751–761
www.elsevier.com/locate/compositesa
* Tel.: þ33-4-73-40-75-29; fax: þ33-4-73-40-74-94.
E-mail address: [email protected] (M. Grediac).
displacement, strain or temperature. Displacements are
measured with various techniques [4], for instance speckle
[5], speckle interferometry [6], geometric moire [7], moire
interferometry [8], holographic interferometry [9], image
correlation [10] or grid method [11]. Strain can be obtained
by numerical differentiation of the above displacement
fields with suitable algorithms [12] or directly, for instance
with shearography [13,14], speckle shearing photography
[15] or by moire fringes shifting [16]. These techniques can
be classified according to various criteria based on the
nature of the physical phenomenon involved. For instance,
non-interferometric (speckle, grid method) and interfero-
metric (speckle interferometry, moire interferometry)
techniques [17] are the two main categories of techniques
which are discussed below. Note that temperature fields can
also be measured with infrared cameras [18,19,20], but the
features of this technique are not recalled below.
2.1. Displacement field measurement techniques with
non-interferometric methods
2.1.1. Speckle photography
When a rough surface is illuminated with a coherent
light, the rays are scattered in all directions and at all
distances from the surface. The scattered waves distribution
displays a random spatial variation of intensity called
speckle pattern which contrast mainly depends on the
degree of coherence of the incident radiation and the surface
roughness. The scattered rays are usually collected with a
lens and focused on a screen. Speckle patterns are in fact
randomly coded patterns, which carry information about the
surface under investigation. Moreover, if the surface
undergoes changes, the position and the irradiance of the
pattern are changed. Techniques that monitor the positional
changes of the speckles are classified under speckle
photography. The displacement field is obtained by
calculating the so-called cross-correlation function
kI0ðx; yÞ; Iðx; yÞl; where I0ðx; yÞ and Iðx; yÞ are, respectively,
the intensity distribution before and after loading of the
specimen. Such calculations are carried out with suitable
algorithms after digitizing the image captured by a camera.
The main advantage of the speckle method is the ability to
measure large and out-of-plane displacements. Several
books or review articles are devoted to this technique
[21–24] for instance.
2.1.2. Image correlation
Generally, it does not matter how the speckles are
formed in the above method. Hence, incoherent light can
be used. Surfaces under investigation can therefore be
prepared with white painting and sprayed with a black
aerosol. This leads to a random structured aspect, which
can be observed with a digital camera. In this case, the
speckles can be considered as physically attached to the
surface unlike the above laser speckles. Since incoherent
white light is used, neither laser nor specific optical device
are required. Moreover, the preparation of the surface is
very simple and the displacements are easily obtained by
matching different zones of two images captured before
and after loading of the specimen. This image processing is
performed with the same type of algorithms as above. This
method is therefore easy to use and straightforward, as
illustrated by the literature on this subject [10,25–27] for
instance, but its sensitivity is lower than laser speckle
because of larger speckle size. This method is popular
thanks to its simplicity.
2.1.3. Geometric moire and grid method
Analyzing the evolution of a regular network of
equispaced and parallel lines which deform is the base of
the grid and moire methods. In the first case, the network is
physically attached to the surface of the specimen [28]
whereas it is obtained with some geometric methods in the
second one. For instance, in-plane moire fringes [29–31]
are obtained by superposing a grating applied to a surface
and a second one called reference grating. When the
specimen is loaded or moved, a fringe pattern is generated
since the location of the lines relative to the reference
grating changes. These fringes represent the component of
the displacement normal to the reference grating. Out-of-
plane displacements normal to the surface plane are
represented by the fringes of a shadow moire [32]. In this
case, fringes are obtained by superposing a grating placed in
front of the surface and its shadow. Such optical arrange-
ments are used in practice to determine the deflection field
of bent or vibrating plates. Finally, slopes are determined
with reflection moire [33]. In this case, fringes are produced
by superposing a grating placed in front of the surface and
its shadow.
2.2. Displacement field measurement techniques with
interferometric methods
Interferometric methods increase sensitivity of the above
methods by more than one order of magnitude. They are
however susceptible to environmental disturbances like
vibrations because of their high sensitivity. Moire inter-
ferometry and electronic speckle pattern interferometry
(ESPI) are the two main methods which have been
developed for displacement measurement.
2.2.1. Moire interferometry
The superposition of two coherent laser beams of light
provides interference and fringes which can be considered as
regular reference grids which frequency is usually greater
than 1000 lines/mm. Moire interferometry is based on the
same physical phenomenon as the above geometric moire
methods, but it can be observed that the grating frequency is
much greater. This method therefore extends the possibilities
of the moire method to the submicron level [8]. First, a
specimen grating has to be imprinted onto the surface of the
specimen. The grating is obtained by exposing a photographic
M. Grediac / Composites: Part A 35 (2004) 751–761752
plate to a two-beam interference pattern. The resulting fringes
overcoated with a thin layer of aluminum are then transferred
to the specimen with a layer of epoxy. The reference grating is
also obtained via two-beam interference. The superposition
of these two gratings provides moire fringes from which in-
plane displacement are deduced. Out-of-plane displacements
can also be measured [34]. In this case, the reference grating is
placed perpendicular to the surface. The superposition of the
first beam generated by reflection from the specimen surface
and the second one reflected from the reference grating
provides moire fringes since the first beam is distorted by the
out-of-plane deformation of the specimen. Consequently, the
fringes here are contours of the out-of-plane displacement.
2.2.2. Electronic speckle pattern interferometry
ESPI is based on the coherent addition of the scattered
light from the specimen surface and a reference laser beam
[5,35,36]. The phase changes within one speckle because of
the object displacement are coded by the reference beam
with the assumption that the microstructure is modified. The
displacement field is extracted by correlation of two speckle
patterns, one taken before and one taken after object
displacement. The method requires surfaces, which scatter
light. Hence neither grating nor smooth surface are
necessary.
2.3. Strain field measurement techniques with
interferometric methods
Only a few techniques directly provide strain fields
among which the shearing interferometry is the most
popular. The principle of shearing interferometry is to
interfere an optical wavefront with a shifted copy of itself
[37]. The resulting fringes are related to the gradient of the
optical phase from which the gradient of the displacement
are deduced. Strain components or local rotations are
therefore directly obtained from these measurements.
Various devices have been proposed in the literature to
create this shearing effect [14,38–42]. Ligtenberg proposed
a double-exposure method to measure curvatures of bent
plates [43]. These quantities are directly proportional to the
surface strain components thanks to the Love-Kirchhoff
assumption [44]. Various optical set-ups providing curva-
ture fields are described in Ref. [45].
2.4. Choosing a method
All the above methods have been used in various
applications of experimental mechanics. An important
question for the user is the optimal choice of the method
for a given problem. The answer is not easy to find for
different reasons:
† the published work is scattered over several journals,
making it difficult for a reader to have ready access to the
information.
† vocabulary and physical phenomena involved in these
techniques come from other fields than mechanics like
optics or data processing. This causes most of potential
users to feel uneasy when reading the description of the
optical arrangements and choosing a method becomes
therefore troublesome.
† the output from a full-field measurement system is
optical data like speckle or fringes in which the
information is encoded. These data must therefore be
processed by a programme to provide displacement or
strain patterns, giving rise to a black box in which the
different steps are often confuse and cannot always be
clearly distinguished.
† the metrological features of any system should be defined
and characterized but extensive data sheets from manu-
facturers are generally not available. Indeed, the word
‘accuracy’ is too general and some important notions
coming from metrological aspects should be clarified. For
instance, any data sheet should at least quantify the
following properties: sensitivity, uncertainty of the
measurements, repeatability, resolution, spatial resolution
[46]. This task is however somewhat difficult to perform
because most of the arrangements are in-house designed.
Moreover, some extrinsic parameters of the optical
methods themselves influence the results like the
displacement or strain gradients in the field or the
performance of the digital camera used for capturing
the fields. Some studies are devoted to the evaluation of
the accuracy of full-field measurement systems [47,48],
but such a concern is too seldom taken into account in the
literature. Standards in this field should have to be urgently
proposed to define some objective criteria, which would
be useful to calibrate and to compare the methods through
round robin confrontations or benchmarks for instance. It
should be pointed out that the Versailles Project on
Advanced Materials and Standards (VAMAS) which is
directly involved in pre-standards research activities has
launched a Technical Working Area called ‘TWA26 Full
Field Optical Stress and Strain Measurements’ which is
devoted to the development of standards for the use offull-
field stress and strain measurement techniques [49]. Some
documents dealing to the evaluation of non-contact
systems are already available [46–48,50,51]. These
papers show that the first problem is to properly define
the terminology, showing that the community of exper-
imental mechanics and composite materials has still much
effort to spend before correctly using calibrated systems.
† programmes which process the images provide very
attractive colorful displacement or strain patterns which
often fascinate the user, avoiding relevant questions
concerning the above issues.
2.5. Image processing
A common property of most of the above methods is
that they produce a fringe pattern as output. The quantity
M. Grediac / Composites: Part A 35 (2004) 751–761 753
of interest (in-plane displacement, deflection, strain) is
coded at the scale of the fringe period. These fringes must
therefore be analyzed to convert them into a continuous
phase map directly proportional to the quantity of interest.
For a more accurate evaluation than just counting the
fringes, the phase fringe pattern has first to be filtered and
processed. Since this pattern contains discontinuities due
to the wrapping of the phase modulo 2p, it must be
unwrapped and finally correctly scaled. The recent
connection between image digital processors, optical test
arrangements and microcomputers has opened new
possibilities for automatically processing these patterns.
Various algorithms are available and described in
Refs. [52,53] for instance. It must be emphasized that
the situation here is somewhat similar as the situation for
the systems themselves described above. Indeed, the
softwares provided with optical set-ups often appear like
‘black boxes’ for the users who are therefore unable to
correctly estimate their capabilities. For instance, the
influence of noisy data on the final quantity provided by
the softwares remains often unknown.
3. Application to the composite material and structure
characterization
3.1. Introduction
In the last volume of the international journal Exper-
imental Mechanics [54], 19 papers over 61 reported the use
of full-field measurement techniques, showing an important
interest of the community of experimental mechanics for
these methods. Full-field measurements are well suited to
analyze the specific mechanical properties of composite
materials because of their anisotropic and heterogeneous
nature. Papers found in the literature which report the use of
full-field measurement techniques for composite material
and structure characterization can be classified for instance
according to the link between measurements and modeling.
Seven groups were found applying this criterion. The link
between measurements and modeling presently increases
from one category to another:
1. non-destructive testing and inspection;
2. verification of boundary conditions applied to tested
coupons;
3. experimental evidence of local gradients due to material
heterogeneities;
4. cracking characterization;
5. verification of assumptions under which theoretical or
numerical models are built;
6. validation of models;
7. identification of constitutive parameters.
Some recent examples belonging to the above categories
are presented in the following sections.
3.2. Non-destructive testing and inspection
Full-field measurement techniques are used in non-
destructive testing and inspection since a defect induces as a
singularity in a field which can easily be detected [55]. In
composites materials, these defects may be due to the
manufacturing process (delaminations for instance) or to the
degradation of the structure during its live (damage,
impacts, macrocracks, etc.). Waldner [56] detected a
localized damage within the foam of a sandwich structure
due to an impact which did not damage the skin. The
specimen was slightly heated with an infrared lamp and the
deformation during cooling was detected with ESPI and
shearography, showing the location of the impact. Indeed,
the defect causes a strain concentration, which manifests
itself in the form of fringes lying close together. The same
procedure was used to evaluate the influence of removing
paint from a sandwich part with a strong pulsed laser [57]
and to detect a simulated flaw in an epoxy patch [56]. The
influence of the location of the defect on the size of the
disturbance of the field was investigated, showing that
defects closer to the surface induced a larger deformation
than defects located below [58,59]. The resolution of ESPI
allows the detection of damaged zones in terms of small
cracks due to fatigue for instance, as shown in Ref. [56].
Some compact set-ups are now available and make it
possible to use them in an industrial environment [60–63]
for instance.
The infrared thermography is also a very good tool for
damage analysis. The analysis of the thermal changes of the
specimens during a test allows a qualitative monitoring of
the damage evolution. Thermal maps were used for instance
in Ref. [64] to analyze the static notch sensitivity of various
GFRP specimens in terms of damage evolution. In Ref. [65],
typical defects like glue infiltration, water ingress and
disbonds were detected on the blade of a wind turbine made
of sandwich composite structure. The use of thermography
in order to detect defects in sandwich structures is illustrated
in various papers [66–68] for instance. Note finally that the
determination of the fatigue limit of various materials
among which composites can be performed with infrared
thermographic techniques [69–72].
3.3. Verification of boundary conditions applied to tested
coupons
Full-field measurements often reveal parasitic effects that
occur during testing composite materials: misalignments of
the grips, heterogeneous strain fields or local effects near the
loading zones are immediately detected. For instance, it is
well-known that designing a test which leads to a state of
pure shear stresses a difficult task. Concerning sandwich
structures, the shear properties are determined through some
usual tests like bending [73] or shear tests [74]. Some
parasitic effects occur however during these tests like the
indentation under the loading points [75], the bending
M. Grediac / Composites: Part A 35 (2004) 751–761754
of the loading steel plates [76] or the influence of free edges
[77]. In Ref. [78], the grid method and its companion
software ‘Frangyne’ developed by Surrel [79] were used to
quantify these two last effects during an ASTM C273 shear
test [74]. The heterogeneity of the shear strain field was
clearly highlighted as well as the existence of local
transverse tensile stresses near the free edge, which initiate
early failure. A similar study has been carried on the off-axis
test on composites [80]. The heterogeneity of the shear
strain field due to the grips was highlighted and this parasitic
effect was reduced thanks to oblique tabs [81]. In the same
way, the correlation method was used to assess the
heterogeneity of the strain field in fabrics subjected to a
shear test [82].
3.4. Experimental evidence of local gradients due to
material heterogeneities
Composite materials are heterogeneous at different
scales. This leads to some local variations of strain
components around their average values. Only these
quantities are measurable with usual transducers like strain
gauges because of their too high spatial resolution. Evidence
of local variations of the strain field in a composite is
however important because they may initiate cracks for
instance. These variations have been observed in different
studies, for instance by Post and co-workers with moire
interferometry. In Ref. [83], the through-thickness longi-
tudinal displacement field in various bent specimens was
measured with moire interferometry. Striations and zigzag
fringes were clearly highlighted through the thickness of
unidirectional composites under five-point bending. This is
the consequence of high-localized shear strains in resin-rich
zones between adjacent plies. Shear strain through the
thickness of quasi-isotropic stacking sequences under three-
point bending were deduced from the longitudinal displace-
ment field, showing free-edge shear strains in region of
normal stresses, especially near the top and bottom of the
specimen. The shear strain variation due to the cyclic
variation of shear compliance of individual plies was also
clearly pointed out. The same technique was used to
measure the strain field onto thick composite coupons under
compression [8,84]. Very important variations were
observed. Note that curved surfaces can also be investigated
with the same technique, as shown in Refs. [85–87] where
the ply-by-ply deformation of composite plates at the
cylindrical surface of a hole in a specimen under tension/
compression is examined. Very local phenomena can also
be investigated with full-field measurement techniques. For
instance, the failure mechanisms in laminates with dropped
plies was studied in Ref. [88] with moire interferometry.
The strain gradients near a ply drop of an enlarged specimen
were measured. More recently, the tension/bending coup-
ling effect in the warp and fill yarns and the shear strain
concentration in resin-rich regions were observed thanks to
the grating shearography method [14,89]. Significant local
variations of the strains were detected. Similar conclusions
were obtained with ESPI [90].
3.5. Cracking characterization
Full-field measurements are very useful to detect cracks.
These cracks appear indeed as singularities in a displace-
ment field. The magnitude of the displacement jump along a
direction perpendicular to a crack provides its width.
Thanks to the resolution of most of the techniques described
in Section 2, crack widths of some micrometers only can be
measured. Using full-field measurements is especially
effective in the case of brittle materials where multicracking
appears since the location of the cracks is not known a
priori. For instance, the grid method [91] and image
intercorrelation [92] were used to measure the width and
the profile of cracks in a concrete structure reinforced with
composite materials. These results were used to build up
some relevant models describing the mechanical response
of such structures. Cement-based composites with steel
fibers were also investigated in Ref. [93]. In this study,
multicracking of specimens under three and four-point
bending was studied in terms of relationship between
loading and number of cracks, crack width and crack profile.
3.6. Verification of assumptions under which theoretical or
numerical models are built
Numerical models used for computing stresses in
composite materials are often built under some assumptions
concerning the displacement and strain fields. For instance,
the calculation of the transverse shear in laminated
structures is usually carried out under some assumptions
concerning the through-thickness displacement field. The
classical laminated theory assumes that straight lines
perpendicular to the mid-plane remain straight after loading
[94], Thimoshenko or Mindlin theories that these straight
lines remain straight but not perpendicular to the mid-plane,
more refined theories that a warping appears, leading to a
non-uniform through-thickness shear strain and stress
components. Reddy proposed a cubic horizontal displace-
ment distribution [95,96] whereas Touratier suggested a
sine repartition [97,98] to model this warping. This warping
is locked at the center of bent beams in any case [99]. The
relevance of these different assumptions was verified and
discussed by measuring the displacement field through the
thickness of bent composite beams, either with the grid
method [100] or with ESPI [101], highlighting the influence
of the span-to-depth ratio on their validity.
3.7. Validation of models
Full-field measurement techniques are efficient tools to
validate theoretical models when heterogeneities are
involved. For instance, a theoretical model describing
the post-buckling response of composite I-sections was
M. Grediac / Composites: Part A 35 (2004) 751–761 755
developed in Ref. [102]. This model was then verified by
measuring the out-of-plane deflection of web and flange
due to buckling during compression tests on columns
[103]. The shadow moire method was used in this study
to measure the deflection field due to buckling. In the
same way, the influence of joining techniques on the
response of assembled composite beams was investigated
with moire interferometry and compared with some
theoretical models in Ref. [104]. A meso-model based
on the anisotropic damage theory was proposed in Ref.
[105] to evaluate the degradation state in a laminate.
This model was then validated through full-field
measurements performed on bi-axial specimens with
intercorrelation.
3.8. Identification of constitutive parameters
Procedures which allow the identification of constitutive
parameters from heterogeneous strain fields are very
promising. They allow indeed the determination of several
constitutive parameters from a reduced number of tests.
Two main difficulties arise however. First, an amazing
amount of measurements must be processed since the input
data is a field, that is up to some hundreds of thousands of
measurements and the question is to manage this unusual
quantity of information. Second, no direct relationship is
available between measurements and unknown parameters.
Specific procedures have therefore been proposed in the
recent past. The main features of two of them are described
below.
3.9. Conclusion
Various applications of full-field measurement tech-
niques for composite material and structure characterization
have been described in this section. The link between
measurements and modeling increases from one case to
another as illustrated in Fig. 1, showing the interest of this
type of measurements for a better understanding of the
mechanical response of composites.
4. Identification
4.1. Introduction
The determination of parameters of constitutive
equations of materials is usually obtained thanks to
mechanical tests for which the loading conditions and
the specimen geometries are such that homogeneous
stress/strain fields take place [106]. In this case, a simple
relationship between applied loading and local strain
measurements directly provides the unknown parameters.
It is however well-known that such pure states of stress/strain
Fig. 1. Link between measurements and modeling.
M. Grediac / Composites: Part A 35 (2004) 751–761756
are often difficult to obtain in composite materials because
of their anisotropy and their heterogeneity at different
scales. Moreover, the number of unknown parameters which
characterize these anisotropic materials—even in linear
elasticity—is much more important than in the case of
isotropy, leading therefore to a more important number of
mechanical tests to measure them. Finally, the manufactur-
ing conditions influence the final mechanical properties of
composite materials, but taking out test samples from large
industrial structures may often be unacceptable. For all
these reasons, an increasing interest is found in the literature
in methods allowing the identification of parameters of
constitutive equations from testing configurations leading to
heterogeneous stress/strain fields, either for composites or
other materials. From a practical point if view, the main
breakthrough is the relaxation in the demands in terms of
specimen geometry and loading conditions, leading to much
more freedom in the nature and in the location of the applied
loading as well as in the shape of the specimens to be tested.
For instance, such strategies allow the design of exper-
iments in which the conditions are much closer to those of
practical or industrial situations. From a theoretical point of
view, a much more important number of parameters
influence the heterogeneous stress/strain field, leading to
their possible identification if suitable procedures are
available. This leads to a reduced number of tests and
specimens to get the maximum number of constitutive
parameters. Finally, parameters can be determined in testing
configurations in which complex loading paths are intro-
duced. For all these reasons, this type approach is very
attractive but the main problem here is the lack of analytical
solutions for the stress/strain/displacement fields, leading to
the lack of relationship between measurements and
unknown parameters.
In the recent past, several strategies have been proposed
to extract constitutive parameters from heterogeneous strain
fields, either for composites or for other materials. Such a
problem is often referred as inverse problem in the
literature. The corresponding direct problem is the deter-
mination of the stress/strain/displacement fields when the
geometry, loading distribution f and constitutive equations
are known (see Table 1). In the inverse problem, the
parameter identification is carried out within the framework
of constitutive equations which are a priori assumed to be
relevant. The displacement or strain fields are known as well
as the geometry of the specimen geometry and the resulting
force F applied to the specimen. The aim here is to describe
the headlines, the advantages and the limitations of two
strategies found in the literature to solve this inverse
problem, namely updating finite element models and the
virtual fields method.
4.2. Updating finite element models
The finite element method provides displacement/-
strain/stress fields in almost any case of loading conditions,
specimen geometry and constitutive equations. It is there-
fore the most popular numerical solution of the direct
problem. It has been also used as a tool for solving
iteratively the inverse problem, leading often to so-called
mixed experimental/numerical methods. In this case, a first
calculation is performed with an initial set of constitutive
parameters. Nodal displacements are collected and com-
pared to their experimental counterparts. The difference is
quantified with an objective function, which is often the sum
of the squared differences between numerical and exper-
imental data. The idea is then to minimize iteratively this
estimator with respect to the constitutive parameters. Many
optimization algorithms are available for minimizing this
objective function. They are based on the numerical
calculation of a sensitivity matrix, which allows the step-
by-step determination of new sets of constitutive par-
ameters. The procedure stops when the objective function is
lower than a given threshold value. Such procedures have
been successfully simulated for instance by Hendricks [107]
and used for the determination of anisotropic bending
rigidities of wooden plates [108]. More recently, promising
results have been obtained by Meuwissen [109,110] for the
determination of the plastic response of some metals
(displacement fields were measured in this case with the
image correlation technique). Allix and Vidal [111] reduced
the number of iterations necessary to reach convergence and
improved the quality of each iteration using the so-called
LATIN method (Large Time INcrement method) [112,113].
It is clear that this type of approach can also be used for
anisotropic materials. In the same way, LeMagorou et al.
[114] optimized the loading conditions in terms of location
of the applied forces to determine the constitutive
parameters of the elastic/viscoelastic response of wooden
plates under bending.
The two main drawbacks of this type of approach are (i)
the fact that the procedure is a ‘numerical black box’ built up
with the suitable solution of the direct problem and an
objective function in which the physical meaning is not
sufficiently present [115], (ii) often the computing time since
iterative calculations are required, (iii) the fact that boundary
conditions in terms of tractions must often be known to
perform the calculations. Indeed, only the resulting force F
applied to tested specimens are measurable in practice
whereas the loading repartition f is required in the finite
element model apart in the cases of concentrated forces.
Table 1
Direct and inverse problems
Direct problem Inverse problem
Known Geometry Geometry
Loading distribution f Resulting force F
Type of constitutive equations Type of constitutive equations
Constitutive parameters u or e
Unknown u; e ; s Constitutive parameters
M. Grediac / Composites: Part A 35 (2004) 751–761 757
4.3. The virtual fields method
This approach has been proposed in Ref. [116]. It clearly
departs from the above ones since it is direct and does not
require any iterative calculation in many cases. The basic
idea is rather simple since it consists in writing the global
equilibrium of the tested specimen with the principle of
virtual work. Introducing the constitutive equations and
particular virtual fields leads to an equation where the
constitutive parameters only are unknown, provided that the
strain fields are measured, either directly or indirectly, by
numerical differentiation of measured displacement fields
for instance. The idea is then to write the principle of virtual
work with different and independent virtual fields. This
leads to a system of equations in which the constitutive
parameters are unknown. If at least as many virtual fields as
unknowns are chosen and if the constitutive parameters
write as polynomials of the strain, like in the cases of
elasticity and damage, the system becomes linear and the
unknowns are directly determined after inversion of the
system. This approach has been simulated and applied in
various cases of composite materials characterization in the
recent past [116–131] for instance. The key point here is the
choice of the virtual fields, since an infinity of virtual fields
verifying the principle of virtual work is available. A
method has been recently proposed to optimize the choice of
the virtual fields with respect to the sensitivity to noisy data
[132–135]. This dramatic improvement renders the virtual
fields method much more easy to implement and reliable.
The main advantages of this method are (i) its directness in
many cases and (ii) the fact that the influence of the above
problem posed by the boundary conditions can be avoided
by choosing virtual fields in which only the resulting forces
F virtually work. The main limitation is the reduced number
of results obtained in the non-linear case, but this point is
presently under progress [136] for instance.
5. Conclusion
Thanks to recent advances in the sensing technology and
image processing, various techniques are now available to
measure displacement, strain or temperature fields during
mechanical tests on composite materials and structures. The
major breakthrough here is the possibility to detect
heterogeneities which can be due to different phenomena:
defects or cracks within material, mechanical set-ups
causing parasitic effects, strain gradients due to distributed
mechanical properties for instance. Full-field measurement
techniques are very attractive and it is therefore expected
that they will increase their presence and acceptance in
mechanical characterization of composites in the near
future. Different technologies have emerged and found a
niche where they can offer specific performance but it
should be noted that quite a few have evolved into
commercial products till now. More research is still required
to calibrate the different techniques or image processing
softwares, to propose reliable black-box units requiring little
experience to operate and to develop robust procedures that
allow the determination of constitutive parameters from
these fields which constitute in fact a new type of data.
References
[1] Zak G, Park CB, Benhabib B. Estimation of the three-dimensional
fibre orientation distribution in short fibre composites by a two
section method. J Compos Mater 2001;35(4):316–39. Technomic
Publishing Co., Inc.
[2] Lian B, Jiang L, McGrath JJ, Jaranson J. Quantitative determi-
nation of morphological features of triaxially braided composites
by the use of machine vision. Compos Sci Technol 2000;60:
159–66. Elsevier.
[3] Ammouche A, Riss J, Breysse D, Marchand J. Image analysis for the
automated study of microcracks in concrete. Cement Concrete
Compos 2001;23:267–78.
[4] Kobayashi A, Handbook on experimental mechanics, Weinheim:
Society for Experimental Mechanics, VCH publishers, Inc.; 1999.
[5] Dainty JC, Laser speckle and related phenomenon, Berlin: Springer;
1984.
[6] Leendertz JA. Interferometric displacement measurement on
scattering surfaces utilizing speckle effect. J Phys E 1970;3:214–8.
[7] Theocaris PS, Moire fringes in strain analysis, Elmsford: Pergamon
press; 1969.
[8] Post94, High sensitivity moire: experimental analysis for mechanics
and materials, Berlin: Springer; 1994.
[9] Kreis T, Holographic interferometry: principles and methods, Berlin:
Wiley-VCH; 1996.
[10] Sutton MA, Wolters WJ, Perters WH, Ranson WF, McNeill SR.
Determination of displacements using an improved digital corre-
lation method. Image Vis Comput 1983;1(3):133–9.
[11] Sirkis JS. System response to automated grid method. Opt Engng
1990;29(12):1485–93.
[12] Surrel Y. Moire and grid methods: a signal-processing approach. In:
Pryputniewicz RJ, Stupnicki J, editors. Interferometry ‘94: Photo-
mechanics. Berlin: Springer; 1994. p. 213–20.
[13] Templeton DW. Computerization of carrier fringe data acquisition,
reduction and display. Exp Tech 1987;11(11):26–30. Society for
Experimental Mechanics.
[14] Bulhak J, Surrel Y. Grating shearography. In: Interferometry ‘99:
Techniques and Technologies, 20–23 September, Pultusk, Poland,
vol. SPIE 3744.; 1999. p. 506–15.
[15] Rastogi PK. Speckle shearing photography: a tool for direct
measurement of surface strains. Appl Opt 1998;37:1292–8. Optical
Society of America.
[16] Wasowski JJ, Wasowski LM. Computer-based optical differentiation
of fringe patterns. Exp Tech 1987;11(3):16–18. Society for
Experimental Mechanics.
[17] Surrel Y. Optique C1. www.cnam.fr/instrumesure, autres ressources
telechargeables, Optique C1.
[18] Bakis CE, Reifsnider KL. Nondestructive evaluation of fiber
composite laminates by thermoelastic emission. In: Thompson
DO, Chimenti DE, editors. Review of progress in quantitative NDE
plenum. 1987. p. 1109–16.
[19] Heller M, Dunn S, Williams JF, Jones R. Thermoanalysis of
composite specimens. Compos Struct 1988;11:309–24.
[20] Rauch BJ, Rowlands RE. Thermoelastic stress analysis. In:
Kobayashi A, editor. Handbook on experimental mechanics.
Weinheim: Society for Experimental Mechanics, VCH publishers,
Inc.; 1993. p. 581–99.
M. Grediac / Composites: Part A 35 (2004) 751–761758
[21] Joenathan C. Speckle photography, shearography and ESPI. In:
Rastogi PK, editor. Optical measurement techniques and appli-
cations, vol. 6. Boston: Artech House, Inc.; 1997. p. 151–82.
Chapter 6.
[22] Sihori RS, Speckle metrology, New York: Marcel Dekker; 1993.
[23] Sihori RS, Selected papers on speckle metrology, Washington, DC:
SPIE Optical Engineering Press; 1991.
[24] Gasvik KH, Optical metrology, New York: Wiley; 1987.
[25] Chiang FP, Asundi A. White light speckle method of experimental
strain analysis. Appl Opt 1979;18:409–11. Optical Society of
America.
[26] Chu TC, Ranson WF, Sutton MA, Petters WH. Application of digital
image correlation techniques to experimental mechanics. Exp Mech
1985;3:232–44. Society for Experimental Mechanics.
[27] Sutton MA, McNeill SR, Helm J, Chao YJ. Advances in two-
dimensional and three-dimensional computer vision. In: Rastogi PK,
editor. Photomechanics, topics applied physic 77. Berlin: Springer;
2000. p. 323–72.
[28] Parks VJ. Strain measurement using grids. Opt Engng 1982;21(4):
633–9.
[29] Dantu M. Recherches diverses d’extensometrie et de determination
des contraintes. Conference GAMAC; 1954.
[30] Burch JM, Forno C. High resolution moire photography. Opt Engng
1982;21(4):604–14.
[31] Boone PM, Vinckier AG, Denys RM, Sys WM, Deleu EN.
Application of specimen-grid moire techniques in large scale steel
testing. Opt Engng 1982;21(4):615–25.
[32] Pirodda L. Shadow and projection moire techniques for absolute or
relative mapping of surface shapes. Opt Engng 1982;21(4):640–9.
[33] Ritter R. Reflection moire methods for plate bending studies. Opt
Engng 1982;21(4):663–71.
[34] Asundi A, Cheung MT, Lee CS. Moire interferometry for
simultaneous measurement of u; v;w. Exp Mech 1989;29:258–60.
Society for Experimental Mechanics.
[35] Jones R, Wykes C, Holographic and speckle interferometry,
Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
[36] Robinson DW, Reid GT, Interferomgram analysis: digital fringe
pattern measurement techniques, Philadelphia, PA: IOP Publications
Ltd; 2001.
[37] Krishnaswamy S. Techniques for non-birefringent objects: coherent
shearing interferometry and caustics. In: Rastogi PK, editor.
Photomechanics, topics applied physic 77. Berlin: Springer; 2000.
p. 295–321.
[38] Ronchi V. Forty years of history of a grating interferometer. Appl
Opt 1964;3:437. Optical Society of America.
[39] Wyant JC. Double frequency grating lateral shear interferometer.
Appl Opt 1973;12:2057. Optical Society of America.
[40] Patorski K. Talbot interferometry with increased shear. Appl Opt
1985;24:4448. Optical Society of America.
[41] Tippur HV, Krishnaswamy S, Rosakis AJ. Optical mapping of crack
tip deformations using the methods of transmission and reflection
coherent gradient sensing: a study of crack tip K-dominance. Int J
Fract 1991;52:91. Kluwer Academic Publisher.
[42] Lee HS, Krishnaswamy S. A compact polariscope and shearing
interferometer for mapping stress fields in bimaterial systems. Exp
Mech 1996;36:404. Society for Experimental Mechanics.
[43] Ligtenberg FK. The moire method. In: Proceedings of SESA, vol.
12.; 1954. p. 83–98.
[44] Timoshenko S, Woinowsky-Krieger S, Theory of plates and shells,
New York: McGraw-Hill; 1958.
[45] Kao TY, Chiang FP. Family of grating techniques of slope and
curvature measurements for static and dynamic flexure of plates. Opt
Engng 1982;21(4):720–42.
[46] Surrel Y. Some metrological issues in optical full field techniques.
In: Proceedings of Interferometry XI: Techniques and Analysis.
CDROM, vol. SPIE 4777; 2002.
[47] Picard P. Evaluation of phase shifting speckle interferometry
accuracy. In: Jacquot P, Fournier JM, editors. Interferometry in
speckle light. Berlin: Springer; 2000. p. 431–8.
[48] Novak J. Error analysis of three-frame algorithms for evaluation of
deformations. In: Jacquot P, Fournier JM, editors. Interferometry in
speckle light. Berlin: Springer; 2000. p. 439–44.
[49] www.shef.ac.uk/mecheng/mechsol/exptmech/twa26.
[50] Sutton MA. Standard guide for evaluating non-contacting optical
strain measurement systems. Revised draft available at wwwshefa-
cuk/mecheng/mechsol/exptmech/twa26; 2001.
[51] Schreier HW, Sutton MA. Systematic errors in digital image
correlation due to undermatched subset shape functions. Exp Mech
2002;42(3):303–10. Society for Experimental Mechanics.
[52] Moritomo Y. Digital image processing. In: Kobayashi A, editor.
Handbook on experimental mechanics. Weinheim: Society for
Experimental Mechanics, VCH publishers, Inc.; 1993. p. 969–1029.
[53] Kreis T. Computer-aided evaluation of holographic interferograms.
In: Rastogi PK, editor. Holographic interferometry. Berlin: Spinger;
1994.
[54] Experimental Mechanics, vol. 41. Society for Experimental
Mechanics; 2001.
[55] Waldner S, Kress G. Nondestructive testing of composite materials
with electronic speckle pattern interferometry. In: Rastogi P, Inaudi
D, editors. Trends in optical non-destructive testing and inspection.
Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2000. p. 257–71.
[56] Waldner S. Removing the image-doubling in shearography theory
and application. In: Proceedings of SPIE 944; 1996. p. 247–55.
[57] Hertwig M. Macroscopic and microscopic surface topographies
evaluated by improved speckle contouring methods. In Proceedings
of SPIE 3098; 1997. p. 90–105.
[58] Anastasi RF, Serabian SM, Shuford RJ, Das-Gupta DK. Nondes-
tructive detection of simulated delamination in composite laminates
by laser-speckle shearography. Exp Tech 1987;11(6):28–31. Society
for Experimental Mechanics.
[59] Shang HM, Toh SL, Chau FS, Shim VPM, Tay CJ. Location and
sizing disbonds in glassfiber-reinforced plastic plates using shearo-
graphy. J Engng Mater Technol 1991;11(113):99–103.
[60] Newman JW. Production and field inspection of composite aero-
space structures with advanced shearography. In: Proceedings of the
22nd International SAMPE Technical Conference on Advanced
Materials; 1995. p. 1243–9.
[61] Ettermeyer A, Honlet M. Nondestructive testing with TV-hologra-
phy and shearography. In: VDI Berichte Nr 1118, IMECO
Symposium: Laser Metrology for Precision Measurement and
Inspection in Industry; 1994. p. 33–8.
[62] Ettermeyer A, Wang Z, Walz T. Application of 3D speckle
interferometry to material and component testing. In: Proceedings
of SPIE 1997; 1997. p. 188–94.
[63] Walz T, Ettermeyer A. Automatic shearography system for
helicopter rotor blades. In: Proceedings of SPIE 3397; 1998. p.
187–92.
[64] Quaresimin M, Guglielmino E. Static notch sensitivity of GFRP
composites. In: Proceedings of Experimental Techniques and Design
in Composite Materials 5, September 2000, Cagliari; 2000.
[65] Dattoma V, Marcuccio R, Pappalettere C, Smith GM. Thermo-
graphic investigation of sandwich structure made of composite
materials. NDTE Int 2001;34:515–20. Elsevier.
[66] Favro LD, Xiaoyan H, Thomas RL. Quantitative thermal wave
measurements of defects in composite aircrafts structures. In:
Proceedings of the 44th International SAMPE Symposium Exhibi-
tion, Long Beach, California, USA; 1999.
[67] Vickstrom M, Backlund J, Olsson KA. Non-destructive testing of
sandwich construction using thermography. Compos Struct 1989;13:
49–65. Elsevier.
[68] Vickstrom M. Thermography: a fast and reliable method for
detecting flaws in foam-cores sandwich structures. Infrared Observer
1989;5569:15–28.
M. Grediac / Composites: Part A 35 (2004) 751–761 759
[69] Luong MP. Fatigue limit evaluation of metals using an infrared
thermographic technique. Mech Mater 1998;28:155–63. Elsevier.
[70] Gudlielmino E, Gudlielmino ID, La Rosa G, Pasta A. Analysis
of laminate composite under cyclic testing using thermal
infrared imagery. In: Proceedings of International Conference on
Material Engineering, 1996, Galipoli-Leece, Italy; 1996. p. 899–
906.
[71] La Rosa G, Risitano A. Analysis of a multiaxial test on a C/C
composite by using digital image correlation and a damage model.
Int J Fatigue 2000;22:65–73. Elsevier.
[72] Quaresmin M. Fatigue of woven composite laminates under tensile
and compressive loading. In: Proceedings of the 10th European
Conference on Composite Materials (CDROM), ECCM10, Brugge,
Belgium; 1999.
[73] ASTM C373, Method of flexure tests of flat sandwich structures,
Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials; 1999.
[74] ASTM C273, Shear test in flatwise plane of flat sandwich
construction or sandwich cores, Philadelphia, PA: American Society
for Testing and Materials; 2000.
[75] Shuaeib FM, Soden PD. Indentation failure of composite sandwich
beams. Compos Sci Technol 1997;57(9):1249–59. Elsevier.
[76] O’Connor DJ. A comparison of test methods for shear properties of
the cores of sandwich construction. J Test Eval 1989;17(4):241–6.
American Society for Testing and Materials.
[77] O’Connor DJ. An evaluation of test methods for shear modulus of
sandwich cores. The Int J Cement Compos Lightweight Concrete
1984;6(1):3–12.
[78] Grediac M, Dufort L. Experimental evidence of parasitic effects in
the rail shear test on sandwich beams. Exp Mech 2002;42(2):
186–93. Society for Experimental Mechanics.
[79] Surrel Y. Fringe analysis. In: Rastogi PK, editor. Photomechanics,
topics applied physic 77, Berlin: Springer; 2000. p. 55–99.
[80] Pierron F, Alloba E, Surrel Y, Vautrin A. Whole-field assessment of
the effects of boundary conditions on the strain field in off-axis
tensile testing of unidirectional composites. Compos Sci Technol
1998;58(12):1939–47.
[81] Sun CT, Chung I. An oblique end-tab design for testing off-axis
composite specimens. Composites 1993;24:619–23. Elsevier.
[82] Launay J, Lahmar F, Boisse P, Vacher P. Strain measurement in tests
on fibre fabric by image correlation method. Adv Compos Lett 2002;
11(1):7–12. Adcotec Ltd.
[83] Post D, Czarnek R, Joh D, Wood JD. Deformation measurements of
composite multi-span beam shear specimens by moire interferome-
try. Technical Report, NASA Contractor Report; 1984.
[84] Guo Y, Post D, Han B. Thick composites in compression: an
experimental study of micromechanical behavior and smeared
engineering properties. J Compos Mater 1992;26:1930–92. Tech-
nomic Publishing Company, Inc.
[85] Mollenhauer DH. Interlaminar deformation at a hole in laminated
composites: a detailed experimental investigation using moire
interferometry. PhD Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and
State University; 1997.
[86] Mollenhauer D, Reifsnider K. Measurements of interlaminar
deformation along the cylindrical surface of a hole in laminated
composite materials by moire interferometry. Compos Sci Technol
2000;60:2375–88. Elsevier.
[87] Boeman RG. Interlaminar deformation on the cylindrical surface of a
hole in laminated composites: an experimental study. Report 91-07.
Technical Report, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univer-
sity; 1991.
[88] Xing YM, Yun H, Dai FL. An experimental study of failure
mechanisms in laminates with dropped plies. Compos Sci Technol
1999;59:1527–31. Elsevier.
[89] Vautrin A, Lee JR, Molimard J, Surrel Y. Full-field optical
techniques: applications to strain measurement and mechanical
identification. In: Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on
Composite Materials (CDROM), ECCM10, Brugge, Belgium;
2002.
[90] Nishiyabu K, Uetsuji Y, Masaru Z, Prodromou A, Huysmans G,
Verpoest I. Strain fields on plain woven fabric composites under an
axis tensile load: comparison of experimental and numerical results.
In: Proceedings of ECCM9, Brighton (CDROM); 2000.
[91] Avril S, Vautrin A, Ferrier E, Hamelin P, Surrel Y. Experimental
analysis of reinforced-concrete beams repaired with CFRP sheets.
Compos Part A.
[92] Muller M, Toussaint E, Grediac M. Bridging cracks with composite
materials in concrete structures: experimental study and modeling.
Compos Part A.
[93] Destrebecq JF, Toussaint E, Grediac M. A refined study of the crack
propagation in cement-based composite beams under bending.
Cement Concrete Compos. Submitted for publication; 2003.
[94] Tsai SW, Hahn HT. Introduction Compos Mater 1980; Technomic.
[95] Reddy JN. A simple higher-order theory for laminated composite
shells. J Appl Mech 1984;51(3):745–52. Transaction of the
American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
[96] Reddy JN, Liu CF. A higher-theory shear deformation theory of
laminated elastic shells. Int J Solids Struct 1985;23(3):319–30.
Elsevier.
[97] Touratier M. An efficient standard plate theory. Int J Engng Sci 1991;
29(8):901–16. Elsevier.
[98] Touratier M. A refined theory of laminated shallow shells. Int J
Solids Struct 1992;29(11):1401–15. Elsevier.
[99] Dufort L, Drapier S, Grediac M. Closed-form solution for the cross-
section warping in short beams under three point bending. Compos
Struct 2001;52:233–46. Elsevier.
[100] Dufort L, Grediac M, Surrel Y. Experimental evidence of the cross-
section warping in short composite beams under three point bending.
Compos Struct 2001;51:37–47. Elsevier.
[101] Bosia F, Facchini M, Gmur T, Botsis J. Experimental analysis of
composite laminates subjected to bending. In: Proceedings of the
International Conference Interferometry in Speckle Light, 25–28
September 2000, Lausanne, Switzerland; 2000. p. 355–62.
[102] Papila M, Akun MA, Niu X, Ifju P. Post-buckling of composite I-
sections. Part 1. Theory. J Compos Mater 1999;35(9):774–96.
Technomic Publishing Company, Inc.
[103] Papila M, Akun MA, Niu X, Ifju P. Post-buckling of composite I-
sections. Part 2. Experimental validation. J Compos Mater 1999;
35(9):797–821. Technomic Publishing Company, Inc.
[104] Liu D, Shakour E. Joining forces in assembled composite beams.
J Compos Mater 1999;35(22):1985–2008. Technomic Publishing
Company, Inc.
[105] Perie JN, Calloch S, Cluzel C, Hild F. Analysis of a multiaxial test on
a C/C composite by using digital image correlation and a damage
model. Exp Mech 2002;42(3):318–28. Society for Experimental
Mechanics.
[106] Hodgkinson JM, Mechanical testing of advanced fibre composites,
Woodhead Publishing Limited; 2000.
[107] Hendricks MAN. Identification of the mechanical properties of solid
materials. Doctoral Dissertation, Eindhoven University of Technology;
1991.
[108] Foudjet A. Methodes de caracterisation de materiaux anisotropes.
Application au bois. Doctoral Dissertation, INSA Lyon; 1980.
[109] Meuwissen MHH. An inverse method for the mechanical character-
ization of metals. Doctoral Dissertation, Eindhoven University of
Technology; 1998.
[110] Meuwissen MHH, Oomens CWJ, Baaijens FPT, Petterson R,
Janssen JD. Determination of the elasto-plastic properties of
aluminium using a mixed numerical–experimental method. J Mater
Process Technol 1998;75:204–11.
[111] Allix O, Vidal P. A new multi-solution approach suitable for
structural identification problems. Comput Meth Appl Mech Engng
2002;191:2727–58. Elsevier.
M. Grediac / Composites: Part A 35 (2004) 751–761760
[112] Boucard PA, Ladeveze P, Poss M, Rougee P. A non-incremental
approach for large displacement problems. Comput Struct 1997;
64(1–4):499–508. Elsevier.
[113] Champaney L, Cognard JY, Dureissex D, Ladeveze P. Large scale
applications on parallel computers of a mixed domain decomposition
method. Comput Mech 1997;19(4):253–63. Springer.
[114] LeMagorou L, Bos F, Rouger F. Identification of constitutive laws
for wood-based panels by means of an inverse method. Compos Sci
Technol 2002;62(4):591–6. Elsevier.
[115] Bonnet M, Bui HD, Constantinescu A. Principes variationnels et
exploitation de mesures de champs en elasticite/variational prin-
ciples and exploitation of field measurements in elasticity.
Mecanique et Industries 2003;4:687–97.
[116] Grediac M. Principe des travaux virtuels et identification/principle of
virtual work and identification. Comptes Rendus de l’Academie des
Sciences 1989;II(309):1–5. Gauthier-Villars, in French with
Abridged English Version.
[117] Grediac M. Mesure des rigidites de flexion de stratifies minces
anisotropes a l’aide d’essais sur plaques. Doctoral Dissertation,
Ecole Nationale Superieure des Mines de Saint-Etienne/Universite
Claude Bernard—Lyon I; 1989.
[118] Grediac M, Vautrin A. A new method for determination of bending
rigidities of thin anisotropic plates. J Appl Mech 1990;57:964–8.
Transactions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
[119] Gauthier-Villars M, Vautrin A. Mechanical characterization of
anisotropic plates: experiments and results. Eur J Mech/A Solids
1993;12(6):819–38. Gauthier-Villars.
[120] Grediac M. Dossier de travaux d’habilitation a diriger des
recherches. Ecole Nationale Superieure des Mines de Saint-
Etienne/Universite Jean Monnet, Saint-Etienne; 1993.
[121] Grediac M, Pierron F, Vautrin A. The Iosipescu in-plane shear test: a
new approach based on displacement field processing. Compos Sci
Technol 1995;51:409–17. Elsevier.
[122] Grediac M. On the direct determination of invariant parameters
governing the bending of anisotropic plates. Int J Solids Struct 1996;
33(27):3969–82. Elsevier.
[123] Grediac M. The use of heterogeneous strain fields for the
characterization of composite materials. Compos Sci Technol
1996;56:841–6. Elsevier.
[124] Grediac M, Paris P-A. Direct identification of elastic constants of
anisotropic plates by modal analysis: theoretical and numerical
aspects. J Sound Vib 1996;195(3):401–15. Academic Press.
[125] Grediac M, Pierron F. A T-shaped specimen for the direct
characterization of orthotropic materials. Int J Numer Meth Engng
1998;41:293–309. Wiley.
[126] Grediac M, Fournier N, Paris P-A, Surrel Y. Direct identification of
elastic constants of anisotropic plates by modal analysis: experiments
and results. J Sound Vib 1998;210(5):645–59. Academic Press.
[127] Grediac M, Pierron F, Surrel Y. Novel procedure for complete in-
plane composite characterization using a T-shaped specimen. Exp
Mech 1999;39(2):142–9. Society for Experimental Mechanics.
[128] Grediac M, Fournier N, Paris P-A, Surrel Y. Direct measurement of
invariant parameters of composite plates. J Compos Mater 1999;
33(20):1939–65. Technomic.
[129] Pierron F, Grediac M. Identification of the through-thickness moduli
of thick composites from whole-field measurements using the
Iosipescu fixture: theory and simulations. Compos: Part A 2000;
31(4):309–18. Elsevier.
[130] Pierron F, Zhavaronok S, Grediac M. Identification of the through-
thickness properties of thick laminates using the virtual fields
method. Int J Solids Struct 2000;37(32):4437–53. Elsevier.
[131] Grediac M, Auslender F, Pierron F. Applying the virtual fields
method to determine the through-thickness moduli of thick
composites with a nonlinear shear response. Compos: Part A 2001;
32(12):1713–25. Elsevier.
[132] Grediac M, Toussaint E, Pierron F. Special virtual fields for the
direct determination of material parameters with the virtual fields
method. 1. Principle and definition. Int J Solids Struct 2002;39:
2691–705. Elsevier.
[133] Grediac M, Toussaint E, Pierron F. Special virtual fields for the
direct determination of material parameters with the virtual fields
method. 2. Application to in-plane properties. Int J Solids Struct
2002;39:2707–30. Elsevier.
[134] Grediac M, Pierron F. Numerical issues in the virtual fields method.
Int J Numer Meth Engng; 2001. John Wiley and Sons, 2004;59:
1287–312.
[135] Grediac M, Toussaint E, Pierron F. Special virtual fields for the
direct determination of material parameters with the virtual fields
method. 3. Application to the bending rigidities of anisotropic plates.
Int J Solids Struct 2003;40:2401–19.
[136] Giraudeau A, Pierron F. Simultaneous identification of stiffness and
damping properties of isotropic materials from forced vibrating
plates. Comptes-Rendus de l’Academie des Sciences; 2003. Elsevier.
2003;331:259–64.
M. Grediac / Composites: Part A 35 (2004) 751–761 761