print and internet catalog shopping: assessing attitudes and intentions
TRANSCRIPT
Print and Internetcatalog shopping:assessing attitudes andintentions
Leo R. Vijayasarathy and
Joseph M. Jones
Introduction
The recent proliferation of Internet catalog sites
(e.g., landsend.com, llbean.com) has helped to
make electronic commerce and online catalog
shopping an important direct marketing topic.
However, the area is relatively new and it is not
surprising that previous studies on in-home
consumer catalog shopping have almost
exclusively dealt with traditional print catalogs.
Lohse and Spiller (1998) and others (e.g., Alba
et al., 1997; Keeney, 1999; Liang and Huang,
1998) suggested that traditional print catalogers
would continue to add Internet catalogs to save
paper and postage costs, and to provide
consumers with extensive product information
and timesaving conveniences. Further, Kotler
(2000) and Muldoon (1996) predicted that
Internet catalog shopping will become more
popular than print catalog shopping because
consumers will enjoy quicker access to useful
information about products worldwide, make
more price comparisons of competing products
and find more unusual products. Yet, despite
the potential and importance of catalog
shopping via the Internet, many researchers
consider the Internet's effects on consumer
behavior to be unpredictable, and that
additional research is needed to understand the
specific needs and expectations of Internet
shoppers (Donthu and Garcia, 1999; Palmer
and Griffith, 1998).
According to Spiller and Lohse (1997-1998)
the most obvious source for help in designing
Internet catalog sites and assessing its impact is
the literature on the design and evaluation of
print catalogs. These researchers point out
important similarities and differences between
print and Internet catalog shopping. In both
cases, consumers cannot touch, smell, or feel
the items during evaluation stages, and receive
purchases via mail delivery. However, Internet
catalog sites incorporate certain newer features,
such as, interactivity (e-mail inquiries to sales
people, discussion forums, voice and video
applications) and automated price
comparisons.
The purpose of the present study is to
examine individuals' perceptions of print and
Internet catalogs, and to investigate factors that
influence their attitudes and intentions to shop
using each medium.
The authors
Leo R. Vijayasarathy is Assistant Professor at CIS College
of Business, Colorado State University, Fort Collins,
Colorado, USA.
Joseph M. Jones is Assistant Professor in Marketing at the
College of Business Administration, North Dakota State
University, Fargo, USA.
Keywords
Catalogue retailing, Internet, Shopping, Electronic commerce
Abstract
The use of print catalogs for direct marketing has a long
history of success. Today, telecommunication networks, such
as the Internet, offer the potential to reach a larger market
through the use of online catalogs that could be dynamic,
flexible, and consumer-responsive. This paper reports the
results of an empirical study that compared individuals'
attitudes and intentions to shop using print and Internet
catalogs. The findings suggest that individuals perceived
differences between the two catalog media on the shopping
factors of reliability, tangibility, and consumer risk. Further,
product value, pre-order information, post-selection infor-
mation, shopping experience, and consumer risk emerged as
the factors that influenced attitudes and intentions to shop
using print and Internet catalogs.
Electronic access
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is
available at
http://www.emerald-library.com
191
Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy
Volume 10 . Number 3 . 2000 . pp. 191±202
MCB University Press . ISSN 1066-2243
Background
Peterson et al. (1997) contended that the
Internet is an emerging technology with rapid
changes and suggested that it is a market
discontinuity (i.e., there are no historical trends
to forecast how the Internet will influence
consumer shopping). Although Deighton
(1997) predicted that the Internet would
eventually upset the equilibrium among
consumers, retailers, broadcast media, and
manufacturers, he, Burke (1997), and
VanTassel and Weitz (1997) have cautioned
that consumer access to the Internet, via the
personal computer, is expensive and complex,
which limits its appeal and adoption.
Spiller and Lohse (1997-1998) investigated
137 Internet apparel stores to assess potential
problems associated with Internet shopping,
and found several stores with little product
information, low quality pictures, limited
product selection, few service features, and
poor interfaces. Based on these findings, the
researchers concluded that many online
shopping problems could be attributed to poor
Internet retail site design.
Over a decade ago, George (1987) identified
some `̀ negative'' factors that might account for
consumers' low-demand for in-home electronic
shopping via videotext. Among them were cost,
system complications, consumer phobia
towards technology, loss of sensory shopping,
elimination of instant gratification, and loss of
social benefits. In order for electronic shopping
to succeed, George predicted that much
depended on retailers' ability to capitalize on
time saving conveniences.
More recently, results from Jarvenpaa and
Todd's (1996-1997; 1997) survey of 220
consumers did, in fact, find that the most
important perceived benefit of electronic
shopping, via the Internet, was convenience. In
addition to echoing many of the same negative
reactions suggested by George (1987), the
survey results identified other limitations of
online shopping such as the difficulty of
navigating the Internet, obstacles to finding
specific items, the lack of variety and
assortment of product offerings, disappointing
customer service, and wariness about
unknown Internet retailers.
Jarvenpaa and Todd's study also examined
the impact of four multi-dimensional
shopping factors relating to product value,
service quality, shopping experience, and
risk[1]. Findings from their research
suggested that perceptions of product value,
shopping experience, and risk influenced
attitudes towards shopping on the Internet.
However, perceptions of service quality did
not influence attitudes. Other findings
indicated that intentions to shop on the
Internet were influenced by perceptions of
product value, shopping experience, and
service. Yet, perceptions of risk did not
influence intentions. Although the specific
shopping factors that Jarvenpaa and Todd
studied related to retail patronage decisions in
traditional channels, the researchers
suggested that an examination of these factors
would be reasonable starting points for
understanding consumer reactions to Internet
shopping.
The present study extends the work by
Jarvenpaa and Todd (1996-1997; 1997) on
relevant shopping factors to direct comparisons
between print and Internet shopping media,
and to examinations of specific factors that are
associated with attitudes towards and intentions
to shop using print and Internet catalogs.
Therefore, the aim of the present study is to
provide empirical answers to the following two
research questions:
RQ-1: Are there differences in perceptions
about relevant shopping factor variables
between print and Internet catalog
shopping media?
RQ-2: What are the shopping factor variables
that are significantly associated with
attitudes towards and intention to shop
using print and Internet catalog
shopping media?
Method
Data collection procedures
The data for the study were collected using
controlled survey procedures. Participants in
the study were student subjects recruited from
upper-level business courses. In accordance
with the guidelines established by the
American Psychological Association (1992),
192
Print and Internet catalog shopping
Leo R. Vijayasarathy and Joseph M. Jones
Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy
Volume 10 . Number 3 . 2000 . 191±202
subjects participated voluntarily and were
given course credit. The survey was
administered in 12 one-hour time segments
over a period of three days. Students were
asked to sign-up for a time-slot that was
convenient for them. The study consisted
of two treatment groups ± print catalog
shopping group (T1) and Internet catalog
shopping group (T2). As each student arrived
at the designated room, he/she was assigned to
one of the two treatment conditions following
a simple alternating method.
The task for subjects in both groups was to
engage in a shopping simulation to buy a product
of their choice. They were required to browse
through catalogs, select a product, and complete
an order form. T1 subjects were provided with
print catalogs from a variety of major direct
marketers (e.g., J.C. Penney, Lands' End, L.L.
Bean). T2 subjects were provided with high-
speed Internet access through Pentium
workstations that were directly connected to the
University's backbone network. Their task was to
complete the shopping simulation utilizing one or
more online catalogs.
The task was intended to experientially
sensitize the subjects to their respective
shopping media (Jarvenpaa and Todd, 1997).
After completing the task, the student
participants answered structured
questionnaires. The questionnaires elicited
subjects' responses about their assigned
shopping medium (print catalog or Internet
catalog) on relevant shopping factors
including product value, shopping experience,
customer service, consumer risk, attitudes,
and intention to shop (Jarvenpaa and Todd,
1996-1997; 1997). In addition, a
demographic profile questionnaire collected
information about subjects' age, gender, web
use, and shopping experience using print
catalogs and Internet catalogs. On average,
each subject took about 40 minutes to
complete the experiment and fill-out the
questionnaires.
Sample description
The study was conducted using undergraduate
students at a small mid-western university in
the USA. Usable information was obtained
from 201 subjects. The average age of the
participants was 23, their weekly web use
averaged 6.5 hours, and 80 of them were
female. A total of 164 subjects had previously
engaged in print catalog shopping, while 41
subjects had shopped via the Internet. For the
sample, the average monthly expenditure using
print catalog shopping was $39 (range $0 to
$300), and the average monthly expenditure
using Internet shopping was $53 (range $0 to
$500). For subjects who had shopped using
print catalogs, clothing, hunting and fishing
supplies, musical CDs, gifts, cosmetics, and
exercise equipment were popular product
categories. On the other hand, for subjects who
had purchased products via the Internet,
clothing, information/news subscriptions,
computer games, videos, exercise equipment,
and bicycles were the most frequently
mentioned categories.
Data analysis and results
We adapted Jarvenpaa and Todd's (1997)
research instrument to collect data about
shopping factors. A total of 29 items were used
to capture subjects' assessment of product
value, shopping experience, customer service,
consumer risk, attitudes, and intention to shop.
Principal component analysis was conducted
for each of the above variables to ascertain the
dimensionality of the items used in the
measurement. Two criteria were used for
judging the strength of the factor loading of a
particular item. First, it should have a primary
factor loading of at least 0.50 on the scale to
which it belonged. Second, the item should not
have a secondary loading exceeding 0.30 on any
other factor.
Product value is a measure of the shopping
medium's potential to offer a variety of
products/services that are competitively priced
and are of good quality. It was measured using
six items. Based on a factor analysis, one item
that measured variety was dropped on account
of strong secondary factor loading. The
remaining five items loaded on a single factor
that had an eigenvalue of 2.19 and explained
43.76 percent of the variance. A reliability
analysis of this factor revealed a Cronbach's
alpha of 0.62. An examination of the item-total
correlations suggested the elimination of the
second item that measured variety. The revised
alpha for the product value scale increased to
0.71. However, since both items that measured
193
Print and Internet catalog shopping
Leo R. Vijayasarathy and Joseph M. Jones
Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy
Volume 10 . Number 3 . 2000 . 191±202
variety were dropped, the product value scale
captured only the dimensions of price and
quality. The shopping experience factor
captures the shopping medium's appeal in
terms of effort required, its appropriateness for
consumer lifestyles (compatibility), and the
opportunity for fun (playfulness). The three
items used to capture subjects' perceptions
about shopping experience loaded on one factor
that had an eigenvalue of 1.78 and explained
59.2 percent of the variance. The standardized
alpha for this scale was 0.65.
Customer service includes the provision of
relevant shopping information
(responsiveness), the visually appealing display
of products and services (tangibility), the
reliability of the vendors, and the extent to
which vendors understood and accommodated
individual customer needs (empathy). Of the
eight-items used to measure this variable, one
item that measured responsiveness was dropped
because it had a strong secondary factor
loading. From the remaining seven items, three
factors were extracted with eigenvalues greater
than 1.19 and cumulatively explaining 71.3
percent of the total variance.
The first factor included two items from the
responsiveness measure and captured the
availability of shopping information to conduct
a pre-purchase search and make a selection.
This factor that had a standardized alpha of
0.70 was labeled pre-order information. The
second factor included three items that
measured the provision of information to place
an order, make payments, and take delivery of
the purchase. Since all the items related to the
post-product selection phase of the shopping
cycle, it was identified as post-selection
information. Standardized alpha for this scale
was 0.86. It was difficult to find a unifying
theme for the last factor that included an item
each for tangibility, reliability, and empathy.
Further, a reliability analysis of the three items
revealed low item-total correlations and a
standardized alpha score of 0.46. Given the
exploratory nature of the study and the
importance of the catalog shopping facets
captured by these three items, it was decided to
retain these items as single-item measures of
tangibility, reliability, and empathy.
The consumer risk factor comprises
economic risk ± the probability of making poor
purchase decisions, social risk ± the possibility
of incurring societal disapproval for engaging in
shopping using a particular medium,
performance risk ± the chance of product/
services performing less than expected, personal
risk ± the potential for theft and abuse of credit
card information, and privacy risk ± the danger
of compromising personal information. The
five items used to measure this variable loaded
on a single factor that had an eigenvalue of 2.52
and explained 50.4 percent of the variance.
Analysis conducted to test the reliability of the
scale showed a standardized alpha of 0.74.
The outcome variable, attitudes towards the
shopping medium is a gauge of the amount of
affect or feeling for or against either print
catalog shopping or Internet catalog shopping.
It was measured with three items. The factor
analysis extracted a single factor that had an
eigenvalue of 2.60 and explained 86.8 percent
of the variance. Intention to shop using the
shopping medium relates to an individual's
attitude towards the overt behavior of using
either print or Internet catalogs to purchase
products. It was assessed with four items. After
dropping one of the items that had a low
loading factor, a single factor was extracted.
This factor had an eigenvalue of 4.60 and
explained 90.2 percent of the variance.
Standardized alphas for attitudes towards the
shopping medium and intention to shop using
the shopping medium were 0.92 and 0.94
respectively.
Table I provides the number of items used to
measure each research variable along with the
means and standard deviations. In order to
address the first research question about
perceived differences between the two shopping
media, a multivariate analysis of variance
(MANOVA) was conducted. The analysis
showed significant overall effect by shopping
medium (Wilkes Lambda = 0.896; Hypothesis
df = 10; Error df = 186; F = 2.17; p < 0.021).
To clarify the MANOVA results, analysis of
variance (ANOVA) was conducted for each of
the research variables. These results presented
in Table II indicate that three variables ±
reliability, tangibility, and consumer risk ± are
significantly different between the two
treatment groups.
To seek answers for the second research
question, multiple regression analyses were
194
Print and Internet catalog shopping
Leo R. Vijayasarathy and Joseph M. Jones
Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy
Volume 10 . Number 3 . 2000 . 191±202
conducted to examine the association between
shopping factor variables and outcome
variables. Table III summarizes the results of
the regression analyses for the print catalog
medium. For the model regressing attitudes
towards the print catalog medium, the shopping
factor variables that were significant include
shopping experience, post-selection
information, and consumer risk. The model for
the other outcome variable, intention to shop
using the print catalog medium, was also
significant with shopping experience and
consumer risk emerging as the significant
independent variables.
Similar analyses were conducted for the
Internet catalog medium and the results are
presented in Table IV. For attitudes towards
the Internet catalog medium, product value,
shopping experience, pre-order information,
and consumer risk were significant shopping
factor variables. On the other hand, the
variance in intention to shop using the Internet
catalog medium was explained by product
value, shopping experience, post-selection
information, and consumer risk.
Discussion and implication of the results
The results provide some preliminary answers
to the two research questions that motivated
this study. In response to the first question, the
findings suggest that there are differences in
attitudes towards print catalog and Internet
catalog shopping media on relevant shopping
factors. Consistent with results from earlier
studies (Table V provides a comparison of
significant findings), Internet catalog shopping
appears to be viewed less favorably than print
catalog shopping in terms of risk, reliability, and
tangibility (Jarvenpaa and Todd, 1996-1997;
Spiller and Lohse, 1997-1998). This study did
Table I Means and standard deviations of research variables
Shopping factors
No. of
items Alpha Statistics
Print catalog
(n = 90)
Online catalog
(n = 107)
Product value 4 0.71 Mean* 4.95 4.91
SD 0.95 0.89
Shopping experience 3 0.65 Mean 4.59 4.57
SD 1.02 1.18
Customer service
Pre-order information 2 0.70 Mean 5.39 5.51
SD 1.11 1.15
Post-selection information 3 0.86 Mean 5.47 5.39
SD 0.96 1.17
Reliability 1 N/A Mean 4.81 4.35
SD 1.15 1.12
Tangibility 1 N/A Mean 5.80 5.36
SD 1.15 1.22
Empathy 1 N/A Mean 3.88 3.95
SD 1.56 1.38
Consumer risk 5 0.74 Mean** 2.82 3.16
SD 0.95 0.92
Attitudes towards the
shopping medium 3 0.92 Mean 4.95 4.84
SD 1.16 1.36
Intention to shop using the
shopping medium 3 0.94 Mean 3.81 3.60
SD 1.53 1.54
Notes: * All items were measured with a seven-point scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree)** The items for the consumer risk variable were reverse-coded. So, a score of 1 indicates no risk, while a score of 7indicates extreme risk
195
Print and Internet catalog shopping
Leo R. Vijayasarathy and Joseph M. Jones
Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy
Volume 10 . Number 3 . 2000 . 191±202
not obtain data about the underlying rationale
for subjects' perceptions; therefore the
following discussion is based primarily on the
findings of prior empirical studies.
Risk
Risk was conceptualized as a multi-
dimensional construct encompassing
economic, social, performance, personal, and
privacy risks (Jarvenpaa and Todd, 1996-
1997). With the exception of a few sites such
as pricewatch.com and mysimon.com that
facilitate product evaluations across
manufacturers/suppliers, comparing price and
features of similar brands on the Internet is
relatively difficult and time-consuming. Even
among catalogers who offer multiple brands
within a particular product category, it is rare
to find a site that has the capability or design
for viewing and comparing more than one
product on a single page (Baty and Lee, 1995;
Spiller and Lohse, 1997-1998).
The vision of intelligent agents that can scour
the Internet for the best deals on products and
services has been articulated and prototyped.
However, as long as information on the Internet
is unstructured, the potential for these
automated shopping assistants to enhance
market efficiency is limited (Tenenbaum,
1998). Ironically, while the Internet is touted as
an information-intensive medium, the current
inadequacies in information retrieval and
presentation may impinge on and undermine
consumers' confidence in making informed
decisions. It will require the implementation of
standards such as mediating electronic product
catalogs (Lincke and Schmid, 1998) to reduce
perceptions of heightened economic risk using
Internet catalogs.
A number of researchers have examined the
influence of important other people (i.e. their
relevance, power, and perceived opinions) on
individuals' attitudes and behavioral intentions
(Bagozzi et al., 1992; Darden and Dorsch,
1990; Evans et al., 1996). Although most
consumer shopping via the Internet is
conducted presumably at home without
witnesses, an individual could still be
Table II ANOVA results by shopping medium
Shopping factors Source df
Sum of
squares
Mean
square F Sig.
Product value Print vs Internet 1 0.175 0.175 0.208 0.649
Within groups 199 168.029 0.844
Shopping experience Print vs Internet 1 0.108 0.108 0.87 0.768
Within groups 199 248.502 1.249
Customer service
Pre-order information Print vs Internet 1 1.066 1.066 0.836 0.362
Within groups 199 253.616 1.274
Post-selection information Print vs Internet 1 0.233 0.233 0.200 0.656
Within groups 199 232.444 1.168
Reliability Print vs Internet 1 10.901 10.901 8.587 0.004
Within groups 197 250.064 1.269
Tangibility Print vs Internet 1 9.619 9.619 6.707 0.010
Within groups 198 283.976 1.434
Empathy Print vs Internet 1 0.367 0.367 0.170 0.681
Within groups 199 430.439 2.163
Consumer risk Print vs Internet 1 4.818 4.818 5.473 0.020
Within groups 198 174.330 0.880
Attitudes towards the
shopping medium Print vs Internet 1 0.872 0.872 0.542 0.462
Within groups 198 318.430 1.608
Intention to shop using
the shopping medium Print vs Internet 1 2.696 2.696 1.142 0.287
Within groups 198 467.568 2.361
196
Print and Internet catalog shopping
Leo R. Vijayasarathy and Joseph M. Jones
Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy
Volume 10 . Number 3 . 2000 . 191±202
susceptible to perceptions of what important
other social referents think about his/her
actions. Since Internet shopping is yet to
achieve widespread acceptance as a safe
medium for conducting financial transactions,
the perception of social risk could be higher
than with the more established and pervasive
print catalog-shopping medium.
The perception of greater performance risk with
Internet catalog shopping can be attributed to
the virtual nature of the catalogs and the
catalogers. Neither print nor Internet catalogs
provide demonstrable or tangible proof about
the performance of a product. However, print
catalogs may carry an inherent assurance of
reliability that is not easily duplicated on the
ephemeral Internet medium.
In most traditional methods of commerce
including print catalog shopping, payment
processes have been refined over the years and
generally perceived as posing minimal security
threat or risk for the consumer. However, in
Table III Regression results for print-catalog medium
a. Attitudes towards the shopping medium
df Sum of squares Mean square
Regression 8 61.405 7.676
Residual 81 58.275 0.719
F = 10.669 Significance of F = 0.000
Independent variables
Standardized
Betas T p <
Product value 0.044 0.407 0.685
Shopping experience 0.552 6.454 0.000
Pre-order information 0.043 0.480 0.633
Post-selection
information ±0.196 ±2.025 0.046
Reliability 0.070 0.781 0.437
Tangibility 0.116 1.268 0.208
Empathy 0.035 0.422 0.674
Consumer risk ±0.272 ±2.802 0.006
R-square: 0.513; Adjusted R-square: 0.465
b. Intention to shop using the medium
df Sum of squares Mean square
Regression 8 78.383 9.798
Residual 81 131.167 1.619
F = 6.051 Significance of F = 0.000
Independent variables
Standardized
Betas T p <
Product value ±0.011 ±0.085 0.932
Shopping experience 0.497 5.125 0.000
Pre-order information ±0.052 ±0.515 0.608
Post-selection
information ±0.045 ±0.407 0.685
Reliability 0.097 0.959 0.340
Tangibility 0.024 0.231 0.818
Empathy 0.094 0.999 0.321
Consumer risk ±0.258 ±2.344 0.022
R-square: 0.374; Adjusted R-square: 0.312
Table IV Regression results for Internet-catalog medium
a. Attitudes towards the shopping medium
df Sum of squares Mean square
Regression 8 106.950 13.969
Residual 98 88.771 0.906
F = 14.759 Significance of F = 0.000
Independent variables
Standardized
Betas T p <
Product value 0.155 2.012 0.047
Shopping experience 0.371 4.341 0.000
Pre-order information 0.215 2.555 0.012
Post-selection
information 0.019 0.216 0.830
Reliability 0.028 0.352 0.725
Tangibility 0.089 1.139 0.257
Empathy 0.026 0.334 0.739
Consumer risk ±0.221 ±2.905 0.005
R-square: 0.546; Adjusted R-square: 0.509
b. Intention to shop using the medium
df Sum of squares Mean square
Regression 8 100.513 12.564
Residual 98 151.294 1.544
F = 8.138 Significance of F = 0.000
Independent variables
Standardized
Betas T p <
Product value 0.214 2.418 0.017
Shopping experience 0.353 3.594 0.001
Pre-order information 0.158 1.634 0.105
Post-selection
information ±0.225 ±2.236 0.028
Reliability 0.056 0.605 0.547
Tangibility ±0.090 ±0.995 0.322
Empathy 0.008 0.089 0.930
Consumer risk ±0.352 ±4.012 0.000
R-square: 0.399; Adjusted R-square: 0.350
197
Print and Internet catalog shopping
Leo R. Vijayasarathy and Joseph M. Jones
Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy
Volume 10 . Number 3 . 2000 . 191±202
the context of Internet shopping there are
some real and mythical problems associated
with ensuring security of transactions,
specifically related to the transmission and
storage of credit card information. With
advanced encryption, transmission over the
Internet is relatively safe from interception and
misuse. Therefore, it is paradoxical that
consumers who part with their credit cards at a
restaurant or provide credit card information
over the telephone without undue alarm
attribute a greater threat to security when the
same information has to be transmitted over
the Internet. The perception of increased
security risk can be attributed to incidents of
Internet fraud receiving widespread media
coverage, consumers' lack of knowledge about
encryption, technical jargon surrounding
Table V Comparison of results to previous research findingsa
Present study
Jarvenpaa and Todd
(1996-1997, 1997) Spiller and Lohse (1997-1998)
Assessment of shopping factors:
Risk Subjects rated Internet
catalog shopping to be
riskier than print
catalog shopping
55 percent of study participants had
negative comments about Internet
shopping with respect to risk
The capability to perform product
comparisons, which could help
reduce perceptions of economic risk
was available only in a few of the
online apparel stores
Reliabilty Subjects percieved
Internet catalogers to
be less reliable than
print catalogers
Participants expressed reservations
about unknown merchants, and
tended to select online catalogers
who had already established their
reputation through print catalogs or
brick and motar stores
80 percent of the online merchants
had less than ten lines of
information about their company's
history, reputation, policies, etc.
One third of them presented no
identifying information about
themselves
Tangibility Subjects found Internet
catalogs to be inferior
to print catalogs
55 percent of the participants had
negative reactions towards
merchandise presentation at
Internet stores
More than half of the online stores
had sparse product descriptions
(less than three lines). One fourth
of the stores did not have a
consistent navigation system
Predictors of attitudes towards and intention to shop using Internet catalogs:
Shopping
experience
Influences both
outcome variables
Similar results NA (not applicable)
Consumer risk Influences both
outcome variables
Significant predictor of attitudes
towards online shopping; but not a
determinant of intentions to shop
online
N/A
Product value Influences both
outcome variables
Similar results N/A
Customer
service
Pre-order information
influences attitudes
towards Internet
catalogs. Post-selection
information negatively
influences intentions to
shop using Internet
catalogs
Influenced intention to shop online;
but did not determine attitude
N/A
Note: a Please note that there are differences among the above three studies with respect to sample, data collectionstrategy, and data analysis
198
Print and Internet catalog shopping
Leo R. Vijayasarathy and Joseph M. Jones
Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy
Volume 10 . Number 3 . 2000 . 191±202
security mechanisms, lack of payment
standards, mistrust of Internet businesses in
general, and fear of credit card information
being insecurely stored on servers that are
accessible over the Internet.
In this age of database marketing, customers
have no illusion about privacy with respect to
records of past purchases and purchasing
behaviors. It is therefore not surprising that
subjects attribute greater privacy risks to
Internet catalog shopping. After all, the
Internet epitomizes the power, reach, and
versatility of computing technology that has
ushered the era of data mining and micro
marketing. The practice of introducing cookies
in customers' computers without their specific
knowledge, the monitoring of customers'
browsing behavior to create profiles, and the
deluge of unsolicited e-mail can further
stigmatize Internet shopping's poor reputation
for ensuring privacy.
Reliability
Reliability is closely associated with risk since it
is a measure of customers' perceptions about
whether or not merchants can be counted on to
deliver on their promises. In the study
participants perceived Internet catalog
shopping to be less reliable than print catalog
shopping. This could be attributed to the
presence of a number of new businesses that
have started their first commercial activities on
the Internet and have established no prior
customer awareness or trust through more
traditional retail outlets or print catalogs.
According to Spiller and Lohse (1997-1998),
Internet merchants provide very little
information about themselves to bridge the
awareness chasm between new businesses and
potential customers. It is not impossible for
newcomers (e.g., amazon.com, cdnow.com) to
quickly earn widespread name recognition on
the Internet. However, the ease with which a
fraudulent business operation can set-up shop
on the Internet could continue to negatively
impinge on the reliability of Internet vendors.
Another possible explanation for the poor
reliability ratings of Internet catalog shopping
could be tied to the poor reputation of online
catalogers with regards to order fulfillment. In
a survey of 37,000 online shoppers,
BizRate.com (1999) found that 56 percent of
the respondents expressed concerns about
tardy deliveries on the part of online
merchants. This suggests that in order to
change perceptions of reliability, Internet
catalogers would also have to make
improvements to their back-office processes
including order processing, inventory
management, and shipment logistics.
Tangibility
In this study, tangibility characterized the
visual display of goods and services. Although
the Internet has the distinct advantage of
adding greater animation to a static catalog by
incorporating multimedia, the subjects found
Internet catalogs to be inferior to print
catalogs. This result resonates with Lohse and
Spiller's (1998) conclusion that Internet
stores suffered from poor interface design.
The lapses in interface design are manifested
in poor graphics quality, tedious navigational
structure, cluttered page layouts, non-
intuitive catalog organization and product
classifications, inadequate search capabilities,
unimaginative display styles, and
inappropriate use of color, texture, and
patterns (Jarvenpaa and Todd, 1996-1997;
Lohse and Spiller, 1998; Spiller and Lohse,
1997-1998).
Internet shopping is still at an embryonic
stage. Typical of other market discontinuities, it
has to emerge through a period of learning and
growth before it can match the appeal of more
sophisticated direct marketing media such as
print catalogs. If Internet shopping is to escape
the fate of previously failed attempts at
electronic marketing, such as videotext, it is
important to address consumer concerns and
focus on those attributes that are salient to
attracting their patronage.
Next, we discuss the association found between
relevant shopping factors and attitudes towards
catalog shopping and intentions to shop using
catalogs, and compare the findings with results
obtained by Jarvenpaa and Todd (1997).
Shopping experience
Based on the results of the regression analyses,
shopping experience is associated with both
attitudes towards and intentions to shop using
either catalog media. This is consistent with the
premise that catalogs cater to customers who
199
Print and Internet catalog shopping
Leo R. Vijayasarathy and Joseph M. Jones
Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy
Volume 10 . Number 3 . 2000 . 191±202
place a premium on convenience (Jarvenpaa
and Todd, 1997). With catalogs, shopping can
be done at leisure circumventing the effort
required to shop at a retail store or mall.
Further, catalog shopping can fit the needs of
consumers who have busy lifestyles such as
dual-career families by alleviating the time
pressures faced by them. Our findings also
parallel those of Bellman et al. (1999) who
reported that limitations on discretionary time
had a strong influence on an individual's
decision to buy online.
Consumer risk
In addition to shopping experience, consumer
risk also emerged as an important factor that
influences both print catalog and Internet
catalog shopping. These results differ to some
extent from those obtained by Jarvenpaa and
Todd (1997), who found that consumer risk
was significant only for attitudes towards
Internet shopping but not for intentions to buy
using that medium. Regardless, consumer risk
is clearly a significant factor that has to be
mitigated in order to promote the adoption of
Internet catalog shopping.
Product value
Similar to the findings of Jarvenpaa and Todd
(1997), the results from this study suggest that
perceptions of product value influence Internet
catalog shopping. The Internet offers the
ability to maintain virtual stores that entail a
fraction of the infrastructure costs typically
needed to build/lease and operate a physical
outlet. Further, if the savings in transactions
costs can be passed on to consumers in the
form of better deals on price and attractive
promotions without compromising quality, it
can be a positive influence on attitudes
towards and intentions to shop using Internet
catalogs.
Customer service
In the Jarvenpaa and Todd (1997) study,
responsiveness, reliability, tangibility, and
empathy were collapsed into a single factor
called customer service. In this study, the
components of customer service were retained
as separate factors. In addition, responsiveness
was split into two separate factors to capture the
pre-order and post-selection phase of the
shopping process. Except for responsiveness,
none of the other customer service factors were
significant in the regression results.
The pre-order information factor was found
to have a positive influence on attitudes towards
Internet catalog shopping. This suggests that
information that assists consumers to conduct a
pre-purchase search and make a selection is
crucial in nature (Bellman et al., 1999). This
may also be a reflection that the Internet with
its vast and extensive databases is still relied on
for its original mission of information
dissemination. In other words, customers may
rely on the Internet primarily to gather
information and augment their pre-purchase
search; but not necessarily to transact the
purchase itself.
On the other hand, the post-selection
information factor appears to have a negative
influence on intention to buy using Internet
catalogs. This surprising finding could be
related to the current complications and lack
of uniformity in the ordering process across
Internet stores (Jarvenpaa and Todd, 1996-
1997). Moreover, customers may not
appreciate having to repetitively fill out
personal information such as name, address,
etc. in order to complete an online order
(Lohse and Spiller, 1998). Jarvenpaa and
Todd (1997) also report that some study
participants found the frequent assurances of
security were disruptive to their shopping
experience. The results from this study suggest
that consumers prefer plenty of information in
the pre-order phase to assist them in making a
selection. However, in the ordering phase,
brevity and standardization may be more
important. The longer and more complicated
the ordering process, the greater the chance of
losing a potential sale.
Results from this study confirm that
consumer's attitudes and intentions to shop
using the Internet are influenced by factors such
as product value, shopping experience, risk, and
service. It can also be inferred that innovations
in Internet technologies that focus on
improving processes that shape consumer's
perceptions about each of the above factors
hold the most promise for the future of online
commerce.
200
Print and Internet catalog shopping
Leo R. Vijayasarathy and Joseph M. Jones
Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy
Volume 10 . Number 3 . 2000 . 191±202
Limitations and conclusions
Laboratory data collection procedures were
used to provide a basis for an examination of
the effects. Further, a homogeneous student
sample was used for cost and convenience
reasons. Although the shopping simulation did
not have the degree of realism found in actual
`̀ real'' world catalog shopping, care was taken
to assure that the representation was as realistic
as possible. Other limitations included access to
computers and Internet connections that were
probably better and faster than what may be
available to individuals in a typical household,
and the use of only a few print catalogs
promoting a limited variety of products. Future
research might extend the present study to field
experiments using catalog shoppers drawn from
the general population along with a wider
selection of catalogs.
Findings from the present study suggest that
there are concerns about the reliability and
reputation of Internet catalogers, inferior
Internet catalogs as compared to print
catalogs, the lack of security for Internet
transactions, and privacy with respect to past
purchases. In conclusion, Internet catalogers
should consider the Web's unique
characteristics to design sites that appeal to the
primary wants and needs of their target
market. For example, some Internet shoppers
might look for interactivity and control of
information, others might be most interested
in quick access to product information, and
some shoppers might want assurances of safe
and secure transactions. Although Internet
catalogers should adapt to rapid changes in
technology to help build or upgrade sites, they
should also match site designs with preferences
of their target market.
Note
1 For a detailed description of these factors, please referto Jarvenpaa and Todd (1996-1997).
References
Alba, J., Lynch, J., Weitz, B., Janiszewski, C., Lutz, R.,Sawyer, A. and Wood, S. (1997), `̀ Interactive home
shopping: consumer, retailer, and manufacturerincentives to participate in electronic marketplaces'',Journal of Marketing, Vol. 61 No. 3, pp. 38-53.
American Psychological Association (1992), `̀ Ethicalprinciples of psychologists and code of conduct'',American Psychologist, Vol. 47, pp. 1597-611.
Bagozzi, R.P., Baumgartner, H. and Yi, Y. (1992), `̀ Stateversus action orientation and the theory of reasonedaction: an application to coupon usage'', Journal ofConsumer Research, Vol. 18, March, pp. 505-18.
Baty, J.B., II and Lee, R.M. (1995), `̀ Intershop: enhancing thevendor/customer dialectic in electronic shopping'',Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 11,No. 4, pp. 9-31.
Bellman, S., Lohse, G.L. and Johnson, E.J. (1999), `̀ Predictorsof online buying behavior'', Communications of theACM, Vol. 42 No. 12, pp. 32-8.
BizRate.com (1999), `̀ BizRate.com survey finds four timeincrease in holiday buying over last year'', http://www.bizrate.cpm/press/press_room/release_55.xpml
Burke, R.R. (1997), `̀ Do you see what I see? The future ofvirtual shopping'', Journal of the Academy ofMarketing Science, Vol. 25, Fall, pp. 352-60.
Darden, W.R. and Dorsch, M.J. (1990), `̀ An action strategyapproach to examining shopping behavior'', Journal ofBusiness Research, Vol. 21, November, pp. 289-308.
Deighton, J. (1997), `̀ Commentary on exploring theimplications of the Internet for consumer marketing'',Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 25,Fall, pp. 347-51.
Donthu, N. and Garcia, A. (1999), `̀ The Internet shopper'',Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 39 No. 3,pp. 52-8.
Evans, K.R., Christiansen, T. and Gill, J.D. (1996), `̀ Theimpact of social influence and role expectations onshopping center patronage intentions'', Journal of theAcademy of Marketing Science, Vol. 24 No. 3,pp. 208-18.
George, R.J. (1987), `̀ In-home electronic shopping:disappointing past, uncertain future'', The Journal ofConsumer Marketing, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 47-56.
Jarvenpaa, S.L. and Todd, P.A. (1996-1997), `̀ Consumerreactions to electronic shopping on the World WideWeb'', International Journal of Electronic Commerce,Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 59-88.
Jarvenpaa, S.L. and Todd, P.A. (1997), `̀ Is there a future forretailing on the Internet?'', in Peterson, R.A. (Ed.),Electronic Marketing and the Consumer, SagePublications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 139-54.
Keeney, R.L. (1999), `̀ The value of Internet commerce to thecustomer'', Management Science, Vol. 45 No. 4,pp. 533-42.
Kotler, P. (2000), Marketing Management, Prentice-Hall,Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Liang, T. and Huang, J. (1998), `̀ An empirical study onconsumer acceptance of products in electronicmarkets: a transaction cost model'', Decision SupportSystems, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 29-43.
Lincke, D. and Schmid, B. (1998), `̀ Mediating electronicproduct catalogs'', Communications of the ACM,Vol. 41 No. 7, pp. 86-8.
201
Print and Internet catalog shopping
Leo R. Vijayasarathy and Joseph M. Jones
Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy
Volume 10 . Number 3 . 2000 . 191±202
Lohse, G.L. and Spiller, P. (1998), `̀ Electronic shopping'',
Communications of the ACM, Vol. 41 No. 7,
pp. 81-7.Muldoon, K. (1996), How to Profit Through Catalog
Marketing, NTC Business Books, Lincolnwood, IL.Palmer, J.W. and Griffith, D.A. (1998), `̀ An emerging model
of Web site design for marketing'', Communications of
the ACM, Vol. 41 No. 3, pp. 44-51.Peterson, R.A., Balasubramanian, S. and Bronnenberg, B.J.
(1997), `̀ Exploring the implications of the Internet for
consumer marketing'', Journal of the Academy ofMarketing Science, Vol. 25, Fall, pp. 329-48.
Spiller, P. and Lohse, G.L. (1997-1998), `̀ A classification ofInternet retail stores'', International Journal ofElectronic Commerce, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 29-56.
Tenenbaum, J.M. (1998), `̀ WISs and electronic commerce'',Communications of the ACM, Vol. 41 No. 7,pp. 89-90.
VanTassel, S. and Weitz, B.A. (1997), `̀ Interactive homeshopping: all the comforts of home'', Direct Marketing,Vol. 59 No. 10, pp. 40-1.
202
Print and Internet catalog shopping
Leo R. Vijayasarathy and Joseph M. Jones
Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy
Volume 10 . Number 3 . 2000 . 191±202