project overview presentation to doe-netl, tulsa may 23, 2005 prepared by eric ingbar
DESCRIPTION
Adaptive Management and Planning Models for Cultural Resources in Oil and Gas Fields Department of Energy Cooperative Agreement DE-FC26-02NT15445. PROJECT OVERVIEW Presentation to DOE-NETL, Tulsa May 23, 2005 prepared by Eric Ingbar Gnomon, Inc. (Carson City, Nevada) Mary Hopkins - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: PROJECT OVERVIEW Presentation to DOE-NETL, Tulsa May 23, 2005 prepared by Eric Ingbar](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062721/568137f2550346895d9fb342/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Adaptive Management and Planning Models for Cultural Resources in Oil and Gas Fields
Department of Energy Cooperative AgreementDE-FC26-02NT15445
PROJECT OVERVIEWPresentation to DOE-NETL, Tulsa
May 23, 2005
prepared by
Eric Ingbar
Gnomon, Inc. (Carson City, Nevada)
Mary Hopkins
Wyoming State Historic Preservation Office
Note: This overview is intended for use and release only by active project partner organizations. It is not a general public information release.
![Page 2: PROJECT OVERVIEW Presentation to DOE-NETL, Tulsa May 23, 2005 prepared by Eric Ingbar](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062721/568137f2550346895d9fb342/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The Questions
• Can we learn more from cultural resources in oil and gas development areas?
• Could we have gained the same knowledge faster, better, cheaper? Could we have fed that information into management at more appropriate moments?
• Can the management process be more adaptive?
![Page 3: PROJECT OVERVIEW Presentation to DOE-NETL, Tulsa May 23, 2005 prepared by Eric Ingbar](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062721/568137f2550346895d9fb342/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Class III Inventories2000 - 2004
note: Alaska not shown to scale
NO DATAFY 00
FY 01
FY 02
FY 03
FY 04
010002000300040005000
010002000300040005000
010002000300040005000
010002000300040005000
010002000300040005000
010002000300040005000
010002000300040005000
010002000300040005000
010002000300040005000
010002000300040005000
010002000300040005000
![Page 4: PROJECT OVERVIEW Presentation to DOE-NETL, Tulsa May 23, 2005 prepared by Eric Ingbar](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062721/568137f2550346895d9fb342/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Project Tasks – New Mexico and Wyoming
• Data Development into GIS format
• Geomorphology and site visibility
• Planning Models of site densities
• Inventory Simulations (how could we have done it better?)
• Management Recommendations (how SHOULD do we do it in the future?)
![Page 5: PROJECT OVERVIEW Presentation to DOE-NETL, Tulsa May 23, 2005 prepared by Eric Ingbar](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062721/568137f2550346895d9fb342/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Project Activities – New Mexico and Wyoming
• Create comprehensive digital data of existing cultural resource inventories and known sites
• Create landscape models to evaluate whether attributes and distribution of sites are predictable
• Evaluate if we could have gained knowledge more rapidly
• Examine how investigation and evaluation – in the context of management – can be better staged or timed more appropriately.
![Page 6: PROJECT OVERVIEW Presentation to DOE-NETL, Tulsa May 23, 2005 prepared by Eric Ingbar](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062721/568137f2550346895d9fb342/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Wyoming Study Area
![Page 7: PROJECT OVERVIEW Presentation to DOE-NETL, Tulsa May 23, 2005 prepared by Eric Ingbar](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062721/568137f2550346895d9fb342/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
SE New Mexico Study Area
![Page 8: PROJECT OVERVIEW Presentation to DOE-NETL, Tulsa May 23, 2005 prepared by Eric Ingbar](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062721/568137f2550346895d9fb342/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
There is something wonderful about science. One gets such a wholesale return of speculation for such a trifling investment of fact.
-- Mark Twain Life on the Mississippi
![Page 9: PROJECT OVERVIEW Presentation to DOE-NETL, Tulsa May 23, 2005 prepared by Eric Ingbar](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062721/568137f2550346895d9fb342/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Measuring “Knowledge”
• Scientific interests vary by region
Project team assessed what is considered “important” by professionals
• Using digitized data (much of which had to be digitized first!), we assessed when “knowledge” stopped accumulating from investigations.
![Page 10: PROJECT OVERVIEW Presentation to DOE-NETL, Tulsa May 23, 2005 prepared by Eric Ingbar](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062721/568137f2550346895d9fb342/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Watching the Needle (1)
![Page 11: PROJECT OVERVIEW Presentation to DOE-NETL, Tulsa May 23, 2005 prepared by Eric Ingbar](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062721/568137f2550346895d9fb342/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Watching the Needle (2)
![Page 12: PROJECT OVERVIEW Presentation to DOE-NETL, Tulsa May 23, 2005 prepared by Eric Ingbar](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062721/568137f2550346895d9fb342/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Annual Survey Acreages – Loco Hills Study Area, New Mexico
![Page 13: PROJECT OVERVIEW Presentation to DOE-NETL, Tulsa May 23, 2005 prepared by Eric Ingbar](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062721/568137f2550346895d9fb342/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Inventory
![Page 14: PROJECT OVERVIEW Presentation to DOE-NETL, Tulsa May 23, 2005 prepared by Eric Ingbar](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062721/568137f2550346895d9fb342/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
![Page 15: PROJECT OVERVIEW Presentation to DOE-NETL, Tulsa May 23, 2005 prepared by Eric Ingbar](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062721/568137f2550346895d9fb342/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Figure 13 Logistic regression model with 3 classes (0–3). Class 4 is outside the boundaries of the study area
![Page 16: PROJECT OVERVIEW Presentation to DOE-NETL, Tulsa May 23, 2005 prepared by Eric Ingbar](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062721/568137f2550346895d9fb342/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Correlation logistic models by year to 2002 density
![Page 17: PROJECT OVERVIEW Presentation to DOE-NETL, Tulsa May 23, 2005 prepared by Eric Ingbar](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062721/568137f2550346895d9fb342/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Summary – Watching the Needle Example
• Site density revealed by inventory has not changed since mid-1980’s.– Inventory could have focused on
something else since then• Predictive models would have worked as well
in 1990 as they do now.– Again, information collection could have
focused on something different
![Page 18: PROJECT OVERVIEW Presentation to DOE-NETL, Tulsa May 23, 2005 prepared by Eric Ingbar](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062721/568137f2550346895d9fb342/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Loco Hills Knowledge
– Focus on site density as a proxy for settlement
– Survey data insufficient for analysis of temporal or functional variability in Loco Hills
– Sensitivity maps closely track geomorphological units (coppice dunes high and parabolic dunes low)• Adaptation preferences or archeological
visibility?• Further survey will probably not help to
answer this.
![Page 19: PROJECT OVERVIEW Presentation to DOE-NETL, Tulsa May 23, 2005 prepared by Eric Ingbar](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062721/568137f2550346895d9fb342/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Adapting Management in Loco Hills
• APE- Based inventory is no longer adding any meaningful knowledge in Loco Hills. Time to pool data recovery?
• Early large-area inventory might have revealed much the same knowledge in hand now at a far lower cost
• The mandate to protect the information value of cultural resources (Criterion D of the National Register) might better be achieved through shifting to data recovery sooner
• Effective GIS data systems can reduce siting, review, and inventory costs
![Page 20: PROJECT OVERVIEW Presentation to DOE-NETL, Tulsa May 23, 2005 prepared by Eric Ingbar](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062721/568137f2550346895d9fb342/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Wyoming Accomplishments
• Digitization of northeastern Wyoming completed – includes GIS, PDF’s, and database.
• WYCRIS revisions and upgrade. Improved user web based mapping tools.
• CRISP makes appropriate archaeological information available to managers, oil and gas for planning and assessment
• CRMTracker (web-based collaborative project tracking) in place in Wyoming with BLM FOs, consultants, and SHPO
![Page 21: PROJECT OVERVIEW Presentation to DOE-NETL, Tulsa May 23, 2005 prepared by Eric Ingbar](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062721/568137f2550346895d9fb342/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Site Distribution
![Page 22: PROJECT OVERVIEW Presentation to DOE-NETL, Tulsa May 23, 2005 prepared by Eric Ingbar](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062721/568137f2550346895d9fb342/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
![Page 23: PROJECT OVERVIEW Presentation to DOE-NETL, Tulsa May 23, 2005 prepared by Eric Ingbar](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062721/568137f2550346895d9fb342/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Site burial sensitivity model
Estimated extent of Holocene age alluvium deposits with a low enough energy regime to preserve archeological sites (red). Known sites with buried materials are shown as small crosses. Other sites are not shown.
![Page 24: PROJECT OVERVIEW Presentation to DOE-NETL, Tulsa May 23, 2005 prepared by Eric Ingbar](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062721/568137f2550346895d9fb342/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Frequencies of Sites with Buried Components within each soil sensitivity model
Number of Sites with Buried Components
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
SSURGO A SSURGO M STATSGO A STATSGO M
Model
Nu
mb
er
of
Sit
es Very High
High
Moderate
Low
Very Low
![Page 25: PROJECT OVERVIEW Presentation to DOE-NETL, Tulsa May 23, 2005 prepared by Eric Ingbar](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062721/568137f2550346895d9fb342/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Demo of Industry Tool – “CRISP”
![Page 26: PROJECT OVERVIEW Presentation to DOE-NETL, Tulsa May 23, 2005 prepared by Eric Ingbar](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062721/568137f2550346895d9fb342/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Wyoming -- Cost Benefit of Automation
Industry Cost Savings:
$81,168 + 46.75 years in project delay. Industry save approximately 1 FTE per year, which is conservatively $18,700 per year in salary + $4,271 in telecommunications + $3,161 in postage + 46 years “wait time”.
Land Managing Agencies (BLM only in this example)
$34,873 + 32.5 years in project delay.Annually BLM saves approximately .7 FTE per year, which is approximately $29,705 per year in salary + $2,970 in telecommunications + $2,198 in postage + 130 years “wait time”.
Wyoming SHPO
$101,493 + 133 years in project delay. Annually the WYSHPO saves approximately 2.85 FTE per year, which is approximately $88,918 per year in salary + $12,112 in telecommunications + $8,963 in postage + $1,500 in copy costs + 133 years “wait time”.
![Page 27: PROJECT OVERVIEW Presentation to DOE-NETL, Tulsa May 23, 2005 prepared by Eric Ingbar](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062721/568137f2550346895d9fb342/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Pro/Con of of shared information systems:
Pros:
Resources are better managed by government
Decisions time is reduced and better justified
SHPOs are able to manage statewide information systems rather than supporting many local systems.
SHPO and agencies are able to meet NHPA mandate more effectively
Great benefits to indirect information users such as industry, planners,
and elected officials
Cons:
Personal contact and interaction can be reduced
Assumptions or exaggerations of the data can be made – “garbage in gospel out”
![Page 28: PROJECT OVERVIEW Presentation to DOE-NETL, Tulsa May 23, 2005 prepared by Eric Ingbar](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062721/568137f2550346895d9fb342/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Outcomes of Project
• Full GIS and data systems (useful in themselves and a necessity for analysis)
• Figure out how to implement “learn more” strategies• May involve trade-offs in investigation strategies and staging
-- a BLM and SHPO discussion• Develop field tools -- manuals and etc., to implement
revised strategies.• Utilize, where possible and feasible, the geomorphology
buried site models, erosion field indicators, and field assessment tools developed by the geomorphology and geoarchaeology team
• Involve appropriate parties in the whole process.• Focus on knowledge, not just information
![Page 29: PROJECT OVERVIEW Presentation to DOE-NETL, Tulsa May 23, 2005 prepared by Eric Ingbar](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062721/568137f2550346895d9fb342/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Other Information Tools: CRMtracker – Tool for automation of Section 106 information stream
WYCRIS – Professional Internet Mapping System
![Page 30: PROJECT OVERVIEW Presentation to DOE-NETL, Tulsa May 23, 2005 prepared by Eric Ingbar](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062721/568137f2550346895d9fb342/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Further information
Project Manager
Peggy Robinson
Gnomon, Inc.
probinson @ gnomon.com
775 885-2305 x250
Principal Investigator
Eric Ingbar
Gnomon, Inc.
eingbar @ gnomon.com
775 885-2305 x201