psychostimulant use: the good news and the bad news

1
PharmacoEconomics & Outcomes News 282 - 30 Sep 2000 Psychostimulant use: the good news and the bad news The good news is that most children and adolescents who meet full DSM-III-R * criteria for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) receive methylphenidate or other prescription psychostimulant medications. But the bad news is that these agents are used inappropriately in paediatric patients without definite ADHD. These are the findings of a study conducted by researchers at Duke University, North Carolina, US, among paediatric patients (aged 9, 11 and 13 years) in 11 counties in western North Carolina. ** Psychostimulant use among these patients was assessed during 4 annually assessed 3-month periods over the years 1992 to 1996. Most ADHD treated appropriately . . . Among paediatric patients meeting full DSM-III-R criteria for ADHD, an estimated 72% were receiving psychostimulants. For paediatric patients not meeting the full DSM-III-R criteria for ADHD, but having parent reports of ADHD symptoms associated with functional impairment [ADHD-not otherwise specified (ADHD- NOS)], the proportion receiving psychostimulants was 23%. Just under 5% of children and adolescents who did not fall into either the ADHD or the ADHD-NOS categories were receiving psychostimulants. . . . but most psychostimulant use inappropriate However, because of the absolute numbers involved, around two-thirds of all children and adolescents who were receiving psychostimulants did not fall into either the ADHD or the ADHD-NOS categories. Moreover, the group of treated individuals in the non-ADHD/ADHD- NOS group had a mean ADHD symptom count of only 1 parent-reported symptom across the four 3-month periods. ‘It cannot be assumed that stimulants are efficacious in the treatment of such low levels of ADHD symptoms’, comment the researchers. The researchers also found the long-term use of psychostimulants by children and adolescents (a mean duration of > 3 years) ‘cause for concern’. * Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (revised third edition) ** see Current Issues section, this issue, p5; 800763782 Angold A, et al. Stimulant treatment for children: a community perspective. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 39: 975-984, Aug 2000 800843779 » Editorial comment: These findings reveal a distinctly different pattern of psychostimulant use than was found in a 1992 survey. The 1992 survey found that only 12% of paediatric patients (aged 9–17 years) meeting DSM-III-R criteria for ADHD were receiving psychostimulant medications [see PharmacoEconomics & Outcomes News 231: 3, 25 Sep 1999; 800786888]. . 1 PharmacoEconomics & Outcomes News 30 Sep 2000 No. 282 1173-5503/10/0282-0001/$14.95 Adis © 2010 Springer International Publishing AG. All rights reserved

Upload: dangxuyen

Post on 16-Mar-2017

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

PharmacoEconomics & Outcomes News 282 - 30 Sep 2000

Psychostimulant use: the goodnews and the bad news

The good news is that most children and adolescentswho meet full DSM-III-R* criteria for attention-deficithyperactivity disorder (ADHD) receive methylphenidateor other prescription psychostimulant medications. Butthe bad news is that these agents are usedinappropriately in paediatric patients without definiteADHD.

These are the findings of a study conducted byresearchers at Duke University, North Carolina, US,among paediatric patients (aged 9, 11 and 13 years) in11 counties in western North Carolina.**

Psychostimulant use among these patients was assessedduring 4 annually assessed 3-month periods over theyears 1992 to 1996.

Most ADHD treated appropriately . . .Among paediatric patients meeting full DSM-III-R

criteria for ADHD, an estimated 72% were receivingpsychostimulants. For paediatric patients not meetingthe full DSM-III-R criteria for ADHD, but having parentreports of ADHD symptoms associated with functionalimpairment [ADHD-not otherwise specified (ADHD-NOS)], the proportion receiving psychostimulants was23%. Just under 5% of children and adolescents who didnot fall into either the ADHD or the ADHD-NOScategories were receiving psychostimulants.

. . . but most psychostimulant useinappropriate

However, because of the absolute numbers involved,around two-thirds of all children and adolescents whowere receiving psychostimulants did not fall into eitherthe ADHD or the ADHD-NOS categories. Moreover, thegroup of treated individuals in the non-ADHD/ADHD-NOS group had a mean ADHD symptom count of only 1parent-reported symptom across the four 3-monthperiods. ‘It cannot be assumed that stimulants areefficacious in the treatment of such low levels of ADHDsymptoms’, comment the researchers.

The researchers also found the long-term use ofpsychostimulants by children and adolescents (a meanduration of > 3 years) ‘cause for concern’.* Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (revised thirdedition)** see Current Issues section, this issue, p5; 800763782

Angold A, et al. Stimulant treatment for children: a community perspective.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 39:975-984, Aug 2000 800843779

» Editorial comment: These findings reveal a distinctlydifferent pattern of psychostimulant use than was found in a1992 survey. The 1992 survey found that only 12% of paediatricpatients (aged 9–17 years) meeting DSM-III-R criteria for ADHDwere receiving psychostimulant medications [seePharmacoEconomics & Outcomes News 231: 3, 25 Sep 1999;800786888]. .

1

PharmacoEconomics & Outcomes News 30 Sep 2000 No. 2821173-5503/10/0282-0001/$14.95 Adis © 2010 Springer International Publishing AG. All rights reserved