pma2016/uganda-r4 soi - ipums · pma2016/uganda-r4 soi snapshot of indicators summary of the sample...

PMA2016/UGANDA-R4 SOI SNAPSHOT OF INDICATORS

Summary of the sample design for PMA2016/Uganda-R4: PMA2020 is designed to create sentinel sites for data collection both at the population-

level and among service delivery points (SDPs). Enumeration areas (EAs) selected in

Round 1 are generally used for data collection in Rounds 2-4. Households within the EA

are randomly sampled during each round; however the EA is consistent across rounds. For

clarity, the original Round 1 sample design summary is provided below.

PMA2020 uses a two-stage cluster design with residential area (urban and rural) and sub-

regions as strata. The first stage of sampling was a selection of clusters within each

sampling stratum using probability proportional to size procedures. The sample was

designed to generate national estimates of all women modern contraceptive prevalence rate

(mCPR) with less than 2% margin of error and urban/rural estimates at less than 3% margin

of error.

The table below provides a summary of key family planning indicators at the national level

and their breakdown by background characteristics. Disaggregation by administrative unit

was done at the region level (Central, Western, Eastern, and Northern) due to small sample

sizes when disaggregated by sub-region.

To view the breakdown by background characteristics of the respondents, please click

on the respective indicator link.

Additional detail on sample design, data collection and processing, response rates, and

standard errors are available below the indicator tables.

PMA2020 Standard Family Planning Indicators

Round 4

All

Women

Married

Women

Utilization:

Contraceptive Use

Contraceptive Prevalence Rate (CPR) 31.1 36.9

Modern Contraceptive Prevalence (mCPR) 27.5 32.2

Traditional Contraceptive Prevalence 3.6 4.8

Contraceptive Method Mix

Contraceptive method mix (stacked bar charts for all/married

women)

Demand for Family Planning and Fertility Preferences:

Unmet need for family planning 23.8 30.5

Demand for family planning 55.0 67.4

Percent of all/married women with demand satisfied by modern

contraception 50.0 47.7

Percent of recent births, by intention

Wanted then 56.2 58.6

Wanted later 27.1 25.7

Wanted no more 16.8 15.7

http://pma2020.org/sites/default/files/dirtables/UGR4_1_CPR.pdf

http://pma2020.org/sites/default/files/dirtables/UGR4_2_MethodMix.pdf

http://pma2020.org/sites/default/files/dirtables/UGR4_3_MethodMixStackedBars.pdf

http://pma2020.org/sites/default/files/dirtables/UGR4_3_MethodMixStackedBars.pdf

http://pma2020.org/sites/default/files/dirtables/UGR4_4_UnmetNeed.pdf

http://pma2020.org/sites/default/files/dirtables/UGR4_5_Demand.pdf

http://pma2020.org/sites/default/files/dirtables/UGR4_7_UnintendedBirths.pdf

Access, Equity, Quality and Choice:

Percent of users who chose their current method by themselves or

jointly with a partner/provider

93.0 94.4

Percent of users who paid for family planning services 38.4 36.9

Method Information Index

Percent of current users who were informed about other methods 60.8 63.4

Percent of current users who were informed about side effects 61.7 64.6

Percent of current users who were told what to do if they

experienced side effects 84.8 87.3

Percent of current users who would return and/or refer others to

their provider

85.0 85.6

Percent of women receiving family planning information in the

past 12 months

15.6 18.1

Service Environment:

Charging fees for family planning

Contraceptive choice: Availability of at least 3 or at least 5

modern contraceptive methods

Contraceptive choice: Availability of modern contraception, by

method

Contraceptive stock-outs, by method

Number of new and continuing family planning visits, by method

http://pma2020.org/sites/default/files/dirtables/UGR4_8_Choice.pdf

http://pma2020.org/sites/default/files/dirtables/UGR4_8_Choice.pdf

http://pma2020.org/sites/default/files/dirtables/UGR4_9_Payment.pdf

http://pma2020.org/sites/default/files/dirtables/UGR4_10_MethodInfo.pdf

http://pma2020.org/sites/default/files/dirtables/UGR4_12_Quality.pdf

http://pma2020.org/sites/default/files/dirtables/UGR4_12_Quality.pdf

http://pma2020.org/sites/default/files/dirtables/UGR4_13_Knowledge.pdf

http://pma2020.org/sites/default/files/dirtables/UGR4_13_Knowledge.pdf

http://pma2020.org/sites/default/files/dirtables/UGR4_SDP1_Fee.pdf

http://pma2020.org/sites/default/files/dirtables/UGR4_SDP2_3to5methods.pdf

http://pma2020.org/sites/default/files/dirtables/UGR4_SDP2_3to5methods.pdf

http://pma2020.org/sites/default/files/dirtables/UGR4_SDP3_Availability.pdf

http://pma2020.org/sites/default/files/dirtables/UGR4_SDP3_Availability.pdf

http://pma2020.org/sites/default/files/dirtables/UGR4_SDP4_Stockouts.pdf

http://pma2020.org/sites/default/files/dirtables/UGR4_SDP5_FPVisits.pdf

Snapshot of Indicators | PMA2016/Uganda-R4

© 2016 Performance Monitoring and Accountability 2020 (PMA2020)

Background characteristics of respondents Percent distribution of background characteristics of women age 15 to 49

Background characteristics Percentage of sample

Weighted number

Unweighted number

Age group 15–19 20.6 784 780 20–24 21.4 813 809 25–29 17.1 651 668 30–34 14.2 538 546 35–39 11.1 421 430 40–44 8.9 336 315 45–49 6.7 256 245

Marital status Married 34.9 1,326 1,303 Living together 32.6 1,238 1,208 Divorced 8.6 327 331 Widowed 2.8 105 106 Never married 20.9 796 835

Parity None 22.1 840 880 1-2 27.7 1,051 1,063 3-4 20.7 787 790 5 or more 29.4 1,116 1,055

Education Never attended 8.9 338 393

Primary 61.8 2,347 2,234 Secondary 23.9 909 947 Technical/Vocational 3.0 116 109 University 2.2 83 102

Wealth quintile Lowest 19.2 729 707 Lower 18.6 708 695 Middle 20.1 762 743 Higher 20.4 776 720 Highest 21.7 825 928

Region Central 27.3 1,037 1,095 Eastern 28.6 1,087 931 Northern 20.8 792 936 Western 23.3 884 831

Total 100.0 3,800 3,793



Characteristics of service delivery points Number and percentage of service delivery points (SDPs) by background characteristics

Background characteristics Number of SDPs Percentage

Total 350 100.0 SDP type

Hospital 46 13.1 Health Center IV 53 15.1 Health Center III 80 22.9 Health Center II 67 19.1 Health Clinic 24 6.9 Pharmacy/Chemist/Other 80 22.9

Number of beds1 0-50 206 58.9 51-100 31 8.9 101 or more 24 6.9

Sector Public 224 64.0 Private 126 36.0

Region Central 92 26.3 Eastern 99 28.3 Northern 74 21.1 Western 85 24.3

Offers family planning No 18 5.1 Yes 331 94.6

1Number of beds only asked of advanced SDPs, including hospital, health center, health clinic and other



Current use of contraception by background characteristics Percentage of women age 15 to 49 currently using a contraceptive method, by type and background characteristics

Any method Modern method1 Traditional method

Background characteristic All women Married women2 All women Married

women2 All women Married women2

Number 3,800 2,564 3,800 2,564 3,800 2,564 Total 31.1 36.9 27.5 32.2 3.6 4.8 Age group

15–19 13.2 20.4 12.3 17.6 1.0 2.8 20–24 31.9 33.3 28.4 29.6 3.5 3.7 25–29 34.4 34.8 31.5 31.7 2.9 3.1 30–34 43.1 44.6 38.1 39.0 5.0 5.6 35–39 43.6 47.6 38.7 42.0 4.9 5.6 40–44 36.2 41.5 29.7 33.4 6.5 8.1 45–49 22.6 25.8 17.3 19.0 5.2 6.8

Marital status Married2 36.9 na 32.2 na 4.8 na Unmarried, sexually active 44.5 na 40.2 na 4.3 na

Parity 0–1 18.9 26.1 16.7 21.7 2.3 4.4 2–3 36.6 37.3 33.8 34.0 2.8 3.3 4 or more 39.2 41.4 33.7 35.5 5.5 5.9

Residence Urban 35.8 45.7 32.2 40.8 3.6 4.9 Rural 30.0 35.1 26.3 30.4 3.6 4.7

Education Never attended 21.0 22.6 17.6 19.1 3.3 3.4 Primary 30.6 35.5 27.1 30.9 3.5 4.6 Secondary 32.2 42.3 29.6 38.7 2.6 3.7 Technical/Vocational 51.7 63.3 41.6 49.6 10.1 13.7 University 42.6 56.5 33.6 41.4 9.0 15.1

Wealth quintile Lowest 24.3 28.0 21.5 24.6 2.8 3.4 Lower 24.1 26.0 20.8 22.2 3.3 3.8 Middle 30.2 37.7 27.9 34.3 2.3 3.3 Higher 34.8 42.6 30.7 36.8 4.1 5.8 Highest 40.5 50.8 35.2 43.2 5.4 7.6

Region Central 35.5 43.6 30.9 37.4 4.6 6.2 Eastern 30.9 35.1 26.8 29.9 4.1 5.2 Northern 21.2 25.4 19.6 23.4 1.6 2.0 Western 35.2 42.7 31.4 37.5 3.7 5.3

1Modern methods include female and male sterilization, implants, IUD, injectables, pill, emergency contraception, male and female condoms, standard days method, and lactational amenorrhea method 2Married includes married women and those who are living with a man na = not applicable



Contraceptive method mix by background characteristics Percent distribution of current contraceptive users age 15 to 49, by method type, marital status, and background characteristics

1Married includes married women and those who are living with a man

All users

Number = 1,183 Background characteristics

Sterili-zation Implants IUD Inject-

ables Pill Emergency contraception Condom Other

modern Other

traditional Total

Total 6.7 13.1 1.9 47.1 6.7 0.8 10.3 2.4 11.0 100.0 Age group

15–19 0.0 9.9 1.2 37.5 6.2 2.0 35.1 0.7 7.3 100.0 20–24 0.0 17.0 0.1 49.3 6.6 1.4 12.4 2.8 10.3 100.0 25–29 0.6 15.0 2.2 53.5 9.1 0.0 6.5 4.6 8.5 100.0 30–34 3.9 12.8 2.3 56.0 5.9 0.6 6.6 2.3 9.6 100.0 35–39 11.1 15.0 2.6 47.0 7.4 0.4 4.2 1.8 10.5 100.0 40–44 27.7 6.3 1.6 33.9 4.1 0.0 7.1 1.3 18.0 100.0 45–49 25.0 3.2 5.4 22.9 4.9 3.0 12.5 0.0 23.2 100.0

Marital status Married1 7.6 13.5 2.1 49.1 6.7 0.3 5.9 2.7 12.1 100.0 Unmarried, sexually active 3.0 9.9 0.6 41.5 3.2 3.2 28.3 0.7 9.7 100.0

Parity 0–1 0.5 10.5 1.5 36.2 7.8 3.0 26.2 2.8 11.5 100.0 2–3 2.8 15.6 2.1 56.2 8.4 0.2 5.3 2.2 7.2 100.0 4 or more 11.8 12.9 1.9 46.9 4.9 0.1 6.1 2.3 13.1 100.0

Residence Urban 3.2 15.7 3.3 40.0 9.7 1.6 13.0 3.3 10.2 100.0 Rural 7.7 12.3 1.4 49.3 5.8 0.6 9.6 2.1 11.3 100.0

Education Never attended 9.3 22.2 4.4 35.6 6.0 0.0 4.0 2.6 15.9 100.0 Primary 8.8 12.9 1.0 50.1 5.1 0.3 8.8 2.4 10.6 100.0 Secondary 1.8 12.0 2.7 49.9 9.4 0.8 14.2 1.0 8.2 100.0 Technical/vocational 3.4 10.9 1.3 29.7 11.2 6.8 8.9 10.0 17.8 100.0 University 3.3 13.4 8.8 14.8 11.9 2.3 23.6 0.9 21.1 100.0

Wealth quintile 0.0 Lowest 11.6 17.6 1.2 41.7 2.2 0.7 9.9 4.7 10.3 100.0 Lower 8.0 14.0 1.8 47.3 4.1 0.7 7.4 5.1 11.7 100.0 Middle 8.0 12.2 0.7 55.2 4.7 0.0 11.4 0.5 7.2 100.0 Higher 5.6 11.3 1.6 52.1 7.4 0.5 9.0 1.1 11.4 100.0 Highest 3.3 12.3 3.3 40.3 11.2 1.7 12.5 2.1 13.3 100.0

Region Central 2.5 12.9 1.5 46.1 9.3 2.0 11.7 1.0 13.0 100.0 Eastern 13.6 5.7 1.9 45.1 4.3 0.2 14.5 3.0 11.7 100.0 Northern 6.3 29.9 0.9 44.6 3.3 0.8 5.0 2.7 6.7 100.0 Western 4.3 12.2 2.8 52.0 8.1 0.0 7.1 3.2 10.3 100.0



1Married includes married women and those who are living with a man na = not applicable

Married users1

Number = 947 Background characteristics

Sterili-zation Implants IUD

Inject-ables Pill

Emergency contraception Condom

Other modern

Other traditional Total

Total 7.6 13.5 2.1 49.1 6.7 0.3 5.9 2.7 12.1 100.0 Age group

15–19 0.0 20.2 3.3 49.3 6.1 0.0 5.5 1.8 13.8 100.0 20–24 0.0 17.6 0.0 53.2 6.3 0.0 8.9 3.5 10.5 100.0 25–29 0.7 13.2 2.6 56.5 9.0 0.0 4.8 4.1 9.0 100.0 30–34 4.5 12.7 2.6 55.9 6.3 0.2 4.9 2.6 10.2 100.0 35–39 12.3 15.6 2.1 45.7 7.7 0.5 3.2 2.0 10.9 100.0 40–44 27.9 6.4 1.8 35.0 3.1 0.0 4.9 1.4 19.5 100.0 45–49 24.4 4.0 6.9 15.1 5.3 3.8 14.0 0.0 26.5 100.0

Marital status

Married1 na na na na na na na na na na Unmarried, sexually active

na na na na na na na na na na

Parity

0–1 0.9 12.5 2.8 44.1 6.7 1.2 10.9 5.2 15.7 100.0 2–3 3.3 14.9 1.9 56.0 8.8 0.1 4.7 1.8 8.4 100.0 4 or more 11.9 13.0 2.1 46.6 5.2 0.1 5.1 2.6 13.3 100.0

Residence

Urban 4.1 15.6 3.8 44.7 9.2 1.0 6.6 4.2 10.8 100.0 Rural 8.6 12.9 1.7 50.3 6.0 0.1 5.7 2.3 12.5 100.0

Education

Never attended 9.3 20.9 5.3 36.7 4.7 0.0 4.8 3.1 15.2 100.0 Primary 9.9 13.7 1.2 50.3 5.2 0.0 5.3 2.6 11.9 100.0 Secondary 2.4 13.0 2.8 56.4 8.5 0.3 6.8 1.1 8.6 100.0 Technical/vocational 3.9 7.3 1.5 34.7 13.1 3.3 4.7 11.7 19.7 100.0 University 4.2 10.2 11.2 16.3 15.1 1.2 13.8 1.2 26.8 100.0

Wealth quintile Lowest 11.6 18.2 1.4 43.8 1.0 0.0 7.6 5.6 10.8 100.0 Lower 7.9 14.7 2.3 49.4 2.6 0.0 6.0 5.0 12.1 100.0 Middle 9.5 13.6 0.8 56.2 5.6 0.0 5.5 0.6 8.2 100.0 Higher 7.2 9.9 1.7 52.5 8.9 0.4 5.0 1.4 13.2 100.0 Highest 4.1 13.0 3.8 43.9 11.0 0.8 5.8 2.5 15.0 100.0


Current Method Mix Among All and Married Contraceptive Users (Age 15-49)



0

20

40

60

80

100

Round 2Round 1

Other traditional

Other modern

Emergency contraception Male condoms

Pills

Injectables

Implants

IUD

Female sterilization

All Married

Perc

enta

ge

100

75

50

25

0

Number of users:1,183

Number of users:947

6.71.9

13.1

47.1

6.7

10.3

11.02.40.8

2.1

13.5

49.1

6.7

5.9

12.1

2.7

7.6



Unmet need for family planning Percentage of women age 15 to 49 with unmet need for family planning, by marital status and background characteristics


Background characteristics All women Married women1

Number 3,800 2,564 For spacing For limiting Total For spacing For limiting Total

Total 15.1 8.8 23.8 19.2 11.3 30.5 Age group

15–19 13.8 2.5 16.2 35.5 3.9 39.3 20–24 19.9 3.0 22.9 23.4 3.2 26.6 25–29 22.7 6.2 28.9 25.4 6.0 31.5 30–34 16.5 13.1 29.6 18.4 13.8 32.2 35–39 10.7 18.3 29.0 12.4 21.0 33.4 40–44 6.3 18.2 24.6 8.1 20.6 28.7 45–49 0.2 15.6 15.9 0.3 22.5 22.8

Marital status Married1 19.2 11.3 30.5 na na na Unmarried, sexually active 24.9 9.7 34.7 na na na

Parity 0–1 12.7 2.1 14.7 21.4 2.3 23.7 2–3 21.2 5.0 26.2 23.7 5.4 29.1 4 or more 13.5 17.5 31.0 15.5 18.9 34.4


Education Never attended 11.0 17.8 28.8 13.3 21.9 35.1 Primary 17.3 9.2 26.5 21.2 11.4 32.6 Secondary 12.6 6.0 18.6 18.5 8.0 26.4 Technical/vocational 7.8 1.8 9.6 9.6 2.5 12.1 University 7.2 0.9 8.1 10.0 0.7 10.7





Need and demand for family planning Percentage of women age 15 to 49 with met need, unmet need, and total demand for family planning, and percentage of demand for family planning satisfied with modern methods, by marital status and background characteristics


Background characteristics

All women Married women2

Number 3,800 2,564 Met need Met need

Any method

Modern method1

Unmet need

Total demand

Demand satisfied

by modern method

Any method

Modern method1

Unmet need

Total demand

Demand satisfied

by modern method

Total 31.1 27.5 23.8 55.0 50.0 36.9 32.2 30.5 67.4 47.7 Age group

15–19 13.2 12.3 16.2 29.5 41.7 20.4 17.6 39.3 59.7 29.4 20–24 31.9 28.4 22.9 54.8 51.9 33.3 29.6 26.6 60.0 49.3 25–29 34.4 31.5 28.9 63.3 49.8 34.8 31.7 31.5 66.3 47.8 30–34 43.1 38.1 29.6 72.7 52.4 44.6 39.0 32.2 76.9 50.8 35–39 43.6 38.7 29.0 72.7 53.3 47.6 42.0 33.4 81.0 51.8 40–44 36.2 29.7 24.6 60.7 48.8 41.5 33.4 28.7 70.3 47.6 45–49 22.6 17.3 15.9 38.4 45.1 25.8 19.0 22.8 48.6 39.0

Marital status

Married2 36.9 32.2 30.5 67.4 47.7 na na na na na

Unmarried, sexually active 44.5 40.2 34.7 79.2 50.8 na na na na na Parity

0–1 18.9 16.7 14.7 33.7 49.5 26.1 21.7 23.7 49.8 43.6 2–3 36.6 33.8 26.2 62.8 53.9 37.3 34.0 29.1 66.4 51.2 4 or more 39.2 33.7 31.0 70.1 48.1 41.4 35.5 34.4 75.8 46.8

Residence Urban 35.8 32.2 15.8 51.6 62.4 45.7 40.8 21.9 67.7 60.3 Rural 30.0 26.3 25.9 55.8 47.2 35.1 30.4 32.3 67.4 45.0

Education Never attended 21.0 17.6 28.8 49.8 35.4 22.6 19.1 35.1 57.7 33.2 Primary 30.6 27.1 26.5 57.1 47.4 35.5 30.9 32.6 68.1 45.3 Secondary 32.2 29.6 18.6 50.9 58.2 42.3 38.7 26.4 68.8 56.2

Technical/vocational 51.7 41.6 9.6 61.3 67.9 63.3 49.6 12.1 75.4 65.8 University 42.6 33.6 8.1 50.6 66.4 56.5 41.4 10.7 67.3 61.5

Wealth quintile Lowest 24.3 21.5 32.2 56.4 38.1 28.0 24.6 38.1 66.1 37.2 Lower 24.1 20.8 32.5 56.6 36.8 26.0 22.2 40.6 66.6 33.3 Middle 30.2 27.9 21.4 51.6 54.0 37.7 34.3 28.6 66.2 51.9 Higher 34.8 30.7 19.8 54.6 56.2 42.6 36.8 24.2 66.8 55.0 Highest 40.5 35.2 15.1 55.7 63.2 50.8 43.2 20.6 71.5 60.4




Pregnancy intentions Unintended births among women age 15 to 49 with one or more births in the previous 5 years or who are currently pregnant: Percent distribution reporting last or current pregnancy was wanted then, wanted later or not wanted at all, by marital status and background characteristics



All women with 1 or more births Married women with 1 or more births

Number 2,367 2,003 Wanted

then Wanted

later Wanted no more Total Wanted

then Wanted

later Wanted no

more Total

Total 56.2 27.1 16.8 100.0 58.6 25.7 15.7 100.0 Age group

15–19 46.7 36.6 16.7 100.0 57.6 33.7 8.8 100.0 20–24 64.5 29.5 6.1 100.0 68.7 26.7 4.6 100.0 25–29 64.1 26.3 9.6 100.0 65.6 25.2 9.2 100.0 30–34 54.3 27.3 18.4 100.0 54.7 27.3 18.0 100.0 35–39 45.2 23.4 31.4 100.0 44.7 23.3 31.9 100.0 40–44 36.1 17.7 46.2 100.0 33.3 20.4 46.3 100.0 45–49 49.0 8.8 42.2 100.0 52.5 8.2 39.3 100.0

Marital status Married1 58.6 25.7 15.7 100.0 na na na na Unmarried, sexually active 45.5 34.3 20.2

100.0 na na na

na

Parity 0–1 62.7 25.9 11.4 100.0 72.7 20.9 6.4 100.0 2–3 65.9 28.8 5.3 100.0 68.0 27.0 5.0 100.0 4 or more 45.7 26.4 27.9 100.0 45.9 26.9 27.1 100.0

Residence Urban 64.5 23.3 12.2 100.0 67.5 23.2 9.3 100.0 Rural 54.5 27.9 17.7 100.0 56.9 26.2 16.9 100.0

Education Never attended 51.5 19.6 29.0 100.0 53.5 18.2 28.3 100.0 Primary 52.3 30.6 17.1 100.0 54.5 29.4 16.1 100.0 Secondary 66.3 21.1 12.6 100.0 69.2 20.2 10.6 100.0 Technical/Vocational 66.3 29.0 4.6 100.0 72.3 23.3 4.5 100.0

University 84.5 9.1 6.4 100.0 86.5 7.3 6.2 100.0 Wealth quintile

Lowest 45.9 32.9 21.2 100.0 49.1 31.0 20.0 100.0 Lower 53.5 28.3 18.1 100.0 53.8 28.3 17.8 100.0 Middle 56.9 25.3 17.9 100.0 58.0 24.9 17.1 100.0 Higher 59.4 26.6 14.0 100.0 65.4 24.6 10.0 100.0 Highest 66.7 21.5 11.8 100.0 69.5 18.5 11.9 100.0

Region Central 68.2 21.1 10.7 100.0 71.7 18.5 9.8 100.0 Eastern 48.0 26.0 26.0 100.0 50.6 24.7 24.7 100.0 Northern 51.5 32.4 16.1 100.0 53.8 31.2 15.0 100.0 Western 58.4 29.8 11.8 100.0 60.7 29.3 10.0 100.0



Contraceptive choice Percent distribution of women age 15 to 49 who are currently using modern contraception1 reporting on who decided on the contraceptive method, by background characteristics

Background characteristics Self Jointly with partner or provider

Provider alone/ partner alone/other Total

Number 566 521 82 1,006 Total 48.4 44.5 7.0 100.0 Age group

15–19 43.3 40.1 16.6 100.0 20–24 46.9 43.6 9.5 100.0 25–29 52.8 42.3 4.9 100.0 30–34 55.6 40.9 3.5 100.0 35–39 50.4 44.0 5.6 100.0 40–44 37.3 54.5 8.1 100.0 45–49 35.0 60.9 4.1 100.0

Marital status Married2 45.3 49.1 5.6 100.0 Unmarried, sexually active 56.5 31.3 12.2

100.0

Parity 0–1 46.9 40.4 12.7 100.0 2–3 50.8 42.4 6.8 100.0 4 or more 47.4 47.9 4.7 100.0

Residence Urban 49.6 44.9 5.5 100.0 Rural 48.1 44.4 7.5 100.0 Education Never attended 65.8 30.2 4.0 100.0

Primary 47.6 44.9 7.5 100.0 Secondary 49.3 43.7 7.1 100.0 Technical/Vocational 46.2 50.7 3.0 100.0 University 24.8 63.9 11.3 100.0

Wealth quintile Lowest 38.9 50.3 10.7 100.0 Lower 49.5 41.6 8.9 100.0 Middle 50.5 42.2 7.3 100.0 Higher 53.6 41.1 5.3 100.0 Highest 47.4 47.4 5.2 100.0

Region Central 54.1 41.2 4.8 100.0 Eastern 43.9 44.7 11.3 100.0 Northern 42.6 50.9 6.5 100.0 Western 50.0 44.8 5.2 100.0




Payment for family planning Percentage of women age 15 to 49 currently using a modern contraceptive method1 who paid fees for services, by marital status and background characteristics

Background characteristics All modern contraceptive users1

Married2 modern contraceptive users1

Number 1,181 947 Total 38.4 36.9 Age group

15–19 44.3 44.4 20–24 45.6 42.7 25–29 40.7 39.1 30–34 40.2 39.3 35–39 28.1 28.2 40–44 30.8 31.7 45–49 27.7 31.0

Marital status Married2 36.9 na Unmarried, sexually active 50.6 na

Parity 0–1 46.3 45.2 2–3 43.0 41.6 4 or more 31.8 31.7

Residence Urban 46.4 42.6 Rural 36.0 35.4

Education Never attended 18.7 17.9

Primary 36.6 35.2 Secondary 47.5 46.1

Technical/Vocational 42.9 43.2 University 32.1 25.9

Wealth quintile Lowest 33.1 30.9 Lower 32.1 32.7 Middle 31.0 32.7 Higher 41.7 40.4 Highest 46.7 42.9

Region Central 49.6 49.5 Eastern 34.5 33.1 Northern 30.2 29.8 Western 33.8 31.3




Method information index Percentage of current modern1 contraceptive users who reported whether provider informed them about other methods, side effects and, if informed of side effects, what to do, by marital status and background characteristics2

1Modern methods include female and male sterilization, implants, IUD, injectables, pill, emergency contraception, male and female condoms, standard days method, and lactational amenorrhea method 2"Informed about other methods" asked of all current contraceptive users, "informed about side effects" asked of current modern contraceptive users, and "told what to do if experienced side effects" asked of current modern contraceptive users who indicated they were told about side effects. 3Married includes married women and those who are living with a man na = not applicable (XX) = Estimate generated from less than 25 unweighted observations

Background characteristics Informed about other methods

Informed about side effects

Told what to do if experienced side effects

All users Married users3 All users Married users3 All users Married users3

Number 1,181 947 1,064 842 656 545 Total 60.8 63.4 61.7 64.6 84.8 87.3 Age group

15–19 50.3 57.5 48.2 68.3 68.9 (79.6) 20–24 57.3 60.1 59.8 60.4 80.1 84.3 25–29 63.5 64.7 58.1 58.6 89.5 89.1 30–34 62.3 65.1 67.1 68.5 89.3 91.8 35–39 65.2 66.3 70.5 73.3 87.5 87.9 40–44 63.0 60.8 64.6 64.4 83.9 84.0 45–49 60.0 65.5 52.3 57.8 (82.2) (81.1)

Marital status Married3 63.4 na 64.6 na 87.3 na

Unmarried, sexually active

49.9 na 54.6 na 72.0 na

Parity 0–1 52.8 55.7 52.4 57.3 80.0 84.8 2–3 62.3 65.6 63.9 66.0 81.0 84.2 4 or more 63.7 64.5 64.7 65.9 88.9 89.7


Education Never attended 57.4 54.8 73.6 70.6 87.3 87.1

Primary 60.5 62.8 61.2 63.3 85.7 88.2 Secondary 59.6 63.6 58.7 65.0 83.0 86.4

Technical/Vocational 67.2 67.1 63.5 60.4 78.4 82.6 University 73.2 82.7 81.2 91.0 85.7 (85.0)





Perceived quality of care for family planning Percentage of current modern1 contraceptive users who would return, would refer a friend/relative, or would return and refer friend/relative to provider, by background characteristics

Background characteristics Percent who would return to provider

Percent who would refer relative/friend

Percent who would return and refer friend/relative

Number 1,028 1,028 1,028 Total 88.7 88.7 85.0 Age group 15–19 89.4 91.8 86.6 20–24 87.7 87.2 83.8 25–29 84.9 85.1 80.7 30–34 92.8 88.8 87.9 35–39 89.5 89.7 86.5 40–44 88.4 91.3 84.4 45–49 89.3 95.3 89.3

Marital status Married2 89.4 89.1 85.6 Unmarried, sexually active 84.0 87.3 81.9

Parity 0–1 86.9 88.1 84.1 2–3 88.0 85.9 82.2 4 or more 89.9 90.5 87.0

Residence Urban 85.0 83.1 80.0 Rural 89.8 90.3 86.4

Education Never attended 96.2 93.3 92.0 Primary 89.1 89.1 85.7 Secondary 85.2 86.2 81.1 Technical/Vocational 91.4 92.1 87.8 University 91.6 90.9 89.2

Wealth quintile Lowest 91.3 92.2 87.1 Lower 90.1 91.3 87.0 Middle 91.7 91.1 89.1 Higher 88.3 87.8 84.2 Highest 84.9 84.3 80.4

Region Central 86.9 86.0 83.7 Eastern 85.0 88.3 81.0 Northern 95.8 92.3 90.3 Western 90.9 90.1 87.8




Knowledge of family planning Percentage of women age 15 to 49 who reported receiving family planning information from a health worker in the past 12 months, by marital status and background characteristics


Visited by health worker who discussed family planning

Visited facility and provider discussed family planning

Either visited by health worker or visited facility and discussed

family planning All women Married women1 All women Married women1 All women Married women1

Number 3,800 2,564 3,800 2,564 3,800 2,564 Total 15.6 18.1 33.0 40.3 39.4 46.7 Age group

15–19 8.8 12.5 15.5 30.6 20.8 36.4 20–24 15.7 16.8 35.6 40.5 42.4 46.9 25–29 17.6 18.7 41.8 45.4 47.8 51.3 30–34 21.2 23.1 43.4 44.8 50.6 52.2 35–39 19.9 22.1 38.1 41.5 45.6 49.2 40–44 12.9 13.1 34.5 37.0 38.8 41.0 45–49 15.7 13.9 23.7 24.2 32.2 31.7

Marital status Married1 18.1 na 40.3 na 46.7 na Unmarried, sexually active

13.9 na 31.8 na 38.3 na

Parity 0–1 10.6 14.8 20.9 33.3 26.6 39.4 2–3 18.6 19.0 39.6 42.1 46.3 48.4 4 or more 18.5 19.1 40.4 42.2 47.3 48.9


Education Never attended 22.1 22.5 33.9 36.0 42.2 44.1 Primary 15.8 18.3 34.7 41.4 41.0 47.7 Secondary 13.8 16.7 28.4 38.7 35.3 45.8 Technical/vocational 7.7 8.5 34.7 39.7 37.4 41.6 University 13.5 17.9 28.8 42.7 31.7 45.6






Charging fees for family planning Percentage of service delivery points (SDPs) that charge fees for family planning services, by sector and background characteristics, among SDPs offering family planning

Background characteristic Sector Public Private Number of SDPs 223 108 Total 0.4 80.6 SDP type Hospital 0.0 (33.3) Health Center IV 0.0 (0.0) Health Center III 1.4 (100.0) Health Center II 0.0 (100.0) Health Clinic na (95.5) Pharmacy/Chemist/Other na (81.9) Number of beds1 0-50 0.6 93.3 51-100 0.0 (0.0) 101 or more (0.0) (20.0)

1Number of beds only asked of advanced SDPs, including hospital, health center, health clinic and other na = not applicable (XX) = Estimate generated from less than 25 unweighted observations (XX) = Estimate generated from less than 5 unweighted observations



Contraceptive Choice: Availability of at least 3 or at least 5 modern contraceptive methods Percentage of public and private service delivery points (SDPs) offering at least 3 or at least 5 modern contraceptive methods1, by sector and background characteristics, among all SDPs

Background characteristic 3 or more methods 5 or more methods Public Private Public Private

Number of SDPs 224 126 224 126 Total 73.2 41.3 42.0 9.5 SDP type Hospital 97.0 (30.8) 84.8 (30.8) Health Center IV 98.1 (100.0) 76.9 (100.0) Health Center III 73.0 (33.3) 29.7 (33.3) Health Center II 41.5 (50.0) 6.2 (0.0) Health Clinic na 54.2 na (8.3) Pharmacy/Chemist/Other na 38.8 na 3.8 Number of beds1 0-50 67.3 57.1 28.7 20.0 51-100 96.3 (0.0) 96.3 (0.0) 101 or more (93.8) (25.0) (68.8) (25.0)

1Modern methods include female and male sterilization, implants, IUD, injectables, pill, emergency contraception, male and female condoms, and standard days method 2Number of beds only asked of advanced SDPs, including hospital, health center, health clinic and other na = not applicable (XX) = Estimate generated from less than 25 unweighted observations (XX) = Estimate generated from less than 5 unweighted observations



Contraceptive choice: Availability of modern contraception, by method

Percentage of service delivery points (SDPs) offering different types of contraceptive methods, by sector and background characteristics, among all SDPs


Public SDPs Contraceptive method

Background characteristic Pill Injectables IUD Implants Male

condom Female

sterilization Emergency

contraception Number of SDPs = 224 Total 81.7 96.0 54.0 63.8 94.6 20.5 61.6 SDP type Hospital 90.9 100.0 93.9 97.0 97.0 72.7 72.7 Health Center IV 94.2 100.0 90.4 98.1 100.0 40.4 71.2 Health Center III 81.1 97.3 47.3 62.2 94.6 1.4 63.5 Health Center II 67.7 89.2 12.3 21.5 89.2 0.0 46.2 Health Clinic na na na na na na na Pharmacy/Chemist/Other na na na na na na na Number of beds1 0-50 78.9 95.3 42.7 55.0 94.2 8.2 58.5 51-100 88.9 96.3 92.6 96.3 96.3 55.6 74.1 101 or more (87.5) (100.0) (87.5) (87.5) (93.8) (75.0) (62.5)

Private SDPs Contraceptive method


condom Female

sterilization Emergency

contraception Number of SDPs = 126 Total 62.7 65.1 5.6 11.1 73.8 4.8 28.6 SDP type Hospital (23.1) (30.8) (23.1) (30.8) (30.8) (38.5) (23.1) Health Center IV (100.0) (100.0) (100.0) (100.0) (100.0) (100.0) (100.0) Health Center III (33.3) (33.3) (16.7) (33.3) (33.3) (0.0) (33.3) Health Center II (100.0) (100.0) (0.0) (0.0) 100.0 (0.0) (0.0) Health Clinic (87.5) (83.3) (4.2) (16.7) (83.3) (0.0) (45.8) Pharmacy/Chemist/Other 62.5 66.3 1.3 3.8 80.0 0.0 23.8 Number of beds1 0-50 80.0 80.0 11.4 25.7 80.0 8.6 45.7 51-100 (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) 101 or more (25.0) (25.0) (25.0) (25.0) (25.0) (37.5) (25.0)



Contraceptive stock-outs, by method Percentage of service delivery points (SDPs) stocked out of specific modern contraceptives at time of survey or stocked out in the last 3 months, by sector and background characteristics, among SDPs that offer each method


Private SDPs Contraceptive method


condom Emergency

contraception Number of SDPs 79 82 7 14 93 36 Total 51.9 39.0 0.0 7.1 26.9 63.9 SDP type Hospital (33.3) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (25.0) (100.0) Health Center IV (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) Health Center III (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (50.0) Health Center II (0.0) (100.0) na na (50.0) na Health Clinic (57.1) (30.0) (0.0) (25.0) (25.0) (63.6) Pharmacy/Chemist/Other 56.0 45.3 (0.0) (0.0) 28.1 (63.2) Number of beds1 0-50 42.9 28.6 (0.0) (11.1) 21.4 (62.5) 51-100 na na na na na na 101 or more (50.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (50.0) (100.0)

Public SDPs Contraceptive method


condom Emergency

contraception Number of SDPs 183 215 121 143 212 138 Total 71.6 8.4 18.2 27.3 12.3 88.4 SDP type Hospital 66.7 12.1 9.7 12.5 9.4 (87.5) Health Center IV 67.3 7.7 23.4 19.6 5.8 94.6 Health Center III 76.7 5.6 14.3 41.3 8.6 78.7 Health Center II 72.7 10.3 (37.5) (42.9) 24.1 96.7 Health Clinic na na na na na na Pharmacy/Chemist/Other na na na na na na Number of beds1 0-50 72.6 8.0 20.5 36.2 13.0 88.0 51-100 (70.8) 11.5 20.0 7.7 3.8 (85.0) 101 or more (64.3) (12.5) (7.1) (14.3) (20.0) (100.0)



Number of family planning visits, by method Total number of visits and new clients for contraceptive services, by method type and background characteristics, among advanced1 service delivery points (SDPs)1 that offer each method

Contraceptive Methods

Sterilization Injectable IUD Implants Male condom Pills

Emergency Contraception

Total

women Total men Total New Total New Total New Total New Total New Total New

Number of SDPs 52 41 297 128 157 305 262 174 Total 73 2 11,747 4,365 484 353 3,349 2,406 9,658 3,521 1,150 408 72 44 Background characteristic SDP type Hospital 44 2 3,440 1,023 217 157 1,518 972 4,319 1,861 428 97 21 21 Health Center IV 29 0 2,988 1,260 159 109 1,133 868 1,971 205 286 102 5 3 Health Center III 0 0 3,213 1,368 87 73 561 466 1,941 731 246 143 2 2 Health Center II na na 1,895 613 11 11 119 94 1,126 646 44 14 0 0 Health Clinic na na 202 100 10 3 18 6 301 78 134 52 40 18 Other na na 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 4 0 Number of beds 0-50 12 0 7,108 2,879 200 165 1,490 1,186 3,349 1,267 568 264 49 22 51-100 39 2 2,101 673 141 83 872 578 1,360 102 244 72 6 5 101 or more 18 0 1,902 604 107 71 674 401 2,875 1,843 248 44 5 5 Sector Public 61 2 11,141 4,181 422 327 3,206 2,342 8,139 2,238 855 339 23 21 Private 12 0 606 184 62 26 143 64 1,519 1,283 295 69 49 23

1Advanced SDPs include hospital, health center, health clinic and other na = not applicable

The PMA2016/Uganda-R4 Survey in Detail Sample Design

Round 1 Sample Design

The PMA2020 survey collects data annually at the national (urban and rural) and regional

levels to allow for the estimation of key indicators to monitor progress in family planning.

The resident enumerator (RE) model enables replication of the surveys twice a year for the

first two years, and annually each year after that, to track progress.

Survey resources allowed targeting a sample size of 110 enumeration areas (EAs) and a

final sample size of 4,840 households. A total of 110 EAs were sampled throughout all 10

sub-regions in Uganda selected by the Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS) master

sampling frame, which was representative at the national and sub-regional levels for both

urban and rural areas. The primary sampling units for the survey were the EAs, created

during the 2002 National Population and Housing Census. The EAs were selected

systematically with probability proportional to size with urban/rural stratification in the 10

sub-regions. The rationale was for PMA2020 estimates to be comparable to the most recent

national survey estimates. UBOS provided the selection probabilities for the PMA2020

sampled clusters for constructing weights.

In each selected EA, field supervisors randomly selected up to three private service

delivery points (SDPs) to be interviewed by a resident enumerator using the SDP

questionnaire. The field supervisors themselves administered the SDP questionnaires at an

additional three public SDPs that serve each EA; the lowest, second-lowest, and third-

lowest level public health SDPs designated to serve each EA.

Round 4 Sample Update

Data collection for Round 4 continued in the same EAs as all previous rounds. Mapping

and listing occurred in Round 3. As Round 4 was approximately six months after the

Round 3 mapping and listing activity, mapping and listing was not repeated in Round 4.

Rather, the Round 3 household list was used for selection into the sample.

Field supervisors randomly selected 44 households from the original household listing. A

household roster was completed and all eligible women age 15-49 in selected households

were approached and asked to provide informed consent (and assent if aged 15-17 years) to

participate in the study.

The majority of SDPs are repeated in each round, forming a panel survey. If an EA had

more than three private SDPs identified during the listing process, then a new sample of the

private SDPs is selected during each round.

Questionnaires

PMA2020 uses standardized questionnaires to gather data about households and individual

females that are comparable across program countries and consistent with existing national

surveys. Prior to launching the survey in each country, local experts review and modify

these questionnaires to ensure all questions are appropriate to each setting. All female

questionnaires were translated into the local languages based on the Uganda Bureau of

Statistics (UBOS) sub-regions, and translations were reviewed for appropriateness.

The household, the female and the service delivery point (SDP) questionnaires were based

on model surveys designed by PMA2020 staff at the Bill & Melinda Gates Institute for

Population and Reproductive Health, the Makerere University School of Public Health, and

fieldwork materials of the Uganda Demographic and Health Survey (DHS).

All PMA2020 questionnaires are administered using Open Data Kit (ODK) software and

Android smartphones. The PMA2016/Uganda-R4 questionnaires were in English and could

be switched into eight local languages (Luganda, Ngakarimojong, Runyankole, Runyoro-

Rutoro, Luo, Lugbara, Ateso, and Lusoga) on the phone. The questionnaires were

translated using available translations from similar population surveys and experts in

translation. The interviews were conducted in the local language, or English in a few cases

when the respondent was not comfortable with the local language. Female resident

enumerators in each enumeration area (EA) administered the household and female

questionnaires in the selected households.

The household questionnaire gathers basic information about the household, such as

ownership of livestock and durable goods, as well as characteristics of the dwelling unit,

including wall, floor and roof materials, water sources, and sanitation facilit ies. This

information is used to construct a wealth quintile index.

The first section of the household questionnaire, the household roster, lists basic

demographic information about all usual members of the household and visitors who stayed

with the household the night before the interview. This roster is used to identify eligible

respondents for the female questionnaire. In addition to the roster, the household

questionnaire also gathers data that are used to measure key water, sanitation, and hygiene

(WASH) indicators, including regular sources and uses of WASH facilities used and

prevalence of open defecation by household members.

The female questionnaire is used to collect information from all women age 15 to 49 who

were listed on the household roster at selected households. The female questionnaire

gathers specific information on: education; fertility and fertility preferences; family

planning access, choice and use; quality of family planning services; exposure to family

planning messaging in the media; and the burden of collecting water on women.

The SDP questionnaire collected information about the provision and quality of

reproductive health services and products, integration of health services, and water and

sanitation within the SDP.

http://pma2020.org/sites/default/files/dirtables/UGR4_HHQ.pdf

http://pma2020.org/sites/default/files/dirtables/UGR4_FQ.pdf

http://pma2020.org/sites/default/files/dirtables/UGR4_SDPQ.pdf

Training, Data Collection and Processing

Training

The PMA2016/Uganda-R4 fieldwork refresher training of all the continuing staff on the

project – 15 field supervisors, three central staff and 110 resident enumerators (REs) – was

held from March 21 to March 25, 2016. PMA2020 staff from the Bill & Melinda Gates

Institute for Population and Reproductive Health of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School

of Public Health led the training, with support from the Uganda Bureau of Statistics

(UBOS) and Makerere University School of Public Health (MakSPH) project staff. The

training was held in Kampala City, at the Global Grand Hotel on the outskirts of Makerere

University.

As this was a refresher training for continuing staff, the training focused on a handful of

newly added questions to the household, female and service delivery point (SDP)

questionnaires and review of survey content and protocol.

Data Collection and Processing

Data collection was conducted between April and May 2016. Unlike traditional paper-and-

pencil surveys, PMA2020 uses Open Data Kit (ODK) Collect, an open-source software

application, to collect data on mobile phones. All the questionnaires were programmed

using this software and installed onto all project smartphones. The ODK questionnaire

forms are programmed with automatic skip-patterns and built-in response constraints to

reduce data entry errors.

The ODK application enabled REs and supervisors to collect and transfer survey data to a

central ODK Aggregate cloud server. This instantaneous aggregation of data also allowed

for concurrent data processing and course corrections while PMA2020 was still active in

the field. Throughout data collection, central staff at MakSPH in Kampala, Uganda and the

data manager at the Gates Institute at Johns Hopkins in Baltimore, Maryland routinely

monitored the incoming data and notified field staff of any potential errors, missing data or

problems found with form submissions on the central server. The use of mobile phones

combined data collection and data entry into one step; therefore, data entry was completed

when the last interview form was uploaded at the end of data collection in May.

Once all data were on the server, data analysts cleaned and de-identified the data, applied

survey weights, and prepared the final data set for analysis using Stata® version 14

software. The national dissemination workshop of preliminary results was held on August

24, 2016 at Serena Hotel, Kampala, Uganda.

Response Rates

The table below shows response rates for household and female respondents by residence

(rural/urban) for PMA2016/Uganda-R4. A total of 4,839 households were selected for the

survey; 4,433 households were found to be occupied at the time of the fieldwork. Of the

occupied households 4,191 (94.5%) consented to a household-level interview. The response

rate for the household level was higher in the rural (96.2%) relative to the urban (90.1%)

enumeration areas (EAs).

In the occupied households that provided an interview, a total of 3,992 eligible women

aged 15 to 49 years were identified. Overall, 95.0% of the eligible women were available

and consented to the interview. The female response rate was higher in the rural (96.7%)

relative to the urban (90.3%) EAs. Only de facto females are included in the PMA

analyses; the final completed de facto female sample size was 3,793 (unweighted).

The final service delivery point (SDP) sample include 378 interviews, of which 350 were

completed for a response rate of 92.6%.

Weights were adjusted for non-response at the household and individual levels and applied

to all household and individual estimates in this report. SDP estimates are not weighted.

PMA2016/Uganda-R4

Result Urban Rural Total

Household interviews

Households selected 1,364 3,475 4,839

Households occupied 1,217 3,216 4,433

Households interviewed 1,096 3,095 4,191

Household response rate* (%) 90.1 96.2 94.5

Interviews with women age 15-49

Number of eligible women** 1,078 2,914 3,992

Number of eligible women interviewed 973 2,820 3,793

Eligible women response rate† (%) 90.3 96.7 95.0

*Household response rate = households completed/households occupied

**Eligible women response rates include only women identified in completed household interviews †Eligible response rate = eligible women interviewed/eligible women

Sample Error Estimates

The following table shows sample errors for the PMA2020 indicators described above.

More information about PMA2020 indicators, including estimate type and base population,

can be viewed here.

Variable Value[R] Standard

Error

Confidence

Interval

R-2SE R+2SE

All women age 15 to 49

Currently using a modern method 0.275 0.013 0.250 0.301

Currently using a traditional method 0.036 0.005 0.027 0.045

Currently using any contraceptive method 0.311 0.014 0.284 0.338

Currently using injectables 0.149 0.009 0.132 0.166

Currently using condoms 0.034 0.005 0.024 0.044

Currently using implants 0.041 0.005 0.031 0.051

Chose method by self or jointly in past 12

months 0.914 0.016 0.883 0.945

Paid fees for family planning services in past

12 months 0.384 0.026 0.331 0.436

Informed by provider about other methods 0.608 0.030 0.548 0.668

Informed by provider about side effects 0.617 0.028 0.561 0.674

Satisfied with provider: Would return and

refer friend/relative to provider 0.850 0.018 0.813 0.886

Visited by health worker who talked about

family planning in past 12 months 0.156 0.017 0.121 0.190

http://pma2020.org/sites/default/files/dirtables/UGR4_IndicatorInfo.pdf

Married women age 15 to 49

Currently using a modern method 0.322 0.016 0.290 0.354

Currently using a traditional method 0.048 0.007 0.035 0.061

Currently using any contraceptive method 0.369 0.016 0.337 0.402

Currently using injectables 0.184 0.012 0.160 0.207

Currently using condoms 0.024 0.004 0.016 0.032

Currently using implants 0.050 0.007 0.036 0.064

Chose method by self or jointly in past 12

months 0.931 0.015 0.900 0.961

Paid fees for family planning services in past

12 months 0.369 0.028 0.313 0.426

Informed by provider about other methods 0.634 0.033 0.569 0.699

Informed by provider about side effects 0.646 0.029 0.589 0.704

Satisfied with provider: Would return and

refer friend/relative to provider 0.856 0.017 0.822 0.891

Visited by health worker who talked about

family planning in past 12 months 0.181 0.021 0.140 0.223

pma2016/uganda-r4 soi - ipums · pma2016/uganda-r4 soi snapshot of indicators summary of the sample...

Documents