psyc355 p5 ip cognitive psychology applied

44
Running Head: COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY APPLIED 1 Cognitive Psychology Applied Cherilyn Formanek Colorado Technical University Online PSYC355-1304B-01

Upload: cherilyn-formanek

Post on 11-Nov-2014

305 views

Category:

Recruiting & HR


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Paper for Cognitive Psychology class Bachelor of Science: Psychology: Organizational Behavior

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Psyc355 p5 ip cognitive psychology applied

Running Head: COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY APPLIED 1

Cognitive Psychology Applied

Cherilyn Formanek

Colorado Technical University Online

PSYC355-1304B-01

Page 2: Psyc355 p5 ip cognitive psychology applied

COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY 2

Cognitive Psychology Applied

Introduction

Human cognition can be described as the conscious and unconscious mental processes of

the human brain; mental processes that motivate an organism toward action (Ashcraft &

Radvansky, 2010). These mental processes consist of attention, language, memory, perception,

reasoning and solving problems (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010). The field of cognitive

psychology studies human cognition by applying scientific principles (the scientific method)

toward understanding human mental processes in an variety of environments and conditions;

such as in personal and workplace life (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010). The following paper will

examine how cognitive psychology can be applied to personal and workplace issues and

specifically a new employee training program.

I. Introduction to Cognitive Psychology

Application of Cognitive Psychology to Personal and Workplace Issues

Cognitive psychology can have many applications to both personal and workplace issues;

first because the field of cognitive psychology studies the mental processes; how they function;

what areas of the brain may be engaged in each one; how they may differ and how they may be

the same between individuals; and the impact of nature and nurture on each of the processes

(Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; Eraut, 2007; Le Roy, Bastounis & Minibas-Poussard, 2012;

Robotti, 2012). Less important is the question of specific issues as personal and workplace

related; human beings may be consistent in their individual differences; but generally speaking

personal issues and workplace issues are not mutually exclusive; personal issues and workplace

issues often overlap (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; Eraut, 2007; Le Roy, Bastounis & Minibas-

Poussard, 2012; Robotti, 2012). Four examples of how cognitive psychology can be applied to

Page 3: Psyc355 p5 ip cognitive psychology applied

COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY 3

both personal and workplace issues would be in the areas of learning, motivation, emotion and

behavior all of which impact and are impacted by attention, language, and memory, perception,

reasoning and problem-solving (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; Eraut, 2007; Le Roy, Bastounis &

Minibas-Poussard, 2012; Robotti, 2012). Cognitive psychology (with many other disciplines in

particular the neurosciences) can be applied in terms of understanding development and function;

improving methods of learning and motivation; and helping individuals better understand and

control their emotions and behavior appropriately (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; Eraut, 2007; Le

Roy, Bastounis & Minibas-Poussard, 2012; Robotti, 2012).

How Do You Know When Learning Has Occurred

First, learning can be defined as the altering of behavior in relation to one's experience

directly or indirectly (observational); there are many ways in which individuals can learn;

including classical and operant conditioning; insight learning and latent learning (Ashcraft &

Radvansky, 2010; Colorado Technical University, 2010). One can generally tell when learning

has occurred in others when they observe a change in a particular behavior; such as when a

young child learns to avoid touching a hot stove (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; CTU, 2010;

2011). One generally knows when learning has occurred within oneself when one alters a

behavior and usually has a pretty good idea of why (such as previous behavior resulted in an

unpleasant outcome) (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; CTU, 2010; 2011). For instance when one

chooses not to study and complete university course assignments one knows one is not learning

much; one's grades suffer and one may fail the class or pass with a very low grade. However

when one studies and completes university course assignments; one will tend to know which

concepts one feels they have a good grasp of; which ones they may be more uncertain of and

may need to study more; and one will be more likely to pass a class with a much higher grade.

Page 4: Psyc355 p5 ip cognitive psychology applied

COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY 4

An Example of Successful Learning

Successful learning requires all of the cognitive processes; attention, perception, memory,

language, reasoning and problem-solving skills (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; CTU, 2010;

2011). An example of successful learning that many individuals have is learning to read which

usually begins first with learning language (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; CTU, 2010; 2011;

Eraut, 2007; Robotti, 2012). One usually begins with the sensory sensation of hearing; one learns

to associate sounds with different stimuli including family members such as voice differences;

tone; differences in syllabic sound of individual words (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; CTU,

2010; 2011; Eraut, 2007; Robotti, 2012). One pays attention and slowly over time learns to

imitate the sounds; make associations between objects and language words; often as such

behaviors are rewarded by others (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; CTU, 2010; 2011; Eraut, 2007;

Robotti, 2012). The individual may need to reason and problem-solve how to use new language

skills such as remembering the right words to communicate with others so that meaning is

conveyed correctly (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; CTU, 2010; 2011; Eraut, 2007; Robotti,

2012).

Likewise the individual also learns to express words in conjunction with tone of voice to

express intent and meaning; often imitating vocal patterns and tone of voice of those who are

modeling language speech (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; CTU, 2010; 2011; Eraut, 2007;

Robotti, 2012). These are subsets of information one learns prior to being introduced to the

alphabet of the language one has learned; then one is introduced to the associated alphabet; must

provide attention to the individual letter and associated sound; and commit each to memory

(Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; CTU, 2010; 2011; Eraut, 2007; Robotti, 2012). One must then

learn how to sound out each letter in accordance with its representative sound; identify the word,

Page 5: Psyc355 p5 ip cognitive psychology applied

COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY 5

and understand it's meaning; and then learn the rules of grammar for the language where sets of

word symbols are put together to express sentences (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; CTU, 2010;

2011; Eraut, 2007; Robotti, 2012). In learning to recognize individual words and their associated

meanings in sentences; one uses reasoning and problem-solving to determine the meaning of the

combined set of words within a sentence (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; CTU, 2010; 2011;

Eraut, 2007; Robotti, 2012). In learning the process of reading in terms of sentence structure and

grammar one learns that one can also determine elements of meaning in unknown words by

considering the context of the written material; through each element of the learning process

attention, perception, memory; language, reasoning and problem-solving are integral (Ashcraft &

Radvansky, 2010; CTU, 2010; 2011; Eraut, 2007; Robotti, 2012).

II. Key Cognitive Psychology Concepts: the individual, workplace, adult learning; creating

successful learning organizations

Perception Attention and Memory

Factors that influence visual and auditory perceptual knowledge: there are several

factors that influence visual and auditory perceptual knowledge; including attentional processes;

short term, working and long-term memory; pattern recognition processes; feature detection and

top-down and bottom-up processing (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; CTU, 2011; Hall, Fussell &

Summerfield, 2005; Talmsa, et al, 2006). Attentional processes influence what stimuli receive

focus and recording by visual and audio memory processes (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; CTU,

2011; Hall, Fussell & Summerfield, 2005; Talmsa, et al, 2006). They can be reflexive; automatic,

selective and unconscious; we often take in more information that is stored in memory; what is

stored is usually because attention was given to it; and then depending on degree of importance

will often depend how much of the information will be placed in working and long-term memory

Page 6: Psyc355 p5 ip cognitive psychology applied

COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY 6

(Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; CTU, 2011; Hall, Fussell & Summerfield, 2005; Talmsa, et al,

2006). The more attention a stimuli receives particularly if emotional content is also involved;

the stronger information from stimuli is likely to be remembered and can then influence

perception (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; CTU, 2011; Hall, Fussell & Summerfield, 2005;

Talmsa, et al, 2006). Likewise information stored in working and long-term memory is often

associated with other information; creating a knowledge base of data from learning and

experience that can be applied to novel situational and object stimuli in cognitive processing

(Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; CTU, 2011; Hall, Fussell & Summerfield, 2005; Talmsa, et al,

2006).

In pattern recognition, objects perceived by one's eyes are processed and stored

automatically and usually unconsciously into memory as part of a problem-solving process

(Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; CTU, 2011; Hall, Fussell & Summerfield, 2005; Talmsa, et al,

2006). The memory storage essentially records patterns to objects that are seen; in bits and pieces

and fills in the blank areas (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010). A set of principles describing how

visual perception is organized is called the Gestalt grouping principles; these principles help

explain how perceptual ambiguities are sorted out and resolved (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010).

Figure-ground explains the foreground-background relationship between objects and our ability

to perceive one object more prominently than others (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010). Closure is a

process that accounts for gaps in object perception; particularly when one object is blocking the

full view of another (such as a chair might block the full view of a television set from one visual

perspective in a room; one knows the full image of the television set from a record of viewings

from several different perspective in memory) (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010). Proximity groups

objects close to one another; similarity groups objects that are similar causing a blending effect

Page 7: Psyc355 p5 ip cognitive psychology applied

COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY 7

(pixels on a screen to create a larger image); good continuation is an assumption of a blocked

edge of an object continuing and common fate describes objects moving together being grouped

together (headlights of cars moving together in the same direction at night) (Ashcraft &

Radvansky, 2010).

Other important elements are top-down and bottom-up processing and feature detection.

Feature analysis or detection is essentially recognition of feature pattern components; horizontal,

vertical, diagonal lines, curves and arcs within objects (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; Hall,

Fussell & Summerfield, 2005; Talmsa, et al, 2006). We learn to recognize and distinguish

between such components in an object; such as the vertical position and double curve in opposite

directions, first to the left on the top; then to the right on the bottom; that distinguishes the letter s

from the letter t (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; Hall, Fussell & Summerfield, 2005; Talmsa, et al,

2006). Bottom up processing is also referred to as data-driven processing and refers to a

processing mechanism where information comes in and is interpreted in a low to high direction

until all patterns have been recognized and the object resolved (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010;

Hall, Fussell & Summerfield, 2005; Talmsa, et al, 2006). Top-down processing is also referred to

as conceptually driven processing; meaning that context influences perception from higher levels

down to lower levels of perception (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; Hall, Fussell & Summerfield,

2005; Talmsa, et al, 2006). As an example a red light flickering on a panel can mean many

different things depending on the context; a red light flickering on a panel inside a break room of

a bank means a silent alarm has been activated and there may be a dangerous situation on the

other side of the break room door; the context shapes the direction of the processing from the top

downward and influences the perception of meaning (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; Hall, Fussell

& Summerfield, 2005; Talmsa, et al, 2006).

Page 8: Psyc355 p5 ip cognitive psychology applied

COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY 8

Another important element of visual and audio perceptual knowledge is object

recognition; the ability to see or hear an object stimuli; identify it and assignment meaning to it

(Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; Hall, Fussell & Summerfield, 2005; Talmsa, et al, 2006).

Pertinent research in studying object recognition is the study of agnosia; a condition in which

there is a disruption in an individual's ability to identify and assign meaning to an object

(Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010). First object recognition consists of a process of identifying

objects by component elements such as shape; edges and other elements help to further identify

the object in much the same was as pattern recognition (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010). Agnosia

is a condition in which the individual is unable to recognize object patterns and put them together

into a whole; or they are unable to match the object to its meaning; and it can be in the following

forms: prosopagnosia (disruption of facial recognition); apperceptive (inability to perceive

object pattern; or assign meaning); and associative (when the object can be recognized but not be

able to be associated with meaning from memory) (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010). It is from

studying agnosia that we understand the relationship of object recognition in visual perception

and association within memory (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010).

Learning Remembering and Knowing

Human beings are, generally speaking, always learning and committing new information

to memory (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010). There are different kinds of memory; explicit and

implicit memory for instance differs on whether or not an individual is conscious of the memory

retrieval (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010). Explicit memory consists of semantic and episodic

memory; semantic memory is described as general world knowledge and facts while episodic is

described as more personal, autobiographical memory (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010). Implicit

memory is also called procedural memory and consists of information we know but don't

Page 9: Psyc355 p5 ip cognitive psychology applied

COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY 9

necessarily need to be consciously aware of thinking about; we know how to walk; we do not

need to think about walking in order to walk (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010). Learning is a

process in which information is encoded; retained and retrieved from memory; some of it

implicit (procedural) and some of it explicit (semantic and episodic) (Ashcraft & Radvansky,

2010).

Learning through chunking or mnemonic devices as a child: most American children

memorize the alphabet using a rhythmic mnemonic device; a sing-song recitation of each

alphabet character in correct order (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; Brabeck & Jeffrey, 2013;

CTU, 2011, 2010; Congos, 2006). Chunking is used to teach children to differentiate between

consonant letters and vowel letters; and also to associate vocal sounds with each letter and some

letter combinations (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; Brabeck & Jeffrey, 2013; CTU, 2011, 2010;

Congos, 2006). Word spelling is essentially chunking; and children encounter vocabulary and

spelling lessons through most if not all of their academic school careers (Ashcraft & Radvansky,

2010; Brabeck & Jeffrey, 2013; CTU, 2011, 2010; Congos, 2006). Likewise chunking and

mnemonics are used in a whole slew of other subjects; please excuse my dear aunt sally is a

mnemonic that is taught to children (and retained by most adults) to help them keep the correct

order of mathematical operations in mind; and many of them are retained in memory well into

adulthood (for instance I before e except after c; or else I'd constantly be misspelling words like

receive) (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; Brabeck & Jeffrey, 2013; CTU, 2011, 2010; Congos,

2006).

Effectiveness of chunking and mnemonic devices: chunking and mnemonic devices are

effective enough that chunking is used extensively in teaching in general; and mnemonic devices

are still taught even at a university level (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; Brabeck & Jeffrey, 2013;

Page 10: Psyc355 p5 ip cognitive psychology applied

COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY 10

CTU, 2011, 2010; Congos, 2006). Regardless of the topic of course curriculum students are

generally going to be taught small chunks of material first in order to build up to a broader

understanding of the whole topic (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; Brabeck & Jeffrey, 2013; CTU,

2011, 2010; Congos, 2006). When teaching students of psychology for instance; some of the first

undergraduate classes would (or should) be on research methods (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010;

Brabeck & Jeffrey, 2013; CTU, 2011, 2010; Congos, 2006). Such information is chunked in

terms of what is taught first; such as the Scientific method; and the meaning and context of

quantitative research versus qualitative research; and then finally on research methods that fall

under each category (such as a randomized survey method in quantitative; or a field study under

qualitative) (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; Brabeck & Jeffrey, 2013; CTU, 2011, 2010; Congos,

2006). In this way a general knowledge is established in semantic memory to which later

knowledge can be associated (such as the case study of HM was primarily exploratory;

qualitative; however many of the testing measurements were quantitative measurements used

with other participant populations, such as the I.Q. measurements) (Ashcraft & Radvansky,

2010; Brabeck & Jeffrey, 2013; CTU, 2011, 2010; Congos, 2006).

Mnemonic devices are also very effective in teaching information that should be

memorized due to relevant importance (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; Brabeck & Jeffrey, 2013;

CTU, 2011, 2010; Congos, 2006). One example seen repeatedly in classes especially when there

is an overlap between business administration topics and psychology is a model mnemonic;

Abraham Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs; this is a pyramid image that lists from bottom to top the

following: physiological needs; safety needs; affiliation needs; self-esteem needs; and self-

actualization needs (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; Brabeck & Jeffrey, 2013; CTU, 2011, 2010;

Congos, 2006). Another example is a word mnemonic used to help students memorize the Big

Page 11: Psyc355 p5 ip cognitive psychology applied

COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY 11

Five personality traits considered critically important to personality trait theory; open-

mindedness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism become much easier

to remember if one remembers the word ocean (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; Brabeck &

Jeffrey, 2013; CTU, 2011, 2010; Congos, 2006). Even the concepts of quantitative and

qualitative can be remembered accurately through the use of connection mnemonics;

quantitative, quantity and statistical analysis; qualitative, small groups, detailed and in-depth

analysis (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; Brabeck & Jeffrey, 2013; CTU, 2011, 2010; Congos,

2006).

Are chunking and mnemonic devices as effective for adults as they are for children:

chunking and mnemonic devices are effective for both adults and for children as tools for

memorization and skill building; but ultimately it also depends on how much an individual (child

or adult) pays attention to the information, rehearses the information and engages in repetition of

the information (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; Brabeck & Jeffrey, 2013; CTU, 2011, 2010;

Congos, 2006). Chunking and use of mnemonic devices may be slightly more effective for adults

when adults understand that chunking and mnemonic devices constitute strategies in learning and

memorization (Brabeck & Jeffrey, 2013). Children can learn as effectively when they perceive

the strategy is fun (such as singing the ABC song repeatedly); but can also be taught that these

are techniques that aid in memorization of important information (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010;

Brabeck & Jeffrey, 2013; CTU, 2011, 2010; Congos, 2006). It will largely depend on individual

differences in terms of motivation to learn; how well an individual (child or adult) wants to learn

information and how much attention an individual spends on the information, how much practice

(rehearsal and repetition) an individual is willing to participate in with the information (Ashcraft

& Radvansky, 2010; Brabeck & Jeffrey, 2013; CTU, 2011, 2010; Congos, 2006).

Page 12: Psyc355 p5 ip cognitive psychology applied

COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY 12

Learning techniques used as an adult: there are a few other techniques I use as an adult

to learn and remember something; first I read and reflect on what I am reading (Ashcraft &

Radvansky, 2010; Brabeck & Jeffrey, 2013). I take notes; often verbatim; and then paraphrased

(so I can double-check my understanding against the verbatim wording) (Ashcraft & Radvansky,

2010; Brabeck & Jeffrey, 2013). I think about how the material relates to personal experience

and semantic memory knowledge; and I will write about the associations (usually in a personal

journal first; then very often in class assignments) (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; Brabeck &

Jeffrey, 2013). I re-organize the information if necessary and explain it to myself; and usually on

account of an assignment; to other people in the course of that assignment (Ashcraft &

Radvansky, 2010; Brabeck & Jeffrey, 2013). I think about how I can apply the information later;

usually in my personal life; often in terms of a professional context; and I even find myself

discussing information I've learned about with others outside of the class (Ashcraft &

Radvansky, 2010; Brabeck & Jeffrey, 2013).

Are there key differences in learning techniques used as children and adults: there

are key differences in how one might apply learning techniques used with children and adults

that are based on age, level of skill development and length of attention span but otherwise the

learning techniques themselves are not really all that different (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010;

Brabeck & Jeffrey, 2013; CTU, 2011, 2010; Congos, 2006). Children from a very young age are

taught using chunking methods and mnemonic devices; as are older children and adults of all

ages (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; Brabeck & Jeffrey, 2013; CTU, 2011, 2010; Congos, 2006).

Likewise an individual who is motivated can also apply other learning techniques that essentially

do the same thing; encourage attention on a subject; employ rehearsal of the information;

enhance the movement of information from working memory into long-term memory by

Page 13: Psyc355 p5 ip cognitive psychology applied

COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY 13

associating the information more broadly in both semantic and even episodic memory (Ashcraft

& Radvansky, 2010; Brabeck & Jeffrey, 2013; CTU, 2011, 2010; Congos, 2006). For individuals

with deficits in cognition or attention; information may need to be presented for learning in

smaller chunks (including use of mnemonics); for shorter durations of time; in more novel ways;

and with more frequency; but one would still provide information in chunks that build on prior

knowledge (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; Brabeck & Jeffrey, 2013; CTU, 2011, 2010; Congos,

2006).

How can these concepts be applied successfully to learning organizations: first, what

is a learning organization? Theoretically it is an organization that has stepped away from older

hierarchical organizational structures in which there is a focus on control; especially information

control (CTU, 2013; Columbia University, n.d.). Learning organizations attempt to focus on

creating a competitive edge based on collective learning and knowledge; an ability to be more

efficient and flexible as an organization and also in meeting market demands (CTU, 2013;

Columbia University, n.d.). Learning organizations attempt to create and maintain an

environment in which all individuals acquire and share knowledge across all levels of the

organization rather than consolidating knowledge at only executive levels or in key departments

(CTU, 2013; Columbia University, n.d.). For the most part learning organizations rely heavily on

communication and database technology to disburse information across the organization and

between individuals (CTU, 2013; Columbia University, n.d.).

However organizations do not learn per se; they rely on the collective knowledge

retention and learning of the individuals who make up the organization (CTU, 2013; Columbia

University, n.d.). Organizations can only learn by acquiring individual members with the

necessary knowledge; and by relying on their willingness and ability to share that knowledge

Page 14: Psyc355 p5 ip cognitive psychology applied

COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY 14

with other individuals (CTU, 2013; Columbia University, n.d.). The individuals to whom such

information must be shared must likewise be able and willing to learn; and in this respect, yes the

previous concepts can be applied within a learning organization, successfully (CTU, 2013;

Columbia University, n.d.). Information can be encoded, retained and retrieved in both explicit

(semantic and episodic) and implicit memory (procedural) by individuals who can then transmit

such information to other individuals; as well as encode information into technology (computer)

based storage systems for later retrieval by yet other individuals (CTU, 2013; Columbia

University, n.d.). Chunking and mnemonics can certainly be used by such organizations in

training and development programs for employees at all levels; and even transmitting

information through interpersonal communication follows a pattern of organization in terms of

the information being transmitted; regardless of the medium used (CTU, 2013; Columbia

University, n.d.).

Knowledge Language and Comprehension

The mental processes involved in language, metamemory and comprehension:

The first thing to know about the mental processes involved in language, metamemory

and comprehension is that they are processes; they develop incrementally and in an interrelated

fashion (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; StateUniversity.com, 2013; Swinney, 1981). Next,

linguistics is the study of language; language is a "shared symbolic system of communication"

(Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; p. 322); and psycholinguistics is the study of language as it is

learned and used by people (Ashcraft & Radvansky; p. 321). Important factors involved in

comprehension of information and communication itself is planning and memory; one must

know language grammar; phonology; syntax, semantics, conceptual and belief elements of

language interpretation (memory) and be able to communicate in comprehensible ways with

Page 15: Psyc355 p5 ip cognitive psychology applied

COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY 15

others by using the same rules (planning) (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; StateUniversity.com,

2013; Swinney, 1981). Courtesy of research on aphasia patients we know that two areas of the

brain are primarily involved in language processing and comprehension and for which

metamemory is complicit; these are Broca's area and Wernicke's area respectively (Ashcraft &

Radvansky, 2010). Aphasia is described as interference in language; in Broca's aphasia; there is

interference in producing speech; in Wernicke's aphasia the interference involves comprehension

of words and associated concepts (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010).

Metamemory is an individual's ability to self-assess one's own memory; it is self-

awareness of what one knows and remembers and consists of both implicit and explicit memory

(Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; StateUniversity.com, 2013; Swinney, 1981). Metamemory allows

the individual to select strategies and plan; distribute cognitive resources (energies) between

tasks; pay attention to what and how one comprehends information (metacomprehension) and

self-evaluate task performance (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; StateUniversity.com, 2013;

Swinney, 1981). Metacomprehension is self-assessment of what one has learned and understood;

research indicates that for information to be more fully comprehended; individuals need to

engage in metacomprehension as a means of knowing and reinforcing the information (Ashcraft

& Radvansky, 2010; StateUniversity.com, 2013; Swinney, 1981). Language is instrumental in

expressing concepts relating to memory and metamemory; comprehension and

metacomprehension; and individuals begin the process of acquiring language and language

comprehension in early childhood (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; StateUniversity.com, 2013;

Swinney, 1981). Metamemory and metacomprehension appear to develop over time without

much self-awareness (and is continuous); individuals do not appear to be aware of metamemory

processes until around approximately age ten; and may also reflect increased competence in

Page 16: Psyc355 p5 ip cognitive psychology applied

COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY 16

adults in certain areas of expertise (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; StateUniversity.com, 2013;

Swinney, 1981). In short; metamemory and language are integral components that appear to

build on one another to directly impact comprehension and metacomprehension components in

cognition (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; StateUniversity.com, 2013; Swinney, 1981).

Helpful strategies for judging an individual's learning, knowledge acquisition and

comprehension:

Helpful strategies for judging an individual's learning, knowledge acquisition and

comprehension would be relatively similar to how one might assess one's own memory and

comprehension in learning (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; StateUniversity.com, 2013; Swinney,

1981). When we engage in the learning process we can plan and engage in strategies to learn

(like chunking and use of mnemonic devices); we can monitor how well we understand what we

learn; and take steps to increase our understanding (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010;

StateUniversity.com, 2013; Swinney, 1981). We can self-assess our memory (procedural,

semantic; even episodic memory); and make associations in order to better remember concepts

(Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; StateUniversity.com, 2013; Swinney, 1981). We can explain what

we have learned either vocally or in written communications to others; or we can demonstrate

learning through completion of tasks (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; StateUniversity.com, 2013;

Swinney, 1981). Likewise we can judge the learning, knowledge acquisition and comprehension

of other individuals by observing procedural demonstration of tasks or by observing how other

individuals communicate in terms of language; orally or in written forms; particularly we can

observe how competently an individual may have comprehended and acquired knowledge by the

ease in which they can explain learned concepts in their own words by way of language

(Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; StateUniversity.com, 2013; Swinney, 1981).

Page 17: Psyc355 p5 ip cognitive psychology applied

COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY 17

As an example of knowledge, language and comprehension in action and how one can

demonstrate knowledge and be judged in terms of comprehension of a subject; consider that a

class in cognitive psychology has been taught; information transmitted between an instructor and

a learner completely by way of English language rules and symbols (Ashcraft & Radvansky,

2010; StateUniversity.com, 2013; Swinney, 1981). Course content was shown using a textbook

full of symbols and icons; oral lectures accompanied visual symbols and icons on visual

mediums to transmit concepts and ideas between individuals (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010;

StateUniversity.com, 2013; Swinney, 1981). Course content was presented incrementally;

building up to a fuller understanding between concepts as time in the class progresses; the

learners take steps to learn; and self-monitor their comprehension of the course content (Ashcraft

& Radvansky, 2010; StateUniversity.com, 2013; Swinney, 1981). Individuals transmitted their

own knowledge and comprehension of the course content, using the same language rules in a

written format; actively demonstrating how well the information was understood by how well

they were able to transmit an explanation of it to their peers and instructor (how comfortable

were they; how easy was it to put the information into their own words) (Ashcraft & Radvansky,

2010; StateUniversity.com, 2013; Swinney, 1981). The assignments are then judged (graded) in

terms of knowledge acquired; how much learning and comprehension of the course content can

be demonstrated by organizing the information into a comprehensive written paper that meets

assignment parameters; in a way that demonstrates originality and yet also represents the

information accurately both in terms of the content and language expression (Ashcraft &

Radvansky, 2010; StateUniversity.com, 2013; Swinney, 1981).

Decision-Making Problem-Solving and Modern and Future Technology

Page 18: Psyc355 p5 ip cognitive psychology applied

COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY 18

Decision-making: decision-making is essentially choosing between options; when the

options differ significantly; choices are easiest; when options are minimal, choices are more

difficult (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; CTU, 2012; 2009). Judgments are usually influenced by

knowledge and mental representation; can be made of physical or symbolic stimuli (objects,

situations); and can be prone to errors depending on choices of decision-making strategies

(Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; CTU, 2012; 2009). Two approaches often used by individuals in

the process of decision-making are heuristics and algorithms (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010;

CTU, 2012; 2009). Algorithms are sets of procedures or formulas that if followed; will produce

accurate results; heuristics are casual short-cuts in decision-making that are prone to errors

therefore often produce poor results (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; CTU, 2012; 2009).

Heuristics (such as representativeness, availability and simulation) tend to be inaccurate because

of problems with mental representation in areas such as knowledge domain, working memory,

logic and deficiency of evidence; which can result in biases (confirmation; familiarity, hindsight;

salience); fallacies (conjunction) and errors (attribution and anchoring and adjustment)

(Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; CTU, 2012; 2009).

Problem-solving: problem solving is the behavior or act of resolving difficulties in

various aspects of life; and can include decision-making strategies such as use of algorithms and

heuristics (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; CTU, 2012, 2011). Problem-solving is a process of

steps such as identification of the problem, analysis of the problem including various methods

for overcoming the problem; decision-making regarding the best available solution; planning the

steps of overcoming the problem and then evaluating the outcome of the problem-solving

process (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; CTU, 2012, 2011). Required within the problem-solving

process are components such as goal directions and use of sub-goals throughout the problem-

Page 19: Psyc355 p5 ip cognitive psychology applied

COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY 19

solving process; a planned sequence of steps; and engagement of multiple cognitive processes

(Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; CTU, 2012, 2011). Issues that individuals can have for the

problem-solving process are an absence of knowledge on how to problem solve (no training; no

natural talent) fear of decision-making; incorrect analysis of the problem; personal biases;

inability to translate a problem for solving by a computer; and improperly using the steps of the

problem-solving process (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; CTU, 2012, 2011).

Modern and future technology: Essentially, decision-making and problem-solving

especially regarding modern and future technology should involve an emphasis on the use of

algorithms especially when it involves computer model technologies (Ashcraft & Radvansky,

2010; CTU, 2012, 2011; Durning & Artino, 2011; Nielsen, 2007; Wielenga-Meijer, Taris,

Kompier, & Wigboldus, 2010). Individuals should be trained to be aware of heuristic problem-

solving strengths (quick and simple decisions; also means-end analysis) and weaknesses;

including biases, fallacies and errors; training in problem-solving process steps; including goal

and subgoal setting and planning is also critical (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; Durning &

Artino, 2011; Nielsen, 2007; Wielgenga-Meijer, et al, 2010). Of particular importance regarding

decision-making and problem-solving processes where it involves modern and future

technologies is innovation; creating new ways of using present technology (likewise future

technology) (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; Durning & Artino, 2011; Nielsen, 2007; Wielgenga-

Meijer, et al, 2010). Rather than use a particular tool for its most familiar purpose only; learn to

think creatively and find new ways for how the tool can be used to solve new problems (Ashcraft

& Radvansky, 2010; Durning & Artino, 2011; Nielsen, 2007; Wielgenga-Meijer, et al, 2010). In

this way current technology (modern) can be used to create future technology; and the

underlying skill for developing new technologies is further developed for future use in creating

Page 20: Psyc355 p5 ip cognitive psychology applied

COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY 20

still newer future technologies (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; Durning & Artino, 2011; Nielsen,

2007; Wielgenga-Meijer, et al, 2010).

Personal example of means-end analysis: when I decided to enroll in Colorado

Technical University's online Associate of Science in Business Administration degree program;

(later the Bachelor of Science in Psychology: Organizational Behavior); it was with the goal to

learn; not just earn a degree. When I started out; I felt my knowledge domain in business

administration was very limited; and that I should pay close attention to the university's teaching

methods in order to be able to make my own active evaluation of how well I was learning the

material. I recognized early on that taking a college course is not about showing what you

already know about a subject (which is often very little or full of errors) but what you learn

throughout the course; the overall goal is to develop knowledge about a topic and become

competent (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; CTU, 2012; Durning & Artino, 2011; Nielsen, 2007;

Wielgenga-Meijer, et al, 2010). The content and course work within each phase represents sub-

goal knowledge; to reach the overall goal; one must master each sub-goal and build one's

competency from one sub-goal to the next until at the end of the course one can evaluate how

much one knows at the end; that one did not know in the beginning (Ashcraft & Radvansky,

2010; CTU 2012; Durning & Artino, 2011; Nielsen, 2007; Wielgenga-Meijer, et al, 2010). There

are several operators in the course of learning in CTU's classes; use of textbooks and other

course materials; use of live chats and the professional expertise of instructors; use of algorithms

in terms of research, citation and references; all of which are designed to minimize the

differences between current states and sub-goal and goal states (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010;

CTU, 2012). In this way my educational process is itself an on-going means-end analysis and

how well I apply the various operators and actively participate in the learning process is reflected

Page 21: Psyc355 p5 ip cognitive psychology applied

COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY 21

in not just my own sense of learning the information it is also reflected in the consistency of my

grades and my ability to continue to learn still newer information as I go (Ashcraft & Radvansky,

2010; CTU, 2012; Durning & Artino, 2011; Nielsen, 2007; Wielgenga-Meijer, et al, 2010).

So far the means-end analysis has been highly successful; I earned my Associate of

Science in Business Administration in the fall of 2011; with a graduating G.P.A. of 4.0. I often

experienced the feeling of self-appraisal of learning; noting that in the course of trying to

understand complex concepts; what was difficult to grasp one day; would be grasped by the next

day (often with dream recall of course content in between; the brain processing information into

long-term memory) (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010). Likewise I have often been amazed at the

amount of recall from previous classes I have been able to have as a result of the effort of

learning information initially; and from periodic reinforcement of information through the course

of other classes and just simple reflection on course concepts (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010;

CTU, 2012; Durning & Artino, 2011; Nielsen, 2007; Wielgenga-Meijer, et al, 2010). The means-

end analysis has pretty much become my standard algorithm of choice; if I want to continue

learning at the level to which I have been able to thus far; I continue to use the operators

provided; I continue to reflect on course materials; and this has continued to work as a means of

problem-solving in various courses (Ashcraft * Radvansky, 2010; CTU, 2012). I am at the

halfway point of my current degree program (Bachelor of Science, Psychology: Organizational

Behavior) and I still maintain a 4.0 G.P.A.; I no longer worry about not being able to learn a

complex topic; I know I will go back the next day and it will be easier to understand; likewise

the day after that (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; CTU, 2012; Durning & Artino, 2011; Nielsen,

2007; Wielgenga-Meijer, et al, 2010).

Page 22: Psyc355 p5 ip cognitive psychology applied

COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY 22

Helpful suggestions for improving problem-solving abilities: first and foremost be

motivated to improve one's problem-solving abilities (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; CTU, 2012;

Durning & Artino, 2011; Nielsen, 2007; Wielgenga-Meijer, et al, 2010). All of the helpful

suggestions in the world are essentially worthless if individuals are not motivated to act on

improving their problem-solving abilities (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; CTU, 2012; Durning &

Artino, 2011; Nielsen, 2007; Wielgenga-Meijer, et al, 2010). Second, think critically about one's

own judgments and biases; question the ways in which we draw our conclusions about things;

are they based on faulty heuristics; fallacies; biases and errors in thinking (Ashcraft &

Radvansky, 2010; CTU, 2012; Durning & Artino, 2011; Nielsen, 2007; Wielgenga-Meijer, et al,

2010). Analyze a problem carefully and be sure one's understanding of a problem is accurate;

then consider pros and cons of the possible solutions (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; CTU, 2012;

Durning & Artino, 2011; Nielsen, 2007; Wielgenga-Meijer, et al, 2010). Plan; plan how one will

go about accomplishing not just goals; but also sub-goals (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; CTU,

2012; Durning & Artino, 2011; Nielsen, 2007; Wielgenga-Meijer, et al, 2010). Have an accurate

assessment of one's own knowledge domain; take steps to add information to one's knowledge

domain; and practice one's skills and knowledge in order to increase one's competencies

(Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; CTU, 2012; Durning & Artino, 2011; Nielsen, 2007; Wielgenga-

Meijer, et al, 2010).

How can the knowledge of human problem-solving be applied to the use of modern

and future technologies: Human problem-solving has been the root of all technologies; from

prehistoric tool development to the modern day use of both tools and technologies to solve all

manner of problems in general (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010). At some point humans noted that

lightning striking a nearby tree resulted in fire; which was useful for keeping warm; and set

Page 23: Psyc355 p5 ip cognitive psychology applied

COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY 23

about solving the problem of losing access to fire by learning to start fires. Humans have been

actively solving problems ever since; and in modern times can now create and innovate

technology to a point where some problem-solving tools can create other problem-solving tools

(such as robots working in an assembly factory building ball peen hammers) (Ashcraft &

Radvansky, 2010). However this does not mean that modern technology (or future technology)

will ever evolve past a point where problems will no longer require solving; at least initially by

human beings even when using tools to do the problem solving (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010;

CTU, 2012; Durning & Artino, 2011; Nielsen, 2007; Wielgenga-Meijer, et al, 2010). Humans

can program computers with algorithms to use in problem-solving; but problem-solving

processes do not rely on algorithms alone; but usually on multiple problem-solving strategies

working together along with analogies, insight, planning, knowledge and practice (Ashcraft &

Radvansky, 2010; CTU, 2012; Durning & Artino, 2011; Nielsen, 2007; Wielgenga-Meijer, et al,

2010).

Recommendations for Adult Learning and Successful Learning Organizations

Recommendations for adult learning and successful learning organizations with regard to

employee training programs are a combination of in-person classroom instruction, online course

instruction; on-the-job training (procedural memory related job tasks) and mentorship (Ashcraft

& Radvansky, 2010; Columbia University, n.d.; Fuller, Unwin, Felstead, Jewson & Kakavelakis,

2007; Murdoch-Eaton & Whittle, 2012). Instruction should include organizational policies,

procedures and culture; time and stress management; interpersonal communication skills;

critical-thinking; problem-solving skills; and diversity (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; Columbia

University, n.d; Fuller, et al, 2007; Murdoch-Eaton & Whittle, 2012). Likewise instruction

should also cover job or task specific instruction; equipment and safety training; and training

Page 24: Psyc355 p5 ip cognitive psychology applied

COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY 24

should be conducted in a variety of ways; to instruct employees and to also best facilitate

judgment of learning and comprehension (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; Columbia University,

n.d.; Fuller, et al, 2007; Murdoch-Eaton & Whittle, 2012). Employees of successful learning

organizations must be able to communicate clearly with one another; and be willing to divulge

information rather than collect it and use it for their own benefit (Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010;

Columbia University, n.d; Fuller, et al, 2007; Murdoch-Eaton & Whittle, 2012). Successful

learning organizations need to be able to train employees for general skills such as critical-

thinking and problem-solving; and evaluate employee learning and comprehension as well as

evaluate individual differences in skill levels and train accordingly (Ashcraft & Radvansky,

2010; Columbia University, n.d.; Fuller, et al, 2007; Murdoch-Eaton & Whittle, 2012).

Page 25: Psyc355 p5 ip cognitive psychology applied

COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY 25

References

Ashcraft M.H. & Radvansky G.A. (2010). Cognition Fifth Edition. Upper Saddle River, Pearson

Education Inc. Retrieved from https://campus.ctuonline.edu

Brabeck, M. & Jeffrey, J. (2013). Practice for Knowledge: (Not Drill and Kill). Retrieved from

https://books.apa.org/education/k12/practice-acquisition.aspx

Colorado Technical University (2012). Article: Problem Solving. [M.U.S.E.] Retrieved from

https://campus.ctuonline.edu

Colorado Technical University (2011). Attention and Perception. [M.U.S.E.] Retrieved from

https://campus.ctuonline.edu

Colorado Technical University (2012). Decision Making. [M.U.S.E.] Retrieved from

https://campus.ctuonline.edu

Colorado Technical University (2009). Heuristics. [M.U.S.E.] Retrieved from

https://campus.ctuonline.edu

Colorado Technical University (2011). Improving Memory and Learning. [M.U.S.E.] Retrieved

from https://campus.ctuonline.edu

Colorado Technical University (2011). Learning and Cognition [M.U.S.E.]. Retrieved from

https://campus.ctuonline.edu

Colorado Technical University (2010). Learning, Thinking and Memory [M.U.S.E.]. Retrieved

from https://campus.ctuonline.edu

Colorado Technical University (2011). Problem Solving. [M.U.S.E.] Retrieved from

https://campus.ctuonline.edu

Colorado Technical University (2011). Sensation and Perception [M.U.S.E.]. Retrieved from

https://campus.ctuonline.edu

Page 26: Psyc355 p5 ip cognitive psychology applied

COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY 26

Colorado Technical University (2010). Techniques for Improving Memory. [M.U.S.E.] Retrieved

from https://campus.ctuonline.edu

Colorado Technical University (2013). The Learning Organization. [M.U.S.E.] Retrieved from

https://campus.ctuonline.edu

Columbia University (n.d.). Organizational Learning1. Retrieved from

http://www.columbia.edu/~ds2016/digital_port/papers/orglearning1.htm

Congos, D. (2006). The Learning Center Exchange: 9 Types of Mnemonics. Retrieved from

http://www.learningassistance.com/2006/january/mnemonics.html

Deckers, L. (2010). Motivation: Biological, Psychological and Environmental, 3rd Edition.

Boston, Pearson Education Inc. Retrieved from https://campus.ctuonline.edu

Durning, S. J. & Artino, A.R. (2011) Situativity theory: a perspective on how participants and

the environment can interact: AMEE Guide no 52. Medical Teacher 33 188-199.

Retrieved from EBSCOHost.

Eraut, M. (2007). Learning from other people in the workplace. Oxford Review of Education 33

(4) 403-422. Retrieved from EBSCOHost

Fuller, A., Unwin, L., Felstead, A., Jewson, N., & Kakavelakis, N. (2007). Creating and using

knowledge: an analysis of the differentiated nature of workplace learning environments.

British Educational Research Journal 33 (5) 743-759. Retrieved from EBSCOHost

Hall, D., Fussell, C., & Summerfield, A.Q. (2005). Reading Fluent Speech from Talking Faces:

Typical Brain Networks and Individual Differences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

17 (6) 939-953. Retrieved from EBSCOHost

Page 27: Psyc355 p5 ip cognitive psychology applied

COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY 27

Le Roy J., Bastounis, M. & Minibas-Poussard, J. (2012). Interactional Justice and

Counterproductive Work Behaviors: The Mediating Role of Negative Emotions. Social

Behavior and Personality 40 (8) 1341-1356. Retrieved from EBSCOHost

Murdoch-Eaton, D. & Whittle, S. (2012). Generic skills in medical education: developing the

tools for successful lifelong learning. Medical Education 46 120-128. Retrieved from

EBSCOHost

Nielsen, K. (2007). Aspects of a Practical Understanding: Heidegger at the Workplace.

Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 51 (5) 455-470. Retrieved from

EBSCOHost.

Pinel, J.P.J. (2011). Biopsychology: Eighth Edition. Boston, Pearson Education Inc. Retrieved

from https://campus.ctuonline.edu.

Robotti, E. (2012). Natural language as a tool for analyzing the proving process: the case of

geometry proof. Educ Stud Math 80 433-450. Retrieved from EBSCOHost

StateUniversity.com (2013). Memory-Metamemory. Retrieved from

http://education.stateuniversity.com/pages/2220/Memory-METAMEMORY.html

Swinney, D. (1981). The process of language comprehension: an approach to examining issues

in cognition and language. Cognition 10 307-312. Retrieved from Google Search.

Talmsa, D., Doty, T.J., Strowd, R., & Woldorff, M.G. (2006). Attentional capacity for

processing concurrent stimuli is larger across sensory modalities than within a modality.

Psychophysiology 43 541-549. Retrieved from EBSCOHost

Wielenga-Meijer, E.G.A., Taris, T.W., Kompier, M.A.J., & Wigboldus, D.H.J. (2010). Cognition

and Neurosciences: From task characteristics to learning: A systematic review,

Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 51 363-375. Retrieved from EBSCOHost.

Page 28: Psyc355 p5 ip cognitive psychology applied

COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY 28

(Ashcraft & Radvansky, 2010; Durning & Artino, 2011; Wielgenga-Meijer, et al, 2010)