public attitudes t oward lake champlain cormorants: nuisance or scapegoat ?
DESCRIPTION
Public Attitudes T oward Lake Champlain Cormorants: Nuisance or Scapegoat ?. Walter F. Kuentzel David E. Capen Zoe Richards (University of Vermont) Bryan Higgins (SUNY – Plattsburgh). Erhai Lake. Photo: Rachel King - http://www.emc.org.uk/_China-RK09/_rachel_king.htm. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Public Attitudes Toward Lake Champlain Cormorants:Nuisance or Scapegoat?
Walter F. KuentzelDavid E. CapenZoe Richards (University of Vermont)Bryan Higgins (SUNY – Plattsburgh)
Erhai Lake
Photo: Rachel King - http://www.emc.org.uk/_China-RK09/_rachel_king.htm
A Problem Species
A Problem Species
The Human Dimension
• Knowledge• Attitudes• Impact on the Fishery• Social Acceptability
Management Control and Public Controversy
Nuisance Speciesvs.
Animal Rights
Attitude Strength
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither Agree nor Disagree
Agree Strongly Agree0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
9.8
21.7
35.3
16.1 17.1
Cormorants are Like Flying Rats
Perc
ent
ExtremityImportanceKnowledge
Acceptance/RejectionDirect Experience
Conceptual Model
User Groups
Management Control
KnowledgeImportanceExperience
Latitudes
Cormorant Attitudes
Fishery Impact
Attitude Strength Dimensions
Methods
Mailed Survey
• Anglers• Recreational Boaters (non-anglers)• Conservation Organizations• Audubon (Green Mountain, Otter Creek)• Lake Champlain Committee
• Lakeshore Homeowners (VT & NY)
1195 Questionnaires Mailed769 Returned (64% response rate)
Knowledge
KnowledgeFalse Statements (e.g.):• Cormorants eat three or more times their weight in fish each day• Cormorants are large birds weighing approximately 20 pounds
True Statements (e.g.):• Cormorants will gather in flocks of 1000 or more when they are feeding• Yellow perch are the most common food item for cormorants
4-Point Scale:1= Definitely not, 2=Maybe not, 3=Maybe yes, 4=Definitely yes
13-item additive scale
-26
-24
-22
-20
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10 -7 -5 -3 -1 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 22 24 26
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Knowledge About Cormorants
Cormorant Attitudes
Cormorant AttitudesPositive Statements (e.g.):• A large nesting colony of cormorants is an impressive sight• Cormorants are an important part of the Lake Champlain ecosystem
Negative Statements (e.g.):• Cormorants have become a nuisance species on Lake Champlain• If it were legal, I would shoot any cormorant that came near me
5-Point Scale:1= Strongly disagree, 2=Disagree, 3=Neither agree nor disagree, 4=Agree, 5=Strong agree
10-Item Additive Scale (α = .89)
-20
-19
-18
-17
-16
-15
-14
-13
-12
-11
-10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Attitudes About Cormorants
Effect on Fishery
Cormorant Impacts on the FisheryPositive Statements (e.g.):• Cormorants are used as a scapegoat for Lake Champlain fisheries problems• Cormorants cannot possibly eat enough to reduce Lake Champlain sport fish
Negative Statements (e.g.):• I would catch more fish on Lake Champlain if there were fewer cormorants• The future of Lake Champlain bass tournaments is threatened by cormorants
5-Point Scale:1= Strongly disagree, 2=Disagree, 3=Neither agree nor disagree, 4=Agree, 5=Strong agree
10-Item Additive Scale (α = .90)
-20
-19
-18
-17
-16
-15
-14
-13
-12
-11
-10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 17 18 19 20
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Cormorant's Effect on Lake Champlain Fishery
Management Control
Management ControlsSupport Statements (e.g.):• Cormorants should be eliminated from Lake Champlain• There should be an open season for the public to hunt cormorants
Opposition Statements (e.g.):• It is not necessary to control the cormorant population on Lake Champlain• Shooting cormorants to control their population is unethical
5-Point Scale:1= Strongly disagree, 2=Disagree, 3=Neither agree nor disagree, 4=Agree, 5=Strong agree
8-Item Additive Scale (α = .85)
-16
-15
-14
-13
-12
-11
-10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Managing Cormorant Populations
Other Variables
Importance (Single Item, 4-Point Scale)• I am concerned that there are too many cormorants on Lake Champlain
Latitude of Acceptance/Rejection (Additive Scale)• Expected minus Preferred number of cormorants seen flying in a flock• Expected minus Preferred number of cormorants seen nesting on an island
Direct Experience (Additive Scale)• Number of recreational activities participated in on Lake Champlain• Number of days spent recreating on Lake Champlain in previous 12 months• Frequency of recreation participation on Lake Champlain over the years• Number of recreational boats owned
User Group Differences
Anglers Boaters Conservation Homeowners F
Knowledge 3.3a 3.6a 4.6b 4.5b 2.8
Importance 3.7d 3.2b 2.9a 3.5c 31.0
Direct Experience -0.3b 0.1b -1.1a 1.3c 32.0
Acceptance/ Rejection 3.7b 2.7a 2.1a 3.9b 14.8
Cormorant Attitudes -9.7a -2.7c 0.1d -5.9b 57.2
Fishery Impacts -7.7a -2.8c 0.1d -5.5b 49.4
Management Control 8.3a 3.4c 1.4d 5.4b 45.5
Anglers Boaters Conservation Homeowners F
Knowledge 3.3a 3.6a 4.6b 4.5b 2.8
Importance 3.7d 3.2b 2.9a 3.5c 31.0
Direct Experience -0.3b 0.1b -1.1a 1.3c 32.0
Acceptance/ Rejection 3.7b 2.7a 2.1a 3.9b 14.8
Cormorant Attitudes -9.7a -2.7c 0.1d -5.9b 57.2
Fishery Impacts -7.7a -2.8c 0.1d -5.5b 49.4
Management Control 8.3a 3.4c 1.4d 5.4b 45.5
Anglers Boaters Conservation Homeowners F
Knowledge 3.3a 3.6a 4.6b 4.5b 2.8
Importance 3.7d 3.2b 2.9a 3.5c 31.0
Direct Experience -0.3b 0.1b -1.1a 1.3c 32.0
Acceptance/ Rejection 3.7b 2.7a 2.1a 3.9b 14.8
Cormorant Attitudes -9.7a -2.7c 0.1d -5.9b 57.2
Fishery Impacts -7.7a -2.8c 0.1d -5.5b 49.4
Management Control 8.3a 3.4c 1.4d 5.4b 45.5
Anglers Boaters Conservation Homeowners F
Knowledge 3.3a 3.6a 4.6b 4.5b 2.8
Importance 3.7d 3.2b 2.9a 3.5c 31.0
Direct Experience -0.3b 0.1b -1.1a 1.3c 32.0
Acceptance/ Rejection 3.7b 2.7a 2.1a 3.9b 14.8
Cormorant Attitudes -9.7a -2.7c 0.1d -5.9b 57.2
Fishery Impacts -7.7a -2.8c 0.1d -5.5b 49.4
Management Control 8.3a 3.4c 1.4d 5.4b 45.5
Anglers Boaters Conservation Homeowners F
Knowledge 3.3a 3.6a 4.6b 4.5b 2.8
Importance 3.7d 3.2b 2.9a 3.5c 31.0
Direct Experience -0.3b 0.1b -1.1a 1.3c 32.0
Acceptance/ Rejection 3.7b 2.7a 2.1a 3.9b 14.8
Cormorant Attitudes -9.7a -2.7c 0.1d -5.9b 57.2
Fishery Impacts -7.7a -2.8c 0.1d -5.5b 49.4
Management Control 8.3a 3.4c 1.4d 5.4b 45.5
Anglers Boaters Conservation Homeowners F
Knowledge 3.3a 3.6a 4.6b 4.5b 2.8
Importance 3.7d 3.2b 2.9a 3.5c 31.0
Direct Experience -0.3b 0.1b -1.1a 1.3c 32.0
Acceptance/ Rejection 3.7b 2.7a 2.1a 3.9b 14.8
Cormorant Attitudes -9.7a -2.7c 0.1d -5.9b 57.2
Fishery Impacts -7.7a -2.8c 0.1d -5.5b 49.4
Management Control 8.3a 3.4c 1.4d 5.4b 45.5
Anglers Boaters Conservation Homeowners F
Knowledge 3.3a 3.6a 4.6b 4.5b 2.8
Importance 3.7d 3.2b 2.9a 3.5c 31.0
Direct Experience -0.3b 0.1b -1.1a 1.3c 32.0
Acceptance/ Rejection 3.7b 2.7a 2.1a 3.9b 14.8
Cormorant Attitudes -9.7a -2.7c 0.1d -5.9b 57.2
Fishery Impacts -7.7a -2.8c 0.1d -5.5b 49.4
Management Control 8.3a 3.4c 1.4d 5.4b 45.5
Predicting Support for Management Control
KnowledgeManagement
Control
Cormorant Attitudes
Fishery Impact
Importance
Acceptance/ Rejection
Direct Experience
-12.7
-7.5
7.9
-13.2*6.6
-6.5
-18.44.2
-6.2
* - Standardized Coefficients
Model Fit - Χ2 =23.6 (4), CFI=.99
Predicting Support for Management Control
KnowledgeManagement
Control
Cormorant Attitudes
Fishery Impact
Importance
Acceptance/ Rejection
Direct Experience
-12.7
-7.5
7.9
-13.2*6.6
-6.5
-18.44.2
-6.2
* - Standardized Coefficients
Model Fit - Χ2 =23.6 (4), CFI=.99
Predicting Support for Management Control
KnowledgeManagement
Control
Cormorant Attitudes
Fishery Impact
Importance
Acceptance/ Rejection
Direct Experience
-12.7
-7.5
7.9
-13.2*6.6
-6.5
-18.44.2
-6.2
* - Standardized Coefficients
Model Fit - Χ2 =23.6 (4), CFI=.99
Predicting Support for Management Control
KnowledgeManagement
Control
Cormorant Attitudes
Fishery Impact
Importance
Acceptance/ Rejection
Direct Experience
-12.7
-7.5
7.9
-13.2*6.6
-6.5
-18.44.2
-6.2
* - Standardized Coefficients
Model Fit - Χ2 =23.6 (4), CFI=.99
Predicting Support for Management Control
KnowledgeManagement
Control
Cormorant Attitudes
Fishery Impact
Importance
Acceptance/ Rejection
Direct Experience
-12.7
-7.5
7.9
-13.2*6.6
-6.5
-18.44.2
-6.2
* - Standardized Coefficients
Model Fit - Χ2 =23.6 (4), CFI=.99
Take Away Points• Who hates cormorants?
1/3 negative, 1/4 positive, the rest are ambivalent
• User groupsAnglers and lakeshore homeowners most likely to dislike cormorantsConservation members least troubled by cormorants
• Educating the PublicMore knowledge = more positive attitudes/less support for control
• Not to pick on anglers, but…Scored highest on self-rated wildlife knowledge scaleScored lowest on cormorant knowledge scaleFitting beliefs to attitudes?
• Native/Newcomer?Anglers – younger, male, less education & income, rural residenceConservation – older, more education & income, urban residence
• Who hates cormorants?1/3 negative, 1/4 positive, the rest are ambivalent
• User groupsAnglers and lakeshore homeowners most likely to dislike cormorantsConservation members least troubled by cormorants
• Educating the PublicMore knowledge = more positive attitudes/less support for control
• Not to pick on anglers, but…Scored highest on self-rated wildlife knowledge scaleScored lowest on cormorant knowledge scaleFitting beliefs to attitudes?
• Native/Newcomer?Anglers – younger, male, less education & income, rural residenceConservation – older, more education & income, urban residence
• Who hates cormorants?1/3 negative, 1/4 positive, the rest are ambivalent
• User groupsAnglers and lakeshore homeowners most likely to dislike cormorantsConservation members least troubled by cormorants
• Educating the PublicMore knowledge = more positive attitudes/less support for control
• Not to pick on anglers, but…Scored highest on self-rated wildlife knowledge scaleScored lowest on cormorant knowledge scaleFitting beliefs to attitudes?
• Native/Newcomer?Anglers – younger, male, less education & income, rural residenceConservation – older, more education & income, urban residence
• Who hates cormorants?1/3 negative, 1/4 positive, the rest are ambivalent
• User groupsAnglers and lakeshore homeowners most likely to dislike cormorantsConservation members least troubled by cormorants
• Educating the PublicMore knowledge = more positive attitudes/less support for control
• Not to pick on anglers, but…Scored highest on self-rated wildlife knowledge scaleScored lowest on cormorant knowledge scaleFitting beliefs to attitudes?
• Native/Newcomer?Anglers – younger, male, less education & income, rural residenceConservation – older, more education & income, urban residence
• Who hates cormorants?1/3 negative, 1/4 positive, the rest are ambivalent
• User groupsAnglers and lakeshore homeowners most likely to dislike cormorantsConservation members least troubled by cormorants
• Educating the PublicMore knowledge = more positive attitudes/less support for control
• Not to pick on anglers, but…Scored highest on self-rated wildlife knowledge scaleScored lowest on cormorant knowledge scaleFitting beliefs to attitudes?
• Native/Newcomer?Anglers – younger, male, less education & income, rural residenceConservation – older, more education & income, urban residence
Questions or Comments?