philosophy of law exam review

Upload: brittany-stone

Post on 06-Jul-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/17/2019 Philosophy of Law Exam Review

    1/17

    PHILOSOPHY OF LAW EXAM REVIEW

    PATERNALISM OBEDIENCE TO LAW CASESShort answer

    Each worth !" #ar$s

    O%era&& '!( #ar$s

    One #e)*+# &en,th

    answer

    Between (!' #ar$s

    Cho*ce o- " o+t o- .

    /+est*ons

    Worth 0!1 #ar$s each

    Co#2rehens*%e )e3n*t*onan) e4a#2&e 5)*6erent

    e4a#2&e -or each7

     T82es9

    Narrow % Broa)

    I#2+re % P+re

    So-t % Har)

    Wea$ % Stron,

    We&-are % Mora&

     :ohn St+art M*&&

     :+st*3cat*on an)Ar,+#ent -or o;&*,at*on

    to o;e8 the &aw

    E+thanas*aDecr*#*na&*

  • 8/17/2019 Philosophy of Law Exam Review

    2/17

    PATERNALISM

    Narrow

    Inter-erence %*a law  state 2aterna&*s#

    E4a#2&e9 New Yor$ C*t8 ;ann*n, &ar,eso)as

    Iss+e9 &ots o- &oo2ho&es> ar;*trar8 an)

    ca2r*c*o+s who se&&s> what *s so&)>

    re3&&s

    Broad

    Inter-erence %*a interpersonal context  

    E4a#2&e9 Ph8s*c*an not &ett*n, 2at*ent$now cr+c*a& *n-o a;o+t con)*t*on as *t

    wo+&) *nter-ere w*th hea&*n, 2rocess

    Pure

    Inter-erence to ;ene3t that person 

    E4a#2&e9 Ma$*n, s+*c*)e a cr*#e>

    #an)ator8 seat;e&t +se> #an)ator8

    heet +se> -orce) ;&oo) trans-+s*ons

    -or :eho%ahs w*tnesses

    Iss+e9 #a8 &ea) 2eo2&e to sto2 )o*n,the act ent*re&8

    Impure

    Inter-erence to ;ene3t another person 

    E4a#2&e9 s#art ser%e &*cens*n,>

    re,+&at*n, a)%ert*s*n, to )*sco+ra,e

    s#o$*n,

    Soft

    Inter-erence when not mentally

    competent  

    E4a#2&e9 s+;?ect to *n%o&+ntar8

    hos2*ta&* +n$nown to the#> *s

    +nsa-e an) there *s no t*#e to war#

    the#> 8o+ #a8 t+rn the# ;ac$ w*tho+t

    *n-r*n,e#ent ,*%en the*r )es*re *s not to

    -a&& o6

    Means9 cross*n, the ;r*),e

    En)9 to ,et to the other s*)e

    Strong

    Inter-ere w*th ends on the grounds they 

    may be mistaken of their end goal 

    E4a#2&e9 ;an ;ac$co+ntr8 s$**n,

    En)9 S$* *n +n#a*nta*ne) areas

    Ca+ses r*s$ an) e4tens*%e reso+rces to

    sa-e *n *n?+re)

    Welfare

    Inter-ere to protect the emotional,

     physiological, and social well being

    E4a#2&e9 Protect 2rost*t+tes -ro# r*s$

    o- %*o&ence an) )*seases

    Moral

    Inter-ere to protect “moral” well-being

    E4a#2&e9 Ban 2rost*t+t*on to 2rotect

    2rost*t+tes -ro# e42&o*tat*on

     JSM and the Harm Prn!ple

     The e4ce2t*on -or 2aterna&*s# *s that a 2erson cannot se&& the#se&%es *nto s&a%er8

    as *t 2roh*;*ts -+t+re +se

  • 8/17/2019 Philosophy of Law Exam Review

    3/17

    "#eden!e to Law

    D*&e##a9 Whether or not *t wo+&) ;e J$ST -or Socrates to atte#2t esca2e :+st*3cat*on

    o- &aws where an8 c*t* the8 #a8 chan,e the*r #*n)s so he sho+&) ;e a&*%e -or that

    Re?ecte) o2t*on o- e4*&e> he cannot r+n o6 as a &aw;rea$er an) a;an)on

    h*s 2ost

    o- Cons*)erat*on

    @ Fr*en)s o- Socrates w*&& ;e 2+n*she) as acco#2&*ces *n esca2e"@ Another 2o&*s w*&& %*ew h*# as a )estro8er o- &aws0@ Wo+&) #a$e e4*&es o- h*s ch*&)ren

  • 8/17/2019 Philosophy of Law Exam Review

    4/17

    E+thanas*a

    Argument%

    Ro)r*,+e 2roh*;*t*n, ter#*na&&8 *&& 2erson -ro# access*n, 2h8s*c*an!

    ass*ste) s+*c*)e *n-r*n,es on the r*,ht to e/+a&*t8 5Sec@ (7

    Carter9 A+tono#8Se&-!Deter#*nat*on> re/+est -or ass*ste) s+*c*)ePr*nc*2&es an) Theor*es9

    @ Harm prn!ple  s2here o- &*;ert8 an) a+tono#8 5a;*&*t8 to ;e se&-!

    ,o%ern*n,7> sect*on 5&*-e> &*;ert8 an) sec+r*t87 sho+&) a&&ow -or the r*,ht to

    )*e as the )eath *s *nc&+)e) In &*-e"@ Paternal%m9 welfare 52rotect*on o- e#ot*ona&> 2h8s*o&o,*ca& an) soc*a&

    we&&!;e*n,7 % moral 0@ E(ualt' and Ant)d%!rmnaton9 sect*on ". *n-r*n,es on 2r*nc*2&es o-

    -+n)a#enta& -ree)o#s as the r*,ht to w*th)rawa& &*-e s+22ort *s a&&owe) ;+t

    ass*ste) )8*n,> wh*ch *s s*#*&ar *n 2r*nc*2&e> *s )en*e)@*+ ,ualt' of Lfe

    Roote) *n Gt*&*tar*an*s# 5,reatest ,oo) -or ,reatest a#o+nt o- 2eo2&e7A+tono#8Conse/+ent*a&*st #ora& theor8+a&*t8 o- &*-e -actors9 ca2ac*t8 to e42er*ence 2&eas+re an) 2a*n> rat*ona&*t8>

    #e#or*esre&at*onsh*2s> #a$e ,oa&s an) 2&ans to carr8 o+t@Va&+*n, ?+),e#ents9 so#e &*%es> when -+&& o- s+6er*n,> #a8 not ;e worth

    &*%*n, 5ne,at*%e +t*&*t8 2os*t*%e +t*&*t87*&&*n,9 $*&&*n, *s #ora&&8 ;a) *- &*-e *s %a&+a;&e 5?+st*3e) *- &*-e *s one o-

    e4cess*%e 2a*n or &ow %a&+e7-+ San!tt' of Lfe

    Res2ect -or 2ersons an) the +n*/+e %a&+e o- h+#an &*-e@

    A&& h+#an &*%es ha%e %a&+e an) #ere e4*stence *s the +&t*#ate %a&+e.+ Wrongne%% of /llngRoote) *n )eonto&o,89 #ora& a,ents sho+&) act to -+&3&& )+t*esNo conse/+ent*a&*st #ora& theor8E%en *- re/+est ass*stance *n )8*n,> $*&&*n, *s wron, 5wron, to $*&& the

    *nnocent> e4c&+)e) *s ca2*ta& 2+n*sh#ent an) war7Case an) Reason*n, o- :+),esRODRI=GEJ9 O+tco#e co##*tte) s+*c*)e +n)er ass*stance o- 2h8s*c*anBCCA9 Nat+re o- *&&ness N"T &e,a& s8ste# wh*ch restr*cte) -ree)o# o- cho*ce 5Sec@

  • 8/17/2019 Philosophy of Law Exam Review

    5/17

    ". )oes not )*scr*#*nate on ,ro+n)s o- 2h8s*ca& )*sa;*&*t87D*ssent9

    Pro%*s*on wh*ch imposes senseless

    su!ering to those who w*&& )*e short&8

    )oes not con-or# to 2r*nc*2&es o-

    -+n)a#enta& ?+st*ce@ "eath is a part oflife itself#

    S+2re#e Co+rt he&) section $%& infringed on rights but to a reasonable limit  

    where ;&an$et 2roh*;*t*on *s necessar8

    Ma?or*t8

    Se!ton 09 Sec+r*t8 *s r*,ht to #a$e

    cho*ces concern*n, ones own ;o)8

    AGTONOMY

    San!tt' of lfe9 a&&ow*n, ass*ste)

    s+*c*)e +n)er#*nes sanct*t8 o- &*-e an)

    re-or# wo+&) see# as *- state con)one)

    s+*c*)e

    Prote!tng the 1ulnera#le9 *n so that

    the8 are not 2ress+re) *nto re/+est*n,

    Se!ton 2-9 2roh*;*t*on )*scr*#*nates

    those who are +na;&e to co##*t

    s+*c*)e@ Tho+,h ?+st*3e) ,*%en 2+r2ose

    o- sect*on was to 2rotect -ro# other

    want*n, to contro& the*r &*-e

     Ju%t3ed nfrngement9 e4ce2t*ons

    create *ne/+a&*t8 an) &ea) to Ks&*22er8

    s&o2e o- -+&& acce2tance> nee)

    sa-e,+ar)s to 2re%ent a;+se

    Se!ton 249 2roh*;*t*on const*t+te)

    cr+e& an) +n+s+a& 2+n*sh#ent ,*%en *t

    -orces her to en)+re 2ro&on,e)

    s+6er*n, +nt*& )eath@ Co+rt ar,+e)

    #ere 2roh*;*t*on o- act*on wo+&) not

    const*t+te treat#ent@

    D*ssent ONE

    Se!ton 2-9 sect*on ". creates

    *ne/+a&*t8 as )*sa;&e) are +na;&e to

    co##*t s+*c*)e w*tho+t ass*stance an)

    s2ec+&at*on o- a;+se to s8ste# )oes

    not ?+st*-8 restr*ct*ons

    Impl!aton of !hange% n the law9

    re2ea& o- 2roh*;*t*on *n)*cates that

    ,o%ern#ent no &on,er ;e&*e%es

    2reser%at*on o- &*-e o%err*)es se&-

    )eter#*nat*on

    Remed'9 s+s2en) )ec&arat*on o-

    *n%a&*)*t8 -or one 8ear -or &e,a& re-or#

    Ro)r*,+e< 5an) other7 ,rante)

    const*t+t*on e4e#2t*on

    Safeguard%9

    • Const*t+t*ona& e4e#2t*on

    • Cert*3e) ;8 2h8s*c*an an)

    2s8ch*atr*st

    • Da*&8 e4a#*nat*ons

    • Per#*ss*on e42*res a-ter 0 )a8s

    DISSENT TWO

    Se!ton 09 Cr*#*na& Co)e 2roh*;*ts

    a+tono#8 an) *n-r*n,es on sect*on re9

    sec+r*t8@ S+e s+6ers ;eca+se -ear the

    s8ste# #a8 s+6er a;+se

    "1er#road and Ar#trar'9 Ro)r*,+e<

    sca2e,oate) -or others who #*,ht ;e

    2ers+a)e) to co##*t s+*c*)e

  • 8/17/2019 Philosophy of Law Exam Review

    6/17

    Re%pon%e to Ma5ort'9 &aws a&&ow -or

    se&-!)e-ence ?+st*-8 $*&&*n,

    A!t1e 1 Pa%%1e d%tn!ton9

    w*th)rawa& o- s+22ort % act*%e*nter%ent*on@ D*st*nct*on *s ar;*trar8@

    DISSENT THREE

    Rght to de wth dgnt'9 2rtecte)

    +n)er sect*on CARTER9 )*e) o- nat+ra& ca+ses

     Tr*a& Co+rt9 provisions which prohibit assisted suicide breach the charter @ =&or*a>

    who 2ersona&&8 re/+este)> -ree o- coerc*on> not )e2ressant w*th a #ater*a&

    )*sa;*&*t8 that w*&& ne%er *#2ro%e an) a co#2etent a)+&t> sat*s3es con)*t*ons@

    R*s$s can ;e a%o*)e) %*a sa-e,+ar)s

    =rante) =&or*a const*t+t*ona& e4e#2t*on 2er#*tt*n, ass*ste) s+*c*)eFe)era& =o%ern#ent9 +2ho&)s const*t+t*on that 2rotects h+#an &*-e@S+2re#e Co+rt9 ass*ste) s+*c*)e 2roh*;*t*on *s o%er;roa) -or those en)+r*n,

    *nto&era;&e s+6er*n, o- *rre#e)*a;&e #e)*ca& con)*t*on@ In-r*n,e#ent o- charter *s

    not a reasona;&e &*#*t@

    E4ten)s the r*,ht to re-+se treat#ent to rght to !on%entng to re!e1e

    treatment that wll end lfe 

    R*,ht to &*-e *s r*,ht not to )*e@ 'ndividuals can waive their right to life#

    ,ualt' of lfe SCC concerns o- a+tono#8 an) /+a&*t8 o- &*-e are &*;ert8 an)

    sec+r*t8

    Sanct*t8 o- &*-e one o- o+r -+n)a#enta& %a&+es res2ect*n, the %a&+e o- h+#an &*-e>

    as we&& as enco#2ass*n, &*;ert8 an) sec+r*t8 )oes not re/+*re that a&& h+#an &*-e

    ;e 2reser%e) at a&& cost

    L#ert'6 2roh*;*t*on *n-r*n,es on &*;ert8 the r*,ht to non!*nter-erence ;8 the

    state

    Se!urt'6 *n-r*n,es ;eca+se *t restr*cts ;o)*&8 *nte,r*t8

    7gnt' and autonom'9 cr+c*a& cho*ces a;o+t en)*n, ones K&*-e&on, %a&+es area cr*t*ca& #atter *n )*,n*t8 an) a+tono#8

    Parallel% to nformed !on%ent9 re#o%a& o- &*-e s+sta*n*n, e/+*2#ent *s a&&owe)>

    )en8*n, r*,ht to ass*ste) s+*c*)e *s h82ocr*t*ca&

    78eren!e from Rodrgue99

    SCC )*) not 3n) -+n)a#enta& ?+st*ce ?+st*3e) *n-r*n,e#ent o- &*-e> &*;ert8 an)

  • 8/17/2019 Philosophy of Law Exam Review

    7/17

    sec+r*t8 5contrar8 to Ma?or*t8 *n Ro)r*,+e

    re)+ce costs 5)r+, contro& &aws7>

    *nc&+s*on *nto soc*et8 o- the once

    #ar,*na&* *ncrease) re%en+e -or

    ,o%ern#ent

    :ontnued :rmnal Proh#ton

    (ene)ts9 a%o*)*n, )r+, a))*ct*on an)

    or,an*

  • 8/17/2019 Philosophy of Law Exam Review

    8/17

    #ar*?+ana@;7 I#2r*son#ent )oes not *ncrease

    we&&;e*n,> *t *s )e,ra)*n,@c7 I#2r*son#ent o- those

    %+&nera;&e to the r*s$ o- )r+,

    a;+se are &*$e&8 to ;e ne,at*%e&8

    *#2acte) ;8 *#2r*son#ent@)7 I- *#2r*son#ent on&8 ,*%en to

    a)+&tsnon!%+&nera;&e> then the8

    are a #eans to the en) o-

    2rotect*n, the %+&nera;&e

    1ocus on harm reduction

    tility

    a7 Cr*#e rates are &*$e&8 to &ower

    ,*%en )ecr*#*na&*

  • 8/17/2019 Philosophy of Law Exam Review

    9/17

     Alcohol, tobacco, narcotics v marijuana

    a7 H*,her rate o- )*sease than

    #ar*?+ana;7 H*,her rate o- )e2en)enc8 than

    #ar*?+anac7 H*,her rate o- r*s$ to others than

    #ar*?+ana 5)r*%*n, +n)er the

    *n+ence7Connections to reasoning

    ISS$E9 cr*#*na&* or)er> hea&th an)

    %+&nera;&e 2eo2&e

    7%%ent

    Law *s ar;*trar8 an)

    )*s2ro2ort*onate as a

    res2onse to soc*a&

    2ro;&e#s

    Cho*ce o- cr*#*na& &aw to

    contro& con)+ct to h*,h

    r*s$ ,ro+2s *s o+t o-

    $ee2*n, w*th stan)ar)s o-  ?+st*ce

    I#2r*son#ent reser%e)

    -or con)+ct wh*ch 2oses

    reasone) r*s$ o- har# to

    others an) har# to

    *)ent*3a;&e *n)*%*)+a&s

  • 8/17/2019 Philosophy of Law Exam Review

    10/17

    s*,n*3cant> #+st

    we*,h nat+re an)

    e4tent

    .unishment issue

    a7 On&8 *n a,,ra%ate)c*rc+#stances w*&&

    *#2r*son#ent ;e a

    3t sentence -or the

    %+&nera;&e;7 =*%en no #*n*#+#

    an) we&&!

    esta;&*she)

    sentenc*n,

    2r*nc*2&es> *t )oes

    not %*o&ate

    -+n)a#enta&

     ?+st*ce *n ;e*n,

    ,ross&8

    )*s2ro2ort*onatec7 Not o%er;roa) as

    narrower 2os*t*on

    wo+&) not ;e

    e6ect*%e

    )*c+&t to /+ant*-8

    Harm to others

    I#2a*re) )r*%*n, *s

    se2arate *ss+e -ro#

    s*#2&e 2ossess*onI#2act on hea&thcare too

    re#ote

    4esponse to majority

    a7 Who *s #ore&ess

    &*$e&8 to ;e

    *#2r*sone) not

    #e#;ers o-

    %+&nera;&e ,ro+2s>

    those who )o not

    2ose har# tothe#se&%es or

    other;7 State cannot

    2re%ent ,enera&

    2o2+&at*on -ro#

    en,a,*n, *n

    con)+ct that *s

    har#&ess to the#

    on the ;as*s that

    other #ore

    %+&nera;&e 2ersons

    #a8 har#

    the#se&%esc7 =o%ern#ent *s

    tr8*n, to 2re%ent

    &ow /+ant+# o-

    har# to soc*et8 at

    h*,h cost to

    *n)*%*)+a&s

    5INFRIN=MENT OF

    SECTION 7Malmo-Levine; Tracing mari!uana

    Consens+sSect*on ( ar,+#ent

    )*s#*sse) as *t *s not a

    2ersona& character*st*c

    Sect*on cha&&en,e a&so

    -a*&e)

  • 8/17/2019 Philosophy of Law Exam Review

    11/17

    Pro%ttuton

    Phlo%oph!al Argument%:lu%ter%

    7 Legal moral%m9 #ora& an) soc*a&4< Plan %e=07 Welfare Paternal%t9 2h8s*ca& an) e#ot*ona&*< Market >reedom(7 >emn%t :rt(ue%9 ant*!contractar*an> )o#*nat*on> a&*enat*on an)

    co##o)*3cat*on to 2re%ent har#s to ;o)*&8 *n%as*on> #a&e o22ress*on>

    a&*enat*on an) co##o)*3cat*on o- se4+a&*t8> sacr*3ce to a+tono#8Q7 Mod3ed >emn%t :rt(ue%9 ant*!e42&o*tat*on an) st*,#at* e42&o*tat*on7e!rmnal9aton

     Autonomy

    Harm .rinciple V*ct*#&ess cr*#e

    a7 Consens+a&5iberty

    .aternalism

    ;7 Broa) 2aterna&*s# *n -a%o+r o-

    re-or#

     Anti-0oralism

    a7 P&a*n se4 ar,+#ent;7 St*,#a res+&t o- c+&t+ra& ta;oos>

    re?ect*on o- we&-are 2aterna&*s#

    as *t *s create) ;8 st*,#ac7 Re?ect*on o- con%ent*ona&

    #ora&*t82*uality and 1eminist 6heory

    a7 Ant*!st*,#at* s+;or)*nat*onc@ A&*#entat*on an)

    co##o)*3cat*on o-

    se4+a&*t89 a&*enates

    se4+a&*t8> t+rn*n, or,ans

    *nto co##o)*t*es)@ Sacr*3ce o- a+tono#89

    a&&ows -or contro& o- others

    7antian 1eminist+

    2rost*t+t*on re2resents e4tre#es o-

    *ne/+a&*t8 where 2rost*t+te *s

    o;?ect*3e)> co##o)*3e) an) e42&o*te)

    5#eans to c+sto#ers en)s7

    8lobal Human 6ra3cking

  • 8/17/2019 Philosophy of Law Exam Review

    12/17

    riminal nderworld 2mpowerment:onne!ton% and Rea%onng of Judge%

    ISS$E6 Decr*#*na&*

  • 8/17/2019 Philosophy of Law Exam Review

    13/17

    Supreme :ourt

    Gnan*#o+s )ec*s*on

    Contrar8 to -+n)a#enta& ?+st*ce

    4ights infringement not a reasonable limit

    Laws impose dangerous conditions 

    Bawd' hou%e

    O;?ect*%e9 co#;at n+*sance *n -a%o+r o- 2+;&*c hea&th an) sa-et8

    Fo+n) grossly disproportionate as *t *n-r*n,es on sa-et8

    L1ng o8 the a1al%

    O;?ect*%e9 tar,et 2*#2s an) other e42&o*tat*%e re&at*onsh*2s

    Fo+n) o%er;roa) as *t tar,ets other &e,*t*#ate re&at*onsh*2s that *ncrease sec+r*t8

    :ommun!aton

    O;?ect*%e9 co#;at n+*sance *n -a%o+r o- sa-et8 an) hea&th o- 2+;&*c

    Fo+n) ,ross&8 )*s2ro2ort*onate as *t *n-r*n,es on sa-et8

    Infrngement% on %e!ton 0 were not rea%ona#le &*#*ts

  • 8/17/2019 Philosophy of Law Exam Review

    14/17

    Hate Spee!h

    "ate SpeechAr,+#ents *nc&+)*n, )e3n*t*ons an) )e-enses *n e4*st*n, &aw

    Hate Spee!h

    E42ress*on a*#e) to ca+se e4tre#e o6ence an) %*&*-8 a+)*ence

    Mot*%at*on *s to *nc*te -ear an) hatre)

    Pre#*se) on )en*a& o- e/+a&*t8 -or a&&

    Propaganda

    Contr*;+tes &*tt&e to the as2*rat*ons o- Cana)*ans *n e*ther a /+est -or tr+th>

    2ro#ot*on o- *n)*%*)+a& se&-!)e%e&o2#ent or 2rotect*on o- )e#ocrac8

    D*sse#*nat*on o- *)eas> *n-or#at*on or r+#o+r -or the 2+r2ose o- he&2*n,*n?+r*n,

    an *nst*t+t*on

    =enera&&8 ;*ase)#*s&ea)*n, *n nat+re

    :hara!ter%t!% of Propaganda

    &; Pro#ot*on o- self-serving ends$; P+r2oses o- gaining power, control, manipulation

    07 Fa*&+re to respect autonomy  %; 'ndi!erence to the truth>; .otential bias, deception

    Prn!ple and Theore%7e!rmnal9aton

    "8en%e prn!ple

    It *s ,oo) to cr*#*na&&8 2roh*;*t

    so#eth*n, to 2re%ent ser*o+s o6ense

    5as o22ose to *n?+r8 or har#7 to 2ersons

    an) wo+&) &*$e&8 ;e an e6ect*%e #eans

    to that en) *- enacte)

    O6ense *s an anno8ance to so#eone@

     The 2erson e42er*ences a )*s&*$e) state

    ca+se) ;8 wron,-+& con)+ct@

    E%a&+ate) ;8

    7 E4tent 5*ntens*t8> #a,n*t+)e>

    )+ra;*&*t87"7 N+#;er o- 2eo2&e o6en)e)07 Reasona;&8 a%o*)a;&e

    :rmnal9aton

    Harm prn!ple

    D*rect 2h8s*ca& an) r*,hts )e2r*%*n,

    har# *)ent*3a;&e *n)*%*)+a&s

    Does not 2ro%*)e s+c*ent ?+st*3cat*on

    -or &e,a& 2rotect*on a,a*nst wron,-+&

    con)+ct o- others

    :hllng E8e!t

    there *s the concern that *t w*th sto2

    2eo2&e -ro# ta$*n, act*on o+t o- -ear o-

    conse/+ences

    :hallenge% to E?!a!' @de%red

  • 8/17/2019 Philosophy of Law Exam Review

    15/17

    E(ualt'

    Mult!ultural%m

    :rt!al Ra!e Theor'

    >emn%t Legal Theor'

    E?!a!' @de%red re%ult ;8 co##+n*cat*n, state#ents> other than *n 2r*%ate

    con%ersat*on> w*&&-+&&8 2ro#otes hatre) a,a*nst an8 *)ent*3a;&e ,ro+2 *s ,+*&t8 o-

    7efen%e

    riminal ode, Sect*on 09

    507 No 2erson sha&& ;e con%*cte) o- an o6ence +n)er s+;sect*on 5"7

    5a7 *- he esta;&*shes that the state#ents co##+n*cate) were tr+e

    5;7 *-> *n ,oo) -a*th> he e42resse) or atte#2te) to esta;&*sh ;8 ar,+#ent an

    o2*n*on on a re&*,*o+s s+;?ect

    5c7 *- the state#ents were re&e%ant to an8 s+;?ect o- 2+;&*c *nterest> the

    )*sc+ss*on o- wh*ch was -or the 2+;&*c ;ene3t> an) *- on reasona;&e ,ro+n)s

    he ;e&*e%e) the# to ;e tr+e or5)7 I-> *n ,oo) -a*th> he *nten)e) to 2o*nt o+t> -or the 2+r2ose o- re#o%a&>

    #atters 2ro)+c*n, or ten)*n, to 2ro)+ce -ee&*n,s o- hatre) towar)s an

    *)ent*3a;&e ,ro+2 *n Cana)a@

    Ma5ort'

    Hate s2eech *s har#-+&>

    as we&& as o6ens*%e to the

    tar,ete) ,ro+2s an) the

    soc*et8 at &ar,e@ Free)o#

    o- s2eech *s not the r*,ht

    to %*&*-8

    Harm

    Ps8cho&o,*ca& )*stress

    Increase) acts o-

    )*scr*#*nat*on

    Lac$ o- se&-!-+&3&ent

    D*scor) ;etween %ar*o+s

    :on%en%u%

    Hate s2eech -a&&s +n)er

    sect*on " 2rotect*on9 r*,ht

    *s *n-r*n,e) ;8 cr*#*na&

    2roh*;*t*on

    5r*,ht *s not a;so&+te9 a&&

    *#2ortant %a&+es #+st ;e;a&ance)7

    7%%ent

    Foc+s on ;a&anc*n, an)

    2ro2ort*ona&*t8

    Inter2retat*on o- M*&&s

    ar,+#ent

    :la%h of 1ew%1alua#le

     Thro+,h c&ash o- e4tre#e

    %*ews> the tr+th an)

    )e#ocrat*c %*s*on

    re#a*ns %*,oro+s an)

    a&*%e

  • 8/17/2019 Philosophy of Law Exam Review

    16/17

    c+&t+ra& ,ro+2s

    Argument of truth

    In *ts e4tre#e> we wo+&)

    ha%e to 2er#*t the

    co##+n*cat*on o- a&&e42ress*on an) *t wo+&)

    ;e *#2oss*;&e to $now

    w*th certa*nt8 what *s the

    tr+th

    Truth and 7emo!ra!'

     To 2ortra8 #*s&ea)*n,

    state#ents as cr+c*a& to

    tr+th an) the ;etter#ent

    o- the 2o&*t*ca& an) soc*a&

    #*&*e+ *s #*s,+*)e)

    7emo!ra!'

    Part*c*2at*on rests on

    not*on that a&& are e/+a&@

     Tho+,h 2ro2a,an)a *s

    ,enera&&8 2o&*t*ca& an) at

    the heart o- e42ress*on>

    s+ch e42ress*on can

    +n)er#*ne o+r

    co##*t#ent to

    )e#ocrac8 when +se) to

    2ro2a,ate *)eas

    Proportonalt'

    L*#*t*n, r*,ht rat*ona&e *s

    that there *s an

    *#2ortance *n 2rotect*n,

    certa*n ,ro+2s

    Foster*n, har#on*o+s

    soc*a& re&at*onsh*2s

    E4c&+)*n, 2r*%ate

    con%ersat*ons

    Hate %pee!h !harge%

    defenda#le f

    7 Tr+th"7 =oo) -a*th on

    re&*,*o+s #atter07 P+;&*c *nterest

    Low 1alue argument %

    !r!ular

    I- one state#ent *s

    )an,ero+s an) w*tho+t

    %a&+e> then *t can ;e

    conc&+)e) that noco##on ?+st*3cat*ons -or

    2rotect*n, -ree)o# o-

    e42ress*on are ser%e) ;8

    *t

    :hallenge n 1alung

    %pee!h

    What *s o- re)ee#a;&e

    %a&+e

    :hallenge to e?!a!'!lam%

    Note) *n h*stor8 that hate

    2ro2a,an)a &aws )*) not

    2re%ent the Na there *s the

    concern that *t w*th sto2

    2eo2&e -ro# ta$*n, act*on

    o+t o- -ear o-

    conse/+ences

  • 8/17/2019 Philosophy of Law Exam Review

    17/17

    .7 =oo) -a*th atte#2t

    at re#o%a&

    Re%pon%e%

    6ruth9 hate s2eech -a&se

    an) w*)e&8 $nown to ;e-a&se

    /elf-4eali?ation9 +2ho&)

    hate#on,ers OR %*ct*#s

    an) soc*et8 sho+&)

    2rotect %*ct*#s

    "emocracy 9 co#2et*n,

    *nter2retat*ons

    Slpper' %lope

    A&&ow certa*n t82es o-e42ress*on create

    encroach#ents on

    e42ress*on

    Remed'9 #ore than one

    &e,*s&at*%e too&

    Short!omng% n the

    law

    A;sence o- re/+*re) har#

    Concern o- c*rc+#stances

    s+;?ect to state scr+t*n89%*rt+a&&8 +n&*#*te)

    De-ense o- tr+th #a8 not

    narrow sco2e

    :rmnal law argua#le

    unne!e%%ar'

    Process o- cr*#*na& &aw *s

    se%erest soc*et8 can 2ose

    Nee) -or a&ternat*%es