proceedings aisteel 2017aisteel2017.unimed.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/150-153.pdf · assoc....
TRANSCRIPT
THE ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON TRANSFORMATIVE EDUCATION EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIPnd2 AND
AISTEEL
Supported and Coordinated by:
Post Graduate SchoolState University of Medan North Sumatera, Indonesia
Organized by:
Indexing By
PROCEEDINGS
Ball Room Grand Mercure Hotel, Medan - Indonesia
16-17 October 2017
ISSN: 2548 - 4613ISSN: 2548 - 4613ISSN: 2548 - 4613Vol. 2, December 2017Vol. 2, December 2017Vol. 2, December 2017
Educa�onal Research to Endorse Produc�ve and thInnova�ve Genera�on in the 21 Century
2017
9 772548 461 001
Proceedings of The 2nd Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL)
eISSN: 2548-4613
i
Proceedings of The 2nd Annual International Seminar on Transformative
Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL 2017)
“Educational Research to Endorse Productive and Innovation Generation in The 21th Century”
Grand Mercure Hotel, Medan City, North Sumatera, Indonesia
October 16-17, 2017
Editorial Board
Editorial-in-Chief
Dr. Juniastel Rajagukguk, M.Si (State University of Medan, Unimed)
Deputy Editor
Dr. Saronom Silaban, M.Pd (State University of Medan, Unimed)
International Advisory Board / Scientific Committee
Prof. Dr. Kala Saravanamuthu (University of Newcastle, Australia)
Prof. Arjen EJ Wals (University of Gothenburg, Sweden)
Prof. Dr. Bornok Sinaga, M.Pd (Unimed, Indonesia)
Prof. Dr. Aytekin Isman (Sakarya University, Turkey)
Prof. Peter Charles Taylor, Ph.D., Med., B.Sc., Dip.Ed (Murdoch University, Australia)
Prof. Dr. Mukhlas Samani, Ph.D (Indonesia)
Prof. Dr. Jailani bin Md. Yunos (University Tun Hussein on Malaysia)
Prof. Dr. Nurahimah Mohd. Yusuf (UTM, Malaysia)
Assoc. Prof. Dr Pedro Isaias (University of Queensland, Australia)
Assoc. Prof. Elisabeth Taylor, Ph.D (Murdoch University, Australia)
Dr. Bambang Sumintono, M.Ed (Universiti Malaya, Malaysia)
Dr. Isma Widyaty, M.Pd (UPI, Indonesia)
Prof. Dr. Syahrul R, M.Pd (UNP, Indonesia)
Prof. Amrin Saragih, MA., Ph.D (Unimed, Indonesia)
Assoc. Prof. Ade Gafar Abdullah, M.Si (Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia)
Eng. Asep Bayu Dani Nandiyanto (Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia)
Prof. Dr. Hartono, M.Pd (Universitas Negeri Semarang)
Please cite the proceeding as “Proceeding of the First Annual International Seminar on Transformative
Education and Educational Leadership Vol. 2” with the following abbreviation: Proc. Aist., 2
Proceedings of The 2nd Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL)
eISSN: 2548-4613
ii
Preface
The 2nd Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL with
web link is http://aisteel2017.unimed.ac.id/) was held on October 16 -17, 2017 in Medan City, Indonesia. This
conference was organized by Postgraduate School, State University of Medan (Unimed) and is the routine agenda at
Unimed now. The Second Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership‟
is realized this year with various presenters, researchers, lecturers and students from universties both in and out of
North Sumatera participate in the theme of which is “Educational Research to Endorse Productive and Innovative
Generation in the 21st Century.”
2nd AISTEEL is the annual international seminar with main aim is to discuss of recent research special for
Transformative Education and Education Leadership. Several topics like: Teachers Education Model, Research
Global Issue in Education, Mathematics and Science Education, Social, Languange Education, Vocational
Education, Curriculum, Economic, History and Management Education have been discussed at the 2nd AISTEEL
2017. 2nd AISTEEL international seminar provided experts‟ view on transformative education and educational
leadership as well as curriculum article presentation. There were five keynote speakers have been came Professor
Keiichiro Yoshinaga, Dr. Bambang Sumintono, Dr. Sitti Maesuri Patahuddin, and Dr. Yulia Rahmawaty. The
organizer had been use online submission system to receive all abstract, full paper and also communication with
authors. All of information include with comment of reviewer can be cheked real time by author.
Chairperson
Dr. Rahmad Husein, M.Ed
Proceedings of The 2nd Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL)
eISSN: 2548-4613
iii
Welcoming Speech of Director of Postgraduate School State University of Medan
The Second Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership
(AISTEEL)
The honorable,
- Rector of State University of Medan, Prof. Dr. Syawal Gultom, M.Pd.
- Vice Rectors of UNIMED
- Professor Keiichiro Yoshinaga, PhD, Institute of Liberal Arts and Science, Kanazawa University – Japan
- Dr. Bambang Sumintono, M.Ed., University Malaya – Malaysia
- Dr. Sitti Maesuri Patahuddin, Faculty of Education, Science, Technology and Mathematics, University of
Canberra – Australia
- Yuli Rahmawati, Chemistry Education Program, Universitas Negeri Jakarta
- Deans of Faculties of Education, Languages and Arts, Social Sciences, Natural Sciences and Mathematics,
Engineering, Sports Sciences, and Economics
- Vice Directors of Postgraduate School of UNIMED
- All speakers, lecturers, researchers, students, and participants
Good Morning
Welcome the honorable guests speakers Professor Keiichiro Yoshinaga, Dr. Bambang Sumintono, Dr. Sitti Maesuri
Patahuddin, Assoc. Prof. Emilia Zulmira de FAN, and other speakers, lecturers and students from outside and inside
Unimed to this international seminar which is the routine agenda at Postgraduate program of Unimed now. I‟m glad
that „The Second Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership‟ is
realized this year with various presenters, lecturers and students from universties both in and out of North Sumatera.
and participate in the theme of which is “Educational Research to Endorse Productive and Innovative Generation in
the 21st Century.”
Ladies and Gentlemen,
In this second seminar exels the first one related to the administration by online and the publication index by either
Thomson Reuters or Google Schoolar. By the new policy on student‟s publication, postgraduate program really
matches the system, particularly for the students who will sit in the oral defence examination. Through the seminar,
the postgraduate students improve their article journal writing and it is proved by many articles are submitted by the
students.
The plenary speakers coming from 15 provinces in Indonesia will present topics covering multi disciplines. They
will contribute a lot of inspiring inputs and new knowledge on current trending educational research topics all over
the world. The expectation is that all potential lecturers will share their research findings to educational scientists
and researchers as well for improving their teaching process and quality. Thus, this will contribute to the next young
generation researchers to produce innovative research findings in education and educational leadership contexts.
This second seminar continues the promotion of the first sequel „Developing Future Teachers‟ Education Model.
Therefore, the propose of this second seminar on the transformative education and educational leadership research
will trigger the young professional lecturers and educators to compete in the invention of inovative educational
teaching and learning strategies, techniques and leadership.
I hope that the scientific attitude and skills through research will promote Unimed to be a well-known university
which persists to be developed and excelled in the future.
Thank you the Rector of Unimed who always supports us in organizing the seminar. Thank you all guest and plenary
speakers. Special thanks to both steering and organizing committee who have well-coordinated and colaborated in
actualizing the seminar.
Director of Postgraduate Unimed
Prof. Dr. Bornok Sinaga, M.Pd
Proceedings of The 2nd Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL)
eISSN: 2548-4613
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PP The Effect of Using Collaborative Learning Strategy on The Student’s Achievement in Writing
Descriptive Text ................................................................................................................................................ Nursyah Handayani
1
The Development of Multicultural Based Teaching Materials on the Observation Report Text for
Senior High School Student.............................................................................................................................. Nurhasanah Permata Sari Sembiring, Khairil Ansari, Mutsyuhito Solin
5
The Power Behind Advertisement.................................................................................................................... Endang Larasati
10
The Effect of Using Audio Visual Media on Student’s Vocabulary Mastery .............................................. Resti Citra Dewi
13
Ideational Taxonomic Relation of Hata Pangupa in Tapanuli Selatan Wedding Ceremony..................... Mutia Nasution
17
Pal’s Leadership Style and Teacher’s Performance of Islamic Junior High State School (MTsN)
Hamparan Perak Deliserdang Distric.............................................................................................................. Nurmala, Maria Ulfah Handayani, Denny Khairani, Desi Prawita
21
The Influence of Work Motivation on Teacher’s Job Performance of Vocational High School in
Medan................................................................................................................................................................ Darmawati, Sri Melfayetti, Selamat Triono Ahmad
24
Error Analysis by Using Tenses of Senior High School ................................................................................ Hariyanto
28
The Traditional Custom and Ceremonial Tradition in Suku Anak Dalam Language............................... Putri Ayu Lestari
32
The Impact of Internet Marketing on Success of Women Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises
Innovation as Intervening Variable................................................................................................................. Fivi Rahmatus Sofiyah, Ami Dilham
36
The Effect of Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) Technique on Students
Reading Comprehension .................................................................................................................................. Linda Efrina Nasution
40
Translation Shifts in Translating Didong from Gayonese in to Bahasa Indonesia..................................... Wike Yurida
44
The Effect of Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) Strategy on Student’s Reading
Comprehension.................................................................................................................................................. Khairuni Syafitri
48
The Effect of Organizational Culture on Working Disciplines of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Head Master in
Deliserdang......................................................................................................................................................... Muhammad Rifa’i, Syafaruddin Siahaan, Siman Nurhadi
53
Student’s Achievement on Reading Comprehension in Narrative Text by Using Think Pair Share
Technique (TPS) at SMPN 1 Lubuk Pakam................................................................................................... Eprima Lestari Hutabarat
58
Ideational Taxonomic Relations of Hobar on Parpokatan Orja of South Tapanuli................................... Novria Grahmayanuri
63
The Effect of Using Task Based Learning Method on the Student’s Achievement in Reading
Comprehension.................................................................................................................................................. Nilam Ulami Siregar
69
Relationship of Initiation Structure and Consideration with Effectiveness Leadersship........................... Wanti Simanjuntak, Syaiful Sagala
72
The Effect of Storytelling Method on Students Writing Narrative Text Ability at the Eleventh Grade
Students of MAN Panyabungan....................................................................................................................... Armita Novriana Rambe
77
Proceedings of The 2nd Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL)
eISSN: 2548-4613
v
The Implementation of Curriculum 2013 in Vocational High School 4 Takengon..................................... Zainal Arifin, Herbert C.B. Manalu, Rini Deliana, Fitri Ariyanti
80
The Difference of Mathematical Problem Solving Ability by Using Student Teams Achievement
Division (STAD) and Direct Instruction on System Linear Equation Two Variable in Grade VIII
SMP Negeri 11 Medan....................................................................................................................................... Faradilla Bafaqih, Cecep Nandar
84
The Influence of Problem-Based Learning and Every One is A Teacher Here Models on Higher
Order Thingking Skills in Environmental Pollution Topics.......................................................................... Kurnia Putra, Hasruddin, Ahmad Rafiqi Tantawi
89
The Effect of Appliying Task Based Learning (TBL) Approach on The Student’s Ability in Writing
Descriptive Paragraph....................................................................................................................................... Vijay Khana
94
Teacher’s Language Style in English Course Class........................................................................................ Dyan Yosephin Hutagalung
98
Differences Between Students Mark Taught With Co-Operative Learning Model Type TGT With
Guess The Words Media Compared With Students Mark Taught With Co-Operative Learning
Models With Words Square Media in Hydrocarbon Subject....................................................................... Hariani Siregar, Gulmah Sugiharti
101
Language Used by Male and Female of Darul Ilmi Murni............................................................................ Syukri Hidayati
107
The Use of Journal Writing in Improving Student’s Writing Skill of Recount Text.................................. Muhammad Ilham Adha
110
Teacher and Student Perceptions Toward Practical Implementation Obstacles at Learning Chemistry Sepra Pajar, Ramlan Silaban, Zainuddin Muchtar
114
The Analysis of of the Implementation and Problems of Lab Work on Chemistry Learning................... Elvira Lastri, Iis Siti Jahro, Marham Sitorus
120
The Implementation of Using Library Card and ICT Based Library Service Systemin Increasing
Reading Interest of Primary School Students at Tanjung Gading of Batu Bara Regency ........................ Suci Amalia, Asih Menanti
125
Project Based Learning Tools Development on Alcohol and Ether Materials at Natural Science
Faculty State University of Medan................................................................................................................... Nadia Armina Ramud, Jamalum Purba
132
The Development of Teaching Material to Write Explanation Text Based on Mind Map......................... Pienti Mala Ningsih Manalu, Biner Ambarita, Rosmawaty Harahap
138
Improvement of Student Learning Outcome Using Model of Collaborative Based Lesson Study with
Student’s Worksheet on Materials Hydrolisis................................................................................................ Agus Muliaman, Laila Majnun Hutagaol
141
The Application of Comic Learning Media to Improve Student’s Achievement on Reduction and
Oxidation Reaction Topic................................................................................................................................. Anggi Desviana Siregar, Rini, Herdini
146
The Application of Cooperative Learning Round Robin to Improves Student Learning Achievement
on the Subject of Electrolyte-Nonelectrolyte and Redoxin Class X SMAN 1 Seberida.............................. Nora Santi, Betty Holiwarni, Johni Azmi
150
The Effect of Combination Cooperative Learning Models Toward Learning Result................................ Sapnita Idamarna Daulay
154
The Maintenance of Hokkien Among Chinese Speakers in Stabat............................................................... Widya Ningsih
159
Effect of Blended Learning Model and Learning Style to Civic Education Learning Results in Class
VII in Junior High School Panca Budi Medan............................................................................................... Madina Qudsia Lubis, Reh Bungana Br.Perangin-angin, Mursid
164
EFL Student’s Uses of Um as Fillers in Speaking........................................................................................... Eka Riana
169
Proceedings of The 2nd Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL)
eISSN: 2548-4613
vi
The Influence of Role Playing Method and Self Concept of Social Skills of 5-6 Years Old Child............. Rabitah Hanum Hasibuan, Anita Yus, Yusnadi
172
The Effect of Learning Approach and Personality Type Towards Learning Outcomes............................ Dwhy Dinda Sari, Julaga Situmorang, Busmin Gurning
178
The Effect of Learning Models and Critical Thingking Skills on Social Science Learning Outcomes..... Juriah Siregar, Julaga Situmorang, Baharuddin
183
The Effect of Suggestopedia Method on Student’s Achievement in Vocabulary........................................ Heppy Yersin Digita Purba
188
Application of Active Learning Strategy Type Everyone is A Teacher Here (ETH) to Increase Student
Activity and Leraning Outcomes in Chemistry on Salt Hydrolysis.............................................................. Wilta Fajrina, Darra Utari Ningsih, Sri Adelila Sari, Habibati
193
The Effect of Learning Strategy and Type of Personality on Student’s Achievement in Economic
Science................................................................................................................................................................. Dewi Shara Dalimunthe
198
Development of Learning Tools Based on Realistic Mathematics Education of Ethnomatematics
Nuances to Improve Mathematical Communication Skill Students in Junior High School 2 Percut
Seituan................................................................................................................................................................. Rizqi Jamiah, Edi Syahputra, Kms. M. Amin Fauzi
202
The Impact of Cooperative Learning Strategy and Learning Interest Toward the Learning Result of
Second Year of Senior High School Students in 2016/2017........................................................................... Riswan Sianturi, Abdul Muin Sibuea, Edward Purba
208
The Development of Flash Program as a Media of Chemistry Learning on Chemical Equilibrium........ Lenni Khotimah Harahap, Albinus Silalahi, Iis Siti Jahro
210
The Ethnic Mandailing Tradition of Courtship (Markusip) and Revitalization Efforts in the
Formation of the Character Youth.................................................................................................................. Riadi Syafutra Siregar, Ratih Baiduri, Robert Sibarani
214
The Effect of Education on Unemployment Rate in Indonesia..................................................................... Rahmat Putra Ahmad Hasibuan, Dede Ruslan, Fitrawaty
218
Development of Explanatory Text Materials Based on Problem Solving in Senior High School
Pematangsiantar................................................................................................................................................ Tiarma Nova Intan Malasari, Biner Ambarita, Malan Lubis
222
Learning Model of Strengthening Vocational Life Skills With Enterpreneurship Knowledge to
Improve Student Learning Outcomes.............................................................................................................. Husni Wardi Tanjung
226
A Critical Discourse Analysis Wardah Halal Beauty Advertisements......................................................... Ayu Lestari Siregar, Mei Lastri E.F. Butar-Butar
229
Influence of Creative Problem Solving (CPS) Mathematics Leraning Model to Mathematical Problem
Solving and Self Efficacy Students of SMA Negeri 3 Binjai.......................................................................... Nurcahaya Hutasoit, Martua Manullang, Ani Minarni
232
Differences in Mathematics Problems Solving Students With Implementing Learning Model Think
Pair Square and Group Investigation in Junior High Schools...................................................................... Abdul Halim, Edy Surya
236
The Acquisition of Nouns and Verbs of Mandailingnese by Two-Year-Old Mandailing Children.......... Marwah, Amrin Saragih, Sri Minda Murni
240
Utilization of ICT Learning in Senior High School Teladan Medan............................................................ Tengku Salwa Miranti
244
The Effect of Cooperative Learning Model Based Interactive Media and Interpersonal
Communication on Student’s Achievement.................................................................................................... Catur Ayu Wulandari, Efendi Napitupulu, Keysar Panjaitan
248
Developing of Learning Material Based on Problem Based Learning to Increase Student’s
Mathematical Reasoning Ability and Self-Efficacy in Grade X SMA Negeri 1 Medan.............................. Anggi Paramita Daulay, Dian Armanto, Waminton R
253
Proceedings of The 2nd Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL)
eISSN: 2548-4613
vii
Efforts to in Crease A Motivation to Learning Math Using “Program” Learning Model......................... Linda Sari, Edi Syahputra
257
The Eford of Improving Mathematics Learning Outcome on Quadrilateral and Triangle Matter by
Using Gradually Exsercise Strategy with The Assistance of Image Media.................................................. Ady Putra, KMS. Muhammad Amin Fauzi, Yulita Moliq
261
The Difference on Students’ Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability Between Realistic Approach
with Conventional in The State Madrasah Tsanawiyah 2 of Medan............................................................ Siska Lestari, Zul Amry, Hasratuddin
264
Developing Learning Materials Using Realistic Mathematics Education to Increase Junior High
School Students’ Mathematical Disposition and Connection Ability........................................................... Syu’aida Hazar Nasution, Izwita Dewi, E.Elvis Napitupulu
269
Developing Learning Materials Using Problem Based Learning to Increase Senior High School
Student’s Mathematical Disposition and Representation Ability................................................................. Dewi Khairani, Mulyono, Izwita Dewi
275
The Effect of Question Students Have Strategy on The Result of Students Learning in Mathematics.... Yuliani Aruan, Edi Syahputra
281
Analysis of Academic Supervision Competence and Managerial Supervision in Improving the
Performance of Vocational High School Supervisors in Langsa City.......................................................... Muhammad Hendra, Saut Purba, Mian Siahaan
284
The Use in Active Learning Strategy of Learning Starts with a Question Type in the Mathematics
Learning.............................................................................................................................................................. Jeni Putria Efil, Ani Minami, Pardomuan Sitompul
289
Improving the Ability to Learn Math by Using Rubu’ al-Mujayyab Media................................................. Muhammad Hidayat, Edi Syahputra, E.Elvis Napitupulu
293
The Impact of Education Cost and Government Spending the Interest Rate of Bank Indonesia
Subtitle................................................................................................................................................................ Julika Rahma Siagian, Dede Ruslan, Arwansyah
297
The Implementation of Problem Based Learning Models to Improve Mathematical Problem Solving
Ability of Students on Arithmethic Materials in Class VII Junior High School......................................... Elidar Tanjung, Izwita Dewi, Mulyono
301
The Effect of Learning Strategies to Trial By Jury in Participationt Mathematics Learning Student of
Junior High School............................................................................................................................................ Rizka Putri Rahayu, Ani Minami, Zul Amry
305
The Differences Between The Effect of Realistic Mathematics Learning Approach to Conventional
Learning with The Students Mathematics Learning Outcomes in Junior High School of 38 Medan
Grade VII............................................................................................................................................................ Diah Ari Saputri, Syafari
309
The Effect of Value National Exam Standards at Learning Achievement of Students at Senior High
School.................................................................................................................................................................. Nurdiana Fahmi, Bornok Sinaga, W. Rajagukguk
312
The Effect of Open Unemployment Rate and Level of Vocational High Education to Poverty in North
Sumatera Province............................................................................................................................................. Zulaili, Indra Maipita
315
The Application of Cooperative Learning of Think-Pair-Share (TPS) Type to Increase the Students’
Ability of Problem-Solving................................................................................................................................ Mudriqah Fadhilah Siregar, Zul Amry, Syafari
320
The Relationship Between Metacognitive With the Results of Learning Outcomes on the Fungi Topic.. Elizabeth, Herbert Sipahutar, Syahmi Edi
324
Comparison of DNA Isolation Methods from Economically Valuable Plants in Indonesia....................... Chairiyani Rizka, Fauziyah Harahap, Syahmi Edi
327
Development of Learning Device Based on Realistic Approach to Improve Problem Solving Ability
Mathematic of Student at Junior High School................................................................................................ Susanna Romaria Harahap
333
Proceedings of The 2nd Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL)
eISSN: 2548-4613
viii
Efforts to Improve Understanding and Use Concept of Additive Fractions and Reduction Using
Media Comics on Model Cooperative Learning Type Student Team Achievement Division (STAD)...... Ratu Natalia Perangin-angin, Sahat Siahaan
339
The Effect of Cooperative Learning Type Games Teams Tournament (TGT) of Mathematics
Learning Outcomes in the Fractions Matter................................................................................................... Ansori Hasibuan, Asmin Panjaitan, Asrin Lubis
342
Development of Authentic Mathematics Assessment in Application of Problem Based Learning Model
to Improve Problem Solving Ability and Understanding of Student Mathematics Concept at
Namorambe Secondary Private Middle School Junior High........................................................................ Kartika Sari, Asmin, Bornok Sinaga
347
The Increasing of Student’s Mathematics Problem Solving Ability and Learning Motivation Through
Problem Based Learning Model....................................................................................................................... Ridha Maulida
351
Dialect of Bataknese Language Used by Senior High School Students’....................................................... Rafika Nur Rahman
358
The Effectiveness of Tandur Method of Improving Students’ Learning Ability in Junior High School.. Rahimatul Islam Elmujahidah, Mulyono, H. Banjarnahor
362
The Effect of Reciprocal Teaching Approach to Student Achievement on Ecosystem Topic in Junior
High School......................................................................................................................................................... Nilawati, Nurtika Dewi
365
Improvement of Student Learning Result by Using Cooperative Learning Model of Teams Games
Tournament Type on Algebra Fuction Limit.................................................................................................................. Rismalyah Manalu, E.Elvis Napitupulu, Martua Manullang
367
Noun Phrase of Culture Articles in The Jakarta Post.................................................................................... Misdiana
371
Application of Cooperative Learning Model Type Think Pair Share for Improved Communication...... Nurhasanah
374
Implementation Model of School Policy in Constructing Behavior of Troubled Students......................... Khairtati Purnama Nasution, H. Syaiful Sagala
378
Efforts to Improving Creativity and Mathematics Learning Outcomes of Students With SPLET
Strategy............................................................................................................................................................... Antoni
382
The Influence of Physical Education in Establishment of Self Esteem......................................................... Yustinus Tarigan, Tarsyat Nugraha
386
The Improvement of Dance Art Learning Achievement for Deaf Students Through Total
Communication Application (Gesture/Signal) in Sekolah Luar Biasa (SLB) - E Negeri Pembina
Tingkat Provinsi Sumatera Utara.................................................................................................................... Siti Maryam
390
Innovation of Media Video Compact Disc Instructional Pencak Silat for High School............................. Marli Perangin-angin, Imran Akhmad, Agung Sunarno
393
Achievement Strategy of the Indonesian National Qualification Framework Based Curriculum
Generic Description of Sport Education Postgraduate Program Universitas Negeri Medan.................... Muhammad Supriadi Siregar, Nurhayati Simatupang, Albadi Sinulingga
397
The Effect of Teaching Styles and Motor Ability as The Result of Study Dribbling Football................... Muhammad Fajar Doli Siregar
401
Semantic Analysis of English Loan Words in Indonesian Electronic Paper (Analisa)............................... Putri Nurul Rahmadani Siregar
404
Analysis of Empowerment of Competence Sinergity on Optimization of Education System.................... Rameyanti Tampubolon
408
Inquiry-Based Video Learning Media For Overcoming Student Learning Difficulty (Case Study at
State Junior High School 3 Lubuk Pakam Deliserdang District)................................................................. Megawati
412
Proceedings of The 2nd Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL)
eISSN: 2548-4613
ix
The Develpoment of Mathematics learning Tool Oriented on Problem Based Learning to Enhance
Mathematics Problem Solving Ability and Self Efficacy............................................................................... Solawati Nainggolan, Mulyono, Hasratuddin
416
The Effectiveness of Contextual Inquiry-Based Worksheet on the Matter of Fungi on Food Towards
Students’ Higher-Order Thinking and Science Process Skills of Biology Education................................. Nurjamiah Siregar, Hasruddin, Syahmi Edi
422
The Function of Limits Mastery on Mathematics Learning Achievement in Derivative Subject at the
Eleventh Grade of Madrasah Aliyah Yayasan Pendidikan Karya Setia Padangsidimpuan...................... Hasna Dewi Ritonga
426
Effect of Education Level, Income, Inflation on Community Consumption Pattern in North Sumatera
Province.............................................................................................................................................................. Nelly Hutajulu, Fitrawaty, M.Fitri Rahmadana
431
Application of Problem Based Learning Model Assisted by Cabri Software to Improve Problem
Solving Ability of Mathematics Students.........................................................................................................
Ahmad Darmawan, Edi Syahputra, Kms. M. Amin Fauzi
437
Optimization of Academic Supervision Competence of High School Supervisor in Karo Regency with
Critical Events Model (CEM)........................................................................................................................... Karyawan Keliat, Yasaratodo Wau, Irsan
441
The Concept of Physics Learning Media Based Computer Animation........................................................ Ratna Tanjung, Mukhtar, Efendi Napitupulu
446
Cultivating Children’s Critical Attitude with Educational Philosophy....................................................... Daulat Saragi
451
Proceedings of The 2nd Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL)
eISSN: 2548-4613
150
The Application of Cooperative Learning Round
Robin to Improves Student LearningAchievement on
the Subject of Electrolyte-Nonelectrolyteand
Redoxin Class X SMAN 1 Seberida
Nora Santi
Department of Education Chemistry
State University of Medan
Medan, Indonesia
Corresponding email: [email protected]
Betty Holiwarni
Department of Education Chemistry
University of Riau
Riau, Indonesia
JohniAzmi
Department of Education Chemistry
University of Riau
Riau,Indonesia
Abstract -Research onthe application of cooperative learning
model Round Robin has been conducted to improve student
learning achievement on the topic electrolyte- nonelectrolyte and
redox at class XSMAN 1 Seberida. This research is experimental
research with randomized control group pretest-posttest design.
The sample took in the 10 Maret – 24 April 2013. The sample
consisted of two classes, X3 classas experimental
classandX1classas control class. Experimental class is a class that
is used cooperative learning model Round Robin, while the
control class was not. Data analysis technique used is the t-test.
Based on analysis of data obtained tarithmetic>ttableis 3.43 > 1.67,
means that the cooperative learning model Round Robin can
improve student achievement on the subject of reaction rate in
class X SMAN 1 Seberida where the effect of an increase is 15.96
Keywords: cooperative learning, round robin, learning
achievement, electrolyte- nonelectrolyte and redox
I. INTRODUCTION
Learning is a process by which a person undertakes a
whole new behavioral change as a result of his own
experience in interaction with his environment [6]. The
presence of teachers in the teaching and learning process still
plays an important role [8]. As an educator who is directly
involved in the implementation of learning, teachers should
be able to choose and apply the right way of learning. If the
teacher succeeds in creating an atmosphere that causes
students to be actively motivated in learning, it will allow for
increased learning outcomes. For learning in schools, students
are exposed to a number of subjects, one of them chemistry
subjects.
Chemistry is part of the Natural Science (IPA) that is
taught at the secondary school to college level. Chemistry is
the study of the structure, structure, properties, and changes in
matter and energy that accompany material changes. In
chemistry subjects, students study various topics such as
Electrolyte-Nonelectrolyte and Redox Reaction. This subject
is the subject of memorization, understanding and calculation
so that the necessary way for students to learn actively and
easily understand the material provided by the teacher.
Information obtained from chemistry teacher class X
SMAN 1 Seberida, there are still many students who have
difficulty learning on the subject Electrolyte-nonelectrolyte
and Redox Reaction. This can be seen from the average value
of students on the subject Electrolyte-nonelectrolyte and
Redox Reactions 2012/2013 academic year that has not met
the Minimum Exhaustiveness Criteria (KKM). Teachers
informed that on the learning of chemistry in class X SMAN
1 Seberida academic year 2012/2013, teachers have attempted
some learning method, but in the learning process not all
students are actively involved. If students are given practice
questions and asked to go forward to complete it, students
who often forward only certain students while the other
students just want to wait for answers from friends. The
interaction between teachers and students is dominated by
Proceedings of The 2nd Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL)
eISSN: 2548-4613
151
these students, so not all students can be active in the learning
process [3].
Efforts that can be done to improve student motivation
and activeness One of them is by applying the appropriate
learning model. Learning model is a planning or a pattern
used as a guide in implementing the learning process [9]. The
use of a new learning model can also provide a new
atmosphere during the learning process so that students
become more motivated.
A teacher should seek active students in the learning
process, In order for student learning outcomes are
satisfactory. Teachers are expected to be able to choose how
to teach so that students can activate. Learning model is
expected to improve student activeness one of them is
cooperative learning model Round Robin type.
Cooperative learning is a learning where students study in
small groups collaboratively consist of 4-6 people with
heterogeneous group structure. One of the stages in
cooperative learning is the appreciation given to the group
based on the contribution of the individual student evaluation
value so that each student will have a sense of responsibility
towards the group[5]. While round robin is a model of
cooperative learning that teaches students how to wait their
turn while working in groups. Learning activities designed in
the round robin learning model enable students to be more
active, creative, responsible, cooperative, healthy competition
and learning engagement [1].The round robin steps according
to [1] are as follows:
1).The teacher presents the material to be taught in a broad
outline;
2). Students are grouped in groups of 4-6 students;
3). Students sit around in a circle;
4). The teacher asks a question in the form of a double-
answer piece or a topic that can be used in brainstorming
5). The teacher sets the timer (Timer, stopwatch) according to
the agreed time, for example10 seconds for each student
and 2 minutes for the whole team (depending on the
likelihood of short length of answer, as well as the
difficulty level of the teacher)
6). Students sitting around the table write answers in turns
according to the time provided;
7). The student continues the brainstorming until the time
devoted to the question is exhausted;
8) The teacher together with the student summed up the
overall learning material that had been studied.
II. METHODS
The study was conducted at SMAN 1 Seberida in X class
of semester of the academic year 2012/2013 on March 10 -
April 24, 2013. The population in the study were the students
of class X SMAN 1 Seberidasemester of the academic year
2012/2013 consisting of 4 classes taught by one chemistry
subject teacher. Samples were taken two homogeneous
classes, then determined by experiment class and control class
by drawing, then got class X3 as experiment class and class
X1 as control class.
The study used the Randomized control group pretest-
posttest design. The study design according to [4], can be
seen in table 1.
Table 1. Research design
Class Pretest Treatment Posttest
Experiment T0 X T1
Control T0 - T1
Information:
X :Treatment of the experimental class
T0:The pretest grade of the experiment class and the control
class.
T1: The value of the experimental class posttest and the
control class
Technique of collecting data in research is test technique.
The data collected were obtained from: (1) Pretest, performed
in both classes before learning the subjects of electrolytes-
nonelectrolyte and redox reactions, (2) Posttest, given in both
classes after study of redox reactions. While the data analysis
technique used in the study is t-test. T-test statistics can be
performed based on the criteria of normally distributed data.
Therefore, before the data processing, firstly tested the
normality using Liliefors test. If Lmax price <Ltable, then the
data is normally distributed. Ltabel Price obtained by
formulation[6]:
L =
After the data is normally distributed, then the
homogeneity test is done by testing the variance of both
samples (homogeneous or not) first, by the formula:
F =
The pretest of each sample class is used for hypothesis
testing. Hypothesis in this research is the application of
cooperative learning model type Quick On The Draw can
improve student achievement on redoks subject in class X
SMAN 1 Seberida. Then t-test is done to test the hypothesis,
with the following formula [7]:
t = dengan =
By the criteria of hypothesis testing the research is
accepted if tcount>ttable where ttableobtained from the list of
distribution t with dk = n1 + n2 - 2 with the real level α = 0.05.
the effect of student achievement improvement is shown by
the following formula:
Proceedings of The 2nd Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL)
eISSN: 2548-4613
152
III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A. Results of Data Processing Analysis
The results of data analysis research will be described is
the result of normality test data analysis, the results of
homogeneity test data analysis, the results of hypothesis test
data analysis and the results of improved analysis of learning
achievement
1. Pretest Data
The result of normality test of pretest data can be seen in table
2
table2. Pretest Normality Test Results
Group N
SD Lcount Ltable
Experiment 32 31,88 11,15 0,14 0,156
Control 32 32,75 11,10 0,09 0,156
With n = amount of data in group, = average value of group,
SD = standard deviation and L = statistical symbol to test
normalization
Can be seen in Table 2 that the experimental group
obtained Lmax<Ltabel is 0.14 <0.16 and Lmaxcontrol group
<Ltabel is 0,09<0,156. This shows that both groups are
normally distributed
2. Posttest data
The result of normality test of posttest data can be seen in
Table 3
table 3. Posttest Normality Test Results
Group N
SD Lcount Ltable
Experiment 32 83,13 7,09 0,11 0,156
Control 32 76,25 8,44 0,09 0,156
Can be seen in Table 4.3 that in the experimental group
obtained Lmax<Ltabelis 0.11 <0.156 and Lmax control group
<Ltable is 0,09<0,156. This shows that both groups are
normally distributed.
3. Homogeneity Test
The results of homogeneity test analysis can be seen in table
table4. Homogeneity Test Results
Group N ∑X ∑X2
Ftable Fcount ttable Tcount
Sample 1 32 2425 186275 75,78 1,82 1,10 2,00 0,54
Sample 2 32 2385 180525 74,53
Description: n =number of students receivingtreatment
ΣX= number of posttest and pretest difference
values
x = average value of posttest andpretest
difference
Sg = standard deviation combined
The tcountvalue lies between -ttabeland ttabel(-2.00 < 0.54 <2.00)
thus, it can be concluded that both samples have the same
basic capability (homogeneous). The two homogeneous
classes were then randomly selected as experimental and
control groups, namely class X3 as the experimental group
and class X1 as the control group.
The result data of hypothesis test analysis can be seen in table
5.
table 5. Hypothesis test results
Group N ∑ X ∑X2 Sgab ttable Tcount
Experimen 32 1640 86112 51,25 9,04 1,67 3,43
Control 32 1392 62272 43,5
Description: n = number of students receivingtreatment
ΣX=number of posttest and pretest difference values
x =average value of posttest andpretest difference
Sg = standard deviation combined
The results of the hypothesis test data analysis show that
tcount>ttable (3.43> 1.67). This suggests that "the application of
the Round Robin type of cooperative learning model can
improve student achievement on the subject of Electrolyte-
Nonelectrolyte and Redox Reagents in Grade X SMAN 1
Seberida".
Improvement of student achievement of experimental
class with Round Robin cooperative learning model occurs
because Round Robin cooperative learning model requires
students to be actively involved in learning process, can
reduce student dominance in answer group questions,
encourage students to study harder and more master the
subject matter, because each student is given individual
responsibility in working on the questions given
Giving different questions to each learner in the group,
will spur interest to find out the problems done by friends
next to him. For example, at the third meeting students learn
about oxidation-reducing reactions, learners B gets about the
determination of oxidizing and reducing agents in redox
reactions, learners C gets about the determination of the
oxidation and the reduction results in the reaction redox and
learners D get questions about determination of
disproportionation and konproporsionasi reactions. The
difference of questions given will arise the interest of each
learner A, B, C and D to find out what is done by the friend
next to them. The time given to work on a problem is
approximately 5 minutes (depending on the length of the
answer). If the 5 minute time has been exhausted, the
question that has been answered will be rotated clockwise so
that each learner will receive a new problem. In the example
above, after the rotation of the questions A learners will
receive the questions from learners D, learners B receives
questions from learners A and so on until all the questions are
finished rotating. If a learner spends time to answer the
question in less than 5 minutes, then he will still wait until the
5 minute time runs out because the matter will rotate every 5
Proceedings of The 2nd Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL)
eISSN: 2548-4613
153
minutes. Rotation or rotation of questions will make learners
try their best to prepare for new problems, because the new
problem will be different from the previous problem.
The existence of rotation problems in the model of
cooperative learning type Round Robin will make all learners
involved actively in the learning process. Involvement of all
learners in solving the problems given will provide equal
opportunities for all learners to be able to issue their ideas /
opinions so as to avoid the dominance of smart students in the
learning process. The existence of time constraints in the
work of each question will make the learner to be more
serious in doing the problem because next every problem will
be done so that no chance of the students to play games in
solving the given problem.
The results showed that the experiment class students
were more active than the control class students. This can be
seen from the activities of learners during the learning process
on the assessment sheet attitude and skills of learners and
skills of learners in the practicum. Activity learners can be
seen from the involvement of all learners in the learning
process because with the rotation of the problem in the model
of cooperative learning type Round Robin every learner
involved to contribute his opinion. Then learners who ask and
answer questions in the experiment class more than the
control class because cooperative learning type Round Robin
requires learners to do the repetition in thinking so that
learners can answer the questions posed.
Round Robin learning model, Every problem done
individually by each learner will help learners to be able to
build their own knowledge because the answers come from
each individual learners so that will spur his thinking power.
[6] that when learners become active participants in the
learning process, then he will have the knowledge obtained
well.Knowledge sought and built by these learners will last
longer in the commemoration of learners, in this way can be
known to what extent learners understand the lesson given.
Although the Round Robin learning model contributes in
improving the achievement of learners, but in the
implementation there are some obstacles encountered, one of
them Limited time in the implementation of research because
at the time of answering the problem individually, there are
still learners who request additional time so that the rotation
is not smoothly because they have to wait for learners who
spend more time than specified. This is overcome by giving
emphasis and affirmation to the learners that the time
provided to answer the problem is limited so it is expected
that all learners can take advantage of the time given as
possible. Another constraint is also in one group feel
unsuitable because the division of the group is determined by
the teacher, so when the group of students become noisy, to
overcome the teacher explained that each group is formed
heterogeneously so that students can learn to adapt to the
group and also explained that will be awarded the group,
where each member of the group is responsible and should be
mutually cooperative in their respective group.
IV. CONCLUSION
The application of cooperative learning model of Round
Robin type can improve student's learning achievement on the
subject of Electrolyte-Nonelectrolyte and Redox Reaction in
class X SMA Negeri 1 Seberida with tcount>ttable is 3.43> 1.67.
The influence of students' learning achievement in the
experimental group is 15.96%.
REFERENCES
[1] Hariyanto, and Warsono, 2012, Active Learning. PT
RemajaRosdakarya, Bandung
[2] Irianto, Agus.2003. Statistics Basic Concepts and Applications.
Kencana. Jakarta
[3] M. Dimyati. 2006. Learning and Learning. RinekaCipta, Jakarta
[4] MNazir, 2003, Research Methods, Indonesian ghalia, Jakarta.
[5] R.E Slavin,. 2005. Cooperative Learning Teori, Riset,
danPraktik.Nusamedia. Bandung
[6] Slameto. 2010. Learning and Factors Affecting it. RinekaCipta:
Jakarta
[7] Sudjana, 2005, Statistical Method, Tarsito, Bandung
[8] Sudjana, 2010, Basics of Teaching and Learning Process,
Algensindo new light Bandung.
[9] Trianto. 2007. Designing Innovative Progressive Innovative
Models: Concepts, Platforms and Implementation on Education
Unit Level Curriculum.Kencana. Jakarta.