pre-demolition asbestos survey - pinal county, arizona...pre-demolition asbestos survey location:...
TRANSCRIPT
O L E A . S O L B E R G , P . E . C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R
5 0 8 E . B A R R U S P L A C E • C A S A G R A N D E , A R I Z O N A • 8 5 1 2 2 - 1 6 0 2
P H O N E : ( 5 2 0 ) 8 3 6 - 0 2 7 0 • O L E @ S O L B E R G E N G I N E E R I N G . C O M
Pre-Demolition Asbestos Survey
Location:
Pinal County Building F 31 N Pinal St Florence, Arizona 85132
Prepared for: Hattie Sturgill Project Coordinator Pinal County Dept of Facility Management P.O. Box 876 121 W. 22nd St, Florence AZ 85132
Project Number 219044
Prepared by:
Sept 23, 2019
Ole A. Solberg, P. E.
September 20, 2019
Table of Contents
1.0 SUMMARY .............................................................................................................. 1
1.1 Asbestos Summary ................................................................................................ 1 2.0 INSPECTION DESCRIPTION ................................................................................ 2 3.0 LIMITATIONS ......................................................................................................... 2 4.0 SITE INFORMATION ............................................................................................. 3
4.1 Site Inspection ....................................................................................................... 3 4.2 Site Description ..................................................................................................... 3 4.3 Review of Building Plans ...................................................................................... 3 4.4 Review of Prior Surveys ........................................................................................ 3
5.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGY ......................................... 4
5.1 Sampling Methods ................................................................................................. 4
5.2 Analytical Methods................................................................................................ 4 6.0 BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS AND HOMOGENOUS AREAS ............................. 4
6.1 Laboratory Results ................................................................................................. 4
7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................................... 4
List of Appendices
APPENDIX A - Site Map with Sample Locations
APPENDIX B - Homogenous Area Descriptions & Bulk Sample Logs
APPENDIX C - Laboratory Summary, Laboratory Analysis & Chain of Custody
APPENDIX D - Certifications
Sept 23, 2019
Page 1
1.0 SUMMARY
Site Description ..........Pinal County Building F
Site Location ..............31 N Pinal St, Florence, Arizona, 85132
Contact .......................Hattie Sturgill Phone Number ......520-866-6914
Type of Inspection .....Complete NESHAPS Demolition Inspection
Date Inspected ............September 17, 2019
Inspector .....................Ole A. Solberg, P.E. Training Provider ...............................TAI
Inspector’s EPA/AHEARA Certificate Number ....4644-4846-051819
Certificate Expiration Date ...................................May 18, 2020
Number of homogenous areas identified .......27
Number of samples taken...............................41
Homogenous areas assumed positive.............None
1.1 Asbestos Summary
Functional Space: Building F
Category I Non-Friable Material (may be demolished in place, must be removed if burned)
Homogenous Area Amount U/M Result
Roof Mastic Old Roof 52 SqFt Positive
Category II Non-Friable Material (required removal depends on demolition methods used, must
be removed if burned)
Homogenous Area Amount U/M Result
None N/A N/A
Category II Friable Material (must be removed if demolished or burned)
Homogenous Area Amount U/M Result
None N/A N/A
Page 2
2.0 INSPECTION DESCRIPTION
An asbestos survey was performed on the Pinal County Building F on September 17, 2019, by Ole
A. Solberg, P.E. and Alexis Solberg, as requested by Hattie Sturgill of Pinal County Dept of
Facility Management. The purpose of this survey was to identify asbestos-containing materials
(ACM's) used in the construction of the building prior to demolition. This survey was performed
in general accordance with the guidelines set forth in U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 763 Asbestos-Containing Materials in Schools:
Final Rule and Notice (AHERA), and 40 CFR Part 61 National Emission Standards for Hazardous
Air Pollutants (NESHAP); Asbestos NESHAP Revision; Final Rule.
This survey was destructive in nature and all accessible materials were sampled for asbestos.
Hidden pipes, locked rooms, etc. were not sampled. Commonly known building materials that
contain asbestos were assumed to contain asbestos. The sampling of the building materials (i.e.,
floors, walls, ceiling, insulation, roofs, thermal pipe insulation, and other miscellaneous materials)
were performed on a homogenous-area basis. A homogeneous material is defined as uniform in
color and texture. Friable and nonfriable materials were sampled and tested. Friable asbestos
material, as defined by NESHAP, is any material containing more than 1 percent asbestos that,
when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure.
Only those areas and materials identified in this report were surveyed. All other areas and materials
of construction not identified in this report must be assumed to be asbestos containing material
unless they are surveyed and or sampled by an EPA certified AHERA inspector. Forty bulk
samples were collected from the subject site during this survey. One sample was used for multiple
materials. Multiple homogenous areas were identified during the survey. None of the homogenous
areas were assumed with the presence of asbestos.
3.0 LIMITATIONS
This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted practices for use by the client
for evaluation purposes. The named inspector observed that degree of care and skill generally
exercised by the profession under similar circumstances and conditions.
This report does not, in any way, represent a warranty or guarantee that there are no asbestos
containing material (ACM) within the building, or within building components that are not
accessible or sampled during the survey. Destructive sampling was undertaken during the survey.
It should be noted that the ACM test program results were based on the named inspector's field
investigation and analyses of selected samples which are assumed to be representative of the
materials within the structure. It is recommended that, unless a renovation area/material has been
sampled and shown through analysis to be negative, the material should be assumed to be asbestos
containing, until sampled and analyzed for the presents of asbestos.
This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of Pinal County Dept of
Facility Management, solely for their use and reliance in the evaluation of this site. This report and
the findings contained herein shall not, in whole or in part, be disseminated or conveyed to any
Page 3
other party, nor used by any other party in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of
Pinal County Dept of Facility Management.
4.0 SITE INFORMATION
4.1 Site Inspection
An asbestos survey was performed on September 17, 2019, by Ole A. Solberg, P.E., an
EPA/AHERA accredited Asbestos Inspector No. 4644-4846-051819. The purpose of this survey
was to identify ACM's used in the construction of the buildings on the subject site prior to
demolition.
4.2 Site Description
The subject site is comprised of slab on grade floors with concrete masonry unit (CMU) exterior
walls with an exterior stucco. The Public Works portion has a masonry exterior and storefront
entrance/windows. The interior walls are constructed of various materials such as; steel and wood
stud with textured wallboard, and CMU walls. Floors have several carpeting materials and small
amounts of floor tile. Ceilings are mostly suspended ceiling with small amounts of textured ceiling.
The former roof in the Development Services area is made of cast concrete T bar panels. A wood
framed roof has been added with plastic tile, asphaltic rolled and shingle roofing. Some areas have
a foam roof. Some original foam roof is still apparent in the attic. The Public Works side has a
steel deck roof covered by a membrane roofing. The site is located at 31 N Pinal St, Florence,
Arizona.
4.3 Review of Building Plans
No previous building plans were available for review. A set of plans for proposed replacement
building containing the demolition plan was used to determine what areas and materials that were
to be sampled. The plans were prepared BWS Architects and labeled 95% Construction
Documents and dated August 16, 2019.
4.4 Review of Prior Surveys
My files contain a record of a previous survey dated December 16, 1997 for an inspection that I
conducted on December 10, 1997. At that time the building was being converted from the County
Jail to the current government office building. That survey reported a small amount (3.3 Sq Ft) of
duct tape and mastic were assumed to be Class II ACM and were demolished along with the non-
ACM material as the amount was under the regulatory threshold of 160 Sq Ft.
My files contain another record of a previous survey dated February 23, 2011 for an inspection
that I conducted on February 16, 2011. The inspection covered building renovations in the
Building Safety Dept. Samples of gypsum wallboard and base cove were taken and reported as
negative for asbestos. The sampled material is of the same existing construction material by
personal knowledge.
Page 4
5.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGY
5.1 Sampling Methods
A complete visual inspection was performed to acquaint the inspector with a total perspective of the
building. Homogenous areas were mapped where building materials of the same type; style and
composition were used in the same manner.
All of the samples were collected in general accordance with AHERA and NESHAP guidelines.
Materials were determined to be friable or non-friable by touch. Representative samples were
taken in random/convenience fashion of the homogeneous areas, using variations of the EPA
random sample pattern. Samples were obtained by physically removing a small portion of the
material using wet methods and a slicing technique. All layers of the material sampled were
penetrated, and the disturbance of the adjacent material was kept at a minimum. The sample was
then placed into a labeled container and sealed. The sampling instrument was then wiped with a
wet disposable towel to remove material that could contaminate the next sample. All samples were
labeled, identifying the sample number, then logged into a Chain-of-Custody with a brief
description of the sampling material. The sample number and a description of the homogenous
material sampled were marked on a copy of the building plans when available. The survey was
non-destructive: therefore, hidden pipe chases, locked rooms, and restricted areas were not
accessed for inspection.
Bulk samples were submitted for analysis to Fiberquant, Inc. and cross-referenced to the locations in
which they were taken to determine which areas of the structure have asbestos containing building
materials. Chain-of-Custody protocols were followed throughout the collection and analysis process.
5.2 Analytical Methods
The samples that were collected from the subject site were delivered with a proper Chain-of-
Custody to a Phoenix laboratory, Fiberquant, Inc. Fiberquant's laboratory is fully accredited by the
National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) # 101031-0. The analytical
procedure used for bulk samples is EPA 40 CFR, Ch 1, Pt 763, Subpart F, App A, Polarized Light
Microscopy with Dispersion Staining.
6.0 BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS AND HOMOGENOUS AREAS
6.1 Laboratory Results
Copies of the lab results are provided in the Appendix C.
7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
Current National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulations classify
ACM into the following categories: Category I materials, Category II non-friable materials and
Category II friable materials that are called Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials (RACM).
Page 5
Category I materials are resilient floor coverings, gaskets, packing and roofing materials
containing greater that 1% asbestos. Category I materials only need to be removed from a structure
prior to demolition, renovation or repair if they are in poor condition, are friable, or would be
subjected to sanding, cutting or abrading. Category I materials that remain intact without
significant breakage would not require removal prior to demolition.
The following materials were tested positive for asbestos or was assumed to contain asbestos and
are classified as Category I material.
Building F
Old Roof Roofing Mastic – Note This mastic is on clay brick which appears to be a parapet
of the original building CMU walls. The mastic appears to be an edge sealant of the former roof
when the building was a jail.
All of the materials are in good condition and can be demolished in place.
Category II materials are all other ACM's. Category II material is broken down into two sub-
categories which are Category II non-friable ACM and Category II friable ACM. Category II
nonfriable ACM is any material, excluding Category I, containing greater than 1 % asbestos that,
when dry, cannot be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand. These items do become
friable during normal demolition activities and thus are considered regulated. No Category II
material was found.
RACM are any materials containing more than 1% asbestos that, when dry can be crumbled,
pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure or cause an emission (Category II friable
ACM's). RACM's must be removed prior to demolition or renovation activities and disposed of in
a landfill, which has been approved to accept asbestos. No RACM material was found.
List of Homogenous Areas
Job Number 219044Project Name Pinal County Building F NESHAP Inspection
Functional Area # 1
Area #
Functional Area Description
Homogenous Area Description Amount Type FriableTest
Status
Building F
Category
1 Red Asphaltic Shingle 2,239 Non-Friable NegativeMiscSF NR
2 Red Rolled Roofing 560 Non-Friable NegativeMiscSF NR
3 Roofing Mastic Black 45 Non-Friable NegativeMiscSF NR
4 Roofing Mastic Silver 19 Non-Friable NegativeMiscSF NR
5 Cement Stucco - Exterior 9,121 Non-Friable NegativeMiscSF NR
6 Concrete Masonry Unit 576 Non-Friable NegativeMiscSF NR
7 Screen Block 240 Non-Friable NegativeMiscSF NR
8 Concrete Brick 9,154 Non-Friable NegativeMiscSF NR
9 Gypsum Wallboard Textured 84,751 Non-Friable NegativeMiscSF NR
10 Ceiling Texture 318 Non-Friable NegativeMiscSF NR
11 Carpet Light Green 16,245 Non-Friable NegativeMiscSF NR
12 Vinyl Base Cove 3,320 Non-Friable NegativeMiscSF NR
13 Acoustical Lay-In Tile 36,415 Friable NegativeMiscSF NR
14 Duct Tape 526 Non-Friable NegativeMiscSF NR
15 Vinyl Floor Tile - Green 130 Non-Friable NegativeMiscSF NR
16 Vinyl Floor Tile - Grey 130 Non-Friable NegativeMiscSF NR
17 Carpet - Green Speckle 16,245 Non-Friable NegativeMiscSF NR
18 Vinyl Floor Tile - White 455 Non-Friable NegativeMiscSF NR
19 Carpet Tile 3,610 Non-Friable NegativeMiscSF NR
20 Ceiling Tile -Old Style 51 Friable NegativeMiscSF NR
21 Insulation 49,400 Non-Friable NegativeTSISF NR
22 Foam Roof 12,369 Friable NegativeMiscSF NR
23 Flex Duct 1,690 Non-Friable NegativeMiscLF NR
24 Foam Roof Old 1,877 Friable NegativeMiscSF NR
25 Clay Brick 1,520 Non-Friable NegativeMiscSF NR
26 Concrete 38,962 Non-Friable NegativeMiscSF NR
27 Roof Mastic Old Roof 52 Non-Friable PositiveMiscSF Cat I
Page 1 of 1
SignatureInspector
Date
Ole A. Solberg
ACM - Asbestos Containing Material
Cat I - Category I ACM Cat II - Category II ACM RACM - Regulated ACM NR - Not Regulated, No ACM
9/23/2019
Bulk Sample Log
Project Number 219044
Project Name Pinal County Building F NESHAP Inspection
Functional Area # 1 Functional Area Description: Building F
1
Description
Amount of Material
Type of Suspect Material:
Friablility Catagory:
CategoryAsbestos Containing Material:
Sample Number Sample Location Date Sampled Time Sampled Result
Red Asphaltic Shingle
Homogenous Area #
Negative NR
Misc
Manner of Sampling: Convenience
Non-Friable2,239 SF
1-1 Roof 90 West 10 South 9/17/2019 7:25 AM Negative
2
Description
Amount of Material
Type of Suspect Material:
Friablility Catagory:
CategoryAsbestos Containing Material:
Sample Number Sample Location Date Sampled Time Sampled Result
Red Rolled Roofing
Homogenous Area #
Negative NR
Misc
Manner of Sampling: Convenience
Non-Friable560 SF
2-1 Roof 110 West 40 South 9/17/2019 7:27 AM Negative
3
Description
Amount of Material
Type of Suspect Material:
Friablility Catagory:
CategoryAsbestos Containing Material:
Sample Number Sample Location Date Sampled Time Sampled Result
Roofing Mastic Black
Homogenous Area #
Negative NR
Misc
Manner of Sampling: Convenience
Non-Friable45 SF
3-1 Roof 120 West 20 South 9/17/2019 7:29 AM Negative
4
Description
Amount of Material
Type of Suspect Material:
Friablility Catagory:
CategoryAsbestos Containing Material:
Sample Number Sample Location Date Sampled Time Sampled Result
Roofing Mastic Silver
Homogenous Area #
Negative NR
Misc
Manner of Sampling: Convenience
Non-Friable19 SF
4-1 Roof 120 West 40 South 9/17/2019 7:30 AM Negative
Page 1 of 7
Ole A. Solberg P.E.
The Asbestos Institute 4644-4846-051819EPA 5/18/2019
Inspector:
Accrediation Agency:
Signature
State: Accrediation # Date Issued:
Project Number 219044
Project Name Pinal County Building F NESHAP Inspection
5
Description
Amount of Material
Type of Suspect Material:
Friablility Catagory:
CategoryAsbestos Containing Material:
Sample Number Sample Location Date Sampled Time Sampled Result
Cement Stucco - Exterior
Homogenous Area #
Negative NR
Misc
Manner of Sampling: Convenience
Non-Friable9,121 SF
5-1 East Exterior Wall 10 South 0 H 9/17/2019 7:37 AM Negative
5-2 Southeast Corner EOC Room 9/17/2019 7:48 AM Negative
5-3 Southwest Corner EOC Room 9/17/2019 7:50 AM Negative
5-4 West of Development Center Main Door 9/17/2019 7:52 AM Negative
5-5 West Wall 20 North Window Corner 9/17/2019 7:54 AM Negative
5-6 North Wall 0 East 4 H 9/17/2019 7:55 AM Negative
5-7 North Wall East Side Electric Room Door 9/17/2019 7:57 AM Negative
6
Description
Amount of Material
Type of Suspect Material:
Friablility Catagory:
CategoryAsbestos Containing Material:
Sample Number Sample Location Date Sampled Time Sampled Result
Concrete Masonry Unit
Homogenous Area #
Negative NR
Misc
Manner of Sampling: Convenience
Non-Friable576 SF
6-1 South Wall 20 West 5 H 9/17/2019 7:40 AM Negative
7
Description
Amount of Material
Type of Suspect Material:
Friablility Catagory:
CategoryAsbestos Containing Material:
Sample Number Sample Location Date Sampled Time Sampled Result
Screen Block
Homogenous Area #
Negative NR
Misc
Manner of Sampling: Convenience
Non-Friable240 SF
7-1 South Wall East of Utility Room 0 H 9/17/2019 7:42 AM Negative
8
Description
Amount of Material
Type of Suspect Material:
Friablility Catagory:
CategoryAsbestos Containing Material:
Sample Number Sample Location Date Sampled Time Sampled Result
Concrete Brick
Homogenous Area #
Negative NR
Misc
Manner of Sampling: Convenience
Non-Friable9,154 SF
8-1 South Wall 30 West of EOC at Window Ledge 9/17/2019 8:01 AM Negative
Page 2 of 7
Ole A. Solberg P.E.
The Asbestos Institute 4644-4846-051819EPA 5/18/2019
Inspector:
Accrediation Agency:
Signature
State: Accrediation # Date Issued:
Project Number 219044
Project Name Pinal County Building F NESHAP Inspection
9
Description
Amount of Material
Type of Suspect Material:
Friablility Catagory:
CategoryAsbestos Containing Material:
Sample Number Sample Location Date Sampled Time Sampled Result
Gypsum Wallboard Textured
Homogenous Area #
Negative NR
Misc
Manner of Sampling: Convenience
Non-Friable84,751 SF
9-1 Air Quality Compliance Office East Wall 4 South 1 H 9/17/2019 8:58 AM Negative
9-2 Public Works Director Outside Office by Door 9/17/2019 9:08 AM Negative
9-3 Public Works East Entrance South Wall 1 West 1 H 9/17/2019 9:12 AM Negative
9-4 Planning Office South Wall Behind Door 9/17/2019 9:38 AM Negative
9-5 EOC IT Closet behind East Door 9/17/2019 9:40 AM Negative
9-6 IT Closet Behind Door 9/17/2019 9:42 AM Negative
9-7 Build Safety Director Office Behind Door 9/17/2019 9:58 AM Negative
10
Description
Amount of Material
Type of Suspect Material:
Friablility Catagory:
CategoryAsbestos Containing Material:
Sample Number Sample Location Date Sampled Time Sampled Result
Ceiling Texture
Homogenous Area #
Negative NR
Misc
Manner of Sampling: Convenience
Non-Friable318 SF
10-1 Public Works East Entrance Ceiling Northwest Corner 9/17/2019 9:15 AM Negative
10-2 Public Works East Entrance Ceiling Southwest Corner 9/17/2019 9:16 AM Negative
10-3 Public Works East Entrance Ceiling Above Entrance 9/17/2019 9:17 AM Negative
11
Description
Amount of Material
Type of Suspect Material:
Friablility Catagory:
CategoryAsbestos Containing Material:
Sample Number Sample Location Date Sampled Time Sampled Result
Carpet Light Green
Homogenous Area #
Negative NR
Misc
Manner of Sampling: Convenience
Non-Friable16,245 SF
11-1 Public Works Break Room South Floor By Door 9/17/2019 9:20 AM Negative
Page 3 of 7
Ole A. Solberg P.E.
The Asbestos Institute 4644-4846-051819EPA 5/18/2019
Inspector:
Accrediation Agency:
Signature
State: Accrediation # Date Issued:
Project Number 219044
Project Name Pinal County Building F NESHAP Inspection
12
Description
Amount of Material
Type of Suspect Material:
Friablility Catagory:
CategoryAsbestos Containing Material:
Sample Number Sample Location Date Sampled Time Sampled Result
Vinyl Base Cove
Homogenous Area #
Negative NR
Misc
Manner of Sampling: Convenience
Non-Friable3,320 SF
12-1 Depressed Floor Area Next to Restroom Door 9/17/2019 9:30 AM Negative
13
Description
Amount of Material
Type of Suspect Material:
Friablility Catagory:
CategoryAsbestos Containing Material:
Sample Number Sample Location Date Sampled Time Sampled Result
Acoustical Lay-In Tile
Homogenous Area #
Negative NR
Misc
Manner of Sampling: Convenience
Friable36,415 SF
13-1 EOC IT Closet Ceiling 9/17/2019 9:45 AM Negative
14
Description
Amount of Material
Type of Suspect Material:
Friablility Catagory:
CategoryAsbestos Containing Material:
Sample Number Sample Location Date Sampled Time Sampled Result
Duct Tape
Homogenous Area #
Negative NR
Misc
Manner of Sampling: Convenience
Non-Friable526 SF
14-1 Public Works East Hall 10 North Above Ceiling 9/17/2019 9:22 AM Negative
15
Description
Amount of Material
Type of Suspect Material:
Friablility Catagory:
CategoryAsbestos Containing Material:
Sample Number Sample Location Date Sampled Time Sampled Result
Vinyl Floor Tile - Green
Homogenous Area #
Negative NR
Misc
Manner of Sampling: Convenience
Non-Friable130 SF
15-1 Planning Break Room floor by EOC 9/17/2019 10:20 AM Negative
Page 4 of 7
Ole A. Solberg P.E.
The Asbestos Institute 4644-4846-051819EPA 5/18/2019
Inspector:
Accrediation Agency:
Signature
State: Accrediation # Date Issued:
Project Number 219044
Project Name Pinal County Building F NESHAP Inspection
16
Description
Amount of Material
Type of Suspect Material:
Friablility Catagory:
CategoryAsbestos Containing Material:
Sample Number Sample Location Date Sampled Time Sampled Result
Vinyl Floor Tile - Grey
Homogenous Area #
Negative NR
Misc
Manner of Sampling: Convenience
Non-Friable130 SF
16-1 Depressed Floor Area Restroom Floor 9/17/2019 9:25 AM Negative
17
Description
Amount of Material
Type of Suspect Material:
Friablility Catagory:
CategoryAsbestos Containing Material:
Sample Number Sample Location Date Sampled Time Sampled Result
Carpet - Green Speckle
Homogenous Area #
Negative NR
Misc
Manner of Sampling: Convenience
Non-Friable16,245 SF
17-1 Depressed Floor Area Next to Restroom Door 9/17/2019 9:28 AM Negative
18
Description
Amount of Material
Type of Suspect Material:
Friablility Catagory:
CategoryAsbestos Containing Material:
Sample Number Sample Location Date Sampled Time Sampled Result
Vinyl Floor Tile - White
Homogenous Area #
Negative NR
Misc
Manner of Sampling: Convenience
Non-Friable455 SF
18-1 Men's Restroom floor North of EOC 9/17/2019 9:50 AM Negative
19
Description
Amount of Material
Type of Suspect Material:
Friablility Catagory:
CategoryAsbestos Containing Material:
Sample Number Sample Location Date Sampled Time Sampled Result
Carpet Tile
Homogenous Area #
Negative NR
Misc
Manner of Sampling: Convenience
Non-Friable3,610 SF
19-1 EOC IT Closet Floor by Door 9/17/2019 9:44 AM Negative
Page 5 of 7
Ole A. Solberg P.E.
The Asbestos Institute 4644-4846-051819EPA 5/18/2019
Inspector:
Accrediation Agency:
Signature
State: Accrediation # Date Issued:
Project Number 219044
Project Name Pinal County Building F NESHAP Inspection
20
Description
Amount of Material
Type of Suspect Material:
Friablility Catagory:
CategoryAsbestos Containing Material:
Sample Number Sample Location Date Sampled Time Sampled Result
Ceiling Tile -Old Style
Homogenous Area #
Negative NR
Misc
Manner of Sampling: Convenience
Friable51 SF
20-1 Depressed Floor Area Restroom Ceiling 9/17/2019 9:21 AM Negative
21
Description
Amount of Material
Type of Suspect Material:
Friablility Catagory:
CategoryAsbestos Containing Material:
Sample Number Sample Location Date Sampled Time Sampled Result
Insulation
Homogenous Area #
Negative NR
TSI
Manner of Sampling: Convenience
Non-Friable49,400 SF
21-1 Above Ceiling Outside Building Safety Director Office 9/17/2019 10:03 AM Negative
22
Description
Amount of Material
Type of Suspect Material:
Friablility Catagory:
CategoryAsbestos Containing Material:
Sample Number Sample Location Date Sampled Time Sampled Result
Foam Roof
Homogenous Area #
Negative NR
Misc
Manner of Sampling: Convenience
Friable12,369 SF
22-1 West of Roof Access Door 9/17/2019 10:07 AM Negative
23
Description
Amount of Material
Type of Suspect Material:
Friablility Catagory:
CategoryAsbestos Containing Material:
Sample Number Sample Location Date Sampled Time Sampled Result
Flex Duct
Homogenous Area #
Negative NR
Misc
Manner of Sampling: Convenience
Non-Friable1,690 LF
23-1 Attic 18 East 9/17/2019 10:10 AM Negative
Page 6 of 7
Ole A. Solberg P.E.
The Asbestos Institute 4644-4846-051819EPA 5/18/2019
Inspector:
Accrediation Agency:
Signature
State: Accrediation # Date Issued:
Project Number 219044
Project Name Pinal County Building F NESHAP Inspection
24
Description
Amount of Material
Type of Suspect Material:
Friablility Catagory:
CategoryAsbestos Containing Material:
Sample Number Sample Location Date Sampled Time Sampled Result
Foam Roof Old
Homogenous Area #
Negative NR
Misc
Manner of Sampling: Convenience
Friable1,877 SF
24-1 Attic 15 East 0 South 9/17/2019 10:11 AM Negative
25
Description
Amount of Material
Type of Suspect Material:
Friablility Catagory:
CategoryAsbestos Containing Material:
Sample Number Sample Location Date Sampled Time Sampled Result
Clay Brick
Homogenous Area #
Negative NR
Misc
Manner of Sampling: Convenience
Non-Friable1,520 SF
25-1 Attic 15 East North Wall at Top 9/17/2019 10:13 AM Negative
26
Description
Amount of Material
Type of Suspect Material:
Friablility Catagory:
CategoryAsbestos Containing Material:
Sample Number Sample Location Date Sampled Time Sampled Result
Concrete
Homogenous Area #
Negative NR
Misc
Manner of Sampling: Convenience
Non-Friable38,962 SF
26-1 North Sidewalk by Electric Room Door 9/17/2019 10:30 AM Negative
27
Description
Amount of Material
Type of Suspect Material:
Friablility Catagory:
CategoryAsbestos Containing Material:
Sample Number Sample Location Date Sampled Time Sampled Result
Roof Mastic Old Roof
Homogenous Area #
Positive Cat I
Misc
Manner of Sampling: Convenience
Non-Friable52 SF
27-1 See Mastic on sample 25-1 results 9/17/2019 10:13 AM Positive
Page 7 of 7
Ole A. Solberg P.E.
The Asbestos Institute 4644-4846-051819EPA 5/18/2019
Inspector:
Accrediation Agency:
Signature
State: Accrediation # Date Issued:
Client Job: 219044 Pinal County Bldg F PO Number:
JobNumber: 201909022
Routing Number: -
# Samples: 40
PLMn
PLM The "New" Method; see below
Client:
Polarized Light Microscope (PLM) Analysis for Asbestos in Bulk Sample
Method and Analysis Information:
Each bulk sample is first dissected under a 7-30x magnification stereo-microscope. This examination is used to determine the general type of sample,
how many and what type of layers it has, and initial estimates of fiber types and quantities. Second, liquid media mounts are made of each layer -
such mounts may be of selected fibers (used solely for identification purposes) or may be representative of the layer as a whole (used for quantitation
purposes). The mounts may be made in a synthetic Canadian balsam, one of several solvents, or in refractive index oils (media of known refractive index). Generally, a variety of different mounts are made: some optimized for fiber visibility, some optimized for fiber identification, and some
optimized for fiber quantitation. The mounted slides are then examined at 50-400x magnification on a Nikon Labphot-pol microscope. Optical
characteristics are used to identify each observed fiber type; the optical data are contained for each sample on its detail analysis sheet, attached.
Current EPA and NESHAP regulations designate a result of ≤1 % asbestos as "negative" or "non-regulated"and >1 % asbestos as "positive" or
"regulated." Samples containing layers that have been determined to be "positive" may have to be handled differently during a renovation or
demolition than samples whose layers have been determined to be "negative." OSHA under CFR 1926.1101 regulates work done involving any
detectable concentration of asbestos.
The method of fiber identification and quantitation is the “Standard Operating Procedures for the Analysis of Asbestos in Bulk Samples using Polarized
Light Microscopy”, Chapter 7 of the Quality Assurance and Management Manual. This SOP and its associated reporting have been designed to satisfy all requirements in both EPA Method 600/M4-82-020 (The Interim Method) and EPA Method 600/R-93/116 (The New Method). The Interim Method is
the required method for AHERA (US EPA 40 CFR Pt. 763), but this method calls for the reporting of composited results of multi-layered samples that is
no longer an acceptable reporting practice in most circumstances. Current EPA rules, such as NESHAP (US EPA 40 CFR Pt. 61), as well as NVLAP
accreditation policies, call for separate reporting for each layer of multi-layered samples. The New Method contains the same procedures for identification and quantification of asbestos as does the Interim Method, except that multi-layered samples are reported to comply with the latest US
EPA rule. Fiberquant not only reports the asbestos content of each layer of multi-layered samples separately (satisfying current EPA and NVLAP
reporting requirements), but Fiberquant also reports what percentage of the sample each layer comprises. Therefore, the results may be
arithmetically composited to satisfy the reporting requirements of the Interim Method. The method of fiber quantitation is an estimation technique in which the analysts quantitation is routinely calibrated by reference quantitation standards, and which has been shown to be equivalent in precision
and accuracy to point counting. Friability is estimated for the purposes of deciding when to point count. Friabilities determined in the field take
precedence over those determined in the laboratory. Those sample layers which are friable and estimated by the analyst to contain <= 1% asbestos are point counted using 400 points. Such point counting is required by NESHAP (National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Polutants, Nov. 1990)
in order to rely on analytical results that are ≤ 1%. The coefficient of variation for the estimation quantitation technique is 100% in the range 0-5%.
This means that PLM analysis is not capable of conclusively determining whether a layer containing close to 1% asbestos is actually "positive" or
"negative". For this reason, Fiberquant refers to results where asbestos was detected but ≤ 1% as "borderline negative", and results where asbestos was >1 % but <= 2% as "borderline positive" to indicate the uncertainty in assigning a "positive" or "negative" label. In the sample summary, "ND"
means that no asbestos was detected during the analysis. A "Tr" or "Trace" of asbestos reported is defined for our purposes as the detection of
several asbestos fibers during the analysis; this level would be right at the limit of detection for the method. Trace is only reported on the analysis
detail - in the summary a trace would be reported as <=1%. The limit of detection (the smallest % of asbestos that can be detected) varies greatly depending on the matrix in which the asbestos is found. As little as 0.001% asbestos can be detected in favorable samples, while detection in
unfavorable samples may approach the detection limit of 1% stated in the method. During the analysis, the analyst, for Fiberquant identification
purposes only, determines the "apparent sample type" and "apparent layer types." It must be emphasized that these types are only what is
apparent. Often, different materials appear similar or identical after sampling, so the analyst may assign a type other than what was sampled.
Floor tiles present a special problem for PLM asbestos analysis. Floor tile can contain chrysotile fibers so thin that they cannot be resolved by optical
methods. In such a case, we may observe a percentage of asbestos which is lower than the actual percentage, or not observe asbestos at all when some is present. For this reason, floor tiles reported as negative should be confirmed to be negative using transmission electron microscope (TEM)
analysis. Likewise, vermiculite insulation materials containing traces of asbestiform asbestos present a problem for routine PLM analysis - the
amphiboles are sometimes present in trace amounts inhomogeneously distributed. For this reason, loose vermiculite samples reported as negative
should be confirmed to contain no amphibole using hydroseparation techniques.
The samples were analyzed under the following ongoing quality assurance program: Blank samples are routinely analyzed to maintain contamination-
free materials. Each analyst has at least a bachelor's degree in physical science, and has also completed extensive training specific to asbestos
analysis for 1-3 months before being allowed to analyze client samples. Qualitative reference samples are routinely analyzed to assure that analysts
Method: EPA 600/R-93/116Rec: 9/18/2019
Report Date: 9/23/2019 Date Analyzed: 9/20/2019
Fiberquant Internal SOP:
SOLBERG OLE
508 E BARRUS PL
CASA GRANDE, AZ
Office Phone: (520) 836-0270
FAX: (520) 836-0355
85122-0000
5025 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040-2816 Phone: 602-276-6139 1-800-743-2687 FAX: 602-276-4558
Fiberquant, Inc. Page 1 of 22
PLM Analysis Summary: Job Number: 201909022 219044 Pinal County Bldg F
can identify asbestos and asbestos-look-alike fibers. Quantitative reference samples are routinely analyzed to calibrate and characterize the
estimation procedure. Microscope alignment is checked each day. Refractive index oils are calibrated at least quarterly. At least 10% of client
samples are re-analyzed from scratch by a different analyst than the original, and any discrepancies are resolved for the sample and similar sample types before the results are reported. All quality checks performed for these samples were in control except as detailed in the "Analytical Notes"
below. All analysts participate in interlab round robins and proficiency testing to assure competence. Fiberquant is accredited by NVLAP (Lab code
#101031) for the analysis of bulk samples for asbestos using PLM. Accreditation does not imply endorsement by the EPA, any other United States governmental agency or any private agency or association. Each lab analysis refers only to the sample tested, and may not, due to the sampling
process, be representative of the material sampled. This report may not be reproduced except in full, without the approval of Fiberquant Analytical
Services.
Job Analysis Notes:
Some results may have been calculated using client supplied data, such as volume or area sampled, for which Fiberquant assumes no liability for accuracy.
Sample Number Lab Number Apparent Sample Type * Asbestos Detected Yes or No
Layer Color Apparent Layer Type * Asbestos Results
Roofing2019-09022- 11-1 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedroofing roll/shingleblackLayer # 1
no asbestos detectedroofing roll/shingleblackLayer # 2
no asbestos detectedroofing roll/shingleblackLayer # 3
Roofing2019-09022- 22-1 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedroofing roll/shingleblackLayer # 1
no asbestos detectedroofing roll/shingleblackLayer # 2
Roofing2019-09022- 33-1 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedpaintredLayer # 1
no asbestos detectedcaulkblackLayer # 2
Adhesive/caulk2019-09022- 44-1 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedsealantgrayLayer # 1
Cementitious2019-09022- 55-1 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedpaintoff-whiteLayer # 1
no asbestos detectedstuccooff-whiteLayer # 2
no asbestos detectedstuccograyLayer # 3
Cementitious2019-09022- 65-2 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedpaintoff-whiteLayer # 1
no asbestos detectedstuccograyLayer # 2
Cementitious2019-09022- 75-3 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedpaintoff-whiteLayer # 1
no asbestos detectedstuccooff-whiteLayer # 2
no asbestos detectedstuccograyLayer # 3
Cementitious2019-09022- 85-4 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedpaintoff-whiteLayer # 1
no asbestos detectedstuccograyLayer # 2
Cementitious2019-09022- 95-5 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedpaintvariousLayer # 1
no asbestos detectedstuccograyLayer # 2
no asbestos detectedstuccograyLayer # 3
Cementitious2019-09022- 105-6 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedpaintvariousLayer # 1
no asbestos detectedstuccograyLayer # 2
no asbestos detectedstuccograyLayer # 3
Cementitious2019-09022- 115-7 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedpaintvariousLayer # 1
no asbestos detectedstuccograyLayer # 2
Cementitious2019-09022- 126-1 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedblockgrayLayer # 1
Cementitious2019-09022- 137-1 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedpaintvariousLayer # 1
no asbestos detectedblockgrayLayer # 2
Cementitious2019-09022- 148-1 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedpaintvariousLayer # 1
no asbestos detectedbrickgrayLayer # 2
Wall System2019-09022- 159-1 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedpaintoff-whiteLayer # 1
no asbestos detectedtexture/joint compoundwhiteLayer # 2
no asbestos detectedpaper/cardboardtanLayer # 3
no asbestos detecteddrywall corewhiteLayer # 4
5025 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040-2816 Phone: 602-276-6139 1-800-743-2687 FAX: 602-276-4558
Fiberquant, Inc. Page 2 of 22
Wall System2019-09022- 169-2 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedpaintoff-whiteLayer # 1
no asbestos detectedtexture/joint compoundwhiteLayer # 2
no asbestos detectedpaintoff-whiteLayer # 3
no asbestos detectedwall coveringwhiteLayer # 4
no asbestos detectedmastictanLayer # 5
no asbestos detectedpaintoff-whiteLayer # 6
no asbestos detectedpaper/cardboardtanLayer # 7
no asbestos detecteddrywall corewhiteLayer # 8
Wall System2019-09022- 179-3 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedpaintoff-whiteLayer # 1
no asbestos detectedtexture/joint compoundwhiteLayer # 2
no asbestos detectedpaper/cardboardtanLayer # 3
no asbestos detecteddrywall corewhiteLayer # 4
Wall System2019-09022- 189-4 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedpaintoff-whiteLayer # 1
no asbestos detectedtexture/joint compoundwhiteLayer # 2
no asbestos detectedpaper/cardboardtanLayer # 3
no asbestos detecteddrywall corewhiteLayer # 4
Wall System2019-09022- 199-5 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedpaintoff-whiteLayer # 1
no asbestos detectedtexture/joint compoundwhiteLayer # 2
no asbestos detectedpaper/cardboardtanLayer # 3
no asbestos detecteddrywall corewhiteLayer # 4
Wall System2019-09022- 209-6 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedpaintoff-whiteLayer # 1
no asbestos detectedtexture/joint compoundwhiteLayer # 2
no asbestos detectedpaper/cardboardtanLayer # 3
no asbestos detecteddrywall corewhiteLayer # 4
Wall System2019-09022- 219-7 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedpaintoff-whiteLayer # 1
no asbestos detectedtexture/joint compoundwhiteLayer # 2
no asbestos detectedpaper/cardboardtanLayer # 3
no asbestos detecteddrywall corewhiteLayer # 4
Sprayed Material2019-09022- 2210-1 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedpaintoff-whiteLayer # 1
no asbestos detectedspray-on ceilingwhiteLayer # 2
Sprayed Material2019-09022- 2310-2 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedpaintoff-whiteLayer # 1
no asbestos detectedspray-on ceilingwhiteLayer # 2
Sprayed Material2019-09022- 2410-3 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedpaintoff-whiteLayer # 1
no asbestos detectedspray-on ceilingwhiteLayer # 2
Carpet2019-09022- 2511-1 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedcarpetvariousLayer # 1
Miscellaneous2019-09022- 2612-1 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedbase coveblackLayer # 1
no asbestos detectedmasticoff-whiteLayer # 2
Acoustical Tile2019-09022- 2713-1 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedpaintwhiteLayer # 1
no asbestos detectedacoustical tileoff-whiteLayer # 2
Miscellaneous2019-09022- 2814-1 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedfoilsilverLayer # 1
no asbestos detectedmasticclearLayer # 2
Flooring2019-09022- 2915-1 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedfloor tilegreenLayer # 1
no asbestos detectedmastictanLayer # 2
no asbestos detectedmasticblackLayer # 3
Flooring2019-09022- 3016-1 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedfloor tilegrayLayer # 1
no asbestos detectedmasticyellowLayer # 2
Carpet2019-09022- 3117-1 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedcarpetgreenLayer # 1
no asbestos detectedmasticyellowLayer # 2
Flooring2019-09022- 3218-1 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedfloor tileoff-whiteLayer # 1
no asbestos detectedmasticyellowLayer # 2
no asbestos detectedmasticblackLayer # 3
Carpet2019-09022- 3319-1 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedcarpetvariousLayer # 1
Acoustical Tile2019-09022- 3420-1 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedpaintoff-whiteLayer # 1
no asbestos detectedacoustical tiletanLayer # 2
5025 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040-2816 Phone: 602-276-6139 1-800-743-2687 FAX: 602-276-4558
Fiberquant, Inc. Page 3 of 22
Insulation2019-09022- 3521-1 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedinsulationyellowLayer # 1
Roofing2019-09022- 3622-1 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedpaintoff-whiteLayer # 1
no asbestos detectedfoamyellowLayer # 2
Insulation2019-09022- 3723-1 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedinsulation wrapsilverLayer # 1
no asbestos detectedinsulationyellowLayer # 2
Roofing2019-09022- 3824-1 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedpaintoff-whiteLayer # 1
no asbestos detectedfoamyellowLayer # 2
no asbestos detectedcoatingwhiteLayer # 3
Roofing2019-09022- 3925-1 Asbestos Detected? YesSample # 5-10% chrysotile asbestoscaulkblackLayer # 1
no asbestos detectedpaintoff-whiteLayer # 2
no asbestos detectedtileredLayer # 3
Cementitious2019-09022- 4026-1 Asbestos Detected? NoSample # no asbestos detectedconcretegrayLayer # 1
* Apparent Sample Types and Apparent Layer Types are as they appeared to the analyst. Since many types of materials appear similar after sampling damage, the apparent type of material may not be the actual type of material.
5025 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040-2816 Phone: 602-276-6139 1-800-743-2687 FAX: 602-276-4558
Fiberquant, Inc. Page 4 of 22
PLM Analysis Details Job Number: 201909022 219044 Pinal County Bldg F
2019-09022- 11-1 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/23/2019
Homogeneous
Roofing
No
Fibrous SolidOKAn?
3# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
glass fiberFiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
glass fiber CL D Y
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): filler, bitumen, rock
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 34 5-10% - - - - -roofing roll/shingle black 1
2 33 5-10% - - - - -roofing roll/shingle black 1
3 33 5-10% - - - - -roofing roll/shingle black 1
100Total % 5-10% - - - - -Overall %
2019-09022- 22-1 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/23/2019
Homogeneous
Roofing
No
Fibrous SolidOKAn?
2# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
synthetic fiber (extr glass fiberFiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
synthetic fiber (extruded)
glass fiber
W E N N H + P
CL D Y
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): filler, bitumen, rock
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 95 5-10% n.d. - - - -roofing roll/shingle black 1
2 5 n.d. 5-10% - - - -roofing roll/shingle black 1
100Total % 5-10% <=1% - - - -Overall %
5025 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040-2816 Phone: 602-276-6139 1-800-743-2687 FAX: 602-276-4558
Fiberquant, Inc. Page 5 of 22
PLM Analysis Details Job Number: 201909022 219044 Pinal County Bldg F
2019-09022- 33-1 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/23/2019
Homogeneous
Roofing
No
Fibrous SolidOKAn?
2# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
cellulose fiberFiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
cellulose fiber W F N N H + U
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): filler, bitumen, binder
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 5 n.d. - - - - -paint red 1
2 95 5-10% - - - - -caulk black 1
100Total % 5-10% - - - - -Overall %
2019-09022- 44-1 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/23/2019
Homogeneous
Adhesive/caulk
Yes
Non-fibrous SolidOKAn?
1# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
synthetic fiber (extrFiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
synthetic fiber (extruded) W E N N H + P
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): filler, binder,
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 100 >1-2% - - - - -sealant gray 1
100Total % >1-2% - - - - -Overall %
2019-09022- 55-1 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/23/2019
Homogeneous
Cementitious
No
Fibrous SolidOKAn?
3# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
glass fiber Fiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of polymer matrix using solvent. Procedure: dissolution of stucco matrix using acid.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
glass fiber
CL D Y
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): powder, rock, binder
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 3 n.d. - - - - -paint off-white 1
2 27 n.d. - - - - -stucco off-white 2
3 70 <=1% - - - - -stucco gray 2
100Total % <=1% - - - - -Overall %
5025 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040-2816 Phone: 602-276-6139 1-800-743-2687 FAX: 602-276-4558
Fiberquant, Inc. Page 6 of 22
PLM Analysis Details Job Number: 201909022 219044 Pinal County Bldg F
2019-09022- 65-2 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/23/2019
Homogeneous
Cementitious
No
Fibrous SolidOKAn?
2# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
glass fiber Fiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of polymer matrix using solvent. Procedure: dissolution of stucco matrix using acid.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
glass fiber
CL D Y
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): powder, rock, binder
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 15 n.d. - - - - -paint off-white 1
2 85 >1-2% - - - - -stucco gray 2
100Total % >1-2% - - - - -Overall %
2019-09022- 75-3 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/23/2019
Homogeneous
Cementitious
No
Fibrous SolidOKAn?
3# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
cellulose fiber Fiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of polymer matrix using solvent. Procedure: dissolution of stucco matrix using acid.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
cellulose fiber
W F N N H + U
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): powder, rock, binder
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 3 n.d. - - - - -paint off-white 1
2 77 n.d. - - - - -stucco off-white 2
3 20 <=1% - - - - -stucco gray 2
100Total % <=1% - - - - -Overall %
5025 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040-2816 Phone: 602-276-6139 1-800-743-2687 FAX: 602-276-4558
Fiberquant, Inc. Page 7 of 22
PLM Analysis Details Job Number: 201909022 219044 Pinal County Bldg F
2019-09022- 85-4 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/23/2019
Homogeneous
Cementitious
No
Non-fibrous SolidOKAn?
2# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
none Fiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of polymer matrix using solvent. Procedure: dissolution of stucco matrix using acid.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
none
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): powder, rock, binder
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 5 n.d. - - - - -paint off-white 1
2 95 n.d. - - - - -stucco gray 2
100Total % n.d. - - - - -Overall %
2019-09022- 95-5 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/23/2019
Homogeneous
Cementitious
No
Fibrous SolidOKAn?
3# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
synthetic fiber (extr Fiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of polymer matrix using solvent. Procedure: dissolution of stucco matrix using acid.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
synthetic fiber (extruded)
W E N N H + P
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): powder, rock, binder
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 3 n.d. - - - - -paint various 1
2 17 n.d. - - - - -stucco gray 2
3 80 <=1% - - - - -stucco gray 2
100Total % <=1% - - - - -Overall %
5025 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040-2816 Phone: 602-276-6139 1-800-743-2687 FAX: 602-276-4558
Fiberquant, Inc. Page 8 of 22
PLM Analysis Details Job Number: 201909022 219044 Pinal County Bldg F
2019-09022- 105-6 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/23/2019
Homogeneous
Cementitious
No
Non-fibrous SolidOKAn?
3# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
none Fiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of polymer matrix using solvent. Procedure: dissolution of stucco matrix using acid.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
none
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): powder, rock, binder
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 10 n.d. - - - - -paint various 1
2 85 n.d. - - - - -stucco gray 2
3 5 n.d. - - - - -stucco gray 2
100Total % n.d. - - - - -Overall %
2019-09022- 115-7 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/23/2019
Homogeneous
Cementitious
No
Fibrous SolidOKAn?
2# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
synthetic fiber (extr glass fiberFiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of polymer matrix using solvent. Procedure: dissolution of stucco matrix using acid.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
synthetic fiber (extruded)
glass fiber
W E N N H + P
CL D Y
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): powder, rock, binder
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 5 n.d. n.d. - - - -paint various 1
2 95 <=1% <=1% - - - -stucco gray 2
100Total % <=1% <=1% - - - -Overall %
2019-09022- 126-1 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/23/2019
Homogeneous
Cementitious
Yes
Non-fibrous SolidOKAn?
1# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
noneFiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using dilute HCl acid. No mortar.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
none
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): powder, rock,
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 100 n.d. - - - - -block gray 1
100Total % n.d. - - - - -Overall %
5025 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040-2816 Phone: 602-276-6139 1-800-743-2687 FAX: 602-276-4558
Fiberquant, Inc. Page 9 of 22
PLM Analysis Details Job Number: 201909022 219044 Pinal County Bldg F
2019-09022- 137-1 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/23/2019
Homogeneous
Cementitious
No
Non-fibrous SolidOKAn?
2# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
noneFiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using dilute HCl acid. No mortar. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using
solvent.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
none
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): powder, rock, binder
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 5 n.d. - - - - -paint various 1
2 95 n.d. - - - - -block gray 1
100Total % n.d. - - - - -Overall %
2019-09022- 148-1 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/23/2019
Homogeneous
Cementitious
No
Non-fibrous SolidOKAn?
2# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
noneFiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using dilute HCl acid. No mortar. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using
solvent.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
none
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): powder, rock, binder
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 5 n.d. - - - - -paint various 1
2 95 n.d. - - - - -brick gray 1
100Total % n.d. - - - - -Overall %
5025 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040-2816 Phone: 602-276-6139 1-800-743-2687 FAX: 602-276-4558
Fiberquant, Inc. Page 10 of 22
PLM Analysis Details Job Number: 201909022 219044 Pinal County Bldg F
2019-09022- 159-1 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/23/2019
Homogeneous
Wall System
No
Fibrous SolidOKAn?
4# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
cellulose fiber glass fiberFiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of paint matrix using solvent. Procedure: dissolution of joint compound/texture matrix using acid.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
cellulose fiber
glass fiber
W F N N H + U
CL D Y
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): powder, binder,
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 1 n.d. n.d. - - - -paint off-white 1
2 2 n.d. n.d. - - - -texture/joint compound white 3
3 5 90-100% n.d. - - - -paper/cardboard tan 2
4 92 <=1% <=1% - - - -drywall core white 3
100Total % 5-10% <=1% - - - -Overall %
2019-09022- 169-2 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/23/2019
Homogeneous
Wall System
No
Fibrous SolidOKAn?
8# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
cellulose fiber synthetic fiber (extrFiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of paint matrix using solvent. Procedure: dissolution of joint compound/texture
matrix using acid.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
cellulose fiber
synthetic fiber (extruded)
W F N N H + U
W E N N H + P
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): powder, binder, polymer
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 2 n.d. n.d. - - - -paint off-white 1
2 5 n.d. n.d. - - - -texture/joint compound white 3
3 1 n.d. n.d. - - - -paint off-white 1
4 5 10-20% 10-20% - - - -wall covering white 1
5 2 n.d. n.d. - - - -mastic tan 1
6 1 n.d. n.d. - - - -paint off-white 1
7 3 90-100% n.d. - - - -paper/cardboard tan 2
8 81 >1-2% n.d. - - - -drywall core white 3
100Total % 5-10% <=1% - - - -Overall %
5025 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040-2816 Phone: 602-276-6139 1-800-743-2687 FAX: 602-276-4558
Fiberquant, Inc. Page 11 of 22
PLM Analysis Details Job Number: 201909022 219044 Pinal County Bldg F
2019-09022- 179-3 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/23/2019
Homogeneous
Wall System
No
Fibrous SolidOKAn?
4# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
cellulose fiber glass fiberFiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of paint matrix using solvent. Procedure: dissolution of joint compound/texture matrix using acid.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
cellulose fiber
glass fiber
W F N N H + U
CL D Y
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): powder, binder,
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 1 n.d. n.d. - - - -paint off-white 1
2 4 n.d. n.d. - - - -texture/joint compound white 3
3 5 90-100% n.d. - - - -paper/cardboard tan 2
4 90 <=1% <=1% - - - -drywall core white 3
100Total % 5-10% <=1% - - - -Overall %
2019-09022- 189-4 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/23/2019
Homogeneous
Wall System
No
Fibrous SolidOKAn?
4# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
cellulose fiber glass fiberFiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of paint matrix using solvent. Procedure: dissolution of joint compound/texture matrix using acid.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
cellulose fiber
glass fiber
W F N N H + U
CL D Y
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): powder, binder,
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 1 n.d. n.d. - - - -paint off-white 1
2 4 n.d. n.d. - - - -texture/joint compound white 3
3 5 90-100% n.d. - - - -paper/cardboard tan 2
4 90 <=1% <=1% - - - -drywall core white 3
100Total % 5-10% <=1% - - - -Overall %
5025 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040-2816 Phone: 602-276-6139 1-800-743-2687 FAX: 602-276-4558
Fiberquant, Inc. Page 12 of 22
PLM Analysis Details Job Number: 201909022 219044 Pinal County Bldg F
2019-09022- 199-5 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/23/2019
Homogeneous
Wall System
No
Fibrous SolidOKAn?
4# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
cellulose fiber glass fiberFiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of paint matrix using solvent. Procedure: dissolution of joint compound/texture matrix using acid.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
cellulose fiber
glass fiber
W F N N H + U
CL D Y
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): powder, binder,
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 1 n.d. n.d. - - - -paint off-white 1
2 2 n.d. n.d. - - - -texture/joint compound white 3
3 5 90-100% n.d. - - - -paper/cardboard tan 2
4 92 <=1% <=1% - - - -drywall core white 3
100Total % 5-10% <=1% - - - -Overall %
2019-09022- 209-6 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/23/2019
Homogeneous
Wall System
No
Fibrous SolidOKAn?
4# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
cellulose fiber glass fiberFiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of paint matrix using solvent. Procedure: dissolution of joint compound/texture matrix using acid.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
cellulose fiber
glass fiber
W F N N H + U
CL D Y
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): powder, binder,
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 1 n.d. n.d. - - - -paint off-white 1
2 4 n.d. n.d. - - - -texture/joint compound white 3
3 5 90-100% n.d. - - - -paper/cardboard tan 2
4 90 <=1% <=1% - - - -drywall core white 3
100Total % 5-10% <=1% - - - -Overall %
5025 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040-2816 Phone: 602-276-6139 1-800-743-2687 FAX: 602-276-4558
Fiberquant, Inc. Page 13 of 22
PLM Analysis Details Job Number: 201909022 219044 Pinal County Bldg F
2019-09022- 219-7 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/23/2019
Homogeneous
Wall System
No
Fibrous SolidOKAn?
4# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
cellulose fiber glass fiberFiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of paint matrix using solvent. Procedure: dissolution of joint compound/texture matrix using acid.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
cellulose fiber
glass fiber
W F N N H + U
CL D Y
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): powder, binder,
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 1 n.d. n.d. - - - -paint off-white 1
2 2 n.d. n.d. - - - -texture/joint compound white 3
3 5 90-100% n.d. - - - -paper/cardboard tan 2
4 92 <=1% <=1% - - - -drywall core white 3
100Total % 5-10% <=1% - - - -Overall %
2019-09022- 2210-1 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/23/2019
Homogeneous
Sprayed Material
No
Non-fibrous SolidOKAn?
2# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
none Fiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of paint matrix using solvent. Procedure: dissolution of sprayed material using acid.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
none
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): polymer foam, powder, binder
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 15 n.d. - - - - -paint off-white 1
2 85 n.d. - - - - -spray-on ceiling white 3
100Total % n.d. - - - - -Overall %
5025 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040-2816 Phone: 602-276-6139 1-800-743-2687 FAX: 602-276-4558
Fiberquant, Inc. Page 14 of 22
PLM Analysis Details Job Number: 201909022 219044 Pinal County Bldg F
2019-09022- 2310-2 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/23/2019
Homogeneous
Sprayed Material
No
Non-fibrous SolidOKAn?
2# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
none Fiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of paint matrix using solvent. Procedure: dissolution of sprayed material using acid.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
none
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): polymer foam, powder, binder
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 15 n.d. - - - - -paint off-white 1
2 85 n.d. - - - - -spray-on ceiling white 3
100Total % n.d. - - - - -Overall %
2019-09022- 2410-3 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/23/2019
Homogeneous
Sprayed Material
No
Non-fibrous SolidOKAn?
2# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
none Fiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of paint matrix using solvent. Procedure: dissolution of sprayed material using acid.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
none
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): polymer foam, powder, binder
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 15 n.d. - - - - -paint off-white 1
2 85 n.d. - - - - -spray-on ceiling white 3
100Total % n.d. - - - - -Overall %
2019-09022- 2511-1 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/20/2019
Homogeneous
Carpet
Yes
Fibrous MatOKAn?
1# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
synthetic fiber (extr glass fiberFiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
synthetic fiber (extruded)
glass fiber
V E N N H + P
CL D Y
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): filler, polymer,
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 100 40-50% >1-2% - - - -carpet various 1
100Total % 40-50% >1-2% - - - -Overall %
5025 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040-2816 Phone: 602-276-6139 1-800-743-2687 FAX: 602-276-4558
Fiberquant, Inc. Page 15 of 22
PLM Analysis Details Job Number: 201909022 219044 Pinal County Bldg F
2019-09022- 2612-1 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/20/2019
Homogeneous
Miscellaneous
No
RubberyOKAn?
2# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
none Fiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of polymer matrix using solvent. Minor adhering wall paint and/or texture, etc. not
analyzed.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
none
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): polymer, filler,
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 90 n.d. - - - - -base cove black 1
2 10 n.d. - - - - -mastic off-white 1
100Total % n.d. - - - - -Overall %
2019-09022- 2713-1 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/20/2019
Homogeneous
Acoustical Tile
No
Fibrous MatOKAn?
2# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
cellulose fiber glass fiberFiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of paint matrix using solvent. Procedure: dissolution of acoustical tile using acid.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
cellulose fiber
glass fiber
W F N N H + U
CL D Y
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): perlite, powder, binder
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 2 n.d. n.d. - - - -paint white 1
2 98 20-30% 20-30% - - - -acoustical tile off-white 3
100Total % 20-30% 20-30% - - - -Overall %
5025 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040-2816 Phone: 602-276-6139 1-800-743-2687 FAX: 602-276-4558
Fiberquant, Inc. Page 16 of 22
PLM Analysis Details Job Number: 201909022 219044 Pinal County Bldg F
2019-09022- 2814-1 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/20/2019
Homogeneous
Miscellaneous
No
StickyOKAn?
2# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
glass fiberFiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
glass fiber CL D Y
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): metal, polymer, filler
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 50 n.d. - - - - -foil silver 1
2 50 2-5% - - - - -mastic clear 1
100Total % >1-2% - - - - -Overall %
2019-09022- 2915-1 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/20/2019
Homogeneous
Flooring
No
Non-fibrous SolidOKAn?
3# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
cellulose fiber Fiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of floor tile matrix and mastic using solvent.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
cellulose fiber
W F N N H + U
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): filler, polymer, binder
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 97 n.d. - - - - -floor tile green 1
2 2 n.d. - - - - -mastic tan 1
3 1 >1-2% - - - - -mastic black 1
100Total % <=1% - - - - -Overall %
5025 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040-2816 Phone: 602-276-6139 1-800-743-2687 FAX: 602-276-4558
Fiberquant, Inc. Page 17 of 22
PLM Analysis Details Job Number: 201909022 219044 Pinal County Bldg F
2019-09022- 3016-1 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/20/2019
Homogeneous
Flooring
No
Non-fibrous SolidOKAn?
2# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
cellulose fiber Fiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of floor tile matrix and mastic using solvent.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
cellulose fiber
W F N N H + U
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): filler, polymer,
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 95 n.d. - - - - -floor tile gray 1
2 5 2-5% - - - - -mastic yellow 1
100Total % <=1% - - - - -Overall %
2019-09022- 3117-1 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/20/2019
Homogeneous
Carpet
No
Fibrous MatOKAn?
2# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
synthetic fiber (extrFiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
synthetic fiber (extruded) V E N N H + P
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): filler, binder,
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 99 90-100% - - - - -carpet green 1
2 1 n.d. - - - - -mastic yellow 1
100Total % 90-100% - - - - -Overall %
5025 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040-2816 Phone: 602-276-6139 1-800-743-2687 FAX: 602-276-4558
Fiberquant, Inc. Page 18 of 22
PLM Analysis Details Job Number: 201909022 219044 Pinal County Bldg F
2019-09022- 3218-1 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/20/2019
Homogeneous
Flooring
No
Non-fibrous SolidOKAn?
3# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
cellulose fiber Fiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of floor tile matrix and mastic using solvent.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
cellulose fiber
W F N N H + U
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): filler, polymer,
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 97 n.d. - - - - -floor tile off-white 1
2 2 n.d. - - - - -mastic yellow 1
3 1 2-5% - - - - -mastic black 1
100Total % <=1% - - - - -Overall %
2019-09022- 3319-1 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/20/2019
Homogeneous
Carpet
Yes
Fibrous MatOKAn?
1# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
synthetic fiber (extrFiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent. No mastic.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
synthetic fiber (extruded) V E N N H + P
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): filler, binder,
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 100 90-100% - - - - -carpet various 1
100Total % 90-100% - - - - -Overall %
2019-09022- 3420-1 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/20/2019
Homogeneous
Acoustical Tile
No
Fibrous MatOKAn?
2# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
cellulose fiberFiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of paint matrix using solvent. Procedure: dissolution of acoustical tile using acid.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
cellulose fiber W F N N H + U
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): filler, binder,
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 2 n.d. - - - - -paint off-white 1
2 98 80-90% - - - - -acoustical tile tan 3
100Total % 80-90% - - - - -Overall %
5025 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040-2816 Phone: 602-276-6139 1-800-743-2687 FAX: 602-276-4558
Fiberquant, Inc. Page 19 of 22
PLM Analysis Details Job Number: 201909022 219044 Pinal County Bldg F
2019-09022- 3521-1 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/20/2019
Homogeneous
Insulation
Yes
Fibrous MatOKAn?
1# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
glass fiberFiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using dilute HCl acid.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
glass fiber CL D Y
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): binder, ,
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 100 90-100% - - - - -insulation yellow 3
100Total % 90-100% - - - - -Overall %
2019-09022- 3622-1 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/20/2019
Homogeneous
Roofing
No
Non-fibrous SolidOKAn?
2# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
noneFiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
none
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): polymer foam, filler, binder
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 8 n.d. - - - - -paint off-white 1
2 92 n.d. - - - - -foam yellow 3
100Total % n.d. - - - - -Overall %
2019-09022- 3723-1 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/20/2019
Homogeneous
Insulation
No
Fibrous MatOKAn?
2# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
cellulose fiber glass fiberFiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using dilute HCl acid.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
cellulose fiber
glass fiber
W F N N H + U
CL D Y
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): binder, filler, metal
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 5 40-50% 10-20% - - - -insulation wrap silver 2
2 95 <=1% 90-100% - - - -insulation yellow 3
100Total % 2-5% 80-90% - - - -Overall %
5025 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040-2816 Phone: 602-276-6139 1-800-743-2687 FAX: 602-276-4558
Fiberquant, Inc. Page 20 of 22
PLM Analysis Details Job Number: 201909022 219044 Pinal County Bldg F
2019-09022- 3824-1 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/20/2019
Homogeneous
Roofing
No
Non-fibrous SolidOKAn?
3# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
noneFiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using dilute HCl acid.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
none
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): polymer foam, filler, binder
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 2 n.d. - - - - -paint off-white 1
2 93 n.d. - - - - -foam yellow 3
3 5 n.d. - - - - -coating white 1
100Total % n.d. - - - - -Overall %
2019-09022- 3925-1 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/20/2019
Homogeneous
Roofing
No
Non-fibrous SolidOKAn?
3# Layers YesAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
chrysotile asbestosFiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
1.561 1.553chrysotile asbestos 1.550 db/ly sb/oW A N N L + P
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): powder, filler, bitumen
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 3 5-10% - - - - -caulk black 1
2 2 n.d. - - - - -paint off-white 1
3 95 n.d. - - - - -tile red 1
100Total % <=1% - - - - -Overall %
5025 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040-2816 Phone: 602-276-6139 1-800-743-2687 FAX: 602-276-4558
Fiberquant, Inc. Page 21 of 22
PLM Analysis Details Job Number: 201909022 219044 Pinal County Bldg F
2019-09022- 4026-1 9/17/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 9/20/2019
Homogeneous
Cementitious
Yes
Non-fibrous SolidOKAn?
1# Layers NoAsbestos Detected?
Apparent Smp Type
noneFiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using dilute HCl acid.
Fibers
1
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
2
3
4
5
6
none
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): powder, rock,
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Calibrated Visual Estimate of Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 100 n.d. - - - - -concrete gray 1
100Total % n.d. - - - - -Overall %
Fr=Friability: 1=very non-friable; 2= non-friable; 3=friable; 4=highly friableColors: B=black;BL=blue;BR=brown;CL=clear;G=Green;GY=gray;OR=orange;OW=off-white;PN=pink;PU=purple;R=red;TN=tan;W=white;Y=yellow;V=variousFiber Morphology: A=fine fibers/bundles, white, sinewy, flexible; B=fine fibers/bundles, w-br, straight, broomed ends; C=fine fibers/bundles, blue, straight, broomed ends; D=fine to coarse fibers, CL-B, brittle; E=coarse fibers,CL or dyed, striated; F=coarse fibers or splinters, W-BR, ribbon-like; G=lath-like or shards, low aspect ratio, may taperIso=isotropism - may be yes or no; Pleo=pleochroism - may be yes or no; Bi=birefringence - may be None, Low, Medium or HighElg=sign of elongation - may be +, - or B (both); Ext=extinction - may be Parallel, Oblique, None or Undulating; Oil=medium used to for dispersion stainingCol Par=dispersion staining colors parallel to the fiber (fiber/halo): b/w=black/white; dg/py=dark gray/pale yellow; vg/y=violet gray/yellow; db/ly=dark blue/lemon yellow; vb/g= vivid blue/gold; sb/o=sky blue/orange; pb/r=pale blue/red; gb/dr=gray blue/dark red; w/b=white/black. Col Perp=same only perpendicular to fiber.RI Par=refractive index parallel to fiber; RI Perp=refractive index perpendicular to fiber
23-Sep-19Analyst: ROBERT A. McCORMICK
Larry S. Pierce, Approved Accreditation Signatory
Printed:
23-Sep-19Original Print Date:
5025 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040-2816 Phone: 602-276-6139 1-800-743-2687 FAX: 602-276-4558
Fiberquant, Inc. Page 22 of 22
Ole
So
lber
g
AH
ER
A B
uild
ing
Insp
ecto
r R
efre
sher
May
18,
201
9
ON
-464
4-48
46-0
5181
9
18-M
ay-2
019
18-M
ay-2
020
Pow
ered
by
TC
PD
F (
ww
w.tc
pdf.o
rg)