public advocate de blasio letter to department of transportation on 34th street proposal

Upload: bill-de-blasio

Post on 08-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/7/2019 Public Advocate de Blasio Letter to Department of Transportation on 34th Street Proposal

    1/2

    THE PUBLIC ADVOCATE FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK

    Bill de Blasio PUBLIC ADVOCATE

    March 9, 2011

    Commissioner Janette Sadik-KhanNYC Department of Transportation

    55 Water Street

    New York, NY 10041

    Dear Commissioner Sadik-Khan:

    Over the last four years the Department of Transportation (DOT) has implemented numerousmajor changes to our Citys traffic system, from bike paths to pedestrian plazas. Each of these

    proposals is subjected to a DOT-led evaluation to determine its success; in some cases theseevaluations are used as the principle factor in whether pilots are made permanent. However,

    these DOT-led evaluations have also provided a rubber stamp on every single one of its majorproposals, even in cases where findings were not universally supportive of the projects goals.

    For this reason, I urge the DOT to subject future projects, especially the 34th

    street bus rapid

    transit proposal to a full Environmental Impact Assessment with an independent contractor.

    Every project the DOT put forward which represented a major experimental change to our traffic

    system has been supported by its post implementation evaluations. When the DOT put in thefirst bike lane on 9th Avenue, its evaluation claimed the project was a success, noting increases in

    cycling, but it failed to include what impact the project had on traffic and congestion.1 Similarly

    its first evaluation of the Bx12 Select Bus Service,2 the first attempt at bus rapid transit, failed tomeasure whether changes had any impact on traffic flow. In addition, evaluations of TimesSquare and Herald Square Pedestrian Plazas3, Broadway Boulevard4, and Prospect Park West

    bike lanes,5

    all universally supported the DOTs proposals, no matter the impact they had on

    surrounding areas.

    To make matters worse, in at least one case the DOT presented an evaluation to the public that

    which ignored City data critical of the project. A study for Times Square and Herald SquarePedestrian Plazas entitled Green Light for Midtown Evaluation Report claimed the project had

    improved traffic flow, emphasizing GPS data from taxicabs. However, the DOTs study left out

    data collected by New York City Transit for the report which found that riders trying to get

    downtown through the Times Square area have experienced longer travel times on four out of

    1http://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/20100511_columbus_ave_cb7.pdf

    2http://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/beaton_presentation_sbs_2010trb.pdf

    3http://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/broadway_report_final2010_web2.pdf

    4http://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/broadway_0223409.pdf

    5http://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/20110120_ppw_data.pdf

  • 8/7/2019 Public Advocate de Blasio Letter to Department of Transportation on 34th Street Proposal

    2/2

    five affected bus routes.6

    Despite this revelation, the project remains permanently established in

    its current form.

    The 34th

    street proposal will bring substantial change to one of the most important streets in our

    City and, consequentially, requires a more thorough and independent evaluation process. 34th

    street runs through the heart of the busiest commercial district in the nation. The DOTs currentproposal would be one of the most extreme changes to the area we have seen in decades, from

    curbside access to traffic patterns. To ensure its proposal provides the maximum benefit to allconstituencies including commuters, drivers and the surrounding community, the DOT should be

    willing to make the extra effort.

    I am gratified that the DOT has responded to substantial community concerns by eliminating its

    proposal for a pedestrian plaza. However, if the DOT truly believes this project is in the best

    interest of the City and the community, it should allow the independent and thorough prospective

    provided by an Environmental Impact Assessment.

    Regards,

    Bill de Blasio

    Public Advocate for the City of New York

    6http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/21/nyregion/21broadway.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=%22Pedestrian%20Plaza%22%

    20AND%20%22de%20Blasio%22&st=cse