providing infrastructure for optical communication networks prof. michael green dept. of eecs henry...

75
Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering [email protected] EECS 294 Colloquium 4 October 2006 his presentation can be found at: ttp://www.eng.uci.edu/faculty/green/public/courses/294

Upload: barbara-flora-newton

Post on 17-Jan-2016

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks

Prof. Michael GreenDept. of EECSHenry Samueli School of [email protected]

EECS 294 Colloquium4 October 2006

This presentation can be found at:http://www.eng.uci.edu/faculty/green/public/courses/294

Page 2: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Friday, March 7 2003

Page 3: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Advantages of Optical Fibers over Copper Cable

• Very high bandwidth (bandwidth of optical transmission network determined primarily by electronics)• Low loss• Interference Immunity (no antenna-like behavior)• Lower maintenance costs (no corrosion, squirrels don’t like the taste)• Small & light: 1000 feet of copper weighs approx. 300 lb.

1000 feet of fiber weighs approx. 10 lb.• Different light wavelengths can be multiplexed onto a single fiber: Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing (DWM)• 10Gb/s transmission networks now being deployed; 40Gb/s will be here soon.

Page 4: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Protocols for High-Speed Optical Networks

Synchronous Optical Network (SONET):• Provides a protocol for long-haul (50-100km) wide-area netework (WAN) fiber transmission• Basic OC-1 rate is 51.84Mb/s OC-48 (2.5Gb/s) & OC-192 (10Gb/s) are commonGigabit/10 Gigabit Ethernet (IEEE Standard 802.3):• Ethernet was invented in 1973 at Xerox PARC

(“ether” is the name of the medium through which E/M waves were thought to travel)

• Provides a protocol for local-area network (LAN) copper or fiber transmission

• 1 Gb/s links can be transmitted over twisted-pair copper• 10 Gb/s links can be transmitter over copper (short lengths) or fiber.

Page 5: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Fiber Channel:• Often used for Storage Area Networks (SAN); allows fast transmission of large amounts of data across many different servers.• Currently 1-4 Gb/s is deployed; 8Gb/s will arrive soon.

Page 6: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Some SAN Terminology

JBOD: Just a Bunch Of DisksRefers to a set of hard disks that are

not configured together.

RAID: Redundant Array of Independent (or Inexpensive?) Disks

Multiple disk drives that are combined for fault tolerance

and performance. Looks like a single disk to the rest of

the system. If one disk fails, the systems will continue

working properly.

Page 7: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Blade Servers vs. Regular Servers

See: http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/WEBONLY/publicfeature/apr05/1106for full article.

Page 8: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Barcelona, Spain:MareNostrum supercomputer cluster (2282 Blade servers)

Housed in Chapel Torre Girona (Technical Univ. of Catalonia)

Page 9: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Characteristics of Broadband Signals & Circuits

• Standard analog circuit applications: Continuous-time operation Precision required in signal domain (i.e., voltage or current) Dynamic range determined by noise & distortion

• Broadband communication circuits: Discrete-time (clocked) operation Precision required in time domain (low jitter) Bilevel signals processed

t

V

t0

V

t

V

t

Vh

Vt

Vl

Primarily digital (i.e., bilevel) operation but high bit rate (multi-Gb/s) dictates analog behavior & design techniques.

Page 10: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Typical broadband data waveform:

Length of single bit = 1 Unit Interval (1 UI)

Eye diagram

An eye diagram maps a random bit sequence to a regular structure that can be used to analyze jitter.

Page 11: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Close-up of eye diagram:

voltage swing

1 UI

Zero crossings

trise = tfall

Page 12: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

What is Jitter?

Jitter is the short-term variation of the significant instants of a digital signal from their ideal positions in time.Jitter normally characterizes variations above 10Hz; variations below 10Hz are called wander.

1. Phase noise (frequency domain)2. Jitter (time domain)3. Bit Error-Rate (end result of phase

noise & jitter)

The effects of these variations are measured in 3 ways:

Page 13: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Types of Jitter

1. Random Jitter (RJ)• Originates from external and

internal random noise sources• Stochastic in nature (probability-

based)• Measured in rms units• Observed as Gaussian histogram

around zero-crossing• Grows without bound over time

Histogram measurement at zero crossing exhibiting Gaussian probability distribution

Page 14: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Types of Jitter (cont.)

2. Deterministic Jitter (DJ)• Originates from circuit non-idealities (e.g., finite bandwidth, offset, etc.)• Amount of DJ at any given transition is predictable• Measured in peak-to-peak units• Bounded and observed in various eye diagram “signatures”

• Different types of DJ:a) Intersymbol interference (ISI)b) Duty-cycle distortion (DCD)c) Periodic jitter (PJ)

Page 15: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Consider a 1UI output pulse from a buffer:

If rise/fall time << 1 UI, then the output pulse is attenuated and the pulse width decreases.

a) Intersymbol interference (ISI)

τ <<UI

τ ≈UI

τ >UI

1UI

< 1UI

Page 16: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

0 0 1

1 0 1

ISI (cont.)

Consider 2 different bit sequences:

t = ISISteady-state not reachedat end of 2nd bit

2 output sequencessuperimposed

ISI is characterized by a double edge in the eye diagram. It is measured in units of ps peak-to-peak.

Page 17: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Double-edge

Effect of ISI on eye diagram:

Page 18: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Occurs when rising and falling edges exhibit different delaysCaused by circuit mismatches

Nominal data sequence

Data sequence with early falling edges& late rising edges

t = DCD

Eye diagram with DCD

b) Duty cycle distortion (DCD)

Crossing offset fromnominal threshold

Page 19: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

c) Periodic Jitter (PJ)

Timing variation caused by periodic sources unrelated to the data pattern.Can be correlated or uncorrelated with data rate.

Clock source withduty cycle

≠50%

Synchronized dataexhibiting correlated PJ

t1 t0

PJ =t1 − Δt0

Uncorrelated jitter (e.g., sub-rate PJ due to supply ripple) affects the eye diagram in a similar way as RJ.

Page 20: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

R

0 T

T

2

t0

T − t0

PL =1

σ 2π⋅ exp −

x 2

2σ 2

⎣ ⎢

⎦ ⎥

t0

∫ dx

PR =1

σ 2π⋅ exp −

T − x( )2

2σ 2

⎣ ⎢ ⎢

⎦ ⎥ ⎥t0

∫ dx

pL (t) =1

σ 2π⋅exp −

t 2

2σ 2

⎣ ⎢

⎦ ⎥

pR (t) =1

σ 2π⋅exp −

T − t( )2

2σ 2

⎣ ⎢ ⎢

⎦ ⎥ ⎥

Probability of sample at t > t0 from left-hand transition:Probability of sample at t < t0 from right-hand transition:

Jitter and Bit Error Rate

Page 21: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Total Bit Error Rate (BER) given by:

BER = PL + PU =1

σ 2π⋅ exp −

x 2

2σ 2

⎣ ⎢

⎦ ⎥

t0

∫ dx +1

σ 2π⋅ exp −

x 2

2σ 2

⎣ ⎢

⎦ ⎥

T −t0

∫ dx

=1

2erfc

t0

⎝ ⎜

⎠ ⎟+ erfc

T − t0

⎝ ⎜

⎠ ⎟

⎣ ⎢

⎦ ⎥

where erfc(t) ≡2

π⋅ exp

t

∫ −x 2( )dx

PL =1

σ 2π⋅ exp −

x 2

2σ 2

⎣ ⎢

⎦ ⎥

t0

∫ dx

PR =1

σ 2π⋅ exp −

T − x( )2

2σ 2

⎣ ⎢ ⎢

⎦ ⎥ ⎥t0

∫ dx =1

σ 2π⋅ exp −

x 2

2σ 2

⎣ ⎢

⎦ ⎥

T −t0

Page 22: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

t0 (ps)

log BER

σ =5ps

σ =2.5ps

σ =2.5ps :

BER ≤10−12 for t0 ∈ 18ps, 82ps[ ]

σ =5ps :

BER ≤10−12 for t0 ∈ 36ps, 74ps[ ]

Example: T = 100ps

(64ps eye opening)

(38ps eye opening)

log(0.5)

Page 23: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Bathtub CurvesThe bit error-rate vs. sampling time can be measured directly using a bit error-rate tester (BERT) at various sampling points.

Note: The inherent jitter of the analyzer trigger should be considered.

JrmsRJ

( )measured

2= Jrms

RJ( )

actual

2+ Jrms

RJ( )

trigger

2

Page 24: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Benefits of Using Bathtub Curve Measurements

1. Curves can easily be numerically extrapolated to very low BERs (corresponding to random jitter), allowing much lower measurement times.

Example: 10-12 BER with T = 100ps is equivalent to an average of 1 error per 100s. To verify this over a sample of 100 errors would require almost 3 hours!

t0 (ps)

Page 25: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

2. Deterministic jitter and random jitter can be distinguished and measured by observing the bathtub curve.

Page 26: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Advantages of Using CMOS Fabrication Process

• Compact (shared diffusion regions)

• Very low static power dissipation

• High noise margins (nearly ideal inverter voltage transfer characteristic)

• Very well modeled and characterized

• Inexpensive (?)

• Mechanically robust

• Lends itself very well to high integration levels

• SiGe BiCMOS has many advantages but is a generation behind currently available standard CMOS

Page 27: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

CMOS gates generate and are sensitive to supply/ground bounce.

Series R & L cause supply/ground bounce.Resulting modulation of transistor Vt’s results in jitter.

Page 28: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

data in clock in

Rs = 0Ls = 0

clock out

clock out

Rs = 5Ls = 5nH

clock out

data out

DDV ′

SSV ′

DDV ′

SSV ′

data out

Rs = 5 Ls = 5nH

Page 29: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Inverter based on differential pair:

• Differential operation• Inherent common-mode rejection• Very robust in the presence of common-mode disturbances (e.g., VDD/VSS bounce)

“Current-mode logic (CML)”

Page 30: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

data in clock in

Rs = 0Ls = 0

clock out

clock out

Rs = 5Ls = 5nH

clock out

data out

DDV ′

SSV ′

DDV ′

SSV ′

data out

Rs = 5 Ls = 5nH

Page 31: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Research Topics

BiCMOS 10Gb/s Adaptive Equalizer

A Novel CDR with Adjustable Phase Detector Characteristics

A Distributed Approach to Broadband Circuit Design

Page 32: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Research Topics

BiCMOS 10Gb/s Adaptive EqualizerEvelina Zhang, Graduate Student

Researcher

A Novel CDR with Adjustable Phase Detector Characteristics

A Distributed Approach to Broadband Circuit Design

Page 33: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Cable Model

Copper Cable

Where: L is the cable length a is a cable-dependent

characteristic

shorter cable

longer cable

longer cable

shorter cable

1G 10Gf

+10

0

-10-20

-30

magnitude (dB)

100M

1G 10G

f

100M

0

-100

-200

-300

phase (deg)

F (s) =e−aL s

Page 34: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Motivation

Reduce ISI Improve receiver sensitivity

40 41 42 43

t (ns)

40 41 42 43

t (ns)

0.5

0

-0.5

input waveform (V)

39

0.3

0

-0.339

output waveform (V)

100 200 300

t (ps)

0

100 200 300

t (ps)

0

0.5

0

-0.5

0.3

0

-0.3

input eye

output eye

Page 35: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Adaptive Equalizer

Implemented in Jazz Semiconductor SiGe process:• 120GHz fT npn • 0.35 CMOS

Page 36: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Equalizer Block Diagram

Page 37: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Feedforward Path

Page 38: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

f (Hz)

Veq

Vin

(dB)

Vcontrol

FFE Frequency Response

Page 39: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

teq = 75psPW = 86ps

teq = 60psPW = 100ps

2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8

t (ns)

-0.3

0

0.3

VFFE

ISI & Transition Time

• Simulations indicate that ISI correlates strongly with FFE transition time teq.

• Optimum teq is observed to be 60ps.

teq = 45psPW = 108ps

Page 40: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Slicer

Page 41: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Feedback Path

Page 42: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Transition Time Detector

DC characteristic:

−+ −VV

SV

Transient Characteristic:

t

−+ −VV

SV

• Rectification & filtering done in a single stage.

(a)

(b)

(a)

(b)

Page 43: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Integrator

( )2110 oom rrgA ||=

1m

Lint g

C=τ

intint sAs

AsH

ττ1

1 0

0 ≈+

=)(

Page 44: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Detector + Integrator

slopedetector

slopedetector

FromSlicer

tslicer=60ps

FromFFEtFFE

Vcontrol

+ _0 10 20 30 40 50

60

40

0

-40

20

-20

-60

t (ns)

Vcontrol (mV)

60ps

45ps

15ps

75ps

90ps

FFE transitionTime tFFE

Page 45: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

∑+

_Kd

Kd

Keq

tslicer teqdetector

detector

feedforwardequalizer

integrator

H(s)

Vcontrol

)(

)(

sHKK

sHKK

t

t

eqd

eqd

slicer

eq

+=1

eqd

slicer

eq

KKst

t

intτ+=1

1

intssH

τ1

≈)(

Keq = 1.5 ps/mV

Kd = 2.5 mV/ps

τint = 75ns

τadapt=τint

KdKeq

=20ns

System Analysis

Page 46: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Measurement Setup

Die under test

231 PRBS signalapplied to cable

EQ inputs

EQ outputs

Page 47: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Eye Diagrams

4-footRU256 cable

15-footRU256 cable

EQ input EQ output

4.0ps rms jitter

3.9ps rms jitter

Page 48: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Supply voltage 3.3V

Power Dissipation 350mW(155mW not including output driver)

Die Size 0.81mm X 0.87mm

Output Swing 490mV single-ended p-p

Random Jitter 4.0ps rms (4-foot cable)3.9ps rms (15-foot cable)

Summary of Measured Performance

Page 49: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Ongoing Research Investigate transition detector more thoroughly

Understand trade-off between ISI reduction and random jitter generation

Investigate compensation of PMD in optical fiber

Page 50: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Random noise in Analog Equalizer

input eye(no noise added)

output eyeISI: 6.2ps p-p

Page 51: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

input eye with added noise output eyeISI+random jitter: 23ps p-p

ISI is reduced but random jitter is increased due toamplification of random noise.

Page 52: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Decision Feedback Equalization (DFE)

Page 53: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Summing circuit:

Variable delay circuit:

Page 54: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

output eyeno noise addedISI: 6.7ps p-p

output eyerandom noise added

ISI+random jitter: 7.4ps p-p

DFE Simulations (copper)

Page 55: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

DFE Simulations (fiber)

input waveformexhibiting PMD

input eye output eyeISI: 7.9ps p-p

Page 56: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Research Topics

BiCMOS 10Gb/s Adaptive Equalizer

A Novel CDR with Adjustable Phase Detector Characteristics

Xinyu Chen, Graduate Student Researcher

A Distributed Approach to Broadband Circuit Design

Page 57: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Clock/Data Recovery Circuits

Binaryoperation

Linearoperation

• Ability to handle high bit rates• Low jitter generation• High jitter tolerance• Fast acquisition

CDR Requirements:

Page 58: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

2-Loop CDR Architecture

Is it possible for a CDR to exhibit linear (quiet) behavior and fast acquisition with a single loop?

Page 59: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Deadband PD characteristic

“Ternary” latch:

Page 60: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

CML version:

externalcontrol

Page 61: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Comparisons

Page 62: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Conventional Binary PD Hogge PD

Ternary PD;VG = 1.75V

Ternary PD;VG = 1.65V

Simulation Results

Page 63: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Varying VG During Acquisition

Page 64: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Future Work Using the variable PD characteristic as part of a lock detection circuit.

Minimizing jitter in a similar way.

Page 65: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Research Topics

BiCMOS 10Gb/s Adaptive Equalizer

A Novel CDR with Adjustable Phase Detector Characteristics

A Distributed Approach to Broadband Circuit Design

Ullas Singh, Graduate Student Researcher

Page 66: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Distributed Amplifier

• Signals travel ballistically through amplifier.• Higher gain-bandwidth product.• Naturally drives resistive load.• Trades off delay for bandwidth.

T

mmmdist C

Ng

c

g

lcc

lgGBW ==⎟⎟

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛⎟⎟

⎜⎜

⎛=

22 T

mconv C

gGBW =

Page 67: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Distributed Frequency Divider

Distributed divider schematic

Lumped frequency divider schematic

– Buffer delay of lumped elements can be replaced by passive element delay in distributed divider

All simulations used 0.18 CMOS

Page 68: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Distributed Frequency Divider Simulations

Input/Output waveformDivider sensitivity curve

Page 69: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Frequency Divider Layout

Area=800m*807m

Page 70: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Distributed 2-to-1 Select Circuit

Proposed distributed select circuit

Lumped select circuit Timing diagram

Page 71: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

PRBSgenerator

4:2MUX

2:1MUX

10Gb/s20Gb/s 40Gb/s

lumped circuitry distributed circuitry(180nm CMOS)

40Gb/s MUX Block Diagram

Page 72: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Simulated 40Gb/s Eye Diagram

ISI: 2ps (80mUI) p-p

0.6

0.4

0.2

0

-0.2

-0.4

-0.60 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

t (ps)

Vout (V)

Page 73: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Test Setup

die bondeddirectly to board

Page 74: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Measured Results

Measurements taken with Agilent 86-100C DCA-J with

80GHz plug-in module

Bit-rate: 34Gb/s (due to varactor variations)

Page 75: Providing Infrastructure for Optical Communication Networks Prof. Michael Green Dept. of EECS Henry Samueli School of Engineering mgreen@uci.edu EECS 294

Future Research Analyze nonlinear large-signal effects & derive a clear design methodology.

Investigate possible methods of electrically (or optically?) controlling characteristic impedances of tranmission lines.