pre-renovation hazardous materials survey - bay future

Pre-Renovation Hazardous Materials Survey Former Water Plant 488 State Park Drive Bangor Township, Michigan 48706

PREPARED FOR

PROJECT #

DATE

City of Bay City 301 Washington Avenue Bay City, Michigan 48708 12956s-3-194 December 18, 2017

PRE-RENOVATION SURVEY I

1.0 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................1

1.1 PURPOSE ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 SCOPE OF WORK ..................................................................................................................... 1

1.2.1 Asbestos Survey ...................................................................................................... 1 1.2.2 PCB, Mercury, Lead, and Other Hazardous Materials ............................................ 2

1.3 LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS OF THE SURVEY .................................................................... 3

2.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY METHODOLOGY ...........................................................................................4

2.1 DESCRIPTION OF HOMOGENOUS AREAS ................................................................................ 4 2.1 DESCRIPTION OF FUNCTIONAL SPACES .................................................................................. 5 2.2 BULK SAMPLE MATERIAL INVENTORY ..................................................................................... 5 2.3 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES ................................................................................ 5

3.0 ASBESTOS AND OTHER HAZARDOUS MATERIALS CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........6

3.1 HOMOGENEOUS AREA & ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS (ACMS .................................. 6 3.2 SUMMARY OF IDENTIFIED OTHER POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ......................... 10 3.3 ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERS AND MECHANICAL ELEVATOR MOTORS ................................ 11

4.0 LIMITATIONS ........................................................................................................................... 11

5.0 SIGNATURES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS ................................................................. 12

FUNCTIONAL SPACE FIGURES Figure 1 ......................................................................................................... Subject Property Location Map Figure 2 ................................................................................................ Functional Space Map – Upper Level Figure 3 ................................................................................................ Functional Space Map – Lower Level

Figure 4 ................................................................................................... Functional Space Map – Basement

APPENDICES Appendix A .................................................................................................................................. Photographs Appendix B ................................................................................................................. Functional Space Table

Appendix C ........................................................... PCB, Mercury, and Other Hazardous Materials Summary Appendix D .................................................................... Asbestos Laboratory Reports and Chain of Custody

PRE-RENOVATION SURVEY 488 STATE PARK DRIVE BANGOR TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN PAGE 1

PRE-RENOVATION HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY Former Water Plant 488 State Park Drive, Bangor Township, Michigan 48706 AKT Peerless Project No. 12956s-3-194

1.0 Introduction AKT Peerless Environmental Services (AKT Peerless) was retained by the City of Bay City (Client) to conduct a Pre-Renovation Hazardous Materials Survey of the Former Water Plant property located at 488 State Park Drive, Bangor Township, Michigan. AKT Peerless’ scope of work is based on its proposal PS-21854, dated September 14, 2017, as well as the terms and conditions of the agreement with the Client. AKT Peerless’ Pre-Renovation Hazardous Materials Survey was performed for the benefit of the City of Bay City.

1.1 Purpose The purpose of AKT Peerless’ Hazardous Materials (HazMat) Survey was to identify the location and presence of: (1) asbestos-containing building materials (ACBMs); (2) potential polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) containing electrical or hydraulic equipment; (3) potentially hazardous or regulated materials/wastes located in containers and drums; (4) potential, mercury or radioactive-containing equipment or materials located in the buildings; and (5) any other materials that would require special handling or disposal requirements and should be segregated from general construction debris.

1.2 Scope of Work The scope of work for this survey is specifically designed to support facility renovation. AKT Peerless understands that the scope of renovation at the site includes all interior and accessible exterior components of the Building #1 and Building #2.

Michigan Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (LARA) accredited Asbestos Inspectors: Mr. Heath Bobick (A43315) and Mark Breeden (A44842) of AKT Peerless conducted the Pre-Renovation Hazardous Materials Survey of the property.

1.2.1 Asbestos Survey The scope of work for AKT Peerless’ asbestos survey is based on the Asbestos School Hazard Abatement Reauthorization Act (ASHARA). The purpose of ASHARA is to extend the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) inspection and management requirements to commercial and industrial buildings. Since the facility is slated for renovation, it is also subject to Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) standards. ACM survey activities were completed according to the following protocol:


1. Functional spaces were identified for the purpose of assessing all suspect materials, as appropriate.

2. The ACM inspection was performed in an effort to determine the extent and location of ACM present in Building #1 and Building #2. This survey was qualitative and quantitative in that an attempt was made to locate accessible friable and non-friable ACM areas, as well as estimate the amount of ACM. All accessible locations of the survey areas were inspected with exception of inaccessible areas or materials not surveyed that are identified in Section 1.3.

3. Bulk samples of suspect ACMs were collected in accordance with professional standards by a Michigan-accredited Asbestos Building Inspector.

4. Bulk samples were collected in each homogeneous area in accordance with EPA-recommended sampling guidelines.

5. Samples of suspect ACM were analyzed by a National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP)-accredited laboratory for analysis, via Polarized Light Microscopy and dispersion staining (PLM) following the EPA Test Method (EPA-600/M4-82-020) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Bulk Asbestos Handbook.

6. In an effort to minimize costs, the laboratory analyses were performed using first positive stop analysis methodologies. First positive stop involves analyzing samples by homogeneous area groupings. Laboratory analyses proceeded sample by sample, within each homogeneous area grouping until a sample was determined to be asbestos containing.

7. Upon completion of the field inspection and receipt of laboratory data, this report was prepared and includes: (a) a general description of the suspect ACM identified and non-suspect homogeneous materials that were visually evaluated; (b) quantity of suspect materials observed as able to be determined; and (c) laboratory testing results.

1.2.2 PCB, Mercury, Lead, and Other Hazardous Materials The survey for PCBs, potential lead/mercury-containing equipment, and containers that may contain universal hazardous wastes or regulated materials/wastes were completed according to the following procedures:

1. The buildings were inspected for potential hazardous materials such as PCB-containing light ballasts, batteries, chlorofluorocarbon-containing equipment, smoke detectors, exit signs, and mercury light tubes and switches. The survey of lighting/alarm systems comprised a visual inspection of the exterior of accessible emergency, light and exit sign fixtures, panels or components for possible PCB-containing ballast systems, mercury vapor lighting fixtures, batteries, or other hazardous materials. No intrusive examination or contact with manufacturers, sample collection, or testing of this equipment was performed. Limited sampling was performed as summarized, and as part of the survey report, an inventory of the materials identified has been included that summarizes the quantities of the hazardous building materials observed.

During execution of this survey, the work was performed using commercially reasonable best efforts consistent with the level and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions.


1.3 Limitations and Exceptions of the Survey The following general limitations were encountered during the preparation of this survey:

• AKT Peerless uses trained and licensed inspectors in attempting to locate and identify materials potentially containing some form of hazardous material (i.e., asbestos, lead, PCB, etc.). The possibility exists that AKT Peerless did not identify all hazardous materials within the buildings. Some buildings have hidden spaces that may not be immediately obvious to a surveyor, who is not intimately familiar with the buildings, and who has only a limited time in the buildings. There may be additional hazardous materials that were not found because they were not visible or accessible to the inspection team. Asbestos, PCB, lead, and mercury were used in a variety of building components and in many types of materials in the construction of buildings. In some of these materials, a hazardous material may be present, not as an intentional ingredient, but as a contaminant.

The following building-specific limitations apply to this Hazardous Materials Survey:

• Areas enclosed by fixed wall, ceiling systems, and roofing systems were restricted to limited visual access in identifying materials such as, but not limited to: pipe wrap, mud fittings, roof flashing, caulks, etc. Fixed wall and ceiling systems included plaster, concrete and masonry. Roofing systems may include: multiple layers of materials. These systems are installed throughout the exterior and interior areas of the buildings. Due to hatches, pre-existing damage or destructive search techniques, limited inspections of the internal ceiling and wall cavities, as well as roofing areas were performed. Representative intrusive observations were made above drop ceilings, inside walls, and below flooring materials and roofing. As such, a complete survey and delineation of all hidden materials were not performed. Due to these limitations, actual quantities of hazardous materials present may be greater than those inventoried as part of this survey.

• Access to suspect ACM was restricted in areas defined as being located within a regulated

confined space (i.e., such as pipe chases, pipe trenches, attics, etc.). These areas require the use of trained confined space professionals, personnel protective equipment, and rescue personnel. AKT Peerless did not access confined space areas.

• Inaccessible suspect materials observed were assumed to contain asbestos.

• The subject buildings are vacant with limited heating and lighting. AKT Peerless used portable spotlights and flashlights to improve general viewing conditions.

• Interior observations were limited due to utilities in use.

• During the survey, areas of heavy debris, stored items, building contents, remaining furniture, and

facility equipment limited the inspection.

• During the survey, no dismantling of electrical or mechanical equipment was conducted. Since trade personnel was not available (i.e. electricians, plumbers, etc.), no dismantling of equipment was performed to identify the existence of PCB containing components, mercury switches, or asbestos insulation.


• During the survey, no dismantling or sampling of fire doors or fire door frames was conducted, and assumed to contain asbestos.

• During the survey, AKT Peerless was unable to inspect the interior of Building #2.

• During the survey, AKT Peerless was unable to inspect the roof, due to weather conditions and limited accessibility. Additionally, destructive testing was not implemented for the roofing and/or roofing components. Destructive sampling methods of the roofing materials may void the roof warranty and cause significant water damage to the buildings’ interior. Roofing materials are assumed asbestos containing.

• Based on the scope of work approved by the Client, AKT Peerless’ inspection did not include the use of mechanical lift equipment as part of the work, thereby limiting access to elevated areas of the subject buildings’ interiors and/or exteriors.

• Estimated and not estimated quantities of materials reported are based on observations and

estimates made by AKT Peerless at the time of the inspection. Specific materials including, but not limited to: roof flashing, roofing materials, tar coatings, thermal insulation and fittings, pipe wraps and debris, mud fittings, building caulks, and wall adhesives were located in inaccessible areas such as behind fixed walls or ceilings, unsafe areas, confined spaces, and/or elevated heights. Due to these limitations, actual quantities may vary from those estimated as part of this survey.

Other limitations pertaining to material accessibility or characterization may also be described in the survey data tables contained herein.

Quantities of identified ACM reported in this document are provided for reference only and are not authorized to be relied upon for Contractor abatement bidding purposes. AKT Peerless strongly cautions against utilizing the reported material quantities without field verification. It is expected that contractors will utilize their own quantities when preparing bid pricing. AKT Peerless recommends that a contingency allowance be used to address estimating method uncertainties for quantified materials.

2.0 Asbestos Survey Methodology The following sections of this survey outline the approach, procedures, and methods employed by AKT Peerless to complete the ACM Survey of the subject property. Photographs of the subject property are attached as Appendix A.

2.1 Description of Homogenous Areas During the asbestos survey, AKT Peerless identified Homogeneous Areas (HA) based on appearances and type of materials observed. As defined under AHERA, a homogeneous area is an area (material) that appears similar throughout in terms of its color, texture, and date of material application. In addition, building materials suspect for asbestos content are also described based on one of three following material classifications:


Surfacing Materials: A material that is sprayed-on, troweled-on, or otherwise applied to surfaces, such as acoustical plaster on ceilings and fireproofing materials on structural members, or other materials on surfaces for acoustical, fireproofing, or other purposes. Glued-on ceiling panels are interpreted by the State of Michigan as a surfacing material.

Thermal System Insulation: A material that is applied to pipes, fittings, boilers, breeching, tanks, ducts, or other interior structural components to prevent heat lost or gain, or water condensation, or for other purposes.

Miscellaneous Materials: A building material on structural components, structural members or fixtures, such as floor and ceiling panels, and does not include surfacing material or thermal system insulation.

AKT Peerless identified homogeneous suspect ACMs at the subject property for sampling. Homogeneous areas were identified based on the site inspection by AKT Peerless. Any materials that were identified, but were not sampled due to inaccessibility were recorded.

2.1 Description of Functional Spaces In general, functional spaces are defined as spatially distinct units or areas within the buildings, which contain identifiable populations of building occupants. Functional spaces can also include storage spaces, mechanical rooms, closets and services areas, etc. However, a functional space can also be delineated based on general building layouts, facility use factors, and can be assigned using various arbitrary factors that were useful in the completion of this survey. A Functional Space Table is included in Appendix B.

2.2 Bulk Sample Material Inventory Based on homogeneous and functional areas identified during the survey, AKT Peerless collected bulk samples for analysis. Samples were collected in polyethylene containers and labeled with an identification number. In general, AKT Peerless’ sampling protocol consisted of: (a) wetting or misting the sample as appropriate; (b) extracting a sample with a clean knife, chisel, or coring tool; and (c) placing the sample into its properly labeled sample container. The sampling protocol used to procure the appropriate number of samples for an identified homogeneous area of suspect ACM is based on sampling guidelines outlined under AHERA or as proposed in the approved scope of work.

2.3 Laboratory Analytical Procedures All samples collected by AKT Peerless were submitted to Apex Research, Inc. (Apex) of Whitmore Lake, Michigan for analysis. Apex is accredited by the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) and participates in the NVLAP. Samples were submitted under chain-of-custody guidelines to ensure proper handling and delivery of the samples. The samples were analyzed using PLM with dispersion staining in accordance with the following United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) guidance document Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials: EPA/600/R-93/116, dated July 1993.

The USEPA defines ACM as those materials that contain greater than one percent asbestos. Friable materials are defined as those that can be crumbled or reduced to powder by hand pressure. The


NESHAP for asbestos, dated November 1990 stipulates that any friable material identified as containing asbestos in concentrations greater than one percent must be considered ACM.

Materials containing one (1) percent or less asbestos are generally considered non-asbestos-containing, and therefore are not regulated by NESHAP. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) definition of ACM is similarly any material containing more than one (1) percent asbestos. However, specific work practices must be followed under OSHA regulations for materials containing less than one percent asbestos, if an individual layer exceeds one percent. Under the PLM method, percentages and types of fibrous components in these samples were determined by visual estimation of the amount of fibrous materials versus the total amount of material present.

Current USEPA guidelines specify that when initial laboratory analysis of friable or non-friable materials regulated under NESHAP detects the presence of asbestos in a quantity between less than one percent (or trace) and less than ten percent, a verification analysis using the point counting analytical method should be considered or the material in question should be treated as ACBM as identified by PLM analysis. AKT Peerless utilized the “positive-stop” method of sample analyses. In this method, the analyses of a homogeneous material are stopped on a group of samples once the first positive (e.g., greater than 1% asbestos) sample is analyzed. According to the USEPA, if one sample of a homogenous material is identified to be asbestos-containing, the entire material must be considered asbestos-containing.

Based on appearances and type of materials, suspect ACMs were grouped into homogeneous areas and functional spaces as appropriate based on apparent age and similarity in texture and color. Upon completion of these activities, representative bulk samples of the suspect materials were collected. A copy of the bulk sample laboratory report and chain-of-custody record is presented in Appendix D.

3.0 Asbestos and Other Hazardous Materials Conclusions and Recommendations AKT Peerless was retained to conduct a Pre-Renovation Hazardous Materials Survey of the Former Water Plant located at 488 State Park Drive, Bangor Township, Michigan. The purpose of the survey was to identify hazardous materials that will require special handling procedures or removal activities, prior to renovation activities. The following sections of this report summarize the findings of the Pre-Renovation Hazardous Materials Survey.

3.1 Homogeneous Area & Asbestos Containing Materials (ACMs Based on the results of the asbestos survey, the following ACMs were identified:

Summary of Homogeneous Areas & Asbestos Containing Materials

Material Description HA Identified Locations Estimated Quantity F/NF Asbestos

Content

Newer Boiler Casing Jacket 1 FS-1 Boiler Room 250 SF F Assumed

Newer Boiler Interior 2 FS-1 Boiler Room NE F NAD



Content Newer Boiler – Red Gasket

Materials 3 FS-1 Boiler Room 2 SF NF NAD

Black Table Top 4 FS-1 Boiler Room 10 SF NF Assumed

Fire Doors and Frames 5 Throughout 12 CT NF Assumed

Old Boilers Metal Components Insulation Debris/Residual 6 FS-1 Boiler Room 10 SF F 20% CHR

Old Boilers Metal Panels Insulation Debris/Residual 7 FS-1 Boiler Room 4 SF F 5% CHR

15% AMO Old Boilers Internal

Fibrous Debris/Residual 8 FS-1 Boiler Room 5 SF F 10% CHR

Old Boilers Internal Debris Spread/Patching 9 FS-1 Boiler Room 10 SF NF NAD

Old Boilers Internal Fire Brick Debris 10 FS-1 Boiler Room 3 CY NF NAD

Plaster 11 FS-2 Bathroom #1 FS-3 Bathroom #2

FS-9 Vestibule 640 SF F NAD

Debris Pile Grey Reflective Materials 12 FS-1 Boiler Room 1 CY F NAD

Fuse Panel Building Caulk 13 FS-1 Boiler Room 3 SF NF 5% CHR

Interior Door Frame Building Caulk 14 Throughout 120 SF NF 5% CHR

12” White Ceiling Tile 15 FS-5 Office #1 80 SF F NAD

Window Glazing Aluminum Framed Windows 16 FS-24 Exterior 24 CT

(11 SF) NF 5% CHR

Window Glazing Steel Framed Windows 17 FS-4 Landing #1

FS-7 Storage Room #1 10 CT (5 SF) NF NAD

Electrical Control Panels, Fuse Panels, and Associated

Equipment, and Components 18 Throughout NE NF Assumed

Glazing Decorative Windows and Doors 19 FS-9 Vestibule

5 CT Windows

2 CT Doors

NF Assumed

Interior Mortar and Brick 20 Throughout NE NF NAD

Decorative Plaster Trim and Molding 21 FS-9 Vestibule 25 SF F NAD

Cement Type Patching Materials 22 Throughout NE NF NAD

Debris Pile Grey/White Plaster Type

Materials 23

FS-9 Vestibule FS-13 Basement Pump Room

FS-14 Storage Room #3 NE F NAD



Content

Black Sheet Flooring Materials 24 FS-7 Storage Room #1 FS-13 Basement Pump Room 60 SF F

Flooring NAD Glue NAD

White Fibrous Debris 25 FS-12 Lower Level

Pump Room (On Metal Deck/Floor)

1 SF F 15% AMO

Fire Hose 26 FS-13 Basement Pump Room 1 CT NF Assumed

Internal Debris Ludlow Component 27 FS-13 Basement Pump Room 5 SF F NAD

Water Line Gasket Large 28

FS-12 Lower Level Pump Room

FS-13 Basement Pump Room NE F 20% CHR

Cloth Type Gasket Off White 29

FS-12 Lower Level Pump Room

FS-13 Basement Pump Room NE F 60% CHR

Grey Type Gasket 30 FS-13 Basement Pump Room NE F 25% CHR

Red Type Gasket 31 FS-13 Basement Pump Room NE F NAD

Concrete Foundation 32 Throughout NE NF NAD

Ash Pit Door Insulation Materials 33 FS-14 Storage Room #3 40 SF F NAD

Ash Pit Debris 34

FS-16 Ash Pit #1 FS-17 Ash Pit #2 FS-18 Ash Pit #3 FS-19 Ash Pit #4

5 CY NF/F 5% CHR

Ash Pit Sealant/Caulk 35 FS-14 Storage Room #3 NE NF NAD

White Fibrous Powder in Crate 36 FS-14 Storage Room #3 0.5 CY F 10% CHR 10% AMO

Residual Pipe Fittings/Wrap Materials 37 Throughout NE F Assumed

Exterior/Interior Stucco 38 Throughout Interior FS-24 Exterior NE F Assumed

Exterior Building #1 Door Frames and Window

Frames Caulk* 39 FS-24 Exterior NE NF 5% CHR

Large Stack Caulking Southern Most Stack* 40 FS-24 Exterior 25 SF NF 10% - 20%

CHR Exterior Building #2

Door Frames and Window Frames Caulk*

41 FS-24 Exterior NE NF 10% CHR

Exterior Brick and Mortar 42 FS-24 Exterior NE NF NAD

Building #1 Roofing Materials and Components 43 FS-24 Exterior 16,000 SF NF Assumed



Content Building #2 Roofing Materials

and Components 44 FS-24 Exterior 250 SF NF Assumed

Suspect Foundation Tar 45 FS-24 Exterior NE NF Assumed

*Remove All Layers as Asbestos Containing Table Notes: F= Friable NF= Non-Friable NE= Not Estimated SF= Square Feet LF= Linear Feet CY= Cubic Yard NAD= No Asbestos Detected CHR= Chrysotile AMO= Amosite PC= Point Count CT= Count ACM= Asbestos Containing Material (Greater than 1% Asbestos Content) ASSUMED= Suspect material that was not sampled, and assumed asbestos-containing.

The following summarizes our recommendations regarding the ACMs identified:

1. Identified asbestos containing caulking materials may be intact throughout the interior and exterior of the buildings that were not observed during the inspection due to limitations of accessibility and/or observations. Due to building maintenance of the interior and/or exterior of the subject buildings, occurring over the duration of construction, to present day; all caulking materials encountered during renovation activities are to be handled as ACMs in accordance to state and federal regulations.

2. Identified asbestos containing gasket materials may be intact throughout the water line system, and other components (HA-28, HA-29, HA-30). AKT Peerless recommends the water line system gaskets be handled as asbestos containing, as well as other systems utilizing gaskets, to remediate asbestos containing gaskets and/or associated materials in accordance with state and federal regulations.

3. Assumed Residual Pipe Fittings/Wrap Materials (HA-37) were observed within Storage Room #3 (FS-14) intact on piping systems. It is AKT Peerless’ opinion that residual materials are likely to be intact throughout the facility, and recommends piping systems be handled as asbestos containing where residual debris may be encountered during renovation activities, as well as must be handled in accordance with applicable state and federal regulations.

4. Assumed ACMs not accessible or sampled as part of the survey, or discovered during the renovation, are required to be assumed asbestos containing and handled appropriately in accordance with state and federal regulations. Assumed materials must be removed by a licensed contractor in accordance with applicable state and federal regulations or sampled to verify asbestos content.

5. Based on the findings of the Asbestos Survey and the anticipated renovation of the building, AKT Peerless recommends that all identified ACMs be properly removed by a licensed contractor in accordance with applicable state and federal regulations.

6. Suspect materials discovered during renovation activities are required to be assumed asbestos containing and handled appropriately in accordance with state and federal regulations unless determined through laboratory testing identifying them as non-asbestos containing.


7. Due to damage to certain portions of ACM materials and associated components, all building debris that has come in contact with ACM debris and cannot be properly decontaminated, is to be removed and handled as ACM, as well as removed for disposal by a licensed contractor in accordance with applicable state and federal regulations.

8. AKT Peerless attempted to quantify materials based on visual observations made during the survey. Further, it is AKT Peerless’ opinion that additional quantities of ACM may be identified during renovation activities and disposed of in accordance with State and Federal Regulations.

9. Based on findings of the Asbestos Survey, AKT Peerless recommends that an Operations and Maintenance Plan (O & M Plan) be created for the subject property if ACM materials will remain on site and will not be abated during planned renovations. An O & M Plan manual should be prepared to meet USEPA, OSHA, and State of Michigan guidelines concerning ACM. The O & M Plan should be designed to minimize the potential release of asbestos fibers during general work activities, scheduled maintenance, and renovation of the buildings, as well as be in effect until all the ACMs/PACMs have been removed from the facility. The O & M Plan should be designed utilizing the EPA's Document, Managing Asbestos in Place; A Building Owner's Guide to Operations and Maintenance Programs For Asbestos-Containing Materials and the National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS) Guidance Manual: Asbestos Operations and Maintenance Work Practices.

3.2 Summary of Identified Other Potentially Hazardous Materials The HazMat survey was conducted to identify universal hazardous wastes or regulated materials/wastes. The buildings were inspected for potential hazardous materials, such as PCB or oil containing light ballasts, batteries, chlorofluorocarbon-containing equipment, smoke detectors, exit signs, and mercury light tubes and switches. The survey of lighting/alarm systems comprised a visual inspection of the exterior of accessible emergency, light and exit sign fixtures, panels or components for possible PCB-containing ballast systems, mercury vapor lighting fixtures, batteries or other hazardous materials. No intrusive examination or contact with manufacturers, sample collection, or testing of this equipment was performed. No sampling of any hazardous component materials was performed.

During the HazMat Survey, AKT Peerless observed various types and quantities of potentially hazardous materials in the buildings. An inventory of hazardous building materials and containers was prepared and is included in Appendix C.

Hazardous Materials Recommendation:

The following summarizes our recommendations regarding the hazardous materials identified:

1. These materials included in Appendix C and other items banned from landfill disposal, identified during the renovation, should be properly removed and disposed of in accordance with applicable regulations.

2. AKT Peerless recommends that qualified contractors perform the removal of these materials and follow appropriate special handling and disposal measures, which are required before general building demolition or renovation. Based on the conditions observed, it is recommended that


unknown waste materials, and oil stained concrete be sampled and appropriately characterized for waste disposal or recycling purposes, if applicable.

3. During any future renovation or demolition activities that may impact identified oil stained concrete, the contractor must delineate materials and segregate materials from the recyclable materials.

3.3 Electrical Transformers and Mechanical Elevator Motors AKT Peerless identified four transformers on the exterior of the subject buildings. Additionally, AKT Peerless observed various electrical control panels and associated components within the main subject building (Building #1). The transformers, panels, and components may contain PCBs containing oils and/or suspect asbestos containing components.

Prior to renovation activities, AKT Peerless recommends the transformers, electrical control panels, and the associated equipment is assessed for potential PCB containing oil, and limited oil wipe sampling is conducted in areas potentially impacted by oils and/or other miscellaneous fluids. Further, any miscellaneous fluids identified by the contractor should be tested to confirm appropriate material handling and disposal. Additionally, the electrical control panels and associated equipment is assumed to contain asbestos containing components, and be handled in accordance with all applicable state and federal regulations.

4.0 Limitations

The information and opinions obtained in this report are for the exclusive use of the Client. No distribution to or reliance by other parties may occur without the express written permission of AKT Peerless. AKT Peerless will not distribute this report without written consent or as required by law or by a Court order. The information and opinions contained in the report are given in light of that assignment. The report must be reviewed and relied upon only in conjunction with the terms and conditions expressly agreed upon by the parties and as limited therein. Any third parties, who have been extended the right to rely on the contents of this report by AKT Peerless (which is expressly required prior to any third-party release), agrees to be bound by the original terms and conditions entered into by AKT Peerless and the Client.

Subject to the above and the terms and conditions, AKT Peerless accepts responsibility for the competent performance of its duties in executing the assignment and preparing reports in accordance with the normal standards of the profession, but disclaims any responsibility for consequential damages. Although AKT Peerless believes that results contained herein are reliable, AKT Peerless cannot warrant or guarantee that the information provided is exhaustive or that the information provided by the Client or third parties is complete or accurate.


5.0 Signatures of Environmental Professionals The following individuals contributed to the completion of this report.

Heath S. Bobick Environmental Consultant AKT Peerless Saginaw, Michigan Office Phone: 989-754-9896 Fax: 989-754-3804

[email protected]

MIOSHA LARA CSHD Asbestos Inspector Accreditation No. A43315

Sean D. Robinson, CHMM Project Manager-Group Leader AKT Peerless Saginaw, Michigan Office Phone: 989-754-9896 Fax: 989-754-3804

[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

Functional Space Figures

488 STATE PARK DRIVEBANGOR TOWNSHIP, MICHIGANPROJECT NUMBER: 12956s-3-194

SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATION MAP DRAWN BY:

DATE:

OGO

11/28/2017

FIGURE 1

LEGEND

www.aktpeerless.com

FS-11

FS-10

FS-10.3FS-10.2FS-10.1

FS-12

FS-8

FS-5

FS-3

FS-2

FS-4

FS-7

FS-1

FS-9

SMOKE STACKS

SMOKE STACK

FS-22 FS-21 - EXTERIOR


FUNCTIONAL SPACE MAP - UPPER LEVEL DRAWN BY:

DATE:

OGO

12/06/2017

FIGURE 2

30150SCALE: 1" = 30'

www.aktpeerless.com

FS-11

FS-10

FS-10.3FS-10.2FS-10.1

FS-12

FS-8

FS-7FS-6FS-6


FUNCTIONAL SPACE MAP - LOWER LEVEL DRAWN BY:

DATE:

OGO

12/06/2017

FIGURE 3

30150SCALE: 1" = 30'

www.aktpeerless.com

FS-10

FS-10.3FS-10.2FS-10.1

FS-12

FS-13

FS-14

FS-14

FS-19 FS-18

FS-17 FS-16FS-15

FS-23


FUNCTIONAL SPACE MAP - BASEMENT DRAWN BY:

DATE:

OGO

12/06/2017

FIGURE 4

30150SCALE: 1" = 30'

www.aktpeerless.com

Appendix A Photographs

VIEW OF SUBJECT BUILDING 1 FACING SOUTHEAST

VIEW OF SUBJECT BUILDING 1 FACING NORTHEAST

PROPERTY PHOTOGRAPHS

488 STATE PARK DRIVE BANGOR TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN

TAKEN BY: AKT DATE: 12-15-2017

PROJECT NUMBER: 12956s

VIEW OF SUBJECT BUILDING 1 FACING NORTHWEST

VIEW OF SUBJECT BUILDING 1 FACING SOUTHWEST





VIEW OF SUBJECT BUILDING 2 FACING NORTHWEST

REPRESENTATIVE VIEW OF VARIOUS HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND DEBRIS





REPRESENTATIVE VIEW OF ASH PITS

REPRESENTATIVE VIEW OF IDENTIFIED ASBESTOS CONTAINING FUSE PANEL(S)





REPRESENTATIVE VIEW OF WATER LINES AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT

REPRESENTATIVE VIEW OF PRESSURIZED TANKS AND GENERATOR SYSTEM





REPRESENTATIVE VIEW OF SUSPECT MERCURY GAUGES

REPRESENTATIVE VIEW OF WATER LINE WITH ASBESTOS CONTAINING GASKET(S)





REPRESENTATIVE VIEW OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

REPRESENTATIVE VIEW OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND ASBESTOS CONTAINING GASKETS





REPRESENTATIVE VIEW OF INTERIOR OF SUBJECT BUILDING ONE

REPRESENTATIVE VIEW OF ASSUMED ASBESTOS CONATINING

WINDOWS AND DOORS (GLAZING)





REPRESENTIVITIVE VIEW OF HOIST SYSTEM

REPRESENTIVE VIEW OS WATER VAULT





REPRESENTIVE VIEW OF ELECTRICAL PANELS WITH ASSUMED ASBESTOS CONTAINING

COMPONENTS AND SUSPECT MERCURY CONTAINING GAUGES

REPRESENTITIVE VIEW OF ASSUMED ASBESTOS CONTAINING ELECTRICAL COMPONENT





REPRESENTITIVE VIEW OF GENERATOR MOTOR

REPRESENTITVE VIEW OF GENERATOR MOTOR

FROM BASEMENT





REPRESENTIVIVE VIEW OF BATTERIES AND CHARGING SYSTEM

REPRESENTITIVE VVIEW OF IDENTIFIED HAZARDOUS MATERIALS





REPRESENTIVE VIEW OF BOILER SYSTEMS

REPRESENTIVE VIEW OF BOILER DEBRIS





Appendix B Functional Space Table

CLIENT: CITY OF BAY CITYPROJECT NO: 12956s-3-194PROJECT NAME: 488 STATE PARK DRIVE, BANGOR TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN

Functional Space No.

Description

FS-1 BOILER ROOMFS-2 BATHROOM #1FS-3 BATHROOM #2FS-4 LANDING #1FS-5 OFFICE #1FS-6 STORAGE ROOM #1FS-7 STORAGE ROOM #2FS-8 UPPER LEVEL PUMP ROOMFS-9 VESTIBULE

FS-10 NORTH MEZANINEFS-10.1 WATER VAULT #1FS-10.2 WATER VAULT #2FS-10.3 WATER VAULT #3FS-11 CONTROL ROOMFS-12 LOWER LEVEL PUMP ROOMFS-13 BASEMENT PUMP ROOMFS-14 STORAGE ROOM #3FS-15 STORAGE ROOM #4FS-16 ASH PIT #1FS-17 ASH PIT #2FS-18 ASH PIT #3FS-19 ASH PIT #4FS-20 ATTIC ABOVE VESTIBULEFS-21 EXTERIOR FS-22 INTERIOR OF BUILDING #2FS-23 TUNNEL (OFF OF FS-15)FS-24 EXTERIOR

FORMER WATER PLANT FUNCTIONAL SPACE (FS) LISTING

Page 1 of 1

Appendix C PCB, Mercury, and Other Hazardous Materials Table

CFL'

s, M

ercu

ry V

apor

, Fl

ood

Ligh

ts

1' -

3' F

luor

esce

nts

4' F

luor

esce

nts

8' F

luor

esce

nts

1 8 2 5 2 1 3 2

2 2 1 2 134 2 2 1 1 1 15 2 1 2 46 1 4 1 1 17 2 1 2 1

EYE WASH MOTOR - 1 CT

CEILING HEATER - 1

BOILER SYSTEMS & ASSOCIATED

COMPONENTS- 1 CT, HELIX & ASSOCIATED COMPONENTS - 1 CT, CEILING HEATER - 1

CT, HOIST/ZIP LIFT - 1 CT, SMALL MOTOR

COMPONENT - 1 CT, SODIUM SULFIDE 30 GALLON CONTAINER - 1 CT, BOILER SYSTEM

TREATMENT CHEMICALS 40

GALLON CONTAINERS - 3 CT, COMPRESSOR - 1 CT, CEILING FAN UNITS -

2 CT, UNKNOWN CONTENTS IN 55

GALLON DRUMS - 2 CT,

MISCELLANEOUS HAZARDOUS MATERIALS NOT IDENTIFIED

Mat

eria

ls L

ocat

ion

Func

tiona

l Spa

ce

Num

ber

Project Address: 488 STATE PARK DRIVE, BANGOR TOWNSHIP, MICHIGANProject #: 12956s-3-194

Hazardous Material Inventory of Former Water Plant

CEILING HEATER -

Types of Bulbs

Mis

cella

neou

s Ha

zard

ous M

ater

ials

Exit

Sign

s w/L

ight

ing

and/

or B

atte

ry

FORMER WATER PLANT

Fire

Ext

ingu

ishe

rs

Tele

visi

ons

Quantities

Door

Act

uato

r

Mis

c. E

lect

roni

cs

Aero

sol C

ans

Mis

c. C

lean

ers

AC U

nit W

all M

ount

Mis

c. P

aint

s, V

arni

sh, &

St

ains

Susp

ect M

ercu

ry G

auge

s

Drin

king

Fou

ntai

ns

Ther

mos

tat /

Th

erm

omet

er

Smok

e De

tect

ors

Ligh

t Bal

last

s

1

CFL'

s, M

ercu

ry V

apor

, Fl

ood

Ligh

ts

1' -

3' F

luor

esce

nts

4' F

luor

esce

nts

8' F

luor

esce

nts

Mat

eria

ls L

ocat

ion

Func

tiona

l Spa

ce

Num

ber

Project Address: 488 STATE PARK DRIVE, BANGOR TOWNSHIP, MICHIGANProject #: 12956s-3-194

Hazardous Material Inventory of Former Water PlantTypes of Bulbs

Mis

cella

neou

s Ha

zard

ous M

ater

ials

Exit

Sign

s w/L

ight

ing

and/

or B

atte

ry

FORMER WATER PLANT

Fire

Ext

ingu

ishe

rs

Tele

visi

ons

Door

Act

uato

r

Mis

c. E

lect

roni

cs

Aero

sol C

ans

Mis

c. C

lean

ers

AC U

nit W

all M

ount

Mis

c. P

aint

s, V

arni

sh, &

St

ains

Susp

ect M

ercu

ry G

auge

s

Drin

king

Fou

ntai

ns

Ther

mos

tat /

Th

erm

omet

er

Smok

e De

tect

ors

Ligh

t Bal

last

s

8 1 22 10 3 2 3

9 210 2 2 111 4 2 1 3 212 2 2 213 15 17 8 2 2 24 214 11 2 2 10 2 415 2 2 2 11617181920212223

24 6 1

0 39 3 69 14 29 0 5 13 10 12 34 4 2 6 1 0 0

CEILING FAN - 6 CT, 40 GALLON DRUM

CONTENTS UNKNOWN - 1 CT,

SIMPLEX MONITORING

MISCELLANEOUS MISCELLANEOUS

MISCELLANEOUS HAZARDOUS MATERIALS NOT IDENTIFIED

-

CEILING HEATER - 2 PUMP SYSTEM

TRANSFORMERS - 4CT, SECURITY

SYSTEM

MISCELLANEOUS HAZARDOUS MATERIALS NOT IDENTIFIEDMISCELLANEOUS HAZARDOUS MATERIALS NOT IDENTIFIEDMISCELLANEOUS HAZARDOUS MATERIALS NOT IDENTIFIED

MISCELLANEOUS HAZARDOUS MATERIALS NOT IDENTIFIEDMISCELLANEOUS HAZARDOUS MATERIALS NOT IDENTIFIEDMISCELLANEOUS HAZARDOUS MATERIALS NOT IDENTIFIEDMISCELLANEOUS HAZARDOUS MATERIALS NOT IDENTIFIED

Totals

CEILING HEATER - 1

12 TON HOIST AND

2

Appendix D ACM Laboratory Reports and Chain of Custody

Certificate of Laboratory AnalysisTest Method, Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM)

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:

Mr. Heath Bobick

Date Reported:

1-1

2-1

Lab ID #: Mineral Wool - 5%

73637 - 01

Appearance:

NO SAMPLE RECEIVED

Asbestos Present:

Lab ID #: Mineral Wool - 10%

NOOther - 95%

grey,fibrous,nonhomogenous

Other - 90%Material: Cust. #:

Accessed Via Side Hatch

Test Method EPA 600/R-93/116 was used to analyze the above samples. Matrix interference and/or resolution limits may yield false/negative results in certain circumstances.

Suspect floor tiles containing <1% should be tested with SEM or TEM. This certificate of analysis relates only to the samples tested and to insure the integrity of the results, may

only be reproduced in full. This certificate may not be used by the customer to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the US Government. APEX Research Inc.

is not responsible for the accuracy of the results for layered samples or samples comprising multiple materials. Liability limited to cost of analysis.

of

Robert T. Letarte Jr., Laboratory Director

1

Cust. #:

73637 - 02

No Asbestos Observed

Asbestos Present:

(Not Sampled)Material:

Newer Boiler Interior

grey,fibrous,nonhomogenous

73637 - 03

Project: 488 State Park Drive, Bay City, MI

Report To:

of

AKT Peerless

ARI Report # Date Collected: Date Received:

Project #: 12956s

12/15/17

Lab ID #:

12/05/1712/08/1712/14/17

17-73637

214 Janes Ave.Saginaw, MI 48607

Appearance:

Sample Information Asbestos Type/Percent Non-Asbestos

Cust. #:

Date Analyzed:


NOAsbestos Present:

NVLAP Lab Code 102118-0

For Layered Samples, each component will be analyzed and reported separately.

1

Newer Boiler Casing Jacket

Newer Boiler Interior2-2

Appearance: Accessed Via Side Hatch

Material:

of 11

APEX Research Inc., 11054 Hi Tech Drive, Whitmore Lake, MI 48189 (734) 449-9990, Fax (734) 449-9991

Page 1 of 32


Mr. Heath Bobick

Date Reported:


Report To:

AKT Peerless


Project #: 12956s

12/15/17

12/05/1712/08/1712/14/17

17-73637


Date Analyzed:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:

Appearance: 1 of 1

Other - 100%


NO Other - 100%

black,nonfibrous,nonhomogenous

NO

Material:

Asbestos Present:

Newer Boiler - Red Gasket MaterialsCust. #:

4-1

Lab ID #:

Cust. #:

1 of

73637 - 06

Cust. #:

Asbestos Present:

Asbestos Present:

3-2

73637 - 05Lab ID #:

Lab ID #:

3-1 No Asbestos Observed

73637 - 04


Newer Boiler - Red Gasket Materials


of







NO SAMPLE RECEIVEDMaterial: Black Table Top

Material:

Appearance: black,nonfibrous,nonhomogenous

Appearance: (Not Sampled)

1


Page 2 of 32


Mr. Heath Bobick

Date Reported:


Report To:

AKT Peerless


Project #: 12956s

12/15/17

12/05/1712/08/1712/14/17

17-73637


Date Analyzed:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:

Lab ID #: 73637 - 09 Asbestos Present:

of

Material: Metal Components Insulation

Asbestos Present: YES Mineral Wool - 20%Lab ID #: 73637 - 08



Appearance:

Cust. #: 5-1

Old Boilers - Debris/Residual


Appearance:


of

(Not Sampled)Material: Fire Doors & Frames NO SAMPLE RECEIVED

Other - 60%Chrysotile - 20%6-1

Old Boilers - Debris/ResidualAppearance: white,fibrous,nonhomogenous

Cust. #:

1 of 1


Material: Cust. #: 6-2

Metal Components Insulation NOT ANALYZED






Page 3 of 32


Mr. Heath Bobick

Date Reported:


Report To:

AKT Peerless


Project #: 12956s

12/15/17

12/05/1712/08/1712/14/17

17-73637


Date Analyzed:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:

Cust. #: 8-1 Chrysotile - 10% Other - 75%Material: Internal Debris

Appearance: brown,fibrous,nonhomogenousOld Boilers - Debris/Residual

Appearance: grey,fibrous,homogenous

Cust. #: 7-1


Asbestos Present:

Metal Panels InsulationChrysotile - 5% Other - 70%Amosite - 15%

1

Old Boilers - Debris/Residual

of

Asbestos Present: YES Mineral Wool - 15%Lab ID #:

Lab ID #: Mineral Wool - 10%YES73637 - 10

1 of

Material:

Cust. #: 7-1

73637 - 12

Lab ID #: 73637 - 11

Appearance:

Asbestos Present:

Material: Metal Panels Insulation NOT ANALYZEDOld Boilers - Debris/Residual







1 of 1



Page 4 of 32


Mr. Heath Bobick

Date Reported:


Report To:

AKT Peerless


Project #: 12956s

12/15/17

12/05/1712/08/1712/14/17

17-73637


Date Analyzed:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:

Internal DebrisOld Boilers - Spread/Patching Material


NOLab ID #: 73637 - 15 Asbestos Present:

brown,nonfibrous,nonhomogenous11 of

Appearance:

Other - 100%

Appearance: Old Boilers - Debris/Residual

9-1

Lab ID #: Asbestos Present:


73637 - 13Lab ID #: Asbestos Present:

No Asbestos ObservedMaterial: Internal DebrisCust. #: 9-2

1

Material:

Material:

of

Cust. #:

Internal Debris8-2Cust. #:

NOT ANALYZED

Other - 100%73637 - 14 NO


1 of


Old Boilers - Spread/Patching Material






Appearance: brown,nonfibrous,nonhomogenous


Page 5 of 32


Mr. Heath Bobick

Date Reported:


Report To:

AKT Peerless


Project #: 12956s

12/15/17

12/05/1712/08/1712/14/17

17-73637


Date Analyzed:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:







1 of 1

NO Cellulose - 1%

Other - 99%

Appearance: white,nonfibrous,homogenous

Asbestos Present:

Cust. #: 11-1 No Asbestos ObservedMaterial: Plaster

Lab ID #: 73637 - 18

1

Material: Internal Fire Brick Debris

yellow,nonfibrous,nonhomogenous

Asbestos Present:

Old Boilers

NO Other - 100%

1 of 1

Lab ID #: 73637 - 17



Other - 100%

Material: Internal Fire Brick DebrisOld Boilers

Appearance: yellow,nonfibrous,homogenous


Cust. #: 10-1 No Asbestos Observed

NO

of 1Appearance:



Page 6 of 32


Mr. Heath Bobick

Date Reported:


Report To:

AKT Peerless


Project #: 12956s

12/15/17

12/05/1712/08/1712/14/17

17-73637


Date Analyzed:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:








1 of 1

Other - 75%

NO Fiberglass - 5%

Vermiculite - 20%

Lab ID #:

Appearance: brown,fibrous,homogenous

Appearance:

Asbestos Present:


Between Old and Newer Boiler UnitsMaterial: Grey/Reflective Material - Debris Pile

73637 - 21

of 11

Material: Plaster

white,nonfibrous,homogenous

NO Other - 100%



1 of 1Appearance: white,nonfibrous,homogenous

Material: Plaster

NO Other - 100%

Cust. #:


Lab ID #: 73637 - 19


Asbestos Present:


Page 7 of 32


Mr. Heath Bobick

Date Reported:


Report To:

AKT Peerless


Project #: 12956s

12/15/17

12/05/1712/08/1712/14/17

17-73637


Date Analyzed:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:








of

NOT ANALYZED

Lab ID #:

Appearance:

Appearance:

Asbestos Present:

Cust. #: 13-2

Fuse PanelMaterial: Building Caulk

Fuse Panel

73637 - 24

of 11

Material: Building Caulk

brown,fibrous,homogenous

YES Other - 95%

Cust. #: 13-1 Chrysotile - 5%


1 of 1

Between Old and Newer Boiler Units

Vermiculite - 15%

Appearance: brown,fibrous,homogenous

Lab ID #: 73637 - 22


Asbestos Present:

Material: Grey/Reflective Material - Debris Pile Other - 80%

NO Fiberglass - 5%

Cust. #:



Page 8 of 32


Mr. Heath Bobick

Date Reported:


Report To:

AKT Peerless


Project #: 12956s

12/15/17

12/05/1712/08/1712/14/17

17-73637


Date Analyzed:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:








1 of 1

NO Cellulose - 80%

Other - 20%

Lab ID #:

Appearance: brown,fibrous,nonhomogenous

Appearance:

Asbestos Present:

Cust. #: 15-1 No Asbestos ObservedMaterial: 12" White Ceiling Tile

Interior Door Frame

73637 - 27

of

Material: Building Caulk NOT ANALYZEDCust. #: 14-2


1 of 1

Interior Door FrameAppearance: grey,fibrous,homogenous

Lab ID #: 73637 - 25

14-1 Chrysotile - 5%

Asbestos Present:

Material: Building Caulk

YES Other - 95%

Cust. #:



Page 9 of 32


Mr. Heath Bobick

Date Reported:


Report To:

AKT Peerless


Project #: 12956s

12/15/17

12/05/1712/08/1712/14/17

17-73637


Date Analyzed:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:








of

NOT ANALYZED

Lab ID #:

Appearance:

Appearance:

Asbestos Present:

Cust. #: 16-2

Aluminum Framed WindowsMaterial: Window Glazing

Aluminum Framed Windows

73637 - 30

of 11

Material: Window Glazing

grey,fibrous,homogenous

YES Other - 95%



1 of 1

Other - 20%

Appearance: brown,fibrous,nonhomogenous

Lab ID #: 73637 - 28


Asbestos Present:

Material: 12" White Ceiling Tile

NO Cellulose - 80%

Cust. #:



Page 10 of 32


Mr. Heath Bobick

Date Reported:


Report To:

AKT Peerless


Project #: 12956s

12/15/17

12/05/1712/08/1712/14/17

17-73637


Date Analyzed:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:








of

NO SAMPLE RECEIVED

Lab ID #:

Appearance:

Appearance:

Asbestos Present:

Cust. #: 18-1

(Not Sampled)Material: Westing House Fuse/Breaker Unit

Steel Framed Windows

73637 - 33

of 11


brown,nonfibrous,homogenous

NO Other - 100%



1 of 1

Steel Framed Windows

Other - 99%

Appearance: brown,nonfibrous,homogenous

Lab ID #: 73637 - 31


Asbestos Present:


NO Cellulose - 1%

Cust. #:



Page 11 of 32


Mr. Heath Bobick

Date Reported:


Report To:

AKT Peerless


Project #: 12956s

12/15/17

12/05/1712/08/1712/14/17

17-73637


Date Analyzed:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:








2 of 2

NO Other - 100%Lab ID #:

Appearance: grey,nonfibrous,homogenous

Appearance:

Asbestos Present:

Cust. #: 20-1 No Asbestos ObservedMaterial: Mortar

73637 - 35a

of 21

Material: Interior Brick

beige,nonfibrous,homogenous

NO Other - 100%



of

Decorative Windows/DoorsAppearance:

Lab ID #: 73637 - 34

19-1

Asbestos Present:

Material: Suspect Glazing NO SAMPLE RECEIVEDCust. #:



Page 12 of 32


Mr. Heath Bobick

Date Reported:


Report To:

AKT Peerless


Project #: 12956s

12/15/17

12/05/1712/08/1712/14/17

17-73637


Date Analyzed:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:








1 of 2


Appearance: beige,nonfibrous,homogenous

Appearance:

Asbestos Present:

Cust. #: 20-3 No Asbestos ObservedMaterial: Interior Brick

73637 - 37

of 22

Material: Mortar

grey,nonfibrous,homogenous

NO Other - 100%


Lab ID #: 73637 - 36a Asbestos Present:

1 of 2Appearance: beige,nonfibrous,homogenous

Lab ID #: 73637 - 36


Asbestos Present:

Material: Interior Brick

NO Other - 100%

Cust. #:



Page 13 of 32


Mr. Heath Bobick

Date Reported:


Report To:

AKT Peerless


Project #: 12956s

12/15/17

12/05/1712/08/1712/14/17

17-73637


Date Analyzed:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:








1 of 1



Appearance:

Asbestos Present:


Trim/MoldingMaterial: Decorative Plaster

Trim/Molding

73637 - 39

of 11

Material: Decorative Plaster


NO Cellulose - 1%

Cust. #: 21-1 No Asbestos Observed Other - 99%


2 of 2Appearance: grey,nonfibrous,homogenous

Lab ID #: 73637 - 37a


Asbestos Present:

Material: Mortar

NO Other - 100%

Cust. #:



Page 14 of 32


Mr. Heath Bobick

Date Reported:


Report To:

AKT Peerless


Project #: 12956s

12/15/17

12/05/1712/08/1712/14/17

17-73637


Date Analyzed:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:








1 of 1



Appearance:

Asbestos Present:

Cust. #: 22-2 No Asbestos ObservedMaterial: Cement Type Patching Materials

73637 - 42

of 11

Material: Cement Type Patching Materials


NO Cellulose - 1%

Cust. #: 22-1 No Asbestos Observed Other - 99%


1 of 1

Trim/MoldingAppearance: grey,nonfibrous,homogenous

Lab ID #: 73637 - 40


Asbestos Present:

Material: Decorative Plaster

NO Other - 100%

Cust. #:



Page 15 of 32


Mr. Heath Bobick

Date Reported:


Report To:

AKT Peerless


Project #: 12956s

12/15/17

12/05/1712/08/1712/14/17

17-73637


Date Analyzed:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:








1 of 1

NO Cellulose - 1%

Other - 99%

Lab ID #:


Appearance:

Asbestos Present:


Debris PileMaterial: Grey/White Plaster Type Materials

Debris Pile

73637 - 45

of 11

Material: Grey/White Plaster Type Materials


NO Other - 100%




Lab ID #: 73637 - 43


Asbestos Present:

Material: Cement Type Patching Materials

NO Other - 100%

Cust. #:



Page 16 of 32


Mr. Heath Bobick

Date Reported:


Report To:

AKT Peerless


Project #: 12956s

12/15/17

12/05/1712/08/1712/14/17

17-73637


Date Analyzed:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:








1 of 2

NO Cellulose - 1%

Other - 99%

Lab ID #:

Appearance: black,nonfibrous,homogenous

Appearance:

Asbestos Present:

Cust. #: 24-2 No Asbestos ObservedMaterial: Black Sheet Flooring

73637 - 47

of 22

Material: Glue

yellow,nonfibrous,homogenous

NO Other - 100%



1 of 2

Other - 99%

Appearance: black,nonfibrous,homogenous

Lab ID #: 73637 - 46


Asbestos Present:

Material: Black Sheet Flooring

NO Cellulose - 1%

Cust. #:



Page 17 of 32


Mr. Heath Bobick

Date Reported:


Report To:

AKT Peerless


Project #: 12956s

12/15/17

12/05/1712/08/1712/14/17

17-73637


Date Analyzed:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:








of

NOT ANALYZED

Lab ID #:

Appearance:

Appearance:

Asbestos Present:

Cust. #: 25-2Material: White Debris - Chunk

73637 - 49

of 11

Material: White Debris - Chunk

white,fibrous,homogenous

YES Other - 85%

Cust. #: 25-1 Amosite - 15%


2 of 2Appearance: yellow,nonfibrous,homogenous

Lab ID #: 73637 - 47a


Asbestos Present:

Material: Glue

NO Other - 100%

Cust. #:



Page 18 of 32


Mr. Heath Bobick

Date Reported:


Report To:

AKT Peerless


Project #: 12956s

12/15/17

12/05/1712/08/1712/14/17

17-73637


Date Analyzed:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:








1 of 1


Appearance: white,nonfibrous,homogenous

Appearance:

Asbestos Present:


Ludlow ComponentMaterial: Internal Debris

Ludlow Component

73637 - 52

of 11

Material: Internal Debris

white,nonfibrous,homogenous

NO Other - 100%



of

(Not Sampled)Appearance:

Lab ID #: 73637 - 50

26-1

Asbestos Present:

Material: Fire Hoses NO SAMPLE RECEIVEDCust. #:



Page 19 of 32


Mr. Heath Bobick

Date Reported:


Report To:

AKT Peerless


Project #: 12956s

12/15/17

12/05/1712/08/1712/14/17

17-73637


Date Analyzed:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:








1 of 1

YES Cellulose - 20%

Other - 20%

Lab ID #:

Appearance: white,fibrous,homogenous

Appearance:

Asbestos Present:

Cust. #: 29-1 Chrysotile - 60%Material: Cloth Type Gasket

73637 - 55

of

Material: Water Line Gasket - Large NOT ANALYZEDCust. #: 28-2


1 of 1Appearance: grey,fibrous,homogenous

Lab ID #: 73637 - 53


Asbestos Present:

Material: Water Line Gasket - Large

YES Other - 80%

Cust. #:



Page 20 of 32


Mr. Heath Bobick

Date Reported:


Report To:

AKT Peerless


Project #: 12956s

12/15/17

12/05/1712/08/1712/14/17

17-73637


Date Analyzed:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:








of

NOT ANALYZED

Lab ID #:

Appearance:

Appearance:

Asbestos Present:

Cust. #: 30-2Material: Grey Type Gasket

73637 - 58

of 11

Material: Grey Type Gasket


YES Other - 75%



ofAppearance:

Lab ID #: 73637 - 56

29-2

Asbestos Present:

Material: Cloth Type Gasket NOT ANALYZEDCust. #:



Page 21 of 32


Mr. Heath Bobick

Date Reported:


Report To:

AKT Peerless


Project #: 12956s

12/15/17

12/05/1712/08/1712/14/17

17-73637


Date Analyzed:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer: 1 of 1










Material: Concrete Foundation

NO Other - 100%


Appearance: red,nonfibrous,homogenous

Material: Red Type Gasket

1 of 1

NO Other - 100%



1 of 1Appearance: red,nonfibrous,homogenous

Lab ID #: NO Other - 100%

Cust. #:

Asbestos Present:

Material: Red Type Gasket


73637 - 59



Page 22 of 32


Mr. Heath Bobick

Date Reported:


Report To:

AKT Peerless


Project #: 12956s

12/15/17

12/05/1712/08/1712/14/17

17-73637


Date Analyzed:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:








1 of 1



Appearance:

Asbestos Present:

Cust. #: 32-4 No Asbestos ObservedMaterial: Concrete Foundation

73637 - 64

of 11



NO Other - 100%




Cust. #: 32-2 No Asbestos ObservedMaterial: Concrete Foundation

Lab ID #: 73637 - 62 Asbestos Present: NO Other - 100%



Page 23 of 32


Mr. Heath Bobick

Date Reported:


Report To:

AKT Peerless


Project #: 12956s

12/15/17

12/05/1712/08/1712/14/17

17-73637


Date Analyzed:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:








1 of 1



Appearance:

Asbestos Present:

Cust. #: 33-2 No Asbestos ObservedMaterial: Ash Pit Door Materials

73637 - 67

of 11

Material: Ash Pit Door Materials

grey,nonfibrous,nonhomogenous

NO Other - 100%




Lab ID #: 73637 - 65


Asbestos Present:


NO Other - 100%

Cust. #:



Page 24 of 32


Mr. Heath Bobick

Date Reported:


Report To:

AKT Peerless


Project #: 12956s

12/15/17

12/05/1712/08/1712/14/17

17-73637


Date Analyzed:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:








of

NOT ANALYZED

Lab ID #:

Appearance:

Appearance:

Asbestos Present:

Cust. #: 34-2Material: Ash Pit Debris

73637 - 70

of 11

Material: Ash Pit Debris


YES Mineral Wool - 10%

Cust. #: 34-1 Chrysotile - 5% Other - 85%



Lab ID #: 73637 - 68


Asbestos Present:

Material: Ash Pit Door Materials

NO Other - 100%

Cust. #:



Page 25 of 32


Mr. Heath Bobick

Date Reported:


Report To:

AKT Peerless


Project #: 12956s

12/15/17

12/05/1712/08/1712/14/17

17-73637


Date Analyzed:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:








1 of 1


Appearance: brown,nonfibrous,homogenous

Appearance:

Asbestos Present:

Cust. #: 35-2 No Asbestos ObservedMaterial: Ash Pit Door Frame Sealant/Caulk

73637 - 73

of 11

Material: Ash Pit Door Frame Sealant/Caulk

brown,nonfibrous,homogenous

NO Other - 100%



ofAppearance:

Lab ID #: 73637 - 71

34-3

Asbestos Present:

Material: Ash Pit Debris NOT ANALYZEDCust. #:



Page 26 of 32


Mr. Heath Bobick

Date Reported:


Report To:

AKT Peerless


Project #: 12956s

12/15/17

12/05/1712/08/1712/14/17

17-73637


Date Analyzed:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:








of

NOT ANALYZED

Lab ID #:

Appearance:

Appearance:

Asbestos Present:

Cust. #: 36-2Material: White Fibrous Powder - In Crate

73637 - 76

of 11

Material: White Fibrous Powder - In Crate Amosite - 10%

white,fibrous,homogenous

YES Other - 80%



1 of 1Appearance: brown,nonfibrous,homogenous

Lab ID #: 73637 - 74


Asbestos Present:

Material: Ash Pit Door Frame Sealant/Caulk

NO Other - 100%

Cust. #:



Page 27 of 32


Mr. Heath Bobick

Date Reported:


Report To:

AKT Peerless


Project #: 12956s

12/15/17

12/05/1712/08/1712/14/17

17-73637


Date Analyzed:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:








1 of 1



Appearance:

Asbestos Present:


Door/Window Frames - Building 1Material: Exterior Building Caulk

(Not Sampled)

73637 - 79

of

Material: Exterior/Interior Stucco Panels NO SAMPLE RECEIVEDCust. #: 38-1


of

(Not Sampled)Appearance:

Lab ID #: 73637 - 77

37-1

Asbestos Present:

Material: Residual Pipe Fittings/Wrap Materials NO SAMPLE RECEIVEDCust. #:



Page 28 of 32


Mr. Heath Bobick

Date Reported:


Report To:

AKT Peerless


Project #: 12956s

12/15/17

12/05/1712/08/1712/14/17

17-73637


Date Analyzed:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:








1 of 2

YES Other - 80%Lab ID #:

Appearance: black,fibrous,homogenous

Appearance:

Asbestos Present:


Southern Most StackMaterial: Large Stack Caulking

Door/Window Frames - Building 1

73637 - 81

of 22

Material: Rubber


NO Other - 100%



1 of 2

Door/Window Frames - Building 1Appearance: grey,fibrous,homogenous

Lab ID #: 73637 - 80


Asbestos Present:

Material: Exterior Building Caulk

YES Other - 95%

Cust. #:



Page 29 of 32


Mr. Heath Bobick

Date Reported:


Report To:

AKT Peerless


Project #: 12956s

12/15/17

12/05/1712/08/1712/14/17

17-73637


Date Analyzed:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:








1 of 1

YES Other - 90%Lab ID #:

Appearance: grey,fibrous,homogenous

Appearance:

Asbestos Present:


Door/Window Frames - Building 2Material: Exterior Building Caulk

Southern Most Stack

73637 - 83

of

Material: Large Stack Caulking NOT ANALYZEDCust. #: 40-2


2 of 2

Southern Most StackAppearance: white,fibrous,homogenous

Lab ID #: 73637 - 81a


Asbestos Present:

Material: White Caulk

YES Other - 90%

Cust. #:



Page 30 of 32


Mr. Heath Bobick

Date Reported:


Report To:

AKT Peerless


Project #: 12956s

12/15/17

12/05/1712/08/1712/14/17

17-73637


Date Analyzed:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:








1 of 1



Appearance:

Asbestos Present:

Cust. #: 42-2 No Asbestos ObservedMaterial: Exterior Brick Mortar

73637 - 86

of 11

Material: Exterior Brick Mortar


NO Other - 100%



of

Door/Window Frames - Building 2Appearance:

Lab ID #: 73637 - 84

41-2

Asbestos Present:

Material: Exterior Building Caulk NOT ANALYZEDCust. #:



Page 31 of 32


Mr. Heath Bobick

Date Reported:


Report To:

AKT Peerless


Project #: 12956s

12/15/17

12/05/1712/08/1712/14/17

17-73637


Date Analyzed:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:

Location:

Layer:








of

Lab ID #:

Appearance:

Appearance:

Asbestos Present:

Cust. #: Material:

(Not Sampled) NO SAMPLE RECEIVED

of

Material: Building One Roofing Materials/ComponentsCust. #: 43-2


of

(Not Sampled) NO SAMPLE RECEIVEDAppearance:

Lab ID #: 73637 - 87

43-1

Asbestos Present:

Material: Building One Roofing Materials/ComponentsCust. #:



Page 32 of 32

pre-renovation hazardous materials survey - bay future

Documents