planning justification report › wp-content › uploads › final-planning-justification... · map...

36
Planning Justification Report 120-122 Huron Street 120 Huron GP Inc. City of Guelph Zoning By-law Amendment November 2017

Upload: others

Post on 25-Jun-2020

9 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Planning Justification Report › wp-content › uploads › Final-Planning-Justification... · Map Centre (UTM NAD83 z17): 561,828.18 4,821,882.32 T hism ap n otb eu d f rv g | 2015

Planning Justification Report

120-122 Huron Street

120 Huron GP Inc.

City of Guelph

Zoning By-law Amendment

November 2017

Page 2: Planning Justification Report › wp-content › uploads › Final-Planning-Justification... · Map Centre (UTM NAD83 z17): 561,828.18 4,821,882.32 T hism ap n otb eu d f rv g | 2015

Planning Justification Report | 120 Huron GP Inc. 120 Huron St, Guelph ii

GSP Group | November 2017

Planning Justification Report

120-122 Huron Street

Zoning By-law Amendment

City of Guelph

November 2017

Prepared for:

120 Huron GP Inc.

c/o Zehr Group

607 King Street West

Kitchener, ON

N2G 1C7

Prepared by:

GSP Group Inc.

72 Victoria Street South, Suite 201

Kitchener, ON

N2G 4Y9

Page 3: Planning Justification Report › wp-content › uploads › Final-Planning-Justification... · Map Centre (UTM NAD83 z17): 561,828.18 4,821,882.32 T hism ap n otb eu d f rv g | 2015

Planning Justification Report | 120 Huron GP Inc. 120 Huron St, Guelph iii

GSP Group | November 2017

Contents

1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1

1.1 Background ............................................................................................................... 1

1.2 Supporting Studies .................................................................................................... 1

2. Site Description .................................................................................................................. 5

2.1 Site Location and Description .................................................................................... 5

3. Proposed Development ...................................................................................................... 6

3.1 Integration of Proposed Development with Surrounding Land Uses .......................... 8

4. Planning Policy Framework ................................................................................................ 9

4.1 Provincial Policy Statement ....................................................................................... 9

4.2 Places to Grow Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2017) .................. 10

4.3 City of Guelph Official Plan (OPA 48) ...................................................................... 12

4.4 City of Guelph Zoning By-law (1995) - 14864 .......................................................... 17

5. Planning Analysis ............................................................................................................. 20

6.1 Provincial Policy Statement ..................................................................................... 20

6.2 Places to Grow Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe ............................. 21

6.3 City of Guelph Official Plan (2017) ........................................................................... 21

6.5 City of Guelph Zoning By-law (1995) - 14864 .......................................................... 27

7. Conclusions ...................................................................................................................... 28

Appendix: Draft Proposed Zoning By-law .................................................................................. 29

Page 4: Planning Justification Report › wp-content › uploads › Final-Planning-Justification... · Map Centre (UTM NAD83 z17): 561,828.18 4,821,882.32 T hism ap n otb eu d f rv g | 2015

Planning Justification Report | 120 Huron GP Inc. 120 Huron St, Guelph iv

GSP Group | November 2017

Figures

Figure 1 – Site Location ……………………………………………………………………… 2

Figure 2 – Site Plan …………………………………………………………………………... 3

Figure 3 – Building Elevations ………………………………………………………………. 4

Figure 4 – Growth Plan Elements ………………………………………………………..... 13

Figure 5 – Existing Official Plan ………………………………………………….………… 15

Figure 6 – Existing Zoning ………………………………………………………………..… 18

Page 5: Planning Justification Report › wp-content › uploads › Final-Planning-Justification... · Map Centre (UTM NAD83 z17): 561,828.18 4,821,882.32 T hism ap n otb eu d f rv g | 2015

Planning Justification Report | 120-122 Huron Street 1

GSP Group | November 2017

1. Introduction

1.1 Background

GSP Group has been retained by 120 Huron GP Inc. (the “Owners”) to coordinate the

preparation and submission of a Zoning By-law Amendment for the property municipally known

as 120-122 Huron Road in the City of Guelph (the “Subject Property / Site”). The Owners also

own a vacant lot, located on the west side of Huron Street at the northwest corner of Huron and

Oliver Streets. A location plan is shown as Figure 1.

A Zoning By-law Amendment (“ZBA”) is necessary to permit the adaptive reuse of an existing

industrial heritage building into a residential apartment building containing 86 dwelling units, and

to develop the remainder of the Site with 3 stacked townhouse buildings containing 54 units and

6 cluster townhouse buildings containing 42 units (the “Proposed Development” see Figure 2

and 3). The total number of residential dwellings proposed is 182 units with 228 parking spaces.

A Pre-Consultation Meeting was held with all City Departments and Agencies that will comment

on this application on July 12, 2017 to discuss the requirements for a complete application.

Several supporting technical reports were identified for the ZBA to be deemed complete,

including a Planning Justification Report. This Planning Justification Report should be read in

conjunction with the other associated studies prepared in support of the ZBA.

The purpose of this Planning Justification Report is to provide:

• A description of the Site, its existing physical condition, and its context within the

surrounding community;

• An outline of the Zoning By-law Amendment Application;

• An overview of the relevant planning policy and regulations that affect the Proposed

Application, including Provincial and City policies, regulations and guidelines;

• A summary of each of the technical studies; and

• A planning opinion and justification for the Proposed Application.

1.2 Supporting Studies

The following studies were identified to be provided by the City and commenting Agencies and

have been prepared in support of the ZBA:

• Urban Design Brief, prepared by GSP Group;

• Cultural Heritage Resource Impact Assessment, prepared by CHC Limited;

• Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report, prepared by GM BluePlan;

Page 6: Planning Justification Report › wp-content › uploads › Final-Planning-Justification... · Map Centre (UTM NAD83 z17): 561,828.18 4,821,882.32 T hism ap n otb eu d f rv g | 2015

GRCA

Grand RiverConservation Authority

Date: Nov 13, 2017

Copyright Grand River Conservation Authority, 2017.

0 75 150 22537.5Metres ±NAD 1983 UTM Zone 17N Scale: 6,183This map is not to be used for navigation | 2015 Ortho (ON)Map Centre (UTM NAD83 z17): 561,828.18 4,821,882.32

Disclaimer: This map is for il lustrative purposes only. Informationcontained herein is not a substitute for professional review or a sitesurvey and is subject to change without notice. The Grand RiverConservation Authority takes no responsibil ity for, nor guarantees,the accuracy of the information contained on this map. Anyinterpretations or conclusions drawn from this map are the soleresponsibili ty of the user.The source for each data layer is shown in parentheses in the maplegend. For a complete listing of sources and citations go to:https://maps.grandriver.ca/Sources-and-Citations.pdf

Floodplain (GRCA)

Slope Valley (GRCA)

Slope Erosion (GRCA)

Legend

Regulation Limit (GRCA)

Wetland (GRCA)

EngineeredEstimatedApproximateSpecial Policy Area

SteepOversteepSteep

OversteepToe

Lake Erie Flood (GRCA)Lake Erie Shoreline Reach (GRCA)Lake Erie Dynamic Beach (GRCA)Lake Erie Erosion (GRCA)Parcel - Assessment (MPAC/MNRF)

This legend is static and may not fully reflect thelayers shown on the map. The text of OntarioRegulation 150/06 supercedes the mapping asrepresented by these layers.

Regulated Watercourse (GRCA)Regulated Waterbody (GRCA)

Site

Corning Canada

York

Rd

Toronto St

Ontario St

Elizab

eth S

t

Neeve St

Richardson St

Manito

ba St

Alice St

Huron St Morris St

Harris St

Johnston St

Stevenson St

Fergus

on St

Beverl

ey St

Waterworks Pl

Hooper St

Wheeler Ave

Fergus

on St

Hooper St Park

Royal Recreation

Trail

Corning Canada

EmployeeParking Lot

GuelphLittle

Theatre

CN Rail

Spur Line

Other LandsOwned byApplicant:

104 Oliver St

Oliver S

t

SacredHeart

Church

Sacred HeartCatholicSchool

Site LocationSource: GRCA (2015)

Planning Justification Report | 120-122 Huron StreetGSP Group | November 2017

Figure

1

Page 7: Planning Justification Report › wp-content › uploads › Final-Planning-Justification... · Map Centre (UTM NAD83 z17): 561,828.18 4,821,882.32 T hism ap n otb eu d f rv g | 2015

SITE STATISTICS

ZONING R.4A-__ LOT AREA 2.5 haUNITS 182 Apartment 86 Townhouses 96DENSITY 72.8 UPH Apartment 98.8 UPH Townhouses 60.0 UPHLOT FRONTAGE 117.5 mBUILDING HEIGHT (max.) Apartment (4 Storeys) 15.7 m Townhouses (3.5 Storeys) 11.4 mFRONT YARD Apartment 0.3 m Townhouses 82.2 mEXTERIOR SIDE YARD Apartment 10.6 m Townhouses 4.5 mSIDE YARD Apartment 26.1 m Townhouses 15.0 mREAR YARD Aparment 164.5 m Townhouses 5.2 mDISTANCE BETWEEN BUILDINGS 3.0mCOMMON AMENITY AREA Exterior 1,7935.5 m² Interior 126.2 m²LANDSCAPED OPEN SPACE 1.02 ha (41%)FLOOR SPACE INDEX Apartment 0.8 Townhouses 0.7PARKING 228 Aparment (Surface) 113 Townhouses (Surface) 73 Townhouses (Garage) 42BARRIER FREE PARKING 7 Type A 3 Type B 4BICYCLE PARKING 174 Apartment 96 Townhouses 78

Site PlanSource: ABA Architects Inc (October 5, 2017)

Planning Justification Report | 120-122 Huron StreetGSP Group | November 2017

Figure

2

Page 8: Planning Justification Report › wp-content › uploads › Final-Planning-Justification... · Map Centre (UTM NAD83 z17): 561,828.18 4,821,882.32 T hism ap n otb eu d f rv g | 2015

LEVEL 1100.00

LEVEL 2103.33

LEVEL 3106.67

LEVEL 4109.99

TOP OF PARAPET114.63

BASEMENT97.25

ROOF113.49

PARKING ALICE ST.

RESTORED PAINTED CONCRETE, WHITE

RESTORED BRICK, RED

NEW WINDOW

RECESSED BALCONY

1135

3500

3322

3339

3331

2748

1562

7

LEVEL 1100.00

LEVEL 2103.33

LEVEL 3106.67

LEVEL 4109.99

TOP OF PARAPET114.63

BASEMENT97.25

ROOF113.49

RESTORED PAINTED CONCRETE, WHITE

RESTORED BRICK, RED

NEW WINDOW

RECESSED BALCONY

1562

7

2748

3331

3339

3322

3500

1135

HURON ST.

LEVEL 1100.00

LEVEL 2103.33

LEVEL 3106.67

LEVEL 4109.99

TOP OF PARAPET114.63

BASEMENT97.25

ROOF113.49

RESTORED PAINTED CONCRETE, WHITE

RESTORED BRICK, RED

STEEL ENTRANCE CANOPY

METAL GUARDRAIL, BLACK

NEW WINDOW

RECESSED BALCONY

1135

3500

3322

3339

3331

2748

1562

7

HURON ST.

LEVEL 1100.00

LEVEL 2103.33

LEVEL 3106.67

LEVEL 4109.99

TOP OF PARAPET114.63

BASEMENT97.25

ROOF113.49

ALICE ST. PARKING

RESTORED PAINTED CONCRETE, WHITE

RESTORED BRICK, RED

STEEL ENTRANCE CANOPY

NEW WINDOW

RECESSED BALCONY

1135

3500

3322

3339

3331

2748

1562

7

THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE & IS THE PROPERTY OF ABA ARCHITECTS INC. & CANNOT BE MODIFIED AND/OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF ABA ARCHITECTS INC.

THE CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS ON SITE AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE ARCHITECT, BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.

DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO BE SCALED.

CHRONOLOGY DATE

SCALE

SHEET SIZE

PROJECT NUMBER

24X36

DRAWING NUMBER

DRAWING TITLE

PROJECT NAME

CLIENT

607 KING ST. W. SUITE 205A, KITCHENER, ON120 HURON ST. LP

1 : 200

14/1

1/20

17 2

:33:

56 P

MC

:\Us

ers\

nad

inen

.ABA

\Doc

umen

ts\_

Doc

umen

ts\5

.0 R

evit

Loca

l File

s\20

17-1

12 1

20 H

uron

_Cen

tral_

nad

inen

.rvt

EP-1

ELEVATIONS

120 HURON ST

2017-112

120 HURON ST, GUELPH, ON

EP-1 1 : 200

APARTMENT BUILDING - EAST ELEVATION4

EP-1 1 : 200

APARTMENT BUILDING - NORTH ELEVATION1

EP-1 1 : 200

APARTMENT BUILDING - SOUTH ELEVATION2

EP-1 1 : 200

APARTMENT BUILDING - WEST ELEVATION3

BUILDING A

BUILDING A

BUILDING A BUILDING A

No. REVISIONS DATE1 ISSUED FOR ZONE CHANGE

COORDINATION2017.11.14

LEVEL 1100.00

LEVEL 2103.20

LEVEL 3106.40

BASEMENT96.80

ROOF109.31

600

2908

3200

3200

3200

1140

0

LEVEL 1100.00

LEVEL 2103.20

LEVEL 3106.40

BASEMENT96.80

ROOF109.31

3200

3200

3200

2908

600

1140

0

LEVEL 1100.00

LEVEL 2103.20

LEVEL 3106.40

BASEMENT96.80

ROOF109.31

600

2908

3200

3200

3200

1140

0

LEVEL 1100.00

LEVEL 2103.20

LEVEL 3106.40

BASEMENT96.80

ROOF109.31

600

2908

3200

3200

3200

1140

0

LEVEL 1100.00

LEVEL 2103.05

LEVEL 3106.10

ROOF109.15

600

3050

3050

3050

9750

LEVEL 1100.00

LEVEL 2103.05

LEVEL 3106.10

ROOF109.15

3050

3050

3050

600

9750

LEVEL 1100.00

LEVEL 2103.05

LEVEL 3106.10

ROOF109.15

600

3050

3050

3050

9750

LEVEL 1100.00

LEVEL 2103.05

LEVEL 3106.10

ROOF109.15

600

3050

3050

3050

9750

THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE & IS THE PROPERTY OF ABA ARCHITECTS INC. & CANNOT BE MODIFIED AND/OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF ABA ARCHITECTS INC.

THE CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS ON SITE AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE ARCHITECT, BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.

DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO BE SCALED.

CHRONOLOGY DATE

SCALE

SHEET SIZE

PROJECT NUMBER

24X36

DRAWING NUMBER

DRAWING TITLE

PROJECT NAME

CLIENT

607 KING ST. W. SUITE 205A, KITCHENER, ON120 HURON ST. LP

1 : 200

14/1

1/20

17 2

:34:

06 P

MC

:\Us

ers\

nad

inen

.ABA

\Doc

umen

ts\_

Doc

umen

ts\5

.0 R

evit

Loca

l File

s\20

17-1

12 1

20 H

uron

_Cen

tral_

nad

inen

.rvt

EP-2

CONCEPT ELEVATIONS

120 HURON ST

2017-112

120 HURON ST, GUELPH, ON

EP-2 1 : 200

STACKED TOWNHOUSE - EAST ELEVATION1

EP-2 1 : 200

STACKED TOWNHOUSE - NORTH ELEVATION2

EP-2 1 : 200

STACKED TOWNHOUSE - SOUTH ELEVATION4

EP-2 1 : 200

STACKED TOWNHOUSE - WEST ELEVATION3

EP-2 1 : 200

TOWNHOUSE - EAST ELEVATION6

EP-2 1 : 200

TOWNHOUSE - NORTH ELEVATION5

EP-2 1 : 200

TOWNHOUSE - SOUTH ELEVATION7

EP-2 1 : 200

TOWNHOUSE - WEST ELEVATION8

BUILDING H

BUILDING H BUILDING H

BUILDING H

BUILDING E BUILDING E

BUILDING E BUILDING E

No. REVISIONS DATE1 ISSUED FOR ZONE CHANGE

COORDINATION2017.11.14

Building ElevationsSource: ABA Architects Inc (November 14, 2017)

Planning Justification Report | 120-122 Huron StreetGSP Group | November 2017

Figure

3

Page 9: Planning Justification Report › wp-content › uploads › Final-Planning-Justification... · Map Centre (UTM NAD83 z17): 561,828.18 4,821,882.32 T hism ap n otb eu d f rv g | 2015

Planning Justification Report | 120-122 Huron Street 5

GSP Group | November 2017

• Technical Memorandum for Private Tree Preservation By-law Exemption, prepared by

Natural Resource Solutions Inc.;

• Environmental Noise (Rail and Stationary) Impact Study, prepared by GHD Engineering;

• Traffic Impact Study, prepared by Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited; and,

• Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment, prepared by Detritus Consulting Ltd.

2. Site Description

2.1 Site Location and Description

The Site is located in the southeast corner of Huron Street and Alice Street in the City of

Guelph, in the St. Patrick’s Ward neighbourhood. It is legally described as Part of Lots 1

and 2, Range 2, Division F and Part 1 of 61R-4274 and is known municipally as 120-122

Huron Street. The Site has approximately 117.5 metres of frontage on Alice Street and 204

metres of frontage on Huron Street.

The Subject Property is approximately 2.5 hectares in area and was historically used as a

chemical manufacturing company and quarry owned by Northern Rubber / Northern-

Woodstock Rubber / Dominion Rubber/ Uniroyal / Crompton / Chemtura chemical company.

There are four existing buildings on the Site including a four-storey reinforced concrete

building with brick spandrels, a former daylight factory (circa 1919-1920). That building is

on the City of Guelph’s Heritage Register and is proposed to be preserved and adaptively

reused for residential purposes. The other buildings include a brick powerhouse set back

from Alice Street, a metal-sided single-storey shed, and a brick office/laboratory building

fronting on Huron Street.

The southern portion of the Site is currently treed. It was previously the location of a quarry

and, subsequently a shallow pond used for chemical waste disposal associated with the

research laboratory. The pond was subsequently filled and now is covered by an immature

woodlot.

The Subject Property is a known brownfield site as a result of past industrial chemical

operations and is proposed to be remediated by the Owners. The Ministry of the

Environment, Energy and Climate Change (“MOECC”) Risk Assessment process has been

on-going for a number of years. Comprehensive discussions and submissions have been

made to the MOECC to provide for rehabilitation of the Site to make it safe for residential

land uses. This environmental clean up work will be initiated concurrently with the ZBA

process.

Page 10: Planning Justification Report › wp-content › uploads › Final-Planning-Justification... · Map Centre (UTM NAD83 z17): 561,828.18 4,821,882.32 T hism ap n otb eu d f rv g | 2015

Planning Justification Report | 120-122 Huron Street 6

GSP Group | November 2017

To make way for this remediation, an application to demolish the brick powerhouse,

office/laboratory and shed has been submitted and approved by the City. In addition, the

City has approved an exemption to the Private Tree Protection By-law to permit the Owners

to remove the trees to provide access to the area of contamination for remediation.

The Site is located within an older neighbourhood west of downtown Guelph, and is

surrounded by inner City residential uses (predominantly single-detached residences) and

supporting community uses. Two small-scale apartment buildings are located opposite the

Site on Huron Street, along with a community garden. Sacred Heart Church and Catholic

School are located at the northwest corner of Huron Street and Alice Street, next to a

repurposed industrial building that is now occupied by St. Joseph’s Outreach Services.

Tytler Public School is within a 5 minute walk southwest of the Site.

A spur line that connects to the CN Railway immediately abuts the Site to the east and

extends southerly across York Road to service the Corning Canada manufacturing plant.

Corning’s employee parking lot is immediately south of the Site. A vacant block currently

being developed into a cluster townhouse development is located to the east across the

spur line on the former Biltmore industrial site.

Two bus transit routes operate within a five minute walk of the Site. Transit Route 4, which

services downtown Guelph runs south of the Site along Ontario Street / York Road. To the

north, Transit Route 14 runs along Elizabeth Street to the downtown and provides access

to the Holy Trinity Catholic School to the east.

3. Proposed Development

The Proposed Development includes the remediation of an historic brownfield site, the

adaptive reuse of a significant historic building and the creation of a mix of multiple

residential dwelling types with associated parking and amenity areas. The development of

the Site will be integrated in terms of vehicular accesses, outdoor amenity areas and

servicing. The combination of reuse of the vacant former industrial building and new

construction of medium density residential uses will provide for additional housing choices

in the St. Patrick’s Ward.

The existing four storey heritage building will be converted into 86 apartment buildings, with

parking accommodated in 113 surface parking spaces in the interior of the Site. Bike racks

will be provided for residents and visitors, and outdoor amenity areas are proposed in the

south and east portions of the Site to be shared by all future residents.

Page 11: Planning Justification Report › wp-content › uploads › Final-Planning-Justification... · Map Centre (UTM NAD83 z17): 561,828.18 4,821,882.32 T hism ap n otb eu d f rv g | 2015

Planning Justification Report | 120-122 Huron Street 7

GSP Group | November 2017

After remediation of the former quarry pond, it is proposed that 3 buildings containing a

total of 54 stacked townhouse dwellings and 6 buildings containing 42 cluster townhouse

dwellings will be constructed. As well, a shallow stormwater management facility less than

0.5 metres deep will be constructed at the south end of the Site adjacent to, and providing

additional outdoor amenity area.

Combined, the stacked and cluster townhouses will provide an additional 96 units, for a Site

total residential unit yield of 182 units. The overall density will be 73 units per hectare

(“UPH”). A total of 115 parking spaces is proposed for the stacked and cluster townhouses,

at a rate of 1.2 spaces per unit, whereby 96 spaces are required. A total of 113 parking

spaces is proposed for the apartment dwellings, at a rate of 1.0 spaces per unit, whereby

113 spaces is required. Overall a total of 228 parking spaces will be provided or 1.25 spaces

per unit.

Access will be provided via two entrances from Huron Street. The northern entrance will

provide the main access to the apartment building and is aligned with Oliver Street at a

cross intersection. The second access is south of Manitoba Street and will provide an

additional ingress and egress for residents and visitors of the stacked and cluster

townhouses. No access driveway is proposed along Alice Street due to the street’s limited

width and close proximity to the rail spur to the east.

A road widening of 3 metres along Alice Street has been requested by the City of Guelph to

accommodate a potential future widening of Alice Street. Given the proximity of the existing

building, however, a reduced road widening across the north façade of the existing building

and 3 metres to the east of the building to the spur line is proposed.

Pedestrian access will be enhanced throughout the neighbourhood by the addition of a

concrete sidewalk along the east side of the Huron Street frontage. This will provide for a

continuation of the existing sidewalk from the neighbourhood to the north, southerly towards

York Road. Pedestrian access throughout the Site will be via concrete sidewalks and

landscaped areas between townhouse buildings that will be owned and maintained by the

condominium board(s).

Principal entrances to the Apartment Building will be at the west façade and south facades

of the existing building, with the west pedestrian entrance typically for residents walking

to/from the Site and the south entrance for residents accessing the parking area.

Waste will be collected by a private contractor. For the apartment building, waste will be

stored in an interior garbage room and brought outside to a concrete pad on the day of

pickup. For the townhouses, waste will be stored in in-ground waste disposal units located

Page 12: Planning Justification Report › wp-content › uploads › Final-Planning-Justification... · Map Centre (UTM NAD83 z17): 561,828.18 4,821,882.32 T hism ap n otb eu d f rv g | 2015

Planning Justification Report | 120-122 Huron Street 8

GSP Group | November 2017

throughout the Site. These waste systems will ensure nuisance smells are limited, and will

reduce opportunities for wildlife to interfere with waste collection.

A dry stormwater management pond is proposed in the south portion of the Site. This pond

will be a shallow depression (less than 0.5m deep) that will service the entire Site retaining

water with a very quick drain down only during significant weather events.

Outdoor amenity space is provided for residents throughout the Site with the largest areas

located along the southerly and easterly areas having areas of 935 and 850 square metres

respectively. These areas will be maintained by condominium boards and will provide

residents with shared outdoor amenity areas. Apartment residents will each have access to

a balcony, while townhouse residents will have private backyards for their own use, with the

stacked townhouses having balconies facing Huron Street and to the interior of the Site.

In addition to 120-122 Huron Street, the owners have acquired 104 Oliver Street, which is

located across Huron Street at the intersection of Huron Street and Oliver Street. This

parcel is approximately 0.081 hectares in area and is currently zoned Residential Single

Detached (R.18-10). Subject to further discussions with the City, it is proposed that this

block may be transferred to the City for parkland purposes for the neighbourhood. This

parcel represents approximately 3 percent of the combined total landholdings of the Owner.

3.1 Integration of Proposed Development with Surrounding Land Uses

The Proposed Development takes into consideration the context of the surrounding

neighbourhood and integrates the proposed development into the community. This is achieved

through building orientation with facades facing the public realm, limited parking area fronting

the streets, architectural details, and landscaping to enhance the aesthetics of the Site.

The Proposed Redevelopment of the existing heritage building is not being increased in height

from its existing four storeys and balconies are proposed to be recessed into the building, not

extending out into the road allowance and/or extending over the sidewalk on Alice Street. The

redevelopment of this building will enhance the neighbourhood by increasing the aesthetic

appeal of the building, reducing vandalism associated with the vacant buildings, and will provide

increased surveillance of the neighbourhood through the introduction of new residents.

The stacked townhouses are proposed to create an attractive streetscape and enhance the

pedestrian realm along Huron Street. Those units are proposed to front onto Huron Street with

principal entrances along the street and with parking located to the east in the interior of the Site.

This building orientation will promote an enhanced streetscape framing Huron Street by having

the buildings oriented forward with a reduced 4.5 metre setback. Building heights will be

compatible with the neighbourhood with a proposed maximum building height of 3.5 storeys,

similar to the three-storey apartment buildings on the west side of Huron Street.

Page 13: Planning Justification Report › wp-content › uploads › Final-Planning-Justification... · Map Centre (UTM NAD83 z17): 561,828.18 4,821,882.32 T hism ap n otb eu d f rv g | 2015

Planning Justification Report | 120-122 Huron Street 9

GSP Group | November 2017

The cluster townhouses are proposed to be interior to the Site. They will be orientated in an

east/west direction which will assist in minimizing noise impacts from the rail spur line and

maximizing solar heating. Only 3 end units will “side” onto the rail spur and the closest unit is

proposed to be over 32 metres from the rail tracks. Each of the buildings will have a rear yard

comprised of outdoor amenity areas with a minimum depth of 7.5 metres. The most southerly

buildings will be separated from the mutual property line of the Corning employee parking area

by the stormwater management depression (<0.5m deep) and one of the outdoor amenity areas

(935 sq.m.), averaging a setback between the building from the property line of approximately

30 metres. A second large outdoor amenity area is proposed at the central east portion of the

Site having an area of 860 square metres.

Interior pedestrian movements will be directed by a network of sidewalks. This network will

provide pedestrians with direct access to the public streets, principal entrances to the dwellings,

parking areas and spaces, and the outdoor amenity areas.

Landscaping is an important element in softening the built form of the Proposed Development

and will be used to provide a buffer to the limited parking areas along Huron and Alice Streets,

between the apartment building and stacked townhouses, along the streets as a part of the

streetscape improvements, in the rear yards of the cluster townhouses, and along the pedestrian

connections throughout the Site.

Combined the design elements of the building configurations, orientation and heights; the intra

and inter-connectivity of the development; amenity area distribution; and the landscaping will

integrate this multiple residential development to enhance the neighbourhood.

4. Planning Policy Framework

The following section sets out the relevant planning policy framework to assess the

appropriateness of the Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment Application in the context of

Provincial and City policies and regulations.

4.1 Provincial Policy Statement

The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS), issued under the Planning Act with the latest version

coming into effect on April 30, 2014, provides direction on matters of provincial significance

related to land use planning. The Planning Act requires that, “decisions affecting planning

matters shall be consistent with” the PPS. The overriding vision of the PPS states that “the long-

term prosperity and social well-being of Ontarians depends on maintaining strong communities,

a clean and healthy environment and a strong economy.” The below PPS policies are relevant

to the Site and the Proposed Applications:

Page 14: Planning Justification Report › wp-content › uploads › Final-Planning-Justification... · Map Centre (UTM NAD83 z17): 561,828.18 4,821,882.32 T hism ap n otb eu d f rv g | 2015

Planning Justification Report | 120-122 Huron Street 10

GSP Group | November 2017

• Policy 1.1.1 b) identifies that “healthy, liveable and safe communities are sustained by

accommodating an appropriate range and mix of residential (including second units,

affordable housing and housing for older persons), employment (including industrial and

commercial), institutional (including places of worship, cemeteries and long-term care

homes), recreation, park and open space, and other uses to meet long-term needs”.

• Policy 1.1.1 e) promotes cost-effective development patterns and standards to minimize

land consumption and servicing costs.

• Policy 1.1.3.2 a) encourages a mix of land uses that efficiently use land and resources

and effectively use transit, infrastructure and public service facilities.

• Policy 1.1.3.3 identifies that planning authorities shall identify appropriate locations and

promote opportunities for intensification and redevelopment where this can be

accommodated taking into account existing building stock or areas, including brownfield

sites, and the availability of suitable existing or planned infrastructure and public service

facilities required to accommodate projected needs.

• Planning authorities Policy 1.1.3.4 promotes appropriate development standards that

facilitate intensification, redevelopment and compact form, while avoiding or mitigating

risks to public health and safety.

• Policy 1.4.3 d) supports planning for an appropriate range and mix of housing types and

densities by, among other elements, promoting “densities for new housing which

efficiently use land, resources, infrastructure and public service facilities, and support

the use of active transportation and transit in areas where it exists”.

• Policy 1.5.1 identifies that healthy, active communities should be promoted, including

ensuring that public streets, spaces and facilities to be safe, meet the needs of

pedestrians, foster social interaction and facilitate active transportation and community

connectivity.

4.2 Places to Grow Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2017)

The Province announced a new Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe which came

into effect on July 1, 2017. The new Growth Plan continues to support the development of

complete communities, provision of a mix of housing types, intensification and efficient use of

land and municipal services, and providing a range of transportation options.

The Growth Plan provides an overall growth strategy for the Greater Golden Horseshoe region

that complements the Provincial Policy Statement and is implemented by municipal planning

documents. At the core of the Growth Plan are guiding principles for building compact, vibrant

Page 15: Planning Justification Report › wp-content › uploads › Final-Planning-Justification... · Map Centre (UTM NAD83 z17): 561,828.18 4,821,882.32 T hism ap n otb eu d f rv g | 2015

Planning Justification Report | 120-122 Huron Street 11

GSP Group | November 2017

and complete communities; planning and managing growth to support a strong, competitive

economy; and optimizing the use of existing or planned infrastructure to support growth in a

compact and efficient form.

Policies for managing growth are contained in Section 2.2 of the Growth Plan. The following

policies, contained in Section 2.2.1 are applicable to the Proposed Application:

4. Applying the policies of this Plan will support the achievement of complete

communities that:

a) Feature a diverse mix of land uses, including residential and employment

uses, and convenient access to local stores, services, and public service

facilities;

b) Improve social equity and overall quality of life, including human health,

for people of all ages, abilities, and incomes;

d) expand convenient access to:

i. a range of transportation options, including options for the safe,

comfortable and convenient use of active transportation;

ii. public service facilities, co-located and integrated in community

hubs;

iii. an appropriate supply of safe, publicly-accessible open spaces,

parks, trails, and other recreational facilities; and

e) ensure the development of high quality compact built form, an attractive

and vibrant public realm, including public open spaces, through site

design and urban design standards.

The Site is identified within the Built-Up Area – conceptual on Schedule 4 – Urban Growth

Centres. The Growth Plan states that by the year 2031 and each year thereafter all residential

development occurring annually within each upper- or single-tier municipality will be within the

Built-Up Area. The Growth Plan states, all municipalities will develop a strategy to achieve the

minimum intensification target and intensification throughout delineated built-up areas, which

will:

a) Encourage intensification generally to achieve the desired urban

structure;

b) Identify the appropriate type and scale of development and transition of

built form to adjacent areas;

d) ensure lands are zoned and development is designed in a manner that

supports the achievement of complete communities;

Page 16: Planning Justification Report › wp-content › uploads › Final-Planning-Justification... · Map Centre (UTM NAD83 z17): 561,828.18 4,821,882.32 T hism ap n otb eu d f rv g | 2015

Planning Justification Report | 120-122 Huron Street 12

GSP Group | November 2017

4.3 City of Guelph Official Plan (OPA 48)

The City of Guelph updated their Official Plan to bring it into conformity with applicable Provincial

plans and policies. OPA 48 (OP) was approved with modifications by the Ministry of Municipal

Affairs and Housing in December 2013. The Decision was appealed to the Ontario Municipal

Board and was recently approved on October 5, 2017.

The Site is within the Built-Up Area of the City of Guelph as is identified on Schedule 1 – Growth

Plan Elements in the OP (see Figure 4). Lands within the Built-Up Area are to be the focus to

accommodate population and employment growth through infill and intensification. The

following policies are applicable to the Proposed Application (Section 3.7 of the OP):

• 3.7.1 To ensure development proceeds in accordance with the objectives of

Section 3.1 and to achieve the intensification targets of this Plan, significant

portions of new residential and employment growth will be accommodated

within the built-up areas through intensification.

• 3.7.3 iii) vacant or underutilized lots, greyfield, and brownfield sites will be

revitalized through the promotion of infill development, redevelopment and

expansions or conversions of existing buildings.

• 3.7.3 iv) the City will plan and provide for a diverse and compatible mix of

land uses, including residential and employment uses to support vibrant

communities.

• 3.7.3 vi) intensification of areas will be encouraged to generally achieve

higher densities than the surrounding areas while achieving an appropriate

transition of built form to adjacent areas.

General criteria for multi-unit residential buildings and intensification within existing residential

neighbourhoods are contained in Policy 9.3.1.1 and are to be used to assess development

proposals for multi-unit residential development. The policies applicable to the Proposed

Applications are as follows:

1. Building form, scale, height, setbacks, massing, appearance and

siting are compatible in design, character and orientation with

buildings in the immediate vicinity.

2. Proposals for residential lot infill will be compatible with the general

frontage of lots in the immediate vicinity.

3. The residential development can be adequately served by local

convenience and neighbourhood shopping facilities, schools, trails,

parks, recreation facilities and public transit.

4. Vehicular traffic generated from the proposed development will not

have an unacceptable impact on the planned function of the adjacent

roads and intersections.

Page 17: Planning Justification Report › wp-content › uploads › Final-Planning-Justification... · Map Centre (UTM NAD83 z17): 561,828.18 4,821,882.32 T hism ap n otb eu d f rv g | 2015

Site

Growth Plan ElementsSource: City of Guelph Official Plan, Schedule 1B (September 2014 Consolidation)

Planning Justification Report | 120-122 Huron StreetGSP Group | November 2017

Figure

4

Page 18: Planning Justification Report › wp-content › uploads › Final-Planning-Justification... · Map Centre (UTM NAD83 z17): 561,828.18 4,821,882.32 T hism ap n otb eu d f rv g | 2015

Planning Justification Report | 120-122 Huron Street 14

GSP Group | November 2017

5. Vehicular access, parking and circulation can be adequately provided

and impacts mitigated.

6. That adequate municipal infrastructure, services and amenity areas

for residents can be provided.

7. Surface parking and driveways shall be minimized.

8. Development shall extend, establish or reinforce a publicly accessible

street grid network to ensure appropriate connectivity for pedestrians,

cyclist and vehicular traffic, where applicable.

9. Impacts on adjacent properties are minimized in relation to grading,

drainage, location of service areas and microclimatic conditions, such

as wind and shadowing.

10. The development addresses public safety, identified public views and

accessibility to open space, parks, trails and the Natural Heritage

System, where applicable.

The Site is designated Mixed Office / Commercial on Schedule 2 – Land Use Plan in the OP

(see Figure 5). This designation permits apartments, townhouses, and a range of commercial

and office uses (Section 9.4.6.6), with policies to limit the size of developments to a maximum

building height of 4 storeys and a maximum density of 100 units per hectare (Section 9.4.6.7

and 9.4.6.8 respectively). The Proposed Development is within the height and density

provisions of the Official Plan and therefore no Official Plan Amendment is required.

The existing building has been identified as a building of interest in the Municipal Register

of Cultural Heritage Properties. As such, the Cultural Heritage Resource Policies of Section

4.8.1 apply to the development. These polices require conservation and maintenance of

built heritage resources (Policy 4.8.1.8) whereby the City will ensure the conservation and

protection of cultural heritage when considering site alteration (Policy 4.8.1.12). In support

of the preservation and adaptive reuse of this significant heritage resource, a “Cultural

Heritage Resource Impact Assessment” has been completed by CHC Limited.

The City OP requires parkland dedication in the development of lands as set out in Section 7.3.2,

which states:

3. It is the policy of the City to maintain a minimum city-wide average

rate of Neighbourhood Parks provision of 0.7 hectares /1000

population.

4. The following criteria will be considered in the provision of

Neighbourhood Parks:

i. that the site is located within a five to ten minute walk from

the residential area served (service radius of about 500

metres) and is unobstructed by major barriers;

Page 19: Planning Justification Report › wp-content › uploads › Final-Planning-Justification... · Map Centre (UTM NAD83 z17): 561,828.18 4,821,882.32 T hism ap n otb eu d f rv g | 2015

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

Township of Guelph-Eramosa

Township of PuslinchTownship of

Guelph-Eramosa

Township of Puslinch

G uel p

hL

ak

e

C.N.R.

C.N.R.

G.J.R.

G.J.R.

C.N.R.

C.N

.R.

FORESTELL RD

SO

UT

HG

ATE

DR

TEAL DR

K O R T R I G H T R D E

FLEMING RD

TOVE LL DR

WO

OD

LAND

GL EN DR

CIT

YV

IEW

DR

N

GO

SL I

NG

GD

NS

INV

ER

NE

SS

DR

COUNTRY CLUB DR

PINE RIDGE DR

WILLOW

RD

JENSON BLVD

PO

PP

YD

R

BE

A VE

RM

EA

DO

WD

R

EASTVIEW RD

DE

LHI S

T

IMPERIA

L RD N

MALTBY RD W MALTBY RD E

DAW

SO

N R

D

ME

TCA

LFE

ST

NISKA RD

RI

CK

SO

NA

VE

IMPERIALRD

S

STARWOOD

DR

AUD

EN R

D

SCO

TTSD

ALED

R

GRANGE ST

WESTW

OO

DR

D

DEAN AVE

WATER ST

WH

ITE

LAW

RD

HAD

ATI RD

WAVERLEY DR

ALM

A S

T N

CLAIR RD W

WE

STM

OU

NT

RD

LONDON RD W

SUFFOLK ST W

HARVARD RD

BRAN T AVE

WAT

SON

RD

S

CO

LL

EGE AVE W

EMMA ST

ELIZABETH ST

WATERLOO AVE

CO

LON

IAL

DR

NEEVE ST

CLAIRFIELDS DR W

SUM

ME RFIELD DR

YOR

KS

HIR

E S

T N

PTARMIGAN

DR

NIC

KLI

N R

D

FA

RL

EY

DR

JAN

EFI

ELD

AV

E

IRO

N W O O D

RD

S TEPH

ANIE

DR

RIV

ERVI

EWDR

CLAIRFIELDS DR E

MUNICIPAL ST

MU

SKO

KA

DR

KATH

LEE

N S

T

WIN

DS

OR

ST

BAILEY AVE

ARTHUR ST N

GO

RD

ON

ST

YORK RD

VIC

TOR

IA R

D S

STONE RD E

EDIN

BU

RG

H R

D S

WOODLAWN RD W

PAISLEY RD

SPEEDVALE AVE W

WILLOW RD

WO

OLW

ICH

ST

DOW

NEY

RD

ERAMOSA RD

ELM

IRA

RD

N

STONE RD W

WAT

SON

PK

Y N

EDIN

BU

RG

H R

D N

CLAIR RD E

GRANGE RD

WELLINGTON ST W

SILV

ER

CR

EE

K P

KY N

WOODLAWN RD E

ELM

IRA

RD

S

FIFE RD

ARKELL RD

STE

VE

NS

ON

ST

N

COLLEGE AVE E

WATSO

N PKY S

KORTRIGHT RD W

COLLEGE AVE W

LAIRD RD

SPEEDVALE AVE E

VIC

TOR

IA R

D N

CLAIR RD W

ELIZABETH ST

PAISLEY ST

WATERLOO AVE

STE

VE

NS

ON

ST

S

WAT

SON

RD

S

VIC

TOR

IA R

D S

SO

UT

HG

ATE

DR

LA IR D RD

SILV

ER

CR

EE

K P

KY S

IRONWOOD RD

GO

RD

ON

ST

WY

ND

HA

M S

T N

NO

RFO

LK S

T

WELLINGTON ST E

MACDONELL ST

HA

NLO

N E

XPY

HA

NLO

N E

XPY

HANLON CREEK BLVD

(!(!

(!

WAT

SO

N R

D S

CONCESSION 4

MALTBY RD E

LAIRD RD W

CA

RTE

R R

D

SIDE

ROAD

10

N

WEL

LING

TON

RD 3

5

WELLINGTON RD 37

FIFE RD

WELLINGTON RD 124

SIDE

ROAD

20

N

FORESTELL RD

WE

LLIN

GTO

N R

D 4

1

HUME RD

COOK'S MILL RD

WE

LLIN

GTO

N R

D 3

9

WE

LLIN

GTO

N R

D 8

6

FARNHAM RD

WH

ITE

LAW

RD

SIDE

ROAD

12

WELLINGTON RD 31

STONE RD E

SPEEDVALE AVE E

BO

RE

HA

M

DR

WELLINGTON RD 124

1 0 10.5KM

Projection: UTM 17N NAD83Produced by the City of GuelphPlanning ServicesSeptember 2017 Consolidation

±

SCHEDULE 2:

CITY OF GUELPHOFFICIAL PLAN

LAND USE PLANI:\gis_staging\Planning\OFFICIAL PLAN MAPPING NEW\Schedule2\OPSchedule2-Landuse.mxd

This Schedule is to be read in conjunction with the other Schedules and the text of The Official Plan

Produced by the City of Guelph with Data supplied under Licence by Members of the Ontario Geospatial Data Exchange.

The City of Guelph, its employees and agents, do notundertake to guarantee the validity of the contents of thedigital or hardcopy map files, and will not be liable for any claims for damages or loss arising from their application orinterpretation, by any party. It is not intended to replace a survey or be used for legal description. This map may notbe re-produced without the permission of the City of Guelph. Please contact the City of Guelph's GIS group foradditional information at 519-822-1260.

Produced using information under License with the Grand River Conservation Authority © Grand River Conservation Authority, 2009 [2009].

Refer to Guelph Innovation District

Secondary Plan

Refer to DowntownSecondary

Plan

Legend

City Street

Future City Street

County Road

Railway

Watercourse

Waterbody

Corporate Boundary

Future Highway Interchange(!

Land Use Designations

Open Space and Park

Major Utility

Mixed Business! ! ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! ! ! !

Institutional / Research Park

Corporate Business Park

Industrial

Mixed Office / Commercial

Approved Secondary Plans

High Density Residential

Medium Density Residential

Low Density Greenfield Residential

Service Commercial

Neighbourhood Commercial Centre

Mixed-Use Corridors

Major Institutional

Special Study Area

Low Density Residential

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

Community Mixed-Use Centre

Potential School Siten

Secondary Planning Area

Reserve Lands! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! !

Significant Natural Areas & Natural Areas

Natural Areas Overlay

Secondary Plans

Note: Official Plan Amendment no. 48 remains under appeal for the lands

indicated, known municipally as0 Niska Road.

Site

Existing Official PlanSource: City of Guelph Official Plan Amendment No. 48,

Schedule 2 Land Use Plan (September 2017 Consolidation)

Planning Justification Report | 120-122 Huron StreetGSP Group | November 2017

Figure

5

Page 20: Planning Justification Report › wp-content › uploads › Final-Planning-Justification... · Map Centre (UTM NAD83 z17): 561,828.18 4,821,882.32 T hism ap n otb eu d f rv g | 2015

Planning Justification Report | 120-122 Huron Street 16

GSP Group | November 2017

ii. that the site, where feasible and desirable, is located

adjacent to school sites;

iii. that the site contains adequate street frontage for visibility

and safety; iv) that the site can be linked, where feasible,

to the trail network;

iv. that the site contains sufficient table land (approximately

80 percent of site) and is well drained, except where the

site takes advantage of a specific natural feature; and

v. that the site has a minimum size of 1.0 hectare so that a

variety of outdoor recreation activities may be

accommodated.

Similarly, parkland dedication policies are contained in Section 7.3.5:

5. Where a parkland dedication is required by this Plan, the City will

ensure that the land is suitable for development as a park.

Generally, the parkland acquired should satisfy the following

criteria:

i. that the site satisfies the development criteria for the type

of park proposed;

ii. that the site is not susceptible to major flooding, poor

drainage, erosion, steep slopes or other environmental or

physical conditions that would interfere with its potential

development or use as an active public recreation area.

Sites subject to these conditions may be integrated, where

possible, into the development of municipal park areas by

serving as pedestrian walkways, as part of a linear trail

system, as passive recreation areas, or as natural areas;

iii. that the site is oriented to take advantage of favourable

topography, vistas and mature stands of trees where

possible and desirable; and

iv. that the lands be dedicated in a condition suitable for

parkland development in accordance with the standards of

the City.

There is a vacant remnant lot located on the west side of Huron Street that is a part of the

lands acquired by the Owners. That lot is approximately 800 square metres in area. It is

proposed that the lot could be transferred to the City for parkland dedication purposes.

Discussions with the City will be on-going as a part of the ZBA application process.

Page 21: Planning Justification Report › wp-content › uploads › Final-Planning-Justification... · Map Centre (UTM NAD83 z17): 561,828.18 4,821,882.32 T hism ap n otb eu d f rv g | 2015

Planning Justification Report | 120-122 Huron Street 17

GSP Group | November 2017

The Proposed Development is a brownfield site that was previously occupied by a chemical

manufacturing, and research and development firm. In the 1940s the southerly portion of

the Site was a quarry and ponds. That area was subsequently filled and has now become

overgrown with immature trees. Through site testing, that area and the area up to the

existing four storey building has been identified as an area of contamination. As such, the

existing trees and the three buildings south of the existing heritage building need to be

removed for remediation of the Site. An Exemption to the Private Tree Preservation By-law

and a Demolition Permit has been approved by the City for the tree and building removals.

Section 8.18 of the OP addresses safety in the built environment. The following policies are

contained within this Section:

1. Sidewalks and community trails should be visible, accessible and

aligned along well-used public spaces.

2. New development should be designed in a manner that:

i. provides opportunity for informal surveillance of outdoor

spaces (“eyes on the street”), including public parks,

streets and parking areas;

ii. clearly marks the transition or boundary between public

and private spaces;

iii. includes materials that allow for the built environment to be

effectively and efficiently maintained;

iv. provides adequate lighting in accordance with Sections

8.14, 8.15 and 8.16 of this Plan; and

v. provides for multiple walking routes, where appropriate.

Finally, the City OP contains policies with regard to the use of land in proximity to rail lines

and industrial operations. Section 4.4.5 Noise and Vibration indicates that the City may

require a Noise Impact Study or Vibration Study for development applications that propose

to establish or expand sensitive land uses in proximity to existing or planned sources of

noise or vibration including transportation corridors, certain industrial facilities or aggregate

operations. As a result, the Owners have completed a Noise Study, prepared by GHD

Group – Engineering Company. That report concludes that there are no noise impacts from

the adjacent industrial operations, and noise from the intermittent use of the spur line can

be properly mitigated to meet MOECC requirements.

4.4 City of Guelph Zoning By-law (1995) - 14864

The Site is currently zoned Specialized Industrial (B4-1) in the City of Guelph Zoning By-law

(1995) – 14864 (see Figure 6). A Laboratory and Research Establishment is the only permitted

use within the Specialized B4-1 Zone.

Page 22: Planning Justification Report › wp-content › uploads › Final-Planning-Justification... · Map Centre (UTM NAD83 z17): 561,828.18 4,821,882.32 T hism ap n otb eu d f rv g | 2015

ALICE ST

WIL

LIA

M S

T

GROVE ST

HU

RO

N S

T

ONTARIO ST

DU

KE

ST

HA

RR

IS S

T

ER

IE S

T

BEVERLEY ST

OLIVER STM

OR

RIS

ST

KIN

GS

MIL

L AV

E

JOH

NS

TON

ST

TORONTO ST

JAN

E S

T

FERGUSON ST

ME

NZI

E A

VE

HAY

ES

AV

E

HA

RD

Y S

T

MANITOBA ST SUBURBAN AVE

WE

LLS

ST

AU

DR

EY

AV

E

HO

OP

ER

ST

FLORENCE LANE

LOU

ISA

DR

DO

DD

S A

VE

BO

ULT

AV

E

BR

OC

KV

ILLE

AV

E

EMPIRE ST

IND

US

TRIA

L S

T

STE

VEN

SON

ST

N

ELIZABETH ST

STE

VEN

SON

ST

S SIMCOE ST

LAW

RE

NC

E A

VE

WAT

ER

WO

RK

S P

L

SM

ITH

AV

E

CROSS ST

AR

MS

TR

ON

G A

VE

WOO

D ST

HO

OD

ST

WH

EE

LER

AV

E

RICHARDSON ST

CLA

RA

ST

SACKVILLES

T

WA

LTE

R S

T

SHO

RT S

T

BELL AVE

GA

RIB

ALD

I ST

MARG

ARET ST

FRANCHETTO BLVD

BALSARROCH PLH

AYE

S A

VE

MO

RR

IS S

THOWITT ST

FERGUSON ST

ELIZABETH ST

NEEVE ST

ELIZABETH ST

YORK RD

VIC

TOR

IA R

D N

VIC

TOR

IA R

D S

ALICE ST

Eramosa River

I.2

B.4

B.4 B.4

B.4

B.4

CC

B.4

P.3-1

B.4-1 B.4

CR

R.1B

R.1B

P.5-

2

P.2

B.4

NC

P.5-

5

I.1

B.4-1

I.1

R.1B

R.1B

CR

R.1B

R.1B

R.1C-3

R.1B-10

R.4D-6

R.1C-3

B.4

R.1B

-10

R.1

C-3R.1C-3

R.1B-10

B.4

R.1B

R.1B-10

R.1C-3

R.1C-3R.1B-10

R.1B-10

R.1

B

SC.1

-5

R.1C-3

SC.2-10

R.1C-3

R.1C-3

R.1

C-3

R.1

C-3

R.1B

R.1B

R.4A-2

R.1B-10

R.1B

-10R.1B-10

B.4

R.1B-10

B.4

R.1

B

R.2

R.1B

-10

R.1

C-3

SC.2-2

R.1C-3R

.1C

-3

R.1B-10

R.1B-10

R.1B-10

R.1B

-10

R.1B-10

CR

R.1

C-3

R.1B-1

0

R.1B-10

B.4-

1

R.1

C-3

R.1B-10

SC.2-12

B.4-

6

SC.2-10

B.4-1

R.1

C-3

R.1B-10

R.1

C-3

R.1B

-10

R.1

B-1

0

I.1

R.1

C-3

R.1B-10

R.1B-10

R.4D

-9(H)

R.1

C-3

SC.1-25

B.4-

1

SC.2-2

R.1B-10

R.1B-10

CR

R.1C-3

R.1C-22

C.1-3

R.1

C-3

R.1B-10

B.4-5

R.1B-10

C.1-14

R.1

B-1

0

B.4-1

R.1B

-10

R.1

B-1

0

C.1-7

R.1B

-10

R.1B-10

P.2(H3)

R.1

C-3

R.3A(H4)

NC-6

B.4-

1

SC.1-22

C.1-5

R.1B-10(H5)R

.1B

-3

R.1B-10

R.3A(H3)

B.4-1

OR

-49

R.1B-10

R.1B

-10

R.1

B-1

0

SC.2-12

SC.1

-31

R.1B-10

R.1B-10R

.1B

-22

R.1D-10

B.4-18

R.1B-10

R.2

R.1C-3

R.1

C-3

C.1

R.1B-10

R.1C-3

C.1

-10

R.1C-22

SC.1-31

R.1B-10

R.4D(H3)

R.1B-10

C.1

-12

R.1B-10

R.1B-10

R.1B-10

SC.1-31

R.2-18

R.1B-10

R.1

C-3

R.1B-10

C.1-15

R.1

B

SC.2-10

OR-25

R.2-17

B.4-13

P.3

P.3P.3

P.3 P.3

P.3P.3

I.1

P.5

P.3

B.4

P.3-1FL

FL

FL

FL

FL FL

R.1B-10

R.3A-20

P.5

R.4B-15

R.1D

-46R.1B-10

R.3B

-22(H)

Lyon Park

Eramosa River Park

Mico Valeriote Park

100 0 10050M

DEFINED AREAMAP NO.

Surrounding DAMs

46

LANDS WITHIN THE SPECIAL POLICY AREA (See Section 12.4)

LANDS WITH ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: LOCALLY SIGNIFICANT WETLANDS, SIGNIFICANT WOODLOTS, NATURAL CORRIDOR, OR LINKAGE (See Section 13.4)

LANDS ADJACENT TO PROVINCIALLY SIGNIFICANT WETLANDS (See Section 13.3)

LANDS WITHIN THE FLOOD FRINGE (See Section 12.3)

Produced by the City of GuelphPlanning Services

39 4753

45

38

51

52

3536

54

5737

56

2658

24 34

25

27 59

±

As last amended by By-law (2016) - 20009CITY OF GUELPH BY-LAW (1995) - 14864

SCHEDULE 'A'

Site

Existing ZoningSource: City of Guelph Zoning By-law 1995-14864, Map No. 46 (2016 Consolidation)

Planning Justification Report | 120-122 Huron StreetGSP Group | November 2017

Figure

6

Page 23: Planning Justification Report › wp-content › uploads › Final-Planning-Justification... · Map Centre (UTM NAD83 z17): 561,828.18 4,821,882.32 T hism ap n otb eu d f rv g | 2015

Planning Justification Report | 120-122 Huron Street 19

GSP Group | November 2017

The Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment would rezone the Site to General Apartment (R.4A)

with site specific exemptions to permit the Proposed Development, as follows:

Permitted uses:

• Apartment Building

• Stacked Townhouses

• Cluster Townhouses

Regulations: In accordance with Section 5.4.2 and Table 5.4.2 of By-law Number (1995)-

14864, as follows:

Regulation Required Provided Compliance

Minimum Lot Area 650 sq.m. 24700 sq.m. ✓

Minimum Lot Frontage 15m 117.46m ✓

Maximum Density 100 UPH 74 UPH ✓

Minimum Front Yard 6m 2m - Apt X

Minimum Exterior Side Yard 6m 10.6m - Apt

4.5m - St.Ths

N/A – Ths

X

N/A

Minimum Side Yard ½ building height

or 3m

26m – Apt

N/A – St.Ths

15m - Ths

N/A

Minimum Rear Yard 20% of Lot Depth

or ½ building

height or 7.5m

N/A - Apt

13m - St. Ths

5m -Ths

N/A

X

Maximum Building Height 8 storeys 4 storeys - Apt

3.5 storeys–St.Ths

3 storeys-Ths

Minimum Distance Between

Buildings

15 m 18 m ✓

Minimum Common Amenity Area 3840 sq.m.

(182 units)

1807 sq.m. X

Minimum Landscaped Open

Space

20% of Lot Area

= 4940 sq.m.

10166 sq.m ✓

Off-street Parking 113 spaces -Apt

96 spaces -

St.Ths.& Ths

113 spaces – Apt

115 spaces – St.

Ths & Ths

Floor Space Index 1.0 0.83 ✓

Page 24: Planning Justification Report › wp-content › uploads › Final-Planning-Justification... · Map Centre (UTM NAD83 z17): 561,828.18 4,821,882.32 T hism ap n otb eu d f rv g | 2015

Planning Justification Report | 120-122 Huron Street 20

GSP Group | November 2017

Justification for the proposed site-specific regulations is provided in the following Section of this

Report.

5. Planning Analysis

The following section of this Report provides an analysis of the proposed Zoning By-law

Amendment application to permit the Proposed Development with respect to the applicable

policy and regulatory framework detailed in Section 4 of this Report.

6.1 Provincial Policy Statement

The proposed ZBA application is consistent with the policies of the PPS.

The Proposed Development will provide for the intensification of the Site. The Subject Property

is vacant and the buildings have not been occupied for several years. The redevelopment will

provide for an infilling of the vacant portion of the Site and adaptive reuse of an obsolete former

industrial building with cultural heritage attributes. The Proposed Development will provide 182

residential units or a population or approximately 350 persons on the Site. This equates to a

density of 73 units per hectare and a population of approximately 141 persons per hectare. This

intensification meets the targets of the PPS and the reuse of the Site will contribute to the quality

of life in the neighbourhood.

The Proposed Development will contribute to the mix of residential uses and is compatible with

the neighbourhood that is predominantly single-detached dwellings. The existing heritage

industrial building is four storeys in height and is not proposed to be increased in height. The

stacked townhouse units will front onto Huron Street and will be a maximum building height of

3.5 storeys similar to the two apartment buildings located on the west side of Huron Street. The

Cluster Townhouses are interior to the Site and will have an east/west orientation limiting only 3

end units to the impacts of the rail spur line, and taking advantage of solar heating. The Noise

Study completed by GHD Engineering confirms that rail noise can be properly mitigated for those

three units, and the proposal is compatible with the surrounding neighbourhood.

The Proposed Development will provide for the efficient use of public services. The Functional

Servicing Report prepared by GM BluePlan Engineering, confirms that there is capacity in the

existing sanitary sewer and watermains to accommodate the residential uses. As well, the

proposed uses are transit supportive with good accessibility to the existing two transit routes

(Nos. 4 and 14) to the north and south on Elizabeth and York. In addition, the Proposed

Development will promote cycling as an alternative mode of transportation, providing for

healthier lifestyles. A total of 174 bike parking spaces is proposed for the 182 units, provided in

a number of convenient bike storage locations throughout the Site. This equates to a bike

parking ratio of 0.95 spaces per unit.

Page 25: Planning Justification Report › wp-content › uploads › Final-Planning-Justification... · Map Centre (UTM NAD83 z17): 561,828.18 4,821,882.32 T hism ap n otb eu d f rv g | 2015

Planning Justification Report | 120-122 Huron Street 21

GSP Group | November 2017

The Proposed Development will contribute to the institutional and commercial uses in the

neighbourhood, including schools, places of worship, and places of business.

The proposed ZBA application will facilitate a desirable reuse of lands that will contribute to the

vibrancy of the St. Patrick’s Ward.

6.2 Places to Grow Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe

The proposed ZBA application conforms with the Growth Plan. The Proposed Development will

provide for the intensification and redevelopment of the Site within the Built-Up Area. The

intensification of the Site will support population growth, contribute to higher residential densities

and efficient use of land, and support existing and future public transit services. The proposed

ZBA application will permit greater density that will contribute to the Growth Plan’s targets for

residential development occurring annually within the Built-Up Area. The proposed application

will facilitate an efficient use of the Site and contribute to the housing supply and choice within

the City of Guelph. The Proposed Development will provide housing near public transportation,

public service facilities, and publicly-accessible open spaces.

In addition, the proposed application will facilitate development that will contribute to a vibrant

and active public realm along Huron Street through appropriate site and urban design measures.

The guiding principles of the Growth Plan speak to the achievement of complete communities

that meet the needs of residents for daily living. The proposed ZBA application will facilitate

development that provides housing within proximity to commercial, recreational and institutional

amenities, consistent with the Growth Plan to provide for the basic needs of all residents in a

community.

6.3 City of Guelph Official Plan (2017)

The proposed ZBA application is in conformity with the intent of the OP policies for lands within

the Built-Up Area and Mixed Office / Commercial designation, as well as policies related to the

preservation of heritage resources, safety, and brownfield remediation.

Criteria for multi-unit residential buildings and intensification within existing residential

neighbourhoods are contained in Policy 9.3.1.1 and are to be used to assess development

proposals for multi-unit residential development. Justification for each of the criteria are provided

below:

1. Building form, scale, height, setbacks, massing, appearance and

siting are compatible in design, character and orientation with

buildings in the immediate vicinity.

The Proposed Development includes the rehabilitation and adaptive

reuse of an existing heritage building that has been an establishing

feature of the neighbourhood since 1919- 1920. The remainder of

Page 26: Planning Justification Report › wp-content › uploads › Final-Planning-Justification... · Map Centre (UTM NAD83 z17): 561,828.18 4,821,882.32 T hism ap n otb eu d f rv g | 2015

Planning Justification Report | 120-122 Huron Street 22

GSP Group | November 2017

the Proposed Development consists of 3.5 storey stacked

townhouses, which are east of residential dwellings that are generally

2 to 3 storeys in height. Townhome units along Huron Street will be

oriented to the street, and will be similar in scale and character to the

small-scale apartments across the street. A reduction in the exterior

side yard setback (facing Huron Street) from 6.0 to 4.5 metres is

appropriate to frame the street, particularly with no vehicular

driveways accessing the west façade of the units. In addition, a

sidewalk along Huron Street will improve the connectivity and

integration of the development for pedestrians along Huron Street.

2. Proposals for residential lot infill will be compatible with the general

frontage of lots in the immediate vicinity.

The frontages of the proposed stacked townhouses will be in keeping

with modest scale of housing in the neighbourhood. Units oriented

towards Huron Street will have landscaping and architectural

elements that will reduce the visual impact of the horizonal and

vertical massing of the buildings.

3. The residential development can be adequately served by local

convenience and neighbourhood shopping facilities, schools, trails,

parks, recreation facilities and public transit.

The Proposed Development is within a mixed-use neighbourhood,

with a church, two schools, a theatre, a gym, and industrial

employment within a 5 to 10 minute walk. Transit routes and

sidewalks provide convenient access to commercial areas for

shopping and employment. Many parks are within a 5 to 10 minute

walk of the Site, including Hooper Street Park, York Road Park and

Lyon Park. In addition, the Royal Recreation Trail is approximately

750 metres from the Proposed Development, providing active

transportation that links to downtown. The Owners propose to enter

into discussions with the City about the possibility of creating a

parkette at 104 Oliver Street, across the street from the Site.

4. Vehicular traffic generated from the proposed development will not

have an unacceptable impact on the planned function of the adjacent

roads and intersections.

As demonstrated by the Traffic Impact Study prepared by Paradigm

Transportation Solutions Limited, the surrounding road system has

Page 27: Planning Justification Report › wp-content › uploads › Final-Planning-Justification... · Map Centre (UTM NAD83 z17): 561,828.18 4,821,882.32 T hism ap n otb eu d f rv g | 2015

Planning Justification Report | 120-122 Huron Street 23

GSP Group | November 2017

adequate capacity to service the Proposed Development. No road

improvements are required, and no negative impacts are expected.

5. Vehicular access, parking and circulation can be adequately provided

and impacts mitigated.

Two accesses are provided from Huron Street, with the main access

aligned with Oliver Street. No accesses are proposed from Alice

Street due to the setback distance to the rail spur line and the narrow

road allowance width.

The Proposed Development requires 209 parking spaces in the

Zoning By-law. A total of 232 spaces are proposed, resulting in an

additional 23 parking spaces. Additional parking will ensure resident

and visitor parking is limited to the Site and will not spill over into the

surrounding neighbourhood. As well, the Owners are proposing to

“unbundle” the parking, whereby the parking is unassigned or not

reserved for particular residents. They are also willing to consider

“carshare” programs.

Circulation is provided on the Site via a connected paved

condominium road system. Fire routes are provided throughout the

Site, with heavy duty asphalt to ensure road integrity is maintained.

Pedestrians will be accommodated throughout and around the Site

using a network of sidewalks and landscaped pathways.

6. That adequate municipal infrastructure, services and amenity areas

for residents can be provided.

As demonstrated by the Functional Servicing Report, adequate water

and sewage capacity and infrastructure is in place to service the

Proposed Development.

Outdoor amenity space is provided in the form of two amenity areas

combined having a total area of 1807 square metres. This outdoor

amenity area will be augmented by recessed balconies on the

apartment building, and decks/patios for the townhouse dwellings, as

well as some indoor amenity area in the apartment building.

7. Surface parking and driveways shall be minimized.

The Proposed Development is comprised primarily of surface

parking. As the heritage structure is nearing 100 years of age, it is

Page 28: Planning Justification Report › wp-content › uploads › Final-Planning-Justification... · Map Centre (UTM NAD83 z17): 561,828.18 4,821,882.32 T hism ap n otb eu d f rv g | 2015

Planning Justification Report | 120-122 Huron Street 24

GSP Group | November 2017

not structurally compatible with an underground parking garage. The

townhomes that comprise the remainder of the development are not

suitable for a parking structure. To reduce the visual impact of the

surface parking, parking has been kept to the interior of the Site with

buildings oriented to the streets. Any gaps between buildings where

surface parking could be visible will be buffered by landscaped

boulevards. All of the townhouses will have garages.

8. Development shall extend, establish or reinforce a publicly accessible

street grid network to ensure appropriate connectivity for pedestrians,

cyclist and vehicular traffic, where applicable.

The Proposed Development will result in the installation of a sidewalk

along Huron Street, which will provide pedestrians with a connection

to the sidewalks immediately north and south of the property. This

will enhance the connectivity of the neighbourhood to access

community facilities such as schools, parks and trails. A total of 174

bike parking spaces are proposed in numerous locations throughout

the Proposed Development, including secure indoor storage to

encourage a heathy lifestyle through alternative modes of

transportation.

9. Impacts on adjacent properties are minimized in relation to grading,

drainage, location of service areas and microclimatic conditions, such

as wind and shadowing.

The Site will be graded post-remediation to match the grade of

surrounding properties. Drainage will be directed to the on-site dry

stormwater management pond, that will have a limited depth of less

than 0.5 metres. No microclimate impacts are anticipated given the

maximum height of the buildings to be between 3 and 4 storeys.

10. The development addresses public safety, identified public views and

accessibility to open space, parks, trails and the Natural Heritage

System, where applicable.

Public safety will be increased by the redevelopment of the Site,

which currently features abandoned industrial buildings. The

redevelopment of the Site will increase safety by displacing buildings

that have been susceptible to vandalism, and by increasing public

activity and surveillance of the Site and adjacent neighbourhood

through the addition of new residents.

Page 29: Planning Justification Report › wp-content › uploads › Final-Planning-Justification... · Map Centre (UTM NAD83 z17): 561,828.18 4,821,882.32 T hism ap n otb eu d f rv g | 2015

Planning Justification Report | 120-122 Huron Street 25

GSP Group | November 2017

104 Oliver Street, located at the northwest corner of Huron and Oliver

Streets, is a surplus property that are a part of the Owners’

landholdings. It is proposed that this lot become a parkette, subject

to discussions with the City.

Policies pertaining to neighbourhood parks are contained in Section

7.3.2, which states:

5. It is the policy of the City to maintain a minimum city-wide average

rate of Neighbourhood Parks provision of 0.7 hectares /1000

population.

The proposed park on 104 Oliver Street is 0.8 hectares in size.

With 182 units, the Proposed Development is expected to provide

homes for approximately 350 new residents. As such, the new

park would meet the parkland provision for the Proposed

Development as well as approximately 800 residents in the

surrounding neighbourhood.

The lot at 104 Oliver Street is located directly across the street

from the Community Gardens at the southwest intersection of

Huron and Oliver. A parkette in this location would compliment

the neighbourhood.

It is considered that the Official Plan criteria for multiple residential

uses in an existing neighbourhood are met by the Proposed

Development.

Section 8.18 of the OP sets out policies regarding safety in the built environment. The following

policies are contained within this Section:

3. Sidewalks and community trails should be visible, accessible and

aligned along well-used public spaces.

Sidewalks will be installed along Huron Street, and internal

sidewalks will be lit and within view of surrounding residences.

4. New development should be designed in a manner that:

Page 30: Planning Justification Report › wp-content › uploads › Final-Planning-Justification... · Map Centre (UTM NAD83 z17): 561,828.18 4,821,882.32 T hism ap n otb eu d f rv g | 2015

Planning Justification Report | 120-122 Huron Street 26

GSP Group | November 2017

vi. provides opportunity for informal surveillance of outdoor

spaces (“eyes on the street”), including public parks,

streets and parking areas;

vii. clearly marks the transition or boundary between public

and private spaces;

viii. includes materials that allow for the built environment to be

effectively and efficiently maintained;

ix. provides adequate lighting in accordance with Sections

8.14, 8.15 and 8.16 of this Plan; and

x. provides for multiple walking routes, where appropriate.

The redevelopment of the Site will allow for surveillance of the

neighbourhood through the addition of residents in the

neighbourhood. The height of the apartment building and layout of

the internal vehicular and pedestrian routes will ensure adequate

surveillance of the Proposed Development. The potential for a

parkette on 104 Oliver Street would also benefit from the surveillance

of the new residents. The outdoor amenity spaces are located in two

areas of the Site with good accessibility and visibility to the residents.

Street lighting will be provided over internal roads and parking lots

with down lighting to ensure no light bleeds off of the Site, and

pedestrian paths will be lit.

It is our opinion that the proposed ZBA application will provide for a multiple residential

development that is in keeping with the City of Guelph Official Plan. The Proposed Development

is a permitted use in the Mixed Office / Commercial designation of the Official Plan and is within

the height and density provisions of that designation. The massing, setbacks, and access routes

also meet the policies of the Official Plan to create intensive infill projects that are compatible

and contribute to the vibrancy of the surrounding residential neighbourhood.

The Proposed Development meets the intent of the Official Plan for lands within the Built-Up

Area and represents an ideal location for intensification of a Site that is vacant and underutilized.

The proposed ZBA application will facilitate redevelopment that will provide additional housing

availability and choice within the existing neighbourhood on existing municipal services. In

addition, the cultural heritage policies of the Official Plan will be met through the adaptive reuse

of the heritage building on Site, and the policies for remediation of a brownfield site.

The location of the Site will support sustainable modes of transportation such as active

transportation and transit, as it is within walking distance of various destinations, high frequency

transit and cycling corridors. The addition of a sidewalk along Huron Street will increase

connectivity and active transportation options throughout the neighbourhood.

Page 31: Planning Justification Report › wp-content › uploads › Final-Planning-Justification... · Map Centre (UTM NAD83 z17): 561,828.18 4,821,882.32 T hism ap n otb eu d f rv g | 2015

Planning Justification Report | 120-122 Huron Street 27

GSP Group | November 2017

6.5 City of Guelph Zoning By-law (1995) - 14864

The Site is zoned Specialized Industrial (B4-1) in the City of Guelph Zoning By-law (1995) –

14864. A Laboratory and Research Establishment is the only permitted use within the

Specialized B4-1 Zone.

The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment would rezone the Site to General Apartment (R.4A),

with site specific exemptions to permit the Proposed Development. A draft copy of the Zoning

By-law is appended to this report. The exemptions would include allowing Apartments, Stacked

Townhouses and Cluster Townhouses as permitted uses, and the following variances to the

regulations:

• a reduction in the Minimum Front Yard for the Apartment building from 6.0 to 2.0 metres;

• a reduction in the Exterior Side Yard for the Stacked Townhouses from 6.0 to 4.5 metres;

• a reduction in the Minimum Rear Yard for the Cluster Townhouses from 7.5 to 5.0

metres; and,

• a reduction in the Minimum Common Amenity Area from 3840 sq.m. to 1807 sq.m.

The proposed ZBA application is appropriate.

The reduced front yard is proposed simply to legalize the existing building. The existing

building has a setback of 4.1 metres, wherein the required setback is 6.0 metres. A road

widening is required across the Alice Street Frontage and it is proposed that a 2.0 metre

setback with a 2.1 metre widening will provide for the proper access to the exterior of the

building for maintenance purposes of the Apartment building.

The Stacked Townhouses are proposed with no driveway or garage accesses fronting Huron

Street. As a result, it is proposed that the buildings be located 4.5 metres from the street line.

Typically, an exterior side yard requirement of 6.0 metres is required to provide for parking in

front of a garage.

The Cluster Townhouse units are proposed to be located facing the south. The rear property

line is not perpendicular to the Huron Street and angles northeasterly across the southern

boundary of the Site. As a result, the rear yard to the Cluster Townhouses ranges from 45 to

5 metres. Only one corner of the southeasterly unit requires the reduced setback and there is

sufficient area to provide for a private amenity area of 41.25 sq.m. (5.5 by 7.5m).

The common outdoor amenity area is proposed in two locations having areas of 935 and 858

square metres to the south and east portions of the Site. These two areas (approximately

0.25 acres in area) will provide sufficient land for playground structures for residents. This will

be augmented by private, recessed balconies and indoor amenity areas in the apartment

building for those residents, and the stormwater management area that will be a sodded

depression less than 0.5 metres deep.

Page 32: Planning Justification Report › wp-content › uploads › Final-Planning-Justification... · Map Centre (UTM NAD83 z17): 561,828.18 4,821,882.32 T hism ap n otb eu d f rv g | 2015

Planning Justification Report | 120-122 Huron Street 28

GSP Group | November 2017

7. Conclusions

GSP Group has been retained by 120 Huron GP Inc. to coordinate the preparation and

submission of a Zoning By-law Amendment application for the property municipally known as

120-122 Huron Street in the City of Guelph.

The proposed ZBA application is necessary to permit the redevelopment of the Site into a

residential complex consisting of an adaptively reused former industrial building into an

apartment building and nine buildings containing stacked and cluster townhouses. The total unit

yield is for 182 residential dwelling units, with a density of 73 units per hectare, and with a total

of 232 surface parking spaces.

This Planning Justification Report concludes that the proposed ZBA application is appropriate

and represents good planning for the following reasons:

• Consistent with the policies of the Provincial Policy Statement (2014);

• Conforms with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2017);

• Conforms with the policies of the City of Guelph Official Plan including the criteria for

multiple residential infill in an existing neighbourhood;

• Conforms with the policies of the Mixed Office / Commercial designation in the OP;

• The requested R.4A Zone and each of the requested site-specific provisions are

appropriate and justified for the reasons set out in Section 6.5 of this Report;

• The Development Proposal addresses applicable sections of the City’s Urban Design

policies and many details of the design can and will be further developed at the Site Plan

approval stage;

• The Site can be serviced through proposed service connections to the existing sanitary,

water and stormwater networks and appropriate measures for stormwater management

quality control can be implemented; and

• It is appropriate in this urban context.

Page 33: Planning Justification Report › wp-content › uploads › Final-Planning-Justification... · Map Centre (UTM NAD83 z17): 561,828.18 4,821,882.32 T hism ap n otb eu d f rv g | 2015

Planning Justification Report | 120-122 Huron Street 29

GSP Group | November 2017

Appendix: Draft Proposed Zoning By-law

Page 34: Planning Justification Report › wp-content › uploads › Final-Planning-Justification... · Map Centre (UTM NAD83 z17): 561,828.18 4,821,882.32 T hism ap n otb eu d f rv g | 2015

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF GUELPH

By-law Number (2017)-XXXXX

A by-law to amend By-law Number (1995)-

14864, as amended, known as the Zoning

By-law for the City of Guelph as it affects

property known municipally as 120-122

Huron Road and legally described as Part of

Lots 1 and 2, Range 2, Division “F” and Part

1 of 61R-4274, City of Guelph (File ____).

WHEREAS Section 34(1) of The Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13 authorizes the

Council of a Municipality to enact Zoning By-laws;

NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY

OF GUELPH ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

1. By-law Number (1995)-14864, as amended, is hereby further amended by transferring

property described as Part of Lots 1 and 2, Range 2, Division F and Part 1 of 61R-4274,

City of Guelph, from the B.4-1 (Specialized Industrial) Zone to the R.4A-__ (Specialized

Residential Apartment) Zone to implement a residential development.

2. Section 5.4.3.1 of By-law Number (1995)-14864, is hereby further amended by adding new

subsection 5.4.3.1.50 as follows:

5.4.3.1.50 R.4A-__

120-122 Huron Street

As shown on Defined Area Map Number 46 of Schedule “A” of this By-law.

5.4.3.1.__.1 Permitted Uses

In accordance with Section 5.4.1.1 of By-law Number (1995)-14864

as amended, plus:

• Stacked Townhouse

• Cluster Townhouse

5.4.3.1.__.2 Minimum Front Yard

2.0 metres to Apartment Building

5.4.3.1.__.3 Minimum Exterior Side Yard

4.5 metres to Stacked Townhouses

Page 35: Planning Justification Report › wp-content › uploads › Final-Planning-Justification... · Map Centre (UTM NAD83 z17): 561,828.18 4,821,882.32 T hism ap n otb eu d f rv g | 2015

5.4.3.1.__.4 Minimum Side Yard

5.0 metres to Cluster Townhouses

5.4.3.1.__.6 Minimum Common Amenity Area

1,807 m2

3. Schedule “A” of By-law Number (1995)-14864, as amended, is hereby further amended

by deleting Defined Area Map 46 and substituting therefore new Defined Area Map 46

attached hereto as Schedule “A”.

4. Where notice of this by-law is given in accordance with the Planning Act, and where no

notice of objection has been filed within the time prescribed by the regulations, this by-law

shall come into effect. Notwithstanding the above, where notice of objection has been filed

within the time prescribed by the regulations, no part of this by-law shall come into effect

until all of such appeals have been finally disposed of by the Ontario Municipal Board.

PASSED this ______ day of _________, 20__

____________________________________

CAM GUTHRIE – MAYOR

____________________________________

STEPHEN O’BRIEN – CITY CLERK

Page 36: Planning Justification Report › wp-content › uploads › Final-Planning-Justification... · Map Centre (UTM NAD83 z17): 561,828.18 4,821,882.32 T hism ap n otb eu d f rv g | 2015

ALICE ST

WIL

LIA

M S

T

GROVE ST

HU

RO

N S

T

ONTARIO ST

DU

KE

ST

HA

RR

IS S

T

ER

IE S

T

BEVERLEY ST

OLIVER ST

MO

RR

IS S

T

KIN

GS

MIL

L AV

E

JOH

NS

TON

ST

TORONTO ST

JAN

E S

T

FERGUSON ST

ME

NZI

E A

VE

HAY

ES

AV

E

HA

RD

Y S

T

MANITOBA ST SUBURBAN AVE

WE

LLS

ST

AU

DR

EY

AV

E

HO

OP

ER

ST

FLORENCE LANE

LOU

ISA

DR

DO

DD

S A

VE

BO

ULT

AV

E

BR

OC

KV

ILLE

AV

E

EMPIRE ST

IND

US

TRIA

L S

T

STE

VEN

SON

ST

N

ELIZABETH ST

STE

VEN

SON

ST

S SIMCOE ST

LAW

RE

NC

E A

VE

WAT

ER

WO

RK

S P

L

SM

ITH

AV

E

CROSS STA

RM

ST

RO

NG

AV

E

WOO

D ST

HO

OD

ST

WH

EE

LER

AV

E

RICHARDSON ST

CLA

RA

ST

SACKVILLES

T

WA

LTE

R S

T

SHO

RT S

T

BELL AVE

GA

RIB

ALD

I ST

MARG

ARET ST

FRANCHETTO BLVD

BALSARROCH PL

HAY

ES

AV

E

MO

RR

IS S

T

HOWITT ST

FERGUSON ST

ELIZABETH ST

NEEVE ST

ELIZABETH ST

YORK RD

VIC

TOR

IA R

D N

VIC

TOR

IA R

D S

ALICE ST

Eramosa River

I.2

B.4

B.4 B.4

B.4

B.4

CC

B.4

P.3-1

B.4-1 B.4

CR

R.1B

R.1B

P.5-

2

P.2

B.4

NC

P.5-

5

I.1

B.4-1

I.1

R.1B

R.1B

CR

R.1B

R.1B

R.1C-3

R.1B-10

R.4D-6

R.1C-3

B.4R.

1B-1

0

R.1

C-3R.1C-3

R.1B-10

B.4

R.1B

R.1B-10

R.1C-3

R.1C-3R.1B-10

R.1B-10

R.1

B

SC.1

-5

R.1C-3

SC.2-10

R.1C-3

R.1C-3

R.1

C-3

R.1

C-3

R.1B

R.1B

R.4A-2

R.1B-10

R.1B

-10R.1B-10

B.4

R.1B-10

B.4

R.1

B

R.2

R.1B

-10

R.1

C-3

SC.2-2

R.1C-3

R.1

C-3

R.1B-10

R.1B-10

R.1B-10

R.1B

-10

R.1B-10

CR

R.1

C-3

R.1B-1

0

R.1B-10

B.4-

1

R.1

C-3

R.1B-10

SC.2-12

B.4-

6

SC.2-10

B.4-1

R.1

C-3

R.1B-10

R.1

C-3

R.1B

-10

R.1

B-1

0

I.1

R.1

C-3

R.1B-10

R.1B-10

R.4D

-9(H)

R.1

C-3

SC.1-25

B.4-

1

SC.2-2

R.1B-10

R.1B-10

CR

R.1C-3

R.1C-22

C.1-3

R.1

C-3

R.1B-10

B.4-5

R.1B-10

C.1-14

R.1

B-1

0

B.4-1

R.1B

-10

R.1

B-1

0

C.1-7

R.1B

-10

R.1B-10

P.2(H3)

R.1

C-3

R.3A(H4)

NC-6

B.4-

1

SC.1-22

C.1-5

R.1B-10(H5)

R.1

B-3

R.1B-10

R.3A(H3)

B.4-1

OR

-49

R.1B-10

R.1B

-10

R.1

B-1

0

SC.2-12

SC.1

-31

R.1B-10

R.1B-10

R.1

B-2

2

R.1D-10

B.4-18

R.1B-10

R.2

R.1C-3

R.1

C-3

C.1

R.1B-10

R.1C-3

C.1

-10

R.1C-22

SC.1-31

R.1B-10

R.4D(H3)

R.1B-10

C.1

-12

R.1B-10

R.1B-10

R.1B-10

SC.1-31

R.2-18

R.1B-10

R.1

C-3

R.1B-10

C.1-15

R.1

B

SC.2-10

OR-25

R.2-17

B.4-13

P.3

P.3P.3

P.3 P.3

P.3P.3

I.1

P.5

P.3

B.4

P.3-1FL

FL

FL

FL

FL FL

R.1B-10

R.3A-20

P.5

R.4B-15

R.1D

-46R.1B-10

R.3B

-22(H)

Lyon Park

Eramosa River Park

Mico Valeriote Park

100 0 10050M

DEFINED AREAMAP NO.

Surrounding DAMs

46

LANDS WITHIN THE SPECIAL POLICY AREA (See Section 12.4)

LANDS WITH ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: LOCALLY SIGNIFICANT WETLANDS, SIGNIFICANT WOODLOTS, NATURAL CORRIDOR, OR LINKAGE (See Section 13.4)

LANDS ADJACENT TO PROVINCIALLY SIGNIFICANT WETLANDS (See Section 13.3)

LANDS WITHIN THE FLOOD FRINGE (See Section 12.3)

Produced by the City of GuelphPlanning Services

39 4753

45

38

51

52

3536

54

5737

56

2658

24 34

25

27 59

±

As last amended by By-law (2016) - 20009CITY OF GUELPH BY-LAW (1995) - 14864

SCHEDULE 'A'

B.4-1

R.4A-__

BY-LAW 201_ - ____SCHEDULE ‘A’