presenter: eva wong effect of neurofeedback: case study slides...effect of neurofeedback: case...

Download Presenter: Eva Wong EFFECT OF NEUROFEEDBACK: CASE STUDY   slides...effect of neurofeedback: case study on children with dyslexia presenter: eva wong

Post on 06-Feb-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents

2 download

Embed Size (px)

TRANSCRIPT

  • EFFECT OF NEUROFEEDBACK: CASE STUDY ON CHILDREN WITH DYSLEXIA

    Presenter: Eva Wong

  • OBJECTIVES OF THE PAPER

    Seeks to present the effectiveness of Neurofeedback as strategy to improve

    children with Dyslexia in word recognition

  • WHY? PREVALENCE RATE OF ASD IMPLICATIONS OF THE

    CONDITION: PSYCHOLOGYSOCIAL BEHAVIOUR

    CONDITION IN MALAYSIA

    7% Standard 2 Malays students (Gomez, 2000)

  • METHODOLOGY

    Embedded experimental design

    QUAL + quan

    Creswell, 2003

  • Research Design

    n= 10, DDT (Dysphoneidesia)

    Age (mean): 8.4

    Sampling: Purposive

    Design: Pre-post

    Group: Intervention (A-E),

    Control (F-J)

    Duration: 30 sessions

    qual

    Dyslexia Determination Test

    Post-positivism

    Quan

    Burt Reading Test

    positivism

  • WHAT? Intervention group Educational TherapyNeurofeedback

    Intervention group Educational Therapy

    Educational Therapy

    Phonetic Task

    Writing Task

  • INTERVENTION GROUP

    Block Duration Instruction

    1 0 - 5 minutes Toy play

    2 5 - 25 minutes Phonic Task

    3 25 - 55 minutes Games + Neurofeedback

    4 55 75 minutes Writing tasks Neurofeedback Protocol T6 Delta F7 C3 Alpha Marinus, et al (2009)

  • CONTROL GROUP

    Block Duration Instruction

    1 0 - 5 minutes Toy play

    2 5 - 25 minutes Phonic Task

    3 25 - 55 minutes Games

    4 55 75 minutes Writing tasks

  • FINDINGS:Intervention Group

    Quantitative Data Pre: Avg 3.67 Post: Avg 4.08 11.36% (Improvement)

    SubjectsChro. Age

    BurtPre Post

    A 7;4 3;9 4;3B 7;7 4;1 4;5C 7;6 3;3 3;9D 7;3 3;8 4;2E 7;8 3;7 4;2

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    A B C D E

    Reading Age Pre and Post Intervention (Intervention Group)

    Pre Post

  • FINDINGS:Control Group

    Quantitative Data Pre: Avg 3.58 Post: Avg 3.83 7.00% (Improvement)

    SubjectsBurt Burt

    Before AfterF 3;1 3;3G 3;6 3;9H 4;1 4;4I 3;3 3;3J 4;0 4;7

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    F G H I J

    Reading Age Pre and Post Intervention (Control Group)

    Pre Post

  • Findings: Qualitative Data (Intervention Group)Dyslexia Determination Test

    Subjects Pre Intervention Post - Intervention

    Basal Level Ceiling Level Basal Level Ceiling Level

    A Pre-Primer Pre-Primer Primer Primer

    B Pre-Primer Pre-Primer Pre-Primer Primer

    C - - Pre-Primer Pre-Primer

    D - - Pre-Primer Pre-Primer

    E Pre-Primer Pre-Primer Primer Grade 1

  • Findings: Qualitative Data (Control Group)Dyslexia Determination Test

    Subjects Pre Intervention Post - Intervention

    Basal Level Ceiling Level Basal Level Ceiling Level

    A - -

    B Primer Primer

    C Pre-Primer Pre-Primer

    D Pre-Primer Grade 1

    E Pre-Primer Pre-Primer

  • DISCUSSION

    Result (intervention and control group)

    Quantitative and Qualitative

    Literature (Vanessa, 2014; Edelson, 2014)

  • Limitation

    Limited number of subjects

    Short intervention duration

    Long term effect?

  • THANK YOU

Recommended

View more >