profession germanynorth america based on international peers survey may 2015
TRANSCRIPT
General Practitioner
OMS
Prosthodontist
Periodontist
Implantologist
-10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0%
9%
31%
40%
20%
0%
General Practi-tioner
OMS
Prosthodontist
Periodontist
Implantologist
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0%
35%
57%
20%
9%
23%
Profession
GermanyNorth America
Based on international PEERS survey May 2015
5-10 Jahre
11-20 Jahre
Mehr als 20 Jahre
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0%
13%
39%
48%
Length of time working in dentistry
Based on international PEERS survey May 2015
5-10 years
11-20 years
More than 20 years
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0%
0%
24%
76%
GermanyNorth America
Male
Female
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0%
96%
4%
Gender
Based on international PEERS survey May 2015
Male
Female
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0%
88%
13%
GermanyNorth America
Primary work setting
Based on international PEERS survey May 2015
Private practice
University
Public healthcare
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0%
80%
18%
2%
Private practice
University
Public healthcare
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0%
83%
14%
3%
GermanyNorth America
<40 years old
41-60 years old
61-75 years old
>75 years old
0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 35.00% 40.00%
6%
21%
38%
28%
Unter 40 Jahre:
41–60 Jahre:
61–75 Jahre:
Über 75 Jahre:
0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 35.00% 40.00%
4%
11%
21%
25%
Fully edentulous in one jaw:percentage by patient age group
Based on international PEERS survey May 2015
GermanyNorth America
<40 years old
41-60 years old
61-75 years old
>75 years old
0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 35.00% 40.00%
4%
16%
36%
35%
Unter 40 Jahre:
41–60 Jahre:
61–75 Jahre:
Über 75 Jahre:
0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 35.00% 40.00%
3%
8%
19%
26%
Fully edentulous in both jaws:percentage by patient age group
Based on international PEERS survey May 2015
GermanyNorth America
Konventionelle Prothese:
Deckprothese auf zwei Implantaten:
Deckprothese auf vier Implantaten:
Deckprothese auf mehr als vier Implantaten:
Brücke auf vier Implantaten:
Brücke auf mehr als vier Implantaten:
0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 35.00% 40.00% 45.00%
35%
4%
22%
17%
5%
16%
Conventional den-ture
Overdenture on two implants
Overdenture on four implants
Overdenture on more than four
implants
Bridge on four implants
Bridge on more than four implants
0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 35.00% 40.00% 45.00%
38%
4%
22%
10%
11%
26%
Fully edentulous in the upper jaw:percentage by treatment type provided
Based on international PEERS survey May 2015
GermanyNorth America
Konventionelle Prothese:
Deckprothese auf zwei Implantaten:
Deckprothese auf vier Implantaten:
Deckprothese auf mehr als vier Implantaten:
Brücke auf vier Implantaten:
Brücke auf mehr als vier Implantaten:
0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 35.00% 40.00%
29%
20%
28%
6%
7%
14%
Conventional den-ture
Overdenture on two implants
Overdenture on four implants
Overdenture on more than four
implants
Bridge on four implants
Bridge on more than four implants
0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 35.00% 40.00%
21%
31%
17%
3%
20%
22%
Fully edentulous in the lower jaw:percentage by treatment type provided
Based on international PEERS survey May 2015
GermanyNorth America
Not likely
Somewhat likely
Very likely
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0%
3%
33%
64%
Nicht wahrscheinlich
Weniger wahrscheinlich
Sehr wahrscheinlich
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0%
4%
12%
85%
How likely to incorporate a removable with the stability of a fixed solution?
Based on international PEERS survey May 2015
North America Germany
Replacement of resilient, remov-
able implant connectors
Adjustment of the connectors
Relining of the denture base for
improved soft tissue support
None of the above
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0%
68%
18%
59%
29%
What services do you charge for?
Based on international PEERS survey May 2015
Replacement of resilient, remov-
able implant connectors
Adjustment of the connectors
Relining of the denture base for
improved soft tissue support
None of the above
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0%
72%
36%
82%
17%
GermanyNorth America
Nicht zutreffend
Ein- oder zweimal
Drei- oder viermal
Häufiger als viermal
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0%
45%
51%
2%
2%
Number of times per year your patient’s overdenture needs adjustment
Based on international PEERS survey May 2015
Not applicable
One or two
Three or four
More than four
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0%
35%
65%
0%
0%
GermanyNorth America
Average chairtime for adjustment or replacement of retention component
Based on international PEERS survey May 2015
Less than 15 minutes
15-30 minutes
31-45 minutes
46-60 minutes
Over one hour
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0%
52%
29%
14%
5%
0%
Less than 15 minutes
15-30 minutes
31-45 minutes
46-60 minutes
Over one hour
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0%
49%
36%
13%
0%
2%
GermanyNorth America
Null
1-25%
26-50%
51-75%
76-100%
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0%
4%
17%
23%
36%
21%
% of conventional denture patients you would consider transitioning to something more stable
Based on international PEERS survey May 2015
Zero
1-25%
26-50%
51-75%
76-100%
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0%
3%
9%
24%
18%
47%
GermanyNorth America
Null
1-25%
26-50%
51-75%
76-100%
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0%
24%
53%
12%
7%
4%
Zero
1-25%
26-50%
51-75%
76-100%
-10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0%
3%
38%
21%
21%
18%
% of attachment-retained patients you would consider transitioning to something more stable
Based on international PEERS survey May 2015
GermanyNorth America
Null
1-25%
26-50%
51-75%
76-100%
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0%
24%
54%
11%
10%
2%
Zero
1-25%
26-50%
51-75%
76-100%
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0%
15%
53%
12%
18%
3%
% of patients with attachment-retained prostheses who have expressed the desire for something more stable
Based on international PEERS survey May 2015
GermanyNorth America
Anatomical/func-tional (e.g. alveo-lar ridge resorp-
tion)%
Financial%
0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00%
27.71%
61%
Anatomische/funktionale
Gründe (z. B. Resorption des Kieferkamms):
Finanzielle Gründe:
0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00%
35%
56%
% ratio between anatomical vs. financial limitation for not being able to transition to a more stable solution
Based on international PEERS survey May 2015
GermanyNorth America
Patients with fixed solutions – frequency of recall
Based on international PEERS survey May 2015
Zero
One or two
Three or four
Over four
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0%
3%
76%
15%
6%
Zero
One or two
Three or four
Over four
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0%
6%
74%
16%
4%
GermanyNorth America
No
Yes
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0%
56%
44%
Do the screws in a fixed prosthesis need replacement due to “wear and tear”
Based on international PEERS survey May 2015
No
Yes
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0%
86%
14%
GermanyNorth America
% of fixed prostheses that require screw replacement
Based on international PEERS survey May 2015
Zero
1-25%
26-50%
51-75%
76-100%
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0%
14%
50%
21%
7%
7%
Zero
1-25%
26-50%
51-75%
76-100%
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0%
10%
50%
20%
10%
10%
GermanyNorth America
Innerhalb des ersten Jahres
Während des zweiten Jahres
Nach dem zweiten Jahr
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0%
30%
10%
60%
Within the first year
During the second year
After the second year
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0%
8%
15%
77%
Average time after delivery of fixed prostheses that screws start being replaced
Based on international PEERS survey May 2015
GermanyNorth America
Zweimal pro Jahr
Einmal pro Jahr
Einmal alle 2 Jahre
Einmal alle 3 Jahre und seltener
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0%
18%
9%
18%
55%
How often the screws are replaced
Based on international PEERS survey May 2015
Twice a year
Once a year
Once every two years
Once every three+ years
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0%
0%
8%
23%
69%
GermanyNorth America