ramon jose henares, a089 658 481 (bia sept. 25, 2013)

7/27/2019 Ramon Jose Henares, A089 658 481 (BIA Sept. 25, 2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ramon-jose-henares-a089-658-481-bia-sept-25-2013 1/10

Chernysheva, Margo6725 Via Austi Parkway, Suite 230Las Vegas, NV 89119

Name: HENARES RAM JSE

pmn u

Executive Oce r Immgration Review

Boar of mmgaton AppealsOce of the Clek

5 eb Pk t Fal Chh gini 4

OHS/ICE ic of Chief ounsel VG3373 Pepper aneas Vegas NV 89120

A 089-68-481

Date of this notic: 9/25/2013

clsed a cpy of the Bard' dec ad rder the abve-reerenced cae.

clore

bMi

Scerely,

DC c

Da Carr

Chef Cerk

Dckt

For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished

Cite as: Ramon Jose Henares, A089 658 481 (BIA Sept. 25, 2013)



Departen f JustceExecutve Oce Imigraion

.Revew

Decisio of te Boad o mmra Appeals

Fa Chch, V 4

Fe: A09 4 Las Vegas NV

In re RAMON JOSE HENAS

IN MOVA PROCEEDINGS

APPAL

Date

ON BHAF OF SPONDENT ago Chemyseva Esqe

O BEALF OF S Pee el Assstan Cef Couse

APLICAION eopenng adjsent of stas

SEP i 20

Te esondent as ed an aea o e Igaton uge's eson eyng e esoets oto to reope oeedgs lowng ery of an n absena oder f reova he Depn of oel Sey S has e a bef w supos te respondens apea d reests s Boar o an od o he Igaton Jge so at e eson ay rse austent of sas based o an aroved vsa peton e o te rsponet's bealf by s Une Staes tze w The S sates a s exete ta he esoe wl prse enaon of hs Noe to Appear so at he ay p se sadsn apao bere e Ued States Ctzensp ad Igat Ses

Ae a revew of e eo a he aes ae on apea we w ssan the esoens appeal a ga hs oo o eoe e Iaon Jdges oders ateJne 0, and a 00, w be vaa reor w be an o t Igato Jdge he peengs

ODER Te respondens apea s sstane a s oton o eopen s gane

FUTH OE Te Iato Juges rers date Jne 0, an ay 6, 00,ae vaaed

FUTH ODE The eo s ee o te gaton Juge e oeegs osste wt e regong opnon r te eny of a new deso

FEBOARD

A supeeal g o e espoent nldes apato ase of stas

Cite as: Ramon Jose Henares, A089 658 481 (BIA Sept. 25, 2013)



·c

�

ITED STATES DEPATMENT OF JUSICEEXET OFCE OR IMGAION EVEW

MIGRTION COUR3365 PEPPE E, SUIE 20

LA EGA 8912

PEREIRA & VEASQZ VELASE OLO ESQE67 S. EASER AE #4S GA 8919

x

Date: 1 22

Fie A089-658-48

In the atter ofHEARES RON OSE

Attaced is a copy of the wrtten deciion of te Immgraton udge. ecion na uness an apeal is taken o te Boar oImmraton Appeals Te encloed copies o FOR EOIR 26 Notce o Appea and FORM EO 2 Notce o Enty a Attorney orepresentative proerl executed must be fie wt te Boar ofmgraton Apeas on or beore JLY 2, 212e apeal must be accomanied b proo of pad fee ($1000).

Enclosed s a copy o the ora eson

Encose s a trancrpt of te testmon o reor

Yo are rante nti to sbmit a brefto t oce n pport o your apea

Opposng cone s granted ntbref in oppositon to th apea

to submit a

Encosed is a opy of the orer/decsion o te Immigraton udge

Al aers ie with te Cort sal be accompane by proofo serice upon oposng counsel

Sincerely

ORTON

mgrton Court Cler Uc PEE F EIEL ESQUIRE373 PEPPER E

; S VGA I 8973



UNITE TTE EPRTMET O JUTCEEXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGTIO REVIEW

IMIGRTION COURT3365 pper Lane ut 200

La ega, vada 89120

I TE TTER OF In Reoval Proen

ENRE Raon Fle No: A89-658-48

Ronnt

Dat: Je 22

On Balf of DOn Bhalf of t Reonntolano . Veas, Esqerea & Velasqez600 Soth Ease Avene, ite 450as Vegas N 919

Oce o the Chie ConeImmgraton ad Cusoms cemet Deatment o Hoean Seciy3 7 Peer Laea Vega, evada 892

DECIIO OF TE IMIGRTO COURT

BCGROU

e respoe s a tenone year od mae native an ctize o e Phlippie He aadmtte to he Uned States o May 0 204 as a onimmgrt B2 vstor r peae (Ex1) His nonimant visa more recenty wa change to L-2 as a cil o a L racompseree wth aoraton to remain n the Unte State ntl Sepemer 1 2006 Id OnMch 8, 2010 e epare o Homelad Secty (S) ssed the reondent a Notce toAe A) cgg hi as eovable urat to secton 27(a)()(B) o he mmgaton aaoal Act (Act or ), as amened, r emaing he nted ates beyo the tmeermtted y noimmiga va (Exh. ) Te NT note te repodent he wod berqre to aear n Las Vega Nevada Immgratio Co o a ate an time to e scheded

ubseelyId)

heeae o r 12, 20 te reode as ent a notce o eang yegl ai to he ares e in the NTA noting hm i attenace a reqire a a maser aring schedled r May 26 20 a :3 am

O May a master eag w oveed as sceded, og the esodent eto aear oequey te mmgato ou oreed te espodet removed be ome Unted taes to te Pliies Also o May 26 2010 a coy o the in be oder o emova a et by ega mal to e resodent at is addres isted te N



INAS, Ramon 089-658481

On Sepember 14 2011 he respondent led he current Moion o Reopen beemova Orde In his moion e responden argues he is eniled o have his be removaloer escinded and his emoval proceeding reopened because he neihe eceived noice he was inhs proceeding no notice of e May 26 2010 hearng Noneheess he respondent indicaes bohnoices were sent o his correct residence address and_ eceived by is arens who also esde at hadress. The esonden aleaivel agues he Immigraion Cou should execise its u oeauhoiy o reoen his removal proceeding. In hs las regard he responden goes on o expain e now is e benecia of a pending Peiion r Aien eaive Fom -13) ogh is UniedSaes ciizen spose and he clams o be prima ce eligie o adus staus once he eion ispproved DHS has no answeed he responden's moion

I. LCK OF NOTICE

The mmigaion Court may rescind a removal order d reopen a oceeding "pon a motion

o eopen ed a an ime if the alien demonsraes tha he aien did no receive noice inacodance with pagaph 1) o 2 of secion 239a). . INA§ 240b(5(C)ii. Sevice by anmmgraion Cour of a wien noice o e aen ma be accomplished hrough egula mai if pesona sevice is "no acicale A § 239al ) The eco of poceedings mus conainproof a mailed en noice of a schedued remova hearing was seved a he mos recen addesspovied o te mmiaion Co. 8 CR § 1003.26c 012 f he alien ils o provide anaddess psua o secion 239(a))F of he Act "no notice sha be euired INA §0(b(B.

Both sautory and eglaoy requiremens obgae HS wih ensuring a wen "noce [is]reasonably calclaed o apprse e alien of is or her sceduled heing Mer ofG-Y-R, 23

&N Dec 181 186 (B 2001 ut these equeents do no mandae "ha e alien muspersonally receive ead and undersand he wtten notice he noice reuremens to besased a 89 ee lo Mer ofGrlv 21 &N Dec. 27 32 (BA 995) hoing hatseing a writen noce by certied mail is sufcien uposes of e srngen servicereiemens conceing an Order o Show Cause under rme NA § 242Ba() were heeied mail retun recei is "signed by he responden or a responsibe peson at he responden'sadess) If a rien noice is delivered o he coec address "bu does no each he aien houghsome ile in e ineal wokings of he hosehold he alien c be caged wih eceiving roernoice and roe sevce wl have een eeced Mter oG-Y- 23 &N ec a 89

a poceeding involving a minor alien under he age of 14 as a saguard the regulaionsvde a eecive service of a wrien noice "shal be mae upon e person wh wom ...enor esides; wheneve possibe service sall also e made on the nea elave, gudiancmmiee or iend. 8 .. § 13.8(c((ii ee o 8 C R 1236(a Mter ofGomez

Gomez, 23 &N ec. 22 528 ( 20 ("we elieve i is imici in te saue and eglaionsaling ih notce hat an adul relave o receies noice on behalf of a mino alien eas heresponsibiliy o sse tha he mino apeas he herng n ForeChvez v hro 362

2



HRS, Rainon 089 68 481

d 1150 (9t Cr 2004) te United States Crt Co of peas r e Nint iruit (NntCr), evalating te ssantal smlar reguatons at 8 C.FR § 24224 and 10 (a)( 99)goveing te detentn, releae ad serve f wren note to uveniles, extended te wennote protetion r venes to tose aliens under te age of 18 In Maer ofGomez-Gomez, teoard eld tat rten notie reeved b an adlt relative of a jvenle alien at te address ere at jvenie alien residing ositted sent serie f e rten ntie 23 I& De at28

Here te respondent onedes te NT and nte of eing separate were maled to teqet resdene address were e as resdng wt is arents Te respondent as provdedadavits om bot of s arents aknoledgng t was te w atal reeved te NT andMa 26, 2010 earng note (See Resndents Moti at ta B. Te resondent asexplained tat bease e at all relevant tmes was a mnor d benear, meanng ndert enyone ears of age, s parents dd not pen te envelpes ntanng eter te T or Ma

26, 20 0 earing note addressed t m, nr advsed m tese rten nties ad been deveredHe ges n t pont u tat s aents ated n tis manner nder te assumptin is removareeding wold e onsdered n Immigration Cour as par of teir separate remova preedng.Despite e resondents ontenton e personal dd nt reeive seve o eiter is T r tea 26, 20 0 earng otie, te Immigration Cut nevereess detemnes tat servie f ot ten noties to m properl urred on at least a onsutve basis Tis s beause bt writenties ere maled t te rret address and reeved b a resonsle indidal resding at ataddess urer, an ire neing te nteal orkngs f te respondents seod doesnt ndemine te mmigratn Cout's onsion at e reeved satsto witten notie bt te immigratn ges ntaned n te NT and e Ma 26, 20 0 earing e ailed to aend

Te respondent appears to ateatvel arge tat serve of is T and te Ma 26, 20 0arng otie ere nsient bease at te tme serve of tese douments ourred e a aminr and te enaned sere f note requrements r juvenies sould ave een ledTis argment s itot mert Te resondent as tent ears f age en te T d te Ma26, 20 0 earng nte separatel ere mailed t is resdene address, s e enanedreirements r sere of a ren note to a jvene aien nder te age f 18 dd not appl tom. ee 8 CFR§ 108((2)(); see lso FoesChave, supra. ssming aguendo tat teenaned serve of wrtten nte requremet to a juvene wa applae ere, servie stl as

1With

FloresChezthe Ninth Circuit deteined it implcit in the regulations goveing detention and reeae

(juvenile that tose aiens under the age of 18 are unable to appear in Immigration Cour witout e sistance of andut. 362 F.3d at 1157; s alo 8 C.F.R. §§ 236.3 and 1236.3. The Ninth Ciruit went on to explan tat aplying theve of wen note afeguard to rotet only uvenle under the ae of 14 ignored egitimate coces regardng te need r protection of aiens beeen the age of 14 and 18 exresed in te regulatons goveing teir release andtenton d Based on is reaonin te Ninth Circuit n FloresChz ruled that writen notice ony to the uvenileaHen, but not te adut cutodan a well erive te uvene of the "eectve noice to wic e wa egaly entitled



.ENRES, Raon 089-8-481

roper a o te wrien NT A May 26, 20 0 eing oice were received by te reponet'sare at he address where al ee reie· . 8 .. § 3.8(c)()(i); ee alo ae ofGomezomez upa

e on e regoing te Immigration o concludes tat the responent receve roper service of oh i N A d May 1 earg notce It low tha te repodent moionto reci i n abet a remova orer cnnot be nted ae on te clai tat e did no receiveeecive service o e witten noices

I. SUA SPOE UOTY

Iiation Juge has he autoriy at ay te o "reope or reconider y cae nwch he or se ha ae a ecison les jrisicio i vete with he ord of migration

ppeal. 8 CFR. § 03.3(b Te athority to reope cases ua pote "a exraorin rmedy reee r truy exceptional situaion atte ofGD, I&N Dec 12134 (BIA999) denyinguapote reoeng wihou coniering he alien eigiili o receve reief omremoval; c atte ofX-GW- , 22 &N ec 7(BIA998 ( determinguapote reopening wraed where there wa a namenal change i te princie of ayum aw he alie wobar the brden to prove an excepiona circumtace exis mering reopenng. ae of -, &N ec 97, 985 (BIA 997 he mmigraton Cos autoriy o reopen proceeing uaponte is no meant o be sed as a general cure r ling decs or o oerwise circumvent heregulations were enrcng hem migh resut in rdi See atte of I&N Dec t 984( 997 eclning o exercie ua pote auhory to reoen roceedings of a deed po eaien woe otion to reopen was bae on changed co conditions ad e two ays ae.

Te reone alteaivey gue ha e migraton Cour shoud exercise itcretio auhority o reopen h remova proceeing ua pote because he i the eeciyo a eding -30 petition le by i Une States cizen wi Tat he repoet ay ow ema ae eigile r ajustmet of status oes not constiute excepioa crcumce owrrat he Immgration o reopening hi proceeing ua ponte See ae ofGD, upaThi piclarly true were as here te responden has fale to provie ufcient proof to peit e migraion Cor o eermine weer he pmaface eigble r ajusent of taus SeeINSv Abuu, 85 U.S 94 78 (1988) (exlaiing at e retrictive exercise of dcretion oropen proceeing even were ere is pmafac e howing of eigiblity may be aropriate to prevent endless delay roote nay of roceeings)ee alo 8 CR 032b)3) (ny

oio o reopen r puroe of acing on an aplcatio r relief mt be accompied y theapropriae aplcation r relief d al suorig documens)

e responen as e in mmigration ort a compete copy of e Petion r ienRelaive (or 3 acke incding is wis bi certicae iscloing er nited StateCitzeip teir maiage ceicae an is ppor scong awl adision to e iteState e resonet also as led e Unite izesip an Iigration Seice Form I797C



ENS, Raon 089-658-48

gvng him oie he o 130 a ed i ha ageny 8 201. Regade, he ha noovded a ompeed Apaon o Rege Pemanen Residene o Adjus Sa om 1485)

as eque he Immgaon Cou o deemne hi rmafac e elbiy admen o sa o aw pemane esdeny. See 8 CFR.§ 003.23(b)"Any moon o eoe e puoseo ang on applao ee mus be aompaed by e apopae aiaio ele al upong doumens. odgy, he esponde as ie o emonsae eoene o eepiona umaes meing he sua sonte eoeing o hs ase.

IV CONCUSION

Base on e egoing he Immgaon Cou ondes ha he eoden seaaey aoed opey o hs NT a he heag onveed on May 6, 010, hh eued in he nabsentia ode o emova sued o hm he Immigaon o e one e esonen

as e o demonsae he eeona iumes neessay o an eopeng hs emovaoeeng sua sonte

Hee e log ode shal e eneed:

IT I EREB ORERE ha e espondens oon o eoen be NIE

Roald L Mlimmaio Jude

ER OF ERVESERV BY Mal M Peonal Seve (P)TO �DHS [ ] Alie Vien oeyAr : il � \dB CoSa �



w .: . "

�I .

' _ �

HNARS RON JOS3 SHASTA GLOW CT ·

HNDRSON N 895

IN TH ATTER OHENARES N SE

ITD STATS DEARTMNT OF JSTICEXECUTIV OFIC OR IMIGRATION RVIEW

IMMIGRATIN CRT3365 PPER , SUITE

LAS VEGAS N 89

ILE A 89-658-48 DAT: May 6

ABL TO ORWARD NO DRESS ROVIDED

ATACHED IS A COY OF THE DCISION TH IMMIGRATIN JG. THS DCISIONIS I NA LSS APEAL IS ILED WITH THE BOARD O IMIGRATIN AALS

WITIN 3 CNAR DAYS TH DAT O TH ILING OF THIS WRITTN-CISIN

SEETHE NCLSD ORMS

INSTRUCTINS R RPRLY RARING YUR AALYR NOTCE APAL ATTACHED DCNTS, D FEE R EE AIVER REQUESTMUST BE MAILED TO BOARD O IMMIGRATIN APPEASX - OICE O THE CLERK ·:./

l-'• 0 BX 85 3 J '

, I�TTACo rs A CY O

·

A

TH2

:; G: N

�

THE RSULT YUR AILUR TO AAR AT YR SCHEDULED ERTATIN OR RMOV HEINGTHIS DCISIN IS FIN LESS A MOTIN'O ROEN IS ILD IN ACCRDC

WIT SCTIN 4c 3} TH IMMI�TON D NATINALITY ACT 8 USCSECTIN 5c 3 IN DEPRTATI PRCDINGS R SECTIN 4c68 u.sc SECTIN 9a'c6 IN REMVAL RCEDINGS I YOU IL A MTIN REEN YR MTIN MST BE ILD WITH THIS CORT:

THR:

IIGRATION CURT3365 EER LE SUIT LAS VEGAS, N 89

COURT cLIMIGRATIN CURT

CC PTER F EITEL, SQUIRE333 EER LAN

AS VGAS N , 8939

I .

./



N HE AER O

r'

ED SAES DEPARENT OF USCEEXECUE CE GRAN REVEW

GRON CUR�S EGAS NEVA

N REVA PRCEENGS

HENARES RAN OSECASE N A065

RESPOEN

RER O E GRAON GE

o y 6 00 t 00 A urust to ror otic t tit mttr ws schdu for hrig bfor mmigrtio udg Howr

� Rsodt was ot rst

t Rots Rrsta was rst but t Rsot ws ot

itr t Rsodt or th Rsodts rrst� ·

ws rst

h ssu of dortbiitydmssbity ws rso by t submssio ofth orm 3 ador otr dc rod by th rtt of HoadScurit dor by t mssios of t Rsodt

No oo caus as for Rsodts faur to aar at t ar · hrfor t Rsod s abdod ay ad a forms of rffrom

moa

S ORERE for t rsos st forth i t crgg istrumts)tt t Rsot b rmod from t Uit Stts t: PHPPNES

t y 6 00

A

ramon jose henares, a089 658 481 (bia sept. 25, 2013)

Documents