pretentious pre-colon phrase: mapping u.s. partisan realignment, 1952-2004 dan barclay dan barclay...

Dan Barclay

Pretentious Pre-Colon Phrase: Mapping U.S. Partisan Realignment, 1952-2004

Dan Barclay

November 2005

Pretentious Pre-Colon Phrase: Mapping U.S. Partisan

Realignment, 1952-2004

Dan Barclay


• So there’s this paper that models political realignment on a two-dimensional issues axis.

• Problem is, it doesn’t have any data to back it up.

• I’ll be bringing in data to quantify the model.

Abstract

Dan Barclay


An Optical Depiction

Dan Barclay


Nifty Graph

Dan Barclay


Literature Review

• Periodicity– Adams (1918): 12-year cycles from 1776-1812– Schlesinger, Sr. (1949): Projected cycles from

1947-1962, 1962-1978, 1978-1993• “Critical elections”

– Certain elections such as 1896 and 1932 are “flash points” that see abrupt changes in ideologies

– Discontinuous model

Dan Barclay


Literature Review II: First Blood

• Attempted link to congressional politics– Brady (1982): Congressional policy changes can

be explained through realignment theory.– “Our field isn’t credible, so let’s try to support it

with one that is!”– Epic failure

Dan Barclay


Literature Review III: Reign of Chaos

• The public opinion challenge– Stimson (1998): When you actually look at the

data, realignment theory doesn’t work at all. You people are dumb.

– Mayhew (2002): Yeah, what he said.– Huge pile-on; realignment lies in tatters

Dan Barclay


Literature Review IV: A New Hope

• Maybe realignment theory will work if we use models that are continuous, not discontinuous.– Smith (2002): If we assume the two parties have

gradually traded places in the past few decades, public opinion data doesn’t tear us a new one.

– Miller and Schofield (2003): The paper I’m plagiarizing building upon

Dan Barclay


Miller and Schofield (2003)• Theory

– Regressions show that the two parties have gradually changed places, which can’t be accounted for by white noise and must therefore be due to realignment factors

• Mechanism– Each party continually tries to outflank the other to

appeal to groups of swing voters• Two dimensions, economic and social

Dan Barclay


That Nifty Graph Again

Dan Barclay


1896

Dan Barclay


1932-60

Dan Barclay


1960-64

Dan Barclay


1964-68

Dan Barclay


2005

Dan Barclay


My Project

• Quantify Schofield and Miller– Roll call data = relative density of each quadrant– Elections data = area occupied by each party– Public opinion data = frontier between the parties– Party platform data = point position of each party

• I code national platforms on a 1 / 0 / -1 basis

• Regress the results• Make projections

Dan Barclay


Validity Problems

• None.

Dan Barclay


Methodology

• Roll call: Use the data I already have• Elections: Acquire from NES• Public opinion: Acquire from NES• Party platforms: Code the data I already have• Regression: Use STATA

Dan Barclay


• Sampling error, from public opinion data

• Personal bias, from coding party platforms

• 1952-2004 time period dictated by data availability

Validity Problems

Dan Barclay


Methodology

• Roll call: Use the data I already have• Elections: Acquire from NES• Public opinion: Acquire from NES• Party platforms: Code the data I already have• Regression: Use STATA

– Arbitrary designation of social issues as the independent variable and economic issues as the dependent variable

pretentious pre-colon phrase: mapping u.s. partisan realignment, 1952-2004 dan barclay dan barclay...

Documents