public policy and trust
DESCRIPTION
Presentation by Yann Algan at the OECD Workshop on “Joint Learning for an OECD Trust Strategy” on 14 October 2013. Mr. Algan discusses the relationships between institutions, inequality/segmentation and trust. He also examines how to identify impact of policy on trust.TRANSCRIPT
Public Policy and Trust
Yann Algan Sciences Po OECD October 14th
Introduc>on • Large evidence of a rela>onship between
– Ins>tu>ons and trust: rule of law, transparency …. – Inequality, segmenta>on …and trust See survey Algan and Cahuc, Handbook of Economic Growth, 2013
• How can we iden>fy the impact of policy on trust ? – Regula>on and Distrust…. – School and Social Capital
I -‐Regula>on and Distrust Distrust and regulation of product market
D Z AA R G
A U S
A U T B G DB E L
B R A
B G R
C A N
C H L
C H NH R V
C Z E
D N K
E G Y
F IN
F R AD E U
G R C
H U N
IN DID N
IR L
IT A
JP N
J O R
K O R
L V A
L T UM E X
M A R
N L D
N G A
N O R
P A KP E R
P H L
P O LP R T
R O M
R U S
S G P
S V KS V NZ A F
E S P
S W E
C H E
T Z AT U R
U G A
U K R
G B RU S A
V E N
V N M
Z W E
.51
1.5
22.
53
Reg
ulat
ion
of e
ntry
.2 .4 .6 .8 1D is t ru s t
R ²= 0 .3 2
9
Source: Aghion, Algan, Cahuc, Shleifer: Regula>on and Distrust QJE 2010
Distrust and regulation of labor market
D Z A
A R G
A U S
A U TB G D
B E L
B R A
B G R
C A N
C H LC H N
H R V
C Z E
D N K
E G Y
F IN
F R A
D E U
G R C
H U N
IN DID N
IR L
IT A
JP N
J O R
K O R
LV ALT UM E X
M A R
N LD
N G A
N O RP A K
P E R
PH LP O L
P R T
R O M
R U S
S G P
S V K
S V N
Z A F
E S P
SW E
C H E
T Z A
T U R
U G A
U K R
G B R
U S A
V E N
V N M Z W E
020
4060
80R
igid
ity o
f Em
ploy
men
t Ind
ex
.2 .4 .6 .8 1D istrus t
R ²= 0 .1 1
10
Distrust, Civicness and Flexisecurity
Aus
Aut
Bg
Cd
Czr
Dk
FraGer
Gre
Hg
Ire
ItaJp
Mx
Nth
Nw
Pol
PtSp
Swd
Switz
UkUsa
0.2
.4.6
.8Ex
pend
iture
per
une
mpl
oyed
-.6 -.4 -.2 0Civic attitudes: marginal country effect
WVS and OECD databases 1980-2000
R²=0.36
12
Demand for regula>on Distrust and Political support for Regulation: Micro evidence
Distrust
others
Distrust legal
system
Distrust civil
servants
Distrust
companies
(1) Competition is harmful.027***
(.010)
.025***
(.007)
.013**
(.006)
.139**
(.006)
N 114722 93406 111113 111113
(2) Government should
control firms.097***
(.014)
.022*
(.013)
.020*
(.011)
.023***
(.019)
26978 26919 26594 13318
(3) Government should
take more responsibility
.039***
(.006)
.018**
(.006)
.015**
(.006)
.088**
(.006)
N 129393 123798 123798 120807
(3) In democracies the economic
system runs badly
.134***
(.009)
.081***
(.010)
.082***
(.008)
.053***
(.009)
N 76061 47542 74288 65011
Source: WVS - Controls: country fixed e�ects, gender, age, education, income, political a!liation
Robust standard error with clustering at the country level. ***:1%, **: 5%, *: 10.
19
The Side effects of Deregula>on in Low Social capital environment: ex of Transi>on Economies
Changes in social capital between 1990 and 2000: WVS
-0,06
-0,04
-0,02
0
0,02
0,04
0,06
0,08
0,1
0,12
0,14
Distrust in others Distrust in civil servants Distrust in Business
Change in OECD countriesChange in Transition economies
29
Change in corruption: WVS 1990 and 2000
-0,06
-0,04
-0,02
0
0,02
0,04
0,06
0,08
0,1
Justifiable to accept bribes Justifiable to cheat on taxes
Change in OECD countriesChange in Transition economies
30
Change in demand for regulation: WVS 1990 and 2000
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
Competition is harmful Government should run business
Change in OECD countriesChange in Transition economies
31
Changes in civic education between 1990 and 2000
-0,08
-0,06
-0,04
-0,02
0
0,02
0,04
0,06
Education Respect and Tolerance Education Unselfishness
Change in OECD countriesChange in Transition economies
35
State regulation and civil society: how to build a virtuous circle
Source, Aghion, Algan and Cahuc, JEEA 2011
• Trust and Horizontal Organiza>on Bloom and Van Reenen (2011) & Algan, Cahuc et Shleifer (2013): 4,000 firms
14
General Index of Decentraliza>on of decisions between Central Head Quarter (CHQ) and plants: « How are decisions taken on new product introduc>ons? At the plant ? CHQ? Both ?» « How much of sales and marke>ng is carried out at the plant level ? »…
Cha`er
Lessons from Private Sector
Bloom and Van Reenen (2013): Rela>onship between decentraliza>on, produc>vity and trust
15
Cha`er
Argentina
AustraliaAustriaBelgium
BangladesBulgaria
Brazil
Botswana
CanadaSwitzerland
ChileChina
Germany
Denmark
Algeria
Egypt
Spain
Estonia
Finland
France
UK
Greece
Hungary
IndonesiaIndia
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Jordan
Japan
KoreaLesotho
Luxembourg
Morocco
Mexico
Mali
Malawi
Nigeria
NetherlandsNorway
Pakistan
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Puerto Rico
Portugal
Romania
Singapore
Sweden
Turkey
Tanzania
UgandaUkraine
USA
Venezuela
Vietnam
South Africa
Zambia
Zimbabwe
34
56
Dece
ntra
lizat
ion o
f dec
ision
s with
in fir
ms
0 .25 .5 .75Generalized Trust, country average
R-sq=0.37
!
Decentraliza>on and Firm Size
16
Cha`er
II-‐ Educa>on and Trust
Show the rela>onship between teaching prac>ces and social capital, across countries, schools and within classrooms
Ver%cal versus Horizontal Teaching Methods
Varia>on in Teaching prac>ces
Country level (CES)
Average answers for “Lecture” and “Groups”
AUS
BEL
BGR
CHE
CYP
CZE
DEU
DNK
EST FIN
GBR
GRC
HUN
ITA
LTU
LVANORPRT
ROM
RUS
SVK SVN
SWE
USA
1.52
2.53
3.5Te
ache
r lectu
res - C
ES
2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3Students works in groups - CES
!
Varia>on in Teaching prac>ces
Country level (TIMSS)
AUS
AUTBELBGR
CAN
CHE
CZE DEU
DNK
GBRESP
FIN
FRAGRC
HKG
HUNIRL
ISL
ISR
ITA
JPN
KOR
LTU
LVA
NLD
NOR
PRT
ROMRUS
SGPSVK
SVN
SWE
TUR
USA
22.
53
3.5
Take
not
es fr
om th
e bo
ard
- TIM
SS
1 1.5 2 2.5Students works in groups - TIMSS
!
AUS
AUT BELBUL
CDCHE
CZR
DEU
DNK
SP
FIN
FRA
UK
GRCHG
IDN
IREISL
ISR
ITA
JPN
KOR
LTU
LVA
NLD
NW
PRT
ROM
RUS
SGP
SVK SVN
SWD
TUR
USA0
.2.4
.6G
ener
aliz
ed T
rust
0 .5 1 1.5 2Gap between Vertical and Horizontal Teaching
R=0.31
• “ Coopera>on among students” -‐ Increase by 1 point in “Students work in group”:
2.1 % of the standard devia>on in the index “Coopera>on among students” -‐ Increase by 1 point in “Teacher lectures”: 2.2% of the standard devia>on • “Coopera>on between students and teachers” -‐ Increase by 1 point in “Students work in group”: 3.6 % of the standard devia>on in the index “Coopera>on between students and teachers” -‐ Increase by 1 point in “Teacher lectures”: 1.6% of the standard devia>on
Across Schools varia>on
Within school varia>on