blob defect prevention in 193nm to pcoat-free immersion ... · blob defect prevention in 193nm to...

8
Blob Defect Prevention in 193nm Topcoat-free Immersion Lithography Deyan Wang, Jinrong Liu, Doris Kang, Cong Liu, Tom Estelle, Cheng-Bai Xu, George Barclay and Peter Trefonas The Dow Chemical Company Dow Electronic Materials 455 Forest Street, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA, 01752 1. Introduction In 193nm immersion lithography, immersion top coat was the first proposed technique for preventing the leaching of photoresist (resist) components, such as photoacid generator (PAG) and quencher base, into the immersion fluid (DI water). In this approach, the top coat is coated onto a resist film in a separate step including coating the top coat film and baking the film. This approach certainly adds extra cost to the device manufacturing and incurs reduced throughput as compared to the dry lithography process. The embedded barrier layer (EBL) technology 1-5 developed at Dow Electronic Materials has been demonstrated to be a revolutionary approach, in which a suitable EBL material is formulated into an existing resist, and in a spin coating process the EBL material comes to the resist surface to forms a leaching barrier in situ. This approach has now been widely accepted and implemented in the integrated circuit manufacturing industry for replacing the conventional immersion top coat process. In addition to being an excellent leaching barrier, EBL materials, in general, result in a resist surface with a high receding angle for water. This property makes the EBL approach more desirable in topcoat free immersion lithography, since it allow for the latest scanners to perform at their maximum scan speed without generating watermark defects. For immersion lithography, the most important issue for mass production is defectivity control. This is true for both top coat and topcoat free approaches. In the top coat approach, the formulation optimization for both top coat and resists was extensively involved for this technique finally to reach an acceptable defectivity level for mass production of semiconductor devices. As a later developed technology, the EBL approach has gone through a series of research and development stages particularly in material innovation to reach the same low defectivity level as that of an immersion top coat process. After achieving the target of low defectivity in lithography, the challenges left to the EBL approach were to solve high defectivity in bulk exposed and bulk unexposed regions, which became prominent in both bright field and dark field lithographic applications. To solve the high defectivity issues, a thorough understanding of the blob defect formation mechanism was imperative. In this paper, the defect formation mechanism in both bulk exposed and unexposed regions is proposed, and this proposed mechanism is applicable not only to the EBL approach but also to the immersion top coat approach in general. 2. High Blob Defectivity Issues with Earlier Generation EBL Materials In earlier stages of EBL development, EBL materials were designed primarily for reaching a high receding angle while functioning as an effective leaching barrier to DI water for PAG and other resist components. These properties were achieved without much effort because of the inherent hydrophobic nature of the EBL materials. Efforts were then focused on achieving the same low defectivity levels as the top coat process in lithography patterning. This was eventually achieved by ensuring developer solubility of the EBL materials in the unexposed regions. 2 The blob defects in bulk exposed and unexposed regions on a processed wafer, however, remained a prominent issue. Shown in Figure 1 is a comparison of wafer maps showing defectivity between top coat and EBL with EPIC™2096 Photoresist (Dow Electronic Materials). Advances in Resist Materials and Processing Technology XXIX, edited by Mark H. Somervell, Thomas I. Wallow, Proc. of SPIE Vol. 8325,83252G © 2012 SPIE · CCC code: 0277-786X/12/$18 · doi: 10.1117/12.916818 Proc. of SPIE Vol. 8325 83252G-1 DownloadedFrom:http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/on09/03/2013TermsofUse:http://spiedl.org/terms

Upload: vodien

Post on 05-Jun-2018

233 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Blob Defect Prevention in 193nm To pcoat-free Immersion ... · Blob Defect Prevention in 193nm To pcoat-free Immersion Lithography Deyan Wang, Jinrong Liu, ... (coating at 1500 rpm,

Blob Defect Prevention in 193nm Topcoat-free Immersion Lithography

Deyan Wang, Jinrong Liu, Doris Kang, Cong Liu, Tom Estelle, Cheng-Bai Xu, George Barclay and

Peter Trefonas

The Dow Chemical Company Dow Electronic Materials

455 Forest Street, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA, 01752

1. Introduction

In 193nm immersion lithography, immersion top coat was the first proposed technique for preventing the leaching of photoresist (resist) components, such as photoacid generator (PAG) and quencher base, into the immersion fluid (DI water). In this approach, the top coat is coated onto a resist film in a separate step including coating the top coat film and baking the film. This approach certainly adds extra cost to the device manufacturing and incurs reduced throughput as compared to the dry lithography process. The embedded barrier layer (EBL) technology1-5 developed at Dow Electronic Materials has been demonstrated to be a revolutionary approach, in which a suitable EBL material is formulated into an existing resist, and in a spin coating process the EBL material comes to the resist surface to forms a leaching barrier in situ. This approach has now been widely accepted and implemented in the integrated circuit manufacturing industry for replacing the conventional immersion top coat process. In addition to being an excellent leaching barrier, EBL materials, in general, result in a resist surface with a high receding angle for water. This property makes the EBL approach more desirable in topcoat free immersion lithography, since it allow for the latest scanners to perform at their maximum scan speed without generating watermark defects. For immersion lithography, the most important issue for mass production is defectivity control. This is true for both top coat and topcoat free approaches. In the top coat approach, the formulation optimization for both top coat and resists was extensively involved for this technique finally to reach an acceptable defectivity level for mass production of semiconductor devices. As a later developed technology, the EBL approach has gone through a series of research and development stages particularly in material innovation to reach the same low defectivity level as that of an immersion top coat process. After achieving the target of low defectivity in lithography, the challenges left to the EBL approach were to solve high defectivity in bulk exposed and bulk unexposed regions, which became prominent in both bright field and dark field lithographic applications. To solve the high defectivity issues, a thorough understanding of the blob defect formation mechanism was imperative. In this paper, the defect formation mechanism in both bulk exposed and unexposed regions is proposed, and this proposed mechanism is applicable not only to the EBL approach but also to the immersion top coat approach in general. 2. High Blob Defectivity Issues with Earlier Generation EBL Materials In earlier stages of EBL development, EBL materials were designed primarily for reaching a high receding angle while functioning as an effective leaching barrier to DI water for PAG and other resist components. These properties were achieved without much effort because of the inherent hydrophobic nature of the EBL materials. Efforts were then focused on achieving the same low defectivity levels as the top coat process in lithography patterning. This was eventually achieved by ensuring developer solubility of the EBL materials in the unexposed regions. 2 The blob defects in bulk exposed and unexposed regions on a processed wafer, however, remained a prominent issue. Shown in Figure 1 is a comparison of wafer maps showing defectivity between top coat and EBL with EPIC™2096 Photoresist (Dow Electronic Materials).

Advances in Resist Materials and Processing Technology XXIX, edited by Mark H. Somervell, Thomas I. Wallow, Proc. of SPIE Vol. 8325,83252G© 2012 SPIE · CCC code: 0277-786X/12/$18 · doi: 10.1117/12.916818

Proc. of SPIE Vol. 8325 83252G-1

Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 09/03/2013 Terms of Use: http://spiedl.org/terms

Page 2: Blob Defect Prevention in 193nm To pcoat-free Immersion ... · Blob Defect Prevention in 193nm To pcoat-free Immersion Lithography Deyan Wang, Jinrong Liu, ... (coating at 1500 rpm,

Fig. 1. Defect wafer map comparison for a checkerboard defectivity test. Exposure dose is the dose for printing 50nm, 1:1 line space patterns. Film thickness is 1200Å. The EBL material used is an EBL that does not change its hydrophobicity during a development/rinsing step. Its loading is 3% relative to the total solid content of the resist. The top coat is OCTM2000 (Dow Electronic Materials) with its POR process condition (coating at 1500 rpm, and bake at 90°C for 60 seconds) Each dot in the wafer map represents an actual defect regardless of its nature. Although some of the defects are attributed to particles or defects from the BARC (bottom antireflective coating) onto which the resist was coated, a majority of the defects are classified as satellite defects. As suggested by their name, satellite defects are a type of defect in which a larger mass is normally at the center and a few smaller pieces randomly reside around the center mass, as shown in Figure 2 6,7

Figure 2. SEM Images of typical satellite (blob) defects. The scale bar is 1µm. When contact angles were determined on the EBL resist surface for a processed wafer, we found that the EBL containing resist remains more hydrophobic on its surface than its counterpart processed with a top coat. To be specific, the static contact angle of the EBL resist was 79° and its receding angle was 49.5°, whereas the static and receding angles of the same resist but processed with the top coat were 58° and 20°, respectively. We rationalize the higher hydrophobicity of the processed EBL resist surface as follows: Although the EBL material tested was designed to have a certain developer solubility, the developer (an aqueous solution of 0.26N TMAH) removes only the outermost surface of the resist film where the EBL concentration is essentially 100%. As illustrated in Figure 3, which shows the EBL concentration profile across the depth of a resist film, immediately under the EBL enriched surface, the EBL concentration drops rapidly to zero in the range of a few nanometers. It is not difficult to imagine that after the EBL enriched surface is removed in the development process, a new resist surface is created from the sharp gradient region where the EBL polymer and the resist polymer coexist. Because of the hydrophobic nature of the EBL, the new surface is colored with the hydrophobicity of the EBL.

Proc. of SPIE Vol. 8325 83252G-2

Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 09/03/2013 Terms of Use: http://spiedl.org/terms

Page 3: Blob Defect Prevention in 193nm To pcoat-free Immersion ... · Blob Defect Prevention in 193nm To pcoat-free Immersion Lithography Deyan Wang, Jinrong Liu, ... (coating at 1500 rpm,

0

4

8

1 2

0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 4 0 1 6 0 1 8 0 2 0 0

n m

Rat

io

Figure 3. SIMS spectra of an EBL containing resist created by monitoring signal intensities corresponding to the characteristic mass ratios of the EBL polymer. Regardless of the defect formation mechanism, the high level of blob defects seems closely related to the new, hydrophobic EBL resist surface. The question then becomes, how does the high hydrophobicity correspond to the high level of blob defects? 3. Exploring Blob Defect Formation Mechanism of EBL Resists There is a popular theory in this industry for the formation of blob defects on a processed wafer. Based on this theory, the blob defects are due to the aggregation of the resist components during alkaline developer development and DI water rinse steps, and the aggregated resist components then fall back onto the wafer surface forming the blobs. This mechanism is also referred to as pH shock or reduced zeta potential of the resist components in the developing/rinsing transition stage.7 This theory provides a good guideline for the selection or design of resist materials including resist polymers, PAGs, quencher bases and other additives. Experimentally, people do see that a resist formulation with poor developer soluble components often results in high defectivity, particularly blobs. Is this the mechanism that governs blob defect formation for hydrophobic EBL resists? Our meticulous studies lead us to the belief that these satellite defects are, in fact, water stains. On a hydrophobic resist surface, water droplets bead up, and their shapes or contact angles depend on the hydrophobicity of the surface. This can be measured not only by droplet static contact angle (θs) but also by its receding angle (θr). The latter is more sensitive to the interaction strength between a liquid and a solid surface, and therefore is a very important parameter in characterizing the behaviour of water droplets on a surface, particularly in a dynamic condition such as spinning of a wafer. Under a dynamic condition, i.e., wafer spinning, water droplets on a resist surface start to deform, skewing towards the wafer edge, and then followed by one of two actions as follows depending on the different situations: Situation 1. Resist surface is hydrophobic (high θs and high θr). In this situation, water droplets slide outwards when centrifugal force exceeds the interaction strength between the droplet and the wafer surface, otherwise staying on the wafer surface and possibly becoming dried during spinning. This is often called poor dynamic wetting. Situation 2. Resist surface is hydrophilic (low θs and low θr). This corresponds to a strong water-resist interaction. In this situation, instead of sliding, the droplets spread outwards to become coated on the resist surface and are coated evenly and dried during the wafer spinning. To elaborate the first situation, let’s look at the force analysis diagram of a droplet on a spinning wafer surface in Figure 4.

Proc. of SPIE Vol. 8325 83252G-3

Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 09/03/2013 Terms of Use: http://spiedl.org/terms

Page 4: Blob Defect Prevention in 193nm To pcoat-free Immersion ... · Blob Defect Prevention in 193nm To pcoat-free Immersion Lithography Deyan Wang, Jinrong Liu, ... (coating at 1500 rpm,

Figure 4. A force analysis diagram of a water droplet on a spinning wafer surface. The direction as pointed by the centrifugal force, mω2R, is towards the wafer edge. θr and θa are receding and advancing angles, respectively. Ignoring all forces perpendicular to the wafer surface including gravity and normal force, the forces of interest are centrifugal force, mω2R, with m being the mass of the droplet, R the distance from the mass center of the droplet to the wafer center and ω the angular velocity of the spinning wafer, and two forces related to the interaction between the droplet and the resist surface, which two forces are each, in magnitude, approximately 2rσ, where r is the radius of the circular droplet base on the resist surface, and σ is the surface tension of water at the processing temperature, normally 21°C. The minimum centrifugal force required for a droplet starting to slide is given by the following equation: As seen, for the first approximation, the interaction strength between a droplet and a resist surface is proportional to Cosθr. That is, the lower the receding angle is the stronger will be the interaction between the droplet and the resist surface. Using the above equation, we can determine the critical size of the droplets. The critical size is defined as the smallest size at which a droplet will slide. When a droplet is smaller than the critical size, it will not slide since the centrifugal force is weaker than the droplet-resist interaction. At a given spin speed, for example 2000 rpm, and a given droplet location, for example 10cm away from the wafer center, and when the receding angle is 70° and advancing angle is 90°, the critical size (radius) of droplets is calculated to be 73µm. This means that with the aforementioned conditions, all the droplets whose sizes are smaller than 73 µm are not spun away but stay on the resist surface during the post rinsing spin. DI water, once in contact with a resist surface during post development rinsing, is no longer pristine. All resist components including polymer, PAG, quencher base and photoacid can all be leachable into DI water to a certain extent. Therefore, when the droplets dry, the leached substances in them become concentrated and then deposit on the small area where the droplets resided before becoming dried, and form blobs (satellite defects). This is for the aforementioned situation 1. For situation 2, since water is coated evenly onto a resist surface and soon dries during the post rinsing spin, trace amounts of the leached substances in the coated water is evenly distributed on the resist surface, and thus leaves no visible blobs. Going back to the checkerboard defectivity of a hydrophobic EBL resist, the bulk unexposed regions are the sections of the original resist surface, whereas the exposed regions are the sections of the BARC surface which in general is more hydrophilic than the EBL resist surface owing to the enriched hydroxy groups on the BARC surface. Therefore, the above arguments can well rationalize the high blob defectivity level on the bulk unexposed regions. Then what causes the high blob defectivity in the bulk exposed regions? The exposed regions are shallow wells whose depth is the thickness of the resist film, generally in the range of 1000Å. Carefully examining the exposed regions, one can easily recognize that the areas inside the shallow well including the partially deprotected resist sidewalls and the hydroxy group enriched BARC surface are all hydrophilic, whereas the unexposed areas that abut the wells are all hydrophobic. During the post rinse spin, residual water is easily trapped in the hydrophilic wells since the energy is less favorable for water to advance from a hydrophilic region into a hydrophobic

ӨrӨa

~2r σ ~2r σ

mω2RӨrӨa

~2r σ ~2r σ

mω2R

mω2R ≈ 2r σ (CosӨr - CosӨa)≈ 2r σ CosӨr when Өa is ~ 90°

Proc. of SPIE Vol. 8325 83252G-4

Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 09/03/2013 Terms of Use: http://spiedl.org/terms

Page 5: Blob Defect Prevention in 193nm To pcoat-free Immersion ... · Blob Defect Prevention in 193nm To pcoat-free Immersion Lithography Deyan Wang, Jinrong Liu, ... (coating at 1500 rpm,

region. Thus, once the residual water dries in the wells, i.e., the exposed regions, the solutes in it will deposit on the areas where water residues used to reside, and form blob defects. Shown in Figure 5 is a wafer map for the bulk exposed region defectivity. The distribution of the defects in the wells depends on the amount of water trapped in the wells as illustrated on the right hand side of the wafer map. Figure 5. A wafer map for the blob defects in the bulk exposed areas from the checkerboard defect test as aforementioned. The exposed and developed BARC surface becomes more hydrophilic with a surface contact angle in the range of 50° to 55° for the BARC used in this test. Based on the above discussions, the high blob defectivity in both bulk exposed and unexposed regions is attributed to the high hydrophobicity of the EBL resist surface. Thus, the task for solving high blob defectivity is essentially to reduce the hydrophobicity of a resist surface to its maximum extent in the wet processing, i.e., in post development rising and spin drying steps. 4. Developer Switchable EBL Materials and Low Blob Defectivity EBL materials that can perform the change from hydrophobic to hydrophilic in a time frame of seconds during aqueous alkaline development has been demonstrated to be an effective means for reducing the blob defect count and overall defectivity. The developer switchable EBL materials are able to provide a resist surface with a high receding angle as needed during the exposure scanning, and to reach a desired hydrophilicity in the wet processing to ensure an excellent dynamic wetting of the resist surface. The latter is achieved by cleaving off the hydrophobic alkyl or fluoro-alkyl groups and forming hydroxy, carboxy and the like on the EBL polymers. Shown in Table 1 are static and dynamic contact angles of a bulk unexposed surface of EPIC™2096 Photoresist (Dow Electronic Materials) containing a developer switchable EBL before and after development using 0.26N aqueous TMAH developer. Table 1. Static and dynamic contact angles of resist EPIC™2096 Photoresist with a developer switchable EBL at 3% loading relative to total solids of the resist. The development time is 20 seconds with single puddle development method followed by DI water rinse and spin dry. The symbols on the top row stands for (from left to right) static, receding, advancing and tilting (sliding) angles. As seen in the table, an excellent switch from hydrophobic to hydrophilic is achieved with this EBL material. A greater than 50° drop in receding angle was demonstrated, indicating a resist surface having excellent dynamic wetting, and as a direct result of this, a low defectivity level in both bulk exposed and unexposed regions was achieved. Shown in Figure 6 is the defectivity wafer map comparison between a developer switchable EBL and a top coat for EPIC™2096 Photoresist.

More water in well

Less water in well

More water in well

Less water in well

64.7

88.2

Өa

33.322.244.8Post Develop

16.773.782.8Post CoatӨtӨrӨs

64.7

88.2

Өa

33.322.244.8Post Develop

16.773.782.8Post CoatӨtӨrӨs

Proc. of SPIE Vol. 8325 83252G-5

Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 09/03/2013 Terms of Use: http://spiedl.org/terms

Page 6: Blob Defect Prevention in 193nm To pcoat-free Immersion ... · Blob Defect Prevention in 193nm To pcoat-free Immersion Lithography Deyan Wang, Jinrong Liu, ... (coating at 1500 rpm,

Figure 6. Wafer map comparison for blob defects in a checkerboard defect test. TC is OCTM2000 top coat (Dow Electronic Materials), and a developer switchable EBL. The test was performed with same test conditions as used for Figure 1. 5. Additional Test Results and Discussions During the course of EBL material development for both developer switchable and non-switchable materials, a group of EBL polymers was synthesized and tested for blob defectivity in both bulk exposed and bulk unexposed regions. These EBL materials are with different hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity as measured by their receding angles after development with 0.26N TMAH developer. As discussed in the previous section, a higher receding angle corresponds to a weaker water-resist interaction, and a lower one to a stronger interaction. The tested EBL materials are listed in Table 2 along with their post develop receding angles.

EBL Post Develop Өr EBL 1 51.5 EBL 2 67.3 EBL 3 69.4 EBL 4 30.2 EBL 5 29.7 EBL 6 47.1 EBL 7 40.2 EBL 8 16.0 EBL 9 22.2 EBL 10 23.1

Table 2. Different EBL materials and their post development receding angles (θr) The blob defectivity of these EBL materials was tested with the aforementioned checkerboard test using the exposure dose for printing 50nm, 1:1 line space patterns. Although the tests were conducted in different test sets and over a period of time, a very interesting relationship between the post develop receding angle and the blob defect count in the bulk unexposed regions was observed, and is illustrated in Figure 7.

Proc. of SPIE Vol. 8325 83252G-6

Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 09/03/2013 Terms of Use: http://spiedl.org/terms

Page 7: Blob Defect Prevention in 193nm To pcoat-free Immersion ... · Blob Defect Prevention in 193nm To pcoat-free Immersion Lithography Deyan Wang, Jinrong Liu, ... (coating at 1500 rpm,

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Postdevelop Receding Angle, deg

Avg

Une

xpos

ed C

B D

efec

ts

Figure 7. Relationship between blob defect count in the bulk unexposed regions and the post develop receding angles of the EBL resist surfaces As seen, in the receding angle range from approximately 30 to approximately 70°, the number of blob defects increases with a decrease in receding angle. As discussed earlier, a lower receding angle corresponds to a stronger interaction between water and the resist surface. More water droplets are retained on the resist surface at a lower receding angle due to the increased critical size (larger sized droplets are retained). In this receding angle range, the droplets having a size larger than the critical size were spun off the resist surface (by sliding) during the post rinsing spin. This receding angle range can also be considered a poor dynamic wetting range under the dynamic condition or spin speed used in the post rinsing spin. With a further decrease in receding angle, a dramatic change takes place. In the receding angle range lower than 23°, the number of blob defects drops to an insignificant level. The strong water/resist interaction corresponding to this low receding angle range is strong enough to anchor the droplet onto the resist surface without sliding, and the centrifugal force from the wafer spinning spreads the droplets to cover the entire wafer surface. This low receding angle range corresponds to a good dynamic wetting under the dynamic condition (spin speed) in the process. In this experiment, however, we did not catch the break point that lies between the dynamic wetting range and the dynamic non-wetting range, but it is between 23 and 30°. This breaking point, however, depends on the dynamic condition in the process, i.e., the post rinsing spin speed. 6. Acknowledgment The authors are grateful to the support from the Semiconductor Technologies business division of Dow Electronic Materials particularly to the Application Engineering group led by Dr. Sheri Ablaza. The acknowledgment is extended to those who were involved in the EBL material development including Drs. Tony Zampini, Joon Seok and Mingqi Li, and Ms. Janet Wu. Some contact angle measurement work performed by Mr. Paul Baranowski and Ms. Sue McNamara is also acknowledged. 7. References

1. Deyan Wang, US patent US 7968268 2. Wang, Deyan; Xu, Chengbai; Caporale, Stefan; Trefonas, Peter. Creating 193 nm immersion resists with

embedded top barriers. Solid State Technology (2007), 50(9), 50-51, 53, 55. 3. Wang, Deyan; Caporale, Stefan; Andes, Cecily; Cheon, Kap-Soo; Xu, Cheng Bai; Trefonas, Peter; Barclay, George.

Design consideration for immersion 193: embedded barrier layer and pattern collapse margin. Journal of Photopolymer Science and Technology (2007), 20(5), 687-696.

4. Steven Wu, Aroma Tseng, Bill Lin, Chun Chi Yu, Bo-Jou Lu, Wen-Shiang Liao, Deyan Wang, Vaishali Vohra, Cheng Bai Xu, Stefan Caporale, and George Barclay, Non-topcoat Resist Design for Immersion Process at 32-nm Node, SPIE, Vol. 6993, 692307.

5. US patent applications: Deyan Wang and et al, US20100173245 A1, US20090130592 A1, US20090123869 A1, US20090117489 A1, US20080193872 A1.

Proc. of SPIE Vol. 8325 83252G-7

Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 09/03/2013 Terms of Use: http://spiedl.org/terms

Page 8: Blob Defect Prevention in 193nm To pcoat-free Immersion ... · Blob Defect Prevention in 193nm To pcoat-free Immersion Lithography Deyan Wang, Jinrong Liu, ... (coating at 1500 rpm,

6. Yayei Wei; Non-lensing defects and defect reduction for 193i; SPIE Micro/Nano Lithography & Fabrication; 10 February 2008, SPIE Newsroom. DOI: 10.1117/2.1200801.0976; http://spie.org/x19495.xml?ArticleID=x19495

7. Yayi Wei; David Back; Immersion lithography: topcoat and resist processes; SPIE Micro/Nano Lithography & Fabrication; 27 September 2007, SPIE Newsroom. DOI: 10.1117/2.1200709.0825; http://spie.org/x16909.xml?ArticleID=x16909

Proc. of SPIE Vol. 8325 83252G-8

Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 09/03/2013 Terms of Use: http://spiedl.org/terms