radiological terrorism: dirty bombs – fact and...

50
1 Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fiction An Educational Briefing By The HEALTH PHYSICS SOCIETY Specialists in Radiation Safety April 8, 2003

Upload: others

Post on 07-Aug-2020

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

1

Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fiction

An Educational Briefing By The

HEALTH PHYSICS SOCIETYSpecialists in Radiation Safety

April 8, 2003

Page 2: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

2

Briefing Moderator

John R. Frazier, Ph.D., CHP

President, Health Physics Society

Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fiction

Page 3: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

3

Presentation Agenda• Dirty Bombs: Fact and Fiction

Eric E. Kearsley, Ph.D., CHP

• How Do We Control Radioactive Material Under The Old and New Paradigm?Keith H. Dinger, CHP

• Who Will Mind The Store?Kenneth R. Kase, Ph.D., CHP

• Questions & AnswersPanel of Experts in the Audience

Page 4: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

4

Dirty Bombs: Fact and Fiction

Eric E. Kearsley, Ph.D., CHP

High Point High School

Beltsville, Maryland

Page 5: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

5

What kinds of bombs are we talking about?

• Radiological Dispersion Devices—RDD’s

• Radioactive materials spread around by conventional explosives or other means

• “Poor man’s nuclear weapon”—NOT!

Page 6: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

6

Background

• Considered by Allies during WW II

• Recent threats

Page 7: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

7

RDD Design

• Type of radioactive material

• Dispersal strategy

Page 8: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

8

RDD Design

Type of radiation• Penetrating radiation—external hazard;

difficult to shield/conceal• Non-penetrating—internal hazard; easier to

shield/conceal; more difficult to detect

Page 9: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

9

RDD Design

Some sources of material • Radiotherapy sources• Industrial radiography sources• Thermal generators

Page 10: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

10

Potential Sources

Page 11: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

11

Dose Rate vs Radius for 1000 Curies of Cesium-137

0

50

100

150

200

0 50 100 150 200 250

Radius (meters)

Do

se R

ate

(mS

v/h

)

Page 12: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

12

Dose Rate vs Radius for 1000 Curies of Cesium-137

0.000

0.001

0.010

0.100

1.000

0 5 10 15 20 25Radius (kilometers)

Dos

e R

ate

(mSv

/h)

Red: Cesium

Blue: NaturalBackground 0.00034 mSv/h

Page 13: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

13

Dose Rates for the 1000 Curie Example

1200

1.7150

3.5100

1250

Dose Rate (mSv/h)Radius (meters)

Page 14: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

14

What are the effects?

• Medical/Health

• Psychological

• Economic

Page 15: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

15

Medical/Health Effects

• No clinical effects below 350 mSv

• For 1000 Ci spread out over an area with a radius of 100 meters, an individual would have to remain for 100 hours to receive this dose (i.e., continuously for 4 days).

Page 16: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

16

Medical/Health Effects

• Other than the injury from the explosion, the principle health risk at expected dose levels is the possible increased risk of cancer.

• At 100 mSv the lifetime risk of fatal cancer is believed to be increased from about 20% (all causes) to about 20.5 %.

Page 17: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

17

Psychosocial Effects

Fear/Panic

• Transportation paralysis

• Demand for medical evaluation

Page 18: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

18

Psychosocial Effects

• Emotional, physical, and cognitive effects

• Social withdrawal

• Stigma

• Potential for immediate and long-term care

Page 19: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

19

Economic Effects

• Clean up costs • Impact on commerce

Page 20: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

20

Public Policy Issues

Education of

• Leaders

• Emergency responders

• Press

• Public

Page 21: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

21

Public Policy Issues

Clean-up criteria

• Agriculture

• Urban areas

• National monuments

Page 22: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

22

Public Policy Issues

Detection--how do first responders distinguish between a "clean" bomb and a "dirty” bomb?

Page 23: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

23

Public Policy Issues

How do we control radioactive material?

Old paradigm: safety

New paradigm: security & safety

Page 24: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

24

How Do We Control Radioactive Material Under The Old and New Paradigm?Keith H. Dinger, CHP

Harvard School of Public Health

Boston, Massachusetts

Page 25: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

25

Radiation Controls in the U.S. - A Word About the Current (Old) Paradigm -

Today’s regulatory framework for control of exposure from radioactive material and radiation producing machines is the result of over 100 years of evolution in the use and understanding of radioactive materials and radiation.

Page 26: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

26

How do we control radioactive material under the old and new paradigm?

• How is it done?

• Who does it?

Page 27: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

27

How is radioactive material controlled?

Old Paradigm: Based on an “inherent” classification system that– Is based on the potential for use by

responsible parties of radioactive material [for the benefit of society] and the extent of the threat to public health and safety posed by that potential

Page 28: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

28

How is radioactive material controlled?

New Paradigm: Develop a classification system that– Is based on the potential for use by terrorists

of radioactive material [for the harm of society] and the extent of the threat to public health and safety posed by that potential*

* paraphrase from S350/HR891 “Dirty Bomb Prevention Act of 2003”

Page 29: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

29

How is radioactive material controlled?

Old Paradigm: The “classification” takes into account– Radioactivity levels of the material– Dispersibility of the material– Chemical and physical form of the material– Intended use of the material– Other appropriate factors

Page 30: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

30

How is radioactive material controlled?

New Paradigm: The classification takes into account– Radioactivity levels of the material– Dispersibility of the material– Chemical and physical form of the material– Intended use of the material– Other appropriate factors

* paraphrase from S350/HR891 “Dirty Bomb Prevention Act of 2003”

Page 31: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

31

Comparison of Old and New Paradigm for Control

• Old Paradigm requires control of the exposure of people and the environment from the beneficial use of sources

• New Paradigm requires control of the sources to not allow the exposure of people and the environment from a sinister use of sources

Page 32: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

32

Comparison of Old and New Paradigm for Control

• Both require a “classification” system for radioactive material to ensure resources are properly focused on the potential for a threat to public health and safety

• The New Paradigm requires greater security controls for a small number of radioactive sources

• The Old Paradigm will continue to require lesser safety controls for a large number of radioactive sources

Page 33: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

33

Who controls the radioactive material in the U.S.?

Major Entities with Regulatory Responsibilities for Radioactive Material:– Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)– Department of Energy (DOE)– Department of Defense– States

Page 34: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

34

Which entity controls the radioactive material in the U.S.?It Depends

– Intended Use and Activity• Civilian

– Commercial power, research, test reactor– Industry– Medical – Academia – Consumer Products– Transportation, storage, and disposal

• Military– Nuclear weapons– Naval Reactors Program– Research reactors

Page 35: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

35

Which entity controls the radioactive material in the U.S.?

It Depends– Origin

• Made in a reactor or result of a reactor’s operation *• Left over from extraction of U or Th from ores *• Made in an accelerator• Naturally occurring

* Termed “Byproduct material”

– Type• Source material (U and Th)• Special nuclear material (U-233, U-235, Pu)

Page 36: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

36

Which entity controls the radiation exposure in the U.S.?

If radiation protection standards and radiation producing machines are considered add the:– Environmental Protection Agency– Food and Drug Administration– Department of Labor

• OSHA• MSHA

Page 37: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

37

Radiation Regulatory Framework – Old Paradigm

• Complex

• Inefficient

• Redundant

• Incomplete

Page 38: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

38

Effectiveness of Radioactive Material Control Under Current Regulatory Framework• Orphaned Sources

– Up to 500,000 of the estimated 2,000,000 sources in the U.S. are no longer needed 1

– About 375 sources are reported orphaned in the US each year 1

– Can infer only a small fraction of these have the potential for a heightened security concern 2

1 Background Information Paper, Health Physics Society, April 20022 Commercial Radioactive Sources: Surveying the Security Risks, Monterey

Institute of International Studies, Occasional Paper No. 11, Jan 2003

Page 39: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

39

Radiation Regulatory Framework – New Paradigm

Page 40: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

40

Technical and Organizational Complexity Requires

Competence

Who will mind the store?

Page 41: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

41

Who Will Mind The Store?- The Health Physics Human Capital Crisis -

Kenneth R. Kase, Ph.D., CHP

Stanford Linear Accelerator Center

Menlo Park, California

Page 42: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

42

The Human Capital CrisisWhere are professional health physicists

needed?

• Security

• Health

• Energy

Page 43: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

43

The Human Capital Crisis -Indicators

There is a serious projected shortage of professional Health Physicists over the next 10 years

• NEI Commissioned Study Reported in 2001“Insufficient workers will be available to meet industry demand in two job pipelines:- Health Physicists (shortage is about 700 HPs over 10 years)” 1

• NEI Chairman noted“A particular difficulty in employing degreed HPs is that the demand for these candidates extends well beyond the nuclear energy industry. Most degreed HPs go directly from college and pursue careers in medicine, research and other industrial applications.” 2

1 Nuclear Pipeline Analysis Report for NEI by Navigant Consulting, 12/17/012 Staffing Nuclear Energy’s Future, remarks by Joe Colvin, President and CEO, NEI, at

INPO CEO conference 11/8/01

Page 44: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

44

The Human Capital Crisis –Indicators (continued)

• HPS Position Statement“present demand for radiation safety professionals is approximately 130% of supply. Demand during the next five years, which appearsto be related solely to attrition, outstrips supply by nearly 160%.” 1

• Four Health Physics University Programs closed in 1990’s

• HP University Program support by DOE (EH&S) was terminated in 19991 Human Capital Crisis in Radiation Safety, Position Statement of the Health Physics Society, August 2001

Page 45: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

45

The Human Capital Crisis –HPS Actions• Commissioned Health Physics Manpower

Assessment

• Communicating with Congress– Authorizing legislation introduced in 107th

– Providing testimony to Appropriations Committees for FY04

• Communicating with Federal Agencies– DOE, NSF, DNFSB, NRC, EPA

• Working with Industry– NEI, EFCOG

Page 46: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

46

Briefing Moderator

John R. Frazier, Ph.D., CHP

President, Health Physics Society

Briefing Summary“Take Home” Messages

Page 47: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

47

“Take Home” Messages• Dirty Bombs

– The spread of radioactive material is unpredictable due to all the variables associated with a specific bomb and location

– The more the material is dispersed the lower the radiation dose to anyone in the area

– It is very unlikely anyone will have clinically observable effects due to radiation exposure

– The primary health effect will be Psychosocial effects– There will be some economic burden resulting from a dirty

bomb explosion– An important strategy to mitigating a dirty bomb’s effects is

education – leaders, general public, first responders

Page 48: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

48

• Source Control and Regulatory Framework– “New paradigm” for source controls requires consideration

of security with safety– “New paradigm” requires a new focus but it must still be

based on a Classification System, like that inherent in the “Old Paradigm.”

– Only a small fraction of orphan sources in the U.S. may have a potential for security concerns, but the existence of orphan sources continues to be a public health issue from the focus of the “Old paradigm” – i.e., safety.

– The Regulatory Framework for source control is decentralized and inefficient

“Take Home” Messages

Page 49: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

49

• Health Physics Human Capital Crisis– Professional health physics expertise is needed to

support the Nation’s Security, Health, and Energy policies.

– There is a projected shortfall of professional health physicists for positions requiring professional radiation safety expertise

– Health Physics Academic programs will continue to decline without Federal financial support

“Take Home” Messages

Page 50: Radiological Terrorism: Dirty Bombs – Fact and Fictionhps.org/govtrelations/documents/congress_briefing... · 2006-10-30 · • Dirty Bombs – The spread of radioactive material

50

Questions?