pesticide policies scored at ag meeting
TRANSCRIPT
USDA's G. W. Irving, Jr.
Contaminated 2,4,5-T samples
Chemical & Engineering
NEWS OCTOBER 5, 1970
PESTICIDE POLICIES SCORED AT AG MEETING
SPAC's Emil M. Mrak Era of "chemical McCarthyism"
Castigating both Government and the pesticides industry for failure to avoid the panicky crises that have brought on an era of "chemical McCarthyism," food technologist Emil Mrak last week warned that current antipesticide movements might lead to chaos in food production. Dr. Mrak, who in 1969 was chairman of former Health, Education, and Welfare Secretary Finch's commission on pesticides and their relationship to environmental health, lamented lack of judgment by Government and positive action by industry.
Speaking in White Sulphur Springs, W.Va., at the annual meeting of the National Agricultural Chemicals Association, Dr. Mrak said that there has been some improvement in cooperation among various departments within HEW. Implementation of the Finch commission recommendations, however, has been spotty.
The Secretary's Pesticide Advisory Committee (SPAC), recommended by the commission, has been established, and is chaired by Dr. Mrak. SPAC is purely advisory, however, and is not involved in operations. This became very evident, Dr. Mrak points out, when the Department of Agriculture took action against some uses of 2,4,5-T because of its alleged "imminent hazard" (C&EN, April 27, page 60) without consulting SPAC.
Modification of the Delaney clause to permit the HEW Secretary to determine when evidence of carcinogenesis justifies restrictive action, also recommended by the commission, is probably not politically expedient or even politically possible at present, Dr. Mrak says.
A recommendation for increased federal support for research on all methods of pest control has met with little enthusiasm. There is also little being done to increase participation in international cooperative efforts to promote safe and effective use of pesticides, according to Dr. Mrak.
He thinks the absence of general outlines for procedures to test pesticides is the worst problem. Realistic standards with respect to dosages, for example, must be developed. Until such protocols are developed, Dr. Mrak warns, one crisis after another will occur.
Industry simply doesn't know what is expected of it. But, he adds, industry has been slow in taking convincingly positive action. Dr. Mrak chides industry for applying the "sometimes ugly pressure" that he has observed from the sidelines. He also thinks that very few helpful or constructive suggestions have come from industry.
The committee chairman also thinks that adequate dose-response studies will require a number of years and several hundred thousand test animals. SPAC has looked at laboratories throughout the country to locate facilities where such studies could be carried out. SPAC's recommendation is that the military's Pine Bluff, Ark., laboratory be taken over for the studies. The Government would necessarily be the prime source of funds for the project, but Dr. Mrak expressed hope that industry would also contribute.
Dr. Mrak had some encouraging words for 2,4,5-T producers. Branding actions against 2,4,5-T as products of "hasty, panic-button decisions," he
says he is counting on the Office of Science and Technology to rectify the situation. The conclusions of the careful, deliberate study of 2,4,5-T by OST, Dr. Mrak says, will tend not to support past decisions. Industry sources who have seen parts of the OST study in rough form agree that it is generally favorable and satisfactory from the industry point of view. The report hasn't yet been made available to the public.
At press time, Administration officials were reluctant to disclose what legislative and administrative proposals the Administration would make to broaden pesticide control before the formal establishment of the Environmental Protection Agency slated for Oct. 2. At hearings before Sen. Philip A. Hart's (D.-Mich.) Subcommittee on Energy, Natural Resources, and the Environment, however, Dr. George W. Irving, Jr., administrator of the Agricultural Research Service, disclosed results of USDA research on 110 samples of 2,4,5-T and 16 other commercially available herbicides potentially contaminated with dioxins. (Researchers suspect that dioxins cause birth deformities in laboratory animals.)
Most of 60 samples analyzed to date contain sufficiently low levels of tetra-chlorodibenzo-para-dioxin to constitute "no known hazards to human health." But samples of 2,4,5-T produced by Monsanto contained relatively high levels of the dioxin. Monsanto, which no longer makes the herbicide, told USDA that it will reprocess remaining 2,4,5-T stocks to eliminate the contaminant.
OCT. 5, 1970 C&EN 7