pharma litigation

INDUSTRY | COMMENTJANUARY 15, 2010

Pharmaceuticals

Analyzing Litigation Success Rates

In this report we analyze over 370 court rulings since the beginning of thedecade to establish litigation success rates by company, court and judge. Wealso look at other trends in the pharmaceutical industry such as at-risklaunches, patent settlements and authorized generics. Based on our review, weconclude that while patent challenges by generics are extremely common,winning is not.

Below are the key conclusions from our analysis:• Patent challenges remain on the rise with a record 65 new first-to-file

lawsuits in 2009, up from 51 in the prior year and more than double thenumber just three years ago.

• Over the last decade, the overall success rate for the generic drug industry is48% for cases that have gone to trial. However, the success rate increases to76% when settlements are included. Over half of all cases are settled ordropped.

• Perrigo has the best overall litigation success rate, taking top honors in bestoverall success rate, best batting average in court and highest percent ofcases settled/dropped. Watson has the second best overall success rate.

• The top three courts by volume -- NJ, DE and SDNY -- accounted for 69%of all decisions. Unfortunately, these courts have a combined success rate ofjust 36% for generics. However, just over half of the cases in these threecourts get settled or dismissed.

• Four courts have never ruled against a generic --California-CD, NewYork-ED, Minnesota and Missouri-ED.

• The top five judges by volume accounted for 31% of the total decisions.These five judges ruled in favor of generics only 33% of the time. The totalsuccess rate, however, including settlements is 75%.

• Last year we saw six at-risk launches, up from four in the last few years.Teva remains the most likely to go at-risk with 12 of the 28 at-risk launchessince 2002.

• The number of settlements in 2009 reached an all-time high of 54, up from45 in the prior year. Settlements occur on average 47% of the time withTeva accounting for nearly one-third of all settlements. On the innovatorside, Glaxo and Novartis have settled the most.

• We counted 25 authorized generics launched in 2009 compared to 18 in theprior year. However, more products are launching without an AG than inprior years.

• By our count, Watson has introduced the most AGs, nearly one fifth of theindustry's total.

Priced as of prior trading day's market close, EST (unless otherwise noted).All values in USD unless otherwise noted.

RBC Capital Markets Corp.

Adam Greene (Analyst)(212) 618-3266; [email protected]

D. Dewey Steadman, CFA (Associate)(212) 428-3012; [email protected]

Companies Mentioned

Cephalon, Inc.(Nasdaq: CEPH, $64.14; Sector Perform, AboveAverage Risk)

Endo Pharmaceuticals Holdings(Nasdaq: ENDP, $20.82; Sector Perform, AboveAverage Risk)

Forest Laboratories, Inc.(NYSE: FRX, $31.35; Underperform, Above AverageRisk)

King Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(NYSE: KG, $12.97; Sector Perform, Above AverageRisk)

Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp.(NYSE: MRX, $24.91; Outperform, Above AverageRisk)

Mylan Inc.(Nasdaq: MYL, $17.87; Outperform, Above AverageRisk)

Par Pharmaceutical Co., Inc.(NYSE: PRX, $26.17; Sector Perform, AboveAverage Risk)

Perrigo Company(Nasdaq: PRGO, $42.13; Outperform, Above AverageRisk)

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited(Nasdaq: TEVA, $59.02 Outperform, Above AverageRisk)

Warner Chilcott plc(Nasdaq: WCRX, $28.53; Outperform, AboveAverage Risk)

Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc.(NYSE: WPI, $41.10; Outperform, Above AverageRisk)

For Required Conflicts Disclosures, see Page 23.

2

Table of Exhibits

Exhibit 1: Litigation Summary Page 3

Exhibit 2: First To File Lawsuits

Exhibit 3: Generic Drug Industry: Litigation Success Rate Page 3

Exhibit 4: Best Generic Challengers 2000-2009 Page 5

Exhibit 5: Legal Scorecard Summary 2000-2009 Page 5

Exhibit 6: Decisions By Court Page 6

Exhibit 7: Decisions By Most Active Judge Page 6

Exhibit 8: Number of At-Risk Launches 2003-2009 Page 7

Exhibit 9: At-Risk Launches 2008-2009 Page 7

Exhibit 10: Number of Patent Settlements 2003-2009 Page 8

Exhibit 11: Most Cases Settled (Generics), Most Likely to Settle, Most Cases Settled (Brand) Page 9

Exhibit 12: Patents Settlements in 2009 Page 10

Exhibit 13: Estimated 30 Month Stay Expirations in 2010-01-08 Page 11

Exhibit 14: Top Five Authorized Generic Players 2000-2009 Page 12

Appendix A: Potential Launches 2010-2011 Page 14

Appendix B: Rulings By Judge 2000-2009 (Complete) Page 15

Appendix C: Paragraph 4 Filings (Complete) Page 16

Appendix D: Litigation Scorecard History 2000-2009 (Complete) Page 22

PharmaceuticalsJanuary 15, 2010

3

Summary

Patent challenges remain on the rise, with 65 new first-to-file paragraph IV challenges initiated in 2009, which brings the total to over

300 active cases. In this report we analyze over 370 court rulings since the beginning of the decade to establish litigation success rates

by company, court and judge. We also look at other relevant trends in the industry such as at-risk launches, patent settlements and

authorized generics. Exhibit 1 below summarizes litigation trends over the past seven years.

Exhibit 1: Litigation Summary

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Settlements 6 4 8 20 21 45 54

At-Risk Launches 2 5 3 4 4 4 6

First to File P4 Suits 13 15 24 27 43 51 65

Source: PACER, Company reports, RBC Capital Markets estimates

Paragraph IV Challenges In recent years patent challenges have become the rule rather than the exception for generics. According to our database there are

approximately 300 active first-to-file paragraph IV challenges, most of which have multiple filers. The incentive is clear: the first

ANDA filer to make a paragraph IV certification receives 180 days of market exclusivity during which no other ANDA can be

approved for that drug. With very little downside and huge upside, exclusivity is the driving force to the huge increase in first-to-file

paragraph IV filings (exhibit 2).

Exhibit 2: First-to-File Lawsuits

13

15

24

27

43

51

65

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Source: PACER, Company reports, RBC Capital Markets estimates.

The litigation process starts with the filing of an ANDA with a paragraph IV certification, an acknowledgment that patents exist but

the generic doesn’t infringe or the patents aren’t valid. The FDA has 60 days to accept the ANDA filing and then the generic filer has

20 days to notify the patent holder of its paragraph IV filing. Paragraph IV certifications are required for all products with patents

listed in the FDA’s Orange Book (the official patent listing). The patent holder then has 45 days to sue in order to initiate a 30 month

stay of FDA approval of the generic version (companies may sue after 45 days but no stay would be granted). The approval stay is

lifted at the end of 30 months or after a court decision, whichever is earlier. Following the Medicare Modernization Act (MMA) in


4

December 2003, patent holders are entitled to only one 30 month stay and are not entitled to a stay if a patent is listed after an ANDA

is pending at the FDA (a late-listed patent). The 30 month clock is important because at the end of the stay companies are free to

receive FDA approval and launch their generic products. However, this would be considered an at-risk launch if there is no court

decision prior to launch. As such, generic companies may be responsible for up to triple damages if their products are found to

infringe after an at-risk launch.

As a result of the large incentive to be first-to-file, we expect every patented product to be challenged, regardless of its size, i.e.,

Rozerem. We believe that if a drug does not have a challenge it speaks to the difficulty of formulating that product (i.e., Lidoderm).

We count around 65 new first-to-file lawsuits in 2009 up 27% from 2008, but nearly a three-fold increase since 2005 (exhibit 2).

Patent Challenge Success Rates The question we are most frequently asked relates to the success rate of paragraph IV patent challenges. According to our database on

over 370 resolved cases over the last decade, the outcome is fairly even, with generics winning 82 of the rulings compared to losing

89. Thus, the overall success rate for the generic industry is 48% based on court decisions. However, when you take into account

patent settlements and cases that were dropped, the success rate for generics jumps to 76%, substantially in favor of challenging

patents (exhibit 3). With 54% of all cases either settled or dropped, it’s easy to see why generic firms focus on first-to-file

opportunities. Settlements provide clarity for the company and shareholders and we see them as a win-win for the generic and brand

company. As we discuss later in the report, there were 54 disclosed patent settlements last year, an all time high.

Exhibit 3: Generic Drug Industry: Litigation Success Rate

Settled: 175 (47%)

Dropped: 25 (7%)

Lost: 89 (24%)

Won: 82 (22%)


The Best Generic Challengers The second most common question we get is which generic companies are the most successful at winning patent challenges. We have

highlighted in exhibits 4 and 5 the track records over the past decade for companies with five or more resolved paragraph IV

challenges.

Perrigo takes the top honors for best overall success rate (defined as winning or settling a case), highest percentage of cases

won and the highest settlement percentage. To be fair, Perrigo has only won one case, Pepcid Complete, but favorably resolved its

other seven cases. That said, in our opinion, a settlement is as good as a win for shareholders, or possibly even better as it eliminates

uncertainty and legal costs. Of the generic companies that have at least one court decision, Perrigo is the most likely to settle its case

with seven cases settled/dropped of eight that have concluded, followed by Watson with 29 of its 39 cases either settled or dropped.

Watson has the second best overall success rate, having settled/dropped almost three quarters of its cases. Sandoz had the second

best track record for court outcomes, but this is boosted by the inclusion of Eon Labs. Excluding Eon from Sandoz’s results, the

company would be tied with Par, Impax and Actavis for second with a 67% success rate. The results are presented in the scorecard

below.


5

Exhibit 4: Best Generic Challengers 2000-2009

Best Cases Won Cases Lost Cases Settled/Dropped Most Number

Overall Success Rate As % of Decisions As % of Decisions As % of Total P4s Of Concluded P4 Cases

Perrigo 100% Perrigo 100% Apotex 86% Perrigo 88% Teva 108

Watson 90% Sandoz 79% Ranbaxy 78% Watson 74% Watson 39

Sandoz 88% Par 67% Dr. Reddy's 78% KV Pharm 71% Mylan 25

Par 87% Impax 67% Sun 75% Lupin 63% Sandoz 24

KV Pharm 86% Actavis 67% Lupin 67% Par 60% Apotex 21

Impax 86% Watson 60% URL Pharma 67% Impax 57% Ranbaxy 19

Actavis 83% Teva 53% Mylan 56% Sun 56% Dr. Reddy's 18

Teva 78% KV Pharm 50% KV Pharm 50% Teva 53% Par 15

Lupin 75% Mylan 44% Teva 47% Ranbaxy 53% Impax 14

Sun 67% Lupin 33% Watson 40% Dr. Reddy's 50% Sun 9

Mylan 64% URL Pharma 33% Par 33% Actavis 50% Perrigo 8

Ranbaxy 63% Sun 25% Impax 33% Sandoz 42% Lupin 8

Dr. Reddy's 61% Ranbaxy 22% Actavis 33% URL Pharma 40% KV Pharm 7

URL Pharma 60% Dr. Reddy's 22% Sandoz 21% Mylan 36% Actavis 6

Apotex 43% Apotex 14% Perrigo 0% Apotex 33% URL Pharma 5

*Includes predecessor firms.


Exhibit 5: Legal Scorecard Summary 2000-2009

Dropped/ Success Launched

Lost % Won % Settled % TOTAL % At Risk

Actavis 1 17% 2 33% 3 50% 6 83% 1

Apotex 12 57% 2 10% 7 33% 21 43% 1

Dr. Reddy's 7 39% 2 11% 9 50% 18 61% 0

Impax 2 14% 4 29% 8 57% 14 86% 0

KV Pharm 1 14% 1 14% 5 71% 7 86% 0

Lupin 2 25% 1 13% 5 63% 8 75% 0

Mylan 9 36% 7 28% 9 36% 25 64% 1

Par 2 13% 4 27% 9 60% 15 87% 1

Perrigo 0 0% 1 13% 7 88% 8 100% 1

Ranbaxy 7 37% 2 11% 10 53% 19 63% 0

Sandoz 3 13% 11 46% 10 42% 24 88% 6

Sun 3 33% 1 11% 5 56% 9 67% 2

Teva 24 22% 27 25% 57 53% 108 78% 13

URL Pharma 2 40% 1 20% 2 40% 5 60% 0

Watson 4 10% 6 15% 29 74% 39 90% 0


Court Information We have also reviewed our database to determine which districts are the best to try a case (exhibit 6). Three districts were responsible

for nearly 70% of all court decisions -- New Jersey (35%), Delaware (21%) and the Southern District of New York (12%). The bad

news for generics is that the combined historical success rate in these three districts is just 36%, which likely explains the 52%

settlement rate in these districts. The most pro-generic courts include the Central District of California, the Eastern District of New

York, Minnesota and the Eastern District of Missouri, having a perfect record of ruling in favor of generics every time.


6

Exhibit 6: Decisions By Court

Ruled For Ruled Against Total Generic Case Case Overall Generic Total

Generics Generics Rulings Success Rate Settled Dismissed Success Rate Cases

California (Central District) 8 0 8 100% 9 0 100% 17

California (Northern District) 2 2 4 50% 2 0 67% 6

DC 3 2 5 60% 0 0 60% 5

Delaware 10 17 27 37% 46 8 79% 81

Florida (Southern District) 2 1 3 67% 4 0 86% 7

Georgia (Northern District) 0 0 0 NM 5 0 100% 5

Illinois (Northern District) 8 8 16 50% 6 1 65% 23

Indiana (Southern District) 1 5 6 17% 0 2 38% 8

Maryland 0 0 0 NM 2 0 100% 2

Massachusetts 0 3 3 0% 1 2 50% 6

Michigan (Eastern District) 2 2 4 50% 1 0 60% 5

Michigan (Western District) 0 0 0 NM 1 0 100% 1

Minnesota 2 0 2 100% 0 0 100% 2

Missouri (Eastern District) 1 0 1 100% 0 1 100% 2

New Jersey 27 47 74 36% 55 3 64% 132

New York (Eastern District) 2 0 2 100% 1 0 100% 3

New York (Southern District) 8 16 24 33% 22 1 66% 47

North Carolina (Eastern District) 0 0 0 NM 1 0 100% 1

North Carolina (Middle District) 0 1 1 0% 0 0 0% 1

Ohio (Southern District) 0 1 1 0% 2 0 67% 3

Pennsylvania (Eastern District) 1 3 4 25% 1 1 50% 6

Pennsylvania (Western District) 1 1 2 50% 1 0 67% 3

Virginia (Eastern District) 4 2 6 67% 0 0 67% 6

West Virginia (Northern District) 1 3 4 25% 1 0 40% 5


Drilling down more to review how each judge ruled in the past. The top five judges accounted for 31% of the total decisions with

Judges Farnan and Sleet in Delaware issuing the most decisions. The generic success rate for bench rulings from these five judges is

33%. The total success rate, however, including settlements is 75%.

When looking at judges that have issued five or more decisions (exhibit 7), the success rate for rulings for generics is just 37%. The

total overall success rate for generics among these judges increases to 64% when including cases dropped or settled for this group of

judges.

Exhibit 7: Decisions By Most Active Judges

Ruled For Ruled Against Total Generic Case Case Overall Generic Total

Judge District Generics Generics Rulings Success Rate Settled Dismissed Success Rate Cases

Joseph J. Farnan Jr DE 6 10 16 38% 20 4 75% 40

Dennis M. Cavanaugh NJ 7 4 11 64% 0 1 67% 12

John C. Lifland NJ 3 7 10 30% 8 0 61% 18

Joel A. Pisano NJ 4 5 9 44% 6 0 67% 15

Stanley R. Chesler NJ 1 8 9 11% 2 0 27% 11

Sue L. Robinson DE 3 5 8 38% 5 1 64% 14

Barbara S. Jones NY-SD 3 5 8 38% 0 0 38% 8

Mary L. Cooper NJ 1 5 6 17% 12 0 72% 18

Mariana R. Pfaelzer CA-CD 5 0 5 100% 3 0 100% 8

Sidney H. Stein NY-SD 2 3 5 40% 9 0 79% 14

David H. Coar IL-ND 1 4 5 20% 4 0 56% 9

Sarah Evans Barker IN-SD 1 4 5 20% 0 0 20% 5

Dickinson R. Debevoise NJ 1 4 5 20% 0 0 20% 5

38 64 102 37% 69 6 64% 177



7

At-Risk launches

While at-risk launches get a lot of attention, they are still fairly uncommon. We define an at-risk launch as any launch without a lower

court ruling. Last year we saw six at-risk launches, up from four in the last few years (exhibit 8). Teva is the most likely to launch at-

risk, having launched 12 of the 28 at-risk launches over the last seven years. This is followed by Sandoz with six and Mylan, Par and

Sun each launching two products at-risk.

Exhibit 8: Number of At-Risk Launches 2003-2009

2

5

3

4 4 4

6

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009


Last year was the first year we did not see any at-risk launches of blockbuster products like Protonix, Pulmicort or Plavix that

occurred in prior years. However, 2009 was unusual in that of the six at-risk launches, two were on very small drugs – Niravam and

Xopenex solution – and the other four were settled after launch – Solodyn by both Teva and Sandoz, as well as Ortho Tri Cyclen Lo

and Loprox Shampoo (exhibit 9). Settling after launch appears to be a new emerging trend with two in 2008 and four in 2009.

Exhibit 9: At-Risk Launches 2008-2009

Date Drug Generic Comments

Jan-08 Protonix Sun/Caraco

Mar-08 Olux Perrigo

Mar-08 Ethyol Sun/Caraco Settled after launch

Nov-08 Pulmicort Teva Settled after launch

Mar-09 Solodyn Teva Settled after launch

Jan-09 Niravam Par Very small drug

Jul-09 Ortho Tri Cyclen Lo Teva Settled after launch

Aug-09 Solodyn Sandoz Settled after launch

Aug-09 Xopenex concentrate Mylan Very small drug

Nov-09 Loprox shampoo Paddock Settled after launch

Source: Company reports and RBC Capital Markets estimates.


8

Settlements

The number of settlements in 2009 reached an all-time high of 54, up from 45 in 2008 (exhibit 10). Settlements spiked in 2006

following the June 2006 decision by the Supreme Court to not hear the FTC’s appeal in Schering Plough vs. Upsher-Smith. This case

questioned whether monetary payment from a brand company to a generic company was lawful. In 2009, legislation heated up to

limit patent settlements and in October the Senate Judiciary Committee passed the Kohl Bill. The bill was eventually revised to make

payments presumptively illegal rather than per se illegal. This allows generics and brands to defend their settlement as pro-

competitive. It is difficult to say whether the activity in Washington had a direct impact on the number of settlements, but of the 54

cases, there were 10 settled in both the first and second quarter of 2009 and 17 in each of the final quarters of the year. Thus, there

was no discernable up tick in settlements near year end.

Exhibit 10: Number of Patent Settlements 2003-2009

64

8

2021

45

54

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009


Despite the noise in Washington, we expect settlements to remain fairly common. For active paragraph IV firms with over five

resolved cases, settlements occur on average 54% of the time. Teva accounts for almost 30% of all settlements but this is just 53% of

their caseload (exhibit 11). Of all generics, Wockhardt tends to walk the most, settling all four of its patent challenges. We have also

included in the exhibit 11 the innovator firms with the most patent settlements. GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis have each settled

about 9% of the total.


9

Exhibit 11: Most Cases Settled (Generics), Most Likely to Settle, Most Cases Settled (Brand)

Settled/ Total % Cases Settled/ Total % Cases Number of % of

Generic Dropped Cases Settled Generic Dropped Cases Settled Brand Settlements Total

Teva 57 108 53% Wockhardt 4 4 100% Glaxo 14 8.8%

Watson 29 39 74% Orchid 2 2 100% Novartis 14 8.8%

Sandoz 10 24 42% Upsher Smith 2 2 100% Schering-Plough 12 7.5%

Ranbaxy 10 19 53% Alcon 1 1 100% Forest 11 6.9%

Mylan 9 25 36% Amneal 1 1 100% Abbott 11 6.9%

Dr. Reddy's 9 18 50% Bedford 1 1 100% J&J 8 5.0%

Par 9 15 60% Breath 1 1 100% Wyeth 8 5.0%

Impax 8 14 57% Covidien 1 1 100% Pfizer 7 4.4%

Apotex 7 21 33% Cypress Pharma 1 1 100% Shire 7 4.4%

Perrigo 7 8 88% Tolmar 1 1 100% Cephalon 6 3.8%

Sun 5 9 56% Perrigo 7 8 88% Medicis 6 3.8%

Lupin 5 8 63% Anchen 3 4 75% Purdue 6 3.8%

KV Pharm 5 7 71% Watson 29 39 74% Warner Chilcott 6 3.8%

Wockhardt 4 4 100% KV Pharm 5 7 71% Sanofi 5 3.1%

Actavis 3 6 50% Glenmark 2 3 67% AstraZeneca 3 1.9%



10

Exhibit 12: Patent Settlements in 2009

Settled Brand Generic Drug Launch Date

1/12/09 Loestrin-24 Fe Warner Chilcott Watson 01/22/2014

1/12/09 Femcon Fe Warner Chilcott Watson NLT 1/1/2013

2/11/09 Lotrel Novartis Par 1Q11

2/19/09 Opana ER 7.5mg 15mg Endo Actavis 40739

3/6/09 Naprelan Elan Watson 41800

3/10/09 Xopenex Sepracor Barr 41322

3/18/09 Solodyn Medicis Teva Nov 2011

3/27/09 Razadyne J&J KV Pharma NA

3/27/09 Razadyne ER J&J KV Pharma NA

3/30/09 Razadyne J&J Sandoz NA

4/8/09 Clarinex Schering-Plough Mylan 07/01/2012

4/8/09 Clarinex Schering-Plough Sandoz 07/01/2012

4/14/09 Vanos Medicis Perrigo 12/15/2013

4/16/09 Oxycontin Purdue Actavis TBD

4/21/09 Rythmol SR Glaxo Par 01/01/2011

4/23/09 Effexor XR caps Wyeth Lupin 06/01/2011

4/24/09 Lybrel Wyeth Watson 05/22/2010

4/29/09 Comtan Novartis/Orion Wockhardt 09/30/2012

4/29/09 Stalevo Novartis/Orion Wockhardt 09/30/2012

5/18/09 Effexor XR caps Wyeth Wockhardt 06/01/2012

7/9/09 Eloxatin Sanofi Ebewe NA

7/10/09 Lexapro Forest Sun Pharm 10/14/2012

7/24/09 Ortho Tri Cyclen Lo J&J Teva 12/31/2015

8/3/09 Ethyol Medimmune Sun Pharm NA

8/11/09 Clarinex RediTabs Schering-Plough Orchid 01/01/2012

8/11/09 Clarinex Schering-Plough Orchid 07/01/2012

8/11/09 Plavix Bristol-Myers Watson TBD

8/30/09 Oxycontin Purdue Apotex TBD

9/9/09 Lotrel Novartis Lupin NA

9/11/09 Namenda Forest Apotex 04/11/2015

9/11/09 Namenda Forest Upsher Smith 01/11/2015

9/11/09 Namenda Forest Amneal 01/11/2015

9/11/09 Namenda Forest Wockhardt 01/11/2015

9/14/09 Carbatrol Shire Teva NA

9/14/09 Lybrel Wyeth Sandoz NA

9/24/09 Lotrel Novartis Dr. Reddy NA

9/24/09 Lotrel Novartis Cobalt NA

10/5/09 Flomax Astellas Impax 02/10/2003

10/8/09 Namenda Forest Sun Pharm 01/11/2015

10/13/09 Adderall XR Shire Sandoz When approved

10/14/09 Vfend Pfizer Mylan 1Q11

10/15/09 Duac Stiefel Perrigo TBD

10/19/09 Namenda Forest Cobalt 42015

10/27/09 Oxytrol Watson Barr 42120

11/5/09 Namenda Forest Teva 42015

11/12/09 Fentora Cephalon Teva Oct 2018

11/16/09 Loprox Medicis Glenmark 41623

11/16/09 Vanos Medicis Glenmark 41623

11/30/09 Tricor 145mg Abbott Teva 40630

12/8/09 Effexor XR caps Wyeth Mylan 40695

12/8/09 Arthrotec Pfizer Teva NA

12/9/09 Loprox shampoo Medicis Paddock NA

12/14/09 Namenda Forest Dr. Reddy 42015

12/14/09 Namenda Forest Lupin 42015



11

30 Month Stays

As discussed earlier the expiration of the 30 month stay is important since the FDA is cleared to approve the generic at the end of the

stay. At that point, the generic firm can decide to launch at-risk or wait for resolution of the litigation. Also, as previously discussed,

at-risk launches are fairly uncommon. However, they do present an overhang in that the patent litigation can go in the innovator’s

favor after launch, leaving the generic company liable for damages. In exhibit 13, we highlight upcoming 30-month stay expirations

in 2010.

Exhibit 13: Estimated 30 Months Stays Expirations in 2010

Drug Dose Brand Co. Est. First Filer Date Sued 30 Month Stay

Boniva 2.5 and 150 mg Roche Shared-Multiple 9/7/07 1/24/10

Zegerid caps 20/1100mg, 40/1100mg, 20/1680mg Santarus Par 9/13/07 1/30/10

Focalin XR 5, 10, 20 mg Novartis Teva 9/14/07 1/31/10

Focalin XR 15 mg Novartis Par 10/4/07 2/20/10

Zanaflex (caps) 2, 4, 6 mg Acorda Apotex 10/11/07 2/28/10

Avinza 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 120 mg King Actavis 10/18/07 3/4/10

Allegra D-24 180 mg/240 mg Aventis Dr. Reddy's 10/26/07 3/14/10

Asacol 400 mg P&G Roxane 10/26/07 3/14/10

Combivir 150 mg/300 mg GlaxoSmithKline Teva 11/2/07 3/20/10

Luxiq 0.12% Connetics Perrigo/Pentech 11/6/07 3/24/10

Taxotere 20mg/2ml, 80mg/8ml, 160mg/16ml Sanofi-Aventis Hospira 505b2 11/9/07 3/28/10

Stalevo 100, 150 25/100/200 mg and 37.5/150/200 mg Novartis/Orion Sun Pharm 11/13/07 3/31/10

Opana ER 5, 10, 20, 40 mg Endo Impax 11/15/07 4/2/10

Zymar 0.3% solution drops Allergan Apotex 11/29/07 4/16/10

Zetia 10 mg Merck Glenmark 3/22/07 4/24/10

Tarka 4/240mg, 2/240mg, 2/180mg, 1/240mg Abbott Glenmark 12/7/07 4/28/10

Detrol LA 2, 4 mg Pfizer Teva 12/12/07 4/29/10

Strattera 10, 18, 25, 40, 60, 80, 100mg Eli Li l ly Shared-Multiple 8/9-9/5/2007 5/6/10

Zegerid suspension 40/1680mg per packet Santarus Par 12/20/07 5/13/10

Abil ify 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30 mg Bristol-Myers Squibb Shared-Multiple 3/2/07 5/15/10

Abil ify ODT 10, 15, 20, 30 mg Bristol-Myers Squibb Barr 3/16/07 5/15/10

Argatroban Injection 100 mg/ml Encysive Barr 12/28/07 5/19/10

Equetro 200, 300 mg Validus Pharmaceuticals Actavis 1/17/08 6/3/10

Clobex shampoo 0.05% Galderma Actavis 2/21/08 7/8/10

Avodart 0.05 mg GlaxoSmithKline Barr 2/25/08 7/11/10

Abil ify Oral Solution 1 mg/ml Bristol-Myers Squibb Teva 3/31/08 8/15/10

Entocort 3mg AstraZeneca Barr 5/22/08 10/8/10

Fentora .1, .2, .3, .4, .6, .8mg Cephalon Watson 6/2/08 10/20/10

Alimta 500mg/vial El i Li l ly Teva 6/5/08 10/23/10

Accolate 10mg, 20mg AstraZeneca Dr. Reddy 6/27/08 11/12/10

Opana ER 7.5mg, 15mg Endo Actavis 7/11/08 11/27/10

Zometa (inj) 4mg base/5mL, 5mg base/100mL Novartis Teva 7/24/08 12/9/10

Uroxatral 10 mg Sanofi-Aventis Shared 9/21/07 12/10/10

Sensipar 30, 60, 90mg Amgen Teva 7/25/08 12/11/10

Actoplus Met 15/500mg and 15/850mg Eli Li l ly/Takeda Mylan 8/5/08 12/22/10

Taxotere 40mg/ml, 20mg/0.5ml, 80mg/2ml Sanofi-Aventis Apotex 505b2 8/8/08 12/26/10

Opana ER 30mg Endo Actavis 7/11/08 12/29/10

Ambien CR 12.5mg Sanofi-Aventis Anchen Filed 1/19/06 Not Sued

Ambien CR 6.25mg Sanofi-Aventis Actavis Filed 2/24/06 Not Sued

Atacand 4, 8, 16, and 32 mg AstraZeneca Sandoz Filed 12/22/06 Not Sued

Atacand HCT 16/12.5, 32/12.5 mg AstraZeneca Mylan Filed 12/22/06 Not Sued

Elestat 0.05% Inspire/Allergan Sandoz Filed 10/14/08 Not Sued

Exforge 10/160mg Novartis Par Filed 10/1/07 Not Sued




Lescol XL 80mg Novartis Par Filed 3/15/07 Not Sued

Requip XL 2, 3, 4, 8, 12mg GlaxoSmithKline Impax, Actavis Filed 10/14/08 Not Sued

Rhinocort spray 0.032 mg (32 mcg)/spray AstraZeneca Apotex Filed 5/14/07 Not Sued



12

Authorized Generics

There were roughly 25 authorized generics (AG) launched in 2009, up from about 18 in the prior year. However, one trend we have

noticed recently is an increasing number of generics launched without an AG. We counted around a dozen generics launched last

year with no AG compared to just six in 2008. We believe this is a highly correlated to the increase in settlement agreements a few

years ago. Some of the recent high-profile generic launches without AGs include Adderall XR, Pulmicort and Mirapex to name just a

few. We see this as a very positive trend for the generic pharmaceutical industry and expect an increase in the number of AG-free

launches in the future. Launching without an AG can generate almost three times the revenue and approximately 3.7x more profit

than launching with an AG.

Notwithstanding the favorable economic impact an AG-less launch presents, we still expect AGs to remain part of the industry. While

margins are small, an AG presents an attractive ROI for the company launching the AG. Of the 96 AGs we count launched by

independent generic firms since 2000, Watson was involved in close to 20% with Prasco close behind (exhibit 14). We also expect

generic arms of big pharma companies such as J&J’s Patriot, Pfizer’s Greenstone and Sanofi’s Winthrop to remain active players in

the market going forward.

Exhibit 14: Top Five Authorized Generic Players 2000-2009

Authorized Generics Total

Watson 19

Prasco 17

Par 9

Sandoz 9

Ranbaxy 4

Industry Total 96



13

APPENDIX


14

Appendix A: Potential Launches 2010-2011

Date of Generic

Gx Entry Brand Company Drug Company Type

TBD Sanofi Ambien CR Anchen, Par Patent

TBD Merck Primaxin IV Multiple Patent Expiration

TBD Warner Chilcott Femhrt Barr Settlement Launch

3/1/10 Meda Astelin Apotex Settlement Launch

3/2/10 Boehringer Flomax Ranbaxy, Impax Settlement Launch

4/6/10 Merck Cozaar/Hyzaar Multiple Patent Expiration

4/20/10 GlaxoSmithKline Coreg CR Mutual Data Exclusivity

4/27/10 Boehringer Flomax Multiple Patent Expiration

5/22/10 Wyeth Lybrel Watson Settlement Launch

6/1/10 Wyeth Effexor XR caps Teva Settlement Launch

6/27/10 AstraZeneca Arimidex Multiple Patent Expiration

7/1/10 Novartis Exelon Dr. Reddy's, Sun Settlement Launch

8/28/10 Meda Astelin Cobalt Settlement Launch

9/1/10 Valeant Diastat Par/Barr Settlement Launch

9/23/10 Medicines Co. Angiomax Teva At Risk

11/15/10 Eli Lilly Gemzar Multiple Patent invalidated

11/25/10 Pfizer Aricept Teva, Ranbaxy Patent Expiration

1/1/11 GlaxoSmithKline Rythmol SR Par Settlement Launch

1/1/11 Novartis Lotrel Par Settlement Launch

1/17/11 Takeda Actos Multiple Patent Expiration

1/19/11 Wyeth Protonix Multiple Patent Expiration

1Q11 Pfizer Vfend Mylan Settlement Launch

1Q11 Novartis Exelon Watson Settlement Launch

3/22/11 Pfizer Xalatan Multiple Patent Expiration

3/28/11 Abbott Tricor 145mg Teva Settlement Launch

6/1/11 Wyeth Effexor XR caps Impax Settlement Launch

6/1/11 Wyeth Effexor XR caps Anchen Settlement Launch

6/1/11 Wyeth Effexor XR caps Lupin Settlement Launch

6/15/11 Sanofi Nasacort AQ Barr Settlement Launch

6/20/11 J&J Levaquin Multiple Patent Expiration

7/1/11 Bayer Yaz Barr Settlement Launch

7/15/11 Endo Opana ER 7.5mg 15mg Actavis Settlement Launch

10/23/11 Eli Lilly Zyprexa Multiple Patent Expiration

10/23/11 Eli Lilly Symbyax Multiple Patent Expiration

11/1/11 Medicis Solodyn Impax Settlement Launch

11/1/11 Medicis Solodyn Teva Settlement Launch

11/17/11 Bristol Myers Plavix Multiple Settlement Launch

11/30/11 Pfizer Caduet Ranbaxy Settlement Launch

11/30/11 Pfizer Lipitor Ranbaxy Settlement Launch

2011E Novartis Femara Mylan Settlement Launch



15

Appendix B: Rulings By Judge 2000-2009 (Complete)

Ruled For Ruled Against Ruled For Ruled Against

Generics Generics Settled Dismissed Generics Generics Settled Dismissed

California (Central District) 8 0 9 0 New York (Eastern District) 2 0 1 0

Cormac J. Carney 0 0 1 0 David G. Trager 1 0 1 0

James V. Selna 1 0 5 0 Nina Gershon 1 0 0 0

Mariana R. Pfaelzer 5 0 3 0 New York (Southern District) 8 16 22 1

Robert J. Timlin 2 0 0 0 Barbara S. Jones 3 5 0 0

California (Northern District) 2 2 2 0 Colleen McMahon 1 0 0 0

Charles R. Breyer 0 1 0 0 Charles L. Brieant 1 0 0 0

James Ware 0 0 1 0 Denise Cote 0 1 0 0

Marilyn Patel 1 0 0 0 Gerard E. Lynch 0 2 0 0

Maxine M. Chesney 0 1 1 0 Harold Baer 0 0 3 0

Vaughn R. Walker 1 0 0 0 Kimba Wood 0 0 1 0

DC 3 2 0 0 Laura Taylor Swain 0 0 1 0

John D. Bates 0 2 0 0 Lawrence M. McKenna 0 2 1 0

Reggie B. Walton 1 0 0 0 Loretta A. Preska 0 0 1 0

Ricardo M. Urbina 1 0 0 0 Lewis A. Kaplan 0 0 0 1

Royce C. Lamberth 1 0 0 0 P. Kevin Castel 0 0 1 0

Delaware 10 17 46 8 Richard C. Casey 0 1 0 0

Gregory M. Sleet 0 2 19 3 Richard J. Holwell 0 0 1 0

Joseph J. Farnan Jr 6 10 20 4 Richard J. Sullivan 0 0 1 0

Kent A. Jordan 1 0 2 0 Robert P. Patterson 0 1 0 0

Sue L. Robinson 3 5 5 1 Setphen C. Robinson 0 0 2 0

Florida (Southern District) 2 1 4 0 Sidney H. Stein 2 3 9 0

Adalberto Jordan 1 1 0 0 Victor Marrero 0 0 1 0

Daniel T. K. Hurley 0 0 2 0 William H. Pauley III 1 1 0 0

Shelby Highsmith 0 0 1 0 New Jersey 27 47 55 3

Wilkie D. Fergusun Jr. 1 0 0 0 Harold A. Ackerman 0 2 2 1

William P. Dimitrouleas 0 0 1 0 Dennis M. Cavanaugh 7 4 0 1

Illinois (Northern District) 8 8 6 1 Dickinson R. Debevoise 1 4 0 0

David H. Coar 1 4 4 0 Faith S. Hochberg 1 0 1 0

Geraldine Soat Brown 0 0 1 0 Freda Wolfson 1 1 2 0

James M. Rosenbaum 0 1 0 0 Garrett E. Brown, Jr 1 2 4 0

Joan B. Gottschall 1 0 0 0 Joel A. Pisano 4 5 6 0

Joan H. Lefkow 0 1 0 0 John C. Lifland 3 7 8 0

John W. Darrah 2 0 0 1 John W. Bissell 1 1 1 0

Rebecca R. Pallmeyer 1 0 0 0 Jose L. Linares 1 1 0 1

Richard A. Posner 1 1 1 0 Joseph A. Greenaway Jr 2 0 4 0

Robert W. Gettleman 0 1 0 0 Katherine S. Hayden 1 1 1 0

Ronald A. Guzman 1 0 0 0 Mary L. Cooper 1 5 12 0

Wayne R. Anderson 1 0 0 0 Noel L. Hillman 0 0 1 0

Georgia (Northern District) 0 0 5 0 Peter G. Sheridan 2 1 3 0

Thomas W. Thrash Jr. 0 0 1 0 Renee Marie Bumb 0 4 1 0

William S. Duffey, Jr 0 0 3 0 Stanley R. Chesler 1 8 2 0

J. Owen Forrester 0 0 1 0 Susan D. Wigenton 0 0 2 0

Indiana (Southern District) 1 5 0 2 Tonianne J. Bongiovanni 0 0 1 0

Larry J. McKinney 0 0 0 1 William J. Martini 0 1 3 0

Richard Young 0 1 0 1 Willam H. Walls 0 0 1 0

Sarah Evans Barker 1 4 0 0 North Carolina (Middle District) 0 1 0 0

Maryland 0 0 2 0 James A. Beaty 0 1 0 0

William D Quarles, Jr 0 0 1 0 North Carolina (Eastern District) 0 0 1 0

Marvin J. Garbis 0 0 1 0 James C. Dever, III 0 0 1 0

Massachusetts 0 3 1 2 Ohio (Southern District) 0 1 2 0

Douglas P. Woodlock 0 0 1 0 Edmund A. Sargus 0 0 1 0

Joseph L. Tauro 0 1 0 1 Michael R. Barrett 0 1 1 0

Reginald C. Lindsay 0 0 0 1 Pennsylvania (Eastern District) 1 3 1 1

Richard G. Steams 0 2 0 0 Michael M. Baylson 0 2 0 0

Michigan (Eastern District) 2 2 1 0 Paul S. Diamond 0 0 1 0

Avern Cohn 0 1 0 0 R. Barclay Surrick 1 1 0 1

Bernard A Friedman 1 0 1 0 Pennsylvania (Western District) 1 1 1 0

George Caram Steeh 1 1 0 0 Gary L. Lancaster 0 0 1 0

Michigan (Western District) 0 0 1 0 Terrence F. McVerry 1 1 0 0

Paul L Maloney 0 0 1 0 Virginia (Eastern District) 4 2 0 0

Minnesota 2 0 0 0 Henry C. Morgan Jr. 2 0 0 0

Ann D. Montgomery 1 0 0 0 Richard L. Williams 0 1 0 0

Michael J. Davis 1 0 0 0 Robert E. Payne 1 0 0 0

Missouri (Eastern District) 1 0 0 1 Robert G. Doumar 0 1 0 0

Donald J. Stohr 0 0 0 1 T. S. Ellis, III 1 0 0 0

Rodney W. Sippel 1 0 0 0 West Virginia (Northern District) 1 3 1 0

Irene M. Keeley 1 2 1 0

William K. Sessions 0 1 0 0



16

Appendix C: Paragraph IV Filings (Complete)

Estimated Date Date Case Outcome for

Drug Dose First Filer Notified Sued Number Court Judge Generic Other Paragraph IV Filers (Date Sued)

Abilify 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30 mg

Teva, Sandoz, Barr,

Apotex, Synthon Multiple 3/2/2007 (earliest)3:07-cv-01000 NJ Mary L. Cooper Pending Teva (3/07), Sandoz (3/07), Barr (3/07), Apotex (3/07), Sun (3/30), Synthon (4/07)

Abilify ODT 10, 15, 20, 30 mg Barr 3/6/07 3/16/07 3:07-cv-01267 NJ Mary L. Cooper Pending Barr (3/07), Zydus (6/08)

Abilify Oral Solution 1 mg/ml Teva 2/15/08 3/31/08 3:08-cv-01583 NJ Mary L. Cooper Pending Teva (3/08, 10/09)

Accolate 10mg, 20mg Dr. Reddy 5/14/08 6/27/08 3:08-cv-03237 NJ Mary L. Cooper Pending Dr. Reddy (6/08)

Aciphex 20 mg Teva, Dr. Reddy NA 11/20/03 1:03-cv-09223 SD of NY Gerard E. Lynch Lost 5/07; Upheld 7/08 Dr. Reddys (11/03), Teva (11/03), Mylan (1/04)

Aceon 2, 4, 8 mg Cobalt Pharma 6/23/06 8/8/06 1:06-cv-01856 ND of GA Marvin H. Shoob Settled 5/08 Cobalt (8/06, S-5/08)

Actonel 5, 30, 35 mg Teva 7/2/04 8/13/04 1:04-cv-00940 DE Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. Lost 2/08; Upheld 5/09 Teva (8/04)

Actonel 75 mg Teva 12/19/07 2/1/08 1:08-cv-00066 DE Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. Lost 2/08; Upheld 5/09 Teva (2/08)

Actonel with Calcium 35/500 mg Teva 2/19/08 4/4/08 1:08-cv-00191 DE Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. Lost 2/08; Upheld 5/09 Teva (4/08)

Actonel 150 mg Teva 8/12/08 9/26/08 08-cv-00627 DE Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. Pending Teva (9/08), Sun (1/09, D-4/09), Apotex (3/09)

Actos 15, 30, 45 mg Mylan 9/8/03 10/17/03 1:03-cv-08253 SD of NY Denise L. Cote Lost 2/06; Upheld 6/07

Mylan (10/03), Watson (10/03), Ranbaxy (10/03), Alphapharm (3/04), Sandoz (5/07), Torrent

(7/09)

Actoplus Met 15/500, 15/850 mg Mylan 6/23/08 8/5/08 1:08-cv-06999 SD of NY Denise L. Cote Pending Mylan (8/08), Teva (5/09), Sandoz (6/09)

Adenoscan 3 mg/ml Teva 4/18/05 5/26/05 1:05-cv-00337 DE Sue L. Robinson Settled 10/07; Launch 9/12 Teva (5/05, S-10/07), Wockhardt (9/09)

Adderall XR 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 mg Barr NA 2/24/03 1:03-cv-01219 SD of NY P. Kevin Castel Settled 8/06; Launch 4/09

Barr (2/03, S-8/06), Impax (12/03, S-1/06), Colony (1/05, NS), Teva (3/05, S-3/08), Andrx

(11/06, S-11/07), Sandoz (1/07, S-10/09), Actavis/Colony (3/07, S-4/08)

Advicor 20/1000 mg Filed 5/22/08 NA NA NA NA NA Pending NA



Aggrenox 25/200 mg Barr 5/31/07 7/11/07 1:07-cv-00432 DE Gregory M. Sleet Settled 8/08; Launch 7/15 Barr (7/07, S-8/08)

Aldara cream 5% cream Filed 10/17/06 NA NA NA NA NA Pending NA

Alimta 500 mg/vial Teva 4/24/08 6/5/08 08-cv-00335 DE Gregory M. Sleet Pending Teva (6/08), APP Pharma (6/08), Barr (4/09)

Alimta 100 mg/vial Teva 10/14/08 11/19/08 08-cv-00860 DE Gregory M. Sleet Pending Teva (11/08), Barr (4/09)

Allegra tabs 30, 60, 180 mg Barr 6/1/01 8/1/01 2:01-cv-03627 (lead case) NJ Joseph A. Greenaway, Jr. At risk 9/05; Settled 11/08

Barr (9/01), Impax (3/02), Teva (2/03), Dr. Reddys (3/03), Sandoz (1/04, 8/04), Ranbaxy (4/04),

Mylan (5/04, 8/05, 10/07), Wockhardt (11/07, WD-12/07), Sun (10/09)

Allegra D-12 60/120 mg Barr NA 1/28/02

2:01-cv-00401

(consolidated with 2:01-

cv-03627) NJ Joseph A. Greenaway, Jr. Settled 11/08; Launch 11/09

Barr (1/02), Impax/Teva (4/02, 3/04), Mylan (3/03, 3/04), Dr. Reddys (12/03), Sandoz (3/06,

5/07), Wockhardt (11/07, WD-12/07), Sun (1/09)

Allegra D-24 180/240 mg Dr. Reddy's 9/14/07 10/26/07 2:07-cv-05180 NJ Joseph A. Greenaway, Jr. Pending Dr. Reddy's (10/07)

Allegra tabs 30, 60, 180 mg Dr. Reddy (505(b)2) 9/26/03 10/29/03 2:03-cv-05108 NJ Joseph A. Greenaway, Jr. Pending Dr. Reddys (10/03)

Allegra D-12 60/120 mg Dr. Reddy (505(b)2) 6/1/04 7/2/04 2:04-cv-03194 NJ Joseph A. Greenaway, Jr. Pending Dr. Reddys (7/04)

Alphagan P 0.15% solution Exela/Paddock 2/12/07 3/26/07 1:07-cv-00516 DE Gregory M. Sleet Lost 10/23/09 Exela (3/07), Apotex (5/07)

Alphagan P 0.10% solution Filed 12/20/06 NA NA NA NA NA Pending NA

Ambien CR 12.5 mg Anchen NA Not Sued P.IV filed 1/19/06 NA NA NA Anchen (1/06, NS), Actavis, Synthon (2/07), Barr (4/07), Mutual (5/07), Sandoz (3/08)

Ambien CR 6.25 mg Actavis NA Not Sued P.IV filed 2/2/06 NA NA NA Actavis (2/06, NS), Anchen, Watson (1/07), Synthon (2/07), Barr (4/07), Mutual (5/07)

Amrix 15, 30 mg Mylan 10/20/08 11/25/08 08-cv-00889 DE Sue L. Robinson Pending Mylan (11/08), Barr (11/08), Impax (1/09), Anchen (7/09, 9/09)

Androgel 1% Watson 7/8/03 8/21/03 1:03-cv-02501 ND of GA Thomas W. Thrash Jr. Settled 9/06; Launch 8/15 Watson (8/03, S-9/06), Paddock/Par (8/03, S-9/06)

Angeliq 0.5 mg/ 1 mg Filed 12/26/07 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Angiomax 250 mg/vial Teva 9/1/09 10/8/09 1:09-cv-00751 DE Eduardo C. Robreno NA Teva (10/09), APP (10/09)

Antara 43mg, 130mg Lupin 12/2/08 1/14/09 1:09-cv-00083 MD Richard D Bennett Dropped 10/2009 Lupin (1/09), Paddock (7/09-DJ)

Argatroban Injection 100 mg/ml Barr 11/19/07 12/28/07 1:07-cv-11614 SD of NY John G. Koeltl Pending Barr (12/07)

Aricept 5, 10 mg Teva, Ranbaxy 10/27/05 12/7/05 2:05-cv-05727 NJ Garrett E. Brown, Jr. Pending Teva (12/05), Apotex (7/09-DJ)

Aricept ODT 5, 10 mg URL/Mutual NA 8/3/06 2:06-cv-03613 NJ Garrett E. Brown, Jr. Dismissed 12/07 Mutual/URL (8/06, D-12/07)

Arthrotec 75/0.2, 50/0.2 mg Teva 3/9/09 4/21/09 09-cv-03965 SD of NY Richard J. Sullivan Settled 12/09 Teva (4/09)

Asacol 400 mg Roxane 9/14/07 10/26/07 3:07-cv-05165 NJ Freda L. Wolfson Pending Roxane (10/07)

Astelin EQ 0.125 mg base Apotex 1/27/05 3/10/06 1:06-cv-00164 DE Sue L. Robinson Settled 4/08; Launch 3/10 Apotex (3/06, 4/08-S), Sun Pharma (6/07), Cobalt (8/07, 8/08-S)

Atacand 4, 8, 16, and 32 mg Sandoz NA Not Sued NA NA NA NA Sandoz (4/07, NS), Teva (3/08, 4/08, NS), Mylan (7/08, NS)

Atacand HCT 16/12.5, 32/12.5 mg Mylan 9/22/08 Not Sued NA NA NA NA Mylan (9/08, NS)

Atripla 600/200/300 mg Teva 3/30/09 5/8/09 1:08-cv-10838 SD of NY Richard J. Sullivan Pending Teva (5/09)

Axid oral sol. 15 mg/ml Filed 5/14/08 NA NA NA NA NA Pending NA

Avalide 150/12.5, 300/12.5 mg Filed 11/10/04 NA NA NA NA NA Pending NA

Avalide 300/25 mg Filed 6/6/06 NA NA NA NA NA Pending NA

Avandamet

1/500, 2/500, 4/500, 2/1000,

4/1000 mg Teva 12/20/04 1/26/05 1:05-cv-00536 NJ Noel L. Hillman Settled 9/07; Launch 1Q12 Teva (1/05, S-9/07)

Avandaryl 1/4, 2/4, 4/4, 8/2, 8/4mg Teva 3/29/07 5/11/07 1:07-cv-02238 NJ Noel L. Hillman Settled 9/07; Launch 1Q12 Teva (5/07, S-9/07)

Avandia 2, 4, 8 mg Teva or Dr Reddy 7/14/03

8/26/03 (TEVA)

9/5/03 (RDY)

1:03-cv-04037 (TEVA)

1:03-cv-04179 (RDY) NJ Noel L. Hillman Settled 9/07; Launch 1Q12 Teva (8/03, S-9/07), Dr. Reddys (9/03)

Avapro 75, 150, 300 mg Teva NA NA NA NA NA Pending Teva

Avelox 400 mg Dr. Reddy's 2/10/04 3/24/04 1:04-cv-00179 DE Sue L. Robinson Lost 10/07 Dr. Reddy (3/04), Teva (4/07)


17



Avinza 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 120 mg Actavis 9/4/07 10/18/07 2:07-cv-05041 NJ Susan D. Wigenton Pending Actavis (10/07), Sandoz (7/09)

Avodart 0.05 mg Barr 1/11/08 2/25/08 1-08-cv-00112 DE Sue L. Robinson Pending Barr (1/08)

Axert 6.25, 12.5 mg Teva 2/8/06 3/24/06 1:06-cv-02293 SD of NY Loretta A. Preska Settled 12/07 Teva (3/06)

Azor 5/20, 10/40 mg Mylan 4/18/08 6/3/08 2:06-cv-03462 NJ William J. Martini Lost 7/09 Mylan (6/08)

Benicar 5 , 20 , 40 mg Mylan 6/19/06 7/31/06 2:06-cv-03462 NJ William J. Martini Lost 7/09 Mylan (7/06)

Benicar HCT 20/12.5, 40/12.5, 40/25 mg Mylan 5/14/07 6/22/07 2:07-cv-03039 NJ William J. Martini Lost 7/09 Mylan (6/07)

Boniva 2.5 and 150 mg Shared 7/27/07 9/7/07 2:07-cv-04284 NJ Stanley R. Chesler Pending

Teva (9/07), Mutual (9/07), Apotex (9/07), Dr. Reddy's (9/07), Cobalt (9/07), Orchid

(9/07), Mylan (9/07), Actavis (5/08, 6/08-D)

Boniva 1 mg/ml, 3 ml vial Filed 8/31/07 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Brovana 0.015mg base/2mL Filed 10/1/09 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Caduet

2.5/50, 5/10, 5/20, 5/40, 10/10,

10/20, 10/80 Ranbaxy 1/24/07 3/9/07 1:07-cv-00138 DE Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. Lost 11/07 Ranbaxy (3/07, 3/08-DJ), Sandoz (10/09)

Cancidas (inj) 50 mg/vial and 70 mg/vial Teva 10/22/09 11/25/09 2:09-cv-06026 NJ Stanley R. Chesler Pending Teva (11/09)

Carbatrol 300 mg Nostrum Pharma 7/29/03 9/18/03 3:03-cv-04436 NJ Mary L. Cooper SJ denied 7/05 Nostrum (9/03), Core Pharma (5/06), Teva (5/07, S-9/09), Actavis (7/08, L-3/09)

Carbatrol 100, 200 mg Core Pharma 3/30/06 5/17/06 2:06-cv-02266 NJ Stanley R. Chesler SJ granted 11/08

Core Pharma (5/06), Teva (5/07, S-9/09), Nostrum (7/08), Apotex (7/08), Actavis (7/07,

L-3/09)

Cardizem LA 120, 180, 240, 300, 360, 420 mg Andrx

6/27/2005 (420

mg)

9/2/05 (other

doses) 8/10/05 1:05-cv-00586 DE Kent A. Jordan Settled 12/07; Launch 4/09 Andrx (8/05, 10/05, 10/06, S-12/07)

Celebrex 100, 200, 400 mg Teva 1/6/04 2/19/04 2:04-cv-00754 NJ John C. Lifland

Lost 3/07; Upheld in

part/Reversed in part 3/08 Teva (2/04)

Celebrex 50 mg Filed 3/21/08 NA NA NA NA NA Pending NA

Cenestin 1.25, 0.625mg Paddock 1/16/09 3/2/09 1:09-cv-1905 SD of NY NA Pending Paddock (3/09)

Cialis 5, 10, 20 mg Filed 11/21/07 NA NA NA NA NA Pending NA

Cialis 2.5 mg Filed 10/14/08 NA NA NA NA NA Pending NA

Clarinex 5 mg Shared 8/17-8/31/06 9/29/06 3:06-cv-04715 NJ Mary L. Cooper Pending

Zydus, Sandoz (S-4/09), Mylan (S-4/09), Orchid (S-8/09), Perrigo (S-12/08), Glenmark,

GeoPharma, Lupin (S-12/08), Ranbaxy, Sun Pharm, Watson (all 9/06), Anchen (11/07),

Clarinex RediTabs 2.5, 5 mg Zydus, Dr. Reddy's 8/17-8/31/06 9/29/06 3:06-cv-04715 NJ Mary L. Cooper Settled 12/08 Zydus (9/06), Dr. Reddy's (9/06, S-12/08), Orchid ( S-8/09)

Clarinex D12/24 2.5/120, 5/240 mg Dr. Reddy's 8/17-8/31/06 9/29/06 3:06-cv-04715 NJ Mary L. Cooper Settled 12/08 Dr. Reddy (9/06, S-12/08), Anchen (10/07), Sandoz (3/08)

Clarinex syrup 0.5 mg/ml Filed 5/8/08 NA NA NA NA NA Pending NA

Clobex lotion 0.05% Actavis 5/22/06 7/5/06 4:06-cv-00471 ND of TX Terry R. Means Pending Actavis (7/06)

Clobex shampoo 0.05% Actavis 1/8/08 2/21/08 4:08-cv-00115 ND of TX John McBryde Pending Actavis (2/08)

Clobex spray 0.05% Paddock 11/24/08 1/7/09 4:09-cv-00002 ND of TX Terry R. Means Pending Paddock (1/09); Perrigo (12/09)

Combigan 0.2%/0.5% Sandoz 2/20/09 4/7/09 2:09-cv-00097 ED of TX John T. Ward Pending Sandoz (4/09), Hi-Tech (6/09), Alcon (11/09)

Combivir 150/300 mg Teva 9/20/07 11/2/07 1:07-cv-00713 DE Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. Pending Teva (11/07), Lupin (8/08)

Comtan 200 mg Wockhardt 8/3/07 9/13/07 1:07-cv-00550 DE Gregory M. Sleet Settled 4/09; Launch 9/12 Wockhardt (9/07), Sun Pharm (11/08)

Concerta 18, 27, 36, 54 mg Impax 7/20/05 9/1/05 1:05-cv-00642 DE Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. Dismissed 10/06 Impax (9/05, D-10/06), Andrx (9/05)

Copaxone 20 mg/mL, 1mL Momenta/Sandoz 7/14/08 8/28/08 1:08-cv-07611 SD of NY Barbara S. Jones Pending Momenta/Sandoz (8/08), Mylan (11/09)

Cosopt 2%/0.5% Hi-Tech Pharmacal 12/5/05 1/18/06 3:06-cv-00266 NJ Mary L. Cooper Lost 4/06; Upheld 4/07 Hi-Tech (1/06), Apotex (12/06)

Covera HS 240 mg Filed 12/03 NA NA NA NA NA Pending NA

Coreg CR 40, 80, 10, 20 mg URL/Mutual 12/14/07 2/4/08 2:08-cv-00549 ED of PA Barclay Surrick Dismissed 11/08 URL/Mutual (2/08)

Crestor 5, 10, 20, 40 mg Shared 10/31-11/19/07 12/11/07 Multiple DE Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. Pending

Aurobindo (12/07), Apotex (12/07, DJ-1/08), Cobalt (12/07), Par (12/07), Sandoz

(12/07), Mylan (12/07), Sun (12/07), Teva (12/07-NS), Glenmark (12/07-NS)

Cubicin 250, 500mg/vial Teva 2/6/09 3/23/09 09-cv-00189 DE Gregory M. Sleet Pending Teva (3/09)

Cutivate 0.05% Glenmark 10/27/08 12/12/08 08-cv-05023 ED of NY Carol B. Amon Pending Glenmark (10/08), Perrigo (11/2009)

Cymbalta 20, 30, 60 mg Shared 10/28-11/6/08 11/14/08 Multiple SD of IN Larry J. McKinney Pending

Impax (11/08), Actavis (11/08), Sandoz (11/08), Wockhardt (11/08), Cobalt (11/08),

Lupin (11/08), Aurobindo (11/08), Sun (12/08), Anchen (8/09)

Delsym 30mg/5mL Tris Pharma 5/14/09 6/26/09 3:09-cv-03125 NJ Freda L. Wolfson Pending Tris (6/09)

Detrol 1, 2 mg Teva 2/23/04 3/26/04 2:04-cv-01418 NJ Dennis M. Cavanaugh Dismissed 3/07 Teva (3/04)

Detrol LA 2, 4 mg Teva 10/30/07 12/12/07 2:08-cv-01331 NJ Dennis M. Cavanaugh Pending Teva (12/07), Impax (3/08, 8/08)

Diastat

2.5/0.5, 5/1, 10/2, 15/3, 20/4

mg/ml Kali/Par 5/28/04 7/8/04 2:04-cv-03238 NJ John C. Lifland Settled 7/07; Launch 9/10 Par (7/04, S-7/07)

Diastat acudial 5 mg/mL, 4mL Filed 12/23/08 NA NA NA NA NA Pending NA

Differin 0.30% Filed 9/15/09 NA NA NA NA NA Pending NA

Diovan 40, 80, 160, 320 mg Ranbaxy 6/28/07 8/9/07 3:07-cv-03755 NJ Mary L. Cooper Settled 9/07; Launch 9/12 Ranbaxy (8/07, S-9/07)

Diovan HCT 80/12.5, 160/12.5, 160/25 mg Mylan (?) NA NA NA NA NA Pending NA

Diovan HCT 320/12.5, 320/25 mg Filed 2/7/07 NA NA NA NA NA Pending NA

Doryx 75, 100 mg Shared NA 12/23/08 2:08-cv-06304 NJ William J. Martini Pending Mutual (12/08), Mylan (12/08), Impax (12/08), Sandoz (1/09), Actavis (1/09)

Doryx 150 mg Impax 2/1/09 3/18/09 2:09-cv-01233 NJ William J. Martini Pending Impax (3/09), Mylan (5/09)

Dovonex solution 0.00005 Hi-Tech Pharmacal NA Not Sued P.IV filed 5/19/06 NA NA Pending Hi-Tech (8/06, NS), Altana (9/06, NS)

Duac 1%/5% Perrigo 4/10/09 5/28/09 09-cv-00376 DE Sue L. Robinson Dismissed 10/19/09 Perrigo (5/09, D-10/09)

Effexor XR caps 37.5, 75, 150 mg Teva 2/26/03 3/24/03 2:03-cv-01293 NJ William J. Martini Settled 10/05; Launch 7/10

Teva (3/03, S-10/05), Impax (4/06, S-7/08), Anchen (4/06, S-11/08), Lupin (3/07, S-

4/09), Osmotica (4/07, S-1/08), Sandoz (6/07), Mylan (7/07, S-12/09), Wockhardt

(8/07, S-5/09), Apotex (8/08), Torrent (1/09), Zydus (4/09), Orchid (7/09)

Effexor XR tabs 37.5, 75, 150 mg Sun Pharm 8/29/07 Convenant Not to SueNA NA NA Pending Sun Pharm (NS)

Elestat 0.05% Sandoz 1/16/09 Not Sued 1:09-cv-01444 DC NA Pending Sandoz (7/09-DJ)

Elocon cream 0.1% Filed 4/03 NA NA NA NA NA Pending NA

Elocon lotion 0.1% Filed 6/10/04 NA NA NA NA NA Pending NA


18



Eloxatin 50 mg/vial, 100 mg per vial Shared May 2007 June/July 2007 3:07-cv-02762 NJ Freda L. Wolfson

Won 6/09; TRO 8/09;

Remanded 9/09

Sandoz (6/07), Dabur (6/07), Par (7/07), Teva (7/07), Abraxis (7/07), Ebewe (7/07,

S-7/09), Actavis (7/07), Sun/Caraco (7/07), Mayne (7/07, 9/07), Barr (1/08),

Apotex (8/08)

Eloxatin 200 mg per vial Par, Ebewe 5/24/07 7/6/07 3:07-cv-03143 NJ Freda L. Wolfson Pending Par (7/07), Ebewe (7/07), Mayne (9/07), Teva (11/07), Barr (1/08)

Emend 40, 80, 125 mg Sandoz 1/15/09 2/27/09 3:09-cv-00890 NJ Mary L. Cooper Pending Sandoz (2/09)

Enablex 7.5, 15 mg Teva, Watson, Anchen 3/19/09 4/24/09 1:09-cv-00291 DE Sue L. Robinson Pending Teva (4/09), Watson (4/09), Anchen (4/09)

Entocort 3 mg Barr 4/9/08 5/22/08 1:08-cv-00305 DE Gregory M. Sleet Pending Barr (5/08), Mylan (7/08)

Epipen 0.15, 0.3 mg Teva 7/20/09 1:09-cv-00652 DE Gregory M. Sleet Pending Teva (9/09)

Epivir 150 mg Filed 10/1/07 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Epivir HBV 100 mg Filed 10/31/07 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Epzicom 600/300 mg Aurobindo (?) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Equetro 200, 300 mg Actavis (?) 12/4/07 1/17/08 1:08-cv-00036 DE Gregory M. Sleet Pending Actavis (1/08)

Ethyol 500 mg/vial Sun Pharm 6/29/04 8/12/04 1:04-cv-02612 MD Marvin J. Garbis At risk 3/08; Settled 7/09 Sun Pharm (8/04)

Evista 60 mg Barr 10/9/02 11/26/02 1:02-cv-01844 SD of IN Sarah Evans Barker Lost 9/09 Barr (12/02), Teva (6/06), Invagen (1/09)

Evoclin 1% Perrigo/Cobrek 1/29/09 3/13/09 1:09-cv-00167 DE Sue L. Robinson Pending Cobrek (3/09)

Evoxac 30mg Apotex NA 6/26/09 1:09-cv-00470 DE Jerome B. Simandle Pending Apotex (6/09), Sandoz (11/09)

Exforge 10/160 mg Par NA Not Sued NA NA NA NA Par (10/07, NS)




Exelon caps 1.5, 3, 4.5, 6 mg Dr. Reddy's, Sun Pharm NA 8/5/04 1:04-cv-06045 SD of NY Harold Baer Settled 12/07, 1/08

Dr. Reddys (8/04, S-1/08), Sun Pharm (8/04, S-12/07), Ranbaxy (3/05), Watson

(5/05, D-12/07)

Exelon solution 2 mg/ml Ranbaxy NA NA NA NA NA Pending Ranbaxy

Factive 320 mg Orchid 5/30/08 NA NA NA NA Pending Orchid

Famvir 125, 250, 500 mg Teva 2/22/05 4/8/05 2:05-cv-01887 NJ Dennis M. Cavanaugh At risk 9/07; Lost 11/09 Teva (4/05), Roxane (3/08)

Faslodex (inj) 50 mg/mL, 2.5 mL, 5 mL Filed 10/1/09 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Fazaclo 25, 100 mg Barr 7/14/08 8/21/08 1:08-cv-00531 DE Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. Case closed 8/09 Barr (8/08), Novel (11/08)

Femara 2.5 mg Mylan 5/10/06 6/26/06 3:06-cv-02885 NJ Mary L. Cooper Settled 12/08 Mylan (6/06)

Femcon Fe 0.035 mg; 0.04 mg Barr 8/13/07 9/24/07 2:07-cv-04560 NJ William J. Martini Settled 12/08 Barr (9/07, S-12/08), Watson (9/07, S-1/09), Lupin (8/09)

Fentora .1, .2, .3, .4, .6, .8 mg Watson 4/21/08 6/2/08 3:08-cv-00330 DE Sue L. Robinson Pending Watson (6/08), Barr (7/08, 10/08, S-11/09)

Flomax 0.4 mg Ranbaxy 4/6/05 5/13/05 3:05-cv-02563 NJ Mary L. Cooper Lost 2/07; Settled 11/07 Ranbaxy (5/05, S-11/07), Impax (7/08; s-10/09)

Focalin daily 2.5, 5, 10 mg Teva

7/9/04 (5, 10

mg)

7/28/04 (2.5

mg) 8/19/04 3:04-cv-04030 NJ Freda L. Wolfson Pending Teva (8/04), Par (10/07)

Focalin XR 5, 10, 20 mg Teva 8/3/07 9/14/07 1:07-cv-00552 DE Sue L. Robinson Pending Teva (9/07), Par (10/07), Actavis (10/07), Barr (11/07)

Focalin XR 15 mg Par 8/23/07 10/4/07 1:07-cv-00603 DE Sue L. Robinson Pending Par (10/07), Actavis (10/07), Barr (11/07)

Fortamet 500, 1000 mg Lupin 12/3/08 1/15/09 09-cv-00037 DE Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. Pending Lupin (1/09)

Fortical 200 mcg Apotex 6/12/06 7/24/06 1:06-cv-05571 SD of NY Robert P. Patterson Pending Apotex (7/06)

Fosrenol 500, 750, 1000 mg Mylan, Barr, Natco 2/2/09 3/16/09 1:09cv02380 SD of NY Paul G. Gardephe Pending Mylan (3/09), Barr (3/09), Natco (3/09)

Gabitril 2, 4 mg Sun Pharm NA Not Sued P. IV filed 2/1/05 NA NA Pending Sun (5/05)

Gemzar 200 mg/vial Teva 1/4/06 2/15/06 1:06-cv-00238 SD of IN Sarah Evans Barker Won 8/09 Teva (2/06), Mayne (8/06), Sun Pharm (12/06, D-9/07), Sandoz (10/09)

Gemzar 1 g/vial Teva 1/17/06 2/15/06 1:06-cv-00238 SD of IN Sarah Evans Barker Won 8/09 Teva (2/06), Sun Pharm (12/06, D-9/07), Sandoz (10/09)

Gemzar 2 g/vial Hospira/Mayne 12/5/07 1/10/08 1:08-cv-00037 SD of IN Sarah Evans Barker Won 8/09 Hospira (1/08), Mayne (1/08), Teva, (9/08)

Geodon 20, 40, 60, 80 mg Lupin NA NA NA NA NA Pending Lupin

Gleevec 100, 400 mg Sun Pharm NA NA NA NA NA Pending NA

Glumetza 500, 1000 mg Lupin 11/6/09 11/25/09 09-cv-05587 ND of CA NA Pending NA

Hectorol (inj) 2 mcg/ml, 2 ml ampules Perrigo/Pentech NA 2/21/08 1:08-cv-01083 ND of IL Robert M. Dow, Jr Pending Pentech (2/08), Eagle (4/09), Sandoz (7/09), Roxane (8/09)

Integrelin 2 mg/mL, 10 mL vial Teva 1/8/09 2/18/09 09-cv-00105 DE J. Curtis Joyner NA Teva (2/09)

Kaletra 100/25, 200/50 mg Mylan 1/30/09 3/13/09 1:09-cv-01586 ND of IL Robert M. Dow, Jr. Pending Mylan (3/09)

Lescol XL 80 mg Par NA Not Sued NA NA NA Pending Par (3/07, NS)

Lescol 20, 40 mg base Mylan 8/27/08 10/10/08 2:08-cv-05042 NJ Peter G. Sheridan Pending Mylan (10/08)

Lexapro 5, 10, 20 mg Ivax NA 9/23/03 1:03-cv-00891 DE Joseph J. Farnan Jr. Lost 7/06; Upheld 9/07 IVAX (9/03), Alphapharm (5/04, S-10/05), Caraco (7/06, S-7/09)

Levitra 5, 10, 20 mg Teva 5/19/09 7/1/09 1:09-cv-00480 DE Gregory M. Sleet Pending Teva (7/09)

Lipitor 10, 20, 40, 80 mg Ranbaxy 1/10/03 2/25/03 1:03-cv-00209 DE Joseph J. Farnan Jr. Lost 12/05; Upheld 8/06

Ranbaxy (2/03, DJ-3/08), Teva (6/07, 4/08), Cobalt (10/07), Apotex (12/08), Mylan

(6/09), KUDCO (11/09), Kremers-Urban (12/09), Dr. Reddys (12/09)

Loestrin 24 Fe 1 mg/0.02 mg and 75 mg Watson 6/19/06 7/28/06 2:06-cv-03491 NJ Harold A. Ackerman Settled 1/09 Watson (7/06, S-1/09), Lupin (8/09, D-10/09)

Loprox gel 0.77% gel Paddock 5/8/06 6/22/06 0:06-cv-02588 MN Michael J Davis Settled 8/07 Paddock (6/06, S-8/07), Glenmark (10/09, S-11/09)

Lotrel 2.5/10, 5/10, 5/20, 10/20 mg Teva 8/6/04 9/16/04 2:04-cv-04473 NJ Garrett E. Brown, Jr. At risk 5/07; PI denied 6/07

Teva (9/04), Watson (3/06), Par (10/06, S-2/09), Lupin (12/06, S-9/09), Dr Reddy

(7/07, 5/08, S-9/09), Mylan (10/07), Cobalt (12/08, S-9/09)

Lotrel 5/40, 10/40 mg Par 11/17/06 12/29/06 2:06-cv-04788 NJ Garrett E. Brown, Jr. Pending Par (12/06), Lupin (12/06, S-9/09), Teva (2/08), Cobalt (6/08)

Lovaza 1g Par, Teva, Apotex 3/17/09 4/23/09 1:09-cv-00286 DE Sue L. Robinson Pending Teva (4/09), Par (4/09), Apotex (4/09)

Lovenox Multiple Amphastar Pharma NA 8/4/03 5:03-cv-00887 CD of CA Mariana R. Pfaelzer

Won SJ 6/05; Overturned 4/06

(Remanded); Won 2/07; Under

appeal Amphastar (8/03), Teva, Momenta/Sandoz, Eon (8/06), Hospira (12/07)


19



Lumigan 0.03% Barr 3/26/09 5/7/09 09-cv-00333 DE Sue L. Robinson Pending Barr (5/09)

Lunesta 1, 2, 3 mg Shared Multiple 3/20/09 2:09-cv-01302 NJ Dennis M. Cavanaugh Pending

Teva (3/09), Wockhardt (3/09), Reddy's (3/09), Roxane (3/09), Cobalt (3/09),

Glenmark (3/09), Orchid (3/09), Orgenus (3/09), Lupin (3/09), Sun Pharm (3/09),

Luvox CR 100, 150 mg Actavis, Anchen 8/24/09 10/6/09 1-09-cv-00744 DE Gregory M. Sleet Pending Actavis (10/09), Anchen (10/09)

Luxiq 0.12% Perrigo/Pentech 9/24/07 11/6/07 1:07-cv-06297 ND of IL Joan B. Gottschall Pending Pentech (11/07)

Lybrel 0.02 mg/0.09 mg Watson 2/1/08 3/12/08 1:08-cv-00145 DE Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. Dismissed 4/09; Launch 5/10 Watson (3/08, D-4/09), Sandoz (5/08, D-9/09)

Lyrica

25, 50, 75, 100, 150, 200, 225,

300mg Shared 3/17/09 4/29/09 Multiple DE Gregory M. Sleet Pending

Teva (4/09), Mylan (4/09), Lupin (4/09), Sandoz (4/09), Actavis (4/09), Wockhardt

(4/09), Sun (4/09), Cobalt (4/09),

Malarone 250/100mg Glenmark 8/10/09 8/14/09 1:09-cv-00608 DE Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. Pending Glenmark (8/09)

Maxalt 5, 10 mg Filed 9/2/04 NA NA NA NA NA Pending NA

Maxalt MLT 5, 10 mg Mylan (?) NA NA NA NA NA Pending NA

Meridia 10, 15 mg Apotex 11/9/09 12/23/09 1:09-cv-07968 ND of IL Rebecca R. Pallmeyer Pending NA

Metadate CD 10, 20, 30 mg Filed 5/13/05 NA NA NA NA NA Pending NA

Metadate CD 40 mg KV Pharm NA 4/18/08 1:08-cv-00223 DE Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. Pending KV (4/08)

Metrogel (topical) 0.75% Tolmar 1/19/09 3/3/09 3:09-cv-0400 ND of TX David C Godbey Dismissed 4/09 Tolbar (3/09, D-4/09)

Micardis 20, 40, 80 mg Watson (?) NA NA NA NA NA Pending NA

Micardis HCT 80/12.5, 80/25mg Filed 12/31/08 NA NA NA NA NA Pending NA

Mirapex 0.25, 0.125, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 mg Barr 8/10/05 9/26/05 1:05-cv-00700 DE Joseph J. Farnan, Jr.

Won 6/08; Settled 8/08; Launch

1/10 Barr (9/05, S-8/08), Mylan (12/05)

Monistat 1

Combination Pack 2% and 1.2 g Perrigo 3/7/08 4/18/08 3:08-cv-01909 NJ Freda L. Wolfson Dismissed 9/08 Perrigo (4/08)

Moviprep oral soln

100 g, 7.5 g, 2.691 g, 1.015 g,

5.9 g and 4.7 g per pouch Novel Labs NA 5/14/08 3:08-cv-02311 NJ Freda L. Wolfson Pending Novel (5/08)

Mucinex SE 600, 1200 mg URL/Mutual 8/22/06 10/2/06 2:06-cv-04418 ED of PA Paul S. Diamond Settled 3/07; Launch 7/12 Mutual/URL (10/06, S-3/07), Perrigo (9/07), Watson (4/09)

Mucinex DM 600/30, 1200/60 mg Watson 3/11/09 4/24/09 1:09-cv-03933 SD of NY Barbara S. Jones Pending Watson (4/09)

Mucinex D 600/60, 1200/120 mg Watson 4/21/09 6/5/09 1:09-cv-04455 SD of NY Barbara S. Jones Pending Watson (6/09)

Myfortic 180, 360 mg Apotex 9/20/09 11/4/09 1:09-cv-06950 ND of IL David H. Coar Pending Apotex (11/09)

Namenda 5, 10 mg Shared Multiple 1/10/08 1:08-cv-00021 DE Multiple Pending

Barr (1/08, WD-5/09), Cobalt (1/08, S-10/09), Lupin (1/08, S-12/09), Orchid

(1/08), Teva (1/08, S-11/09), Upsher-Smith (1/08, S-9/09), Wockhardt (1/08, S-

9/09), Dr. Reddy's (1/08, WD-12/09), Mylan (1/08), Amneal (1/08, S-9/09),

Genpharm (1/08, WD-10/09),

Namenda 15, 20 mg Upsher-Smith 12/14/07 1/10/08 1:08-cv-00021 DE Gregory M. Sleet Pending Upsher-Smith (1/08)

Nasacort AQ 0.055 mg/spray Barr/Perrigo 3/20/06 5/2/06 1:06-cv-00286 DE Gregory M. Sleet Settled 11/08; Launch 6/11 Barr (5/06)

Nasonex 50mcg spray Apotex NA 12/18/09 3:09-cv-06373 NJ Garrett E. Brown, Jr. Pending Apotex (12/09)

Nexium 20, 40 mg Ranbaxy 10/14/05 11/21/05 3:05-cv-05553 NJ Garrett E. Brown, Jr. Settled 4/05; Launch 5/27/14 Ranbaxy (11/05), Ivax (3/06, 10/08), Dr. Reddy's (7/07), Mylan (NS), Sandoz

Nexium (inj) 20, 40 mg/vial Teva NA 4/25/08 08-cv-00238 NJ Joel A. Pisano Pending Teva (4/08)

Niaspan 1000 mg Barr NA 3/4/02 1:02-cv-01683 SD of NY Victor Marrero Settled 4/05; Launch 9/13 Barr (3/02, S-4/05), Lupin (3/09)

Niaspan 500, 750 mg Barr NA 8/12/02 1:02-cv-08995 SD of NY Victor Marrero Settled 4/05; Launch 9/13 Barr (3/02, S-4/05), Lupin (3/09)

Nimbex (inj)

2mg/mL, 5mL vial, 10 mg/mL,

20mL vial, 2mg/mL, 10 mL vial Sandoz 11/6/09 12/18/09 1:09-cv-00972 DE Gregory M. Sleet Pending Sandoz (12/09)

Niravam 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2 mg Par 3/17/06 4/28/06 2:06-cv-01970 NJ Dickinson R. Debevoise At risk 1/09 Par (4/06), Actavis (2/07)

Nitrostat 0.3, 0.4, 0.6 mg Filed 10/19/05 NA NA NA NA NA Pending NA

Nuvigil

100, 200mg (amend: 50, 150,

250mg) Teva 10/19/09 12/2/09 1:09-cv-00918 DE Gregory M. Sleet Pending Teva (12/2/09), Actavis (12/8/09), Mylan (12/11/09), Watson (1/10)

Nuvigil 200mg) Mylan 11/2/09 12/11/09 1:09-cv-00954 DE Gregory M. Sleet Pending Teva (12/2/09), Actavis (12/8/09), Mylan (12/11/09), Watson (1/10)

Olux 0.05% foam Perrigo 9/7/05 10/19/05 2:05-cv-05038 NJ Garrett E. Brown, Jr. PI Denied, Launched 3/08 Perrigo (10/05), Pentech (4/08)

Opana ER 5, 10, 20, 40 mg Impax 10/3/07 11/15/07 2:09-cv-00831 NJ Katharine S. Hayden Pending Impax (11/07), Actavis (3/08-S 2/09), Sandoz (8/08), Barr (10/08)

Opana ER 30 mg Actavis 6/30/08 7/11/08 2:08-cv-01563 NJ Katharine S. Hayden Pending Actavis (7/08-S 2/09), Impax (7/08), Teva (7/09)

Opana ER 7.5, 15mg Actavis 5/29/08 7/11/08 2:08-cv-01563 NJ Katharine S. Hayden Pending Actavis (7/08-S 2/09), Impax (7/08), Teva (7/09)

Optivar 0.05% solution Apotex 3/6/07 4/17/07 1:07-cv-00204 DE Sue L. Robinson Settled 4/08: Launch 12/09 Apotex (3/07), Sun Pharm (6/07)

Oracea 40 mg Mylan 2/4/09 3/19/09 1:09-cv-00184 DE Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. Pending Mylan (3/09), Lupin (7/09), Impax (9/09)

Ortho Evra 0.15 mg/0.02 mg Filed 3/22/07 NA NA NA NA NA Pending NA

Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo

0.18/0.025, 0.215/0.025,

0.25/0.025 mg/mg Barr 8/20/03 10/1/03 2:03-cv-04678 NJ Stanley R. Chesler

At Risk 6/09; Settled 7/09;

Launch 12/15 Barr (10/03, S-7/09), Watson (10/08), Sandoz (6/09)

Osmoprep 1.102 g and 0.398 g Novel Labs 7/25/08 9/8/08 3:08-cv-04628 NJ Freda L. Wolfson Pending Novel (9/08)

Oxytrol 3.9mg/24hrs Barr 9/11/08 10/23/08 1:08-cv-00793 DE Gregory M. Sleet Settled 10/09; Launch 4/15 Barr (10/08, S-10/09)

Patanol 0.1% Apotex 10/2/06 11/15/06 1:06-cv-01642 SD of IL Richard L. Young Pending Apotex (11/06), Barr (10/07), Sandoz (2/09)

Pataday 0.2% Barr 11/24/08 1/8/09 1:09-cv-00026 SD of IN Jane Magnus-Stinson Pending Barr (1/09), Apotex (2/09)

Paxil CR 37.5 mg Filed 5/19/09 NA NA NA NA NA Pending NA

Perforomist 0.2mg/2mL Teva 5/12/09 6/23/09 1:09-cv-00087 ND of WV Irene M Keeley Pending Teva (6/09)

Plavix 75 mg Apotex 3/14/02 3/21/02 2:02-cv-02255 SD of NY Sidney H. Stein

Settled 3/06 (Rejected 7/06);

Lost 6/07

Apotex (3/02, S-3/06), Dr. Reddy (5/02), Teva (9/04), Watson (8/04, S-8/09)),

Mylan, Sandoz, Cobalt (9/05), Sun (7/08)

Prandimet 1/500, 2/500 mg Apotex 9/10/09 10/22/09 1:09-cv-08939 SD of NY Paul G. Gardephe Pending Actavis (10/09), Sandoz (11/09)

Prandin 0.5, 1.0, 2 mg Caraco 4/26/05 6/9/05 4:05-cv-40188 ED of MI Donald A Scheer Lost 6/22/09 Caraco (6/05), Mylan (5/09)

Precedex 100mcg/mL Sandoz 7/27/09 9/4/09 3:09-cv-04591 NJ Mary L. Cooper Pending Sandoz (9/09)

Prevacid 15, 30 mg Teva 12/5/05 1/17/06 1:06-cv-00033 DE Sue L. Robinson Lost 3/31/08 Teva (1/06)

Prevacid SoluTabs 15, 30 mg Teva 4/12/07 5/25/07 1:07-cv-00331 DE Sue L. Robinson Won 11/09 Teva (5/06), Barr (6/08)

Primaxin IM 500, 750 mg Ranbaxy 1/22/07 4/30/07 1:07-cv-00229 DE Gregory M. Sleet Dismissed 7/08 Ranbaxy (4/07)


20



Protonix 20, 40 mg Teva, Sun Pharm 4/6/04 5/20/04 2:04-cv-02355 NJ Jose L. Linares At risk 12/07

Teva (4/04), Sandoz (4/04-PIII on compound patent, PIV on formulation patents),

SunPharm (4/04, 5/05), KUDCO (8/06), Apotex (8/09)

Protonix IV 40 mg/vial Sun Pharm 3/1/05 5/5/05 2:05-cv-02391 NJ Jose L. Linares Pending Sun Pharm (6/05), Teva (NS), Apotex (2/08), Sandoz (5/08), Teva (6/08)

Provigil 100, 200 mg

Teva, Mylan, Barr,

Ranbaxy 3/28/03 3/31/03 2:03-cv-01394 NJ John C. Lifland

Settled 12/05, 1/06,

2/06; Launch 4/12

Teva (3/03-S), Mylan (3/03-S), Ranbaxy (3/03-S), Barr (3/03-S), Sandoz (5/04-DR

5/05), Carlsbad (2/05-S), Caraco (11/05-NS), Apotex (1/06-NS), Hikma (8/08-NS)

Pulmicort Respules 0.25/2 ml, 0.5/2 ml Ivax 9/14/05 10/26/05 1:05-cv-05142 NJ Renee Marie Bumb Settled 11/08 Ivax (10/05), Breath (3/08), Apotex (4/09)

Quixin 0.5% solution Hi-Tech Pharmacal 11/7/03 12/19/03 1:03-cv-01151 DE Kent A. Jordan Dismissed 2/04 Hi-Tech (10/03)

Reclast (inj) 0.05 mg/mL, 100 mL vial Teva 11/7/08 12/18/08 08-cv-00952 DE Sue L. Robinson NA Teva (12/08)

Renagel 400, 800 mg Mylan (?) NA Not Sued NA NA NA Pending Mylan ? (Not Sued), Lupin (3/09), Impax (3/09), Sandoz (7/09), Endo (10/09)

Renvela 800 mg Impax 2/23/09 4/3/09 1:09-cv-00846 MD J. Frederick Motz Pending Impax (4/09), Lupin (5/09)

Requip XL 2, 3, 4, 8, 12 mg Impax, Actavis Jan 2009 Not Sued NA NA Pending NA

Reyataz 100, 150, 200, 300 mg Teva 10/19/09 12/2/09 1:09-cv-00919 DE Sue L. Robinson Pending NA

Rhinocort spray 0.032 mg (32 mcg)/spray Apotex Not Sued Not Sued NA NA NA Not sued NA

Ritalin LA 20, 30, 40 mg Abrika 10/23/06 12/6/06 2:06-cv-05818 NJ Freda L. Wolfson Pending Abrika (12/06), KV (10/07), Barr (10/07)

Ritalin LA 10 mg Filed 5/21/07 NA NA NA NA NA Pending KV (10/07), Barr (10/07)

Rogaine Foam 5% Perrigo 8/26/09 10/9/09 1:09-cv-00758 DE Gregory M. Sleet Pending Perrigo (10/09)

Rozerem 8 mg Teva 7/22/09 11/6/09 1:09-cv-00841 DE Sue L. Robinson Pending Teva (11/09), Watson (12/09)

Rythmol SR 225, 325, 425 mg Par 11/8/06 12/19/06 1:06-cv-00774 DE Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. Settled 4/09 Par (12/06, S-4/09)

Ryzolt 100, 200, 300 mg Sun 9/29/09 11/5/09 1:09-cv-00833 DE Kent A. Jordan Pending Sun (11/09)

Sanctura XR 60 mg Watson 6/2/09 7/13/09 09-cv-00511 DE NA Pending Watson (7/09); Sandoz (11/09)

Sandostatin Multiple Sun Pharm (?) NA NA NA NA NA Pending KV (10/07), Barr (10/07)

Seasonale 0.03 mg; 0.15 mg Watson NA 12/13/07 3:07-cv-05941 NJ Mary L. Cooper Pending Watson (12/07), Sandoz (12/07), Lupin (9/09)

Seasonique 0.03 mg; 0.15 mg Watson 1/22/08 3/6/08 2:08-cv-01145 NJ Jose L. Linares Dismissed 3/08 Watson (3/08, D-3/08)

Sensipar 30, 60, 90 mg Barr, Teva 6/12/08 7/25/08 1:08-cv-00464 DE Harvey Bartle, III Pending Barr (7/08), Teva (7/08)

Seroquel

25, 50, 100, 150, 200, 300, 400

mg Teva

9/26/2005 (25 mg)

2/21/06 (100, 200,

300 mg)

11/8/2005 (25

mg)

3/31/06 (100,

3:05-cv-05333 (25

mg)

2:06-cv-01528 (100, NJ Joel A. Pisano

Lost SJ 7/08; Upheld

9/09

Teva (11/05, 25 mg, 3/06, 100, 200, 300 mg, 7/07, 50, 150, 400 mg), Sandoz

(4/07)

Seroquel XR 150, 200, 300, 400 mg

Handa

Pharmaceuticals

7/10/08 (200, 300

mg)

7/23/08 (400 mg) 7/28/08 3:08-cv-03773 NJ Joel A. Pisano Pending Handa (7/08, 10/08), Accord/Intas (9/08), Biovail (1/09)

Simcor 20/1000 mg Filed 9/17/09 NA NA NA NA NA Pending NA

Singulair tablets 4, 5, 10 mg Teva 2/23/07 4/3/07 3:07-cv-01596 NJ Garrett E. Brown, Jr. Lost 8/09 Teva (4/07)

Singulair chewables 4, 5 mg Teva 4/4/07 5/14/07 3:07-cv-02264 NJ Garrett E. Brown, Jr. Lost 8/09 Teva (5/07)

Singulair granules 4 mg Teva 12/8/08 1/16/09 09-cv-00233 NJ Garrett E. Brown, Jr. Lost 8/09 Teva (1/09)

Skelaxin 800 mg Eon 11/3/04 12/17/04 1:04-cv-05540 ED of NY David. G. Trager Won SJ 1/09 Eon (12/04)

Solaraze 3% topical

Novartis Consumer

(505b2) 3/20/07 5/3/07 2:07-cv-02075 NJ Dennis M. Cavanaugh Pending Novartis (5/07)

Solodyn 45, 90, 135 mg Impax 1/15/08 1/15/08 3:08-cv-00253 ND of CA Maxine M. Chesney Dismissed 4/08; Impax (1/08, S-12/08)

Solodyn 45, 90, 135 mg Mylan, Barr, Sandoz 12/8/08 1/13/09 1:09-cv-00033 DE Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. Pending

Mylan (1/09), Sandoz (1/09, S-8/09), Barr (1/09, S-3/09), Ranbaxy (6/09), Lupin

(11/09)

Solodyn 65, 115 mg Teva 11/20/09 12/28/09 1:09-cv-03464 MD Marvin J. Garbis Pending Teva (12/09), Lupin (1/10)

Stalevo 100, 150 25/100/200, 37.5/150/200 mg Sun Pharm 10/1/07 11/13/07 3:07-cv-05436 NJ Mary L. Cooper Pending Sun (11/07)

Stalevo 50, 200 12.5, 50, 200 mg Wockhardt 10/29/08 12/8/08 08-cv-00917 DE Gregory M. Sleet

Settled 4/09; Launch

9/12 Wockhardt (12/08)

Stalevo 75, 125 18.75 mg/75 mg/200 mg and Filed 5/19/09 NA NA NA NA NA Pending NA

Starlix 60, 120 mg Par, Teva, Watson 1/19/05 Not Sued NA NA NA Pending Par (NS), Teva (NS), Watson (NS)

Strattera 10, 18, 25, 40, 60, 80, 100 mg Shared 6/28-8/16/07 8/9-9/5/2007 2:07-cv-03770 NJ Dennis M. Cavanaugh Pending

Actavis (8/07), Sandoz (8/07-DJ, 9/07), Sun (9/07), Glenmark (9/07, 7/08-S),

Mylan (9/07), Teva (9/07), Apotex (9/07), Aurobindo (9/07), Synthon (9/07, 8/08-

Sular 25.5, 34 mg Filed 11/28/08 NA NA NA NA NA Pending NA

Suprane 99.9% Minrad 12/12/08 1/23/09 09-cv-00054 DE Unassigned Pending Minrad (1/09)

Sustiva 600 mg Mylan 7/16/09 8/28/09 09-cv-00651 DE Unassigned Pending NA

Symbyax 6/25, 12/25, 6/50, 12/50 mg Teva 3/11/05 4/22/05 1:05-cv-00595 SD of IN Richard L. Young Dismissed 10/07 Teva (4/05)

Tarceva 25, 100, 150 mg base Teva, Mylan 2/6/09 3/19/09 1:09-cv-00185 DE Sue L. Robinson Pending Teva (3/09), Mylan (3/09)

Tarka

4/240, 2/240, 2/180, 1/240

mg Glenmark 10/29/07 12/7/07

2:07-cv-05855

2:08-cv-01658 (1

mg/240 mg dose) NJ Dennis M. Cavanaugh Pending Glenmark (12/07, 4/08 for 1 mg/240 mg)

Tarka 1/240 mg Filed 2/20/08 NA NA NA NA NA Pending NA

Taxotere 20/2, 80/8, 160mg/16ml Hospira 505b2 9/28/07 11/9/07 1:07-cv-00721 DE Gregory M. Sleet Pending Hospira b2 (11/07), Apotex b2 (8/08); Sun b2 (8/09)

Taxotere 40/1, 20/0.5, 80mg/2ml Apotex 505b2 6/27/08 8/8/08 1:08-cv-00496 DE Gregory M. Sleet Pending Hospira b2 (11/07), Apotex b2 (8/08); Sun b2 (8/09)

Taxotere 40 mg/mL, 0.5 mL and 2 mL Sandoz 9/15/09 10/29/09 1:09-cv-00810 DE Pending Sandoz (10/09)

Temodar 5, 20, 100, 250 mg Barr 6/8/07 7/20/07 1:07-cv-00457 DE Sue L. Robinson Pending Barr (7/07)

Temodar 140, 180 mg Filed 3/24/08 NA NA NA NA NA Pending NA

Testim 1% Upsher-Smith 10/22/08 12/4/08 1:08-cv-00908 DE Sue L. Robinson Pending Upsher-Smith (12/08)

Thalomid 50, 100, 150, 200 mg/vial Barr 12/6/06 1/18/07

2:07-cv-00286 (lead

case) NJ Susan D. Wigenton Pending Barr (1/07, 8/07 on new '012 patent, 11/07 on 150 mg dose)

Tobi 300mg/5mL Teva 10/27/09 12/10/09 1:09-cv-00949 DE Noel L. Hillman Pending Teva (12/09)

Travatan 0.004% Teva 3/17/09 4/30/09 1:09-cv-00318 DE Legrome D. Davis Pending Teva (4/09), Par (7/09), Apotex (10/09)

Travatan Z 0.004% Par 6/1/09 7/1/09 1:09-cv-00481 DE Legrome D. Davis Pending Par (7/09), Teva (7/09)


21



Tricor tab 160 mg Teva NA 10/4/02 1:02-cv-01512 DE Kent A. Jordan Settled 6/05 Teva (11/02, S-6/05), Impax (1/03), Par (2/03), Ranbaxy (1/04)

Tricor tab 54 mg Teva NA 10/4/02 1:02-cv-01512 DE Kent A. Jordan Settled 6/05 Teva (11/02, S-6/05), Impax (1/03), Par (2/03), Ranbaxy (1/04)

Tricor tab 145 mg Teva 1/16/08 2/29/08 2:08-cv-01085 NJ Joseph A. Greenaway, Jr. Settled 11/09 Teva (2/08, S-11/09), Biovail (11/08), Lupin (3/09), Impax (10/09)

Tricor tab 48 mg Biovail 9/19/08 11/3/08 1:08-cv-06274 ND of IL Wayne R. Andersen Pending Biovail (11/08), Lupin (3/09), Impax (10/09)

Treximet 85/500 mg Par 10/8/08 11/14/08 6:08-cv-00437 ED of TX Leonard Davis Pending Par (11/08), Mylan (1/09), Teva (4/09), Dr. Reddy's (9/09)

Truvada 200/300 mg Teva 11/3/08 12/12/08 1:08-cv-10838 SD of NY Richard J. Sullivan Pending Teva (12/08)

Tygacil (inj) 50mg/vial Sandoz 10/30/09 12/11/09 1:09-cv-00955 DE Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. Pending Sandoz (12/09)

Uroxatral 10 mg Shared Multiple 9/21/07 1:07-cv-00572 DE Gregory M. Sleet Pending

Actavis/Par (9/07), Aurobindo (9/07), Mylan (9/07), Teva (9/07), Sun (9/07),

Torrent (9/07), Ranbaxy (9/07), Barr (9/07), Apotex (12/07), Wockhardt (3/08)

Valcyte 450 mg Ranbaxy 3/17/05 4/28/06 3:06-cv-02003 NJ Freda L. Wolfson Won 9/09 Ranbaxy (4/06)

Valtrex 500, 1000 mg Ranbaxy 4/1/03 5/9/03 3:03-cv-02158 NJ Mary L. Cooper Settled 7/07 Ranbaxy (5/03, S-7/07), Apotex (7/09-DJ)

Vanos 0.1% cream Perrigo 4/25/08 6/6/08 1:08-cv-00539 WD of MI Paul L. Maloney Settled 4/09 Perrigo (6/08, S-4/09), Glenmark (6/09, S-11/09)

Velcade 3.5mg/vial Teva 1/16/09 2/27/09 1:09-cv-00127 DE Gregory M. Sleet Pending Teva (2/09)

Verelan PM 100, 200, 300 mg Mylan 7/19/06 9/1/06 1:06-cv-00133 ND of WV Irene M. Keeley Dismissed 8/07 Mylan (9/06, D-8/07)

Vesicare 5, 10 mg Teva 8/11/09 9/22/09 1:09-cv-08100 SD of NY Sidney H. Stein Pending Teva (9/09)

Vfend (tab) 50, 200 mg Mylan Not Sued Not Sued NA NA NA Settled 10/09 Mylan (NS)

Vfend (inj) 200mg/vial Sandoz Not Sued Not Sued NA NA NA Pending Sandoz (NS)

Viagra 25, 50 mg Filed 10/25/04 NA NA NA NA NA Pending NA

Viagra 100 mg Filed 11/19/04 NA NA NA NA NA Pending NA

Vigamox 0.5% solution Teva 2/21/06 4/5/06 1:06-cv-00234 DE Sue L. Robinson Lost 10/09 Teva (4/06)

Vytorin 10/10, 10/20, 10/40, 10/80mg Mylan 11/5/09 12/18/09 1:09-cv-00167 ND of WV Irene M. Keeley Pending Mylan (12/09)

Welchol 625mg Filed 7/1/09 NA NA NA NA NA Pending NA

Xalatan 2.5 ml Par/Arrow 12/18/01 12/21/01 3:01-cv-06011 DE Stanley R. Chesler

Lost 7/04; Upheld

8/05; Mandate 10/05 Par/Arrow (12/01),

Xeloda 150, 500 mg Mylan 3/11/09 4/8/09 2:09-cv-01692 NJ William J. Martini Pending Mylan (4/09), Teva (10/09), Roxane (12/09)

Xopenex neb

0.0103%, 0.021% and 0.042%

solution Breath Ltd 9/6/05 10/21/05 1:06-cv-10043 MA Douglas P. Woodlock Settled 5/08 Breath (10/05, S-4/08), Dey (2/06), Watson (3/06, NS), Barr (7/07, S-3/09)

Xopenex neb 0.25% solution Dey 8/14/06 9/27/06 1:06-cv-00113 DE Kent A. Jordan Pending Dey (9/06)

Xyzal tabs 5 mg Perrigo/Synthon 2/28/08 4/10/08 1:08-cv-00207 DE Gregory M. Sleet Case Dropped 6/08 Synthon (4/08, D-6/08), Sun (5/08, D-5/09), Sandoz (6/08), Barr (7/08, D-4/09)

Xyzal oral sol. 0.5mg/mL Perrigo/Synthon 5/5/09 6/17/09 5:09-cv-00264 ED of ND W. Earl Britt Pending Synthon (6/09)

Yasmin 3 mg/0.03 mg Barr 3/18/05 4/29/05 2:05-cv-02308 NJ Peter G. Sheridan

Won on SJ 3/08;

Settled 6/08 Barr (3/05), Watson (4/08), Sandoz (4/08)

Yaz 3 mg/0.02 mg Barr Not Sued Not Sued NA NA NA Settled 6/08 BRL (9/06-NS, S-6/08), WPI (11/07), Sandoz (7/08)

Zanaflex (caps) 2, 4, 6 mg Apotex 8/31/07 10/11/07 2:07-cv-04937 NJ Garrett E. Brown, Jr. Pending Apotex (10/07)

Zantac syrup 15 mg base/ml Teva 2/5/04 3/18/04 1:04-cv-00171 DE Kent A. Jordan Pending Teva (3/04), Cypress (6/07, D-1/08), Amneal Pharma (1/08)

Zegerid caps

20/1100, 40/1100, 20/1680

mg Par 8/2/07 9/13/07 1:07-cv-00551 DE Gregory M. Sleet Pending Par (9/07)

Zegerid

suspension 40 mg/1680 mg per packet Par 11/13/07 12/20/07 1:07-cv-00827 DE Gregory M. Sleet Pending Par (12/07)

Zemplar (caps) 1, 2, 4mcg Teva 10/8/08 11/20/08 1:08-cv-06659 ND of IN Charles P. Kocoras Pending Teva (10/08)

Zemplar (inj)

0.002mg/mL in 1 mL vial and

0.005mg/mL Sandoz 2/19/09 4/1/09 09-cv-00215 DE Gregory M. Sleet Pending Sandoz (4/09); Teva (11/09)

Zetia 10 mg Glenmark 2/9/07 3/22/07 2:07-cv-01334 SD of NY Jose L. Linares Pending Glenmark (3/07)

Zometa (inj) 4mg base/5mL; 5mg Teva 6/10/08 7/24/08 1:08-cv-00459 DE Sue L. Robinson Pending Teva (7/08)

Zymar 0.3% solution drops Apotex 10/17/07 11/29/07 1:07-cv-00779 DE Sue L. Robinson Pending Apotex (11/07)

Zyvox (inj) 2mg/ml, 300ml bag Filed 9/1/09 NA NA NA NA NA Pending NA

Zyvox (susp.) 100mg/5mL Filed 8/3/09 NA NA NA NA NA Pending NA

Zyvox (tab) 600 mg Filed 12/21/05 NA NA NA NA NA Pending NA



22

Appendix D: Litigation Scorecard History 2000-2009 (Complete)

Success

Lost % Won % Settled % Dropped % TOTAL %

Actavis (total) 1 17% 2 33% 3 50% 0 0% 6 83%

Alpharma 0 0% 1 100% 0 0% 0 0% 1 100%

Actavis 1 20% 1 20% 3 60% 0 0% 5 80%

Alcon 0 0% 0 0% 1 100% 0 0% 1 100%

Amneal 0 0% 0 0% 1 100% 0 0% 1 100%

Amphastar 0 0% 1 100% 0 0% 0 0% 1 100%

Anchen 0 0% 1 25% 3 75% 0 0% 4 100%

Apotex 12 57% 2 10% 7 33% 0 0% 21 43%

Baxter 0 0% 1 100% 0 0% 0 0% 1 100%

Bedford 0 0% 0 0% 1 100% 0 0% 1 100%

Breath 0 0% 0 0% 1 100% 0 0% 1 100%

Caraco 0 0% 1 100% 0 0% 0 0% 1 100%

Cheminor 1 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 0%

Corepharma 0 0% 1 50% 1 50% 0 0% 2 100%

Covidien 0 0% 0 0% 1 100% 0 0% 1 100%

Cypress Pharma 0 0% 0 0% 1 100% 0 0% 1 100%

Dr. Reddy's 7 39% 2 11% 9 50% 0 0% 18 61%

Endo 0 0% 1 50% 1 50% 0 0% 2 100%

Exela 1 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 0%

Glenmark 1 33% 0 0% 2 67% 0 0% 3 67%

Hi Tech 1 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 0%

Hospira 1 33% 2 67% 0 0% 0 0% 3 67%

Impax 2 14% 4 29% 7 50% 1 7% 14 86%

KV Pharm 1 14% 1 14% 3 43% 2 29% 7 86%

Lupin 2 25% 1 13% 4 50% 1 13% 8 75%

Mylan 9 36% 7 28% 9 36% 0 0% 25 64%

Nostrum 1 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 0%

Orchid 0 0% 0 0% 2 100% 0 0% 2 100%

Par 2 13% 4 27% 9 60% 0 0% 15 87%

Paddock 0 0% 1 50% 1 50% 0 0% 2 100%

Perrigo 0 0% 1 13% 4 50% 3 38% 8 100%

Prasco 1 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 0%

Ranbaxy 7 37% 2 11% 9 47% 1 5% 19 63%

Roxane 1 33% 0 0% 2 67% 0 0% 3 67%

Sandoz (total) 3 13% 11 46% 9 38% 1 4% 24 88%

Sandoz 3 18% 6 35% 7 41% 1 6% 17 82%

Eon Labs 0 0% 5 71% 2 29% 0 0% 7 100%

Schwarz 1 50% 1 50% 0 0% 0 0% 2 50%

Sun 3 33% 1 11% 4 44% 1 11% 9 67%

Teva (total) 24 22% 27 25% 51 46% 8 7% 110 78%

Teva 17 25% 16 23% 31 45% 5 7% 69 75%

Copley 0 0% 1 50% 1 50% 0 0% 2 100%

IVAX 4 80% 1 20% 0 0% 0 0% 5 20%

Barr 3 9% 9 26% 19 56% 3 9% 34 91%

Tolmar 0 0% 0 0% 1 100% 0 0% 1 100%

Upsher Smith 0 0% 0 0% 2 100% 0 0% 2 100%

URL Pharma 2 40% 1 20% 1 20% 1 20% 5 60%

Watson (total) 4 10% 6 15% 23 59% 6 15% 39 90%

Watson 2 13% 0 0% 9 56% 5 31% 16 88%

Andrx 2 13% 6 40% 7 47% 0 0% 15 87%

Cobalt 0 0% 0 0% 7 88% 1 13% 8 100%

Wockhardt 0 0% 0 0% 4 100% 0 0% 4 100%

Zydus 1 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 0%

Generics Total 89 24% 82 22% 177 47% 25 7% 373 76%



23

Required Disclosures

Conflicts Disclosures

This product constitutes a compendium report (covers six or more subject companies). As such, RBC Capital Markets chooses toprovide specific disclosures for the subject companies by reference. To access current disclosures for the subject companies, clientsshould refer to http://www7.rbccm.com/GLDisclosure/PublicWeb/DisclosureLookup.aspx?EntityID=1 or send a request to RBC CMResearch Publishing, P.O. Box 50, 200 Bay Street, Royal Bank Plaza, 29th Floor, South Tower, Toronto, Ontario M5J 2W7.

The analyst(s) responsible for preparing this research report received compensation that is based upon various factors, including totalrevenues of the member companies of RBC Capital Markets and its affiliates, a portion of which are or have been generated byinvestment banking activities of the member companies of RBC Capital Markets and its affiliates.

Distribution of Ratings

For the purpose of ratings distributions, regulatory rules require member firms to assign ratings to one of three rating categories - Buy,Hold/Neutral, or Sell - regardless of a firm's own rating categories. Although RBC Capital Markets' ratings of Top Pick/Outperform,Sector Perform and Underperform most closely correspond to Buy, Hold/Neutral and Sell, respectively, the meanings are not the samebecause our ratings are determined on a relative basis (as described above).

Distribution of RatingsRBC Capital Markets, Equity Research

Investment BankingServ./Past 12 Mos.

Rating Count Percent Count Percent

BUY[TP/O] 587 49.50 182 31.01HOLD[SP] 529 44.60 120 22.68SELL[U] 71 6.00 4 5.63

Conflicts Policy

RBC Capital Markets Policy for Managing Conflicts of Interest in Relation to Investment Research is available from us on request. Toaccess our current policy, clients should refer tohttps://www.rbccm.com/global/file-414164.pdfor send a request to RBC CM Research Publishing, P.O. Box 50, 200 Bay Street, Royal Bank Plaza, 29th Floor, South Tower,Toronto, Ontario M5J 2W7. We reserve the right to amend or supplement this policy at any time.

Dissemination of Research and Short-Term Trading Calls

RBC Capital Markets endeavours to make all reasonable efforts to provide research simultaneously to all eligible clients, havingregard to local time zones in overseas jurisdictions. RBC Capital Markets' research is posted to our proprietary websites to ensureeligible clients receive coverage initiations and changes in rating, targets and opinions in a timely manner. Additional distribution maybe done by the sales personnel via email, fax or regular mail. Clients may also receive our research via third party vendors. Pleasecontact your investment advisor or institutional salesperson for more information regarding RBC Capital Markets research.RBC Capital Markets also provides eligible clients with access to a database which may contain Short-Term trading calls on certain ofthe subject companies for which it currently provides equity research coverage. The database may be accessed via the followinghyperlink https://www2.rbccm.com/cmonline/index.html. The information regarding Short-Term trading calls accessible through thedatabase does not constitute a research report. These Short-Term trading calls are not formal ratings and reflect the research analyst'sviews with respect to market and trading events in the coming days or weeks and, as such, may differ from the price targets andrecommendations in our published research reports reflecting the research analyst's views of the longer-term (one year) prospects ofthe subject company. Thus, it is possible that a subject company's common equity that is considered a long-term 'sector perform' oreven an 'underperform' might be a Short-Term buying opportunity as a result of temporary selling pressure in the market; conversely,a subject company's common equity rated a long-term 'outperform' could be considered susceptible to a Short-Term downward pricecorrection.

Analyst Certification

All of the views expressed in this report accurately reflect the personal views of the responsible analyst(s) about any and all of thesubject securities or issuers. No part of the compensation of the responsible analyst(s) named herein is, or will be, directly orindirectly, related to the specific recommendations or views expressed by the responsible analyst(s) in this report.


http://www7.rbccm.com/GLDisclosure/PublicWeb/DisclosureLookup.aspx?EntityID=1

https://www.rbccm.com/global/file-414164.pdf

https://www2.rbccm.com/cmonline/index.html

24

Disclaimer

RBC Capital Markets is the business name used by certain subsidiaries of Royal Bank of Canada, including RBC Dominion Securities Inc., RBC Capital MarketsCorporation, Royal Bank of Canada Europe Limited and Royal Bank of Canada - Sydney Branch. The information contained in this report has been compiled by RBCCapital Markets from sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made by Royal Bank of Canada, RBC Capital Markets, itsaffiliates or any other person as to its accuracy, completeness or correctness. All opinions and estimates contained in this report constitute RBC Capital Markets'judgement as of the date of this report, are subject to change without notice and are provided in good faith but without legal responsibility. Nothing in this reportconstitutes legal, accounting or tax advice or individually tailored investment advice. This material is prepared for general circulation to clients and has been preparedwithout regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive it. The investments or services contained in this report may not besuitable for you and it is recommended that you consult an independent investment advisor if you are in doubt about the suitability of such investments or services. Thisreport is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. Past performance is not a guide to future performance, future returns are not guaranteed,and a loss of original capital may occur. RBC Capital Markets research analyst compensation is based in part on the overall profitability of RBC Capital Markets, whichincludes profits attributable to investment banking revenues. Every province in Canada, state in the U.S., and most countries throughout the world have their own lawsregulating the types of securities and other investment products which may be offered to their residents, as well as the process for doing so. As a result, the securitiesdiscussed in this report may not be eligible for sale in some jurisdictions. This report is not, and under no circumstances should be construed as, a solicitation to act assecurities broker or dealer in any jurisdiction by any person or company that is not legally permitted to carry on the business of a securities broker or dealer in thatjurisdiction. To the full extent permitted by law neither RBC Capital Markets nor any of its affiliates, nor any other person, accepts any liability whatsoever for anydirect or consequential loss arising from any use of this report or the information contained herein. No matter contained in this document may be reproduced or copiedby any means without the prior consent of RBC Capital Markets.

Additional information is available on request.

To U.S. Residents:This publication has been approved by RBC Capital Markets Corporation (member FINRA, NYSE), which is a U.S. registered broker-dealer and which acceptsresponsibility for this report and its dissemination in the United States. Any U.S. recipient of this report that is not a registered broker-dealer or a bank acting in a brokeror dealer capacity and that wishes further information regarding, or to effect any transaction in, any of the securities discussed in this report, should contact and placeorders with RBC Capital Markets Corporation.To Canadian Residents:This publication has been approved by RBC Dominion Securities Inc.(member IIROC). Any Canadian recipient of this report that is not a Designated Institution inOntario, an Accredited Investor in British Columbia or Alberta or a Sophisticated Purchaser in Quebec (or similar permitted purchaser in any other province) and thatwishes further information regarding, or to effect any transaction in, any of the securities discussed in this report should contact and place orders with RBC DominionSecurities Inc., which, without in any way limiting the foregoing, accepts responsibility for this report and its dissemination in Canada.To U.K. Residents:This publication has been approved by Royal Bank of Canada Europe Limited ('RBCEL') which is authorized and regulated by Financial ServicesAuthority ('FSA'), inconnection with its distribution in the United Kingdom. This material is not for general distribution in the United Kingdom to retail clients, as defined under the rules ofthe FSA. However, targeted distribution may be made to selected retail clients of RBC and its affiliates. RBCEL accepts responsibility for this report and itsdissemination in the United Kingdom.To Persons Receiving This Advice in Australia:This material has been distributed in Australia by Royal Bank of Canada - Sydney Branch (ABN 86 076 940 880, AFSL No. 246521). This material has been preparedfor general circulation and does not take into account the objectives, financial situation or needs of any recipient. Accordingly, any recipient should, before acting onthis material, consider the appropriateness of this material having regard to their objectives, financial situation and needs. If this material relates to the acquisition orpossible acquisition of a particular financial product, a recipient in Australia should obtain any relevant disclosure document prepared in respect of that product andconsider that document before making any decision about whether to acquire the product.To Hong Kong Residents:This publication is distributed in Hong Kong by RBC Investment Services (Asia) Limited and RBC Investment Management (Asia) Limited, licensed corporationsunder the Securities and Futures Ordinance or, by Royal Bank of Canada, Hong Kong Branch, a registered institution under the Securities and Futures Ordinance. Thismaterial has been prepared for general circulation and does not take into account the objectives, financial situation, or needs of any recipient. Hong Kong personswishing to obtain further information on any of the securities mentioned in this publication should contact RBC Investment Services (Asia) Limited, RBC InvestmentManagement (Asia) Limited or Royal Bank of Canada, Hong Kong Branch at 17/Floor, Cheung Kong Center, 2 Queen's Road Central, Hong Kong (telephone numberis 2848-1388).To Singapore Residents:This publication is distributed in Singapore by RBC (Singapore Branch) and RBC (Asia) Limited, registered entities granted offshore bank status by the MonetaryAuthority of Singapore. This material has been prepared for general circulation and does not take into account the objectives, financial situation, or needs of anyrecipient. You are advised to seek independent advice from a financial adviser before purchasing any product. If you do not obtain independent advice, you shouldconsider whether the product is suitable for you. Past performance is not indicative of future performance.

®Registered trademark of Royal Bank of Canada. RBC Capital Markets is a trademark of Royal Bank of Canada. Used under license.Copyright © RBC Capital Markets Corporation 2010 - Member SIPC

Copyright © RBC Dominion Securities Inc. 2010 - Member CIPFCopyright © Royal Bank of Canada Europe Limited 2010

Copyright © Royal Bank of Canada 2010All rights reserved


pharma litigation

Documents