pwe2013 cameron

54

Click here to load reader

Upload: aravindhcam

Post on 27-Nov-2015

119 views

Category:

Documents


18 download

DESCRIPTION

Orifice Flange Catalog

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: PWE2013 Cameron

Advances in Compact Flotation Unitsfor the Treatment of Produced Water

Produced Water & EnvironmentalConference - Aberdeen

June 5-6, 2013

Mike BhatnagarSr. Product Manager

Page 2: PWE2013 Cameron

TST-CFUTM

Process & Compression SystemsCustom Process Systems2

Cameron is a leading provider of branded flow equipment products,systems and services to worldwide oil, gas and process industries.

Page 3: PWE2013 Cameron

OIL GAS WATER SOLIDS

• Free Water Knockout

• TS WKO™ CompactFree Water Knockout

• NATCO® MechanicalHeater Treaters

• Multi PhaseSeparators

• PORT-TESTRevolution®

• CONSEPT ICD®

• NATCO® DualFrequency®

• NATCO® DualPolarity®

• PETRECO® Bilectric®

• PETRECO® MeterCell

• CES™ CompactCoalescer

• Bilectric HF™

• Cynara® CO2

• PureMEG™ MEGReclamation

• Shell / Paques• THIOPAQ®

• PORT-TESTWhirlyScrub I™, V™

• PORT-TESTRevolution®

• CONSEPT DC™• CONSEPT IVD™• CONSEPT SI™• CONSEPT Spinlet™• CONSEPT ACI™• NATCO® CHF® Heater• NATCO® BTEX Buster®

• NATCO® Desi-Dri®

• NATCO® SHV™Flare/Combuster

• NATCO® Water BathHeaters

• NATCO® Glymine• Amine Treating• Glycol Dehydration• Mechanical

Refrigeration• NATCO® Jewel T®

Produced Water Seawater • MOZLEY™ WellheadDesander

• MOZLEY™Desanding SLC

• MOZLEY™Microspin

• MOZLEY™Hydrotrans™

• MOZLEY™Fluidizer™

• MOZLEY™Deltaclone™

• MOZLEY™Sandcleaning

• UNICEL®Vertical SkimVessel

• WEMCO® Pacesetter®

• NATCO® Cross-FlowScrubber

• VORTOIL® DeoilingCyclones

• WEMCO® ISF®

• WEMCO®Depurator®

• UNICEL® IGF• NATCO® Versaflo™• PETRECO®

Hydromation® Nutshell• PETRECO® Silverband

Nutshell• PETRECO® Softeners• NATCO® Skim Pile• NATCO® DOX®• TS CFU™ Compact

Flotation

• METROL® SeaCell®

• METROL® BFCC™

• METROL SeaScreen& SeaScreen Max

• Media Filters

• Vacuum Deaerators

• Gas Strip Deaerators

• Polymem UF

• NATCO® SulphateRemoval

• CDX™ CompactDeaeration

Custom Process Systems - Portfolio

Page 4: PWE2013 Cameron

TS Technology acquired by Cameron Custom Process Systems

Custom Process Systems

2004 2011

1990 20101997 20011999 2002 2007

Baker HughesProcessSystems(BHPS)

formed fromBaker HughesIndustries &WEMCO with

Metrol

Custom ProcessSystems

PetrecoInternationalacquired byCameron

BHPSacquiresBFCC

BHPSacquiresVortoil

1990 20101993 1995 1997

BHPSacquiresPetreco

19981996 2001

Sequal Holdingspurchases BakerHughes Process

Systems fromBaker Hughes

creating PetrecoInternational

2002

PetrecoInternational

acquiresKCC

Process

PetrecoInternational

acquires

Unicel

TEST

CYNARAMembranes

MPE

ESI

Axsia

PORTA-TEST

ConSepT

Mozley

BakerHughes

Industries

WEMCOOil &

Gas withMetrol

BHPSacquiresKrebs

20001998

NATCOAcquired by

Cameron

Cameronacquires

TSTechnology

Page 5: PWE2013 Cameron

Divider graphic should fill and notexceed the defined gray box.

Custom Process Systems5

Produced Water Treatment TrendsNext Generation Compact Flotation - TST CFU

Field Trials – North SeaField Test Results

Summary of other Field Test Results and Full Scale InstallationsConclusions and Future Work

Page 6: PWE2013 Cameron

Produced Water Trends – Onshore Applications

• Globally produced water associated with the oil & gas productionis between three and seven times than the oil production and itcontinues to increase over the lifespan of the well.

• Onshore produced water is usually treated and re-injected intounderground formations, or treated and discharged underpermits issued by regional agencies.

• Cameron’s WEMCO Depurator Flotation Systems and thePetreco Hydromation Nut Shell Filters are well established inthese applications.

Custom Process Systems6

Page 7: PWE2013 Cameron

Produced WaterTreatment

Compression Compression Gas Export

Knockout

DrumGas

Treatment /Dehydration

CrudeExport

ProducedWater for re-

injection

HYDROMATIONNutshell Filter

WEMCOFlotation

WEMCOCPI

SkimmingsSeparation

HPProductionSeparator

LP ProductionSeparator

ElectrostaticDehydrator

WellheadChoke

Typical OnshoreSeparation PFD

Bulk PhaseSeparation

ElectrostaticCrudeConditioning

Gas Treatmentand Conditioning

Solids SeparationSystem

WellheadDesanders

Pressurereducing

Pressurereducing

SandClean System

SandDisposal

Water

FromWellhead

Cartridge FilterAdsorption

Page 8: PWE2013 Cameron

8

WEMCO ® Depurator ®

ConventionalBox Design

CylindricalDesign

Page 9: PWE2013 Cameron

Custom Process Systems9

Petreco® Hydromation® Nut Shell Filters

Page 10: PWE2013 Cameron

Produced Water Trends – Offshore Applications

• Most offshore produced water is treated and discharged to theocean as permitted by the regional agencies.

• In the past, many offshore operators have adopted a trendtoward the use of de-oiling hydrocyclones followed byconventional flotation, degasser or conventional compactflotation to treat produced water prior to overboard discharge.

Custom Process Systems10

Page 11: PWE2013 Cameron

Compression Compression Gas Export

Knockout

DrumGas

Treatment /Dehydration

CrudeExport

ProducedWater forDisposal

SkimmingsSeparation

HP ProductionSeparator

LP ProductionSeparator

ElectrostaticDehydrator

Cartridge FilterAdsorption

WaterRecycle

OilRecycle

DesandingHydrocyclone

Deoiler

Deoiler

ProducedWater for re-

injection

ConventionalFlotation /

Degasser/ CFU

Typical OffshoreSeparation PFD

Produced WaterTreatment

ElectrostaticCrudeConditioning

Gas Treatmentand Conditioning

Bulk PhaseSeparation

DeltaClone

Solids SeparationSystem

WellheadDesanders

PressureReducing

Pressurereducing

SandClean System

SandDisposal

WellheadChoke

Page 12: PWE2013 Cameron

12

Vortoil ® Deoiling Hydrocyclone

Inserted Sandwiched OriginalOffset

ModifiedManufacturedOffset

Super Offset

Value Engineeredover 20+ years

Page 13: PWE2013 Cameron

13

Unicel ® Vertical Flotation

Page 14: PWE2013 Cameron

Offshore Production Trends, continued…

• Oilfield operating companies continue moving to ever-increasing waterdepths to produce oil and gas reserves. The high cost of constructingfloating platforms, is driving the need to reduce the size and weight oftopsides processing equipment on these platforms.

• The challenges for the operators are increasing and the need for highperformance, compact and more cost effective technologies exists thatcan handle the high water cuts.

• This has lead to the development of the next generation TST-CFUTM, thathas multiple stages in a single vessel making it capable of handlinghigher inlet OIW concentrations.

• The TST-CFUTM offers better performance than that achieved by acombination of multiple technologies like Hydrocyclones, ConventionalFlotation or Compact Flotation units, considerably reducing the need forfoot print and weight.

Custom Process Systems14

Page 15: PWE2013 Cameron

Divider graphic should fill and notexceed the defined gray box.

Custom Process Systems15

Produced Water Treatment TrendsNext Generation Compact Flotation - TST CFU

Field Trials – North SeaField Test Results

Summary of other Field Test Results and Full Scale InstallationsConclusions and Future Work

Page 16: PWE2013 Cameron

Next Generation Compact Flotation – TST CFUTM

• The TST-CFUTM uses gas flotation andadditional hydraulic forces to separateand remove hydrocarbons, aromaticcompounds, hydrophobic substancesand fine solid particles from producedwater.

• The TST-CFU is available as a singlestage vessel or as a single vessel withmultiple internal stages offering acompact solution specially designed tohandle higher inlet oil concentrations,over 1,000mg/l.

• It requires a smaller foot print, has areduced weight than competitivetechnologies.

• The technology is world wide patentpending.

Custom Process Systems16

Page 17: PWE2013 Cameron

TST CFU – Compact Flotation Technology

• The Technology uses bothinduced, and dissolved gasflotation to removehydrocarbons.

• Special internals for mixingof gas and oil have beendeveloped to achieve easyseparation of this mixturefrom the water.

• The water can be treatedthrough several stages withinone vessel. It s available inconfigurations up to 4stages.

• The numbers of stagesdepend on the inlet fluidconditions.

17 Custom Process Systems

Direction of flow

Orifice /Valve/Mixer

Gas

Water

Orifice /Valve

Gassaturated water at pressure P1

Pressure P2Pressure P1P1 > P2

Direction of flow

Induced gas flotation

Dissolved gas flotation

Page 18: PWE2013 Cameron

TST CFU Basic (Single stage vessel)

• The TST-CFUTM design consists of specialinternals that include a static mixture, ariser pipe, distribution arms and guidevanes.

• Improved produced water circulation andre-mixing is crucial to the design of TST-CFUTM system to enhance the oilseparation efficiency and reduce theretention time down to 20 seconds perstage.

• Key parameters like downward fluidvelocity, gas bubble size, fluid circulation,internal flow paths, gas bubble re-mixing aswell as cell residence time, gas inductionrates, skimming rates, and their effects onprocess hydrodynamics have been takeninto consideration when designing this nextgeneration compact flotation technology.

Custom Process Systems18

1st stagewithoverlappingguide vanes

Cleanwaterwithoutbubblesbelow thevanes

Inletnozzle

Page 19: PWE2013 Cameron

CUSTOM PROCESS SYSTEMS19

TST CFU – Gas bubble distributuion and re-mixing

Page 20: PWE2013 Cameron

TST CFUTM MS3 (Three stage vessel)

Custom Process Systems20

• CFD analysis was used to improve theefficiency of the internal guide vanes byretaining more of the swirling oil watermixture and providing an upward flowpattern to the rising gas bubblesattached to the oil.

• The proper distribution of gas bubblesover the entire cross-sectional area ofthe vessel, the re-mixing of the gasbubbles, the size of the bubbles inducedinto the produced water are all critical topromote good oil separation

• Much shorter retention times of around20 seconD/S per stage has resulted in amore compact vertical pressure vesseland smaller reject volumes.

• The result is an enhanced CFU designwith multiple stages in a single vessel ascompared to the single stage design ofthe conventional vertical IGFs andconventional Compact Flotation Units.

Stage 1

Stage 2

Stage 3

PW inlet

Treated waterOutlet

Page 21: PWE2013 Cameron

TST CFUTM MS3 (Gas inlet and oil reject lines)

Custom Process Systems21

Gas recycleStage 1

Reject stage 1

Reject stage 2

Reject stage 3

Gas InletStage 2

Produced Water Inlet

Treated Water outlet

Page 22: PWE2013 Cameron

Divider graphic should fill and notexceed the defined gray box.

Custom Process Systems22

Produced Water Treatment TrendsNext Generation Compact Flotation - TST CFU

Field Trials – North SeaField Test Results

Summary of other Field Test Results and Full Scale InstallationsConclusions and Future Work

Page 23: PWE2013 Cameron

Field Trials – North Sea

Custom Process Systems23

Existing System:• 1st stage separator• 2nd stage separator• Flocculation tank• 1st stage hydrocyclones• 2nd stage hydrocyclones• Degassing tank• Single stage existing

compact flotation unit

Tie-in points :• Downstream of the

degasser• Downstream of the 1st

stage hydrocyclones• Downstream of the 2nd

stage hydrocyclones• Downstream of the 1st

stage separator

Page 24: PWE2013 Cameron

TST-CFUTM Test Skid

• The TST-CFU test-skidconsisted of two compactflotation units, the CFU Aand CFU B with differentinternal designs.

• The test allowed CFU Aand CFU B to be operatedindividually, in series or inparallel.

Custom Process Systems24

Page 25: PWE2013 Cameron

Inlet Oil/ water Specifications

Custom Process Systems25

Oil API 30.0Oil Density (150 C) [kg/l] 0.8759

PW Temperature[°C] 70PW pH 7.1-7.2

OIW levels in PW from existing treatment system

Page 26: PWE2013 Cameron

Test Procedures

• Tests at different tie-in points

• Flow rate (Typical 50; 100; 150% of design)

• Gas rate injection variation

• Tests performed with and without flocculants

• Testing with the normal variation of incoming water

• Measure OIW & Oil droplet size

Custom Process Systems

Testing instruments

• OIW field instrument calibrated with the existing plant’spermit monitoring instrument

• Malvern Mastersizer Oil droplet size and particle sizemonitoring

• Malvern Zeta-sizer used when oil droplet surface chargewas problematic (especially for condensate water)

Page 27: PWE2013 Cameron

Divider graphic should fill and notexceed the defined gray box.

Custom Process Systems27

Produced Water Treatment TrendsNext Generation Compact Flotation - TST CFU

Field Trials – North SeaField Test Results

Summary of other Field Test Results and Full Scale InstallationsConclusions and Future Work

Page 28: PWE2013 Cameron

North Sea Test Results - Tie in Points

Custom Process Systems28

Page 29: PWE2013 Cameron

Single Stage TST-CFU - D/S of the degasser

• The incoming OIW wasaround 20 mg/l with afew peaks of up to 50mg/l.

• Initially no gas wasinjected into the TST-CFUs, but when gaswas added to the unit,the effluent OIWconcentration stabilizedat around 2-3 mg/l.

• No additionalflocculants were usedduring this test.

• The effluent from theexisting CFU wasaround 7.8 mg/l.

Custom Process Systems29

4 52 3 2

4 53 4

1 1 2 3 2 26

4 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

mg

/lO

IW

Inlet Outlet

Page 30: PWE2013 Cameron

Oil droplet size changes over the TST-CFU – D/S of the degasser

• The median (d0.5) oildroplet size changedfrom 3 to 2 μm from inlet to outlet of the TST-CFU.

• The measuredconcentration D/S theTST-CFU was very low.

• The size distribution dataand the low OIWconcentration from thislocation both indicateexcellent treatability.

• The TST-CFU removesvery small diameter oildroplets.

Custom Process Systems30

Page 31: PWE2013 Cameron

Single Stage TST-CFU - D/S of 1st stage hydrocyclones

Custom Process Systems31

• The OIW resultsshow that the OIWwas reduced from~45 mg/l to 5 mg/lover one stage.

• The lowest OIWconcentration out ofthe TST-CFUwithout flocculantswas 3.5 mg/l andwith flocculants was2.5 mg/l.

• The median oildroplet size wasreduced from 3.1 to1.8μm over the TST-CFU.

Page 32: PWE2013 Cameron

Single Stage TST-CFU –D/S of 2nd stage hydrocyclones

• The test wasperformed usinga single stageCFU B.

• Flocculantsimproved theOIWperformancefrom ~ 4 mg/l to~2 mg/l in theeffluent.

Custom Process Systems32

Page 33: PWE2013 Cameron

33

9

5

11 12

8 911

8 8 8 79 9 9

7 8 7

10

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

mg

/lO

IW

Inlet OIW values between 850 and 1,000 mg/l

Custom Process Systems

3 Stage TST-CFU – D/S of the 1st stage Separator

• The inlet oil in waterconcentrations werebetween 850 and 1000mg/l.

• The oil in the waterfrom the 1st stageseparator containedsmall oil droplet sizewith 50% of the oildroplets < 5.7 μm.

• The first stage of theTST-CFU removed> 95 % and moved thed0.5 to 2.5 μm.

• The second and thirdstage of the TST-CFUremove a further 60%and reduce the d0.5 to2.3 μm

Page 34: PWE2013 Cameron

TST-CFU – North Sea Field test Summary

• D/S of the degassing vessel – Single stage TST-CFU treated the water from an inletOIW concentration of 20 mg/l down to 2 mg/l, (90 % reduction). The existing CFU had anoutlet OIW concentration of ~7.8 mg/l, (61% OIW reduction).

• D/S of the 1st stage separator - A two stage TST CFU reduced the OIW to 20 mg/l.With subsequent treatment over a three stage TST-CFU, the effluent OIW concentrationwas reduced to 8-11 mg/l., the same level as four separate existing produced watertechnologies- flocculant vessel, hydrocyclones, degasser and existing CFU

• D/S of the 1st stage hydrocyclones - A single stage TST-CFU treated the water to anOIW concentration below that achieved by using the existing degasser and the existingCFU. With subsequent treatment over a second stage TST-CFU, the effluent OIWconcentration was further reduced by 1-2 mg/l.

• D/S of the 2nd stage hydrocyclones - A single stage TST-CFU treated the water to aconcentration down to 2 mg/l OIW, and a treatment efficiency of 90% OIW, much betterthan the level reached by using the existing degasser and the existing CFU.

Custom Process Systems34

Tie-in Points InletOIW

OIW (mg/l)Outlet 1st

stage

OIW (mg/l)Outlet 2nd

stage

OIWRemoval %

1st Stage

OIWRemoval %2nd Stage

OIWRemoval %

Total

D/S Degasser ~20 ~2 90 90

D/S 1st StageSeparator

>1000 50 20 95 60 98

D/S 1st Stage HC 50 3.5 93 93

D/S 2nd Stage HC 20 2 90 90

Page 35: PWE2013 Cameron

Divider graphic should fill and notexceed the defined gray box.

Custom Process Systems35

Produced Water Treatment TrendsNext Generation Compact Flotation - TST CFU

Field Trials – North SeaField Test Results

Summary of other Field Test Results and Full Scale InstallationsConclusions and Future Work

Page 36: PWE2013 Cameron

TST-CFUTM Configurations and Applications

Custom Process Systems

TST CFU 2 stages

TST CFU 1 stage

TST CFU 3 or 4 stages

Page 37: PWE2013 Cameron

37

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

220

240

260

280

300

320

340

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34

Inlet

Stage 4

Pilot test results – GOM D/S of Separator

Custom process Systems

Page 38: PWE2013 Cameron

3 stage CFU – South Sea China

• Outlet from Separator- 100 to 180 ppm

• Outlet from existing HC - 80 ppm

• Outlet from existing Degasser vessel - 50 ppm

Custom Process Systems38

Page 39: PWE2013 Cameron

39

3 stage CFU D/S of inlet separator – South Sea China

Custom process Systems

Page 40: PWE2013 Cameron

40

3 stage CFU D/S of inlet separator – South Sea China

Custom process Systems

Page 41: PWE2013 Cameron

Full Scale Unit Startup 3 stage CFU – South Sea China

41

-101030507090

110130150170190210230250270290310330350370390410430450470490510530550

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Inlet

Stage 3

Custom process Systems

Page 42: PWE2013 Cameron

42

3 stage CFU – China

Page 43: PWE2013 Cameron

Pilot test - 4 stage CFU – China

Custom Process Systems43

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

220

240

260

280

300

320 Inlet

Stage 4

Page 44: PWE2013 Cameron

Full scale unit Startup 4 stage CFU – China

44

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

Inlet CFU B

Stage 4 Outlet of CFU B

Custom process Systems

Page 45: PWE2013 Cameron

Pilot test TST- WKO Water Knock Out - China

Custom Process Systems45

• Inlet to WKO – 100,000 mg/l

• Outlet from WKO - 500 mg/l

• Outlet from CFU – <20 mg/l

Page 46: PWE2013 Cameron

WKO/ CFU Test Units – China

46

Page 47: PWE2013 Cameron

Full Scale Startup of WKO - China

Custom Process Systems47

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

600

650

700

750

800

850

900

950

1000

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

Inlet OIW values between 80,000 and 100,000 mg/l

Page 48: PWE2013 Cameron

Divider graphic should fill and notexceed the defined gray box.

Custom Process Systems48

Produced Water Treatment TrendsNext Generation Compact Flotation - TST CFU

Field Trials – North SeaField Test Results

Summary of other Field Test Results and Full Scale InstallationsConclusions and Future Work

Page 49: PWE2013 Cameron

Parameters impacting performance

Oil droplet size

Important parameter for efficiency

Oil slugs

Minor effect on performance. Free oil iseasy to separate.

Gas bubble size

Smaller bubbles will give biggersurface and better contact between oildroplets and gas bubbles.

Salinity

Affects gas bubble size.

Temperature

No effect on performance, tested from250C to 950C

Pressure

No effect, tested from 0.5 to 20 bar

49 Custom process Systems

Page 50: PWE2013 Cameron

50

Dissolved gas in the feedPositive effect on gas flotation

FlocculantsImproved performance with use of flocculants

Shearing across valvesShearing across upstream valves can create small oildroplets and should be avoided

Custom process Systems

Other parameters impacting performance

Page 51: PWE2013 Cameron

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple separation stages within one single vessel

Can handle OIW inlet concentrations over 1,000 mg/l

No need for several vessels in series

Less space required and easier adaptation into existing installation

More flexible design

Multiple internal feed distribution instead of an external tangential inlet

Better fluid distribution and internal re-mixing

Higher probability of contact between gas bubbles and oil droplets

Not impacted by scaling up of vessels

The technology is world wide patent pending

51 Custom Process Systems

Page 52: PWE2013 Cameron

CONCLUSIONS

• Better performance than traditional IGFs and conventional CFU’s

90 to 98% efficiency

• Less equipment as it can replace multiple technologies

Lower weight

Smaller footprint

• Less dependent on chemicals than the first generation CFUs

Lower OPEX

• Simple skid design

Compact single vessel option

52 Custom Process Systems

Page 53: PWE2013 Cameron

FUTURE WORK

• Thus far the next generation TST-CFUTM

compact flotation technology has beeninstalled at several platforms performingsatisfactorily.

• Other operating companies in the GoMand other deepwater locations are alsotesting the TST-CFUTM.

• As feedbacks from existing and new fieldinstallations are received, additionalenhancements will be made to the TST-CFUTM design.

Custom Process Systems53

Page 54: PWE2013 Cameron

Custom Process Systems