procedure to write a bibliometrics paper

7/24/2019 Procedure to write a Bibliometrics paper

1/48

Procedure to write aBibliometrics paper

[email protected]

@aleebrahim

www.researcherid.com/rid/C-2414-2009

http://scholar.google.com/citations

Nader Ale Ebrahim, PhDVisiting Research FellowResearch Support Unit

Centre for Research Services

Research Management & Innovation Complex

University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

1stMarch 2016
http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=XiIuF7YAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=srahttp://scholar.google.com/citations?user=XiIuF7YAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=srahttp://aleebrahim.com/https://twitter.com/aleebrahim


2/48

Procedure to write a Bibliometricspaper

Part 1: Keywords search & Data extraction

Nader Ale Ebrahim, PhD=====================================

Research Support Unit



University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysiawww.researcherid.com/rid/C-2414-2009


Read more: Ale Ebrahim, N., Salehi, H., Embi, M. A., Habibi Tanha, F., Gholizadeh, H., Motahar, S. M., & Ordi, A. (2013). Effective

Strategies for Increasing Citation Frequency. International Education Studies, 6(11), 93-99. doi: 10.5539/ies.v6n11p93

Available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3032332

& https://figshare.com/authors/Nader_Ale_Ebrahim/100797
http://www.researcherid.com/rid/C-2414-2009http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=XiIuF7YAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=srahttp://ssrn.com/abstract=2344585http://ssrn.com/abstract=2344585http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3032332https://figshare.com/authors/Nader_Ale_Ebrahim/100797https://figshare.com/authors/Nader_Ale_Ebrahim/100797https://figshare.com/authors/Nader_Ale_Ebrahim/100797http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3032332http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3032332http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3032332http://ssrn.com/abstract=2344585http://ssrn.com/abstract=2344585http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=XiIuF7YAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=srahttp://scholar.google.com/citations?user=XiIuF7YAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=srahttp://www.researcherid.com/rid/C-2414-2009http://www.researcherid.com/rid/C-2414-2009http://www.researcherid.com/rid/C-2414-2009http://www.researcherid.com/rid/C-2414-2009http://www.researcherid.com/rid/C-2414-2009


3/48

Abstract

Abstract: Bibliometrics can be defined as the statistical

analysis of publications. Bibliometrics has focused on the

quantitative analysis of citations and citation counts which is

complex. It is so complex and specialized that personal

knowledge and experience are insufficient for understandingtrends and then making decisions. We need tools for analysis

of bibliometrics information to recognize the research trends

and evaluate scientific/institution/countrys research

productivity. This presentation will provide procedure to write

a Bibliometrics paper.

Keywords: H-index, Improve citations, Research tools,

Bibliometrics, Research Visibility, Research Impact2016-2017 Nader Ale Ebrahim


4/48

Outline

2016-2017 Nader Ale Ebrahim

No. Topic

Day 1:

1 Terminology

2 Major Citation Databases

3 H-index and g-index

4 Keywords search

5 Retrieve data

6 Q&A


5/48

Introduction of bibliometrics

Bibliometrics can be defined as the quantitative analysisof science and technology performance and thecognitive and organizational structure of science andtechnology.

Basic for these analyses is the scientific communicationbetween scientists through (mainly) journal publications.

Key concepts in bibliometrics are outputand impact, asmeasured through publications and citations.

Important starting point in bibliometrics: scientists

express, through citations in their scientific publications,a certain degree of influence of others on their own work.

By large scale quantification, citations indicate influenceor (inter)national visibility of scientific activity, butshould not be interpreted as synonym for quality.


Source: Thed van Leeuwen, (2010)Application of bibliometric analysis: Advantages & pitfalls,Workshop on Research Evaluation in Statistical

Sciences , Bologna, 25thMarch 2010
http://www.slideshare.net/roger961/advantages-and-drawbacks-of-bibliometricshttp://www.slideshare.net/roger961/advantages-and-drawbacks-of-bibliometrics


6/48

Altmetrics

Webometrics

Cybermetrics

Bibliometri

cs

Scientometrics

Informetrics

Science of

Science

Bibliographies

largely

references

Alternativemetricsviews,

downloads, web

citations, etc

Web presence,

visibility and

impactlinks,pages,

documents

Whole Internet,

cyberspace

Informetrics, scientometrics, bibliometrics,

webometrics, cybermetrics and altmetrics

Source: Onyancha, Omwoyo Bosire. "Can informetrics shape biomedical research? A case study of the HIV/AIDS research in sub-Saharan Africa ."

Inkanyiso: Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences6.1 (2014): 49-65.2016-2017 Nader Ale Ebrahim


7/48

Frequently Used Terms for Research

Evaluation Metrics


Source: Das, A.-K. (2015). Research Evaluation Metrics. 7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP, France: United Nations Educational, Scientific and

Cultural Organization.
http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002322/232210E.pdfhttp://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002322/232210E.pdf


8/48

Reasons for bibliometric studies

Understanding ofpatterns

discovery of regularities, behavior

order out of documentary chaos [Bradford, 1948]

Analysis of structures & dynamics discovery of connections, relations, networks

search for regularities - possible predictions

Discovery of impacts, effects relation between entities & amounts of their various uses

providing support for making of decisions, policies


Source: https://comminfo.rutgers.edu/~tefko/Courses/e530/Lectures/Lecture09%20Bibliometric%20searching.ppt
https://comminfo.rutgers.edu/~tefko/Courses/e530/Lectures/Lecture09%20Bibliometric%20searching.ppthttps://comminfo.rutgers.edu/~tefko/Courses/e530/Lectures/Lecture09%20Bibliometric%20searching.ppthttps://comminfo.rutgers.edu/~tefko/Courses/e530/Lectures/Lecture09%20Bibliometric%20searching.ppt


9/48

Use of evaluative bibliometrics

Academic, research & government institutions for: promotion and tenure, hiring, salary raising

decisions for support of departments, disciplines

grants decision; research policy making visualization of scholarly networks, identifying key contributions

& contributors

monitoring scholarly developments

determining journal citation impact

Resource allocation: identifying authors most worthy of support;

research areas most worthy of funding

journals most worthy of support or purchase; etc.


Source: https://comminfo.rutgers.edu/~tefko/Courses/e530/Lectures/Lecture09%20Bibliometric%20searching.ppt
https://comminfo.rutgers.edu/~tefko/Courses/e530/Lectures/Lecture09%20Bibliometric%20searching.ppthttps://comminfo.rutgers.edu/~tefko/Courses/e530/Lectures/Lecture09%20Bibliometric%20searching.ppthttps://comminfo.rutgers.edu/~tefko/Courses/e530/Lectures/Lecture09%20Bibliometric%20searching.ppt


10/48

Applications of Scientometrics and

Bibliometrics in Research Evaluation




For Institution/ Collaborative Research

Group

For a scientist: Mapping of collaborations, collaborating institutions, collaborating countries,

co-authors, highly cited papers, top publishing journals, percentage of cited vs.

uncited papers, percentage of self-citations, author-level indicators such as h-

index, i10-index, etc.

For a country

For a journal


11/48

Major Citation Databases





12/48

The Institute for Scientific Information (ISI)

The Institute for Scientific Information(ISI) was founded by Eugene

Garfieldin 1960. It was acquired by Thomson Scientific & Healthcarein

1992, became known as Thomson ISIand now is part of the Healthcare &

Science business of the multi-billion dollar Thomson Reuters Corporation.

ISI offered bibliographic databaseservices. Its speciality: citation indexing

and analysis, a field pioneered by Garfield. It maintains citation databases

covering thousands of academic journals, including a continuation of its long

time print-based indexing service the Science Citation Index(SCI), as well

as the Social Sciences Citation Index(SSCI), and theArts and Humanities

Citation Index(AHCI). All of these are available via ISI's Web of Knowledge

database service.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_Garfieldhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_Garfieldhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomson_Scientific_&_Healthcarehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomson_Reutershttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bibliographic_databasehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citation_indexhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_journalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_Citation_Indexhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Sciences_Citation_Indexhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arts_and_Humanities_Citation_Indexhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arts_and_Humanities_Citation_Indexhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_of_Knowledgehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_of_Knowledgehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arts_and_Humanities_Citation_Indexhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arts_and_Humanities_Citation_Indexhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Sciences_Citation_Indexhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_Citation_Indexhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_journalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citation_indexhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bibliographic_databasehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomson_Reutershttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomson_Scientific_&_Healthcarehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_Garfieldhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_Garfield


13/48

Science Citation

Index

Arts &Humanities

Citation Index

WOK 4.0Social

Sciences

Citation

Index

ISI Web of

Knowledge

1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2007 2008SciSearch

Century of

Science TS InnovationEssential

Science

IndicatorsPC-based Indicators

for journals, nations,

institutions

PC-based citation sets

Custom citation projects

and national indicators -

mainframe

Thomson Reuters (formerly ISI) has been the

authority on citation data for over 50 years.



14/48

Eugene Garfield, Ph.D.


Founder & Chairman Emeritus

Institute for Scientific Information (ISI)

For more Info
http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/


15/48

The Institute for Scientific Information (ISI)

The ISI also publishes annual Journal Citation Reportswhich list an impact

factorfor each of the journals that it tracks. Within the scientific community,

journal impact factors play a large but controversial role in determining the

kudos attached to a scientist's published research record.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journal_Citation_Reportshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impact_factorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impact_factorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impact_factorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impact_factorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journal_Citation_Reports


16/48

Scopus(Launched 2004)

Scopus is the largest abstract and citation database of

peer-reviewed literature: scientific journals, books and

conference proceedings. Delivering a comprehensive

overview of the world's research output in the fields of

science, technology, medicine, social sciences, and artsand humanities, Scopus features smart tools to track,

analyze and visualize research.

As research becomes increasingly global,

interdisciplinary and collaborative, you can make surethat critical research from around the world is not missed

when you choose Scopus.


Source: http://www.elsevier.com/online-tools/scopus
http://www.elsevier.com/online-tools/scopushttp://www.elsevier.com/online-tools/scopushttp://www.elsevier.com/online-tools/scopushttp://www.elsevier.com/online-tools/scopus


17/48

A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature

Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases


Source: Aghaei Chadegani, Arezoo and Salehi, Hadi and Yunus, Melor Md and Farhadi, Hadi and Fooladi, Masood and Farhadi, Maryam and Ale Ebrahim,

Nader, A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases (April 7, 2013). Asian Social Science, Vol.9, No. 5, pp. 18-26, April 27, 2013. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2257540
http://ssrn.com/abstract=2257540http://ssrn.com/abstract=2257540http://ssrn.com/abstract=2257540http://ssrn.com/abstract=2257540http://ssrn.com/abstract=2257540http://ssrn.com/abstract=2257540http://ssrn.com/abstract=2257540http://ssrn.com/abstract=2257540


18/48

Author Level Indicators





19/48

H and g-index


20/48

H-index Example


Scholar A Scholar B

10 27

10 12

9 5

8 47 4

6 2

6 2

56 citations 56 citations

6 h-index 4 h-index

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

NumberofCitations

Article Number

H-index

Scholar A

Scholar B

Source: http://www.slideshare.net/librarian68/overview-of-citation-metrics

Jorge E. Hirsch
http://www.slideshare.net/librarian68/overview-of-citation-metricshttp://www.slideshare.net/librarian68/overview-of-citation-metricshttp://www.slideshare.net/librarian68/overview-of-citation-metricshttp://www.slideshare.net/librarian68/overview-of-citation-metricshttp://www.slideshare.net/librarian68/overview-of-citation-metricshttp://www.slideshare.net/librarian68/overview-of-citation-metricshttp://www.slideshare.net/librarian68/overview-of-citation-metricshttp://www.slideshare.net/librarian68/overview-of-citation-metricshttp://www.slideshare.net/librarian68/overview-of-citation-metricshttp://www.slideshare.net/librarian68/overview-of-citation-metricshttp://proj.ncku.edu.tw/research/commentary/e/20080815/images/0808110317430yfDpK.jpg


21/48

A new phenomenonNumbers of published papers on the h-index

6

19

31

63

115

145

173

224

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Papers

Source: Scopus July 2013

Source: Rowlands, I. (2013). Theh-index. Friend or Foe?

2nd Bibliometrics in Libraries Meeting: The Open

University.

https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php?name=the-h-index-friend-or-foe-ian-rowlands-research-services-manager-and-bibliometrician-university-of-leicester.pptx&site=269https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php?name=the-h-index-friend-or-foe-ian-rowlands-research-services-manager-and-bibliometrician-university-of-leicester.pptx&site=269https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php?name=the-h-index-friend-or-foe-ian-rowlands-research-services-manager-and-bibliometrician-university-of-leicester.pptx&site=269https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php?name=the-h-index-friend-or-foe-ian-rowlands-research-services-manager-and-bibliometrician-university-of-leicester.pptx&site=269https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php?name=the-h-index-friend-or-foe-ian-rowlands-research-services-manager-and-bibliometrician-university-of-leicester.pptx&site=269


22/48

Source: http://guides.is.uwa.edu.au/content.php?pid=372347&sid=3050052

A scientist has index h if h of his/her Np papers have at least

h citations each, and the other (Np-h) papers have no more than

h citations each.

http://guides.is.uwa.edu.au/content.php?pid=372347&sid=3050052http://guides.is.uwa.edu.au/content.php?pid=372347&sid=3050052http://guides.is.uwa.edu.au/content.php?pid=372347&sid=3050052


23/48

h-index importance

Hirsch, who has a h-index of 49, says that a

"successful scientist" will have an index of 20

after 20 years; an "outstanding scientist" will

have an index of 40 after 20 years; and a "trulyunique individual" will have an index of 60 after

20 years.

Source: Ball, P. (2005). Index aims for fair ranking of scientists. Nature 436(7053), 900-

900.

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v436/n7053/full/436900a.htmlhttp://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v436/n7053/full/436900a.html


24/48


Source: Rousseau, Ronald. "New developments related to the Hirsch index." (2006).
http://eprints.rclis.org/7616/1/Hirsch_new_developments.pdfhttp://eprints.rclis.org/7616/1/Hirsch_new_developments.pdfhttp://eprints.rclis.org/7616/1/Hirsch_new_developments.pdf


25/48

How good is this? What is the

context?

Additional metrics are needed to

understand research performance.

23.3 cites/paper

H-index: 13

Citation rates vary among fields. What is good or average in

mathematics is very different from what is good or average in

biochemistry.

14.5 cites/paper

H-index: 7 9.8 cites/paper

H-index: 7 4.2 cites/paperH-index: 3


Normalized citation metrics put citation

information in context

Source: Ann Kushmerick (May 3, 2013), Bibliometric Analysis Tools for

Research Portfolio Analysis and Management, Manager, Research Evaluation

and Bibliometric Data
http://nihlibrary.nih.gov/AboutUs/Announcements/Documents/NIH%20Thomson%20Reuters%20May%203rd%202013.pptxhttp://nihlibrary.nih.gov/AboutUs/Announcements/Documents/NIH%20Thomson%20Reuters%20May%203rd%202013.pptxhttp://nihlibrary.nih.gov/AboutUs/Announcements/Documents/NIH%20Thomson%20Reuters%20May%203rd%202013.pptxhttp://nihlibrary.nih.gov/AboutUs/Announcements/Documents/NIH%20Thomson%20Reuters%20May%203rd%202013.pptx


26/48

All three publication lists have a Hirsch Index of 5


30 P1

10 P2

8 P3

6 P45 P5

1 P6

0 P7

30 P1

10 P2

8 P3

6 P45 P5

4 P6

4 P7

4 P84 P9

100 P1

70 P2

8 P3

6 P45 P5

1 P6

0 P7

H=? H=? H=?5 5 5

1

2

3

45

6

7

89

Author 2Author 1 Author 3

Source: Henk F. Moed, (2011) New developments in electronic publishing and bibliometrics, CWTS, Leiden University, Netherlands & Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands
https://www.lumc.nl/sub/2009/att/100602053349221.ppthttps://www.lumc.nl/sub/2009/att/100602053349221.ppt


27/48

Different bibliometric

distributionshave the same H-Index

Source: Henk F. Moed, (2011) New developments in electronic publishing and bibliometrics, CWTS, Leiden University, Netherlands &

Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands
https://www.lumc.nl/sub/2009/att/100602053349221.ppthttps://www.lumc.nl/sub/2009/att/100602053349221.ppt


28/48

Keywords search


29/48

Research Tools Mind Map

http://www.mindmeister.com/39583892/research-tools-by-nader-ale-ebrahimhttp://www.mindmeister.com/39583892/research-tools-by-nader-ale-ebrahim


30/48

Example of Keywords selection

http://goo.gl/forms/7K6VCv0rI7https://docs.google.com/forms/d/12hhCoikEI51Khv4zWlRmKIdRf2axUyUqL8lVwhqPOIw/viewform?c=0&w=1http://goo.gl/forms/7K6VCv0rI7


31/48

Selecting keywords

http://apps.webofknowledge.com/WOS_GeneralSearch_input.do?highlighted_tab=WOS&product=WOS&last_prod=WOS&SID=S2U4kYgBRDd9ieGvej8&search_mode=GeneralSearch


32/48

Science Citation

Index

Arts &Humanities

Citation Index

WOK 4.0SocialSciences

Citation

Index

ISI Web of

Knowledge

1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2007 2008

SciSearch

Century of

Science TS InnovationEssential

Science

IndicatorsPC-based Indicators

for journals, nations,

institutions

PC-based citation sets

Custom citation projects

and national indicators -

mainframe

2016-2017 Nader AleEbrahim

Thomson Reuters (formerly ISI) has been the

authority on citation data for over 50 years.


33/48

Keywords Plus

KeyWords Plusare index terms created

by Thomson Reuters from significant,

frequently occurring words in the titles of

an article's cited references.

Source: http://images.webofknowledge.com/WOK46/help/WOS/h_fullrec.html

http://images.webofknowledge.com/WOK46/help/WOS/h_fullrec.htmlhttp://images.webofknowledge.com/WOK46/help/WOS/h_fullrec.html


34/48

Keywords and Keywords Plus

Authors sometimes provide a list of keywords or terms that they feel best

represent the content of their paper. These keywords are contained in the ISI

record (1991 data forward, depending on the database) for each article and are

searchable. In addition, ISI generates KeyWords Plus for many articles.

KeyWords Plusare words or phrases that frequently appear in the titles of an

article's references, but do not necessarily appear in the title of the article itself.

KeyWords Plus may be present for articles that have no author keywords, or

may include important terms not listed among the title, abstract, or authorkeywords.

Source: http://wos.isitrial.com/help/helpdefs.html

http://wos.isitrial.com/help/helptoc.htmlhttp://wos.isitrial.com/help/helpdefs.htmlhttp://wos.isitrial.com/help/helpdefs.htmlhttp://wos.isitrial.com/help/helptoc.html


35/48

KeyWords Plus- Example

New Product Development in Virtual

Environment (ISI Indexed)

Author Keywords: New product Development;

Virtual teams; Concurrent Collaboration; Reviewpaper

KeyWords Plus: DEVELOPMENT TEAMS;

PERFORMANCE; TECHNOLOGY;

KNOWLEDGE; COMMUNICATION;

PERSPECTIVE; INTEGRATION; INNOVATION;

NETWORK; WORKING



36/48



37/48



38/48

Key Words Selection



39/48

Key Words Selection


Source: Ponce, F. A., & Lozano, A. M. (2014). Highly cited works in neurosurgery. Part II: the citation classics A review

(vol 112, pg 233, 2010). Journal Of Neurosurgery 120(5), 1252-1257. doi: 10.3171/2014.2.JNS14358a
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20078193http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20078193http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20078193http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20078193http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20078193http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20078193http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20078193http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20078193http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20078193http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20078193http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20078193http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20078193http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20078193http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20078193


40/48

100 top-cited scientific papers in limb

prosthetics

http://biomedical-engineering-online.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1475-925X-12-119http://biomedical-engineering-online.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1475-925X-12-119http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_7/Link/Eshraghi-2013-100%20top-cited%20scient.pdfhttp://biomedical-engineering-online.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1475-925X-12-119http://biomedical-engineering-online.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1475-925X-12-119http://biomedical-engineering-online.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1475-925X-12-119http://biomedical-engineering-online.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1475-925X-12-119


41/48

100 top-cited scientific papers in

limb prosthetics

http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_7/Link/Eshraghi-2013-100%20top-cited%20scient.pdf


42/48

Global scientific production on GIS research

by bibliometric analysis from 1997 to 2006

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157707000715http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157707000715http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_7/Link/sample%20for%20keywords.pdfhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157707000715http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157707000715http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157707000715http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157707000715http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157707000715


43/48

Global stem cell research trend: Bibliometric analysis

as a tool for mapping of trends from 1991 to 2006

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-008-1939-5#/closehttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-008-1939-5#/closehttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_7/Link/Scientometrics80,%2039.pdfhttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-008-1939-5#/closehttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-008-1939-5#/closehttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-008-1939-5#/closehttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-008-1939-5#/closehttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-008-1939-5#/closehttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-008-1939-5#/close


44/48

Global stem cell research trend: Bibliometric analysis

as a tool for mapping of trends from 1991 to 2006


100 f
http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_7/Link/Scientometrics80,%2039.pdf


45/48

100 top-cited scientific papers in

limb prosthetics

http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_7/Link/Eshraghi-2013-100%20top-cited%20scient.pdf


46/48

My recent publications


RESEARCH SUPPORT UNIT (RSU)
http://www.cwejournal.org/vol10no2/100-most-cited-articles-in-urban-green-and-open-spaces-a-bibliometric-analysis/http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/japa.2015-0188http://aleebrahim.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Qualitative-and-Quantitative.pdfhttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-015-1730-3http://www.cwejournal.org/vol10no2/100-most-cited-articles-in-urban-green-and-open-spaces-a-bibliometric-analysis/http://www.journaliji.org/index.php/iji/article/view/43/pdf_19


47/48

Questions?

E-mail: [email protected]

Twitter: @aleebrahim



Nader Ale Ebrahim, PhD=====================================

Research Support Unit



University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia



CENTRE FOR RESEARCH SERVICES

RESEARCH MANAGEMENT & INNOVATION COMPLEX (IPPP)

UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA

http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=XiIuF7YAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=srahttp://www.researcherid.com/rid/C-2414-2009http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=XiIuF7YAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=srahttp://scholar.google.com/citations?user=XiIuF7YAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=srahttp://scholar.google.com/citations?user=XiIuF7YAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=srahttp://www.researcherid.com/rid/C-2414-2009http://www.researcherid.com/rid/C-2414-2009http://www.researcherid.com/rid/C-2414-2009http://www.researcherid.com/rid/C-2414-2009http://www.researcherid.com/rid/C-2414-2009http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=XiIuF7YAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=srahttps://twitter.com/aleebrahim


48/48

References

1. Ball, P. (2005). Index aims for fair ranking of scientists. Nature 436(7053), 900-900.

2. Thed van Leeuwen, (2010)Application of bibliometric analysis: Advantages & pitfalls,Workshop on Research Evaluation in Statistical Sciences , Bologna,

25thMarch 2010

3. Ebrahim, N.A., et al. (2013). Effective strategies for increasing citation frequency. International Education Studies, 6(11), 93-

99. doi:10.5539/ies.v6n11p93

4. Aghaei Chadegani, Arezoo and Salehi, Hadi and Yunus, Melor Md and Farhadi, Hadi and Fooladi, Masood and Farhadi, Maryam and Ale Ebrahim, Nader,

A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases (April 7, 2013). Asian Social Science, Vol. 9,

No. 5, pp. 18-26, April 27, 2013. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2257540

5. Onyancha, Omwoyo Bosire. "Can informetrics shape biomedical research? A case study of the HIV/AIDS research in sub-Saharan Africa ." Inkanyiso:

Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences6.1 (2014): 49-65.

6. Das, A.-K. (2015). Research Evaluation Metrics. 7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP, France: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural

Organization.

7. Mller, A. M., Ansari, P., Ale Ebrahim, N., & Khoo, S. (2015). Physical Activity and Aging Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. Journal Of Aging And PhysicalActivity In Press. doi:10.1123/japa.2015-0188

8. Ale Ebrahim, N. (2015). Virtual R&D Teams: A New Model for Product Development. International Journal of Innovation, 3(2), 1-27. :

http://dx.doi.org/10.5585/iji.v3i2.43

9. Rakhshandehroo, M., Yusof, M. J. M., Ale Ebrahim, N., Sharghi, A., & Arabi, R. (2015). 100 Most Cited Articles in Urban Green and Open Spaces: A

Bibliometric Analysis. Current World Environment, 10(2), 1-16. doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.1509863 http://ssrn.com/abstract=2643922

10. Maghami, M., Navabi Asl, S., Rezadad, M. i., Ale Ebrahim, N., & Gomes, C. (2015). Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Solar hydrogen Generation

Literature From 2001 to 2014. Scientometrics 105(2), 759-771. : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1730-3

11. Eshraghi, A., Osman, N. A. A., Gholizadeh, H., Ali, S., & Shadgan, B. (2013). 100 top-cited scientific papers in limb prosthetics. Biomedical engineering

online, 12(1), 119.12. Tian, Y., Wen, C., & Hong, S. (2008). Global scientific production on GIS research by bibliometric analysis from 1997 to 2006. Journal of Informetrics, 2(1),

65-74.

13. Li, L. L., Ding, G., Feng, N., Wang, M. H., & Ho, Y. S. (2009). Global stem cell research trend: Bibliometric analysis as a tool for mapping of trends from

1991 to 2006. Scientometrics, 80(1), 39-58.

14. Ale Ebrahim, N. (2016). Research Tools: Literature Search and Scientific Source Comparison. Retrieved from Computer Room, Level 4, Institute of

Graduate Studies, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.2070115

15. Ale Ebrahim, N. (2016). Journal selection procedure: Select the best journal to ensure the highest citation. Retrieved from Research Support Unit, Centre

for Research Services, Institute of Research Management and Monitoring (IPPP), University of Malaya:

https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.2067492.v1

16. Ale Ebrahim, N. (2015).Analysis of Bibliometrics information for select the best field of study. Retrieved from Research Support Unit, Centre for Research
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v436/n7053/full/436900a.htmlhttp://www.slideshare.net/roger961/advantages-and-drawbacks-of-bibliometricshttp://ssrn.com/abstract=2344585http://ssrn.com/abstract=2344585http://ssrn.com/abstract=2257540http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002322/232210E.pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1123/japa.2015-0188http://dx.doi.org/10.5585/iji.v3i2.43http://ssrn.com/abstract=2643922http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1730-3http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.2070115https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.2067492.v1https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.2067492.v1https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.2067492.v1http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.2070115http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.2070115http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1730-3http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1730-3http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1730-3http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1730-3http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1730-3http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1730-3http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1730-3http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1730-3http://ssrn.com/abstract=2643922http://ssrn.com/abstract=2643922http://dx.doi.org/10.5585/iji.v3i2.43http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/japa.2015-0188http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/japa.2015-0188http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/japa.2015-0188http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002322/232210E.pdfhttp://ssrn.com/abstract=2257540http://ssrn.com/abstract=2344585http://ssrn.com/abstract=2344585http://ssrn.com/abstract=2344585http://ssrn.com/abstract=2344585http://ssrn.com/abstract=2344585http://ssrn.com/abstract=2344585http://ssrn.com/abstract=2344585http://www.slideshare.net/roger961/advantages-and-drawbacks-of-bibliometricshttp://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v436/n7053/full/436900a.html