principles objectivity fairness competence professionalism relevance to the results to be achieved

17

Upload: quentin-sharp

Post on 16-Jan-2016

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: PRINCIPLES Objectivity Fairness Competence Professionalism Relevance to the results to be achieved
Page 2: PRINCIPLES Objectivity Fairness Competence Professionalism Relevance to the results to be achieved

PRINCIPLESPRINCIPLES

Objectivity

Fairness

Competence

Professionalism

Relevance to the results to be achieved

Page 3: PRINCIPLES Objectivity Fairness Competence Professionalism Relevance to the results to be achieved

UDG REVIEW PANEL UDG REVIEW PANEL (UDGRP)(UDGRP)

UDGRP will consist of min 5 members

one of the Reviewers will be designated as the Anchor Reviewer

Appointed by the UGC/MoHE

Any potential conflict of interest should be prevented in the evaluation process

reviewers will not be allowed to evaluate proposals submitted by his/her own university or the institution that he/she has affiliation, financial connection or personal interest

Page 4: PRINCIPLES Objectivity Fairness Competence Professionalism Relevance to the results to be achieved

KEY STEPSKEY STEPS

RatificationRatification

RecommendationRecommendation

Desk EvaluationDesk Evaluation

Site EvaluationSite Evaluation

Eligibility CheckEligibility Check

Page 5: PRINCIPLES Objectivity Fairness Competence Professionalism Relevance to the results to be achieved

ELIGIBILITY CHECKELIGIBILITY CHECK

will be conducted by the MoHE

those satisfying the eligibility criteria will be forwarded for Desk Evaluation

Updated University/Institution Corporate Plan will also be forwarded to the review panel along with the proposal

Page 6: PRINCIPLES Objectivity Fairness Competence Professionalism Relevance to the results to be achieved

DESK EVALUATIONDESK EVALUATION

Undertaken by a UDG Review Panel (UDGRP) – 5 members; One as the Anchor

Reviewer

Carried out according to a set of evaluation criteria

Detailed Feedback will be provided to all– in the form of Reviewers’ Comments

Page 7: PRINCIPLES Objectivity Fairness Competence Professionalism Relevance to the results to be achieved

DESK EVALUATIONDESK EVALUATION

If the proposal meets the selection criteria only partially, then

Revise and Resubmit

If the proposal fully meets the selection criteria, then Site Evaluation

Page 8: PRINCIPLES Objectivity Fairness Competence Professionalism Relevance to the results to be achieved

SITE EVALUATIONSITE EVALUATION By the same UDGRP that has conducted the

Desk Evaluation

Main Objective

– to assess the conformity between the written proposal & the ground realities, and

– to draw a final judgement on the feasibility & implementability of the proposed plan

In particular

– Validation of the data included in the proposal

– Clarification of issues that have arose during the desk evaluation

– Assessment of the university/institution’s commitment to the project activities outlined in the proposal

Page 9: PRINCIPLES Objectivity Fairness Competence Professionalism Relevance to the results to be achieved

EVALUATION CRITERIAEVALUATION CRITERIA

Institutional Commitment, Institutional Commitment, Feasibility & ImplementabilitFeasibility & Implementabilityy

Relevance & Quality Enhancement

Efficiency & EffectivenessEfficiency & Effectiveness

Page 10: PRINCIPLES Objectivity Fairness Competence Professionalism Relevance to the results to be achieved

Relevance & Quality EnhancementRelevance & Quality Enhancement

Relevance – responsiveness to the social demand & labour market needs universities are encouraged to make their

programs more demand driven

Also, Relevance to the Results to be Achieved (Performance Targets)

Proposed plan should also be in line with the updated University/Institution Corporate Plan

Page 11: PRINCIPLES Objectivity Fairness Competence Professionalism Relevance to the results to be achieved

Relevance & Quality EnhancementRelevance & Quality Enhancement

Proposal should demonstrate how the proposed activities would improve the quality & relevance of programs as a result provide graduates with knowledge,

capabilities, skills and attitudes required by the labour market and the society

special emphasis on the employability of graduates of Arts & Humanities, Management and General Sciences

Proposal should demonstrate the commitment

to submit a separate proposal for improving the quality & relevance of the EDPs, where applicable

Innovation and creativity in designing the activities is encouraged and will be highly appreciated

Page 12: PRINCIPLES Objectivity Fairness Competence Professionalism Relevance to the results to be achieved

Relevance & Quality EnhancementRelevance & Quality Enhancement

Improvements in Teaching & Learning Process

Corporate Plan

Mechanism & Design of Activities

Improvements in Assessment Methods

Performance Targets

Reviewers Reviewers will look at will look at

Page 13: PRINCIPLES Objectivity Fairness Competence Professionalism Relevance to the results to be achieved

Institutional Commitment, Institutional Commitment, Feasibility & ImplementabilityFeasibility & Implementability

Institutional Commitment

Provision of Tangible Support to the Proposed Plan

Feasibility & Implementability

Availability of Physical & Human Resources

Availability of Required Conditions

Realistic Time Schedules

Some Examples of Hindering Factors Unrealistic and/or Over Ambitious Targets Over Optimistic Assumptions Inadequate Number of Qualified & Experienced Staff

to carry out the project activities Other Limitations due to external factors

etc.

Page 14: PRINCIPLES Objectivity Fairness Competence Professionalism Relevance to the results to be achieved

Institutional Commitment, Institutional Commitment, Feasibility & ImplementabilityFeasibility & Implementability

Project Planning

Access to Data & Information

Space to carry out activities

Physical & Human Resources

Proposed Budget

Performance Targets

Activities & Activity Plan

Reviewers Reviewers will look at will look at

Page 15: PRINCIPLES Objectivity Fairness Competence Professionalism Relevance to the results to be achieved

Efficiency & EffectivenessEfficiency & Effectiveness Efficiency – Relationship between Input & Process

shows the degree of the proposed plan’s frugality in using resources

Effectiveness – Relationship between Process & output shows the results of a process using specified

resources to achieve the objectives

Proposed Budget should be based on Solid Rationale efficient and effective use of proposed investment

as well as the existing resources to achieve the objectives

Beneficiary Population & Performance Targets would also demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed plan

Page 16: PRINCIPLES Objectivity Fairness Competence Professionalism Relevance to the results to be achieved

Efficiency & EffectivenessEfficiency & Effectiveness

Improvement Plan – Mechanism & Design of Activities

Utilization/Sharing of Resources

Beneficiary Population

Performance Indicators

Reviewers Reviewers will look at will look at

Page 17: PRINCIPLES Objectivity Fairness Competence Professionalism Relevance to the results to be achieved