plaintiff($), no -against- judgment motion $), : no opposition : ... defendants the goodyear tire ...

Download Plaintiff($), NO -against- JUDGMENT MOTION  $), : NO OPPOSITION : ... defendants The Goodyear Tire  Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case

Post on 09-May-2018

212 views

Category:

Documents

0 download

Embed Size (px)

TRANSCRIPT

  • SCANNEDON 111812010

    : Index Nos. 112589/00 01 3269189

    Plaintiff($), : NO OPPOSITION

    : MOTION AND ORDER

    Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler,

    -against- : SUMMARY JUDGMENT

    A.C. & S. INC.., et al.,

    Defendants. IASPart30 I__________________________r______l__r__---"----------------- X

    WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

    Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

    CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

    Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

    thereto, it is hereby:

    ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

    against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the

    same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

    Dated: New York,*New York (?, \ b8\W

    WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff

    By: DrQcey By: New York, New York 10003

    LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc.

    FrankM. Ortiz, s $ 4 2 Y $? b

  • 'TMc:CC(jpk) 6/18/10

    SUPREME COURT : ALL COUNTIES

    IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION, 109600/97 and 102335/06 ! ASSIGNED TO: I ; NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY ' JUDGMENT MOTION AND I

    I ORDER WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New Yurk, Inc.

    hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

    and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison

    Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

    ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims

    against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby

    dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

    Dated: New York, New York

    700 Broadway New York, NY 100035

    Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003-3598

    S-5 108-97

  • 536.08818/AJM SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE O F NEW TOUNTY O F NEW YORK

    IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION :

    This document relates to:

    NALTER L. CLEGHORN, Deceased, :

    Plaintiff ,

    vs.

    JNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, et al.,

    Defendants.

    YORK

    NYCAL IAS PART 30 (Honorable S,,erry Klein Heitler)

    Index N o . : 100488/98 111061/98 117710/99

    (June 2010 Monthly FIFO Trial Group)

    NO OFPOSTTION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby

    requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

    Complaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with

    prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

    ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and

    e crossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corpor

    same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

    DATED, .June4

    WEITZ & LUXENBERG GARRITY, GRAHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALO Attorneys f o r Plaintiff & FLIJXN 700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant, New York, New York 10003 United Conveyor Corporation

    72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350 P.O. BOX 438 East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

    ----.- SO ORDERED,

    Honorable ShVerry Klein Heitler UUL 2 0 70117

  • Plaintiff(s),

    -against-

    A.C. & S., INC.

    Index No.: 103381/98, 105236/98, 11 1060/98 & 12243 1 /99

    NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30

    WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request

    summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

    $32 12, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS

    with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

    Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

    defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

    prejudice and without costs.

    L \ l a b

    suz . Halbardier, Esq. BARRY, TIERNAN & MOO

    FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14th Floor

    Frank Ortiz, Esq.

    Attorneys for Plaintiff A t t o 2 D e f e n d a n t % I L E [) 180 Maiden Lane New Yurk, New York 10038 (21 2) 558-5500 New York, New York 10006

    (212) 313-3600 J 'JL 2 8 2010

    \'P"-t;l I 'r"Og#K

    -@4 tai,ERtR$

    'v' 20201Qi I 1 SO ORI)ERED,_

  • Plaintiff( s),

    -against-

    A.C. & S., INC.

    Index No.: 103381/98, 105236/98, 11 1060/98 & 12243 1 /99

    NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    NYCAL X.A.S. Part 30

    WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request

    summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

    532 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS

    with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

    Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

    defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

    prejudice and without costs.

    A L \ l R \ b

    Attorneys for Plaintiff 1 SO Maiden Lane

    Attorneys for Defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14'h Floor New York, New York 10038

    (212) 558-5500 New York, New York 10006 JI'L 2 8 2010 \ ' E " , # i

    (212) 313-3600 " T I 'l"GRK

    X U N $+&R%$ SO ORDERED,

    ! ? ' j ' 2 0 2010/

  • Plaintiff(s),

    -against-

    A.C. & S., INC.

    Index No.: 103381/98, 105236/98, 1 11 060/98 & 12243 1 I99

    NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30

    WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request

    summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

    $32 12, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS

    with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

    Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

    defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

    prejudice and without costs.

    Attorneys for Plaintiff 180 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038 (21 2) 55s-5500

    Attorneys for Defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14'h Floor New York, New York 10006 JlJ1 2 8 2010 (212) 313-3600 4.1;- I I

    "" 20201Q1

    * . ,

    SQ ORLIERED,-- Hon. Sherry Klein-Heitler

    1 J

  • i36,08818/AJM ;UPREME COURT OF THE STATE :OUNTY O F NEW YORK

    i I

    F NEW

    :N RE: NEW YORK C I T Y ASBESTOS LITIGATION :

    ?his document relates to:

    'JALTER L. CLEGHORN, Deceased, :

    Plaintiff,

    v s .

    JNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, ?t al.,

    Defendants.

    YORK

    NYCAL I A S PART 3 0 (Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler)

    Index N o . : 100488/98 111061/98 117710/99

    (June 2010 Monthly FIFO Trial Group)

    NO OPPOSITION S W R Y JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby

    requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant tc

    Z i V i l Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's

    Zomplaint against defendant,

    prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

    United Conveyor Corporation, 'wit?

    ORDERED, that upon notice to a11 co-defendants, all claims anc

    c crossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corpor

    J\Y-

    WEITZ & LUXENBERG Attorneys for Plaintiff & FLINJ!J 7 0 0 Broadway- New Y o r k , New York 10003

    Attorneys f o r Defendant, United Conveyor Corporation 72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350 P.O. Box 438 East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

    ---+- SO ORDERED, Honorable ShVerry Klein Heitler

    VUL 2 0 7 n i ~

  • L ' --.* Y , ' ' .

    Plaintiffs,

    - against -

    A. C . & S., JNC. et al.,

    Index No.: 10005 1/99

    Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler Part 30

    NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    WHEREFORE, defendant Robert A. Keasbey Co. hereby requests summary judgment in

    the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

    Plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Robert A. Keasbey Co. with prejudice, and there being

    no opposition thereto,

    ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

    defendant Robert A. Keasbey Co,, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

    without costs.

    Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003

    Attorneys for Plaintiffs (212) 558-5500 (2 12) 80 1-9200

    Attorneys for Robert A. Kea* Cps zoT0

    6 / q h ,2010

    rk%venue, 15'" F l o g 1 1 %e*_l II

    S O O K U ~ ~ U , 1 Hon. Sherry K1(

  • Plaintiff(s),

    - against -

    A.C.&S. INC., et al.;

    NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

    Index No.: 100490/99

    NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30

    WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request summary

    judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

    dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS with prejudice,

    and there being no opposition thereto,

    ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

    defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS,

Recommended

View more >