power amplifier design challenges and solutions for mm ...slide 1 of 205 power amplifier design...

of 205

Power Amplifier Design Challenges and Solutions for mm-wave Radios

WW04

Vittorio Camarchia1, Roberto Quaglia2, Matteo Oldoni3

1Politecnico di Torino, 2Cardiff University, 3SIAE Microelettronica

[email protected]

IEEE 802.11ad – Local Area Networks

Wireless Gigabit (WiGig) Alliance

60 GHz band – exploits O2 resonance

Used in liaison with RF LANsSupport up to 7 GbpsIn-room communicationSwitch to lower band when far from access point

oooooo

o

o

o

o

o

o

oooooo

o

o

o

o

oooooo

o

o

o

o

o

ooo

o

oo

oooooo

ooo

o

o

o

o

o

o

24 26 28 30 32 3422 36

-15-10

-505

1015

-20

20

Frequency (GHz)

Gai

n an

d R

etur

n Lo

ss (d

B)

Vi A t A tVo aVi a Vi a Vi

Lower side a A A t

Upper side a A A t

Vi A t A t t t

Lower side a A A t a A t t

Upper side a A A t a A t t

ETSI EN 302 217-2-2 V2.2.1Normalized spectrum mask for different modulation formats

PurposesIncreased OIP3 -> 40dBm allowing 6 dB higher output power (Present PAs operate 6 dB lower than Peak Power!!)

Improved operational efficiency (closer to its full capability)

Increased distance -> Maintained power consumption

Reduced power consumption -> Maintained distance

Peak CI3 @ highoutput power

Wide bandwidth

ETSI EN 302 217-2-2 V2.2.1

ETSI EN 302 217-2-2 V2.2.1

ETSI EN 302 217-2-2 V2.2.1

210 230 250 270 290 310 330−20

−10

0

10

20

30

Frequency (GHz)

S−

pa

ram

ete

rs

(dB

)

S21

S11

S22

100 200 300 400 500 600 7000

5

10

15

20

Frequency (GHz)N

oise

Mea

sure

(dB

)

InP HEMTGaAs mHEMTInP DHBTSiGe HBTThis work

Design V. Vassilev, H. Zirath, Y. Karandikar

of 38

Wideband CMOS PA Design at mm-Wave: Challenges and Case Studies

WW04

Matteo BassiUniversity of Pavia, Italy

[email protected]

WW04 Power Amplifier Design Challenges and Solutions for mm-wave Radios

of 38

Outline


• CMOS Power Amplifier Design Challenges• Coupled Resonators to Improve GBW• Case Studies

– [CS1] A 40-67 GHz PA with 13 dBm PSAT and 16% PAE in 28nm CMOS LP

– [CS2] A 15 GHz-Bandwidth 20 dBm PSAT Power Amplifier with 22% PAE in 65 nm CMOS

• Wrap up and conclusions

Slide 3of 38

CMOS Power Amplifier Trends


• Generation of power at mm-wave in CMOS technology is challenging• If large bandwidth is required, output power further limited

[http://isscc.org/doc/2016/ISSCC2016_TechTrends.pdf*]

*CMOS only

of 38

Power Amplifier Design Trade-Off


• Demand for broadband PAs:• Radar Imaging, Gb/s Wireless, Chip-to-Chip Links

• For a given power, bandwidth trades with gain and efficiency

Bandwidth

EfficiencyGain

Slide 5of 38

GBW-Efficiency Trade-Off


• High efficiency requires high gain

• As a matter of fact, having both high gain/stage (hence good efficiency) and large BW is difficult

11Out In Out

DC DC

P P PPAEP P G

of 38

Typical Power Amplifier


• Active Stages • High output power: large Ci2 and Co2• Class AB biasing: high efficiency but low gm

• gm,MIn/Ci2

Slide 7of 38

GBW vs Efficiency at Interstage 1/2


• Assumptions:– Fixed output power Pout and gain G=Vout/Vin

– Fixed Vdd and size of MPA for desired Pout

– Inductor L1 resonates Ci,PA at center frequency– For every MDR size, RD selected to achieve desired gain G

of 38

GBW vs Efficiency at Interstage 2/2


• If 55% fractional BW is targeted, an interstage network with GBWEN=3 allows 5x smaller transistor, and PAE goes from 11% to 26%

• Interstage network with high GBW key in ehnancing efficiency at a fixed fractional BW

Slide 9of 38

Outline






of 38

Coupled Resonators (CR)


• Simple topology and low losses• Two peaking frequencies:

• L2 used to control the bandwidth• ZIn L within band

1 3

21 1 3 3

1 1 , 1 L H LL L

LL C L C

Slide 11of 38

GBW Improvement


2 , 2CR LC CR LCZt Zt BW BW

Coupled resonators allow x2 GBW enhancement (GBWEN)

20 40 60 80 10010

20

30

40

50

Frequency [GHz]

|Zt|

[dB

]

CRLC

of 38

In-Band Ripple Minimization


• Limited inductor Q leads to asymmetric response• Coupled resonator can be conveniently tuned to minimize in-band

ripple

30 40 50 60 70 8020

25

30

35

Frequency [GHz]

|Vou

t/Iin

| [dB

]

Q=100 Q=30 Q=10

30 40 50 60 70 8022

24

26

28

30

32

Frequency [GHz]|V

out/I

in| [

dB]

Q=10

1

3

( )( )

T H

T L

Z LZ L

Decreasing Q Increasing L1/L3

Slide 13of 38

Outline






of 38

PA Targets and Complete Schematic


• Design targets:• PSAT f.c.) > 40% @60GHz• Gain > 10dB, PAE > 10%

• Careful design of interstage and output matching network are key in achieve desired targets

Slide 15of 38

Output Matching Network


Split L2

Norton transformation for impedance scaling

Transformer

Coupled Resonators for 2x GBWEN

of 38

Output Matching Network


• Transformer for differential to single-ended conversion• L2s implemented by the parasitic inductor of the trace

connecting pads to the transformer• Efficiency greater than 70%

Lp=Ls=70pH, k=0.7 - L2s=40pH

Slide 17of 38

Traditional Interstage Matching Network


• L resonates Ci and Co at center frequency• Given a target gain Gd and bandwidth BWd

• Explicit resistor Re increases bandwidth but decreases gain• Larger MIn required to restore gain level at the cost of

increased power consumption

of 38

Interstage Matching Network


• Given Gd and BWd, GBW improvement of inductively coupled resonators exploited to scale down transistor size by n

• Norton transformations further reduce the size and power consumption by t

• nt close to 3 in this design

Slide 19of 38

Input Matching Network


• Neutralization increases stability but also QIN

• Inductive degeneration decreases QIN to achieve wideband input matching and enhances linearity

• Mutual coupling facilitates layout routing and reduces inductors length

of 38

Chip Microphotograph


ST 28nm CMOS LP, chip area: 0.34 mm2

620 m

540

m

Interstage Matching

Output Matching

Slide 21of 38

Measured S-Parameters


30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

Frequency [GHz]

S-P

aram

eter

s [d

B]

S21S11S22S12

Gain 13 dB, BW 27 GHz, Frac. BW 51%

of 38

Large Signal Performance at 50GHz


-10 -5 0 50

5

10

15

20

Input Power [dBm]

Pou

t [dB

m] /

Gai

n [d

B] /

PA

E [%

]Pout Gain PAE

PSAT 1dB

Slide 23of 38

Large Signal Performance vs Frequency


Uniform PSAT and P1dB from 42-50GHz

40 42 44 46 48 500

5

10

15

20

Frequency [GHz]

P 1dB

[dBm

]/ P S

AT [d

Bm]/

PAE

peak

[%]

P1dB PSAT PAE

of 38

Performance Summary and Comparison


Reference Tech.& Vdd

Gain [dB]

BW [GHz]

GBW[GHz]

PSAT[dBm]

P1dB[dBm]

PAE[%]

Frac.BW [%]

[W1] 65nm / 1.8V 16 21.0 133 13.0 8.0 8.0 35[W2] 65nm / 1V 16 9.0 57 11.5 n.d. 15.2 15[W3] 45nm / 2V 20 13.0 130 14.5 11.2 14.4 22[W4] 65nm / 1.2V 18 12.5 99 9.6 n.d. 13.6 21[CS1] 28nm / 1V 13 27.0 121 13.0 12.0 16.0 51

Largest bandwidth with state-of-the-art efficiency and output power

Slide 25of 38

Outline






of 38

Power Combining


• Transformer-based combiner/splitter is popular– Compact size– Low insertion loss– Generally low bandwidth

• Wideband combining with coupled resonators

• Power combining mandatory for high POUT in CMOS PAs

Slide 27of 38

Wideband Combiner


• Easy to transform– Divide the left network into two same parts

of 38

Wideband Splitter


• Easy to transform– Divide the right network into two same parts

Slide 29of 38

Comparison with Transformer Splitter


20 40 60 80 10010

20

30

40

50

Frequency [GHz]

Tras

nim

peda

nce

Gai

n [d

BOhm

]

Designed Power SplitterSimple Tuned Transformer

More than two timesGBW improvement.

Practical impedance

of 38

Complete Schematic


• A prototype has been designed in ST 65nm CMOS:– Bandwidth > 13 GHz– Gain > 25dB– OP1dB > 15dBm– PAE > 20%

120u/60n 120u/60n 240u/60n

120u/60n 240u/60n

Slide 31of 38

Chip Microphotograph


ST 65nm CMOSChip area: 0.57 mm2

Core area: 0.11 mm2

of 38

Measured S-Parameters


3dB: 58.5-73.5GHz

40 50 60 70 80 90-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

Frequency [GHz]

S-P

aram

eter

s [d

B]

S21S12S11S22

Slide 33of 38

Large Signal Performance at 65GHz


PSAT 1dB Pdc

-20 -15 -10 -5 0 50

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Input Power [dBm]

Pou

t [dB

m] /

Gai

n [d

B] /

PA

E [%

]

Pout Gain PAE

of 38

Large Signal Performance vs Frequency


P1dB>15dBm, PAE>15% over the bandwidth

60 65 70 7512

14

16

18

20

22

24

Frequency [GHz]

S-P

aram

eter

s [d

B]

Peak PAEPoutP1dB

Slide 35of 38

Performance Summary and Comparison


State-of-the-art PSAT and PAE with the largest GBW

Reference Tech.& Vdd

Gain (dB)

BW (GHz)

GBW(GHz)

PSAT(dBm)

P1dB(dBm)

PAE(%)

[W5] 28nm / 1V 24 11 174 16.5 11.7 13[W6] 40nm / 1V 17 6 42 17 13.8 30[W7] 65nm / 1.2V 17.7 12 92 16.8 15.5 15[W8] 28nm SOI/ 1V 35 8 450 18.9 15 18[CS2] 65nm / 1V 30 15 474 20 16 22

of 38

Outline






Slide 37of 38

Conclusions


• High GBW is critical for PAs to achieve high efficiency over largebandwidth

• Coupled resonator can improve PA GBW while forming compactlayout

• A methodology was proposed to build wideband combiner/splitterusing coupled resonators

• A [CS1] two-stage one-path PA with 13dBm PSAT, 16% PAE, and 27GHz BW in 28nm CMOS and a [CS2] three-stage two-path PA with20dBm PSAT, 22% PAE, and 15GHz BW in 65nm CMOS demonstrate theeffectiveness of the proposed techniques

of 38

References


[CS1a] J. Zhao, M. Bassi, A. Bevilacqua, A. Ghilioni, A. Mazzanti and F. Svelto, "A 40–67GHz power amplifier with 13dBm PSAT and 16% PAE in 28nm CMOS LP," European Solid State Circuits Conference ESSCIRC 2014 - 40th, Venice Lido, 2014, pp. 179-182.[CS1b] M. Bassi, J. Zhao, A. Bevilacqua, A. Ghilioni, A. Mazzanti and F. Svelto, "A 40–67 GHz Power Amplifier With 13 dBm PSAT and 16% PAE in28 nm CMOS LP," in IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 1618-1628, July 2015.[CS2] J. Zhao, M. Bassi, A. Mazzanti and F. Svelto, "A 15 GHz-bandwidth 20dBm PSAT power amplifier with 22% PAE in 65nm CMOS," CustomIntegrated Circuits Conference 2015 IEEE, San Jose, CA, 2015, pp. 1-4.

[W1] A. Siligaris et al., “A 65-nm CMOS fully integrated transceiver module for 60-GHz wireless HD applications,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol.46, no. 12, pp. 3005–3017, Dec 2011.[W2] W. Chan and J. Long, “A 58–65GHz neutralized CMOS power amplifier with PAE above 10% at 1-V supply,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 45,no. 3, pp. 554–564, March 2010.[W3] M. Abbasi et al., “A broadband differential cascode power amplifier in 45 nm CMOS for high-speed 60GHz system-on-chip,” in RadioFrequency Integrated Circuits Symposium 2010 IEEE, May 2010, pp. 533–536.[W4] T. Wang et al., “A 55–67GHz power amplifier with 13.6% PAE in 65 nm standard CMOS,” in Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium

), 2011 IEEE, June 2011, pp. 1–4.[W5] S. Thyagarajan, A. Niknejad, and C. Hull, “A 60 GHz linear wideband power amplifier using cascode neutralization in 28 nm CMOS,” inCustom Integrated Circuits Conference 2013 IEEE, Sept 2013, pp. 1–4.[W6] D. Zhao and P. Reynaert, “A 60-GHz dual-mode class AB power amplifier in 40-nm CMOS,” Solid-State Circuits, IEEE Journal of, vol. 48, no.10, pp. 2323–2337, Oct 2013.[W7] P. Farahabadi and K. Moez, “A dual-mode highly efficient 60 GHz power amplifier in 65 nm CMOS,” in Radio Frequency Integrated CircuitsSymposium, 2014 IEEE, June 2014, pp. 155–158.[W8] A. Larie et al., “A 60 GHz 28 nm UTBB FD-SOI CMOS reconfigurable power amplifier with 21% PAE, 18.2 dBm P1dB and 74mW PDC,” inSolid-State Circuits Conference - 2015 IEEE International, Feb 2015, pp. 1–3.

power amplifier design challenges and solutions for mm ...slide 1 of 205 power amplifier design...

Documents