quality assurance summary report and data …

74
QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA VALIDATION FOR GROUND-WATER SAMPLES FROM MONITORING WELLS (THIRD ROUND-FIRSTSET) July 1991 Prepared for Novak Sanitary South Whitehall Township, Pennsylvania Prepared by Geraghty & Miller, Inc. 201 West Passaic Street Rochelle Park, New Jersey 07662 (201)909-0700 flR30l972 GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.

Upload: others

Post on 05-May-2022

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORTAND DATA VALIDATION FORGROUND-WATER SAMPLESFROM MONITORING WELLS(THIRD ROUND-FIRST SET)

July 1991

Prepared for

Novak SanitarySouth Whitehall Township, Pennsylvania

Prepared by

Geraghty & Miller, Inc.201 West Passaic Street

Rochelle Park, New Jersey 07662(201)909-0700 flR30l972

GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.

Page 2: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORTAND DATA VALIDATION FOR GROUND-WATER SAMPLES

FROM MONITORING WELLS

REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDYAT THE NOVAK SANITARY LANDFILL

SOUTH WHITEHALL TOWNSHD?, PENNSYLVANIA

Prepared forNovak RI/FS PRP Group

Jury 18, 1991

ct Sdenfet/RI

Staff Scientist, Geraghty & Miller, Inc. Date

_________ -,/,>ject Scicptist/RDQAM, Date

Anthonys. Rana/P Sject Scientist/Project Manager, Date/Geraghty & Mffler, Inc. \V \_ u t___ X, • i—C»*JKA«»CJL \% ?>y N. \ ti

J. Lawrence Hosmer, P.E., Vice President/Project Officer DateGeraghty & Miller, Inc.

Geraghty & Miller, Inc.Environmental Services201 West Passaic Street

Rochelle Park, New Jersey 07662AR30I973

GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.

Page 3: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

CONTENTS _

Page \

1.0 OVERVIEW .......................................... 1-1

2.0 ORGANICS - VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DATA VALIDATIONNARRATIVE SUMMARY ................................ 2-1

2.1 Holding Time ..................................... 2-12.2 Blank Contamination ................................ 2-12.2.1 Method Blank Contamination ........................... 2-12.2.2 Field Blank Contamination ............................. 2-22.2.3 Trip Blank Contamination ............................. 2-32.3 Mass Spectrometer Tuning ............................. 2-32.4 Calibration ...................................... 2-32.4.1 Response Factor ................................... 2-42.4.2 Percent Relative Standard Deviation

and Percent Difference ............................... 2-42.5 Surrogates ....................................... 2-52.6 Internal Standards Performance .......................... 2-52.7 Compound Identification .............................. 2-62.3 Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate ...................... 2-62.9 System Performance and Overall Assessment ................. 2-7 ,

TABLES

Table 2-1 Holding Times from Sampling Date to Volatile Analysis for the Monitoring WellGround-Water Samples Collected at the Novak Sanitary Landfill, South WhitehallTownship, Pennsylvania, May 1991.

Table 2-2 Method Blanks and Associated Samples for the Monitoring Well Ground-WaterSamples Collected at the Novak Sanitary Landfill, South Whitehall Township,Pennsylvania, May 1991.

HR30197I*

GERAGHTY ff MILLER. INC.

Page 4: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

( J APPENDICES

A. Data Qualifier Glossary.

B. Data Summary Forms, Organic Regional Data Assessment Form, and Abbreviated DataValidation Narrative. ?•••'•

C. Laboratory Forms Is.

D. Organic Tentatively Identified Compounds.

E. Support Documentation.

AB30I975

GERAGHTY 8 MILLER. INC.

Page 5: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

1.0 OVERVIEW

This report presents the data validation and data summary of the nine aqueous fieldsamples, three aqueous trip blanks, and one aqueous field blank collected from monitoring wellsat the Novak Sanitary Landfill in South Whitehall Township, Pennsylvania on May 6,7, and 8,1991. The sample identifications and corresponding matrices are provided in the followingtable:

Sample Field ID MatrixNSL-MW-1C-03 waterNSL-MW-2A-03 waterNSL-MW-06-03 waterNSL-MW-06-03R waterNSL-MW-07-03 waterNSL-MW-16-01 waterNSL-MW-16-01B waterNSL-MW-17-01 waterNSL-MW-18-01 waterNSL-MW-19-01 waterNSL-MW-TB-11 waterNSL-MW-TB-12 waterNSL-MW-TB-13 water

Sample NSL-MW-19-01 was used for the matrix spike (MS) and matrix spike duplicate(MSD) analyses. The volatile organic compounds were analyzed by NET Atlantic, Inc.Cambridge Division Laboratories using United States Environmental Protection Agency(USEPA) Method 8240 in accordance with the Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) Statementof Work (SOW) revised January 1987.

ftR301976

GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.

Page 6: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

2.0 ORGANICS - VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDSDATA VALIDATION NARRATIVE SUMMARY

2.1 HOLDING TIME

The holding time for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in preserved samples isfourteen days from sampling to analysis; therefore the samples must be analyzed within this timeframe. The associated data for samples that exceed holding time are qualified as estimated (J),or estimated at the sample quantitation limit (UJ). The data for samples that have grosslyexceeded holding times are qualified using professional judgment.

All of the samples were analyzed within the specified holding time (Table 2-1).

2.2 BLANK CONTAMINATION

Quality assurance (QA) blanks, i.e. method, field, rinse, and water blanks areprepared to identify any contaminant which may have been introduced into the samples duringsample preparation or field activity. Method blanks measure laboratory contamination, tripblanks measure cross-contamination of samples during shipment, and field blanks measure cross-contamination of samples during field procedures. If the concentration of the analyte is less thanfive times the blank contaminant level (ten times for common laboratory contaminants) theanalytes are qualified as not detected substantially above the level reported in the blank (B).

2.2.1 Method Blank Contamination

Method blanks and associated samples are listed in Table 2-2.

Method blank VBLK051391K is reported to contain 27 ug/L of acetone, a commonlaboratory contaminant. Samples NSL-MW-lC-03, -06-03, -06-03R, -07-03, -16-01, -16-01B(field blank), -18-01, and TB-11 (trip blank) are all associated with this method blank. SamplesNSL-MW-16-01 and NSL-MW-18-01 are not qualified using this method blank since the

AR30I977GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.

Page 7: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

2-2

associated field blank (NSL-MW-16-01B) is reported to contain more acetone than method blank \ JVBLK051391K.

Samples NSL-MW-lC-03, -06-03, -06-03R, and -16-01B are all reported to containless than ten times (< 10X) the concentration of acetone in the associated method blank;therefore the associated data are qualified as not detected substantially above the level reportedin the associated blank (B). Acetone was undetected in samples NSL-MW-07-03 and NSL-MW-TB-11 (trip blank); therefore the associated sample data require no qualification.

Method blank VBLK051491K is reported to contain 1 ug/L of 1,1,2-trichloroethane,1 ug/L of bromoform, 8 ug/L of 2-hexanone, and 2 ug/L of 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane. SamplesNSL-MW-2A-03, -17-01, -19-01, -19-01MS (matrix spike), -19-01MSD (matrix spikeduplicate), -TB-12 (trip blank), and TB-13 (trip blank) are all associated with this method blank.All of the compounds, other than 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane, were undetected in all of theassociated samples; therefore all of the associated sample data do not require qualification. , ;

Sample NSL-MW-2A-03 is reported to contain 1 ug/L of 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane.Since this sample contains < 5X the amount of 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane contained in theassociated method blank, this result is qualified as not detected substantially above the levelreported in the associated method blank (B).

2.2.2 Field Blank Contamination

Field blank NSL-MW-16-01B is reported to contain 37 ug/L of acetone. SamplesNSL-MW-16-01, -17-01, -18-01, -19-01, -19-01MS, -19-01MSD, and -TB-13 (trip blank) areall associated with this field blank. Samples NSL-MW-17-01, -18-01, -TB-13, and -19-01MSare all reported to contain < 10X the amount detected in the field blank; therefore these dataare qualified, "B". Acetone was undetected in samples NSL-MW-16-01, -19-01, and -19-01MSD; therefore the associated sample data do not require qualification.

A R 30 1 97 8GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.

Page 8: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

2-3

2.2.3 Trip Blank Contamination

No contaminants were detected in trip blanks NSL-MW-TB-1 1 or NSL-MW-TB-12.••"'.•:', (."• •"

Trip blank NSL-MW-TB-13 is reported to contain 11 ug/L of acetone. All of thesamples that are associated with the field blank (NSL-RW-16-01B) are also associated with thistrip blank. Since the field blank contains more acetone than this trip blank, the field blank isused to qualify the associated sample data.

2.3 MASS SPECTROMETER TUNING

Tuning and performance criteria are established to ensure adequate mass resolution,proper identification of compounds, and to some degree, sufficient instrument sensitivity. Thesecriteria are not sample specific. Instrument performance is determined using standard reference

i , materials. Therefore, these criteria should be met in all circumstances. The tuning standard forvolatile organics is bromofiuorobenzene (BFB).

All mass calibrations and instrument tunes are acceptable.

2.4 CALIBRATION

Satisfactory instrument calibration is established to ensure that the instrument iscapable of producing acceptable quantitative data. An initial calibration demonstrates that theinstrument is capable of giving acceptable performance at the beginning of the experimentalsequence. The continuing calibration checks document that the instrument is giving satisfactorydaily performance.

AR30I979

GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.

Page 9: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

2-4

2.4.1 Response Factor

The response factor measures an instrument's response to specific chemicalcompounds. The response factor for the target compound list (TCL) must be _>.0.05 (a ratioof areas) in both the initial and continuing calibration. A value < 0.05 indicates poor sensitivity.Analytes detected in the sample are qualified as biased low (L) and non-detects are unusable andrejected (R).

All response factors are >0.05 for all of the initial and continuing calibrations.

2.4.2 Percent Relative Standard Deviation and Percent Difference

Percent relative standard deviation (%RSD) is calculated on the initial calibration andis used to indicate the stability of the specific compound response factor over increasing v/concentrations. Percent difference (%D) compares the response factor of the continuingcalibration check to the relative (mean) response factor (RRF) from the initial calibration; %Dis a measure of an instrument's daily performance. %RSD must be _<30% and %D must be<35 %. A value outside of these limits indicates potential detection and quantitation errors. Forthese reasons, all positive results are qualified as estimated (J) and non-detects are qualifiedusing professional judgment.

All %R5Ds for the initial calibration performed May 7,1991 on instrument HP5970Kare within quality control (QQ limits (< 30%).

All %Ds for the continuing calibration performed May 13, 1991 on instrumentHP5970K are within QC limits (< 25%).

The continuing calibration performed May 14, 1991 on instrument HP5970K had a> 25% for carbon disulfide (48.4%). Samples NSL-MW-2A-03, -17-01, -19-01, 19-

GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC. ft H O U I _

Page 10: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

2-5

01MS, -19-01MSD, -TB-12 (trip blank), -TB-13 (trip blank), and VBLK051491K (methodblank), are all associated with this deficiency. As carbon disulfide was undetected in all of theassociated samples, no data qualification is necessary.

2.5 SURROGATES

All samples are spiked with surrogate compounds prior to sample preparation in orderto evaluate overall laboratory performance and efficiency of the analytical technique. If themeasured surrogate concentrations are outside contract specifications, data are qualified "L" ifbiased low, and "K" if biased high.

All of the surrogate percent recoveries (%Rs) are within QC limits.

2.6 INTERNAL STANDARDS PERFORMANCE

Internal standards ensure that the GC/MS sensitivity and response are stable duringevery experimental run. The internal standard area count must not vary by more than a factorof 2 (-50% to +100%) from the associated continuing calibration standard. The retention timeof the internal standard must not vary more than ±.30 seconds from the associated continuingcalibration standard. If the area count is outside the range, all positive results for compoundsquantitated using that internal standard are qualified as an estimated (J) and all non-detects areestimated at the sample quantitation limit (UJ), or unusable and rejected (R), if there is a severeloss of sensitivity.

. * ' - • '. • ' , • • •

All internal standard area counts and retention times are within QC limits.

RR30I98I

GERAGHTY 8MILLER. INC.

Page 11: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

2-6

2.7 COMPOUND IDENTDICATION

TCL compounds are identified on the GC/MS by using the analyte's relative retentiontime (RRT) and by comparison to the ion spectra obtained from known standards. For theresults to be a positive hit, the sample peak must be within +.0.06 RRT units of the standardcompound and have an ion spectra which has a ratio of the primary and secondary m/e(mass/charge) intensities within 20% of that in the standard compound. For the tentativelyidentified compounds (TICs) the ion spectra must match accurately. In the cases where thereis not an adequate ion spectrum match, the laboratory may have provided false positiveidentifications.

Positive results for volatile organic compounds are properly identified on the GC/MS.Sample peaks are within 0.06 RRT units of the standard compound and match ion spectra inaccordance with Q C criteria. \ y

Dichlorofluoromethane as well as several other tentatively identified and unknowncompounds have been reported as TICs associated with many of the samples. The presence ofthese compounds cannot be attributed to blank contamination. In addition, all of the data forTICs are quantitatively qualified as estimated (J) since the GC/MS was not calibrated for thesecompounds.

2.3 MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE

The matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) data are generated todetermine the long term precision and accuracy of the analytical method in various matrices.

All %Rs and relative percent differences (RPDs) are within QC limits.

GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.

Page 12: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

2-7

2.9 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE AND OVERALL ASSESSMENT

It is appropriate for the data reviewer to make professional judgments and expressconcerns and comments on the validity of the overall data for a case. This is particularlyappropriate when there are several QC criteria out of specification. The additive nature of QCfactors out of specifications is difficult to assess in an objective manner. The reviewer has aresponsibility to inform the user concerning data quality and data limitations to assist the userin avoiding inappropriate use of the data. Therefore, this review has presented all QC factorswhich may affect the quality of the data.

Overall, NET Atlantic Cambridge Division has presented data of good quality andacceptable completeness. No data are rejected in the volatile organic fraction. Some data arequalified "B" to indicate that a compound is not detected substantially above the amount found

i , in the associated blank. Positive data mat are less than the corresponding contract requiredquantitation limit (CRQL) are qualified as estimated (J), unless the compound is not detectedsubstantially above the level reported hi the associated blank. In this case, the "B" qualifiersupersedes the "J" qualifier.

AR301983

GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.

Page 13: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

TABLES

ft R 30

GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.

Page 14: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

Table 2-1. Holding Times from Sampling Date to Volatile Analysis for the MonitoringI \ Well Ground-Water Samples Collected at the Novak Sanitary Landfill- South Whitehall Township, Pennsylvannia, May 1991

Maximum Holding Time 14 days(from sampling)

Sample Field ID Date Sampled Date Analyzed

NSL-MW-lC-03 5/6791 5/13/91

NSL-MW-2A-03 5/7/91 5/14/91

NSL-MW-06-03 5/7/91 5/13/91

NSL-MW-06-03R 5/7/91 5/13/91

NSL-MW-07-03 5/7/91 5/13/91

. , NSL-MW-16-01 5/8/91 5/13/91

NSL-MW-16-01B 5/8/91 5/13/91

NSL-MW-17-01 5/8/91 5/14/91

NSL-MW-18-01 5/8/91 5/13/91

NSL-MW-19-01 5/8/91 5/14/91

NSL-MW-TB-11 5/6/91 5/13/91

NSL-MW-TB-12 5/7/91 5/14/91

NSL-MW-TB-13 5/8/91 5/14/91

KJ06403-3/HOLD2.WK3

AR30I985

GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.

Page 15: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

Table 2-2. Method Blanks and Associated Samples for the Monitoring WellGround- Water Samples Collected at the Novak Sanitary Landfill,South Whitehall Township, Pennsylvania, May 1991.

Method Blank Associated Sample (Field ED)

VBLK051391K NSL-MW-lC-03NSL-MW-06-03NSL-MW-06-03R(replicate)NSL-MW-07-03NSL-MW-16-01NSL-MW-16-01BNSL-MW-18-01NSL-MW-TB-11(trip blank)

VBLK051491K NSL-MW-2A-03NSL-MW-17-01NSL-MW-19-01NSL-MW-19-01MS(matrix spike)NSL-MW-19-10MSD(matrix spike duplicate)NSL-MW-TB-12(trip blank)NSL-MW-TB-13(trip blank)

NJ06403/meth2

ftR30l986GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.

Page 16: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

APPENDIX A

DATA QUALmER GLOSSARY

GERAGHTY 8 MILLER. INC.

&R30I987

Page 17: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

GLOSSARY OF DATA QUALIFIER CODES (ORGANIC)

CODES RELATING TO IDENTIFICATION(confidence concerning presence or absence of compounds):

U = Not detected The associated number indicates approximate sampleconcentration necessary to be detected.

(NO CODE) = Confirmed identification.

B = Not detected substantially above the level reported in laboratory orfield blanks.

R = Unreliable result Analyte may or may not be present in the sample.Supporting data necessary to confirm result.

N = Tentative identification. Consider present Special methods may beneeded to confirm its presence or absence in future sampling efforts.

CODES RELATED TO OUANTTTATION(can be used for both positive results and sample quantitation limits):

J = Analyte present Reported value may not be accurate or precise.

K = Analyte present Reported value may be biased high. Actual value isexpected to be lower.

L = Analyte present Reported value may be biased low. Actual value isexpected to be higher.

UJ = Not detected, quantitation limit may be inaccurate or imprecise.

UL » Not detected, quantitation limit is probably higher.

OTHER CODES

Q = No analytical result

NJ06403/071891 58301988"

GERAGHTY S MILLER. INC.

Page 18: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

APPENDIX B

DATA SUMMARY FORMS, ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT FORM,AND ABBREVIATED NARRATIVE

AR30I989

GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC

Page 19: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

O

ts

-H

001

March 6. 7

,

fQj

aV

|

i

i

i!a«•a

tesam

Tr» ralr-ula

•1•2£§

3

ei

1a

siii

f

|?1

f

NSL-MW-06

I<3

U

z

!

a

a

a

s

3

a

3

1

5

1

1

1

j

g

1

2

j

j

j

Locatkw

Comoouui

1

i

8i

i3

a

3

3

3

j3

-

0*

•*

j

S

a

-

a

5

a

S

a

R

a

*

a

a

»

|

S

]-

1 U-DKUoratbene

1

•fi

ce

w

*-

1 1.1-Dickloroelh.ne

1

-

CJ

W)

S

1

-

m

I

A1<e>

a

-

»A

i

-

(M

3

j

j2

-

(S

•"

|3

£

-

Ul

IIA

8

iftiV)

-;1 3

1 sz O

w uQ

8OS2S35

|w

^a

CO .CSConiract Requited (

laSiA

VO UD , °c

W 3

Page 20: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

WBTfi ;;oCMS>5 <

ttlJ

o>

&

iII

2

•s-

fcs

,.- - 1

S

ifIj

S

j

fj

IT

?

1

?

1

*?

j

J!

§

j

§

1

S

J

8

§

a

I

2

J

JJ

g

g

1

2

jj

JgiJ

! 1

, f:

" t-; i

• >

" 1

: i

• ;

: ;

s f

c

^M

7

(4

,

«

|

8

1:i

/

tl

1

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

*

,

«

i

1j

t

-

w>

4-Me**-2-pe«ta.o«e |

S

f

:

iS

i

8'l

:|

n

-

8

1

1

-

-

-

«

*

«

S

S

-

«

c

8

CJ

|8 ,

"

0)

-

ft

-

iTMlXvfewt

1

Q£LU

I 1@ aii

Page 21: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

f»U

S

00

5

J-

aB

e

1EaV

11

ii

IIli30

P

'

9

ja

j

1II

StupfeN*

,

j

a

aj.|g

£

a

s

a

J

^omDOund

e5

a

3

a

3

|3

j

3

1

MelhykoeCtk

a

s

Acetone

3

•9ui\

a

1 U-DkUon*

-

M

3

"

-

JoeoetheiM

1

i|J

1 U-OicUone

1

3

a

3

.ft 13

1

j

a

j

8

J2a

21

20

18m^062

ii

ccG•MM

f

or

1 8

9

Ti§i

LU

>-

q111

Page 22: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

aeuS^>

i

S3

£

.1

001

March 6, 7)

>•>

I

1•

«0

1

Iji!s£s"

e

£»

125

siIj

\

a

§

§

1I

1

3

<;

j

f

f"-' '

. - . . , - ,

1

db

i

I'l1 , [5 j i

i:|1 1

w

|

1i,• ij i

i i

i

l11

j

V

s7

s

i

i

i't= |4 1

8'l

i

»

,!

i!i ,

I

B

2OEz

g81

ii

aei'g

a

IU30I993o s6 1

Page 23: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

2r*i tilli!

itz2

J!

l

i

OOOO ffl O O OOVVVVV —VVVV VVVVV VVVVV VVVVV VVVVV VVVV

OOOO O O— — — — <n — «n«o>n<o >/»«rt—VVVVV VVVVV VVVVV VVVVV VVVVV VVVVV VVVV

oooo o 22 22«VVVVV VVVVV VVVVV VVVVV VVVVV VVVVV VVVV

2222 2 m mm2VVVVV VVVpi— VVVVV VVVVV VVVVV VVVVJJJ VVVV

2222m ffl mm mm2mm 2 mm 22*VVVVV SVVVV VVVVV VVVVV VVVVV VVVV- VVVV

OOOO 09 2 ° °°vvvvv 2vvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv£ vvvv

oooo oa 22 " 22vvvvv Rvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvv

2222m 2mm mm2mm 2mmm mm mm 22«VVVVV VVVcoJJ VVVVV VVVVw VV^VV VVVV'S 2VVV

2222m 2mm mm2mm 2m m mm mm 22^VVVVV VVV»m VVVVV VVVV^ VV-VV VVVVS VVVV

22 o 2 2 22«VV2ttV fl^VViS^ VmVVV VVVV"* VV*OVV VVVV —

22 M m O mm2m 2 22Vw\/or»w Piwv/wjS VVVVV VVVV? VVt-VV VVVVS VVV«

2222 2 mm mm2 2 m 22vvvvv vvvv£ vvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvv2w vvvv

oooo ca 2 O— <nv» —vvvvv pvvvv vvvvv vvvvv

Bslii

1991*

Page 24: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

Region IIIORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT

CASE NO.FM356_______________._____ SITE NOVAK SANITARY LANDFILL (MONITORINGWELLS>

i j LABORATORY NET ATLANTIC. CAMBRIDGE DIV. NO. OF, SAMPLES/x—' MATRIX 13/AOUEOUS_______________

SDGtf N/A__________________ •'• REVIEWER (If NOT ESD)_

SOW#_l/87_________________jj_____ REVIEWER'S NAME CAMERON DUNNAN

DPO: ACTION__ FYIX________________ COMPLETION DATE June 20. 1991

DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

VOA BNA PEST OTHER

1. HOLDING TIMES _Q____ N/A N/A N/A

2. GC/MS TUNE/INSTR. PERFORM. _Q____ N/A N/A N/A

3. CALIBRATIONS X____ N/A N/A N/A

4. BLANKS O____ N/A N/A N/A

5. SURROGATES _Q____ N/A N/A N/A

6. MATRIX SPKE/DUP _Q ____ N/A N/A N/A

7. OTHER QC N/A N/A N/A N/A

8. INTERNAL STANDARDS O____ N/A N/A N/A

9. COMPOUND IDENTIFICATION O____ N/A N/A N/A

10. SYSTEM PERFORMANCE _Q____ N/A N/A N/A

11. OVERALL ASSESSMENT _Q____ N/A N/A N/A

O * Data had DO problems/or qualified due to minor problems.M »= Data'qualified due to major problems.Z - Data unacceptable.X - Problems, but do not affect data.

ACTION ITEMS: Some data are qualified "6" because the compound was not detected substantially above the level reportedin an associated blank. Positive data less than the corresponding contract required quantitation limit (CROP are qualifiedas estimated /J>.______________________________________________________AREAS OF CONCERN:_________'••' ''____________________________________

NOTABLE PERFORMANCE: Overall, the data presented are of good quality mid acceptable completeness._______

OXDAF

flR301995

GERAGHTY 6? MILLER. INC.

Page 25: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

1.0 ABBREVIATED DATA VALIDATION NARRATIVE SUMMARY FOR THEVOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSTS OF GROUND-WATER SAMPLES FROMMONITORING WELLS AT THE NOVAK SANITARY LANDFILL. SOUTH

WHITEHALL TOWNSHIP. PENNSYLVANIA

1.1 BLANK CONTAMINATION

1.1.1 Method Blank Contamination

Method blank contamination is reported. The common laboratory contaminant,acetone, was detected in one of the method blanks. All of the samples associated with thismethod blank are reported to contain less than ten times (< 10X) the concentration of acetonein the associated method blank; therefore the associated sample data are qualified as not detectedsubstantially above the level reported in the blank (B). Acetone was undetected in other

\

associated samples; therefore the data associated with these samples do not require qualification.

Another method blank is reported to contain 1,1,2-trichloroethane, bromoform,2-hexanone, and 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane. All of the compounds, other than 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane, are undetected in all of the associated samples; therefore the affected sampledata do not require qualification. One sample is reported to contain < 5X the amount of1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane in the associated method blank; therefore this result is qualified "B".

1.1.2 Field Blank Contamination

Field blank contamination is reported. The common laboratory contaminant,acetone, was detected in the field blank. All of the samples associated with this method blankare reported to contain less than ten times ( < 10X) the concentration of acetone in the associatedmethod blank; therefore the associated sample data are qualified as not detected substantiallyabove the level reported in the blank (B). Acetone was undetected in other associated samples;therefore the data associated with these samples do not require qualification, n n f996

GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.

Page 26: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

1.1.3 Trio Blank Contamination

Trip blank contamination is reported. The common laboratory contaminant,acetone, was detected in one of the trip blanks. All of the samples that are associated with thistrip blank are also associated with the field blank. Since the field blank contains more acetonethan this trip blank, the field blank is used to qualify the associated sample data.

1.2 . CALIBRATION I

One of the continuing calibrations had a percent difference (%D) from the initialcalibration of greater than (>) 25% for carbon disulfide (48.4%). Carbon disulfide wasundetected in all of the associated samples; therefore the associated sample data do not requirequalification.

AR 30199 7

GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.

Page 27: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

APPENDIX C

LABORATORY FORM Is

GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.

Page 28: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

U , . . EPA SAMPLE NO.VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ___________

I I| NSLMUIC03 |

Lab Mane: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAKJI j_________j

L«b Code: CAMBRG Case Mo.: FN3S6 SAS No.: SDG No.:

Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 910504S-01AX

Sample wt/vol: 5.0 <g/nL) ML Lab File 1C: K8713

Level: (lew/ned) LOW Date Received: 05/07/91

X Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed: 05/13/91

Column: (pack/cap) PACK Dilution Factor: 1.0

CONCENTRATION UNITS:CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L

74-87-3———Ch loromethane__74-83-9--———Bromoaethane75-01-4—————vinyl Chloride.75•00-3-••-••—Chloroethane75.09-2—————Methylene chloride.67-64-1—————Acatone_______75-15-0—————Carbon Oisulfide_75-35-4—————1.1-Dichloroethene.75-34-3—————1.1-0ichlorcethane~540-59-0-————1,2-Ofchleroethene (total)67-66-3————Chloroform__________107-06-2-———1,2-fllchloroe thane.78-93-3———"2-Butanone71-55-6————1,1,1-THehloroethane.56-23-5————Carbon Tetrachleride.108-05-4————Vinyl Acetate____"75-27-4———Brcnodichloroniethane78-87-5————1.2-CHchlorooropane10061-01-5———ci«-1,3-0lchlcropropene_79-01 -6-———Trichloroethene_____124-48-1--------0ibronochloromethane.79-00-5-——-—1,1,2-Trichloroethane.71-43-2—————Benzene_______10061-02-6———trans-1,3-0ichlorcpropene_75-25-2————Brcnofora_________108-10-1————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_591-78-6————2-iexanone______127-18-4————Tetrachloroethene.79-34-5 ————— 1.1>2.2-Tetrachloroethane108-88-3— — -Toluene.108-90-7———"Chlorobenzene.100-41-4————Ethytbenzene__100-42-5————ttvrene

I1330-20-7 ——— Xytene (total)

I10 JU10 JU10 JU10 JU5 |U77 |85 |U5 |U5 |U5 |05 |U5 |U10 |U5 |U5 |U10 |U5 |U5 |U5 |U5 |US |US |U4 |J5 |U5 |US |J10 JU5 |U5 |U43 |26 |5 |lt5 |U6 ft

FORM I VQA 1/87 Rev. AR30J999

Page 29: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

1A EPA SAMPLE NO.VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET __________

INSLMW2A03 | __,.

Lab Name: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAK_II j_________j ;

Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No.: FM356 5AS No.: SOG No.:

Matrix: (soil/water) UATEX Lab Sanple ID: 9105066-03AX

Sample ut/vol: 5.0 (g/raL) ML Lab File ID: K8742

Level: (lou/ned) LOW Oat* Received: 05/08/91

X Moisture: not dec. Oat* Analyzed: 05/14/91

Column: (pack/cap) PACK Dilution Factor: 1.0

CONCENTRATION UNITS:CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L

Ij 74-87-3—————Oiloromethane_| 74-83-9--———Bromomethane75-01-4———Vinyl Chloride.75-00-3-——"CM oroethan*75-09-2—————HethyIen. Chloride.67-64-1—————Acetone______~75-15-0—————Carbon Disulfide_75-35-4————1.1-Oichloroethen*.75-34-3————1.1-Olchloroethane.540-59-0————1.2-Dfehloroethene (total)_67-66-3————Chloroform_______________107-06-2———1.2-Olchloroethene.73.93.3.———2-Butanorw_____71-53-6—————1,1,1-Trlchloroethane.56*23-3—————Carbon Tetrachlorid*_108-05-4————Vinyl Acetate______75-27-4————Bromodichlorometh an*.78-87-5—————1,2-0tchloropropane_10061-01-5———cis-1,3-Dichloropropem_79-01-6———Trlchloroethene________124-48-1—-----Dlbronochloromethane79-00-5———1,1,2-THchloroethane.71-43-2—————Benzene______10061-02-6———trans-1,3-Dichloropropen«_75-25-2———BrcBoforn______________108-10-1———-4-Methyl-2-Pentanonei_591-78-6———2-ttexanone127-18-4————Tetrachloroethene79-34-3————1,t.2.2-Tetrachloroethsne.108-88-3———•Toluene_________108-90-7———Chlorobenzen*.100-41-4———EthylbenzeneJ100-42-5————-Stvrene1330-20-7————Xylene (total).

I10 JU10 JU10 JU10 JUs |u10 JU5 |U5 |U5 |U3 N5 |u5 |U10 JU5 JU5 |U10 |U5 |U5 |U5 |U3 |U3 |U5 |U3 |U5 |U5 |U10 JU10 JU5 |tl

25555

FORM I VGA 1/37 Rev.

&R3Q2QOQ

Page 30: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

1A ' ERA SAMPLE NO.VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET __________

; * j NSLMU0603 jLab Name: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAKJI j_____ )

Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No.: FM356 SAS No.: ' SOG No.: '• ' ..

Matrix: (soil/water) WATER LabSample ID: 9105066-02AX

Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: K8716

Level: (low/wed) LOU Date Received: 05/08/91

X Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed: 05/13/91

Column: (pack/cap) PACK Dilution 'Factor: 1,0

CONCENTRATION UNITS:CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/ICg) UG/L Q

74-87-3 —74-83-9—75-01-4—75-00-3 —75.09.2—67-64-1 —75-15-0 —75-35-4—75-34-3—rff V * W w

67-66-3—107-06-2--78-93-3 —71-55-6—56-23-5 —108-05-4"75-27-4 —78-87-5—10061-01-579-01-6—124-48-1"• w w »

71-43-2—10061 -02-<75-25-2 —108-10-1--591-78-6-127-18-4-

108-88-3--108-90-7--100-41-4-100-42-5--1330-20-7-

— — Bromonethane

— — Chloroethane '—— -Methvlene Chloride——Acetone

—— -1.1-Dfchloreethene

——— 1,2-Oichloroethene (total)-——Chloroform =— — 1.2-Dfchleroethane—— — 2-Butanone— — 1.1.1-Trichleroethane......Carbon Tetrachloride——— Vinvl Acetate

Jl LI k

•-— -cit-1.3-DichloroDrooene

—— -1,1.2-Trlchloroethane ____ ..——Benzene——— tram- 1. 3-D ichlcropropene

— — Tetrechloroethene 4— — 1.1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane——— Toluene———Chlorobenzene——— Ethvlbenzene——— Ctvrene——— XVlene (total)

10 |U; 10 |Uf . J _IM; 10

7 N5 |U27 IB5 |U5 |U75180

; s fu5 |U10 |Us |u5 |U10 |U5 |U5 |U5 |U

e 40f 5 |U? 5 JU1 7 I

• 5 |U5 U10 U10 US U

1 5 U: « 1

5 |U5 |U5 U3 JY

.. —

FORM 1 VGA 1/87 Rev.

AB30200I

Page 31: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

1A EPA SAMPLE NO.VOLATILE ORGAN1CS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET __________

I I| NSLMU0603R |

Lab Name: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAKJI |_________|

Lab Coda: CAMBRG Case Ho.: FM356 SAS No.: SDG No.:

Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 9105066-01AX

Sample ut/vol: 5.0 (g/raU ML Lab File ID: K3715

Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 05/08/91

X Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed: 05/13/91

Colum: (pack/cap) PACK Dilution Factor: 1.0

CONCENTRATION UNITS:CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 9

74-87-3---— —Chloromethane74-83-9— ——— Bran-methane75-01-4 ————— Vinyl Chloride75-00-3— — — Chloroethane75-09-2 ————— Methvlene Chloride67-64-1 ————— Acetone , ,_, , , ,

7S-35-4 ————— 1.1-Dichloroethene75-34-3 ————— 1.1-Df Chloroethane540-59-0 ———— 1,2-Dfchloroethene (total) _67-66-3- —— ——Chloroform107-06-2 ———— 1.2-Dlchloroethane78-93-3— ——— 2-Butanone71-55-6 ————— 1.1.1-Trichloroethane ________56-23-5 ————— Carbon Tetrachloride108-05-4 ———— Vlnvl Acetate75-27-4— •— --Bromodichloromethane

10061-01-5— — ci»-1.3-DichloroproDene79-01-6 ————— Trichloroethene124-48-1—— —Dibromochloromethane79.00-5 ————— 1,1.2-Trichloroethane ________71-43-2 — ———Benzene10041-02-6 ——— trans-1 .3-Oichloropropene75-25-2 ————— Broooforn .108-10-1 ———— 4-Methvl-2-Pentanone591.78-6— ——— 2-Hexanone127-18-4 ———— Tetradiloroethene79-34-5 ———— •1.1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane1oa-aa-3 ———— Toluene108-90-7 ———— Chlorobenzene100-41-4 ———— Ethvlbenzene100-42-5 ———— Stvrene1330-20-7- ——— Xvlene (total) „„, ., ,

10 |10 |10 IIIII74 |170 |* 1510 |3 is I10 |S 1S535

1010

1

3

Uu

JuBJUU

U

UUUUuuuuu«uuu«uuuu4Y

ftR302002

Page 32: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

1A '' EPA SAMPLE NO.VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ___________

, 1 I; \ NSLMW0703 |

s Name: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAK II ..„ j_________j

'Code: CAMBRG Case No.: FM356 SAS No.: SOG No.:

Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 9105066-04AX

Sample ut/vol: 5.0 (g/raL) ML Lab File ID: K8718

Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 05/08/91

X Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed: 05/13/91

Column: (pack/cap) PACK Dilution Factor: 1.0

CONCENTRATION UNITS:CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q

I I I74-87-3—————Chloronethane_________j ' 10 JU j74-63-9-————Brc-omethane75.01.4-———Vinyl Chloride.75.00-3-—..—. Chloroethane75-09-2—————Methylene Chloride.67-64-1—————Acetone___________75-15-0—————Carbon Bisulfide_75-35-4—————1,1-Olchloroethene.75-34-3—————1.1-Dlchloroethane.540-59-0————1,2-DIehloroethene (totel)_67-66-3————Chloroform________________107-06-2————1.2-Oichloroethane.78-93-3————-2-Butanone______71-55-6————1,1.1-Trichloroethane.56-23-5—————Carbon Tetrachloride.108-05-4————Vinyl Acetate______75-27-4————Brcaodichlerome thane78-87-5———1.2-fltchlorooroDane10061-01-5-——cis-1(3-Dichloropropene_79-01-6————Trichloroethene_____'124-48-1-——— Oibromochlorome thane.79-00-5————1,1,2-THchloroethane_71-43-2———--Benzene________10061-02-6——-tren_-1,3-Dichlorcpropene___75-25-2-———Bromofora108-10-1————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone.591-78-6-———2-Rexanone_____"127-18-4-———Tetrechlcroethene79-34-5————1,1.2,2-Tetrechloroethane__108-88-3———-Toluene108-90-7———Ch lorobenzene.100-41-4————Cthylbenzene100-42-5—•-—Stvrene1330-20-7————Xylene (total)

10 |U10 JU10 JU5 |U10 JU5 |U5 |U8 j5 j5 |U5 |U10 |U5 |US |U10 |U5 |U5 |U5 |U2 |J5 |U5 JU1 |J5 |U5 |U10 JU10 |u5 JU5 |U

5 |U5 |US |U5 |U

\

FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev.

AR30Z003

Page 33: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

1A EPA SAMPLE NO.VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET __________

I| NSLMW1601

Lab Name: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAK.II | _________

Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No.: FM356 SAS No.: SOG No.:

Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sanple ID: 9105113-02AX

Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Lab FUe ID: K3721

Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 05/09/91

X Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed: 05/13/91

Colum: (pack/cap) PACK Dilution Factor: 1.0

CONCENTRATION UNITS:CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q

74-87-3 ——— -74-83-9———75-01-4——75-00-3———73-09-2———67-64-1———75-15-0— —75-35-4— —75-34-3— —

67-66-3— —107-06-2 ——78-93-3 ———71-55-6 ———56-23-5 ———108-05-4———75-27-4 ———78-87-5———10061-01-5 —79-01-6 ———124-48-1———

71-43-2———IWWwl Wfc w

75-25-2———

591-78-6——127-13-4— ••79•34•S——108-88-3———108-90-7———100-41-4-- —100-42-5——1330-20-7——

— Chloranethana---Bronomethane— Vinvl Chloride---Chloroethane— Methvlene Chloride— Acetone _..—Carbon Disulfide— 1f1-Dichloroathene---1 1-Dichloroethane— 1.2-Dlchloroethene (total) _---Chloroform---1 r2-Df Chloroethane— 2-Butanone— 1.1.1-Trichloroethane—Carbon Tetrachloride— Vinvl Acetate

---1 r2-DichloroDropane-••eia-1.3-Dichloropropene— Trichloroethene-"DibrctaochlorooM thane— 1,1,2-Trichloroethane _____—Benzene

—Br conform— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone _______— 2-Hexanone-**Tetrachloroethene— 1.1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane— Toluene __,. .—Chlorobenzene— Ethylbenzene— Stvrene— Xvlene (total)

10 |U10 |U10 JU10 |U5 |U10 |Us u5 U812S US U10 U5 |U5 |U10 JU5 |U5 |U5 |U2 |J5 |U5 |U2 N5 |U3 |U10 JU10 JU5 |U5 |U36125 U5 U5 U

FORM t VOA 1/87 Rev.

Page 34: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

1A i ll ' EPAlSAMPLE NO.VOLATILE ORGAN ICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ' ' ______

I Ij NSLMW1601B 1

Lab Name: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAKJI j_________|

Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No.: FM356 SAS Ho.: SDG No.:- -•-:'-. < i '

Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 9105113-03AX

Sample ut/vol: 5.0 (g/«t) ML Lab File ID: K8722

Level: Clow/me.) LOW Date Received: 05/09/91

X Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed: 05/13/91

Column: (pack/cap) PACK Dilution Factor: 1.0

CONCENTRATION UNITS:CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/K0) UG/L

74-87-3————Chloromethane__74-83-9——---Bromomethane75-01-4—————Vinyl Chloride.75.00-3--—-—Chloroethane75-09-2—————Methylene Chloride.67-64-1—•——Acetone______"75-15-0—————Carbon Disulfide_75-35-4————1,1-Dtchloroethene.75-34-3—————1,1-Dichloroe thane"540-59-0————1,2-Olchloroethene (total)_67-66-3———— Chloroform__________107-06-2————1.2-Oichloroethane.78-93-3-——"2-Butanone______71-55-6——•——1,1,1-Trichloroe thane.56-23-5———Carbon Tetrachleride.108-05-4————Vinyl Acetate_____75-27-4-———Bronodichlororoethane78-87-5————1.2-Dichloropropane10061-01-5———eis-1,3-Dlehloropropene_79-01-6———Trichloroethene_______124-48-1——— Olbroroochloromethane__79-00-5—————1,1,2-Tri Chloroethane71-43-2————Benzene_______~_10061-02-6———trans-1.3-0tchlorooropene75-25-2———-Bronoform____________108-10-1——*—4-Nethyl-2-Pentanone_591-78-6———2-ilexanone_________127-18-4———"Tetrechleroethene79-34-5—————1.1.2.2-Tetrechloroethane108-88-3———Toluene___________108-90-7———Chlorobenzene.100-41-4————Ethylbenzene__100-42-5———Styrene_____1330-20-7———Xylene (total).

I10 JU10 JU10 |U10 JU5 |U37 (a5 |U5 |U5 |USs5105S105 |U5 I"5 |U5 |U5 |U5 |U5 |U5 |U5 |U10 JU10 JU5 |U5 |U5 |US |U5 |U5 JU5 |U

FORM I VGA 1/87 Rev. AR302005

Page 35: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

1A EPA SAMPLE NO.VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET __________

I Ij NSLMU1701 |

Lab Name: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAKJI j_________|

Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No.: FM356 SAS No.: SOG No.:

Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 910S113-04AX

Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: K8744

Level: (lou/med) LOW Date Received: 05/09/91

X Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed: 05/14/91

Colusn: (pack/cap) PACK Dilution Factor: 1.0

CONCENTRATION UNITS:CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L

74-87-3—————Chlororaethane_74-83-9———Bromomethane75-01-4—————Vinyl Chloride.75-00-3———Chloroethane75-09-2—————Methylene Chloride.67-64-1————-Acetone__________75-15-0—————Carbon Bisulfide_75-35-4—————1.1-Dlchloroethene.75-34-3—————1.1-Dichloroethane.540-59-0————1,2-Dlchloroethene (total)_67-66-3——-—Chloroform___________

|U1 |U

IK

107-06-2————1,2-9ichloroethane78-93-3————2-Butanone

124-48-1———Oibronochloromethane.79-00-5—————1,1,2-Trichloroethane.71-43-2———Benzene________10061-02-6———trsns-1.3-Dichloropropene75-25-2—— ——Bromoforn108-10-1————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_591-78-6————2-Hexanone______127-18-4-————Tetrechloroethene.79-34-3————-1.1.2,2-Tetrachloroe thane.108-88-3———'Toluene__________"108-90-7-———Chlorobenzene.100-41-4————€thylbenzene_100-42-5————Stvrene1330-20-7———Xylene (total).

"mtm

I10 JU10 JU10 JU10 JU5 |U19

71-53-6—————1,1.1-Trichloroathane.56-23-3—————Carbon TetrachloHda_____.108-03-4————Vinyl Acetate_________ 1 JU75-27-4————Bromodichloromethane.________78-87-5—————1.2-Dlchloropropane_____ |U10061-01-5———cis-1,3-0ichloropropene79-01-6-—-——Trichloroethene____

|u|u|u

|u5 |U3 |U3 |U5 |U5 |U10 JU10 JUI"

uJuuuu

Page 36: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

1A .(• EPA SAMPLE NO.VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET __________

I Ij NSLMW1801 |

Lab Name: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAK J!.. j _____j

Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No.: FM356 SAS No.: SDG No.: :x"

Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Cample ID: 9105113-01AX

Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: K8720

Level: (low/ned) LOW Date Received: 05/09/91

X Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed: 05/13/91

Column: (pack/cap) PACK Dilution Factor: 1.0

CONCENTRATION UNITS:US NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L

74-87-3—————Chloromethane_________-| 1074-83-9-———Bronome thane________75-01-4-————Vinyl Chloride.75-00-3-------—chloroethane75-09-2—————Nethylene Chloride.67-64-1-————Acetone______"75-15-0—————Carbon Oisulf ide_75-3S-4--———1,1-Dlchloroethene.75-34-3"————1,1-Oichloroethane.540-59-0————1,2-Olchloraethene (total)_67-66-3—————Chloroform.107-06-2————1,2-Dlchlcroethane.78-93-3———2-Butanone______71-55-6—————1,1,1-Trichloroethane.56-23-5—-——Carbon Tetrechloride.108-05-4——-—Vinyl Acetate____"75-27-4—————Brcnodichlorcmethane78-87-5———1.2-PichloroDrooane10061-01-5———cis-1t3-D1chloropropene_79-01-6————Trichlcroethene______

101010

124-48-1------—Dibrenochloromethane.79-00-5————1.1.2-Trlchloroethane.71-43-2————Benzene________10061-02-6———tr«ns-1,3-0lchloropropene___75-25-2———Brcnoform_________________108-10-1————4-Nethyl-2-Pentanone_591-78-6———2-Nexanone________127-18-4————Tetrachloroethene79-34-5————-1,1,2.2-Tetrachloroethane108-88-3————Toluene__________'~108-90-7———Ch Icrobenzene.100-41-4————Ethylbenzene_100-42-5——•—Styrene____1330-20-7———Xylene (total)

I

5 |U4i |B5 |U5 |U5 |U

I 5 |U5 |U5 |U10 JU5 |U5 |U10 JU5 |U5 |U5 |U5 |U5 |U5 |U5 |U5 |U5 |U10 JU10 JU5 |Us lu1 IJ5 |U5 |U5 |US |lf__I-

FORMIVOA 1/87 Rev. AR 30200 7

Page 37: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

1A EPA SAMPLE NO.VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET __________

INSLMW1901 | _^

Lab Name: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAK.II j_________j ~""~

Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No.: FM3S6 SAS Ho.: SDG No.: —'

Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 9105113-05AX

Sample Mt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: K8745

Level: (lou/med) LOW Date Received: 05/09/91

X Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed: 05/14/91

Colum: (pack/cap) PACK Dilution Factor: 1.0

CONCENTRATION UNITS:CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Xg) UG/L

I| 74-87-3— ———Chloromethane_j 74-S3-9-——"8roinomethane| 75-01-4—————Vinyl Chloride.| 75-00-3———Chloroethane.| 75-09-2—————Methylene Chloride.I 67-64-1—-——-Acetone,75-15-0—————Carbon Oisulfide_75-35-4————1,1-Dfchloroethene.75-34-3—————1,1-Oichloroethane.540-59-0————1,2-Oichloroethene (total)_67-66-3————Chloroform_____________107-06-2————1,2-BtcMoroethane.78-93-3————2-Butanone_______71-55-6—————1.1.1-THcMoroethane,S6-23-5—————Carbon Tetrachloride.108-05-4————Vinyl Acetate____~75-27-4————Bro»odichloromethane_78-87-5"——"1,2-Dlchloropropane.10061-01-5———cis-1,3-DlcMoropropene_79-01-6———Trichloroethene______124-48-1——— Dtbromochloromethane.79-00-3—•—"1,1,2-TMchloroethane.71-43-2————-Benzene_______10061-02-6-—--trans-1,3-Dtchloropropene_75-25-2————Broooform_____________108-10-1————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_591-78-6————2-Hexenone_______127-18-4———-Tetrachloroethene79.34.5....——1.1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane__108-88-3————Toluene_______________108-90-7-———Chlorobenzene.100-41-4————Ethylbenzene__100-42-5———Styrene_____1330-20-7————Xylene (total).

I

I10 JU10 JU10 JU10 |U5 |U10 JU5 |U3 l«2 |J1 |J5 |U5 |U10 JU3 |U5 |U10 JU5 |U5 |U5 |U5 |U5 l«5 |U3 l«3 |U5 |U10 JU10 JU3 l«3 |u23 |5 |U5 l«5 l«5 |U

___L.

FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev.

ftR302008

Page 38: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

1A |" EPA SAMPLE NO.VOLATILE ORGAN I CS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET : ______

, , | NSLMW1901MSLab Name: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAKJI | _________

Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No.: FM356 SAS No.: SDG No.:

Matrix: (sol l/uater) WATER Lab Sample ID: 910S113-5MS

Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/nL) ML Lab File ID: K8747

Level: (lou/med) LOW Date Received: 05/09/91

X Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed: 05/14/91

Coluan: (pack/cap) PACK Dilution Factor: 1.0

CONCENTRATION UNITS:CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L

74-87-3———Ch loromethane_74-83-9————Brc-ome thane75-01.4-————Vinyl Chloride.75-00-3———Chloroethane75-09-2—————Methylene Chloride.67-64-1—————Acetone______~75-15-0—————Carbon Oisulf Ide_75-35-4————1,1-Oichloroethene.75-34-3--———1,1-0ichloroetharx_540-59-0————1.2-Dlchloroethene (total) 67-66-3————Chloroform__________107-06-2————1,2-Oichleroethane.78-93-3————-2-Butanone_____

I10 JU10 JU10 JU10 JU5 |U235 U5 US U1 JS U5 |U10 JUl«

I"I"I"I"l«I"I"I"|u|uI"I"I"I"l«|wI"|uI"

FORM I VOA 1/87 tev.

56-23-5——108-05-4 —75-27-4-—78-87-5——10061-01-5-79-01-6——124-48-1 —

71-43-2- —10061-02-6-75-25-2 ——108-10*1—591-78-6 —127-18-4—

108-90-7 —100-41-4—100-42-5—1330-20-7--

—— Vinvl Acetate

— — 1 .2-Dichloroorocane— •— cis-1.3-01chleroDropene—— Tr ieh loroethene

.. . .

—— 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ______

- — - trans- 1 ,3-0 Ich loropropene____

.... .4-Meth v I -2-Pentanone—— 2-Nexanone----- Tetrachloroethene

——Chlorobenzene

—— Stvrene _—— XVlene (total) .

3^ 5

10S55555

:• 5;: s51010555

'• fl 55; . 5

- i' . S.'

AR302009

Page 39: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

1A EPA SAMPLE NO.VOLATILE ORGAN I CS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET __________

I| NSLMW1901MSD

Lab Name: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAK.II j _________

Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No.: FM356 SAS No.: SDG No.:

Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 910S113-5MSD

Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: K8748

Level: (lou/med) LOW Date Received: 05/09/91

X Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed: 05/14/91

Column: (pack/cap) PACK Dilution Factor: 1.0

CONCENTRATION UNITS:CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L

74-87-3-———Ch loromethane.74-83-9-———Bromomethane75.01.4———Vinyl Chloride.75-00-3——-——Chloroethane_75-09-2—————Mathylene Chloride.67-64-1—————Acetone________75-15-0—————Carbon Disulfide_75-35-4—————1.1-D1chloroethene.75-34-3—————1.1-Dlchloroethane_540-59-0————1,2-Olchloroethene (totel)_67-66-3— ———Chloroform____________107-06-2————1.2-Oichloroethane.73.93.3. . ....—2. Butanone______71-55-6—•——1,1.1-Trichloroethane.56-23-5————Carbon Tetrachloride.108-05-4-———Vinyl Acetate____75-27-4————Bra_xHchloromethane_78-87-5———1,2-Dichloropropane.10061-01-5——-cis-1.3-Dichloropropene_79-01-6————Trichloroethene124-48-1———Dibromochloromethane.79-00-5—————1.1,2-Trichloroethane.71-43-2————-Benzene________10061-02-6———trans-1f3-Dichloropropene.75-25-2————Bromoform_____________

591-78-6————2-H*xanone127-18-4————Tetrachloroethene79-34-5—————1.1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane108-88-3————Toluene____________

I10 JU10 JU10 JU10 JU5 |U10 JU

|u

5I"

10 |U5 I"5 |U10 JUS |U3 lu5 |U5 |U5 JU3 |U5 |U3 I"5 |U

108-10-1————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_____( 10 |U10 JU

108-90-7———Oilorobenzene.100-41-4————Ethylbenzene_100-42-5————Stvrene1330-20-7————Xylene (total)_________ JU

I

FORM I VQA 1/87 Rev.

AR3020IO

Page 40: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

1A |,:! EPA SAMPLE NO.VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

, i ;.. | NSLMWTB11 |Lab Name: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAKJI |_________|

Lab Code: CAMBRG Case Ho.: FM356 SAS No.: SDG No.: .<

Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 910504S-02AX

Sample ut/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File 10: K8714

Level: (low/wed) LOW Date Received: 05/07/91

X Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed: 05/13/91

Column: (pack/cap) PACK Dilution Factor: 1.0

CONCENTRATION UNITS:CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L

74-87-3———-Ch loromethane__74-83-9————Brcmome thane75-01-4—————Vinyl Chloride.75-00-3——-——Chloroethane75-09-2————-Methylene Chloride.67-64-1—————Acetone_______75.15.0————carbon Disulfide_75-35-4—————1,1-Dichloroethene.75-34-3—————1,1-DIchleroethane.540-59-0-———1.2-Dfchloroethene (total)_67-66-3————Chloroform| 107-06-2————1,2-Olchlcroethane.78-93-3————2-Butanone71-55-6————1.1,1-Trichloroethane.56-23-5—————Carbon Tetrachloride_108-05-4————Vinyl Acetate75-27-4———Bronodichloromethane.78-87-5————1,2-Dlehloroprcpane10061-01-5———ci»-1,3-0ichlcropropene.79-01-6—•—"Trichloroethene_____

71 -43-2———"_enzene_10061-02-6——trans-1,3-D{chlorepropene_75-25-2-———Bromofom_________108-10-1————4-Nethyl-2-Pentanone591-78-6--——-2-Hexanone______"127-18-4————Tetrechleroethene79-34-5—————1.1.2.2-Tetrechloroethane108-88-3———--Toluene___________108-90-7————Chlorobenzene.100-41-4————£thylbenzene__100-42-5————Styrene____1330-20-7———Xylene (total).

I10 JU10 JU10 JU10 |U5 |U10 JUs |u5 |U5 |U5 |«5 |U5 |U10 JU5 |U5 |U10 JU5 |US U

124-48-1-—•—Oibromochloromethane I ; 579.00-5-———1.1,2-Trfehloroethane____j , 5

5S

5 |U5 |U

5 |U10 JU10 JU5 |US |U5 |U5 |U5 |US |Us ju

I

FORM I VGA 1/87 Rev.

HR3020II

Page 41: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

1A EPA SAMPLE NO.VOLATILE CRGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET __________

I I| NSLMWT312 |

Lab Names CAMBRG Contract: NOVAK.I I j _________ j

Lab Code: CAMBRG Case Ho.: FM356 SAS No.: SDG No.:

Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 9105066-05AX

Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: K3743

Level: (lou/med) LOW Date Received: 05/08/91

X Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed: 05/14/91

Column: (pack/cap) PACK Dilution Factor: 1.0

CONCENTRATION UNITS:CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Xg) UG/L

74-87-3—————Ch I oromethane_74-83-9-—--——Brcnomethane75-01-4———Vinyl Chloride.75-00-3-———Chloroethane75-09-2—————Methylene Chloride.67-64-1—————Acetone______~75-15-0—————Carbon Bisulfide_75-35-4———1.1-Dichloroethene_75-34-3—————1,1-Otchloroethane.340-59-0————1,2-Dfchloroethene (total)_67-66-3———Chloroform____________107-06-2————1.2-D1chloroethane_78-93-3————2-Butanone_______71-55-6———1,1,1-Trichloroethane.36-23-3————Carbon Tetrachloride.108-05-4-———Vinyl Acetate____~_75-27-4--———Bromodl ch I oronethane_78-87-5————1,2-Dlchloropropane.10061-01-5-——cis-1,3-0tchloropropene_79-01-6————Trichloroethene______124-48-1———-Dlbronochloromethane.79-00-5——-——1,1.2-TMchloroethene71-43-2————-Benzene________10061-02-6— -—t rant-1,3-D ichloropropene.75-25-2————Bronoform_______________103-10-1————4-Methyl-2-Pentanon*_591-78-6————2-ltexanone____127-18-4————Tetrechloroethene79-34-5-————1.1.2.2-Tatrach loroathane108-88-3————Toluene________________108-90-7———CMorobenzene_100-41-4————Ethylbenzene.!____________100-42-5————Stvrene _________ JU1330-20-7———Xylene (total).

I10 JU10 JU10 JU10 JU5 |U10 JU5 |U5 |U5 |U5 |U3 I"5 |U10 JU5 |U5 |U10 JU5 |U5 |U5 |U5 |U5

10 |U10 JUI"

FORM I VGA 1/87 Rev.

Page 42: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

1A ' i ' EPA SAMPLE NO.VOLATILE ORGAN ICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ' '_______

; j NSLMTB13Lab Name: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAK jI .

Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No.: FM356 SAS No.: SOG No.:

Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 910S113-06AX

Sample ut/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: K8746

Level: (low/med> LOW Date Received: 05/09/91

X Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed: 05/14/91

Colunn: (pack/cap) PACK Dilution Factor: 1.0

CONCENTRATION UNITS:CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q

i I74-87-3—--——Chloromethane_________j 10 JU74-83-9--———Bromome thane _____J 10 JU75-01-4—-——vinyl Chloride________j 10 JU75-00-3—————Chloroethane__________j ^ 10 |U75-09-2—————Nethylene Chloride______j 5 |U67-64-1————Acetone_____________j 11 j75-15-0————Carbon Bisulfide_______j S |U75-35-4—————1,1-Oichloroethene______j 5 |U75-34-3—————1,1-Dichloroethane______j 5 |U540-59-0————1,2-Olchloroethene (total)__,67-66-3— ————ch loroform107-06-2————1.2-Dlchloroethane.78-93-3————2-Butanone______71-55-6—————1.1,1-Trtchloroethane.56-23-5—————Carbon Tetrachlortde.'108-05-4————Vinyl Acetate______75-27-4———Bromodichloromethane.78-87-5--——-1.2-Dichlorooropane10061-01-5——"ci«-1,3-Dtchloropropene_79-01-6———Trichloroethene______124-48-1——•—-Dtbromochlorome thane.79.00-5—————1,1,2-Trf Chloroethane.71-43-2—————Benzene______10061-02-6——trans-1,3-Dichlerepropene.75-25-2———Bromoform__________108-10-1————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone.591-78-6————2-Hexanone_____"127-18-4———Tetrechloroethene79-34-5————-1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane108-88-3————Toluene__________L108-90-7———Chlerobenzene100-41-4———Ethylbenzene_100-42-5————Stvrene1330-20-7————Xylene (total)

5 |U5 |U5 |U10 JU5 |US U10 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 |U5 |US |US |US |U10 |U10 JU5 |U5 |U5 |U5 |U

S |U5 |U

-I I-

FORM I VQA 1/87 Rev.

AR3020I3

Page 43: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

U EPA SAMPLE NO.VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET __________

i Ij VBLK051391X j

Lab Name: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAKJI j_________j

Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No.: FM356 SAS No.: SOG No.:

Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 6340-051391

Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: K3711

Level: (lou/med) LOW Date Received:

X Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed: 05/13/91

Column: (pack/cap) PACK Dilution Factor: 1.0

CONCENTRATION UNITS:CAS HO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Xg) UG/L 0

74-87-3———Ch loromethane_74-83-9—— -""Bromomethane75-01-4—————Vinyl Chloride.75-00-3————Chloroethane75-09-2—————He thy I en. Chloride.67-64-1————-Acetone______"75-15-0—————Carbon Disulf ide_75-35-4—————1.1-Dtchloroethene_75-34-3————1.1-D1chloroethane_340-59-0————1.2-Blchloroethene (total)_67-66-3————Chloroform_____________107-06-2————1.2-0ichloroethane_78-93-3———2-Butanone________71-55-6————1,1,1-THchloroethane_36-23-3-————Carbon Tetrachloride_108-05-4————Vinyl Acetate__75-27-4————Bromodichloromethane.78-87-5———1,2-Dichloropropane_10061-01-5——ei8-1,3-Dichloropropene_79-01-6————Trichloroethene________124- 48-1———0 tbromochl orcraethane.79-00-5—————1 1,2-THchloroethane.71-43-2————Benzene_______10061-02-6——trans-1,3-0ichloropropene_75-25-2————BroBoform_________103-10-1————4-Hetnyl-2-Pentanone_591-78-6————2-Hexanone________

100-42-5————Styrene____________

I10 JU10 JU10 JU10 JU5 |U27 j3 |U

I"

I"|U

10 |U3 |U3 |U10 JU3 |U3 lu5 |U5 |U5 |U5 |U5 |U5 |U5 |U10 JU

_________ 10 JU127-18-4————Tetrachloroethene I S JU79-34-5—————1.1.2.2-Tetrachloroathane I108-88-3———-Toluene____________|108-90-7————Chlorobenzene I100-41-4————Ethylbenzene_________j

|U1330-20-7———Xylene (total)

I

FORM I VGA 1/87 Rev.

flR3020|it

Page 44: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

1A '' EPA SAMPLE NO.VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ___________

I Ij V8LK051491K |

Lab Name: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAKJI j_________j

Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No.: FM356 SAS No.: SDG No.:

Matrix: (soil/uater) WATER Lab Sample ID: 6340-051391

Sample ut/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: K8740

Level: (tou/med) LOW Date Received:

X Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed: 05/14/91

Column: (pack/cap) PACK Dilution Factor: 1.0

CONCENTRATION UNITS:CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L

74-87-3—————Chlorcoiethane_74-83-9-————Bromomethane75-01-4—————Vinyl Chloride.75.00-3————Chloroethane75.09.2—————Nethylene Chloride.67-64-1—————Acetone________75-15-0————Carbon Bisulfide_75-35-4—————1.1-Olchloroethene.75-34-3—————1.1-Dfchleroethane.540-59-0————1,2-Oichloroethene (total)_67-66-3————Chloroform107-06-2————1,2-Diehloroethane.78-93-3————2-Butanone_______71-55-6—————1.1.1-THchlcroethane.56-23-5—————Carbon Tetrachloride/108-05-4————Vinyl Acetate75-27-4————Brcaodichlorome thane78-87-5———"1.2-Dichlerooropane10061-01-5———eie-1,3-Didiloropropene_79-01-6————Triehloroethene_______

I10 JU10 JU10 JU10 |U5 |U10 JU5 |U5 |U5 |U

124-48-1———0 ibrcraochlorane thane79.00-5—————1,1.2-Trichloroe thane.71-43-2—————Benzene_______10061-02-6——tran»-1.3-Blchleropropene75-25-2————Broooform____________108-10-1————4-Hethyl-2-Pentanone_591-78-6———2-lexanone_____"127-18-4———•Tetrechleroethene79-34-5—————1.1.2.2-TetracMcroethane108-88-3———•Toluene.108-90-7———-Chlerobenzene,100-41-4————£thylbenzene_100-42-5——"Stvrene1330-20-7————Xylene (total).

S |US |Us lu10 |US |U5 It-10 JUs |u5 |U5 |U5 |U5 |U1 |JS |U5 |U1 N10 |U8 MS |U2 |JS |U5 |U5 |U5 |U5 |U

AR3020I5

Page 45: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

APPENDIX D

ORGANIC TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS

AR3020I6

GERAGHTY 6? MILLER. INC

Page 46: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

1E EPA SAMPLE NO.VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ___________TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS | |

j NSLMWIC03 jLab Name: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAKJI j_________j

Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No.: FM356 SAS No.: SDG No.:

Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 9105048-01AX

Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: K8713

Level: (leu/med) LOW Date deceived: 05/07/91

X Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed: 05/13/91

Column (pack/cap) PACK Dilution Factor: 1.0

CONCENTRATION UNITS:Number TICs found: 8 (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L

1CAS NUMBER | COMPOUND NAME

1. |C4N80 ISOMER2. (UNKNOWN3. 60297 (ETHYL ETHER4. 1066406 JSILANOL, TRIMETHYL-5. (UNKNOWN6. (UNKNOWN7. (BENZENE, CHLOROMETKYL ISOHER8. JDICHLOR08ENZENE ISOMER

1

RTxxxxMn

9.229.729.9911.8012.8218.1925.2428.24

1ST. CONC.«-t8«_t-K*9*-l**S

25 |10fi.o527.07.01234

Q•MSB

J

FORM 1 VOA-TIC 1/87 Rev.

AR3020I7

Page 47: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

IE EPA SAMPLE NO.VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET __________TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS |

| NSLMW2A03Lab Name: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAX_II |

Lab Coda: CAMBRG Case Ho.: FH356 SAS No.: SOG No.:

Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 9105066-03AX

Sample ut/vo 1: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: K3742

Level: (lou/med) LOW Date Received: 05/03/91

X Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed: 05/14/91

Colum (pack/cap) PACK Dilution Factor: 1.0

CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Xg) UG/L

CAS NUMBER

1.2.

1| COMPOUND NAMEl , :, ™

IDICMLOROBENZENE ISOMER(UNKNOWNl

»T

23.2425.29

1 1| EST. CONC. | Q

1 ?.5|J1 « N1 1

FORM I VGA-TIC 1/87 Rev.

ftR3020!8

Page 48: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

1E i ; EPA SAMPLE NO.VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ___________

TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS | |j NSLMW0603 |

Lab Name: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAK.II j________|

Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No.: FM356 SAS No.: . SDC No.:

Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 9105066-02AX

Sample ut/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: K8716

Level: (lou/med) LOW Date Received: 05/08/91

X Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed: 05/13/91

Column (pack/cap) PACK Dilution Factor: 1.0

CONCENTRATION UNITS:Nuober TICs found: 4 (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L

CAS NUMBER

1.2.3. 754344.

1j COMPOUND NAME

(UNKNOWNj UNKNOWN(METHANE, DICHLOROFLUORO(UNKNOWN1

1«T J

2.03 |2.43 j5.22 j11.34 |

1

1EST. CONC. | 0

7.0JJ7.0 j J21 |J12 |J

FORM I VOA-TIC 1/87 Rev.

AR3020I9

Page 49: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

IE EPA SAMPLE NO.VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ___________TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS |

j NSLMW0603RLab Name: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAKJ1 | _________

Lab Code: CAMBRG Case Ho.: FM356 SAS No.: SOG No.:

Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 91 05066- 01 AX

Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL> ML Lab File ID: K3715

Level: (lou/med) LOW Date Received: 05/03/91

X Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed: 05/13/91

Column (pack/cap) PACK Dilution Factor: 1.0

CONCENTRATION UNITS:Number TICs found: 6 (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L

CAS NUMBER

1.2.3. 754344. 602975.6. 76380

COMPOUND NAME

UNKNOWNUNKNOWNMETHANE, DICHLQROFLUORO-ETKYL ETHERUNKNOWNETHANE.2.2-OICHLORO-1 , 1 -DIFL

RT

2.032.435.279.9911.3414.35

IEST. CONC. |

__n_-------_ 1 -J.lu.--_--_-_|»

7.0JJ7.0|J22 N72 |J10 |J5.0|J

I

FOR-.VOA-TIC 1/87R.V.AR302020

Page 50: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

1E ' ' EPA SAMPLE NO.VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ___________

TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS | || NSLMW0703 j

Lab Name: CAM8RG Contract: NOVAKJI |_________J

Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No.: FM356 SAS No.: SDG No.:

Matrix: (soil/uater) WATER Lab Sample 10: 910S066-0&AX

Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/roL) ML Lab File ID: K8718

Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 05/08/91

X Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed: 05/13/91

Coluirt (pack/cap) PACK Dilution Factor: 1.0

CONCENTRATION UNITS:Number TICs found: 2 (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L

1. 602972.

I I| COMPOUND NAME

IETKYL ETHER(C7H12 ISOMER1

RT

9.9916.87

1EST. CONC. | Q

5.0|Ja.ojj

1

FORM I VOA-TIC 1/87 Rev.

A8302Q2I

Page 51: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

1E EPA SAMPLE NO.VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET __________TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS | |

j NSLMW1601 |Lab Name: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAK JI j_________j

Lab Coda: CAMBRG Case No.: FM356 SAS No.: SOG No.:

Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 9105113-02AX

Sample ut/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: K8721

Level: (lou/med) LOW Date Received: 05/09/91

X Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed: 05/13/91

Column (pack/cap) PACK Dilution Factor: 1.0

CONCENTRATION UNITS:Nuofeer TICs found: 1 (ug/L or ug/Xg) UG/L

I II CAS NUMBER | COMPOUND NAMEI'j 1. 60297 (ETHYL ETHERI__________I_______

RT

FORM 1 VGA-TIC 1/87 Rev.

AR302022

Page 52: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

1E EPA SAMPLE NO.VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET __________TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS | I

, | NSLMW1601B jLab Name: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAKJI j_________j

Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No.: FM3S6 SAS No.: . SDG No.:

Matrix: (soil/Mater) WATER Lab Sample ID: 9105113-03AX

Sample ut/vol: 5.0 (fl/mL) ML Lab File ID: K8722

Level: (lou/med) LOW Date Received: 05/09/91

X Moisture: not dee. Date Analyzed: 05/13/91

Column (pack/cap) PACK Dilution Factor: 1.0

CONCENTRATION UNITS:limber TICs found: 0 (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L

I I I I ICAS NUMBER | COMPOUND NAME { RT j EST. CONC. j Q j

I•

-I_______________________I______I___________I.

FORM I VOA-TIC 1/87 Rev.

6R302023

Page 53: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

1E EPA SAMPLE NO.VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET __________TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS | |

j NSLMW1701 jLab Name: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAX.II |_________j

Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No.: FM356 SAS No.: SOG No.:

Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 9105113-04AX

Sample ut/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: KS744

Level: (lou/med) LOW Date Received: 05/09/91

X Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed: 05/14/91

Column (pack/cap) PACK Dilution Factor: 1.0

CONCENTRATION UNITS:Number TICs found: 0 (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L

I I I I I Ij CAS NUMBER j COMPOUND NAME j RT j EST. CONC. | Q |

_______________ ____________ I ________ I _____________ I ——___ IM»»»»MaM»»»»»S»»M»»aji»M I *X3W*n I »»M»»m___^J I X333IS I

-I__________________I_____I________I___I

FORM I VOA-TIC 1/87 Rev.

AR302021*

Page 54: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

1E EPA SAMPLE NO.VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET __________

TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS | |j NSLMW1801 |

Lab Name: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAKJI |_________j

Vs_J Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No.: FM356 SAS No.: SDG No.:

Matrix: (soil/uater) WATER Lab Sample ID: 910S113-01AX

Sample ut/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: K8720

Level: (lou/med) LOW Date Received: 05/09/91

X Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed: 05/13/91

Colum (pack/cap) PACK Dilution Factor: 1.0

CONCENTRATION UNITS:Number TICs found: 0 (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L

I I i l l !j CAS NUMBER | COMPOUND NAME j RT j EST. CONC, | Q j

f

I ——————— I ____________ ' ' _____ I __ I

FORM I VOA-TIC 1/87 Rev.

AR302025

Page 55: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

IE EPA SAMPLE NO.VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET __________TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS | |

j NSLMW1901 ILab Name: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAKJ I j _________ j

Lab Code: CAMBRG Case Ho.: FM356 SAS No.: SDG No.:

Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 910S113-05AX

Sample ut/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: K3745

Level: (lou/med) LOW Date Received: 05/09/91

X Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed: 05/14/91

Column (pack/cap) PACK Dilution Factor: 1.0

CONCENTRATION UNITS:Ninber TICs found: 0 (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L

I I I I I I| CAS NUMBER ] COMPOUND NAME | RT | EST. CONC. j 0 || «--»-— -a-»a~jiia ( aaaaa aaaaa_za3xss___aaaaaxaa ( aaaaaaaa ( aaaaaaaaaaaaa 1 1

I ______ ! ___________

FO«,,VOA.T,C 1/37 Rev.AB3Q2026

Page 56: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

1E EPA SAMPLE NO.VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET __________TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS I

| NSLMWTB11Lab Name: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAKJI |_______

\_y Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No.: FM356 SAS Ho.: SDG No.:

Matrix: (soil/uater) WATER Lab Sample ID: 910S048-02AX

Sample ut/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: K8714

Level: (lou/med) LOW Date Received: 05/07/91

X Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed: 05/13/91

Column (pack/cap) PACK Dilution Factor: 1.0

CONCENTRATION UNITS:Number TICs found: 0 (ug/L or ug/KQ) UG/L

I I I( CAS NUMBER j COMPOUND NAME j RT(

I

I IEST. CONC. | Q |

•a»aasaaas__aI_aa_«|

_________I____I

FORM I VOA-TIC 1/37 Rev.

AR302027

Page 57: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

IE EPA SAMPLE NO.VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET __________TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS |

| NSLMUTB12Lab Name: CAHBRG Contract: NOVAX II _________

Lab Code: CAMBRG Case Ho.: FM356 SAS No.: SDG No.:

Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 9105066-05AX

Sample Mt/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: K3743

Level: (lou/med) LOW Date Received: 05/08/91

X Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed: 05/14/91

Column (pack/cap) PACK Dilution Factor: 1.0

CONCENTRATION UNITS:Number TICs found: 0 (ug/L or ug/Xg) UG/L

I I I t I I| CAS NUMBER | COMPOUND NAME | RT | EST. CONC. | 9 |( aaa— aaasasa- j j i a I aaasaaaatasaaaaaa-aaaaaaa-wCT I a__a_aaa | aaaaaaaaaaaaa I asaaa I

I _____________ I ________________________ I _______ I ___________ I ____ I

FORM I VOA-TIC 1/87 Rev.

A8302028

Page 58: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

1E ' - EPA SAMPLE NO.VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET __________TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS I

j NSLMTB13Lab Name: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAK U _______

Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No.: FM356 SAS No.: SOG No.:

Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 9105113-06AX

Sample ut/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: K8746

Level: (lou/med) LOW Date Received: 05/09/91

X Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed: 05/14/91

Column (pack/cap) PACK Dilution Factor: 1.0

CONCENTRATION UNITS:Number TICs found: 0 (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L

I I| CAS NUMBER | COMPOUND NAME|——————————j.I_______L

I IEST. CONC. j 0 |

FORM I VOA-TIC 1/87 Rev.

(IR302029

Page 59: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

1E EPA SAMPLE NO.VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET __________TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS |

| V3LX051391KLab Name: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAK.I I j _________

Lab Coda: CAMBRG Case No.: FH356 SAS No.: SOG No.:

Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 6340-051391

Sample ut/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: K3711

Level: (lou/med) LOW Date Received:

X Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed: 05/13/91

Colum (pack/cap) PACK Dilution Factor: 1.0

CONCENTRATION UNITStNunber TICs found: 0 (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L

I I I I I I| CAS NUMBER j COMPOUND NAME | RT | EST. CONC. j Q j| -aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ( aaaaaaaaa_x»a»--aaaaaaaaaaaa I aaaaazaa | aaaxaaaaaaaaa I aaaaai I

I ______________ I ________________________ I _______ I ___________ I ____ I

FORM I VGA-TIC 1/87 Rev.

AR302030

Page 60: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

1E EPA SAMPLE NO.VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET __________TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS |

| VBLK051491KLab Name: CAMBRG Contract: HOVAKJI j_________

Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No.: FM356 SAS No.: SDG No.:f

Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 6340-051391

Sample ut/vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: K8740

Level: (lou/med) LOW Date Received:

X Moisture: not dec. Date Analyzed: 05/14/91

Column (pack/cap) PACK Dilution Factor: 1.0

CONCENTRATION UNITS:Number TICs found: 0 (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L

J I I I I I| CAS NUMBER | COMPOUND NAME j RT EST. CONC. j Q j

ca_as__s ess_sssss-__a aasaa

I —————— I ——————————— I ___ I. _____ I

FORM I VOA-TIC 1/87 Rev.

AR30203I

Page 61: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

o•f(u

i

zzzzp.

?&

nIn.

O

AR302032

Page 62: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

•:.*.

APPENDIX E

SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION

AR302033

OERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.

Page 63: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

2AWATER VOLATILE SURROGATE RECOVERY

Lab Name: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAK.II

Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No.: FM356 SAS No.: SOG No.

EPA | S1 | 52 | S3 [OTHER |TOT|SAMPLE NO. j(TOL)0j(BFB)*|(DC£)*j JOUTJ

(aaaaaaaaaaa*

01JNSLMTB1302JHSLMW060303JHSLMW0603R04JHSLMW07Q305JHSLMU160106JHSLMU1601B07JNSLMW170103JHSLMU180109JHSLMU190110|HStHW2A0311JHSLMUIC0312JHSLMWTB1113JHSLHWTB1214JHSLMU1901MS15JHSLMW1901MSD16JVBLK051391K17JVBU051491K

I

aaaaaa

961079797103103991041029610410110010410310199

aaaaaa961039896101103971041049610199101102101101100

aaaaaa961059793101103104100109969210496971019397

aaaaaa

00000000000000000

aaa00000000000000000

QC LIMITSSI (TOL) * Toluene-dS ( 83-110)S2 (8FB) * Bromofluorobenzene ( 86-115)S3 (DCS) • 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 ( 76-114)

* Colum to be used to flag recovery values

* Values outside of contract required QC limits

D Surrogates diluted out

page 1 of 1FORM II VOA-1 1/87 Rev.

AR302031*

Page 64: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

3AWATER VOLATILE MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE RECOVERY

Lab Hame: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAKJI i til

ab Code: CAMBRG Case Ho.: FM356 SAS No.: SDG No.:

Matrix Spike • EPA Sample No.: NSLMW1901

COMPOUND

1.1-OtchleroetheneTrichloroetheneBenzeneTolueneChlorobenzene

SPIKEADDED(ug/L)

50.050.050.050.050.0

| SAMPLE(CONCENTRATION| (ug/L),|™»_™I oI oI oj 24.8! o

MSCONCENTRATION

(ug/L)

48.854.658.283.752.0

MS | OC |x (LIMITS!REC *j REC. jcassas | aaaaaa |

98 (61-145 |109 (71 -120 j116 |76-127|118 (76- 125 j104 J75-130J

I I

' COMPOUND

| 1,1-Dtchloroethene _____TrichloroetheneBenzeneTolueneChlorobenzene

SPIKEADDED(ug/L)

50.050.050.050.050.0

MSOCONCENTRATION(ug/D

50.854.058.083.553.9

USD*RECf

102108116117103

I I% j QC LIMITS jRPD #j RPD | REC. j

-4 | 14 (61-145 11 j 14 (71-120J0 | 11 |76-127|1 | 13 (76-125 |-4 | 13 |75-130|

i 1 1

i Column to be used to flag recovery end RPD values with an asterisk

* Values outside of OC limits

RPD: 0 out of 5 outside limitsSpike Recovery: 0 out of 10 outside limits

COMMENTS: 9105113-05AX,V,,NOVACLP,FM356,,NS!.-MV-19-01,L,W,ALS8 SML KMC

foamm-i '«"""• AR302035

Page 65: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

4AVOLATILE METHOD BLANK SUMMARY

Lab Name: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAKJI

Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No.: FM356 SAS No.: SOG No.:

Lab File ID: KS711 Lab Sample ID: 6340-051391

Date Analyzed: 05/13/91 Time Analyzed: 1317

Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Level:(lou/med) LOW

Instrument ID: HP5970K

THIS METHOD BLANK APPLIES TO THE FOLLOWING SAMPLES, MS AND MSO:

| EPAj SAMPLE NO.

01|NSLHW060302JNSLMU0603R03JHSIMW070304JHSLMU160103JHSUM1601B06|HSLMW180107JNSUWIC0303JNSLMUTB11

1

LABSAMPLE ID

9105066-02AX9105066-01AX9105066-04AX910S113-02AX9105113-03AX91051 13-01 AX9105048-01AX9105043-02AX

LABFILE ID

K8716K8713K3713K3721K3722K8720X3713K3714

TIMEANALYZED

17121634182320212059194315191556

COMMENTS: 6340-051391,V.BLANKCL?,,,VBLKOS1391K.L,U,ALS4 5ML KMC

page 1 of 1FORM IV VGA 1/87 Rev.

AR302036

Page 66: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

4A 'VOLATILE METHOD BLANK SUMMARY

Lab Name: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAK.II

i lab Code: CAMBRG Case No.: FM356 SAS No.: SOG No.:

Lab File ID: K8740 Lab Sample ID: 6340-051391

Date Analyzed: 05/14/91 Time Analyzed: 1156

Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Level:(lou/med) LOW

Instilment ID: HPS970K

THIS METHOD BLANK APPLIES TO THE FOLLOWING SAMPLES, MS AND MSD:

EPASAMPLE NO.

01 NSLMTB1302JHSLMW170103JKSLMW190104JNSLMW2A0305JNSLMWTB1206JNSLMU1901MS07JNSLMW1901MSD

1

LABSAMPLE ID

91051 13-06AX9105113-04AX9105113-05AX9105066-03AX9105066-OSAX9105113-5MS9105113-5MSD

LABFILE 10

K8746K8744K8745K8742K8743 .K8747K8748

| TIMEj ANALYZED!-s-aaa-sas1618| 1504j 1541j 1349 ij 1426I W56| 17331

COMMENTS: 6340-051391,V, BLANKCLP,,.VBLK051491K,L,V.ALS3 5ML KMC

page 1 of 1FORM IV VOA 1/87 Rev.

AR302037

Page 67: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

5AVOLATILE ORGANIC GC/MS TUNING AND MASSCALIBRATION • BROMOFLUOROBENZENE (BFB)

Lab Name: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAXJI

Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No.: FM356 SAS No.: SDG No.:

Lab File ID: K8649 BFB Injection Date: 05/07/91

Instrument ID: HPS970K BFB Injection Time: 1255

Matrix:(soiI/water) WATER Level:(lou/med) LOW Colutn:(pack/cap) PACK

m/e

50759596173174175176177

ION ABUNDANCE CRITERIA

15.0 - 40.0X of mass 9530.0 - 60.0X of mass 95Base peak, 100X relative abundanceS.O - 9.0X of mass 95Less than 2.0X of mass 174Greater than 50.0X of mass 955.0 • 9.0X of mass 174Greater than 95.0X, but less than 101. OX of mass 174S.O - 9.0X of mass 176

X RELATIVEABUNDANCE

21.844.3100.06.40.4 ( 0.5)1 |79.95.7 ( 7.1)1 |79.1 ( 99.0)1 |4.1 ( 5.2)21

1-Value is X mass 174 2-Value is X mass 176

THIS TUNE APPLIES TO THE FOLLOWING SAMPLES, MS, MSD, BLANKS, AND STANDARDS:

| EPAj SAMPLE NO.•

01 (VSTD02002JVSTD10003JVSTD15004JVSTD20005JVSTD050

1

LABSAMPLE ID

6302-0506916302-0506916302-0506916302-0506916302-050691

LABFILE ID

K86S1K8652K8653K8654K8653

DATEANALYZED

05/07/9105/07/9105/07/9105/07/9105/07/91

TIMEANALYZED

15331611164317261803

page 1 of 1FORK V VGA 1/87 Rev. AR302038

Page 68: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

5AVOLATILE ORGANIC GC/MS TUNING AND MASSCALIBRATION - BROMQFLUOROSENZENE (BFB)

Lab Name: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAK.II

ab Code: CAMBRG Case No.: FM356 SAS No.: • SDG No.:

Lab File ID: K8707 BFB Injection Date: 05/13/91

Instrument ID: HP5970K BFB Injection Time: 1019

Matrix:(soil/uater) WATER Level:(lou/med) LOW Colum:(pack/cap) F-ACK

m/e

50759596173174175176177

ION ABUNDANCE CRITERIA

15.0 • 40.0X of mass 95.30.0 - 60.0X of mass 95

20.647.6

Base peak, 100X relative abundance 1100.0

X RELATIVEABUNDANCE

5.0 • 9.0X of mass 95____________________ 6.1Less than 2.0X of mass 174________'• • • •-•• 0.5 ( 0.6)11Greater than 50.0X of mass 95 : I 75.7 j5.0 - 9.0X of mass 174_____________;_____ } 4.8 ( 6.4)1 jGreater than 95.0%, but less than 101.OS of mass 174j 75.1 ( 99.2)1)5.0 • 9.0X of mass 176__________ \ 4.7 ( 6.2)2|

.1.1-Value is X mass 174 2-Value is X mass 176

THIS TUNE APPLIES TO THE FOLLOWING SAMPLES. MS, MSD, BLANKS, AND STANDARDS:

| EPAj SAMPLE NO.

01|VSTDOSO02JVBLK051391K03JNSLMWIC0304JNSLMVTB1105|NSLMU0603ft06JHSLMW060307JNSLMW070308JNSLMU180109JHSLMU160110JNSLMW1601B

1

LABSAMPLE ID

_-~aaaaaaaatf»a6302-0513916340-0513919105043-01AX9105048-02AX9105066-01AX9105066-02AX9105066-04AX910S113-01AX9105113-02AX9105113-03AX

LABFILE ID

K8709K8711K8713K8714K8715K8716K8718K8720K8721K8722

DATEANALYZED•-a-ff-aaaa05/13/9105/13/9105/13/91OS/13/9105/13/9105/13/9105/13/9105/13/9105/13/9105/13/91

TIMEANALYZED

1138131715191556163417121828194320212059

page 1 of 1

Page 69: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

SAVOLATILE ORGANIC GC/MS TUNING AND MASSCALIBRATION - BROMOFLUCROBENZENE (BFB)

Lab Name: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAKJI

Lab Code: CAMBRG Case Ho.: FM356 SAS Ho.: SOG No.: X"—••'

Lab File ID: K8737 BFB Injection Date: 05/14/91

Instrument ID: HP5970X BFB Injection Time: 0924

Matrix:(soiI/water) WATER Level:(lou/med) LOW Colum:(pack/cap) PACK

in/a

50759596173174175176177.

ION ABUNDANCE CRITERIA

15.0 - 40.0X of mass 9530.0 • 60.0X of mass 95Base ceak. 100X relative abundance5.0 - 9.0X of mass 95Less than 2.0X of mass 174Greater than 50.0X of mass 95S.O - 9. OX of mass 174Greater than 95.0X, but less than 101. OX of mass 1745.0 - 9.0X of mass 176

X RELATIVEABUNDANCE

27.254.4100.07.20.0 ( 0.0)1 |73.0 |5.6 ( 7.2)1 |73.3 (101.0)1|4.9 ( 6.2)2!

• 11-Value is X mass 174 2-Value is X mass 176

THIS TUNE APPLIES TO THE FOLLOWING SAMPLES, MS, MSO, BLANKS, AND STANDARDS:

| EPAj SAMPLE NO.I——— ————

01|VSTD05002|V8LKOS1491K03|NSLMW2A0304{HSLMUTB1205|HSLMU170106|NSLMU190107|HSLMTB1308|HSLMV1901MS09|NSLHU1901MSO

1

LABSAMPLE 10

6302-0313916340-0513919105066-03AX9105066-05AX91051 13-04AX910S113-05AX9105113-06AX9105113-5M391031 13-5MSO

LABFILE ID

K8739K8740K3742K8743K8744K3745X3746K3747K3748

DATEANALYZED

05/14/9105/14/9105/14/9105/14/9105/14/9105/14/9105/14/9105/14/9105/14/91

TIMEANALYZED

104911561349142615041541161316561733

page 1 of 1FOR-VVOA 1/87 Rev. ftR3Q-2Qt.O

Page 70: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

6A «VOLATILE ORGANICS INITIAL CALIBRATION DATA

Lab Name: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAKJI

ab Code: CAMBRG Case No.: FM356 SAS No.: . SDG No.:

Instrument ID: HP5970K Calibration Oate(s): 05/07/91 05/07/91

Matrix:(soil/water) WATER Level:(lou/med) LOW Co lum: (pack/cap) PACK

Min RRF for SPCC(*) » 0.300 (0.250 for Bromoform) Max XRSD for CCC(*) > 30.0X

(LAB FILE ID: RRF20 • K8651 RRF50 * K8655(RRFIOOa K8652 RRF150* K86S3 RRF200» K8654I.I I I I I I I ——j COMPOUND JRRF20 (RRF50 JRRF100JRRF150JRRF200J RRF

I aaaaaa j aaaaaa I— — ~— — aaaaaa aaaaaa

X IRSO j

(Chlorcmethane ________ * 1.233J 1.155) 1.238J 1.336| 1.313J 1.255| 5.7*JBronomethane _________ | 1.378J 1.296J 1.306J 1.078J 0.987J 1.209J 13.8|(Vinyl Chloride _______ • 1.134J 1.114J 1.141J 1.097J 1.055J 1.108) 3.1*jChloroethane _________ | 0.766J 0.737J 0.748J 0.806 j 0.780) 0.767) 3.5J

1.460 j 1.412J 1.472 j 1.52SJ 1. 486 j 1.471 j 2.8J0.239 j 0.183) 0.149) 0.145J 0.142J 0.172J 23.9J3.526 j 3.786J 4.031 j 4.424) 4.575) 4.068J 10.7J

|1,1-Dichloroethene _____ * 1.487) 1.432J 1.516) 1.570) 1.544) 1.510J 3.5*|1,1-Dlehloroethane _____ f 3.113 j 3.162) 3.322) 3.548) 3.491) 3.327) 5.8*

(Nethylene Chloride.(Acetone.(Carbon Disulfide.

(1,2-Dichloroethene (total).] 3.263| 3.281j 3.455JChloroform_________* 3.163) 3.206) 3.340(1,2-Dlchloroethane_____| 2.T44J 2.199) 2.156|2-Butsnone__________j 0.113) 0.115) 0.089

3.607) 3.542| 3.430) 4.5|3.580) 3.478j 3.353J 5.3*2.307) 2.289j 2.219) 3.4|0.097) 0.100) 0.103) 10.7J

J1,1,1-Trichlcroethane___j 0.566) 0.582J 0.628J 0.642) 0.638) 0.611) 5.7)0.534) 0.547) 0.596) 0.611j 0.606) 0.579) 6.2JCarbon Tetrachleride

jVfnyl Acetate________ 0.429) 0.478) 0.483) 0.4811 0.502) 0.476J 5.8J(Bromodichloromethane____| 0.681) 0.729) 0.774) 0.763) 0.759j 0.741 j 5.1)|1,2-Dichloropropane_____* 0.407) 0.439) 0.446) 0.448) 0.454) 0.439J 4.2*)cit-1.3-Plchloroprooene | 0.629j 0.661) 0.683) 0.694) 0.716J 0.678) 4.9)JTrichloroethene_______| 0.433j 0.455j 0.448) 0.464) 0.509) 0.462) 6.2)jolbromochlororoethana_____j 0.581) 0.620) 0.627) 0.613) 0.635) 0.615) 3.4)|1.1.2-Trichleroethane | 0.348) 0.367(Benzene_________________j 0.927J 0.944jtrans-1,3-Dlchleropropene_j 0.441JBrcmofcna f 0.392(4-MethyI-2-Pentanone.|2-Hexanone_jTetrachIoroethene.

0.4020.3050.456

0.4580.4450.433

0.346) 0.331) 0.330| 0.344) 4.4)0.969) 0.961j 0.954j 0.951) 1.7J0.476j 0.454) 0.456) 0.457) 2.7)0.414j 0.421) 0.444| 0.423) 5.240.305) 0.313) 0.333j 0.357) 16.0)

0.303) 0.195) 0.206) 0.222) 0.246) 21.8)0.438J 0.439 j 0.431) 0.445) 0.442) 2.1 j

|1,1.2.2-Tetrachlcroethane_jl 0.622) 0.641) 0.545 j 0.548) 0.431) 0.557) 14.6*(Toluene ___________ • 0.702) 0.695) 0.700) 0.719) 0.718) 0.707) 1.6*jchlorobenzene ________ f 1.017) 0*980) 1.010) 1.040) 1.043) 1.018) 2.5#JEthylbenzene _________ * 0.482 | 0.474) 0.485 j 0.483) 8.497) 0.484) 1.7*jstyrene ___________ | 0.996) 1.018) 1.042) 1.053) 1.092) 1.040) 3.5)jxylene (total) ________ j 0.625 j 0.616) 0.619) 0.629) 0.637) 0.625) 1.3)

|Toluene-d8 __________ | 1.147) 1.177) 1.231) 1.230) 1.233) 1.204) 3.3)JBromofluorobenzene _______ j 0.862) 0.681) 0.858 | O.C72) 0.898 1 0.874 j 1.8))1,2-0ichloroethane-d4 _____ j 1.835J 1.978) 1.961) 2.009) 2.035 j 1.964) 3.9J

FORM VI VOA 1/87 Rev.

AR3020l» I

Page 71: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

7AVOLATILE CONTINUING CALIBRATION CHECK

Lab Name: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAKJI

Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No.: FM356 SAS No.: SDG No.: ^J

Instrument ID: HP5970K Calibration date: 05/13/91 Time: 1133

Lab File ID: X3709 Init. Calib. Date(s): 05/07/91 05/07/91

Matrix:(soiI/water) WATER Level:(loM/med) LOW Coluin:(pack/cap) PACK

Nin RRF50 for SPCC(») • 0.300 (0.250 for Bromoform) Max XD for CCC{*) * 25.0X

I| COMPOUNDI"(Chloronethane________9 1.255) 1.044( 16.8j Bromomethane(Vinyl Chloride.jChloroethane.(Methylene Chloride.(Acetone.(Carbon Oisulfide.

1.209) 1.165) 3.61.103) 1.011J 3.30.767J 0.657) 14.31.4711 1.214J 17.50.172) 0.141j 13.04.063J 3.4551 15.1

|1,1-0ichloroethene_____• 1.510) 1.289) 14.6(1,1-Dtchloroethane_____» 3.327) 2.74SJ 17.5(1,2-Dichloroathene (total).

1,2-Dtchloroethane.2-Butanone

Chloroform__________* 3.353) 2.843) 15.22.219) 1.833) 17.40.103) 0.087) 15.50.611j O.S16J 15.60.579) 0.435) 16.20.476J 0.384) 19.3

iBrenodichloromethsne 0.741) 0.637) 14.011.2-aicM-rc-ropane * 0.439) 0.331) 13.2jcis-1.3-0ichloropropene___ 0.673) 0.597) 12.0JTrichloroethene_______ 0.462) 0.336) 16.4

1,1,1-Trichloroethane.Carbon Tetrachloride__(Vinyl Acetate.

RRF (RRFSO j XDjaaasssj

3.430) 2.396) 15.6

(Dibromochloromathane_____| 0.615) 0.549) 10.7(1.1.2-Trichloroethane I 0.344) 0.322) 6.4(Benzene____________j 0.951 j 0.339) 11.3|trans-1.3-0lchloropropene_| 0.457) 0.399) 12.7JBro-ofont__________9 0.423) 0.373) 11.3

0.357) 0.329) 7.30.246) 0.249) -1.2

iTetrachloroethene______) 0.442) 0.337) 12.4|1,1.2.2-Tetrachloroathane__» 0.557) 0.539) 3.2(Toluene____________• 0.707) 0.615) 13.0jchlorobenzene________* 1.018) 0.900) 11.6JEthytbenzene________* 0.484) 0.411) 15.1

|4-Nethyl-2-Pentanone.|2-Hexanone_

(Styrene.(Xytene (total)

|Toluene-d8_iBromofluorobenzene.I1,2-Dlchloroethane-d4

1.040) 0.904) 13.10.623) 0.517) 17.3

1.204) 1.031) 10.20.874) 0.319) 6.31.964) 1.740) 11.4___I-

FORM VII VOA 1/87 Rev.

AR3020*f2

Page 72: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

VOLATILE CONTINUING CALIBRATION CHECK

Lab Name: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAK JI

Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No.: FM356 SAS No.: . SDG No.:

Instrument ID: HP5970K Calibration date: 05/14/91 Time: 1049

Lab File ID: K8739 Init. Calib. Date(s): OS/07/91 OS/07/91

Matrix:(soil/water) WATER Level:(lou/med) LOW Colum:(pack/cap) PACK

Min RRF50 for SPCCCO * 0.300 (0.250 for Bromoform) Max XD for CCC(*) • 25.OX

I| COMPOUNDI—— —— ———————————— ——(Chloromethane|Brcmome thane|Vinvl Chloride| Chloroethane(Methvlene Chloride(Acetone(Carbon Disulfide(1.1-Dichloroethene _______jl.t-Dichloroe thane(1,2-Oichloroethene ( total )_(Chloroform|1.2*fiichloroethane|2-Butanone)1.1.1-Trichloroethane(Carbon Tetrachloridejvinvl Acetate)Bromodichlorome thane(l.2-Dichloropropanelcis-1.3-DicMorooropeneJTrichloroethene)Dibromochlerc~ethane|1.1.2-Trichloroethane(Benzene|trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_(Bromoform|4-Methyl-2-Pentanone|2-Nexanone| Tetrach I oroethene|1,1,2,2-Tetrachleroethane__| Toluene „ _ .(Chlerebenzene(Ethylbenzene(Stvrene(Xvlene (total), _ .

__RRF (RRFSO•aaasa aaaasa1.255) 1.0541.209) 1.181)1.108) 0.9600.767) 0.6451.471 j 1.2370.172J 0.1584.068) 2.1011.510) 1.3133.327J 2.7353.430 j 2.8733.353) 2.8192.219) 1.9470.103) 0.1100.611) 0.544O.S79J 0.4980.476) 0.4160.741 j 0.6450.439) 0.3850.678) 0.6030.462) 0.3860.615 j 0.5470.344) 0.3230.951 j 0.8470.457) 0.4140.423) 0.3720.357) 0.3580.246) 0.2760.442 j 0.3900.557 0.5440.707 0.6221.018 0.8970.484 0.4191.040 0.9050.625 0.551

i - - •(Toluene-d8|Bromofluorobenzene|1,2-0ichloroethane-d41

XDcaaaas16.0: 2.313.4;is.915.9

<3l__n13.017.816.2J5.912.3•6.811.014.012.613.0«-511.116.4,11.1.6.110.99.412.1•0.3•12.211.82.312.011.913.413.011.8

! 1.204| 1.103) fi.40.874) 0.831 j 4.91.964) 1.806) 8.0

FORM VII VOA 1/87 Rev.

AR3020ii3

Page 73: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

8AVOLATILE INTERNAL STANDARD AREA SUMMARY

Lab Name: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAKJI

Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No.: FM356 SAS No.: SOG No.:

Lab File ID (Standard): K3709 Date Analyzed: 05/13/91

Instrument ID: HPS970X Time Analyzed: 1133

Matrix:(soiI/water) WATER Level:(lou/med) LOW Colum:(pack/cap) PACK

12 HOUR STO

UPPER LIMIT

LOWER LIMIT 9850

EPA SAMPLENO.

01JNSLMW060302JNSLMV06Q3R03JHSLMW070304JHSLMU160103|HStHU1601B06JNSLMU1801Q7JNSLMVIC0303JNSLMUTB1109JVBU051391K

I.

1SKBCM) (AREA *j RT

19700

39400

3.47 89300 | 15.37) 33700 | 13.50

159001690015900160001510016100172001610017200

IS2(DFB) | | 1S3(CBZ) |AREA »j RT j AREA *j RT

•IX3SSXXIJ»aa»a3ss»Is

178600

44650

167400

8.55| 719003.52) 775003.52| 705003.50) 710003.47) 666003.52) 714003.52) 779003.52) 767003.52) 31100

.1____i_____

41850

15.44J 6700015.44) 7170015.44) 6620015.39) 6720015.37) 6500013.40) 6530015.40) 7130015.44) 7240015.40) 75200

13.62)13.59)18.62j13.37)13.54)13.59)13.54) J13.62) N -X13.54)___I

IS1 (BCM) a Bromochloromethane UPPER LIMIT a + 100XIS2 (DFB) * 1,4-Difluorobenzene of internal standard area.IS3 (CBZ) • Chlorobenzene LOWER LIMIT a - 50X

of internal standard area.

* Column used to flag internal standard area values uith an asterisk

page 1 of 1FORM VIM VGA 1/87 Rev.

AR3020-U

Page 74: QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY REPORT AND DATA …

8AVOLATILE INTERNAL STANDARD AREA SUMMARY

Lab Name: CAMBRG Contract: NOVAKJI

,- ab Code: CAMBRG Case No.: FM356 SAS No.: SOG No.:

Lab File ID (Standard): K8739 Date Analyzed: 05/14/91

Instrument ID: HPS970K Time Analyzed: 1049

Matrix:(soil/uater) WATER Level:(lou/ned) LOW CoI urn:(pack/cap) PACK

12 HOUR STO

| ISKBCM)j AREA *•I-

UPPER LIMIT

LOWER LIMIT

17300

34600

| IS2(OFB)RT j AREA *

I8.49| 76000

8650

EPA SAMPLEMO.

01JNSLMT81302JNSLMW170103JNSLMW190104JNSLMW2A0305JHSLKWTB1206JNSLMW1901MS07JNSLMU1901MSD

( j 08JVBLK051491K

1520015000145001560016300157001510016600

8.55| 723008.52j 711008.52) 696008.52 j 737008.54) 731008.52) 683008.55| 694008.54) 75400

.1.

RT

15.39 71200

IC3(CBZ) |AREA *j RT

aaaaaa

18.52

142400

35600

15.40) 6710015.40j 6850015.40) 6510015.42) 6950015.39) 6770015.40] 6630015.44) 6520015.39) 70100

18.59j18.57)18.54(18.55j18.52)18.54)18.59)18.49j___I

IS1 (BCM) a Bromochleromethane UPPER LIMIT > * 100XIS2 (OFB) - 1,4-Oifluorobenzene of Internal standard area.IS3 (CBZ) • Chlorobenzene LOWER LIMIT * • 50X

of- internal standard area.

f Column used to flag internal standard area values uith an asterisk

page 1 of tFORM VIII VOA 1/87 Rev.

AR3020l(5