phases of matter in the brahms experiment
DESCRIPTION
Phases of matter in the BRAHMS experiment. Paweł Staszel, Marian Smoluchowski Institute of Physics Jagiellonian University for the BRAHMS Collaboration. XXXIII International Conference On High Energy Physics Moscow , 26.07 – 2.08. 200 6. Outline. Detector setup. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Phases of matter inthe BRAHMS experiment
Paweł Staszel, Marian Smoluchowski Institute of Physics
Jagiellonian Universityfor the BRAHMS Collaboration
XXXIII International Conference On High Energy Physics
Moscow, 26.07 – 2.08.2006
2
2P. Staszel - Jagiellonian University, KrakówICHEP, Moscow 2006
BRAHMS
Outline
1. Detector setup.
2. General (bulk) characteristics of nucleus-nucleus reactions.
3. Nuclear modification at mid-rapidity
4. Nuclear modification at forward rapidity
5. Elliptic Flow
6. Summary.
3
3P. Staszel - Jagiellonian University, KrakówICHEP, Moscow 2006
BRAHMS
Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider
Au+Au d+Au
p+p
energies:sNN=200GeV,
sNN=62GeV
Cu+Cu
PHOBOS
STAR
PHENIX BRAHMS
4
4P. Staszel - Jagiellonian University, KrakówICHEP, Moscow 2006
BRAHMS
BBroad RaRange HHadron MMagnetic SSpectrometers
Tile Ring 1
Flow Ring 2
Si Ring 1
5
5P. Staszel - Jagiellonian University, KrakówICHEP, Moscow 2006
BRAHMS
Particle production and energy loss
Energy density: Bjorken 1983
eBJ = 3/2 (<Et>/ R20) dNch/d
assuming formation time t0=1fm/c:
>5.0 GeV/fm3 for AuAu @ 200 GeV
>4.4 GeV/fm3 for AuAu @ 130 GeV
>3.7 GeV/fm3 for AuAu @ 62.4 GeV
p
p
y
y
BB
yT dyydy
dNm cosh)(
Total E=25.72.1TeV72GeV per participant
6
6P. Staszel - Jagiellonian University, KrakówICHEP, Moscow 2006
BRAHMS
Primary versus produced matter
• longitudinal net-kaon evolution similar as net-proton in |y|< 3 at RHIC (AuAu @ 200 GeV)• strong “association”: net-kaon / net-lambda /net-
proton?
BRAHMS
NA49
AGS
primary matter is concentrated around y3 (y2.2)
At 200GeVcreated matter is at picked at y=0
7
7P. Staszel - Jagiellonian University, KrakówICHEP, Moscow 2006
BRAHMS
q
q
hadronsleadingparticle
leading particle
Schematic view of jet production Particles with high pt’s (above ~2GeV/c) are primarily produced in hard scattering processes early in the collision
Experimentally depletion of the high pt region in hadron spectra
In A-A, partons traverse the medium Probe of the dense and hot stage
p+p experiments hard scattered partons fragment into jets of hadrons
If QGP partons will lose a large part of their energy (induced gluon radiation) suppression of jet production Jet Quenching
High pt suppression jet quenching
8
8P. Staszel - Jagiellonian University, KrakówICHEP, Moscow 2006
BRAHMS
Charged hadron invariant spectra
AuAu @200GeV
Scaled N+N reference
RAA =Yield(AA)
NCOLL(AA) Yield(NN)
Nuclear Modification Factor
RAA<1 Suppression relative to scaled NN reference
SPS: data do not show suppression enhancement (RAA>1) due to initial state
multiple scattering (“Cronin Effect”)
9
9P. Staszel - Jagiellonian University, KrakówICHEP, Moscow 2006
BRAHMS
Energy and System Dependent Nuclear Modification Factors at h~0 and 1
• R AuAu (200 GeV) < RAuAu(63 GeV) < RCuCu(63 GeV) for charged hadrons
• p+p at 63 GeV is ISR Data (NPB100), RHIC-Run6 will provide better reference
10
10P. Staszel - Jagiellonian University, KrakówICHEP, Moscow 2006
BRAHMS
Control measurement: d+Au @ sNN=200
Suppression in AuAu dueto Jet Quenching or due toInitial State PartonSaturation (CGC)?
What about d+Au? - Jet Quenching – No - CGC - Yes/No?
Excludes alternative interpretation in terms of Initial State Effects Supports the Jet Quenching for central Au+Au collisions
+ back-to-back azimuthal correlation by STAR
11
11P. Staszel - Jagiellonian University, KrakówICHEP, Moscow 2006
BRAHMS
Nuclear modification factors (RCP, RAuAu) for p,K,p at y~3.1
• Suppression for pions and kaons: RAuAu: < K < p
• RAuAu ≠ Rcp (<Ncoll>,<Npart> for 40-60% ~ 70,56)
12
12P. Staszel - Jagiellonian University, KrakówICHEP, Moscow 2006
BRAHMS
RAuAu(Y=0) ~ RAuAu(y~3)
for central Au+Au at √s = 200 GeV
• R AuAu (Y=0) ~ RAuAu(y~3) for pions and protons: accidental?
• Rapidity dependent interplay of Medium effect + Hydro + baryon transport
13
13P. Staszel - Jagiellonian University, KrakówICHEP, Moscow 2006
BRAHMS
... more on RAA rapidity dependence
•Similar level of suppresion for central collisions•At forward rapidity RAA shows stronger rise towards peripheral coll. (surface -> volume emmission)Looking for scaling: dN/d ?
BE: eBJ = 3/2 (<Et>/ S0) dNch/d S is transwers area of overlaping region <Et> dirived from and K spectra
Is the energy density the only parameter that controls RAA?
New pp data @62GeV will allow for various comparisions at the same rapidities
14
14P. Staszel - Jagiellonian University, KrakówICHEP, Moscow 2006
BRAHMS
Flowing at forward
v2 for pion
• Understanding missing low-pt fraction is important for integrated v2 from FS
• Kaon and proton v2 will come: Statistically Challenging
• v2(y~0) ~ v2(y~3) for 0.5<pT<2 GeV/c
dN 1ddpt 2(1 + 2v1cos +
2v2(,pt)cos2)
dN ddptd
=
15
15P. Staszel - Jagiellonian University, KrakówICHEP, Moscow 2006
BRAHMS
Examine d+Au at all rapidities
Cronin enhancement Cronin enhancement suppression suppression
I. Arsene et al., BRAHMS PRL 93 (2004) 242303.
16
16P. Staszel - Jagiellonian University, KrakówICHEP, Moscow 2006
BRAHMS
RdAu and RAA for anti-protons and pions @200
BRAHMS PRELIMINARY
• suppression for - but stronger for AuAu• both RdA and RAA show enhancement for p-bar
17
17P. Staszel - Jagiellonian University, KrakówICHEP, Moscow 2006
BRAHMS
Non-hadronic energy loss through the medium in |y|<3:
High energy density >> nuclear density
- y 2 - 25 TeV left for particle production
Strong transverse/elliptic flow in y<3
(local) Chemical equilibration
Onset of gluon saturation?
Summary
Limitingfragmentation
18
18P. Staszel - Jagiellonian University, KrakówICHEP, Moscow 2006
BRAHMS
I.Arsene7, I.G. Bearden6, D. Beavis1, S. Bekele6 , C. Besliu9, B. Budick5, H. Bøggild6 , C. Chasman1, C. H. Christensen6, P. Christiansen6, R. Clarke9,
R.Debbe1, J. J. Gaardhøje6, K. Hagel7, H. Ito10, A. Jipa9, J. I. Jordre9, F. Jundt2, E.B.
Johnson10, C.E.Jørgensen6, R. Karabowicz3, N. Katrynska3, E. J. Kim4, T.M.Larsen11, J. H.
Lee1, Y. K. Lee4, S.Lindal11, G. Løvhøjden2, Z. Majka3, M. Murray10, J. Natowitz7,
B.S.Nielsen6, D. Ouerdane6, R.Planeta3, F. Rami2, C. Ristea6, O. Ristea9, D. Röhrich8, B. H. Samset11, D. Sandberg6, S. J. Sanders10, R.A.Sheetz1, P. Staszel3, T.S. Tveter11, F.Videbæk1, R. Wada7, H. Yang6, Z. Yin8, and I. S. Zgura9
1Brookhaven National Laboratory, USA, 2IReS and Université Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg, France3Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland,
4Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA, 5New York University, USA6Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
7Texas A&M University, College Station. USA, 8University of Bergen, Norway 9University of Bucharest, Romania, 10University of Kansas, Lawrence,USA
11 University of Oslo Norway
48 physicists from 11 institutions
The BRAHMS Collaboration
19
19P. Staszel - Jagiellonian University, KrakówICHEP, Moscow 2006
BRAHMS
BACKUP SLIDES
20
20P. Staszel - Jagiellonian University, KrakówICHEP, Moscow 2006
BRAHMS
•At 200 GeV: -/+ = 1.0, K-/K+ = 0.95, pbar/p = 0.75 •At 62 GeV: -/+ = 1.0, K-/K+ = 0.84, pbar/p = 0.45,• At |y|<1 matterantimatter
Anti-particle to particle ratios
• pbar/p verus K-/K+ : good statistical model description with B= B(y) with T~170MeV•But this describes also energy depencency at y=0 only B controls the state of matter•STAR and NA47 measures pbar/p versus -/+
Chemical freeze-out
BRAHMS PRELIMINARY
It is not true for p+p
BRAHMS PRELIMINARY
21
21P. Staszel - Jagiellonian University, KrakówICHEP, Moscow 2006
BRAHMS
K-/K+ and antihyperon/hyperon
K-/K+ = exp((2s - 2u,d)/T)pbar/p = exp(-6u,d/T)s=0 K-/K+ = (pbar/p)1/3
Fit shows that K-/K+ = (pbar/p)1/4
s= ¼ u,d
How s= ¼ u,d will work for
hyperons?Hbar/H = (pbar/p)3/4 for Lambdas = (pbar/p)1/2 for Xis = (pbar/p)1/4 for Omegas
22
22P. Staszel - Jagiellonian University, KrakówICHEP, Moscow 2006
BRAHMS
RAuAu 200 GeV
BRAHMS, PRL 91, 072305 (2003)
Cronin enhancement Cronin enhancement
suppression at high pT
significant medium effects
suppression at high pT
significant medium effects
23
23P. Staszel - Jagiellonian University, KrakówICHEP, Moscow 2006
BRAHMS
Strong rapiditydependence
CuCu data consistent with AuAu for the same Npart
pp
pp
pbar/- scaling with Npart
sNN=200GeV
24
24P. Staszel - Jagiellonian University, KrakówICHEP, Moscow 2006
BRAHMS
K/ ratios at =3.1, Au+Au @200GeV
25
25P. Staszel - Jagiellonian University, KrakówICHEP, Moscow 2006
BRAHMS
Strong energy absorption model from a static 2D matter source. (Insprired by A.Dainese (Eur.Phys.J C33,495) and A.Dainese , C.Loizides and G.Paic (hep-ph/0406201) )
• Parton spectrum using pp reference spectrum• Parton energy loss E ~ q.L**2• q adjusted to give observed RAA at ~1.
The change in dN/d will result in slowly rising RAA .
The modification of reference pp spectrum causes the RAA to be approximately constant as function of .
26
26P. Staszel - Jagiellonian University, KrakówICHEP, Moscow 2006
BRAHMS
Summary Large hadron multiplicities Almost a factor of 2 higher than at SPS energy( higher ) Much higher than pp scaled results( medium effects)
p/ show strong dependency for given energy depend only on Npar
High-pT
suppression increases with energy for given centrality bin weak dependency on rapidity of RAA which is consistent with surface jet emission RCP can hide or enhance nuclear effects At y=3.2 RAA shows larger suppression than RdA
Identified hadron spectra Good description by statistical model Large transverse flow consistent with high initial density
v2(pt) is seem to not depend on rapidity
27
27P. Staszel - Jagiellonian University, KrakówICHEP, Moscow 2006
BRAHMS
FS PID using RICH
Multiple settings
28
28P. Staszel - Jagiellonian University, KrakówICHEP, Moscow 2006
BRAHMS
RdAu Update: Identified Particle RdAu at y~3
• RdAu of identified particle consistent with published h- results• dAu(-)/dAu(+): Valance quark isospin dominates in pp?
BR
AH
MS
P
relim
inary
+ blue- red
29
29P. Staszel - Jagiellonian University, KrakówICHEP, Moscow 2006
BRAHMS
Limiting FragmentationShift the dNch/d distribution by the beam rapidity, and scale by Npart. Lines up with lower energy limiting fragmentation
Au+Au sNN=200GeV (0-5% and 30-40%)Au+Au sNN=130GeV (0-5%)Pb+Pb sNN=17GeV (9.4%)