prospecting rpt battersby twp
TRANSCRIPT
' . .. ' .'
November 17, 2008
Prepared by: Michael A. Weirmeir P.O. Box 524 565 Queen Elizabeth Street Lively, Ontario P3Y 1M5
2.39
Report of Exploration work
Mining Claim 54205080 Battersby Township
RECEIVED
NOV 2 a ?nnR
GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMErJT OFFICE
I ntrod uction
From October 2005 to May 2006, ARW Exploration Ltd. conducted exploration work to determine the significance of the magnetic anomaly located on south central part of claim S4205080. The intent was to examine local geology and to perform geophysical tests to determine the future exploration paths to take.
Location and Access
The study area is located in south easterly comer of Battersby Township and southeast of Battersby Lake. The property can be reached by travelling approximately 107 km north of Sudbury following highway 144 to a westerly turnoff onto a bush road and thence 2.5 km westerly to the central part of the claim S4205080. This location is more particularly shown in the following sketch, figure A and in the following UTM points.
access from HWY 144 (17 T 447153E 5217457N) central claim S 4205080 (17 T 445778E 5216014N)
*note both above points and all foi/owing location references are NAD 83 UTM zone 17T
6 r .... ~ Mf'I
~- ": ··~J,R~ -o.,-,L .... c~
, A -l
Fig~e .1 :
'.
Mining claim and claim holders Mining claim 84205080 is 32 hectares in area and was recorded November 30,2008. The claim is jointly held by ARW Exploration Ltd and prospector David Vallillee .
Work summary:
1979 Rio Tinto Canadian Exploration Limited:
On January 3 and 4,1979, Rio Tinto caused an airborne magnetic survey to be flown. The results of the survey were included in their August 1979 report - "Report on an airborne magnetometer survey, Onaping Lake Area, Ontario". A copy of this report was obtained from the files of the Ministry of Northern Development and Mines.
The reporting of "a very short but intense magnetic anomaly of .5km strike length ..... located on flight lines 17 to 20 ... " was seen as significant to this project. This feature was earmarked for follow up by Rio Tinto, but we are unaware of any such follow up.
In 2005 David Vallillee comp eted seven soil samples of the tili loeated "down ice" of the magnetic anomaly. Two samples were submitted for heavy mineral separation . The resulting heavy minerals were microscopically separated specifically for G1 0 garnets and chromites. Xray spectrometry performed was inconclusive.
.. Work performed 2008
October 1 to 30, 2008: The site was visited on three occasions with a view to determining the character of the magnetic response found by Rio Tinto (above). The locations of the work is shown in figure 3, next.
Outcrop mapping, prospecting
LEGEND
prosp 'cting traver 'c Sept. 25. 2008
MAXMIN survcy li ne (nil) Oct. 2 & 3, 2008
M, gnctomcte r trave rs Oct. 4 . 2008
o sample locations
September 25, 2008 geological mapping: David Vallillee and Mark Croteau, Senior Geologist at Wallbridge Mining Company visited the site for the day to examine and map the available bedrock outcroppings on or surrounding claim 4205080. Control during this exercise was with hand held GPS.
In general, claim 4205080 is overlain by alluvial till of an undetermined thickness and bedrock exposure minimal. Granite was located in the south west part of the claim and diabase (possibly Nipissing formation) was located outside the claims limits (see figure 3). Samples of the diabase were taken, but a decision was made not to proceed with any geochemical analysis at this time.
The sample locations are shown listed below and illustrated in figure 3 (above).
Sample 801738 diabase, located at 17T 445231E, 5215076N Sample 801739 diabase, located at 17T 445172E, 5215079N Sample 801740 diabase, located at 17T 445201E, 5215163N
Appendices:
Appendix 1: Detailed statement of costs for work performed on Claim 54205080.
Appendix 2: Names and addresses of contractors and labourers
Appendix 3: MAXMIN data
Appendix 4: MAXMIN phase response profiles
Appendix 5: Maxmin and Magnetometer map
MAXMIN and Magnetometer surveys:
On October 2 and 3, 400 metres of line were cut to facilitate a single Max-min traverse line survey. Additionally a magnetometer traverse was performed. This work was performed by Peter Anderson, Connor Zubal and Kevin Dutchburn. The data and graphic representation of the surveys are attached (see appendices 4 and 5).
MAXMIN: The MAXMIN line consists of a single 350 to 400m line cut out and oriented north 45 degrees east azimuth. Readings were taken at 50 metre intervals using 150 metre coil separation. The length of the coils was adjusted on stations 16 and 17 to compensate for a 10 metre change in elevation. The survey indicates a conductor at station 14.
Magnetometer: This survey consists of a continuous readings traverse of 1.4km in length. The survey confirms the physical location of the magnetic anomaly identified by Rio Tinto in its 1979 survey
Michael A. Weirmeir ARW Exploration Ltd. November 18, 2008
•
Appendix 1
Det I d t ale s atement 0 f t f k cos s or wor pe rf orme d I' S4205080 on calm 3(A) Work performed comments from to # units cost Actual Time Invoice
(date) (date) of work per costs ($) adjusted provided
unit credit ($)
Compilation of Geological 23--Sep-08 23-Sep-08 1 $250 $250.00 $250.00 NO report data from technician, Rio Tinto to orient Peter Anderson mag survey to geography Plan and conduct Geological 2-0cl-08 8-Ocl..o8 2.5 days $250 $625.00 $625.00 NO MAXMIN & technician, magnetometer Peter Anderson surveys, interpret field data prepare map Prospecting Mark Croteau, 24-Sep-08 "4-Sep-08 1 $400 $400.00 $400.00 NO
Senior Geologist Waf/bridge Mining
Field assistant David Val/if/ee 24-Sep-08 24-Sep-08 1 150 $150.00 $150.00 NO
Field assistants Connor Zubal 2·0cl..o8 3-0ct..o8 3 150 $450.00 $450.00 NO and Kevin Dutchburn, provided field assistance. Line cutting, magnetometer instument field data collection
Report Michael 17-Nov-08 18-Nov-08 2.5 250 $625.00 $625.00 NO compilation, Weirmeir ARW mapping Exploration
Limited
3(B) Associated costs
MAXMIN 3-0c!-08 3·OcI-08 1day 50 $50.00 $50.00 NO instrument Magnetometer 3-0cHJ8 3-OcHJ8 1day 50 $50.00 $50.00
3(C) Transportation
Vehicles Transportation 24-Sep-08 3-Ocl·08 720km 0.41 $295.00 $295.00 NO to and from site. Round trip distance is 240km. 3 trips required for a total distance of 720km
3(D) Meals and accomodatlons
Meals
Food
TOTAL EXPENSE CLAIMED $2,895.00 $2,895.00
'Note: Approximat/y 10% of the field work noted above was performed outside of claim S4205080. A reduction of $200 is applied to the amount to be claimed for assesment credit.
Appendix 2:
Names and addresses of contractors, consultants and helpers
Name: address: David G. Vallillee 392 YORK ST
SUDBURY ON P3E 2A7 Canada
Phone: {705} 674-9205 Michael Weirmeir 565 Queen Elizabeth St.
P.O. Box S24 Lively, ON P3Y 1 M5
7056921019 Mark Croteau, Geologist Wall bridge Mining Company Ltd.
129 Fielding Road Lively, Ontario ON P3Y 117
Phone: 705 682 9297 Kevin Dutchburn, Field assistant Wallbridge Mining Company Ltd.
129 Fielding Road lively, Ontario ON P3Y 117
Phone: 705 682 9297 Connor Zubal, Field assistant Wallbridge Mining Company Ltd.
129 Fielding Road Lively, Ontario ON P3Y 117
Phone: 705 682 9297 Peter Anderson, Geological Technician Wall bridge Mining Company Ltd.
129 Fielding Road Lively, Ontario ON P3Y 117
Phone: 705 682 9297
•
Appendix 3:
Max-min data October 3, 2008 • frequencies
stations 110 440 880 1760 7040 10 -2/0 -5/0 -5/0 -3.2/+0.2 -4/+3 11 -0.5 -1.5/-1 -2/0 12/+0.2 -1.5/+2 12 0/+1 -1/0 -1.5/-0.4 -1.5/+0.2 0/+1.8 13 +2/+1 +2/-1 +1/-1 +1/-0.8 +3/-2 14 +2/+1 -1/-1 -1/-1 -1/-1.4 -1/-5 15 -2/0 -3/-0.5 -3/-0.4 -3/-0.4 -2.8/+0.5 16 -3/0 -3.4/-0.2 -5/0 -4/+0.6 -4/+4 17 -8/+1 -1.8/0 -9/+0.2 -8/+1 -6/+6
j rut",.1: 150 m coil separation model MAXM1N **note 2: Line planned and cut to parallel contours. Length was adjusted on stations 16 and 17 to compensate for 10m drop in elevation
. Appendix 4: . ..
Maxmin profiles
110 in phase response +lO'r---- .,----,.-------,---,-- --.-----,-----.------.- - --.
-10 '--__ --'-___ --'--___ ~ _ _ _ -'--___ L...J...... _ __'___"_'_--'--__ --'
station 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 440 in phase response
+ lOr---,-----.-- - -:-r-----.--- --,----,r--T"r7---,---,-.,-------.
-10 '--__ --'-___ --'--_ __ --'-_-'--_-'--___ L--'-_---'-_ __ --'
station 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 880 in phase response
+10r------.-------,------.--'----.,--::-r,----,--- --r----,
-10 '--__ --'-___ --'--___ --'-___ -'--___ L-__ --'-_--'-_--'
station 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1760 in phase response
+10.-----.-----,------,------=---.----.------.-----,
1
-10 '--_ _ --'-___ ---'--___ -'-_ __ -'--_ __ L--__ --'-_--'---'---'
station 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 7040 in phase response
+1Or---;---.-~-----,------,------.----.------.-----,----,
-10 '--__ ---'-___ ---'--___ -'-___ -'--___ '--__ ----'-___ --'
station 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 lSO
l. • •
Maxmin profiles
110 out of phase response +10~----~r------.-------.----~-.--~---'-------'--~--~
-lO~ ____ ~L-____ ~ ______ -J ______ ~ ______ ~ __ ~ __ -L ____ ~~
station 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 440 out of phase response
+lO~----~r------.-------.----L--.--~--,,-------r--~--~
-lO~ __ L-~L-____ ~ __ L-__ -J ______ ~ ______ ~ ______ -L __ ~ __ ~
station 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 880 out of phase response
-lOL-~L-~ ______ ~ ______ -J ______ ~ ______ ~ ______ _L ______ ~
station 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1760 out of phase response
-lO L-____ ~ ______ ~ ______ ~ ______ ~ ______ _L ______ _L ______ ~
station 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 7040 out of phase response
+10~, ----~-------.-------.----~-.~--~-.-------r------~
I J
0/0 0
-10 ~ ______ L-____ ~ ______ ~ ______ ~ ______ ~ ______ _L ______ ~
station 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Appendix 5:
ERSBY TWP G & MAXMIN STATIONS
MAG ANOMALY 42.05080
50
metres 0{' •
100
B<oneIWbyI.lu"" tJof MagVo"'"
. neoo
. 112.220
• 615lO ~'.~ 1100lI0
.118180 ilem 58 110 58.120 57 !>to 58~
!!el70
• 55.180 . 55.:!OO
• 54810
• S-IOlO
.. .
t
.. -'
N
A