r. malagrida: responsible research and innovation, a new paradigm in horizon 2020
TRANSCRIPT
Responsible Research and InnovationScientix, October 2014
Rosina Malagrida, Head of Public Engagement on Health Research
|
|
UDR-Bio: Unit of Public Engagement on Health Research
Educational programmes & dialogue events
Community Advisory Board & other collaborations
Science Communication
|
|
Session 1Introduction to the project and workshop
RRI ToolsEU 7th Framework Program project
26 partners
19 Hubs covering 30 countries
Main goal & outcome: develop a
Training and Dissemination Toolkit on Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI)
keystone to foster RRI among all stakeholders-explicitly referred to in several Horizon2020 calls-
|
The RRI ToolsConsortium
Technologicalpartner Networks
Hub leaders
Coordinator
Deputy coordinator
Hubs coordinator
RRI Definition &Practices leader
Stakeholder assessment leader
Training & Advocacy leader
Evaluation leader
Dissemination leader
Management Board
| INDEX
1. Why RRI?
2. What is it?
3. RRI, already a reality?
4. Conclusions
|
Why Responsible Research and Innovation?
Health and wellbeing
Clean energy
Climate action and
resource efficiency
Inclusive and
secure societies
Grand Challenges
Global poverty
|
Privacy issues: different atmacro and micro levels
Nanoparticles: Right impactinnovation?
ValueSensitiveDesign
Social perceptionof GMOs
Unmet
needs
Why RRI?
|
|
Outreach: focused on understanding, informing
Understanding
Dialogue
A need to transform the relationship between science and society: science for and with society
|
Patients being objects of studies and beneficiaries of researchresults decision making on research within experts
A need to transform the relationshipbetween science and society
|
DEFICIT MODEL
|
NEED FOR A TRANSFORMATIVE CHANGE OF THE R&I SYSTEM
|
1. Why RRI?
2. What is it?
3. RRI, already a reality?
4. Conclusions
|
A PROCESS OF R&D&I
|
Science Practice
|
Need for RRI
Problem Research Implementation
Science and practice join hands
Ex. biofuel
|
FROM SCIENTISTS RESPONSABILITY TO COLLECTIVE RESPONSABILITY
(Society into the research process)
Science for and with Society
|
FROM PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT TO
PUBLICLY ENGAGED SCIENCE
|
REFLECTION
&
CO-CREATION
|
FROM DEFICITTO DEMOCRACY
|
FROM KNOWLDEGE ECONOMY TO KNOWLEDGE DEMOCRACY
Orientating research, technology and innovation policy towards
societal challenges, rather than economic growth objectives only
| Who?
• Not only researchers and innovators
• As inclusive as possible and required
Researchers
Policymakers
Industry
CSOs
Educators
| Outcomes
1. Learning outcomes
• Engaged publics
• Responsible actors
• Responsible institutions
2. R&I outcomes
• Ethically acceptable
• Sustainable
• Socially desirable
3. Solutions to
societal challenges
• 7 Grand Challenges (EU)
| Our working definition
• Responsible research and innovation is a dynamic, iterative process;
• all stakeholders involved in the practice of research and innovation become mutually responsive;
• these stakeholders share the responsibility regarding the outcomes and processes of research and innovation.
|RRI: A dynamic and iterative process
Problem Research Implementation
|RRI: A dynamic and iterative process
Problem Research Implementation
|RRI: A dynamic and iterative process
Problem Research Implementation
Ex. biofuel
Responsiveness &
adaptativechange
|
How, exactly?
1. Learning outcomes
• Engaged publics
• Responsible actors
• Responsible institutions
2. R&I outcomes
• Ethically acceptable
• Sustainable
• Socially desirable
3. Solutions to
societal challenges
• 7 Grand Challenges (EU)
Outcomes:
Process requirements:
Responsiveness &
adaptativechange
Policy Agendas:
|
|
1. Why RRI?
2. What is it?
3. RRI, already a reality?
4. Conclusions
| RRI: already a reality?
Governance:
Institutional level:
What is right impact innovation?
Monitoring public opinion on nanotech...
What is right impact innovation?
• Information:
•Repository with 150 tools
•Communication campaign on social media
and The Guardian, El Mundo, Ticonuno, Le
courrier...
•Outreach events: products and experiments
(scientific and ELSA) + questionnaire
•Participatory workshops: general public and
consumers have to be engaged in the debate on
agenda setting, regulation and labelling.
Collaborative learning is essential for opinion
forming.
Monitoring public opinion on nanotech...
•Resources: moodle platform, protocols of
experiments, theatre discussion game, videos,
virtual experiment & teacher guides
•16 Teachers coordinators in 15 countries
•Implementation of activities
•Workshops for other teachers
•Feedback through questionnaires
Educational programme
|Community Advisory Boards and Community Advisors
• Changes and improvements in research funding applications
• Setting research agendas
• Help to address ethical issues
• Refined research protocols
• Analysed and interpreted findings
• Help to disseminate results and calls for volunteers
SUGAR, Service users
and carers Group
Advising on Research
@City University London
Community Advisory
Board
@IrsiCaixa
Burn survivors setting
research agendas
@Athena, Netherlands
|Xplore Health, empowering future citizens by participating in the R&I system
|Demands of Civil Society on scientific& research policyOrganised by German Federeation of Scientists
Allow more civil society participation in research through participation in the formulation of researchquestions and programs and representation in bodies of publicly funded scientific institutions.
Develop and implement transparent agenda processes for the list of priorities of public research fundingand with the participation of Civil Society (both in setting research agendas and in the implementation of research projects)
Strengthen the establishment of community-based, participatory institutions such as Science Shops orCommunity Based Research centers.
Give free access to research results
Foster capacity building in science policy
Expand significantly research programs and activities for future topics and transdisciplinary research
Establish a civil society research fund
Ensure adequate equipment for universities for basic research and teaching
| INDEX
1. Why RRI?
2. What is it?
3. RRI, already a reality?
4. Conclusions
|Complex problems need multidisciplinarity and collaboration
| Science cannot be isolated from Social Innovation
Take your responsability!
|
Rosina Malagrida
Deputy coordinator of RRI Tools
Head of Public Engagement on HealthResearch
IrsiCaixa, Hospital Germans Trias, Barcelona
www.irsicaixa.es/publicengagement
@RosinaMalagrida
@RRITools also on FB & Linkedin
Other members of the team:
Josep Carreras
Matilde Gordero
Laia Corbella
Josep Coll
In collaboration with: