ralph wolff presentation oer2011

16
Reflections on OER and Accreditation Ralph Wolff [email protected]

Upload: oer-commons

Post on 25-May-2015

503 views

Category:

Education


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Ralph Wolff Presentation OER2011

Reflections on OER and Accreditation

Ralph [email protected]

Page 2: Ralph Wolff Presentation OER2011

2

Propositions Both higher education and

accreditation are broken and the fix isn’t clear

Current business/organizational models are not sustainable

Increases in both federal financial aid and regulation are also not sustainable

OER represents a set of disruptive changes we will need to learn from, not fight

2OER 3-11

Page 3: Ralph Wolff Presentation OER2011

3OER 3-11

Why Is Credentialing or Accreditation Important?

Provides assurance of quality and integrity

Access to financial aid or credit transfer

Provides institutional and personal recognition

Required for licensure or employment

Identifies a standard of achievement and competence

Page 4: Ralph Wolff Presentation OER2011

4OER 3-11

Why Is Our Current System of Credentialing

and Accreditation Irrelevant?

Current system does not serve enough students or serve them well

Destroys motivation and creativity; blocks innovation

Employers are not satisfied with graduates

New forms – social media – will create new pathways

Page 5: Ralph Wolff Presentation OER2011

5OER 3-11

The Current System

Over 5000 institutions with 19,000,000 students

Need state authorization to award degrees

Accreditation for financial aid and credit recognition (regional, national and specialized accreditation)

State licensing to operate and credentialing to practice

Page 6: Ralph Wolff Presentation OER2011

6OER 3-11

4 Likely Scenarios More legislation and regulations to

control new models and increase accountability and ROI

Demands for greater public information will overwhelm us but not necessarily guide better decision making

Alternative models of delivery and organizational form will emerge within and outside existing institutions

Credentialing/accreditation may be the biggest barrier

Page 7: Ralph Wolff Presentation OER2011

7OER 3-11

Why More Control?

Concern over fraud and abuse - $150 Billion in federal aid

Low college completion rates High default rates with no loan

forgiveness Proliferation of degree mills and

fake accreditation Abuses of for profit institutions

Page 8: Ralph Wolff Presentation OER2011

8OER 3-11

University of the People

Is University of the People an accredited university?

• At present, University of the People is not an accredited institution. The University is in the process of preparing the necessary materials to apply for accreditation from an agency recognized by the U.S. Department of Education.

Challenge: Time and standards for accreditation.

Page 9: Ralph Wolff Presentation OER2011

9OER 3-11

Challenge: Federal rule -- 25% limitation on outsourcing

Page 10: Ralph Wolff Presentation OER2011

DIY Students

10OER 3-11

Challenge: How do we validate large scale non-institutionally validated learning?

Page 11: Ralph Wolff Presentation OER2011

11OER 3-11

www.khanacademy.orgName: Salman Khan• Channel Views: 3,959,888• Total Upload Views: 35,547,067• Joined: November 16, 2006• Subscribers: 97,071• Website: http://www.khanacademy.org• It is our mission to accelerate learning for

students of all ages.

Challenge: Lack of adequate faculty credentials to recognize; does not meet definition of a “credit hour”

Page 12: Ralph Wolff Presentation OER2011

12OER 3-11

Key Federal Regulations Definition of a credit hour –

“reasonably equivalent” to Carnegie unit (1 hour of classroom instruction and 2 hours out of class)

State authorization for issuing degrees and online learning

Substantive change Online and correspondence

education Monitoring institutional growth

Page 13: Ralph Wolff Presentation OER2011

13OER 3-11

Page 14: Ralph Wolff Presentation OER2011

14OER 3-11

What Could an Open Access Approach

Include? Instruction separated from the

classroom Evaluation separated from

instruction Learning recognized from multiple

sources Credentialing by both credentialed

and non-credentialed faculty Shift in accreditation from the

institution to the student

Page 15: Ralph Wolff Presentation OER2011

15OER 3-11

How WASC Is Responding

Fundamental redesign of our process to create both a public accountability and public advocacy role AND embrace the changes coming

Address 5 areas in our HB revision process:

Evaluating retention and graduation rates Defining more clearly the level of learning

and “what is good enough?” Establish common broad outcomes for– the

DQP Greater transparency Addressing the new ecosystem to support

innovation

Page 16: Ralph Wolff Presentation OER2011

16OER 3-11

Your ideas and suggestions are

welcome: If we created a OER unit within

WASC, what should we focus on? How might we change our standards?

What are the most important steps we can take to support your efforts?

[email protected]