promising practices in rural public transit: minnesota’s experience

17
Promising Practices in Rural Public Transit: Minnesota’s Experience NADO National Rural Transportation Conference Cincinnati, OH December 3, 2014

Upload: rpo-america

Post on 11-Jul-2015

57 views

Category:

Government & Nonprofit


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Promising Practices in Rural Public Transit: Minnesota’s Experience

Promising Practices in Rural Public Transit: Minnesota’s Experience

NADO National Rural Transportation ConferenceCincinnati, OH

December 3, 2014

Page 2: Promising Practices in Rural Public Transit: Minnesota’s Experience

Cook

Lake

St. Louis

Koochiching

Lake of the Woods

Roseau

Itasca

Beltrami

Cle

arw

ate

r

Marshall

Pennington

Red Lake

Polk

Norman Mahnomen

Clay Becker

Hubbard

Aitkin Carleton

MilleLacs

Morrison

Todd

Kittson

Cass

Crow Wing

Wad

en

a

Otter TailWilkin

Traverse

Grant Douglas

Stevens PopeStearns

Benton

Pine

Kan

abe

c

Ch

isag

o

IsantiSherburne

Wright

Meeker

McLeod

Kandiyohi

Swift

BigStone

LacQuiParle

Chippewa

Renville

Sibley

No County-wide Service

T.C. Metro Area

Nicollet

Blue Earth

Brown

Watonwan

Redwood

Yellow Medicine

Lincoln Lyon

CottonwoodMurray

Pip

est

on

e

Rock Nobles Jackson Martin Faribault Freeborn

Waseca

LeSueur Rice

Steele Dodge

Mower Fillmore

Houston

WinonaOlmstead

Wabasha

Goodhue

Anoka

Was

hin

gto

n

Ram

sey

Dakota

Hennepin

Scott

Carver

5311 Municipal Only

5307 Small Urban

As of today: 12/03/20141 county with no service

15 multi-county systems17 single counties

8 municipal only7 urban systems7 Metro counties with service

Page 3: Promising Practices in Rural Public Transit: Minnesota’s Experience

Cook

Lake

St. Louis

Koochiching

Lake of the Woods

Roseau

Itasca

Beltrami

Cle

arw

ate

r

Marshall

Pennington

Red Lake

Polk

Norman Mahnomen

Clay Becker

Hubbard

Aitkin Carleton

MilleLacs

Morrison

Todd

Kittson

Cass

Crow Wing

Wad

en

a

Otter TailWilkin

Traverse

Grant Douglas

Stevens PopeStearns

Benton

Pine

Kan

abe

c

Ch

isag

o

IsantiSherburne

Wright

Meeker

McLeod

Kandiyohi

Swift

BigStone

LacQuiParle

Chippewa

Renville

Sibley

No County-wide Service

T.C. Metro Area

Nicollet

Blue Earth

Brown

Watonwan

Redwood

Yellow Medicine

Lincoln Lyon

CottonwoodMurray

Pip

est

on

e

Rock Nobles Jackson Martin Faribault Freeborn

Waseca

LeSueur Rice

Steele Dodge

Mower Fillmore

Houston

WinonaOlmstead

Wabasha

Goodhue

Anoka

Was

hin

gto

n

Ram

sey

Dakota

Hennepin

Scott

Carver

5311 Municipal Only

5307 Small Urban

As of 1/01/20151 county with no service

16 multi-county systems14 single counties

8 municipal only7 urban systems7 Metro counties with service

Page 4: Promising Practices in Rural Public Transit: Minnesota’s Experience

Cook

Lake

St. Louis

Koochiching

Lake of the Woods

Roseau

Itasca

Beltrami

Cle

arw

ate

r

Marshall

Pennington

Red Lake

Polk

Norman Mahnomen

Clay Becker

Hubbard

Aitkin Carleton

MilleLacs

Morrison

Todd

Kittson

Cass

Crow Wing

Wad

en

a

Otter TailWilkin

Traverse

Grant Douglas

Stevens PopeStearns

Benton

Pine

Kan

abe

c

Ch

isag

o

IsantiSherburne

Wright

Meeker

McLeod

Kandiyohi

Swift

BigStone

LacQuiParle

Chippewa

Renville

Sibley

T.C. Metro Area

Nicollet

Blue Earth

Brown

Watonwan

Redwood

Yellow Medicine

Lincoln Lyon

CottonwoodMurray

Pip

est

on

e

Rock Nobles Jackson Martin Faribault Freeborn

Waseca

LeSueur Rice

Steele Dodge

Mower Fillmore

Houston

WinonaOlmstead

Wabasha

Goodhue

Anoka

Was

hin

gto

n

Ram

sey

Dakota

Hennepin

Scott

Carver

5307 Small Urban

In the foreseeable future12 multi-county systems

7 urban systems7 Metro counties with service

Page 5: Promising Practices in Rural Public Transit: Minnesota’s Experience
Page 6: Promising Practices in Rural Public Transit: Minnesota’s Experience

Born out of reaction to proposed budget cuts in the 2011 legislative session

Questions we asked ourselves:• How can we preserve service coverage in the

rural parts of the state?• How much cutting can the transit systems take

and still be viable?

We ended up with no cuts, and we persevered

Why are we proposing changes?

Page 7: Promising Practices in Rural Public Transit: Minnesota’s Experience

What do we hope to gain?

Improved regional and interregionaltravel

Streamlined administration of transit systems

More efficient fleet utilization

Better FTA compliance

Fewer contracts

Page 8: Promising Practices in Rural Public Transit: Minnesota’s Experience

Improved regional travel

Things have changed since 2000 census• Aging populations

• New Americans

• Regional Trade Center (RTC) amenities

Next larger RTC may be on the other side of a jurisdictional boundary

Page 9: Promising Practices in Rural Public Transit: Minnesota’s Experience

Streamlined administration

The transit system’s manager is expected to:• Manage all aspects of daily operations

Scheduling trips, drivers, vehicle maintenance Customer service Public outreach and marketing Coordinate with other transportation providers All finances and reporting Interface with governing board Other duties as directed

• With 100% proficiency

Page 10: Promising Practices in Rural Public Transit: Minnesota’s Experience

Efficient fleet utilization

Minnesota operates a state-procured multiple award system

Spare ratio possibly reduced

Makes sense to have in house mechanic

Page 11: Promising Practices in Rural Public Transit: Minnesota’s Experience

Federal compliance

All transit systems are expected to be 100% compliant:• Drug and alcohol rules and regulations• Procurement rules and regulations • Title VI Civil Rights responsibilities• Environmental Justice responsibilities• ADA responsibilities• Service planning experts

State statutes and rules also require expertise

Page 12: Promising Practices in Rural Public Transit: Minnesota’s Experience

Fewer contracts

Presently approximately 50 operating grant contracts + rolling stock grants + facility grants + ITS grants

Page 13: Promising Practices in Rural Public Transit: Minnesota’s Experience

So, what do we really hope to gain?

Greater coverage in the most rural parts of the state

Better access to desired regional trade center amenities

Better frequency of service

More efficient use of public funding

Page 14: Promising Practices in Rural Public Transit: Minnesota’s Experience

Still many challenges

Limited funding: Federal and State

Efficiency vs. effectiveness

Political subdivisions

Page 15: Promising Practices in Rural Public Transit: Minnesota’s Experience

Regional Development Organizations

Continue to play a large role in rural transit development

Coordinated Human Services Plans (required by FTA for Sec. 5310)

Boots on the ground contact with end users• Research

• Surveys

• Focus groups

• Community meetings

• Advocacy

Page 16: Promising Practices in Rural Public Transit: Minnesota’s Experience

For the foreseeable future

• Work on getting to here

• Develop mobility management strategies

• Coordinate with non-public transit

• Address human services issues, especially non-emergency medical transportation

Page 17: Promising Practices in Rural Public Transit: Minnesota’s Experience

Contact:

Sarah Brodt LenzGreater MN Public Transit Coordinator

Minnesota Department of TransportationOffice of Transit

[email protected]