laatu seniorit2015 elinikäinen oppiminen

36
Elinikäinen opettaminen/oppiminen ja vaikuttaminen yhteiskunnan laatuun 5.2.2015 Juhani Anttila Kansainvälinen laatuakateemikko (IAQ) xxxx/10.1.2015/jan These pages are licensed under the Creative Commons 3.0 License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 (Mention the origin)

Upload: juhani-anttila

Post on 15-Jul-2015

182 views

Category:

Business


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Laatu seniorit2015 elinikäinen oppiminen

1

Elinikäinen opettaminen/oppiminenja vaikuttaminen yhteiskunnan laatuun

5.2.2015

Juhani AnttilaKansainvälinen laatuakateemikko (IAQ)

xxxx/10.1.2015/jan

These pages are licensed

under the Creative Commons 3.0 License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0

(Mention the origin)

Page 2: Laatu seniorit2015 elinikäinen oppiminen

2

xxxx/3.9.2014/jan

Näkökulmia teemaan:

1. Johdanto: Laadukkaasta elinikäisestäopettamisesta/oppimisesta laatuyhteiskuntaan

2. Opettaminen ja oppiminen ilmiönä3. Laatu opettamisessa ja oppimisessa4. Oppimisen tarpeet ja odotukset5. Opettamisen ja oppimisen prosessit: Tiedon jakaminen ja

vastaanottaminen6. Yksilön, organisaation ja yhteiskunnan oppiminen7. Ihmisnäkökulma opettamisessa ja oppimisessa8. Opettamisen ja oppimisen arviointi9. Suomalainen näkökulma opetuksessa10. Yhteenveto

Mitä on opettaminen/oppiminen?Mitä on laatu?

Mitä on yhteiskunta?

Elinikäinen opettaminen/oppiminenja vaikuttaminen yhteiskunnan laatuun

Page 3: Laatu seniorit2015 elinikäinen oppiminen

3

Distinguishing the interacting societal entities

4377/5.1.2015/jan

A

C

A = IndividualB = OrganizationC = Society as a whole

B

Page 4: Laatu seniorit2015 elinikäinen oppiminen

4

4378/3.2.2015/jan

Learning domains for the “quality society”

Quality management: Qualitymanagement within the

individual societal actors(Societal quality diffusion)

Quality management: Managementof the organization with regard to

quality

Quality management: Love yourneighbor as yourself. (Mat 22:39)

Responsibility: Nobody oreverybody

Responsibility: Top managementof the organization

Responsibility: The personhim/herself (or the guardian)

An individual An organization A societyEntity: A rationally, non-rationallyand irrationally behaving humanbeing with paradoxical existential

freedom and tied to thesurrounding environment and

other individuals

Entity: A systemic group of peoplewith functions, responsibilities,authorities and relationships toachieve the objectives with its

interested parties

Entity: A more or less orderedaggregate of independent people

and organizations interactingwith its own members andexternal parties as a non-

systemic networkQuality: Faith, hope and love, but

the greatest of these is love(1 Cor 13:13); A good life

Quality: Fulfilling all interestedparties’ needs and expectations;Sustained successful business of

the organization

Quality: “Quality society”; Well-functioning and well-developingcommunity for all its members;Competitive with other societies

Learning: A learning individual( A knowledge transformation)

Learning: A learning organization(Organizational regeneration)

Learning: A learning society(Diffusion: evolution/revolution)

Continual quality improvement = Increasing continually the ability to fulfill needsand expectations of the interested parties ⇒Lifelong learning of people

Page 5: Laatu seniorit2015 elinikäinen oppiminen

5

Learning with time (chronos)

4379/20.1.2015/jan

Past Present Future

Societies at large

Organizations

Individuals

(*) “Father Time”, The personification of time (Chronos)

Page 6: Laatu seniorit2015 elinikäinen oppiminen

6

Challenging towards quality of lifelongteaching/learning: A man as a member of society

4300/2.1.2015/jan

13. Posthumous: Life reference12. Death: Final enlightenment

11. Late adulthood (Age 80+): Wisdom 10. Mature adulthood (Ages 50-80): Benevolence 9. Midlife (Ages 35-50): Contemplation 8. Early adulthood (Ages 20-35): Enterprise 7. Adolescence (Ages 12-20): Passion 6. Late childhood (Ages 9-11): Ingenuity 5. Middle childhood (Ages 6-8): Imagination 4. Early childhood (Ages 3-6): Playfulness 3. Infancy (Ages 0-3): Vitality 2. Birth: Hope1. Pre-birth stage, embryo: Potential

(Ref.: T. Armstrong)

A challenge: Creating a universal quality model for learning at all life stages

Teaching / Learning:Interaction of two persons

with their individual lifecycles

Page 7: Laatu seniorit2015 elinikäinen oppiminen

7

Our societies have a great variety of approaches for education and learning:

• General education from kindergartens, primary schools to universities Preparing for the citizenship and working life in the society and world

• Training and education of young people in vocational schools Preparing for an occupation and profession for the needs and expectations of

the society and its organizations and person’s career development• Training and education in adult education centers

Getting specialized knowledge and skills for citizenship and wellbeing• Training and education by third sector organizations (e.g. sport clubs, youth centers,

associations, etc.) Developing skills and attitudes

• Training and education by educational enterprises and consultants Getting specialized knowledge and skills and networking

• Self-learning through individual living within home, society and their members• Organization-internal education and learning of leaders and employees

Preparing for the needs and expectations of the business and person’s career

All these activities have crucial influence to the development of our societies as a whole.Concepts, principles, and practices of the general education and quality disciplines may be appliedin all these cases but their specific needs and expectations are very different.

4126/15.9.2014/jan

Challenges of quality in a large variety of educationalenvironments and with different needs and expectations

Page 8: Laatu seniorit2015 elinikäinen oppiminen

8

4324/3.9.2014/jan

Plato's Academy from ca. 387 BC(for teaching and learning,knowledge transformation):

Interlinked teaching and learningprocesses in a certain structurefor fulfilling the needs andexpectations of the participants(i.e. interested parties)

Archetype of the teaching / learning phenomenon:Learning as the result of interaction of human processes.

Plato’s Academy. Mosaic from Pompeii (Villa of T. Siminius Stephanus). Naples, National Archaeological Museum

Page 9: Laatu seniorit2015 elinikäinen oppiminen

9

Oppiminen on opetus- ja oppimisprosessien tulos.

4060/14.1.2015/jan

Opettava osapuoliOppiva osapuoli

Prosessit jarakenteet

Prosessit ja rakenteet

Liitäntäpinta

Oppimistulos(prosessien tulos)

Osapuolten vuorovaikutteinen liitäntä:

Partneri

Hallinnassa olevat prosessit on laadun toteuttamisen perusedellytys.Prosessi on tuloksellista toimintaa. Rakenteiden pitäisi tukea prosesseja.Laadukkaan tuloksen aikaansaaminen, kokeminen ja hyödyntäminentuottaa arvoa ja tyytyväisyyttä molemmille osapuolille.

Kolleega,kumppani, jne.

Page 10: Laatu seniorit2015 elinikäinen oppiminen

10

Opettajan ja oppilaan molemminpuolinenvuorovaikutus

4370/7.1.2015/jan

Alku Loppu

Tunne (Emootio)

Asia (Ratio)

(Ref. Kaset International)

Page 11: Laatu seniorit2015 elinikäinen oppiminen

114371/5.1.2015/jan

S

AA

S

Antaa Antaa

Saa Saa

Kummatkin osapuolet ovat itsenäisiä ja heillä on omat tarpeensa ja odotuksensailmaistuna heidän omilla mitoillaan ja tavoillaan.Hyöty osapuolille luodaan yhteisesti rationaalisen (järki), ei-rationaalisen (tunne) jairrarionaalisen (henki) vuorovaikutuksen kautta.Kummankin osapuolen pitäisi kokea saavansa itselleen nettohyötyä (S miinus A).

Opettaja Oppilas

Menestyksellinen Win / Win –opetus/oppimistapahtuma

Opettaja Oppilas

(Ref.: Bengt Stenberg)

Page 12: Laatu seniorit2015 elinikäinen oppiminen

12

Laatu ja sen toteuttaminen

4058/17.8.2014/jan

Laatu:Laatu:““Missä määrin Missä määrin jokinjokin täyttää kaikkien siihen liittyvien sidosryhmien täyttää kaikkien siihen liittyvien sidosryhmien tarpeet ja odotuksettarpeet ja odotukset””

Organisaatio

Sidosryhmä

Tuotos

Laatua ja laadunhallintaa on ainajossain määrin olemassa kaikissaorganisaatioissa. Oleellinenkysymys on, miten niitä voidaanjatkuvasti lisätä. Ns. ylilaatu onkäsitteenäkin mahdoton.

LaadunhallintaLaadunhallinta::““koordinoidut toimenpiteet organisaationsuuntaamiseksi ja ohjaamiseksi laatuunliittyvissä asioissa””

(Ref.: ISO 9000)

Page 13: Laatu seniorit2015 elinikäinen oppiminen

13

Opetuksen ja oppimisen laadun perustat

4372/3.1.2015/jan

Opetuksen laatu:

- Opetusorganisaation johtaminen- Opettamisen opetusprosessit (ts. todellinentoiminta)- Organisaation oppiminen

Oppimisen laatu:

- Oppimisen tarpeiden ja odotustentäyttyminen- Oppimisen prosessi

Page 14: Laatu seniorit2015 elinikäinen oppiminen

14(Ref.: http://truenomads.com/2013/06/the-problem-with-the-us-education-system/)

The right needs and expectations provide the basisfor all quality activities and satisfaction

4119/22.8.2013/jan

A key question forquality:How can we realizethe right needs andexpectations?

(*) Kenneth Johnston

The law of satisfaction (*):”If you treat everyone thesame, what varies issatisfaction. To achieveequal satisfaction, youmust vary treatment”.

Page 15: Laatu seniorit2015 elinikäinen oppiminen

15

Oppimisen tukipilarit:• Oppia tietämään• Oppia tekemään• Oppia elämään toisten kanssa

yhdessä• Oppia olemaanOppimisen jännitteiset dilemmat:• Globaali ja paikallisuus• Universaalisuus ja yksilöllisyys• Traditio ja modernisuus• Pitkä ja lyhyt aikajänne• Tiedon valtava lisääntyminen ja

ihmisen omaksumiskyky• Henkisyys ja materiaalisuus

Oppimisen tarpeet ja odotukset

4059/3.1.2015/jan (Ref.: UNESCO)

Oppimisen perustarpeet:• Oppimiskeinot (learning tools): luku- ja kirjoitustaito,

suullinen ilmaisutaito, laskutaito ja ongelmienratkaisutaito

• Oppimisen sisältö: tiedot, taidot, arvot ja asenteetOppimisen ulottuvuudet:• Etiikka ja kulttuuri• Tiede ja teknologia• Talous ja yhteiskunta

Oppiva yksilö, oppiva organisaatio ja oppivayhteiskunta ovat hyvin erilaisia oppimisenkohteita, vaikka kaiken keskiössä on yksilö.Yksilö on ihminen. Organisaatio voidaanymmärtää järjestelmänä, systeeminä. Sen sijaanyhteiskunta ei ole systeemi vaan on verkosto.

Page 16: Laatu seniorit2015 elinikäinen oppiminen

16

SWMW

Opetusprosessin jakelukanavat:

- HW: Laitteisto*- SW: Ohjelmisto*- MW: Ihmistö**Näiden oppimisvaikutukset tarpeiden jaodotusten mukaisesti: hw, sw ja mw:* Välillinen henkilövaikutus** Välitön henkilövaikutus

HW

P

sw

mw

hw

Opetuksen kokonaisvaikutus:P = hw + mw + sw

Opetuskanavien vaikutuksenkehittyminen elinjaksonaikana (Todellisuudessa ainahyvin tapauskohtainen)

Opetusprosessin monimuotoisuusja vaikutus oppimisen tarpeisiin ja odotuksiin

4373xx/4.1.2015/jan

Page 17: Laatu seniorit2015 elinikäinen oppiminen

17

4130/17.9.2014/jan (Ref.: Cross, Mitra, Illich, etc.)

Paradox of formal / informal learning and regenerating education systems and processes

A lot of new learning approaches mainly based on social, informal and openlearning with both good and questionable experiences:

- School-of-One, flipped classroom, blended learning- Yutori education- SOLE (Self-Organized Learning Environment)- Schools in clouds, ubiquitous learning- MOOC (Massive open online course), Udacity, ...- Disney learning, Pixar learning, Angry Birds education, …

Professional quality approaches have not been explicitly used in these cases.

Sugata Mitra

Spending Learning

Informal learning•Every day activities•Co-learning with others inperson or via web•Action learning•Self-organized learning•Mentors

The spending / learning paradox:

Formal learning•Education programs•Courses •Textbooks•Classes

Old learning theories have to replace with new ones, especially based on social collaboration.This means “deschooling” and “reschooling” in education as well as in many other expertise.

Page 18: Laatu seniorit2015 elinikäinen oppiminen

18

A hot current topic in the development of education:Technology in educational processes?

4139/22.1.2015/jan

Key issues:• Using information technology and computers in the class room education• Introducing entertainment media products to the class room for education• Teaching software skills to the children

These applications are surely and strongly coming,but there are opinions both for and against:

• What? What is the meaning of technology?• Where?• How?• What is the role of teachers and parents?• How to approach?• To what extent?• What are the needs and expectations?• Influence on learning? What could possibly be achieved, and what to lose?

Ref.: a) CICERO Learning Network with the University of Helsinki, Aalto University, University ofLapland and University Consortium of Pori and the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health.b) eEemeli competition to improve the quality of eLearning operations and activities

The debate has been going on in abroader sense already years, e.g.:• Healy, J. M. (1998). Failure to connect:How computers affect our children’sminds - for better and worse.• Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital:The rise of the Net generation.

Page 19: Laatu seniorit2015 elinikäinen oppiminen

19

Individual, organizational and societal learning

4380/22.1.2015/jan

Individual learning• A person’s cognitive processes for acquiringknowledge through study, experience, or beingtaught• Knowledge transformation through incrementallearning (chronos) or enlightenment (kairos)• Influenced by personal rational, emotional andspiritual, and general cultural factors• Imitation (memes) incorporated with inventionand innovation

Organizational learning• People of an organization learning in anorganized and managed way for betterawareness, attitudes, skills and competences• Creating learning disciplines: Personalmastery, mental models, shared vision, teamlearning and systems thinking• Organizational renewal or regenerationthrough incremental changes or breakthroughtransformations

Societal learning• Collaborating for multiple Win / Win benefits: Connecting, interacting andsharing knowledge• Strong network actors (hubs) with power and effective communication• Societal changes through evolution or revolution• Promoting society members’ learning based on the general societal learning

K N O W L E D G ED I F F U S I O N

Page 20: Laatu seniorit2015 elinikäinen oppiminen

20

4326/3.1.2015/jan

Age time (chronos)

Individual learning of a person

Personalperformance

PLPL

POPL

0 15

An opportune time moment (kairos)of significant emotional experience

POPL = Personal operational performance levelinfluenced by mood, operational situation, andlearning: Learned meta-abilities enable a personto use a wider range of (1) cognitive skills, (2)self knowledge, (3) emotional resilience, and (4)personal drive

PLPL = Personal limiting performance levelinfluenced by cultural, emotional, and spiritualfactors

DecayingInventing (kairos)Learning

Page 21: Laatu seniorit2015 elinikäinen oppiminen

21

Learning vs. inventing

4381/3.1.2015/jan

Learning:

- Acquiring knowledge or skills throughstudy, experience, or being taught- Two parties- In chronos

Inventing:

- Creating or designing something thathas not existed before- One party- In kairos

Innovating:

- Making changes in somethingestablished, especially by introducingnew methods, ideas, or products- Many parties- In chronos

(Ref.: The Oxford Dictionary)

Page 22: Laatu seniorit2015 elinikäinen oppiminen

22

Transition phases in organizational learning (*)

(*) Ref.: Adams & al4327/2.9.2014/jan

1. IMMOBILISATIONShock - Mismatch betweenexpectations and reality

2. DENIALDefensiveness - Retreatinto false competence.Denial of needto change

3. INCOMPETENCEAnger, frustration and confusion - Awareness that change is necessary but unsure what to do.

4. ACCEPTANCE OF REALITYSadness - Letting go to pastattitudes and behavior.Excitement - At prospect ofimproved performance

5. TESTINGTrying new approachesand coping with risk offailure (trepidation)

6. SEARCH FOR MEANINGCuriosity - Trying tounderstand how and whynew behaviors are better.

7. INTEGRATIONConfidence - New attitudesand behavior becamepart of behavioralrepertoire

Perceivableperformance

Time Conflicts, decay, succumbing

Crisis

Page 23: Laatu seniorit2015 elinikäinen oppiminen

23

Foundations for managing the balancedmultidisciplinary learning in an organization

1. Personal mastery 2. Mental models 3. Shared vision 4. Team learning 5. Systems thinking

3997/10.1.2013/jan (Ref.: Senge)

Quality Innovation

Business

Page 24: Laatu seniorit2015 elinikäinen oppiminen

24

High quality society

“Quality Society”

Visions

Development

Learning society and quality of society:Societal learning ⇒ quality diffusion

4307/5.1.2015/jan

A society

Achievedperformance

Networked society membersA companyA public organizationA third sector organizationAn individual (permanent orvisiting)

Referencesocieties

Visionaryneeds

Needs and expectationsfor the development

Page 25: Laatu seniorit2015 elinikäinen oppiminen

25

Tiedon olemuksen muuntuminen:Hiljainen tieto Avoin tieto, Tiedon leviäminen

Tiedon muuntumisprosessi:

2723/14.1.2015/jan (Ref.: Nonaka - SECI, Shiba)

Hiljainen Hiljainen

Hilj

aine

n

AvoinAvoin

Hilja

inen

AvoinAvoinKanssakäyminen

(Socialization)S

Sisäistäminen

Ulkoistaminen (Externalization)

E

Yhdisteleminen

C(Combination)

I(Internalization)

Page 26: Laatu seniorit2015 elinikäinen oppiminen

26

Societal quality diffusion through a network basedmultiple win / win learning

Quality of a network “v”, Qvm:“Degree to which a set of inherentcharacteristics of the network fulfilsneeds and expectations of the involvednetwork members”:- Number of members (m) in the network- Each member gets something useful(Si) from the other network members butalso loses something (Ai) of its own.

4328/15.9.2014/jan

Networkmember i

Networkmember j

S

A A

S

i

j

Metcalfe’s Law: A network increases in value as the square of the numbers of its users.

A network “v”

Page 27: Laatu seniorit2015 elinikäinen oppiminen

27

Learning through participation in collaborativenetworks

3509/20.1.2015/jan (Ref.: Gloor)

Degree ofconnectivity

among networkmembers

Degree ofinteractivity

between networkmembers

Degree of sharing

knowledge withinthe network

0 0

m m

LowPersonalHigh

Community

Target: Highlyeffective

learning innetworks

Page 28: Laatu seniorit2015 elinikäinen oppiminen

28

A power law of the scale-free network:“the rich get richer”

3676/16.1.2015/jan (Ref.: Barabasi)

Power law of the scale-freenetworks:

Many knots withfew links

Few knots withmany links

Knots with k links

Number of links (k)

Scale-free network:- A network grows one by one node.- A new node is easier linked with a nodewith many existing links (Ref. Paretoprinciple 80/20)- A power law: p nodes / k links per anode:

- p = a k-n

- Distribution parameters a and nvary according to the network.

*

Page 29: Laatu seniorit2015 elinikäinen oppiminen

29(Ref.: http://truenomads.com/2013/06/the-problem-with-the-us-education-system/)

Both education/learning and quality are based onpsychology: Hence, human issues play the key role.

4134/1.1.2014/jan

Students, teachers,school managers,authorities, etc. havetheir own individualcharacteristics.

All they experience theirposition in their ownway, and thus have aneffect to learning results.

Page 30: Laatu seniorit2015 elinikäinen oppiminen

30

A person* holistically in teaching and learningprocesses

Internal mental and spiritual process:• appreciations (values)• feelings

4135/17.1.2015/jan

Consciousness (Awareness)

Sub-consciousness

External explicit process:process targets and needs

Tacit knowledge

Physical body (Soma)Explicit knowledge and information

Holistic targets for a person’s successful process activities:(1) Creativity (joy of thinking)(2) Physical activity (joy of physical doing)(3) Sociality ( joy of sharing pleasure and pain with colleagues)

Process commitmentCollective consciousnessand unconsciousness

(ref.: Shusterman, Nishibori, Seligman)

* All persons have certainintellectual, social, temperanceand transcendent characterstrengths and virtues.

Page 31: Laatu seniorit2015 elinikäinen oppiminen

31

Pedagogy of character strengths and virtues based onthe positive psychology (basic education)

4138/22.8.2013/jan (Ref.: Juhani Räsänen, Martin Seligman, and Christopher Peterson)

Universal virtues and strengths:• Wisdom and knowledge• Courage• Humanity• Justice• Temperance• Transcendence

Striving for the effectiveness of the pedagogy:1. Establishing the pedagogic concept:

Identified strengths and skills of teachers2. Defining the contents of the strengths:

Strengths implemented in the educationalplans according to the universal virtuesand strengths of the original references

3. Building the learning environment:Artifacts supporting the strength andcommunications

4. Establishing the educational culture: Theguiding principles for home-school-teachers-classroom cooperation

5. Planning the strength education: Orientedschool management and teacher team

6. Professional networking: Expertcommunities and the schools of thestrengths approach

Virtues and strengths:1. Supporting the development of young

people’s identity, personality, and characteron the basis of virtues and strengths

2. Forming the basis of social and human well-being, and promoting the cultural continuity

3. Developing the strength pedagogy culture inthe school community

4. Developing home-school cooperation basedon virtues and strengths

5. Developing the awareness of choice ofvirtues and strengths among young people

Page 32: Laatu seniorit2015 elinikäinen oppiminen

32

• UNESCOn EFA Education for all. GEQAF General education quality/diagnostic framework, LLECELatin American laboratory for assessment of the quality of education, SACMEQ The Southern andEastern African consortium for monitoring educational quality

• OECDn PISA The programme for international student assessment• TIMSS Trends in international mathematics and science study, PIRLS Progress in international

reading literacy study• EIU (The Economist intelligence unit) Learning curve• The Bologna process Approach to ensure comparability in the standards and quality of higher

education qualifications and university quality assurance• Baldrige approach Baldrige excellence framework (Education)• EQAVET the European quality assurance in vocational education and training• ISO and IEC standardisointi koulutuksen hallintajärjestelmistä (ISO 29990:2010, ISO/IEC CD

36001, ISO/WD 18420, ISO/PC 288)• Kansallinen standardisointi, esim. NP 4512:2012 (A Portuguese management system standard

fostering quality, innovation and technology in vocational education and training)• Muut kansainväliset ja kansalliset arvioinnit ja luokittelut, esim. yliopistot, korkeakoulut,

ammattikorkeakoulut, lukiot ja ohjelmat

Arviointimallit, vertailututkimukset ja luokittelutkoskevat sekä toimintaa että tuloksia

4374/13.1.2015/janMenettelyistä puuttuu yhtenäinen johdonmukaisuus ja laatunäkökulma on epäselvä.

Page 33: Laatu seniorit2015 elinikäinen oppiminen

33

Practical references from Finland

4305/2.2.2015/jan

Development of the primary level education orientation in Finland:

• Engaged through a long-term tradition (over 100 years) in planning and developing thenationwide primary education system in line with the general social and economictransformation of the country into a welfare state and a competitive knowledge society.

• Achieved good results in international evaluations and comparisons of education performance• Exporting the Finnish experiences and education services• Staying quite apart from the global education reform movement (GERM) that has emerged

since the 1980s and become adopted throughout the world (*).• Piloting for new challenges and progressing with many distinct initiatives, studies and

experiments, e.g.: Practicing the use of information technology in education in many different cases but

simultaneously arguing about its advantages and disadvantages Gaining experiences in positive psychology and character strengths in education

• Confronting the tough time of recession that affects educational development: Challenging and compromising the new investments and causing fears about the

worsening situation Providing lifeblood to the new renaissance of education and learning industry

• Quality expertise had very little influence on the development.

(*) Ref.: Pasi Sahlberg

Page 34: Laatu seniorit2015 elinikäinen oppiminen

34

Alternative approach to the education reform in Finland

4329/22.9.2014/jan (Ref.: Pasi Sahlberg)

Global Educational Reform Movement (GERM)

• Competition• Standardization• Test-based accountability• Human capital (teachers)• School choice

The Finnish alternative approach

• Collaboration• Personalization• Trust-based responsibility• Professional capital (teachers)• Equity

Page 35: Laatu seniorit2015 elinikäinen oppiminen

35

4330/3.9.2014/jan

Conclusions

A lot of research results is available, and continuing extensive worldwide discussions areunderway on various future challenges of lifelong learning and their relation to the qualityand development of the society as a whole. However, the overall situation is confusing.

• Globally the overall picture of education and learning, and their quality arefragmented and comprise contradicting views. Especially, evaluation andcomparison methodologies are scattered and made their purposes vague andperception of the clear overall understanding impossible.

• However, wide and varied education and learning are recognized crucialparticularly from societies’ development point of view towards quality of society.

• Quality is recognized important in the field of education and learning althoughprofessional quality practices are not widely known by the educationprofessionals.

This presentation aimed at building a bridge between education and quality expertise formultidisciplinary professionalism and mutual learning.

• Quality discipline may refine the intention of the lifelong learning with provenprofessional concepts and practices for quality in education and learning and insociety at large.

Page 36: Laatu seniorit2015 elinikäinen oppiminen

36

"Hyvinvointiaatteen peruskivi on uskomus, että kun ihmisen perustarpeet tyydytetään ja hänelleannetaan riittävä sivistys ja vapaus toteuttaa itseään, hän alkaa elää hyvää ja arvokasta elämää.Näin ei ole käynyt. Arvoista tyhjentyneessä vapaudessa vain harva kykenee itsenäiseenharkintaan, terveeseen ja arvokkaaseen elämään. ---Hyvinvointi ilman sivistystä ja moraalia ei ole muuta kuin primitiivistä hyvää oloa. Ideologia ontullut tiensä päähän, ja on vain ajan kysymys, milloin sen arvo ajattelevien ihmisten silmissäromahtaa lopullisesti.” (*)

“Kansalliset ennakointihankkeet rajaavat Suomen tulevaisuuden suunnan valinnanyhteiskunnallisen eliitin ja asiantuntijoiden toimialaksi. Tulevaisuus ei avaudu laajallekeskustelulle ja toiminnalle vaan pikemminkin se epäpolitisoituu monella tasolla. ---Epäpolitisoitumisen aiheuttaa ajattelutapa, jota näyttää luonnehtivan epäluottamus tavallistenihmisten näkemyksiin ja kykyihin toimia yhteiskunnassa ja politiikassa. Kansalaisia ei näin ollennähdä Suomen tulevaisuuden suunnasta käytävän keskustelun ja päätöksenteon keskeisenäosapuolena.” (**)

Haasteena sivistynyt hyvinvointi ja yhteiskunnallinenvaikuttaminen ⇒ Ihmisten elinikäinen oppiminen

4376/21.1.2015/jan (*) Jari Ehrnrooth, HeSa 10.1.2015 (Jaakko Lyytinen), (**) Anu Kettunen, Jyväskylän yliopisto 10.12015