qualitymanagementromanstyle (40/138)

40
Mott L.L. Groom September 2005 Annual Meeting INAA Rome

Upload: mllgroom

Post on 29-Jun-2015

609 views

Category:

Education


0 download

DESCRIPTION

The leadership skills and Emotional Intelligence of seven Roman emperors are evaluated while taking a virtual walking tour through ancient Rome. The complete 138 slide tour is available through [email protected]

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

Mott L.L. Groom

September 2005Annual Meeting INAA

Rome

Page 2: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

Today, we are going to take a walk around Rome and see what lessonsthe past has to offer.

Because Romans live with one foot in the past ^

Page 3: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

And yesterday’ challenges are still challenges 2000 years later, Because In Rome^

Page 4: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

Via S. Chiara

People still live in the samebuildings, like the 2000 year ol

baths of Agrippa ^

Page 5: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

they park their vehicles next to the 2400 year old Servian Wall

Page 6: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

they maneuveraround ancient structures ontheir way to work^AND

Page 7: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

AND . . .they jog along the ancient aqueducts, Hollywood . . .

Page 8: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

Palazzo Massimo. . . likes to emphasize the bizarre, with Gladiator combats and orgies

particularly by these two jokers.But, Most amazing thing about ancient Rome and its people is not the bizarre,

but the similarities with the presentSo today we’ll talk about Rome, and some of its leaders

in business terms, and for thisI have borrowed an article . . .

Page 9: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

Reprint, March/April 2000Daniel Goleman, Rutgers University

In this article, the author Daniel Goleman says good leadership gets resultsand good leadership results from a persons use of his or her^

Page 10: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

“the ability to manage ourselves and our relationships effectively”.

Emotional Intelligence consists of . . .

Page 11: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

Social Awareness:

Social Skill:

Self-Awareness:

Self-Management:

A manager needs to know his strengths and weaknessesin each of these areas. Briefly they are . . .

Page 12: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

Self-Awareness:Self-confidenceAccurate self -assessmentEmotional self-awareness

Self Awareness is knowing yourselfand your emotional situation

Page 13: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

Self Awareness:

Self-Management:Self-ControlAdaptabilityInitiativeTrustworthinessConscientiousness

Self Management, is how you act toward others

Page 14: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

Social Awareness:EmpathyOrganizational AwarenessService Orientation

Self Awareness:

Self-Management:

Social Awareness, is how you perceive social situations and interactions

Page 15: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

Social Awareness:

Social Skill:Visionary LeadershipInfluenceCommunication skill

OrganizationConflict Management

Self Awareness:

Self-Management:

And Social Skill is how you motivate, organize and produce results.Then a manager selects a management style for given situation.

there are six styles according to Goleman^

Page 16: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

1. Coercive . . . forcing

Page 17: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

1. Coercive . . . forcing2. Authoritative . . . leading, “follow me”

Page 18: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

1. Coercive . . . forcing2. Authoritative . . . leading, “follow me”3. Affiliative . . . People oriented

Affiliatiative, which involves people motivating one another

Page 19: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

1. Coercive . . . forcing2. Authoritative . . . leading, “follow me”3. Affiliative . . . People oriented4. Democratic . . . Consensus

Democratic which builds consensus

Page 20: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

1. Coercive . . . forcing2. Authoritative . . . leading, “follow me”3. Affiliative . . . People oriented4. Democratic . . . Consensus5. Pacesetting . . . Goal setting and achieving

Pacesetting which works against targets and goals

Page 21: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

1. Coercive . . . forcing2. Authoritative . . . leading, “follow me”3. Affiliative . . . People oriented4. Democratic . . . Consensus5. Pacesetting . . . Goal setting and achieving6. Coaching . . . mentoring

Today, Our survey will cover the period . . .

Page 22: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

From Julius Caesar in 48 BC to Constantine in 337 AD,and we’ll talk about 1 dictator and 7 emperors.We’ll look at a 20th century style leader like…

Page 23: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

Palazzo Massimo

Augustus ^ and Rome’s first auditor Emperor . . .

Page 24: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

Palazzo Massimo

Vatican and an Iraqi invader. . .

Page 25: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

and see how they succeeded or failed in their management challenges. These men didn’t pass their days in orgies or feasting at the vomitorium,

They spent full time managing an empire with techniquesand skills which aren’t very different than those practiced today.

The Roman empire^ they built . . .

Page 26: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

Was a hugely successful organization that At its peak by 160 AD, spanned 3 continents, a land area approximately the size of the

48 United States.Today, we will take a virtual walk around Rome and

learn some lessons from the people who built and ran i.

Imperial Forum

Page 27: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

Julius Caesar effectively endedthe Republican period in 48 BC.

As a Roman general he conquered Gaul and ended the running battles with

Rome’s neighbors.

Page 28: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

He then took his legions beyond his authorized territory, crossed the Rubicon river and marched on Rome.

Like any good takeover artist, he headed straight . . .

Imperial Forum

Page 29: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

. . .for the cashthat had

been stashedas a reserve against an invasion by Gaul, which

was no longer needed.

^ He then headed downthe Via Appia

Page 30: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

To pursue the deposed leader Pompey who was fleeing to set up a government in exile.Caesar, always an innovator, understood how to use modern^ technology and he

had his engineers design machines^.

Page 31: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

EUR

to attack Pompey’s fleeing ships.But, like so often happens today, the technology failed him and he had to resort to traditional warfare to defeat Pompey’s army

Then, after traveling to Egypt and having a son with its queen Cleopatra, Caesar returned to Rome to manage his empire . . .

Page 32: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

Palazzo Altemps

and in the Inferno, Dante describes his management style as “falcon eyed and fully armed”

But like a lot of takeover artists, Caesar didn’t’ have the disposition for management, First there was managing at headquarters rather than in the field ^ which meant that . . .

Page 33: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

Capitoline Museum

Skilled politicians like Cicerowere able to promote their own agenda and oppose

Caesar’s dictatorship.

Caesar also surrounded Himself with sycophants,

like Marc Antony whowanted him to declare

himself King.

While Caesar did makesome reforms in

fundamental areas such as . . .

Page 34: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

Palazzo Massimo

. . .a new solar calendar of 365 days. His ego kept getting in his way , he even named the 5th month July, after himself.

Caesar was guilty of two classical management mistakes.He was vulnerable to flattery and he

never appreciated thestrength and determination of his opposition.

so on the ides^ of march . . .

Page 35: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

E tuBrutus ?

March 44 BC, he was slain at this point in the Pompey theatre by 23 knife wounds.

Every year at the altar of the divine Julius in the Forum . . .

Page 36: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

flowers are still placed on his tomb.So, How do we judge Caesar ? As a manager . . .

Page 37: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

Marc Antony stood here and said “I come to bury Caesar not to praise him”,according to Shakespeare

But instead of literature, we’ll use Professor Goleman’s criteria.

Page 38: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

Emotional Intelligence

9

7

4

66.5

123456789

10

Self Aware Self Mngt. SocialAware

SocialSkills

Avg.

Julius Caesar

I give Caesar low scores in social awareness and social skills,He was a good talker but a lousy listener and as a result he

didn’t appreciate the strength and conviction of his opponentsand therefore didn’t employ his social awareness and social

skills to win them over , he paid the price, he was assassinatedAnd he was certainly . . .

Page 39: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

1. Coercive . . . forcing2. Authoritative . . . leading, “follow me”3. Affiliative . . . People oriented4. Democratic . . . Consensus5. Pacesetting . . . Goal setting and achieving6. Coaching . . . mentoring

A coercive leader with his opposition and detractors, although avery authoritative leader with his troops and supporters who idolized him.

Page 40: QualityManagementRomanStyle (40/138)

31 BC- 14 AD

Octavian So having dispatched Caesar, lets turned to his adopted son and successor, Octavian. After Caesar’s assassinatio

there was a long succession struggle, The 3 contenders (MA, Octavian , Lepidus) agreed to power sharing, and divi