plaintiff($), no -against- judgment motion order$), : no opposition : ... defendants the goodyear...

SCANNEDON 111812010

: Index Nos. 112589/00 01 3269189

Plaintiff($), : NO OPPOSITION

: MOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler,

-against- : SUMMARY JUDGMENT

A.C. & S. INC.., et al.,

Defendants. IASPart30 I__________________________r______l__r__---"----------------- X

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York,*New York (?, \ b8\W

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff

By: DrQcey By:

New York, New York 10003

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc.

FrankM. Ortiz, s $ 4 2 Y $? b<%....' 1 %>dh 700 Broadway 264 West 40th Street v

New York, New York 1001 8 (212) 558-5500 (212) 302-2400 I " 7 E 29/19 ,7\ \ l \ . . I.-

Thtecl: New York. New York

'TMc:CC(jpk) 6/18/10

SUPREME COURT : ALL COUNTIES

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION, 109600/97 and 102335/06 ! ASSIGNED TO:

I ; NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY ' JUDGMENT MOTION AND

I

I ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New Yurk, Inc.

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison

Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims

against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

700 Broadway New York, NY 100035

Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003-3598

S-5 108-97

536.08818/AJM SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE O F NEW TOUNTY O F NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION :

This document relates to:

NALTER L. CLEGHORN, Deceased, :

Plaintiff ,

vs.

JNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

YORK

NYCAL IAS PART 30 (Honorable S,,erry Klein Heitler)

Index N o . : 100488/98 111061/98 117710/99

(June 2010 Monthly FIFO Trial Group)

NO OFPOSTTION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

Complaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and

e crossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corpor

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

DATED, .June4

WEITZ & LUXENBERG GARRITY, GRAHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALO Attorneys f o r Plaintiff & FLIJXN 700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant, New York, New York 10003 United Conveyor Corporation

72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350 P.O. BOX 438 East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

----.- SO ORDERED,

Honorable ShVerry Klein Heitler UUL 2 0 70117

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.C. & S., INC.

Index No.: 103381/98, 105236/98, 11 1060/98 & 12243 1 /99

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30

WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

$32 12, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS

with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

L \ l a b

suz . Halbardier, Esq. BARRY, TIERNAN & MOO

FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14th Floor

Frank Ortiz, Esq.

Attorneys for Plaintiff A t t o 2 D e f e n d a n t % I L E [) 180 Maiden Lane New Yurk, New York 10038 (21 2) 558-5500 New York, New York 10006

(212) 313-3600 J 'JL 2 8 2010

\'P"-t;l I 'r"Og#K

-@4 tai,ERtR$

'v' 20201Qi I 1

SO ORI)ERED,_

Plaintiff( s),

-against-

A.C. & S., INC.

Index No.: 103381/98, 105236/98, 11 1060/98 & 12243 1 /99


NYCAL X.A.S. Part 30



532 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS





A L \ l R \ b

Attorneys for Plaintiff 1 SO Maiden Lane

Attorneys for Defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14'h Floor New York, New York 10038

(212) 558-5500 New York, New York 10006 JI'L 2 8 2010 \ ' E " , # i

(212) 313-3600 " T I 'l"GRK

X U N $+&R%$ SO ORDERED,

! ? ' j ' 2 0 2010/

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.C. & S., INC.

Index No.: 103381/98, 105236/98, 1 11 060/98 & 12243 1 I99





$32 12, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS





Attorneys for Plaintiff 180 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038 (21 2) 55s-5500

Attorneys for Defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14'h Floor New York, New York 10006 JlJ1 2 8 2010 (212) 313-3600 4.1;- <>I I

"" 20201Q1

* . ,

SQ ORLIERED,-- Hon. Sherry Klein-Heitler

1 J

i36,08818/AJM ;UPREME COURT OF THE STATE :OUNTY O F NEW YORK

i I

F NEW

:N RE: NEW YORK C I T Y ASBESTOS LITIGATION :

?his document relates to:

'JALTER L. CLEGHORN, Deceased, :

Plaintiff,

v s .

JNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, ?t al.,

Defendants.

YORK

NYCAL I A S PART 3 0 (Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler)

Index N o . : 100488/98 111061/98 117710/99


NO OPPOSITION S W R Y JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER


requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant tc

Z i V i l Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's

Zomplaint against defendant,


United Conveyor Corporation, 'wit?

ORDERED, that upon notice to a11 co-defendants, all claims anc

c crossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corpor

J\Y-

WEITZ & LUXENBERG Attorneys for Plaintiff & FLINJ!J

7 0 0 Broadway- New Y o r k , New York 10003

Attorneys f o r Defendant, United Conveyor Corporation 72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350 P.O. Box 438 East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

---+- SO ORDERED, Honorable ShVerry Klein Heitler

VUL 2 0 7 n i ~

L ' --.* Y , ' ' .

Plaintiffs,

- against -

A. C . & S., JNC. et al.,

Index No.: 10005 1/99

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler Part 30


WHEREFORE, defendant Robert A. Keasbey Co. hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

Plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Robert A. Keasbey Co. with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendant Robert A. Keasbey Co,, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003

Attorneys for Plaintiffs (212) 558-5500 (2 12) 80 1-9200

Attorneys for Robert A. Kea* Cps zoT0

6 / q h ,2010

rk%venue, 15'" F l o g 1 1 %e*_l II

S O O K U ~ ~ U , 1 Hon. Sherry K1(

Plaintiff(s),

- against -

A.C.&S. INC., et al.;


Index No.: 100490/99


WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby-dismissed with prejudice

and without costs. b \-.A\-

Attorney for Piaini iffs Weitz 61c Luxenberg 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

Hon, Sherry Klein-Heitler

SuzhdHalbardier, Esq. Ati~meys for FrJT TfiN BOILER W@FXS Barry McTiernan & Moore 2 Rector Street, 14fh Floor New York, New York 10006

F I L E D (212) 313-3600

JUL 2 8 2010

536.06191/AJM JPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK IUNTY OF NEW YORK

RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION :

lis document relates to:

4WRENCE C. ELIE, Deceased,

Plaintiff,

vs.

NITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, t al.,

Defendants.

NYCAL IAS PART 30 (Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler)

Index No. : 100558/99


WHEREFORE, defendant, United


conveyor Corporation, hereby

'equests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

:ivil Practice Law and Rules Section 3 2 1 2 , dismissing plaintiff's

:omplaint against defendant, united Conveyor Corporation, witk

irejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims ani

WEITZ & LUXENBERG Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

SO ORDEF""

GARRITY , GRAHAM , MURPHY, GAROFAL & FLINN Attorneys for Defendant, United Conveyor Corporation 72 Eaqle Rock Avenue, Suite 350 P.O. Box 438 East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED,

P.O. Box 438 East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

.ein Heitler

36.09053/AJM JPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW 3UNTY OF NEW YORK

!J RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION :

his document relates to:

ERMAN H. HARDY, JR., Deceased, :

Plaintiff ,

v s ,


YORK

NYCAL IAS PART 30 (Honorable Sherry K ein Hei

Index No. : 101607/99

1



Defendants.


S O ORDERED,

JUL 2 0 2010

-

for the Estate of JOHN BOVENZI,

Plaintiff( s), - - -

-against- : MOTION AND ORDER

: NO OPPOSITION * SUMMARY JUDGMENT

A.C. & S . INC., et al., 1 Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler,









Dated: New York, New York b \ sb\\Q



By: v-.!&&< By:

700 Broadway

Frank M. Ortiz,

264 West 40fh Street New York, New York 10003 New York, New York 10018

ZOQ 1212) 558-5500 (212) 302-2400 J[\L z 8

SIJPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK _ _

COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL

/ I.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler. J.)

ASBESTOS LITIGATION , , I \

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: ! Index No.: 10 1622/99

FRANCES BOVENZI, Individually and as Executrix for / the Estate of JOHN BOVENZI,

Plaintiff, \ NO OPPOSITION -against- j SUMMARY JUDGMENT

[ MOTION AND ORDER A.C. & S., INC., et al.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, Peerless Industries, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiff's

complaint against defendant, Peerless Industries, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being



defendant Peerless Industries, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: New York, New York A

2010

Steven T. Corbin, Esq. Attorney for Defendant LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 199 Water Street, Suite 2500 New York, New York 10038-3516

Frank Ortiz, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C 700 Broadwa New York, r\

\\\L 28 zu'u (212) 558-5500

inyeitler

(212) 232-1300

SO ORDERED,

HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER

4823-0796-5702.1

/dYL/?

u--

A. C . & S., NC., et al.,

- against -

Defendants.

Index No.: 101622/99



----_r__" --__r_----____ l--_.. r_______r______________" x WHEREFORE, defendant Robert A. Keasbey Co. hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

Plaintiffs Complaint against defendant Robert A. Keasbey Co. with prejudice, and there being



defendant Robert A. Keasbey Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with pr udi ! e k d E

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York b \ L R ,2010 A

w g l * , Frank M. Ortiz, \

w Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003

Attorneys for Plaintiff (212) 558-5500 (212) 801-9200

Attorneys for Robert A. Keasbey Co.

SO ORDERED,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

X

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler

x

ESTATE JAMES RIGGINS SR. and ANN Index No. 101624/1999 RIGGINS

NO OPPOSITION

AND ORDER Plaintiff(s), SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION

-against-

A.C.& S. INC. et al., including FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant Foster FOSTER WHEELER, LLC (sued herein as “Fostere Wheeler

Corporation”) hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant FOSTER WHEELER, LLC with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

FOSTER WHEELER, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York G\ L 3 2010

Robert M. Gilmartin, Jr., Esq. Weitz & Luxenberg, P . C . u Attorneys for Plaint@ Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, LLC J ~ L 2 180 Maiden Lane, I 71h Floor New York, NY 10038

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP

Three Gateway Center, 1 Zth Floor Newark, N J 07 102

I Q ~ Q

(212) 558-5500 (973) 242-0002

SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY : NYCAL,

I I.A.S. Part 30 ; (Heitler, J.)

: Index No.: 103833/99 I

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

HENRY R. VERREGO AND JACQUELINE VERREGO,

1

I I

I

Plaintiff(s), I NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against- MOTION AND ORDER I I I I I I

A.C. & S., mC., et al.,

Defendant(s). I

WHEREFORE, defendant, Avocet Enterprises, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiff's

complaint against defendant Avocet Enterprises, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto,


defendant, Avocet Enterprises, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Attorneys for Defendants Avocet Enterprises, Inc. 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456

Attorneys for Plaintiff Henry R. Verrega and Jacqueli 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

JUL 2 8 2010

I

JUL 202010' 722-2635

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

I THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: I

HENRY R. VERREGO AND JACQUELINE I I Index No.: 103833/99 I I I I I

VERREGO,

Plaintiff(s), I NO OPPOSITION I SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against- MOTION AND ORDER I

A.C. & S., INC., et al,, I I Defendant( s) .

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation., hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Q 3212, dismissing plaintiff's

complaint against defendant Treadwell Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto,


defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York New York $w b 5 2 0 1 0

Attorneys for Defendants Treadwell Corporation 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004

700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 JUL 2 8 2oMl

NEW Y0!3:K p ~ u ~ - i y CEWK'S QFFECIF

(2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

N0007390-1

1235-17712


1 (Heitler, J.) ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 30

I ’

I THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: : Index No.: 103833/99 I I

I

I

HENRY R. VERREGO AND JACQUELINE I

VERREGO, I

Plaintiff(s), I NO OPPOSITION : SUMMARY JUDGMENT : I MOTION AND ORDER -against-

I I

I I

A.C. & S., INC, et al., I

Defendant( s) . WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 3212, dismissing

plaintiff’s complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation with prejudice, and there

being no opposition thereto,


defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with


WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Defendants Tishman Liquidating Corporation 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004

Attorneys for Plaintiff Henry R. Verrego and Jacquelin 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 JJL 2 8 20’O

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 PjpJJ .(OH%

RKS OFF\= WTf Ca-E SO ORDERED,

2383-22918

N0007391-1


ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 30 ; (Heitler, J.)

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: I

Index No.: 103833199 HENRY R. VERREGO AND JACQUELINE I

I I I I

VERREGO,

Plaintiff(s), I NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against- MOTION AND ORDER I I I I I

A.C. & S., INC., et al., I Defendant(s). I

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against defendant Cowter & Company, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,


defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Attorneys for Defendants Courter & Company, Inc.


Henry R. Verrego and Jacqueline Verego

New York, New York 10003 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor 700 Broadway \UL 2 8

,, < - 5 ; \$!'jF I s (212) 558-5500 . Lv I y G ~ f i y i S W ~ * @ (2 12) 509-3456

\ y 1 I I - SO ORDERED,

Hon. SheSKlein Heitler

1122-18265

N0007389-1

36.07844/AJM JPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW IUNTY OF NEW YORK

il RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION :

nis document relates to:

3HN FLASHOFSKY, SR., Deceased, :

Plaintiff,

vs.


Defendants.

YORK

NYCAL IAS PART (Honorab

30 e Sherry K1 in Heitler)

Index No. : 103855/99



-equests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

:omplaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, witk

Irejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

;ame are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. JUL 2 8 2010

N El'?$ 'a 3 E i ;i

GARRITY , GRAHAM, MURPHY, GAROFAL Attorneys for Plaintiff & FLINN 700 Broadway Attorneys f o r Defendant, New York, New York 10003 United Conveyor Corporation

72 Eagle Rock Avenue, P.O. Box 438 East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

Suite 350

SO ORDERED,

NYCAL Index No.:

104800/99

IAS Part 30

Hon. Sherry Heitler,

J.S.C.

Plaintiffs,

Index No.: 104800/99

No Opposition Summary Judgment Motion and Order

-against-

PAYNE ELEVATOR INC., ET AL,

Defendants.

WHEREFOlXE, Defendant, PAYNE ELEVATOR INC., hereafter ("Payne") hereby

requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and

Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs WILLIAM SCHULTZ and DOROTHY SCHULTZ'S

("Plaintiffs") Complaint against Defendant Payne and all related cross-claims with prejudice and

there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-c

defendant Payne be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Jennifer E. Busch

By: f f B y : @pL Mark G. Straws, Esq.

Early & Straws L.L.C.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

360 Lexington Avenue, 20th F1.

New York, NY 1001 7

Boeggeman, George &

Corde, P.C.

Attorneys for Defendant

Payne Elevator, Inc.

1 Water Street

White Plains, NY 10601

-..-

9 14-761 -2252

File No.: 010-108

Dated: 7/b/l ' g&J&

So Ordered

SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER, J.S.C.

'JUI 202010

lUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK iLL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY

:N RE: NEW YORK COUNTY . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ l - - _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ - - _ - x

ASBESTOS LITIGATION -X

'his Document Relates to: Wedine V. Dietz, Individually and as Jersanal Representative for the Estate If Arthur D. Dietz,

Plaintiff, - against -

2.C. & S . Inc., et al.,

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Judge Heitler)

Index No.: 105736/99


Defendants. - X

WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC, hereby requests summarl

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practicf

Law and Rules Section ~ 3 2 1 2 , dismissing plaintiffs' Complainl

against defendant Burnham LLC, with prejudice, and there bein!


with prejudice and without cost

Dated: Brooklyn, New York

Weitz & Luxenberg,-. Attorneys for Plaintiff Fredine V. D i e t z , I n d i v i d u a l l y a n d a s Personal R e p r e s e n t a t i v e f o r the Estate of A r t h u r D. Dietz 700 Broadway, 6th Floor

S.

torneys for Defendant Burnham LLC 177 Montague Street Brooklyn, New York 11201

Our File No.: 11084-1779 (718) 8 5 5 - 9 0 0 0


So Ordered:

_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X This Document Relates to: Fredine V. Dietz, Individually and as Personal Representative fo r the Estate of Arthur D. Dietz,


A.C. & S. Inc., et al.,

Defendants. _- -_____________-_____ l____________ l_ -X

WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs'

Complaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc., with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claimE

defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. , be

without costs.

and cross claims against

dismissed with prejudice and

c

a

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 3 0 (Judge Heitler)

Index No.: 1 0 5 7 3 6 / 9 9


Inc., hereby requests

Dated : Brooklyn, New York - I 20 0

Attorneys for Defendant Fredine- V . D i e t z , I nd iv idua l l y G o u l d s Pumps Inc . and a s Personal Representat ive 177 Montague Stre f o r the Estate of Arthur D . Brooklyn, Ne

700 Broadway, 6th Floor Dietz (718) 855-90

u r File No.: 6 7 5 4 - 1 5 3 2 28 Z D ~ Q New York, New York 10003 --- JVJL

So Ordered: Hon. Sherry K. Heitler

JUL 2 0 2010

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW Y O N _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ . . ~ ~ . . ~ ~ ~ - ~ . ~ ~ - - ~ ~ . ~ ~ - . - - ~ . ~ ~ - . - ~ ~ . - - - - - - ~ ~ . - - - . " IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL

(Heitler, S. j

Index No.: 106246/99

ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 30 _. " _ .._..._

This Document Relates to:

AUGUST ARRINDELL NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company hereby requests

summdry judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

12 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company

with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.


defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with


Dated:

New York, NY 10003

McElr y, Deutsc Mulv ey & Carpenter, L I Y Atto d eys forDe Products Company 88 Pine Street, 24th Floor

0. Smith Water

I I J New York, New York I 100 6

JUL 2 8 2010

so ORDERED, NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

1445546-1

6.08834/AJM PREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW

equests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant tc

ivi1 Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff':

lomplaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with

YORK UNTY OF NEW YORK

RE: NEW YORK CITY .

ASBESTOS LITIGATION :

tis document relates to:

LANK COSTELLO,

Plaintiff,

v s .

\JITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, : al.,

Defendants.

NYCAL I A S PART 30 (Honorable Sh

Index No. :

rry Klein Heitler)

106261/99



)rejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

EITZ & LUXENBERG Attorneys f o r Plaintiff & FLINN 700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant,

New York, New York 10003 United Conveyor Corporation 72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350 P . O . Box 438 East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED,


ANTHONY CATALINA NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER


summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Seclion

321 2, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company





Frank Ortiz, Esq. Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003

I A

- -.

- Cristina 2. Si$%$-, Esq.

, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP A. 0. Smith Water

New York, New York 10005 JIJL 2 8 2010


HAROLD F. AMES NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER


sumniary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company



dcfendant A . 0. Smith Water Products Company be and the same are hereby dismissed mith


Dated:

New York, NY 10003

-C d'

aney & Carpenter, LLP A. 0. Smith Water

88 Pine Streel, 24'h E'loor New York, New York 10005 ---i=tk€ D

SO ORDERED, Hon. Shemplein Hgitler

1445546-1

S U P E M E COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ____.___. "__ . .__" .__~~.~~~- .~-~ .~~~~. "~~- .~~-~ .~~~.~~-~ . -~ . . - - - . - " - -

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL

(Heitler, S.)

Index No.: 106337/99

ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 30 _...


GEORGE L. CHAMPAGNE NO OPPOSlTION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER


summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Kules Section






Dated: New York, New York 6 \srs ,2010


ey & Carpenter, LLP 0. Smith Water

!E-@ New York, New York 100

.f

1445546-1

Jill 202010

f ' Th;Ic:CC(jpk)

t 6/10/10

Our File No S-6208-99

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

HOWARD GUILDER

INDEX NO. 10725 1 /99 ASSIGNED TO: HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER


WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.


and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison





WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100035

Consolidated Edison Company o f New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003-35

SO ORDERED: Jl.11. 2 8 2010

136.08703/AJM XJPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW :OUNTY OF NEW YORK

:N RE: NEW YORK C I T Y ASBESTOS LITIGATION :

rhis document relates to:

YORK

)HN HUGHES, Deceased,

Plaintiff,

KIITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, t al.,

NYCAL IAS PART 30 (Honorable Sh

Index No. :

rry Klein Heitler)

107936/99



Defendants.

Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

S' Gf & FLTNN Attorneys for Defendant, United Conveyor Corporation 72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350 P.O. Box 438 E a s t Hanover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED, Honorablb Sherry Klein Heitler

"

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

-against-

A,C. & S., INC., @ &, Defendants.

NYCAL

Index No. 108928/99


Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, IAS Part 30


Canada Inc, hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber






Dated: New York, New York b \ \ A \ O

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiffs


n o& By: Frank Ortiz

700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

264 West 40th Street New York, New York 1001 8 F I L E D ' (212) 558-5500 (212) 302-2400

Dated: New York, New York JUL 2 8 2010

--

Representative for the Estate of EDWIN SCHWEERS, : NO OPPOSITION

: SUMMARY JUDGMENT : MOTION AND ORDER

Plaintiffs,

-against- : Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, : IASPart30 A.C. & S,, INC.,gt&

Defendants. :



CPLR 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber






Dated: New York, New York ( n \ \ A \ w



By: By: Frank Ortiz


264 West 40* Street New York, New York 1001 8 JUL 28 @ (212) 558-5500 (2 12) 302-2400

Dated: New York, New York I - ;I . ' @OF+ C)t-i\* e

P@H r4 GLE

SO ORDERED: Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.

j36,10713/AJM ;UPREME COURT OF THE STATE O F NEW YORK IOUNTY O F NEW YORK

I RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION :

lis document relates to:

NYCAL I A S PART (Honorab

30 e Sherry Klein Heitler)

{ED C . HAGEDORN, Deceased,

Plaintiff,

vs.

UTED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, 2 al.,

Defendants.

110087/99 Index No. :



Yttorneys for Plaintiff & FL1N"N 700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant, Slew York, New York 10003 United Conveyor Corporation

72 Eaqle Rock Avenue, Suite 350 - P.O. Box 438 East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED,

UUL 2 0 2016

TMcCCfipk)' 5/24/10


IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION,


STEPHEN A. STEWART

INDEX NO. 1 1 1889/99 ASSIGNED TO: HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER









Dated: New ork, ew York @+

Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc,

$Ot3t8 E SO ORDERED: JUL 2 8 2010

t c ;~ '?d YBRK ~ U N - ~ V CLERK'S O F A d

TMc:CCCjpk) 6/ 10/10

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGR~EQN, hA' $ $

'., , ..! ,

, * , , SUPREME COURT : ALL COUNTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW YORK @

1 INDEXNO. .______.___..___.__"...___.___._

I 13070/99 AND 1 16125/06 ASSIGNED TO:









WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100035

Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY 100

SO ORDERED:



GEORGE E. ALLEN NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company hereby rcqucsts

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section






Dated: New York, New York 49\18 ,2010

n

Ly n


--


xs Pine Street, 24th lo or

t New York, New York IO -_.-

1445546-1

-against- : MOTION AND ORDER









Dated: New York, New York b \ \ b \ \ Q

WEIT2 & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiffs

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Frank Ortiz, Esq.


264 West 40' Street New York, New York 100 18

J l l L 2 8 2010 (212) 558-5500 (2 12) 302-2400 t\\yi7j y1 I 5

Dated: New York, New York ~ ~ N T Y CLERK'S OFlCilJF

SO ORDERED: Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.


DONALD C. ALLEN NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER



32 12, dismissing plaintifrs complaint against defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company





Dated:



? 88 Pine Street, 24t" I~loor New York, New York 10005 __I___ I ... " ., , . . . "..

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler

JUL 2 8 2010

I " NEW YORK

COUNTY CLERKS OFFlclrE

1445546-1

- - MARY ALLEN, as Executrix for the Estate of DONALD C. ALLEN, and MARY ALLEN, Individually,

Plaintiff,

- against - A. C. & S., INC., et al.,

Index No.: 113379/99




Plaintiff's Complaint against defendant Robert A. Keasbey Co. with prejudice, and there being



defendant Robert A. Keasbey Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed w i + f ~ t e without costs.

Dated: New York. New York b\zP ,2010 A

Frank M. Ortiz, Es Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003

Attorneys for Plaintiff (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, ? (2 12) 80 1-9200 Attorneys for Robert A. Keasbey Co.


36.11215/AJM JPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW 3UNTY OF NEW YORK

N RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION :

DATED :&n &q , New Jerse

RPHY, GAROFALC Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant, New York, New York 10003 United Conveyor Corporation

72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350


Plaintiff,

vs .

.NITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, It al. ,

Defendants.

YORK


Index No. : 114000/99




:equests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

livil Practice Law and Rules Section 3 2 1 2 , dismissing plaintiff’s

:omplaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with

3rejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,


UUL 202010

I

F


FlU3DERICK BOBB NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER



3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant A, 0. Smith Water Products Company





Dated: New Yor &yew,E

aney & Carpenter, LLP A. 0. Smith Water 700 Broadway

New York, NY 10003

?36.06285/AJM JPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW 3UNTY OF NEW YORK


h i s document relates to:

HOMAS FUGATE, Deceased,

Plaintiff,

vs.

YORK

NYCAL IAS PART 30 (Honorable Sh rry Klein Heitler)

Index No. : 116768/99


'NITED COJWEYOR CORPORATION, 't al. ,

Defendants.

NO OPPOSITION SUMWRY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

& FLINN Attorneys f o r Defendant, United Conveyor Corporation 72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350 P.O. Box 438 East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

S O ORDERED,

SUL 2.0 2010

'36.09655/AJM UPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW OUNTY OF NEW YORK



'ILLLAM G. FULLER, Deceased,

Plaintiff,

VS.

lNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, ?t al. .,

Defendants.

YORK

NYCAL IAS PART (Honorab

30 e Sherry Klein H

Index No. : 116769/99

itler)


NO OFPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER



:ivil Practice Law and Rules Section 3 2 1 2 , dismissing plaintiff's

lomplaint against defendant., United Conveyor Corporation, w i t h

?rejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims ani

WEITZ & LU Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 1 0 0 0 3


SO ORDERED, Honorable She'rry Klein Heitler

GARRITY, GRAHAM, MURPHY., GAROFAL & F L I m Attorneys for Defendant, United Conveyor Corporation 72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350

36.08429/AJM UPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW OUNTY OF NEW YORK


'his document relates to:

YORK

NYCAL IAS PART 30 (Honorable Sllerry K ein Heitler)

.OHN GARY, Deceased, Index No. : 117282 /99

Plaintiff,

VS.

INITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, :t al.,

Defendants.



:equests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

:omplaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with

lrejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

% FRANK MVOTTIZ ,TsQ. ATEITZ & LUXENBERG Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

JCIL 2 8 2010

GARRITY, GRAHAM, MURPHY, GAROF&( & FLINJY Attorneys for Defendant, United Conveyor Corporation 72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350 P.O. Box 438 East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED,

JUL 2 0 2010

36.08818/AJM

'OUNTY OF NEW YORK

N RE: NEW YORK CITY

'UPREME COURT O F THE STATE O F NEW

ASBESTOS LITIGATION :

TALTER L . CLEGHORN, Deceased, :

Plaintiff,

v s .

JNITED C O W E Y O R CORPOmTION, :t al. ,

Defendants.

YORK


Index No. : 1 0 0 4 8 8 / 9 8 111061/98 117710/99



WEITZ & LUXENBERG Attorneys for Plaintiff 7 0 0 Broadway- New York, New York 10003

E ted Conveyor Corpor

ejudice and without

GARRITY , GRAHAM, MURPHY , GAROFAL & FLTNN Attorneys for Defendant, United Conveyor Corporation 72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350 P . O . Box 438

anover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED,


PETER H. ARANSON NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER



3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company





Dated:



Products Company 88 Pine Street, 24th Floor

SO ORDERED,

1445546-1


HERMAN BORDEN NO OPPOSITION SUMn RY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER _...-.- -...____... "__... .__".. . . ."~-~..~~~~-~~.~~~~"..~~~~...___._.







prcjudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York - Le!J&-E-, 2010


L CristinaZ. S" cl I , 7sq. MCH~~~~II ~ u l v a n e y & Carpenter, LLP Attorney for D fendant A, 0. Smith Water Products 88 Pine Street, 24'h Floor New York, New York 10005

.c.

-

536.09431/AJM SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK C I T Y : NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION : IAS PART 3 0 : (Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler)

This document relates to: PATRICK J. O'NEILL, : Index No.: 118787 /99

Plaintiff, (June 2010 Monthly FIFO Trial

: Group) vs.

UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, : NO OPPOSITION et al., : SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION

: AND ORDER Defendants.



civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

Complaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with



same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and with0

Z & LUXENBERG PHY, GAROFALO

Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant, New York, New York 10003 United Conveyor Corporation

72 Eagle Rock Avenue, P.O. Box 438 East Hanover, New Jersey 0 7 9 3 6

Suite 350

SO ORDERED, Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler


IN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 30


X NY CAL _ l _ _ _ l _ _ _ l _ _ _ _ l _ _ _ l _ _ - - - - - _ I - _ _ - - - - _ _ - - _ _ - - _ _ - -

(Heitler, J.) __--__--___-___-___-_____l__________l___ X

PATRICK J. O'NEILL and FRANCES O'NEILL, Index No.: 99 /118787

Plaintiff ( s ) , -against-

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY J U D M N T MOTION AND ORDER NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a

NATIONAL GRID, et al.,

WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL

GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f / k / a

LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, a11 claims and

cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are

hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: Brooklvn, New York a , 2010

/

NAL GRID GENERATION LLC

(718) 855-9000

h

I __ - - - - - - WEITZ & LUXENBERG, r31.c. i / 2 / 7 n , , Attorneys for P l a i d 700 Broadway New Y o r k , NY 10003' (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, 1 I \ \ \ \ 2oeole'


JOSEPH R. MITCHELL NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER








Dated: T T H e w York ,2010


I I

Products Company 88 Pine Street, 24'h Floor

$-t 1 New York, New York 10005

SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler


ANTHONY J. PORTELLO NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant A, 0. Smith Water Products Company hereby requests

summary judgment in the abovc-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law arid Rules Section






Dated:

New York, NY 10003

& Carpenter, I L P Attorney

F \ Products Company 88 Pine Streel, 24'" Floor - New York, New York 10005

JUL 2 8 2010

'T$&:CpGjpk) 6/16/10

SUPREME COURT : ALL COUNTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW YORK


...______.. "_____.__---"-.-------.-------..~--------~------~~--------"---- I INDEXNO. 120820/99

1 ASSIGNED TO: HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER

1 NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: 'I I WILLIAM T. CARTER

_____...______..____~-..~-----..--------.-------..------ "---------.-------,










RICHARD(WJbABINECZ, ESQ. Attorney fo efendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place

D JQ\L 2 8 mfl

New York, NY 10003-35 F $ t SO ORDERED:

Our File No S-7 122-99

JUL 20201

.

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.C. & S., INC.

Index No.: 122201/99, 114257/00 & 125333/00





532 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER W O M S





r

psq'7/z// 6 Sm-uelMehowtz, Weitz & Luxenberg BARRY, MCTIERNAN & MOORE


2 Rector Street, 14th Floor T I L 700 Broadway FULTON BOILER WO New York, New York 10003

New York, New York 10006 (212) 313-3600 JUL 2 8 zolo

Attorneys for Plaintiff I 1

SO ORDERED, NEW YORK C;OUEFC~ CERIC8 Opplbb

Plainti ff(s),

"against-

Index No.: 103381/98, 105236/98, 11 1060198 & 12243 1/99





532 12, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS





L \ d b

Frank Ortiz, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, Attorneys for Plaintiff 180 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038

Attorneys for Defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14* Floor

(2 12) 558-5500 New York, New York 10006 J ~ u - 2 8 2510 . . t ' r ;'OR&

XWN TV i ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ $

+ . i c - < 8 l

~

(212) 313-3600

SO CNWERED,-- 1 p 202010,

Won. Sherry Klein-Heitler I

I

From: FAXmaker To: Scott A Page: 313 Date: 612212010 5:02:59 PM

Plaintiffs, : NO OPPOSITION : SUMMARY JUDGMENT : MOTION AND ORDER

: Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler,

-against-

A.C. & S., INC., a&, Defendants. Part 3o

1"-"*111 fr-cII- *-*"-..-.. ___--____ I -____ ___rl___f_____f______II -x WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby requcst summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber


thereto, it is hereby: ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims






By: " R W - 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

Danny

264 West 40* Street

2~ IOIO

;t:$

(212) 558-5500 (2 12) 302-2400

Dated: New York, New Yark JUL

a l > + o d 'It & 'i ($5 l_l _ _ _ _ I . - -- "--

<It

SO ORDERED:

This fax was sent with GFI FAXmaker fax server. For more information, visit: http://w.gfi.com

http://w.gfi.com

'SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORJS

Plaintiffs, : NO OPPOSITION

-against-

A.C. & S., INC., gt &,

: SUMMARY JUDGMENT : MOTION AND ORDER

: Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, IASPart30 Defendants.

___r----l----__r---___________l______l__-----------"----------- X -.









Dated: New York, New York 9 J - g Y W'Q

WEITZ & LUXENBERG. P.C. LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire & I,ubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc.

Scott A. Harford By: aw- By:-.#


DWY > -

i 264 West 40' Street New York, New York 100 18

(212) 558-5500 (21 2) 302-2400


SO ORDERED: Hon. She& Kl&n Heitler, J.S.C.

3UL to2010

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW Y O N

VIRGINIA M. BURNS NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Conipany hereby requests



with pre.judice, and there being no opposition thereto.




New York New York d j ) 2010 Dated:

Frank Ortiz, Esq. Weitz & Luxenberg, P,C. 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003

I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK lN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL

j I.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler, J,)

i Index No.: 125073/99

ASBESTOS LITIGATION


VIRGINIA M. BURNS,

Plaintiff, -against-

A.C. & s., rNc., et Ed.,

/ NO OPPOSITION j SUMMARY JUDGMENT i MOTION AND ORDER

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, Peerless Industries, Inc., incorrectly plead as Peerless Heater

Co., Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

Law and Rules Q 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, Peerless Industries,

Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,



costs.

Dated: New York, New York b \ k 23 ,2010

Frank Ortiz, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff


P

Steven T. Corbin, Esq. Attorney for Defendant

199 Water Street, Suite 2500 New York, New York 10038-35 16

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

(212) 232-1300

SO ORDERED, Hon. o i i ~ u y nici

SUI - DATIED: ---? I

4823.0796-5702 I

HENDRICK, As Executor for the Estate of ROSE FREIHEIT,

: : NO OPPOSITION : SUMMARY JUDGMENT : MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiffs,

-against-

A.C. & S., INC., gt &, : Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler,

IASPart30

Defendants.









Dated: New York, New York I, \ A 0


LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada ICC.

n

0% By: Frank Ortiz


264 West 40* Street New York, New York 10018

F 1 L E D (212) 558-5500 (21 2) 302-2400



c

JAMES SCHIAVO NO OPPOSlTION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER








Dated:

New York, NY 10003

-- F I L E D

SO ORDERED, JUL 28 2Q10

NEW YORH m U N n CERPC'S OFPU

JUL 202010' 1445546-1

/ Lk f

TMc:CCCjpk) 611 O/ 1 0

SUPREME COURT : ALL COUNTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW YORK


____..___ "...___".__---..-------"---.-"----.-----.."----.~------"-----.~


INDEX NO. 10381 1/00 ASSIGNED TO: HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER


JOHN BELLANDI NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER








Dated: NewPo& New York

SO ORDERED: Hon.

RICHARD W. H M ESQ. Attorney for Defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place

D NY 60{3&

. / I / I

Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100035

, .+

' TX4c:CCCjpk) 6/10/10




MAURICE BEEMAN






Company of New York, Inc, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,




Da ed: New York, New York L w a2, 2310


Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY

1 SO ORDERED: I

TfjIc:CC(ipk) - 6/10/10

IN RE NEW YOFX CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION, ~~~~~ . . . . . . . .


ALBERT CASAlUO, SR.










Dated: New York, New York sum zL*lO

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100035

Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY 1000

SO ORDERED: JUL 2 0 zOl&JUi 2 8 2010 Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler Our File No S-6055-00

NEW YOdK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFILE


IN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL X _"______"_r_________"-----_----_--------------------------~---

ASBESTOS LITIGATION X ___1_____________1__________11____1____1..--------_------------

ANNA IMAGNA, as Executrix for the Estate of : Index Nos. 105556100 FIORIO P. IMAGNA, 124484102

Plaintiff( s),

-against-

A.C. & S., INC., et al.,

: NO OPPOSITION : SUMMARY JUDGMENT : MOTION AND ORDER

: Won. Sherry Klein Heitler, Defendants IASPart30

__* .. r_________" ____" _r__l_________ I _-__ x


Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in .the above-entitled case, pursuant to







Dated: New York, New York L?\ kS\ \ fJ


f i .. LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc.

Scott A. Harford, Esq. By: BY:

Frank M. Ortiz, % 264 West 40th Street New York, New York 10018

s l - (2 12) 302-2400

700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

J\!\. 2 f3 '?ole Dated: New York, New York I

- 5

\ $ , . -. +y& ~~~~~ i , y -1 1- 'LLCL

SO ORDERED:

I

, ' ,

TFhc:CCQpk) 1 6/10/10




VERONICA B. CONNELLY

INDEX NO. 105597/00 ASSIGNED TO: HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER










J U W 7/21 2ArO

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100035

Attorney for%efendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003-3598

F I L E D JUL 28 2010

SO ORDERED:

TMc:CCCjpk) 6/10/10

" - ,

\ INDEXNO. IN F E NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION, 1 105809/00

i ASSIGNED TO:

I j NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY I JUDGMENT MOTION AND j i ORDER








D ted: New York, New York J- 22r 2 4 0 n


WEITZ & LUXENBERG Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 5

ison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place NewYork,NY 1

/

SO ORDERED: JUL 2 8 2010

1 ":'\,:2' '{(+; K -(.St 2 E I v b ; E""% OFWG

Representative for the Estate of EDWARD W. KRISTAN, JR. and KATHLEEN M. KIRSTAN, NO oPPoSIT1oN

: SUMMARY JUDGMENT : MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiffs,

-against- : Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, IASPart30








same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs,

Dated: New York, New York (p / \\\\a




264 West 40* Street New York, New York 100 18 j U 1 2 8 20'O

(212) 558-5500 (212) 302-2400


SO ORDERED: 4 4 i L Hon, Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.


IndexNo.: 111222/01; 115819/01

ALBERT KENNETH NICHOLAS NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER


surnniary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

32 12, dismissing plaintiff7s complaint against defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company





Dated: New&''F,JJgw York ,2010

vaney & Carpenter, LLP ndant A, 0. Smith Water

w York, N Y 10003


1445546-1 JUL ~02m

ORIGINAL

LEONARD LESNEFSKY,

Plaintiff,

-against-


A.C. and S., Inc., et al., Including MAREMONT CORPORATION,

:


plaintiffs complaint against defendant Maremont Corporation with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,


defendant Maremont Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FIUEDMAN LLP Attorneys for Defendant 1633 Broadway New York, New York 10019

New York, NY 10003 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED (212) 506-1700

Jtil. ZOZOrel







against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc, be and the


Dated: New York, New York (* \ &--8\w




264 West 40h Street New York, New York 1001 8

(212) 558-5500 (212) 302-2400

ORIGINAL

ROBERT E. THIME and AUDREY THIME, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION

Plaintiffs, AND ORDER

-against-

A.C. and S . , Inc., et al., Including MAREMONT CORPORATION,

:

Defendants. X _______________________ffr_______l______---"--r----~"----------

WHEREFORE, defendant Maremont Corporation hereby requests summary judgment in


plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Marernont Corporation with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,



without costs.

Dated: New York, New York sui4 , 7 ,2010

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintfls 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 (212) 558-5500

Peggy L. Pan, Esq. !

JSASOWITZ, BENSON, TO FRIEDMAN LLP Attorneys for Defendant 1633 Broadway

X. :lcases/F BW39098/legal/NOSJM SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Plaintiff( s),

-against-

IndexNo.: 122201/99, 114257/00 & 125333/00





$321 2, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS





Weitz & Luxenber Attorneys for Plaintiff I 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

BARRY, MCTIERNAN & MOORE Attorneys for Defendant FULTON BOILER W 2 Rector Street, 14th F New York, New York 10006


WHEREFORE, defendant Patterson-Kelley Company, sued herein as Patterson-Kelley

Division, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant

Patterson-Kelley Division with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,


defendant Patterson-Kelley Division, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New, York, NY

€3 y :

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P,C, Attorneys for Plaintiff 180 Maiden Lane New York, NY 10038 (212) 558-5500

Attorneys for Defend

Key Towers at Fountain Plaza 40 Fountain Plaza, Suite 5QWL 2 8 Buffalo, NY 14202

2010

NEW vow rDu~n CLERK SO^^ (716) 853-8100

SO ORDERED,

JUL 2 0 20@1 Hon. Sherry &in keitler

13049003.1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YOKK

Index No.: 1 1 1222/0 1 ; 1 158 19/0 I

ALBERT KENNETH NICHOLAS NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

QRDER









-1

Products Company 88 Pine Street, 24fh Floor

n


1445546-1 JUL 2OZm

: NO OPPOSITION : SUMMARYJUDGMENT : MOTIONANDORDER

Plaintiffs, -against-

: HOD. Sherry Klein geitler, : IASPart30

A.C. & S., TNC., et al., Defendants.

---A 1---..--* --I----- ---_- "--"r--"-L"--.'---"" __I-- "-x WHEREFORE, defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursumt to CPLR 3212, dismisshg plaintiffs'

Complaint against Geol-gia-Pacific LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition


ORDERED, that upon notice to all Go-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against Georgia-Pacific LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

WETTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiffs

By:


Dated: New Yowk, New York

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC

By: Scott A. EIarford

264 West 40' Street New York, New York 10018 (212) 302-2400

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY X ____l___________f__l__l_______l_______

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. P a r t 30 NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION (Judge Heitler)

Index No.. -D 105937/01 Index NO.: 119398/00 Index No.: 100772/03

_ _ l _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ f _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ f l _ -X

This Document Relates to: Armand G. Coreno and Susan Coreno,

Plaintiffs, - against -



hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario ;

DiBono P1 aster ing co . Inc. I

opposition thereto,

with

ORDERED, that upon notice

prejudice,

to

and there

all co-defendants,

being

all claim

Dated: Brooklyn, New York ,& \ k-s \ L o , 2010

A t t o r r l e y s f o r Plaintiffs Armand G. Coreno and S u s a n Coreno 700 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, New York 10003

h u l l e n and Dykman LLP Attorneys f o r Defendant M a r i o & DiBono P l a s t e r i n g C o . Inc. 177 Montague Street Brooklyn, New York 11201 (718) 8 5 5 - 9 0 0 0

Our File No.: 10924-1603

So Ordered: 2070a9' Won. Sherry K. Heitler L

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - X NYCAL IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30

I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I _ c I _ _ _ - - _ - - - I - - _ _ - - _ - - - ~

ASBESTOS LITIGATION (Judge Heitler) -X

This Document Relates to: A r m a n d G. Coreno and Susan Coreno,

Index No.: 105937/01 Index No. 5-J Index No. 100772 0 3

Plaintiffs, - against - NO OPPOSITION

S-Y JUDGMENT A.C. & S. I n c . , et al., MOTION AND ORDER

hereby requests summary judgment in t h e above-entitled case,

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section S3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario 6

DiBono Plastering CO. Inc., with prejudice, and there being nc

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, a l l claims

and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering CO,

Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without

Dated: Brooklyn, New York &! \ t - 5 \\o / 2010

Attorneys f o r Plaintiffs Armand G. Coreno and S u s a n Coreno 700 Broadway, 6"h Floor New York, New York 10003

/Cullen and Dykman LLP Attorneys for Defendant: M a r i o & DiBono P l a s t e r i n g Co. Inc. 177 Montague Street Brooklyn, New York 11201 (718) 855-9000 Our F i l e No.: 10924-1603

So Ordered: 1 Hon. Sherry K. Heitler

30 er

_ _ - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -X

This Document Relates to: Armand G .

Index No.: 1 0 5 9 3 7 / 0 1 Index No Index No :p;% Coreno and Susan Coreno,


SUMMARY JUDGMENT A . C . & S. Inc., et al.,

Defendants. * *

MQTION AND ORDER


pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 53212

dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario ,

DiBono Plastering C o . Idc., with pre judice , a d there being n, "A ,,& . I* -

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to a l l co-defendants, all claim

Dated: Brooklyn, New York & \ + Z h O I 2010

Weitz & Luxenberg>.C. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Armand G. Coreno and S u s a n Coreno 7 0 0 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, N e w York 10003

/Cullen -and Dykman LLP Attorneys for Defendant Mario & DiBono P l a s t e r i n g Co. Inc. 177 Montague Street Brooklyn, New York 11201 (718) 8 5 5 - 9 0 0 0 Our File No.: 10924-1603 <.

So Ordered: Won'. r ~ u \ 2 ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ Sherry K. Heitler $ *



Index No.: 105937/01 Index No.: 119398/00 Index No.: 1 0 0 7 7 2 / 0 3

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT

A.C. & S. Inc., et al., MOTION AND ORDER

Defendants. -X _ _ _ _ _ I _ _ _ _ I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - -

WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC, hereby requests summarq

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

Law and Rules Section S3212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint

against defendant Burnham LLC, with prejudice, and there beinc


ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, a11 claim:

and cross claims against defendant Burnham LLC, be dismisset

with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: Brooklyn, New York b i b 5 \ \a , 2010

Weitz & Luxenber

Armand G. Coreno a n d S u s a n Burnham LLC Coreno 177 Montague S 700 Rrnadwav. 6th Floor Brooklyn, New

gullen and Dykman LLP Attorneys f o r Defendant

kT**.

X. :lcaseslFB W44593/legalmOSJM SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

EDWARD GOOD, rrd--" -___-* * ---___- *ri--rr *-----..-- --rr --------x

Plajntiff(s),

-against-

A.C. & S., INC.

IndexNo.: 120396/01 & 103357/02








defendants FULTON BOILER WOWS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs. , . - '

,. *

i: (!I !!'; -"*.+-

1''. , j,i"\,>,> /.< /

-&-Ew. r y m /c j ~~i~~~~ ,c'e

I,: * , I ) ' '

, ' ~ "" "" I / ! < \,:r

& M O O E

J1)1, 2 8 .ynrh

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. "81ef ~

*r &

I 1 r Q Attorneys for Plaintiff 1 SO Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038 (212) 558-5500 New York, New York 10006

t., ,, T' I r I SO ORDERED, * .. ,

qJUf..i'!,-'.' r .. ' .'

c

L

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE O F NEW YORK ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY _ _ _ _ I _ _ _ I c _ _ _ . _ _ _ I _ _ _ - - - - - - _ - - _ - - - - I - - - -

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30

-X _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ - _ _

This Document Relates to: Dorothy B. Hitchcock and Sandra Webb, as Co-Administrators for the Estate of Frank Samuel Hitchcock,

-X NYCAL


Index No.: 124526/00 a Plaintiffs,

- against - NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER A.C. & S . Inc., et al.,

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case

pursuant to C i v i l Practice Law and Rules Section fi3212

d i s tn i a s ing p l a i n t i f f s I Complaint against defendant Mario

oppos i t ion t h e r e t o ,

ORCERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all clain

and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering cc

Inc. , be dismissed with prejudice and without costF e E L] Dated:

I I I

Plaintiff( s),

-against-

A.C. & S., INC.

Index No,: 122201/99, 114257/00 & 125333/00





$3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS

with prejudice, and there being nu opposition thereto,




s a BARRY, MCTIERNAN & MOORE

Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant 700 Broadway FULTON BOILER WO New York, New York 10003 2 Rector Street, 14* Floor


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE F JEi ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ - - - - - - - - - _ _ - - - - - - - - - -X IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION _- -____I____-______________I_________ -X This Document Relates to: Robert E. DeForge and Patricia DeForge,

< \

RK


A.C. & S . Inc., et al.,

JWCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Judge Heitler) n

Index No. : b00681/07) Index No.: 100221/01


Defendants. -X -l_l_-l_________-_____l____l____l____

WHEREFORE, defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.,

hereby requests sumnary judgment in the above-entitled case,

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 83212,

dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario S

DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being nc

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims

and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBano Plastering Co.

F-I L E D Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without COS

Dated : Brooklyn, New York , 2 0 1 0

Robert E . DeForge and Pa t r i c ia DeFoxge 7 0 0 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, New York 10003

Attorneys for Defendant Mario & DiBono P las t e r ing C o . Inc. 177 Montague Street Brooklyn, New York 11201 (718) 8 5 5 - 9 0 0 0 Our File No,: 10924-961

S o Ordered: Hon, Shergy K. Heitler

I ,\\ 2 O 7 ~ 0 '

TMc:CC(jpk) 5/24/10



EARL MONETTE NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND 1 ORDER

I








Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place

SO ORDERED:

Our File No S-5206-0 1

New York, NY 10003-3

4

Plaintiff( s),

-against-

A.C. & S . , INC.

Index No.: 120396/0 1 & 103357/02









prejudice and without costs,

Attorneys for Plaintiff 180 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038 (212) 558-5500 New York, New York 10006

SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry Klei

SUPREME COURT F THE ST TE OF NEW YORK ALTJ COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - _ _ - -X IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - _ - - - - _ - - - - _ _ -X This Document Relates to: Dorothy R. Coggins, Individually and as Executr ix for the Estate of Robert W. Coggins,


A . C . & S. Inc., et al.,

Defendants.

1

c

NY CAL I.A.S. P a r t 30 (Judge Heitler)

Index No.: 105913/01


WHEREFORE, defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering CQ. I n c . ,


pursuant to C i v i l Practice Law and Rules Section §3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario 6


opposition thereto,

ORCERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, a l l claim:

and CL'OSS claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co

Pnc., be dismissed with prejudice and without

Dated : Brooklyn, New York

costs.

llen and D Attorneys f o r Plaintiffs Dorothy R. Coggins I n d i v i d u a l l y M a r i o & DiBono P l a s t e r i n g Co. and a s E x e c u t r i x f o r +,ne E s t a t e Inc. of Robert W. C o g g i n s 177 Montague Street 700 Broadway, 6th Floor Brooklyn, New York 11201 N e w York, N e w York 1 0 0 0 3 (718) 8 5 5 - 9 0 0 0

Our File No.: l W 4 - 1

- JUL 202018 So Ordered:

Hon. S k e i ' r Y K . Heitler

t-

SUPREME COURT OF THE ST TE OF NEW YORK ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ I I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -X IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION __-_______-__________1_____1_____1___ -X This Document Relates to: Armand G. Coreno and Susan Coreno,



Defendants. ___-______-___________1_________11___ -X

WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC,

NY CAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Judge Heitler)



hereby requests summary


Law and Rules Section s3212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint



ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claim:

and cross claims against defendant Burnham LLC, be dismissec


Dated: Brooklyn, New York h h - 5 \\a , 2010

Frank M. Ortizy Weitz & Luxenber Attorneys for P1 Armand G. Coxeno and S u s a n B u r n h a m L LC C o r e n o 177 Montague Stre 700 Broadway, 6th Floor Brooklyn, New e r


New York, New York 10003 (718) 855-9000

S o Ordered:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY l _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ l _ l _ _ _ _ _ - d _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I _ _ _ _ - X NY CAL IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30


- X This Document Relates to: Armand G. Coreno and Susan Coreno,

Index No.: 105937/01 Index No Index No: \Fi3


SUMMARY JUDGMENT A.C. & S. Inc., et al., MOTION ORDER

ll hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212

dismissing plaintiffs’ Complaint against defendant Mario

DiBono Plastering Co.

opposition thereto,

. i ^ with prejudice, and there being r! -

II


/Cullen and Dykman LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs Armand G. Coreno and Susan Coreno r n c .

700 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, New York 10003

Attorneys for Defendant Mario & DiBono P l a s t e r i n g Co.

177 Montague Street: Brooklyn, New York 11201

Our File No.: 1,0924-1603 (718) 8 5 5 - 9 0 0 0

So Ordered:



NYCAL I.A.S. P a r t 30 (Judge Heitler)

Index No.: 105937/01 Index No. Index No. 100772 03


Defendants. X - - _ _ - - - _ _ I - _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ - - - ___I___________


hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case ,

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 53212,

dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario &

DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to a11 co-defendants, a l l claims

and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering co.


Dated: Brooklyn, New York & i t - s \\e , 2010

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Armand G. Coreno and S u s a n M a r i o & DiBono P l a s t e r i n g Co. Coreno Inc . 700 Broadway, 6th Floor 177 Montague Street New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York 11201


(718) 855-9000 Our File No.: "+ 10924-1603

So Ordered: '- r ? 9 \ 2 8 70H' Hon. Sherry K. Heitler t. 0'

SUPREME URT F THE STATE OF NEW YORK ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY -X

ASBESTOS LITIGATION - -X l____l__________l____l____l_________





Index No. : G s > Index No.: 119398/00 Index No.: 100772 /03


Defendants.



dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario S


opposition thereto,


and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co


Dated: Brooklyn, New York b - s \ L o , 2 0 1 0

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Armand G. Coreno and Susan M a r i o & DiBono P l a s t e s i n g Co. Coreno Inc . 700 Broadway, 6th Floor 177 Montague Street New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York 11201

(718) 8 5 5 - 9 0 0 0 Our File No.: 1-0924-1603

So Ordered: y r i 2070W Hon. Sherry K. Heitler L

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY

-X IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION - X _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

This Document Relates to: Vito Pietanza and Raffaella Pietanza,


A.C. & S . I n c . , et al.,


Index No.: 1 0 6 4 7 2 / 0 1


Defendants. -X _________________-__________________I





DiBono Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,


and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plaste



Attorneys f o r Plaintiffs Attorneys for Defendant V i t o P i e t a n z a and Raffaella M a r i o & DiBono P l a s t e r i n g Co. Pi e t a n z a Inc . 700 Broadway, 6th Floor 177 Montague Street New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York 11201

(718) 855-9000 ur File No.: 10924-82

- -

So Ordered: Hon. Sherry K.%itler JUL 2 0 2010

, TM;lc:CCCj'pk) 6/16/10



ALFRED LEO LOZIER

INDEX NO. 1066&4/01 ASSIGNED TO: HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER









Dated: Ney York, New York


Attorney for Defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY fiOf-3@


_ _ IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL

(Heitler, S.>

Index No.: 106927/01

ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 30 .___ " _ _ _ _ _ r " . _ " _ . . . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . - " - ~ ~ . . . . . ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " - ~ " . . . - " - - - . ~ " ~ - ~ - - - This Document Relates to:

PHILIP PEARSALL NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER



3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant A. 0. Smith Water Product3 Company





Dated:

Frank Ortiz, Esq, Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003

& Carpenter, LLP

Products Company 88 Pine Street, 24th Floor


1445546-1

JUL 2 8 2010

Plaintiffs, : NO OPPOSITION : S U M M A R Y m G m N T : MOTIONANDORDER -against-

A.C. & $., INC., et al., : Hon. Sherry Klein Heitles, : IASPart30 Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against Georgia-Pacific LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition


ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against Georgia-Pacific LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New or New York

LYNCH DASKAZ, EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC

+ WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintif&

By: By:


264 West 40& Street New York, New York 10018

F I L E D (212) 558-5500 (212) 302-2400

JUL 2 8 2010 Dated: New York, New York

I


4 TN RE: NEW Y O N COUNTY \ NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: GLENDA GUARINO, as Administratrix for the Estate of JOHN C. LOBERTA;

j I.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler, J.)

i Index No.: 107295/01


! NO OPPOSITION A. C. AND S., TNC., ET AL. i SUMMARY JUDGMENT

i MOTION AND ORDER Defendants,

._ - . ._

WHEREFORE, defendant, Peerless industries, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs





casts.


Steven - . T. Corbin, Esq. Frank M. Ortiz, Esq. Attorney for Plainti Attornev for Defendant

D ~ a v l o n c Tnr’iiqtries Inc GLENDA GUARINO, as Administratrix for the Estate of JOHN C. LOBERTA

7 - 7

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P . L I -” .~

700 Broadway New York, New York lOdg3

I” k 10038-3516

1863-1 0484 HQN, I SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER SKH - DATED: L

481 5-9294-6694.1 JUL 20 2010

A.C. & S. WC., @ &. : Hon. Sherry Klein Heitlex, : IASPart30

Defendants.






O W E M U , that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims




LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Diane M. Pompei, Esq. 0 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

264 West 40"' Street New York, New York 1001 8

(212) 558-5500 (212) 302-2400


Hon. Sherry JUeh Heitler, J.S.C.

t- ,Th;ic:dC(ipk)

61.1 611 0



ABRAHAM L. HOROWITZ











S d e l kk%witz,'Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.


Attorneys for Plaintiff I

S-5704-0 1


IN RIE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION


DENNIS M. WHALEN

J1 CAL

Index No. 107450/01


WHEREFORE, Defendant Reynolds Metals Company, sued incorrectly as “Reynolds

Metals Company, Individually and as successor in interest to Atlantic Asbestos Corp.” hereby

requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 32 12, dismissing Plaintiffs’ complaint against Defendant Reynolds Metals Company,

without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is


defendant, Reynolds Metals Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice

and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York A June 18,2010

P

Frank Ortiz, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 Attorneys for Pluintjff‘ (212) 558-5500

New York, New York 1003 8 Attorneys fiir Defendant

rh f (212) 791-0285


PETER STASI NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER








Dated: NeGz;g New York ,2010

700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 Products Company

88 Pine Street, 24th Floor New York, New York 10005

A I

1445546-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION


CATHERINE STASI, as Executrix for the Estate of PETER W. STASI, and CATHERINE STASI, Individually,



Defendants.

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

Index No,: 107731/01




Law and Rules 4 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, Peerless Industries,




costs.

Dated: New York, New York d \L8 ,2010

e-7- li;A* Steven T. Corbin, Esq. Attorney for Defendant LEWIS BRISBOIS B~SGAARD & SMITH LLP 199 Water Street, Suite 2500 New York, New York 10038-3516

d ~ , 3 ;tj: ... 700 Broadway

New York, New York 10003 (212) 232-1300

SO ORDERED,

"ON- SHERRY KLEIN HElTLEigUl2 0 2010 4823-0796-5702.1

/l;67


DANIEL ROBINSON NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

WIIEREFORE, defendant A, 0. Smith Water Products Company hereby requests


32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant A. 0 Smith Water Products C'olnpany





Dated:

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 Products Company

88 Pine Street, 24th Floor New York, New York 10005 --

1445546-!

SUPW,ME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YOFX

MILTON G. POSILXCO NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER








Dated: yJo;kfl ew Yo rk ,2010

,I >.

New York, NY 10003

& Carpenter, L d L P Attorne Products Company 88 Pine Street, 24th Floor New York. New York 10

Defendant A. 0. Smith Water

1445546-1

. ... . __


EDWARD PARKER NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER








Dated: New York New York - ($-/g ,2010

New York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10003

& Carpenter, LLP Attorneys for Defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company 88 Pine Street, 24'h Floor New York, New York 100

/

F E COIJRT OF THE STA JTY OF NEW YORK

A RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

TE OF NEW YORK

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, S . )

Index No.: 108564/01

STANLEY WIERZCHOWICZ r NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER









dant A. 0. Smith Water


1445546-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YOFX

JOHN REY NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant A, 0. Smith Water Products Company hereby requests


3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant A. 0, Smith Water Products Company





Dated:


& Carpenter, LLF

Products Company 88 Pine Street, 24th Floor New York, New York

1445546-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S, Part 30 / (Heitler, J+)

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: j Index No.: 1091 15/01

GERALDINE L, REY, as Administratrix for the Estate / of JOHN E Y and GERALDINE L. REY, Individually, j


A.C. & S., XNC., et al,,

j NO OPPOSITION i SUMMARY JUDGMENT j MOTION AND ORDER

Defendants.



Law and Rules Q 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, Peerless Industries,



defendant Peerless Industries, Inc,, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.


I 6 \ L8 ,2010

Frank Ortiz, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

F T - ICR Steven T. Corbin, Esq. Attorney for Defendant LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 199 Water Street, Suite 2500 New York, New York 10038-3516 0 6 \ E (212) 232-1300 (2 m-5588-5500

SO ORDERED,


PHILIP L. WRIGHT NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER


sumniary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section



ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross clainls against

defendail A. 0. Smith Water Products Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prcjudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York 6 \kB ,2010

--__I

- Frank Ortiz, Esq. Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. Carpenter, LIJ 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003

Attorneys for Defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company 88 Pine Street, 24* Floor New York, New York LO005

'",

-

SO ORDERED, - I-Ion. Sherry Klein Heitler

&,,. '1

1 445 546-1 I?*


Attorneys for Defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company 88 Pine Street, 24* Floor New York, New York LO005

'",

-

SO ORDERED, - I-Ion. Sherry Klein Heitler

&,,. '1

1 445 546-1 I?*


Index No.: 109770/0 1

LUTHER STONE NO OPPOSITIOF SUMn R JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER _______-__..._......____________________







prejudice aqd without costs.

Dated:

New York, NY 10003 Products Company 88 Pine Street, 24Ih Floor New York, New York 10005 1D

.-

SO ORDERED,

8 , ' 6 '

Plaintiffs,

- against -

Index No. : 1 10 164/0 1



A. C. & S., INC., et al.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant Robert A. Keasbey Co. hereby requests summary judgment


Plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Robert A. Keasbey Co. with prejudice, and there being


ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-

defendant Robert A. Keasbey Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with

without costs.

/ Y

Daniel P. Blhuin, Esq. Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003

Attorneys for Plaintiffs (212) 558-5500


Attorneys for Robert A. Keasbey Co. (212) 801-9200

SO ORDERED,

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CPLR

3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims asserted

against defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same hereby are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

By: g?%z& Matthew MacIn&e




(212) 558-5500

LYNCH DASICAL EMERY LLP L y P

By: Mark D. Tevis

Attorneys for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. and Goodye& Canada Inc.

264 West 40th Street New York, New York 100 18 I

(212) 302-2400 I

so ORDERED:

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.C. & S., INC.

Index No.: 1 10437/0 1


NYCAL I.A.S, Part 30



$321 2, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS





Attorneys for Plaintiff 180 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038 (21 2) 558-5500

Attorneys for Defendant FULTONBOILERWORKS Q I L E D 2 Rector Street, 14fh Floor New York, New York 10006

J11L 2 8 20l0

- f l k ,Ih, I I ' , 2, E, 9 ,,f :'-" T c W ~ ~ f

(2 12) 3 13-3600 I c

SO ORDERED,.__ ,I__

'JUL 2 o zoia

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y0R.K COUNTY OF NEW YORK

FRANK J. SARD0 NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION ANI)

ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant ,4. 0. Smith Water Products Company hereby requcsts

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and R.u?es Section






Ne Yor NewYork &-. & ,2010 Dated:

McElro&sch, Mulvariey 6: Carpenter, LLP Attorneys for Defendant A. 0. Smith Water 700 Broadway

New York, NY 10003 Products Company 88 Pine Street, 24'h Floor

- I

1445546-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY : NYCAL

j I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

ASBESTOS LITIGATION


THERESA SARDO, Individually and as Proposed Executrix for the Estate of FRANK J. SARDO,

j Index No,: 110439/01

Plaintiff, j NO OPPOSITION -against- i SUMMARY JUDGMENT

: MOTION AND ORDER A.C. & S., INC., et al.,

Defendants,



Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, Peerless Industries,




costs.


Attorney for Plaintiff WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

& \ L a ) 2010

Steven T. Corbin, Esq. Attorney for Defendant LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 199 Water Street, Suite 2500 New York, New York 10038-3516 (212) 232-1300

SO ORDERED, *: ;!- '2 8 2010

SKH - DATED: 4823-0796-5702.1 -

Plaintiff( s), : NO OPPOSITION : SUMMARY JUDGMENT : MOTION AND ORDER -against-

A.C. & S., INC.,gt&, Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, : IASPart30

Defendants.











LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &

By:

D (212) 558-5500 (2 12) 302-2400 jUL 2 8 ZOZQ

Samuel M. Meirowitz, Esq. Diane M. Pompei, Esq.


264 West 40" Street New York, New York 1001 8


1 SO ORDERED:

Hon. Sherry m i x e r , J.S.C. B.; Li I 2 0 2010

" . . I " * . - ? 1 .

- against - NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT

A. C. & S., INC., et al., MOTION AND ORDER Defendants.

X __________l_r_-_-_______1__1_1__________-----------------------"-----

WHEREFORE, defendant Robert A. Keasbey Co. hereby requests summary judgment


Plaintiffs Complaint against defendant Robert A. Keasbey Co. with prejudice, and there being


ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-cl

defendant Robert A, Keasbey Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.


JUL 2 8 solo

NtGv ' ..117)\

.'R)UNT( CLERKS OFFLF

-Y 2010

py& 6/28//0 Samiel Meirohitz, Esq. /


Attorneys for Plaintiff


Attorneys for Robert A. Keasbey Co, (212) 558-5500 (212) 801-9200

SO ORDERED,

* *.


In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION :

Plaintiffs,

- against - A. C. & S., INC., et al.,

Index No.: 110740/01



WHEIREFORE, defendant Robert A. Keasbey Co. hereby requests summary judgment


Plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Robert A. Keasbey Co. with prejudice, and


ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims a g u 2 8

defendant Robert A. Keasbey Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice &@$ '*L''**' p-up,jn CERK'S tX+n~

without costs.




New York, New York 10 166

Attorneys for Robert A. Keasbey Co. (212) 558-5500 (2 12) 80 1-9200

SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry Kleia Heitler

'JUL 202010

SUPREME coum OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

JAMES L. MCGEE NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER








Dated: New York, New York L7 \ h-T ,2010


I

I I

-

& Carpenter, LLP

88 Pine Street, 24fh Floor tow New York, New York 1pa

SO ORDERED, 1 Hon. Sherry Klein Meitler

JUL 2 8 2010

NEW YORK 0 COUNTY6

1445546-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE YTAW OF N b W YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

STEPHEN J. SIZENSKY NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOHON AND

ORDER








New York New York ("0- 12 ,2010

Dated:

Frank O d z , Bsq. Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. 700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant A. 0. Smith Water New York, NY 10003 Products Company

88 Pine Street, 24'h Floor New York, New York 10

SO ORDERED, JUL 2 8 2010

NEW YORK T-XSUNTY CLERKS OFFICE

1 445 546-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ......._ "___________-"----........--""------------"--...-"~~--------

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAI,

(Heitler, S.)

Index No.: 1 1 1 U25/0 1

ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 30 ..............__ ""__~~~-~~~... . . . . . . . . .~..~~~~~~"~~~~.~... . . . . .----~


RAYMOND THOMAS MURPHY NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER


summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practicc Law and RLI~CS Section


with prejudice, and there bcing no opposition thereto.


defendant A. 0, Smith Water Products Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with


Dated: New York, New York b \ L-$? ,2010

ch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP efendant A. 0. Smith Water

SO ORDERED,

1445546-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y O N COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW Y O M COUNTY NYCAL

(Heitler, S.)

IndexNo.: 111218/01; 115621/01

ASBESTOS LITIGATION LAS. Part 30 _________-....-_____~-----..-.--- "---------..--~~-------.-...-------


FRED P. SILEO NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER - - - _ _ - _ " - - . . . . . " " _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - ~ . ~ . ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ . - . ~ " " ~ ~ ~ ,






defendaiit A. 0. Smith Water Products Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with


Dated:


n r

SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry &in I -d l e r

1445546-1


....................................................................

IN RE: NEW YOFX COUNTY NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 30

(Heitler, S.)

Index No.: .111218/01; 115630i01

...._. 1"_-_"_______" . ._ . . . . . . . . _ ._ I______r___________________~~~~- -~


DANIEL TORRETTA NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company herebj requests


32 12: dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company





Dated: New York, New York 6 - r 8 L y 20 10

I

y & Carpenter, LLP 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003

Attorneys for Defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company 88 Pine Street, 241h Floor

L 1 New York, New Y ork 100

JUL 2 8 2010

i 445546-1


ROGER WARKENTHEIN NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER








Dated:

fendant A. 0. Smith Water I New York, NY 10003 Produck Company 88 Pine Street, 24'h Floor

1445546-1

SUPREME, COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

RAYMOND PFLIEGLER NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company hereby rcquests





defendant -4. 0. Smilh Water Products Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with


Dated: NegY,~-#kw York ,2010


& Carpenter, I.,LP

Products Company 88 Pine Street, 24th Floor New York, New York 10005 .

I

SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry Klein fieitler '

1 445 546,-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY N Y C a



Index No.: 1 1 1231/01, 120575/01 I I

I

BERTRAND E. LINDSEY AND EILEEN LINDSEY, I

Plaintiff@), I

I NO OPPOSITION

; MOTION AND ORDER -against- SUMMARY JUDGMENT

I I A.C. & S., INC., et al., I

Defendant(s). I

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against defendant Courter & Company, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,


defendant, Courter & Company, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Ke- ook, Esq. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. Courter & Company, Inc. 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456

Bertrand E. Lindsey 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500


'!. 2 0 20N' 1122-199AE

N0008804-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW Y O M IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL


Index No.: 11 1231/01, 120575/01 THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: I

BERTRAND E. LINDSEY AND EILEEN I

LINDSEY,

I

I I I Plaintiff(s), I

I NO OPPOSITION

: MOTION AND ORDER -against- SUMMARY JUDGMENT

I I A.C. & S., INC., et al.,

Defendant( s) . I

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against defendant Patterson Pump Company with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,


defendant, Patterson Pump Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: L l j , g ~ s ~ r $ New York ,20 10

Attorneys for Defendants Patterson Pump Company 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004

Bertrand E. Lindsey 700 Broadway

(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,

N000SS03-I

454- 1464AE

JUL 20 2010


X

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL Ron. Sherry Klein Heitler

X

BEATRICE SCHIAVO, AS ADMINISTRATRIX FOR Index No. 120582-2001

BEATRICE SCHIAVO, INDIVIDUALLY, THE ESTATE OF JAMES SCHIAVO, AND 111231-2001

Plaintiff(s),

-against- NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTlON

AND ORDER A X . & S. INC. et al., including FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant Foster Wheeler, LLC (sued herein as "Foster Wheeler Corporation") hereby

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Foster Wheeler, LLC with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant Foster

Wheeler, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York ( A S P 20i0

Frank Ortiz, Esq.

I SO Maiden Lane, 171h Floor New York, NY 10038

Weitz & Luxenberg, P. Attorneys for Plaintgs

Robert M. Gilmartin, Jr., Esq. Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Ar Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, LL Three Gateway Center, 1 Zth Floor Newark, NJ 07 102 (973) 242-0002 J\\L 2 8 2010 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, fi Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY : NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J,)


Index No.: 11 1231/01, 120575/0 I I

I

BERTRAND E. LINDSEY AND EILEEN LINDSEY, I

Plaintiff(s), I

NO OPPOSITION -against- : SUMMARY JUDGMENT : MOTION AND ORDER

I I A.C. & S., INC., et al,, I I

Defendant( s). I I

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests summary


plaintiffs complaint against defendant Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co. with prejudice, and



defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co. be and the same are hereby dismissed with


,20 10 e- McGi Y & KLUGER, P.C.

Attorneys for Defendants Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co. 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004

Bertrand E. Lindsey

New York, New York 10003 700 Broadway JUL 28 2Q10

CQtJNTY &WS (2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 y; -.N L Y0BKQFF\bE

.*qi!----- SO ORDERED,


N0008802-1

324-6212AE

,1 '7 \ 20zOul


ANGEL0 PALERMO NO OPPOSITION lMMAR JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company hereby rcquests







Dated:

Frank Ortiz, Esq. Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003

A

Attorneys Products Company 88 Pine Street, 24'h Floor

I New York, New York 10005 I


-. . . . I

dUt 2 8 2010

1445546-1

JUL 2 0 2 0 ~ 1


BOBBY SLEGER

(Heitler, S.)

Index No.: 1 12406/0 1

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER






defendant A. 0, Smith Water Products Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with


Weitz & L,uxenberg, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003

& Carpenter, LLP Attorneys Products Company 88 Pine Street,24th Floor New York, New York 10

r.r? I

1445546-1

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.C. & S., INC.

Index No.: 1 13260/01

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND OrnER


WHEREFORE, defendants HILTON BOILER WORKS hereby request


$32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant FULTON BOTLER WORKS

with prejudice, and there being no opposition t h e t a ,

Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defcndants, all claims and cross-claim against


prejudice and without costs! I

Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (2 12) 558-5500 New York, New York 10006 aL--- (212) 313-3600 F 1 L E D so ORDERED,-

. - .. - -__ JUL 2 8 2018

JIon. Sherry Klein-Heitier

SUPREME coum OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

LOUIS M. SORSAIA NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

WHEREFORE: defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company hereby requests







Dated: NgJo;@New York , 2010

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. aney & Carpenter, LLP 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003

Attorneys kr Defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company 88 Pine Street, 24th Floor New Yoxk, New York 10005

I

SO ORDERED,

1445546-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y O N COUNTY OF NEW YORK

.................................................................... IN RE? NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL

(Heitler, S.) ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 30

.................................................................... This Document Relates to:

Index No.: 113998/01

FRANKIE R. VERBLE NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER ....................................................................


summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sectjori






Dated: Ne York New York -" Z -& ,2010


aney & Carpenter, LLP Attorneys for Defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company 88 Pine Street, 24th Floor New York, New York 10005

/

1445 546- I

SUPREME cowr OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

PETER T. VELLA NO OPPOSlTION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER






defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company bc and the same are hereby dismissed with


Dated: N g T o r r N e w , I ; ; i


JUL 2 8 20'10

NEW YQRK C Q U N ~ CLERKS om&

SO ORDERED,

1445546-1

JUL 20 2010

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORJS COUNTY OF NEW YORK

F U N K MICCICHE NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER





ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againsl



Dated:


& Carpenter, I,LP

Products Company 88 Pine Street, 24'h Floor New York, New York 10005

Hon. S1

144SS46-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION


KATHERINE L. VALENTE, as Executrix for the Estate of DAVID J. VALENTE, and KATHERINE L. VALENTE, Individually,


A.C. & S., INC,, et al.,

Defendants,

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

Index No,: 115466/01


WHEREFORE, defendant, Peerless Industries, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant ta Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing plaintiffs





costs.

Dated: New York, New York b \ L a ,2010

* I

Steven T. Corbin, Esq. Attorney for Defendant LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 199 Water Street, Suite 2500 New York, New York 10038-35 16 New York, New York 10003 dUt 2 '''O

700 Broadway

NW YORK (212) 232-1300

SO ORDERED, ;OUNTy CLERKS OFF-

HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER 3uL 2 0 ?o\O 4823-0796-5702 1 SKEI - DATED:

I

SUPREME COURT OF TEE STATE OF NEW 'YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW Y O M COUNTY NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION 1,A.S. Part 30

Index No.: 1 15466/01

DAVID J. VALENTE

....-.._

NO OPPOSITION SUMM, -R1 JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER



321 2, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant A, 0. Smith Water Products Company


ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims arid cross claims against



Dated: New York, New York - k \ a-8 ,2010


SO ORDERED,

I 1445546-1

SUPREME COUKT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y O N comm OF NEW YON

.................................................................... IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION 1,A.S. Part 30 ............................................................. This Document Relates to:

FRED P. SILEO

_ _ _ _ _ (Heitler, S.)

Index No.: 1 1121 8/01 ; 1 15621/01

! NO opposinm SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER .....................................................................



32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendarit A. 0. Smith Water Products Company



defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company be arid the same are hereby dismissed with


Dated: N e g Y r g New York ,2010

New York, NY 10003

I

Products Company 88 Pine Street,2ilih New York, New Yor

Hon. Sherry &in Healer

1445546-1


DANIEL TORRETTA NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER






defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company be and the sarnc are hereby dismissed with


Dated: New York, New York ,2010

New York, NY 10003

1445546-1


ROGER WARKENTHEIN NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant A. 0, Smith Water Products Company hereby requests




OlIDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against



Dated: .-

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.

New York, N Y 10003 efendant A. 0. Smith Water

1 New York, New York 10005

I

1445545-1


Index No.: 116148/01

GEORGE L. MCLAUGHLIN NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

I








Dated:

aney & Carpenter, LLP ndant A. 0. Smith Water

w York, NY 10003

1445546-1


Index No.: 119199/01

LUCAS TOTO NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

WHEREFORE, deFendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company hereby requests







Dated:

aney & Carpenter, L1.P

New York, NY 10003

New York. New York 10005

JLlL 2 8 2070 SO ORUERED,

1445546-1

c , d . 4 b # ,

* TMc:CC(jpk) 611 6/10

Our File No S-6624-0 1



JACK LOCKER

INDEX NO. 1 19243/0 1 ASSIGNED TO: HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER






ORDEmD, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims





Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY 10F-kSg E D


..............._ ""__~~~~~~~~"~~"~.""......-.............-..-.......-

IN RE? NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 30

(Heitler, S.)

Index No.: 11 1229/01; 119620/01

.... ......._...___ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

'This Document Relates to:

RAYMOND I'FLIEGLER NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company hcreby rqucsts


3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant A. 0. Smith Water Prodwts Company


ORDERFiD, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against



Dated; Neg, ;pew York ,2010

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, N Y 10003

Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP ndant A. 0. Smith Water

SO ORQERED,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW Y O K IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION : I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, I.)

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: I I

BERTRAND E. LINDSEY AND EILEEN LINDSEY,

; Index No.: 11 1231/01, 120575/01 I

"against-


Plainti ff(s), I


I I I I

Defendant( s). I I

WHEREFORE, defendant, Cowter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 32 12, dismissing plaintiff's

complaint against defendant Courter & Company, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,


defendant, Courter & Company, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: w York, New York 4 ,2010

IVlCCrlVNEY & KLUGER, l'.C WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P. Courter & Company, Inc. 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456

Attorneys for Plaintiff Bertrand E. Lindsey 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

2 $ IQ'Q ilL

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitier

N0008804-1

1122-199AE

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I NYCAL



1 IndexNo.: 111231/01, 120575/01 I 1 I I

BERTRAND E. LINDSEY AND EILEEN LINDSEY,

Plaintiff(s), I

/ NO OPPOSITION

: MOTION AND ORDER -against- I SUMMARY JUDGMENT

A.C. & S., NC., eta]., I I I I

Defendmt(s). I

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 9 3212, dismissing plaintiff's

complaint against defendant Patterson Pump Company with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,


defendant, Patterson Pump Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: N w York, New York ,% 01 ,2010

WEITZ & LUXENBER Attorneys for Defendants Attorneys for Plainti Patterson Pump Company 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor

Bertrand E. Lindsey 700 Broadway

New York, New York 10004 New York, New York 10003 ~ k ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ k 6 (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 9 h* qu,5 1 (+-JFT;\b@

;E$.$\>, A>.$ C,,'"

SO ORDERED,

N0008803- 1

4.54-1464AE

1. f "l.? L 2 0 2010

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y O K COUNTY OF NEW YORK

~

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY : NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 30

(Heitler, J.) THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: I

BERTRAND E. LINDSEY AND EILEEN LINDSEY, I Plaintiff(s), I

: Index No.: 111231/01, 120575/01 I I

I

I I NO OPPOSITION

"against- I SUMMARY JUDGMENT

A.C. & S., INC., et al., MOTION AND ORDER

I I I I

Defendant(s). I

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests summary


plaintiff's complaint against defendant Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co. with prejudice, and



defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co. be and the same are hereby dismissed with


re- & KLUGER, P.C.

Attorneys for Defendants Attorneys for Plaintiff Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co. 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004

Bertrand E. Lindsey 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

(2 12) 509-3456 (2 12) 558-5500 * 3 --'$I W y 6 F I " E ?' -GGRks Wpw'

SO ORDERED,

N0008802-1

SIJPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YO= COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN R.E: NEW YQRK COUNTY ASBESlOS LITIGATION


JAMES SCHIAVO

NYCAI, LAS. Part 30 (Heitler, S.)

._."___-"--

Index No.: 100667/00; 120582/01

NO OPPOSlTION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

I ORDER


summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil PraclJce Law and R L ~ S Section



ORDERED, that upon notice to all ca-defendarlts, all clairns and cross claims zgainst

defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company be and the same are hereby dismisst.d with


Dated: NekYrpNew York ,2010

New York, NY 10003 Products Company 88 Pine Street, 24th Floor i

1445546-1 JUL 2 0 2010'

I


x

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler

X

BEATRICE SCHIAVO, AS ADMINISTRATRIX FOR Index No. 120582-2001

BEATRICE SCHIAVO, INDIVIDUALLY, THE ESTATE OF JAMES SCHIAVO, AND 1 1 123 1-200 1

Ptaintiff(s),

-against-

A.C.& S. INC. et at., including FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION,

Defendants.

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTlON

AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Foster Wheeler, LLC (sued herein as "Foster Wheeler Corporation") hereby

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Foster Wheeler, LLC with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant Foster

Wheeler, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York 6 \ r P 2010

Y

Frank Ortiz, Esq. - Robert M. Gilrnartin, Jr., Esa. Weitz & Luxenberg, P . C u Attorneys for Plaintgs 180 Maiden Lane, 1 7th Floor New York, NY 10038 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, e Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Ar Attorneys for Foster Wheeler, LL?' rL E D Three Gateway Center, 12" Floor Newark, NJ 07 102 (973) 242-0002 J\\L 2 8 2010

. "$i" t(lJRir

1N I GLERK'S OFF^^ Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.


Index No.: 106466/02; 12 1 1 OO/O 1

JERRY SPIELER NO OPPOSITION SUMMAR JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER




with prejudicc, and there being no opposition thereto.




Dated: New York New York (I-. rg' ,2010

I

vaney & Carpenter, 1,LP 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003

Attorneys forvefeendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company 88 Pine Street, 24Ih Floor

I 1 New York, New York 100 i

SO ORDEFED,

1445546-1

...

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUN?'Y OF NEW YORK

.................. "_____________________--.........-~--------.-....-

IN RE: NEW YOFK COUNTY NYCAI,

(Heitler, S.)

Index No.: 1 06466/02; 12 1 1 OO/O 1

ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 30 ____.__....._.._........~.


JERKY SPIELER NO OPYOSXTION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER




with prejudicc, and there being no opposition thereto.




Dated: New York New York I&- \g ,2010

New York, NY 10003

-.I-c

-

& Carpenter, 1,LP

Products Company 88 Pine Street, 24'h Floor I New York, New Yorli


3445546-1


IN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL X _____________"_1________________________-------------------"--

ASBESTOS LITIGATION X ..............................................................

ANNA MAGNA, as Executrix for the Estate of : Index Nos. 105556/00 FIORIO P. MAGNA, 124484102

Plaintiff( s), : NO OPPOSITION

-against- : SUMMARY JUDGMENT

A.C. & S., INC., et al., : MOTION AND ORDER









Dated: New York, New York c\ b-8\ \o

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C, Attorneys for Plaintiff


Scott A. Harford, Esq.


264 West 40th Street New York, New York l 0 0 l S F 1 L E I&I

(212) 558-5500 (212) 302-2400

Dated: New York, New York r


FRANK D'ALESSANDRO











Y I I

Samuelhirowitz, Esq! W y l O WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100035

Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003-3 8 FALED

JuL 2 8 2010

NEW YORK

_"

SO ORDERED: Hon. Sherry Xleh Heitler

-0UNl-Y CLERRS OFfqU Our File No

S-4004-03 JlJL 202010,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY -X


This Document Relates to: Armand G . Coreno and Susan Coreno,

Plaint iff s , - against -



Index No. : G ) : Index No.: 119398/00 Index No.: 100772 /03


Defendants. -X

WHEREFORE, defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co. Inc . ,



dismissing plaintiffs’ Complaint against defendant Mario &

DiBano Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,


and cross claims aqainst defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co. I


Dated: Brooklyn, New York G;. \ t-s \\o , 2010

Attorneys f o r Plaintiffs Armand G. Coreno and S u s a n M a r i o & DiBono P l a s t e r i n g Co. Coreno Inc. 700 Broadway, 6th Floor 177 Montague Street New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York 11201

Attorneys fo r Defendant

(718) 8 5 5 - 9 0 0 0 Our File No.: 10924-1603

Sa Ordered:

rgu\ 2070# Hon. Sherry K. Heitler t.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY _____l_________l_l______t_l______l___ -X IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -X This Document Relates to: Armand G. Coreno and Susan Coreno,

P l a i n t i f f s I - against -


NYCAL I.A.S. Par t 30 (Judge Heitler)

Index No.: 105937/01 Index No. F T > Index No. 100772 03


WHEREFORE, defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co. Inc . ,

hereby requests summary judgment in t h e above-entitled case,



D i B o n o Plastering Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to a l l co-defendants, all claims

and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co.


Dated: Brooklyn, New York 6;. \ k-s \ L o , 2010

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys f o r Defendant Armand G. Coreno and S u s a n Mario & DiBono P l a s t e r i n g C o . Coreno Inc. 700 Broadway, 6th Floor 177 Montague Street New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York 11201

( 7 1 8 ) 8 5 5 - 9 0 0 0 Our File No.: 10924-1603

So Ordered:

I- q I! 2 ~ 7 ~ ~ ' Hon. Sherry K. Heitler f


A.C. & S. I n c . , et al.,


Index N o . : 105937/01 Index No Index No: :F;> NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

hereby requests summary judgment in t he above-entitled case,


dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario E

DiBono Plastering Co. Ink., with prejudice, and there being nc

opposition there to , *t -- -

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, a l l claim2

and cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering co


Dated: Brooklyn, New York & 1 k-s \\o , 2010

Attorneys f o r Plaintiffs Armand G. Coreno and Susan M a r i o & DiBono P l a s t e r i n g Co.

7 0 0 Broadway, 6th Floor 177 Montague Street New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York 11201

Coreno Inc.

(718) 855-9000 Our File No.: 10924-1603

So Ordered:

I- 71 11 2 Q 7 0 l ' Hon. Sherry K. Heitler t ,

I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY _ - - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -X IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION ________- - -__________1_____1________1 -X This Document Relates to: Armand G. Coreno and Susan Coreno,


A . C . 6c S . ~ n c . , et al.,

NYCAL I.A.S. Par t 30 (Judge Heitler)



Defendants. ---------______----_____-----___------x

WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC, hereby requests summary


Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint

against defendant Burnham LLC, with prejudice, and there being



and cross claims against defendant Burnham LLC, be dismissed



Frank M. Ortiz, 2010 3gsgszf Weitz & L u x e n b e r g k

Armand G. Coreno and S u s a n Coreno 177 Montague S 700 Broadway, 6th Floor Brooklyn, New

fullen and Dykman LLP Attorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC

Attorneys for

New York, New York 10003 (718) 855-9000

So Ordered:

0 R 1 G 1 f\l A 1."-

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., Including MAREMONT CORPORATION,

Defendants, X ____"frr_lff_l"l"-l----1-----f--------------------"--"--"-------


the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant Maremont Corporation with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,



without costs.

Dated: New York. New York

Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 (212) 558-5500

FRIEDMAN LLP Attorneys for Defendant 1633 Broadway New York, New York 10019 (2 12) 506- 1700

SO ORDERED, ilSJt~~~281H ,


0 R I GI NAL

-against-

A.C. and S . , Inc., et al., Including MAREMONT CORPORATION,

:

Defendants. X "l___f-f_f_---_r_-l_---""--"------~"---------------------------



plaintiff's complaint against defendant Maremont Corporation with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,



without costs.

700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP Attorneys for Defendant 1633 Broadway New York, New York 10019 (212) 506-1700

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW Y O N

~ -1x

rNRE NEW YORK CITY NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

X

VINCENZO DI CARLO AND LAURA DI CARLO, Index No. 05-116828

Plaintiffs,

-against-

NO OPPOSITION I SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., Defendants.

x

WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,


defendant Morse Diesel, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Vincenzo Di Curlo and Laura Di Carlo Morse Diesel, Inc. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

JUL 2 8 2010

NEW YQRK

150 Broadway, Suite 600 New York, New York 10038 (212) 791-0285

CXWNTY CERK'S OFFICC: JUL 202019



IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

_-

NYCAL

VINCENZO DlCARLO and LAURA DICAFUO,

Plaintiff($),

-against-

A. 0. SMlTH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et ai., including REYNOLDS METALS COMPANY,

Defendants.

_-

Index No. 116828/0S


WHEREFORE, Defendant Reynolds Metals Company, sued incorrectly as “Reynolds Metals

Company, Individually and as successor in interest to Atlantic Asbestos Corp.” hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

Plaintiffs’ complaint against Defendant Reynolds Metals Company, without prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant,

Reynolds Metals Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

v

Eva S. Wayne, Esq. M A L A B Y & T I R A D L Y , L L F 1 L E 150 Broadway, Suite 600


Vincenzo DiCmlo nnd Luura DiCarlo (212) 558-5500 (212) 791-0285


Reynolds Metals Company Attorneys for Phint i fs Atlorneys for Defendunt $If 3 R 7010

2$&4 L: C - Y h t . i 4 +FM$

SO ORDERED, JUL 2 0 2010 Won. Sherry Klein Heitler


_ _ IN RE NEW Y ORK CITY NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.) 1-

VINCENZO Dl CARLO AND LAURA DI CARLO, Tndex No. 05-116828

Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITION

-against- SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER WITHOUT PREJUDICE A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant CBS Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc.,

successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse

Electric Corporation (hereinafter "CBS corporation") hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CBS Corporation with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,


defendant CBS Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: New York, F l D JUL 2 8 2010

NEW YORK UN'P( CLERKS OFFIb,

Z & LUXENBERG, P.C.

Vincenzo Di C'urlo and Laura Di Carlo 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500 Electric Corporation

ttorneys for Plaint8Y Aitcirneys for Defendant CBS Corporation, u Delaware Corporation, Yk/a Viacom Inc., successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation, fl,Vu Westinghouse

150 Broadway, Suite 600 New York, New York 10038 (2 12) 79 1-0285

SO ORDERED, Dated: Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOKK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

._

IN RE NEW YORK CITY NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

'I

VINCENZO D1 CARLO AND LAURA DI CARLO, Index No. 05-116828

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., Defendants.


WHEREFORE, Defendant Cleaver-Brooks, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in


plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Cleaver-Brooks, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,


defendant Cleaver-Brooks, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs,


MALABY & E$hDLEY, L Attorneys for Defendmt Cleaver- Brooks, Inc. 150 Broadway, Suite 600

Vincenzo Di Carlo and Laura Di Carlo 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 New York, New York 10038 r (-\rqK (21 2) 558-5500 (212) 791-0285 I'\ bk:?**t "",tgS

SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry Klein H&er Dated:

'.>TMc:dC(jpk) ' 6/18/10

INDEX NO. 109600/97 and 102335/06 ASSIGNED TO: HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER










kjLFllOl0 S d u e l Meirowb, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 5

Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003-3598

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler JUL 2 8 2O1O

SO ORDERED:


, ' TMc:CC(jpk)

- 6/10/10

":;& # , , : . I . , ' U.

SUPREME COURT : ALL COUNTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW YOFX

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LIT1

..........................................................

KLEIN HEITLER THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY ' JUDGMENT MOTION AND TED M. CHOATES 1 I ORDER

Our File No S-66 1 1-99

I









3u* a, 2 h 0


Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY l0@-319& E

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE O F NEW YORK ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY -X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


This Document Relates to: Robert E. DeForge and Patricia DeForge,

- - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ l _ l _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - -


A.C. & S . Inc., et al.,

Defendants. -X

WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC, _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - -


Index No.: 100681/07 Index No.: 100221/01

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDCMENT MOTION AND ORDER

hereby requests summarl


Law and Rules Section Si3212, dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint



ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, a l l claimE

and cross claims against defendant Burnham LLC, be dismissed



Attorneys fo r Plaintiffs Robert E. DeForge and P a t r i c i a Burnham LLC DeForge 177 Montague Street 700 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, New York 10003


So Ordered:

JUL 2 0 2010


IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To: LUIGI CERRETA and KAREN CERRETA, his wife, :

----_---------------________11___1__11__-------------------------- X

* NYCAL

* (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler) part 39

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

: Index No.: 107024/08

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY ; JUDGMENT MOTION AND : ORDER

WHEREFORE, Defendants CRANE CO. and CRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC.


and Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against Defendants CRANE CO. and

CRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,


Defendants CRANE CO. and CRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC. be, and the same are hereby,

dismissed with prejudice and without costs. D

L GATES LLP

/F/& dWL 7J Ruth D. Marcus, Esq. WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys for Defendants 110 William Street, 26* Floor CRANE CO. New York, NY 1003 8 CRANE PUMPS & SYSTEMS, INC. (212) 267-3091 599 Lexington Avenue

New York, NY 10022 (212) 536-3990

SO ORDERED,

-against-

A.C. & S., INC,,a&,

Plaintiffs, : NO OPPOSITION : SUMMARY JUDGMENT : MOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, : IASPart30 Defendants.






ORDERED? that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims






By: By:


264 West 40' Street New York, New York 100 (212) 302-2400


SO ORDERED: l Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.

JUL 2 0 2018

.

SUPWME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

: I.A.S. Part30 Plaintjff(s), (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler) -against-

WHEREFORE, defendant MCWANE, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-

entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's

complaint against defendant MCWANE, INC. with prejudice, and there being na apposition


MCWANE, INC. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

r-,b c .I QLY.AB Holfy C. hterson, Esq. LEVY PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERG, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) 800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 (212) 605-6200

~~~~~~ Esq.

Attorneys for Defendant MCWANE, INC. One Newark Center, Tenth Floor Newark, NJ 07102-5252

d h-w D 1 ) "

, (973) 848-4000 JuJ- 2 8 2010

JO€M C. PRTSONE and BEVERLY FRTSONE, : JndexNo. 190264/09

Plaintiff&,

-against- : NOQPPOSITXQN : SUMMARYJUDGMEm : ~OlrJroNANDORDEQ

A. 0. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., @ a. I Wan. sbw Wein Heider, : IASPart30 Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire (8; Rubber Company atld Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request s m m y judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing phintiffi' complaint against The Goodyem Tire & Rubber Company arsd Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada hc. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudiw and without costs.

Dated: New Yo&, New York - C Y / L , Zd/d

WEIT2 dk LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiffs


By: BY: Michael Roberts, Esq.


264 West 40th Street New York, New York 10018

(212) 558-5500 (2 12) 3 02-2400 2a 2010 * Jt\l

,\OF. " / * " ' " W Dated New Ymk, New York

~ 3. y i * ! .* ,I ; i.Jk

@O SO ORDERED:

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant &orgia-PaCific LLC hereby requests summary

judgment'in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintjffs' complaint against Gorgia-Paciflc LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby: ORDERED, that upon notice to all cc-defendants, all claims and crow claims

against Georgia-Pacific LLC be and the same arc hereby dismissed with prejudice aid

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York \wcv 12. Loto

WEITZ & LIJXENBmG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiffs

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY U P Attorneys far Defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC

J' bats, Bsq. Lawrence 6. Lee, Esq.


264 West 40' Street New York, New York 1001 8

(212) 558-5500 (2 12) 3 02-2400

Dated New Yark, New York

SOORDEW: Hon. Sherry €3 n Hcitler, J.S.C.

D \

JUL 2 8 2010

George Graham : NO OPPOSITION

: MOTION AND ORDER STJMMARY JUDGEMENT

WHEREFOE, defendant THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER hereby requests summary

judgement in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 8 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant THE GOODYEAR TJRE & RUBBER, with prejudice in this

action, and there being no opposition thereto,


THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

800 3rd Ave., 13 FL New York. NY 10022

New York, NY 100 8

ED

STATE OF NEW YORK ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK

GEORGE GRAHAM,

Plaintiff( s),

: NYCAL : I.A.S. Part 30 ' (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)

Index No.: 190300/09 vs.

' NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al. : JUDGMENT MOTION AND

~ Defendants. ...

WHEREFORE, defendant MC WANE, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-

entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant MCWANE, INC. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto,


defendant MCWANE, INC., be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Al w?q4 LEVY, PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERG, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) 800 Third Avenue, 13th Floor New York, NY 10022 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

M' ael . Waller, Esq. & GfTES LLP

Newark, NJ 07 102 (973) 848-4000

NW-338177 V I

OUR FILE NUMBER: UNS 37-29890 (AS-6)

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y O M COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION-

WILLIAM EDWARD TURNER and ZELLA FARIS TURNER,

X -.

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,

Index No: 190349/09

NO OPPOSITION SITMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

Practice LAW m i Rules Seztim 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Jefendmt

EA TON HXDKALiLICS, TNC., fWa VICKERS, INC. with prejudice, and there being



against defendant EATON HYDRAULICS, XNC., f/k/a WICKERS, INC be and the same

are hereby dismissed with prejudice md without costs.

Dated: New York, New York April 29,2010

-- - Atto eys for Plaintiff AEorneys for Defendant Belluck &- &, Fox EA'I'ON HYDRAULICS. INC. 546; Fifth Avenue, 4'h Floor Neu York, NY 10036

ew York, NY 10005

SO ORDEREL): SUL 2 0 201I1

- DA? ED: HON. SHkRRY KLEIN HEITLER,

BIVONA & COHEN, P.C. COUNSELORS A T h W WALL STREET PLAZA, 88 PINE STREET NEW YORK, N.V. 10005


- _ - _ - l - - l - _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - _ -X NEW YORK ASBESTOS LITIGATION STANLEY ADLER Plaintiff, Index No. 09/190369

-against- NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT

A . J . FRIEDMAN SUPPLY CO., MOTION AND ORDER

I N C . , et als. Defendants

WHEREFORE, Defendant Western C a r p e t and Linoleum Co., Inc. and

its affiliates, subsidiaries, predecessors, successors in interest,

agent, heirs and assigns, hereby request Summary Judgment in the

above-captioned case, pursuant to CPLR 5 3212, dismissing

Plaintiff's complaint against Defendant with prejudice, and there



cross claims against Defendant, be and the same are hereby


HARDIN, KUNDLA, MCKEON & Attorneys for Plaintxf POLETTO , P . A. 800'Third Avenue 110 William S 13th Floor New York, F New York, New York 10022 212-571-013 212-605-6200

1

JI!L 2 8 2010

::vw YORK wbilj's, mm

L5Fr- SO-OFtDERED:

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler J . S . C .

I APR 14'2010

I PART 30

OUR FILE NUMBER: UNS-38-29934(AS-6)

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW 7 COUNTY OF NEW YORK

OR

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

LndexNo.: 190062/10 THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

CARLOS SIMMONS

WHEREFORE, defendant E ATON HYDRAULICS, INC., fMa VICKERS,

INC. hereby requests s ~ u w n a r y judgment in the above-entitled case. pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaiiitiff 5 ccmplaint against defendant

EATON HYDRAU I,ICS, INC,, flkh VICKEH,Li, CNC. wit11 prejudice. and there being



against defendant EATON HYDRAULICS, INC., fMa VICKERS, INC be and the same

are hereby dismissed with prejudice and withour iosts.

Oakd New York, hlew York April 29,20 10

D Bivona & Cohen, P.C Attorneys for Defendant EATON HYDRAULICS, Wall Street Plaza 88 Pine Street, 17'h Floor

Attorneys for Plaintiff 546 Fifth Avenue, 4" Floor New York, NY 10036

J\)\. 2 8 2010

I y "jRK New York, NY 10005 . -?K'sOFFIcE

Tx;rJ,jM # I' ' .i L:i

I r a IL 2 0 201Q SO ORDERED:

HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER SKH - DATED:

BIVONA C COHEN, P.C. COUNSELORSATLAW WALL STREET PLAZA, 88 PINE STREET NEW YORK, N.Y. 10005

I

t '


: NYCAL ' I.A.S. Part 30 CARLOS E. SIMMONS,

: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)

: Index No.: 190062- 10

Plaintiff(s), -against-

' NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,

: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER Defendants. I

Square D Company, (hereinafter "SQUARE D") hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 321 2, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant SQUARE D with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,


defendant SQUARE I? be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

28 2010

BELLUCK & FOX, LL

546 Fil'th Avenue, 4'h Floor New York, N Y 10036

SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA, INC. 599 Lexington Avenue

(212) 681-1575 I New York, NY 10022 (212) 536-3900

n

3UL 2 0 20W' SO ORDERED,

NY-795390 V I


."___I__.. . . "~~..............~~..~~-~~~~~~~~"

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 30

(Heitler, S.)

Index No.: 190062/10

. . . . . . . . . . . . . _*______..............~~ "-------------~--............

This Docuinent Relates to:

CARLOS E. SIMMONS NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER .. "_____"_"_................._..__"~~~~~~~~~~~~~.............~~~~~~~~

WHEREFORE, defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company ("A.0, Smith") hereby

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against A.O. Smith with prejudice, and there

being no opposition thereto.


defendant A.O. Smith be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.


- Brian Belasky, Kq. Attorneys for Plaintiff Belluck & Fox, LLP 546 Fifth Avenue, 4th Floor New York, New York 10036

Attorneys for Defendant A.0, Smith Water Products Company McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP 88 Pine Street, 241h Floor New York, New York 10005

145079% I


............. .......................................................

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 30

(Heitler, S.) ............. ...____ “_________“___r__________________ . .~~ - - - - - - - - - - -

This Document Relates to: Index No.: 190062/10

CARLOS E. SIMMONS NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER ________..... .......................................................

WHEREFORE, defendant Eaton Aeroquip Inc. flWa Aeroquip Corporation (“Eaton

Aeroquip”) and defendant Eaton Corporation, as successor in interest to Eaton Electrical, Inc.

and Cutlcr-Hammer, Inc. (“Cutler-Hammer”) hereby request summary judgment in the above- I I ~

entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against Eaton Aeroquip and Cutler-Hammer with prejudice, and there being no

opposit io 11 thereto.


defendants Eaton Aeroquip and Cutler-Hammer be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudicc and without costs.


Brian Belasky, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff Belluck & Fox, LLP 546 Fifth Avenue, 4th Floor Corporation, as successor in int t o aton New York, New York 10036

Attorneys for Defendants Eaton Aeroquip Inc. f/Wa Aeroquip Corporation and Eaton

Electrical, Inc. and C u t k r - H s , i n % McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, 88 Pine Street, 24fh Floor New York, New York 10005 JUl- 2 8 2010


1450774-1


: NYCAL

: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)

: Index No.: 190062-1 0

: I.A.S. Part 30 CARLOS E. SIMMONS,

Plaintiff(s), -against-

: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,

: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDEli Defendants,

X r___"------"__"---__--------------------"----------------

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,


defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

CRANE CO.

New York, NY 10022 599 Lexington Avenue &@V YBRK

W N ~ ~ F I ) c s OFF)-

546 Fifth Avenue, 4th Floor New York, NY 10036 (212) 681-1575

(212) 536-3900


NY-795387 VI

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

LEO WGINALD AKERS Plaintiff,

-against-

AMEMCAN RONDA MOTOR COMF’ANY, MC., et rrl.

Pefeadant.3.

N0.927 a883

ndexNo. 190150/10

WHEREFORE, defendant, American Honda Motor Go., Inc. (“AHM”), hereby requcsts

summary judgment in the aboventitled case, pursuant to Civil P m c t b Law arld Rules Section

3212, dismissing plaintiffs Complaint against dofendant, AHbf, with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto.

IT IS ORDERED, that upon notice to all codefendants, all claims and crossclaims against

defendant, AWM, bq and the same are, hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs,

G&-==-- Walsh, EN. L 6 d S Law Firm.PLLC Attorneys for Plaintiffs, 747 Third Avenue, 37‘h Floor New Yak, New Yark 10017 Td: (212) 558-5675

Attorneys for Defendant, herican Honda Motor Go., Inc. 75 Livingston Avenuc, Suite 301 Rosslan& New Jersey 07068 Tcl: (973) 534-1600

so OrnER-ED:

0.

HONORABLE SHERRY KLEIN mITLER

JUL 2 0 2010 1217597.01

1

0649/2010 17: 20

Defendants.

N0.917 5BQ3

Q!xQm

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y O U COUNTY OF NEW YORK

LEO REGINALD M R S

Index No. 190 1 SW10 Plaintiff,

lagaim-

NO OPPOSI”4 SUMMARY 1 JuIsGhzENT MOTTON AND AMERICAN BONDA MOTOR COMPANY, JNC., et al.

WHEREFORE, defendant, American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (“AHM’)), hereby requests

summary judgment in the abovMntitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law arid Rulcs Section

3212, dismissing plaintiffs Complaint againnst dofendant, AILM, with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto.

1T IS ORDEFSD, that upon notice to all codefendams, ali claims and crossclaims against

dofendank AWM, bc, and the same are, hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Sa - Walsh, Esq. Lkdks Law Firm PLLC Attorneys for Plaintiffs, 747 Third Avenue, 37* Floor New York, New York 1001 7 Ttl: (212) 558-5675

SO ORDERED:

2 H O N O W L E SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER

121 7597.01 1

-A- Robert: M. Goodman, Bsq. Crreenbaum, Rowe, Smith 62 Davis LLP Att~meys for Defendant, American Honda Motor Co., Tnc, 75 Livingston Avenue, Suite 301 Ros~land, New Jersey 07068 Tel: (973) 535-I 600

In Re First Judicial District Asbestos Litigation

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATEFF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

LEO REGINALD AKERS, Plaintiff,

VS.

GENUINE PARTS COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

NYCAL - NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER Index No.: 190150/10

WHEREFORE, GENUINE PARTS COMPANY, hereby requests summary judgment in


Plaintiffs Complaint against GENUINE PARTS COMPANY only, with prejudice, and there



defendant GENUINE PARTS COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs.

, 2010 Dated: Buffalo, ew York

June &{ 2010

747 31d Avenue, 37th Floor New York, NY 100 I 7

Genuine Parts Company The Avant Building, Suite l29OL 2 8 2010 200 Delaware Avenue

0e09’281t3 17: 20 GREENBAUM + 12128383735

,-, +A 1

I

N0.917 PO03


LEO REGINALD A.KERS

IndexNo. 190150/10 Plaintiff,

-against-

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR COMPANY, IW., et al, 1 JmGmm

WHEREFORE, defendant, American Honda Motor Co., Inc, (“AHM’)), hereby requests

summary judgment in tho aboventitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismisshg plaintiffs Complaint against defendant, AkM, with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto.

defendant, AMM, be, and the same are, hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs,

+ Walsh, Esq. Lb6ks Law Firm.PLLC Attorneys for Plaintiffs, 747 Third Avenue, 37’h Floor Ncw Y a k , New York I OQ 17 Td: (212) 558-5675

-A- R o h M+ Goodman, Esq. Orwenbaurn, Rowe, Smith gC Dwis U P Attorneys for Defendant, herican Honda Motor Co., Inc. 75 Livingston Avenue, Suite 301 Roselaad, New Jersey 07068 Tcl: (973) 535-1 600

SO ORDERED:

HONORABLE SHERRY KLE- ITLER

121 7597.0 I 1

JUL 2 8 zmo

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK C O W OF NEW YORK

WHEREFORE, defendant Dimlet Trucks North America, LLC, sued herein t~

Freightliner LLC (hereafter "DTNA''), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled

we, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

a@mt defendant DINA with prejudice, ,md there being no opposition thereto,

defendant DTNA, be euld the same are bereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs,

bated: Jeficho, NY Jdy14,ZOlO , ~

A Janet C. Walsh, bq. LOCKS LAW FIRM FLLC Attorneys for Plainti$ 747 Third Avenue, 37* F1, New York, NY 1001 7 (2 12) 838-3333

NXXON PEABODY LLP Anorneys for Defgizdant, Daimler Truch North America, U C s/h/a Freightliner U C 50 Jericho Quadrangle, # i * e \ Q L E D fcsicho, NY 1 1735-272s (5 16) 832-7500 JUL 2 8 2010

\E~'\I '{ORK Hon. Sherry Klein Reltler ~ ~ b J N T Y CLERK'S

SO ORDERJD, E I3022957.1


..idex No.: In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

90 I

LEO AKERS, Plaintiff(s), NO OPPOSITION

SUMMARY JUDGMENT - against - MOTION

AFTON PUMPS, INC,, et a1

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, Defendant PACCAR, INC., hereinafter (“PACCAR”) hereby requests

Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

32 12, dismissing plaintiff’s complaint against Defendant PACCAR with prejudice:, and there



Defendant, PACCAR be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to

either party.

Dated: 1 - 1 0 ,2010 New York, New York

SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD. Attorneys for Defendant PACCAR, INC. 850 Third Avenue, Suite 1 100 New York, NY 10022 (212) 651-7500 I d

-mt,m

Attorneys for Plaintiff 747 Third Avenue New York, NY 1001 7

J\\L 2 8 2010

SO ORDERED, Hon.

1 f

Plaintiffs,

-against-

AETNA HEALTH INC., et. al., including UNILEVER US, INC. (Individually and as .

Successor to CHESEBROUGH-POND'S USA, INC.; VICKS CHEMICAL COMPANY AND PRINCE ~iA-rcmlt3ELLI) ,

NYCAL Index No. 10-190157


WHEREFORE, defendant Conopco, Inc. ("Conopco") d/b/a Unilever hereby requests

summary judgincnt in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

32 12: dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Conopco with prejudice, and there being


ORDEIU?D, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defmdant Conopco be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York Junf: ?g 201 0

A

EAI~EY, L L ~ W I ~ K , SWEENEY & STRAUS S AiorneysLfor Plnintif 360 Lexington Avenue, 20th Floor New York, N Y 100 17 (2 12) 986-2233

Mark K. Hsu, Esq. KASOWITZ, BENSON, TO €REDMAN LLP Atlorncysjcjr Dejendnni 1633 I3rondway NCW York, New York IO019 JUL 28 20'O (212) 506-1'700


Index No.: 190170/10



WHEREFORE, defendant Victory Real Estate Development Corp., sued h e r u

incorrectly as Victory Development Corporation (“Victory”), hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing Plaintiff’s Complaint against defendant Victory with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claimq

defendant Victory be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs,

Dated: New Y$:r york 2010

Belluck & Fox, LLP 546 Fifth Avenue, 4th Floor New York, NY 10036

Attorneys for Plaintiff (212) 681-1575

New Yoik, New York 10166

Attorneys for Victory Real Estate (2 12) 80 1-9200 &--- fevelopment Corp.

SO ORDERED, Hon. Sxrry Klein Heitler


X

I N RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL Han. Sherry Klein Heitler

X

VINCENT DIIAGONE, Index No. 190192-2010

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

AIR & LIQUID SYSTElr CORPORATI I as Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. et wl., including GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION

AND ORDER

Defendants.

X

WHEREFORE, defendant Foster GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-cntitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY with prejudice, and there being



GENERAL, ELECTRIC COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: New York New York 7/3 2010

David A. Chandler, Esq. -’ Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. Attorneys for Plaint@ 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 (2 12) 558-5500

Robert M. Gilmartin, Jr., Esq. v

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arn Attorneys for General Electric Co Three Gateway Center, 1 2t” Floor Newark, NJ 07 102 (973) 242-0002

plaintiff($), no -against- judgment motion order$), : no opposition : ... defendants the goodyear...

Documents