‘re-imagining the law’ graduate attributes

46
1 Law’ Graduate Attributes Presentation to ALTA Conference Legal Education session Cairns July 7 2008

Upload: kapono

Post on 20-Jan-2016

27 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

‘Re-Imagining the Law’ Graduate Attributes. Presentation to ALTA Conference Legal Education session Cairns July 7 2008. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

1

‘Re-Imagining the Law’ Graduate Attributes

Presentation to ALTA Conference Legal Education session

Cairns July 7 2008

Page 2: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

2

Support for this activity has been provided by The Australian Learning and Teaching Council, an initiative of the Australian Government Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. The views expressed in this activity do not necessarily reflect the views of The Australian Learning and Teaching Council.

Page 3: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

3

Background Information

“Learning and Teaching in the Discipline of Law: Achieving and Sustaining Excellence in a Changed and Changing Environment”

Council of Australian Law Deans: Discipline Based Initiative in Law

Professor Gary Davis, Flinders University Law School (Dean of Law 2001-2007)Project [email protected] 08 8201 3883

Dr Susanne Owen, Flinders University Law SchoolSenior Research [email protected] Mob: 0412532107

Page 4: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

4

Australian Learning & Teaching Council Grant focus

Diversity in Australian Law programs proliferation of law schools & students professional training vs intellectual discipline “selling” of Law as preparation for non-law careers

8 Goal areas for grant focus

Page 5: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

5

Australian Learning and Teaching Grant goals for Law

• Learning Outcomes and Curriculum Developments in Law (2003) report

• Mapping diversity of student profiles/legal education programs

• Identifying infrastructure for stakeholder consultation and engagement

• Law graduate attributes framework• Standards for Australian law schools• Values of professionalism, ethics and service • Baseline data on mental well-being of law students• Processes for re-designing the law curriculum and future

legal education delivery

Page 6: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

6

Background Context

Diversity of Australian law programs and students

• Law enrolments: Over 17000 students in 2006

• 79% internal, others external, multimode 80% full-time (internal/external/ multimode) 66% under 25 years Males: 39% (among over 25s, males 44%) 95% Australian born (incl.1.6% indigenous) 92% graduates in full time employment (Of these, 72% private,

20% govt) Median salary $44000 (NSW $50000)

CALD website shows range of law programs in Australia, costs, student support. Currently 32 law programs

Page 7: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

7

Methodology for Consultation

Regional meetings: Brisbane, Adelaide, Sydney, Perth, Melbourne + video/telephone conference link

30 law schools represented by one or more senior representatives

Page 8: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

8

Graduate Attributes

‘..the qualities, skills and understandings a university community expects its students to develop during their time at the institution and consequently, shape the contribution they are able to make to their profession and as a citizen’ (ATN, 2000)

Reflects increased focus on integration of university knowledge and practice within authentic contexts

Page 9: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

9

Background to Graduate Attributes

3 major factors in establishment: o lifelong learning focus & need for highly skilled & flexible

professionalso education/employment focus & professionals linked to

organisational goalso emphasis on outcomes-based education (knowledge, skills,

attributes)

West Review of universities (1998) highlighted broader generic skills: reflective thinking; technical/theory competence; intellectual curiosity; effective communication; research; problem solving & team work; ethical standards

Other university-specific graduate attributes include : social justice, global perspective, valuing cultural/intellectual diversity

Page 10: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

10

Employability Skills, GraduateAttributes & Curriculum Renewal

‘….More than ever before universities are being relied upon as a vehicle for advancement of both the national economy and wider society. They do this through the creation of new knowledge and by preparing graduates with appropriate skills and attributes. It makes sense then for them to maintain a focus on keeping graduate capabilities in line with the needs of the economy and society’ (Employability Skills for the Future report DEST, 2002: 25)

Employability skills are subset of Graduate Attributes Australian Chamber of Commerce & Industry/Business Council of

Australia identified 8 employability skills Employers v. university perspective: employability skills & applying

knowledge in work setting v. deep knowledge & ensuring students as work ready

Page 11: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

11

Law Curriculum Renewal

ALRC (1999: para 2.21) Managing Justice Report: highlighted need for curriculum beyond content focus towards skills and values:

… ‘what lawyers need to be able to do [rather than] anchored around outmoded notions of what lawyers need to know’

Page 12: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

12

University Graduate Attributes

Knowledge: Body of knowledge & skillse.g ‘Operate effectively with and upon a body of knowledge’

Social & intellectual: Oral & written communication, team work/initiative/independence/creativity, critical thinking/problem-solvinge.g. ‘Communicates effectively’ ‘Can work both autonomously & collaboratively’ ‘Are effective problem solvers’

Attitudes & Values: Ethics, professionalism, lifelong l’nge.g. ‘Are committed to ethical action & social responsibility’ ‘Lifelong learning’

Page 13: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

13

Other University-specific Graduate AttributesKnowledge: • Technical & Research

Social & Intellectual: Scholarship Professional Practice

Attitudes & Values: Diversity & social justice Indigenous Internationalism & global citizenship Futures-oriented and change

Page 14: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

14

Genesis of Graduate Attributes in Law Schools

• Compliance with University processes through refinement and alignment with university level Graduate Attributes

• Some pioneering development ahead of and influencing university processes

• One university encouraging disciplines to generate statement of graduate distinctiveness

• Primarily “top-down”; “bottom-up” used

Page 15: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

15

Leadership of Development& Sustainability

Two levels: PROCESS & INSTITUTIONAL PROCESS; person/committee with responsibility

& authority to drive – strong, ongoing & consistento Resourced & supported

INSTITUTIONAL; high level backingo Cooperation, enthusiasm; recognitiono Manage resistance; ‘spoiler’ role

Adaptive leadership (Heifetz, Leadership Without Easy Answers, 1994)

Page 16: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

16

Consensus building

Collective responsibility→ corporate view Compliance vs flexibility objectives

o Refine & adapt contento Unpack →learning outcomes: knowledge, skills,

attitudeso Retreats, sub-groups (e.g. first-year)o Negotiate and compromise

Use of ‘champions’

Page 17: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

17

Resources

Access to sources of funds external to law schoolo Signals support, visible commitment

→sustainability Used for consultants: process; re-design;

teaching methodologies; assessment development; produce instructional material

Using non-$ resources e.g. sources of expertise Strong message of sharing: publications,

conferences; workshops, ‘mini-festival’

Page 18: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

18

Approaches to Designing Law Graduate Attributes

Link law to university Graduate Attributes e.g. University: ‘Operate effectively with and

upon a body of knowledge’

Law : ‘Gain a deep understanding of the origins, essential principles and limitations of the common law system of justice including a detailed knowledge of the content of particular legal concepts’

Page 19: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

19

Law Graduate Attributes example: ProfessionalismProfessionalism: ‘an attitude or stance towards

work and activity’ (university broad area)

Associated Law Graduate Attributes: ‘The graduate at… will be a consummate legal

professional Skills in lateral thinking and problem-solving which

enable the provision of appropriate advice and solutions, not only in litigation but over a range of Alternative Dispute Resolution mechanisms

Uphold the highest ethical standards in discharging his or her responsibilities to clients, other professionals, the courts and the public

Pursue lifelong learning in a dynamic discipline’

Page 20: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

20

Law Graduate Attributes example: Community Responsiveness

Community Responsiveness: ‘an attitude or stance towards society’ (university broad area):

Associated Law Graduate Attribute ‘Provide high quality service to employers,

government, and individual clients Acts as an advocate for the rule of law Accept responsibility to play a constructive role in the

maintenance and reform of the legal system Understand, evaluate and critically reflect upon the

interaction of law and society’

Page 21: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

21

Law Graduate Attribute example: Scholarship

Scholarship: ‘an attitude or stance towards knowledge and learning’ (university broad area)

Associated Law Graduate Attribute: ‘Capacity to engage in legal research High level ability in analysis, including legal analysis &

synthesis Superior verbal and written communication skills Critical thinking and reflective engagement with legal

material Pursue lifelong learning in a dynamic discipline’

Page 22: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

22

Components of Law Graduate Attributes Documentation

• Identification and documentation of law Graduate Attributes

Mapping of law Graduate Attributes against topics or development of vertical subjects

Identification of specific aspects/skills related to law Graduate Attributes

Possible identification of levels of achievement Assessment tasks aligned to graduate

attributes

Page 23: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

23

Law Graduate Attributes Curriculum Mapping

Law curriculum reinvigorated using coherent & systematic approach:

developing law-specific graduate attributes and clear outcomes

general overview mapping within individual topics/areas

providing scaffolded learning opportunities for students

transparency of assessment tasks and criteria related to outcomes

Page 24: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

24

Assessment of knowledge, practical skills, attitudes

Clear criteria for judging performance

Scaffold learning opportunities

Clear goals re legal knowledge, lawyering skills, professional values & consideration of student needs & backgrounds

Strategies to moderate results & ensure validity of assessment

Explicit feedback for law students

Evaluate law program effectiveness using data & re-plan

Page 25: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

25

Various Processes for Curriculum mapping with Law Graduate Attributes

1. Graduate Attributes mapped against law topics

e.g. Ten Graduate Attributes mapped against 18 compulsory law subjects: UTS (see slide following)

2. Eight Graduate Attributes, generally vertically integrated across various topics in each year of law degree (Griffith)

Legal theory & inter-disciplinarity Group Work Legal Ethics Generic & Legal skills Internationalisation Indigenous Issues Legal knowledge Diversity

Page 26: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

26

UTS Mapping

Page 27: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

27

Graduate Attribute levels

Single level or three levels (generic or specific

to particular GA)

Single level: acknowledges flexible pathways especially for part-time/double degree students undertaking law studies

3 levels: introduce, develop, graduate or

foundation, developing, advancing

Page 28: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

28

Example of generic levels for all law Graduate Attributes

Introduce: students instructed on theoretical framework & application of capability within legal context, given opportunity to practise capability with feedback and then assessment to determine understanding of relevance of capability in legal context and attainment of the capability

Develop: students provided with additional guidance of advanced level of capability in environment linked to real world legal scenario and feedback provided. Students reflect to support improvement and summative assessment then occurs and students have opportunity to practice capability in real world context and feedback provided on attainment of capability

Graduate: students able to demonstrate graduate capability with instruction limited to improvement of capability to an advanced level. Students required to draw on previous experience and feedback throughout course. Assessment occurs to determine student’s demonstrated attainment of capability

Page 29: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

29

Levels of Graduate Attribute example applied to ‘Being a critical thinker’:

At UTS law, we develop this attribute in three stages to give you an appropriate level of independent thinking, creativity and critical analysis

Basic: comprehend meanings; aware of relationship of source of information/writer motives/timing; use basic skills of compare/contrast

Intermediate: basic plus ranking sources; deeper comparison; comprehend implicit/explicit meaning; track theories & identify assumptions; critical perspective

Advanced: intermediate plus challenge assumptions underlying theory/practice; develop new perspective & critically analyse

Page 30: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

30

Levels of GA example 2: Legal knowledgeFoundation: ProceduralKnowing how and why courts functionKnowing court hierarchiesKnowing court processes and why steps existKnowing the historical development of law and its methodsKnowing how legal systems differKnowing basic research techniquesKnowing basic writing techniques

Developing: Declarative:Knowing legal doctrine in core categories of lawDeveloping a map of legal terrainBuilding structured legal knowledge

Advanced: FunctioningKnowing theories of law and justiceKnowing dispute resolution techniquesKnowing advocacy techniques

Page 31: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

31

Skills/specific aspects within Law Graduate Attributes

Some law schools have identified skills linked to particular Graduate Attributes

e.g. GA: ‘Excellent intellectual skills of analysis, synthesis, critical judgement, reflection and evaluation’

Skills: Collect and sort facts Identify and analyse legal issues Interpret legal texts Apply the law to real legal problems Invoke theory and inter-disciplinary knowledge to develop

new and creative solutions to legal problems Critique law and policy to develop new ideas about the law

and law reform Participate effectively in debates about the law

Page 32: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

32

Development of Assessment Framework

QUT: evidence-based work on assessment of law GA Review & development: gathering information on

valid & reliable assessment of social/relational/cultural/generic capabilities

Trial implementation & improvements developed collaboratively in four graduate capabilities

Evaluate and refine models in context

Key aspects:• Focus on alignment & targeted capability Feedback practice facilitating student capacity & reflective

practice Assessment methods being valid and reliable Provision of PD to support T&L improvements Use range of evaluation: student/staff survey, focus groups,

reflective records, teamwork evaluation, expert review

Page 33: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

33

Principles in Designing Assessment Tasks

QUT assessment constructed on sound theoretical basis including authentic assessment of all graduate capabilities e.g.

social/relational/cultural/generic (esp. oral, teamwork, indigenous, ethics), with criteria rating of poor/fair/good for individual assessment items (15) and for the overall assessment strategy (4)

Develop overall assessment strategy to allow students to demonstrate learning in different ways, encourage range of learning, create systematic & comprehensive assessment package

Individual assessment items: authentic, valid, reliable, fair, unambiguous & supportive of student learning, & being constructive and leading to deep learning, also providing timely feedback to students

Assessment helping teachers teach by providing timely formative feedback to teachers, management student assessment workload for staff and students, ethical assessment, provision of EO

Page 34: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

34

Assessment Checklist (QUT)Criteria (for individual assessment items): Poor (1)Fair (2)Good (3)Unknown (0)

1 Is the assessment valid? 2 Is the assessment reliable? 3 Is the assessment fair? 4 Is the assessment unambiguous in its intention? 5 Is the assessment authentic?

6-10 Does the assessment help students to learn by: Being constructive Relating well to different learning styles Relating well to different cognitive styles Obliging deep learning strategies Providing timely formative feedback to students

Does the assessment help teachers to teach by: 11 Providing timely formative feedback to teachers 12 Is the assessment workload manageable by students? 13 Is the assessment workload manageable by staff? 14 Does the assessment provide equal opportunity? 15 Is the assessment ethical?

Total Score (maximum = 45)

16-18 Criteria for whole assessment strategy:o allow students to demonstrate their learning in different wayso encourage students to learn in different wayso cohere together to make a systematic and complete assessment 19 Is the whole assessment strategy up and down-scalable?

Total Score (maximum = 57)

or further information see D Nulty & S Kift, "Assuring the Quality of Assessment: A Case Study", ATN Evaluations and Assessment Conference 2003, University of South Australia, 24-25/11/03. Retrieved June 24, 2008 from http://www.unisa.edu.au/evaluations/Presentations/NultyKiftPPT.ppt

Page 35: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

35

QUT Aspects of Assessment related to Teamwork

Types of assessment – formative or summative; peer/self/teacher assessed; external assessment; individual or group marks; objectivity and subjectivity of assessment criteria;

Assessment locations – in and outside classroom, virtually;

Nature of teams – optional or compulsory; virtual; self selected; tutor allocated; or random;

Learning about teamwork - lectures; tutorials; web resources; proximal learning.

Page 36: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

36

Assessment Task Example linked to Graduate Attributes: Teamwork 1. Teamwork in the classroom task within practical skills unit ‘Drafting’.

End of each teamwork session, students assess selves in relation to team using Teamwork Evaluation sheet and indicators (e.g equality of contribution, ability to listen to others; discussion without domination; ability to question within team, respect for other points of view; focus on task; ability to reach consensus; appropriate allocation of roles). This contributes to academic staff member assessment

2. Teamwork outside classroom task developed in 3 Law units (class size 200-750, incl. some external students). In Law, Society & Justice, Oral presentation in team & students completing formatively assessed Teamwork Reflection sheet. In Corporate law, group assignment used. Teamwork portfolio documents teamwork processes & self and peer evaluation of teamwork sheet is part of summative assessment. In Advanced Research & Legal Reasoning, group research tasks incl. memorandum of advice, client letter, client newsletter. Students complete Reflective Record of Teamwork

3. Teamwork in Corporate Law in virtual environment, assessment includes Teamwork Portfolio documenting teamwork processes & self and peer evaluation of teamwork. Support with group formation, opportunities for virtual teams to meet face to face; private online discussion forum provided for each external team

Page 37: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

37

Assessment Task Example linked to Graduate Attribute: Ethical Knowledge & Values

Cognitive aspects of ethical knowledge in Professional Responsibility

Established criteria: comprehension of resources, description of main points, identification of issues, cohesion and cogency of argument, overall construction, conclusions & professional judgment

Ethical values or Attitudes difficult to assess. Use tutorials: demonstrates an ethical approach during tutorial participation: support for other students in their participation, enthusiasm and commitment to beliefs, respect for opinions of others, attentiveness when others speaking.

1st yr students Law Society & Justice, encourages ethical stance early in course. Ethical Orientation Inventory devised & beginning and end of course evaluations undertaken to see if changes in ethical perspective

Page 38: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

38

Ethics Graduate Attribute: Law Assessment Task

Construct a hypothetical scenario that presents a professional dilemma requiring students to work through the problem:

Central issue? Nature of the problem, 'ethical', 'moral' or something else? Values, norms or standards to consider? Competing considerations and their weight or priority? Nature of decision-making process in reaching a decision? Effective methods for assessing Ethical Skills

Students are given a number of options with regards to completing the assignment: written/oral and individual work/group of 3.

Criteria for assessment: Demonstrating a comprehensive understanding of nature and extent of lawyer's

dilemma; Providing thorough analysis of the available choices and effects of those

choices; Providing a clear indication of nature and source of values, norms or standards

applying in resolution of the dilemma; Providing a clear justification for the conclusion that the students' reach; and Overall coherence, structure and succinctness, effective language use and

expression.

Page 39: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

39

Control

“Academic freedom” challenge Centralised control essential & overriding Mandatory compliance model: “technical

leadership” (Heifetz) Emphasis on holistic nature of outcomes-

driven curriculum, teaching, assessment “Adaptive leadership” → new pathway &

cultural change; “disloyalty” to past Need to avoid “resistance traps

Page 40: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

40

The “buy in” problem

The “buy in” Problem

Dealing with resistance & avoiding dilution Listening to expressions of reservation →

better informed “Going to the balcony” – dance floor

metaphor → objectivity & perspective

• Ultimate objective of adaptive leadership – throw work back upon the collective

Page 41: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

41

Buy-in Suggestions from Consultation Rounds

Authority, supervision, management Emphasis upon corporate view Mechanisms that increase collective responsibility Develop shared understandings Present as evolutionary development Build upon “good things”

Page 42: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

42

Buy-in Suggestions (cont)

Utilise “bottom-up” mechanisms Neutral workload effects Give reasons to engage Ongoing discussion, consultation, engagement Attention to sessional teaching staff

Page 43: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

43

Buy-in and Students

Documentation First-year acculturation Assessment reflecting learning outcomes Criterion-referenced assessment Employment relevance Working with peers and peer work examples Early evaluation

Page 44: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

44

Framework Discussion Questions

Does this framework provide support in developing Law Graduate Attributes? How useful is it to include examples of assessment tasks or

levels of graduate attributes and other details as part of the framework?

Are the processes outlined in the framework in regard to leadership, consensus building, resources etc. useful?

What other inclusions in the framework would be helpful for your university in progressing a curriculum for T& L within the Graduate attributes context?

What format should the final product be to be useful? How do we make Graduate Attributes project accessible to

relevant people?

Page 45: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

45

Graduate Attributes Process Discussion Group Focus

Share ideas about your journey and developmental processes for curriculum renewal focused

around Graduate Attributes

Page 46: ‘Re-Imagining the Law’  Graduate Attributes

46

Assessment Discussion Group Questions

What are the issues regarding assessment and Graduate Attributes for your university and what successful strategies have you used?