project title - · pdf filec0000086 cheran spinner ltd 4 2.5 c0000020 cheran spinning mills...

`PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 02 CDM – Executive Board page 1

This template shall not be altered. It shall be completed without modifying/adding headings or logo, format or font.

Project Title

Bundled Wind Power project in Tamil Nadu, India.

Project Proponent

TamilNadu Spinning Mills Association(TASMA)

Draft Version: 1.00

Date: 15/09/2005



CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-PDD)

Version 02 - in effect as of: 1 July 2004 CONTENTS A. General description of Project activity B. Application of a Baseline methodology C. Duration of the Project activity / Crediting period D. Application of a Monitoring methodology and plan E. Estimation of GHG emissions by sources F. Environmental impacts G. Stakeholders’ comments Annexes Annex 1: Contact information on participants in the project activity Annex 2: Information regarding public funding Annex 3: Baseline information

Annex 4: Monitoring plan

Appendix 1 : Brief on Project Participants Appendix 2 : WTG Contribution to Sustainable Environment Appendix 3 : Abbreviations



SECTION A. General description of project activity A.1 Title of the Project activity: >> Bundled Wind power project in Tamilnadu, India co-ordinated by Tamil Nadu Spinning Mills Association (TASMA) A.2. Description of the project activity: >> This project involves a collection of wind mill sub projects all of which are connected to Tamil Nadu electricity Board Grid situated within Tamilnadu , but micro-sited in many locations based on wind availability. This wind based electricity generation aggregates to a total Installed capacity of 473 MW and the generation is expected to be approximately 1035 MU , annually. The project activity consists of many sub projects with different ownerships , all of whom are Members of Tamil Nadu Spinning Mills Association(TASMA). All these individual sub projects are connected to same grid , and electricity generated by these member projects are purchased by TNEB through power purchase agreements.. Hence these sub projects have been bundled into a project activity . The project activity consists of following sub –projects.

Sub Project Details in the Project Activity Reference Company WTG MW

C0000077 A.D. TEXTILE 1 0.5

C0000155 A.R.SUBRAMANIAM 1 0.6

C0000030 ADISANKARA SPINNING MILLS (P) LTD., 12 9

C0000008 AJANTHA MILLS 3 0.675

C0000055 AMARAVATHI TEXTILES 2 1.35

C0000125 AMBIKA COTTON MILLS LTD 11 6.6

C0000072 ANANGOOR TEXTILE MILLS PVT LTD 2 1.5

C0000063 ANNAMALAIAR MILLS PRIVATE LTD 1 0.75

C0000138 ARASAN SYNTEX LTD., 3 3.75

C0000090 ARMSTRONG KNITTING MILLS 6 4.5

C0000091 ARMSTRONG KNITTING MILLS (P) LTD., 2 1.75

C0000089 ARMSTRONG SPINNING MILLS (P) LTD 3 3

C0000206 ARULJOTHI EXPORTS PVT. LTD., 2 0.45

C0000207 ARUN KUMAR SPINNING MILLS PVT. LTD. 5 1.125

C0000009 ARUN SPINNING MILLS P LTD 2 2.5

C0000066 ARUN TEXTILES (P) LTD 9 6.05

C0000165 ARUNACHALA GOUNDER TEXTILEMILLS (P) 2 1

C0000058 ASHWINI TRADERS 1 0.75

C0000074 ASWIN TEXTILES PVT LTD 2 2.5

C0000161 ATLAS EXPORT ENTERPRISES 3 2.35

C0000197 AVE MARIA SPINNING MILLS (P) LTD., 1 0.5

C0000208 B.R.T. SPINNERS LTD., 3 2.25



C0000111 BEST COTTON MILLS PVT. LTD., 4 5

C000182A BRITISH WEAVING COMPANY 1 0.75

C0000184 C.N.V TEXTILES (P) LTD 6 1.625

C0000143 C.V. SPINNERS (P) LIMITED 1 0.75

C0000050 CENTWIN TEXTILE MILLS (P) LTD 2 2.5

C0000086 CHERAN SPINNER LTD 4 2.5

C0000020 CHERAN SPINNING MILLS PRV LTD 4 5

C0000118 CHINTHAMANI FOODS & FEEDS (P) LTD 1 0.35

C0000157 CHOLA SPINNING MILLS (P) LTD 5 3

C0000019 CHOLA TEXTILES PRIVATE LIMITED 4 5

C0000199 CIBI EXPORTS 1 1.25

C0000005 DEEKAY WIND FARMS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. 1 1.25

C0000153 DHARANI WIND ENERGY PVT.LTD 5 2.5

C0000094 DIVYA SPINNING MILLS (P) LTD 2 2

C0000127 EASTMAN EXPORTS GLOBAL 2 2.5

C0000126 EASTMAN SPINNING MILLS (P)LIMITED 3 3.75

C000127A EASTMANEXPORTSGLOBALCLOTHINGPVT.LTD 4 2

C000103B ELGI AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES LTD 1 0.225

C0000073 ERODE ANNAI SPINNING MILLS (P) LTD. 2 1.5

C0000098 EVEREADY SPINNING MILLS (P) LIMITED 4 5

C0000023 EXCEL COTSPIN(INDIA) PVT LTD 1 1.25

C0000133 FEMINA SPINNING MILLS LIMITED 1 0.5

C000103A G BALAKRISHNAN & BROS. LTD., 3 1.5

C0000065 GANGOTHRI TEXTILES LTD UNIT II 1 1.65

C0000064 GANGOTHRI TEXTILES UNIT I 1 1.65

C0000013 GOMUKI SPINNING MILLS (P) LTD 6 1.35

C0000003 GUHAN TEXTILE MILLS (P) LTD 3 3.75

C0000194 ICMC CORPORATION LTD., 1 0.6

C0000128 INDIA DYEING MILLS PVT. LTD., 4 2

C0000198 INTEX 2 0.45

C0000011 ISWARI SPINNING MILLS 4 2

C0000162 J&J BUYING SERVICES PVT LTD. 1 0.75

C0000154 J.V.TAPES 2 1.475

C0000100 JANSONS TEXILE PROCESSORS 1 1.25

C0000134 JAYALAKSHMI TEXTILES (P) LTD., 3 3.15

C0000187 JAYANTHI TEXTILES PRODUCTS -UNIT II 2 1

C0000081 JAYAVARMA TEXTILES (P) PVT LTD 7 5.725

C0000106 JAYAVISHNU SPINTEX (P) LTD 2 1

C0000047 JEYAM AND COMPANY 1 0.6

C0000204 K.A.S. EXPORTS 2 1.1

C0000203 K.A.S. TANNING CO. LTD., 2 1.1

C0000107 K.M KNITWAER 2 0.45

C0000176 K.M.D.CLOTHING 2 1.1

C0000190 K.S.R. TEXTILE MILLS PRIVATE LTD 1 0.5

C0000150 K.S.R.EXPORTS 1 0.5

C0000163 K.T.SPINNING MILLS (P) LTD 1 0.75



C0000119 KANDAGIRI SPINNING MILLS LTD 9 6.15

C0000085 KANDHAN KNITSS 1 0.75

C0000014 KARIKALI AMMAN SPINNINGMILLS(P)LTD 2 1.5

C0000160 KARUR FINANCE PVT LTD 1 0.75

C0000053 KUTTI SPINNERS PRIVATE LTD 2 2

C0000103 L.G. BALAKRISHNAN& BROS. LTD., 5 1.125

C000103C L.G.B. AUTO PRODUCTS LTD., 1 0.225

C000103D L.G.B. TEXTILE LTD., 2 1

C0000084 LEEDS EXPORTS 5 1.125

C0000095 LEEDS SPINNING MILLS PVT LTD 7 3.8

C0000140 M.T.A. MILLS PRIVATE LIMITED 1 0.5

C0000172 M/S ANGALAKSHMI SPINNING MILL 1 0.5

C000111A M/S BEST INTERNATIONAL 44 9.9

C0000068 M/S. NARASU"S SPINNING MILLS 1 0.6

C0000120 MALLUR SIDDESWARA SPINNING MILLS 3 2.75

C0000099 MANI SPINNING MILLS (P) LTD 5 5.6

C0000173 MANOHAR TEXTILE 1 0.5

C0000075 MAXWELL INDUSTRIES LTD. 1 0.35

C0000022 MEERA TEXTILES PRIVATE LTD 1 1.25

C0000054 MEHALA CARONA TEXTILES (P) LTD. 13 6.5

C0000164 MIDHUNAM SPINNERS (P).LTD 1 0.75

C0000180 MOON SPINNERS (P) LTD 2 1

C0000015 MOTHI SPINNERS LIMITED 3 4.15

C0000148 MOUNTAIN LEASING CO. PVT. LTD., 1 0.75

C0000122 MOUNTAIN SPINNING MILLS LTD 3 3.15

C0000181 MUTHU EXPORT HOUSE 1 0.225

C0000158 N.PARVATHI TEXTILES 1 0.6

C0000124 NILGIRI TEXTILE (P) LTD 1 0.6

C0000168 O.P.T.INTERNATIONAL 1 0.225

C0000177 OPT YARN STORES 1 0.225

C0000201 P. MUTHUSWAMY MUDALIAR & CI. 1 0.225

C0000192 P.K. GANESHWAR, 21, POLLACHI ROAD, 20 4.5

C0000166 P.K.P.N.SPINNING MILLS (P) LTD 4 2

C0000087 PALLAVA TEXILE LIMITED 3 2.25

C0000170 PALLIPALAYAM SPINNERS (P) LTD 6 4

C0000010 PALMAR MILLS PVT. LTD. 2 2.5

C0000021 PANDIAN TEXTILE MILLS PVT LTD 5 6.25

C0000002 PARANI SPINNING MILLS (P) LTD 3 3.75

C0000012 PAVATHAL SPINNING MILLS (P) LTD 1 1.25

C0000080 POPPYS KNITWEAR PRIVATE LTD 1 1.25

C0000029 PRABHU SPINNING MILLS (P) LTD., 8 6

C0000028 PRABHU SPINNING MILLS (P) LTD., 10 7.5

C0000130 PRASANNA SPINNING MILLS 4 2.5

C0000182 PREM TEXTILES INTERNATIONAL 4 3

C0000145 RAJAVE TEXTILES (P) LTD., 1 0.23

C0000045 RASI SEEDS (P) LTD 5 6.25



C0000044 RASI TECHNITEX(P) LTD 1 1.25

C000102A ROGINI GRAMENTS 2 1

C0000102 ROGINI MILLS 3 1.5

C000111B RRD TEX PVT LTD., 4 5

C0000156 S.CHANDRAKUMAR 1 0.6

C0000104 S.K.T. TEXTILE MILLS 1 0.5

C0000108 S.N.Q.S INTERNATIONAL 2 0.45

C0000147 S.P.APPARELS 4 1.66

C0000052 S.P.SPINNING MILLS PVT LIMITED 8 4.8

C0000146 S.P.TEXTILES 1 0.23

C0000096 S.S. SPINNING MILLS 4 3

C0000115 SAKTHE WIND FARM 2 0.45

C0000097 SAKTHI MASALA (P) LTD 1 1.65

C0000112 SAKTHI MURUGAN AGRO FOODS LTD 4 1.185

C0000113 SAKTHI MURUGAN ROLLERFLOURMILLS LTD 2 0.725

C0000114 SAKTHI MURUGAN WIND FARM 2 0.45

C0000141 SALONA COTSPIN LTD., 3 2.25

C0000046 SAMBA PUBLISHING COMPANY PVT LTD 1 0.6

C000118A SAMBANDAM SPINNING MILLS LTD 10 6.1

C0000004 SANDEEP WIND FARMS PVT.LTD. 1 1.25

C0000006 SARANYA SPINNING MILLS (P) LTD 2 2.5

C0000188 SARMANGAL SYNTHETICS LIMITED 3 1.825

C0000136 SCM CREATIONS 7 7.75

C0000137 SCMTEXTILESPINNERS(UNITOFTCSTEXTILE 11 8.5

C0000017 SENTHIL NATHAN SPINNING MILLS P LTD 1 1.25

C0000178 SEYAD COTTON MILLS LTD 2 1

C0000175 SHAKTHI MURUGAN TEXTILE 1 0.5

C0000060 SHREE SIDDIVINAYAKA COTTON CORP. 1 0.75

C0000059 SHREE TIRUPATI COTTON CORP. 1 0.75

C0000117 SHREYA POWER FARM 1 0.225

C0000129 SHRI HARI PROCESS 2 1.75

C0000116 SHRI KARTHIKAYAN POWER FARM 1 0.225

C0000123 SILVER SPRING SPINNERS INDIA (P)LTD 1 0.6

C0000025 SIVARAJ SPINNING MILLS (P) LIMITED 7 5.25

C0000179 SIVARATHISH SPINNING MILLS PVT.LTD 3 0.75

C0000186 SIVASUBRAMANIA TEXTILES 4 2

C0000110 SJLT TEXTILES (P) LTD 4 0.9

C0000001 SMP TEXTILES MILLS (P) LTD 2 1.2

C0000039 SMT R. UMAMAHESHWARI 1 0.75

C0000040 SMT. J. JAYALAKSHMI 1 0.75

C0000034 SMT. K. INDIRA 3 2.25

C0000038 SMT. R. GEETHA 1 0.75

C0000037 SMT. V. DHANALAKSHMI 3 2.25

C0000042 SMT.S.GOWTHAMI 1 0.75

C0000041 SMT.S.SHANTHI 1 0.75

C0000043 SMT.S.VEENA ABIRAMI 1 0.75



C0000093 SORANALAKSMI SPINNG MILLS P LTD 1 1.25

C0000174 SPEEDLINE SPINNERS INDIA(P) LTD 1 0.75

C0000049 SPICTEX 7 3.75

C0000195 SREE KAILAI SIVASAKTHI SPINNER 3 1.2

C0000007 SRI AMARAVATHI SPINNING MILLS 3 2.25

C0000205 SRI ARUNOTHAYA TEXTILVES 1 0.225

C0000057 SRI BALAJI & CO 1 0.75

C0000061 SRI BALAJI & CO. 1 0.23

C0000018 SRI BALAMBIKA TEXTILE MILLS (P) LTD 2 1.2

C0000035 SRI C. KANDASWAMY 3 2.25

C0000193 SRI DHANALAKSHMISIZING&SPINNINGMILL 11 2.475

C0000132 SRI GANASA TEXTILE (P) LTD 20 4.5

C0000183 SRI JAYA JOTHI & CO LTD 20 15

C0000202 SRI KARPAGAM MILLS INDIA (P) LTD., 2 1

C0000135 SRI KARVEMBU TEXTILES PRIVATE LTD 4 0.9

C0000031 SRI MATHA SPINNING MILLS (P) LTD., 13 9.75

C0000191 SRI NAVAMANI TEXTILES (P) LTD 1 0.225

C000191A SRI NAVAMANI WIND FORMS 1 0.225

C0000036 SRI P.S. VELUSAMY 3 2.25

C0000144 SRI PRIYALAKSHMI SPINNERS (P) LTD., 1 0.75

C0000062 SRI RADHALAKSMI COTTON P LTD 1 0.23

C0000016 SRI RATHINAGIRI SPINNERS (P) LTD 1 0.5

C0000079 SRI SARAVANA SPINNING (P) LTD 10 12.5

C0000056 SRI SARVANA SPINNING MILLS 1 1.25

C0000024 SRI SHANMUGAVEL MILLS(P)LIMITED 8 7.8

C0000101 SRI SRINIVASA PROCESSORS 2 0.46

C0000027 SRI VELAYADHAAWAMY SPINNING MILLS 11 8.25

C0000209 SRI VIGNESH YARNS PVT. LTD., 5 3.75

C0000196 SRIGANAPATHYMURUGANSPINNINGMILLS(P) 2 1

C0000092 SRIPATHI PAPER AND BOARDS PVT LTD 1 0.85

C0000082 SRIRENUGAGINNING&OILSPINNINGMILLS 3 1.75

C0000078 SSM FINE YARNS 1 0.35

C0000142 STATUS SPINNING MILLS P LTD 1 0.5

C0000026 SUDHAN SPINNING MILLS (P) LIMITED 10 7.5

C0000200 SUGANESWARA SPINNING MILLS (P) MILL 2 1.5

C0000149 SUMMER INDIA TEXTILE MILLS (P) LTD. 4 5

C0000152 SUNRISE KNITTING MILLS 3 1.5

C0000159 T.N.NANTAGOPAL & SONS 1 0.6

C0000121 THE CHENNAI SILKS 1 0.5

C0000131 THE TUTICORIN SPINNING MILLS LTD 3 3.15

C0000067 THIRUPUR SURIYA TEXTILES PVT. LTD., 5 4.75

C0000051 THURAN SPG MILLS P LTD 2 2.5

C0000083 TRIDENT TEXTILE MILLS LTD 1 1.25

C0000171 V.K.S.M.COTTON MILLS (P) LTD 2 1.5

C0000167 V.N.C ELECTRODES 1 0.225

C0000169 V.N.C.STEELCDISTRIBUTORS 1 0.5



C0000088 V.S.M.WEAVES INDIA LIMITED 3 2.25

C0000076 V.S.N.C NARASIMHA CHETTIAR SONS 2 1

C0000105 VANITHA TEXTILES 1 0.5

C0000109 VASU YARN MILLS INDIA (P) LTD 6 1.35

C0000032 VEDHA SPINNING MILLS(P) LTD., 9 6.75

C0000070 VEEJAY LAKSHMI ENGINEERING WORKS LI 2 1.35

C0000069 VEEJAY LAKSHMI TEXTILES LTD 3 1.8

C0000071 VEEJAY SALES & SERVICES LYD 1 0.75

C0000185 VELLINGIRI ANDAVAR TEXTILES (P)LTD 2 1

C0000139 VENNILAKSHMI MILLS (P) LTD., 1 0.5

C0000048 VINAYAGAR SPINNING MILLS 5 1.125

C0000189 VISHNU FABRICS 1 0.75

C0000151 VISNUKUMAR TRADERS PVT LTD 2 1

733 473.15 The project activity proposes to generate 473 MW of green power using wind energy through modern technology , enabling displacement of thermal energy and alos contribute to delaying or minimising the capacity of new plants. The project activity generates and sells electricity to TNEB under Power Purchase Agreement executed with individual owners. All the wind mill systems have been commissioned. The project activity will contribute significantly to reducing the plant load factor of thermal generation sources connected to the grid. The Significant Contributions by the project activity toward sustainable development are:

- Use of renewable energy (Wind) for power - Reduction in Green House Gases - Increase the contribution of renewable energy to Tamil Nadu Grid - Encourage Industries to contribute to Green Power Development and CDM - Reduction in procurement and use of diesel sets as power option by project participants - Rural development - Capacity addition to installed capacity of Tamil Nadu Grid and grid the ever-growing gap of

power supply - Generation of employment especially for wind mill operation and maintenance

A.3. Project participants: >> The Tamil Nadu Spinning Mill Association (TASMA) is the Primary Project Sponsor. The members of the association are the member sponsors who own wind mills , which farm part of the project activity. TASMA has been authorised by its members to act as the aggregator of the sub–projects of the CDM- Project activity TASMA started in the year 1997 , with small group of 36 spinning mills from Dindigul district of Tamil nadu , with the purpose of catering to multifarious business needs of spinning mills from a common



platform. To day the association has grown to a strength of 247 mills having effective interfaces with Governement , Business Houses , NGOs , and Overseas Bodies. The association specifically interacts with organizations like Tamilnadu Pollution Control Board , TNEB , Labour Department , Export / Import , Ministry of Industry . TASMA in this process , has also been instrumental in bringing the mills together from CDM activities. TASMA is responsible for bringing in many best practices for its members. The promotion of wind based electricity generation has also been mooted by TASMA through various meeting and presentations organised with the help of WTG manufactures. TASMA will be the nodal point for the CDM project activity and all communication with regard to this CDM project activity will be done by TASMA. TASMA will also be responsible to communicate with other CDM entities such as EB , DOE , DNA etc. CER Sales: TASMA has not committed its CER sales to any organization so-far. This activity will be taken up after the registration of the project. The Brief on Other Project Participants : The brief detail of the project Participant is given in Appendix-1. The contact details of all project participants is given in Annex I A.4. Technical description of the project activity: A.4.1. Location of the project activity: >> A.4.1.1. Host Party(ies): >> The Host party is the Government of India (GOI) A.4.1.2. Region/State/Province etc.: >> Tamil Nadu A.4.1.3. City/Town/Community etc: >> Coimbatore , Tirunelveli , Kanyakumari districts of Tamil Nadu A.4.1.4. Detail of physical location, including information allowing the unique identification of this project activity (maximum one page): >> The WTGs are located in major locations Udumalpet , Ayakudi , Aralvaimozhi of districts Coimbatore , Tirunelveli and Kanyakumari . These sites in these locations have been sleeted through the micro-siting studies and data analysis on wind availability , speed of wind , minimum speed etc. All WTGs belonging to the project activities are connected to same grid namely TNEB. . The map showing the location of WTGs is as follows:



A.4.2. Category(ies) of project activity: >> The category of the CDM project activity would be –“Grid connected electricity generation from renewable sources” Scope : Scope No 1 , Sect oral Scope – Energy Industry A.4.3. Technology to be employed by the project activity: >> All the WTGs deployed in the project activity are from well-known international manufactures. All these machines are type tested and approved by MNES. A unit system fo WTG , consists of subsystems like tower , Nacelle , LT line and HT lines. The turbines generate power 400 v which is stepped up to 33 KVA by the local transformers. The HT transmissions are connected to service 110 KVA substations provided by TNEB The plant load factor of WTG is affected by Wind availability , Wind speed , Grid Availability. The average plant load factor of all the WTGs based on empirical data is ., approximately – 25%- 30% The Sub Projects covered by this project activity involves the installation of 733 WTGs with following capacity distribution.

TASMA Sub Project Locations



The sub projects covered by this project activity involves the following makes of WTGs Capacity Details of WTGs

Make WTG MW

ABB 1 0.75

BONUS 3 0.96

ENERCON 64 35.84

GAMESA 4 3.4

NEG MICON 221 173.35

NEPC 159 37.875

PIONEER 12 3.6

PIONEER WINCON 2 0.5

SIEMENS 2 1.6

SUZLON 120 147.3

TACKE 7 4.2

VESTAS 11 5.5

VESTAS-RRB 126 58.025

WIND WORLD 1 0.25

733 473.15

A.4.4. Brief explanation of how the anthropogenic emissions of anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHGs) by sources are to be reduced by the proposed CDM project activity, including why the emission reductions would not occur in the absence of the proposed project activity, taking into account national and/or sectoral policies and circumstances: >> The sources of anthropogenic green house gas (GHG) that is considered by this project is Tamilnadu Grid. Installed Capacity Tamilnadu :

Capacity Details of WTGs

Capacity WTG MW

750 217 162.75

600 61 36.6230 8 1.84

225 174 39.15

1650 9 14.85

20 3 0.96

500 117 58.5

350 4 1.4

800 2 1.6

850 5 4.25

250 15 3.75

1250 118 147.5

733 473.15



The installed capacity of Tamilnadu as on 31/12/2004 is 10138.94 MW comprising of state sector , central sector and private sector contribution. Close to 64 % of installed capacity is based on thermal and gas and diesel . The current consumption needs are fast increasing due to increased manufacturing activities and fast growing IT sector in Tamilnadu. The generation of Tamilnadu: Close to 80% generated output is based on thermal and gas. Based on this TNEB grid is one of the major source of anthropogenic CHG emissions. In the last five years the capacity additions have also been significantly been through coal based power plants , although there is representation by Nuclear and Wind. Presently the average plant load factor of coal and gas based power plants is in the range of 74% to 81% . The plant load factors of thermal power plants are steadily increasing. The plant load factor of hydel and wind power generation is around 30%. This means we would need more and more of wind based electricity generation The absence of the project activity would result in increasing the plant load factor of thermal plants and also the addition of new plants based on thermal and coal. This is detailed in section B.3 The project does not have any direct or fugitive emissions as it use wind energy which is renewable in nature. A.4.4.1. Estimated amount of emission reductions over the chosen crediting period: >> The estimated amount of emission reduction from the project activity is : 84785556 tCO2 This is for the crediting period of 10 years as shown below:



A.4.5. Public funding of the project activity: >> No official development Assistance (ODA) has been used for the project. Individual sub-project participants have taken commercial loan from banks at commercial interest rates. The textile committee has given an interest subsidy of 5 % , which has been subsequently withdrawn. SECTION B. Application of a baseline methodology B.1. Title and reference of the approved baseline methodology applied to the project activity: >> Title: Consolidated Baseline Methodology for grid connected electricity generation from renewable sources Reference :ACM0002 Version 02 B.1.1. Justification of the choice of the methodology and why it is applicable to the project activity: >>

SLNO

Operating Years

CO2 Emission Reductions TCO2

1. 2003-2004 279172.2

2. 2004-2005

631464.3

3. 2005-2006

945990

4. 2006-2007 945990

5. 2007-2008

945990

6. 2008-2009 945990

7. 2009-2010

945990

8. 2010-2011

945990

9. 2011-2012

945990

10. 2012-2013

945990

Total 8,478,556



- The project activity involves electricity generated from wind sources connected to a single grid namely T.N.E.B

- The project activity does not involve switchover from fossil fuel in any of the sub –project - The geographic and system boundaries of the T.N.E.B grid can be clearly identified

B.2. Description of how the methodology is applied in the context of the project activity: >>

- The project activity is a grid connected electricity generation from wind (Renewable energy) sources.

- As the grid is considered as source of GHG emission , - the approach used is – “Existing actual or Historical emissions as applicable”

- Additionality As per 17/CP.7 , a project will be defined additional if the anthropogenic CHG emissions from the source are reduced below that would have occurred in the absence of the registered project activity. Additionality : As per the selected methodology ACM0002 , the additionality of the project activity is established using “Tool for the demonstration and assessment of additionality “ as published in annex –1 of the executive Board STEP-0: Preliminary screening based on the starting date of the project activity.

a. Provide evidence that the project activity has started after 01/01/2000.

The project activity for all the sub projects has started after year 2000 and the Project activity is in operation at present . Documentary evidence for this can be provided to the DOE

b. Provide evidence that CDM was seriously considered TASMA has created awareness of CDM to its members through training programs conducted by the manufactures , in the year 2001. TASMA has created resolution on CDM projects based on wind mills.and also the CDM revenues. The CDM Revenue has been considered in the investment analysis and these points have been discussed in the AGM. Documentary evidence for this can be provided to the validator.

The project activity for all the sub projects has started after year 2000 and the Project activity is in operation at present .



Step 1: Identification of alternatives to the project activity consistent with current laws and regulations a. Alternatives to the project activity An alternative for this project would have been , to allow TNEB add the capacity instead of the TASMA members adding capacity through wind mills. Based on the trends available in the Tamilnadu Electricity Scenario , the additions would have been through coal based power plants or diesel generators. The government plan for addition in capacity for power generation is mostly thermal. b.Enforcement of applicable laws and regulation Electricity generation through wind is not a legal requirement. Some state and sectoral polices to attract investment from private sector , the risk involved in wind power project are high , and also the cost equipment is very high. Indian electricity act 2003 – does notput any restriction on the choice of fuel. The National electricity Policy indicate that coal would be the major consideration as fuel The environmental regulations do not insist on use of wind energy for power generation.

2. Investment Analysis a. Determine appropriate analysis method The appropriate method will be option II/ III .Apply Investment Comparison Analysis - Apply Bench Mark analysis

b. Apply Investment Comparison Analysis Apply Bench Mark analysis The financial indicators considered are : unit cost of service Paisa / Kwh and IRR.(%) DSCR The service cost of the power generation through wind mill presented. The IRR analysis of the project activity is also presented. The DSCR analysis of the project activity is also presented. c. Calculation and Comparison of Financial Indicators



The comparison of unit cost of service is given in Notes-1. It becomes clear the unit cost of generation from wind power project is the highest. As for the IRR is concerned , the IRR from the project without CDM revenue is 12% to 14% without CDM revenues. The IRR with CDM revenues 13% - 15%. The financially attractive IRR for projects in electrical industry would be 16% As for the DSCR is concerned , the DSCR from the project without CDM revenue is 1.15 – 1.23 without CDM revenues. The DSCR with CDM revenues 1.22-1.30. Given the risk profile of a wind mill project a DSCR of 1.4 would be required. d.Sensitivity Analysis Factors like generation and cost of maintenance were taken for sensitivity analysis. The changes in values of these factors , do not have significant impact on the afore said financial Indicators. From the above discussions it becomes amply clear , that the project is not financially attractive. The details of these analysis can be provided to DOE. 3. Barrier analysis a. Identify the barriers that would prevent the implementation of type proposed by project activity - Investment Barrier Term loans have been made available only at higher interest rates. The TUF benefit of 5 % interest rate has been cut off. - Technology Barrier Most of the critical wind mill parts such as gearbox, alternator and spare parts imported are imported which makes the O&M quite difficult. The uncertainty about the availability and speed of wind makes the Plant Load factor quite less Requirement of Land is high. Most of the critical wind mill parts such as gearbox, alternator and spare parts imported are imported which makes the O&M quite difficult. - Barriers due to prevailing practice Most of the spinning mills rely on Diesel Power as additional sources of power b. Identify barriers would not prevent the implementation of at least one alternatives



Land requirement per mw is much less for diesel plants Fully Indigenous technology is available for diesel plants 4. Common Practice Analysis a. Analyse other activities similar to the project activity In India only 10 states have wind power generation , in which Tamilnadu has maximum share. Out of the potential 3050 MW wind power generation , Tamilnadu has 2020 MW of installed capacity . This is because . People/companies from other states have also put up their WTGs in Tamilnadu . For an association of industrialists to guide the wind power generation projects is not very common. There is no other industry association which is promoting wind power generation projects of this magnitude. The Other projects which are existing in Tamilnadu are lesser in capacity. The TASMA project activity are is the first of its kind in India , where single project has a capacity of 450 MW with a combination of many makes and capacities. b. Discuss Similar Options That are Occurring Similar Projects , Smaller in capacity in Tamil Nadu are also in the process of seeking CDM Revenue. More over the proposed project activity has a large number of WTGs with a higher capacity – 750 KW , 1250 KW , for which the initial investment is very high. 5. Impact of CDM Reduction

• Anthropogenic GHG emission • Generation from WTGs connected to the project activity reduce the CHG emission from other

sources connected . For this better plant load factor of wind mills essential • The Financial benefit of selling the CERs • For Better PLF , better maintenance and increasing the life expectancy of the machine is essential.

Registration of this project activity would attract other similar associations to promote CDM project activities as a centralised initiative. The CDM revenues is expected to be Re 0.15- 0,20 per unit would help in better maintenance of machines with is around Re 0.30 to 0.40

• The CDM revenues can also help in providing plantations , Improvement of approach roads and organising training programs.

• Attracting new players for Investment • Registration of this project activity would attract other similar associations to promote CDM project

activities as a centralised initiative • Attracting New Players for technology



• Registration of this project activity would attract new players to bring in technology for higher capacity , higher PLF and generation with lower wind speeds

• Reducing inflation and exchange rate risk • More than 50 % of wind mill components are imported. CDM revenue will be certainly be able to

offset the import component of the maintenance cost going up due to exchange rate



Note – 1: Cost of Generation through Various sources

COST OF GENERATION 2003-2004

Name of Power House Gross Generation (M.U.) Rate per Unit (in paise)

THERMAL ENNORE T.P.S. 1264 288.90METTUR T.P.S. 6735 184.04TUTICORIN T.P.S. 8083 176.58NORTH CHENNAI T.P.S. 4348 228.23TOTAL THERMAL 20430 196.51

HYDEL GENERATION KUNDAH PYKARA 143 44.09MOYAR 56 67.58KUNDAH - I 73 89.10KUNDAH - II 172 72.07KUNDAH - III 123 107.89KUNDAH - IV 40 171.61KUNDAH - V 18 180.36KUNDAH - VI(PARSONS VALLEY) 18 908.46PYKARA MINI 2 238.55MARAVAKANDY 1 332.10 GENERATION KADAMPARAI ALIYAR 86 33.00SARKARPATHY 52 19.37SHOLAYAR -I 148 10.78SHOLAYAR -II 52 20.88KADAMPARAI 406 94.73KADAMPARAI PUM[ 0.00PUNACHI 2 2074.74MUKURTHY 0

THIRUMOORTHY 2 1373.05



GENERATION TIRUNELVELI KODAYAR - I 106 61.50KODAYAR - II 44 73.86PAPANASAM 46 86.86SERVALAR 17 152.82PERIYAR 213 60.85SURILIYAR 48 102.20VAIGAI SMALL 7 106.67 GENERATION ERODE METTUR DAM 15 168.08METTUR TUNNEL 69 76.14BARRAGE I TO IV 96 302.39BHAVANI SAGAR 9 310.0BHAVANI R.B.C. 1 11260.72SATHANOOR 2 2307.79TOTAL HYDRO 2067.00 130.19 GAS BASIN BRIDGE 89 1653.03KOVILKALAPPAL 724 166.56VALUTHUR 672 191.84KUTTALAM 108 380.19TOTAL GAS 1593 278.54WIND 24 316.00TOTAL HYDRO 2067 130.19TOTAL THERMAL 20430 196.51TOTAL GAS 1593 278.54TOTAL WIND 24 316.00TOTAL 24114 197.52

Base Line Scenario Base Line emissions are calculated based on approved methodology ACM002 version 2 recommended by CDM Meth panel. The detailed information on Base line is provided under annex 3. The details of calculations are provided in section E. The baseline is the following: Electricity would have otherwise been generated by the operation of existing power plants connected to the TNEB Grid and by the addition of new generation sources.



The base line emission factor consists of two components: Operating Margin – Impact of the output of the project activity on the output of existing plants Build Margin - Impact of the output of the project activity on delaying or avoiding the construction of future power plants. Baseline Emission Factor (EFy) is calculated as a combined margin (CM) , consisting of the combination of operating Margin (OM) and Build Margin (BM) factors according to steps provided in the approved methodology. The data used for calculation of CM has been collected based on the authentic reports from TNEB , CEA , MNES, Ministry of Power. Generation data for the most recent 3 years has been used . OM – has been calculated based on existing actual historical emission for the last 3 years average and BM has been calculated based on the historic capacity addition in the recent 5 years , taking into consideration the actual emission of the sample plants. STEP 1: Calculate the Operating Margin Emission factor(s) (EF OM,y) From the guidelines provided by ACM0002 , Simple OM method is used to calculate OM. This method is used since the low-cost / must run resources ( Hydro , Wind and Nuclear) constitute less than 50 % of the total T.N.E.B grid generation based on the average of five most recent years. Analysis of Installed Capacity in TNEB Grid – in the last 5 Years Hydro Coal Gas Diesel Total Wind Nuclear Total 2000-2001 State 1993.2 2970 130 0 3100 19.83 0 5113.03 Private 0 0 0 200 200 765.19 0 965.19 Central 4170 350 0 4520 0 910 5430 1993.2 7140 480 200 7820 785.02 910 11508.22001-2002 State 1995.15 2970 237 0 3207 19.4 0 5221.55 Private 0 0 330.5 411.66 742.16 812.3 0 1554.46 Central 1611 0 0 1611 0 358 1969 1995.15 4581 567.5 411.66 5560.16 831.7 358 8745.012002-2003 State 1995.15 2970 297 0 3267 19.4 0 5281.55 Private 0 250 330.5 411.66 992.16 838.1 0 1830.26 Central 1821 0 0 1821 0 358 2179 1995.15 5041 627.5 411.66 6080.16 857.5 358 9290.81



2003-2004 State 1995.15 2970 431 0 3401 19.4 0 5415.55 Private 0 250 330.5 411.66 992.16 970.9 0 1963.06 Central 2031 0 0 2031 0 358 2389 1995.15 5251 761.5 411.66 6424.16 990.3 358 9767.612004-2005 State 1995.15 2970 431 0 3401 19.42 0 5415.57 Private 0 250 330.5 411.66 992.16 1342.21 0 2334.37 Central 2031 0 0 2031 0 358 2389 1995.15 5251 761.5 411.66 6424.16 1361.63 358 10138.9

Constitution by resource-type by Capacity-MW in TNEB grid

0.0010.0020.0030.0040.0050.0060.0070.00

Hydro Coal Gas Diesel Wind Nuclear

Type of resource

% o

f In

stal

led

Cap

a

2000-20012001-20022002-20032003-20042004-2005

Analysis of Generation in TNEB Grid in the last five years

2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-2005 Total Average Hydro 5450 4350 2724 2067 4426 19017 3803.4

Thermal (Coal+Diesel) 34275 36836 40636 43183 42577 197507 39501.382Gas 215 870 1107 1593 2003 5788 1157.6Wind 1114 1263 1324 1690 2426 7816 1563.218Nucelar 710 601 402 965 913 3591 718.2Total 41764 43920 46192 49498 52345 233719 46743.8



Constitution by Resources by Genearion (MU) in TNEB Grid

0.00

20.00

40.00

60.00

80.00

100.00

Hydro Thermal(Coal+Diesel)

Gas Wind Nucelar

Type of Resources

% G

enea

rted

cap

a 2000-012001-022002-032003-042004-05Avearge

Based on the above analysis , the simple OM method is used for the project activity. STEP 2: Calculate the Build Margin Emission Factor –(EF BM,y) For calculation of the BM , option 1 given in the ACM0002 is used. A sample set of plants have been selected that have been built most recently , have been selected .. For those plants emission factors has been calculated Ex-ante. It is ensured that a representative mix of capacity added is given by the plants. STEP 3: Calculate the Base Line Emission Factor –(EF,y) The baseline emission factor has been calculated as the weighted average of Operating Margin Emission Factor (EF OM,y)and Build Margin Emission Factor –(EF BM,y) The default proposition equal weight ages have been used for OM and BM. As per ACM0002 , no leakage has been considered for the calculation of emission factor.

B.3. Description of how the anthropogenic emissions of GHG by sources are reduced below those that would have occurred in the absence of the registered CDM project activity: >> As the power requirement from the state of Tamilnadu , is steadily increasing , in the absence of the project activity , the same amount of power as generated by the project activity would have been generated by TNEB grid using the existing power plants. Since generation of power based on windmill



does not have any emission, the generation will reduce the emission from the other sources to the TNEB grid. B.4. Description of how the definition of the project boundary related to the baseline methodology selected is applied to the project activity: >> The Project Boundary includes the project micro site(s) and all the power plant connected to the single Grid of TNEB. The boundary also includes the pool of TNEB sub stations . The schematic diagram of project boundary is as follows: B.5. Details of baseline information, including the date of completion of the baseline study and the name of person (s)/entity (ies) determining the baseline: >> The details of Baseline Information is given in Annex –3. M.Raja Chidambaram of Urs Productively has assisted the project sponsor in determining the application of methodology. His contact information is available in annex-1. SECTION C. Duration of the project activity / Crediting period C.1 Duration of the project activity: C.1.1. Starting date of the project activity: >> First Sub Project Started on : 31/03/2000 All sub projects progressively started commercial operation from then onwards and the process stabilised in the year 2003-04: C.1.2. Expected operational lifetime of the project activity: >> Expected life time of the project activity is 20 years.

T N E B Grid

Project Activity

Power Plants Connected to TNEB Grid

TNEB Consumers

System Boundary

Project Boundary

WTG Transformer

Sub Station(s)



C.2 Choice of the crediting period and related information: >> The project proponents propose a fixed credit period of 10 years. C.2.1. Renewable crediting period C.2.1.1. Starting date of the first crediting period: >> Not Applicable C.2.1.2. Length of the first crediting period: >> Not Applicable C.2.2. Fixed crediting period: C.2.2.1. Starting date: >> April 2003 for all the sub projects considered under this project activity C.2.2.2. Length: >> 10 Years SECTION D. Application of a monitoring methodology and plan D.1. Name and reference of approved monitoring methodology applied to the project activity: >> Approved Methodology ACM0002 Ver 2.0 “Consolidated Monitoring Methodology for zero-emissions Grid connected electricity generation from renewable sources” - which is recommended for sectoral scope 1, has been used. D.2. Justification of the choice of the methodology and why it is applicable to the project activity: >>

• The project activity is for electricity capacity additions from wind sources • The project activity does not involve switching from fossil fuel to renewable energy. • The geographic and system boundaries of TNEB grid can be clearly identified.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 02 CDM – Executive Board page 26


D.2. 1. Option 1: Monitoring of the emissions in the project scenario and the baseline scenario D.2.1.1. Data to be collected in order to monitor emissions from the project activity, and how this data will be archived: Not applicable as the emission by wind based power generation is Zero. D.2.1.2. Description of formulae used to estimate project emissions (for each gas, source, formulae/algorithm, emissions units of CO2 equ.) Not Applicable

D.2.1.3. Relevant data necessary for determining the baseline of anthropogenic emissions by sources of GHG’s within the project boundary and how such data will be collected and archived.

ID NUMBER

Data Variable

Source of Data

Data Unit Measured(M) Calculated © Estimated (E)

Recording frequency

Proportions of data to be monitored

How will the data be archived (electronic/paper)

Comments

1.EGy Electricity supplied to the grid by the project

Project MWh M

Continuous 100% Electronic Electricity supplied by the project to the grid and double check by receipt of sales.

2.EFy CO2 emission factor of the grid

Project t CO2/MWh

C Yearly 100% Electronic Calculated as equal weighted sum of OM and BM emission factors.



ID NUMBER

Data Variable

Source of Data

Data Unit Measured(M) Calculated © Estimated (E)

Recording frequency

Proportions of data to be monitored

How will the data be archived (electronic/paper)

Comments

3.EFOM,y CO2 operating margin emission factor of the grid

Project t CO2/MWh

C Yearly 100% Electronic Calculated as simple OM excluding all low cost must run generating sources

4.EFBMy CO2 build margin emission factor of the grid

Project t CO2/MWh

C Yearly 100% Electronic Calculated as mix of five power plant most recently commissioned.

Plant Name (PNOM)

Identification of the power plant for the OM

State Load Dispatch centre

Text E Yearly 100%of the set of plants

Electronic Data on identification of the set of plants included on OM calculation of the grid would be collected from the stat load dispatch

GEN Electricity generation of each using fuel (i)power plant connected to the grid

State Load Dispatch centre

GWh E Yearly 100% of the set of plants

Electronic Dispatch data on generation by the set of plants included on OM calculation to the grid would be collected from the State Load/Dispatch Centre

COEF CO2emission factor coefficient of each fuel tupe per unit of electricity generation

IPCCC t CO2/GWh E Yearly 100% Electronic IPCCC default value should be used

Plant Name (PNBM)

Identification of the power plant for the BM

State Load Dispatch

Text E Yearly 100% of the set of pants

Electronic Data on identification of the set of plants included on BM calculation of the



centre grid would be collected from the State Load/Dispatch center

D.2.1.4. Description of formulae used to estimate baseline emissions (for each gas, source, formulae/algorithm, emissions units of CO2 equ.) Details Given in section E. D. 2.2. Option 2: Direct monitoring of emission reductions from the project activity (values should be consistent with those in section E). Not Required D.2.2.1. Data to be collected in order to monitor emissions from the project activity, and how this data will be archived: Not applicable D.2.2.2. Description of formulae used to calculate project emissions (for each gas, source, formulae/algorithm, emissions units of CO2 equ.): Not Applicable D.2.3. Treatment of leakage in the monitoring plan D.2.3.1. If applicable, please describe the data and information that will be collected in order to monitor leakage effects of the project activity There is no leakage from the project



D.2.3.2. Description of formulae used to estimate leakage (for each gas, source, formulae/algorithm, emissions units of CO2 equ.) Not Applicable D.2.4. Description of formulae used to estimate emission reductions for the project activity (for each gas, source, formulae/algorithm, emissions units of CO2 equ.) Details given in section E.

D. 3 Quality control (QC) and quality assurance (QA) procedures are being undertaken for data monitored

Data (indicate table and ID number e.g. 3.-, 1.; 3.2.)

Uncertainty level of data (High/Medium/Low)

Explain QA/QC procedures planned for these data, or why such procedures are not necessary

D2-1 Low ISO 9000 based procedures will be established for collecting and maintaining primary data from project activity and secondary data form other bodies such as TNEB.

D2-2 Low ISO 9000 based procedures will be established for collecting and maintaining primary data from project activity and secondary data form other bodies such as TNEB.

Others Low ISO 9000 based procedures will be established for collecting and maintaining primary data from project activity and secondary data form other bodies such as TNEB.



D.4 Please describe the operational and management structure that the project operator will implement in order to monitor emission reductions and any leakage effects, generated by the project activity

- Management Structure: - Operation and Maintenance - Maintenance of Meters and Calibration - Calculation of Emission Figures - Local Environmental Care - Changes in project boundary - Documents and Records - Periodic Review meetings -

The project activity will be operated and managed by project sponsors who are also the project proponent. They will ensure the safe operation and a project manager will be allocated with the responsibility for safe operation of the wind farms and employees working in the farms and generation unit. The CDM wind power project will abide by all regulatory and statutory requirements as prescribed under the state and central laws and regulations. To ensure such performance, the project sponsors will monitor all its activities and performance related to emission, discharge and solid waste generation, if any, TASMA will install meters that meet the Indian and regional electricity authority’s standards (with set calibration schedules)and wherever possible online monitoring systems to be able to measure and calculate actual creditable emission reduction in most transparent and relevant manner.. installed meters will be calibrated according to the maintenance schedule programmed at the start of the operation and refresh according to the plants performance requirement. All the monitoring data will be recorded and kept under safe custody of the power plant site manager and/or the Management Representative board members. Also any change within the project boundary , such as change in spare and or equipment will be recorded and any change in the emission reduction due to such alteration will also be studied and recorded. Any addition in electricity generated will be informed to the relevant a priority, though these additions will not be considered as any part of the wind power project and thus no benefits will be claimed under the same project. Such project can be qualified as another CDM project. Although it is being anticipated that there won’t be any leakage of the wind power project, however, if any such condition arises, and leakage effect is found due to this project activity, such leakage will be accounted accordingly as mentioned in the chosen approved baseline methodology. Systems based on ISO 9001:2000 will be implemented D.5 Name of person/entity determining the monitoring methodology:

M.Raja Chidambaram of URs Productively has assisted the project sponsor in determining the application of methodology. His contact information is available in annex-1.

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM PDD) - Version 02 CDM – Executive Board


SECTION E. Estimation of GHG emissions by sources E.1. Estimate of GHG emissions by sources: >> Using the ACM 0002 methodology that is recommended by the CDM Meth Panel, the projected GHG emission reduction for the proposed CDM activity are determined. The project activity is a wind based power generation project, hence there will be no GHG emissions of from the project activity. Therefore, no calculation is required here. E.2. Estimated leakage: >> Leakage is defined as the net change of anthropogenic emissions by source of GHGs that occur outside the project boundary, which can be measured and directly attributed to the CDM project activity. No leakages were identified due to the project activity. Therefore, no calculation is required here E.3. The sum of E.1 and E.2 representing the project activity emissions: >> Zero E.4. Estimated anthropogenic emissions by sources of greenhouse gases of the baseline: >> The emission reductions ERy by the project activity during a given year y is ERy = EGy * EFy………………..(1) Where EGy is the electricity supplied to the grid, EFy is the CO2 emission factor of the grid as calculated below: The emission factor EFy of the grid is represented as a combination of the Operating Margin and the Build Margin. Considering the emission factors for these two margins as EFOM,y and EFBM,y then the EFy is given by EFy = WOM * EFOM,y + WBM * EFBM,y ………………..(2) The default values of equal weight for WOM and WBM has been considered , that is WOM = 1 WBM = 1 The Operating Margin emission factor EFOM,y is defined as the generation—weighted average emissions per electricity unit generated (tCO2/GWh) for all sources serving the TNEB grid, excluding zero- or low-operating cost power (hydro, wind and nuclear) , based on the average of the five years most recent data and using the following equation (for the simple operating margin calculation) : EFOM,y = [∑ Fi,j,y * COEFij] /∑GENi,j]……………………….(3) Where,



EFOM,y =Total GHG emissions and electricity generation supplied to the grid by the power plants connected to the grid excluding zero- or low-operating cost sources. Fi,j,y = Fuel Consumption of it h Fuel and j th Plant in the year(s) y COEFi,j,y = carbon coefficient of the fossil fuel, (i) , (tCO2) / mass or volume unit of the fuel ) , taking into account the carbon contents of the fuels used by relevant power plant j , and the present oxidation of the fuel in year(s) , y , and GENj,y electricity ( MWh ) delivered to the grid by power plant j. GENj.y =I the electricity generation at the plant/connected to the grid excluding zero- or low-cost operating sources. The CO2 emission coefficient COEF is obtained as : COEFi = NCVi * EFCO2,i * OXIDi ……………………………(4) Where : NCV is the net calorific value (energy content) per mass or volume unit of a fuel i, OXIDi is the oxidation factor of the fuel (see page 1.29 in the 1996 revised IPCC guidelines for default values). EFCO2,i in the CO2 emission factor per unit of energy of the fuel i : The Build Margin emission factor EMBM,y (tCO2/GWh) is given as the generation-weighted average emission factor of the selected representative set of recent power plants represented by the 5 most recent plants or the most 20% of the generating units built (summation is over such plants specified by K) : EFBM,y = [∑ Fi,m,y * COEFim] /∑GENm,y] If the grid imports or exports electricity from/to other grids, the associated correction to be used: EFY EFY + (ELin

y)/(TGENy)* (EFin y) –ELout

y*//(TGENy)* (EFout y) ……………..(6)

This is needed unless such correction is demonstrated to be conservative or negligible. The arrow means replacement of the EFy by the right-hand-side of the above formula. Using the above formula, the baseline emission are 945990 tCO2 per year from the year 2005-2006 onwards. E.5. Difference between E.4 and E.3 representing the emission reductions of the project activity: >> The Total emission reduction for the entire crediting period is 8478556 tCO2. E.6. Table providing values obtained when applying formulae above:



Sl.No Year Generation-MU Emission factor- tCO2/MU CER-tCO2

1 2003-04 305.44 914 279172.2 2 2004-05 690.88 914 631464.3 3 2005-06 1035 914 945990 4 2006-07 1035 914 945990 5 2007-08 1035 914 945990 6 2008-09 1035 914 945990 7 2009-10 1035 914 945990 8 2010-11 1035 914 945990 9 2011-12 1035 914 945990

10 2012-13 1035 914 945990 Total 8478556

SECTION F. Environmental impacts F.1. Documentation on the analysis of the environmental impacts, including transboundary impacts: >> An Environmental Aspect and Impact analysis study was carried out By an Environmental consultant of the installations. The steps involved are as follows:

- Identify Environmental aspects - Identify the significant aspects by studying the impact (Refer Criteria Matrix) - Based on the significance of the aspects – prepare Environmental Management Programs or

Operational Controls. The Criteria for analyzing the aspects with respect to the impact , is shown in the following table:

SCORE

QUANTITY Q

OCCURRENCE O

RISK I

STATUS OF CONTROL

C 5 Excessive Continuous Fatal to Human Life No Control 4 Very High Several Times a day Human Health Effect Partial Control at output



stage 3 High Once a day -Land/Water contamination

-Resources consumption Partial Control at input stage

2 Moderate Once a week Cause discomfort or acidic rain or nuisance

Total Control at output stage

1 Low Once a month or less frequent

Negligible visual impact Total Control at input stage

Overall Score = A * B * C * D

Environmental aspect and impact analysis

EMS ASPECT ANALYSIS

Type of aspect Category of aspect

Severity of Aspect T

Activity Aspect A L S V H D ID L E R NR

Q O I C

Equipment moving

Dust X X 2 2 2 2 16

Smoke X X 2 2 2 2 16

Generation Noise X X 1 1 1 2 2

Air quality X X X 1 1 1 1 1

Heat X 1 1 1 1 1

Bird hit X X 1 1 5 1 5

Maintenance Fall/accident X X X 1 1 5 1 5

Snake bite X X 1 1 4 1 4

Tower Fall X X 1 1 4 1 4

Power consumption/

X 1 1 1 1 1

Generation loss

X 1 1 1 1 1

Oil Spillage X X 2 2 2 1 6

Waste cloth X X 2 2 1 1 4

Broken switches

X X 1 1 1 1 1

Metal pieces X X 1 1 1 1 1

General Ecology X 1 1 3 1 3

Interference with communication channels

X 2 1 2 1 4

Soil erosion X X



Legend to the Table

Type of Aspect Category of Aspect Severity of Aspect

A Air D Direct aspect Q Quantity

L Liquid ID In direct aspect O Occurrence

S Solid L Legal aspect I Impact

V Vibration E Emergency aspect C Control

H Heat R Routine aspect T Total

NR Non routine aspect



As mentioned above there are no aspects scoring above 25. Hence there are no significant Environmental aspects. But, considering the long term contribution to environment some Environmental Management Programs and Operation Controls have been established. F.2. If environmental impacts are considered significant by the project participants or the host Party, please provide conclusions and all references to support documentation of an environmental impact assessment undertaken in accordance with the procedures as required by the host Party: >> As per the host country’s existing Laws, Environmental Regulations do not apply to wind mill installations. Moreover the environmental aspect/impact study , there are no significant aspects. However some environment management programs and operational controls have been worked out as a proactive measure.

ENVIRONEMTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAMMES (EMPS)

Responsibilities EMPs Action Plan Time frame

Implementation Supervision Maintain Air quality

Ambient air monitoring As per plan Site Engineers TASMA

Vehicle emission norms During Operations Site Engineers TASMA Providing PPEs During Operations Site Engineers TASMA

Maintain Noise Levels

Noise monitoring at sensitive receptors

During Operations Site Engineers TASMA

Periodic maintenance During Operations Site Engineers TASMA Proving Ear muffs to operators During Operations Site Engineers TASMA Maintain Ecology

Identification, segregation and safe disposal of wastes


Plantation of Jetropa Through out operations Site Engineers TASMA Control Spillages Provide Proper approach Roads Minimise soil Erosion Green Belt Development Provide safe And healthy Work environment

Minimum safety setbacks of 150 m or 3 times of turbine height which ever is greater should be established from any property line, public roadway/rail


Providing rotational speed controls to ensure safe rotation of rotors


Preparing emergency plan for major accidents




Arranging public response program encase of any emergency


Personnel to be trained on hazards, safety procedure , emergency plan and other specific instructions


safety manual instruction will be followed


All necessary PPEs as applicable will be provided


OPERATIONAL CONTROL/MONITORING PLAN Responsibility Compo

nent Project stage

Parameters

Standard Location Freq Duration Implementation

Supervision

Air quality

Operation

SPM, PM10h

NAAQS of CPCB

At every location

yearly 2 operational days continuously

External agency in coordination with Site ER

TASMA

Noise Level

Operation

Leq Day, Leq night,L10, L50, L90dB(A)

CPCB Noise standards

At every location

yearly 2 operational days continuously


TASMA

Soil Test

Hevay metal, oil and grease

Contamination Threshold level

At every location

Once in 3 years

As Planned


TASMA

SECTION G. Stakeholders’ comments >> G.1. Brief description how comments by local stakeholders have been invited and compiled: >> The local stake holders are the people living in the villages near by the site. The opinion of these villagers about the wind mill operation has been collected through a questionnaire survey. The questionnaire covered the following aspects



Survey on Wind Mill in Your area In your area windmills have been functioning from the year 2001. You are aware that the electricity produced Windmills reduce the load on thermal power plants. This survey is conducted by Tamil Nadu spinning Mills association , on behalf of the members companies whose wind mills are functioning in your locality Kindly fill in following questionnaire Name : Occupation: Educational Qualification

Sl No

Question Response

1. What do you think about the environment in you locality

2. Is your environment affected by wind mill

3. Is your TV Reception affected by Windmill

4. Does the project affect the livelihood 5. Does the project improve livelihood 6. Has employment increased due to he project 7. Is there Notice problem due to wind mill 8. Is there water problem due to windmill 9. Is there Vibration problem due to windmill 10. Is there any problem with respect to construction 11. Does the wind mill affect the migration of birds 12. Does the wind mill affect the grazing by cattle 13. What are the benefits from the wind Mill 14. Comments and suggestions

The questionnaire was given to the individuals in local language (Tamil) G.2. Summary of the comments received: >> The analysis of the questionnaire shows that the respondents are positively disposed. The summary analysis as follows: No of Respondents:

Sl No

Question Maximum Possible + score

Actual score

%



15. What do you think about the environment in you locality

100 79.1

16. Is your environment affected by wind mill 100 85.3

17. Is your TV Reception affected by Windmill

100 94.2

18. Does the project affect the livelihood 100 95 19. Does the project improve livelihood 100 72 20. Has employment increased due to he project 100 88 21. Is there Notice problem due to wind mill 100 80 22. Is there water problem due to windmill 100 92 23. Is there Vibration problem due to windmill 100 92 24. Is there any problem with respect to construction 100 90 25. Does the wind mill affect the migration of birds 100 74 26. Does the wind mill affect the grazing by cattle 100 80 27. What are the benefits from the wind Mill 100 78.2 28. Comments and suggestions

Stake Holder Response

0

20

40

60

80

100

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q5

Q6

Q7

Q8

Q9

Q10

Q11

Q12

Q13

Question No

Scor

e of

+ O

pini

o

Series1

G.3. Report on how due account was taken of any comments received: >>

No Comment Corrective Action

Implementation action Plan



1 Plant trees to improve environment Jetrupa will be planted in all possible locations

Project report from TNAU is under preparation

2 Water reaching catchment areas are affected by roads

While construction of roads provide water drainage

Identify such roads Prepare plan for existing roads and new roads

3 May be situated 1 KM away from school

Consider this factor in micro siting

Discuss with Manufacturers

4 Avoid accidents Install a proper maintenance and safety programme

Arrange programmes including public



Annex 1

CONTACT INFORMATION ON PARTICIPANTS IN THE PROJECT ACTIVITY Organization: Tamil Nadu Spinning Mills Association Street/P.O.Box: 11 th Cross Street Building: Spencers Compound City: Dindigul State/Region: Tamil Nadu Postfix/ZIP: 624 008 Country: India Telephone: 0091 451 2433637 0091 451 2428755 FAX: 0091 451 2431513 E-Mail: [email protected] URL: Represented by: K.Venkatachalam Title: Chef Advisor Salutation: Mr. Last Name: Middle Name: First Name: Department: All Mobile: 0091 9842133318 Direct FAX: 0091 451 2431513 Direct tel: 0091 9842133318 Personal E-Mail:



Organization: URS Productively Street/P.O.Box: 10th Avenue Building: Prasanth Castle City: Chennai State/Region: Tamil Nadu Postfix/ZIP: 600 083 Country: India Telephone: 0091 44 2371 3258 / 24894938 FAX: E-Mail: [email protected] URL: Represented by: Raja Chidambaram.M Title: Director Salutation: Mr. Last Name: Chidambaram Middle Name: First Name: Department: Mobile: 9444003258 Direct FAX: Direct tel: 9444003258 Personal E-Mail: [email protected] The contact information of all other participants , are given in a separate Appendix .,

Annex 2

INFORMATION REGARDING PUBLIC FUNDING No public funding has been made use of , for this project activity



Annex 3

BASELINE INFORMATION

OPERATING MARGIN

Operating Margin



GY1 GY2 GY3 g-AVG

Plant Installed Cap Fuel 2002-03

2003-04

2004-05 G-Avg FY1 FY2 FY3 f-AVG IPCC-Coeff Emission

Emission Rate

MU MU MU MU Mill KGs Mill Kgs Mill Kgs Mil KGslTCO2/Mill KGs Tonnes TCO2/MU

T.T.P.S 1050 Coal 8193 8083 8178 8151.333 5050 5300 5560 5303.33 1852 9821773.33 1204.9284

E.T.PS 450 Coal 1742 1264 1223 1409.667 1660 1190 1160 1336.67 1852 2475506.67 1756.0936

M.T.P.S 840 Coal 6738 6735 6685 6719.333 4850 4920 4900 4890.00 1852 9056280.00 1347.7944

N.C.T.P.S 630 Coal 4407 4348 3918 4224 3280 3090 2840 3070.00 1852 5685640.00 1345.926

NEYVELI TS I 600 Lignite

NEYVELI TS I EXP 420 Lignite 3659 4584 5059 4434 3659 4584 5059 4434.00 972 4309848.00 972

NEYVELI TS II 1470 Lignite 2832 2842 2629 2768 2832 2842 2629 2767.67 972 2690172.00 972

NTPC 2100 Coal 4442 3816 4010 4089 3287.1 2823.8 2967 3026.11 1852 5604349.55 1370.48

TALCHAR STAGE II 1000 0 0 0 0.00 1890 0.00

GAS

Narimanam Gas 0 0 0 0

Basin Bridge Gas 276 89 41 135 63.48 20.47 9.43 31.13 2698 83979.75 620.54

Kovil Kallappal Gas 727 724 763 738 167.21 166.52 175 169.74 2698 457958.52 620.54

Valuthur Gas 104 671 558 444 23.92 154.33 128 102.20 2698 275726.61 620.54

Kuttalam Gas 108 641 250 0 24.84 147 57.42 2698 154928.15 620.54

IPP & OTHERS 1466

GMR Vasavi Diesel 1007 763 885 0 211.47 160 185.85 3138 583197.30 658.98

Samalpatti Diesel 468 356 412 0 98.28 74.8 86.52 3138 271499.76 658.98

Pillai Perumal Nallur Gas 1342 464 903 0 308.66 107 207.69 2698 560347.62 620.54

Samayanallur Deiesel 468 342 405 0 98.28 71.8 85.05 3138 266886.90 658.98

Neyvelo Zero Lignite 1529 1248 1389 0 1529 1248 1388.50 972 1349622.00 972

37356.50 43647716.15 1168.41

HYDEL 1987.4

`

Operating Margin 1168.4



Build Margin

Build Margin

Type Project ID Capacity Date of Commission Capacity

Eff Capacity generation

Emission Rate-T/gwh

Emission-tonnes

Emission Rate

thermal Neyveli Thermal Station I (Expn.) (420MW) I 210 06/05/2003 210

II 210 09/05/2003 210 240 1596 972 1551312 972

Talchar Super Thermal Station (2000 MW) I 500 01/08/2003 500

II 500 01/03/2004 500 III 500 01/11/2004 500 405 2513 1370.48 3444016 1370.48 1920 nuclear Kaiga Atomic Power Station I 220 16/11/2000 220 (440 MW) II 220 16/03/2000 220 237 1419 0 0 0 440 hydel Parsons Valley (30 MW) I 30 29/03/2000 30 56 0 Thirumurthy Mini (1.95 MW) I 0.65 20/03/2000 0.65 II 0.65 20/03/2000 0.65 III 0.65 20/03/2000 0.65 3 0 Mukurti Mini (0.70 MW) I 0.35 18/08/2000 0.35 II 0.35 18/08/2000 0.35 2 0 Aliyar Small (2.5 MW) I 1.25 23/09/2002 1.25 II 1.25 23/09/2002 1.25 2 0 gas Kovilkalappal (107.88 MW) I 107.88 21/02/2001 107.88 763 620.5 473442 620.5 Valuthur (95 MW) I 95 13/03/2003 95 558 620.5 346239 620.5 Kuttalam (101 MW) I 101 24/03/2004 101 641 620.5 397741 620.5 339.03 339 ipp Samalpatti DEPP (105.66 MW) I to VII 7 X 15.09 01/11/2001 105.63 356 658.98 234597 658.98

Pillaiperumal Nallur GTPP (321.45 I 330.5 26/04/2001 330.5 464 620.5 287912

Samayanallur DEPP (106 MW I to VII 7 x 15.143 22/09/2001 106.001 342 658.98 225371 Neyveli Zero Unit (250 MW) I 250 16/12/2002 250 1248 972 1213056 792.131 792.1 Wind Production 1361 2426 2426 0 0 2013 12389 8173685 659.753 Total Generation 52345 20% 10469 Build Margin 659.75



Calculation of Emission Factor

Operating Margin 1168.41

Build Margin 659.75

Weighted average 914.08

Annex 4



MONITORING PLAN

Annex 4

Monitoring plan Organization: The monitoring activity will be centrally controlled by TASMA. The organization fro monitoring will be as follows: SYSTEMS AND PROCEDURES Detailed systems and procedures will be maintained to implement the monitoring Plan. Following are general guidelines for metering and monitoring, For all these activities detailed procedures will be maintained. After some time these systems will be upgraded to ISO 9001 based quality management system. ENERGY GENERATION CAPTURING

TASMA – Chief Advisor

Site Engineers

Management Representative

Region Representative



Site Engineers Site Engineers



Metering: The delivered Energy shall be metered by the parties at the high voltage side of the step up

Transformer installed at the project site owned by TNEB. Metering Equipment:

Metering equipment shall be electronic multipurpose meter of accuracy class 0.2% required for the project (both main and check meters) .The main meter shall be installed and owned by the TASMA member, whereas check meters shall be by the TNEB.

Dedicated core of both CT’s and PT’s of required accuracy shall be made available by the company to TNEB. The metering equipment Shall be maintained in accordance with electricity standards. Such equipment shall have the capability of Recording half - hourly and monthly readings. The company shall provide such metering result of the TNEB. The meter installed shall be capable of recording and storing half hourly reading of all the Electrical parameters for a minimum period of 35 days with digital output. Meter Reading :

The monthly meter reading (both main and check meter) shall be taken jointly by the Parties on the first day of the following month at 12 Noon. At the conclusion of each meter reading an Appointed representative of TNEB and the company shall sign a document indicating the number of the kilowatt-hour indicated by the meter. Inspection of Energy Meters:

All the main and check energy meter (export and import ) and all Associated instruments , transformer installed at the project shall be of 0.2% accuracy class. Each meter Shall be jointly inspected and sealed on behalf of the parties and shall not be interfered with by either Party expect in the other party or its accredited representatives. Meter Test checking:

All the main and check meter shall be tested for accuracy every calendar quarter With reference to a portable standard meter shall be of accuracy class 0.1 % the portable Standard meter shall be owned by the TNEB at its own cost and expense and tested and certified at Least once every year against an accepted laboratory standard meter in accordance with electricity for Meter of 0.25 accuracy class. The consumption registered by the main meter alone will hold good for The purpose of billing as long as the error in the main meters is within within the permission limits

If during the quarterly tests, the main meter is found to be within permissible limit of error .but the Corresponding check meter is beyond the permissible limits, then billing will be as per the main meter as usual. The clock meter shall ,however, be calibrated immediately.

If during the quarterly tests, the main meter is found to be beyond permissible limits of error ,but the

corresponding check meter is found to be within permissible limit of error, then the billing for the month up to the date and time of such test shall be as per the check meter. There will be a revision in the bills for the period from the previous calibration test up to the current test based on the reading of the Check meter.



The main meter shall be calibrated immediately and billing for the period there after till the next monthly Meter reading shall be as per the calibrated main meter.

If during the quarterly test, both the main meter and the corresponding check meters are founded to be Beyond the permissible limits of the error , both the main meter shall be immediately calibrated and the Correction applied to the reading registered by the main meter to arrive the correct reading of energy Supplied for billing purpose for the period from the last month’s meter reading upto the current test. Billing from the period there after till the next monthly reading shall be as per the calibrated main meter. If during any of the monthly meter reading , the variation between the main meter and the check meter is more than the permissible for meter of 0.2%accuracy class, all the meter shall be re-tested and calibrated Immediately. Interconnection and Metering Facilities: The company shall provide dedicated core for the check Metering. Communication Facilities : In each site minimum communication facilities such as telephone , wireless will be provided.

Appendix –1

Brief On Project Participants

Brief on Project Participants Reference Company Product Turn Over Employees

C0000077 A.D. TEXTILE Textiles 12 235



C0000155 A.R.SUBRAMANIAM NA NA

C0000030 ADISANKARA SPINNING MILLS (P) LTD., COTTON YARN 99.47 374

C0000008 AJANTHA MILLS HOSIERY YARNS 5.25 98

C0000055 AMARAVATHI TEXTILES HOME TEXTILES ORDER BASSED 19.1 70

C0000125 AMBIKA COTTON MILLS LTD COTTON YARN 86.11 489

C0000072 ANANGOOR TEXTILE MILLS PVT LTD YARN 8.76 97

C0000063 ANNAMALAIAR MILLS PRIVATE LTD COTTON YARN 26.83 244

C0000138 ARASAN SYNTEX LTD., YARN NA 269

C0000090 ARMSTRONG KNITTING MILLS NA NA C0000091 ARMSTRONG KNITTING MILLS (P) LTD., NA NA C0000089 ARMSTRONG SPINNING MILLS (P) LTD COTTON YARN 35 230

C0000206 ARULJOTHI EXPORTS PVT. LTD., GRAY CLOTH 964 19

C0000207 ARUN KUMAR SPINNING MILLS PVT. LTD. COTTON YARN 4504 375

C0000009 ARUN SPINNING MILLS P LTD CARDED AND COMBED YARNS 23 271

C0000066 ARUN TEXTILES (P) LTD COTTON YARN 52.6 210

C0000165 ARUNACHALA GOUNDER TEXTILEMILLS (P) YARN 42.63 210

C0000058 ASHWINI TRADERS NA NA C0000074 ASWIN TEXTILES PVT LTD COTTON YARN 25.12 151

C0000161 ATLAS EXPORT ENTERPRISES HOME TEXTILES 27.82 101

C0000197 AVE MARIA SPINNING MILLS (P) LTD., COTTON YARN 4.46 34

C0000208 B.R.T. SPINNERS LTD., COTTON YARN 244.82 138

C0000111 BEST COTTON MILLS PVT. LTD., COTTON YARNS 44.28 490

C000182A BRITISH WEAVING COMPANY COTTON 0.26 12

C0000184 C.N.V TEXTILES (P) LTD OTTON YARN 10.31 95

C0000143 C.V. SPINNERS (P) LIMITED COTTON YARN 8.68 50

C0000050 CENTWIN TEXTILE MILLS (P) LTD COTTON YARN 51.36 255

C0000086 CHERAN SPINNER LTD 0 0

C0000020 CHERAN SPINNING MILLS PRV LTD COTTON HOSIERY 60.81 507

C0000118 CHINTHAMANI FOODS & FEEDS (P) LTD CATTLE & POULTRY FEEDS 7.01 50

C0000157 CHOLA SPINNING MILLS (P) LTD SYNTHETIC YARN 47.4 227

C0000019 CHOLA TEXTILES PRIVATE LIMITED COTTON HOSIERY YARN 60.13 487

C0000199 CIBI EXPORTS KNITTED GARMENTS 5.97 73

C0000005 DEEKAY WIND FARMS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. NA NA NA C0000153 DHARANI WIND ENERGY PVT.LTD WIND NA 1

C0000094 DIVYA SPINNING MILLS (P) LTD COTTON YARN 31.75 255

C0000127 EASTMAN EXPORTS GLOBAL KNITTED READYMADE GARMENTS 377.227 62

C0000126 EASTMAN SPINNING MILLS (P)LIMITED HOSIERY COTTON YARN 66.29 362

C000127A EASTMANEXPORTSGLOBALCLOTHINGPVT.LTD KNITTED READYMADE GARMENTS 377.27 62

C000103B ELGI AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES LTD NA NA C0000073 ERODE ANNAI SPINNING MILLS (P) LTD. NA NA C0000098 EVEREADY SPINNING MILLS (P) LIMITED COTTON YARN 62 340

C0000023 EXCEL COTSPIN(INDIA) PVT LTD COTTON YARN 18.89 173

C0000133 FEMINA SPINNING MILLS LIMITED COTTON YARN 19.08 224

C000103A G BALAKRISHNAN & BROS. LTD., AUTOMOBILE PARTS 350 0

C0000065 GANGOTHRI TEXTILES LTD UNIT II COTT5ON YARN 85 262

C0000064 GANGOTHRI TEXTILES UNIT I NA NA



C0000013 GOMUKI SPINNING MILLS (P) LTD COTTON YARN 45.3 133

C0000003 GUHAN TEXTILE MILLS (P) LTD COTTON YARN 50.97 373

C0000194 ICMC CORPORATION LTD., MONOCARTONS,FLEXIBLES,LABELS 17 260

C0000128 INDIA DYEING MILLS PVT. LTD., DYEING & PRINTING ACTIVITIES 45 490

C0000198 INTEX HOME TERXTILES 8.4 NA

C0000011 ISWARI SPINNING MILLS YARN 22.33 115

C0000162 J&J BUYING SERVICES PVT LTD. 7.03 35

C0000154 J.V.TAPES ELASTIC TAPES 20 210

C0000100 JANSONS TEXILE PROCESSORS PROCESSING 1750 56

C0000134 JAYALAKSHMI TEXTILES (P) LTD., SPINNING YARN 36.78 825

C0000187 JAYANTHI TEXTILES PRODUCTS -UNIT II COTTON YARN 14.81 134

C0000081 JAYAVARMA TEXTILES (P) PVT LTD COTTON,HOSIERY YARN 61 250

C0000106 JAYAVISHNU SPINTEX (P) LTD COTTON YARN 10.39 326

C0000047 JEYAM AND COMPANY NA 12

C0000204 K.A.S. EXPORTS FINISHED LEATHERS 10 53

C0000203 K.A.S. TANNING CO. LTD., NA NA C0000107 K.M KNITWAER GARMENT 35 238

C0000176 K.M.D.CLOTHING YARN DYED COTTON FABRICS 19 235

C0000190 K.S.R. TEXTILE MILLS PRIVATE LTD COTTON YARN 966.34 99

C0000150 K.S.R.EXPORTS 0 0

C0000163 K.T.SPINNING MILLS (P) LTD COTTON TARN 7.62 177

C0000119 KANDAGIRI SPINNING MILLS LTD COTTON YARN 71.06 837

C0000085 KANDHAN KNITSS NA NA C0000014 KARIKALI AMMAN SPINNINGMILLS(P)LTD HOSIERY COTTON YARN 23.33 234

C0000160 KARUR FINANCE PVT LTD N/A 1.23 5

C0000053 KUTTI SPINNERS PRIVATE LTD COTTON YARN 19.57 175

C0000103 L.G. BALAKRISHNAN& BROS. LTD., AUTOMOBILE PARTS 350 NA

C000103C L.G.B. AUTO PRODUCTS LTD., NA NA C000103D L.G.B. TEXTILE LTD., AUTOMOBILE & INDUSTRIAL SPARES AND AUTO PARTS 350 NA

C0000084 LEEDS EXPORTS HOSIERY GARMENTS 20.67 75

C0000095 LEEDS SPINNING MILLS PVT LTD COTTON HOSIERY YARN & WOVEN CLOTH 26.88 229

C0000140 M.T.A. MILLS PRIVATE LIMITED COTTON YARN 64.14 56

C0000172 M/S ANGALAKSHMI SPINNING MILL N/A 4 91

C000111A M/S BEST INTERNATIONAL INNER GARMENT & BABY GARMENTS 80.05 2050

C0000068 M/S. NARASU"S SPINNING MILLS COTTON YARN 23.22 181

C0000120 MALLUR SIDDESWARA SPINNING MILLS YARN 27.08 454

C0000099 MANI SPINNING MILLS (P) LTD COTTON YARN 64 293

C0000173 MANOHAR TEXTILE NA NA C0000075 MAXWELL INDUSTRIES LTD. YARN 41 353

C0000022 MEERA TEXTILES PRIVATE LTD COTTON YARN 22.01 276

C0000054 MEHALA CARONA TEXTILES (P) LTD. YARN 47 370

C0000164 MIDHUNAM SPINNERS (P).LTD YARNS 7.79 101

C0000180 MOON SPINNERS (P) LTD COTTON YARN 13.92 116

C0000015 MOTHI SPINNERS LIMITED VSF,COTTON/FLAX YARN 48 316

C0000148 MOUNTAIN LEASING CO. PVT. LTD., LEASING & FINANCING NA 3

C0000122 MOUNTAIN SPINNING MILLS LTD COTTON YARN 33.87 458



C0000181 MUTHU EXPORT HOUSE HOUSEHOLD ITEMS 12 125

C0000158 N.PARVATHI TEXTILES N/A 97 31

C0000124 NILGIRI TEXTILE (P) LTD N/A 8.06 42

C0000168 O.P.T.INTERNATIONAL N/A NA NA C0000177 OPT YARN STORES YARN NA NA C0000201 P. MUTHUSWAMY MUDALIAR & CI. HOME TEXTILES 4.2 NA C0000192 P.K. GANESHWAR, 21, POLLACHI ROAD, N/A NA NA C0000166 P.K.P.N.SPINNING MILLS (P) LTD S.F & OTHER TYPES OF YARNS 58.26 280

C0000087 PALLAVA TEXILE LIMITED COTTON FLAX YARN 59.46 463

C0000170 PALLIPALAYAM SPINNERS (P) LTD YARN 73.6 496

C0000010 PALMAR MILLS PVT. LTD. YARN 20 395

C0000021 PANDIAN TEXTILE MILLS PVT LTD COTTON HOSIERY YARN 68.3 492

C0000002 PARANI SPINNING MILLS (P) LTD COTTORN YARN 57.32 325

C0000012 PAVATHAL SPINNING MILLS (P) LTD PSF,P/V 16.22 147

C0000080 POPPYS KNITWEAR PRIVATE LTD READYMADE GARMENTS 9 952

C0000028 PRABHU SPINNING MILLS (P) LTD., COTTON YARN 105.15 566

C0000029 PRABHU SPINNING MILLS (P) LTD., COTTON YARN 105.15 566

C0000130 PRASANNA SPINNING MILLS COTTON YARN 26.52 146

C0000182 PREM TEXTILES INTERNATIONAL OTHER MADE UPS 22.5 150

C0000145 RAJAVE TEXTILES (P) LTD., COTTON YARN 20.14 302

C0000045 RASI SEEDS (P) LTD COTTON YARN 39.98 266

C0000044 RASI TECHNITEX(P) LTD COTTON YARN 39.98 266

C000102A ROGINI GRAMENTS HOSIERY GARMENTS 35.78 230

C0000102 ROGINI MILLS HOSIERY YARN 37.97 170

C000111B RRD TEX PVT LTD., N/A NA 275

C0000156 S.CHANDRAKUMAR NA NA

C0000104 S.K.T. TEXTILE MILLS COTTON YARN NA 90

C0000108 S.N.Q.S INTERNATIONAL N/A NA NA

C0000147 S.P.APPARELS GARMENTS 172 1416

C0000052 S.P.SPINNING MILLS PVT LIMITED COTTON YARN 52.31 293

C0000146 S.P.TEXTILES GADA 11.98 253

C0000096 S.S. SPINNING MILLS COTTON YARN 10.62 165

C0000115 SAKTHE WIND FARM N/A NA 1

C0000097 SAKTHI MASALA (P) LTD SPICE POWDERS & CURRY POWDERS 89.81 734

C0000112 SAKTHI MURUGAN AGRO FOODS LTD FOOD PRODUCTS 31.88 21

C0000113 SAKTHI MURUGAN ROLLERFLOURMILLS LTD FOOD PRODUCTS 24.22 10

C0000114 SAKTHI MURUGAN WIND FARM N/A NA 1

C0000141 SALONA COTSPIN LTD., COTTON HOSIERY YARN 34.06 140

C0000046 SAMBA PUBLISHING COMPANY PVT LTD EDUCATIONAL SCHOOL TEXT BOOKS 11.66 182

C000118A SAMBANDAM SPINNING MILLS LTD YARN 91.53 1007

C0000004 SANDEEP WIND FARMS PVT.LTD. NA NA NA C0000006 SARANYA SPINNING MILLS (P) LTD COTTON YARN,GREY FABRIC 10.78 208

C0000188 SARMANGAL SYNTHETICS LIMITED YARN 25 424

C0000136 SCM CREATIONS GARMENTS 80.86 1506

C0000137 SCMTEXTILESPINNERS(UNITOFTCSTEXTILE COTTON YARN 43.67 898

C0000017 SENTHIL NATHAN SPINNING MILLS P LTD COTTON YARN 5.36 120



C0000178 SEYAD COTTON MILLS LTD COTTON YARN 27.68 198

C0000175 SHAKTHI MURUGAN TEXTILE NA 7.75 110

C0000060 SHREE SIDDIVINAYAKA COTTON CORP. NA NA C0000059 SHREE TIRUPATI COTTON CORP. NA NA C0000117 SHREYA POWER FARM NA NA C0000129 SHRI HARI PROCESS HOSIERY READYMADE GARMENTS 10.71 48

C0000116 SHRI KARTHIKAYAN POWER FARM NA NA C0000123 SILVER SPRING SPINNERS INDIA (P)LTD COTTON YARN 17.1 387

C0000025 SIVARAJ SPINNING MILLS (P) LIMITED COTTON YARN 99.88 343

C0000179 SIVARATHISH SPINNING MILLS PVT.LTD COTTON YARN 40.61 55

C0000186 SIVASUBRAMANIA TEXTILES COTTON YARN 22.38 157

C0000110 SJLT TEXTILES (P) LTD COTTON YARN 63.1 234

C0000001 SMP TEXTILES MILLS (P) LTD VSF CONE YARN 24.21 156

C0000039 SMT R. UMAMAHESHWARI NA NA C0000040 SMT. J. JAYALAKSHMI NA NA C0000034 SMT. K. INDIRA NA NA C0000038 SMT. R. GEETHA NA NA C0000037 SMT. V. DHANALAKSHMI NA NA C0000042 SMT.S.GOWTHAMI NA NA C0000041 SMT.S.SHANTHI NA NA C0000043 SMT.S.VEENA ABIRAMI NA NA C0000093 SORANALAKSMI SPINNG MILLS P LTD COTTON YARN 12.5 85

C0000174 SPEEDLINE SPINNERS INDIA(P) LTD C/Y 6 62

C0000049 SPICTEX COTTON YARN 465.571 188

C0000195 SREE KAILAI SIVASAKTHI SPINNER YARN 4.34 65

C0000007 SRI AMARAVATHI SPINNING MILLS COTTON YARN 20.53 250

C0000205 SRI ARUNOTHAYA TEXTILVES GRAY CLOTH 1310 19

C0000057 SRI BALAJI & CO NA NA C0000061 SRI BALAJI & CO. NA NA C0000018 SRI BALAMBIKA TEXTILE MILLS (P) LTD COTTON YARN 14 103

C0000035 SRI C. KANDASWAMY NA NA C0000193 SRI DHANALAKSHMISIZING&SPINNINGMILL COTTON YARN 19.81 369

C0000132 SRI GANASA TEXTILE (P) LTD COTTON YARN 86.11 489

C0000183 SRI JAYA JOTHI & CO LTD COTTON YARN 32.02 292

C0000202 SRI KARPAGAM MILLS INDIA (P) LTD., COTTON YARN 10.84 426

C0000135 SRI KARVEMBU TEXTILES PRIVATE LTD NA NA C0000031 SRI MATHA SPINNING MILLS (P) LTD., COTTON YARN 105.86 363

C0000191 SRI NAVAMANI TEXTILES (P) LTD COTTON YARN 1.3 32

C000191A SRI NAVAMANI WIND FORMS NA NA C0000036 SRI P.S. VELUSAMY NA NA C0000144 SRI PRIYALAKSHMI SPINNERS (P) LTD., COTTON YARN 85.82 50

C0000062 SRI RADHALAKSMI COTTON P LTD 400 43

C0000016 SRI RATHINAGIRI SPINNERS (P) LTD YARN 10.46 81

C0000079 SRI SARAVANA SPINNING (P) LTD COTTON YARN 53.4 595

C0000056 SRI SARVANA SPINNING MILLS YARN 15.86 321

C0000024 SRI SHANMUGAVEL MILLS(P)LIMITED COTTON YARN 94.92 323



C0000101 SRI SRINIVASA PROCESSORS CALENDERING 24.05 24

C0000027 SRI VELAYADHAAWAMY SPINNING MILLS COTTON YARN 92.13 341

C0000209 SRI VIGNESH YARNS PVT. LTD., 0 0

C0000196 SRIGANAPATHYMURUGANSPINNINGMILLS(P) COTTON YARN 5.67 70

C0000092 SRIPATHI PAPER AND BOARDS PVT LTD KRAFT PAPER 16.18 45

C0000082 SRIRENUGAGINNING&OILSPINNINGMILLS COTTON YARN 231 340

C0000078 SSM FINE YARNS YARN DYEING 4 144

C0000142 STATUS SPINNING MILLS P LTD COTTON YARN 8.1 72

C0000026 SUDHAN SPINNING MILLS (P) LIMITED COTTON YARN 444.4 324

C0000200 SUGANESWARA SPINNING MILLS (P) MILL COTTON YARN 18.44 263

C0000149 SUMMER INDIA TEXTILE MILLS (P) LTD. NA NA C0000152 SUNRISE KNITTING MILLS NA NA C0000159 T.N.NANTAGOPAL & SONS N/A 4.8 10

C0000121 THE CHENNAI SILKS N/A 32.82 237

C0000131 THE TUTICORIN SPINNING MILLS LTD COTTON YARN 3366.35 270

C0000067 THIRUPUR SURIYA TEXTILES PVT. LTD., COTTON YARN,HOSIERY 56.95 289

C0000051 THURAN SPG MILLS P LTD NA NA C0000083 TRIDENT TEXTILE MILLS LTD COTTON GREY FABRICS 17.25 396

C0000171 V.K.S.M.COTTON MILLS (P) LTD N/A 13 130

C0000167 V.N.C ELECTRODES NA NA C0000169 V.N.C.STEELCDISTRIBUTORS NA NA C0000088 V.S.M.WEAVES INDIA LIMITED ALL KIND OF GREY FABRICS 45.65 30

C0000076 V.S.N.C NARASIMHA CHETTIAR SONS N/A NA NA C0000105 VANITHA TEXTILES NA NA C0000109 VASU YARN MILLS INDIA (P) LTD COTTON YARN 7.29 77

C0000032 VEDHA SPINNING MILLS(P) LTD., COTTON YARN 64.24 267

C0000070 VEEJAY LAKSHMI ENGINEERING WORKS LI RING TWISTER 69.36 437

C0000069 VEEJAY LAKSHMI TEXTILES LTD COTTON YARN 38.18 415

C0000071 VEEJAY SALES & SERVICES LYD SERVICES 20.06 25

C0000185 VELLINGIRI ANDAVAR TEXTILES (P)LTD COTTON YARN 12.19 105

C0000139 VENNILAKSHMI MILLS (P) LTD., COTTON YARN 66.36 94

C0000048 VINAYAGAR SPINNING MILLS COTTON YARN 10.5 95

C0000189 VISHNU FABRICS GREY COTTON FABRIC 15.68 173

C0000151 VISNUKUMAR TRADERS PVT LTD FOOD PRODUCT 13 40

[NA- Not Available]

Appendix 2

Project’s Contribution to Sustainable Development



The Project sub activities in different locations contributes to the sustainable development of the region and country, by creating value in the economic, social and Environmental fronts. The various dimensions development attempted by the project activity are as under: Contribution to Economic Value

• Development of Rural / Backward areas • Most of the sites where these wind mills are located are backward areas and the large scale presence of

windmills here increase direct and indirect employment opportunities • This way the wind mill can contribute to country’s rural development programs. • The increasing demand in energy in the state of Tamil Nadu can be met by the energy share of wind

mills Contribution to Environment

o Wind power is a renewable energy and there is n depletion of resources o There is no emission in wind power o There is no treated effluent since there is no water consumption o There is no problem of solid waste handling o There not much of noise and heat emissions o The Initial environmental study shows that there is no significant impact on land , water or air. o The area around the wind mill can be used for plantation. In fact TASMA has plans to plant Jetropa

(Bio-Fuel) in all the sites. Contribution to Social Value

o Most the local labour are trained in wind mill operation and maintenance resulting in skill improvement

o Local people are exposed to new technology. o Life style and culture of the local people has improved o Transport facilities including roads and rails have improved o Communication has improved drastically in the villages and the project remote hilly terrains , where

the project are situated. o The project has brought road and approach paths o those areas o The wind mill sites and approach paths , has facilitated grazing of cattle.

-

Appendix –3

Abbreviations

ABBREVATIONS MEANING



ACM Approved Consolidated Methodology BAU Business As Usual BEF Baseline emission Factor BM Build Margin CDM Clean Development Mechanism CEA Central Electricity Authority CER Carbon Emission Ratio CII Confederation of Indian Industry CM Combined Margin CO2 Carbon Dioxide COP Conference of Parties DCS Distributed Control System DNA Designated National Authority DOE Designated Operational Entity DPR Detailed Project Report DSCR Dead Service Cover Ratio EB Executive Board EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMS Environmental Management System GHG Green House Gases INR Indian Rupees IPCC Inter Governmental Panel on Climatic Change IPP Independent Power Producers IREDA Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency IRR Internal Rate Reduction ISO International Standards Organization KW Kilowatt NCDMA National CDM Authority ODA Official Development Assistant OM Operating Margin PPA Power Purchase Agreement QA Quality Assurance QC Quality Control TASMA Tamil Nadu Spinning Mills Association TNEB Tamil Nadu Electricity Board TNPCB Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board WTG Wind Turbine Generator